SettleADebt.

FIND THE EXPLANATION

Which place’s debt rules apply—and who can help?

Use the notice, agreement, and places connected to the debt to find the right court, regulator, or legal-help service.

Explore Minnesota information →

This address preserves a dated source document behind the guide. The complete explanation covers the questions, comparisons and next steps for this subject.

If you came here to check a specific citation, open the original archive below. It includes its source dates and recorded qualifications.

Original source archive (optional)Original working documents, complete tables and revision history
About this archive

The explanation above is written for readers. These original working documents preserve the evidence trail, including technical language, dated passages and known corrections. They have not all received independent professional review. Use the marked limits before relying on a particular rule or figure.

DETAILED RESEARCH · EVIDENCE & LIMITS INCLUDED

SMN Bounded correction supplement to

S_MN · pass-16Captured 2026-10-279 tables · 18 claim records · 9 source recordsScoped coordinator review completed

Read the evidence with its boundaries. These are saved research components, including revisions. A scoped coordinator review checks selected evidence; it does not certify every claim, a complete jurisdiction, current law or individual applicability. Dates and access limits remain attached to the records.

How to read the research →

Read the related correction supplements

These components repair their stated scope. They do not replace every other finding in this research series.

SMN Credit-repair representations, Minnesota CSOs, CROA, and the TSR →

S_MN PASS-16 — Bounded correction supplement to PASS-14

Fresh research/access date: October 27, 2026 Pacific / October 27, 2026 UTC. Correction: §571.79(h)’s later-of-disclosure-service-or-actual-return trigger.

The reviewer’s concern is supported. PASS-14’s July 17 → August 6 calculation is arithmetically correct, but incomplete if presented as the final §571.79(h) endpoint when funds are actually returned later. The statute expressly uses “whichever is later.” The correct treatment is two conditional calculations—not one unconditional deadline. [P16-C001, C010–C012.] revisor.mn.gov

This supplement does not replace the original report or alter its raw history. The supplied PASS-14 acceptance/capture metadata, response identifier, model provenance, hash-review results, and original 44 source groups, 64 claims, 70 coverage rows, H01–H08, and seven separate crosswalk rows remain historical records. They were not independently reverified here. PASS-15’s unreviewed limitations findings are not premises.

A. Verified statutory correction

A1. What §571.79(h) requires

The complete paragraph establishes:

Element Verified requirement Qualification
Actor An interested person Not exclusively the creditor
Twenty-day trigger Later of disclosure service or actual return of the specified debtor property Nominal expiration of retention is not proof of return
Act required Service of either a garnishment-related motion or the specified supplemental-complaint motion Filing alone is not the event named here
Hearing condition Motion scheduled to be heard within 30 days after motion service Not 30 days after disclosure or return
Discharge/vacatur language Paragraph includes court vacatur upon a proper showing A calculated date alone does not establish a stay, vacatur, renewed retention, or entitlement

The supplemental-complaint alternative cross-references §571.75(4), which separately addresses creditor notice, alleged liability, probable cause and service of the supplemental pleading. This supplement does not replace those requirements with deadline arithmetic. [P16-C001–C003, C007.] MN Revisor+1

A2. Necessary surrounding discharge provisions

Paragraph Distinction preserved
(a) Disclosure denies attachable indebtedness/property; the paragraph nevertheless preserves the specified retention duty for disclosed nonexempt property.
(b) Disclosure acknowledges indebtedness; conclusiveness does not eliminate the stated retention duty.
(c) Prejudgment service plus retained property: the 270-day discharge/return provision, subject to paragraph (h).
(d) Postjudgment service plus retained property: the 180-day discharge/return provision, subject to paragraph (h).
(g) Discharge under (a)–(d) is not, by itself, determinative of rights under another summons, subject to the stated adjudication qualification.

The corresponding enacted language was also read in Laws 2000, chapter 405, §20. These different discharge predicates must not be collapsed into a universal return, stay, or resumption rule. [P16-C004–C005.] MN Revisor

Section 571.78 separately distinguishes remittance to the creditor from return to the debtor. Its return obligation does not establish that a particular return actually occurred. PASS-14’s 90-day-form-payment harmonization hold remains unchanged. [P16-C006.] MN Revisor

B. Corrected fictional calculations

B1. Shared assumptions

Each calculation assumes 2026, personal service/receipt before 5 p.m. Minnesota time, no mail addition, no different governing court order, and no separately declared holiday, postal nonoperation, or court-office inaccessibility affecting the endpoint.

Rule 6.01 excludes the triggering day, counts intervening calendar days, and extends a Saturday/Sunday/legal-holiday endpoint as prescribed. Its mail and after-5-p.m. additions are not applied on these facts. Office-inaccessibility and filing-end-time provisions are not converted into a universal motion-service cutoff. [P16-C008–C009.] MN Revisor

B2. Branch A — Disclosure-date-only calculation

Stipulated event: Garnishee’s disclosure personally served Friday, July 17, 2026.

Counting step Days
July 17, triggering day Excluded
July 18–31 14
August 1–6 6
Total 20

Disclosure-based endpoint: Thursday, August 6, 2026.

This preserves the original arithmetic. It is not a conclusion that August 6 remains the final paragraph-(h) endpoint when a later qualifying return occurs. [P16-C010.]

B3. Branch B — Actual later return stipulated

Additional hypothetical fact: Funds are actually returned to the debtor Wednesday, October 14, 2026, and that is the later relevant event.

Counting step Days
October 14, triggering day Excluded
October 15–31 17
November 1–3 3
Total 20

Later-return-based endpoint: Tuesday, November 3, 2026.

The dates and weekdays were independently calculated. August 6 and November 3 are not holidays listed in §645.44(5). November 3 is not made a legal holiday by that provision merely because it is election day. No additional closure or postal-nonoperation fact is assumed. [P16-C009–C011.] MN Revisor

Critical qualification: PASS-14’s nominal 180-day endpoint of October 14 does not prove that money was returned that day. If actual return is unestablished, the return-based endpoint—and therefore a definitive later-event deadline—remains unknown. The known disclosure-date calculation does not authorize indefinite delay while awaiting an assumed future return.

No actual motion-service date is stipulated, so no actual 30-day hearing endpoint is calculated. Nor is proper service, a scheduled hearing, a proper showing, or vacatur assumed. [P16-C002–C003, C012.]

B4. Ledger preserved only in the stipulated actual-return branch

Plain text

Previously withheld:                 $600
Actually returned to debtor:         $600
Remitted to creditor:                  $0
Still held:                            $0

$600 = $600 returned + $0 remitted + $0 held.

