Which place’s debt rules apply—and who can help?

The Arizona legislative compilation identifies the 57th Legislature’s second regular session as its update basis. The 2025 and 2026 tables of sections affected were also examined for the targeted arbitration sections. This establishes the displayed compilation and a bounded amendment screen, not exhaustive subsequent-law clearance.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001 compilation notice; S003 Title 12 entries; S004 Title 12 entries.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; later-law completeness remains held.

Subject to its exclusions, § 12-3003(A) covers agreements made on or after January 1, 2011; permits recorded agreement to its application to older agreements; and states that on or after January 1, 2011 it governs agreements whenever made. The historical savings clause must also be considered.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-3003(A)(1)–(3); S002, § 5.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; do not resolve an accrued pre-2011 right from the compilation heading alone.

The revised act excludes employer–employee agreements, insurance-contract arbitration, specified national-bank/federal-savings-association customer agreements, and specified self-regulatory-organization arbitration. Subsection C sends the latter three categories—not the employment category—to the older Arizona act.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-3003(B)(1)–(4), (C).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; actual institutional identity, relationship, and agreement must be established.

The recovered HB 2430 text preserves proceedings commenced and rights accrued before January 1, 2011, and makes the new chapter effective after December 31, 2010. The official final chapter image was not recovered; the reproduction’s historical authentication limit remains material.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S002, §§ 5–6; current S001, § 12-3003.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D/G; obtain the official enacted chapter and responsive transition construction before deciding a disputed historical application.

The older act also excludes employer–employee arbitration. For that act, “court” means Arizona superior courts; ordinary civil venue governs, with subsequent applications ordinarily remaining in the initial court.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, §§ 12-1516–1517.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; this does not establish the court competent under every revised-act or federal proceeding.

FAA § 2 addresses written arbitration provisions in maritime transactions or contracts evidencing transactions involving commerce, and written submission agreements. Its text is not limited to consumer debt. Ordinary contract-revocation defenses remain available, subject to federal equal-treatment principles and chapter 4.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S006, §§ 1–2; S036, pp. 248–257.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D/H; interstate-commerce facts and the agreement remain necessary.

FAA § 1 excludes the stated transportation-worker employment classes. Separately, the 2022 Act allows the specified election against predispute arbitration in qualifying sexual-assault/harassment cases and assigns its applicability question to a court despite delegation. Its application clause concerns disputes or claims arising or accruing on or after enactment.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S006, §§ 1, 401; S007, § 2 adding § 402, and § 3.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; enacted March 3, 2022. Full employment, military, and special-claim regimes are deferred.

The FAA does not independently confer federal subject-matter jurisdiction. A federal applicant needs an applicable jurisdictional basis, such as the requirements of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 or 1332. A small consumer balance and an FAA citation do not supply that basis.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S009, §§ 1331–1332; S033, pp. 59–62; S034, slip pp. 4–8.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D/H; citizenship, amount, federal question, and the application’s nature are unknown.

For a § 4 petition, Vaden permits looking through to the underlying controversy. Federal jurisdiction cannot be manufactured from a federal defense or counterclaim when the well-pleaded underlying action lacks a federal basis.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S033, pp. 62–72; S006, § 4.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; § 4’s particular language matters.

Badgerow rejects importing § 4’s look-through method into §§ 9 and 10 applications. The award application needs an independent jurisdictional foundation. An underlying federal claim alone is insufficient under that method.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S034, slip pp. 4–16.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; the decision does not resolve every jurisdictional question under other FAA sections.

Section 4 contains a district-related arbitration-hearing restriction. By contrast, Cortez Byrd Chips holds the venue provisions of §§ 9–11 permissive rather than exclusively confined to the award district. Venue and subject-matter jurisdiction remain separate.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S006, § 4; S042, pp. 195–204.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D/H; the actual forum agreement and independently proper venue remain unknown.

FAA substantive enforceability does not justify silently substituting all federal motion, service, appeal, or award procedures for Arizona procedures in state court. The Supreme Court opinions read expressly leave aspects of state-court procedural application undecided.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S033, p. 71 n.20; S034, slip p. 5 n.2; S001 state procedures.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H/I; identify the actual court, governing agreement, and applicable state procedural statute.

Arizona’s electronic-transactions law applies only within its statutory scope and where parties agreed to conduct the transaction electronically, assessed from context and conduct. It does not force a person to transact electronically.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S005, §§ 44-7003, 44-7005(A)–(C).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; statutory exclusions and actual consent remain relevant.

Electronic form alone does not invalidate an otherwise qualifying record or signature. Attribution depends on the person’s act and surrounding evidence; required written information must be retainable where § 44-7008 applies.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S005, §§ 44-7007–7009.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; no universal paper-signature requirement, and no universal checkbox-sufficiency rule.

Arizona’s electronic sending/receipt rules depend on designated systems, accessibility, and processability. Human awareness is not invariably required, and an acknowledgment does not itself establish that transmitted content was identical.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S005, § 44-7015(A)–(F).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; delivery, content, assent, and notice adequacy remain separate factual questions.

E-SIGN’s consumer provisions impose consent and access-related conditions when legally required written information is supplied electronically. Section 7001(c)(3) limits one asserted invalidity consequence; it does not excuse every delivery defect. The § 7002 state-law interaction body was not recovered.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S008, § 7001(a)–(d)(2), especially (c)(1)–(3); § 7006 definitions.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D/G; § 7002 preemption reconciliation remains held.

The revised act permits some variation by agreement but makes specified provisions nonwaivable, including important court-motion and award-review provisions. Its actual lists must be checked rather than assuming every contractual procedural alteration is effective.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-3004(A)–(C).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; actual clause and federal interaction unknown.

Generally applicable authority and contract defenses survive. An arbitration-specific rule demanding special authorization because arbitration waives court adjudication is impermissible under Kindred Nursing. That holding does not create agency authority that ordinary law otherwise withholds.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S036, pp. 248–257; S006, § 2.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; actual capacity, agency instrument, and ordinary authority remain factual/legal predicates.

In the Arizona motion posture addressed by Duncan, the proponent must demonstrate an arbitration agreement; material factual disputes require resolution rather than acceptance of unsupported assertions. The challenger bears the burden of a generally applicable contract defense.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S021, ¶¶ 10–18.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; actual evidence and the precise disputed issue are absent.

Consent, consideration, capacity, fraud, duress, and related ordinary contract issues can matter. A court must distinguish whether any agreement was formed from whether an admittedly formed contract is unenforceable.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S021, ¶¶ 12–18; S001, § 12-3006; S028, p. 70 n.2.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H/D; no presumption that every account document proves these elements.

A proponent relying on an electronic clause must connect the asserted version and assent evidence to the relevant person and transaction. A statement, collection notice, or later website copy does not, without more, prove assent to that version.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-3006(A); S005, §§ 44-7002, 44-7009; S021, ¶ 18.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

I; a proof requirement inferred from formation and attribution rules, not a prescribed universal document checklist.

Cornell permits modification of standardized terms in an ongoing, at-will consumer relationship when the initial terms reserve change authority, reasonable modification/rejection notice is received, the consumer can preserve the status quo by rejecting, and the relationship continues beyond a reasonable rejection period.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S020, ¶¶ 2, 24, 28–30.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; not a holding that every fixed-term loan can be changed by silence.

Cornell also preserves good faith, negotiated terms, and ordinary defenses. Its footnote recognizes a separately reserved termination power subject to limits against unreasonable cost, value loss, or personal burden. Its facts do not establish a universal opt-out duration.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S020, ¶¶ 24 n.2, 27–29.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; actual reservation, notice, rejection, and burden evidence required.

