FIND THE EXPLANATION

Which place’s debt rules apply—and who can help?

Use the notice, agreement, and places connected to the debt to find the right court, regulator, or legal-help service.

This address preserves a dated source document behind the guide. The complete explanation covers the questions, comparisons and next steps for this subject.

If you came here to check a specific citation, open the original archive below. It includes its source dates and recorded qualifications.

Original source archive (optional)Original working documents, complete tables and revision history

About this archive

The explanation above is written for readers. These original working documents preserve the evidence trail, including technical language, dated passages and known corrections. They have not all received independent professional review. Use the marked limits before relying on a particular rule or figure.

DETAILED RESEARCH · EVIDENCE & LIMITS INCLUDED

SID Idaho appellate rehearing, discretionary review, and narrow remittitur/remand operation

S_ID · pass-31Captured 2026-10-2930 tables · 45 claim records · 8 source recordsScoped coordinator review completed

Read the evidence with its boundaries. These are saved research components, including revisions. A scoped coordinator review checks selected evidence; it does not certify every claim, a complete jurisdiction, current law or individual applicability. Dates and access limits remain attached to the records.

How to read the research →

Read the related correction supplements

These components repair their stated scope. They do not replace every other finding in this research series.

SID bounded rule-pinpoint clarification →
SID Rule 40 quantity and exception completion →
Idaho: appellate history and quantity-row corrections →
Idaho: completion of appellate costs inquiry cells B07–B27 →
Idaho: appellate rehearing quantity-row correction →

S_ID PASS-31 — Idaho appellate rehearing, discretionary review, and narrow remittitur/remand operation

Fresh public-source access date: October 28, 2026, America/Los_Angeles.

Scope: Ordinary state-civil Supreme Court rehearing, Court of Appeals rehearing, discretionary Supreme Court review of Court of Appeals decisions, and the necessary postdecision briefing, finality, remittitur, and remand interfaces.

Evidence disposition

The official current-published operative rules were recovered and read to the bounds recorded below. The relevant original 2015 and 2019 amendment-order routes failed. Current rule footers therefore remain publication-history evidence, not separately authenticated original orders.

Necessary holiday statutes were recovered as 2025 secondary reproductions, not current official 2026 statutory bodies. Current API-hosted guides, internal rules, and forms were not opened.

Earlier findings, provenance, C033/C035, and resolved bounded corrections remain unchanged. P30’s unreviewed cost/fee merits are not premises.

Principal findings

Rehearing and discretionary review are different requests. Prior Court of Appeals rehearing is not required before Supreme Court review, but the Supreme Court will not act on a review petition until the Court of Appeals has finally determined all rehearing petitions. [C008–C009.] Idaho Supreme Court

Petition and supporting-brief periods are separate. The ordinary rehearing and review rules permit a later supporting brief, while the expressly incorporated Rule 12.2 expedited branch requires simultaneous filing and states a summary-dismissal consequence. [C003–C005, C008.] Idaho Supreme Court+1

The published rules require a qualified reading of review-petition lateness. Rules 21, 44, and 46 expressly identify rehearing petitions but do not expressly name review petitions; Rule 118 incorporates Rule 42’s times and manner. This report does not convert that omission into either unrestricted extension authority or a categorical jurisdictional holding. [C018–C020.] Idaho Supreme Court+2

Remittitur, opinion modification, and recall are not interchangeable. Rule 38 supplies issuance and compliance duties; Rule 122 controls the effect of granted review. No universal postfinal recall power, stipulated early-remittitur procedure, or new twenty-one-day period after every denial was authenticated from the read text. [C032–C039.] Idaho Supreme Court+1

1. Reviewed reuse, new evidence, and routes

Labels:

O — Official body read: current-published operative rule or official instruction.
P — Provisional statute: dated secondary reproduction.
G — Guidance: official explanatory material, not a substitute for the operative rule.
D — Discovery only: index, search metadata, or unopened source.
H — Held: material history, incorporation, construction, or application remains unresolved.

1.1 Reuse versus new work

Earlier material	Retained scope	New P31 reading	Remaining boundary
Reviewed P27 rehearing/review interface	Earlier period, assignment, and finality distinctions retain their source limits.	Complete Rules 42, 116, 118, 120, 122 and necessary related provisions read afresh.	No actual decision, petition, or deadline classified.
Reviewed P27 remittitur follow-on	Full compliance, remand, recall, modification, and enforcement remained open.	Rule 38, Rule 83(r), Rules 112, 114, and 13.3 read for the specific new questions.	No general recall power or actual mandate interpretation inferred.
Reviewed P29 briefing	Ordinary 2026 format and word-count findings remain within their scope.	Special rehearing/review provisions and necessary general formatting clauses independently read.	A special supporting brief is not automatically treated as a new “first brief.”
P30 cost/fee report	Not a substantive premise.	Only Rules 38(d), 40(f), and 41(d) reread for unresolved taxation and remittitur.	No fee entitlement, amount, or taxation report repeated.
P25 trial additur/remittitur	Trial damages remittitur remains distinct from appellate remittitur.	No trial-remedy merits reused.	No acceptance, election, or damages calculation.
P27 LIMITED-01	Rule 46’s objection runs from service of the motion, with Clerk service of the order separate.	Complete current Rule 46 freshly read.	No revival of the earlier ambiguous reference.
C033/C035 and other holds	Preserved.	No provider/checklist or unrelated statutory research.	No implied closure.

1.2 Route and actor comparison

Request or event	Deciding court and filing office	Source-stated scope
Supreme Court rehearing	Supreme Court; petition filed with its Clerk	Rule 42 uses an opinion-based petition relation. It does not expressly establish a universal rehearing route for every procedural order.
Court of Appeals rehearing	Court of Appeals decides; subsequent papers use the Supreme Court clerk structure	Rule 116 covers an aggrieved party’s request concerning an opinion or order and incorporates Supreme Court rehearing procedure.
Supreme Court review of Court of Appeals	Supreme Court; petition filed with its Clerk	Rule 118(a) refers to opinions/orders; subsection (b) describes review of a final decision as discretionary.
Supreme Court initiative	Supreme Court acts on its own motion	Rule 120 supplies a distinct review-order mechanism.
District court acting in an ordinary magistrate appeal	District court under Rule 83	Rule 83’s motion and procedural-fallback provisions are not an express universal Rule 42 rehearing entitlement.
After review is granted	Supreme Court proceeds under the review order	Court of Appeals assignment terminates as stated in Rule 122.
Special or federal routes	Their own authority	Criminal/capital, Rule 12.2, agency, special statutory, federal certiorari, tribal, and interstate rules are not ordinary civil defaults.

[C002, C007–C014, C031.] The decisional court, filing office, party status, and existence of a reviewable decision are separate predicates. No actual posture or entitlement is determined. Idaho Supreme Court+2

2. Rehearing

2.1 Supreme Court rehearing

Subject	Complete material Rule 42 relation
Petition	Physically filed with the Supreme Court Clerk, together with the applicable filing fee, within twenty-one days after the filing date of the opinion; served on all parties.
Modified opinion	An aggrieved party may file another petition within twenty-one days from the modified opinion’s date, unless modification merely corrects a clerical error; service is on adverse parties.
Supporting brief or memorandum	Filed within fourteen days after petition filing.
Copies	Original petition and brief; no copies required.
Response	None unless the court directs.
Argument on petition	None unless ordered.
Grant/denial order	Clerk serves all parties; order may identify rehearing issues and must direct the time/order of briefing.
Argument after grant	Scheduled in the same manner as merits argument, subject to the governing argument rules.

[C003–C006.] The petition’s deadline is not replaced by the later support-brief period. The rule does not enumerate a federal-style “overlooked or misapprehended” test, an exhaustive merits-ground list, or unrestricted permission to add new issues or evidence. Idaho Supreme Court

The permission for another petition after a qualifying modification is not a general right to unlimited successive petitions. A clerical-change category, a substantive modification, and an opinion on rehearing remain different events.

2.2 Court of Appeals rehearing

Rule 116 permits a party aggrieved by an opinion or order of the Court of Appeals to petition that court for rehearing. It uses the Supreme Court rehearing rules’ manner, times, grounds, and effect; the Court of Appeals determines whether to grant rehearing and conducts it.

[C007.] The incorporation does not make the Supreme Court the rehearing decision-maker. Mapping an unusual standalone Court of Appeals order to Rule 42’s opinion-based timing language remains a construction question; no actual order is classified. Idaho Supreme Court

2.3 Special expedited exception

Rule 42(b), Rule 118(a), and Rule 12.2(g) expressly address an appeal expedited under Rule 12.2: the supporting brief must accompany the petition, or the petition is summarily dismissed.

That branch is recorded to preserve the exception. The underlying special proceedings and their separate notice, argument, or merits schedules are not analyzed as ordinary debt appeals. [C005, C008.] Idaho Supreme Court+1

3. Discretionary Supreme Court review of the Court of Appeals

3.1 Petition, rehearing relationship, and briefing

Rule 118’s petition period is twenty-one days after the applicable announcement: the opinion/order, denial of rehearing, opinion on rehearing, or a nonclerical modification without rehearing. Support is filed with the petition or within fourteen days thereafter, subject to the expedited exception.

Prior Court of Appeals rehearing is unnecessary. A review petition does not prevent a timely rehearing petition, but the Supreme Court takes no action on review until all rehearing petitions have been finally determined below. [C008–C009.] Idaho Supreme Court

The support brief must address the review criteria. Discussion and argument should be confined to those criteria. There is no response unless the Supreme Court requests one before ruling, and no automatically authorized reply period is supplied. [C011.]

3.2 Criteria: discretionary, nonexclusive, and not a merits checklist

Rule 118(b) factor	Generic question identified by the rule
(1)	Has the Court of Appeals decided a substantive question not previously determined by the Idaho Supreme Court?
(2)	Is the substantive decision probably inconsistent with applicable Idaho Supreme Court or U.S. Supreme Court decisions?
(3)	Does it conflict with a prior Court of Appeals decision?
(4)	Does the departure from usual judicial procedure, or approval of such a departure below, call for supervisory intervention?
(5)	Has a majority of Court of Appeals judges certified, after decision, that further review is desirable in the public interest or interests of justice?

Review requires special and important reasons and direction from a majority of the Justices. The factors are neither controlling nor exhaustive. [C010.] No opinion or alleged conflict was researched, and no likelihood of review is assessed. Idaho Supreme Court

3.3 After review is granted

The Supreme Court ordinarily uses the briefs already filed and considered by the Court of Appeals. Additional briefing occurs only if ordered. The grant does not itself establish a right to submit a new evidentiary record, repeat ordinary merits briefing, or obtain a favorable outcome.

Rule 122 terminates the Court of Appeals assignment upon the grant and prevents its remittitur on that opinion. The Supreme Court’s eventual opinion/remittitur proceeds under Rule 38 unless otherwise ordered. [C012, C014.] Idaho Supreme Court+1

The read rules do not state that denial of review endorses the lower court’s reasoning or that a grant automatically vacates every prior judgment. Those propositions are not supplied.

3.4 Review on the Supreme Court’s initiative

Rule 120 permits the Supreme Court, within twenty-one days after the listed Court of Appeals announcement, to order review on its own motion. The listed events include an opinion/order, an opinion/order on rehearing, and a modified opinion/order without rehearing. The order has the same effect as granting review.

Unlike Rules 42 and 118, Rule 120 does not repeat a clerical-error exception in its modified-decision wording. That textual difference is preserved without deciding its application. [C013.] Idaho Supreme Court

4. Filing, fees, lateness, extensions, and consequences

4.1 Filing is not ordinary mailing

IAR 20 includes petitions for rehearing and review among the papers requiring receipt by the proper clerk, rather than treating mailing alone as filing. Its separate rule for other appellate papers and service remains distinct.

Electronic-filing rules control conflicting mechanics within their scope. Consequently, “physically filed” is not interpreted here as a direction to use paper instead of an authorized electronic method. [C015.] Idaho Supreme Court+1

4.2 Fee categories

Item	Published IAR 23 provision	Limit
Ordinary rehearing petition	$71	Criminal, habeas, and post-conviction exceptions are expressly listed.
Review petition concerning Court of Appeals decision	No filing fee	Not a ruling on other costs or fee-shifting.
Public-actor exemption	Incorporates specified statutes	Statutory status and scope were not completed here.
Waiver	Rule 23(c) refers to §§ 31-3220/31-3220A and Supreme Court approval.	Its detailed application language is notice-of-appeal-oriented; petition-specific mechanics and statutory eligibility remain held.
Automatic categories	Rule 23(e) uses defined representation categories.	No representation, program, or eligibility investigation.

