FIND THE EXPLANATION
Use the notice, agreement, and places connected to the debt to find the right court, regulator, or legal-help service.
Explore Idaho information →This address preserves a dated source document behind the guide. The complete explanation covers the questions, comparisons and next steps for this subject.
If you came here to check a specific citation, open the original archive below. It includes its source dates and recorded qualifications.
The explanation above is written for readers. These original working documents preserve the evidence trail, including technical language, dated passages and known corrections. They have not all received independent professional review. Use the marked limits before relying on a particular rule or figure.
Read the evidence with its boundaries. These are saved research components, including revisions. A scoped coordinator review checks selected evidence; it does not certify every claim, a complete jurisdiction, current law or individual applicability. Dates and access limits remain attached to the records.
These components repair their stated scope. They do not replace every other finding in this research series.
SID bounded rule-pinpoint clarification →Original response: 7c09b3d3-e99d-41a9-8485-2d6c4ea98da7 Affected location: PASS-30 Table 28, supplied rows 7–27. Fresh source-access date: October 28, 2026, America/Los_Angeles.
These are inquiry additions, not substantive revisions. The first four columns below reproduce the supplied wording. Only the inquiry and source-status columns are added.
Read-status key: Fresh means read during this completion. P30-only means the visible PASS-30 register records that earlier reading; it was not repeated here. Secondary retains P30’s 2025 reproduction/currentness limitation. Unread/held identifies authority or construction not established. No actual factual predicate is supplied or requested.
| Branch | Supplied missing predicate | Supplied supported consequence | Supplied adverse inference | NEW exact next generic inquiry | Source/read status and literal URL/pinpoint or precise dependency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B07—memo | Correct opinion event, filing and service | Claim considered under rule | Rehearing automatically suspends filing | Determine whether withdrawal, replacement, or modification of an opinion creates a new cost-memorandum trigger, and identify any authority permitting relief from the stated nonfiling waiver. Keep those questions distinct from merely filing a rehearing or review petition. The actual opinion, filing, and service events remain absent. | Fresh: IAR 40(c), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40. P30-only: IAR 38(a), (d), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38. Held: changed-opinion and waiver-relief construction; no actual event determination. Idaho Supreme Court |
| B08—objection | Proper service event and specified grounds | Court determination | Trial-rule objection waiver copied wholesale | Identify the authority governing late objections, court-initiated review of claimed costs, and objections to a later amended taxation statement. Determine whether any civil-rule waiver provision governs the particular appellate or remanded proceeding, rather than treating silence in the appellate rule as either automatic waiver or unlimited objection rights. | Fresh: IAR 40(d), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40; fee-amount incorporation in IAR 41(d), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41. P30-only: IRCP 54(d)(5), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54. Held: late-objection and post-taxation procedure. Actual service and objection contents are absent. Idaho Supreme Court+1 |
| B09—first brief | Timely claim or permitted later claim | Fee-right request | Claim alone supplies substantive entitlement | Clarify the public-law standard and permissible conditions for allowing a later fee claim, including whether amended or replacement briefing changes the first-brief requirement. Independently identify the applicable substantive fee source. Actual brief contents, a later-permission order, and the substantive predicates cannot be supplied by this generic inquiry. | Fresh: IAR 41(a)–(c), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41. P30-only: IAR 35(a)(5), (b)(5), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/35; IRCP 54(e)(1), (8), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54. Held: later-claim construction and substantive entitlement. Idaho Supreme Court |
| B10—§12-120(1) | Pleaded threshold/demand/tender predicates | Statutory fee branch | Award amount substitutes for pleaded amount | Recover the complete current official subsections and material application history. Resolve how “amount pleaded” operates with amended pleadings or multiple demands, what the written-demand predicate requires, and how the precommencement-tender proviso affects an appellate fee claim. Do not substitute an award for the pleaded measure or invent pleadings, demand, tender, or award facts. | P30-only, secondary: Idaho Code § 12-120(1)–(2), https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-120/. Historically failed official route: https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title12/T12CH1/SECT12-120/. Unread/held: current official body, necessary enacted application clauses, aggregation/amendment and appellate-consequence construction. No fresh attempt was made. |
| B11—§12-120(3) | Covered obligation and no contrary law | Possible mandatory reasonable fee | Personal-purpose definition erases every listed category | Resolve the relationship between the separately enumerated obligation/contract categories and the defined commercial-transaction category. Identify any expressly applicable contrary law, consumer-credit limitation, instrument rule, or sector-specific nonwaiver provision before selecting a fee branch. Actual obligation classification and contractual facts remain absent; no private instrument is to be inspected. | P30-only, secondary: § 12-120(3), including its definitions and contrary-law qualification, https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-120/. Unread/held: current official text and the particular consumer, instrument, or sector incorporation required by a legally specified category. No such category is established here. |
| B12—§12-121 | Prevailing status and required finding | Discretionary reasonable fee | Losing proves frivolity | Recover the current official statute and final 2017 enactment/application clauses. Resolve whether the pertinent inquiry concerns the appeal, the entire action, or identified issues; which court must make the finding; and when IRCP 54(e)(2)’s written-findings requirement governs a direct appellate award or an amount remand. Keep actual conduct and prevailing status unassessed. | P30-only, secondary: § 12-121, https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-121/. P30-only official rule: IRCP 54(e)(2), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54. Held original: final 2017 Idaho Session Laws chapter 47, relevant amendment, repeal, effectiveness, and application provisions; P30’s introduced mirror is not that final act. |
| B13—public actor | Defined adverse parties and statutory conditions | Applicable §12-117branch | Every government participant has identical standard | Authenticate the current definitions and determine which distinct statutory branch governs a generic government/private, government/government, or partially successful proceeding. Resolve the subsection (7) cross-reference without changing either statute’s threshold. Complete the budget-insufficiency incorporation only if necessary. The actual actor’s legal capacity and adverse-party relationship remain absent. | P30-only, secondary: § 12-117(1)–(7), https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-117/; § 67-5201(4), https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-67/chapter-52/section-67-5201/. Unread/held: § 67-2018 and title 6, chapter 9 for the identified budget-insufficiency branch; constitutional-function and current-official-text limits remain. |