Creditor principal:                $4,000
Actual creditor payment credit:        $0
Remaining principal:              $4,000

The return does not pay or extinguish the debt. The corrected deadline calculation does not create a new credit, recovery entitlement, or permission to resume withholding. [P16-C013.]

C. Execution-route comparison: no later-return transplant

The freshly read execution provisions differ from §571.79(h).

Route Paragraph (a) trigger and requirement Paragraph (b), read only as necessary
Sheriff execution — §550.135(14) Interested person serves an execution-related motion within 20 days after service of the third party’s disclosure; hearing scheduled within 30 days after motion service Separate creditor motion for supplemental-complaint leave under subdivision 8 and court vacatur upon proper showing
Attorney execution — §551.04(15) Same disclosure-service-only trigger in paragraph (a) Corresponding separate subdivision-8/vacatur provision

Neither paragraph (a) contains §571.79(h)’s later-return alternative. The execution provisions’ adjacent discharge and supplemental-complaint qualifications remain applicable; they are not replaced by a generic deadline. [P16-C014–C015.] revisor.mn.gov+1

PASS-14 M04 calculation retained

Stipulated disclosure service: Friday, May 29, 2026, personally before 5 p.m.

Plain text

May 29: excluded.
May 30–31: 2 days.
June 1–18: 18 days.
Total: 20 days.

Endpoint: Thursday, June 18, 2026.

June 18 is not a listed holiday; Juneteenth is June 19. No modeled endpoint extension applies. The calculation remains subject to the actual execution route, motion purpose, service and hearing requirements. A later debtor return is not substituted as a new paragraph-(a) trigger. [P16-C009, C016.] MN Revisor

D. Exact PASS-14 replacement and annotation text

These are correction instructions for the identified passages, not changes to immutable originals.

D1. Canonical replacement text

R1 — Replace PASS-14 C012’s assertion and B1’s qualification description

Section 571.79(h)’s twenty-day motion-service calculation uses the later of disclosure service or an actual return of the specified property to the debtor. Apply its two stated motion alternatives, the thirty-day scheduled-hearing condition measured from motion service, and its court-on-proper-showing vacatur language. A calculated endpoint alone establishes neither procedural compliance nor substantive relief.

Authority: S_MN-P16-S001, paragraph (h); S009, §20. MN Revisor+1

R2 — Replace the final paragraph of PASS-14 M01 Branch C

A separate interested-party motion can affect this branch, subject to §571.79(h)’s complete conditions. For disclosure personally served before 5 p.m. on July 17, 2026, the disclosure-date-only calculation is July 18–31 (14 days) plus August 1–6 (6 days): Thursday, August 6. That is not the final endpoint for a later-return branch. Only if funds are actually returned to the debtor on October 14, 2026 and that is the later relevant event, October 15–31 (17 days) plus November 1–3 (3 days) produces Tuesday, November 3. The nominal 180-day date does not establish actual return. Without the relevant return facts, the actual later-event deadline remains unresolved. The motion-service, scheduled-hearing and discharge/vacatur predicates remain necessary; no indefinite stay, automatic vacatur or collection entitlement is inferred.

The date arithmetic is independently checked; its legal selection follows R1. The preceding $600-return ledger remains conditional as specified in section B4.

R3 — Replace PASS-14 C057’s assertion

M01’s original arithmetic remains correct. Branch C now distinguishes the August 6 disclosure-based calculation from the November 3 calculation conditioned on an actual later October 14 return. Neither a return, proper motion, hearing, vacatur nor lawful continued holding is established merely by the calendar. The stipulated actual-return ledger remains $600 returned, $0 remitted, $0 held, with $4,000 principal unchanged.

D2. Original-to-correction map

Original PASS-14 entry Action Exact replacement/annotation
C012 Replace assertion only R1; retain its original source history, with fresh support in P16
B1 qualification row Replace description R1; preserve the separate “does not establish” limitation
M01 Branch C final paragraph Replace paragraph R2
C057 Replace assertion only R3
C011 and V11 Qualification annotation, not reversal “The nominal paragraph-(d) date is not evidence of actual return; apply corrected C012 to the actual disclosure/return chronology.”
V12 — Section571.79(h) Replace coverage qualification Resolved portion: later-of trigger established. Remaining evidence: actual disclosure service, actual return if any, motion service, scheduled hearing and proper-showing/vacatur facts. No generic stay established.
V61 — M01 Replace model qualification “Completed with separate disclosure-only and actual-later-return branches; actual disposition facts remain unproved.”
C040/C060; V43/V64; M04 execution calculation Preserve; append route distinction “The freshly checked execution paragraph-(a) triggers remain disclosure-service-only; May 29 → June 18 is unchanged.”
All other claims, source entries, coverage rows and H01–H08 Preserve No substantive replacement by this supplement

V58’s counting-rule finding remains supported; no separate correction to its legal rule is needed. The new dates are annotations to the affected M01 analysis, not a new statewide coverage item.

E. Source/access register for this supplement

Common access field for every row: October 27, 2026 PDT / October 27, 2026 UTC. These are session access dates, not invented individual fetch timestamps.

Source ID Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL Body actually read; version/effect; limits
S_MN-P16-S001 Minnesota Revisor, §571.79 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/571.79 Fresh: complete operative paragraphs (a)–(h), introductory qualification and history; parsed lines 250–264. Displayed 2025 Minnesota Statutes. Core later-of correction; original effectiveness not reconstructed from the history line.
S_MN-P16-S002 Revisor, §571.78 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/571.78 Fresh: complete operative clauses (1)–(3), lines 250–261. Displayed 2025. Return/remittance distinction only; no 90-day-form harmonization rerun.
S_MN-P16-S003 Minnesota Civil Procedure Rule 6 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/court_rules/cp/id/6/ Fresh: Rule 6.01(a)–(e), lines 243–279, including counting, inaccessibility, last-day definition, holidays and additions. Page’s displayed amendment note includes January 1, 2020. No complete later-rule-order certification.
S_MN-P16-S004 Revisor, §550.135 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/550.135 Fresh targeted: subd. 8; subd. 13; subd. 14(a)–(b), especially lines 297–300 and 322–335. Displayed 2025. No general execution report rerun.
S_MN-P16-S005 Revisor, §551.04 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/551.04 Fresh targeted: subd. 8; subd. 14; subd. 15(a)–(b), especially lines 360–363 and 389–403. Displayed 2025. No general motion-packet or recipient-conflict resolution.
S_MN-P16-S006 Revisor, §645.44 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/645.44 Fresh: complete subd. 5 holiday text, lines 293–300. Displayed 2025. Used for endpoint check; no actual extraordinary closure investigation.
S_MN-P16-S007 Revisor, 2026 Table 2 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/2026/table2?full=&page=6&per_page=500&year=2026 Fresh index-only: relevant range around Chapters 533, 559 and 580, lines 318–336. No listed change to the targeted Chapters 550/551/571 in that range. Not a complete later/special-session or rule-amendment certificate.
S_MN-P16-S008 Revisor, §571.75 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/571.75 Fresh narrow cross-reference: complete subd. 4, lines 600–603. Displayed 2025. Supplemental-complaint notice/probable-cause/service framework only; no forms or fee/earnings calculations reapproved.
S_MN-P16-S009 Minnesota Legislature/Revisor, Laws 2000, chapter 405 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/laws/2000/0/405/ Fresh selected enacted text: §20, lines 1702–1763, including later-of language and discharge structure. Signature line identifies April 14, 2000, 2:13 p.m.; that is not asserted as effectiveness. Original effective-date chain not reconstructed. Not the entire act.