[C016.] No payment, fee application, affidavit, or financial information was requested. The absence of a review filing fee does not confer review as of right. Idaho Supreme Court

4.3 Petition lateness and other failures

Provision	Exact distinction retained
IAR 21	Expressly identifies untimely rehearing-petition filing as jurisdictional, with dismissal on motion or court initiative. Other steps are generally treated as nonjurisdictional but may support an appropriate sanction, including dismissal.
IAR 46	Excludes rehearing-petition filing from its general enlargement power. Brief extensions additionally require Rule 34(d).
IAR 44	Extraordinary procedure may be changed only under the stated conditions; rehearing filing time cannot be shortened or lengthened under this rule.
Review petitions	Not expressly named in those lists, but Rule 118 incorporates Rule 42’s times and manner.
Ordinary support brief	No universal automatic summary-dismissal rule is stated in Rule 42 for every late ordinary supporting brief.
Rule 12.2 support brief	Simultaneous filing and summary dismissal are express.
No response when none requested	Not treated as an admission, a default, or disobedience to a universal response duty.

[C017–C020.] The review-petition omission is not converted into a right to extension. Its jurisdictional and extension treatment remains an exact construction dependency. Idaho Supreme Court+2

4.4 Extensions and the resolved reference event

For an act that is eligible for enlargement, Rule 46 requires good cause on motion and service on all parties. The court or a Justice may issue an immediate ex parte order. Review by written objection uses seven days from service of the motion, while the Clerk separately serves the order.

This preserves the resolved P27 LIMITED-01 relation. It does not extend an excluded petition period. [C021.] Idaho Supreme Court

Rule 34(d)’s brief-extension affidavit requirements remain applicable when an extension is legally available: due date, prior extensions, prior denials, grounds, requested duration/new date, stipulation, opposing parties’ positions, and completion assurance. No motion or assurance is constructed.

4.5 Sanction and dismissal boundaries

IAR 11.2 requires the proper signature and reasonable-inquiry certification. An established violation calls for an appropriate sanction; possible causal expenses and fees are not an automatic award in every unsuccessful petition.

IAR 32’s general motion-response period does not override Rules 42/118’s no response unless directed limitation. Its untimely-rehearing dismissal branch is separate from a merits response. ICAR 59 referral, professional discipline, and constitutional sanction procedure remain held. [C022.] Idaho Supreme Court+1

5. Special supporting papers, format, privacy, and electronic procedure

5.1 No invented special petition word limit

Subject	Authenticated text	Qualification
Rehearing support	Brief or memorandum; Rule 42’s special timing and court-ordered briefing	No distinct numeric special word limit appears in Rule 42.
Review support	Criteria-focused Rule 118(c)(1) brief	Not automatically a new full merits brief.
Binding/cover	Special support/opposition briefs need not be bound or use a colored cover.	Not a waiver of every other applicable formatting or identifying requirement.
General word limits	Rule 34 states 14,000 words for a party’s first brief and 7,000 for a reply.	Classification of a later rehearing/review supporting paper under that wording is not supplied by assumption.
Petition length	No standalone numeric petition cap was authenticated from the read special rules.	Not unlimited-length permission.
Response/reply	Only as authorized by the special rule or court order.	No automatic fourteen-day opposition or twenty-one-day reply imported.
After review grant	Original Court of Appeals briefs used unless additional briefing ordered.	No automatic fresh length allowance or required merits rebriefing.

[C023–C024.] The current technical guide and internal citation rules were not recovered through an allowed readable route. No obsolete page limit or familiar federal petition limit is substituted. Idaho Supreme Court+2

5.2 Applicable general form requirements and exceptions

The necessary general rules supply these conditions:

Item	Rule-based structure
Page and margins	Printable 8½ × 11-inch pages; at least one-inch margins
Text	Double-spaced body; specified headings, footnotes, and block quotations may be single-spaced
Typeface	Black, proportionally spaced Times New Roman or Century Schoolbook, 14 point or larger, including footnotes
Pagination	Bottom margin
Authority names	Rule 36’s italic/underline treatment
Certificate	Rule 34’s word-count statement immediately before signature, subject to the specified exceptions
Count	Headings, footnotes, and quotations included; listed front matter, signatures, certificates, appendices and exhibits excluded
Typewriter exception	Specified unrepresented non-word-processor branch permits standard 12-point type
Handwritten exception	Qualifying prisoner branch has its stated page limits and legibility requirements
Copies	Special Rule 42 requires the original petition and brief, no copies
Signatures	IAR 11.2 and applicable electronic-signature rules retain their actor and certification conditions

[C025.] A certificate exception does not eliminate every length limit. General page/word exclusions do not authorize new evidence or unrestricted attachments. No cover, signature, certificate, caption, or paper was created. Idaho Supreme Court+1

Record references and legal-authority addenda remain governed by the necessary Rule 35 provisions. No named citation example, judicial opinion, headnote, or record excerpt was reproduced or investigated.

5.3 Electronic format, filing, and correction

Event	Required distinction
Format	Searchable PDF/PDF-A; the scanned-attachment exception is not a universal brief exception
Size	Rule 6’s file/envelope limits and separation rules apply within their exceptions
Protected attachments	Separate handling; a confidentiality label is subject to court verification
Submission	Receipt, acceptance, rejection, and accepted filing-date relation are distinct
Correction after rejection	Conditional three-business-day resubmission/relation-back request
Technical receipt failure	Satisfactory proof and the seven-business-day resubmission branch
Judicial relief	Technical filing-date relief is not merely an ordinary discretionary extension of a protected petition period
Service	Authorized system transmission, not courtesy copy; party and court service rules differ
Fees	Rule 10’s notice-of-appeal-specific waiver rule is not automatically a rehearing-petition rule

[C026–C028.] No system, account, contact, rejection, technical failure, or actual filing was examined. Idaho Supreme Court+3

5.4 Privacy and access

A petition or supporting appendix does not authorize public disclosure of protected information. IRCP and electronic-rule redaction responsibilities, ICAR 32’s access hierarchy, and the separate protected-copy mechanisms remain applicable within their scope.

ICAR 32(i)’s sealing-denial amendment branch does not by itself extend a jurisdictional rehearing deadline. The rule’s power to alter a sealing order is not an authenticated power to recall a final appellate remittitur. [C029.] Idaho Supreme Court+1

Full privilege, waiver, sealed-record inclusion, public access, and sector-specific privacy law remain separate. No protected material was requested.

6. Finality, remittitur, remand, and correction limits

6.1 Announcement, service, and finality

Rule 38(a) equates an opinion’s filing with its announcement. The Clerk’s transmission of the certified opinion and copies is a different act.

Rule 38(b) lists a twenty-one-day finality relation from the last of the original opinion, opinion on rehearing, or modified opinion without rehearing. Its modified-opinion clause does not repeat Rules 42/118’s clerical-error exception. [C032.] Idaho Supreme Court

Pending petitions and denial: precise limit

The Court’s generic official instruction says that denial of Supreme Court rehearing makes the decision final. That is useful guidance, but it is not a complete codified clerk-processing or jurisdictional-timing rule.

The read Rule 38 does not expressly state a universal new twenty-one-day period after every rehearing or review denial. Nor does its short text, alone, complete all pending-petition withholding, dismissal, or sequential-petition consequences.

Accordingly:

No automatic fresh twenty-one-day period after every denial is asserted.
No remittitur date is calculated merely by ignoring a pending petition.
Rule 118’s express twenty-one-day review relation after Court of Appeals rehearing denial remains separate.
The particular effect of denial, dismissal, modification, or an express court order remains subject to the exact rule and judicial construction.

[C033.] Idaho Supreme Court+2

6.2 Issuance and receiving-court duty

Event	Rule 38 or 122 relationship
Opinion becomes final under the applicable rule/order framework	Clerk issues and files remittitur with the originating district court or agency and mails the specified copies.
Remittitur content	Advises that the opinion is final and directs compliance with its directive.
Lower tribunal	Must comply forthwith with the actual directive—not an invented generic outcome.
Review granted	No Court of Appeals remittitur on that opinion; assignment terminates.
Supreme Court completes granted review	Supreme opinion/remittitur under Rule 38, unless otherwise ordered.
Costs/fees determined	Included as the rules provide.
Amount unresolved	Does not necessarily delay remittitur; later itemized treatment follows the narrow rule.

[C014, C034–C035.] Issuance, filing below, mailing copies, and compliance are separate events. No actual remittitur, instruction, or jurisdictional result was interpreted. Idaho Supreme Court+1

Rules 40(f) and 41(d) were read only for later inclusion/transmission. P30 fee entitlement and taxation merits were not reused. A later fee statement does not itself reopen the appellate merits. Idaho Supreme Court+1

6.3 District-appellate postdecision boundary

Rule 83(n) permits the stated district-appellate motions and supporting briefs, with its response and argument rules. Subsection (q) supplies an IRCP/IAR fallback where unspecified.

That does not expressly establish a universal Rule 42 rehearing petition, a twenty-one-day district rehearing right, or automatic appellate-period tolling. IRCP 11.2’s trial-court reconsideration language was read as a boundary, not presumed to resolve every district court acting in an appellate capacity.

Rule 83(r)(1) requires the district appellate decision and directions to be filed/transmitted. If no further appeal is filed within its forty-two-day filing-based relation, the district clerk issues/files the remittitur to the magistrate division. A higher remittitur’s filing and transmission have a separate branch. [C031.] Idaho Supreme Court+1

The Rule 83 de novo branch remains distinct. No actual motion, finality, appeal time, or lower-court authority is determined.

6.4 Remand authority is not unlimited recall authority

Provision	What the read text supplies	What is not inferred
IAR 112	Court of Appeals may affirm, reverse, modify, direct proper judgment/order, new trial, or further proceedings within the rule.	No actual entitlement to a new trial or particular judgment.
IAR 13.3	Before opinion, good-cause temporary remand on motion or initiative; appeal remains pending; lower authority limited by remand.	A universal postfinal remittitur recall power.
IAR 114	Supreme Court may revoke a Court of Appeals assignment; that court then takes no further action.	Recall of an already final lower-court judgment merely from assignment language.
IAR 33	Stipulated dismissal before opinion, with cost/fee agreement; partial-party stipulation treated as a motion.	Stipulated early remittitur after opinion or universal postdecision withdrawal.
IAR 48	Court may regulate unspecified appellate practice.	A completed substantive standard for recall, reopening, or correction.
ICAR 32(i)(8)	Court may alter a sealing order.	Authority to alter an appellate merits decision or mandate.

[C036–C039.] No explicit general procedure for recalled/reissued remittitur, stipulated acceleration of its issuance, or universal clerical correction of a remittitur was authenticated. That is a bounded evidence gap, not a conclusion that such authority does not exist. Idaho Supreme Court+3

6.5 No universal enforcement stay

IAR 13’s initial automatic-stay language is tied to a notice of appeal or cross-appeal. It is not relabeled as a new automatic stay triggered by every rehearing or review petition.

Opinion finality, assignment, remittitur issuance, retained lower-court powers, enforcement stays, and bond/security obligations are distinct. Full stay/security, bankruptcy, military, and execution law remain separate. [C040.] Idaho Supreme Court

7. Source and usage register

All fresh access occurred October 28, 2026, Pacific time. Short IDs carry the prefix S_ID-P31-.

Print and consolidated pages of the same rule are not independent corroboration.

S001 — official Idaho Appellate Rules

Issuer/title: Idaho Supreme Court, Idaho Appellate Rules. Consolidated URL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/iar

The consolidated route initially failed; the separately discovered ordinary URL https://isc.idaho.gov/iar successfully redirected to the same official collection. Those are one source instrument, not independent authorities.

