{"meta":{"key":"s_id--pass-31","task":"S_ID","title":"SID Idaho appellate rehearing, discretionary review, and narrow remittitur/remand operation","parent_title":"Idaho debt and debt relief law","edition":"pass-31","path":"/research/s_id--pass-31/","kind":"split_pass","category":"state","role":"state","area_numbers":[66],"groups":["collections"],"date":"2026-10-29","tables":30,"claims":45,"sources":8,"review_status":"whole_first_scoped_review_complete_one_quantity_completion_pending_other_holds","review_complete":true,"sha256":"8eb5a82a01af875c1da37794095476f5be1d9291642cc9837c9040123ce5ace8","headings":["Evidence disposition","Principal findings","1.1 Reuse versus new work","1.2 Route and actor comparison","2.1 Supreme Court rehearing","2.2 Court of Appeals rehearing","2.3 Special expedited exception","3.1 Petition, rehearing relationship, and briefing","3.2 Criteria: discretionary, nonexclusive, and not a merits checklist","3.3 After review is granted","3.4 Review on the Supreme Court’s initiative","4.1 Filing is not ordinary mailing","4.2 Fee categories","4.3 Petition lateness and other failures","4.4 Extensions and the resolved reference event","4.5 Sanction and dismissal boundaries","5.1 No invented special petition word limit","5.2 Applicable general form requirements and exceptions","5.3 Electronic format, filing, and correction","5.4 Privacy and access","6.1 Announcement, service, and finality","Pending petitions and denial: precise limit","6.2 Issuance and receiving-court duty","6.3 District-appellate postdecision boundary","6.4 Remand authority is not unlimited recall authority","6.5 No universal enforcement stay","S001 — official Idaho Appellate Rules","Core displayed histories","S002 — official civil-rule district and computation interfaces","S003 — official electronic-filing rules","S004 — official confidentiality interface","S005 — provisional computation statutes","S006 — official generic procedural guidance","S007 — history locators and official notices","S008 — failed and discovery-only sources","9.1 Petitions, briefs, review, and decision effects","9.2 Fees, filing, extensions, and counting","9.3 Format, privacy, and argument","9.4 Finality, remand, and history","14.1 What was actually done","14.2 PDF text and pixels","14.3 Researcher self-check"],"generation_provenance":{"actual_route":"regular_chat_adaptive_models","actual_model":"GPT-6","actual_mode":"Pro","provenance_limit":"Actual documented capture labels only; missing labels remain unknown. No preferred setting is inferred as actual execution."},"public_id":"S_ID/pass-31","facets":{"geography":["us","us-id"],"debt_type":[],"stage":["repossession","appeal"],"subject":["appeals"]},"scope":"Distinctreviewedremainingordinarycivilrehearing/discretionaryreview/narrowremittiturremandoperation","pending_corrections":0},"markdown":"# S_ID PASS-31 — Idaho appellate rehearing, discretionary review, and narrow remittitur/remand operation\n\n**Fresh public-source access date:** **October 28, 2026, America/Los_Angeles.**\n\n**Scope:** Ordinary state-civil Supreme Court rehearing, Court of Appeals rehearing, discretionary Supreme Court review of Court of Appeals decisions, and the necessary postdecision briefing, finality, remittitur, and remand interfaces.\n\n## Evidence disposition\n\nThe **official current-published operative rules were recovered and read** to the bounds recorded below. The relevant original 2015 and 2019 amendment-order routes failed. Current rule footers therefore remain **publication-history evidence, not separately authenticated original orders**.\n\nNecessary holiday statutes were recovered as **2025 secondary reproductions**, not current official 2026 statutory bodies. Current API-hosted guides, internal rules, and forms were not opened.\n\nEarlier findings, provenance, C033/C035, and resolved bounded corrections remain unchanged. P30’s unreviewed cost/fee merits are not premises.\n\n## Principal findings\n\n**Rehearing and discretionary review are different requests.** Prior Court of Appeals rehearing is not required before Supreme Court review, but the Supreme Court will not act on a review petition until the Court of Appeals has finally determined all rehearing petitions. **[C008–C009.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/118)\n\n**Petition and supporting-brief periods are separate.** The ordinary rehearing and review rules permit a later supporting brief, while the expressly incorporated Rule 12.2 expedited branch requires simultaneous filing and states a summary-dismissal consequence. **[C003–C005, C008.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/42)\n\n**The published rules require a qualified reading of review-petition lateness.** Rules 21, 44, and 46 expressly identify rehearing petitions but do not expressly name review petitions; Rule 118 incorporates Rule 42’s times and manner. This report does not convert that omission into either unrestricted extension authority or a categorical jurisdictional holding. **[C018–C020.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+2](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/21)\n\n**Remittitur, opinion modification, and recall are not interchangeable.** Rule 38 supplies issuance and compliance duties; Rule 122 controls the effect of granted review. No universal postfinal recall power, stipulated early-remittitur procedure, or new twenty-one-day period after every denial was authenticated from the read text. **[C032–C039.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38)\n\n# 1. Reviewed reuse, new evidence, and routes\n\nLabels:\n\n- **O — Official body read:** current-published operative rule or official instruction.\n- **P — Provisional statute:** dated secondary reproduction.\n- **G — Guidance:** official explanatory material, not a substitute for the operative rule.\n- **D — Discovery only:** index, search metadata, or unopened source.\n- **H — Held:** material history, incorporation, construction, or application remains unresolved.\n\n## 1.1 Reuse versus new work\n\n| Earlier material | Retained scope | New P31 reading | Remaining boundary |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reviewed P27 rehearing/review interface | Earlier period, assignment, and finality distinctions retain their source limits. | Complete Rules 42, 116, 118, 120, 122 and necessary related provisions read afresh. | No actual decision, petition, or deadline classified. |\n| Reviewed P27 remittitur follow-on | Full compliance, remand, recall, modification, and enforcement remained open. | Rule 38, Rule 83(r), Rules 112, 114, and 13.3 read for the specific new questions. | No general recall power or actual mandate interpretation inferred. |\n| Reviewed P29 briefing | Ordinary 2026 format and word-count findings remain within their scope. | Special rehearing/review provisions and necessary general formatting clauses independently read. | A special supporting brief is not automatically treated as a new “first brief.” |\n| P30 cost/fee report | Not a substantive premise. | Only Rules 38(d), 40(f), and 41(d) reread for unresolved taxation and remittitur. | No fee entitlement, amount, or taxation report repeated. |\n| P25 trial additur/remittitur | Trial damages remittitur remains distinct from appellate remittitur. | No trial-remedy merits reused. | No acceptance, election, or damages calculation. |\n| P27 LIMITED-01 | Rule 46’s objection runs from service of the **motion**, with Clerk service of the order separate. | Complete current Rule 46 freshly read. | No revival of the earlier ambiguous reference. |\n| C033/C035 and other holds | Preserved. | No provider/checklist or unrelated statutory research. | No implied closure. |\n\n## 1.2 Route and actor comparison\n\n| Request or event | Deciding court and filing office | Source-stated scope |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Supreme Court rehearing | Supreme Court; petition filed with its Clerk | Rule 42 uses an opinion-based petition relation. It does not expressly establish a universal rehearing route for every procedural order. |\n| Court of Appeals rehearing | Court of Appeals decides; subsequent papers use the Supreme Court clerk structure | Rule 116 covers an aggrieved party’s request concerning an opinion or order and incorporates Supreme Court rehearing procedure. |\n| Supreme Court review of Court of Appeals | Supreme Court; petition filed with its Clerk | Rule 118(a) refers to opinions/orders; subsection (b) describes review of a final decision as discretionary. |\n| Supreme Court initiative | Supreme Court acts on its own motion | Rule 120 supplies a distinct review-order mechanism. |\n| District court acting in an ordinary magistrate appeal | District court under Rule 83 | Rule 83’s motion and procedural-fallback provisions are not an express universal Rule 42 rehearing entitlement. |\n| After review is granted | Supreme Court proceeds under the review order | Court of Appeals assignment terminates as stated in Rule 122. |\n| Special or federal routes | Their own authority | Criminal/capital, Rule 12.2, agency, special statutory, federal certiorari, tribal, and interstate rules are not ordinary civil defaults. |\n\n**[C002, C007–C014, C031.]** The decisional court, filing office, party status, and existence of a reviewable decision are separate predicates. No actual posture or entitlement is determined. [Idaho Supreme Court+2](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/116)\n\n# 2. Rehearing\n\n## 2.1 Supreme Court rehearing\n\n| Subject | Complete material Rule 42 relation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Petition | Physically filed with the Supreme Court Clerk, together with the applicable filing fee, within **twenty-one days after the filing date of the opinion**; served on all parties. |\n| Modified opinion | An aggrieved party may file another petition within **twenty-one days from the modified opinion’s date**, unless modification merely corrects a clerical error; service is on adverse parties. |\n| Supporting brief or memorandum | Filed within **fourteen days after petition filing**. |\n| Copies | Original petition and brief; no copies required. |\n| Response | None unless the court directs. |\n| Argument on petition | None unless ordered. |\n| Grant/denial order | Clerk serves all parties; order may identify rehearing issues and must direct the time/order of briefing. |\n| Argument after grant | Scheduled in the same manner as merits argument, subject to the governing argument rules. |\n\n**[C003–C006.]** The petition’s deadline is not replaced by the later support-brief period. The rule does not enumerate a federal-style “overlooked or misapprehended” test, an exhaustive merits-ground list, or unrestricted permission to add new issues or evidence. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/42)\n\nThe permission for another petition after a qualifying modification is not a general right to unlimited successive petitions. A clerical-change category, a substantive modification, and an opinion on rehearing remain different events.\n\n## 2.2 Court of Appeals rehearing\n\nRule 116 permits a party aggrieved by an opinion or order of the Court of Appeals to petition that court for rehearing. It uses the Supreme Court rehearing rules’ manner, times, grounds, and effect; the Court of Appeals determines whether to grant rehearing and conducts it.\n\n**[C007.]** The incorporation does not make the Supreme Court the rehearing decision-maker. Mapping an unusual standalone Court of Appeals order to Rule 42’s opinion-based timing language remains a construction question; no actual order is classified. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/116)\n\n## 2.3 Special expedited exception\n\nRule 42(b), Rule 118(a), and Rule 12.2(g) expressly address an appeal expedited under Rule 12.2: the supporting brief must accompany the petition, or the petition is summarily dismissed.\n\nThat branch is recorded to preserve the exception. The underlying special proceedings and their separate notice, argument, or merits schedules are not analyzed as ordinary debt appeals. **[C005, C008.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/12.2)\n\n# 3. Discretionary Supreme Court review of the Court of Appeals\n\n## 3.1 Petition, rehearing relationship, and briefing\n\nRule 118’s petition period is **twenty-one days after the applicable announcement**: the opinion/order, denial of rehearing, opinion on rehearing, or a nonclerical modification without rehearing. Support is filed with the petition or within **fourteen days thereafter**, subject to the expedited exception.\n\nPrior Court of Appeals rehearing is unnecessary. A review petition does not prevent a timely rehearing petition, but the Supreme Court takes no action on review until all rehearing petitions have been finally determined below. **[C008–C009.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/118)\n\nThe support brief must address the review criteria. Discussion and argument should be confined to those criteria. There is no response unless the Supreme Court requests one before ruling, and no automatically authorized reply period is supplied. **[C011.]**\n\n## 3.2 Criteria: discretionary, nonexclusive, and not a merits checklist\n\n| Rule 118(b) factor | Generic question identified by the rule |\n| --- | --- |\n| **(1)** | Has the Court of Appeals decided a substantive question not previously determined by the Idaho Supreme Court? |\n| **(2)** | Is the substantive decision probably inconsistent with applicable Idaho Supreme Court or U.S. Supreme Court decisions? |\n| **(3)** | Does it conflict with a prior Court of Appeals decision? |\n| **(4)** | Does the departure from usual judicial procedure, or approval of such a departure below, call for supervisory intervention? |\n| **(5)** | Has a majority of Court of Appeals judges certified, after decision, that further review is desirable in the public interest or interests of justice? |\n\nReview requires special and important reasons and direction from a **majority of the Justices**. The factors are neither controlling nor exhaustive. **[C010.]** No opinion or alleged conflict was researched, and no likelihood of review is assessed. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/118)\n\n## 3.3 After review is granted\n\nThe Supreme Court ordinarily uses the briefs already filed and considered by the Court of Appeals. Additional briefing occurs only if ordered. The grant does not itself establish a right to submit a new evidentiary record, repeat ordinary merits briefing, or obtain a favorable outcome.\n\nRule 122 terminates the Court of Appeals assignment upon the grant and prevents its remittitur on that opinion. The Supreme Court’s eventual opinion/remittitur proceeds under Rule 38 unless otherwise ordered. **[C012, C014.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/118)\n\nThe read rules do not state that denial of review endorses the lower court’s reasoning or that a grant automatically vacates every prior judgment. Those propositions are not supplied.\n\n## 3.4 Review on the Supreme Court’s initiative\n\nRule 120 permits the Supreme Court, within **twenty-one days after the listed Court of Appeals announcement**, to order review on its own motion. The listed events include an opinion/order, an opinion/order on rehearing, and a modified opinion/order without rehearing. The order has the same effect as granting review.\n\nUnlike Rules 42 and 118, Rule 120 does **not repeat a clerical-error exception** in its modified-decision wording. That textual difference is preserved without deciding its application. **[C013.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/120)\n\n# 4. Filing, fees, lateness, extensions, and consequences\n\n## 4.1 Filing is not ordinary mailing\n\nIAR 20 includes petitions for rehearing and review among the papers requiring receipt by the proper clerk, rather than treating mailing alone as filing. Its separate rule for other appellate papers and service remains distinct.\n\nElectronic-filing rules control conflicting mechanics within their scope. Consequently, “physically filed” is not interpreted here as a direction to use paper instead of an authorized electronic method. **[C015.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/20)\n\n## 4.2 Fee categories\n\n| Item | Published IAR 23 provision | Limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Ordinary rehearing petition | **$71** | Criminal, habeas, and post-conviction exceptions are expressly listed. |\n| Review petition concerning Court of Appeals decision | **No filing fee** | Not a ruling on other costs or fee-shifting. |\n| Public-actor exemption | Incorporates specified statutes | Statutory status and scope were not completed here. |\n| Waiver | Rule 23(c) refers to §§ 31-3220/31-3220A and Supreme Court approval. | Its detailed application language is notice-of-appeal-oriented; petition-specific mechanics and statutory eligibility remain held. |\n| Automatic categories | Rule 23(e) uses defined representation categories. | No representation, program, or eligibility investigation. |\n\n**[C016.]** No payment, fee application, affidavit, or financial information was requested. The absence of a review filing fee does not confer review as of right. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/23)\n\n## 4.3 Petition lateness and other failures\n\n| Provision | Exact distinction retained |\n| --- | --- |\n| **IAR 21** | Expressly identifies untimely rehearing-petition filing as jurisdictional, with dismissal on motion or court initiative. Other steps are generally treated as nonjurisdictional but may support an appropriate sanction, including dismissal. |\n| **IAR 46** | Excludes rehearing-petition filing from its general enlargement power. Brief extensions additionally require Rule 34(d). |\n| **IAR 44** | Extraordinary procedure may be changed only under the stated conditions; rehearing filing time cannot be shortened or lengthened under this rule. |\n| **Review petitions** | Not expressly named in those lists, but Rule 118 incorporates Rule 42’s times and manner. |\n| **Ordinary support brief** | No universal automatic summary-dismissal rule is stated in Rule 42 for every late ordinary supporting brief. |\n| **Rule 12.2 support brief** | Simultaneous filing and summary dismissal are express. |\n| **No response when none requested** | Not treated as an admission, a default, or disobedience to a universal response duty. |\n\n**[C017–C020.]** The review-petition omission is not converted into a right to extension. Its jurisdictional and extension treatment remains an exact construction dependency. [Idaho Supreme Court+2](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/21)\n\n## 4.4 Extensions and the resolved reference event\n\nFor an act that is eligible for enlargement, Rule 46 requires good cause on motion and service on all parties. The court or a Justice may issue an immediate ex parte order. Review by written objection uses **seven days from service of the motion**, while the Clerk separately serves the order.\n\nThis preserves the resolved P27 LIMITED-01 relation. It does not extend an excluded petition period. **[C021.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/46)\n\nRule 34(d)’s brief-extension affidavit requirements remain applicable when an extension is legally available: due date, prior extensions, prior denials, grounds, requested duration/new date, stipulation, opposing parties’ positions, and completion assurance. No motion or assurance is constructed.\n\n## 4.5 Sanction and dismissal boundaries\n\nIAR 11.2 requires the proper signature and reasonable-inquiry certification. An established violation calls for an appropriate sanction; possible causal expenses and fees are not an automatic award in every unsuccessful petition.\n\nIAR 32’s general motion-response period does not override Rules 42/118’s **no response unless directed** limitation. Its untimely-rehearing dismissal branch is separate from a merits response. ICAR 59 referral, professional discipline, and constitutional sanction procedure remain held. **[C022.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.2)\n\n# 5. Special supporting papers, format, privacy, and electronic procedure\n\n## 5.1 No invented special petition word limit\n\n| Subject | Authenticated text | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Rehearing support | Brief or memorandum; Rule 42’s special timing and court-ordered briefing | No distinct numeric special word limit appears in Rule 42. |\n| Review support | Criteria-focused Rule 118(c)(1) brief | Not automatically a new full merits brief. |\n| Binding/cover | Special support/opposition briefs need not be bound or use a colored cover. | Not a waiver of every other applicable formatting or identifying requirement. |\n| General word limits | Rule 34 states 14,000 words for a party’s first brief and 7,000 for a reply. | Classification of a later rehearing/review supporting paper under that wording is not supplied by assumption. |\n| Petition length | No standalone numeric petition cap was authenticated from the read special rules. | Not unlimited-length permission. |\n| Response/reply | Only as authorized by the special rule or court order. | No automatic fourteen-day opposition or twenty-one-day reply imported. |\n| After review grant | Original Court of Appeals briefs used unless additional briefing ordered. | No automatic fresh length allowance or required merits rebriefing. |\n\n**[C023–C024.]