| B14—contract | Lawful applicable fee term and authority | Possible contractual source | Boilerplate or alleged agreement proves entitlement | Identify the generic public law governing enforceability and appellate scope of a fee term, including any necessary reciprocity, assignment/successor, consumer, or sector-specific nonwaiver rule. Keep substantive contract authority separate from procedural permission to request fees. Without an actual lawful term and applicable category, generic research cannot establish contractual entitlement; no contract is requested or constructed. | P30-only official rule: IRCP 54(e)(1), (8), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54. Fresh procedural reference: IAR 41(b)–(c), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41. Unread/held: applicable substantive contract and overriding sector law. Absent fact: lawful fee term and authority to invoke it. |
| B15—amount | Competent support and applicable factors | Judicial amount determination | Claimed method or invoice proves necessity | Identify the required detail and competent support for the computation affidavit, when additional evidence or a hearing is authorized, and whether the Rule 54(e)(3) factors govern the direct appellate determination, a remand, or both. Distinguish an asserted computation method from judicial evaluation of reasonableness and necessity. No billing material or service facts are supplied. | Fresh: IAR 41(d), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41. P30-only: IRCP 54(e)(3), (5)–(6), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54. Held: direct-appellate versus remand incorporation, proof sufficiency, and amount-setting construction. Idaho Supreme Court |
| B16—allocation | Compensable claims/work and governing standard | Conditional apportionment | Universal percentage or multiplier | Identify the authority for separating compensable from noncompensable claims, parties, and appellate work, including inseparable common work, mixed success, cross-appeals, work concerning fees, and avoidance of duplicate recovery. Determine what findings support allocation under the applicable source. Do not invent a percentage, multiplier, segregation formula, or actual work history. | P30-only: IRCP 54(d)(1)(B), (d)(2), (e)(3), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54; secondary § 12-117(2), https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-117/. Fresh: IAR 41(d), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41. Held: allocation, common-work, fee-litigation, and duplicate-recovery construction. |
| B17—fee waiver | Actual lawful waiver and statute | Initial payment relief | Immunity from later adverse award | Recover current official § 31-3220 and resolve the relationship among initial payment relief, any later public-fund reimbursement or repayment obligation, and an adverse cost/fee judgment under subsection (8). Identify a separate actor-specific waiver statute only when its generic scope is established. An actual waiver order, statutory status, or ability-to-pay predicate cannot be inferred. | P30-only, secondary: § 31-3220(1)–(8), https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-31/chapter-32/section-31-3220/. P30-only official rule: IAR 23(c)–(e), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/23. Unread/held: current official statutory chain and any independently necessary special waiver provision. No financial inquiry or record request. |
| B18—signing sanction | Specific certification violation and process | Appropriate sanction | Every defective paper automatically yields fees | Identify the procedural and constitutional authority for notice, opportunity to respond, required findings, and amount determination on a party motion versus court initiative. Distinguish signer, represented party, award recipient, and expenses causally attributable to the challenged filing. Do not import another rule’s safe harbor or infer a violation from an unsuccessful paper. | P30-only official: IAR 11.2(a), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.2; IAR 32, particularly (c)–(f), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/32. Unread/held: complete sanction due-process and severity standards; ICAR 59 if the separate referral branch becomes indispensable. Actual conduct is absent. |
| B19—record sanction | Irrelevance, vexatious/unreasonable enlargement, cost effect | Defined cost denial/sanction | Every unused document sanctionable | Clarify the required distinction between material not ultimately used and material whose irrelevant inclusion vexatiously or unreasonably increased expense. Identify the necessary findings, permitted sanction targets and recipient, causal expense limits, and process for denying costs versus imposing a monetary sanction. No record contents, designation, or cost increase may be assumed. | P30-only official: IAR 19(e), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/19. Unread/held: construction of the stated conduct and cost predicates, target/recipient authority, and constitutional process beyond the express notice-and-response clause. No record audit. |
| B20—nonappearance | Applicable actor/event and lawful determination | Possible sanction | Nonappearance proves merits | Determine which consequences address party absence, counsel’s failure to appear, or failure to file a brief. For a monetary sanction, identify the required notice, opportunity, applicable excuse or fault considerations, proper target and recipient, causal work, and amount findings. Do not convert procedural nonparticipation into proof of the underlying claim. | P30-only official: IAR 37(d)–(e), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/37; related nonjurisdictional consequence boundary in IAR 21, https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/21. Unread/held: complete sanction-process and amount construction. No appearance or briefing event exists for evaluation. |
| B21—§12-123 | Appellate applicability not authenticated | Held boundary | Trial period becomes IARfee deadline | Resolve whether § 12-123 reaches conduct and fees in an appellate proceeding or instead governs the originating civil proceeding; identify the competent court and the meaning of its trial/judgment references if appellate application is legally established. Until then, retain its timing and remedy provisions as an uncompleted applicability question, not an IAR deadline or independent appellate entitlement. | P30-only, secondary: complete § 12-123(1)–(4), https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-123/. Fresh procedural comparison: IAR 41, https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41. Held: current official statute and appellate-reach construction; no case/opinion research. |
| B22—electronic correction | Rule-specific timely request and proof | Conditional relation back | Technical allegation automatically excuses | Determine which correction provision governs a rejected cost/fee memorandum or objection versus a technical failure of receipt. Identify the required request, proof, decision-maker, and relation-back effect, then reconcile that effect with the applicable cost/fee filing requirement and any express waiver. Do not equate relation back with an automatic extension or infer any system event. | P30-only official: IREFS 13 and 14, https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/13 and https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/14. Fresh interface: IAR 40(c)–(d), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40; IAR 41(d), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41. Held: event-specific interaction and actual proof. |