Literal HTTPS URL	Actual read bounds and use
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/iar	Necessary complete Rules 1–2 and reserved-rule index; no general gateway rerun
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/6	Complete generic paper/title provisions; no caption created
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.2	Complete signing/sanction text; ICAR 59 merits held
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/12.2	Complete body inspected; substantive use limited to scope and (g) simultaneous-support exception
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13	Complete body inspected; narrow stay-trigger/retained-authority boundary; security amounts not applied
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13.3	Complete temporary-remand provision
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/20	Complete filing/service rule
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/21	Complete jurisdictional and other-step distinction
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/22	Complete computation clause
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/23	Complete; substantive use limited to rehearing/review fees and waiver-incorporation limits; form unopened
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/32	Complete motion rule; printed generic form not reproduced
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/33	Complete pre-opinion stipulated-dismissal rule
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/34	Complete; special-brief length/certificate/extension boundaries only; ordinary merits schedule not reused
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/35	Complete page inspected; reliance on necessary record-citation/addendum provisions
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/36	Complete form and exception provisions; model cover unopened
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/37	Complete argument provision; applied only through relevant rehearing/review interface
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38	Complete (a)–(d)
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/39	Complete special federal-mandate clause read as an exclusion; its period not applied to ordinary state remittitur
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40	Complete page inspected; substantive use limited to (f) and the narrow unresolved-taxation relation
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41	Complete page inspected; substantive use limited to (d) remittitur insertion/remand interface
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/42	Complete (a)–(e)
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/44	Complete extraordinary-procedure alteration and exclusions
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/46	Complete; seven-day objection from motion service preserved
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/47	Complete court-service provision
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/48	Complete unspecified-practice provision
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/101	Complete Court of Appeals scope
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/110	Complete subsequent-filing/assignment interface
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/112	Complete disposition authority
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/114	Complete assignment-revocation provision
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/116	Complete Court of Appeals rehearing provision
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/118	Complete (a)–(c)
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/120	Complete own-initiative review provision
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/122	Complete opinions/remittiturs provision

Core displayed histories

Rule	Displayed adoption/amendment/effectiveness
42	March 25, 1977/July 1, 1977; March 20, 1985/July 1, 1985; March 28, 1986/July 1, 1986; January 4, 2010/February 1, 2010; March 18, 2011/July 1, 2011; November 20, 2012/January 1, 2013; January 24, 2019, effective same day
116	April 17, 1981/July 1, 1981; March 24, 1982/July 1, 1982
118	April 17, 1981/July 1, 1981; March 24, 1982/July 1, 1982; March 28, 1986/July 1, 1986; March 23, 1990/July 1, 1990; January 4, 2010/February 1, 2010; March 18, 2011/July 1, 2011; November 20, 2012/January 1, 2013; September 1, 2015/January 1, 2016
120	April 17, 1981/July 1, 1981
122	March 24, 1982/July 1, 1982
38	March 25, 1977/July 1, 1977; January 30, 2001/July 1, 2002; March 22, 2002/July 1, 2002—the displayed dates are retained
13.3	March 28, 1986/July 1, 1986
112, 114	April 17, 1981/July 1, 1981
21	March 25, 1977/July 1, 1977; April 18, 1983/July 1, 1983; November 20, 2012/January 1, 2013
32	Latest displayed April 28, 2022/July 1, 2022
46	Latest displayed April 28, 2022/April 28, 2022
34, 36	Latest displayed April 29, 2026/July 1, 2026
12.2	Current page includes June 30, 2026/July 1, 2026
13, 23	Current pages include April 29, 2026/July 1, 2026

These are displayed source histories. The 2015, 2019, and 2026 original orders were not authenticated here. Older anomalous footer dates were not silently repaired.

IAR 1’s historical July 1, 1977 application provision was read, including its separate treatment of notice time for earlier judgments. It is not a present-day actual-case transition determination.

S002 — official civil-rule district and computation interfaces

Issuer: Idaho Supreme Court.

Literal HTTPS URL	Actual read bounds
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83	Complete page inspected; substantive reliance on (n)–(r), and necessary (f) scope only
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11.2	Complete (a)–(b); used only to preserve district postdecision/reconsideration limits
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2	Complete computation, extension, nonextension, inaccessibility, and mail provisions

Displayed baseline: March 1, 2016/July 1, 2016. Rule 2.2 and Rule 11.2 include September 9, 2016/same-day amendments. Rule 83’s current footer includes amendments through June 30, 2026/July 1, 2026.

No Rule 60 merits, full trial procedure, or ordinary notice-of-appeal report was regenerated.

S003 — official electronic-filing rules

Issuer: Idaho Supreme Court. Consolidated URL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/irefs

Literal HTTPS URL	Actual read bounds
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/1	Complete scope/conflict hierarchy
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/2	Complete definitions
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/4	Complete filer categories and exceptions
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/5	Complete exceptions; special-case practices not applied
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/6	Complete format, size, separation, and guide incorporation
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/7	Complete protected-filing treatment
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/9	Complete signature rule; specimen identity and special emergency scenarios not reproduced
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/10	Complete fees/waiver provision; notice-of-appeal branch distinguished
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/11	Complete filing/acceptance provision
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/12	Complete filing-time relation
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/13	Complete rejection/correction; no prescribed text prepared
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/14	Complete technical-failure relief
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/15	Complete privacy/redaction/exception text; no example identifiers reproduced
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/17	Complete party-service provision; discovery merits excluded
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/18	Complete court-service provision; form wording omitted
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/20	Complete page inspected; reliance only on (f) briefing interface

Displayed baseline: April 15, 2019/July 1, 2019. Material later entries include Rule 4’s September 11, 2024 amendment; Rules 6–7’s December 18, 2024/January 1, 2025 amendments; and Rules 5/9 amendments through June 30, 2025/July 1, 2025.

Original orders and the API-hosted technical guide were not read.

S004 — official confidentiality interface

Issuer/title: Idaho Supreme Court, ICAR 32. URL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/icar/32

Read: Complete necessary (a), relevant (b) definitions, protected reference-copy provisions, and (i)(1)–(8). Other access-request, fee, and special-regime provisions were not developed.

Displayed history: Current amendments extend through February 5, 2026, effective same day.

Limit: No actual protected record or sealing application. A sealing-order modification provision is not treated as appellate-remittitur recall authority.

S005 — provisional computation statutes

Publisher/edition: Justia, 2025 Idaho Code.

Literal HTTPS URL	Actual read and history
https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-16/section-1-1607/	Complete nonjudicial-day and exception provision; C.C.P.1881 §46 lineage; 1961 ch.270 §1 p.480; 1971 ch.84 §1 p.186
https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-73/chapter-1/section-73-108/	Complete holiday/substitution provision; displayed history through 2002 ch.146 §3 p.423

Limit: Secondary text only. No actual holiday calendar, office closure, or special proclamation selected.

S006 — official generic procedural guidance

Literal HTTPS URL	Actual selected read	Status
https://isc.idaho.gov/about-the-courts/sc-procedures	“When Does a Supreme Court Decision Become Final?” paragraph	Official guidance: denial of rehearing makes the decision final; not a complete rule-based postdenial clock
https://isc.idaho.gov/about-the-courts/ica-procedures	“Further Review” section	Official guidance only; discretionary review description

Other generic statements on those pages were not used to expand jurisdiction, merits, or federal-review findings.

S007 — history locators and official notices

Literal HTTPS URL	Actual use
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments	Publication/incorporation statement and available index context; original orders not recovered
https://isb.idaho.gov/blog/amendments-to-the-idaho-appellate-rules/	January 28, 2019 notice and actual original-order link; notice is not the order
https://isb.idaho.gov/blog/amendments-to-idaho-appellate-rules-eff-july-1-2026/	May 11, 2026 official institutional notice; linked order API-hosted and unopened
https://isb.idaho.gov/blog/recent-amendments-to-idaho-appellate-rules/	August 10, 2026 notice; current rule bodies, not this summary, support the formatting findings

S008 — failed and discovery-only sources

Literal URL	Actual observation
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/iar	Initial ordinary consolidated-page delivery failed; separately discovered https://isc.idaho.gov/iar successfully redirected to the same collection
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/115	Failed delivery; official consolidated index identifies Rule 115 as Reserved
https://isc.idaho.gov/orders/IAR_Order_09.01.15.pdf	Discovered ordinary 2015 order route; 404
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules/2016_Highlights_of_Rule_Changes.pdf	Materially different official historical route; 404
https://www.isc.idaho.gov/rules/Order-Amending-Appellate-Rules.pdf	Actual 2019 notice link followed; 404
https://isc.idaho.gov/files/IdahoAppellateInformationHandbook_2025.pdf	Ordinary handbook route; 404; search excerpt not treated as a body read
https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title1/T1CH16/SECT1-1607/	Fresh official statutory route inaccessible
https://isc.idaho.gov/orders/Rule_Highlights_2015.pdf	Search lead only; not opened
API-hosted originals, technical guide, internal rules, forms	Not opened; no guessed alternative endpoint

No original PDF body was recovered. Search metadata describing amendments or finality was not substituted for an operative read.

8. Atomic consequential-claim register

Short IDs carry the prefix S_ID-P31-.

Claim	Precise proposition	Source/pinpoint	Status
C001	Current operative rules were read; original history and statutory gaps remain.	S001–S008	O/P/H
C002	Rehearing, discretionary review, initiative review, and district postdecision practice are different routes.	IAR 42,116,118,120; Rule 83	O/H
C003	Ordinary Supreme rehearing has the specified petition filing, fee, and service relation.	IAR 42(a)	O
C004	Nonclerical modified opinions have a separately stated further-petition branch.	IAR 42(a)	O
C005	Supporting-brief timing differs from petition timing and the Rule 12.2 exception.	IAR 42(b),118(a),12.2(g)	O
C006	Responses, petition argument, grant/denial notice, and rehearing argument require their own authority.	IAR 42(c)–(e)	O
C007	Court of Appeals decides its own rehearing under the incorporated framework.	IAR 116	O/H
C008	Review uses the listed alternative decision events and does not require prior rehearing.	IAR 118(a)	O
C009	Concurrent timely rehearing remains possible; review action awaits final rehearing determinations.	IAR 118(a)	O
C010	Review is discretionary, requires special/important reasons and a majority direction, with nonexclusive factors.	IAR 118(b)	O
C011	Review support is criteria-focused; no response is authorized unless requested.	IAR 118(c)(1)	O
C012	Granted review ordinarily uses existing Court of Appeals briefs.	IAR 118(c)(2)	O
C013	Own-motion review has its own twenty-one-day text and no repeated clerical exception.	IAR 120	O/H
C014	Granted review terminates assignment and prevents the specified Court of Appeals remittitur.	IAR 122	O
C015	Petition filing differs from ordinary mailing and from service.	IAR 20; IREFS 1,11–12	O
C016	Rehearing and review have different filing-fee categories; waiver predicates remain held.	IAR 23	O/H
C017	Untimely rehearing filing is expressly within the jurisdictional-dismissal provision.	IAR 21	O
C018	General enlargement and extraordinary alteration exclude the specified rehearing period.	IAR 44,46	O
C019	Review’s omission from those lists must be reconciled with Rule 118’s incorporation.	IAR 21,44,46,118	H
C020	Late ordinary support and expedited simultaneous-support failure have different textual consequences.	IAR 21,42(b),12.2(g)	O/H
C021	Rule 46 review objection runs from motion service, not order service.	IAR 46	O
C022	Signing and motion sanctions do not establish actual misconduct or an automatic fee.	IAR 11.2,32	O/H
C023	The special rules do not state a distinct universal petition/support word cap.	IAR 42,118,34	O/H
C024	General first/reply limits are not automatically fresh allowances for special papers.	IAR 34–36	H
C025	Special no-binding/no-colored-cover language preserves other applicable form conditions.	IAR 42(d),118(c)(1),34–36	O/H
C026	Electronic format and filing exceptions remain material.	IREFS 1–7,20	O/H
C027	Correction and technical-failure branches have distinct predicates and effects.	IREFS 11–14	O
C028	Party service, court service, fee handling, and filing are separate.	IREFS 10,17–18; IAR 20,47	O/H
C029	Privacy/sealing remedies do not supply general appellate recall or deadline-extension power.	IREFS 15; ICAR 32(i)	O/H
C030	Computation and added time require the correct event and scope.	IAR 22; Rule 2.2; IREFS 17(h)	O/P/H
C031	Rule 83’s district postdecision and remittitur branches are not a universal Rule 42 rehearing route.	Rule 83(n)–(r); Rule 11.2	O/H
C032	Filing, announcement, modification, and Rule 38 finality are distinct.	IAR 38(a)–(b)	O
C033	A universal fresh twenty-one-day postdenial period was not authenticated.	IAR 38; S006 guidance	O/G/H
C034	Remittitur issuance, filing below, copies, and compliance have separate actors/events.	IAR 38(c),122	O
C035	Unresolved cost/fee amount does not necessarily delay remittitur.	IAR 38(d),40(f),41(d)	O
C036	Court of Appeals disposition authority does not establish a particular remand outcome.	IAR 112	O
C037	Pre-opinion temporary remand is not general postfinal recall.	IAR 13.3	O/H
C038	Assignment revocation and pre-opinion stipulated dismissal have limited functions.	IAR 114,33	O/H
C039	No universal recall, early-stipulated-remittitur, or mandate-correction procedure was authenticated.	Read scope; IAR 48	H
C040	A rehearing/review petition is not declared a new universal enforcement-stay trigger.	IAR 13; special rules	O/H
C041	Denial of review is not characterized as approval of merits; grant is not universally equated with vacatur.	Rule 118/122 scope	H
C042	Original orders, current guide, and internal-rule restrictions remain unverified here.	S007–S008	H
C043	Published clerical-modification exceptions are not identical across Rules 38,42,118,120.	Those complete rules	O/H
C044	Federal and other special regimes remain separate.	IAR 12.2,39; exclusions	H
C045	No actual petition, record, event, fee eligibility, deadline, or outcome was determined.	Research record	Certain

9. Quantity, event, and exception register

No actual date, event sequence, fee payment, word count, file, or calendar result is supplied.