** The current technical guide and internal citation rules were not recovered through an allowed readable route. No obsolete page limit or familiar federal petition limit is substituted. [Idaho Supreme Court+2](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/34)\n\n## 5.2 Applicable general form requirements and exceptions\n\nThe necessary general rules supply these conditions:\n\n| Item | Rule-based structure |\n| --- | --- |\n| Page and margins | Printable 8½ × 11-inch pages; at least one-inch margins |\n| Text | Double-spaced body; specified headings, footnotes, and block quotations may be single-spaced |\n| Typeface | Black, proportionally spaced Times New Roman or Century Schoolbook, 14 point or larger, including footnotes |\n| Pagination | Bottom margin |\n| Authority names | Rule 36’s italic/underline treatment |\n| Certificate | Rule 34’s word-count statement immediately before signature, subject to the specified exceptions |\n| Count | Headings, footnotes, and quotations included; listed front matter, signatures, certificates, appendices and exhibits excluded |\n| Typewriter exception | Specified unrepresented non-word-processor branch permits standard 12-point type |\n| Handwritten exception | Qualifying prisoner branch has its stated page limits and legibility requirements |\n| Copies | Special Rule 42 requires the original petition and brief, no copies |\n| Signatures | IAR 11.2 and applicable electronic-signature rules retain their actor and certification conditions |\n\n**[C025.]** A certificate exception does not eliminate every length limit. General page/word exclusions do not authorize new evidence or unrestricted attachments. No cover, signature, certificate, caption, or paper was created. [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/36)\n\nRecord references and legal-authority addenda remain governed by the necessary Rule 35 provisions. No named citation example, judicial opinion, headnote, or record excerpt was reproduced or investigated.\n\n## 5.3 Electronic format, filing, and correction\n\n| Event | Required distinction |\n| --- | --- |\n| Format | Searchable PDF/PDF-A; the scanned-attachment exception is not a universal brief exception |\n| Size | Rule 6’s file/envelope limits and separation rules apply within their exceptions |\n| Protected attachments | Separate handling; a confidentiality label is subject to court verification |\n| Submission | Receipt, acceptance, rejection, and accepted filing-date relation are distinct |\n| Correction after rejection | Conditional three-business-day resubmission/relation-back request |\n| Technical receipt failure | Satisfactory proof and the seven-business-day resubmission branch |\n| Judicial relief | Technical filing-date relief is not merely an ordinary discretionary extension of a protected petition period |\n| Service | Authorized system transmission, not courtesy copy; party and court service rules differ |\n| Fees | Rule 10’s notice-of-appeal-specific waiver rule is not automatically a rehearing-petition rule |\n\n**[C026–C028.]** No system, account, contact, rejection, technical failure, or actual filing was examined. [Idaho Supreme Court+3](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/11)\n\n## 5.4 Privacy and access\n\nA petition or supporting appendix does not authorize public disclosure of protected information. IRCP and electronic-rule redaction responsibilities, ICAR 32’s access hierarchy, and the separate protected-copy mechanisms remain applicable within their scope.\n\nICAR 32(i)’s sealing-denial amendment branch does not by itself extend a jurisdictional rehearing deadline. The rule’s power to alter a **sealing order** is not an authenticated power to recall a final appellate remittitur. **[C029.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/icar/32)\n\nFull privilege, waiver, sealed-record inclusion, public access, and sector-specific privacy law remain separate. No protected material was requested.\n\n# 6. Finality, remittitur, remand, and correction limits\n\n## 6.1 Announcement, service, and finality\n\nRule 38(a) equates an opinion’s **filing** with its **announcement**. The Clerk’s transmission of the certified opinion and copies is a different act.\n\nRule 38(b) lists a twenty-one-day finality relation from the last of the original opinion, opinion on rehearing, or modified opinion without rehearing. Its modified-opinion clause does **not repeat** Rules 42/118’s clerical-error exception. **[C032.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38)\n\n### Pending petitions and denial: precise limit\n\nThe Court’s generic official instruction says that denial of Supreme Court rehearing makes the decision final. That is useful guidance, but it is not a complete codified clerk-processing or jurisdictional-timing rule.\n\nThe read Rule 38 does not expressly state a universal new twenty-one-day period after every rehearing or review denial. Nor does its short text, alone, complete all pending-petition withholding, dismissal, or sequential-petition consequences.\n\nAccordingly:\n\n- No automatic fresh twenty-one-day period after every denial is asserted.\n- No remittitur date is calculated merely by ignoring a pending petition.\n- Rule 118’s express twenty-one-day **review** relation after Court of Appeals rehearing denial remains separate.\n- The particular effect of denial, dismissal, modification, or an express court order remains subject to the exact rule and judicial construction.\n\n**[C033.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+2](https://isc.idaho.gov/about-the-courts/sc-procedures)\n\n## 6.2 Issuance and receiving-court duty\n\n| Event | Rule 38 or 122 relationship |\n| --- | --- |\n| Opinion becomes final under the applicable rule/order framework | Clerk issues and files remittitur with the originating district court or agency and mails the specified copies. |\n| Remittitur content | Advises that the opinion is final and directs compliance with its directive. |\n| Lower tribunal | Must comply forthwith with the actual directive—not an invented generic outcome. |\n| Review granted | No Court of Appeals remittitur on that opinion; assignment terminates. |\n| Supreme Court completes granted review | Supreme opinion/remittitur under Rule 38, unless otherwise ordered. |\n| Costs/fees determined | Included as the rules provide. |\n| Amount unresolved | Does not necessarily delay remittitur; later itemized treatment follows the narrow rule. |\n\n**[C014, C034–C035.]** Issuance, filing below, mailing copies, and compliance are separate events. No actual remittitur, instruction, or jurisdictional result was interpreted. [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38)\n\nRules 40(f) and 41(d) were read only for later inclusion/transmission. P30 fee entitlement and taxation merits were not reused. A later fee statement does not itself reopen the appellate merits. [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40)\n\n## 6.3 District-appellate postdecision boundary\n\nRule 83(n) permits the stated district-appellate motions and supporting briefs, with its response and argument rules. Subsection (q) supplies an IRCP/IAR fallback where unspecified.\n\nThat does not expressly establish a universal Rule 42 rehearing petition, a twenty-one-day district rehearing right, or automatic appellate-period tolling. IRCP 11.2’s trial-court reconsideration language was read as a boundary, not presumed to resolve every district court acting in an appellate capacity.\n\nRule 83(r)(1) requires the district appellate decision and directions to be filed/transmitted. If no further appeal is filed within its **forty-two-day filing-based relation**, the district clerk issues/files the remittitur to the magistrate division. A higher remittitur’s filing and transmission have a separate branch. **[C031.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83)\n\nThe Rule 83 de novo branch remains distinct. No actual motion, finality, appeal time, or lower-court authority is determined.\n\n## 6.4 Remand authority is not unlimited recall authority\n\n| Provision | What the read text supplies | What is not inferred |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| IAR 112 | Court of Appeals may affirm, reverse, modify, direct proper judgment/order, new trial, or further proceedings within the rule. | No actual entitlement to a new trial or particular judgment. |\n| IAR 13.3 | Before opinion, good-cause temporary remand on motion or initiative; appeal remains pending; lower authority limited by remand. | A universal postfinal remittitur recall power. |\n| IAR 114 | Supreme Court may revoke a Court of Appeals assignment; that court then takes no further action. | Recall of an already final lower-court judgment merely from assignment language. |\n| IAR 33 | Stipulated dismissal before opinion, with cost/fee agreement; partial-party stipulation treated as a motion. | Stipulated early remittitur after opinion or universal postdecision withdrawal. |\n| IAR 48 | Court may regulate unspecified appellate practice. | A completed substantive standard for recall, reopening, or correction. |\n| ICAR 32(i)(8) | Court may alter a sealing order. | Authority to alter an appellate merits decision or mandate. |\n\n**[C036–C039.]** No explicit general procedure for recalled/reissued remittitur, stipulated acceleration of its issuance, or universal clerical correction of a remittitur was authenticated. That is a bounded evidence gap, not a conclusion that such authority does not exist. [Idaho Supreme Court+3](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/112)\n\n## 6.5 No universal enforcement stay\n\nIAR 13’s initial automatic-stay language is tied to a notice of appeal or cross-appeal. It is not relabeled as a new automatic stay triggered by every rehearing or review petition.\n\nOpinion finality, assignment, remittitur issuance, retained lower-court powers, enforcement stays, and bond/security obligations are distinct. Full stay/security, bankruptcy, military, and execution law remain separate. **[C040.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13)\n\n# 7. Source and usage register\n\nAll fresh access occurred **October 28, 2026, Pacific time**. Short IDs carry the prefix **S_ID-P31-**.\n\nPrint and consolidated pages of the same rule are not independent corroboration.\n\n## S001 — official Idaho Appellate Rules\n\n**Issuer/title:** Idaho Supreme Court, *Idaho Appellate Rules*.\n**Consolidated URL:** https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/iar\n\nThe consolidated route initially failed; the separately discovered ordinary URL https://isc.idaho.gov/iar successfully redirected to the same official collection. Those are one source instrument, not independent authorities.\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Actual read bounds and use |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/iar | Necessary complete Rules 1–2 and reserved-rule index; no general gateway rerun |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/6 | Complete generic paper/title provisions; no caption created |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.2 | Complete signing/sanction text; ICAR 59 merits held |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/12.2 | Complete body inspected; substantive use limited to scope and **(g)** simultaneous-support exception |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13 | Complete body inspected; narrow stay-trigger/retained-authority boundary; security amounts not applied |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13.3 | Complete temporary-remand provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/20 | Complete filing/service rule |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/21 | Complete jurisdictional and other-step distinction |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/22 | Complete computation clause |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/23 | Complete; substantive use limited to rehearing/review fees and waiver-incorporation limits; form unopened |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/32 | Complete motion rule; printed generic form not reproduced |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/33 | Complete pre-opinion stipulated-dismissal rule |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/34 | Complete; special-brief length/certificate/extension boundaries only; ordinary merits schedule not reused |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/35 | Complete page inspected; reliance on necessary record-citation/addendum provisions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/36 | Complete form and exception provisions; model cover unopened |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/37 | Complete argument provision; applied only through relevant rehearing/review interface |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38 | **Complete (a)–(d)** |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/39 | Complete special federal-mandate clause read as an exclusion; its period not applied to ordinary state remittitur |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40 | Complete page inspected; substantive use limited to **(f)** and the narrow unresolved-taxation relation |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41 | Complete page inspected; substantive use limited to **(d)** remittitur insertion/remand interface |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/42 | **Complete (a)–(e)** |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/44 | Complete extraordinary-procedure alteration and exclusions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/46 | Complete; seven-day objection from **motion service** preserved |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/47 | Complete court-service provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/48 | Complete unspecified-practice provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/101 | Complete Court of Appeals scope |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/110 | Complete subsequent-filing/assignment interface |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/112 | Complete disposition authority |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/114 | Complete assignment-revocation provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/116 | **Complete Court of Appeals rehearing provision** |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/118 | **Complete (a)–(c)** |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/120 | **Complete own-initiative review provision** |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/122 | **Complete opinions/remittiturs provision** |\n\n### Core displayed histories\n\n| Rule | Displayed adoption/amendment/effectiveness |\n| --- | --- |\n| **42** | March 25, 1977/July 1, 1977; March 20, 1985/July 1, 1985; March 28, 1986/July 1, 1986; January 4, 2010/February 1, 2010; March 18, 2011/July 1, 2011; November 20, 2012/January 1, 2013; **January 24, 2019, effective same day** |\n| **116** | April 17, 1981/July 1, 1981; March 24, 1982/July 1, 1982 |\n| **118** | April 17, 1981/July 1, 1981; March 24, 1982/July 1, 1982; March 28, 1986/July 1, 1986; March 23, 1990/July 1, 1990; January 4, 2010/February 1, 2010; March 18, 2011/July 1, 2011; November 20, 2012/January 1, 2013; **September 1, 2015/January 1, 2016** |\n| **120** | April 17, 1981/July 1, 1981 |\n| **122** | March 24, 1982/July 1, 1982 |\n| **38** | March 25, 1977/July 1, 1977; January 30, 2001/**July 1, 2002**; March 22, 2002/July 1, 2002—the displayed dates are retained |\n| **13.3** | March 28, 1986/July 1, 1986 |\n| **112, 114** | April 17, 1981/July 1, 1981 |\n| **21** | March 25, 1977/July 1, 1977; April 18, 1983/July 1, 1983; November 20, 2012/January 1, 2013 |\n| **32** | Latest displayed April 28, 2022/**July 1, 2022** |\n| **46** | Latest displayed April 28, 2022/**April 28, 2022** |\n| **34, 36** | Latest displayed **April 29, 2026/July 1, 2026** |\n| **12.2** | Current page includes **June 30, 2026/July 1, 2026** |\n| **13, 23** | Current pages include **April 29, 2026/July 1, 2026** |\n\nThese are displayed source histories. The 2015, 2019, and 2026 original orders were not authenticated here. Older anomalous footer dates were not silently repaired.\n\nIAR 1’s historical July 1, 1977 application provision was read, including its separate treatment of notice time for earlier judgments. It is not a present-day actual-case transition determination.\n\n## S002 — official civil-rule district and computation interfaces\n\n**Issuer:** Idaho Supreme Court.\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Actual read bounds |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83 | Complete page inspected; substantive reliance on **(n)–(r)**, and necessary (f) scope only |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11.2 | Complete (a)–(b); used only to preserve district postdecision/reconsideration limits |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2 | Complete computation, extension, nonextension, inaccessibility, and mail provisions |\n\n**Displayed baseline:** March 1, 2016/July 1, 2016. Rule 2.2 and Rule 11.2 include September 9, 2016/same-day amendments. Rule 83’s current footer includes amendments through **June 30, 2026/July 1, 2026**.\n\nNo Rule 60 merits, full trial procedure, or ordinary notice-of-appeal report was regenerated.\n\n## S003 — official electronic-filing rules\n\n**Issuer:** Idaho Supreme Court.\n**Consolidated URL:** https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/irefs\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Actual read bounds |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/1 | Complete scope/conflict hierarchy |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/2 | Complete definitions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/4 | Complete filer categories and exceptions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/5 | Complete exceptions; special-case practices not applied |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/6 | Complete format, size, separation, and guide incorporation |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/7 | Complete protected-filing treatment |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/9 | Complete signature rule; specimen identity and special emergency scenarios not reproduced |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/10 | Complete fees/waiver provision; notice-of-appeal branch distinguished |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/11 | Complete filing/acceptance provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/12 | Complete filing-time relation |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/13 | Complete rejection/correction; no prescribed text prepared |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/14 | Complete technical-failure relief |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/15 | Complete privacy/redaction/exception text; no example identifiers reproduced |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/17 | Complete party-service provision; discovery merits excluded |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/18 | Complete court-service provision; form wording omitted |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/20 | Complete page inspected; reliance only on **(f)** briefing interface |\n\n**Displayed baseline:** April 15, 2019/July 1, 2019. Material later entries include Rule 4’s September 11, 2024 amendment; Rules 6–7’s December 18, 2024/January 1, 2025 amendments; and Rules 5/9 amendments through June 30, 2025/July 1, 2025.\n\nOriginal orders and the API-hosted technical guide were not read.\n\n## S004 — official confidentiality interface\n\n**Issuer/title:** Idaho Supreme Court, ICAR 32.\n**URL:** https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/icar/32\n\n**Read:** Complete necessary (a), relevant (b) definitions, protected reference-copy provisions, and **(i)(1)–(8)**. Other access-request, fee, and special-regime provisions were not developed.\n\n**Displayed history:** Current amendments extend through **February 5, 2026, effective same day**.\n\n**Limit:** No actual protected record or sealing application. A sealing-order modification provision is not treated as appellate-remittitur recall authority.\n\n## S005 — provisional computation statutes\n\n**Publisher/edition:** Justia, **2025 Idaho Code**.\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Actual read and history |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-16/section-1-1607/ | Complete nonjudicial-day and exception provision; C.C.P.1881 §46 lineage; 1961 ch.270 §1 p.480; 1971 ch.84 §1 p.186 |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-73/chapter-1/section-73-108/ | Complete holiday/substitution provision; displayed history through 2002 ch.146 §3 p.423 |\n\n**Limit:** Secondary text only. No actual holiday calendar, office closure, or special proclamation selected.\n\n## S006 — official generic procedural guidance\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Actual selected read | Status |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/about-the-courts/sc-procedures | “When Does a Supreme Court Decision Become Final?” paragraph | Official guidance: denial of rehearing makes the decision final; not a complete rule-based postdenial clock |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/about-the-courts/ica-procedures | “Further Review” section | Official guidance only; discretionary review description |\n\nOther generic statements on those pages were not used to expand jurisdiction, merits, or federal-review findings.