| B23—counting | Correct event, method and applicable rule | Scoped computation | Universal mail/after-hours addition | Determine separately the computation rules for an opinion-based memorandum, a service-based amount objection, and an objection to an extension. Establish whether mailing or late electronic service changes each particular period and whose service qualifies. Preserve Rule 46’s objection reference to motion service. Current holiday authority and any inaccessibility incorporation must be authenticated before a calendar could be determined. | P30-only official: IAR 22, https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/22; IRCP 2.2, https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2; IREFS 17(h), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/17; IAR 46, https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/46. Held: current official §§ 1-1607/73-108, scope reconciliation, and actual service/closure facts. |
| B24—remittitur | Actual award and later determination | Ministerial insertion/transmission | Unresolved amount always blocks finality | Identify the procedure for a later or amended taxation statement after remittitur: judicial versus clerical responsibility, service or notice, any objection or reconsideration opportunity, and transmission to the receiving court. Distinguish correcting an amount statement from changing fee entitlement or reopening appellate merits. Do not invent an additional response period or actual award. | Fresh: IAR 40(f), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40; IAR 41(d), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41. P30-only: IAR 38(d), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38; secondary § 12-114, https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-114/. Held: complete post-taxation correction/review procedure. Idaho Supreme Court+1 |
| B25—advance | Proper authority/order and later review | Provisional amount possible | Advance settles ultimate fee entitlement | Identify the substantive source and procedural predicates for a lower-court advance of appellate fees or costs, including notice, support, and the order’s provisional scope. Resolve how a later appellate entitlement/amount determination affects credit, adjustment, repayment, or other treatment of an advance, without assuming that any such remedy automatically exists. Distinguish trial-level fees from appellate advances. | P30-only official: IAR 13(b)(9), (b)(12), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13. Fresh comparison: IAR 41(b)–(d), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41. Unread/held: substantive advance authority and adjustment/repayment construction. No advance, order, or payment is supplied. |
| B26—history | Final statutes/original orders | Exact gap may close | Mirror/footer proves all application dates | Recover the current official fee statutes and material final enactments, especially the final 2017 chapter 47 amendment/repeal/effective provisions. Recover the relevant original rule amendments and reconcile Rule 40’s disk reference with the Rule 26.1 repeal without reviving historical charges. Preserve the separately read 2022 order only for its actual amendment and effective scope; determine any savings or transition rule from adopted text, not metadata. | Fresh: IAR 40(b)(2), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40. P30-only: repealed Rule 26.1 page, https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/26.1; P30-S005 introduced H0097; P30-S006 adopted 2022 order, detailed below. Historically failed final-act route: https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/sessioninfo/2017/legislation/H0097.pdf. Held: final statutes, original history, and application chain. No new attempt here. |
| B27—constitutional/special | Independent legal coverage | Held dependency | State generic rule resolves federal or sector law | For any identified statutory category, determine whether a specific constitutional notice/hearing requirement, public-actor immunity/payment rule, consumer or sector nonwaiver provision, or federal fee-shifting/stay/discharge rule qualifies the ordinary Idaho source. Read that authority’s scope, exceptions, and application clauses before a positive conclusion. Where the necessary category is absent, keep the authority-selection question open rather than assume universal coverage. | P30-only boundaries: IRCP 54(e)(8), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54; secondary §§ 12-120(3) and 12-117(1), (6), https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-120/ and https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-117/. Unread dependencies: applicable constitutional sanction process; public-actor and sector overrides; any actually indispensable federal fee, stay, or discharge authority. None is selected as applicable to an actual matter. |
The two fresh-use IDs below identify new readings of authorities already within P30’s source collection, not new independent authorities. All other URLs in the completed rows retain their P30 provenance.
| Source/usage ID | Identity and complete literal URL | Read status and exact bounds | History/currentness limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| S_ID-P30-L01-S001 | Idaho Supreme Court, IAR 40—Taxation of costs. https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40 | Fresh: complete (a)–(f) and displayed footer read October 28, 2026. Returned operative lines 7–30; footer line 33. Used only to anchor the inquiry completion. | Current-published official HTML. Displayed latest amendment: April 28, 2022, effective that day. No original order opened in this supplement. Idaho Supreme Court |
| S_ID-P30-L01-S002 | Idaho Supreme Court, IAR 41—Attorney fees on appeal. https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41 | Fresh: complete (a)–(e) and displayed footer read October 28, 2026. Returned operative lines 7–18; footer line 22. | Current-published official HTML. Displayed latest amendment: January 24, 2019, effective that day. No original order opened here. Idaho Supreme Court |
| S_ID-P30-S001 — retained | Earlier P30 IAR collection readings, including Rules 11.2, 13, 19, 21–23, 32, 35, 37–38, 46, and historical 26.1 | P30-only, except Rules 40–41 separately marked fresh above. Exact URLs and relied-on pinpoints appear in the completed rows. | No supplement-wide revalidation or original-order audit. |
| S_ID-P30-S002 — retained | Earlier P30 civil-rule readings, including Rules 2.2 and 54 | P30-only. Exact URLs/subsections appear in the rows. | No new determination that every civil-rule clause governs every appellate route. |
| S_ID-P30-S003 — retained | Earlier P30 electronic-filing readings, including Rules 13, 14, and 17 | P30-only. Exact URLs/subsections appear in the rows. | Actual applicability, service, failure, proof, and technical events remain absent. |
| S_ID-P30-S004 — retained | Earlier P30 2025 secondary statutory reproductions | P30-only, secondary. Exact URLs and relevant provisions appear in the rows. | Current official bodies, necessary incorporations, enacted histories, and actual classification remain held. |
| S_ID-P30-S005 — retained | H0097 introduced mirror: https://legiscan.com/ID/text/H0097/id/1493576/Idaho-2017-H0097-Introduced.pdf | P30 records reading the one-page instrument, including §§ 2–4, page 1/PDF index 0. Not reopened. | Introduced mirror/reporting is not the final official 2017 act. |
| S_ID-P30-S006 — retained | Idaho Supreme Court April 28, 2022 adopted order, hosted by Idaho State Bar: https://isb.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/Amendments-to-Idaho-Appellate-Rules-11.1-12.1-40-46-eff-April-28-2022.pdf | P30 records page-image inspection, particularly Rule 40/46 changes and effectiveness on unnumbered page 2/index 1, and date/attestation on page 3/index 2. Not reopened. | Its earlier verified scope is preserved; it is not a complete history of every fee provision. |
These IDs record the limited completion, not replacement merits claims.