The revised act’s baseline assigns agreement existence and covered-controversy questions to the court, and conditions precedent and whole-contract enforceability to the arbitrator. Valid delegation and controlling federal law require separate analysis.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-3006(B)–(C); § 12-3004.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; do not treat statutory baseline allocation as resolving an unseen delegation clause.

First Options requires clear and unmistakable evidence before treating arbitrability as delegated. Objecting before arbitrators does not itself demonstrate consent to let them conclusively decide their authority.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S027, pp. 943–947.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; actual delegation and conduct must be established.

Under Rent-A-Center, a challenge directed only to the broader arbitration agreement did not defeat a separately enforceable delegation provision. Formation is analytically distinct; an effective challenge to delegation must actually target that provision.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S028, pp. 68–76, especially p. 70 n.2 and pp. 72–75.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; the decision does not presume formation from a disputed signature or version.

With a valid delegation, a court cannot retain a delegated issue merely because the arbitration demand appears wholly groundless. Henry Schein did not itself decide whether the particular contract clearly delegated the dispute.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S029, pp. 67–72.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; actual delegation still must be established.

When parties contest which of two agreements controls and the later agreement provides a judicial forum, Coinbase v. Suski assigns that antecedent contract question to the court. It did not decide the ultimate state-law supersession merits.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S040, slip pp. 4–8.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; requires actual competing agreements, not merely a later statement.

AAA Consumer Rule R-7 authorizes the arbitrator to address specified jurisdictional questions. Reading that private rule does not alone establish valid incorporation or clear and unmistakable consumer assent to delegation.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S019, R-7(a)–(c), p. 11; S027, pp. 943–945.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D/I; actual agreement, incorporation language, access, and applicable case law remain necessary.

The AAA consumer rules read are effective May 1, 2025. R-1 supplies the policy’s consumer-relationship and version/application rules. A different contract, administrator, agreed version, or administrative classification can change the policy inquiry.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S019, R-1, pp. 6–7.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D, private policy; not a statute or proof of legal enforceability.

AAA R-2 provides a conditional administrative suspension process for judicial intervention. That process is not a court stay and does not itself extend statutory review or debt-response periods.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S019, R-2, pp. 7–8; C044–C060.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D/I; no actual AAA proceeding or request was made.

A cost-barrier challenge under Rizzio requires reasonably certain costs and an individualized inability-to-pay showing, with available relief and funding considered. An attorney’s cost-advance agreement is relevant but not categorically dispositive.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S022, ¶¶ 11, 16–19, 22–24.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; no current administrator fee, waiver entitlement, or personal inability was established.

The 2026 Juergensmeyer majority requires a fact-dependent procedural-unconscionability inquiry; unequal bargaining power alone was insufficient on its record. Its prison-employment facts do not determine an ordinary debtor’s contract.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S026, ¶¶ 19–39.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; later treatment and different factual application remain held.

Shivkov enforced arbitration of claims tied to the relevant agreement despite termination arguments on that commercial record. Its reasoning does not make every later dispute arbitrable or eliminate the need to prove the clause’s scope and survival.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S041, pp. 14–20.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; Arizona-law commercial case; important appellate premises were not challenged.

Arthur Andersen permits a nonsignatory to invoke FAA relief when applicable state contract law gives that actor an enforcement right. The FAA does not categorically confine enforcement to signatories, but the actual state-law theory must succeed.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S035, pp. 630–632.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; the Supreme Court did not decide the particular estoppel merits.

Sun Valley Ranch applied Arizona nonsignatory theories to contract-dependent claims and the plaintiffs’ own alter-ego allegations. Its holding is not an exemption from proving a relationship and claim-specific basis for enforcement.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S025, ¶¶ 32–41.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; commercial partnership context, not an ordinary debt-sale holding.

Shivkov applied Arizona alternative estoppel to claims sufficiently dependent on the agreement; it did not decide every asserted close-relationship theory.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S041, pp. 33–35, n.14.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; commercial facts and the actual claims matter.

For an assignee, debt buyer, affiliate, or servicer, the necessary inquiry includes the original agreement, identity, applicable transfer language, account inclusion, defenses, and any agency or nonsignatory theory. Assignment cannot supply assent missing at formation.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, §§ 12-3006–3007; S035, pp. 630–632; S025, ¶¶ 32–41.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

I/G; no directly dispositive Arizona unsecured-consumer debt-sale opinion or actual chain was established here.

Revised-act relief is requested by motion. Initial notice generally uses summons service unless a civil action involving the agreement is pending. A pending covered claim determines the motion court; otherwise § 12-3027 supplies county venue alternatives. Jurisdiction over the controversy and parties is still required.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, §§ 12-3005, 12-3007(E), 12-3026–3027.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; exact court competence and valid service are not established.

A revised-act movant must show an agreement and allege refusal. An opposed application requires summary determination; no enforceable agreement means no compulsion. The court may not refuse arbitration merely because the underlying claim seems meritless.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-3007(A)–(D).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; nonappearance does not remove the statutory agreement showing.

The older act provides an application to compel upon agreement/refusal, summary determination of a substantial existence dispute, and a no-agreement route to stay arbitration. Its general court applications are motions, subject to the particular confirmation procedure.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, §§ 12-1502(A)–(C), 12-1515, 12-1511.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; initial notice generally follows summons service unless a permitted agreement provides otherwise.

FAA § 4 requires five days’ written notice using the prescribed federal service framework. A genuine making/refusal issue goes to summary trial; the allegedly defaulting party has the stated timely jury-demand right outside admiralty.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S006, § 4, second–fifth paragraphs.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; no universal “decide everything on affidavits” rule, and no actual service or jury-demand deadline is calculated.

Appointment begins with the agreed method. The FAA and both Arizona acts provide court appointment in specified failure, vacancy, or unavailable-method circumstances; the precise statute and agreement govern.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S006, § 5; S001, §§ 12-1503, 12-3011.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; no finding that a named administrator or arbitrator is unavailable.

Under the revised act, a motion to order arbitration requires a court stay, on just terms, of judicial proceedings involving the alleged covered claim pending decision. An order compelling arbitration requires a stay of the covered claim; severability can limit its reach.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-3007(F)–(G).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; concerns covered judicial proceedings, not every unrelated obligation.

A court challenge to existence or scope does not itself halt the arbitration under the revised act: arbitration may continue unless the court orders otherwise.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-3006(D).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; distinguish a judicial-action stay from a stay of arbitration.

The older act directs a stay of an action involving an arbitrable issue when the specified arbitration application or order has been made, with possible limitation to a severable issue.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-1502(D).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; the actual application, issue, and court order matter.

In a federal case satisfying FAA § 3, a party’s requested stay must be granted rather than dismissal merely because the claims are arbitrable. The applicant must not be in default in proceeding with arbitration.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S006, § 3; S031, slip pp. 3–6 and n.2.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D/H; an independent dismissal ground, such as lack of jurisdiction, is different.

Morgan rejects an arbitration-specific prejudice requirement for litigation-conduct waiver. It remanded rather than deciding ultimate waiver or every choice between state and federal waiver frameworks.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S030, slip pp. 4–7.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; no fixed number of days, motions, or discovery requests constitutes the rule.

The Ninth Circuit’s post-Morgan test examines knowledge of the arbitration right and intentional acts inconsistent with it, considering the circumstances without the former special heavy burden or prejudice element.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S038, pp. 6–10.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; Armstrong found no waiver on its particular record.