All requested operative URLs ultimately rendered. Initial broad results required pinpoint reopening; that is not an inaccessible-body finding. No opinion, new form, private record or actual court order was needed or claimed as read.

The index check is bounded. The inspected range jumps from Chapter 533 entries to Chapter 559 entries and then Chapter 580 entries; no targeted change appeared there. No blanket 2026-current-law assurance follows. [P16-C017.] MN Revisor

F. Supplement atomic claims

Classification: T = direct text; I = inference/application; C = fictional calculation; G = evidence gap. Full identifiers below are unique to PASS-16.

Claim ID Precise correction or qualification Source/pinpoint Confidence and gap
S_MN-P16-C001 Paragraph (h)’s 20-day calculation uses the later relevant event, not disclosure alone in every branch S001(h); S009 §20(h) T—high; actual events unknown
S_MN-P16-C002 Interested person must serve a specified motion scheduled for hearing within 30 days after motion service S001(h) T—high; no actual motion/hearing established
S_MN-P16-C003 Paragraph includes court-on-proper-showing vacatur; dates alone do not establish relief S001(h); S009 §20(h) T/I—high; no universal stay/vacatur construction claimed
S_MN-P16-C004 Paragraphs (a) and (b) preserve their specified disclosed-property retention qualifications S001(a)–(b); S009 §20 T—high
S_MN-P16-C005 Paragraphs (c)/(d) distinguish pre/postjudgment retention periods and remain subject to (h) S001 introductory text, (c)–(d) T—high; nominal date is not actual-return evidence
S_MN-P16-C006 Remittance and return are separate duties; neither is established by the calendar alone S002(3) T/I—high
S_MN-P16-C007 Supplemental-complaint alternative retains its cross-referenced notice, factual and probable-cause conditions S008(4); S004(8); S005(8) T—high; no pleading/merits ruling
S_MN-P16-C008 Rule 6 controls calendar counting and applicable endpoint/addition rules S003, 6.01(a)–(e) T—high; model assumptions exclude additions
S_MN-P16-C009 Three modeled endpoints are weekdays and not listed holidays; no extra closure is assumed S006(5); date calculations T/C; extraordinary facts unverified
S_MN-P16-C010 July 17 + 20 days = Thursday, August 6, 2026, as the disclosure-only calculation S003; model A C—checked; not unconditional final deadline
S_MN-P16-C011 Actual later October 14 return + 20 days = Tuesday, November 3, 2026 S001(h); S003; model B C—checked; return expressly hypothetical
S_MN-P16-C012 Without established actual return facts, no definitive later-return endpoint is supplied S001(h); model assumptions I/G; disclosure calculation remains known
S_MN-P16-C013 Stipulated return preserves $600 returned/$0 remitted/$0 held and $4,000 principal Model B; S001(g); S002(3) C/I; no actual debt-payment conclusion
S_MN-P16-C014 Sheriff execution paragraph (a) uses disclosure service only S004(14)(a), adjacent (13)–(14)(b) T—high; separate supplemental route retained
S_MN-P16-C015 Attorney execution paragraph (a) likewise uses disclosure service only S005(15)(a), adjacent (14)–(15)(b) T—high
S_MN-P16-C016 May 29 + 20 days remains Thursday, June 18, 2026 for the stated execution branch S003–S006; calculation C—checked; no later-return transplant
S_MN-P16-C017 Currentness is limited to the retrieved displays, selected enactment and bounded index check S001–S009 T/G; no complete later-law or rule-history certificate
S_MN-P16-C018 Correction is confined to identified PASS-14 annotations; other findings and holds remain preserved Supplied original/review context; section D Provenance statement; no hash/model verification performed

G. Supplement coverage and remaining evidence

Row Requested correction question Status Exact remaining evidence/next action
V01 Read complete §571.79(h) and verify reviewer concern Answered Later-of omission supported by fresh text
V02 Distinguish paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d) Answered textually Actual discharge predicate remains unproved
V03 Interested person, motion service, hearing and vacatur conditions Answered textually; application unresolved Actual motion, service, hearing schedule, proper showing and order
V04 §571.78 return/remittance distinction Answered narrowly Actual disposition evidence; H01 unchanged
V05 Disclosure-only July 17 → August 6 Answered conditionally Not the final date if a later relevant return exists
V06 Actual-return October 14 → November 3 Answered conditionally Proof of actual qualifying return would be indispensable in a real matter
V07 Nominal 180-day endpoint versus actual return Distinguished No return date inferred from nominal endpoint
V08 Rule 6 weekday/holiday/addition checks Answered under stated assumptions Different service method, time, closure, postal or court-order facts require recalculation
V09 Preserve $600/$0/$0 and $4,000 ledger Answered for stipulated return branch No actual funds/credit record examined
V10 Sheriff §550.135(14)(a), adjacent context and (b) Answered narrowly Actual execution and motion predicates remain necessary
V11 Attorney §551.04(15)(a), adjacent context and (b) Answered narrowly Same; no recipient-conflict resolution
V12 Preserve May 29 → June 18 execution calculation Answered No §571.79(h) return trigger transplanted
V13 Exact C012/B1/M01/C057 replacements and affected V rows Delivered Section D supplies supplement-only patch text
V14 Fresh source/currentness and failed-route accounting Answered with bounded limits Complete later-session/rule-history review remains outside this correction
V15 Preserve original counts, provenance and H01–H08 Preserved as supplied No raw-file, hash or capture-metadata revalidation claimed
V16 Actual permission, cases, forms, formulas, other dossiers and state acceptance Excluded Separate authorized research or actual evidence would be required

H. Preservation statement and self-check

The fresh work was limited to the identified statutory bodies, Rule 6, the incorporated holiday definition, one narrow supplemental-complaint cross-reference, the selected 2000 enacted paragraph, and a bounded 2026 index check. The three date differences and weekdays were recalculated; the stipulated cash equation was checked.