| Claim ID | Completion finding | Branch mapping |
|---|---|---|
| S_ID-P30-L01-C001 | All twenty-one supplied missing inquiry cells now have a specific generic authority or construction question. The supplied first four columns are unchanged. | B07–B27 |
| S_ID-P30-L01-C002 | Only IAR 40 and 41 were freshly read. The supplement distinguishes those reads from P30-only official sources, secondary statutes, unread incorporations, and absent factual predicates. | All rows; fresh anchors in B07–B09, B14–B16, B21–B22, B24–B26 |
| S_ID-P30-L01-C003 | The additions do not resolve statutory currentness, final enactment history, contract/sector classification, allocation, sanction process, post-taxation procedure, or actual application. | B10–B27, as specified |
| S_ID-P30-L01-C004 | The resolved Rule 46 reference event remains service of the motion. No new timing calculation or universal service addition is supplied. | B23 |
| S_ID-P30-L01-C005 | No original substantive claim, original source identity, raw provenance, or earlier correction is replaced by this completion. | Entire supplement |
| Supplied raw rows | Branches | Completion scope | Remaining status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7–9 | B07–B09 | Opinion-event, objection, and first-brief inquiries completed | No actual timing, objection waiver, or fee entitlement |
| 10–17 | B10–B17 | Statutory source, contract, amount, allocation, and waiver inquiries completed | Official statutory, original-act, category, contract, and amount-construction holds retained |
| 18–21 | B18–B21 | Signing, record, nonappearance, and § 12-123 inquiries completed | No conduct finding, appellate § 12-123 application, sanction, or fee result |
| 22–25 | B22–B25 | Electronic correction, counting, post-remittitur handling, and advance inquiries completed | No actual technical event, calendar, award, advance, or repayment conclusion |
| 26–27 | B26–B27 | Original-history and independent constitutional/special-regime inquiries completed | No final-act, disk-reference, federal, sector, or actual-coverage closure |
B01–B06 are not repeated or modified. This supplement supplies only the requested missing-cell completion and its traceability.
| Action or material | Actual status in this completion |
|---|---|
| Official IAR 40 | Opened once; complete operative body and footer read |
| Official IAR 41 | Opened once; complete operative body and footer read |
| Searches | None needed for the two exact official URLs |
| Fresh failures or fallback routes | None |
| Other official rules and statutory reproductions | Referenced only through the visible P30 source/read record; not freshly opened |
| Previously failed official statute/final-act routes | Historical failures only; not reattempted or relabeled fresh |
| Original orders and legislative PDFs | Not reopened |
| PDF extraction or page-image inspection | None in this completion |
| Cases, opinions, dockets, actual records, contracts, invoices, or identifying material | Not searched or inspected |
| Original local files or saved coordinator packets | Not inspected; supplied row locations and visible P30 content only |
The following holds remain expressly unchanged: current official statutory text; the final 2017 act; other original amendments; the repealed-disk cross-reference; district-appellate procedure; contract and sector law; allocation; sanction due process; post-taxation correction/review; privacy; federal and special regimes; judicial construction; and all actual factual predicates. The source questions above do not retroactively authenticate any earlier source or change its access date.
Researcher self-check—not independent review: The supplied fields were preserved, all twenty-one missing inquiry cells were completed, and fresh versus prior-only source use was separated. No new fee entitlement, amount, misconduct, deadline, liability, recovery, or outcome finding was made. Earlier findings, corrections, provenance, and holds remain intact.
END S_ID PASS-30 LIMITED-01.
Captured cells with original header handling and explicitly labeled bounded correction overlays. Downloaded JSON retains original cells. Tables may contain source limitations, historical examples and identified corrections; the complete reading supplies context.
Read the evidence with its boundaries. These are saved research components, including revisions. A scoped coordinator review checks selected evidence; it does not certify every claim, a complete jurisdiction, current law or individual applicability. Dates and access limits remain attached to the records.
These components repair their stated scope. They do not replace every other finding in this research series.