9.1 Petitions, briefs, review, and decision effects

Quantity/relation	Reference event or base	Qualification
21 days	Supreme opinion filing date	Ordinary rehearing petition
21 days	Date of modified Supreme opinion	Nonclerical modification; aggrieved-party condition
14 days	Rehearing petition filing	Ordinary supporting brief/memorandum
Simultaneous filing	Petition and support under Rule 12.2	Express summary-dismissal condition
Original only; no copies	Rehearing petition and supporting brief	Electronic scope still applies
No fixed response period	Rehearing/review opposition	Only if directed/requested; order governs
No automatic reply period	Special petitions	No ordinary merits-reply schedule imported
21 days	Applicable Rule 118 announcement event	Original opinion/order, denial of rehearing, opinion on rehearing, qualifying modification
With petition or within 14 days	Review support	Rule 12.2 exception
No prior rehearing prerequisite	Review route	Does not prohibit timely rehearing
Final determination of all rehearing petitions	Supreme review-action sequencing	No action before that condition
Five nonexclusive factors	Rule 118(b)	Neither exhaustive nor controlling
Majority of Justices	Grant of review	No actual vote or entitlement
Majority of Court of Appeals judges	Certification factor	Not automatic Supreme acceptance
21 days	Rule 120 listed announcements	Supreme initiative, not party extension
Existing briefs after grant	Rule 118(c)(2)	Additional briefing only if ordered
No Court of Appeals remittitur after grant	Rule 122	Filing petition alone is not the same event
No fixed number of successive ordinary petitions authenticated	Rule 42 modification branch	Not unlimited permission

9.2 Fees, filing, extensions, and counting

Quantity/relation	Reference event/base	Qualification
$71	Ordinary rehearing petition	Listed criminal/habeas/post-conviction exceptions
No filing fee	Review of Court of Appeals decision	Other fees/costs not decided
Clerk receipt/authorized electronic filing	Petition institution	Mailing alone not substituted
Rehearing filing nonextension	Rules 44/46	Review-incorporation issue held
Seven days from motion service	Written objection to ex parte enlargement	Clerk separately serves order
Brief-extension request by due date	Rule 34(d)	Applies only where extension is authorized
Eight affidavit subject categories	Brief-extension request	No affidavit prepared
Fourteen days after service	General IAR 32 opposition	Does not override special no-response rule
Trigger day excluded	IAR 22	Last-day weekend/nonjudicial qualification
Intermediate days counted	IRCP 2.2 within its scope	Not an automatic wholesale IAR import
Three added days	Civil act due after service by mail	Not entry/announcement/filing-based petition period
After 5 p.m.; one added day	Party electronic service	Scope and actual service not determined
Court-local 12:01 a.m.–midnight	Electronic filing day	Acceptance and nonbusiness-day clauses
Three business days, legal holidays excluded	Rejection-correction resubmission	Required request and next-judicial-day qualification
Seven business days, legal holidays excluded	Technical-failure resubmission after unsuccessful-submission notice	Satisfactory proof; not universal extension
General waiver-denial correction period	IREFS 10(b)	Not assumed to resolve every appellate petition’s jurisdictional or statutory waiver issue
Unknown	Actual receipt, submission, acceptance, waiver, correction, or court closure	None supplied

9.3 Format, privacy, and argument

Quantity/relation	Legal base	Qualification
14,000 / 7,000 words	Rule 34 first/reply party brief categories	Not automatically assigned to special petition/support
50 / 25 pages	Specified handwritten-prisoner first/reply branch	Not a general ordinary special-petition limit
Included in count	Headings, footnotes, quotations	Count exceptions retained
Excluded from count	Listed front matter, certificates, appendices/exhibits	Exclusion does not authorize content
8½ × 11 inches	General paper/page form	Electronic printable-page relation
At least one-inch margins	Rule 36	Bottom pagination
14-point or larger	General text and footnotes	Specified typewriter exception
12-point permitted	Qualifying unrepresented typewriter branch	Other applicable conditions remain
Two named proportional fonts	Times New Roman/Century Schoolbook	No font files or generated document
50 MB/file; 100 MB/envelope	IREFS 6	Separation and exception provisions
Seven days	Initial sealing-review branch	Continued protection requires stated order
Seven days from denial order	Amendment of a submission relying on withdrawn newly filed material	Not automatic extension of protected petition filing
No petition argument unless ordered	Rule 42(c)	Review incorporation and court direction
Same manner as merits argument after rehearing grant	Rule 42(e)	General no-argument/order provisions remain
30 minutes per side	General Rule 37 merits argument if applicable	Court may alter for good cause
10 minutes per side; one counsel	Permitted preliminary-motion argument	Not automatically a special petition allotment
At least 14 days before argument	Multiple-party allocation request	No actual argument scheduled
At least 7 days before argument	Court allocation	Court discretion preserved
21 days from no-argument order date	Rule 37 written objection if applicable	Not a fresh petition filing period

9.4 Finality, remand, and history

Quantity/relation	Event	Qualification
21 days after last listed event	Rule 38 original/rehearing/modified-opinion finality text	Pending/denied-petition construction preserved
No repeated clerical exception	Rule 38(b)(3), Rule 120	Not silently made identical to Rules 42/118
42 days after district appellate decision filed	Rule 83(r) no-higher-appeal remittitur branch	No actual tolling or deadline calculation
Forthwith transmission/compliance	Rule 38	No invented numeric compliance deadline
Before opinion; good cause	Temporary remand	Appeal remains pending
At any time in assignment-revocation text	Rule 114	Not universal recall of a final remittitur
Before opinion	Rule 33 stipulated dismissal	Not a post-opinion early-remittitur rule
Unresolved taxation does not delay	Rule 38(d)	Fee merits remain separate
July 1, 1977	IAR historical application baseline	Not each clause’s current amendment date
January 1, 2016	Latest displayed Rule 118 amendment effectiveness	Original 2015 order failed
January 24, 2019	Latest displayed Rule 42 amendment/effectiveness	Original 2019 order failed
July 1, 2026	Material general format and special-expedited amendments	Original 2026 orders unopened
Unknown	Actual finality, pending petition status, mandate scope, recall ground, lower jurisdiction, outcome	None supplied or inferred

10. Conditional branches and precise next inquiries

Branch	Missing predicate	Supported consequence	Adverse inference to avoid	Exact next generic inquiry
B01 — rehearing route	Correct court and eligible decision category	Applicable rehearing procedure	Every order has a universal Rule 42 remedy	Rule-specific order eligibility/construction
B02 — petition time	Correct filing/announcement/modification event	Stated period may apply	Support-brief period extends petition time	Rule 42/118 application
B03 — clerical change	Nature of modification	Express exception may control	Every altered opinion creates identical clocks	Rule 38/42/118/120 reconciliation
B04 — support brief	Ordinary or Rule 12.2 posture	Separate or simultaneous support	Ordinary late support always equals expedited summary dismissal	Exact route and consequence
B05 — response	Court direction/request	Authorized response	Silence is admission or an automatic response deadline exists	Specific order/special rule
B06 — review eligibility	Aggrieved party, final-decision relationship, criteria	Discretionary consideration	Right to Supreme review	Rule 118 construction
B07 — simultaneous requests	Timely rehearing and pending review	Express sequencing	Review petition bars rehearing or is immediately decided	Rule 118(a)
B08 — review grant	Actual grant/order	Existing briefs and assignment consequences	Automatic new briefs, new evidence, or universal vacatur	Order and Rule 118/122
B09 — own initiative	Listed event and court action	Review order may issue	Party can compel own-motion review	Rule 120
B10 — late review petition	Meaning of incorporated times/manner	Exact hold	Omission from Rule 21/46 means unrestricted extension	Judicial construction
B11 — fee	Applicable category and lawful waiver	Defined fee treatment	No fee means automatic review, or waiver request is granted	Unread statutes and petition mechanics
B12 — length	Special-paper classification/order	General form framework	Fresh 14,000 words automatically available	Rule 34/42/118 construction
B13 — electronic defect	Required correction/proof/timing	Conditional filing-date relief	Technical allegation always excuses late filing	IREFS 13/14 interaction
B14 — privacy	Protected status and required order	Limited access/filing treatment	Sealed appendix authorizes disclosure or tolling	ICAR 32 and substantive privacy
B15 — district reconsideration	Governing district-appellate authority	Rule 83 motion/fallback structure	Universal twenty-one-day Supreme rehearing rule	District-appellate construction
B16 — finality	Applicable pending/disposed petition and opinion event	Rule 38/guidance relationship	Universal fresh twenty-one days after denial	Complete finality construction
B17 — remittitur	Finality and actual directive	Issue/file/comply duties	Every remand orders a new trial or a fixed result	Mandate scope law
B18 — recall	Separate lawful source and conditions	Held dependency	General practice or assignment power is unlimited recall authority	Original rule/statute/constitutional construction
B19 — temporary remand	Pre-opinion good cause and limited order	Limited lower-court action	Appeal terminates or all merits reopen	IAR 13.3
B20 — withdrawal/stipulation	Stage and applicable authority	Pre-opinion dismissal branch	Party stipulation automatically accelerates remittitur	Postdecision authority
B21 — stay	Independent stay/order/special law	Conditional protection	Every petition renews an automatic enforcement stay	Full stay/security regime
B22 — sanctions	Specific violation and lawful process	Appropriate response possible	Unsuccessful petition proves misconduct	IAR 11.2/due process
B23 — denial	Actual disposition and applicable law	No merits endorsement inferred	Denial necessarily approves reasoning	Precedential-effect construction
B24 — original history	Readable adopted originals and transition text	Gap may close	Footer or guide proves the whole chain	Ordinary official original sources

11. Exact remaining dependencies

Separate subject	Required later authority or question
Review-petition jurisdiction and extensions	Rule 118’s incorporation reconciled with Rules 21, 44, and 46
Decision/order eligibility	Rule 42’s opinion wording; Rule 116/118 order language; Rule 118(b)’s final-decision requirement
Special-paper length	Whether and how Rule 34’s first/reply categories apply to rehearing/review support, opposition, or a standalone petition
Pending petitions and finality	Exact clerk/court treatment after filing, denial, dismissal, modification, successive qualifying petition, and review disposition
Clerical modification	Differences among Rules 38, 42, 118, and 120
Recall/correction	Express original authority and standards for amended, corrected, recalled, or reissued remittitur; no universal power established here
District-appellate postdecision procedure	Rule 83/IRCP 11.2/IAR interaction and any effect on further-review time
Current technical guide/internal rules	Special formatting, citation restrictions, internal procedures, and lawful public originals
Fee waiver	§§ 31-3220, 31-3220A, 67-2301, 31-3212 and petition-specific implementation
Record/new evidence	Record-boundary and augmentation rules for any proposed additional material; no new-evidence permission inferred
Substantive review	Claim-specific standards, preservation, harmlessness, merits, and precedential effect
Full enforcement	Stay/security, judgment collection, interest, liens, satisfaction, and lower-court compliance remedies
Federal review	U.S. Supreme Court jurisdiction, certiorari, deadlines, federal mandate, and federal stays—no federal timetable supplied
Other special regimes	Criminal/capital, family/juvenile, agency, statutory expedited, extraordinary writ, tribal/interstate, bankruptcy, military, and protected-party law
Original history	2015 Rule 118, 2019 Rule 42, 2026 format/expedited amendments, other intervening orders and application clauses

12. Wholly blank conceptual worksheet

Field	Entry
Governing postdecision route
Authority and edition
Official-current-text status
Decision/opinion/order category
Requesting-role predicate
Deciding court
Filing office
Trigger event
Petition period
Supporting-paper period
Response authorization
Review criteria
Rehearing/review sequencing
Additional briefing authority
Argument authority
Fee/waiver provision
Applicable length classification
Format/certificate requirement
Filing/service distinction
Correction/technical-failure provision
Computation/extension rule
Privacy condition
Finality relation
Remittitur issue/file event
Receiving-court duty
Recall/remand dependency
Special-regime boundary
Missing original authority
Review status

No field is completed.