\n\n## S007 — history locators and official notices\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Actual use |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments | Publication/incorporation statement and available index context; original orders not recovered |\n| https://isb.idaho.gov/blog/amendments-to-the-idaho-appellate-rules/ | January 28, 2019 notice and actual original-order link; notice is not the order |\n| https://isb.idaho.gov/blog/amendments-to-idaho-appellate-rules-eff-july-1-2026/ | May 11, 2026 official institutional notice; linked order API-hosted and unopened |\n| https://isb.idaho.gov/blog/recent-amendments-to-idaho-appellate-rules/ | August 10, 2026 notice; current rule bodies, not this summary, support the formatting findings |\n\n## S008 — failed and discovery-only sources\n\n| Literal URL | Actual observation |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/iar | Initial ordinary consolidated-page delivery failed; separately discovered https://isc.idaho.gov/iar successfully redirected to the same collection |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/115 | Failed delivery; official consolidated index identifies Rule 115 as **Reserved** |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/orders/IAR_Order_09.01.15.pdf | Discovered ordinary 2015 order route; **404** |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules/2016_Highlights_of_Rule_Changes.pdf | Materially different official historical route; **404** |\n| https://www.isc.idaho.gov/rules/Order-Amending-Appellate-Rules.pdf | Actual 2019 notice link followed; **404** |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/files/IdahoAppellateInformationHandbook_2025.pdf | Ordinary handbook route; **404**; search excerpt not treated as a body read |\n| https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title1/T1CH16/SECT1-1607/ | Fresh official statutory route inaccessible |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/orders/Rule_Highlights_2015.pdf | Search lead only; not opened |\n| API-hosted originals, technical guide, internal rules, forms | Not opened; no guessed alternative endpoint |\n\nNo original PDF body was recovered. Search metadata describing amendments or finality was not substituted for an operative read.\n\n# 8. Atomic consequential-claim register\n\nShort IDs carry the prefix **S_ID-P31-**.\n\n| Claim | Precise proposition | Source/pinpoint | Status |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **C001** | Current operative rules were read; original history and statutory gaps remain. | S001–S008 | O/P/H |\n| **C002** | Rehearing, discretionary review, initiative review, and district postdecision practice are different routes. | IAR 42,116,118,120; Rule 83 | O/H |\n| **C003** | Ordinary Supreme rehearing has the specified petition filing, fee, and service relation. | IAR 42(a) | O |\n| **C004** | Nonclerical modified opinions have a separately stated further-petition branch. | IAR 42(a) | O |\n| **C005** | Supporting-brief timing differs from petition timing and the Rule 12.2 exception. | IAR 42(b),118(a),12.2(g) | O |\n| **C006** | Responses, petition argument, grant/denial notice, and rehearing argument require their own authority. | IAR 42(c)–(e) | O |\n| **C007** | Court of Appeals decides its own rehearing under the incorporated framework. | IAR 116 | O/H |\n| **C008** | Review uses the listed alternative decision events and does not require prior rehearing. | IAR 118(a) | O |\n| **C009** | Concurrent timely rehearing remains possible; review action awaits final rehearing determinations. | IAR 118(a) | O |\n| **C010** | Review is discretionary, requires special/important reasons and a majority direction, with nonexclusive factors. | IAR 118(b) | O |\n| **C011** | Review support is criteria-focused; no response is authorized unless requested. | IAR 118(c)(1) | O |\n| **C012** | Granted review ordinarily uses existing Court of Appeals briefs. | IAR 118(c)(2) | O |\n| **C013** | Own-motion review has its own twenty-one-day text and no repeated clerical exception. | IAR 120 | O/H |\n| **C014** | Granted review terminates assignment and prevents the specified Court of Appeals remittitur. | IAR 122 | O |\n| **C015** | Petition filing differs from ordinary mailing and from service. | IAR 20; IREFS 1,11–12 | O |\n| **C016** | Rehearing and review have different filing-fee categories; waiver predicates remain held. | IAR 23 | O/H |\n| **C017** | Untimely rehearing filing is expressly within the jurisdictional-dismissal provision. | IAR 21 | O |\n| **C018** | General enlargement and extraordinary alteration exclude the specified rehearing period. | IAR 44,46 | O |\n| **C019** | Review’s omission from those lists must be reconciled with Rule 118’s incorporation. | IAR 21,44,46,118 | H |\n| **C020** | Late ordinary support and expedited simultaneous-support failure have different textual consequences. | IAR 21,42(b),12.2(g) | O/H |\n| **C021** | Rule 46 review objection runs from motion service, not order service. | IAR 46 | O |\n| **C022** | Signing and motion sanctions do not establish actual misconduct or an automatic fee. | IAR 11.2,32 | O/H |\n| **C023** | The special rules do not state a distinct universal petition/support word cap. | IAR 42,118,34 | O/H |\n| **C024** | General first/reply limits are not automatically fresh allowances for special papers. | IAR 34–36 | H |\n| **C025** | Special no-binding/no-colored-cover language preserves other applicable form conditions. | IAR 42(d),118(c)(1),34–36 | O/H |\n| **C026** | Electronic format and filing exceptions remain material. | IREFS 1–7,20 | O/H |\n| **C027** | Correction and technical-failure branches have distinct predicates and effects. | IREFS 11–14 | O |\n| **C028** | Party service, court service, fee handling, and filing are separate. | IREFS 10,17–18; IAR 20,47 | O/H |\n| **C029** | Privacy/sealing remedies do not supply general appellate recall or deadline-extension power. | IREFS 15; ICAR 32(i) | O/H |\n| **C030** | Computation and added time require the correct event and scope. | IAR 22; Rule 2.2; IREFS 17(h) | O/P/H |\n| **C031** | Rule 83’s district postdecision and remittitur branches are not a universal Rule 42 rehearing route. | Rule 83(n)–(r); Rule 11.2 | O/H |\n| **C032** | Filing, announcement, modification, and Rule 38 finality are distinct. | IAR 38(a)–(b) | O |\n| **C033** | A universal fresh twenty-one-day postdenial period was not authenticated. | IAR 38; S006 guidance | O/G/H |\n| **C034** | Remittitur issuance, filing below, copies, and compliance have separate actors/events. | IAR 38(c),122 | O |\n| **C035** | Unresolved cost/fee amount does not necessarily delay remittitur. | IAR 38(d),40(f),41(d) | O |\n| **C036** | Court of Appeals disposition authority does not establish a particular remand outcome. | IAR 112 | O |\n| **C037** | Pre-opinion temporary remand is not general postfinal recall. | IAR 13.3 | O/H |\n| **C038** | Assignment revocation and pre-opinion stipulated dismissal have limited functions. | IAR 114,33 | O/H |\n| **C039** | No universal recall, early-stipulated-remittitur, or mandate-correction procedure was authenticated. | Read scope; IAR 48 | H |\n| **C040** | A rehearing/review petition is not declared a new universal enforcement-stay trigger. | IAR 13; special rules | O/H |\n| **C041** | Denial of review is not characterized as approval of merits; grant is not universally equated with vacatur. | Rule 118/122 scope | H |\n| **C042** | Original orders, current guide, and internal-rule restrictions remain unverified here. | S007–S008 | H |\n| **C043** | Published clerical-modification exceptions are not identical across Rules 38,42,118,120. | Those complete rules | O/H |\n| **C044** | Federal and other special regimes remain separate. | IAR 12.2,39; exclusions | H |\n| **C045** | No actual petition, record, event, fee eligibility, deadline, or outcome was determined. | Research record | Certain |\n\n# 9. Quantity, event, and exception register\n\nNo actual date, event sequence, fee payment, word count, file, or calendar result is supplied.\n\n## 9.1 Petitions, briefs, review, and decision effects\n\n| Quantity/relation | Reference event or base | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **21 days** | Supreme opinion **filing date** | Ordinary rehearing petition |\n| **21 days** | Date of modified Supreme opinion | Nonclerical modification; aggrieved-party condition |\n| **14 days** | Rehearing petition filing | Ordinary supporting brief/memorandum |\n| Simultaneous filing | Petition and support under Rule 12.2 | Express summary-dismissal condition |\n| Original only; no copies | Rehearing petition and supporting brief | Electronic scope still applies |\n| No fixed response period | Rehearing/review opposition | Only if directed/requested; order governs |\n| No automatic reply period | Special petitions | No ordinary merits-reply schedule imported |\n| **21 days** | Applicable Rule 118 announcement event | Original opinion/order, denial of rehearing, opinion on rehearing, qualifying modification |\n| With petition or within **14 days** | Review support | Rule 12.2 exception |\n| No prior rehearing prerequisite | Review route | Does not prohibit timely rehearing |\n| Final determination of all rehearing petitions | Supreme review-action sequencing | No action before that condition |\n| **Five nonexclusive factors** | Rule 118(b) | Neither exhaustive nor controlling |\n| **Majority of Justices** | Grant of review | No actual vote or entitlement |\n| **Majority of Court of Appeals judges** | Certification factor | Not automatic Supreme acceptance |\n| **21 days** | Rule 120 listed announcements | Supreme initiative, not party extension |\n| Existing briefs after grant | Rule 118(c)(2) | Additional briefing only if ordered |\n| No Court of Appeals remittitur after grant | Rule 122 | Filing petition alone is not the same event |\n| No fixed number of successive ordinary petitions authenticated | Rule 42 modification branch | Not unlimited permission |\n\n## 9.2 Fees, filing, extensions, and counting\n\n| Quantity/relation | Reference event/base | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **$71** | Ordinary rehearing petition | Listed criminal/habeas/post-conviction exceptions |\n| **No filing fee** | Review of Court of Appeals decision | Other fees/costs not decided |\n| Clerk receipt/authorized electronic filing | Petition institution | Mailing alone not substituted |\n| Rehearing filing nonextension | Rules 44/46 | Review-incorporation issue held |\n| **Seven days from motion service** | Written objection to ex parte enlargement | Clerk separately serves order |\n| Brief-extension request by due date | Rule 34(d) | Applies only where extension is authorized |\n| **Eight affidavit subject categories** | Brief-extension request | No affidavit prepared |\n| **Fourteen days after service** | General IAR 32 opposition | Does not override special no-response rule |\n| Trigger day excluded | IAR 22 | Last-day weekend/nonjudicial qualification |\n| Intermediate days counted | IRCP 2.2 within its scope | Not an automatic wholesale IAR import |\n| Three added days | Civil act due after service by mail | Not entry/announcement/filing-based petition period |\n| After **5 p.m.**; one added day | Party electronic service | Scope and actual service not determined |\n| Court-local **12:01 a.m.–midnight** | Electronic filing day | Acceptance and nonbusiness-day clauses |\n| **Three business days**, legal holidays excluded | Rejection-correction resubmission | Required request and next-judicial-day qualification |\n| **Seven business days**, legal holidays excluded | Technical-failure resubmission after unsuccessful-submission notice | Satisfactory proof; not universal extension |\n| General waiver-denial correction period | IREFS 10(b) | Not assumed to resolve every appellate petition’s jurisdictional or statutory waiver issue |\n| Unknown | Actual receipt, submission, acceptance, waiver, correction, or court closure | None supplied |\n\n## 9.3 Format, privacy, and argument\n\n| Quantity/relation | Legal base | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **14,000 / 7,000 words** | Rule 34 first/reply party brief categories | Not automatically assigned to special petition/support |\n| **50 / 25 pages** | Specified handwritten-prisoner first/reply branch | Not a general ordinary special-petition limit |\n| Included in count | Headings, footnotes, quotations | Count exceptions retained |\n| Excluded from count | Listed front matter, certificates, appendices/exhibits | Exclusion does not authorize content |\n| **8½ × 11 inches** | General paper/page form | Electronic printable-page relation |\n| At least **one-inch margins** | Rule 36 | Bottom pagination |\n| **14-point or larger** | General text and footnotes | Specified typewriter exception |\n| **12-point permitted** | Qualifying unrepresented typewriter branch | Other applicable conditions remain |\n| Two named proportional fonts | Times New Roman/Century Schoolbook | No font files or generated document |\n| **50 MB/file; 100 MB/envelope** | IREFS 6 | Separation and exception provisions |\n| **Seven days** | Initial sealing-review branch | Continued protection requires stated order |\n| **Seven days from denial order** | Amendment of a submission relying on withdrawn newly filed material | Not automatic extension of protected petition filing |\n| No petition argument unless ordered | Rule 42(c) | Review incorporation and court direction |\n| Same manner as merits argument after rehearing grant | Rule 42(e) | General no-argument/order provisions remain |\n| **30 minutes per side** | General Rule 37 merits argument if applicable | Court may alter for good cause |\n| **10 minutes per side; one counsel** | Permitted preliminary-motion argument | Not automatically a special petition allotment |\n| At least **14 days before argument** | Multiple-party allocation request | No actual argument scheduled |\n| At least **7 days before argument** | Court allocation | Court discretion preserved |\n| **21 days from no-argument order date** | Rule 37 written objection if applicable | Not a fresh petition filing period |\n\n## 9.4 Finality, remand, and history\n\n| Quantity/relation | Event | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **21 days after last listed event** | Rule 38 original/rehearing/modified-opinion finality text | Pending/denied-petition construction preserved |\n| No repeated clerical exception | Rule 38(b)(3), Rule 120 | Not silently made identical to Rules 42/118 |\n| **42 days after district appellate decision filed** | Rule 83(r) no-higher-appeal remittitur branch | No actual tolling or deadline calculation |\n| Forthwith transmission/compliance | Rule 38 | No invented numeric compliance deadline |\n| Before opinion; good cause | Temporary remand | Appeal remains pending |\n| At any time in assignment-revocation text | Rule 114 | Not universal recall of a final remittitur |\n| Before opinion | Rule 33 stipulated dismissal | Not a post-opinion early-remittitur rule |\n| Unresolved taxation does not delay | Rule 38(d) | Fee merits remain separate |\n| July 1, 1977 | IAR historical application baseline | Not each clause’s current amendment date |\n| January 1, 2016 | Latest displayed Rule 118 amendment effectiveness | Original 2015 order failed |\n| January 24, 2019 | Latest displayed Rule 42 amendment/effectiveness | Original 2019 order failed |\n| July 1, 2026 | Material general format and special-expedited amendments | Original 2026 orders unopened |\n| Unknown | Actual finality, pending petition status, mandate scope, recall ground, lower jurisdiction, outcome | None supplied or inferred |\n\n# 10. Conditional branches and precise next inquiries\n\n| Branch | Missing predicate | Supported consequence | Adverse inference to avoid | Exact next generic inquiry |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **B01 — rehearing route** | Correct court and eligible decision category | Applicable rehearing procedure | Every order has a universal Rule 42 remedy | Rule-specific order eligibility/construction |\n| **B02 — petition time** | Correct filing/announcement/modification event | Stated period may apply | Support-brief period extends petition time | Rule 42/118 application |\n| **B03 — clerical change** | Nature of modification | Express exception may control | Every altered opinion creates identical clocks | Rule 38/42/118/120 reconciliation |\n| **B04 — support brief** | Ordinary or Rule 12.2 posture | Separate or simultaneous support | Ordinary late support always equals expedited summary dismissal | Exact route and consequence |\n| **B05 — response** | Court direction/request | Authorized response | Silence is admission or an automatic response deadline exists | Specific order/special rule |\n| **B06 — review eligibility** | Aggrieved party, final-decision relationship, criteria | Discretionary consideration | Right to Supreme review | Rule 118 construction |\n| **B07 — simultaneous requests** | Timely rehearing and pending review | Express sequencing | Review petition bars rehearing or is immediately decided | Rule 118(a) |\n| **B08 — review grant** | Actual grant/order | Existing briefs and assignment consequences | Automatic new briefs, new evidence, or universal vacatur | Order and Rule 118/122 |\n| **B09 — own initiative** | Listed event and court action | Review order may issue | Party can compel own-motion review | Rule 120 |\n| **B10 — late review petition** | Meaning of incorporated times/manner | Exact hold | Omission from Rule 21/46 means unrestricted extension | Judicial construction |\n| **B11 — fee** | Applicable category and lawful waiver | Defined fee treatment | No fee means automatic review, or waiver request is granted | Unread statutes and petition mechanics |\n| **B12 — length** | Special-paper classification/order | General form framework | Fresh 14,000 words automatically available | Rule 34/42/118 construction |\n| **B13 — electronic defect** | Required correction/proof/timing | Conditional filing-date relief | Technical allegation always excuses late filing | IREFS 13/14 interaction |\n| **B14 — privacy** | Protected status and required order | Limited access/filing treatment | Sealed appendix authorizes disclosure or tolling | ICAR 32 and substantive privacy |\n| **B15 — district reconsideration** | Governing district-appellate authority | Rule 83 motion/fallback structure | Universal twenty-one-day Supreme rehearing rule | District-appellate construction |\n| **B16 — finality** | Applicable pending/disposed petition and opinion event | Rule 38/guidance relationship | Universal fresh twenty-one days after denial | Complete finality construction |\n| **B17 — remittitur** | Finality and actual directive | Issue/file/comply duties | Every remand orders a new trial or a fixed result | Mandate scope law |\n| **B18 — recall** | Separate lawful source and conditions | Held dependency | General practice or assignment power is unlimited recall authority | Original rule/statute/constitutional construction |\n| **B19 — temporary remand** | Pre-opinion good cause and limited order | Limited lower-court action | Appeal terminates or all merits reopen | IAR 13.3 |\n| **B20 — withdrawal/stipulation** | Stage and applicable authority | Pre-opinion dismissal branch | Party stipulation automatically accelerates remittitur | Postdecision authority |\n| **B21 — stay** | Independent stay/order/special law | Conditional protection | Every petition renews an automatic enforcement stay | Full stay/security regime |\n| **B22 — sanctions** | Specific violation and lawful process | Appropriate response possible | Unsuccessful petition proves misconduct | IAR 11.2/due process |\n| **B23 — denial** | Actual disposition and applicable law | No merits endorsement inferred | Denial necessarily approves reasoning | Precedential-effect construction |\n| **B24 — original history** | Readable adopted originals and transition text | Gap may close | Footer or guide proves the whole chain | Ordinary official original sources |\n\n# 11. Exact remaining dependencies\n\n| Separate subject | Required later authority or question |\n| --- | --- |\n| Review-petition jurisdiction and extensions | Rule 118’s incorporation reconciled with Rules 21, 44, and 46 |\n| Decision/order eligibility | Rule 42’s opinion wording; Rule 116/118 order language; Rule 118(b)’s final-decision requirement |\n| Special-paper length | Whether and how Rule 34’s first/reply categories apply to rehearing/review support, opposition, or a standalone petition |\n| Pending petitions and finality | Exact clerk/court treatment after filing, denial, dismissal, modification, successive qualifying petition, and review disposition |\n| Clerical modification | Differences among Rules 38, 42, 118, and 120 |\n| Recall/correction | Express original authority and standards for amended, corrected, recalled, or reissued remittitur; no universal power established here |\n| District-appellate postdecision procedure | Rule 83/IRCP 11.2/IAR interaction and any effect on further-review time |\n| Current technical guide/internal rules | Special formatting, citation restrictions, internal procedures, and lawful public originals |\n| Fee waiver | §§ 31-3220, 31-3220A, 67-2301, 31-3212 and petition-specific implementation |\n| Record/new evidence | Record-boundary and augmentation rules for any proposed additional material; no new-evidence permission inferred |\n| Substantive review | Claim-specific standards, preservation, harmlessness, merits, and precedential effect |\n| Full enforcement | Stay/security, judgment collection, interest, liens, satisfaction, and lower-court compliance remedies |\n| Federal review | U.S. Supreme Court jurisdiction, certiorari, deadlines, federal mandate, and federal stays—no federal timetable supplied |\n| Other special regimes | Criminal/capital, family/juvenile, agency, statutory expedited, extraordinary writ, tribal/interstate, bankruptcy, military, and protected-party law |\n| Original history | 2015 Rule 118, 2019 Rule 42, 2026 format/expedited amendments, other intervening orders and application clauses |\n\n# 12. Wholly blank conceptual worksheet\n\n| Field | Entry |\n| --- | --- |\n| Governing postdecision route |  |\n| Authority and edition |  |\n| Official-current-text status |  |\n| Decision/opinion/order category |  |\n| Requesting-role predicate |  |\n| Deciding court |  |\n| Filing office |  |\n| Trigger event |  |\n| Petition period |  |\n| Supporting-paper period |  |\n| Response authorization |  |\n| Review criteria |  |\n| Rehearing/review sequencing |  |\n| Additional briefing authority |  |\n| Argument authority |  |\n| Fee/waiver provision |  |\n| Applicable length classification |  |\n| Format/certificate requirement |  |\n| Filing/service distinction |  |\n| Correction/technical-failure provision |  |\n| Computation/extension rule |  |\n| Privacy condition |  |\n| Finality relation |  |\n| Remittitur issue/file event |  |\n| Receiving-court duty |  |\n| Recall/remand dependency |  |\n| Special-regime boundary |  |\n| Missing original authority |  |\n| Review status |  |\n\nNo field is completed.