SID bounded rule-pinpoint clarification →Branch · Supplied missing predicate · Supplied supported consequence · 21 data rows
| Branch | Supplied missing predicate | Supplied supported consequence | Supplied adverse inference | NEW exact next generic inquiry | Source/read status and literal URL/pinpoint or precise dependency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B07—memo | Correct opinion event, filing and service | Claim considered under rule | Rehearing automatically suspends filing | Determine whether withdrawal, replacement, or modification of an opinion creates a new cost-memorandum trigger, and identify any authority permitting relief from the stated nonfiling waiver. Keep those questions distinct from merely filing a rehearing or review petition. The actual opinion, filing, and service events remain absent. | Fresh: IAR 40(c), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40. P30-only: IAR 38(a), (d), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38. Held: changed-opinion and waiver-relief construction; no actual event determination. Idaho Supreme Court |
| B08—objection | Proper service event and specified grounds | Court determination | Trial-rule objection waiver copied wholesale | Identify the authority governing late objections, court-initiated review of claimed costs, and objections to a later amended taxation statement. Determine whether any civil-rule waiver provision governs the particular appellate or remanded proceeding, rather than treating silence in the appellate rule as either automatic waiver or unlimited objection rights. | Fresh: IAR 40(d), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40; fee-amount incorporation in IAR 41(d), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41. P30-only: IRCP 54(d)(5), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54. Held: late-objection and post-taxation procedure. Actual service and objection contents are absent. Idaho Supreme Court +1 |
| B09—first brief | Timely claim or permitted later claim | Fee-right request | Claim alone supplies substantive entitlement | Clarify the public-law standard and permissible conditions for allowing a later fee claim, including whether amended or replacement briefing changes the first-brief requirement. Independently identify the applicable substantive fee source. Actual brief contents, a later-permission order, and the substantive predicates cannot be supplied by this generic inquiry. | Fresh: IAR 41(a)–(c), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41. P30-only: IAR 35(a)(5), (b)(5), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/35; IRCP 54(e)(1), (8), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54. Held: later-claim construction and substantive entitlement. Idaho Supreme Court |
| B10—§12-120(1) | Pleaded threshold/demand/tender predicates | Statutory fee branch | Award amount substitutes for pleaded amount | Recover the complete current official subsections and material application history. Resolve how “amount pleaded” operates with amended pleadings or multiple demands, what the written-demand predicate requires, and how the precommencement-tender proviso affects an appellate fee claim. Do not substitute an award for the pleaded measure or invent pleadings, demand, tender, or award facts. | P30-only, secondary: Idaho Code § 12-120(1)–(2), https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-120/. Historically failed official route: https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title12/T12CH1/SECT12-120/. Unread/held: current official body, necessary enacted application clauses, aggregation/amendment and appellate-consequence construction. No fresh attempt was made. |
| B11—§12-120(3) | Covered obligation and no contrary law | Possible mandatory reasonable fee | Personal-purpose definition erases every listed category | Resolve the relationship between the separately enumerated obligation/contract categories and the defined commercial-transaction category. Identify any expressly applicable contrary law, consumer-credit limitation, instrument rule, or sector-specific nonwaiver provision before selecting a fee branch. Actual obligation classification and contractual facts remain absent; no private instrument is to be inspected. | P30-only, secondary: § 12-120(3), including its definitions and contrary-law qualification, https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-120/. Unread/held: current official text and the particular consumer, instrument, or sector incorporation required by a legally specified category. No such category is established here. |
| B12—§12-121 | Prevailing status and required finding | Discretionary reasonable fee | Losing proves frivolity | Recover the current official statute and final 2017 enactment/application clauses. Resolve whether the pertinent inquiry concerns the appeal, the entire action, or identified issues; which court must make the finding; and when IRCP 54(e)(2)’s written-findings requirement governs a direct appellate award or an amount remand. Keep actual conduct and prevailing status unassessed. | P30-only, secondary: § 12-121, https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-121/. P30-only official rule: IRCP 54(e)(2), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54. Held original: final 2017 Idaho Session Laws chapter 47, relevant amendment, repeal, effectiveness, and application provisions; P30’s introduced mirror is not that final act. |
| B13—public actor | Defined adverse parties and statutory conditions | Applicable §12-117branch | Every government participant has identical standard | Authenticate the current definitions and determine which distinct statutory branch governs a generic government/private, government/government, or partially successful proceeding. Resolve the subsection (7) cross-reference without changing either statute’s threshold. Complete the budget-insufficiency incorporation only if necessary. The actual actor’s legal capacity and adverse-party relationship remain absent. | P30-only, secondary: § 12-117(1)–(7), https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-117/; § 67-5201(4), https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-67/chapter-52/section-67-5201/. Unread/held: § 67-2018 and title 6, chapter 9 for the identified budget-insufficiency branch; constitutional-function and current-official-text limits remain. |
| B14—contract | Lawful applicable fee term and authority | Possible contractual source | Boilerplate or alleged agreement proves entitlement | Identify the generic public law governing enforceability and appellate scope of a fee term, including any necessary reciprocity, assignment/successor, consumer, or sector-specific nonwaiver rule. Keep substantive contract authority separate from procedural permission to request fees. Without an actual lawful term and applicable category, generic research cannot establish contractual entitlement; no contract is requested or constructed. | P30-only official rule: IRCP 54(e)(1), (8), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54. Fresh procedural reference: IAR 41(b)–(c), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41. Unread/held: applicable substantive contract and overriding sector law. Absent fact: lawful fee term and authority to invoke it. |
| B15—amount | Competent support and applicable factors | Judicial amount determination | Claimed method or invoice proves necessity | Identify the required detail and competent support for the computation affidavit, when additional evidence or a hearing is authorized, and whether the Rule 54(e)(3) factors govern the direct appellate determination, a remand, or both. Distinguish an asserted computation method from judicial evaluation of reasonableness and necessity. No billing material or service facts are supplied. | Fresh: IAR 41(d), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41. P30-only: IRCP 54(e)(3), (5)–(6), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54. Held: direct-appellate versus remand incorporation, proof sufficiency, and amount-setting construction. Idaho Supreme Court |