13. Granular coverage

Requested question/material subquestion	Disposition	Claims/sources	Exact remaining gap
1 — current ordinary routes	Complete core rules read	C002–C014; S001	No actual posture classification
Supreme rehearing	Complete Rule 42	C003–C006	Order eligibility/merits construction
Court of Appeals rehearing	Complete Rule 116	C007	Unusual order-trigger mapping
Supreme discretionary review	Complete Rule 118	C008–C012	Actual final-decision/criteria determination
Court initiative	Complete Rule 120	C013	No actual exercise of power
District postdecision	Necessary Rule 83/11.2 clauses	C031	Universal rehearing/tolling rule not inferred
Special regimes	Expressly excluded	C044	Independent authority required
2 — petition and support acts	Separate filing/service/fee/support relations	C003–C006,C015–C016	Fee-waiver statutory mechanics
Grounds and argument limits	Textual requirements identified	C006,C011	No borrowed federal merits-ground test
Opposition/reply	Court-directed/requested branch	C005,C011	No universal response/reply period
Grant/denial/change	Conditions and issue/brief-order effects read	C004,C006,C033	Postdenial finality construction
Copies/signatures/form	Necessary rules read	C025–C028	Special-paper length/guide
Extensions/nonextensions	Complete rules and ambiguity preserved	C017–C021	Review incorporation construction
3 — review posture/rehearing relation	Complete Rule 118(a)	C008–C009	No actual exhaustion/eligibility
Criteria	All five factors and majority requirement	C010	No merits or probability finding
Supporting material	Criteria brief; record boundary preserved	C011–C012	No required appendix invented
Acceptance/denial effects	Rule 118/122 limits	C012,C014,C041	No denial-as-approval or automatic-vacatur conclusion
Postgrant briefing/argument	Existing briefs; ordered additions; applicable argument rules	C012,C025	Actual order absent
4 — special format/length	Independently read	C023–C025	No distinct special cap authenticated
Citation/appendix	Necessary general rules only	S001 Rules 6,35–36	Internal citation restrictions/technical guide
E-filing/service/correction	Complete material bodies	C026–C028	No actual system event
Computation/additional time	Scoped rules and provisional statutes	C030	No calendar or universal addition
Privacy	Necessary complete branch	C029	Full privilege/access regime
5 — announcement/finality	Rule 38 complete; guidance qualified	C032–C033	Pending/denied-petition sequencing
Remittitur issuance/transmission/filing	Complete core text	C034	No actual receiving-court event
Review assignment effect	Complete Rule 122	C014	Filing alone not treated as grant
Lower compliance/remand	Necessary Rules 38,112,13.3	C034,C036–C037	Actual mandate interpretation excluded
Recall/reissue/early stipulation	Exact gap retained	C038–C039	No universal authority authenticated
Unresolved taxation	Narrow fresh rule read	C035	P30 merits not reused
Stay/security	Boundary only	C040	Full stay/security regime
6 — untimeliness/consequences	Express distinctions read	C017–C020,C022	Review jurisdiction/construction
No response/nonconformity	No automatic merits admission	C005,C011,C022	Applicable judicial remedy
Withdrawal/correction	Relevant limited clauses read	C027,C038–C039	Postopinion withdrawal/recall authority
Sanctions/notice	Signing and motion interface	C022	Full constitutional/disciplinary process
Federal/special follow-ons	Precise dependencies	Section 11	No broad federal overview
7 — sources/read bounds/history	Visible register supplied	Section 7	Original orders/current statutes
2025–2026 changes	Bounded searches and current footers separated	C042	No all-law-through-date certification
Failed/discovery status	Explicit	S007–S008	No snippet substitution
Quantities/branches/worksheet	Supplied	Sections 9–12	No inputs, dates, or forms
Prior findings/holds	Preserved	C045	No implied closure
Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent	Not accepted complete	Entire report	Recorded dependencies remain

14. Actual read, search, failure, and self-check log

14.1 What was actually done

Material	Actual use
Official Rules 42, 116, 118, 120, 122, 38	Complete bodies and displayed footers
Related appellate rules	Complete or expressly bounded clauses listed in S001
Rule 83 and civil computation/reconsideration	New postdecision interfaces only
Electronic and privacy rules	Complete or expressly bounded material clauses
Official generic court guidance	Selected finality/further-review paragraphs only
Statutory computation source	Official route failed; complete secondary bodies read
2015/2019 original-history searches	Actual ordinary discovered routes attempted; failures preserved
2025–2026 searches	Generic rule/amendment/version searches; no absence-of-change conclusion
Clerk-handbook route	Failed; snippet not treated as complete source
Reserved rules	Official consolidated index checked; no invented operative counterpart
Opinions, cases, dockets, calendars, rosters	Incidental results not opened, investigated, or relied on
Actual petitions, decisions, records, contracts, identities, financial or medical information	Not requested, constructed, or evaluated
Earlier local review files	Supplied scope/reuse descriptions only; no inspection claim

The currentness searches were limited to the relevant rehearing/review/finality rules and material general-form amendments. They did not establish that no other law, order, or amendment exists.

14.2 PDF text and pixels

No PDF body was successfully recovered or analyzed in this pass.

Attempted or discovered PDF	Status
September 1, 2015 appellate amendment order	404
2016 highlights document	404
2019 appellate amendment order	404
2025 appellate handbook	404
2026 API-hosted orders/guide/internal rules	Not opened
2015 highlights search lead	Not opened

No original-order, handbook, or guide page image was inspected. Search excerpts and alternate formats were not counted as independent corroboration.

14.3 Researcher self-check

The core distinctions are supported by complete fresh rule readings: separate petition/support periods; no required prior rehearing before review; criteria-focused discretionary review; no automatic response; use of existing briefs after grant; initiative review; and termination of Court of Appeals assignment when review is granted.

The exact unresolved points are equally important: review-petition jurisdiction/extension treatment; special-paper length classification; pending-petition and postdenial finality mechanics; differing clerical-modification wording; general recall or early-remittitur authority; and original amendment history.

No actual or invented party, lawyer, judge, decision, opinion, order, petition, brief, record, account, amount, event, or calendar was supplied or constructed. No eligibility, preservation, waiver, timeliness, merits, fee entitlement, recall, compliance, liability, or outcome determination was made.

This is a researcher self-check, not independent review. The component is supported by newly read official rules and narrowly qualified official guidance, with expressly provisional statutory support and preserved source-history, incorporation, construction, special-regime, and actual-application holds. Earlier findings and provenance remain unchanged. No Idaho, dimension4, A066, parent, operational, or publication acceptance follows.

END S_ID PASS-31.

Every captured table

Captured cells with original header handling and explicitly labeled bounded correction overlays. Downloaded JSON retains original cells. Tables may contain source limitations, historical examples and identified corrections; the complete reading supplies context.

How to read the research →

Read the related correction supplements

These components repair their stated scope. They do not replace every other finding in this research series.

Captured table 01

Earlier material · Retained scope · New P31 reading · 7 data rows

Earlier material	Retained scope	New P31 reading	Remaining boundary
Reviewed P27 rehearing/review interface	Earlier period, assignment, and finality distinctions retain their source limits.	Complete Rules 42, 116, 118, 120, 122 and necessary related provisions read afresh.	No actual decision, petition, or deadline classified.
Reviewed P27 remittitur follow-on	Full compliance, remand, recall, modification, and enforcement remained open.	Rule 38, Rule 83(r), Rules 112, 114, and 13.3 read for the specific new questions.	No general recall power or actual mandate interpretation inferred.
Reviewed P29 briefing	Ordinary 2026 format and word-count findings remain within their scope.	Special rehearing/review provisions and necessary general formatting clauses independently read.	A special supporting brief is not automatically treated as a new “first brief.”
P30 cost/fee report	Not a substantive premise.	Only Rules 38(d), 40(f), and 41(d) reread for unresolved taxation and remittitur.	No fee entitlement, amount, or taxation report repeated.
P25 trial additur/remittitur	Trial damages remittitur remains distinct from appellate remittitur.	No trial-remedy merits reused.	No acceptance, election, or damages calculation.
P27 LIMITED-01	Rule 46’s objection runs from service of the motion, with Clerk service of the order separate.	Complete current Rule 46 freshly read.	No revival of the earlier ambiguous reference.
C033/C035 and other holds	Preserved.	No provider/checklist or unrelated statutory research.	No implied closure.

Captured table 02

Request or event · Deciding court and filing office · Source-stated scope · 7 data rows

Request or event	Deciding court and filing office	Source-stated scope
Supreme Court rehearing	Supreme Court; petition filed with its Clerk	Rule 42 uses an opinion-based petition relation. It does not expressly establish a universal rehearing route for every procedural order.
Court of Appeals rehearing	Court of Appeals decides; subsequent papers use the Supreme Court clerk structure	Rule 116 covers an aggrieved party’s request concerning an opinion or order and incorporates Supreme Court rehearing procedure.
Supreme Court review of Court of Appeals	Supreme Court; petition filed with its Clerk	Rule 118(a) refers to opinions/orders; subsection (b) describes review of a final decision as discretionary.
Supreme Court initiative	Supreme Court acts on its own motion	Rule 120 supplies a distinct review-order mechanism.
District court acting in an ordinary magistrate appeal	District court under Rule 83	Rule 83’s motion and procedural-fallback provisions are not an express universal Rule 42 rehearing entitlement.
After review is granted	Supreme Court proceeds under the review order	Court of Appeals assignment terminates as stated in Rule 122.
Special or federal routes	Their own authority	Criminal/capital, Rule 12.2, agency, special statutory, federal certiorari, tribal, and interstate rules are not ordinary civil defaults.

Captured table 03

Subject · Complete material Rule 42 relation · 8 data rows

Subject	Complete material Rule 42 relation
Petition	Physically filed with the Supreme Court Clerk, together with the applicable filing fee, within twenty-one days after the filing date of the opinion; served on all parties.
Modified opinion	An aggrieved party may file another petition within twenty-one days from the modified opinion’s date, unless modification merely corrects a clerical error; service is on adverse parties.
Supporting brief or memorandum	Filed within fourteen days after petition filing.
Copies	Original petition and brief; no copies required.
Response	None unless the court directs.
Argument on petition	None unless ordered.
Grant/denial order	Clerk serves all parties; order may identify rehearing issues and must direct the time/order of briefing.
Argument after grant	Scheduled in the same manner as merits argument, subject to the governing argument rules.

Captured table 04

Rule 118(b) factor · Generic question identified by the rule · 5 data rows

Rule 118(b) factor	Generic question identified by the rule
(1)	Has the Court of Appeals decided a substantive question not previously determined by the Idaho Supreme Court?
(2)	Is the substantive decision probably inconsistent with applicable Idaho Supreme Court or U.S. Supreme Court decisions?
(3)	Does it conflict with a prior Court of Appeals decision?
(4)	Does the departure from usual judicial procedure, or approval of such a departure below, call for supervisory intervention?
(5)	Has a majority of Court of Appeals judges certified, after decision, that further review is desirable in the public interest or interests of justice?