\n\n# 13. Granular coverage\n\n| Requested question/material subquestion | Disposition | Claims/sources | Exact remaining gap |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **1 — current ordinary routes** | Complete core rules read | C002–C014; S001 | No actual posture classification |\n| Supreme rehearing | Complete Rule 42 | C003–C006 | Order eligibility/merits construction |\n| Court of Appeals rehearing | Complete Rule 116 | C007 | Unusual order-trigger mapping |\n| Supreme discretionary review | Complete Rule 118 | C008–C012 | Actual final-decision/criteria determination |\n| Court initiative | Complete Rule 120 | C013 | No actual exercise of power |\n| District postdecision | Necessary Rule 83/11.2 clauses | C031 | Universal rehearing/tolling rule not inferred |\n| Special regimes | Expressly excluded | C044 | Independent authority required |\n| **2 — petition and support acts** | Separate filing/service/fee/support relations | C003–C006,C015–C016 | Fee-waiver statutory mechanics |\n| Grounds and argument limits | Textual requirements identified | C006,C011 | No borrowed federal merits-ground test |\n| Opposition/reply | Court-directed/requested branch | C005,C011 | No universal response/reply period |\n| Grant/denial/change | Conditions and issue/brief-order effects read | C004,C006,C033 | Postdenial finality construction |\n| Copies/signatures/form | Necessary rules read | C025–C028 | Special-paper length/guide |\n| Extensions/nonextensions | Complete rules and ambiguity preserved | C017–C021 | Review incorporation construction |\n| **3 — review posture/rehearing relation** | Complete Rule 118(a) | C008–C009 | No actual exhaustion/eligibility |\n| Criteria | All five factors and majority requirement | C010 | No merits or probability finding |\n| Supporting material | Criteria brief; record boundary preserved | C011–C012 | No required appendix invented |\n| Acceptance/denial effects | Rule 118/122 limits | C012,C014,C041 | No denial-as-approval or automatic-vacatur conclusion |\n| Postgrant briefing/argument | Existing briefs; ordered additions; applicable argument rules | C012,C025 | Actual order absent |\n| **4 — special format/length** | Independently read | C023–C025 | No distinct special cap authenticated |\n| Citation/appendix | Necessary general rules only | S001 Rules 6,35–36 | Internal citation restrictions/technical guide |\n| E-filing/service/correction | Complete material bodies | C026–C028 | No actual system event |\n| Computation/additional time | Scoped rules and provisional statutes | C030 | No calendar or universal addition |\n| Privacy | Necessary complete branch | C029 | Full privilege/access regime |\n| **5 — announcement/finality** | Rule 38 complete; guidance qualified | C032–C033 | Pending/denied-petition sequencing |\n| Remittitur issuance/transmission/filing | Complete core text | C034 | No actual receiving-court event |\n| Review assignment effect | Complete Rule 122 | C014 | Filing alone not treated as grant |\n| Lower compliance/remand | Necessary Rules 38,112,13.3 | C034,C036–C037 | Actual mandate interpretation excluded |\n| Recall/reissue/early stipulation | Exact gap retained | C038–C039 | No universal authority authenticated |\n| Unresolved taxation | Narrow fresh rule read | C035 | P30 merits not reused |\n| Stay/security | Boundary only | C040 | Full stay/security regime |\n| **6 — untimeliness/consequences** | Express distinctions read | C017–C020,C022 | Review jurisdiction/construction |\n| No response/nonconformity | No automatic merits admission | C005,C011,C022 | Applicable judicial remedy |\n| Withdrawal/correction | Relevant limited clauses read | C027,C038–C039 | Postopinion withdrawal/recall authority |\n| Sanctions/notice | Signing and motion interface | C022 | Full constitutional/disciplinary process |\n| Federal/special follow-ons | Precise dependencies | Section 11 | No broad federal overview |\n| **7 — sources/read bounds/history** | Visible register supplied | Section 7 | Original orders/current statutes |\n| 2025–2026 changes | Bounded searches and current footers separated | C042 | No all-law-through-date certification |\n| Failed/discovery status | Explicit | S007–S008 | No snippet substitution |\n| Quantities/branches/worksheet | Supplied | Sections 9–12 | No inputs, dates, or forms |\n| Prior findings/holds | Preserved | C045 | No implied closure |\n| Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent | **Not accepted complete** | Entire report | Recorded dependencies remain |\n\n# 14. Actual read, search, failure, and self-check log\n\n## 14.1 What was actually done\n\n| Material | Actual use |\n| --- | --- |\n| Official Rules 42, 116, 118, 120, 122, 38 | Complete bodies and displayed footers |\n| Related appellate rules | Complete or expressly bounded clauses listed in S001 |\n| Rule 83 and civil computation/reconsideration | New postdecision interfaces only |\n| Electronic and privacy rules | Complete or expressly bounded material clauses |\n| Official generic court guidance | Selected finality/further-review paragraphs only |\n| Statutory computation source | Official route failed; complete secondary bodies read |\n| 2015/2019 original-history searches | Actual ordinary discovered routes attempted; failures preserved |\n| 2025–2026 searches | Generic rule/amendment/version searches; no absence-of-change conclusion |\n| Clerk-handbook route | Failed; snippet not treated as complete source |\n| Reserved rules | Official consolidated index checked; no invented operative counterpart |\n| Opinions, cases, dockets, calendars, rosters | Incidental results not opened, investigated, or relied on |\n| Actual petitions, decisions, records, contracts, identities, financial or medical information | Not requested, constructed, or evaluated |\n| Earlier local review files | Supplied scope/reuse descriptions only; no inspection claim |\n\nThe currentness searches were limited to the relevant rehearing/review/finality rules and material general-form amendments. They did not establish that no other law, order, or amendment exists.\n\n## 14.2 PDF text and pixels\n\nNo PDF body was successfully recovered or analyzed in this pass.\n\n| Attempted or discovered PDF | Status |\n| --- | --- |\n| September 1, 2015 appellate amendment order | 404 |\n| 2016 highlights document | 404 |\n| 2019 appellate amendment order | 404 |\n| 2025 appellate handbook | 404 |\n| 2026 API-hosted orders/guide/internal rules | Not opened |\n| 2015 highlights search lead | Not opened |\n\nNo original-order, handbook, or guide page image was inspected. Search excerpts and alternate formats were not counted as independent corroboration.\n\n## 14.3 Researcher self-check\n\nThe core distinctions are supported by complete fresh rule readings: **separate petition/support periods; no required prior rehearing before review; criteria-focused discretionary review; no automatic response; use of existing briefs after grant; initiative review; and termination of Court of Appeals assignment when review is granted**.\n\nThe exact unresolved points are equally important: **review-petition jurisdiction/extension treatment; special-paper length classification; pending-petition and postdenial finality mechanics; differing clerical-modification wording; general recall or early-remittitur authority; and original amendment history**.\n\nNo actual or invented party, lawyer, judge, decision, opinion, order, petition, brief, record, account, amount, event, or calendar was supplied or constructed. No eligibility, preservation, waiver, timeliness, merits, fee entitlement, recall, compliance, liability, or outcome determination was made.\n\nThis is a **researcher self-check, not independent review**. The component is supported by newly read official rules and narrowly qualified official guidance, with expressly provisional statutory support and preserved source-history, incorporation, construction, special-regime, and actual-application holds. Earlier findings and provenance remain unchanged. No Idaho, dimension4, A066, parent, operational, or publication acceptance follows.\n\nEND S_ID PASS-31.\n\n","tables":[{"headers":["Earlier material","Retained scope","New P31 reading","Remaining boundary"],"index":0,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Earlier material","Retained scope","New P31 reading","Remaining boundary"],["Reviewed P27 rehearing/review interface","Earlier period, assignment, and finality distinctions retain their source limits.","Complete Rules 42, 116, 118, 120, 122 and necessary related provisions read afresh.","No actual decision, petition, or deadline classified."],["Reviewed P27 remittitur follow-on","Full compliance, remand, recall, modification, and enforcement remained open.","Rule 38, Rule 83(r), Rules 112, 114, and 13.3 read for the specific new questions.","No general recall power or actual mandate interpretation inferred."],["Reviewed P29 briefing","Ordinary 2026 format and word-count findings remain within their scope.","Special rehearing/review provisions and necessary general formatting clauses independently read.","A special supporting brief is not automatically treated as a new “first brief.”"],["P30 cost/fee report","Not a substantive premise.","Only Rules 38(d), 40(f), and 41(d) reread for unresolved taxation and remittitur.","No fee entitlement, amount, or taxation report repeated."],["P25 trial additur/remittitur","Trial damages remittitur remains distinct from appellate remittitur.","No trial-remedy merits reused.","No acceptance, election, or damages calculation."],["P27 LIMITED-01","Rule 46’s objection runs from service of the motion, with Clerk service of the order separate.","Complete current Rule 46 freshly read.","No revival of the earlier ambiguous reference."],["C033/C035 and other holds","Preserved.","No provider/checklist or unrelated statutory research.","No implied closure."]]},{"headers":["Request or event","Deciding court and filing office","Source-stated scope"],"index":1,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Request or event","Deciding court and filing office","Source-stated scope"],["Supreme Court rehearing","Supreme Court; petition filed with its Clerk","Rule 42 uses an opinion-based petition relation. It does not expressly establish a universal rehearing route for every procedural order."],["Court of Appeals rehearing","Court of Appeals decides; subsequent papers use the Supreme Court clerk structure","Rule 116 covers an aggrieved party’s request concerning an opinion or order and incorporates Supreme Court rehearing procedure."],["Supreme Court review of Court of Appeals","Supreme Court; petition filed with its Clerk","Rule 118(a) refers to opinions/orders; subsection (b) describes review of a final decision as discretionary."],["Supreme Court initiative","Supreme Court acts on its own motion","Rule 120 supplies a distinct review-order mechanism."],["District court acting in an ordinary magistrate appeal","District court under Rule 83","Rule 83’s motion and procedural-fallback provisions are not an express universal Rule 42 rehearing entitlement."],["After review is granted","Supreme Court proceeds under the review order","Court of Appeals assignment terminates as stated in Rule 122."],["Special or federal routes","Their own authority","Criminal/capital, Rule 12.2, agency, special statutory, federal certiorari, tribal, and interstate rules are not ordinary civil defaults."]]},{"headers":["Subject","Complete material Rule 42 relation"],"index":2,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Subject","Complete material Rule 42 relation"],["Petition","Physically filed with the Supreme Court Clerk, together with the applicable filing fee, within twenty-one days after the filing date of the opinion; served on all parties."],["Modified opinion","An aggrieved party may file another petition within twenty-one days from the modified opinion’s date, unless modification merely corrects a clerical error; service is on adverse parties."],["Supporting brief or memorandum","Filed within fourteen days after petition filing."],["Copies","Original petition and brief; no copies required."],["Response","None unless the court directs."],["Argument on petition","None unless ordered."],["Grant/denial order","Clerk serves all parties; order may identify rehearing issues and must direct the time/order of briefing."],["Argument after grant","Scheduled in the same manner as merits argument, subject to the governing argument rules."]]},{"headers":["Rule 118(b) factor","Generic question identified by the rule"],"index":3,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Rule 118(b) factor","Generic question identified by the rule"],["(1)","Has the Court of Appeals decided a substantive question not previously determined by the Idaho Supreme Court?"],["(2)","Is the substantive decision probably inconsistent with applicable Idaho Supreme Court or U.S. Supreme Court decisions?"],["(3)","Does it conflict with a prior Court of Appeals decision?"],["(4)","Does the departure from usual judicial procedure, or approval of such a departure below, call for supervisory intervention?"],["(5)","Has a majority of Court of Appeals judges certified, after decision, that further review is desirable in the public interest or interests of justice?"]]},{"headers":["Item","Published IAR 23 provision","Limit"],"index":4,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Item","Published IAR 23 provision","Limit"],["Ordinary rehearing petition","$71","Criminal, habeas, and post-conviction exceptions are expressly listed."],["Review petition concerning Court of Appeals decision","No filing fee","Not a ruling on other costs or fee-shifting."],["Public-actor exemption","Incorporates specified statutes","Statutory status and scope were not completed here."],["Waiver","Rule 23(c) refers to §§ 31-3220/31-3220A and Supreme Court approval.","Its detailed application language is notice-of-appeal-oriented; petition-specific mechanics and statutory eligibility remain held."],["Automatic categories","Rule 23(e) uses defined representation categories.","No representation, program, or eligibility investigation."]]},{"headers":["Provision","Exact distinction retained"],"index":5,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Provision","Exact distinction retained"],["IAR 21","Expressly identifies untimely rehearing-petition filing as jurisdictional, with dismissal on motion or court initiative. Other steps are generally treated as nonjurisdictional but may support an appropriate sanction, including dismissal."],["IAR 46","Excludes rehearing-petition filing from its general enlargement power. Brief extensions additionally require Rule 34(d)."],["IAR 44","Extraordinary procedure may be changed only under the stated conditions; rehearing filing time cannot be shortened or lengthened under this rule."],["Review petitions","Not expressly named in those lists, but Rule 118 incorporates Rule 42’s times and manner."],["Ordinary support brief","No universal automatic summary-dismissal rule is stated in Rule 42 for every late ordinary supporting brief."],["Rule 12.2 support brief","Simultaneous filing and summary dismissal are express."],["No response when none requested","Not treated as an admission, a default, or disobedience to a universal response duty."]]},{"headers":["Subject","Authenticated text","Qualification"],"index":6,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Subject","Authenticated text","Qualification"],["Rehearing support","Brief or memorandum; Rule 42’s special timing and court-ordered briefing","No distinct numeric special word limit appears in Rule 42."],["Review support","Criteria-focused Rule 118(c)(1) brief","Not automatically a new full merits brief."],["Binding/cover","Special support/opposition briefs need not be bound or use a colored cover.","Not a waiver of every other applicable formatting or identifying requirement."],["General word limits","Rule 34 states 14,000 words for a party’s first brief and 7,000 for a reply.","Classification of a later rehearing/review supporting paper under that wording is not supplied by assumption."],["Petition length","No standalone numeric petition cap was authenticated from the read special rules.","Not unlimited-length permission."],["Response/reply","Only as authorized by the special rule or court order.","No automatic fourteen-day opposition or twenty-one-day reply imported."],["After review grant","Original Court of Appeals briefs used unless additional briefing ordered.","No automatic fresh length allowance or required merits rebriefing."]]},{"headers":["Item","Rule-based structure"],"index":7,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Item","Rule-based structure"],["Page and margins","Printable 8½ × 11-inch pages; at least one-inch margins"],["Text","Double-spaced body; specified headings, footnotes, and block quotations may be single-spaced"],["Typeface","Black, proportionally spaced Times New Roman or Century Schoolbook, 14 point or larger, including footnotes"],["Pagination","Bottom margin"],["Authority names","Rule 36’s italic/underline treatment"],["Certificate","Rule 34’s word-count statement immediately before signature, subject to the specified exceptions"],["Count","Headings, footnotes, and quotations included; listed front matter, signatures, certificates, appendices and exhibits excluded"],["Typewriter exception","Specified unrepresented non-word-processor branch permits standard 12-point type"],["Handwritten exception","Qualifying prisoner branch has its stated page limits and legibility requirements"],["Copies","Special Rule 42 requires the original petition and brief, no copies"],["Signatures","IAR 11.2 and applicable electronic-signature rules retain their actor and certification conditions"]]},{"headers":["Event","Required distinction"],"index":8,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Event","Required distinction"],["Format","Searchable PDF/PDF-A; the scanned-attachment exception is not a universal brief exception"],["Size","Rule 6’s file/envelope limits and separation rules apply within their exceptions"],["Protected attachments","Separate handling; a confidentiality label is subject to court verification"],["Submission","Receipt, acceptance, rejection, and accepted filing-date relation are distinct"],["Correction after rejection","Conditional three-business-day resubmission/relation-back request"],["Technical receipt failure","Satisfactory proof and the seven-business-day resubmission branch"],["Judicial relief","Technical filing-date relief is not merely an ordinary discretionary extension of a protected petition period"],["Service","Authorized system transmission, not courtesy copy; party and court service rules differ"],["Fees","Rule 10’s notice-of-appeal-specific waiver rule is not automatically a rehearing-petition rule"]]},{"headers":["Event","Rule 38 or 122 relationship"],"index":9,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Event","Rule 38 or 122 relationship"],["Opinion becomes final under the applicable rule/order framework","Clerk issues and files remittitur with the originating district court or agency and mails the specified copies."],["Remittitur content","Advises that the opinion is final and directs compliance with its directive."],["Lower tribunal","Must comply forthwith with the actual directive—not an invented generic outcome."],["Review granted","No Court of Appeals remittitur on that opinion; assignment terminates."],["Supreme Court completes granted review","Supreme opinion/remittitur under Rule 38, unless otherwise ordered."],["Costs/fees determined","Included as the rules provide."],["Amount unresolved","Does not necessarily delay remittitur; later itemized treatment follows the narrow rule."]]},{"headers":["Provision","What the read text supplies","What is not inferred"],"index":10,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Provision","What the read text supplies","What is not inferred"],["IAR 112","Court of Appeals may affirm, reverse, modify, direct proper judgment/order, new trial, or further proceedings within the rule.","No actual entitlement to a new trial or particular judgment."],["IAR 13.3","Before opinion, good-cause temporary remand on motion or initiative; appeal remains pending; lower authority limited by remand.","A universal postfinal remittitur recall power."],["IAR 114","Supreme Court may revoke a Court of Appeals assignment; that court then takes no further action.","Recall of an already final lower-court judgment merely from assignment language."],["IAR 33","Stipulated dismissal before opinion, with cost/fee agreement; partial-party stipulation treated as a motion.","Stipulated early remittitur after opinion or universal postdecision withdrawal."],["IAR 48","Court may regulate unspecified appellate practice.","A completed substantive standard for recall, reopening, or correction."],["ICAR 32(i)(8)","Court may alter a sealing order.","Authority to alter an appellate merits decision or mandate."]