| B16—allocation | Compensable claims/work and governing standard | Conditional apportionment | Universal percentage or multiplier | Identify the authority for separating compensable from noncompensable claims, parties, and appellate work, including inseparable common work, mixed success, cross-appeals, work concerning fees, and avoidance of duplicate recovery. Determine what findings support allocation under the applicable source. Do not invent a percentage, multiplier, segregation formula, or actual work history. | P30-only: IRCP 54(d)(1)(B), (d)(2), (e)(3), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54; secondary § 12-117(2), https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-117/. Fresh: IAR 41(d), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41. Held: allocation, common-work, fee-litigation, and duplicate-recovery construction. |
| B17—fee waiver | Actual lawful waiver and statute | Initial payment relief | Immunity from later adverse award | Recover current official § 31-3220 and resolve the relationship among initial payment relief, any later public-fund reimbursement or repayment obligation, and an adverse cost/fee judgment under subsection (8). Identify a separate actor-specific waiver statute only when its generic scope is established. An actual waiver order, statutory status, or ability-to-pay predicate cannot be inferred. | P30-only, secondary: § 31-3220(1)–(8), https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-31/chapter-32/section-31-3220/. P30-only official rule: IAR 23(c)–(e), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/23. Unread/held: current official statutory chain and any independently necessary special waiver provision. No financial inquiry or record request. |
| B18—signing sanction | Specific certification violation and process | Appropriate sanction | Every defective paper automatically yields fees | Identify the procedural and constitutional authority for notice, opportunity to respond, required findings, and amount determination on a party motion versus court initiative. Distinguish signer, represented party, award recipient, and expenses causally attributable to the challenged filing. Do not import another rule’s safe harbor or infer a violation from an unsuccessful paper. | P30-only official: IAR 11.2(a), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.2; IAR 32, particularly (c)–(f), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/32. Unread/held: complete sanction due-process and severity standards; ICAR 59 if the separate referral branch becomes indispensable. Actual conduct is absent. |
| B19—record sanction | Irrelevance, vexatious/unreasonable enlargement, cost effect | Defined cost denial/sanction | Every unused document sanctionable | Clarify the required distinction between material not ultimately used and material whose irrelevant inclusion vexatiously or unreasonably increased expense. Identify the necessary findings, permitted sanction targets and recipient, causal expense limits, and process for denying costs versus imposing a monetary sanction. No record contents, designation, or cost increase may be assumed. | P30-only official: IAR 19(e), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/19. Unread/held: construction of the stated conduct and cost predicates, target/recipient authority, and constitutional process beyond the express notice-and-response clause. No record audit. |
| B20—nonappearance | Applicable actor/event and lawful determination | Possible sanction | Nonappearance proves merits | Determine which consequences address party absence, counsel’s failure to appear, or failure to file a brief. For a monetary sanction, identify the required notice, opportunity, applicable excuse or fault considerations, proper target and recipient, causal work, and amount findings. Do not convert procedural nonparticipation into proof of the underlying claim. | P30-only official: IAR 37(d)–(e), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/37; related nonjurisdictional consequence boundary in IAR 21, https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/21. Unread/held: complete sanction-process and amount construction. No appearance or briefing event exists for evaluation. |
| B21—§12-123 | Appellate applicability not authenticated | Held boundary | Trial period becomes IARfee deadline | Resolve whether § 12-123 reaches conduct and fees in an appellate proceeding or instead governs the originating civil proceeding; identify the competent court and the meaning of its trial/judgment references if appellate application is legally established. Until then, retain its timing and remedy provisions as an uncompleted applicability question, not an IAR deadline or independent appellate entitlement. | P30-only, secondary: complete § 12-123(1)–(4), https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-123/. Fresh procedural comparison: IAR 41, https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41. Held: current official statute and appellate-reach construction; no case/opinion research. |
| B22—electronic correction | Rule-specific timely request and proof | Conditional relation back | Technical allegation automatically excuses | Determine which correction provision governs a rejected cost/fee memorandum or objection versus a technical failure of receipt. Identify the required request, proof, decision-maker, and relation-back effect, then reconcile that effect with the applicable cost/fee filing requirement and any express waiver. Do not equate relation back with an automatic extension or infer any system event. | P30-only official: IREFS 13 and 14, https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/13 and https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/14. Fresh interface: IAR 40(c)–(d), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40; IAR 41(d), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41. Held: event-specific interaction and actual proof. |
| B23—counting | Correct event, method and applicable rule | Scoped computation | Universal mail/after-hours addition | Determine separately the computation rules for an opinion-based memorandum, a service-based amount objection, and an objection to an extension. Establish whether mailing or late electronic service changes each particular period and whose service qualifies. Preserve Rule 46’s objection reference to motion service. Current holiday authority and any inaccessibility incorporation must be authenticated before a calendar could be determined. | P30-only official: IAR 22, https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/22; IRCP 2.2, https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2; IREFS 17(h), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/17; IAR 46, https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/46. Held: current official §§ 1-1607/73-108, scope reconciliation, and actual service/closure facts. |
| B24—remittitur | Actual award and later determination | Ministerial insertion/transmission | Unresolved amount always blocks finality | Identify the procedure for a later or amended taxation statement after remittitur: judicial versus clerical responsibility, service or notice, any objection or reconsideration opportunity, and transmission to the receiving court. Distinguish correcting an amount statement from changing fee entitlement or reopening appellate merits. Do not invent an additional response period or actual award. | Fresh: IAR 40(f), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40; IAR 41(d), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41. P30-only: IAR 38(d), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38; secondary § 12-114, https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-114/. Held: complete post-taxation correction/review procedure. Idaho Supreme Court +1 |
| B25—advance | Proper authority/order and later review | Provisional amount possible | Advance settles ultimate fee entitlement | Identify the substantive source and procedural predicates for a lower-court advance of appellate fees or costs, including notice, support, and the order’s provisional scope. Resolve how a later appellate entitlement/amount determination affects credit, adjustment, repayment, or other treatment of an advance, without assuming that any such remedy automatically exists. Distinguish trial-level fees from appellate advances. | P30-only official: IAR 13(b)(9), (b)(12), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13. Fresh comparison: IAR 41(b)–(d), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41. Unread/held: substantive advance authority and adjustment/repayment construction. No advance, order, or payment is supplied. |