All unrelated PASS-14 holds remain: the 90-day statutory-form payment conflict; absence of an automatic six-business-day employer-release rule; actual percentage-error motion/proof/recipient/calendar questions; employer postorder mechanics; the §551.06 sheriff-versus-attorney conflict; exact direct/indirect tier incorporation and older-case issues; form multiplier/units/revision defects; and incomplete responsive-construction, citator, later-law and actual-record coverage. Irregular pay, tips, benefits, sector, local/tribal, territorial/country and contract issues remain outside this correction.

This supplement contains 9 source/access entries, 18 atomic claims, 16 coverage rows, two conditional garnishment-date examples and one unchanged execution-date comparison. It does not alter the original PASS-14 counts or convert correction coverage into a newly accepted state dimension.

Final correction: August 6 is valid as the disclosure-date calculation. November 3 is valid only on the expressly stipulated actual later October 14 return. Neither date establishes an actual filing deadline, court order, stay, vacatur, renewed collection authority, or payment entitlement.

END S_MN PASS-16

Every captured table

Captured cells with original header handling and explicitly labeled bounded correction overlays. Downloaded JSON retains original cells. Tables may contain source limitations, historical examples and identified corrections; the complete reading supplies context.

Read the evidence with its boundaries. These are saved research components, including revisions. A scoped coordinator review checks selected evidence; it does not certify every claim, a complete jurisdiction, current law or individual applicability. Dates and access limits remain attached to the records.

How to read the research →

Read the related correction supplements

These components repair their stated scope. They do not replace every other finding in this research series.

SMN Credit-repair representations, Minnesota CSOs, CROA, and the TSR →

Captured table 01

Element · Verified requirement · Qualification · 5 data rows

ElementVerified requirementQualification
ActorAn interested personNot exclusively the creditor
Twenty-day triggerLater of disclosure service or actual return of the specified debtor propertyNominal expiration of retention is not proof of return
Act requiredService of either a garnishment-related motion or the specified supplemental-complaint motionFiling alone is not the event named here
Hearing conditionMotion scheduled to be heard within 30 days after motion serviceNot 30 days after disclosure or return
Discharge/vacatur languageParagraph includes court vacatur upon a proper showingA calculated date alone does not establish a stay, vacatur, renewed retention, or entitlement

Captured table 02

Paragraph · Distinction preserved · 5 data rows

ParagraphDistinction preserved
(a)Disclosure denies attachable indebtedness/property; the paragraph nevertheless preserves the specified retention duty for disclosed nonexempt property.
(b)Disclosure acknowledges indebtedness; conclusiveness does not eliminate the stated retention duty.
(c)Prejudgment service plus retained property: the 270-day discharge/return provision, subject to paragraph (h).
(d)Postjudgment service plus retained property: the 180-day discharge/return provision, subject to paragraph (h).
(g)Discharge under (a)–(d) is not, by itself, determinative of rights under another summons, subject to the stated adjudication qualification.

Captured table 03

Counting step · Days · 4 data rows

Counting stepDays
July 17, triggering dayExcluded
July 18–3114
August 1–66
Total20

Captured table 04

Counting step · Days · 4 data rows

Counting stepDays
October 14, triggering dayExcluded
October 15–3117
November 1–33
Total20

Captured table 05

Route · Paragraph (a) trigger and requirement · Paragraph (b), read only as necessary · 2 data rows

RouteParagraph (a) trigger and requirementParagraph (b), read only as necessary
Sheriff execution — §550.135(14)Interested person serves an execution-related motion within 20 days after service of the third party’s disclosure; hearing scheduled within 30 days after motion serviceSeparate creditor motion for supplemental-complaint leave under subdivision 8 and court vacatur upon proper showing
Attorney execution — §551.04(15)Same disclosure-service-only trigger in paragraph (a)Corresponding separate subdivision-8/vacatur provision

Captured table 06

Original PASS-14 entry · Action · Exact replacement/annotation · 9 data rows

Original PASS-14 entryActionExact replacement/annotation
C012Replace assertion onlyR1; retain its original source history, with fresh support in P16
B1 qualification rowReplace descriptionR1; preserve the separate “does not establish” limitation
M01 Branch C final paragraphReplace paragraphR2
C057Replace assertion onlyR3
C011 and V11Qualification annotation, not reversal“The nominal paragraph-(d) date is not evidence of actual return; apply corrected C012 to the actual disclosure/return chronology.”
V12 — Section571.79(h)Replace coverage qualificationResolved portion: later-of trigger established. Remaining evidence: actual disclosure service, actual return if any, motion service, scheduled hearing and proper-showing/vacatur facts. No generic stay established.
V61 — M01Replace model qualification“Completed with separate disclosure-only and actual-later-return branches; actual disposition facts remain unproved.”
C040/C060; V43/V64; M04 execution calculationPreserve; append route distinction“The freshly checked execution paragraph-(a) triggers remain disclosure-service-only; May 29 → June 18 is unchanged.”
All other claims, source entries, coverage rows and H01–H08PreserveNo substantive replacement by this supplement

Captured table 07

Source ID · Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL · Body actually read; version/effect; limits · 9 data rows

Source IDIssuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URLBody actually read; version/effect; limits
S_MN-P16-S001Minnesota Revisor, §571.79 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/571.79Fresh: complete operative paragraphs (a)–(h), introductory qualification and history; parsed lines 250–264. Displayed 2025 Minnesota Statutes. Core later-of correction; original effectiveness not reconstructed from the history line.
S_MN-P16-S002Revisor, §571.78 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/571.78Fresh: complete operative clauses (1)–(3), lines 250–261. Displayed 2025. Return/remittance distinction only; no 90-day-form harmonization rerun.
S_MN-P16-S003Minnesota Civil Procedure Rule 6 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/court_rules/cp/id/6/Fresh: Rule 6.01(a)–(e), lines 243–279, including counting, inaccessibility, last-day definition, holidays and additions. Page’s displayed amendment note includes January 1, 2020. No complete later-rule-order certification.
S_MN-P16-S004Revisor, §550.135 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/550.135Fresh targeted: subd. 8; subd. 13; subd. 14(a)–(b), especially lines 297–300 and 322–335. Displayed 2025. No general execution report rerun.
S_MN-P16-S005Revisor, §551.04 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/551.04Fresh targeted: subd. 8; subd. 14; subd. 15(a)–(b), especially lines 360–363 and 389–403. Displayed 2025. No general motion-packet or recipient-conflict resolution.
S_MN-P16-S006Revisor, §645.44 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/645.44Fresh: complete subd. 5 holiday text, lines 293–300. Displayed 2025. Used for endpoint check; no actual extraordinary closure investigation.
S_MN-P16-S007Revisor, 2026 Table 2 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/2026/table2?full=&page=6&per_page=500&year=2026Fresh index-only: relevant range around Chapters 533, 559 and 580, lines 318–336. No listed change to the targeted Chapters 550/551/571 in that range. Not a complete later/special-session or rule-amendment certificate.
S_MN-P16-S008Revisor, §571.75 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/571.75Fresh narrow cross-reference: complete subd. 4, lines 600–603. Displayed 2025. Supplemental-complaint notice/probable-cause/service framework only; no forms or fee/earnings calculations reapproved.
S_MN-P16-S009Minnesota Legislature/Revisor, Laws 2000, chapter 405 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/laws/2000/0/405/Fresh selected enacted text: §20, lines 1702–1763, including later-of language and discharge structure. Signature line identifies April 14, 2000, 2:13 p.m.; that is not asserted as effectiveness. Original effective-date chain not reconstructed. Not the entire act.