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds and use"],"index":11,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds and use"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/iar","Necessary complete Rules 1–2 and reserved-rule index; no general gateway rerun"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/6","Complete generic paper/title provisions; no caption created"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.2","Complete signing/sanction text; ICAR 59 merits held"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/12.2","Complete body inspected; substantive use limited to scope and (g) simultaneous-support exception"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13","Complete body inspected; narrow stay-trigger/retained-authority boundary; security amounts not applied"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13.3","Complete temporary-remand provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/20","Complete filing/service rule"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/21","Complete jurisdictional and other-step distinction"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/22","Complete computation clause"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/23","Complete; substantive use limited to rehearing/review fees and waiver-incorporation limits; form unopened"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/32","Complete motion rule; printed generic form not reproduced"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/33","Complete pre-opinion stipulated-dismissal rule"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/34","Complete; special-brief length/certificate/extension boundaries only; ordinary merits schedule not reused"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/35","Complete page inspected; reliance on necessary record-citation/addendum provisions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/36","Complete form and exception provisions; model cover unopened"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/37","Complete argument provision; applied only through relevant rehearing/review interface"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38","Complete (a)–(d)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/39","Complete special federal-mandate clause read as an exclusion; its period not applied to ordinary state remittitur"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40","Complete page inspected; substantive use limited to (f) and the narrow unresolved-taxation relation"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41","Complete page inspected; substantive use limited to (d) remittitur insertion/remand interface"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/42","Complete (a)–(e)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/44","Complete extraordinary-procedure alteration and exclusions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/46","Complete; seven-day objection from motion service preserved"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/47","Complete court-service provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/48","Complete unspecified-practice provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/101","Complete Court of Appeals scope"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/110","Complete subsequent-filing/assignment interface"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/112","Complete disposition authority"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/114","Complete assignment-revocation provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/116","Complete Court of Appeals rehearing provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/118","Complete (a)–(c)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/120","Complete own-initiative review provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/122","Complete opinions/remittiturs provision"]]},{"headers":["Rule","Displayed adoption/amendment/effectiveness"],"index":12,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Rule","Displayed adoption/amendment/effectiveness"],["42","March 25, 1977/July 1, 1977; March 20, 1985/July 1, 1985; March 28, 1986/July 1, 1986; January 4, 2010/February 1, 2010; March 18, 2011/July 1, 2011; November 20, 2012/January 1, 2013; January 24, 2019, effective same day"],["116","April 17, 1981/July 1, 1981; March 24, 1982/July 1, 1982"],["118","April 17, 1981/July 1, 1981; March 24, 1982/July 1, 1982; March 28, 1986/July 1, 1986; March 23, 1990/July 1, 1990; January 4, 2010/February 1, 2010; March 18, 2011/July 1, 2011; November 20, 2012/January 1, 2013; September 1, 2015/January 1, 2016"],["120","April 17, 1981/July 1, 1981"],["122","March 24, 1982/July 1, 1982"],["38","March 25, 1977/July 1, 1977; January 30, 2001/July 1, 2002; March 22, 2002/July 1, 2002—the displayed dates are retained"],["13.3","March 28, 1986/July 1, 1986"],["112, 114","April 17, 1981/July 1, 1981"],["21","March 25, 1977/July 1, 1977; April 18, 1983/July 1, 1983; November 20, 2012/January 1, 2013"],["32","Latest displayed April 28, 2022/July 1, 2022"],["46","Latest displayed April 28, 2022/April 28, 2022"],["34, 36","Latest displayed April 29, 2026/July 1, 2026"],["12.2","Current page includes June 30, 2026/July 1, 2026"],["13, 23","Current pages include April 29, 2026/July 1, 2026"]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds"],"index":13,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83","Complete page inspected; substantive reliance on (n)–(r), and necessary (f) scope only"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11.2","Complete (a)–(b); used only to preserve district postdecision/reconsideration limits"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2","Complete computation, extension, nonextension, inaccessibility, and mail provisions"]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds"],"index":14,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/1","Complete scope/conflict hierarchy"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/2","Complete definitions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/4","Complete filer categories and exceptions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/5","Complete exceptions; special-case practices not applied"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/6","Complete format, size, separation, and guide incorporation"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/7","Complete protected-filing treatment"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/9","Complete signature rule; specimen identity and special emergency scenarios not reproduced"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/10","Complete fees/waiver provision; notice-of-appeal branch distinguished"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/11","Complete filing/acceptance provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/12","Complete filing-time relation"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/13","Complete rejection/correction; no prescribed text prepared"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/14","Complete technical-failure relief"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/15","Complete privacy/redaction/exception text; no example identifiers reproduced"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/17","Complete party-service provision; discovery merits excluded"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/18","Complete court-service provision; form wording omitted"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/20","Complete page inspected; reliance only on (f) briefing interface"]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read and history"],"index":15,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read and history"],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-16/section-1-1607/","Complete nonjudicial-day and exception provision; C.C.P.1881 §46 lineage; 1961 ch.270 §1 p.480; 1971 ch.84 §1 p.186"],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-73/chapter-1/section-73-108/","Complete holiday/substitution provision; displayed history through 2002 ch.146 §3 p.423"]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual selected read","Status"],"index":16,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual selected read","Status"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/about-the-courts/sc-procedures","“When Does a Supreme Court Decision Become Final?” paragraph","Official guidance: denial of rehearing makes the decision final; not a complete rule-based postdenial clock"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/about-the-courts/ica-procedures","“Further Review” section","Official guidance only; discretionary review description"]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual use"],"index":17,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual use"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments","Publication/incorporation statement and available index context; original orders not recovered"],["https://isb.idaho.gov/blog/amendments-to-the-idaho-appellate-rules/","January 28, 2019 notice and actual original-order link; notice is not the order"],["https://isb.idaho.gov/blog/amendments-to-idaho-appellate-rules-eff-july-1-2026/","May 11, 2026 official institutional notice; linked order API-hosted and unopened"],["https://isb.idaho.gov/blog/recent-amendments-to-idaho-appellate-rules/","August 10, 2026 notice; current rule bodies, not this summary, support the formatting findings"]]},{"headers":["Literal URL","Actual observation"],"index":18,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal URL","Actual observation"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/iar","Initial ordinary consolidated-page delivery failed; separately discovered https://isc.idaho.gov/iar successfully redirected to the same collection"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/115","Failed delivery; official consolidated index identifies Rule 115 as Reserved"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/orders/IAR_Order_09.01.15.pdf","Discovered ordinary 2015 order route; 404"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules/2016_Highlights_of_Rule_Changes.pdf","Materially different official historical route; 404"],["https://www.isc.idaho.gov/rules/Order-Amending-Appellate-Rules.pdf","Actual 2019 notice link followed; 404"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/files/IdahoAppellateInformationHandbook_2025.pdf","Ordinary handbook route; 404; search excerpt not treated as a body read"],["https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title1/T1CH16/SECT1-1607/","Fresh official statutory route inaccessible"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/orders/Rule_Highlights_2015.pdf","Search lead only; not opened"],["API-hosted originals, technical guide, internal rules, forms","Not opened; no guessed alternative endpoint"]]},{"headers":["Claim","Precise proposition","Source/pinpoint","Status"],"index":19,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claim","Precise proposition","Source/pinpoint","Status"],["C001","Current operative rules were read; original history and statutory gaps remain.","S001–S008","O/P/H"],["C002","Rehearing, discretionary review, initiative review, and district postdecision practice are different routes.","IAR 42,116,118,120; Rule 83","O/H"],["C003","Ordinary Supreme rehearing has the specified petition filing, fee, and service relation.","IAR 42(a)","O"],["C004","Nonclerical modified opinions have a separately stated further-petition branch.","IAR 42(a)","O"],["C005","Supporting-brief timing differs from petition timing and the Rule 12.2 exception.","IAR 42(b),118(a),12.2(g)","O"],["C006","Responses, petition argument, grant/denial notice, and rehearing argument require their own authority.","IAR 42(c)–(e)","O"],["C007","Court of Appeals decides its own rehearing under the incorporated framework.","IAR 116","O/H"],["C008","Review uses the listed alternative decision events and does not require prior rehearing.","IAR 118(a)","O"],["C009","Concurrent timely rehearing remains possible; review action awaits final rehearing determinations.","IAR 118(a)","O"],["C010","Review is discretionary, requires special/important reasons and a majority direction, with nonexclusive factors.","IAR 118(b)","O"],["C011","Review support is criteria-focused; no response is authorized unless requested.","IAR 118(c)(1)","O"],["C012","Granted review ordinarily uses existing Court of Appeals briefs.","IAR 118(c)(2)","O"],["C013","Own-motion review has its own twenty-one-day text and no repeated clerical exception.","IAR 120","O/H"],["C014","Granted review terminates assignment and prevents the specified Court of Appeals remittitur.","IAR 122","O"],["C015","Petition filing differs from ordinary mailing and from service.","IAR 20; IREFS 1,11–12","O"],["C016","Rehearing and review have different filing-fee categories; waiver predicates remain held.","IAR 23","O/H"],["C017","Untimely rehearing filing is expressly within the jurisdictional-dismissal provision.","IAR 21","O"],["C018","General enlargement and extraordinary alteration exclude the specified rehearing period.","IAR 44,46","O"],["C019","Review’s omission from those lists must be reconciled with Rule 118’s incorporation.","IAR 21,44,46,118","H"],["C020","Late ordinary support and expedited simultaneous-support failure have different textual consequences.","IAR 21,42(b),12.2(g)","O/H"],["C021","Rule 46 review objection runs from motion service, not order service.","IAR 46","O"],["C022","Signing and motion sanctions do not establish actual misconduct or an automatic fee.","IAR 11.2,32","O/H"],["C023","The special rules do not state a distinct universal petition/support word cap.","IAR 42,118,34","O/H"],["C024","General first/reply limits are not automatically fresh allowances for special papers.","IAR 34–36","H"],["C025","Special no-binding/no-colored-cover language preserves other applicable form conditions.","IAR 42(d),118(c)(1),34–36","O/H"],["C026","Electronic format and filing exceptions remain material.","IREFS 1–7,20","O/H"],["C027","Correction and technical-failure branches have distinct predicates and effects.","IREFS 11–14","O"],["C028","Party service, court service, fee handling, and filing are separate.","IREFS 10,17–18; IAR 20,47","O/H"],["C029","Privacy/sealing remedies do not supply general appellate recall or deadline-extension power.","IREFS 15; ICAR 32(i)","O/H"],["C030","Computation and added time require the correct event and scope.","IAR 22; Rule 2.2; IREFS 17(h)","O/P/H"],["C031","Rule 83’s district postdecision and remittitur branches are not a universal Rule 42 rehearing route.","Rule 83(n)–(r); Rule 11.2","O/H"],["C032","Filing, announcement, modification, and Rule 38 finality are distinct.","IAR 38(a)–(b)","O"],["C033","A universal fresh twenty-one-day postdenial period was not authenticated.","IAR 38; S006 guidance","O/G/H"],["C034","Remittitur issuance, filing below, copies, and compliance have separate actors/events.","IAR 38(c),122","O"],["C035","Unresolved cost/fee amount does not necessarily delay remittitur.","IAR 38(d),40(f),41(d)","O"],["C036","Court of Appeals disposition authority does not establish a particular remand outcome.","IAR 112","O"],["C037","Pre-opinion temporary remand is not general postfinal recall.","IAR 13.3","O/H"],["C038","Assignment revocation and pre-opinion stipulated dismissal have limited functions.","IAR 114,33","O/H"],["C039","No universal recall, early-stipulated-remittitur, or mandate-correction procedure was authenticated.","Read scope; IAR 48","H"],["C040","A rehearing/review petition is not declared a new universal enforcement-stay trigger.","IAR 13; special rules","O/H"],["C041","Denial of review is not characterized as approval of merits; grant is not universally equated with vacatur.","Rule 118/122 scope","H"],["C042","Original orders, current guide, and internal-rule restrictions remain unverified here.","S007–S008","H"],["C043","Published clerical-modification exceptions are not identical across Rules 38,42,118,120.","Those complete rules","O/H"],["C044","Federal and other special regimes remain separate.","IAR 12.2,39; exclusions","H"],["C045","No actual petition, record, event, fee eligibility, deadline, or outcome was determined.","Research record","Certain"]]},{"headers":["Quantity/relation","Reference event or base","Qualification"],"index":20,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Quantity/relation","Reference event or base","Qualification"],["21 days","Supreme opinion filing date","Ordinary rehearing petition"],["21 days","Date of modified Supreme opinion","Nonclerical modification; aggrieved-party condition"],["14 days","Rehearing petition filing","Ordinary supporting brief/memorandum"],["Simultaneous filing","Petition and support under Rule 12.2","Express summary-dismissal condition"],["Original only; no copies","Rehearing petition and supporting brief","Electronic scope still applies"],["No fixed response period","Rehearing/review opposition","Only if directed/requested; order governs"],["No automatic reply period","Special petitions","No ordinary merits-reply schedule imported"],["21 days","Applicable Rule 118 announcement event","Original opinion/order, denial of rehearing, opinion on rehearing, qualifying modification"],["With petition or within 14 days","Review support","Rule 12.2 exception"],["No prior rehearing prerequisite","Review route","Does not prohibit timely rehearing"],["Final determination of all rehearing petitions","Supreme review-action sequencing","No action before that condition"],["Five nonexclusive factors","Rule 118(b)","Neither exhaustive nor controlling"],["Majority of Justices","Grant of review","No actual vote or entitlement"],["Majority of Court of Appeals judges","Certification factor","Not automatic Supreme acceptance"],["21 days","Rule 120 listed announcements","Supreme initiative, not party extension"],["Existing briefs after grant","Rule 118(c)(2)","Additional briefing only if ordered"],["No Court of Appeals remittitur after grant","Rule 122","Filing petition alone is not the same event"],["No fixed number of successive ordinary petitions authenticated","Rule 42 modification branch","Not unlimited permission"]]},{"headers":["Quantity/relation","Reference event/base","Qualification"],"index":21,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Quantity/relation","Reference event/base","Qualification"],["$71","Ordinary rehearing petition","Listed criminal/habeas/post-conviction exceptions"],["No filing fee","Review of Court of Appeals decision","Other fees/costs not decided"],["Clerk receipt/authorized electronic filing","Petition institution","Mailing alone not substituted"],["Rehearing filing nonextension","Rules 44/46","Review-incorporation issue held"],["Seven days from motion service","Written objection to ex parte enlargement","Clerk separately serves order"],["Brief-extension request by due date","Rule 34(d)","Applies only where extension is authorized"],["Eight affidavit subject categories","Brief-extension request","No affidavit prepared"],["Fourteen days after service","General IAR 32 opposition","Does not override special no-response rule"],["Trigger day excluded","IAR 22","Last-day weekend/nonjudicial qualification"],["Intermediate days counted","IRCP 2.2 within its scope","Not an automatic wholesale IAR import"],["Three added days","Civil act due after service by mail","Not entry/announcement/filing-based petition period"],["After 5 p.m.; one added day","Party electronic service","Scope and actual service not determined"],["Court-local 12:01 a.m.