| B26—history | Final statutes/original orders | Exact gap may close | Mirror/footer proves all application dates | Recover the current official fee statutes and material final enactments, especially the final 2017 chapter 47 amendment/repeal/effective provisions. Recover the relevant original rule amendments and reconcile Rule 40’s disk reference with the Rule 26.1 repeal without reviving historical charges. Preserve the separately read 2022 order only for its actual amendment and effective scope; determine any savings or transition rule from adopted text, not metadata. | Fresh: IAR 40(b)(2), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40. P30-only: repealed Rule 26.1 page, https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/26.1; P30-S005 introduced H0097; P30-S006 adopted 2022 order, detailed below. Historically failed final-act route: https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/sessioninfo/2017/legislation/H0097.pdf. Held: final statutes, original history, and application chain. No new attempt here. |
| B27—constitutional/special | Independent legal coverage | Held dependency | State generic rule resolves federal or sector law | For any identified statutory category, determine whether a specific constitutional notice/hearing requirement, public-actor immunity/payment rule, consumer or sector nonwaiver provision, or federal fee-shifting/stay/discharge rule qualifies the ordinary Idaho source. Read that authority’s scope, exceptions, and application clauses before a positive conclusion. Where the necessary category is absent, keep the authority-selection question open rather than assume universal coverage. | P30-only boundaries: IRCP 54(e)(8), https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54; secondary §§ 12-120(3) and 12-117(1), (6), https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-120/ and https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-117/. Unread dependencies: applicable constitutional sanction process; public-actor and sector overrides; any actually indispensable federal fee, stay, or discharge authority. None is selected as applicable to an actual matter. |
Source/usage ID · Identity and complete literal URL · Read status and exact bounds · 8 data rows
| Source/usage ID | Identity and complete literal URL | Read status and exact bounds | History/currentness limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| S_ID-P30-L01-S001 | Idaho Supreme Court, IAR 40—Taxation of costs. https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40 | Fresh: complete (a)–(f) and displayed footer read October 28, 2026. Returned operative lines 7–30; footer line 33. Used only to anchor the inquiry completion. | Current-published official HTML. Displayed latest amendment: April 28, 2022, effective that day. No original order opened in this supplement. Idaho Supreme Court |
| S_ID-P30-L01-S002 | Idaho Supreme Court, IAR 41—Attorney fees on appeal. https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41 | Fresh: complete (a)–(e) and displayed footer read October 28, 2026. Returned operative lines 7–18; footer line 22. | Current-published official HTML. Displayed latest amendment: January 24, 2019, effective that day. No original order opened here. Idaho Supreme Court |
| S_ID-P30-S001 — retained | Earlier P30 IAR collection readings, including Rules 11.2, 13, 19, 21–23, 32, 35, 37–38, 46, and historical 26.1 | P30-only, except Rules 40–41 separately marked fresh above. Exact URLs and relied-on pinpoints appear in the completed rows. | No supplement-wide revalidation or original-order audit. |
| S_ID-P30-S002 — retained | Earlier P30 civil-rule readings, including Rules 2.2 and 54 | P30-only. Exact URLs/subsections appear in the rows. | No new determination that every civil-rule clause governs every appellate route. |
| S_ID-P30-S003 — retained | Earlier P30 electronic-filing readings, including Rules 13, 14, and 17 | P30-only. Exact URLs/subsections appear in the rows. | Actual applicability, service, failure, proof, and technical events remain absent. |
| S_ID-P30-S004 — retained | Earlier P30 2025 secondary statutory reproductions | P30-only, secondary. Exact URLs and relevant provisions appear in the rows. | Current official bodies, necessary incorporations, enacted histories, and actual classification remain held. |
| S_ID-P30-S005 — retained | H0097 introduced mirror: https://legiscan.com/ID/text/H0097/id/1493576/Idaho-2017-H0097-Introduced.pdf | P30 records reading the one-page instrument, including §§ 2–4, page 1/PDF index 0. Not reopened. | Introduced mirror/reporting is not the final official 2017 act. |
| S_ID-P30-S006 — retained | Idaho Supreme Court April 28, 2022 adopted order, hosted by Idaho State Bar: https://isb.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/Amendments-to-Idaho-Appellate-Rules-11.1-12.1-40-46-eff-April-28-2022.pdf | P30 records page-image inspection, particularly Rule 40/46 changes and effectiveness on unnumbered page 2/index 1, and date/attestation on page 3/index 2. Not reopened. | Its earlier verified scope is preserved; it is not a complete history of every fee provision. |
Claim ID · Completion finding · Branch mapping · 5 data rows
| Claim ID | Completion finding | Branch mapping |
|---|---|---|
| S_ID-P30-L01-C001 | All twenty-one supplied missing inquiry cells now have a specific generic authority or construction question. The supplied first four columns are unchanged. | B07–B27 |
| S_ID-P30-L01-C002 | Only IAR 40 and 41 were freshly read. The supplement distinguishes those reads from P30-only official sources, secondary statutes, unread incorporations, and absent factual predicates. | All rows; fresh anchors in B07–B09, B14–B16, B21–B22, B24–B26 |
| S_ID-P30-L01-C003 | The additions do not resolve statutory currentness, final enactment history, contract/sector classification, allocation, sanction process, post-taxation procedure, or actual application. | B10–B27, as specified |
| S_ID-P30-L01-C004 | The resolved Rule 46 reference event remains service of the motion. No new timing calculation or universal service addition is supplied. | B23 |
| S_ID-P30-L01-C005 | No original substantive claim, original source identity, raw provenance, or earlier correction is replaced by this completion. | Entire supplement |
Supplied raw rows · Branches · Completion scope · 5 data rows
| Supplied raw rows | Branches | Completion scope | Remaining status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7–9 | B07–B09 | Opinion-event, objection, and first-brief inquiries completed | No actual timing, objection waiver, or fee entitlement |
| 10–17 | B10–B17 | Statutory source, contract, amount, allocation, and waiver inquiries completed | Official statutory, original-act, category, contract, and amount-construction holds retained |
| 18–21 | B18–B21 | Signing, record, nonappearance, and § 12-123 inquiries completed | No conduct finding, appellate § 12-123 application, sanction, or fee result |
| 22–25 | B22–B25 | Electronic correction, counting, post-remittitur handling, and advance inquiries completed | No actual technical event, calendar, award, advance, or repayment conclusion |
| 26–27 | B26–B27 | Original-history and independent constitutional/special-regime inquiries completed | No final-act, disk-reference, federal, sector, or actual-coverage closure |
Action or material · Actual status in this completion · 10 data rows
| Action or material | Actual status in this completion |
|---|---|
| Official IAR 40 | Opened once; complete operative body and footer read |
| Official IAR 41 | Opened once; complete operative body and footer read |
| Searches | None needed for the two exact official URLs |
| Fresh failures or fallback routes | None |
| Other official rules and statutory reproductions | Referenced only through the visible P30 source/read record; not freshly opened |
| Previously failed official statute/final-act routes | Historical failures only; not reattempted or relabeled fresh |
| Original orders and legislative PDFs | Not reopened |
| PDF extraction or page-image inspection | None in this completion |
| Cases, opinions, dockets, actual records, contracts, invoices, or identifying material | Not searched or inspected |
| Original local files or saved coordinator packets | Not inspected; supplied row locations and visible P30 content only |
Read the evidence with its boundaries. These are saved research components, including revisions. A scoped coordinator review checks selected evidence; it does not certify every claim, a complete jurisdiction, current law or individual applicability. Dates and access limits remain attached to the records.