Captured table 08

Claim ID · Precise correction or qualification · Source/pinpoint · 18 data rows

Claim IDPrecise correction or qualificationSource/pinpointConfidence and gap
S_MN-P16-C001Paragraph (h)’s 20-day calculation uses the later relevant event, not disclosure alone in every branchS001(h); S009 §20(h)T—high; actual events unknown
S_MN-P16-C002Interested person must serve a specified motion scheduled for hearing within 30 days after motion serviceS001(h)T—high; no actual motion/hearing established
S_MN-P16-C003Paragraph includes court-on-proper-showing vacatur; dates alone do not establish reliefS001(h); S009 §20(h)T/I—high; no universal stay/vacatur construction claimed
S_MN-P16-C004Paragraphs (a) and (b) preserve their specified disclosed-property retention qualificationsS001(a)–(b); S009 §20T—high
S_MN-P16-C005Paragraphs (c)/(d) distinguish pre/postjudgment retention periods and remain subject to (h)S001 introductory text, (c)–(d)T—high; nominal date is not actual-return evidence
S_MN-P16-C006Remittance and return are separate duties; neither is established by the calendar aloneS002(3)T/I—high
S_MN-P16-C007Supplemental-complaint alternative retains its cross-referenced notice, factual and probable-cause conditionsS008(4); S004(8); S005(8)T—high; no pleading/merits ruling
S_MN-P16-C008Rule 6 controls calendar counting and applicable endpoint/addition rulesS003, 6.01(a)–(e)T—high; model assumptions exclude additions
S_MN-P16-C009Three modeled endpoints are weekdays and not listed holidays; no extra closure is assumedS006(5); date calculationsT/C; extraordinary facts unverified
S_MN-P16-C010July 17 + 20 days = Thursday, August 6, 2026, as the disclosure-only calculationS003; model AC—checked; not unconditional final deadline
S_MN-P16-C011Actual later October 14 return + 20 days = Tuesday, November 3, 2026S001(h); S003; model BC—checked; return expressly hypothetical
S_MN-P16-C012Without established actual return facts, no definitive later-return endpoint is suppliedS001(h); model assumptionsI/G; disclosure calculation remains known
S_MN-P16-C013Stipulated return preserves $600 returned/$0 remitted/$0 held and $4,000 principalModel B; S001(g); S002(3)C/I; no actual debt-payment conclusion
S_MN-P16-C014Sheriff execution paragraph (a) uses disclosure service onlyS004(14)(a), adjacent (13)–(14)(b)T—high; separate supplemental route retained
S_MN-P16-C015Attorney execution paragraph (a) likewise uses disclosure service onlyS005(15)(a), adjacent (14)–(15)(b)T—high
S_MN-P16-C016May 29 + 20 days remains Thursday, June 18, 2026 for the stated execution branchS003–S006; calculationC—checked; no later-return transplant
S_MN-P16-C017Currentness is limited to the retrieved displays, selected enactment and bounded index checkS001–S009T/G; no complete later-law or rule-history certificate
S_MN-P16-C018Correction is confined to identified PASS-14 annotations; other findings and holds remain preservedSupplied original/review context; section DProvenance statement; no hash/model verification performed

Captured table 09

Row · Requested correction question · Status · 16 data rows

RowRequested correction questionStatusExact remaining evidence/next action
V01Read complete §571.79(h) and verify reviewer concernAnsweredLater-of omission supported by fresh text
V02Distinguish paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d)Answered textuallyActual discharge predicate remains unproved
V03Interested person, motion service, hearing and vacatur conditionsAnswered textually; application unresolvedActual motion, service, hearing schedule, proper showing and order
V04§571.78 return/remittance distinctionAnswered narrowlyActual disposition evidence; H01 unchanged
V05Disclosure-only July 17 → August 6Answered conditionallyNot the final date if a later relevant return exists
V06Actual-return October 14 → November 3Answered conditionallyProof of actual qualifying return would be indispensable in a real matter
V07Nominal 180-day endpoint versus actual returnDistinguishedNo return date inferred from nominal endpoint
V08Rule 6 weekday/holiday/addition checksAnswered under stated assumptionsDifferent service method, time, closure, postal or court-order facts require recalculation
V09Preserve $600/$0/$0 and $4,000 ledgerAnswered for stipulated return branchNo actual funds/credit record examined
V10Sheriff §550.135(14)(a), adjacent context and (b)Answered narrowlyActual execution and motion predicates remain necessary
V11Attorney §551.04(15)(a), adjacent context and (b)Answered narrowlySame; no recipient-conflict resolution
V12Preserve May 29 → June 18 execution calculationAnsweredNo §571.79(h) return trigger transplanted
V13Exact C012/B1/M01/C057 replacements and affected V rowsDeliveredSection D supplies supplement-only patch text
V14Fresh source/currentness and failed-route accountingAnswered with bounded limitsComplete later-session/rule-history review remains outside this correction
V15Preserve original counts, provenance and H01–H08Preserved as suppliedNo raw-file, hash or capture-metadata revalidation claimed
V16Actual permission, cases, forms, formulas, other dossiers and state acceptanceExcludedSeparate authorized research or actual evidence would be required

Find the assertion and its boundaries

Read the evidence with its boundaries. These are saved research components, including revisions. A scoped coordinator review checks selected evidence; it does not certify every claim, a complete jurisdiction, current law or individual applicability. Dates and access limits remain attached to the records.

How to read the research →

Read the related correction supplements

These components repair their stated scope. They do not replace every other finding in this research series.