Fuller’s older federal prejudice formulation cannot be used unchanged after Morgan and Armstrong. Gray notes Morgan but does not supply a comprehensive Arizona rule for every state-law waiver dispute.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S024, ¶¶ 10–17; S023, ¶ 12; S030; S038.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H/G; a comprehensive current Arizona-specific waiver formulation remains unestablished.

FAA § 16 permits the listed appeals from denials of stays/compulsion, specified award orders, anti-arbitration injunctions, and final decisions. It generally bars the listed interlocutory appeals allowing arbitration, subject to § 1292(b).

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S006, § 16(a)–(b); S009, § 1292(b).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; actual finality, certification, and jurisdiction must be established.

Arizona § 12-2101.01 lists denial of compulsion, grant of a stay of arbitration, denial of confirmation, modification/correction, vacatur without rehearing, and qualifying judgments/decrees. It does not list an ordinary interlocutory grant of compulsion.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-2101.01(A)–(B).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; confirmation judgments fall under the judgment category; do not rewrite item (3) as both granting and denying confirmation.

Fuller and the 2026 Juergensmeyer opinion used discretionary special-action review in FAA-only employment postures rather than assuming the state statutory ordinary appeal applied.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S024, ¶¶ 4–8; S026, ¶¶ 15–17.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; current special-action rules were not independently read, and ordinary consumer jurisdiction must be separately tested.

Coinbase v. Bielski requires a federal district court to stay pretrial and trial proceedings during the covered § 16 appeal from denial of compulsion. Its holding is not a universal state-court appellate-stay rule.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S032, slip pp. 3–10, especially n.2.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; collateral matters and treatment of frivolous appeals are bounded exceptions discussed in the opinion.

FRCP 81(a)(6)(B) applies federal civil rules to FAA proceedings except where the statute supplies other procedures. Rule 7(b) addresses motion content; Rule 5 distinguishes service from filing.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S010, Rules 5, 7(b), 81(a)(6)(B).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; full initial-service mechanics were not investigated.

Federal Rule 6 excludes the triggering day, counts intermediate days, and adjusts qualifying last days. Electronic filing generally ends at midnight in the court’s time zone. Extra service days are conditional, not automatically added to an award-receipt clock.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S010, Rule 6(a), (d).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; statutory extension power is not assumed.

FRAP 4(a) ordinarily measures a civil notice of appeal from entry, with a 30-day period and specified governmental-party, postjudgment-motion, extension, and reopening provisions.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S018, FRAP 4(a)(1), (4)–(7).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; actual entry and triggering orders are absent; no actual appeal deadline is determined.

FRAP 8 ordinarily starts a requested enforcement stay in the district court; FRAP 26 supplies computation and extension limits. These rules do not erase Bielski’s distinct covered-appeal holding or create a universal award-enforcement stay.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S018, FRAP 8(a), 26; S032.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D/H; the actual order, appellate posture, and local requirements remain necessary.

The official Arizona Rule 6 adoption and amendment bodies recovered are historical. A current-looking nonofficial reproduction matches the reviewed core computation provisions, but the complete official 2026 amendment chain was not authenticated.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S012, Rule 6; S013, Rule 6(d); S014.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D/G; current official body remains a hold.

The 2014 ARCAP adoption order contains a general 30-day appeal rule and specified exceptions. The 2019 document recovered makes a different technical correction. Neither establishes a complete current 2026 ARCAP 9 text by itself.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S015, Rules 5, 8–9; S016; failed S017 routes.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D/G; no current Arizona appeal endpoint is certified.

A.R.S. § 1-243 generally excludes the first day and includes the last unless the last is a holiday, subject to its narrow subsection B exception. Section 1-301 identifies state holidays and specified observation rules.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S046, §§ 1-243(A)–(B), 1-301(A)–(F).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; an actual court closure or special order remains unknown.

Revised-act initiation notice must follow the agreement or the statutory alternative, identify the controversy and remedy, and satisfy the prescribed delivery method. A participation-based notice objection must be made by the statutory stage. General notice/receipt definitions also matter.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, §§ 12-3002, 12-3009(A)–(B).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; the statutory certified-mail alternative calls for a requested and obtained return receipt.

Under the older act, absent a permitted contrary agreement, hearing notice uses the prescribed delivery and at least five days’ notice. A duly notified party’s nonappearance does not necessarily stop the hearing; participation can affect a notice objection.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-1505(A)–(C).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; actual notice and any variation must be proved.

The revised act requires fair hearing procedures, provides for specified summary disposition and representation, and imposes neutral-arbitrator disclosure duties. Material nondisclosure and procedural prejudice have specific statutory consequences, not automatic debt cancellation.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, §§ 12-3012, 12-3015–3016.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; detailed discovery, institutional procedure, and a particular challenge record remain outside this gateway.

A revised-act award must be recorded and signed or otherwise authenticated by a concurring arbitrator; each party receives notice including a copy. An objection that the award was made late must be notified before receipt of award notice.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-3019(A)–(B).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; making, authentication, and notice dates are distinct.

The older act requires a written signed award and delivery by its specified methods or agreement. Its late-award objection must precede delivery.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-1508(A)–(B).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; do not substitute revised-act “receipt of notice” terminology without identifying the regime.

Under the revised act, a qualifying arbitrator-correction/clarification motion and notice are due within 20 days after award-notice receipt; objection notice is due within 10 days after receipt of the motion notice.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-3020(A)–(E), read with § 12-3004.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; distinguish potentially variable arbitral procedure from nonwaivable judicial-review provisions.

The older act permits the specified arbitrator correction/clarification application within 20 days after delivery, with notice and a 10-day objection opportunity.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-1509.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; actual delivery, notice, and the correction ground remain necessary.

After revised-act award notice, a party may move to confirm; the court must confirm unless the award is modified, corrected, or vacated under the specified provisions. Section 12-3022 does not itself state the FAA’s one-year period.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-3022.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; absence of that period in this section is not a certificate that no other timing doctrine could apply.

Under the revised act, an award procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means is a statutory vacatur ground.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-3023(A)(1).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; allegation alone is not proof of procurement.

Revised-act vacatur grounds include neutral-arbitrator evident partiality, arbitrator corruption, or misconduct prejudicing a party’s rights.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-3023(A)(2).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; the specified actor and predicate must be shown.

A substantially prejudicial refusal to postpone or consider material evidence, qualifying hearing misconduct, or exceeding arbitral powers can support revised-act vacatur.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-3023(A)(3)–(4).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; disagreement with the result is not itself these grounds.

Lack of an arbitration agreement is a revised-act vacatur ground, subject to the participation/objection restriction stated in subsection (A)(5).

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-3023(A)(5), cross-reference § 12-3015(C).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; this text differs from the older act’s additional prior-determination language.

Improper revised-act initiation notice supports vacatur only with the substantial prejudice required by the statute.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-3023(A)(6); § 12-3009.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; not every notice imperfection automatically invalidates an award.

A revised-act vacatur motion ordinarily must be filed within 90 days after receipt of notice of the award or the specified modified/corrected award.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-3023(B).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; a pending correction request is not itself proof of a newly triggered period.

For alleged procurement by corruption, fraud, or undue means, the revised act measures 90 days from when the ground was known or reasonably should have been known.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-3023(B).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; discovery and reasonable-care facts must be established.

Revised-act judicial modification/correction requires a motion within 90 days after award-notice receipt and a listed mathematical, descriptive, unsubmitted-matter, or nonmerits form defect.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-3024(A)–(C).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; the unsubmitted-matter ground has its own no-merits-effect condition.