Captured table 05

Item · Published IAR 23 provision · Limit · 5 data rows

Item	Published IAR 23 provision	Limit
Ordinary rehearing petition	$71	Criminal, habeas, and post-conviction exceptions are expressly listed.
Review petition concerning Court of Appeals decision	No filing fee	Not a ruling on other costs or fee-shifting.
Public-actor exemption	Incorporates specified statutes	Statutory status and scope were not completed here.
Waiver	Rule 23(c) refers to §§ 31-3220/31-3220A and Supreme Court approval.	Its detailed application language is notice-of-appeal-oriented; petition-specific mechanics and statutory eligibility remain held.
Automatic categories	Rule 23(e) uses defined representation categories.	No representation, program, or eligibility investigation.

Captured table 06

Provision · Exact distinction retained · 7 data rows

Provision	Exact distinction retained
IAR 21	Expressly identifies untimely rehearing-petition filing as jurisdictional, with dismissal on motion or court initiative. Other steps are generally treated as nonjurisdictional but may support an appropriate sanction, including dismissal.
IAR 46	Excludes rehearing-petition filing from its general enlargement power. Brief extensions additionally require Rule 34(d).
IAR 44	Extraordinary procedure may be changed only under the stated conditions; rehearing filing time cannot be shortened or lengthened under this rule.
Review petitions	Not expressly named in those lists, but Rule 118 incorporates Rule 42’s times and manner.
Ordinary support brief	No universal automatic summary-dismissal rule is stated in Rule 42 for every late ordinary supporting brief.
Rule 12.2 support brief	Simultaneous filing and summary dismissal are express.
No response when none requested	Not treated as an admission, a default, or disobedience to a universal response duty.

Captured table 07

Subject · Authenticated text · Qualification · 7 data rows

Subject	Authenticated text	Qualification
Rehearing support	Brief or memorandum; Rule 42’s special timing and court-ordered briefing	No distinct numeric special word limit appears in Rule 42.
Review support	Criteria-focused Rule 118(c)(1) brief	Not automatically a new full merits brief.
Binding/cover	Special support/opposition briefs need not be bound or use a colored cover.	Not a waiver of every other applicable formatting or identifying requirement.
General word limits	Rule 34 states 14,000 words for a party’s first brief and 7,000 for a reply.	Classification of a later rehearing/review supporting paper under that wording is not supplied by assumption.
Petition length	No standalone numeric petition cap was authenticated from the read special rules.	Not unlimited-length permission.
Response/reply	Only as authorized by the special rule or court order.	No automatic fourteen-day opposition or twenty-one-day reply imported.
After review grant	Original Court of Appeals briefs used unless additional briefing ordered.	No automatic fresh length allowance or required merits rebriefing.

Captured table 08

Item · Rule-based structure · 11 data rows

Item	Rule-based structure
Page and margins	Printable 8½ × 11-inch pages; at least one-inch margins
Text	Double-spaced body; specified headings, footnotes, and block quotations may be single-spaced
Typeface	Black, proportionally spaced Times New Roman or Century Schoolbook, 14 point or larger, including footnotes
Pagination	Bottom margin
Authority names	Rule 36’s italic/underline treatment
Certificate	Rule 34’s word-count statement immediately before signature, subject to the specified exceptions
Count	Headings, footnotes, and quotations included; listed front matter, signatures, certificates, appendices and exhibits excluded
Typewriter exception	Specified unrepresented non-word-processor branch permits standard 12-point type
Handwritten exception	Qualifying prisoner branch has its stated page limits and legibility requirements
Copies	Special Rule 42 requires the original petition and brief, no copies
Signatures	IAR 11.2 and applicable electronic-signature rules retain their actor and certification conditions

Captured table 09

Event · Required distinction · 9 data rows

Event	Required distinction
Format	Searchable PDF/PDF-A; the scanned-attachment exception is not a universal brief exception
Size	Rule 6’s file/envelope limits and separation rules apply within their exceptions
Protected attachments	Separate handling; a confidentiality label is subject to court verification
Submission	Receipt, acceptance, rejection, and accepted filing-date relation are distinct
Correction after rejection	Conditional three-business-day resubmission/relation-back request
Technical receipt failure	Satisfactory proof and the seven-business-day resubmission branch
Judicial relief	Technical filing-date relief is not merely an ordinary discretionary extension of a protected petition period
Service	Authorized system transmission, not courtesy copy; party and court service rules differ
Fees	Rule 10’s notice-of-appeal-specific waiver rule is not automatically a rehearing-petition rule

Captured table 10

Event · Rule 38 or 122 relationship · 7 data rows

Event	Rule 38 or 122 relationship
Opinion becomes final under the applicable rule/order framework	Clerk issues and files remittitur with the originating district court or agency and mails the specified copies.
Remittitur content	Advises that the opinion is final and directs compliance with its directive.
Lower tribunal	Must comply forthwith with the actual directive—not an invented generic outcome.
Review granted	No Court of Appeals remittitur on that opinion; assignment terminates.
Supreme Court completes granted review	Supreme opinion/remittitur under Rule 38, unless otherwise ordered.
Costs/fees determined	Included as the rules provide.
Amount unresolved	Does not necessarily delay remittitur; later itemized treatment follows the narrow rule.

Captured table 11

Provision · What the read text supplies · What is not inferred · 6 data rows

Provision	What the read text supplies	What is not inferred
IAR 112	Court of Appeals may affirm, reverse, modify, direct proper judgment/order, new trial, or further proceedings within the rule.	No actual entitlement to a new trial or particular judgment.
IAR 13.3	Before opinion, good-cause temporary remand on motion or initiative; appeal remains pending; lower authority limited by remand.	A universal postfinal remittitur recall power.
IAR 114	Supreme Court may revoke a Court of Appeals assignment; that court then takes no further action.	Recall of an already final lower-court judgment merely from assignment language.
IAR 33	Stipulated dismissal before opinion, with cost/fee agreement; partial-party stipulation treated as a motion.	Stipulated early remittitur after opinion or universal postdecision withdrawal.
IAR 48	Court may regulate unspecified appellate practice.	A completed substantive standard for recall, reopening, or correction.
ICAR 32(i)(8)	Court may alter a sealing order.	Authority to alter an appellate merits decision or mandate.

Captured table 12

Literal HTTPS URL · Actual read bounds and use · 33 data rows

Literal HTTPS URL	Actual read bounds and use
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/iar	Necessary complete Rules 1–2 and reserved-rule index; no general gateway rerun
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/6	Complete generic paper/title provisions; no caption created
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.2	Complete signing/sanction text; ICAR 59 merits held
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/12.2	Complete body inspected; substantive use limited to scope and (g) simultaneous-support exception
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13	Complete body inspected; narrow stay-trigger/retained-authority boundary; security amounts not applied
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13.3	Complete temporary-remand provision
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/20	Complete filing/service rule
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/21	Complete jurisdictional and other-step distinction
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/22	Complete computation clause
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/23	Complete; substantive use limited to rehearing/review fees and waiver-incorporation limits; form unopened
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/32	Complete motion rule; printed generic form not reproduced
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/33	Complete pre-opinion stipulated-dismissal rule
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/34	Complete; special-brief length/certificate/extension boundaries only; ordinary merits schedule not reused
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/35	Complete page inspected; reliance on necessary record-citation/addendum provisions
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/36	Complete form and exception provisions; model cover unopened
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/37	Complete argument provision; applied only through relevant rehearing/review interface
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38	Complete (a)–(d)
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/39	Complete special federal-mandate clause read as an exclusion; its period not applied to ordinary state remittitur
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40	Complete page inspected; substantive use limited to (f) and the narrow unresolved-taxation relation
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41	Complete page inspected; substantive use limited to (d) remittitur insertion/remand interface
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/42	Complete (a)–(e)
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/44	Complete extraordinary-procedure alteration and exclusions
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/46	Complete; seven-day objection from motion service preserved
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/47	Complete court-service provision
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/48	Complete unspecified-practice provision
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/101	Complete Court of Appeals scope
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/110	Complete subsequent-filing/assignment interface
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/112	Complete disposition authority
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/114	Complete assignment-revocation provision
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/116	Complete Court of Appeals rehearing provision
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/118	Complete (a)–(c)
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/120	Complete own-initiative review provision
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/122	Complete opinions/remittiturs provision

Captured table 13

Rule · Displayed adoption/amendment/effectiveness · 14 data rows

Rule	Displayed adoption/amendment/effectiveness
42	March 25, 1977/July 1, 1977; March 20, 1985/July 1, 1985; March 28, 1986/July 1, 1986; January 4, 2010/February 1, 2010; March 18, 2011/July 1, 2011; November 20, 2012/January 1, 2013; January 24, 2019, effective same day
116	April 17, 1981/July 1, 1981; March 24, 1982/July 1, 1982
118	April 17, 1981/July 1, 1981; March 24, 1982/July 1, 1982; March 28, 1986/July 1, 1986; March 23, 1990/July 1, 1990; January 4, 2010/February 1, 2010; March 18, 2011/July 1, 2011; November 20, 2012/January 1, 2013; September 1, 2015/January 1, 2016
120	April 17, 1981/July 1, 1981
122	March 24, 1982/July 1, 1982
38	March 25, 1977/July 1, 1977; January 30, 2001/July 1, 2002; March 22, 2002/July 1, 2002—the displayed dates are retained
13.3	March 28, 1986/July 1, 1986
112, 114	April 17, 1981/July 1, 1981
21	March 25, 1977/July 1, 1977; April 18, 1983/July 1, 1983; November 20, 2012/January 1, 2013
32	Latest displayed April 28, 2022/July 1, 2022
46	Latest displayed April 28, 2022/April 28, 2022
34, 36	Latest displayed April 29, 2026/July 1, 2026
12.2	Current page includes June 30, 2026/July 1, 2026
13, 23	Current pages include April 29, 2026/July 1, 2026

Captured table 14

Literal HTTPS URL · Actual read bounds · 3 data rows

Literal HTTPS URL	Actual read bounds
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83	Complete page inspected; substantive reliance on (n)–(r), and necessary (f) scope only
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11.2	Complete (a)–(b); used only to preserve district postdecision/reconsideration limits
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2	Complete computation, extension, nonextension, inaccessibility, and mail provisions

Captured table 15

Literal HTTPS URL · Actual read bounds · 16 data rows

Literal HTTPS URL	Actual read bounds
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/1	Complete scope/conflict hierarchy
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/2	Complete definitions
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/4	Complete filer categories and exceptions
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/5	Complete exceptions; special-case practices not applied
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/6	Complete format, size, separation, and guide incorporation
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/7	Complete protected-filing treatment
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/9	Complete signature rule; specimen identity and special emergency scenarios not reproduced
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/10	Complete fees/waiver provision; notice-of-appeal branch distinguished
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/11	Complete filing/acceptance provision
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/12	Complete filing-time relation
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/13	Complete rejection/correction; no prescribed text prepared
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/14	Complete technical-failure relief
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/15	Complete privacy/redaction/exception text; no example identifiers reproduced
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/17	Complete party-service provision; discovery merits excluded
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/18	Complete court-service provision; form wording omitted
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/20	Complete page inspected; reliance only on (f) briefing interface

Captured table 16

Literal HTTPS URL · Actual read and history · 2 data rows

Literal HTTPS URL	Actual read and history
https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-16/section-1-1607/	Complete nonjudicial-day and exception provision; C.C.P.1881 §46 lineage; 1961 ch.270 §1 p.480; 1971 ch.84 §1 p.186
https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-73/chapter-1/section-73-108/	Complete holiday/substitution provision; displayed history through 2002 ch.146 §3 p.423

Captured table 17

Literal HTTPS URL · Actual selected read · Status · 2 data rows

Literal HTTPS URL	Actual selected read	Status
https://isc.idaho.gov/about-the-courts/sc-procedures	“When Does a Supreme Court Decision Become Final?” paragraph	Official guidance: denial of rehearing makes the decision final; not a complete rule-based postdenial clock
https://isc.idaho.gov/about-the-courts/ica-procedures	“Further Review” section	Official guidance only; discretionary review description