SMN Credit-repair representations, Minnesota CSOs, CROA, and the TSR →
S_MN-P16-C001 Saved research record

Paragraph (h)’s 20-day calculation uses the later relevant event, not disclosure alone in every branch

Recorded check status: scoped correction review complete actualfacts and currentness held

Source/pinpoint
S001(h); S009 §20(h)
Confidence and gap
T—high; actual events unknown
S_MN-P16-C002 Saved research record

Interested person must serve a specified motion scheduled for hearing within 30 days after motion service

Recorded check status: scoped correction review complete actualfacts and currentness held

Source/pinpoint
S001(h)
Confidence and gap
T—high; no actual motion/hearing established
S_MN-P16-C003 Saved research record

Paragraph includes court-on-proper-showing vacatur; dates alone do not establish relief

Recorded check status: scoped correction review complete actualfacts and currentness held

Source/pinpoint
S001(h); S009 §20(h)
Confidence and gap
T/I—high; no universal stay/vacatur construction claimed
S_MN-P16-C004 Saved research record

Paragraphs (a) and (b) preserve their specified disclosed-property retention qualifications

Recorded check status: scoped correction review complete actualfacts and currentness held

Source/pinpoint
S001(a)–(b); S009 §20
Confidence and gap
T—high
S_MN-P16-C005 Saved research record

Paragraphs (c)/(d) distinguish pre/postjudgment retention periods and remain subject to (h)

Recorded check status: scoped correction review complete actualfacts and currentness held

Source/pinpoint
S001 introductory text, (c)–(d)
Confidence and gap
T—high; nominal date is not actual-return evidence
S_MN-P16-C006 Saved research record

Remittance and return are separate duties; neither is established by the calendar alone

Recorded check status: scoped correction review complete actualfacts and currentness held

Source/pinpoint
S002(3)
Confidence and gap
T/I—high
S_MN-P16-C007 Saved research record

Supplemental-complaint alternative retains its cross-referenced notice, factual and probable-cause conditions

Recorded check status: scoped correction review complete actualfacts and currentness held

Source/pinpoint
S008(4); S004(8); S005(8)
Confidence and gap
T—high; no pleading/merits ruling
S_MN-P16-C008 Saved research record

Rule 6 controls calendar counting and applicable endpoint/addition rules

Recorded check status: scoped correction review complete actualfacts and currentness held

Source/pinpoint
S003, 6.01(a)–(e)
Confidence and gap
T—high; model assumptions exclude additions
S_MN-P16-C009 Saved research record

Three modeled endpoints are weekdays and not listed holidays; no extra closure is assumed

Recorded check status: scoped correction review complete actualfacts and currentness held

Source/pinpoint
S006(5); date calculations
Confidence and gap
T/C; extraordinary facts unverified
S_MN-P16-C010 Saved research record

July 17 + 20 days = Thursday, August 6, 2026, as the disclosure-only calculation

Recorded check status: scoped correction review complete actualfacts and currentness held

Source/pinpoint
S003; model A
Confidence and gap
C—checked; not unconditional final deadline
S_MN-P16-C011 Saved research record

Actual later October 14 return + 20 days = Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Recorded check status: scoped correction review complete actualfacts and currentness held

Source/pinpoint
S001(h); S003; model B
Confidence and gap
C—checked; return expressly hypothetical
S_MN-P16-C012 Saved research record

Without established actual return facts, no definitive later-return endpoint is supplied

Recorded check status: scoped correction review complete actualfacts and currentness held

Source/pinpoint
S001(h); model assumptions
Confidence and gap
I/G; disclosure calculation remains known
S_MN-P16-C013 Saved research record

Stipulated return preserves $600 returned/$0 remitted/$0 held and $4,000 principal

Recorded check status: scoped correction review complete actualfacts and currentness held

Source/pinpoint
Model B; S001(g); S002(3)
Confidence and gap
C/I; no actual debt-payment conclusion
S_MN-P16-C014 Saved research record

Sheriff execution paragraph (a) uses disclosure service only

Recorded check status: scoped correction review complete actualfacts and currentness held

Source/pinpoint
S004(14)(a), adjacent (13)–(14)(b)
Confidence and gap
T—high; separate supplemental route retained
S_MN-P16-C015 Saved research record

Attorney execution paragraph (a) likewise uses disclosure service only

Recorded check status: scoped correction review complete actualfacts and currentness held

Source/pinpoint
S005(15)(a), adjacent (14)–(15)(b)
Confidence and gap
T—high
S_MN-P16-C016 Saved research record

May 29 + 20 days remains Thursday, June 18, 2026 for the stated execution branch

Recorded check status: scoped correction review complete actualfacts and currentness held

Source/pinpoint
S003–S006; calculation
Confidence and gap
C—checked; no later-return transplant
S_MN-P16-C017 Saved research record

Currentness is limited to the retrieved displays, selected enactment and bounded index check

Recorded check status: scoped correction review complete actualfacts and currentness held

Source/pinpoint
S001–S009
Confidence and gap
T/G; no complete later-law or rule-history certificate
S_MN-P16-C018 Saved research record

Correction is confined to identified PASS-14 annotations; other findings and holds remain preserved

Recorded check status: scoped correction review complete actualfacts and currentness held

Source/pinpoint
Supplied original/review context; section D
Confidence and gap
Provenance statement; no hash/model verification performed

Sources, pinpoints and access limits

Keep the source version, actual read extent and jurisdiction with the proposition. A link or researcher access claim is not a substitute for an operative primary passage.

S_MN-P16-S001 Saved research record

Minnesota Revisor, §571.79 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/571.79

Recorded check status: fresh selected body checked with source scope limits

Body actually read; version/effect; limits
Fresh: complete operative paragraphs (a)–(h), introductory qualification and history; parsed lines 250–264. Displayed 2025 Minnesota Statutes. Core later-of correction; original effectiveness not reconstructed from the history line.
Direct source URLs
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/571.79
S_MN-P16-S002 Saved research record

Revisor, §571.78 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/571.78

Recorded check status: fresh selected body checked with source scope limits

Body actually read; version/effect; limits
Fresh: complete operative clauses (1)–(3), lines 250–261. Displayed 2025. Return/remittance distinction only; no 90-day-form harmonization rerun.
Direct source URLs
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/571.78
S_MN-P16-S003 Saved research record

Minnesota Civil Procedure Rule 6 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/court_rules/cp/id/6/

Recorded check status: fresh selected body checked with source scope limits

Body actually read; version/effect; limits
Fresh: Rule 6.01(a)–(e), lines 243–279, including counting, inaccessibility, last-day definition, holidays and additions. Page’s displayed amendment note includes January 1, 2020. No complete later-rule-order certification.
Direct source URLs
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/court_rules/cp/id/6/
S_MN-P16-S004 Saved research record