Revised-act vacatur can lead to rehearing, with the required new-arbitrator distinctions. Denial of vacatur ordinarily leads to confirmation unless modification/correction is pending.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-3023(C)–(D).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; vacatur does not itself decide underlying debt merits.

The revised act directs entry of a judgment conforming to the specified confirmation, modification, correction, or qualifying vacatur order. Ordinary judgment consequences follow through that judicial step.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-3025(A)–(B).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; award possession alone is not a completed judgment-enforcement process.

Revised-act attorney-fee and punitive-award provisions require their stated law/agreement and proof predicates; judicial fees in contested post-award proceedings are separately addressed. The older act’s default arbitrator-expense provision excludes counsel fees unless the agreement otherwise provides.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, §§ 12-3021, 12-3025(C), 12-1510.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; no administrator price, recoverable fee, premium, or consumer charge is established.

Older-act confirmation requires filing and service as a civil complaint. After 20 days from service, the statute directs judgment unless opposition is made under § 12-1512.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-1511.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; service completion and an actual opposition record matter.

Older-act opposition requires a pleading and adequate showing of one of its specified grounds. Section 12-1512 does not state the revised act’s 90-day vacatur period; its no-agreement ground also addresses prior determination and participation.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-1512(A)–(B).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D/G; no invented universal outside deadline or postjudgment cure follows from this omission.

Older-act judicial correction is limited to an application within 90 days after delivery and before judgment. After judgment, § 12-1513(D) refers to Rule 60(c); current numbering and the applicable relief route need reconciliation.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-1513(A)–(D).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D/G; later attempted relief is not guaranteed.

Older-act confirmation produces a judgment enforceable as other judgments, with the stated court-cost provision.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, § 12-1514.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; actual enforcement procedure is deferred.

FAA § 9 addresses agreements permitting judgment on the award and an application within one year after the award is made. Confirmation follows absent statutory vacatur/modification/correction. Whether every later application is categorically barred in the controlling circuit was not resolved here.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S006, § 9; S034, jurisdiction limits.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D/G; do not confuse the one-year question with Cortez Byrd’s venue holding.

FAA § 10 lists procurement misconduct, arbitrator partiality/corruption, specified prejudicial hearing misconduct, and excess/imperfect execution of powers preventing the required definite award. Its rehearing authority has a time condition.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S006, § 10(a)–(b).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; administrative-arbitration subsection (c) is a separate boundary.

FAA § 11 permits the stated material calculation/description corrections, certain unsubmitted-matter corrections, and nonmerits form corrections.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S006, § 11(a)–(c).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; no general merits reconsideration power is supplied.

FAA § 12 requires service of notice of a vacatur/modification/correction motion within three months after the award is filed or delivered. Filing a motion and serving its notice are not interchangeable acts.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S006, § 12, first paragraph.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; three months must not be rewritten as 90 days.

FAA §§ 9 and 12 contain different resident/nonresident service language, including marshal language for nonresidents. This report preserves that text rather than assuming an email or ordinary e-filing satisfies every application.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S006, §§ 9, 12; S010, Rules 5, 81(a)(6).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D/G; exact modern procedural reconciliation and valid actual service remain held.

FAA § 12 permits a judge to issue an order staying the adverse party’s enforcement proceedings, to be served with the motion notice. The statute does not make the review motion itself an automatic enforcement stay.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S006, § 12, second paragraph.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; actual order and scope required.

FAA § 13 requires the listed agreement/appointment/extensions, award, and application papers with the order for judgment entry. The entered judgment—not merely the award—has the stated ordinary judgment force.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S006, § 13(a)–(c).

Classification, limits, and missing facts

D; underlying debt, fees, interest, and collection methods are not independently adjudicated by this report.

Hall Street treats §§ 10 and 11 as exclusive grounds for the FAA’s expedited review mechanism; parties cannot enlarge that mechanism simply by agreeing to review legal error. Other possible legal routes were not comprehensively resolved.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S037, pp. 584–592.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; no blanket conclusion about every asserted “manifest disregard” formulation.

Move holds FAA § 12 subject to equitable tolling and granted relief on an unusual fraud record involving an arbitrator’s fabricated qualifications. It does not create the revised Arizona act’s automatic 90-day discovery formulation in federal law.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S039, pp. 7–14.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

H; substantive tolling objections were partly waived on appeal; diligence and extraordinary facts remain necessary inquiries.

Defeating compulsion, invalidating delegation, vacating an award, obtaining confirmation, and prevailing on the underlying debt are distinct results. Neither an assignment price nor an unremitted amount is a consumer payment.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

S001, §§ 12-3007(D), 12-3023–3025; S006, §§ 10–13; models below.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

I; actual debt and payment adjudication remain outside this pass.

No authority read makes every arbitration motion or appeal suspend every response, limitation, collection, garnishment, or judgment clock. Only the particular statutory/order-based stays identified here are established.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and pinpoint

C044–C060, C090; respective primary pinpoints.

Classification, limits, and missing facts

I/G; this is a bounded non-inference, not a claim that no additional stay law exists.

Actual contract, identity, status, transfer, jurisdiction, service, award, payment, and local-calendar facts remain unestablished.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and limit

G; user supplied no such records and authorized no private lookup.

M01’s alternatives turn on actual formation/version proof and then the distinct delegation inquiry; neither branch determines debt merits.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and limit

K; C013–C029.

M02’s $900 portfolio purchase is separate from consumer payments; with no credited consumer payment, the stipulated $6,000 claimed balance remains $6,000 arithmetically, while legal liability remains held.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and limit

K/I; C035–C038, C094.

M03’s dated litigation acts are inputs to waiver analysis, not a numerical waiver formula; stay and appeal outcomes depend on the applicable regime and actual orders.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and limit

K; C044–C060.

M04’s assumed April 15 receipt produces the conditional May 5 twenty-day and July 14 ninety-day candidates shown below, subject to the stated procedural assumptions.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and limit

K; S001, §§ 12-3020(B), 12-3023(B), 12-3024(A); S046.

M04’s three-calendar-month candidate is July 15, not the ninety-day July 14 candidate. Its § 9 anniversary uses the different award-made date.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and limit

K; S006, §§ 9, 12; S010, Rule 6(a).

M04’s older-act confirmation-service candidate is May 26; its correction branch separately requires both the ninety-day delivery condition and absence of an entered judgment.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and limit

K; S001, §§ 12-1511, 12-1513; S046.

M04’s stipulated July 10 discovery produces October 8 only if that is legally the known-or-reasonably-knowable date under the revised act. It supplies no automatic FAA extension.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and limit

K; S001, § 12-3023(B); S039.

M04 separates a $6,200 assumed award total, judicial judgment, and a later $500 actual credit; only the stipulated actual credit reduces the illustrated remaining amount to $5,700.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and limit

K/I; S001, § 12-3025; S006, § 13; arithmetic below.

The source register distinguishes operative text, historical orders, primary-text republications, private policy, partial reads, and failed routes. No full citator, all-source verification, independent review, or component acceptance is claimed.

Recorded check status: scoped record reconciled selected bodies and dated text with currentness judicial application holds

Authority and limit

Researcher record; see source, currentness, and coverage registers.

Arizona Legislature, Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 12. https://www.azleg.gov/arsDetail/?title=12. Direct section URLs are mapped immediately below.

Recorded check status: scoped selected body or dated reuse with limits

Material actually read; version/effect and limitations

Fresh official bodies for all mapped sections. Compilation displays 57th Legislature, second regular session update basis. Specific statutory dates are identified in claims; compilation metadata is not a universal effective date. Historical amendment chain remains bounded.