–midnight","Electronic filing day","Acceptance and nonbusiness-day clauses"],["Three business days, legal holidays excluded","Rejection-correction resubmission","Required request and next-judicial-day qualification"],["Seven business days, legal holidays excluded","Technical-failure resubmission after unsuccessful-submission notice","Satisfactory proof; not universal extension"],["General waiver-denial correction period","IREFS 10(b)","Not assumed to resolve every appellate petition’s jurisdictional or statutory waiver issue"],["Unknown","Actual receipt, submission, acceptance, waiver, correction, or court closure","None supplied"]]},{"headers":["Quantity/relation","Legal base","Qualification"],"index":22,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Quantity/relation","Legal base","Qualification"],["14,000 / 7,000 words","Rule 34 first/reply party brief categories","Not automatically assigned to special petition/support"],["50 / 25 pages","Specified handwritten-prisoner first/reply branch","Not a general ordinary special-petition limit"],["Included in count","Headings, footnotes, quotations","Count exceptions retained"],["Excluded from count","Listed front matter, certificates, appendices/exhibits","Exclusion does not authorize content"],["8½ × 11 inches","General paper/page form","Electronic printable-page relation"],["At least one-inch margins","Rule 36","Bottom pagination"],["14-point or larger","General text and footnotes","Specified typewriter exception"],["12-point permitted","Qualifying unrepresented typewriter branch","Other applicable conditions remain"],["Two named proportional fonts","Times New Roman/Century Schoolbook","No font files or generated document"],["50 MB/file; 100 MB/envelope","IREFS 6","Separation and exception provisions"],["Seven days","Initial sealing-review branch","Continued protection requires stated order"],["Seven days from denial order","Amendment of a submission relying on withdrawn newly filed material","Not automatic extension of protected petition filing"],["No petition argument unless ordered","Rule 42(c)","Review incorporation and court direction"],["Same manner as merits argument after rehearing grant","Rule 42(e)","General no-argument/order provisions remain"],["30 minutes per side","General Rule 37 merits argument if applicable","Court may alter for good cause"],["10 minutes per side; one counsel","Permitted preliminary-motion argument","Not automatically a special petition allotment"],["At least 14 days before argument","Multiple-party allocation request","No actual argument scheduled"],["At least 7 days before argument","Court allocation","Court discretion preserved"],["21 days from no-argument order date","Rule 37 written objection if applicable","Not a fresh petition filing period"]]},{"headers":["Quantity/relation","Event","Qualification"],"index":23,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Quantity/relation","Event","Qualification"],["21 days after last listed event","Rule 38 original/rehearing/modified-opinion finality text","Pending/denied-petition construction preserved"],["No repeated clerical exception","Rule 38(b)(3), Rule 120","Not silently made identical to Rules 42/118"],["42 days after district appellate decision filed","Rule 83(r) no-higher-appeal remittitur branch","No actual tolling or deadline calculation"],["Forthwith transmission/compliance","Rule 38","No invented numeric compliance deadline"],["Before opinion; good cause","Temporary remand","Appeal remains pending"],["At any time in assignment-revocation text","Rule 114","Not universal recall of a final remittitur"],["Before opinion","Rule 33 stipulated dismissal","Not a post-opinion early-remittitur rule"],["Unresolved taxation does not delay","Rule 38(d)","Fee merits remain separate"],["July 1, 1977","IAR historical application baseline","Not each clause’s current amendment date"],["January 1, 2016","Latest displayed Rule 118 amendment effectiveness","Original 2015 order failed"],["January 24, 2019","Latest displayed Rule 42 amendment/effectiveness","Original 2019 order failed"],["July 1, 2026","Material general format and special-expedited amendments","Original 2026 orders unopened"],["Unknown","Actual finality, pending petition status, mandate scope, recall ground, lower jurisdiction, outcome","None supplied or inferred"]]},{"headers":["Branch","Missing predicate","Supported consequence","Adverse inference to avoid","Exact next generic inquiry"],"index":24,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Branch","Missing predicate","Supported consequence","Adverse inference to avoid","Exact next generic inquiry"],["B01 — rehearing route","Correct court and eligible decision category","Applicable rehearing procedure","Every order has a universal Rule 42 remedy","Rule-specific order eligibility/construction"],["B02 — petition time","Correct filing/announcement/modification event","Stated period may apply","Support-brief period extends petition time","Rule 42/118 application"],["B03 — clerical change","Nature of modification","Express exception may control","Every altered opinion creates identical clocks","Rule 38/42/118/120 reconciliation"],["B04 — support brief","Ordinary or Rule 12.2 posture","Separate or simultaneous support","Ordinary late support always equals expedited summary dismissal","Exact route and consequence"],["B05 — response","Court direction/request","Authorized response","Silence is admission or an automatic response deadline exists","Specific order/special rule"],["B06 — review eligibility","Aggrieved party, final-decision relationship, criteria","Discretionary consideration","Right to Supreme review","Rule 118 construction"],["B07 — simultaneous requests","Timely rehearing and pending review","Express sequencing","Review petition bars rehearing or is immediately decided","Rule 118(a)"],["B08 — review grant","Actual grant/order","Existing briefs and assignment consequences","Automatic new briefs, new evidence, or universal vacatur","Order and Rule 118/122"],["B09 — own initiative","Listed event and court action","Review order may issue","Party can compel own-motion review","Rule 120"],["B10 — late review petition","Meaning of incorporated times/manner","Exact hold","Omission from Rule 21/46 means unrestricted extension","Judicial construction"],["B11 — fee","Applicable category and lawful waiver","Defined fee treatment","No fee means automatic review, or waiver request is granted","Unread statutes and petition mechanics"],["B12 — length","Special-paper classification/order","General form framework","Fresh 14,000 words automatically available","Rule 34/42/118 construction"],["B13 — electronic defect","Required correction/proof/timing","Conditional filing-date relief","Technical allegation always excuses late filing","IREFS 13/14 interaction"],["B14 — privacy","Protected status and required order","Limited access/filing treatment","Sealed appendix authorizes disclosure or tolling","ICAR 32 and substantive privacy"],["B15 — district reconsideration","Governing district-appellate authority","Rule 83 motion/fallback structure","Universal twenty-one-day Supreme rehearing rule","District-appellate construction"],["B16 — finality","Applicable pending/disposed petition and opinion event","Rule 38/guidance relationship","Universal fresh twenty-one days after denial","Complete finality construction"],["B17 — remittitur","Finality and actual directive","Issue/file/comply duties","Every remand orders a new trial or a fixed result","Mandate scope law"],["B18 — recall","Separate lawful source and conditions","Held dependency","General practice or assignment power is unlimited recall authority","Original rule/statute/constitutional construction"],["B19 — temporary remand","Pre-opinion good cause and limited order","Limited lower-court action","Appeal terminates or all merits reopen","IAR 13.3"],["B20 — withdrawal/stipulation","Stage and applicable authority","Pre-opinion dismissal branch","Party stipulation automatically accelerates remittitur","Postdecision authority"],["B21 — stay","Independent stay/order/special law","Conditional protection","Every petition renews an automatic enforcement stay","Full stay/security regime"],["B22 — sanctions","Specific violation and lawful process","Appropriate response possible","Unsuccessful petition proves misconduct","IAR 11.2/due process"],["B23 — denial","Actual disposition and applicable law","No merits endorsement inferred","Denial necessarily approves reasoning","Precedential-effect construction"],["B24 — original history","Readable adopted originals and transition text","Gap may close","Footer or guide proves the whole chain","Ordinary official original sources"]]},{"headers":["Separate subject","Required later authority or question"],"index":25,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Separate subject","Required later authority or question"],["Review-petition jurisdiction and extensions","Rule 118’s incorporation reconciled with Rules 21, 44, and 46"],["Decision/order eligibility","Rule 42’s opinion wording; Rule 116/118 order language; Rule 118(b)’s final-decision requirement"],["Special-paper length","Whether and how Rule 34’s first/reply categories apply to rehearing/review support, opposition, or a standalone petition"],["Pending petitions and finality","Exact clerk/court treatment after filing, denial, dismissal, modification, successive qualifying petition, and review disposition"],["Clerical modification","Differences among Rules 38, 42, 118, and 120"],["Recall/correction","Express original authority and standards for amended, corrected, recalled, or reissued remittitur; no universal power established here"],["District-appellate postdecision procedure","Rule 83/IRCP 11.2/IAR interaction and any effect on further-review time"],["Current technical guide/internal rules","Special formatting, citation restrictions, internal procedures, and lawful public originals"],["Fee waiver","§§ 31-3220, 31-3220A, 67-2301, 31-3212 and petition-specific implementation"],["Record/new evidence","Record-boundary and augmentation rules for any proposed additional material; no new-evidence permission inferred"],["Substantive review","Claim-specific standards, preservation, harmlessness, merits, and precedential effect"],["Full enforcement","Stay/security, judgment collection, interest, liens, satisfaction, and lower-court compliance remedies"],["Federal review","U.S. Supreme Court jurisdiction, certiorari, deadlines, federal mandate, and federal stays—no federal timetable supplied"],["Other special regimes","Criminal/capital, family/juvenile, agency, statutory expedited, extraordinary writ, tribal/interstate, bankruptcy, military, and protected-party law"],["Original history","2015 Rule 118, 2019 Rule 42, 2026 format/expedited amendments, other intervening orders and application clauses"]]},{"headers":["Field","Entry"],"index":26,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Field","Entry"],["Governing postdecision route",""],["Authority and edition",""],["Official-current-text status",""],["Decision/opinion/order category",""],["Requesting-role predicate",""],["Deciding court",""],["Filing office",""],["Trigger event",""],["Petition period",""],["Supporting-paper period",""],["Response authorization",""],["Review criteria",""],["Rehearing/review sequencing",""],["Additional briefing authority",""],["Argument authority",""],["Fee/waiver provision",""],["Applicable length classification",""],["Format/certificate requirement",""],["Filing/service distinction",""],["Correction/technical-failure provision",""],["Computation/extension rule",""],["Privacy condition",""],["Finality relation",""],["Remittitur issue/file event",""],["Receiving-court duty",""],["Recall/remand dependency",""],["Special-regime boundary",""],["Missing original authority",""],["Review status",""]]},{"headers":["Requested question/material subquestion","Disposition","Claims/sources","Exact remaining gap"],"index":27,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Requested question/material subquestion","Disposition","Claims/sources","Exact remaining gap"],["1 — current ordinary routes","Complete core rules read","C002–C014; S001","No actual posture classification"],["Supreme rehearing","Complete Rule 42","C003–C006","Order eligibility/merits construction"],["Court of Appeals rehearing","Complete Rule 116","C007","Unusual order-trigger mapping"],["Supreme discretionary review","Complete Rule 118","C008–C012","Actual final-decision/criteria determination"],["Court initiative","Complete Rule 120","C013","No actual exercise of power"],["District postdecision","Necessary Rule 83/11.2 clauses","C031","Universal rehearing/tolling rule not inferred"],["Special regimes","Expressly excluded","C044","Independent authority required"],["2 — petition and support acts","Separate filing/service/fee/support relations","C003–C006,C015–C016","Fee-waiver statutory mechanics"],["Grounds and argument limits","Textual requirements identified","C006,C011","No borrowed federal merits-ground test"],["Opposition/reply","Court-directed/requested branch","C005,C011","No universal response/reply period"],["Grant/denial/change","Conditions and issue/brief-order effects read","C004,C006,C033","Postdenial finality construction"],["Copies/signatures/form","Necessary rules read","C025–C028","Special-paper length/guide"],["Extensions/nonextensions","Complete rules and ambiguity preserved","C017–C021","Review incorporation construction"],["3 — review posture/rehearing relation","Complete Rule 118(a)","C008–C009","No actual exhaustion/eligibility"],["Criteria","All five factors and majority requirement","C010","No merits or probability finding"],["Supporting material","Criteria brief; record boundary preserved","C011–C012","No required appendix invented"],["Acceptance/denial effects","Rule 118/122 limits","C012,C014,C041","No denial-as-approval or automatic-vacatur conclusion"],["Postgrant briefing/argument","Existing briefs; ordered additions; applicable argument rules","C012,C025","Actual order absent"],["4 — special format/length","Independently read","C023–C025","No distinct special cap authenticated"],["Citation/appendix","Necessary general rules only","S001 Rules 6,35–36","Internal citation restrictions/technical guide"],["E-filing/service/correction","Complete material bodies","C026–C028","No actual system event"],["Computation/additional time","Scoped rules and provisional statutes","C030","No calendar or universal addition"],["Privacy","Necessary complete branch","C029","Full privilege/access regime"],["5 — announcement/finality","Rule 38 complete; guidance qualified","C032–C033","Pending/denied-petition sequencing"],["Remittitur issuance/transmission/filing","Complete core text","C034","No actual receiving-court event"],["Review assignment effect","Complete Rule 122","C014","Filing alone not treated as grant"],["Lower compliance/remand","Necessary Rules 38,112,13.3","C034,C036–C037","Actual mandate interpretation excluded"],["Recall/reissue/early stipulation","Exact gap retained","C038–C039","No universal authority authenticated"],["Unresolved taxation","Narrow fresh rule read","C035","P30 merits not reused"],["Stay/security","Boundary only","C040","Full stay/security regime"],["6 — untimeliness/consequences","Express distinctions read","C017–C020,C022","Review jurisdiction/construction"],["No response/nonconformity","No automatic merits admission","C005,C011,C022","Applicable judicial remedy"],["Withdrawal/correction","Relevant limited clauses read","C027,C038–C039","Postopinion withdrawal/recall authority"],["Sanctions/notice","Signing and motion interface","C022","Full constitutional/disciplinary process"],["Federal/special follow-ons","Precise dependencies","Section 11","No broad federal overview"],["7 — sources/read bounds/history","Visible register supplied","Section 7","Original orders/current statutes"],["2025–2026 changes","Bounded searches and current footers separated","C042","No all-law-through-date certification"],["Failed/discovery status","Explicit","S007–S008","No snippet substitution"],["Quantities/branches/worksheet","Supplied","Sections 9–12","No inputs, dates, or forms"],["Prior findings/holds","Preserved","C045","No implied closure"],["Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent","Not accepted complete","Entire report","Recorded dependencies remain"]]},{"headers":["Material","Actual use"],"index":28,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Material","Actual use"],["Official Rules 42, 116, 118, 120, 122, 38","Complete bodies and displayed footers"],["Related appellate rules","Complete or expressly bounded clauses listed in S001"],["Rule 83 and civil computation/reconsideration","New postdecision interfaces only"],["Electronic and privacy rules","Complete or expressly bounded material clauses"],["Official generic court guidance","Selected finality/further-review paragraphs only"],["Statutory computation source","Official route failed; complete secondary bodies read"],["2015/2019 original-history searches","Actual ordinary discovered routes attempted; failures preserved"],["2025–2026 searches","Generic rule/amendment/version searches; no absence-of-change conclusion"],["Clerk-handbook route","Failed; snippet not treated as complete source"],["Reserved rules","Official consolidated index checked; no invented operative counterpart"],["Opinions, cases, dockets, calendars, rosters","Incidental results not opened, investigated, or relied on"],["Actual petitions, decisions, records, contracts, identities, financial or medical information","Not requested, constructed, or evaluated"],["Earlier local review files","Supplied scope/reuse descriptions only; no inspection claim"]]},{"headers":["Attempted or discovered PDF","Status"],"index":29,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Attempted or discovered PDF","Status"],["September 1, 2015 appellate amendment order","404"],["2016 highlights document","404"],["2019 appellate amendment order","404"],["2025 appellate handbook","404"],["2026 API-hosted orders/guide/internal rules","Not opened"],["2015 highlights search lead","Not opened"]]}],"claims":[{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C001","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C001","Precise proposition":"Current operative rules were read; original history and statutory gaps remain.","Source/pinpoint":"S001–S008","Status":"O/P/H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"bounded_gap_or_provenance_statement_not_universal_negative_legal_proof"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C002","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C002","Precise proposition":"Rehearing, discretionary review, initiative review, and district postdecision practice are different routes.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 42,116,118,120; Rule 83","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C003","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C003","Precise proposition":"Ordinary Supreme rehearing has the specified petition filing, fee, and service relation.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 42(a)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C004","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C004","Precise proposition":"Nonclerical modified opinions have a separately stated further-petition branch.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 42(a)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C005","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C005","Precise proposition":"Supporting-brief timing differs from petition timing and the Rule 12.2 exception.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 42(b),118(a),12.2(g)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C006","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C006","Precise proposition":"Responses, petition argument, grant/denial notice, and rehearing argument require their own authority.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 42(c)–(e)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C007","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C007","Precise proposition":"Court of Appeals decides its own rehearing under the incorporated framework.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 116","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C008","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C008","Precise proposition":"Review uses the listed alternative decision events and does not require prior rehearing.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 118(a)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C009","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C009","Precise proposition":"Concurrent timely rehearing remains possible; review action awaits final rehearing determinations.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 118(a)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C010","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C010","Precise proposition":"Review is discretionary, requires special/important reasons and a majority direction, with nonexclusive factors.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 118(b)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C011","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C011","Precise proposition":"Review support is criteria-focused; no response is authorized unless requested.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 118(c)(1)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C012","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C012","Precise proposition":"Granted review ordinarily uses existing Court of Appeals briefs.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 118(c)(2)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C013","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C013","Precise proposition":"Own-motion review has its own twenty-one-day text and no repeated clerical exception.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 120","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C014","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C014","Precise proposition":"Granted review terminates assignment and prevents the specified Court of Appeals remittitur.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 122","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C015","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C015","Precise proposition":"Petition filing differs from ordinary mailing and from service.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 20; IREFS 1,11–12","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"selected_fresh_and_prior_scoped_rule_support_only_not_all_incorporation_or_currentness_acceptance"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C016","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C016","Precise proposition":"Rehearing and review have different filing-fee categories; waiver predicates remain held.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 23","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C017","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C017","Precise proposition":"Untimely rehearing filing is expressly within the jurisdictional-dismissal provision.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 21","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C018","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C018","Precise proposition":"General enlargement and extraordinary alteration exclude the specified rehearing period.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 44,46","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C019","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C019","Precise proposition":"Review’s omission from those lists must be reconciled with Rule 118’s incorporation.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 21,44,46,118","Status":"H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"bounded_gap_or_provenance_statement_not_universal_negative_legal_proof"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C020","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C020","Precise proposition":"Late ordinary support and expedited simultaneous-support failure have different textual consequences.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 21,42(b),12.2(g)","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C021","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C021","Precise proposition":"Rule 46 review objection runs from motion service, not order service.