Revisor, §550.135 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/550.135

Recorded check status: fresh selected body checked with source scope limits

Body actually read; version/effect; limits
Fresh targeted: subd. 8; subd. 13; subd. 14(a)–(b), especially lines 297–300 and 322–335. Displayed 2025. No general execution report rerun.
Direct source URLs
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/550.135
S_MN-P16-S005 Saved research record

Revisor, §551.04 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/551.04

Recorded check status: fresh selected body checked with source scope limits

Body actually read; version/effect; limits
Fresh targeted: subd. 8; subd. 14; subd. 15(a)–(b), especially lines 360–363 and 389–403. Displayed 2025. No general motion-packet or recipient-conflict resolution.
Direct source URLs
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/551.04
S_MN-P16-S006 Saved research record

Revisor, §645.44 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/645.44

Recorded check status: fresh selected body checked with source scope limits

Body actually read; version/effect; limits
Fresh: complete subd. 5 holiday text, lines 293–300. Displayed 2025. Used for endpoint check; no actual extraordinary closure investigation.
Direct source URLs
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/645.44
S_MN-P16-S007 Saved research record

Revisor, 2026 Table 2 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/2026/table2?full=&page=6&per_page=500&year=2026

Recorded check status: fresh selected body checked with source scope limits

Body actually read; version/effect; limits
Fresh index-only: relevant range around Chapters 533, 559 and 580, lines 318–336. No listed change to the targeted Chapters 550/551/571 in that range. Not a complete later/special-session or rule-amendment certificate.
Direct source URLs
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/2026/table2?full=&page=6&per_page=500&year=2026
S_MN-P16-S008 Saved research record

Revisor, §571.75 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/571.75

Recorded check status: fresh selected body checked with source scope limits

Body actually read; version/effect; limits
Fresh narrow cross-reference: complete subd. 4, lines 600–603. Displayed 2025. Supplemental-complaint notice/probable-cause/service framework only; no forms or fee/earnings calculations reapproved.
Direct source URLs
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/571.75
S_MN-P16-S009 Saved research record

Minnesota Legislature/Revisor, Laws 2000, chapter 405 — https://www.revisor.mn.gov/laws/2000/0/405/

Recorded check status: fresh selected body checked with source scope limits

Body actually read; version/effect; limits
Fresh selected enacted text: §20, lines 1702–1763, including later-of language and discharge structure. Signature line identifies April 14, 2000, 2:13 p.m.; that is not asserted as effectiveness. Original effective-date chain not reconstructed. Not the entire act.
Direct source URLs
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/laws/2000/0/405/

What was examined—and what is still missing

The saved component-level coverage record keeps answered, partial, blank and unresolved branches distinct. A coverage label is not acceptance of a whole subject or jurisdiction.

coverage-1 Saved research record

V01

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested correction question
Read complete §571.79(h) and verify reviewer concern
Status
Answered
Exact remaining evidence/next action
Later-of omission supported by fresh text

Recorded coordinator check boundaries

coordinator acceptance
scoped_correction_review_complete_no_parent_acceptance
coverage-2 Saved research record

V02

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested correction question
Distinguish paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d)
Status
Answered textually
Exact remaining evidence/next action
Actual discharge predicate remains unproved

Recorded coordinator check boundaries

coordinator acceptance
scoped_correction_review_complete_no_parent_acceptance
coverage-3 Saved research record

V03

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested correction question
Interested person, motion service, hearing and vacatur conditions
Status
Answered textually; application unresolved
Exact remaining evidence/next action
Actual motion, service, hearing schedule, proper showing and order

Recorded coordinator check boundaries

coordinator acceptance
scoped_correction_review_complete_no_parent_acceptance
coverage-4 Saved research record

V04

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested correction question
§571.78 return/remittance distinction
Status
Answered narrowly
Exact remaining evidence/next action
Actual disposition evidence; H01 unchanged

Recorded coordinator check boundaries

coordinator acceptance
scoped_correction_review_complete_no_parent_acceptance
coverage-5 Saved research record

V05

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested correction question
Disclosure-only July 17 → August 6
Status
Answered conditionally
Exact remaining evidence/next action
Not the final date if a later relevant return exists

Recorded coordinator check boundaries

coordinator acceptance
scoped_correction_review_complete_no_parent_acceptance
coverage-6 Saved research record

V06

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested correction question
Actual-return October 14 → November 3
Status
Answered conditionally
Exact remaining evidence/next action
Proof of actual qualifying return would be indispensable in a real matter

Recorded coordinator check boundaries

coordinator acceptance
scoped_correction_review_complete_no_parent_acceptance
coverage-7 Saved research record

V07

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested correction question
Nominal 180-day endpoint versus actual return
Status
Distinguished
Exact remaining evidence/next action
No return date inferred from nominal endpoint

Recorded coordinator check boundaries

coordinator acceptance
scoped_correction_review_complete_no_parent_acceptance
coverage-8 Saved research record

V08

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested correction question
Rule 6 weekday/holiday/addition checks
Status
Answered under stated assumptions
Exact remaining evidence/next action
Different service method, time, closure, postal or court-order facts require recalculation

Recorded coordinator check boundaries

coordinator acceptance
scoped_correction_review_complete_no_parent_acceptance
coverage-9 Saved research record

V09

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested correction question
Preserve $600/$0/$0 and $4,000 ledger
Status
Answered for stipulated return branch
Exact remaining evidence/next action
No actual funds/credit record examined

Recorded coordinator check boundaries

coordinator acceptance
scoped_correction_review_complete_no_parent_acceptance
coverage-10 Saved research record

V10

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested correction question
Sheriff §550.135(14)(a), adjacent context and (b)
Status
Answered narrowly
Exact remaining evidence/next action
Actual execution and motion predicates remain necessary

Recorded coordinator check boundaries

coordinator acceptance
scoped_correction_review_complete_no_parent_acceptance
coverage-11 Saved research record

V11

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested correction question
Attorney §551.04(15)(a), adjacent context and (b)
Status
Answered narrowly
Exact remaining evidence/next action
Same; no recipient-conflict resolution

Recorded coordinator check boundaries

coordinator acceptance
scoped_correction_review_complete_no_parent_acceptance
coverage-12 Saved research record

V12

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested correction question
Preserve May 29 → June 18 execution calculation
Status
Answered
Exact remaining evidence/next action
No §571.79(h) return trigger transplanted

Recorded coordinator check boundaries

coordinator acceptance
scoped_correction_review_complete_no_parent_acceptance
coverage-13 Saved research record

V13

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested correction question
Exact C012/B1/M01/C057 replacements and affected V rows
Status
Delivered
Exact remaining evidence/next action
Section D supplies supplement-only patch text

Recorded coordinator check boundaries

coordinator acceptance
scoped_correction_review_complete_no_parent_acceptance
coverage-14 Saved research record