Direct source URLs

https://www.azleg.gov/arsDetail/?title=12
https://www.azleg.gov/arsDetail/?title=12&utm_source=chatgpt.com

Arizona HB 2430 (2010), primary legislative text reproduced by LegiScan: https://legiscan.com/AZ/text/HB2430/2010. Failed official routes: https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.htm and https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.pdf.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Material actually read; version/effect and limitations

Fresh reproduced §§ 5–6 and relevant enacted-language presentation. Host labels the bill chaptered, while the body identifies an engrossed text. Both official routes reported inaccessible through the tool. Final chapter-image authentication remains held; no silent upgrade to an official 2010 image.

Direct source URLs

https://legiscan.com/AZ/text/HB2430/2010
https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.htm
https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.pdf
https://legiscan.com/AZ/text/HB2430/2010?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Arizona Legislative Council, 2025 Table of Sections Affected. https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_1st_Regular.pdf

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Material actually read; version/effect and limitations

Official index, July 18, 2025, chapters 1–265. Title 12 entries read, printed pp. 3–4 / PDF indexes 2–3. Screening evidence, not operative statutory text.

Direct source URLs

https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_1st_Regular.pdf
https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_1st_Regular.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Arizona Legislative Council, 2026 Table of Sections Affected. https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_2nd_Regular.pdf

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Material actually read; version/effect and limitations

Official index, August 19, 2026, chapters 1–264. Title 12 entries read, printed p. 4 / PDF index 3. No complete later-law certificate.

Direct source URLs

https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_2nd_Regular.pdf
https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_2nd_Regular.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Arizona Legislature, Uniform Electronic Transactions Act: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07002.htm; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07003.htm; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07005.htm; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07007.htm; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07008.htm; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07009.htm; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07015.htm.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Material actually read; version/effect and limitations

Fresh official bodies: definitions, scope/exclusions, agreement to transact electronically, legal effect, retainability, attribution, sending/receipt. No complete UETA enactment history or unrelated excluded-transaction law was read.

Direct source URLs

https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07002.htm
https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07003.htm
https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07005.htm
https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07007.htm
https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07008.htm
https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07009.htm
https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07015.htm
https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07002.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07003.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07005.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07007.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07008.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07009.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07015.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com

U.S. House OLRC, Title 9, FAA, section URLs: https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s1/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s2/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s3/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s4/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s5/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s6/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s401/.

Recorded check status: scoped selected body or dated reuse with limits

Material actually read; version/effect and limitations

Fresh official operative bodies and displayed source/amendment notes, currency through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026. Failed chapter route: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title9/chapter1&edition=prelim returned 404; individual sections recovered. Section 402 routes failed as detailed below; its enactment was recovered as S007.

Direct source URLs

https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s1/
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s2/
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s3/
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s4/
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s5/
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s6/
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s401/
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title9/chapter1&edition=prelim
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s1/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s2/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s3/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s4/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s5/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s6/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s401/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Congress/GPO, Public Law 117-90, Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-117publ90/pdf/PLAW-117publ90.pdf

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Material actually read; version/effect and limitations

Fresh official §§ 1–3, 136 Stat. 26–28 / PDF indexes 1–3, enacted March 3, 2022. Section 3 application clause read. Recovered after https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s402/ was inaccessible and https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title9-section402&num=0&edition=prelim returned 404. Full special-claim definitions under other titles remain outside scope.

Direct source URLs

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-117publ90/pdf/PLAW-117publ90.pdf
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s402/
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title9-section402&num=0&edition=prelim
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-117publ90/pdf/PLAW-117publ90.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

OLRC, E-SIGN: https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7001/ and https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7006/.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Material actually read; version/effect and limitations

Fresh § 7001(a)–(c), (d)(1)–(2), and pertinent § 7006 definitions. Currency displayed through PL 119-124. § 7001 remainder not comprehensively read. Failed § 7002 routes: https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7002/ inaccessible; https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section7002&num=0&edition=prelim 404. State-preemption interaction held.

Direct source URLs

https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7001/
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7006/
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7002/
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section7002&num=0&edition=prelim
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7001/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7006/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

OLRC, federal jurisdiction/appeal statutes: https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1331/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1332/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1292/.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Material actually read; version/effect and limitations

Fresh § 1331; material § 1332(a)–(c); § 1292(b). No class-action jurisdiction analysis or actual citizenship determination.

Direct source URLs

https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1331/
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1332/
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1292/
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1331/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1332/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1292/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

U.S. Courts, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, December 1, 2025 edition. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf. Official current-rules page: https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Material actually read; version/effect and limitations

Fresh Rules 5, 6, 7(b), 81(a)(6)(B): printed pp. 8–14, 100 / PDF indexes 26–32, 118. Current-page metadata read. Full Rule 4 and all initial-service methods were not read.

Direct source URLs

https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf
https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure
https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure?utm_source=chatgpt.com

U.S. Supreme Court, 2025 rules transmission/adoption package, official bankruptcy-court-hosted copy. https://www.mdb.uscourts.gov/files/2025_congressional_package_final.pdf

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Material actually read; version/effect and limitations

Fresh April 23, 2025 orders: appellate rules order at printed 00003 / PDF index 2; civil rules order at printed 00106 / PDF index 105. Effective December 1, 2025 with stated new/pending-case application. Not a complete 2026 amendments search.

Direct source URLs

https://www.mdb.uscourts.gov/files/2025_congressional_package_final.pdf
https://www.mdb.uscourts.gov/files/2025_congressional_package_final.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Arizona Supreme Court, R-16-0010 civil-rules restyling order. https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2016%20Rules/R-16-0010.pdf

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Material actually read; version/effect and limitations

Historical official order, September 2, 2016; effective January 1, 2017, with pending-case qualification. Rule 6 read at printed pp. 27–28 / PDF indexes 59–60.

Direct source URLs

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2016%20Rules/R-16-0010.pdf
https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2016%20Rules/R-16-0010.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Arizona Supreme Court, R-17-0009. https://azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2017%20Rules/17-0009.pdf

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Material actually read; version/effect and limitations

Historical official order, August 31, 2017; effective January 1, 2018. Rule 6(d) correction read at order p. 6 / PDF index 5.

Direct source URLs

https://azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2017%20Rules/17-0009.pdf
https://azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2017%20Rules/17-0009.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Michigan Legal Publishing, Arizona Civil Rule 6 reproduction. https://www.courtrules.net/arizona/arizona-civil-procedure/rule-6/

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Material actually read; version/effect and limitations

Fresh nonofficial full Rule 6(a)–(d) and displayed history. Site copyright 2026 is not legal-effect authentication. Official-hosted route https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N957811E086DC11E6B40FA6262051C5AD?viewType=FullText was inaccessible. S012–S013 are historical official alternatives, not a complete current chain.

Direct source URLs

https://www.courtrules.net/arizona/arizona-civil-procedure/rule-6/
https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N957811E086DC11E6B40FA6262051C5AD?viewType=FullText
https://www.courtrules.net/arizona/arizona-civil-procedure/rule-6/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Arizona Supreme Court, R-14-0017 ARCAP restyling order. https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2014%20August%20Rules/R140017.pdf

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Material actually read; version/effect and limitations

Historical official order, September 2, 2014, effective January 1, 2015 with pending-appeal qualification. Rule 5: order p. 14 / PDF 13; Rules 8–9: order pp. 18–20 / PDF 17–19. Rule 7 only partially read, not used as current stay authority.