Captured table 18

Literal HTTPS URL · Actual use · 4 data rows

Literal HTTPS URL	Actual use
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments	Publication/incorporation statement and available index context; original orders not recovered
https://isb.idaho.gov/blog/amendments-to-the-idaho-appellate-rules/	January 28, 2019 notice and actual original-order link; notice is not the order
https://isb.idaho.gov/blog/amendments-to-idaho-appellate-rules-eff-july-1-2026/	May 11, 2026 official institutional notice; linked order API-hosted and unopened
https://isb.idaho.gov/blog/recent-amendments-to-idaho-appellate-rules/	August 10, 2026 notice; current rule bodies, not this summary, support the formatting findings

Captured table 19

Literal URL · Actual observation · 9 data rows

Literal URL	Actual observation
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/iar	Initial ordinary consolidated-page delivery failed; separately discovered https://isc.idaho.gov/iar successfully redirected to the same collection
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/115	Failed delivery; official consolidated index identifies Rule 115 as Reserved
https://isc.idaho.gov/orders/IAR_Order_09.01.15.pdf	Discovered ordinary 2015 order route; 404
https://isc.idaho.gov/rules/2016_Highlights_of_Rule_Changes.pdf	Materially different official historical route; 404
https://www.isc.idaho.gov/rules/Order-Amending-Appellate-Rules.pdf	Actual 2019 notice link followed; 404
https://isc.idaho.gov/files/IdahoAppellateInformationHandbook_2025.pdf	Ordinary handbook route; 404; search excerpt not treated as a body read
https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title1/T1CH16/SECT1-1607/	Fresh official statutory route inaccessible
https://isc.idaho.gov/orders/Rule_Highlights_2015.pdf	Search lead only; not opened
API-hosted originals, technical guide, internal rules, forms	Not opened; no guessed alternative endpoint

Captured table 20

Claim · Precise proposition · Source/pinpoint · 45 data rows

Claim	Precise proposition	Source/pinpoint	Status
C001	Current operative rules were read; original history and statutory gaps remain.	S001–S008	O/P/H
C002	Rehearing, discretionary review, initiative review, and district postdecision practice are different routes.	IAR 42,116,118,120; Rule 83	O/H
C003	Ordinary Supreme rehearing has the specified petition filing, fee, and service relation.	IAR 42(a)	O
C004	Nonclerical modified opinions have a separately stated further-petition branch.	IAR 42(a)	O
C005	Supporting-brief timing differs from petition timing and the Rule 12.2 exception.	IAR 42(b),118(a),12.2(g)	O
C006	Responses, petition argument, grant/denial notice, and rehearing argument require their own authority.	IAR 42(c)–(e)	O
C007	Court of Appeals decides its own rehearing under the incorporated framework.	IAR 116	O/H
C008	Review uses the listed alternative decision events and does not require prior rehearing.	IAR 118(a)	O
C009	Concurrent timely rehearing remains possible; review action awaits final rehearing determinations.	IAR 118(a)	O
C010	Review is discretionary, requires special/important reasons and a majority direction, with nonexclusive factors.	IAR 118(b)	O
C011	Review support is criteria-focused; no response is authorized unless requested.	IAR 118(c)(1)	O
C012	Granted review ordinarily uses existing Court of Appeals briefs.	IAR 118(c)(2)	O
C013	Own-motion review has its own twenty-one-day text and no repeated clerical exception.	IAR 120	O/H
C014	Granted review terminates assignment and prevents the specified Court of Appeals remittitur.	IAR 122	O
C015	Petition filing differs from ordinary mailing and from service.	IAR 20; IREFS 1,11–12	O
C016	Rehearing and review have different filing-fee categories; waiver predicates remain held.	IAR 23	O/H
C017	Untimely rehearing filing is expressly within the jurisdictional-dismissal provision.	IAR 21	O
C018	General enlargement and extraordinary alteration exclude the specified rehearing period.	IAR 44,46	O
C019	Review’s omission from those lists must be reconciled with Rule 118’s incorporation.	IAR 21,44,46,118	H
C020	Late ordinary support and expedited simultaneous-support failure have different textual consequences.	IAR 21,42(b),12.2(g)	O/H
C021	Rule 46 review objection runs from motion service, not order service.	IAR 46	O
C022	Signing and motion sanctions do not establish actual misconduct or an automatic fee.	IAR 11.2,32	O/H
C023	The special rules do not state a distinct universal petition/support word cap.	IAR 42,118,34	O/H
C024	General first/reply limits are not automatically fresh allowances for special papers.	IAR 34–36	H
C025	Special no-binding/no-colored-cover language preserves other applicable form conditions.	IAR 42(d),118(c)(1),34–36	O/H
C026	Electronic format and filing exceptions remain material.	IREFS 1–7,20	O/H
C027	Correction and technical-failure branches have distinct predicates and effects.	IREFS 11–14	O
C028	Party service, court service, fee handling, and filing are separate.	IREFS 10,17–18; IAR 20,47	O/H
C029	Privacy/sealing remedies do not supply general appellate recall or deadline-extension power.	IREFS 15; ICAR 32(i)	O/H
C030	Computation and added time require the correct event and scope.	IAR 22; Rule 2.2; IREFS 17(h)	O/P/H
C031	Rule 83’s district postdecision and remittitur branches are not a universal Rule 42 rehearing route.	Rule 83(n)–(r); Rule 11.2	O/H
C032	Filing, announcement, modification, and Rule 38 finality are distinct.	IAR 38(a)–(b)	O
C033	A universal fresh twenty-one-day postdenial period was not authenticated.	IAR 38; S006 guidance	O/G/H
C034	Remittitur issuance, filing below, copies, and compliance have separate actors/events.	IAR 38(c),122	O
C035	Unresolved cost/fee amount does not necessarily delay remittitur.	IAR 38(d),40(f),41(d)	O
C036	Court of Appeals disposition authority does not establish a particular remand outcome.	IAR 112	O
C037	Pre-opinion temporary remand is not general postfinal recall.	IAR 13.3	O/H
C038	Assignment revocation and pre-opinion stipulated dismissal have limited functions.	IAR 114,33	O/H
C039	No universal recall, early-stipulated-remittitur, or mandate-correction procedure was authenticated.	Read scope; IAR 48	H
C040	A rehearing/review petition is not declared a new universal enforcement-stay trigger.	IAR 13; special rules	O/H
C041	Denial of review is not characterized as approval of merits; grant is not universally equated with vacatur.	Rule 118/122 scope	H
C042	Original orders, current guide, and internal-rule restrictions remain unverified here.	S007–S008	H
C043	Published clerical-modification exceptions are not identical across Rules 38,42,118,120.	Those complete rules	O/H
C044	Federal and other special regimes remain separate.	IAR 12.2,39; exclusions	H
C045	No actual petition, record, event, fee eligibility, deadline, or outcome was determined.	Research record	Certain

Captured table 21

Quantity/relation · Reference event or base · Qualification · 18 data rows

Quantity/relation	Reference event or base	Qualification
21 days	Supreme opinion filing date	Ordinary rehearing petition
21 days	Date of modified Supreme opinion	Nonclerical modification; aggrieved-party condition
14 days	Rehearing petition filing	Ordinary supporting brief/memorandum
Simultaneous filing	Petition and support under Rule 12.2	Express summary-dismissal condition
Original only; no copies	Rehearing petition and supporting brief	Electronic scope still applies
No fixed response period	Rehearing/review opposition	Only if directed/requested; order governs
No automatic reply period	Special petitions	No ordinary merits-reply schedule imported
21 days	Applicable Rule 118 announcement event	Original opinion/order, denial of rehearing, opinion on rehearing, qualifying modification
With petition or within 14 days	Review support	Rule 12.2 exception
No prior rehearing prerequisite	Review route	Does not prohibit timely rehearing
Final determination of all rehearing petitions	Supreme review-action sequencing	No action before that condition
Five nonexclusive factors	Rule 118(b)	Neither exhaustive nor controlling
Majority of Justices	Grant of review	No actual vote or entitlement
Majority of Court of Appeals judges	Certification factor	Not automatic Supreme acceptance
21 days	Rule 120 listed announcements	Supreme initiative, not party extension
Existing briefs after grant	Rule 118(c)(2)	Additional briefing only if ordered
No Court of Appeals remittitur after grant	Rule 122	Filing petition alone is not the same event
No fixed number of successive ordinary petitions authenticated	Rule 42 modification branch	Not unlimited permission

Captured table 22

Quantity/relation · Reference event/base · Qualification · 17 data rows

Quantity/relation	Reference event/base	Qualification
$71	Ordinary rehearing petition	Listed criminal/habeas/post-conviction exceptions
No filing fee	Review of Court of Appeals decision	Other fees/costs not decided
Clerk receipt/authorized electronic filing	Petition institution	Mailing alone not substituted
Rehearing filing nonextension	Rules 44/46	Review-incorporation issue held
Seven days from motion service	Written objection to ex parte enlargement	Clerk separately serves order
Brief-extension request by due date	Rule 34(d)	Applies only where extension is authorized
Eight affidavit subject categories	Brief-extension request	No affidavit prepared
Fourteen days after service	General IAR 32 opposition	Does not override special no-response rule
Trigger day excluded	IAR 22	Last-day weekend/nonjudicial qualification
Intermediate days counted	IRCP 2.2 within its scope	Not an automatic wholesale IAR import
Three added days	Civil act due after service by mail	Not entry/announcement/filing-based petition period
After 5 p.m.; one added day	Party electronic service	Scope and actual service not determined
Court-local 12:01 a.m.–midnight	Electronic filing day	Acceptance and nonbusiness-day clauses
Three business days, legal holidays excluded	Rejection-correction resubmission	Required request and next-judicial-day qualification
Seven business days, legal holidays excluded	Technical-failure resubmission after unsuccessful-submission notice	Satisfactory proof; not universal extension
General waiver-denial correction period	IREFS 10(b)	Not assumed to resolve every appellate petition’s jurisdictional or statutory waiver issue
Unknown	Actual receipt, submission, acceptance, waiver, correction, or court closure	None supplied

Captured table 23

Quantity/relation · Legal base · Qualification · 19 data rows

Quantity/relation	Legal base	Qualification
14,000 / 7,000 words	Rule 34 first/reply party brief categories	Not automatically assigned to special petition/support
50 / 25 pages	Specified handwritten-prisoner first/reply branch	Not a general ordinary special-petition limit
Included in count	Headings, footnotes, quotations	Count exceptions retained
Excluded from count	Listed front matter, certificates, appendices/exhibits	Exclusion does not authorize content
8½ × 11 inches	General paper/page form	Electronic printable-page relation
At least one-inch margins	Rule 36	Bottom pagination
14-point or larger	General text and footnotes	Specified typewriter exception
12-point permitted	Qualifying unrepresented typewriter branch	Other applicable conditions remain
Two named proportional fonts	Times New Roman/Century Schoolbook	No font files or generated document
50 MB/file; 100 MB/envelope	IREFS 6	Separation and exception provisions
Seven days	Initial sealing-review branch	Continued protection requires stated order
Seven days from denial order	Amendment of a submission relying on withdrawn newly filed material	Not automatic extension of protected petition filing
No petition argument unless ordered	Rule 42(c)	Review incorporation and court direction
Same manner as merits argument after rehearing grant	Rule 42(e)	General no-argument/order provisions remain
30 minutes per side	General Rule 37 merits argument if applicable	Court may alter for good cause
10 minutes per side; one counsel	Permitted preliminary-motion argument	Not automatically a special petition allotment
At least 14 days before argument	Multiple-party allocation request	No actual argument scheduled
At least 7 days before argument	Court allocation	Court discretion preserved
21 days from no-argument order date	Rule 37 written objection if applicable	Not a fresh petition filing period