V14

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested correction question
Fresh source/currentness and failed-route accounting
Status
Answered with bounded limits
Exact remaining evidence/next action
Complete later-session/rule-history review remains outside this correction

Recorded coordinator check boundaries

coordinator acceptance
scoped_correction_review_complete_no_parent_acceptance
coverage-15 Saved research record

V15

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested correction question
Preserve original counts, provenance and H01–H08
Status
Preserved as supplied
Exact remaining evidence/next action
No raw-file, hash or capture-metadata revalidation claimed

Recorded coordinator check boundaries

coordinator acceptance
scoped_correction_review_complete_no_parent_acceptance
coverage-16 Saved research record

V16

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested correction question
Actual permission, cases, forms, formulas, other dossiers and state acceptance
Status
Excluded
Exact remaining evidence/next action
Separate authorized research or actual evidence would be required

Recorded coordinator check boundaries

coordinator acceptance
scoped_correction_review_complete_no_parent_acceptance

Corrections, review and scope

Read the evidence with its boundaries. These are saved research components, including revisions. A scoped coordinator review checks selected evidence; it does not certify every claim, a complete jurisdiction, current law or individual applicability. Dates and access limits remain attached to the records.

How to read the research →

No currently queued material correction is mapped to this component. This does not remove its currentness, access, jurisdiction or application limits.

Recorded review disposition

scoped review complete with holds correction addressed

Other components in this research series

S_MNpass-01

SMN — Minnesota Debt Settlement and Debt Management

Inside: A. Substantive findings · 1. Minnesota regulates settlement and debt management separately · 2. Minnesota is a registration state for covered debt settlement services

6 tables20 claim records11 source recordsScoped review · limits applyCaptured 2026-10-25
S_MNpass-02

SMN — Minnesota

Inside: 2026 registration amendments, effective date, and incorporated exemptions · Focused disposition · 1. Replacement for PASS-01 section 4 currentness discussion

8 tables18 claim records13 source recordsScoped review · limits applyCaptured 2026-10-26
S_MNpass-03

Minnesota: correction of PASS-02 research and access dates

Inside:

1 tables0 claim records0 source recordsScoped review · limits applyCaptured 2026-10-26
S_MNpass-04

SMN — Minnesota

Inside: Current public registration materials, transition evidence, and status-verification procedure · Focused disposition · 1. Current public application, checklist, and registration instructions

11 tables22 claim records14 source recordsScoped review · limits applyCaptured 2026-10-26
S_MNpass-05

SMN Minnesota settlement-fee performance and partial-plan savings

Inside: 1. Principal findings · A1. Currentness and material effective dates · A2. Minnesota’s performance question

15 tables44 claim records18 source recordsScoped review · limits applyCaptured 2026-10-27
S_MNpass-06

SMN Minnesota DMP fees, initial-payment allocation, and necessary funds ledger

Inside: A. Answers to the central questions · A1. Can origination and maintenance both be taken from an initial payment? · A2. What remains unresolved about a separately paid origination fee?

17 tables45 claim records17 source recordsScoped review · limits applyCaptured 2026-10-27
S_MNpass-07

SMN Minnesota lead generation, referrals, compensation, and provider boundaries

Inside: A1. Four questions must be answered separately · A2. Lead generation is distinct from providing the service—but not necessarily unregulated · Actor/activity/required-step matrix

12 tables44 claim records25 source recordsScoped review · limits applyCaptured 2026-10-27
S_MNpass-08

SMN Credit-repair representations, Minnesota CSOs, CROA, and the TSR

Inside: A. Principal conclusions · A1. Three regimes—not one interchangeable “debt relief” rule · A2. A material Minnesota amendment must be applied

20 tables58 claim records31 source recordsScoped review · limits applyCaptured 2026-10-27
S_MNpass-09

SMN Custody, account controls, records, reconciliation, and security

Inside: B2. Ownership and account control: what is established · Bank-documentation gap · C1. DMP and settlement controls are not interchangeable

18 tables60 claim records36 source recordsScoped review · limits applyCaptured 2026-10-27
S_MNpass-10

SMN Collection-agency, debt-buyer, and individual-collector credentials

Inside: A. Findings that control this gateway · 1. Minnesota’s collection definition is not the FDCPA definition · 2. Entity approval and individual registration have different starting rules

17 tables64 claim records47 source recordsScoped review · limits applyCaptured 2026-10-27
S_MNpass-11

SMN Ordinary consumer collection communications, validation, and disputes

Inside: A. Conclusions that must remain separate · Necessary 2026 exclusion overlay · Principal-purpose buyers and knowledge

25 tables65 claim records48 source recordsScoped review · limits applyCaptured 2026-10-27
S_MNpass-12

SMN Earnings garnishment, wage exemptions, and the claim–objection–hearing process

Inside: A1. Minnesota no longer has a universally applicable flat 25% ordinary-wage formula · A2. Percentage protection is automatic; a benefit-based claim is a different question · A3. Garnishment, sheriff’s levy, and attorney’s execution are different procedures

21 tables65 claim records47 source recordsScoped review · limits applyCaptured 2026-10-27
S_MNpass-13

SMN Bank-account and non-earnings garnishment, exemptions, tracing, and release

Inside: A1. There are three materially different routes · A2. Automatic federal protection is not the entire exemption determination · A3. Minnesota expressly requires FIFO for specified deposited exemptions

25 tables68 claim records53 source recordsScoped review · limits applyCaptured 2026-10-27
S_MNpass-14

SMN Earnings remittance, retention, exemption claims, and form harmonization

Inside: A. Focused findings · A1. The 90-day remittance instruction is enacted law, not merely informal guidance · A2. The six-business-day creditor rule is not a six-business-day employer-release rule

16 tables64 claim records44 source recordsScoped review · limits applyCaptured 2026-10-27
S_MNpass-15

SMN Consumer contract and account-debt limitations, accrual, choice of law, and revival

Inside: A1. The consumer rule is broader than a debt-buyer restriction · A2. Six years is not a universal classification rule for every transaction · A3. A missed installment is not automatically acceleration of every future installment

18 tables64 claim records50 source recordsScoped review · limits applyCaptured 2026-10-27
S_MNpass-17

SMN Minnesota consumer money-debt court gateway

Inside: A1. District and conciliation court are not interchangeable · The $4,000 category is narrower than “consumer debt” · A2. Venue and jurisdiction are separate

22 tables80 claim records54 source recordsCorrections to readCaptured 2026-10-27
Record integrity

Original saved Markdown SHA-256: 02828487858a00a18c66522910b2f4118089083b83ad436cf845850e4e16d7be. Public formatting, private-reference removal and correction annotations are separate from that immutable original.

Get debt settlement help