Direct source URLs

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2014%20August%20Rules/R140017.pdf
https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2014%20August%20Rules/R140017.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Arizona Supreme Court, April 22, 2019 amended R-14-0017 order. https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2019%20Rules/R-14-0017-Amended%20Order-Filed%204-22-2019.PDF?ver=2019-04-22-161612-227

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Material actually read; version/effect and limitations

Both pages read; immediate technical correction involving a juvenile-rule reference. Does not authenticate a current 2026 Rule 9 body.

Direct source URLs

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2019%20Rules/R-14-0017-Amended%20Order-Filed%204-22-2019.PDF?ver=2019-04-22-161612-227
https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2019%20Rules/R-14-0017-Amended%20Order-Filed%204-22-2019.PDF?ver=2019-04-22-161612-227&utm_source=chatgpt.com

Arizona judiciary, current ARCAP routes and amendment index. https://www.azcourts.gov/rules/Recent-Amendments/Rules-of-Civil-Appellate-Procedure. Failed Rule 9: https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/ND80A48603F9F11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?transitionType=Default. Failed Rule 5: https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N8C476F103F9B11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?viewType=FullText.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Material actually read; version/effect and limitations

Index portions read. Rule 9 returned 403; Rule 5 inaccessible. The current operative bodies were not recovered. S015–S016 preserve what the official alternatives actually establish.

Direct source URLs

https://www.azcourts.gov/rules/Recent-Amendments/Rules-of-Civil-Appellate-Procedure
https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/ND80A48603F9F11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?transitionType=Default
https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N8C476F103F9B11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?viewType=FullText
https://www.azcourts.gov/rules/Recent-Amendments/Rules-of-Civil-Appellate-Procedure?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/ND80A48603F9F11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?transitionType=Default&utm_source=chatgpt.com

Ninth Circuit, FRAP and Ninth Circuit Rules handbook, June 1, 2026. https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/frap-June%201%202026.pdf. Official landing page: https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/rules/.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Material actually read; version/effect and limitations

Fresh FRAP 4(a), printed pp. 11–13 / PDF 29–31; Rule 8(a), p. 30 / PDF 48; Rule 26, pp. 87–88 / PDF 105–106. Landing page identifies June 1, 2026 rules; page update October 21 is not an effective date. National route https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure.pdf returned garbled extraction. A December-2025 change link returned internal error without a recoverable target URL. June change document https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/Redlined-Proposed%20Amendments%20to%20Circuit%20Rules%20Jan%2026.pdf was read only as the linked change material; unrelated amendments were not made arbitration rules.

Direct source URLs

https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/frap-June%201%202026.pdf
https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/rules/
https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure.pdf
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/Redlined-Proposed%20Amendments%20to%20Circuit%20Rules%20Jan%2026.pdf
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/frap-June%201%202026.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/rules/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/Redlined-Proposed%20Amendments%20to%20Circuit%20Rules%20Jan%2026.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

American Arbitration Association, Consumer Arbitration Rules, amended/effective May 1, 2025. https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf. Discovery page: https://www.adr.org/rules-forms-and-fees/consumer/.

Recorded check status: scoped selected body or dated reuse with limits

Material actually read; version/effect and limitations

Fresh private policy, R-1, R-2 and material R-5–R-12 passages, printed pp. 6–13 / PDF 5–12; R-7 at p. 11 / PDF 10. No fee schedule or actual registry status was obtained. Policy is neither legislation nor a legal-validity determination.

Direct source URLs

https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf
https://www.adr.org/rules-forms-and-fees/consumer/
https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://www.adr.org/rules-forms-and-fees/consumer/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Arizona Legislature, general computation and holidays: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00243.htm; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00301.htm.

Recorded check status: scoped selected body or dated reuse with limits

Material actually read; version/effect and limitations

Fresh complete official § 1-243(A)–(B) and § 1-301(A)–(F). Actual emergency closures, local calendars, and full amendment history remain unverified.

Direct source URLs

https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00243.htm
https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00301.htm
https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00243.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00301.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf. Official opinion; ¶¶ 1–30, including ¶ 24 n.2; printed pp. 2–12 / PDF 1–11.

Recorded check status: scoped selected body or dated reuse with limits

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S020 — Cornell v. Desert Financial Credit Union, Arizona Supreme Court, March 2, 2023

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Certified question arising from electronic changes to deposit-account terms. Answered the modification question for ongoing at-will consumer relationships; did not itself issue an individual compulsion judgment. See C022–C023. No later-treatment certificate. azcourts.gov

Direct source URLs

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf
https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/1%20CA-CV%2021-0283%20Duncan%20v.%20Public%20Storage%20%20Opinion%20Final.pdf. Official published opinion; ¶¶ 1–32, printed pp. 2–10 / PDF 1–9.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S021 — Duncan v. Public Storage, Arizona Court of Appeals, March 8, 2022

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Storage renters alleged fraud; denial of compulsion was vacated and remanded because separability and the clause-specific theory required proper treatment. Formation/proof discussion at ¶¶ 10–18. A later memorandum lead was not opened or used. azcourts.gov

Direct source URLs

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/1%20CA-CV%2021-0283%20Duncan%20v.%20Public%20Storage%20%20Opinion%20Final.pdf
https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/1%20CA-CV%2021-0283%20Duncan%20v.%20Public%20Storage%20%20Opinion%20Final.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2021/CV200058PR.pdf. Official opinion; ¶¶ 1–25, especially ¶¶ 11, 16–24; printed pp. 2–10 / PDF 1–9.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S022 — Rizzio v. Surpass Senior Living, Arizona Supreme Court, August 17, 2021

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Nursing-care agreement and cost barrier after a cost-shifting provision was severed. Reversed the trial disposition and remanded; specified court-of-appeals analysis was vacated. Attorney funding is relevant, not a per se answer. Specialized facts do not establish a consumer fee schedule. azcourts.gov

Direct source URLs

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2021/CV200058PR.pdf
https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2021/CV200058PR.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/CV%2021-0533%20Gray%20%20v.%20GC%20Services%20OP.pdf. Official published opinion; material majority through disposition, especially ¶¶ 10–12.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S023 — Gray v. GC Services, Arizona Court of Appeals, September 1, 2022

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Employment dispute, not a consumer collection holding. Merits dismissal without resolving the arbitration request was vacated/remanded. Its brief Morgan reference is bounded; older stay-or-dismiss language is not used against later Smith.

Direct source URLs

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/CV%2021-0533%20Gray%20%20v.%20GC%20Services%20OP.pdf
https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/CV%2021-0533%20Gray%20%20v.%20GC%20Services%20OP.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2017/1-ca-cv-16-0255.html. Published majority reproduced by Justia; ¶¶ 1–21 read. Official image not recovered.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S024 — Security Alarm Financing Enterprises v. Fuller, Arizona Court of Appeals, July 6, 2017

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Former-employee dispute; ordinary appellate jurisdiction was unavailable under the state arbitration appeal provision in that FAA-only posture, but special-action jurisdiction was accepted. Relief granted. Its prejudice-based waiver discussion is historical after Morgan.