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 46","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C022","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C022","Precise proposition":"Signing and motion sanctions do not establish actual misconduct or an automatic fee.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 11.2,32","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"selected_fresh_and_prior_scoped_rule_support_only_not_all_incorporation_or_currentness_acceptance"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C023","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C023","Precise proposition":"The special rules do not state a distinct universal petition/support word cap.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 42,118,34","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"bounded_gap_or_provenance_statement_not_universal_negative_legal_proof"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C024","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C024","Precise proposition":"General first/reply limits are not automatically fresh allowances for special papers.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 34–36","Status":"H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"bounded_gap_or_provenance_statement_not_universal_negative_legal_proof"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C025","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C025","Precise proposition":"Special no-binding/no-colored-cover language preserves other applicable form conditions.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 42(d),118(c)(1),34–36","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"selected_fresh_and_prior_scoped_rule_support_only_not_all_incorporation_or_currentness_acceptance"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C026","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C026","Precise proposition":"Electronic format and filing exceptions remain material.","Source/pinpoint":"IREFS 1–7,20","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"selected_fresh_and_prior_scoped_rule_support_only_not_all_incorporation_or_currentness_acceptance"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C027","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C027","Precise proposition":"Correction and technical-failure branches have distinct predicates and effects.","Source/pinpoint":"IREFS 11–14","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"selected_fresh_and_prior_scoped_rule_support_only_not_all_incorporation_or_currentness_acceptance"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C028","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C028","Precise proposition":"Party service, court service, fee handling, and filing are separate.","Source/pinpoint":"IREFS 10,17–18; IAR 20,47","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"selected_fresh_and_prior_scoped_rule_support_only_not_all_incorporation_or_currentness_acceptance"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C029","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C029","Precise proposition":"Privacy/sealing remedies do not supply general appellate recall or deadline-extension power.","Source/pinpoint":"IREFS 15; ICAR 32(i)","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"bounded_gap_or_provenance_statement_not_universal_negative_legal_proof"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C030","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C030","Precise proposition":"Computation and added time require the correct event and scope.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 22; Rule 2.2; IREFS 17(h)","Status":"O/P/H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"bounded_gap_or_provenance_statement_not_universal_negative_legal_proof"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C031","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C031","Precise proposition":"Rule 83’s district postdecision and remittitur branches are not a universal Rule 42 rehearing route.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 83(n)–(r); Rule 11.2","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C032","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C032","Precise proposition":"Filing, announcement, modification, and Rule 38 finality are distinct.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 38(a)–(b)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C033","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C033","Precise proposition":"A universal fresh twenty-one-day postdenial period was not authenticated.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 38; S006 guidance","Status":"O/G/H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"bounded_gap_or_provenance_statement_not_universal_negative_legal_proof"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C034","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C034","Precise proposition":"Remittitur issuance, filing below, copies, and compliance have separate actors/events.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 38(c),122","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C035","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C035","Precise proposition":"Unresolved cost/fee amount does not necessarily delay remittitur.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 38(d),40(f),41(d)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"selected_fresh_and_prior_scoped_rule_support_only_not_all_incorporation_or_currentness_acceptance"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C036","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C036","Precise proposition":"Court of Appeals disposition authority does not establish a particular remand outcome.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 112","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C037","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C037","Precise proposition":"Pre-opinion temporary remand is not general postfinal recall.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 13.3","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C038","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C038","Precise proposition":"Assignment revocation and pre-opinion stipulated dismissal have limited functions.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 114,33","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"selected_fresh_and_prior_scoped_rule_support_only_not_all_incorporation_or_currentness_acceptance"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C039","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C039","Precise proposition":"No universal recall, early-stipulated-remittitur, or mandate-correction procedure was authenticated.","Source/pinpoint":"Read scope; IAR 48","Status":"H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"bounded_gap_or_provenance_statement_not_universal_negative_legal_proof"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C040","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C040","Precise proposition":"A rehearing/review petition is not declared a new universal enforcement-stay trigger.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 13; special rules","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"selected_fresh_and_prior_scoped_rule_support_only_not_all_incorporation_or_currentness_acceptance"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C041","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C041","Precise proposition":"Denial of review is not characterized as approval of merits; grant is not universally equated with vacatur.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 118/122 scope","Status":"H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"bounded_gap_or_provenance_statement_not_universal_negative_legal_proof"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C042","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C042","Precise proposition":"Original orders, current guide, and internal-rule restrictions remain unverified here.","Source/pinpoint":"S007–S008","Status":"H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"bounded_gap_or_provenance_statement_not_universal_negative_legal_proof"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C043","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C043","Precise proposition":"Published clerical-modification exceptions are not identical across Rules 38,42,118,120.","Source/pinpoint":"Those complete rules","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"scoped_core_current_rule_text_compared_other_original_history_construction_and_actual_holds_preserved"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C044","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C044","Precise proposition":"Federal and other special regimes remain separate.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR 12.2,39; exclusions","Status":"H"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"bounded_gap_or_provenance_statement_not_universal_negative_legal_proof"},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P31-C045","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C045","Precise proposition":"No actual petition, record, event, fee eligibility, deadline, or outcome was determined.","Source/pinpoint":"Research record","Status":"Certain"},"raw_table_index":19,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_with_selected_primary_checks_and_held_dependencies","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_disposition":"bounded_gap_or_provenance_statement_not_universal_negative_legal_proof"}],"sources":[{"source_id":"S_ID-P31-S001","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/iar","https://isc.idaho.gov/iar","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/6","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.2","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/12.2","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13.3","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/20","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/21","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/22","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/23","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/32","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/33","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/34","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/35","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/36","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/37","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/39","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/42","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/44","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/46","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/47","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/48","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/101","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/110","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/112","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/114","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/116","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/118","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/120","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/122"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P31-S001","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S001 — official Idaho Appellate Rules\n\nIssuer/title: Idaho Supreme Court, Idaho Appellate Rules.\nConsolidated URL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/iar\n\nThe consolidated route initially failed; the separately discovered ordinary URL https://isc.idaho.gov/iar successfully redirected to the same official collection. Those are one source instrument, not independent authorities.\n\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tActual read bounds and use\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/iar\tNecessary complete Rules 1–2 and reserved-rule index; no general gateway rerun\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/6\tComplete generic paper/title provisions; no caption created\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.2\tComplete signing/sanction text; ICAR 59 merits held\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/12.2\tComplete body inspected; substantive use limited to scope and (g) simultaneous-support exception\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13\tComplete body inspected; narrow stay-trigger/retained-authority boundary; security amounts not applied\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13.3\tComplete temporary-remand provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/20\tComplete filing/service rule\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/21\tComplete jurisdictional and other-step distinction\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/22\tComplete computation clause\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/23\tComplete; substantive use limited to rehearing/review fees and waiver-incorporation limits; form unopened\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/32\tComplete motion rule; printed generic form not reproduced\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/33\tComplete pre-opinion stipulated-dismissal rule\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/34\tComplete; special-brief length/certificate/extension boundaries only; ordinary merits schedule not reused\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/35\tComplete page inspected; reliance on necessary record-citation/addendum provisions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/36\tComplete form and exception provisions; model cover unopened\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/37\tComplete argument provision; applied only through relevant rehearing/review interface\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38\tComplete (a)–(d)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/39\tComplete special federal-mandate clause read as an exclusion; its period not applied to ordinary state remittitur\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40\tComplete page inspected; substantive use limited to (f) and the narrow unresolved-taxation relation\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41\tComplete page inspected; substantive use limited to (d) remittitur insertion/remand interface\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/42\tComplete (a)–(e)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/44\tComplete extraordinary-procedure alteration and exclusions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/46\tComplete; seven-day objection from motion service preserved\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/47\tComplete court-service provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/48\tComplete unspecified-practice provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/101\tComplete Court of Appeals scope\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/110\tComplete subsequent-filing/assignment interface\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/112\tComplete disposition authority\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/114\tComplete assignment-revocation provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/116\tComplete Court of Appeals rehearing provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/118\tComplete (a)–(c)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/120\tComplete own-initiative review provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/122\tComplete opinions/remittiturs provision\nCore displayed histories\nRule\tDisplayed adoption/amendment/effectiveness\n42\tMarch 25, 1977/July 1, 1977; March 20, 1985/July 1, 1985; March 28, 1986/July 1, 1986; January 4, 2010/February 1, 2010; March 18, 2011/July 1, 2011; November 20, 2012/January 1, 2013; January 24, 2019, effective same day\n116\tApril 17, 1981/July 1, 1981; March 24, 1982/July 1, 1982\n118\tApril 17, 1981/July 1, 1981; March 24, 1982/July 1, 1982; March 28, 1986/July 1, 1986; March 23, 1990/July 1, 1990; January 4, 2010/February 1, 2010; March 18, 2011/July 1, 2011; November 20, 2012/January 1, 2013; September 1, 2015/January 1, 2016\n120\tApril 17, 1981/July 1, 1981\n122\tMarch 24, 1982/July 1, 1982\n38\tMarch 25, 1977/July 1, 1977; January 30, 2001/July 1, 2002; March 22, 2002/July 1, 2002—the displayed dates are retained\n13.3\tMarch 28, 1986/July 1, 1986\n112, 114\tApril 17, 1981/July 1, 1981\n21\tMarch 25, 1977/July 1, 1977; April 18, 1983/July 1, 1983; November 20, 2012/January 1, 2013\n32\tLatest displayed April 28, 2022/July 1, 2022\n46\tLatest displayed April 28, 2022/April 28, 2022\n34, 36\tLatest displayed April 29, 2026/July 1, 2026\n12.2\tCurrent page includes June 30, 2026/July 1, 2026\n13, 23\tCurrent pages include April 29, 2026/July 1, 2026\n\nThese are displayed source histories. The 2015, 2019, and 2026 original orders were not authenticated here. Older anomalous footer dates were not silently repaired.\n\nIAR 1’s historical July 1, 1977 application provision was read, including its separate treatment of notice time for earlier judgments. It is not a present-day actual-case transition determination."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"fresh14completecurrentIAR_bodies_selectedprior_support_otherhistoryheld","classification_reconciliation":"Completevisibleheadinggroup;notcoordinatorprimaryauthentication.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_read_bounds":"Fresh42/116/118/120/122/38/21/44/46/23/13.3/112/114/34complete;otherreportedIARretainpriorP29P30exactchecksorunreopenedholds. Original2015/2019/2026ordersnotverified.","coordinator_source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_ID-P31-S002","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11.2","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P31-S002","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S002 — official civil-rule district and computation interfaces\n\nIssuer: Idaho Supreme Court.\n\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tActual read bounds\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83\tComplete page inspected; substantive reliance on (n)–(r), and necessary (f) scope only\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11.2\tComplete (a)–(b); used only to preserve district postdecision/reconsideration limits\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2\tComplete computation, extension, nonextension, inaccessibility, and mail provisions\n\nDisplayed baseline: March 1, 2016/July 1, 2016. Rule 2.2 and Rule 11.2 include September 9, 2016/same-day amendments. Rule 83’s current footer includes amendments through June 30, 2026/July 1, 2026.\n\nNo Rule 60 merits, full trial procedure, or ordinary notice-of-appeal report was regenerated."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_completeIRCP83_postdecision_scope_otherclausesprior_or_held","classification_reconciliation":"Completevisibleheadinggroup;notcoordinatorprimaryauthentication.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_read_bounds":"Complete83returned0-238read; substantiveusef/n-r. Other11.2/2.2retainpriorcheckbounds; nofullreconsiderationtrialacceptance.","coordinator_source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_ID-P31-S003","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/irefs","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/1","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/2","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/4","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/5","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/6","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/7","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/9","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/10","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/11","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/12","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/13","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/14","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/15","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/17","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/18","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/20"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P31-S003","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S003 — official electronic-filing rules\n\nIssuer: Idaho Supreme Court.\nConsolidated URL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/irefs\n\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tActual read bounds\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/1\tComplete scope/conflict hierarchy\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/2\tComplete definitions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/4\tComplete filer categories and exceptions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/5\tComplete exceptions; special-case practices not applied\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/6\tComplete format, size, separation, and guide incorporation\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/7\tComplete protected-filing treatment\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/9\tComplete signature rule; specimen identity and special emergency scenarios not reproduced\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/10\tComplete fees/waiver provision; notice-of-appeal branch distinguished\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/11\tComplete filing/acceptance provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/12\tComplete filing-time relation\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/13\tComplete rejection/correction; no prescribed text prepared\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/14\tComplete technical-failure relief\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/15\tComplete privacy/redaction/exception text; no example identifiers reproduced\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/17\tComplete party-service provision; discovery merits excluded\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/18\tComplete court-service provision; form wording omitted\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/20\tComplete page inspected; reliance only on (f) briefing interface\n\nDisplayed baseline: April 15, 2019/July 1, 2019. Material later entries include Rule 4’s September 11, 2024 amendment; Rules 6–7’s December 18, 2024/January 1, 2025 amendments; and Rules 5/9 amendments through June 30, 2025/July 1, 2025.