Captured table 24

Quantity/relation · Event · Qualification · 13 data rows

Quantity/relation	Event	Qualification
21 days after last listed event	Rule 38 original/rehearing/modified-opinion finality text	Pending/denied-petition construction preserved
No repeated clerical exception	Rule 38(b)(3), Rule 120	Not silently made identical to Rules 42/118
42 days after district appellate decision filed	Rule 83(r) no-higher-appeal remittitur branch	No actual tolling or deadline calculation
Forthwith transmission/compliance	Rule 38	No invented numeric compliance deadline
Before opinion; good cause	Temporary remand	Appeal remains pending
At any time in assignment-revocation text	Rule 114	Not universal recall of a final remittitur
Before opinion	Rule 33 stipulated dismissal	Not a post-opinion early-remittitur rule
Unresolved taxation does not delay	Rule 38(d)	Fee merits remain separate
July 1, 1977	IAR historical application baseline	Not each clause’s current amendment date
January 1, 2016	Latest displayed Rule 118 amendment effectiveness	Original 2015 order failed
January 24, 2019	Latest displayed Rule 42 amendment/effectiveness	Original 2019 order failed
July 1, 2026	Material general format and special-expedited amendments	Original 2026 orders unopened
Unknown	Actual finality, pending petition status, mandate scope, recall ground, lower jurisdiction, outcome	None supplied or inferred

Captured table 25

Branch · Missing predicate · Supported consequence · 24 data rows

Branch	Missing predicate	Supported consequence	Adverse inference to avoid	Exact next generic inquiry
B01 — rehearing route	Correct court and eligible decision category	Applicable rehearing procedure	Every order has a universal Rule 42 remedy	Rule-specific order eligibility/construction
B02 — petition time	Correct filing/announcement/modification event	Stated period may apply	Support-brief period extends petition time	Rule 42/118 application
B03 — clerical change	Nature of modification	Express exception may control	Every altered opinion creates identical clocks	Rule 38/42/118/120 reconciliation
B04 — support brief	Ordinary or Rule 12.2 posture	Separate or simultaneous support	Ordinary late support always equals expedited summary dismissal	Exact route and consequence
B05 — response	Court direction/request	Authorized response	Silence is admission or an automatic response deadline exists	Specific order/special rule
B06 — review eligibility	Aggrieved party, final-decision relationship, criteria	Discretionary consideration	Right to Supreme review	Rule 118 construction
B07 — simultaneous requests	Timely rehearing and pending review	Express sequencing	Review petition bars rehearing or is immediately decided	Rule 118(a)
B08 — review grant	Actual grant/order	Existing briefs and assignment consequences	Automatic new briefs, new evidence, or universal vacatur	Order and Rule 118/122
B09 — own initiative	Listed event and court action	Review order may issue	Party can compel own-motion review	Rule 120
B10 — late review petition	Meaning of incorporated times/manner	Exact hold	Omission from Rule 21/46 means unrestricted extension	Judicial construction
B11 — fee	Applicable category and lawful waiver	Defined fee treatment	No fee means automatic review, or waiver request is granted	Unread statutes and petition mechanics
B12 — length	Special-paper classification/order	General form framework	Fresh 14,000 words automatically available	Rule 34/42/118 construction
B13 — electronic defect	Required correction/proof/timing	Conditional filing-date relief	Technical allegation always excuses late filing	IREFS 13/14 interaction
B14 — privacy	Protected status and required order	Limited access/filing treatment	Sealed appendix authorizes disclosure or tolling	ICAR 32 and substantive privacy
B15 — district reconsideration	Governing district-appellate authority	Rule 83 motion/fallback structure	Universal twenty-one-day Supreme rehearing rule	District-appellate construction
B16 — finality	Applicable pending/disposed petition and opinion event	Rule 38/guidance relationship	Universal fresh twenty-one days after denial	Complete finality construction
B17 — remittitur	Finality and actual directive	Issue/file/comply duties	Every remand orders a new trial or a fixed result	Mandate scope law
B18 — recall	Separate lawful source and conditions	Held dependency	General practice or assignment power is unlimited recall authority	Original rule/statute/constitutional construction
B19 — temporary remand	Pre-opinion good cause and limited order	Limited lower-court action	Appeal terminates or all merits reopen	IAR 13.3
B20 — withdrawal/stipulation	Stage and applicable authority	Pre-opinion dismissal branch	Party stipulation automatically accelerates remittitur	Postdecision authority
B21 — stay	Independent stay/order/special law	Conditional protection	Every petition renews an automatic enforcement stay	Full stay/security regime
B22 — sanctions	Specific violation and lawful process	Appropriate response possible	Unsuccessful petition proves misconduct	IAR 11.2/due process
B23 — denial	Actual disposition and applicable law	No merits endorsement inferred	Denial necessarily approves reasoning	Precedential-effect construction
B24 — original history	Readable adopted originals and transition text	Gap may close	Footer or guide proves the whole chain	Ordinary official original sources

Captured table 26

Separate subject · Required later authority or question · 15 data rows

Separate subject	Required later authority or question
Review-petition jurisdiction and extensions	Rule 118’s incorporation reconciled with Rules 21, 44, and 46
Decision/order eligibility	Rule 42’s opinion wording; Rule 116/118 order language; Rule 118(b)’s final-decision requirement
Special-paper length	Whether and how Rule 34’s first/reply categories apply to rehearing/review support, opposition, or a standalone petition
Pending petitions and finality	Exact clerk/court treatment after filing, denial, dismissal, modification, successive qualifying petition, and review disposition
Clerical modification	Differences among Rules 38, 42, 118, and 120
Recall/correction	Express original authority and standards for amended, corrected, recalled, or reissued remittitur; no universal power established here
District-appellate postdecision procedure	Rule 83/IRCP 11.2/IAR interaction and any effect on further-review time
Current technical guide/internal rules	Special formatting, citation restrictions, internal procedures, and lawful public originals
Fee waiver	§§ 31-3220, 31-3220A, 67-2301, 31-3212 and petition-specific implementation
Record/new evidence	Record-boundary and augmentation rules for any proposed additional material; no new-evidence permission inferred
Substantive review	Claim-specific standards, preservation, harmlessness, merits, and precedential effect
Full enforcement	Stay/security, judgment collection, interest, liens, satisfaction, and lower-court compliance remedies
Federal review	U.S. Supreme Court jurisdiction, certiorari, deadlines, federal mandate, and federal stays—no federal timetable supplied
Other special regimes	Criminal/capital, family/juvenile, agency, statutory expedited, extraordinary writ, tribal/interstate, bankruptcy, military, and protected-party law
Original history	2015 Rule 118, 2019 Rule 42, 2026 format/expedited amendments, other intervening orders and application clauses

Captured table 27

Field · Entry · 29 data rows

Field	Entry
Governing postdecision route
Authority and edition
Official-current-text status
Decision/opinion/order category
Requesting-role predicate
Deciding court
Filing office
Trigger event
Petition period
Supporting-paper period
Response authorization
Review criteria
Rehearing/review sequencing
Additional briefing authority
Argument authority
Fee/waiver provision
Applicable length classification
Format/certificate requirement
Filing/service distinction
Correction/technical-failure provision
Computation/extension rule
Privacy condition
Finality relation
Remittitur issue/file event
Receiving-court duty
Recall/remand dependency
Special-regime boundary
Missing original authority
Review status

Captured table 28

Requested question/material subquestion · Disposition · Claims/sources · 41 data rows

Requested question/material subquestion	Disposition	Claims/sources	Exact remaining gap
1 — current ordinary routes	Complete core rules read	C002–C014; S001	No actual posture classification
Supreme rehearing	Complete Rule 42	C003–C006	Order eligibility/merits construction
Court of Appeals rehearing	Complete Rule 116	C007	Unusual order-trigger mapping
Supreme discretionary review	Complete Rule 118	C008–C012	Actual final-decision/criteria determination
Court initiative	Complete Rule 120	C013	No actual exercise of power
District postdecision	Necessary Rule 83/11.2 clauses	C031	Universal rehearing/tolling rule not inferred
Special regimes	Expressly excluded	C044	Independent authority required
2 — petition and support acts	Separate filing/service/fee/support relations	C003–C006,C015–C016	Fee-waiver statutory mechanics
Grounds and argument limits	Textual requirements identified	C006,C011	No borrowed federal merits-ground test
Opposition/reply	Court-directed/requested branch	C005,C011	No universal response/reply period
Grant/denial/change	Conditions and issue/brief-order effects read	C004,C006,C033	Postdenial finality construction
Copies/signatures/form	Necessary rules read	C025–C028	Special-paper length/guide
Extensions/nonextensions	Complete rules and ambiguity preserved	C017–C021	Review incorporation construction
3 — review posture/rehearing relation	Complete Rule 118(a)	C008–C009	No actual exhaustion/eligibility
Criteria	All five factors and majority requirement	C010	No merits or probability finding
Supporting material	Criteria brief; record boundary preserved	C011–C012	No required appendix invented
Acceptance/denial effects	Rule 118/122 limits	C012,C014,C041	No denial-as-approval or automatic-vacatur conclusion
Postgrant briefing/argument	Existing briefs; ordered additions; applicable argument rules	C012,C025	Actual order absent
4 — special format/length	Independently read	C023–C025	No distinct special cap authenticated
Citation/appendix	Necessary general rules only	S001 Rules 6,35–36	Internal citation restrictions/technical guide
E-filing/service/correction	Complete material bodies	C026–C028	No actual system event
Computation/additional time	Scoped rules and provisional statutes	C030	No calendar or universal addition
Privacy	Necessary complete branch	C029	Full privilege/access regime
5 — announcement/finality	Rule 38 complete; guidance qualified	C032–C033	Pending/denied-petition sequencing
Remittitur issuance/transmission/filing	Complete core text	C034	No actual receiving-court event
Review assignment effect	Complete Rule 122	C014	Filing alone not treated as grant
Lower compliance/remand	Necessary Rules 38,112,13.3	C034,C036–C037	Actual mandate interpretation excluded
Recall/reissue/early stipulation	Exact gap retained	C038–C039	No universal authority authenticated
Unresolved taxation	Narrow fresh rule read	C035	P30 merits not reused
Stay/security	Boundary only	C040	Full stay/security regime
6 — untimeliness/consequences	Express distinctions read	C017–C020,C022	Review jurisdiction/construction
No response/nonconformity	No automatic merits admission	C005,C011,C022	Applicable judicial remedy
Withdrawal/correction	Relevant limited clauses read	C027,C038–C039	Postopinion withdrawal/recall authority
Sanctions/notice	Signing and motion interface	C022	Full constitutional/disciplinary process
Federal/special follow-ons	Precise dependencies	Section 11	No broad federal overview
7 — sources/read bounds/history	Visible register supplied	Section 7	Original orders/current statutes
2025–2026 changes	Bounded searches and current footers separated	C042	No all-law-through-date certification
Failed/discovery status	Explicit	S007–S008	No snippet substitution
Quantities/branches/worksheet	Supplied	Sections 9–12	No inputs, dates, or forms
Prior findings/holds	Preserved	C045	No implied closure
Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent	Not accepted complete	Entire report	Recorded dependencies remain

Captured table 29

Material · Actual use · 13 data rows

Material	Actual use
Official Rules 42, 116, 118, 120, 122, 38	Complete bodies and displayed footers
Related appellate rules	Complete or expressly bounded clauses listed in S001
Rule 83 and civil computation/reconsideration	New postdecision interfaces only
Electronic and privacy rules	Complete or expressly bounded material clauses
Official generic court guidance	Selected finality/further-review paragraphs only
Statutory computation source	Official route failed; complete secondary bodies read
2015/2019 original-history searches	Actual ordinary discovered routes attempted; failures preserved
2025–2026 searches	Generic rule/amendment/version searches; no absence-of-change conclusion
Clerk-handbook route	Failed; snippet not treated as complete source
Reserved rules	Official consolidated index checked; no invented operative counterpart
Opinions, cases, dockets, calendars, rosters	Incidental results not opened, investigated, or relied on
Actual petitions, decisions, records, contracts, identities, financial or medical information	Not requested, constructed, or evaluated
Earlier local review files	Supplied scope/reuse descriptions only; no inspection claim

Captured table 30

Attempted or discovered PDF · Status · 6 data rows

Attempted or discovered PDF	Status
September 1, 2015 appellate amendment order	404
2016 highlights document	404
2019 appellate amendment order	404
2025 appellate handbook	404
2026 API-hosted orders/guide/internal rules	Not opened
2015 highlights search lead	Not opened

Find the assertion and its boundaries

Search this report’s claim records

How to read the research →

Read the related correction supplements

These components repair their stated scope. They do not replace every other finding in this research series.

S_ID-P31-C001 Saved research record