These components repair their stated scope. They do not replace every other finding in this research series.
SID bounded rule-pinpoint clarification →Recorded check status: scoped completion identity and gap preservation checked not new merits acceptance
Recorded check status: scoped completion identity and gap preservation checked not new merits acceptance
Recorded check status: scoped completion identity and gap preservation checked not new merits acceptance
Recorded check status: scoped completion identity and gap preservation checked not new merits acceptance
Recorded check status: scoped completion identity and gap preservation checked not new merits acceptance
Keep the source version, actual read extent and jurisdiction with the proposition. A link or researcher access claim is not a substitute for an operative primary passage.
Recorded check status: researcher fresh read claim not independently verified
Recorded check status: researcher fresh read claim not independently verified
Recorded check status: retained prior review bounds not freshly reopened
Recorded check status: retained prior review bounds not freshly reopened
Recorded check status: retained prior review bounds not freshly reopened
Recorded check status: retained prior review bounds not freshly reopened
Recorded check status: retained prior review bounds not freshly reopened
Recorded check status: retained prior review bounds not freshly reopened
The saved component-level coverage record keeps answered, partial, blank and unresolved branches distinct. A coverage label is not acceptance of a whole subject or jurisdiction.
Recorded check status: bounded missing cell completion checked other substantive holds unchanged
Recorded check status: bounded missing cell completion checked other substantive holds unchanged
Recorded check status: bounded missing cell completion checked other substantive holds unchanged
Recorded check status: bounded missing cell completion checked other substantive holds unchanged
Recorded check status: bounded missing cell completion checked other substantive holds unchanged
Read the evidence with its boundaries. These are saved research components, including revisions. A scoped coordinator review checks selected evidence; it does not certify every claim, a complete jurisdiction, current law or individual applicability. Dates and access limits remain attached to the records.
No currently queued material correction is mapped to this component. This does not remove its currentness, access, jurisdiction or application limits.
scoped bounded21cellcompletion resolved all substantive holds preserved
Inside: 1. Corrected sentence · 2. Source and read-status register · Document identity
Inside: Displayed history—not an original-order audit · Original claim retained · 3.1 Without-cause branches
Inside: 1. Replacement history rows · 2. Replacement quantity row · 3. Source and usage register
Inside: Replacement quantity row · Source and traceability patch · Read log and preserved gaps
Inside: Controlling result · 1. How Idaho defines and classifies the relevant conduct · 1.1 The statutory classification is functional
Inside: 1. Stable reference aliases · 1.1 Immutable P1 source identities · 1.2 Exact inline-reference replacements
Inside: Bottom-line disposition · A1. C004 — credit-repair definition and exclusions · Substantive disposition
Inside: Current-source limitation · 1. Which models Idaho’s account and funds provisions reach · 1.1 Section 26-2233 uses an actual-custody trigger
Inside: Principal findings · 3.1 Necessary actor and relationship boundaries · 3.2 Collection agency–creditor-client contracts
Inside: 1. Principal findings · Status key · 2.1 General contracts and accounts
Inside: Evidence status · 1.1 Earnings, disposable earnings, and the proceeding being regulated · Earnings versus other property
Inside: Principal findings · 1.1 Different proceedings and legal objects · 1.2 Prejudgment attachment is not ordinary postjudgment collection
Inside: Principal findings · 1.1 Different legal questions must remain separate · 1.2 Roles and consumer categories
Inside: Principal findings · 1.1 Trust deed, mortgage, title, and obligation · 1.2 Property and acreage predicates
Inside: Principal findings · 1.1 Actor and authority comparison · 1.2 Idaho extraordinary collection action is a defined category
Inside: Principal findings · 1.1 Product and actor matrix · 1.2 Territorial and exemption qualifications
Inside: 1.1 Replacement for P9 § 4.5 · 1.2 Disposition and collection are separate clauses · Effective/application status
Inside: Principal findings · 1.1 Instrument, debt, property, and possession · 1.2 Judicially foreclosed trust deeds
Inside: Principal findings · 1.1 Distinct legal objects · 1.2 Actor and property categories
Inside: Evidence disposition · Principal findings · 1.1 Actor and service distinctions
Inside: Principal findings · 1.1 Product and actor distinctions · 1.2 Territorial and exemption conditions
Inside: Principal findings · 1.1 Legal-category comparison · 1.2 Chapter 36 exclusions
Inside: Principal findings · 1.1 Execution, exemption, ownership, and debt are different questions · 1.2 Individual, dependent, and residence predicates
Inside: Principal findings · 1.1 Product and actor comparison · 1.2 Idaho nexus and exclusions
Inside: Evidence disposition · Principal findings · 1.1 Distinct court questions
Inside: Evidence disposition · Principal findings · 1.1 Small claims is a distinct procedural route
Inside: Evidence disposition · Principal findings · 1.1 Applicable rule systems
Inside: Evidence disposition · Principal findings · 1.1 Ordinary discovery versus other proceedings
Inside: Evidence disposition · Principal findings · 1.1 Procedural posture matters
Inside: Evidence disposition · Principal findings · 2.1 Interest categories and controlling events
Inside: Evidence disposition · Principal findings · 2.1 Constitutional and statutory framework
Inside: Evidence disposition · Principal findings · 1.1 Reuse versus new evidence
Inside: Evidence disposition · Principal findings · 1.1 Reuse versus new evidence
Inside: Evidence disposition · Principal findings · 1.1 Reuse versus new work
Inside: Evidence disposition · Principal findings · 1.1 Reuse versus new work
Inside: Evidence disposition · 1.1 Assessment, levy, bill, delinquency, and lien are different · 1.2 Property categories
Original saved Markdown SHA-256: dea6828466409dcda9e5ea0fd7c1629b17008827302a606d79c65956c6d2dde0. Public formatting, private-reference removal and correction annotations are separate from that immutable original.