Direct source URLs

https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2017/1-ca-cv-16-0255.html
https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2017/1-ca-cv-16-0255.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2012/1-ca-cv-11-0711.html. Published majority reproduced by Justia; ¶¶ 1–10, 32–41 and relevant intervening passages read; other commercial-remedy discussion only partially read.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S025 — Sun Valley Ranch 308 LP v. Robson, Arizona Court of Appeals, November 20, 2012

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Partnership/construction dispute. Denial of arbitration vacated and remanded; contract-dependent claims and plaintiffs’ alter-ego allegations supported specified nonsignatory enforcement. Parties agreed the revised act applied. Not an ordinary debt-purchase rule. law.justia.com

Direct source URLs

https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2012/1-ca-cv-11-0711.html
https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2012/1-ca-cv-11-0711.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://coa1.azcourts.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=-jtnWmAZZGo%253d&portalid=1. Official published opinion; ¶¶ 1–39, printed pp. 2–10 / PDF 1–9.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S026 — Juergensmeyer v. Hickman’s, Arizona Court of Appeals, August 18, 2026

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Prison-work injury disputes; special-action jurisdiction accepted and compulsion ordered on remand after rejecting procedural unconscionability on the actual record. ¶¶ 15–17 support the narrow procedural point; ¶¶ 19–39 concern the specialized bargaining facts. coa1.azcourts.gov

Direct source URLs

https://coa1.azcourts.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=-jtnWmAZZGo%253d&portalid=1
https://coa1.azcourts.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=-jtnWmAZZGo%253d&portalid=1&utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-514/pdf/USREPORTS-514-938.pdf. Official U.S. Reports; majority pp. 940–949 / PDF 2–11.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S027 — First Options of Chicago v. Kaplan, U.S. Supreme Court, May 22, 1995

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Workout dispute involving company and individual signatory differences. Clear-and-unmistakable delegation standard and independent judicial review explained; judgment affirmed. The ultimate individual arbitrability merits were outside the granted question.

Direct source URLs

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-514/pdf/USREPORTS-514-938.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-514/pdf/USREPORTS-514-938.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-561/pdf/USREPORTS-561-63.pdf. Official majority pp. 65–76 / PDF 2–13.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S028 — Rent-A-Center, West v. Jackson, U.S. Supreme Court, June 21, 2010

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Employment unconscionability challenge insufficiently targeted the delegation provision. Ninth Circuit reversed. Formation distinguished at p. 70 n.2. Five-Justice majority; dissent not used. Its older dismissal posture is not current requested-stay authority.

Direct source URLs

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-561/pdf/USREPORTS-561-63.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-561/pdf/USREPORTS-561-63.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-586/pdf/USREPORTS-586-63.pdf. Official majority pp. 65–72 / PDF 2–9.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S029 — Henry Schein v. Archer & White, U.S. Supreme Court, January 8, 2019

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Commercial antitrust dispute with an injunction carve-out. Rejected the wholly-groundless exception; vacated/remanded without deciding actual delegation. Unanimous opinion.

Direct source URLs

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-586/pdf/USREPORTS-586-63.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-586/pdf/USREPORTS-586-63.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-328_m6ho.pdf. Official slip majority pp. 1–7 / PDF 2–8. Failed bound-volume route: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-411.pdf was inaccessible.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S030 — Morgan v. Sundance, U.S. Supreme Court, May 23, 2022

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Employment litigation preceded arbitration demand. Rejected arbitration-specific prejudice; vacated/remanded without deciding ultimate waiver. Unanimous majority. Official alternate recovered the operative body.

Direct source URLs

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-328_m6ho.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-411.pdf
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-328_m6ho.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-1218_5357.pdf. Official slip majority pp. 1–6 / PDF 2–7. Failed route: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-601/pdf/USREPORTS-601-472.pdf inaccessible.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S031 — Smith v. Spizzirri, U.S. Supreme Court, May 16, 2024

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Removed Arizona employment case; all claims arbitrable and stay requested. Mandatory § 3 stay; reversed/remanded. Unanimous. Independent jurisdictional dismissal remains distinct.

Direct source URLs

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-1218_5357.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-601/pdf/USREPORTS-601-472.pdf
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-1218_5357.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-105_5536.pdf. Official majority slip pp. 1–10 / PDF 3–12. Failed route: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-599/pdf/USREPORTS-599-736.pdf inaccessible.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S032 — Coinbase v. Bielski, U.S. Supreme Court, June 23, 2023

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Federal consumer litigation and appeal from denial of compulsion. Required district pretrial/trial stay; reversed/remanded. Five-Justice majority; dissent not relied on. Collateral matters and frivolous-appeal controls remain bounded.

Direct source URLs

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-105_5536.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-599/pdf/USREPORTS-599-736.pdf
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-105_5536.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-49.pdf. Official majority material pp. 52–72 / PDF 3–23.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S033 — Vaden v. Discover Bank, U.S. Supreme Court, March 9, 2009

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Consumer-account controversy with a federal counterclaim. § 4 look-through did not supply jurisdiction from that counterclaim; reversed. Majority and partial dissent separated. State-procedure reservation at p. 71 n.20.

Direct source URLs

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-49.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-49.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf. Official majority slip pp. 1–16 / PDF 3–18. Failed route: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-1.pdf inaccessible.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S034 — Badgerow v. Walters, U.S. Supreme Court, March 31, 2022

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Employment award challenge removed to federal court. No § 4 look-through for §§ 9–10; reversed/remanded. Eight-Justice majority; dissent not relied on. No determination of award merits.

Direct source URLs

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-1.pdf
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-624.pdf. Official majority pp. 625–632 / PDF 1–8.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S035 — Arthur Andersen LLP v. Carlisle, U.S. Supreme Court, May 4, 2009

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Nonsignatory advisers sought a stay. State-law enforcement theories can support FAA relief; appellate jurisdiction did not require proving merits first. Reversed/remanded; actual estoppel merits left open.

Direct source URLs

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-624.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-624.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-581/pdf/USREPORTS-581-246.pdf. Official majority pp. 248–257 / PDF 2–11.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S036 — Kindred Nursing Centers v. Clark, U.S. Supreme Court, May 15, 2017

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Nursing agreements signed under powers of attorney. Arbitration-specific special-authority rule preempted; one disposition reversed and the other vacated/remanded for ordinary authority analysis. Majority separated from dissent; one Justice did not participate.

Direct source URLs

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-581/pdf/USREPORTS-581-246.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-581/pdf/USREPORTS-581-246.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-552/pdf/USREPORTS-552-576.pdf. Official relevant majority pp. 578–592 / PDF 2–16.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S037 — Hall Street Associates v. Mattel, U.S. Supreme Court, March 25, 2008

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Commercial lease parties contracted for expanded legal-error review. FAA expedited review grounds could not be enlarged that way; vacated/remanded with other possible routes left open. Separate writings not used.

Direct source URLs

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-552/pdf/USREPORTS-552-576.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-552/pdf/USREPORTS-552-576.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf. Official published majority, printed pp. 4–10 / PDF 3–9; 59 F.4th 1011.

Recorded check status: scoped selected body or dated reuse with limits

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S038 — Armstrong v. Michaels Stores, Ninth Circuit, February 13, 2023

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Employment case applying Morgan. Reservations, limited discovery, and lack of a merits-ruling request supported no waiver; compulsion affirmed. Its record is not a numerical safe harbor.

Direct source URLs

https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf. Official published majority, printed pp. 3–14 / PDF 2–13; 840 F.3d 1152.

Recorded check status: scoped selected body or dated reuse with limits

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S039 — Move, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Ninth Circuit, November 4, 2016

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

FINRA award tainted by an arbitrator’s fabricated qualifications. § 12 equitable tolling recognized; specified relief ordered on remand. Substantive tolling objections were partly waived; unique fraud and prejudice facts limit generalization.