\n\nOriginal orders and the API-hosted technical guide were not read."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_completeIREFS10_other_electronic_prior_scoped_support_or_held","classification_reconciliation":"Completevisibleheadinggroup;notcoordinatorprimaryauthentication.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_read_bounds":"10complete0-22fresh; Q001missing3businessdaysdenialrelationrecorded. Otherformat/signature/service/correctionselectedpriorP29/P30checksretained; nofreshguide.","coordinator_source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_ID-P31-S004","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/icar/32"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P31-S004","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S004 — official confidentiality interface\n\nIssuer/title: Idaho Supreme Court, ICAR 32.\nURL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/icar/32\n\nRead: Complete necessary (a), relevant (b) definitions, protected reference-copy provisions, and (i)(1)–(8). Other access-request, fee, and special-regime provisions were not developed.\n\nDisplayed history: Current amendments extend through February 5, 2026, effective same day.\n\nLimit: No actual protected record or sealing application. A sealing-order modification provision is not treated as appellate-remittitur recall authority."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"prior_ICAR32_scoped_checks_retained_not_new_fetch","classification_reconciliation":"Completevisibleheadinggroup;notcoordinatorprimaryauthentication.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_read_bounds":"PriorP28completebodytwo-windowmap/P29selectedprivacychecks; noactualrecordorfreshprivacy/originalordercertification.","coordinator_source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_ID-P31-S005","urls":["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-16/section-1-1607/","https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-73/chapter-1/section-73-108/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P31-S005","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S005 — provisional computation statutes\n\nPublisher/edition: Justia, 2025 Idaho Code.\n\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tActual read and history\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-16/section-1-1607/\tComplete nonjudicial-day and exception provision; C.C.P.1881 §46 lineage; 1961 ch.270 §1 p.480; 1971 ch.84 §1 p.186\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-73/chapter-1/section-73-108/\tComplete holiday/substitution provision; displayed history through 2002 ch.146 §3 p.423\n\nLimit: Secondary text only. No actual holiday calendar, office closure, or special proclamation selected."},"source_access_status":"provisional_secondary_statutes","coordinator_verification_status":"secondary2025_statutes_not_current_official2026_verified","classification_reconciliation":"Completevisibleheadinggroup;notcoordinatorprimaryauthentication.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_read_bounds":"Twoholiday/nonjudicialtextrecordsread; officialcurrency/historicalapplication/calendarheld.","coordinator_source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_ID-P31-S006","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/about-the-courts/sc-procedures","https://isc.idaho.gov/about-the-courts/ica-procedures"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P31-S006","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S006 — official generic procedural guidance\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tActual selected read\tStatus\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/about-the-courts/sc-procedures\t“When Does a Supreme Court Decision Become Final?” paragraph\tOfficial guidance: denial of rehearing makes the decision final; not a complete rule-based postdenial clock\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/about-the-courts/ica-procedures\t“Further Review” section\tOfficial guidance only; discretionary review description\n\nOther generic statements on those pages were not used to expand jurisdiction, merits, or federal-review findings."},"source_access_status":"official_guidance_selected_only","coordinator_verification_status":"researcher_selected_official_guidance_unreopened","classification_reconciliation":"Completevisibleheadinggroup;notcoordinatorprimaryauthentication.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_read_bounds":"Selectedreportedfinality/furtherreviewparagraphsnotfreshlycoordinatoropened; nooperative-rule/jurisdictionupgrade.","coordinator_source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_ID-P31-S007","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments","https://isb.idaho.gov/blog/amendments-to-the-idaho-appellate-rules/","https://isb.idaho.gov/blog/amendments-to-idaho-appellate-rules-eff-july-1-2026/","https://isb.idaho.gov/blog/recent-amendments-to-idaho-appellate-rules/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P31-S007","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S007 — history locators and official notices\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tActual use\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments\tPublication/incorporation statement and available index context; original orders not recovered\nhttps://isb.idaho.gov/blog/amendments-to-the-idaho-appellate-rules/\tJanuary 28, 2019 notice and actual original-order link; notice is not the order\nhttps://isb.idaho.gov/blog/amendments-to-idaho-appellate-rules-eff-july-1-2026/\tMay 11, 2026 official institutional notice; linked order API-hosted and unopened\nhttps://isb.idaho.gov/blog/recent-amendments-to-idaho-appellate-rules/\tAugust 10, 2026 notice; current rule bodies, not this summary, support the formatting findings"},"source_access_status":"locator_notice_not_original_history","coordinator_verification_status":"locators_not_adopted_original_order_authentication","classification_reconciliation":"Completevisibleheadinggroup;notcoordinatorprimaryauthentication.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_read_bounds":"Allcompleteusagerecordsread; indexes/institutionalnoticesremainlocators; no2015/2019/2026ordersverified.","coordinator_source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_ID-P31-S008","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/iar","https://isc.idaho.gov/iar","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/115","https://isc.idaho.gov/orders/IAR_Order_09.01.15.pdf","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules/2016_Highlights_of_Rule_Changes.pdf","https://www.isc.idaho.gov/rules/Order-Amending-Appellate-Rules.pdf","https://isc.idaho.gov/files/IdahoAppellateInformationHandbook_2025.pdf","https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title1/T1CH16/SECT1-1607/","https://isc.idaho.gov/orders/Rule_Highlights_2015.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P31-S008","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S008 — failed and discovery-only sources\nLiteral URL\tActual observation\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/iar\tInitial ordinary consolidated-page delivery failed; separately discovered https://isc.idaho.gov/iar successfully redirected to the same collection\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/115\tFailed delivery; official consolidated index identifies Rule 115 as Reserved\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/orders/IAR_Order_09.01.15.pdf\tDiscovered ordinary 2015 order route; 404\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules/2016_Highlights_of_Rule_Changes.pdf\tMaterially different official historical route; 404\nhttps://www.isc.idaho.gov/rules/Order-Amending-Appellate-Rules.pdf\tActual 2019 notice link followed; 404\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/files/IdahoAppellateInformationHandbook_2025.pdf\tOrdinary handbook route; 404; search excerpt not treated as a body read\nhttps://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title1/T1CH16/SECT1-1607/\tFresh official statutory route inaccessible\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/orders/Rule_Highlights_2015.pdf\tSearch lead only; not opened\nAPI-hosted originals, technical guide, internal rules, forms\tNot opened; no guessed alternative endpoint\n\nNo original PDF body was recovered. Search metadata describing amendments or finality was not substituted for an operative read."},"source_access_status":"failed_and_discovery_only","coordinator_verification_status":"historical_failed_and_unopened_sources_preserved","classification_reconciliation":"Completevisibleheadinggroup;notcoordinatorprimaryauthentication.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false,"coordinator_read_bounds":"Allfailures/discoveryrecordsread; nofreshfailedretry/guessedroute/API/guide/form/historyrecoveryclaimed.","coordinator_source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]"}],"coverage":[{"topic":"1 — current ordinary routes","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"1 — current ordinary routes","Disposition":"Complete core rules read","Claims/sources":"C002–C014; S001","Exact remaining gap":"No actual posture classification"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Supreme rehearing","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Supreme rehearing","Disposition":"Complete Rule 42","Claims/sources":"C003–C006","Exact remaining gap":"Order eligibility/merits construction"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Court of Appeals rehearing","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Court of Appeals rehearing","Disposition":"Complete Rule 116","Claims/sources":"C007","Exact remaining gap":"Unusual order-trigger mapping"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Supreme discretionary review","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Supreme discretionary review","Disposition":"Complete Rule 118","Claims/sources":"C008–C012","Exact remaining gap":"Actual final-decision/criteria determination"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Court initiative","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Court initiative","Disposition":"Complete Rule 120","Claims/sources":"C013","Exact remaining gap":"No actual exercise of power"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"District postdecision","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"District postdecision","Disposition":"Necessary Rule 83/11.2 clauses","Claims/sources":"C031","Exact remaining gap":"Universal rehearing/tolling rule not inferred"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Special regimes","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Special regimes","Disposition":"Expressly excluded","Claims/sources":"C044","Exact remaining gap":"Independent authority required"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"2 — petition and support acts","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"2 — petition and support acts","Disposition":"Separate filing/service/fee/support relations","Claims/sources":"C003–C006,C015–C016","Exact remaining gap":"Fee-waiver statutory mechanics"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Grounds and argument limits","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Grounds and argument limits","Disposition":"Textual requirements identified","Claims/sources":"C006,C011","Exact remaining gap":"No borrowed federal merits-ground test"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Opposition/reply","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Opposition/reply","Disposition":"Court-directed/requested branch","Claims/sources":"C005,C011","Exact remaining gap":"No universal response/reply period"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Grant/denial/change","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Grant/denial/change","Disposition":"Conditions and issue/brief-order effects read","Claims/sources":"C004,C006,C033","Exact remaining gap":"Postdenial finality construction"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Copies/signatures/form","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Copies/signatures/form","Disposition":"Necessary rules read","Claims/sources":"C025–C028","Exact remaining gap":"Special-paper length/guide"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Extensions/nonextensions","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Extensions/nonextensions","Disposition":"Complete rules and ambiguity preserved","Claims/sources":"C017–C021","Exact remaining gap":"Review incorporation construction"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"3 — review posture/rehearing relation","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"3 — review posture/rehearing relation","Disposition":"Complete Rule 118(a)","Claims/sources":"C008–C009","Exact remaining gap":"No actual exhaustion/eligibility"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Criteria","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Criteria","Disposition":"All five factors and majority requirement","Claims/sources":"C010","Exact remaining gap":"No merits or probability finding"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Supporting material","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Supporting material","Disposition":"Criteria brief; record boundary preserved","Claims/sources":"C011–C012","Exact remaining gap":"No required appendix invented"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Acceptance/denial effects","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Acceptance/denial effects","Disposition":"Rule 118/122 limits","Claims/sources":"C012,C014,C041","Exact remaining gap":"No denial-as-approval or automatic-vacatur conclusion"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Postgrant briefing/argument","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Postgrant briefing/argument","Disposition":"Existing briefs; ordered additions; applicable argument rules","Claims/sources":"C012,C025","Exact remaining gap":"Actual order absent"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"4 — special format/length","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"4 — special format/length","Disposition":"Independently read","Claims/sources":"C023–C025","Exact remaining gap":"No distinct special cap authenticated"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Citation/appendix","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Citation/appendix","Disposition":"Necessary general rules only","Claims/sources":"S001 Rules 6,35–36","Exact remaining gap":"Internal citation restrictions/technical guide"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"E-filing/service/correction","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"E-filing/service/correction","Disposition":"Complete material bodies","Claims/sources":"C026–C028","Exact remaining gap":"No actual system event"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Computation/additional time","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Computation/additional time","Disposition":"Scoped rules and provisional statutes","Claims/sources":"C030","Exact remaining gap":"No calendar or universal addition"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Privacy","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Privacy","Disposition":"Necessary complete branch","Claims/sources":"C029","Exact remaining gap":"Full privilege/access regime"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"5 — announcement/finality","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"5 — announcement/finality","Disposition":"Rule 38 complete; guidance qualified","Claims/sources":"C032–C033","Exact remaining gap":"Pending/denied-petition sequencing"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Remittitur issuance/transmission/filing","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Remittitur issuance/transmission/filing","Disposition":"Complete core text","Claims/sources":"C034","Exact remaining gap":"No actual receiving-court event"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Review assignment effect","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Review assignment effect","Disposition":"Complete Rule 122","Claims/sources":"C014","Exact remaining gap":"Filing alone not treated as grant"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Lower compliance/remand","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Lower compliance/remand","Disposition":"Necessary Rules 38,112,13.3","Claims/sources":"C034,C036–C037","Exact remaining gap":"Actual mandate interpretation excluded"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Recall/reissue/early stipulation","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Recall/reissue/early stipulation","Disposition":"Exact gap retained","Claims/sources":"C038–C039","Exact remaining gap":"No universal authority authenticated"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Unresolved taxation","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Unresolved taxation","Disposition":"Narrow fresh rule read","Claims/sources":"C035","Exact remaining gap":"P30 merits not reused"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Stay/security","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Stay/security","Disposition":"Boundary only","Claims/sources":"C040","Exact remaining gap":"Full stay/security regime"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"6 — untimeliness/consequences","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"6 — untimeliness/consequences","Disposition":"Express distinctions read","Claims/sources":"C017–C020,C022","Exact remaining gap":"Review jurisdiction/construction"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"No response/nonconformity","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"No response/nonconformity","Disposition":"No automatic merits admission","Claims/sources":"C005,C011,C022","Exact remaining gap":"Applicable judicial remedy"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Withdrawal/correction","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Withdrawal/correction","Disposition":"Relevant limited clauses read","Claims/sources":"C027,C038–C039","Exact remaining gap":"Postopinion withdrawal/recall authority"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Sanctions/notice","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Sanctions/notice","Disposition":"Signing and motion interface","Claims/sources":"C022","Exact remaining gap":"Full constitutional/disciplinary process"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Federal/special follow-ons","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Federal/special follow-ons","Disposition":"Precise dependencies","Claims/sources":"Section 11","Exact remaining gap":"No broad federal overview"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"7 — sources/read bounds/history","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"7 — sources/read bounds/history","Disposition":"Visible register supplied","Claims/sources":"Section 7","Exact remaining gap":"Original orders/current statutes"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"2025–2026 changes","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"2025–2026 changes","Disposition":"Bounded searches and current footers separated","Claims/sources":"C042","Exact remaining gap":"No all-law-through-date certification"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Failed/discovery status","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Failed/discovery status","Disposition":"Explicit","Claims/sources":"S007–S008","Exact remaining gap":"No snippet substitution"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Quantities/branches/worksheet","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Quantities/branches/worksheet","Disposition":"Supplied","Claims/sources":"Sections 9–12","Exact remaining gap":"No inputs, dates, or forms"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Prior findings/holds","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Prior findings/holds","Disposition":"Preserved","Claims/sources":"C045","Exact remaining gap":"No implied closure"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false},{"topic":"Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent","researcher_record":{"Requested question/material subquestion":"Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent","Disposition":"Not accepted complete","Claims/sources":"Entire report","Exact remaining gap":"Recorded dependencies remain"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_required_quantity_completion_and_other_source_application_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_primary_or_actual_application_accepted":false}],"annotations":{},"corrections":[],"resolved_corrections":[],"review_history":[{"id":"S_ID-P31-scoped-review-20261029","status":"resolved_bounded_correction_only","at":"2026-10-29T01:22:43.461508+00:00"}]}