Direct source URLs

https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-3_879d.pdf. Official majority slip pp. 1–8 / PDF 2–9.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S040 — Coinbase v. Suski, U.S. Supreme Court, May 23, 2024

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Earlier platform delegation and later sweepstakes court clause conflicted. Court decides which agreement governs; affirmed. Unanimous majority; separate concurrence not relied on. State-law supersession merits were not decided.

Direct source URLs

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-3_879d.pdf
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-3_879d.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2020/09/09/19-16746.pdf. Official published majority; material pp. 7–10, 14–20, 33–35 / PDF 6–9, 13–19, 32–34; 974 F.3d 1051.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S041 — Shivkov v. Artex Risk Solutions, Ninth Circuit, September 9, 2020

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Arizona-law commercial captive-insurance agreements. Relevant survival and nonsignatory-estoppel analysis read; compulsion affirmed. Class-arbitration discussion not comprehensively read or used. Older dismissal disposition does not override Smith.

Direct source URLs

https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2020/09/09/19-16746.pdf
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2020/09/09/19-16746.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-193.pdf. Official majority pp. 195–204 / PDF 2–11.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Source ID; court/date

S_AZ-P13-S042 — Cortez Byrd Chips v. Bill Harbert Construction, U.S. Supreme Court, March 21, 2000

Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits

Construction dispute with competing confirmation/vacatur filings. FAA §§ 9–11 venue provisions permissive; reversed/remanded. Unanimous. This is not a holding on § 9’s one-year limitation question. govinfo.gov

Direct source URLs

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-193.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-193.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Not relied on as a freshly read holding. References to it inside other opinions do not convert it into a full body read.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Route and actual read status

AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-563/pdf/USREPORTS-563-333.pdf. Syllabus/caption material only.

Direct source URLs

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-563/pdf/USREPORTS-563-333.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-563/pdf/USREPORTS-563-333.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Not relied on. Its appearance in Duncan is not a separate fresh underlying-authority read.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Route and actual read status

Hamblen v. Hatch: https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2017/CV-16-0260-PR%20Opinion.pdf. Caption and initial material only.

Direct source URLs

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2017/CV-16-0260-PR%20Opinion.pdf
https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2017/CV-16-0260-PR%20Opinion.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Not relied on. No mass-arbitration fee, consolidation, or refusal-to-arbitrate holding is asserted from this partial read.

Recorded check status: source record reconciled unreopened body holds

Route and actual read status

Jones v. Starz: https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/02/28/24-1645.pdf. Partial facts and § 4 discussion; full majority/disposition not completed.

Direct source URLs

https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/02/28/24-1645.pdf
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/02/28/24-1645.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

G001

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Fresh access and baseline distinction

Status; claims

Answered; C001, C105

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Retain October 27 access and unknown individual opening seconds; do not relabel October 22 as fresh.

G002

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Distinct Arizona arbitration families

Status; claims

Answered; C002–C005

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Apply only after agreement/category facts are known.

G003

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

2010 savings and accrued-right transition

Status; claims

Partial; C004

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Recover official final chapter image and responsive construction for disputed pre-2011 rights.

G004

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Material later Arizona amendments

Status; claims

Partial; C001

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Extend beyond the bounded tables/compilation if a later enactment issue is presented.

G005

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Revised-act listed exclusions

Status; claims

Answered; C003

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Establish actual institutional and transaction predicates before classification.

G006

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Older-act employment exclusion and court definition

Status; claims

Answered; C005

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Do not transfer superior-court definition to every other regime.

G007

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

FAA writing and commerce predicates

Status; claims

Answered; C006

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Actual writing and commerce evidence remain necessary.

G008

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

FAA transportation-worker exclusion

Status; claims

Partial; C007

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Full worker-class construction and actual employment facts deferred.

G009

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

2022 special-federal exclusion and application date

Status; claims

Partial; C007

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Underlying special-claim definitions and actual triggering facts remain outside this ordinary-debt model.

G010

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

State versus federal subject-matter jurisdiction

Status; claims

Answered; C008, C012

Exact remaining evidence or next action

No actual jurisdictional finding.

G011

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

§ 4 look-through

Status; claims

Answered; C009

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Identify the actual underlying well-pleaded controversy.

G012

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Award-stage no-look-through distinction

Status; claims

Answered; C010

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Establish an independent award-application jurisdictional basis.

G013

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Initial forum, venue, and § 4 geographic restriction

Status; claims

Partial; C011, C039

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Actual clause, court competence, and forum facts absent; no general venue dossier.

G014

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Agreement existence and authentic version

Status; claims

Partial; C019–C021

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Actual complete agreement, version, delivery, and assent evidence absent.

G015

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Capacity and agency authority

Status; claims

Partial; C018, C020

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Ordinary authority instrument and capacity facts absent.

G016

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Consideration

Status; claims

Partial; C020

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Actual bargain and applicable contract-law facts absent.

G017

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Electronic record/signature legal effect

Status; claims

Answered; C013–C014

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Electronic form alone neither validates nor defeats agreement.

G018

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Electronic delivery, receipt, and notice

Status; claims

Partial; C015–C016

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Actual designated system, retainability, transmission content, and consent absent.

G019

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

E-SIGN § 7002 interaction

Status; claims

Unresolved; C016

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Recover current official § 7002 body through a permitted public source; no bypass.

G020

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Modification, opt-out, and termination reservation

Status; claims

Partial; C022–C023

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Establish at-will character, actual notices, rejection, and burden; fixed-term branch needs separate authority.

G021

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Survival and clause scope

Status; claims

Partial; C024, C034

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Actual termination/survival language and dispute connection absent.

G022

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Formation versus whole-contract/clause validity

Status; claims

Answered; C020, C024, C026

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Apply the distinction to the actual challenge’s target.

G023

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Clear delegation and conflicting later contracts

Status; claims

Answered; C025–C028

Exact remaining evidence or next action

No delegation presumed from a label.

G024

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Institutional-rule incorporation as delegation

Status; claims

Partial; C029–C030

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Actual incorporation/access and responsive consumer-specific application remain necessary.

G025

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Private administrative suspension versus court stay

Status; claims

Answered; C031

Exact remaining evidence or next action

No actual policy request or court order exists.

G026

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Nonsignatory enforcement principles

Status; claims

Answered; C035–C037

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Recognized theory must fit actual parties and claims.

G027

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Assignee/debt-buyer transfer of this enforcement right

Status; claims

Partial; C038

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Directly responsive Arizona consumer assignment authority and actual chain/account inclusion remain missing.

G028

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

National-bank agreement later transferred to nonbank

Status; claims

Unresolved; C003, C038

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Need authoritative treatment of this precise statutory/assignment branch and the actual agreement.

G029

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Servicer/affiliate authority

Status; claims

Partial; C038

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Need actual authority and enforcement theory; label insufficient.

G030

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Underlying debt validity and amount

Status; claims

Excluded; C094, C098

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Separate merits/evidence pass; unreviewed P10 is not a premise.

G031

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Cost-barrier defense

Status; claims

Partial; C032

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Applicable fee schedule, relief mechanisms, and individualized evidence absent.

G032

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Neutral contract defenses and arbitration-specific discrimination

Status; claims

Answered; C018, C033

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Actual ordinary defense remains fact-dependent.

G033

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Revised-act motion route and opposed determination

Status; claims

Answered; C039–C040

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Actual motion and jurisdiction absent.

G034

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

Older-act application route

Status; claims

Answered; C041

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Apply its particular confirmation exception separately.

G035

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred

Requested issue

FAA § 4 notice, hearing, and disputed-formation trial

Status; claims

Answered; C042

Exact remaining evidence or next action

Actual genuine dispute, service, and timely jury demand absent.

G036

Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred