{"meta":{"key":"s_az--pass-13","task":"S_AZ","title":"SAZ Arizona consumer-account arbitration gateway","parent_title":"Arizona debt and debt relief law","edition":"pass-13","path":"/research/s_az--pass-13/","kind":"split_pass","category":"state","role":"state","area_numbers":[66],"groups":["collections"],"date":"2026-10-27","tables":16,"claims":105,"sources":46,"review_status":"scoped_coordinator_arbitration_regime_formation_waiver_award_calendar_review_with_validation_and_source_currentness_application_holds","review_complete":true,"sha256":"0a32c889fd712e27db8894fcff419a77c02206c227b7929159e0592d65672dfd","headings":["Research scope, access, and notation","1.1 Governing regimes, jurisdiction, and electronic contracting","1.2 Formation, modification, delegation, and enforcement by another actor","1.3 Court motion, waiver, stays, appeals, and calculation rules","1.4 Arbitration notice, award, review, and judgment","1.5 Model and research-boundary claims","M01 — Electronic assent, competing versions, and delegation","Branch A: connected evidence","Branch B: version and delivery gap","Branch C: later modification","M02 — Original creditor, two assignments, and a servicer alternative","M03 — Litigation conduct, requested stay, and appeal","Alternative outcomes","Alternative Arizona branch","M04 — Award dates, judicial review, and separate cash accounting","Stipulated events and counting assumptions","A. Revised-act candidates","B. FAA alternatives","C. Older Arizona act","D. Fraud-discovery alternative","E. Award, judgment, and cash ledger","4.1 Common access and source-status rules","4.2 Statutes, enactments, rules, and policy sources","S001 — Direct operative-section URL map","4.3 Published-opinion source and posture register","4.4 Opened or screened opinion material not used as a holding"],"generation_provenance":{"actual_route":"regular_chat_adaptive_models","actual_model":"GPT-6","actual_mode":"Pro","provenance_limit":"Actual documented capture labels only; missing labels remain unknown. No preferred setting is inferred as actual execution."},"public_id":"S_AZ/pass-13","facets":{"geography":["us","us-az"],"debt_type":[],"stage":[],"subject":["arbitration-adr"]},"scope":"ReviewedP01 exact broad agreement/remedy/state holds + explicit parent arbitration narrowed consumer arbitration formation/delegation/assignment/court enforcement-waiver-stay-appeal/necessary award. P03–P12 unreviewed not premises.","pending_corrections":0},"markdown":"# S_AZ PASS-13 — Arizona consumer-account arbitration gateway\n\n**Arizona has two statutory arbitration regimes, and their applicability and award-review procedures must be kept separate.** The revised act excludes several categories—including specified national-bank and federal-savings-association customer agreements—and expressly sends those categories to Arizona’s older arbitration act. Federal Arbitration Act applicability raises additional questions about interstate commerce, enforceability, procedure, and jurisdiction; it does not itself establish federal subject-matter jurisdiction. **C002–C012.** [Applicability+3](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03003.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com)\n\nThe principal findings are:\n\n- **Agreement formation remains a distinct threshold question.** A valid delegation can assign certain enforceability or scope disputes to an arbitrator, but an alleged delegation does not establish that the parties formed the agreement containing it. Electronic records, modification notices, assignment documents, and the identity of the party seeking enforcement require their own proof. **C013–C038.**\n- **Litigation waiver has no universal elapsed-time threshold.** *Morgan* rejected an arbitration-specific prejudice requirement. The Ninth Circuit’s subsequent *Armstrong* decision applies a fact-dependent inquiry into knowledge and intentional conduct inconsistent with arbitration. **C048–C050.**\n- **A requested federal stay matters.** Under *Smith*, when FAA § 3 applies and a party requests a stay, a federal court cannot dismiss simply because the claims are arbitrable. State statutory stays and appellate stays have separate predicates. **C044–C054.**\n- **An award, confirmation order, judgment, and actual payment are different events.** The revised Arizona act’s 90-day filing provisions, the older act’s confirmation/opposition procedure, and the FAA’s three-month notice-service requirement are not interchangeable. **C065–C094.** [azcourts.gov+6](https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com)\n\n## Research scope, access, and notation\n\nPublic-source research occurred on **October 27, 2026, in both UTC and Pacific time**. Logged clock observations bracketed the research from **16:39:38 to 17:10:05 UTC**, equivalent to **09:39:38 to 10:10:05 PDT**. These are research-session observations, **not individually logged source-opening times**. Exact opening seconds for individual documents are unknown. October 22 is the historical baseline supplied by the user, not the access date for this pass.\n\nAll findings below are confined to the arbitration gateway. No actual agreement, account, assignment, court record, award, payment, or party status was supplied or investigated.\n\n**Identifier convention:** References such as **S001** and **C001** mean **S_AZ-P13-S001** and **S_AZ-P13-C001**. The registers display the complete identifiers. Repeated sections or URLs within one source family are not independent corroborating authorities.\n\n**Claim classifications:**\n\n- **D — Direct text:** supported by the identified statutory, rule, or policy language.\n- **H — Holding:** supported by the identified published majority.\n- **I — Inference:** expressly bounded reasoning from those authorities.\n- **K — Conditional:** application to stipulated fictional facts or arithmetic.\n- **G — Gap:** a proposition or application remains unestablished.\n\nConfidence is high in the accurately described text or holding actually read. That does not certify later treatment, every amendment, an actual party’s status, or application to an unseen contract.\n\n# 1. Atomic findings and evidence matrices\n\n## 1.1 Governing regimes, jurisdiction, and electronic contracting\n\n| Claim ID | Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence | Authority and pinpoint | Classification, limits, and missing facts |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C001** | The Arizona legislative compilation identifies the 57th Legislature’s second regular session as its update basis. The 2025 and 2026 tables of sections affected were also examined for the targeted arbitration sections. This establishes the displayed compilation and a bounded amendment screen, not exhaustive subsequent-law clearance. | S001 compilation notice; S003 Title 12 entries; S004 Title 12 entries. | D; later-law completeness remains held. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C002** | Subject to its exclusions, § 12-3003(A) covers agreements made on or after January 1, 2011; permits recorded agreement to its application to older agreements; and states that on or after January 1, 2011 it governs agreements whenever made. The historical savings clause must also be considered. | S001, § 12-3003(A)(1)–(3); S002, § 5. | D; do not resolve an accrued pre-2011 right from the compilation heading alone. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C003** | The revised act excludes employer–employee agreements, insurance-contract arbitration, specified national-bank/federal-savings-association customer agreements, and specified self-regulatory-organization arbitration. Subsection C sends the latter three categories—not the employment category—to the older Arizona act. | S001, § 12-3003(B)(1)–(4), (C). | D; actual institutional identity, relationship, and agreement must be established. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C004** | The recovered HB 2430 text preserves proceedings commenced and rights accrued before January 1, 2011, and makes the new chapter effective after December 31, 2010. The official final chapter image was not recovered; the reproduction’s historical authentication limit remains material. | S002, §§ 5–6; current S001, § 12-3003. | D/G; obtain the official enacted chapter and responsive transition construction before deciding a disputed historical application. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C005** | The older act also excludes employer–employee arbitration. For that act, “court” means Arizona superior courts; ordinary civil venue governs, with subsequent applications ordinarily remaining in the initial court. | S001, §§ 12-1516–1517. | D; this does not establish the court competent under every revised-act or federal proceeding. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C006** | FAA § 2 addresses written arbitration provisions in maritime transactions or contracts evidencing transactions involving commerce, and written submission agreements. Its text is not limited to consumer debt. Ordinary contract-revocation defenses remain available, subject to federal equal-treatment principles and chapter 4. | S006, §§ 1–2; S036, pp. 248–257. | D/H; interstate-commerce facts and the agreement remain necessary. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C007** | FAA § 1 excludes the stated transportation-worker employment classes. Separately, the 2022 Act allows the specified election against predispute arbitration in qualifying sexual-assault/harassment cases and assigns its applicability question to a court despite delegation. Its application clause concerns disputes or claims arising or accruing on or after enactment. | S006, §§ 1, 401; S007, § 2 adding § 402, and § 3. | D; enacted March 3, 2022. Full employment, military, and special-claim regimes are deferred. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C008** | The FAA does not independently confer federal subject-matter jurisdiction. A federal applicant needs an applicable jurisdictional basis, such as the requirements of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 or 1332. A small consumer balance and an FAA citation do not supply that basis. | S009, §§ 1331–1332; S033, pp. 59–62; S034, slip pp. 4–8. | D/H; citizenship, amount, federal question, and the application’s nature are unknown. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C009** | For a § 4 petition, *Vaden* permits looking through to the underlying controversy. Federal jurisdiction cannot be manufactured from a federal defense or counterclaim when the well-pleaded underlying action lacks a federal basis. | S033, pp. 62–72; S006, § 4. | H; § 4’s particular language matters. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C010** | *Badgerow* rejects importing § 4’s look-through method into §§ 9 and 10 applications. The award application needs an independent jurisdictional foundation. An underlying federal claim alone is insufficient under that method. | S034, slip pp. 4–16. | H; the decision does not resolve every jurisdictional question under other FAA sections. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C011** | Section 4 contains a district-related arbitration-hearing restriction. By contrast, *Cortez Byrd Chips* holds the venue provisions of §§ 9–11 permissive rather than exclusively confined to the award district. Venue and subject-matter jurisdiction remain separate. | S006, § 4; S042, pp. 195–204. | D/H; the actual forum agreement and independently proper venue remain unknown. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C012** | FAA substantive enforceability does not justify silently substituting all federal motion, service, appeal, or award procedures for Arizona procedures in state court. The Supreme Court opinions read expressly leave aspects of state-court procedural application undecided. | S033, p. 71 n.20; S034, slip p. 5 n.2; S001 state procedures. | H/I; identify the actual court, governing agreement, and applicable state procedural statute. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C013** | Arizona’s electronic-transactions law applies only within its statutory scope and where parties agreed to conduct the transaction electronically, assessed from context and conduct. It does not force a person to transact electronically. | S005, §§ 44-7003, 44-7005(A)–(C). | D; statutory exclusions and actual consent remain relevant. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C014** | Electronic form alone does not invalidate an otherwise qualifying record or signature. Attribution depends on the person’s act and surrounding evidence; required written information must be retainable where § 44-7008 applies. | S005, §§ 44-7007–7009. | D; no universal paper-signature requirement, and no universal checkbox-sufficiency rule. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C015** | Arizona’s electronic sending/receipt rules depend on designated systems, accessibility, and processability. Human awareness is not invariably required, and an acknowledgment does not itself establish that transmitted content was identical. | S005, § 44-7015(A)–(F). | D; delivery, content, assent, and notice adequacy remain separate factual questions. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C016** | E-SIGN’s consumer provisions impose consent and access-related conditions when legally required written information is supplied electronically. Section 7001(c)(3) limits one asserted invalidity consequence; it does not excuse every delivery defect. The § 7002 state-law interaction body was not recovered. | S008, § 7001(a)–(d)(2), especially (c)(1)–(3); § 7006 definitions. | D/G; § 7002 preemption reconciliation remains held. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C017** | The revised act permits some variation by agreement but makes specified provisions nonwaivable, including important court-motion and award-review provisions. Its actual lists must be checked rather than assuming every contractual procedural alteration is effective. | S001, § 12-3004(A)–(C). | D; actual clause and federal interaction unknown. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C018** | Generally applicable authority and contract defenses survive. An arbitration-specific rule demanding special authorization because arbitration waives court adjudication is impermissible under *Kindred Nursing*. That holding does not create agency authority that ordinary law otherwise withholds. | S036, pp. 248–257; S006, § 2. | H; actual capacity, agency instrument, and ordinary authority remain factual/legal predicates. |\n\n## 1.2 Formation, modification, delegation, and enforcement by another actor\n\n| Claim ID | Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence | Authority and pinpoint | Classification, limits, and missing facts |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C019** | In the Arizona motion posture addressed by *Duncan*, the proponent must demonstrate an arbitration agreement; material factual disputes require resolution rather than acceptance of unsupported assertions. The challenger bears the burden of a generally applicable contract defense. | S021, ¶¶ 10–18. | H; actual evidence and the precise disputed issue are absent. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C020** | Consent, consideration, capacity, fraud, duress, and related ordinary contract issues can matter. A court must distinguish whether any agreement was formed from whether an admittedly formed contract is unenforceable. | S021, ¶¶ 12–18; S001, § 12-3006; S028, p. 70 n.2. | H/D; no presumption that every account document proves these elements. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C021** | A proponent relying on an electronic clause must connect the asserted version and assent evidence to the relevant person and transaction. A statement, collection notice, or later website copy does not, without more, prove assent to that version. | S001, § 12-3006(A); S005, §§ 44-7002, 44-7009; S021, ¶ 18. | I; a proof requirement inferred from formation and attribution rules, not a prescribed universal document checklist. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C022** | *Cornell* permits modification of standardized terms in an ongoing, at-will consumer relationship when the initial terms reserve change authority, reasonable modification/rejection notice is received, the consumer can preserve the status quo by rejecting, and the relationship continues beyond a reasonable rejection period. | S020, ¶¶ 2, 24, 28–30. | H; not a holding that every fixed-term loan can be changed by silence. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C023** | *Cornell* also preserves good faith, negotiated terms, and ordinary defenses. Its footnote recognizes a separately reserved termination power subject to limits against unreasonable cost, value loss, or personal burden. Its facts do not establish a universal opt-out duration. | S020, ¶¶ 24 n.2, 27–29. | H; actual reservation, notice, rejection, and burden evidence required. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C024** | The revised act’s baseline assigns agreement existence and covered-controversy questions to the court, and conditions precedent and whole-contract enforceability to the arbitrator. Valid delegation and controlling federal law require separate analysis. | S001, § 12-3006(B)–(C); § 12-3004. | D; do not treat statutory baseline allocation as resolving an unseen delegation clause. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C025** | *First Options* requires clear and unmistakable evidence before treating arbitrability as delegated. Objecting before arbitrators does not itself demonstrate consent to let them conclusively decide their authority. | S027, pp. 943–947. | H; actual delegation and conduct must be established. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C026** | Under *Rent-A-Center*, a challenge directed only to the broader arbitration agreement did not defeat a separately enforceable delegation provision. Formation is analytically distinct; an effective challenge to delegation must actually target that provision. | S028, pp. 68–76, especially p. 70 n.2 and pp. 72–75. | H; the decision does not presume formation from a disputed signature or version. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C027** | With a valid delegation, a court cannot retain a delegated issue merely because the arbitration demand appears wholly groundless. *Henry Schein* did not itself decide whether the particular contract clearly delegated the dispute. | S029, pp. 67–72. | H; actual delegation still must be established. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C028** | When parties contest which of two agreements controls and the later agreement provides a judicial forum, *Coinbase v. Suski* assigns that antecedent contract question to the court. It did not decide the ultimate state-law supersession merits. | S040, slip pp. 4–8. | H; requires actual competing agreements, not merely a later statement. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C029** | AAA Consumer Rule R-7 authorizes the arbitrator to address specified jurisdictional questions. Reading that private rule does not alone establish valid incorporation or clear and unmistakable consumer assent to delegation. | S019, R-7(a)–(c), p. 11; S027, pp. 943–945. | D/I; actual agreement, incorporation language, access, and applicable case law remain necessary. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C030** | The AAA consumer rules read are effective May 1, 2025. R-1 supplies the policy’s consumer-relationship and version/application rules. A different contract, administrator, agreed version, or administrative classification can change the policy inquiry. | S019, R-1, pp. 6–7. | D, private policy; not a statute or proof of legal enforceability. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C031** | AAA R-2 provides a conditional administrative suspension process for judicial intervention. That process is not a court stay and does not itself extend statutory review or debt-response periods. | S019, R-2, pp. 7–8; C044–C060. | D/I; no actual AAA proceeding or request was made. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C032** | A cost-barrier challenge under *Rizzio* requires reasonably certain costs and an individualized inability-to-pay showing, with available relief and funding considered. An attorney’s cost-advance agreement is relevant but not categorically dispositive. | S022, ¶¶ 11, 16–19, 22–24. | H; no current administrator fee, waiver entitlement, or personal inability was established. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C033** | The 2026 *Juergensmeyer* majority requires a fact-dependent procedural-unconscionability inquiry; unequal bargaining power alone was insufficient on its record. Its prison-employment facts do not determine an ordinary debtor’s contract. | S026, ¶¶ 19–39. | H; later treatment and different factual application remain held. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C034** | *Shivkov* enforced arbitration of claims tied to the relevant agreement despite termination arguments on that commercial record. Its reasoning does not make every later dispute arbitrable or eliminate the need to prove the clause’s scope and survival. | S041, pp. 14–20. | H; Arizona-law commercial case; important appellate premises were not challenged. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C035** | *Arthur Andersen* permits a nonsignatory to invoke FAA relief when applicable state contract law gives that actor an enforcement right. The FAA does not categorically confine enforcement to signatories, but the actual state-law theory must succeed. | S035, pp. 630–632. | H; the Supreme Court did not decide the particular estoppel merits. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C036** | *Sun Valley Ranch* applied Arizona nonsignatory theories to contract-dependent claims and the plaintiffs’ own alter-ego allegations. Its holding is not an exemption from proving a relationship and claim-specific basis for enforcement. | S025, ¶¶ 32–41. | H; commercial partnership context, not an ordinary debt-sale holding. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C037** | *Shivkov* applied Arizona alternative estoppel to claims sufficiently dependent on the agreement; it did not decide every asserted close-relationship theory. | S041, pp. 33–35, n.14. | H; commercial facts and the actual claims matter. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C038** | For an assignee, debt buyer, affiliate, or servicer, the necessary inquiry includes the original agreement, identity, applicable transfer language, account inclusion, defenses, and any agency or nonsignatory theory. Assignment cannot supply assent missing at formation. | S001, §§ 12-3006–3007; S035, pp. 630–632; S025, ¶¶ 32–41. | I/G; no directly dispositive Arizona unsecured-consumer debt-sale opinion or actual chain was established here. |\n\n## 1.3 Court motion, waiver, stays, appeals, and calculation rules\n\n| Claim ID | Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence | Authority and pinpoint | Classification, limits, and missing facts |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C039** | Revised-act relief is requested by motion. Initial notice generally uses summons service unless a civil action involving the agreement is pending. A pending covered claim determines the motion court; otherwise § 12-3027 supplies county venue alternatives. Jurisdiction over the controversy and parties is still required. | S001, §§ 12-3005, 12-3007(E), 12-3026–3027. | D; exact court competence and valid service are not established. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C040** | A revised-act movant must show an agreement and allege refusal. An opposed application requires summary determination; no enforceable agreement means no compulsion. The court may not refuse arbitration merely because the underlying claim seems meritless. | S001, § 12-3007(A)–(D). | D; nonappearance does not remove the statutory agreement showing. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C041** | The older act provides an application to compel upon agreement/refusal, summary determination of a substantial existence dispute, and a no-agreement route to stay arbitration. Its general court applications are motions, subject to the particular confirmation procedure. | S001, §§ 12-1502(A)–(C), 12-1515, 12-1511. | D; initial notice generally follows summons service unless a permitted agreement provides otherwise. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C042** | FAA § 4 requires five days’ written notice using the prescribed federal service framework. A genuine making/refusal issue goes to summary trial; the allegedly defaulting party has the stated timely jury-demand right outside admiralty. | S006, § 4, second–fifth paragraphs. | D; no universal “decide everything on affidavits” rule, and no actual service or jury-demand deadline is calculated. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C043** | Appointment begins with the agreed method. The FAA and both Arizona acts provide court appointment in specified failure, vacancy, or unavailable-method circumstances; the precise statute and agreement govern. | S006, § 5; S001, §§ 12-1503, 12-3011. | D; no finding that a named administrator or arbitrator is unavailable. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C044** | Under the revised act, a motion to order arbitration requires a court stay, on just terms, of judicial proceedings involving the alleged covered claim pending decision. An order compelling arbitration requires a stay of the covered claim; severability can limit its reach. | S001, § 12-3007(F)–(G). | D; concerns covered judicial proceedings, not every unrelated obligation. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C045** | A court challenge to existence or scope does not itself halt the arbitration under the revised act: arbitration may continue unless the court orders otherwise. | S001, § 12-3006(D). | D; distinguish a judicial-action stay from a stay of arbitration. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C046** | The older act directs a stay of an action involving an arbitrable issue when the specified arbitration application or order has been made, with possible limitation to a severable issue. | S001, § 12-1502(D). | D; the actual application, issue, and court order matter. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C047** | In a federal case satisfying FAA § 3, a party’s requested stay must be granted rather than dismissal merely because the claims are arbitrable. The applicant must not be in default in proceeding with arbitration. | S006, § 3; S031, slip pp. 3–6 and n.2. | D/H; an independent dismissal ground, such as lack of jurisdiction, is different. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C048** | *Morgan* rejects an arbitration-specific prejudice requirement for litigation-conduct waiver. It remanded rather than deciding ultimate waiver or every choice between state and federal waiver frameworks. | S030, slip pp. 4–7. | H; no fixed number of days, motions, or discovery requests constitutes the rule. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C049** | The Ninth Circuit’s post-*Morgan* test examines knowledge of the arbitration right and intentional acts inconsistent with it, considering the circumstances without the former special heavy burden or prejudice element. | S038, pp. 6–10. | H; *Armstrong* found no waiver on its particular record. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C050** | *Fuller*’s older federal prejudice formulation cannot be used unchanged after *Morgan* and *Armstrong*. *Gray* notes *Morgan* but does not supply a comprehensive Arizona rule for every state-law waiver dispute. | S024, ¶¶ 10–17; S023, ¶ 12; S030; S038. | H/G; a comprehensive current Arizona-specific waiver formulation remains unestablished. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C051** | FAA § 16 permits the listed appeals from denials of stays/compulsion, specified award orders, anti-arbitration injunctions, and final decisions. It generally bars the listed interlocutory appeals allowing arbitration, subject to § 1292(b). | S006, § 16(a)–(b); S009, § 1292(b). | D; actual finality, certification, and jurisdiction must be established. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C052** | Arizona § 12-2101.01 lists denial of compulsion, grant of a stay of arbitration, denial of confirmation, modification/correction, vacatur without rehearing, and qualifying judgments/decrees. It does not list an ordinary interlocutory grant of compulsion. | S001, § 12-2101.01(A)–(B). | D; confirmation judgments fall under the judgment category; do not rewrite item (3) as both granting and denying confirmation. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C053** | *Fuller* and the 2026 *Juergensmeyer* opinion used discretionary special-action review in FAA-only employment postures rather than assuming the state statutory ordinary appeal applied. | S024, ¶¶ 4–8; S026, ¶¶ 15–17. | H; current special-action rules were not independently read, and ordinary consumer jurisdiction must be separately tested. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C054** | *Coinbase v. Bielski* requires a federal district court to stay pretrial and trial proceedings during the covered § 16 appeal from denial of compulsion. Its holding is not a universal state-court appellate-stay rule. | S032, slip pp. 3–10, especially n.2. | H; collateral matters and treatment of frivolous appeals are bounded exceptions discussed in the opinion. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C055** | FRCP 81(a)(6)(B) applies federal civil rules to FAA proceedings except where the statute supplies other procedures. Rule 7(b) addresses motion content; Rule 5 distinguishes service from filing. | S010, Rules 5, 7(b), 81(a)(6)(B). | D; full initial-service mechanics were not investigated. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C056** | Federal Rule 6 excludes the triggering day, counts intermediate days, and adjusts qualifying last days. Electronic filing generally ends at midnight in the court’s time zone. Extra service days are conditional, not automatically added to an award-receipt clock. | S010, Rule 6(a), (d). | D; statutory extension power is not assumed. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C057** | FRAP 4(a) ordinarily measures a civil notice of appeal from entry, with a 30-day period and specified governmental-party, postjudgment-motion, extension, and reopening provisions. | S018, FRAP 4(a)(1), (4)–(7). | D; actual entry and triggering orders are absent; no actual appeal deadline is determined. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C058** | FRAP 8 ordinarily starts a requested enforcement stay in the district court; FRAP 26 supplies computation and extension limits. These rules do not erase *Bielski*’s distinct covered-appeal holding or create a universal award-enforcement stay. | S018, FRAP 8(a), 26; S032. | D/H; the actual order, appellate posture, and local requirements remain necessary. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C059** | The official Arizona Rule 6 adoption and amendment bodies recovered are historical. A current-looking nonofficial reproduction matches the reviewed core computation provisions, but the complete official 2026 amendment chain was not authenticated. | S012, Rule 6; S013, Rule 6(d); S014. | D/G; current official body remains a hold. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C060** | The 2014 ARCAP adoption order contains a general 30-day appeal rule and specified exceptions. The 2019 document recovered makes a different technical correction. Neither establishes a complete current 2026 ARCAP 9 text by itself. | S015, Rules 5, 8–9; S016; failed S017 routes. | D/G; no current Arizona appeal endpoint is certified. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C061** | A.R.S. § 1-243 generally excludes the first day and includes the last unless the last is a holiday, subject to its narrow subsection B exception. Section 1-301 identifies state holidays and specified observation rules. | S046, §§ 1-243(A)–(B), 1-301(A)–(F). | D; an actual court closure or special order remains unknown. |\n\n## 1.4 Arbitration notice, award, review, and judgment\n\n| Claim ID | Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence | Authority and pinpoint | Classification, limits, and missing facts |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C062** | Revised-act initiation notice must follow the agreement or the statutory alternative, identify the controversy and remedy, and satisfy the prescribed delivery method. A participation-based notice objection must be made by the statutory stage. General notice/receipt definitions also matter. | S001, §§ 12-3002, 12-3009(A)–(B). | D; the statutory certified-mail alternative calls for a requested and obtained return receipt. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C063** | Under the older act, absent a permitted contrary agreement, hearing notice uses the prescribed delivery and at least five days’ notice. A duly notified party’s nonappearance does not necessarily stop the hearing; participation can affect a notice objection. | S001, § 12-1505(A)–(C). | D; actual notice and any variation must be proved. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C064** | The revised act requires fair hearing procedures, provides for specified summary disposition and representation, and imposes neutral-arbitrator disclosure duties. Material nondisclosure and procedural prejudice have specific statutory consequences, not automatic debt cancellation. | S001, §§ 12-3012, 12-3015–3016. | D; detailed discovery, institutional procedure, and a particular challenge record remain outside this gateway. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C065** | A revised-act award must be recorded and signed or otherwise authenticated by a concurring arbitrator; each party receives notice including a copy. An objection that the award was made late must be notified before receipt of award notice. | S001, § 12-3019(A)–(B). | D; making, authentication, and notice dates are distinct. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C066** | The older act requires a written signed award and delivery by its specified methods or agreement. Its late-award objection must precede delivery. | S001, § 12-1508(A)–(B). | D; do not substitute revised-act “receipt of notice” terminology without identifying the regime. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C067** | Under the revised act, a qualifying arbitrator-correction/clarification motion and notice are due within 20 days after award-notice receipt; objection notice is due within 10 days after receipt of the motion notice. | S001, § 12-3020(A)–(E), read with § 12-3004. | D; distinguish potentially variable arbitral procedure from nonwaivable judicial-review provisions. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C068** | The older act permits the specified arbitrator correction/clarification application within 20 days after delivery, with notice and a 10-day objection opportunity. | S001, § 12-1509. | D; actual delivery, notice, and the correction ground remain necessary. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C069** | After revised-act award notice, a party may move to confirm; the court must confirm unless the award is modified, corrected, or vacated under the specified provisions. Section 12-3022 does not itself state the FAA’s one-year period. | S001, § 12-3022. | D; absence of that period in this section is not a certificate that no other timing doctrine could apply. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C070** | Under the revised act, an award procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means is a statutory vacatur ground. | S001, § 12-3023(A)(1). | D; allegation alone is not proof of procurement. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C071** | Revised-act vacatur grounds include neutral-arbitrator evident partiality, arbitrator corruption, or misconduct prejudicing a party’s rights. | S001, § 12-3023(A)(2). | D; the specified actor and predicate must be shown. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C072** | A substantially prejudicial refusal to postpone or consider material evidence, qualifying hearing misconduct, or exceeding arbitral powers can support revised-act vacatur. | S001, § 12-3023(A)(3)–(4). | D; disagreement with the result is not itself these grounds. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C073** | Lack of an arbitration agreement is a revised-act vacatur ground, subject to the participation/objection restriction stated in subsection (A)(5). | S001, § 12-3023(A)(5), cross-reference § 12-3015(C). | D; this text differs from the older act’s additional prior-determination language. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C074** | Improper revised-act initiation notice supports vacatur only with the substantial prejudice required by the statute. | S001, § 12-3023(A)(6); § 12-3009. | D; not every notice imperfection automatically invalidates an award. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C075** | A revised-act vacatur motion ordinarily must be filed within 90 days after receipt of notice of the award or the specified modified/corrected award. | S001, § 12-3023(B). | D; a pending correction request is not itself proof of a newly triggered period. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C076** | For alleged procurement by corruption, fraud, or undue means, the revised act measures 90 days from when the ground was known or reasonably should have been known. | S001, § 12-3023(B). | D; discovery and reasonable-care facts must be established. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C077** | Revised-act judicial modification/correction requires a motion within 90 days after award-notice receipt and a listed mathematical, descriptive, unsubmitted-matter, or nonmerits form defect. | S001, § 12-3024(A)–(C). | D; the unsubmitted-matter ground has its own no-merits-effect condition. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C078** | Revised-act vacatur can lead to rehearing, with the required new-arbitrator distinctions. Denial of vacatur ordinarily leads to confirmation unless modification/correction is pending. | S001, § 12-3023(C)–(D). | D; vacatur does not itself decide underlying debt merits. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C079** | The revised act directs entry of a judgment conforming to the specified confirmation, modification, correction, or qualifying vacatur order. Ordinary judgment consequences follow through that judicial step. | S001, § 12-3025(A)–(B). | D; award possession alone is not a completed judgment-enforcement process. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C080** | Revised-act attorney-fee and punitive-award provisions require their stated law/agreement and proof predicates; judicial fees in contested post-award proceedings are separately addressed. The older act’s default arbitrator-expense provision excludes counsel fees unless the agreement otherwise provides. | S001, §§ 12-3021, 12-3025(C), 12-1510. | D; no administrator price, recoverable fee, premium, or consumer charge is established. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C081** | Older-act confirmation requires filing and service as a civil complaint. After 20 days from service, the statute directs judgment unless opposition is made under § 12-1512. | S001, § 12-1511. | D; service completion and an actual opposition record matter. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C082** | Older-act opposition requires a pleading and adequate showing of one of its specified grounds. Section 12-1512 does not state the revised act’s 90-day vacatur period; its no-agreement ground also addresses prior determination and participation. | S001, § 12-1512(A)–(B). | D/G; no invented universal outside deadline or postjudgment cure follows from this omission. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C083** | Older-act judicial correction is limited to an application within 90 days after delivery **and before judgment**. After judgment, § 12-1513(D) refers to Rule 60(c); current numbering and the applicable relief route need reconciliation. | S001, § 12-1513(A)–(D). | D/G; later attempted relief is not guaranteed. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C084** | Older-act confirmation produces a judgment enforceable as other judgments, with the stated court-cost provision. | S001, § 12-1514. | D; actual enforcement procedure is deferred. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C085** | FAA § 9 addresses agreements permitting judgment on the award and an application within one year after the award is made. Confirmation follows absent statutory vacatur/modification/correction. Whether every later application is categorically barred in the controlling circuit was not resolved here. | S006, § 9; S034, jurisdiction limits. | D/G; do not confuse the one-year question with *Cortez Byrd*’s venue holding. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C086** | FAA § 10 lists procurement misconduct, arbitrator partiality/corruption, specified prejudicial hearing misconduct, and excess/imperfect execution of powers preventing the required definite award. Its rehearing authority has a time condition. | S006, § 10(a)–(b). | D; administrative-arbitration subsection (c) is a separate boundary. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C087** | FAA § 11 permits the stated material calculation/description corrections, certain unsubmitted-matter corrections, and nonmerits form corrections. | S006, § 11(a)–(c). | D; no general merits reconsideration power is supplied. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C088** | FAA § 12 requires **service of notice** of a vacatur/modification/correction motion within **three months** after the award is filed or delivered. Filing a motion and serving its notice are not interchangeable acts. | S006, § 12, first paragraph. | D; three months must not be rewritten as 90 days. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C089** | FAA §§ 9 and 12 contain different resident/nonresident service language, including marshal language for nonresidents. This report preserves that text rather than assuming an email or ordinary e-filing satisfies every application. | S006, §§ 9, 12; S010, Rules 5, 81(a)(6). | D/G; exact modern procedural reconciliation and valid actual service remain held. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C090** | FAA § 12 permits a judge to issue an order staying the adverse party’s enforcement proceedings, to be served with the motion notice. The statute does not make the review motion itself an automatic enforcement stay. | S006, § 12, second paragraph. | D; actual order and scope required. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C091** | FAA § 13 requires the listed agreement/appointment/extensions, award, and application papers with the order for judgment entry. The entered judgment—not merely the award—has the stated ordinary judgment force. | S006, § 13(a)–(c). | D; underlying debt, fees, interest, and collection methods are not independently adjudicated by this report. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C092** | *Hall Street* treats §§ 10 and 11 as exclusive grounds for the FAA’s expedited review mechanism; parties cannot enlarge that mechanism simply by agreeing to review legal error. Other possible legal routes were not comprehensively resolved. | S037, pp. 584–592. | H; no blanket conclusion about every asserted “manifest disregard” formulation. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C093** | *Move* holds FAA § 12 subject to equitable tolling and granted relief on an unusual fraud record involving an arbitrator’s fabricated qualifications. It does not create the revised Arizona act’s automatic 90-day discovery formulation in federal law. | S039, pp. 7–14. | H; substantive tolling objections were partly waived on appeal; diligence and extraordinary facts remain necessary inquiries. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C094** | Defeating compulsion, invalidating delegation, vacating an award, obtaining confirmation, and prevailing on the underlying debt are distinct results. Neither an assignment price nor an unremitted amount is a consumer payment. | S001, §§ 12-3007(D), 12-3023–3025; S006, §§ 10–13; models below. | I; actual debt and payment adjudication remain outside this pass. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C095** | No authority read makes every arbitration motion or appeal suspend every response, limitation, collection, garnishment, or judgment clock. Only the particular statutory/order-based stays identified here are established. | C044–C060, C090; respective primary pinpoints. | I/G; this is a bounded non-inference, not a claim that no additional stay law exists. |\n\n## 1.5 Model and research-boundary claims\n\n| Claim ID | Precise proposition | Authority and limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C096** | Actual contract, identity, status, transfer, jurisdiction, service, award, payment, and local-calendar facts remain unestablished. | G; user supplied no such records and authorized no private lookup. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C097** | M01’s alternatives turn on actual formation/version proof and then the distinct delegation inquiry; neither branch determines debt merits. | K; C013–C029. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C098** | M02’s $900 portfolio purchase is separate from consumer payments; with no credited consumer payment, the stipulated $6,000 claimed balance remains $6,000 arithmetically, while legal liability remains held. | K/I; C035–C038, C094. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C099** | M03’s dated litigation acts are inputs to waiver analysis, not a numerical waiver formula; stay and appeal outcomes depend on the applicable regime and actual orders. | K; C044–C060. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C100** | M04’s assumed April 15 receipt produces the conditional May 5 twenty-day and July 14 ninety-day candidates shown below, subject to the stated procedural assumptions. | K; S001, §§ 12-3020(B), 12-3023(B), 12-3024(A); S046. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C101** | M04’s three-calendar-month candidate is July 15, not the ninety-day July 14 candidate. Its § 9 anniversary uses the different award-made date. | K; S006, §§ 9, 12; S010, Rule 6(a). |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C102** | M04’s older-act confirmation-service candidate is May 26; its correction branch separately requires both the ninety-day delivery condition and absence of an entered judgment. | K; S001, §§ 12-1511, 12-1513; S046. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C103** | M04’s stipulated July 10 discovery produces October 8 only if that is legally the known-or-reasonably-knowable date under the revised act. It supplies no automatic FAA extension. | K; S001, § 12-3023(B); S039. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C104** | M04 separates a $6,200 assumed award total, judicial judgment, and a later $500 actual credit; only the stipulated actual credit reduces the illustrated remaining amount to $5,700. | K/I; S001, § 12-3025; S006, § 13; arithmetic below. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-C105** | The source register distinguishes operative text, historical orders, primary-text republications, private policy, partial reads, and failed routes. No full citator, all-source verification, independent review, or component acceptance is claimed. | Researcher record; see source, currentness, and coverage registers. |\n\n# 2. Four worked fictional models\n\nThese are conditional research models, not legal instructions for a real case. Every date, document, actor, account identifier, and monetary amount below is fictional.\n\n## M01 — Electronic assent, competing versions, and delegation\n\n**Actors and stipulated documents**\n\n- Consumer **Q** and local nonbank business **A** enter an unsecured household-account relationship on **January 12, 2026**.\n- “V1” is a retained electronic agreement, containing an arbitration clause and a separate delegation clause.\n- The model stipulates ordinary contractual capacity and consideration solely to isolate the electronic-assent question.\n- No bank, employment, insurance, SRO, foreign, or special-federal exclusion is assumed.\n\n### Branch A: connected evidence\n\nA produces the complete V1 record, a contemporaneous presentation record, evidence attributing Q’s acceptance act to Q, and evidence of access to the terms.\n\nThe court still decides whether that evidence proves the agreement. Electronic format alone is not a defect, but attribution is not conclusive merely because a database field says “accepted.” If formation is established, the court separately evaluates whether delegation is clear and unmistakable and whether a challenge actually targets it. **C013–C021, C025–C027; S005, §§ 44-7005, 44-7007–7009; S027–S029.**\n\n**Conditional consequence:** A sufficiently established agreement and delegation can allocate the delegated question to the arbitrator. This does not establish the debt’s amount or validity.\n\n### Branch B: version and delivery gap\n\nA instead produces:\n\n- a current V2 webpage;\n- an unexplained “accepted = yes” entry;\n- no retained V1 content;\n- no evidence that the delegation term appeared in the material presented to Q.\n\n**Held conclusion:** A delegation printed in V2 cannot itself resolve whether Q agreed to V1 or V2. A genuine formation dispute remains a court issue; the proponent’s proof burden has not been displaced. **C019–C021, C025–C026.**\n\n### Branch C: later modification\n\nSuppose A sends a change notice on **March 2, 2026**, and relies on continued account use on **April 20, 2026**.\n\nThe court must first determine whether this is the kind of ongoing at-will relationship addressed in *Cornell*. It then examines the initial change reservation, reasonable notice, rejection opportunity, continued benefits, good faith, and any properly reserved termination power. The interval alone does not prove a reasonable rejection period. A timely effective opt-out, an inaccessible notice, or a fixed-term relationship requiring different analysis creates an adverse branch. **C022–C023; S020, ¶¶ 2, 24–30 and n.2.**\n\n**Accounting:** No payment, fee, award, or principal reduction is modeled. All account amounts remain unchanged.\n\n## M02 — Original creditor, two assignments, and a servicer alternative\n\n**Fictional opening claim:** $6,000. Its legal correctness is not stipulated.\n\n| Date/document | Actor’s asserted role | What the fictional document would need to connect | Adverse or missing branch |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| January 12, 2026 — original agreement | A, original contracting business | Q’s assent, actual account, arbitration/delegation language, scope, governing law | Missing agreement or wrong version prevents reliance on a generic portfolio description. |\n| March 2, 2026 — A-to-B transfer | B, first purchaser | Operative transfer language and account-level inclusion of fictional account Q-17 | Schedule lists Q-71 or excludes disputed accounts; inclusion remains contested. |\n| April 6, 2026 — B-to-C transfer | C, successive purchaser | B’s acquired rights, C’s acquired rights, effective date, and matching obligation | A bill of sale alone does not resolve what the referenced schedule contains. |\n| Alternative April 6 document | C, servicer only | Actual authorization to act for the identified owner and an applicable enforcement theory | Collection authority is not automatically ownership or a personal right to compel. |\n| Alternative affiliate assertion | C, related company | A recognized agency, beneficiary, estoppel, or other applicable contract-law basis | Shared branding or corporate affiliation alone supplies no demonstrated theory. |\n\n**Rules and burden:** C must establish its asserted enforcement basis; no transfer theory manufactures missing original assent. *Arthur Andersen*, *Sun Valley Ranch*, and *Shivkov* support examining actual state-law enforcement theories, but none is a universal Arizona consumer-debt-buyer rule. **C035–C038; S035, pp. 630–632; S025, ¶¶ 32–41; S041, pp. 33–35.**\n\n**Money conservation**\n\n- Claimed opening account amount: **$6,000.00**\n- B pays A for the portfolio allocation: **$900.00**\n- Consumer payment actually credited to Q-17: **$0.00**\n- Claimed account amount after those events:\n**$6,000.00 − $0.00 = $6,000.00**\n- Separate purchaser cash outflow: **$900.00**\n\nThe $900 changes purchaser/seller cash, not Q’s credited payment ledger. No interest, fee, or collection cost is added.\n\n**Held conclusions:** Whether C owns this obligation, may enforce its arbitration terms, has a valid agency theory, or can recover $6,000. A national-bank-origin alternative additionally requires resolving the state-regime consequences of the actual agreement and transfer; it is not assumed to become revised-act litigation merely because a nonbank later appears. **C003, C038, C094, C098.**\n\n## M03 — Litigation conduct, requested stay, and appeal\n\n**Fictional federal branch**\n\nA separately valid federal jurisdictional basis is stipulated only for this model. No conclusion about an actual consumer claim’s federal coverage is made.\n\n| Date | Stipulated event | Legal significance |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| March 3, 2026 | A files an answer. | Its contents, reservation of arbitration, and surrounding conduct matter; answering alone is not a fixed waiver rule. |\n| March 20, 2026 | A seeks discovery. | Scope and purpose matter. Limited information needed for arbitration differs from extensive merits litigation. |\n| May 5, 2026 | A requests a substantive merits ruling. | Potentially inconsistent conduct; no automatic outcome is assigned. |\n| June 9, 2026 | A moves to compel and expressly requests a stay. | Court addresses agreement, scope/delegation, waiver/default, and jurisdiction before the requested relief. |\n\n### Alternative outcomes\n\n1. **Prompt reservation, limited discovery, no merits adjudication sought:** facts may resemble the circumstances that did not establish waiver in *Armstrong*.\n2. **Knowing pursuit of a judicial merits result followed by a late tactical change:** materially different facts may support waiver. The opponent need not satisfy the rejected arbitration-specific prejudice element.\n3. **Court finds § 3 predicates satisfied and the stay was requested:** *Smith* requires the stay rather than dismissal merely because the claims are arbitrable.\n4. **Court denies compulsion; a proper § 16 appeal follows:** *Bielski* supplies the federal pretrial/trial stay described in C054. The model does not decide whether an actual appeal is timely, jurisdictionally valid, or frivolous.\n\n**Sources:** C047–C054; S030, slip pp. 4–7; S038, pp. 6–10; S031, slip pp. 3–6; S032, slip pp. 3–10.\n\n### Alternative Arizona branch\n\n- If the revised act governs, § 12-3007(F)–(G) supplies the judicial-stay rules.\n- If the older act governs, § 12-1502(D) supplies its stay rule.\n- A stay of the court case is distinct from stopping an arbitration already underway.\n- State appealability must be tested under § 12-2101.01 and the applicable procedural route. An FAA label does not automatically import federal § 16 appellate procedure into Arizona court.\n- The current ARCAP and special-action procedure holds remain operative.\n\n**No clock blending:** This model does not extend a debt answer deadline, limitations period, award-review period, or enforcement deadline. No money moves and no debt credit is recorded. **C044–C060, C095, C099.**\n\n## M04 — Award dates, judicial review, and separate cash accounting\n\n### Stipulated events and counting assumptions\n\n- Award **made:** Tuesday, **April 14, 2026**.\n- First relevant delivery and receipt of award notice: Wednesday, **April 15, 2026**.\n- For the principal FAA illustration only, no earlier legally operative “filing” of the award is assumed.\n- No modified award has yet been issued.\n- No lawful agreement variation applicable to the illustrated arbitral-correction period is assumed.\n- Triggering days are excluded where the identified computation law requires.\n- Intermediate weekends and holidays are counted for these illustrated periods.\n- None of the principal endpoints below falls on a weekend or a holiday identified in the reviewed ordinary lists. Special closures, emergency orders, actual e-filing availability, and a real court’s calendar remain held.\n- State candidates remain subject to the current-rule authentication limitation in C059. They are not real filing deadlines.\n\n### A. Revised-act candidates\n\n**Arbitrator correction request and notice — 20 days**\n\n- April 16–30: **15 days**\n- May 1–5: **5 days**\n- Total: **20 days**\n- Conditional candidate: **Tuesday, May 5, 2026**\n\nAuthority: § 12-3020(B), with § 12-3004 and the stated counting assumptions. The separate ten-day objection period is not calculated because its actual notice-receipt date and governing arbitral procedure were not stipulated. **C067, C100.**\n\n**Judicial vacatur or correction — 90 days**\n\n- April 16–30: **15**\n- May: **31**, cumulative **46**\n- June: **30**, cumulative **76**\n- July 1–14: **14**, cumulative **90**\n- Conditional candidate: **Tuesday, July 14, 2026**\n\nAuthority: §§ 12-3023(B), 12-3024(A). Filing—not merely preparation—must satisfy the applicable requirement. A correction request by itself is not treated as a newly delivered corrected award. **C075, C077, C100.**\n\n### B. FAA alternatives\n\n**Section 12 — three calendar months**\n\n- April 15 → May 15: first month\n- May 15 → June 15: second month\n- June 15 → July 15: third month\n- Conditional candidate for the required notice service: **Wednesday, July 15, 2026**\n- Actual elapsed days between April 15 and July 15: **91**\n\nThus the three-month candidate is not the ninety-day candidate.\n\n**Adverse date branch:** If April 14 is instead the legally operative filing date under § 12, the corresponding three-month candidate is **July 14**. The meaning and proof of the relevant filing/delivery event must be resolved; the model does not select an unseen event.\n\n**Section 9 — award-made anniversary**\n\n- Award made: April 14, 2026\n- One-year anniversary: **April 14, 2027**\n\nThis identifies the statute’s stated window. It does not resolve the held question about every application outside one year.\n\n**Jurisdiction hold:** An ordinary $6,200 award does not itself satisfy § 1332’s amount requirement. Under *Badgerow*, an underlying federal claim alone does not establish award-application jurisdiction through look-through. These federal dates are conditional on an independently proper forum and application of the federal provisions. **C008–C011, C085, C088–C089, C101.**\n\n### C. Older Arizona act\n\nAssume the confirmation application is validly filed and served as a complaint on **Wednesday, May 6, 2026**.\n\n- May 7–26: **20 days**\n- Conditional § 12-1511 candidate: **Tuesday, May 26, 2026**\n- Opposition under § 12-1512 must be analyzed in that confirmation posture.\n\nFor judicial modification, the April 15 delivery supplies a ninety-day candidate of July 14, **but § 12-1513 also requires that judgment has not been entered**. A judgment entered after the confirmation stage can therefore make the pre-judgment correction route unavailable before that ninety-day candidate arrives.\n\nThe postjudgment Rule 60 cross-reference is held for current-rule reconciliation; no guaranteed late cure is asserted. **C081–C083, C102.**\n\n### D. Fraud-discovery alternative\n\nAssume, solely for the revised-act branch, that the qualifying procurement ground first became known and could not reasonably have been known before **Friday, July 10, 2026**.\n\n- July 11–31: **21 days**\n- August: **31**, cumulative **52**\n- September: **30**, cumulative **82**\n- October 1–8: **8**, cumulative **90**\n- Conditional candidate: **Thursday, October 8, 2026**\n\nEarlier reasonably discoverable facts would change the premise. The FAA does not receive this state ninety-day discovery rule; *Move* requires a separate equitable-tolling analysis. **C076, C093, C103.**\n\n### E. Award, judgment, and cash ledger\n\nAssume only for arithmetic that the arbitrator lawfully awarded:\n\n- Account amount: **$6,000.00**\n- Separately authorized and proved award cost: **$200.00**\n- Award total: **$6,200.00**\n\nBefore confirmation:\n\n- Judicial judgment entered: **not stipulated**\n- Creditor cash received: **$0.00**\n- Consumer payment credited: **$0.00**\n\nLater alternative:\n\n- A competent court lawfully enters judgment conforming to the award.\n- A **$500.00** payment is actually received and credited.\n- No additional interest or costs are modeled.\n\nCalculation:\n\n**$6,000.00 + $200.00 − $500.00 = $5,700.00 remaining illustrated judgment amount.**\n\nNo rounding is needed beyond cents. An award, a frozen account, escrow, a promised payment, or the creditor’s purchase price is not substituted for the $500 actual credit. **C079–C094, C104.**\n\n# 3. Sixteen additional fictional postures\n\n| Posture | Stage and fictional facts | Rule/holding and required evidence | Conditional consequence and remaining gap |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **P01 — Consumer versus business** | A standardized household account and a separately negotiated business account use similar clauses. | C006, C030; FAA § 2 and AAA R-1 have different scope predicates. | Neither the FAA nor the Arizona acts become consumer-only statutes because AAA has consumer rules. Actual transaction and policy classification remain needed. |\n| **P02 — No clause produced** | A creditor supplies statements but no agreement containing arbitration. | C019–C021; S001, § 12-3006; S021, ¶ 18. | Statements alone do not establish the asserted clause. Formation remains held. |\n| **P03 — Electronic acceptance** | A complete retained agreement is linked to a disputed acceptance log. | C013–C015; S005, §§ 44-7005–7009. | Electronic form is permissible; attribution and assent remain disputed. |\n| **P04 — Opt-out exercised** | A consumer claims timely rejection through the contract’s specified method. | C022–C023; S020, ¶¶ 24–30. | Effective rejection can defeat the asserted modification; content, method, receipt, and applicable relationship are unresolved. |\n| **P05 — Fixed-term unilateral change** | A business invokes an at-will deposit-account decision for a fixed-term loan. | C022–C023. | *Cornell* does not by itself resolve that different contract. Need the actual modification authority and applicable contract law. |\n| **P06 — Whole-contract fraud** | A party alleges the entire transaction was induced by fraud but does not contest formation or separately address the arbitration provision. | C020, C024, C026; S021, ¶¶ 12–18. | Separability matters; the correct decision-maker depends on the actual challenge and valid delegation. |\n| **P07 — Targeted delegation challenge** | A party identifies a particular defect in the delegation provision. | C025–C027; S028, pp. 72–75. | The court must address the appropriately targeted issue; repeating a whole-contract objection is not automatically sufficient. |\n| **P08 — Later inconsistent agreement** | An earlier delegated-arbitration agreement is followed by an asserted court-forum agreement. | C028; S040, slip pp. 4–8. | Court decides which agreement controls; actual assent and supersession remain contested. |\n| **P09 — Successive purchaser** | A debt buyer presents two transfers with a mismatched account schedule. | C035–C038. | Enforcement rights remain unproved until the actual account and transferred rights are connected. |\n| **P10 — Servicer or affiliate** | A company relies on branding and a servicing label. | C035–C038; S035, pp. 630–632. | Need an actual contract-law enforcement theory; a label alone supplies none. |\n| **P11 — Cost barrier** | A consumer supplies a generic online fee estimate but no applicable schedule or individualized financial evidence. | C032; S022, ¶¶ 11, 16–19. | The evidentiary gap matters; neither enforceability nor unconscionability is established. |\n| **P12 — Litigation waiver** | A party litigates, then invokes arbitration. | C048–C050; S030; S038. | Assess knowing inconsistent conduct; no automatic waiver from a fixed delay and no special prejudice prerequisite under the federal test. |\n| **P13 — Requested federal stay** | All claims are found arbitrable and a party requests a § 3 stay. | C047; S031, slip pp. 3–6. | Covered federal case must be stayed rather than dismissed merely because of arbitrability; independent jurisdictional defects remain different. |\n| **P14 — Interlocutory appeal** | A federal court denies compulsion; a party appeals. | C051, C054, C057–C058. | Proper covered appeal invokes *Bielski*; actual appealability, timing, and collateral matters remain distinct. |\n| **P15 — Defective award notice** | A party learns informally of an award but disputes statutory delivery or receipt. | C065–C068, C075, C081–C089. | Identify the regime and exact trigger; an informal date is not automatically every statutory date. |\n| **P16 — Special or external regime** | The asserted clause involves tribal law, a foreign seat, military status, employment, insurance, or a secured transaction. | C003, C005, C007, C012. | Ordinary-account conclusions do not resolve those branches; the relevant primary regime and actual nexus must be investigated separately. |\n\n# 4. Complete source and access register\n\n## 4.1 Common access and source-status rules\n\nEvery numbered source family below was accessed during **October 27, 2026 UTC / October 27, 2026 PDT**, within the research interval stated above. Individual exact opening times are unknown.\n\n- **Fresh body** means the material described was actually returned and read in this pass.\n- **Partial** means only the specified portion was read.\n- **Historical** means a promulgated or enacted historical document, not a certified current compilation.\n- **Reproduction** identifies a nonofficial host of primary text.\n- **Failed** means no usable body was obtained by the identified route.\n- **Index** is discovery/currentness-screening evidence only.\n- All PDF reads were **extracted text**. No visual/pixel inspection is claimed.\n- Judicial-opinion dates are issuance dates, not access clocks.\n- No opinion received a complete citator or live-status investigation.\n\n## 4.2 Statutes, enactments, rules, and policy sources\n\n| Source ID | Issuer, document, and full literal URL | Material actually read; version/effect and limitations |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S001** | Arizona Legislature, **Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 12**. [https://www.azleg.gov/arsDetail/?title=12](https://www.azleg.gov/arsDetail/?title=12&utm_source=chatgpt.com). Direct section URLs are mapped immediately below. | Fresh official bodies for all mapped sections. Compilation displays 57th Legislature, second regular session update basis. Specific statutory dates are identified in claims; compilation metadata is not a universal effective date. Historical amendment chain remains bounded. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S002** | Arizona HB 2430 (2010), primary legislative text reproduced by LegiScan: [https://legiscan.com/AZ/text/HB2430/2010](https://legiscan.com/AZ/text/HB2430/2010?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Failed official routes: [https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.htm) and [https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.pdf](https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.pdf). | Fresh reproduced §§ 5–6 and relevant enacted-language presentation. Host labels the bill chaptered, while the body identifies an engrossed text. Both official routes reported inaccessible through the tool. Final chapter-image authentication remains held; no silent upgrade to an official 2010 image. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S003** | Arizona Legislative Council, **2025 Table of Sections Affected**. [https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_1st_Regular.pdf](https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_1st_Regular.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com) | Official index, July 18, 2025, chapters 1–265. Title 12 entries read, printed pp. 3–4 / PDF indexes 2–3. Screening evidence, not operative statutory text. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S004** | Arizona Legislative Council, **2026 Table of Sections Affected**. [https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_2nd_Regular.pdf](https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_2nd_Regular.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com) | Official index, August 19, 2026, chapters 1–264. Title 12 entries read, printed p. 4 / PDF index 3. No complete later-law certificate. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S005** | Arizona Legislature, **Uniform Electronic Transactions Act**: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07002.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07002.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07003.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07003.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07005.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07005.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07007.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07007.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07008.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07008.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07009.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07009.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07015.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07015.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com). | Fresh official bodies: definitions, scope/exclusions, agreement to transact electronically, legal effect, retainability, attribution, sending/receipt. No complete UETA enactment history or unrelated excluded-transaction law was read. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S006** | U.S. House OLRC, **Title 9, FAA**, section URLs: [https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s1/](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s1/?utm_source=chatgpt.com); [https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s2/](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s2/?utm_source=chatgpt.com); [https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s3/](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s3/?utm_source=chatgpt.com); [https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s4/](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s4/?utm_source=chatgpt.com); [https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s5/](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s5/?utm_source=chatgpt.com); [https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s6/](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s6/?utm_source=chatgpt.com); [https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/?utm_source=chatgpt.com); [https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/?utm_source=chatgpt.com); [https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/?utm_source=chatgpt.com); [https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/?utm_source=chatgpt.com); [https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/?utm_source=chatgpt.com); [https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/?utm_source=chatgpt.com); [https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s401/](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s401/?utm_source=chatgpt.com). | Fresh official operative bodies and displayed source/amendment notes, currency through **Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026**. Failed chapter route: [https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title9/chapter1&edition=prelim](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title9/chapter1&edition=prelim) returned 404; individual sections recovered. Section 402 routes failed as detailed below; its enactment was recovered as S007. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S007** | Congress/GPO, **Public Law 117-90**, Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021. [https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-117publ90/pdf/PLAW-117publ90.pdf](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-117publ90/pdf/PLAW-117publ90.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com) | Fresh official §§ 1–3, **136 Stat. 26–28 / PDF indexes 1–3**, enacted March 3, 2022. Section 3 application clause read. Recovered after [https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s402/](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s402/) was inaccessible and [https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title9-section402&num=0&edition=prelim](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title9-section402&num=0&edition=prelim) returned 404. Full special-claim definitions under other titles remain outside scope. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S008** | OLRC, **E-SIGN**: [https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7001/](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7001/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) and [https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7006/](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7006/?utm_source=chatgpt.com). | Fresh § 7001(a)–(c), (d)(1)–(2), and pertinent § 7006 definitions. Currency displayed through PL 119-124. § 7001 remainder not comprehensively read. Failed § 7002 routes: [https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7002/](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7002/) inaccessible; [https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section7002&num=0&edition=prelim](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section7002&num=0&edition=prelim) 404. State-preemption interaction held. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S009** | OLRC, federal jurisdiction/appeal statutes: [https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1331/](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1331/?utm_source=chatgpt.com); [https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1332/](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1332/?utm_source=chatgpt.com); [https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1292/](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1292/?utm_source=chatgpt.com). | Fresh § 1331; material § 1332(a)–(c); § 1292(b). No class-action jurisdiction analysis or actual citizenship determination. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S010** | U.S. Courts, **Federal Rules of Civil Procedure**, December 1, 2025 edition. [https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf](https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official current-rules page: [https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure](https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure?utm_source=chatgpt.com). | Fresh Rules 5, 6, 7(b), 81(a)(6)(B): printed pp. 8–14, 100 / PDF indexes 26–32, 118. Current-page metadata read. Full Rule 4 and all initial-service methods were not read. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S011** | U.S. Supreme Court, **2025 rules transmission/adoption package**, official bankruptcy-court-hosted copy. [https://www.mdb.uscourts.gov/files/2025_congressional_package_final.pdf](https://www.mdb.uscourts.gov/files/2025_congressional_package_final.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com) | Fresh April 23, 2025 orders: appellate rules order at printed 00003 / PDF index 2; civil rules order at printed 00106 / PDF index 105. Effective December 1, 2025 with stated new/pending-case application. Not a complete 2026 amendments search. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S012** | Arizona Supreme Court, **R-16-0010 civil-rules restyling order**. [https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2016%20Rules/R-16-0010.pdf](https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2016%20Rules/R-16-0010.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com) | Historical official order, September 2, 2016; effective January 1, 2017, with pending-case qualification. Rule 6 read at printed pp. 27–28 / PDF indexes 59–60. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S013** | Arizona Supreme Court, **R-17-0009**. [https://azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2017%20Rules/17-0009.pdf](https://azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2017%20Rules/17-0009.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com) | Historical official order, August 31, 2017; effective January 1, 2018. Rule 6(d) correction read at order p. 6 / PDF index 5. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S014** | Michigan Legal Publishing, **Arizona Civil Rule 6 reproduction**. [https://www.courtrules.net/arizona/arizona-civil-procedure/rule-6/](https://www.courtrules.net/arizona/arizona-civil-procedure/rule-6/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) | Fresh nonofficial full Rule 6(a)–(d) and displayed history. Site copyright 2026 is not legal-effect authentication. Official-hosted route [https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N957811E086DC11E6B40FA6262051C5AD?viewType=FullText](https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N957811E086DC11E6B40FA6262051C5AD?viewType=FullText) was inaccessible. S012–S013 are historical official alternatives, not a complete current chain. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S015** | Arizona Supreme Court, **R-14-0017 ARCAP restyling order**. [https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2014%20August%20Rules/R140017.pdf](https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2014%20August%20Rules/R140017.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com) | Historical official order, September 2, 2014, effective January 1, 2015 with pending-appeal qualification. Rule 5: order p. 14 / PDF 13; Rules 8–9: order pp. 18–20 / PDF 17–19. Rule 7 only partially read, not used as current stay authority. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S016** | Arizona Supreme Court, **April 22, 2019 amended R-14-0017 order**. [https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2019%20Rules/R-14-0017-Amended%20Order-Filed%204-22-2019.PDF?ver=2019-04-22-161612-227](https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2019%20Rules/R-14-0017-Amended%20Order-Filed%204-22-2019.PDF?ver=2019-04-22-161612-227&utm_source=chatgpt.com) | Both pages read; immediate technical correction involving a juvenile-rule reference. Does not authenticate a current 2026 Rule 9 body. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S017** | Arizona judiciary, current ARCAP routes and amendment index. [https://www.azcourts.gov/rules/Recent-Amendments/Rules-of-Civil-Appellate-Procedure](https://www.azcourts.gov/rules/Recent-Amendments/Rules-of-Civil-Appellate-Procedure?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Failed Rule 9: [https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/ND80A48603F9F11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?transitionType=Default](https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/ND80A48603F9F11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?transitionType=Default&utm_source=chatgpt.com). Failed Rule 5: [https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N8C476F103F9B11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?viewType=FullText](https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N8C476F103F9B11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?viewType=FullText). | Index portions read. Rule 9 returned **403**; Rule 5 inaccessible. The current operative bodies were not recovered. S015–S016 preserve what the official alternatives actually establish. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S018** | Ninth Circuit, **FRAP and Ninth Circuit Rules handbook, June 1, 2026**. [https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/frap-June%201%202026.pdf](https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/frap-June%201%202026.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official landing page: [https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/rules/](https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/rules/?utm_source=chatgpt.com). | Fresh FRAP 4(a), printed pp. 11–13 / PDF 29–31; Rule 8(a), p. 30 / PDF 48; Rule 26, pp. 87–88 / PDF 105–106. Landing page identifies June 1, 2026 rules; page update October 21 is not an effective date. National route [https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure.pdf](https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com) returned garbled extraction. A December-2025 change link returned internal error without a recoverable target URL. June change document [https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/Redlined-Proposed%20Amendments%20to%20Circuit%20Rules%20Jan%2026.pdf](https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/Redlined-Proposed%20Amendments%20to%20Circuit%20Rules%20Jan%2026.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com) was read only as the linked change material; unrelated amendments were not made arbitration rules. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S019** | American Arbitration Association, **Consumer Arbitration Rules**, amended/effective May 1, 2025. [https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf](https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Discovery page: [https://www.adr.org/rules-forms-and-fees/consumer/](https://www.adr.org/rules-forms-and-fees/consumer/?utm_source=chatgpt.com). | Fresh private policy, R-1, R-2 and material R-5–R-12 passages, printed pp. 6–13 / PDF 5–12; R-7 at p. 11 / PDF 10. No fee schedule or actual registry status was obtained. Policy is neither legislation nor a legal-validity determination. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S046** | Arizona Legislature, general computation and holidays: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00243.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00243.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00301.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00301.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com). | Fresh complete official § 1-243(A)–(B) and § 1-301(A)–(F). Actual emergency closures, local calendars, and full amendment history remain unverified. |\n\n### S001 — Direct operative-section URL map\n\nThese are sections of the same Title 12 source family, not 39 independent sources.\n\n| Body group | Full literal direct URLs; each body read |\n| --- | --- |\n| Revised-act definitions, notice, application, variation | § 12-3001: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03001.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03001.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-3002: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03002.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03002.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-3003: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03003.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03003.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-3004: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03004.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03004.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com) |\n| Revised-act motions, agreement, stays, initiation | § 12-3005: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03005.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03005.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-3006: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03006.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03006.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-3007: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03007.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03007.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-3008: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03008.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03008.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-3009: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03009.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03009.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com) |\n| Revised-act appointment, disclosure, hearing, representation | § 12-3011: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03011.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03011.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-3012: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03012.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03012.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-3015: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03015.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03015.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-3016: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03016.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03016.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com) |\n| Revised-act award and review | § 12-3019: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03019.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03019.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-3020: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03020.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03020.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-3021: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03021.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03021.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-3022: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03022.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03022.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-3023: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03023.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03023.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-3024: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03024.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03024.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com) |\n| Revised-act judgment, jurisdiction, venue, E-SIGN | § 12-3025: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03025.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03025.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-3026: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03026.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03026.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-3027: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03027.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03027.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-3029: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03029.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03029.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com) |\n| Older-act agreement, application, appointment, hearing | § 12-1501: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01501.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01501.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-1502: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01502.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01502.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-1503: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01503.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01503.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-1505: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01505.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01505.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com) |\n| Older-act award, expenses, confirmation, opposition, correction | § 12-1508: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01508.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01508.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-1509: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01509.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01509.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-1510: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01510.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01510.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-1511: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01511.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01511.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-1512: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01512.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01512.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-1513: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01513.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01513.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com) |\n| Older-act judgment, court applications, jurisdiction, exclusions | § 12-1514: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01514.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01514.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-1515: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01515.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01515.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-1516: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01516.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01516.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-1517: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01517.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01517.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com); § 12-1518: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01518.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01518.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com) |\n| State arbitration appeal categories | § 12-2101.01: [https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/02101-01.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/02101-01.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com) |\n\n## 4.3 Published-opinion source and posture register\n\nThe following **23 sources** contain responsive published majority material actually read. Their holdings are confined to their facts, posture, and statutory version. Quoted underlying authorities were not counted as separate reads.\n\n| Source ID; court/date | Full literal URL; material read | Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S020 — Cornell v. Desert Financial Credit Union**, Arizona Supreme Court, March 2, 2023 | [https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf](https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official opinion; ¶¶ 1–30, including ¶ 24 n.2; printed pp. 2–12 / PDF 1–11. | Certified question arising from electronic changes to deposit-account terms. Answered the modification question for ongoing at-will consumer relationships; did not itself issue an individual compulsion judgment. See C022–C023. No later-treatment certificate. [azcourts.gov](https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com) |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S021 — Duncan v. Public Storage**, Arizona Court of Appeals, March 8, 2022 | [https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/1%20CA-CV%2021-0283%20Duncan%20v.%20Public%20Storage%20%20Opinion%20Final.pdf](https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/1%20CA-CV%2021-0283%20Duncan%20v.%20Public%20Storage%20%20Opinion%20Final.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official published opinion; ¶¶ 1–32, printed pp. 2–10 / PDF 1–9. | Storage renters alleged fraud; denial of compulsion was vacated and remanded because separability and the clause-specific theory required proper treatment. Formation/proof discussion at ¶¶ 10–18. A later memorandum lead was not opened or used. [azcourts.gov](https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/1%20CA-CV%2021-0283%20Duncan%20v.%20Public%20Storage%20%20Opinion%20Final.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com) |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S022 — Rizzio v. Surpass Senior Living**, Arizona Supreme Court, August 17, 2021 | [https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2021/CV200058PR.pdf](https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2021/CV200058PR.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official opinion; ¶¶ 1–25, especially ¶¶ 11, 16–24; printed pp. 2–10 / PDF 1–9. | Nursing-care agreement and cost barrier after a cost-shifting provision was severed. Reversed the trial disposition and remanded; specified court-of-appeals analysis was vacated. Attorney funding is relevant, not a per se answer. Specialized facts do not establish a consumer fee schedule. [azcourts.gov](https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2021/CV200058PR.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com) |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S023 — Gray v. GC Services**, Arizona Court of Appeals, September 1, 2022 | [https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/CV%2021-0533%20Gray%20%20v.%20GC%20Services%20OP.pdf](https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/CV%2021-0533%20Gray%20%20v.%20GC%20Services%20OP.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official published opinion; material majority through disposition, especially ¶¶ 10–12. | **Employment dispute**, not a consumer collection holding. Merits dismissal without resolving the arbitration request was vacated/remanded. Its brief *Morgan* reference is bounded; older stay-or-dismiss language is not used against later *Smith*. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S024 — Security Alarm Financing Enterprises v. Fuller**, Arizona Court of Appeals, July 6, 2017 | [https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2017/1-ca-cv-16-0255.html](https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2017/1-ca-cv-16-0255.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Published majority reproduced by Justia; ¶¶ 1–21 read. Official image not recovered. | Former-employee dispute; ordinary appellate jurisdiction was unavailable under the state arbitration appeal provision in that FAA-only posture, but special-action jurisdiction was accepted. Relief granted. Its prejudice-based waiver discussion is historical after *Morgan*. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S025 — Sun Valley Ranch 308 LP v. Robson**, Arizona Court of Appeals, November 20, 2012 | [https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2012/1-ca-cv-11-0711.html](https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2012/1-ca-cv-11-0711.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Published majority reproduced by Justia; ¶¶ 1–10, 32–41 and relevant intervening passages read; other commercial-remedy discussion only partially read. | Partnership/construction dispute. Denial of arbitration vacated and remanded; contract-dependent claims and plaintiffs’ alter-ego allegations supported specified nonsignatory enforcement. Parties agreed the revised act applied. Not an ordinary debt-purchase rule. [law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2012/1-ca-cv-11-0711.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com) |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S026 — Juergensmeyer v. Hickman’s**, Arizona Court of Appeals, August 18, 2026 | [https://coa1.azcourts.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=-jtnWmAZZGo%253d&portalid=1](https://coa1.azcourts.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=-jtnWmAZZGo%253d&portalid=1&utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official published opinion; ¶¶ 1–39, printed pp. 2–10 / PDF 1–9. | Prison-work injury disputes; special-action jurisdiction accepted and compulsion ordered on remand after rejecting procedural unconscionability on the actual record. ¶¶ 15–17 support the narrow procedural point; ¶¶ 19–39 concern the specialized bargaining facts. [coa1.azcourts.gov](https://coa1.azcourts.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=-jtnWmAZZGo%253d&portalid=1&utm_source=chatgpt.com) |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S027 — First Options of Chicago v. Kaplan**, U.S. Supreme Court, May 22, 1995 | [https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-514/pdf/USREPORTS-514-938.pdf](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-514/pdf/USREPORTS-514-938.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official U.S. Reports; majority pp. 940–949 / PDF 2–11. | Workout dispute involving company and individual signatory differences. Clear-and-unmistakable delegation standard and independent judicial review explained; judgment affirmed. The ultimate individual arbitrability merits were outside the granted question. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S028 — Rent-A-Center, West v. Jackson**, U.S. Supreme Court, June 21, 2010 | [https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-561/pdf/USREPORTS-561-63.pdf](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-561/pdf/USREPORTS-561-63.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official majority pp. 65–76 / PDF 2–13. | Employment unconscionability challenge insufficiently targeted the delegation provision. Ninth Circuit reversed. Formation distinguished at p. 70 n.2. Five-Justice majority; dissent not used. Its older dismissal posture is not current requested-stay authority. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S029 — Henry Schein v. Archer & White**, U.S. Supreme Court, January 8, 2019 | [https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-586/pdf/USREPORTS-586-63.pdf](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-586/pdf/USREPORTS-586-63.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official majority pp. 65–72 / PDF 2–9. | Commercial antitrust dispute with an injunction carve-out. Rejected the wholly-groundless exception; vacated/remanded without deciding actual delegation. Unanimous opinion. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S030 — Morgan v. Sundance**, U.S. Supreme Court, May 23, 2022 | [https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-328_m6ho.pdf](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-328_m6ho.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official slip majority pp. 1–7 / PDF 2–8. Failed bound-volume route: [https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-411.pdf](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-411.pdf) was inaccessible. | Employment litigation preceded arbitration demand. Rejected arbitration-specific prejudice; vacated/remanded without deciding ultimate waiver. Unanimous majority. Official alternate recovered the operative body. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S031 — Smith v. Spizzirri**, U.S. Supreme Court, May 16, 2024 | [https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-1218_5357.pdf](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-1218_5357.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official slip majority pp. 1–6 / PDF 2–7. Failed route: [https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-601/pdf/USREPORTS-601-472.pdf](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-601/pdf/USREPORTS-601-472.pdf) inaccessible. | Removed Arizona employment case; all claims arbitrable and stay requested. Mandatory § 3 stay; reversed/remanded. Unanimous. Independent jurisdictional dismissal remains distinct. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S032 — Coinbase v. Bielski**, U.S. Supreme Court, June 23, 2023 | [https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-105_5536.pdf](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-105_5536.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official majority slip pp. 1–10 / PDF 3–12. Failed route: [https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-599/pdf/USREPORTS-599-736.pdf](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-599/pdf/USREPORTS-599-736.pdf) inaccessible. | Federal consumer litigation and appeal from denial of compulsion. Required district pretrial/trial stay; reversed/remanded. Five-Justice majority; dissent not relied on. Collateral matters and frivolous-appeal controls remain bounded. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S033 — Vaden v. Discover Bank**, U.S. Supreme Court, March 9, 2009 | [https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-49.pdf](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-49.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official majority material pp. 52–72 / PDF 3–23. | Consumer-account controversy with a federal counterclaim. § 4 look-through did not supply jurisdiction from that counterclaim; reversed. Majority and partial dissent separated. State-procedure reservation at p. 71 n.20. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S034 — Badgerow v. Walters**, U.S. Supreme Court, March 31, 2022 | [https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official majority slip pp. 1–16 / PDF 3–18. Failed route: [https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-1.pdf](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-1.pdf) inaccessible. | Employment award challenge removed to federal court. No § 4 look-through for §§ 9–10; reversed/remanded. Eight-Justice majority; dissent not relied on. No determination of award merits. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S035 — Arthur Andersen LLP v. Carlisle**, U.S. Supreme Court, May 4, 2009 | [https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-624.pdf](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-624.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official majority pp. 625–632 / PDF 1–8. | Nonsignatory advisers sought a stay. State-law enforcement theories can support FAA relief; appellate jurisdiction did not require proving merits first. Reversed/remanded; actual estoppel merits left open. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S036 — Kindred Nursing Centers v. Clark**, U.S. Supreme Court, May 15, 2017 | [https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-581/pdf/USREPORTS-581-246.pdf](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-581/pdf/USREPORTS-581-246.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official majority pp. 248–257 / PDF 2–11. | Nursing agreements signed under powers of attorney. Arbitration-specific special-authority rule preempted; one disposition reversed and the other vacated/remanded for ordinary authority analysis. Majority separated from dissent; one Justice did not participate. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S037 — Hall Street Associates v. Mattel**, U.S. Supreme Court, March 25, 2008 | [https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-552/pdf/USREPORTS-552-576.pdf](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-552/pdf/USREPORTS-552-576.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official relevant majority pp. 578–592 / PDF 2–16. | Commercial lease parties contracted for expanded legal-error review. FAA expedited review grounds could not be enlarged that way; vacated/remanded with other possible routes left open. Separate writings not used. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S038 — Armstrong v. Michaels Stores**, Ninth Circuit, February 13, 2023 | [https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf](https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official published majority, printed pp. 4–10 / PDF 3–9; 59 F.4th 1011. | Employment case applying *Morgan*. Reservations, limited discovery, and lack of a merits-ruling request supported no waiver; compulsion affirmed. Its record is not a numerical safe harbor. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S039 — Move, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets**, Ninth Circuit, November 4, 2016 | [https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf](https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official published majority, printed pp. 3–14 / PDF 2–13; 840 F.3d 1152. | FINRA award tainted by an arbitrator’s fabricated qualifications. § 12 equitable tolling recognized; specified relief ordered on remand. Substantive tolling objections were partly waived; unique fraud and prejudice facts limit generalization. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S040 — Coinbase v. Suski**, U.S. Supreme Court, May 23, 2024 | [https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-3_879d.pdf](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-3_879d.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official majority slip pp. 1–8 / PDF 2–9. | Earlier platform delegation and later sweepstakes court clause conflicted. Court decides which agreement governs; affirmed. Unanimous majority; separate concurrence not relied on. State-law supersession merits were not decided. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S041 — Shivkov v. Artex Risk Solutions**, Ninth Circuit, September 9, 2020 | [https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2020/09/09/19-16746.pdf](https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2020/09/09/19-16746.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official published majority; material pp. 7–10, 14–20, 33–35 / PDF 6–9, 13–19, 32–34; 974 F.3d 1051. | Arizona-law commercial captive-insurance agreements. Relevant survival and nonsignatory-estoppel analysis read; compulsion affirmed. Class-arbitration discussion not comprehensively read or used. Older dismissal disposition does not override *Smith*. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S042 — Cortez Byrd Chips v. Bill Harbert Construction**, U.S. Supreme Court, March 21, 2000 | [https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-193.pdf](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-193.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Official majority pp. 195–204 / PDF 2–11. | Construction dispute with competing confirmation/vacatur filings. FAA §§ 9–11 venue provisions permissive; reversed/remanded. Unanimous. This is not a holding on § 9’s one-year limitation question. [govinfo.gov](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-193.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com) |\n\n## 4.4 Opened or screened opinion material not used as a holding\n\n| Source ID | Route and actual read status | Disposition |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S043** | *AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion*: [https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-563/pdf/USREPORTS-563-333.pdf](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-563/pdf/USREPORTS-563-333.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Syllabus/caption material only. | **Not relied on as a freshly read holding.** References to it inside other opinions do not convert it into a full body read. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S044** | *Hamblen v. Hatch*: [https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2017/CV-16-0260-PR%20Opinion.pdf](https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2017/CV-16-0260-PR%20Opinion.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Caption and initial material only. | **Not relied on.** Its appearance in *Duncan* is not a separate fresh underlying-authority read. |\n| **S_AZ-P13-S045** | *Jones v. Starz*: [https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/02/28/24-1645.pdf](https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/02/28/24-1645.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com). Partial facts and § 4 discussion; full majority/disposition not completed. | **Not relied on.** No mass-arbitration fee, consolidation, or refusal-to-arbitrate holding is asserted from this partial read. |\n\n# 5. Currentness and source-conflict register\n\nThese eight rows describe source quality and temporal limits. They are not additional substantive coverage items.\n\n| Currentness item | Established position | Exact remaining limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **T01 — Arizona compilation** | Current displayed Title 12 bodies and 2025/2026 section-affected indexes were read. | No exhaustive amendment search beyond the described index/compilation scope. |\n| **T02 — 2010 transition** | Current § 12-3003 states January 1, 2011 application rules; reproduced HB 2430 §§ 5–6 supply the historical savings/effect text. | Official final session-law image and a dispositive historical accrued-right construction remain held. |\n| **T03 — FAA currency** | OLRC bodies display currency through PL 119-124, October 15, 2026; the 2022 enacted amendment was read. | Access on October 27 does not independently certify all enactments between the displayed currency date and access. |\n| **T04 — Electronic-law interaction** | Arizona UETA and material E-SIGN provisions were read. | E-SIGN § 7002 body failed on both recorded routes; full state-preemption reconciliation remains unresolved. |\n| **T05 — Arizona court rules** | Official 2014, 2016, 2017, and 2019 orders establish their own historical changes. | Current official Rule 6 and ARCAP 5/9 bodies were not fully recovered; no complete 2026 chain is certified. |\n| **T06 — Federal court rules** | December 2025 FRCP and June 2026 Ninth Circuit handbook supplied the material rules; adoption clauses were examined. | Unread local procedures, future amendments, and actual filing-system conditions remain held. |\n| **T07 — Opinions** | Twenty-three responsive published majority sources support the bounded holdings stated. The August 2026 Arizona opinion was freshly read. | No full citator, mandate, rehearing, petition, or live-status verification. |\n| **T08 — Institutional policy** | AAA’s May 1, 2025 consumer rules were read in the specified portions. | Actual incorporation, applicable version, administrator acceptance, fees, waivers, and private contract facts remain unknown. |\n\n# 6. Granular coverage and remaining-evidence table\n\n**Status meanings:** **Answered** means the bounded rule or distinction was established—not that an actual case is resolved. **Partial** means useful primary material was established but a material branch remains. **Unresolved** means the identified operative body or application could not be established. **Excluded** means a separate required investigation remains.\n\nThere are **88 coverage rows: 40 Answered, 27 Partial, 6 Unresolved, and 15 Excluded**. The **33 Partial/Unresolved rows** are the counted evidence-hold rows. General reminders about missing private facts are not added as duplicate coverage.\n\n| Row | Requested issue | Status; claims | Exact remaining evidence or next action |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **G001** | Fresh access and baseline distinction | Answered; C001, C105 | Retain October 27 access and unknown individual opening seconds; do not relabel October 22 as fresh. |\n| **G002** | Distinct Arizona arbitration families | Answered; C002–C005 | Apply only after agreement/category facts are known. |\n| **G003** | 2010 savings and accrued-right transition | Partial; C004 | Recover official final chapter image and responsive construction for disputed pre-2011 rights. |\n| **G004** | Material later Arizona amendments | Partial; C001 | Extend beyond the bounded tables/compilation if a later enactment issue is presented. |\n| **G005** | Revised-act listed exclusions | Answered; C003 | Establish actual institutional and transaction predicates before classification. |\n| **G006** | Older-act employment exclusion and court definition | Answered; C005 | Do not transfer superior-court definition to every other regime. |\n| **G007** | FAA writing and commerce predicates | Answered; C006 | Actual writing and commerce evidence remain necessary. |\n| **G008** | FAA transportation-worker exclusion | Partial; C007 | Full worker-class construction and actual employment facts deferred. |\n| **G009** | 2022 special-federal exclusion and application date | Partial; C007 | Underlying special-claim definitions and actual triggering facts remain outside this ordinary-debt model. |\n| **G010** | State versus federal subject-matter jurisdiction | Answered; C008, C012 | No actual jurisdictional finding. |\n| **G011** | § 4 look-through | Answered; C009 | Identify the actual underlying well-pleaded controversy. |\n| **G012** | Award-stage no-look-through distinction | Answered; C010 | Establish an independent award-application jurisdictional basis. |\n| **G013** | Initial forum, venue, and § 4 geographic restriction | Partial; C011, C039 | Actual clause, court competence, and forum facts absent; no general venue dossier. |\n| **G014** | Agreement existence and authentic version | Partial; C019–C021 | Actual complete agreement, version, delivery, and assent evidence absent. |\n| **G015** | Capacity and agency authority | Partial; C018, C020 | Ordinary authority instrument and capacity facts absent. |\n| **G016** | Consideration | Partial; C020 | Actual bargain and applicable contract-law facts absent. |\n| **G017** | Electronic record/signature legal effect | Answered; C013–C014 | Electronic form alone neither validates nor defeats agreement. |\n| **G018** | Electronic delivery, receipt, and notice | Partial; C015–C016 | Actual designated system, retainability, transmission content, and consent absent. |\n| **G019** | E-SIGN § 7002 interaction | Unresolved; C016 | Recover current official § 7002 body through a permitted public source; no bypass. |\n| **G020** | Modification, opt-out, and termination reservation | Partial; C022–C023 | Establish at-will character, actual notices, rejection, and burden; fixed-term branch needs separate authority. |\n| **G021** | Survival and clause scope | Partial; C024, C034 | Actual termination/survival language and dispute connection absent. |\n| **G022** | Formation versus whole-contract/clause validity | Answered; C020, C024, C026 | Apply the distinction to the actual challenge’s target. |\n| **G023** | Clear delegation and conflicting later contracts | Answered; C025–C028 | No delegation presumed from a label. |\n| **G024** | Institutional-rule incorporation as delegation | Partial; C029–C030 | Actual incorporation/access and responsive consumer-specific application remain necessary. |\n| **G025** | Private administrative suspension versus court stay | Answered; C031 | No actual policy request or court order exists. |\n| **G026** | Nonsignatory enforcement principles | Answered; C035–C037 | Recognized theory must fit actual parties and claims. |\n| **G027** | Assignee/debt-buyer transfer of this enforcement right | Partial; C038 | Directly responsive Arizona consumer assignment authority and actual chain/account inclusion remain missing. |\n| **G028** | National-bank agreement later transferred to nonbank | Unresolved; C003, C038 | Need authoritative treatment of this precise statutory/assignment branch and the actual agreement. |\n| **G029** | Servicer/affiliate authority | Partial; C038 | Need actual authority and enforcement theory; label insufficient. |\n| **G030** | Underlying debt validity and amount | Excluded; C094, C098 | Separate merits/evidence pass; unreviewed P10 is not a premise. |\n| **G031** | Cost-barrier defense | Partial; C032 | Applicable fee schedule, relief mechanisms, and individualized evidence absent. |\n| **G032** | Neutral contract defenses and arbitration-specific discrimination | Answered; C018, C033 | Actual ordinary defense remains fact-dependent. |\n| **G033** | Revised-act motion route and opposed determination | Answered; C039–C040 | Actual motion and jurisdiction absent. |\n| **G034** | Older-act application route | Answered; C041 | Apply its particular confirmation exception separately. |\n| **G035** | FAA § 4 notice, hearing, and disputed-formation trial | Answered; C042 | Actual genuine dispute, service, and timely jury demand absent. |\n| **G036** | Exact valid service in a particular proceeding | Unresolved; C039, C041, C055, C089 | Current initial-service body, actual forum, residency, method, and proof not supplied. |\n| **G037** | Appointment and neutral disclosure gateway | Answered; C043, C064 | Actual agreed method and conflict facts absent. |\n| **G038** | Federal litigation-conduct waiver after Morgan | Answered; C048–C049 | No fixed waiver period; actual totality required. |\n| **G039** | Comprehensive Arizona follow-on waiver rule | Partial; C050 | *Gray* is limited; obtain directly responsive current Arizona treatment for the precise state-law posture. |\n| **G040** | Arizona judicial-action stays | Answered; C044, C046 | Identify applicable act and covered claims. |\n| **G041** | Whether arbitration itself continues during court challenge | Answered; C045 | Actual court order can change the default. |\n| **G042** | Requested federal stay after Smith | Answered; C047 | § 3 predicates and request must be established. |\n| **G043** | FAA § 16 appeal categories/finality | Answered; C051 | Actual order classification and appeal jurisdiction remain unknown. |\n| **G044** | Arizona statutory appeals and FAA-only special-action distinction | Answered; C052–C053 | Exact procedural implementation and actual court posture remain separate. |\n| **G045** | Covered federal appeal stay after Bielski | Answered; C054, C058 | No transfer to every state appeal or collateral matter. |\n| **G046** | Current Arizona appellate timing and special-action procedure | Unresolved; C053, C060 | Recover current ARCAP and special-action bodies/adoption chain. |\n| **G047** | Current Arizona Rule 6 authentication | Partial; C059 | Historical official orders and nonofficial reproduction recovered; complete current official chain remains missing. |\n| **G048** | Federal computation and appeal timing framework | Answered; C056–C058 | Actual entry, motion, court zone, and filing conditions absent. |\n| **G049** | Arbitration initiation notice and participation objection | Partial; C062 | Actual contract method, initiation record, receipt, and objection timing absent. |\n| **G050** | Hearing fairness, nonappearance, and representation | Partial; C063–C064 | Full institutional procedure and actual hearing record not investigated. |\n| **G051** | Award form, making, delivery, notice, and lateness objection | Answered; C065–C066 | Actual dates and documents absent. |\n| **G052** | Arbitrator correction versus court correction | Answered; C067–C068 | Keep each trigger and potentially variable procedure separate. |\n| **G053** | Revised-act confirmation | Answered; C069 | No inference of an unlimited time from one section’s silence. |\n| **G054** | Revised-act vacatur grounds | Answered; C070–C074 | Actual proof and statutory prejudice predicates absent. |\n| **G055** | Revised-act ninety-day and discovery triggers | Answered; C075–C076 | Actual receipt and reasonable discovery facts absent. |\n| **G056** | Revised-act modification/correction | Answered; C077 | Actual defect must fit the listed categories. |\n| **G057** | Older-act confirmation and twenty-day service trigger | Answered; C081 | Actual valid complaint-style service absent. |\n| **G058** | Older-act opposition and absence of a stated ninety-day vacatur period | Partial; C082 | Responsive construction of outside timing/postjudgment consequences remains needed. |\n| **G059** | Older-act correction and Rule 60 cross-reference | Partial; C083 | Current rule-number reconciliation and actual judgment posture missing. |\n| **G060** | FAA confirmation, one-year text, and late application | Partial; C085 | Controlling treatment of an application beyond one year remains held. |\n| **G061** | FAA vacatur/modification and limited review | Answered; C086–C087, C092 | No general merits appeal or expanded contractual legal-error review. |\n| **G062** | FAA notice service, filed/delivered trigger, equitable tolling | Partial; C088–C089, C093 | Actual trigger/service and a qualifying tolling record absent; no state discovery-rule substitution. |\n| **G063** | Review motion versus enforcement stay | Partial; C090, C095 | Actual stay order, scope, and current state implementation absent. |\n| **G064** | Award, judgment, fees, and actual cash distinction | Answered; C079–C080, C084, C091, C104 | No actual fee entitlement, enforcement permission, or payment finding. |\n| **G065** | Published opinions and later treatment | Partial; C105; S020–S042 | Full citator and subsequent-history investigation not performed. |\n| **G066** | Unpublished-opinion use | Excluded; C105 | No unpublished decision relied on; current citation rule would be required before such use. |\n| **G067** | Partial candidate opinions versus actual holding reads | Partial; C105; S043–S045 | Finish the majority bodies only if a distinct unresolved proposition makes them necessary. |\n| **G068** | County/local rules, Justice Court/Small Claims competence, generic forms | Unresolved; C039, C053, C060 | No local practice or court-specific form validation; current competent-court and local-rule bodies needed. |\n| **G069** | Other-state choice of law and interstate territorial facts | Unresolved; C006, C012, C038 | Actual choice clause, forum, commerce, and conflict-law authority absent. |\n| **G070** | Tribal law and jurisdiction | Excluded; C096 | Separate tribal agreement, jurisdiction, and enforcement investigation required. |\n| **G071** | Foreign seat and convention regimes | Excluded; C096 | FAA chapters 2–3 and actual international predicates not investigated. |\n| **G072** | Military-specific arbitration restrictions | Excluded; C007, C096 | Applicable military statute/regulation and actual covered status require a separate pass. |\n| **G073** | Full employment arbitration regime | Excluded; C003, C005, C007 | Employment cases used only for responsive general procedural holdings. |\n| **G074** | Insurance-specific arbitration law | Excluded; C003 | Older-act routing identified; full insurance/federal interaction deferred. |\n| **G075** | Securities/SRO arbitration regime | Excluded; C003, C093 | Classification boundary and *Move* holding do not establish full FINRA/SRO procedure. |\n| **G076** | Secured-debt, mortgage, foreclosure, and repossession arbitration | Excluded; C096 | Separate sector and collateral rules required. |\n| **G077** | Bankruptcy stay, discharge, and arbitration interaction | Excluded; C096 | No bankruptcy jurisdiction, stay, core/noncore, or discharge determination. |\n| **G078** | Federal administrative arbitration | Excluded; C086 | FAA § 10(c) boundary noted; referenced administrative regime not researched. |\n| **G079** | Broader remedies, contract damages, and full surety/fee litigation | Excluded; C080, C094 | Only award-gateway distinctions supplied; no damages or fee recovery determination. |\n| **G080** | Provider access/fees, CSO, licensing, and collection communications | Excluded; C096 | Separate earlier scopes remain unreviewed or separately reviewed as supplied; no incorporation here. |\n| **G081** | General service/default, limitations, judgment duration/renewal | Excluded; C095–C096 | No unreviewed prior clock or conclusion imported. |\n| **G082** | Wage, bank, homestead, and other enforcement/property regimes | Excluded; C091, C094–C096 | Award/judgment distinction does not authorize levy or establish exemptions. |\n| **G083** | Administrator fee/access schedule and incorporated policy version | Partial; C030–C032, C080 | Exact applicable dated schedule, waiver provisions, and contract incorporation absent; unknown fee is not zero. |\n| **G084** | M01 electronic-assent/delegation alternatives | Answered; C097 | Conditional model complete; actual record remains absent. |\n| **G085** | M02 assignment/servicer alternatives and money separation | Answered; C098 | Conditional model complete; no ownership finding. |\n| **G086** | M03 litigation/stay/appeal sequence | Answered; C099 | Conditional model complete; no real deadline or waiver outcome. |\n| **G087** | M04 award/calendar/cash alternatives | Answered; C100–C104 | Conditional model complete; exact forum, actual service, and current-rule holds preserved. |\n| **G088** | Sixteen additional actor/channel/stage postures | Answered; C013–C095 | Each is conditional; none is an actual eligibility or collection decision. |\n\n# 7. Scope and contribution crosswalk\n\nThis crosswalk preserves the supplied history. It does not create duplicate accepted coverage.\n\n| Foundation item | Supplied provenance/status | Narrow PASS-13 contribution | What remains unchanged |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **X01 — Reviewed P01 broad remainder** | User reports the same coordinator’s reviewed statement: **“Full agreements/funds/bonds/remedies and all other state categories stay open.”** | Supplies the arbitration agreement, enforcement, and award gateway investigated here. | No invented exact P01 arbitration row; no rewriting of the original review or acceptance status. |\n| **X02 — Authorized parent litigation requirement** | Parent expressly includes “Service/venue/answer deadlines, court-specific rules, default/vacatur, evidence/standing, arbitration, judgment interest/duration/renewal, satisfaction and lien release.” | Narrows to arbitration, with only necessary court and award distinctions. | Other listed dimensions remain separate; parent/state acceptance is not supplied. |\n| **X03 — P02** | Separate provider-renewal review. | No substantive reliance. | Provider renewal is neither arbitration procedure nor judgment renewal. |\n| **X04 — P03–P12** | User describes these as saved **UNREVIEWED** for this purpose. | No legal, factual, clock, fee, title, contract, or merits conclusion imported. | Their raw provenance and unreviewed status remain as supplied. |\n\n# 8. Researcher self-check and reconciled counts\n\nThis is a **researcher self-check, not an independent review**.\n\n| Item | Count or result |\n| --- | --- |\n| Unique source families | **46**, S_AZ-P13-S001–S046 |\n| Responsive published-majority sources used | **23**, S020–S042 |\n| Partially read candidate opinions not used as holdings | **3**, S043–S045 |\n| Other source families | **20**, comprising statutes, enactments, indexes, rules, failed/current-rule routes, and private policy |\n| Atomic claims | **105**, C001–C105 |\n| Granular coverage rows | **88**, G001–G088 |\n| Coverage status reconciliation | **40 Answered + 27 Partial + 6 Unresolved + 15 Excluded = 88** |\n| Counted evidence-hold rows | **33**, the 27 Partial plus 6 Unresolved rows; no duplicate summary holds added |\n| Worked models | **4**, M01–M04 |\n| Additional fictional postures | **16**, P01–P16 |\n| Currentness-register rows | **8**, T01–T08; not additional substantive coverage |\n| Contribution-crosswalk rows | **4**, X01–X04; not accepted coverage |\n| S001 operative URL map | **39 section URLs** grouped under one statutory source family; not 39 independent authorities |\n\nMaterial primary bodies were actually opened and read as specified. The report distinguishes the official current compilation, historical promulgated orders, the imperfectly authenticated 2010 reproduction, nonofficial rule reproduction, private AAA policy, published holdings, partial opinion reads, and failed routes.\n\nThe most consequential unresolved items are the precise historical transition application, complete current Arizona procedural-rule authentication, the specific consumer-assignee enforcement branch, award-stage jurisdiction and service in any actual proceeding, the FAA late-confirmation question, and all actual contract/record facts. No absence-of-law inference is drawn from those gaps.\n\nNo private records, live dockets, named-provider status queries, filings, contacts, accounts, purchases, browser control, subagents, publication, or local-file writes were used or claimed. No unseen model setting, complete citator clearance, operational readiness, or state/component/parent/A066/A097/A098 acceptance is asserted.\n\nEND S_AZ PASS-13.\n\n","tables":[{"headers":["Claim ID","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence","Authority and pinpoint","Classification, limits, and missing facts"],"index":0,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claim ID","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence","Authority and pinpoint","Classification, limits, and missing facts"],["S_AZ-P13-C001","The Arizona legislative compilation identifies the 57th Legislature’s second regular session as its update basis. The 2025 and 2026 tables of sections affected were also examined for the targeted arbitration sections. This establishes the displayed compilation and a bounded amendment screen, not exhaustive subsequent-law clearance.","S001 compilation notice; S003 Title 12 entries; S004 Title 12 entries.","D; later-law completeness remains held."],["S_AZ-P13-C002","Subject to its exclusions, § 12-3003(A) covers agreements made on or after January 1, 2011; permits recorded agreement to its application to older agreements; and states that on or after January 1, 2011 it governs agreements whenever made. The historical savings clause must also be considered.","S001, § 12-3003(A)(1)–(3); S002, § 5.","D; do not resolve an accrued pre-2011 right from the compilation heading alone."],["S_AZ-P13-C003","The revised act excludes employer–employee agreements, insurance-contract arbitration, specified national-bank/federal-savings-association customer agreements, and specified self-regulatory-organization arbitration. Subsection C sends the latter three categories—not the employment category—to the older Arizona act.","S001, § 12-3003(B)(1)–(4), (C).","D; actual institutional identity, relationship, and agreement must be established."],["S_AZ-P13-C004","The recovered HB 2430 text preserves proceedings commenced and rights accrued before January 1, 2011, and makes the new chapter effective after December 31, 2010. The official final chapter image was not recovered; the reproduction’s historical authentication limit remains material.","S002, §§ 5–6; current S001, § 12-3003.","D/G; obtain the official enacted chapter and responsive transition construction before deciding a disputed historical application."],["S_AZ-P13-C005","The older act also excludes employer–employee arbitration. For that act, “court” means Arizona superior courts; ordinary civil venue governs, with subsequent applications ordinarily remaining in the initial court.","S001, §§ 12-1516–1517.","D; this does not establish the court competent under every revised-act or federal proceeding."],["S_AZ-P13-C006","FAA § 2 addresses written arbitration provisions in maritime transactions or contracts evidencing transactions involving commerce, and written submission agreements. Its text is not limited to consumer debt. Ordinary contract-revocation defenses remain available, subject to federal equal-treatment principles and chapter 4.","S006, §§ 1–2; S036, pp. 248–257.","D/H; interstate-commerce facts and the agreement remain necessary."],["S_AZ-P13-C007","FAA § 1 excludes the stated transportation-worker employment classes. Separately, the 2022 Act allows the specified election against predispute arbitration in qualifying sexual-assault/harassment cases and assigns its applicability question to a court despite delegation. Its application clause concerns disputes or claims arising or accruing on or after enactment.","S006, §§ 1, 401; S007, § 2 adding § 402, and § 3.","D; enacted March 3, 2022. Full employment, military, and special-claim regimes are deferred."],["S_AZ-P13-C008","The FAA does not independently confer federal subject-matter jurisdiction. A federal applicant needs an applicable jurisdictional basis, such as the requirements of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 or 1332. A small consumer balance and an FAA citation do not supply that basis.","S009, §§ 1331–1332; S033, pp. 59–62; S034, slip pp. 4–8.","D/H; citizenship, amount, federal question, and the application’s nature are unknown."],["S_AZ-P13-C009","For a § 4 petition, Vaden permits looking through to the underlying controversy. Federal jurisdiction cannot be manufactured from a federal defense or counterclaim when the well-pleaded underlying action lacks a federal basis.","S033, pp. 62–72; S006, § 4.","H; § 4’s particular language matters."],["S_AZ-P13-C010","Badgerow rejects importing § 4’s look-through method into §§ 9 and 10 applications. The award application needs an independent jurisdictional foundation. An underlying federal claim alone is insufficient under that method.","S034, slip pp. 4–16.","H; the decision does not resolve every jurisdictional question under other FAA sections."],["S_AZ-P13-C011","Section 4 contains a district-related arbitration-hearing restriction. By contrast, Cortez Byrd Chips holds the venue provisions of §§ 9–11 permissive rather than exclusively confined to the award district. Venue and subject-matter jurisdiction remain separate.","S006, § 4; S042, pp. 195–204.","D/H; the actual forum agreement and independently proper venue remain unknown."],["S_AZ-P13-C012","FAA substantive enforceability does not justify silently substituting all federal motion, service, appeal, or award procedures for Arizona procedures in state court. The Supreme Court opinions read expressly leave aspects of state-court procedural application undecided.","S033, p. 71 n.20; S034, slip p. 5 n.2; S001 state procedures.","H/I; identify the actual court, governing agreement, and applicable state procedural statute."],["S_AZ-P13-C013","Arizona’s electronic-transactions law applies only within its statutory scope and where parties agreed to conduct the transaction electronically, assessed from context and conduct. It does not force a person to transact electronically.","S005, §§ 44-7003, 44-7005(A)–(C).","D; statutory exclusions and actual consent remain relevant."],["S_AZ-P13-C014","Electronic form alone does not invalidate an otherwise qualifying record or signature. Attribution depends on the person’s act and surrounding evidence; required written information must be retainable where § 44-7008 applies.","S005, §§ 44-7007–7009.","D; no universal paper-signature requirement, and no universal checkbox-sufficiency rule."],["S_AZ-P13-C015","Arizona’s electronic sending/receipt rules depend on designated systems, accessibility, and processability. Human awareness is not invariably required, and an acknowledgment does not itself establish that transmitted content was identical.","S005, § 44-7015(A)–(F).","D; delivery, content, assent, and notice adequacy remain separate factual questions."],["S_AZ-P13-C016","E-SIGN’s consumer provisions impose consent and access-related conditions when legally required written information is supplied electronically. Section 7001(c)(3) limits one asserted invalidity consequence; it does not excuse every delivery defect. The § 7002 state-law interaction body was not recovered.","S008, § 7001(a)–(d)(2), especially (c)(1)–(3); § 7006 definitions.","D/G; § 7002 preemption reconciliation remains held."],["S_AZ-P13-C017","The revised act permits some variation by agreement but makes specified provisions nonwaivable, including important court-motion and award-review provisions. Its actual lists must be checked rather than assuming every contractual procedural alteration is effective.","S001, § 12-3004(A)–(C).","D; actual clause and federal interaction unknown."],["S_AZ-P13-C018","Generally applicable authority and contract defenses survive. An arbitration-specific rule demanding special authorization because arbitration waives court adjudication is impermissible under Kindred Nursing. That holding does not create agency authority that ordinary law otherwise withholds.","S036, pp. 248–257; S006, § 2.","H; actual capacity, agency instrument, and ordinary authority remain factual/legal predicates."]]},{"headers":["Claim ID","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence","Authority and pinpoint","Classification, limits, and missing facts"],"index":1,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claim ID","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence","Authority and pinpoint","Classification, limits, and missing facts"],["S_AZ-P13-C019","In the Arizona motion posture addressed by Duncan, the proponent must demonstrate an arbitration agreement; material factual disputes require resolution rather than acceptance of unsupported assertions. The challenger bears the burden of a generally applicable contract defense.","S021, ¶¶ 10–18.","H; actual evidence and the precise disputed issue are absent."],["S_AZ-P13-C020","Consent, consideration, capacity, fraud, duress, and related ordinary contract issues can matter. A court must distinguish whether any agreement was formed from whether an admittedly formed contract is unenforceable.","S021, ¶¶ 12–18; S001, § 12-3006; S028, p. 70 n.2.","H/D; no presumption that every account document proves these elements."],["S_AZ-P13-C021","A proponent relying on an electronic clause must connect the asserted version and assent evidence to the relevant person and transaction. A statement, collection notice, or later website copy does not, without more, prove assent to that version.","S001, § 12-3006(A); S005, §§ 44-7002, 44-7009; S021, ¶ 18.","I; a proof requirement inferred from formation and attribution rules, not a prescribed universal document checklist."],["S_AZ-P13-C022","Cornell permits modification of standardized terms in an ongoing, at-will consumer relationship when the initial terms reserve change authority, reasonable modification/rejection notice is received, the consumer can preserve the status quo by rejecting, and the relationship continues beyond a reasonable rejection period.","S020, ¶¶ 2, 24, 28–30.","H; not a holding that every fixed-term loan can be changed by silence."],["S_AZ-P13-C023","Cornell also preserves good faith, negotiated terms, and ordinary defenses. Its footnote recognizes a separately reserved termination power subject to limits against unreasonable cost, value loss, or personal burden. Its facts do not establish a universal opt-out duration.","S020, ¶¶ 24 n.2, 27–29.","H; actual reservation, notice, rejection, and burden evidence required."],["S_AZ-P13-C024","The revised act’s baseline assigns agreement existence and covered-controversy questions to the court, and conditions precedent and whole-contract enforceability to the arbitrator. Valid delegation and controlling federal law require separate analysis.","S001, § 12-3006(B)–(C); § 12-3004.","D; do not treat statutory baseline allocation as resolving an unseen delegation clause."],["S_AZ-P13-C025","First Options requires clear and unmistakable evidence before treating arbitrability as delegated. Objecting before arbitrators does not itself demonstrate consent to let them conclusively decide their authority.","S027, pp. 943–947.","H; actual delegation and conduct must be established."],["S_AZ-P13-C026","Under Rent-A-Center, a challenge directed only to the broader arbitration agreement did not defeat a separately enforceable delegation provision. Formation is analytically distinct; an effective challenge to delegation must actually target that provision.","S028, pp. 68–76, especially p. 70 n.2 and pp. 72–75.","H; the decision does not presume formation from a disputed signature or version."],["S_AZ-P13-C027","With a valid delegation, a court cannot retain a delegated issue merely because the arbitration demand appears wholly groundless. Henry Schein did not itself decide whether the particular contract clearly delegated the dispute.","S029, pp. 67–72.","H; actual delegation still must be established."],["S_AZ-P13-C028","When parties contest which of two agreements controls and the later agreement provides a judicial forum, Coinbase v. Suski assigns that antecedent contract question to the court. It did not decide the ultimate state-law supersession merits.","S040, slip pp. 4–8.","H; requires actual competing agreements, not merely a later statement."],["S_AZ-P13-C029","AAA Consumer Rule R-7 authorizes the arbitrator to address specified jurisdictional questions. Reading that private rule does not alone establish valid incorporation or clear and unmistakable consumer assent to delegation.","S019, R-7(a)–(c), p. 11; S027, pp. 943–945.","D/I; actual agreement, incorporation language, access, and applicable case law remain necessary."],["S_AZ-P13-C030","The AAA consumer rules read are effective May 1, 2025. R-1 supplies the policy’s consumer-relationship and version/application rules. A different contract, administrator, agreed version, or administrative classification can change the policy inquiry.","S019, R-1, pp. 6–7.","D, private policy; not a statute or proof of legal enforceability."],["S_AZ-P13-C031","AAA R-2 provides a conditional administrative suspension process for judicial intervention. That process is not a court stay and does not itself extend statutory review or debt-response periods.","S019, R-2, pp. 7–8; C044–C060.","D/I; no actual AAA proceeding or request was made."],["S_AZ-P13-C032","A cost-barrier challenge under Rizzio requires reasonably certain costs and an individualized inability-to-pay showing, with available relief and funding considered. An attorney’s cost-advance agreement is relevant but not categorically dispositive.","S022, ¶¶ 11, 16–19, 22–24.","H; no current administrator fee, waiver entitlement, or personal inability was established."],["S_AZ-P13-C033","The 2026 Juergensmeyer majority requires a fact-dependent procedural-unconscionability inquiry; unequal bargaining power alone was insufficient on its record. Its prison-employment facts do not determine an ordinary debtor’s contract.","S026, ¶¶ 19–39.","H; later treatment and different factual application remain held."],["S_AZ-P13-C034","Shivkov enforced arbitration of claims tied to the relevant agreement despite termination arguments on that commercial record. Its reasoning does not make every later dispute arbitrable or eliminate the need to prove the clause’s scope and survival.","S041, pp. 14–20.","H; Arizona-law commercial case; important appellate premises were not challenged."],["S_AZ-P13-C035","Arthur Andersen permits a nonsignatory to invoke FAA relief when applicable state contract law gives that actor an enforcement right. The FAA does not categorically confine enforcement to signatories, but the actual state-law theory must succeed.","S035, pp. 630–632.","H; the Supreme Court did not decide the particular estoppel merits."],["S_AZ-P13-C036","Sun Valley Ranch applied Arizona nonsignatory theories to contract-dependent claims and the plaintiffs’ own alter-ego allegations. Its holding is not an exemption from proving a relationship and claim-specific basis for enforcement.","S025, ¶¶ 32–41.","H; commercial partnership context, not an ordinary debt-sale holding."],["S_AZ-P13-C037","Shivkov applied Arizona alternative estoppel to claims sufficiently dependent on the agreement; it did not decide every asserted close-relationship theory.","S041, pp. 33–35, n.14.","H; commercial facts and the actual claims matter."],["S_AZ-P13-C038","For an assignee, debt buyer, affiliate, or servicer, the necessary inquiry includes the original agreement, identity, applicable transfer language, account inclusion, defenses, and any agency or nonsignatory theory. Assignment cannot supply assent missing at formation.","S001, §§ 12-3006–3007; S035, pp. 630–632; S025, ¶¶ 32–41.","I/G; no directly dispositive Arizona unsecured-consumer debt-sale opinion or actual chain was established here."]]},{"headers":["Claim ID","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence","Authority and pinpoint","Classification, limits, and missing facts"],"index":2,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claim ID","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence","Authority and pinpoint","Classification, limits, and missing facts"],["S_AZ-P13-C039","Revised-act relief is requested by motion. Initial notice generally uses summons service unless a civil action involving the agreement is pending. A pending covered claim determines the motion court; otherwise § 12-3027 supplies county venue alternatives. Jurisdiction over the controversy and parties is still required.","S001, §§ 12-3005, 12-3007(E), 12-3026–3027.","D; exact court competence and valid service are not established."],["S_AZ-P13-C040","A revised-act movant must show an agreement and allege refusal. An opposed application requires summary determination; no enforceable agreement means no compulsion. The court may not refuse arbitration merely because the underlying claim seems meritless.","S001, § 12-3007(A)–(D).","D; nonappearance does not remove the statutory agreement showing."],["S_AZ-P13-C041","The older act provides an application to compel upon agreement/refusal, summary determination of a substantial existence dispute, and a no-agreement route to stay arbitration. Its general court applications are motions, subject to the particular confirmation procedure.","S001, §§ 12-1502(A)–(C), 12-1515, 12-1511.","D; initial notice generally follows summons service unless a permitted agreement provides otherwise."],["S_AZ-P13-C042","FAA § 4 requires five days’ written notice using the prescribed federal service framework. A genuine making/refusal issue goes to summary trial; the allegedly defaulting party has the stated timely jury-demand right outside admiralty.","S006, § 4, second–fifth paragraphs.","D; no universal “decide everything on affidavits” rule, and no actual service or jury-demand deadline is calculated."],["S_AZ-P13-C043","Appointment begins with the agreed method. The FAA and both Arizona acts provide court appointment in specified failure, vacancy, or unavailable-method circumstances; the precise statute and agreement govern.","S006, § 5; S001, §§ 12-1503, 12-3011.","D; no finding that a named administrator or arbitrator is unavailable."],["S_AZ-P13-C044","Under the revised act, a motion to order arbitration requires a court stay, on just terms, of judicial proceedings involving the alleged covered claim pending decision. An order compelling arbitration requires a stay of the covered claim; severability can limit its reach.","S001, § 12-3007(F)–(G).","D; concerns covered judicial proceedings, not every unrelated obligation."],["S_AZ-P13-C045","A court challenge to existence or scope does not itself halt the arbitration under the revised act: arbitration may continue unless the court orders otherwise.","S001, § 12-3006(D).","D; distinguish a judicial-action stay from a stay of arbitration."],["S_AZ-P13-C046","The older act directs a stay of an action involving an arbitrable issue when the specified arbitration application or order has been made, with possible limitation to a severable issue.","S001, § 12-1502(D).","D; the actual application, issue, and court order matter."],["S_AZ-P13-C047","In a federal case satisfying FAA § 3, a party’s requested stay must be granted rather than dismissal merely because the claims are arbitrable. The applicant must not be in default in proceeding with arbitration.","S006, § 3; S031, slip pp. 3–6 and n.2.","D/H; an independent dismissal ground, such as lack of jurisdiction, is different."],["S_AZ-P13-C048","Morgan rejects an arbitration-specific prejudice requirement for litigation-conduct waiver. It remanded rather than deciding ultimate waiver or every choice between state and federal waiver frameworks.","S030, slip pp. 4–7.","H; no fixed number of days, motions, or discovery requests constitutes the rule."],["S_AZ-P13-C049","The Ninth Circuit’s post-Morgan test examines knowledge of the arbitration right and intentional acts inconsistent with it, considering the circumstances without the former special heavy burden or prejudice element.","S038, pp. 6–10.","H; Armstrong found no waiver on its particular record."],["S_AZ-P13-C050","Fuller’s older federal prejudice formulation cannot be used unchanged after Morgan and Armstrong. Gray notes Morgan but does not supply a comprehensive Arizona rule for every state-law waiver dispute.","S024, ¶¶ 10–17; S023, ¶ 12; S030; S038.","H/G; a comprehensive current Arizona-specific waiver formulation remains unestablished."],["S_AZ-P13-C051","FAA § 16 permits the listed appeals from denials of stays/compulsion, specified award orders, anti-arbitration injunctions, and final decisions. It generally bars the listed interlocutory appeals allowing arbitration, subject to § 1292(b).","S006, § 16(a)–(b); S009, § 1292(b).","D; actual finality, certification, and jurisdiction must be established."],["S_AZ-P13-C052","Arizona § 12-2101.01 lists denial of compulsion, grant of a stay of arbitration, denial of confirmation, modification/correction, vacatur without rehearing, and qualifying judgments/decrees. It does not list an ordinary interlocutory grant of compulsion.","S001, § 12-2101.01(A)–(B).","D; confirmation judgments fall under the judgment category; do not rewrite item (3) as both granting and denying confirmation."],["S_AZ-P13-C053","Fuller and the 2026 Juergensmeyer opinion used discretionary special-action review in FAA-only employment postures rather than assuming the state statutory ordinary appeal applied.","S024, ¶¶ 4–8; S026, ¶¶ 15–17.","H; current special-action rules were not independently read, and ordinary consumer jurisdiction must be separately tested."],["S_AZ-P13-C054","Coinbase v. Bielski requires a federal district court to stay pretrial and trial proceedings during the covered § 16 appeal from denial of compulsion. Its holding is not a universal state-court appellate-stay rule.","S032, slip pp. 3–10, especially n.2.","H; collateral matters and treatment of frivolous appeals are bounded exceptions discussed in the opinion."],["S_AZ-P13-C055","FRCP 81(a)(6)(B) applies federal civil rules to FAA proceedings except where the statute supplies other procedures. Rule 7(b) addresses motion content; Rule 5 distinguishes service from filing.","S010, Rules 5, 7(b), 81(a)(6)(B).","D; full initial-service mechanics were not investigated."],["S_AZ-P13-C056","Federal Rule 6 excludes the triggering day, counts intermediate days, and adjusts qualifying last days. Electronic filing generally ends at midnight in the court’s time zone. Extra service days are conditional, not automatically added to an award-receipt clock.","S010, Rule 6(a), (d).","D; statutory extension power is not assumed."],["S_AZ-P13-C057","FRAP 4(a) ordinarily measures a civil notice of appeal from entry, with a 30-day period and specified governmental-party, postjudgment-motion, extension, and reopening provisions.","S018, FRAP 4(a)(1), (4)–(7).","D; actual entry and triggering orders are absent; no actual appeal deadline is determined."],["S_AZ-P13-C058","FRAP 8 ordinarily starts a requested enforcement stay in the district court; FRAP 26 supplies computation and extension limits. These rules do not erase Bielski’s distinct covered-appeal holding or create a universal award-enforcement stay.","S018, FRAP 8(a), 26; S032.","D/H; the actual order, appellate posture, and local requirements remain necessary."],["S_AZ-P13-C059","The official Arizona Rule 6 adoption and amendment bodies recovered are historical. A current-looking nonofficial reproduction matches the reviewed core computation provisions, but the complete official 2026 amendment chain was not authenticated.","S012, Rule 6; S013, Rule 6(d); S014.","D/G; current official body remains a hold."],["S_AZ-P13-C060","The 2014 ARCAP adoption order contains a general 30-day appeal rule and specified exceptions. The 2019 document recovered makes a different technical correction. Neither establishes a complete current 2026 ARCAP 9 text by itself.","S015, Rules 5, 8–9; S016; failed S017 routes.","D/G; no current Arizona appeal endpoint is certified."],["S_AZ-P13-C061","A.R.S. § 1-243 generally excludes the first day and includes the last unless the last is a holiday, subject to its narrow subsection B exception. Section 1-301 identifies state holidays and specified observation rules.","S046, §§ 1-243(A)–(B), 1-301(A)–(F).","D; an actual court closure or special order remains unknown."]]},{"headers":["Claim ID","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence","Authority and pinpoint","Classification, limits, and missing facts"],"index":3,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claim ID","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence","Authority and pinpoint","Classification, limits, and missing facts"],["S_AZ-P13-C062","Revised-act initiation notice must follow the agreement or the statutory alternative, identify the controversy and remedy, and satisfy the prescribed delivery method. A participation-based notice objection must be made by the statutory stage. General notice/receipt definitions also matter.","S001, §§ 12-3002, 12-3009(A)–(B).","D; the statutory certified-mail alternative calls for a requested and obtained return receipt."],["S_AZ-P13-C063","Under the older act, absent a permitted contrary agreement, hearing notice uses the prescribed delivery and at least five days’ notice. A duly notified party’s nonappearance does not necessarily stop the hearing; participation can affect a notice objection.","S001, § 12-1505(A)–(C).","D; actual notice and any variation must be proved."],["S_AZ-P13-C064","The revised act requires fair hearing procedures, provides for specified summary disposition and representation, and imposes neutral-arbitrator disclosure duties. Material nondisclosure and procedural prejudice have specific statutory consequences, not automatic debt cancellation.","S001, §§ 12-3012, 12-3015–3016.","D; detailed discovery, institutional procedure, and a particular challenge record remain outside this gateway."],["S_AZ-P13-C065","A revised-act award must be recorded and signed or otherwise authenticated by a concurring arbitrator; each party receives notice including a copy. An objection that the award was made late must be notified before receipt of award notice.","S001, § 12-3019(A)–(B).","D; making, authentication, and notice dates are distinct."],["S_AZ-P13-C066","The older act requires a written signed award and delivery by its specified methods or agreement. Its late-award objection must precede delivery.","S001, § 12-1508(A)–(B).","D; do not substitute revised-act “receipt of notice” terminology without identifying the regime."],["S_AZ-P13-C067","Under the revised act, a qualifying arbitrator-correction/clarification motion and notice are due within 20 days after award-notice receipt; objection notice is due within 10 days after receipt of the motion notice.","S001, § 12-3020(A)–(E), read with § 12-3004.","D; distinguish potentially variable arbitral procedure from nonwaivable judicial-review provisions."],["S_AZ-P13-C068","The older act permits the specified arbitrator correction/clarification application within 20 days after delivery, with notice and a 10-day objection opportunity.","S001, § 12-1509.","D; actual delivery, notice, and the correction ground remain necessary."],["S_AZ-P13-C069","After revised-act award notice, a party may move to confirm; the court must confirm unless the award is modified, corrected, or vacated under the specified provisions. Section 12-3022 does not itself state the FAA’s one-year period.","S001, § 12-3022.","D; absence of that period in this section is not a certificate that no other timing doctrine could apply."],["S_AZ-P13-C070","Under the revised act, an award procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means is a statutory vacatur ground.","S001, § 12-3023(A)(1).","D; allegation alone is not proof of procurement."],["S_AZ-P13-C071","Revised-act vacatur grounds include neutral-arbitrator evident partiality, arbitrator corruption, or misconduct prejudicing a party’s rights.","S001, § 12-3023(A)(2).","D; the specified actor and predicate must be shown."],["S_AZ-P13-C072","A substantially prejudicial refusal to postpone or consider material evidence, qualifying hearing misconduct, or exceeding arbitral powers can support revised-act vacatur.","S001, § 12-3023(A)(3)–(4).","D; disagreement with the result is not itself these grounds."],["S_AZ-P13-C073","Lack of an arbitration agreement is a revised-act vacatur ground, subject to the participation/objection restriction stated in subsection (A)(5).","S001, § 12-3023(A)(5), cross-reference § 12-3015(C).","D; this text differs from the older act’s additional prior-determination language."],["S_AZ-P13-C074","Improper revised-act initiation notice supports vacatur only with the substantial prejudice required by the statute.","S001, § 12-3023(A)(6); § 12-3009.","D; not every notice imperfection automatically invalidates an award."],["S_AZ-P13-C075","A revised-act vacatur motion ordinarily must be filed within 90 days after receipt of notice of the award or the specified modified/corrected award.","S001, § 12-3023(B).","D; a pending correction request is not itself proof of a newly triggered period."],["S_AZ-P13-C076","For alleged procurement by corruption, fraud, or undue means, the revised act measures 90 days from when the ground was known or reasonably should have been known.","S001, § 12-3023(B).","D; discovery and reasonable-care facts must be established."],["S_AZ-P13-C077","Revised-act judicial modification/correction requires a motion within 90 days after award-notice receipt and a listed mathematical, descriptive, unsubmitted-matter, or nonmerits form defect.","S001, § 12-3024(A)–(C).","D; the unsubmitted-matter ground has its own no-merits-effect condition."],["S_AZ-P13-C078","Revised-act vacatur can lead to rehearing, with the required new-arbitrator distinctions. Denial of vacatur ordinarily leads to confirmation unless modification/correction is pending.","S001, § 12-3023(C)–(D).","D; vacatur does not itself decide underlying debt merits."],["S_AZ-P13-C079","The revised act directs entry of a judgment conforming to the specified confirmation, modification, correction, or qualifying vacatur order. Ordinary judgment consequences follow through that judicial step.","S001, § 12-3025(A)–(B).","D; award possession alone is not a completed judgment-enforcement process."],["S_AZ-P13-C080","Revised-act attorney-fee and punitive-award provisions require their stated law/agreement and proof predicates; judicial fees in contested post-award proceedings are separately addressed. The older act’s default arbitrator-expense provision excludes counsel fees unless the agreement otherwise provides.","S001, §§ 12-3021, 12-3025(C), 12-1510.","D; no administrator price, recoverable fee, premium, or consumer charge is established."],["S_AZ-P13-C081","Older-act confirmation requires filing and service as a civil complaint. After 20 days from service, the statute directs judgment unless opposition is made under § 12-1512.","S001, § 12-1511.","D; service completion and an actual opposition record matter."],["S_AZ-P13-C082","Older-act opposition requires a pleading and adequate showing of one of its specified grounds. Section 12-1512 does not state the revised act’s 90-day vacatur period; its no-agreement ground also addresses prior determination and participation.","S001, § 12-1512(A)–(B).","D/G; no invented universal outside deadline or postjudgment cure follows from this omission."],["S_AZ-P13-C083","Older-act judicial correction is limited to an application within 90 days after delivery and before judgment. After judgment, § 12-1513(D) refers to Rule 60(c); current numbering and the applicable relief route need reconciliation.","S001, § 12-1513(A)–(D).","D/G; later attempted relief is not guaranteed."],["S_AZ-P13-C084","Older-act confirmation produces a judgment enforceable as other judgments, with the stated court-cost provision.","S001, § 12-1514.","D; actual enforcement procedure is deferred."],["S_AZ-P13-C085","FAA § 9 addresses agreements permitting judgment on the award and an application within one year after the award is made. Confirmation follows absent statutory vacatur/modification/correction. Whether every later application is categorically barred in the controlling circuit was not resolved here.","S006, § 9; S034, jurisdiction limits.","D/G; do not confuse the one-year question with Cortez Byrd’s venue holding."],["S_AZ-P13-C086","FAA § 10 lists procurement misconduct, arbitrator partiality/corruption, specified prejudicial hearing misconduct, and excess/imperfect execution of powers preventing the required definite award. Its rehearing authority has a time condition.","S006, § 10(a)–(b).","D; administrative-arbitration subsection (c) is a separate boundary."],["S_AZ-P13-C087","FAA § 11 permits the stated material calculation/description corrections, certain unsubmitted-matter corrections, and nonmerits form corrections.","S006, § 11(a)–(c).","D; no general merits reconsideration power is supplied."],["S_AZ-P13-C088","FAA § 12 requires service of notice of a vacatur/modification/correction motion within three months after the award is filed or delivered. Filing a motion and serving its notice are not interchangeable acts.","S006, § 12, first paragraph.","D; three months must not be rewritten as 90 days."],["S_AZ-P13-C089","FAA §§ 9 and 12 contain different resident/nonresident service language, including marshal language for nonresidents. This report preserves that text rather than assuming an email or ordinary e-filing satisfies every application.","S006, §§ 9, 12; S010, Rules 5, 81(a)(6).","D/G; exact modern procedural reconciliation and valid actual service remain held."],["S_AZ-P13-C090","FAA § 12 permits a judge to issue an order staying the adverse party’s enforcement proceedings, to be served with the motion notice. The statute does not make the review motion itself an automatic enforcement stay.","S006, § 12, second paragraph.","D; actual order and scope required."],["S_AZ-P13-C091","FAA § 13 requires the listed agreement/appointment/extensions, award, and application papers with the order for judgment entry. The entered judgment—not merely the award—has the stated ordinary judgment force.","S006, § 13(a)–(c).","D; underlying debt, fees, interest, and collection methods are not independently adjudicated by this report."],["S_AZ-P13-C092","Hall Street treats §§ 10 and 11 as exclusive grounds for the FAA’s expedited review mechanism; parties cannot enlarge that mechanism simply by agreeing to review legal error. Other possible legal routes were not comprehensively resolved.","S037, pp. 584–592.","H; no blanket conclusion about every asserted “manifest disregard” formulation."],["S_AZ-P13-C093","Move holds FAA § 12 subject to equitable tolling and granted relief on an unusual fraud record involving an arbitrator’s fabricated qualifications. It does not create the revised Arizona act’s automatic 90-day discovery formulation in federal law.","S039, pp. 7–14.","H; substantive tolling objections were partly waived on appeal; diligence and extraordinary facts remain necessary inquiries."],["S_AZ-P13-C094","Defeating compulsion, invalidating delegation, vacating an award, obtaining confirmation, and prevailing on the underlying debt are distinct results. Neither an assignment price nor an unremitted amount is a consumer payment.","S001, §§ 12-3007(D), 12-3023–3025; S006, §§ 10–13; models below.","I; actual debt and payment adjudication remain outside this pass."],["S_AZ-P13-C095","No authority read makes every arbitration motion or appeal suspend every response, limitation, collection, garnishment, or judgment clock. Only the particular statutory/order-based stays identified here are established.","C044–C060, C090; respective primary pinpoints.","I/G; this is a bounded non-inference, not a claim that no additional stay law exists."]]},{"headers":["Claim ID","Precise proposition","Authority and limit"],"index":4,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claim ID","Precise proposition","Authority and limit"],["S_AZ-P13-C096","Actual contract, identity, status, transfer, jurisdiction, service, award, payment, and local-calendar facts remain unestablished.","G; user supplied no such records and authorized no private lookup."],["S_AZ-P13-C097","M01’s alternatives turn on actual formation/version proof and then the distinct delegation inquiry; neither branch determines debt merits.","K; C013–C029."],["S_AZ-P13-C098","M02’s $900 portfolio purchase is separate from consumer payments; with no credited consumer payment, the stipulated $6,000 claimed balance remains $6,000 arithmetically, while legal liability remains held.","K/I; C035–C038, C094."],["S_AZ-P13-C099","M03’s dated litigation acts are inputs to waiver analysis, not a numerical waiver formula; stay and appeal outcomes depend on the applicable regime and actual orders.","K; C044–C060."],["S_AZ-P13-C100","M04’s assumed April 15 receipt produces the conditional May 5 twenty-day and July 14 ninety-day candidates shown below, subject to the stated procedural assumptions.","K; S001, §§ 12-3020(B), 12-3023(B), 12-3024(A); S046."],["S_AZ-P13-C101","M04’s three-calendar-month candidate is July 15, not the ninety-day July 14 candidate. Its § 9 anniversary uses the different award-made date.","K; S006, §§ 9, 12; S010, Rule 6(a)."],["S_AZ-P13-C102","M04’s older-act confirmation-service candidate is May 26; its correction branch separately requires both the ninety-day delivery condition and absence of an entered judgment.","K; S001, §§ 12-1511, 12-1513; S046."],["S_AZ-P13-C103","M04’s stipulated July 10 discovery produces October 8 only if that is legally the known-or-reasonably-knowable date under the revised act. It supplies no automatic FAA extension.","K; S001, § 12-3023(B); S039."],["S_AZ-P13-C104","M04 separates a $6,200 assumed award total, judicial judgment, and a later $500 actual credit; only the stipulated actual credit reduces the illustrated remaining amount to $5,700.","K/I; S001, § 12-3025; S006, § 13; arithmetic below."],["S_AZ-P13-C105","The source register distinguishes operative text, historical orders, primary-text republications, private policy, partial reads, and failed routes. No full citator, all-source verification, independent review, or component acceptance is claimed.","Researcher record; see source, currentness, and coverage registers."]]},{"headers":["Date/document","Actor’s asserted role","What the fictional document would need to connect","Adverse or missing branch"],"index":5,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Date/document","Actor’s asserted role","What the fictional document would need to connect","Adverse or missing branch"],["January 12, 2026 — original agreement","A, original contracting business","Q’s assent, actual account, arbitration/delegation language, scope, governing law","Missing agreement or wrong version prevents reliance on a generic portfolio description."],["March 2, 2026 — A-to-B transfer","B, first purchaser","Operative transfer language and account-level inclusion of fictional account Q-17","Schedule lists Q-71 or excludes disputed accounts; inclusion remains contested."],["April 6, 2026 — B-to-C transfer","C, successive purchaser","B’s acquired rights, C’s acquired rights, effective date, and matching obligation","A bill of sale alone does not resolve what the referenced schedule contains."],["Alternative April 6 document","C, servicer only","Actual authorization to act for the identified owner and an applicable enforcement theory","Collection authority is not automatically ownership or a personal right to compel."],["Alternative affiliate assertion","C, related company","A recognized agency, beneficiary, estoppel, or other applicable contract-law basis","Shared branding or corporate affiliation alone supplies no demonstrated theory."]]},{"headers":["Date","Stipulated event","Legal significance"],"index":6,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Date","Stipulated event","Legal significance"],["March 3, 2026","A files an answer.","Its contents, reservation of arbitration, and surrounding conduct matter; answering alone is not a fixed waiver rule."],["March 20, 2026","A seeks discovery.","Scope and purpose matter. Limited information needed for arbitration differs from extensive merits litigation."],["May 5, 2026","A requests a substantive merits ruling.","Potentially inconsistent conduct; no automatic outcome is assigned."],["June 9, 2026","A moves to compel and expressly requests a stay.","Court addresses agreement, scope/delegation, waiver/default, and jurisdiction before the requested relief."]]},{"headers":["Posture","Stage and fictional facts","Rule/holding and required evidence","Conditional consequence and remaining gap"],"index":7,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Posture","Stage and fictional facts","Rule/holding and required evidence","Conditional consequence and remaining gap"],["P01 — Consumer versus business","A standardized household account and a separately negotiated business account use similar clauses.","C006, C030; FAA § 2 and AAA R-1 have different scope predicates.","Neither the FAA nor the Arizona acts become consumer-only statutes because AAA has consumer rules. Actual transaction and policy classification remain needed."],["P02 — No clause produced","A creditor supplies statements but no agreement containing arbitration.","C019–C021; S001, § 12-3006; S021, ¶ 18.","Statements alone do not establish the asserted clause. Formation remains held."],["P03 — Electronic acceptance","A complete retained agreement is linked to a disputed acceptance log.","C013–C015; S005, §§ 44-7005–7009.","Electronic form is permissible; attribution and assent remain disputed."],["P04 — Opt-out exercised","A consumer claims timely rejection through the contract’s specified method.","C022–C023; S020, ¶¶ 24–30.","Effective rejection can defeat the asserted modification; content, method, receipt, and applicable relationship are unresolved."],["P05 — Fixed-term unilateral change","A business invokes an at-will deposit-account decision for a fixed-term loan.","C022–C023.","Cornell does not by itself resolve that different contract. Need the actual modification authority and applicable contract law."],["P06 — Whole-contract fraud","A party alleges the entire transaction was induced by fraud but does not contest formation or separately address the arbitration provision.","C020, C024, C026; S021, ¶¶ 12–18.","Separability matters; the correct decision-maker depends on the actual challenge and valid delegation."],["P07 — Targeted delegation challenge","A party identifies a particular defect in the delegation provision.","C025–C027; S028, pp. 72–75.","The court must address the appropriately targeted issue; repeating a whole-contract objection is not automatically sufficient."],["P08 — Later inconsistent agreement","An earlier delegated-arbitration agreement is followed by an asserted court-forum agreement.","C028; S040, slip pp. 4–8.","Court decides which agreement controls; actual assent and supersession remain contested."],["P09 — Successive purchaser","A debt buyer presents two transfers with a mismatched account schedule.","C035–C038.","Enforcement rights remain unproved until the actual account and transferred rights are connected."],["P10 — Servicer or affiliate","A company relies on branding and a servicing label.","C035–C038; S035, pp. 630–632.","Need an actual contract-law enforcement theory; a label alone supplies none."],["P11 — Cost barrier","A consumer supplies a generic online fee estimate but no applicable schedule or individualized financial evidence.","C032; S022, ¶¶ 11, 16–19.","The evidentiary gap matters; neither enforceability nor unconscionability is established."],["P12 — Litigation waiver","A party litigates, then invokes arbitration.","C048–C050; S030; S038.","Assess knowing inconsistent conduct; no automatic waiver from a fixed delay and no special prejudice prerequisite under the federal test."],["P13 — Requested federal stay","All claims are found arbitrable and a party requests a § 3 stay.","C047; S031, slip pp. 3–6.","Covered federal case must be stayed rather than dismissed merely because of arbitrability; independent jurisdictional defects remain different."],["P14 — Interlocutory appeal","A federal court denies compulsion; a party appeals.","C051, C054, C057–C058.","Proper covered appeal invokes Bielski; actual appealability, timing, and collateral matters remain distinct."],["P15 — Defective award notice","A party learns informally of an award but disputes statutory delivery or receipt.","C065–C068, C075, C081–C089.","Identify the regime and exact trigger; an informal date is not automatically every statutory date."],["P16 — Special or external regime","The asserted clause involves tribal law, a foreign seat, military status, employment, insurance, or a secured transaction.","C003, C005, C007, C012.","Ordinary-account conclusions do not resolve those branches; the relevant primary regime and actual nexus must be investigated separately."]]},{"headers":["Source ID","Issuer, document, and full literal URL","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations"],"index":8,"links":[{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/arsDetail/?title=12&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/arsDetail/?title=12"},{"href":"https://legiscan.com/AZ/text/HB2430/2010?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://legiscan.com/AZ/text/HB2430/2010"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.htm","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.pdf","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_1st_Regular.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_1st_Regular.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_2nd_Regular.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_2nd_Regular.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07002.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07002.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07003.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07003.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07005.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07005.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07007.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07007.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07008.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07008.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07009.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07009.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07015.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07015.htm"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s1/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s1/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s2/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s2/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s3/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s3/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s4/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s4/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s5/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s5/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s6/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s6/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s401/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s401/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title9/chapter1&edition=prelim","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title9/chapter1&edition=prelim"},{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-117publ90/pdf/PLAW-117publ90.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-117publ90/pdf/PLAW-117publ90.pdf"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s402/","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s402/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title9-section402&num=0&edition=prelim","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title9-section402&num=0&edition=prelim"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7001/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7001/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7006/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7006/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7002/","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7002/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section7002&num=0&edition=prelim","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section7002&num=0&edition=prelim"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1331/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1331/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1332/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1332/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1292/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1292/"},{"href":"https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure"},{"href":"https://www.mdb.uscourts.gov/files/2025_congressional_package_final.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.mdb.uscourts.gov/files/2025_congressional_package_final.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2016%20Rules/R-16-0010.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2016%20Rules/R-16-0010.pdf"},{"href":"https://azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2017%20Rules/17-0009.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2017%20Rules/17-0009.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.courtrules.net/arizona/arizona-civil-procedure/rule-6/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.courtrules.net/arizona/arizona-civil-procedure/rule-6/"},{"href":"https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N957811E086DC11E6B40FA6262051C5AD?viewType=FullText","text":"https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N957811E086DC11E6B40FA6262051C5AD?viewType=FullText"},{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2014%20August%20Rules/R140017.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2014%20August%20Rules/R140017.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2019%20Rules/R-14-0017-Amended%20Order-Filed%204-22-2019.PDF?ver=2019-04-22-161612-227&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2019%20Rules/R-14-0017-Amended%20Order-Filed%204-22-2019.PDF?ver=2019-04-22-161612-227"},{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/rules/Recent-Amendments/Rules-of-Civil-Appellate-Procedure?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azcourts.gov/rules/Recent-Amendments/Rules-of-Civil-Appellate-Procedure"},{"href":"https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/ND80A48603F9F11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?transitionType=Default&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/ND80A48603F9F11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?transitionType=Default"},{"href":"https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N8C476F103F9B11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?viewType=FullText","text":"https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N8C476F103F9B11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?viewType=FullText"},{"href":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/frap-June%201%202026.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/frap-June%201%202026.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/rules/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/rules/"},{"href":"https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure.pdf"},{"href":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/Redlined-Proposed%20Amendments%20to%20Circuit%20Rules%20Jan%2026.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/Redlined-Proposed%20Amendments%20to%20Circuit%20Rules%20Jan%2026.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.adr.org/rules-forms-and-fees/consumer/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.adr.org/rules-forms-and-fees/consumer/"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00243.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00243.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00301.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00301.htm"}],"row_links":[[],[{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/arsDetail/?title=12&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/arsDetail/?title=12"}],[{"href":"https://legiscan.com/AZ/text/HB2430/2010?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://legiscan.com/AZ/text/HB2430/2010"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.htm","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.pdf","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_1st_Regular.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_1st_Regular.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_2nd_Regular.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_2nd_Regular.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07002.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07002.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07003.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07003.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07005.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07005.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07007.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07007.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07008.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07008.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07009.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07009.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07015.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07015.htm"}],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s1/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s1/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s2/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s2/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s3/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s3/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s4/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s4/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s5/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s5/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s6/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s6/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s401/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s401/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title9/chapter1&edition=prelim","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title9/chapter1&edition=prelim"}],[{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-117publ90/pdf/PLAW-117publ90.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-117publ90/pdf/PLAW-117publ90.pdf"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s402/","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s402/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title9-section402&num=0&edition=prelim","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title9-section402&num=0&edition=prelim"}],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7001/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7001/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7006/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7006/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7002/","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7002/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section7002&num=0&edition=prelim","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section7002&num=0&edition=prelim"}],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1331/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1331/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1332/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1332/"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1292/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1292/"}],[{"href":"https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure"}],[{"href":"https://www.mdb.uscourts.gov/files/2025_congressional_package_final.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.mdb.uscourts.gov/files/2025_congressional_package_final.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2016%20Rules/R-16-0010.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2016%20Rules/R-16-0010.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2017%20Rules/17-0009.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2017%20Rules/17-0009.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://www.courtrules.net/arizona/arizona-civil-procedure/rule-6/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.courtrules.net/arizona/arizona-civil-procedure/rule-6/"},{"href":"https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N957811E086DC11E6B40FA6262051C5AD?viewType=FullText","text":"https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N957811E086DC11E6B40FA6262051C5AD?viewType=FullText"}],[{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2014%20August%20Rules/R140017.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2014%20August%20Rules/R140017.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2019%20Rules/R-14-0017-Amended%20Order-Filed%204-22-2019.PDF?ver=2019-04-22-161612-227&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2019%20Rules/R-14-0017-Amended%20Order-Filed%204-22-2019.PDF?ver=2019-04-22-161612-227"}],[{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/rules/Recent-Amendments/Rules-of-Civil-Appellate-Procedure?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azcourts.gov/rules/Recent-Amendments/Rules-of-Civil-Appellate-Procedure"},{"href":"https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/ND80A48603F9F11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?transitionType=Default&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/ND80A48603F9F11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?transitionType=Default"},{"href":"https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N8C476F103F9B11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?viewType=FullText","text":"https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N8C476F103F9B11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?viewType=FullText"}],[{"href":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/frap-June%201%202026.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/frap-June%201%202026.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/rules/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/rules/"},{"href":"https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure.pdf"},{"href":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/Redlined-Proposed%20Amendments%20to%20Circuit%20Rules%20Jan%2026.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/Redlined-Proposed%20Amendments%20to%20Circuit%20Rules%20Jan%2026.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.adr.org/rules-forms-and-fees/consumer/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.adr.org/rules-forms-and-fees/consumer/"}],[{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00243.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00243.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00301.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00301.htm"}]],"rows":[["Source ID","Issuer, document, and full literal URL","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations"],["S_AZ-P13-S001","Arizona Legislature, Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 12. https://www.azleg.gov/arsDetail/?title=12. Direct section URLs are mapped immediately below.","Fresh official bodies for all mapped sections. Compilation displays 57th Legislature, second regular session update basis. Specific statutory dates are identified in claims; compilation metadata is not a universal effective date. Historical amendment chain remains bounded."],["S_AZ-P13-S002","Arizona HB 2430 (2010), primary legislative text reproduced by LegiScan: https://legiscan.com/AZ/text/HB2430/2010. Failed official routes: https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.htm and https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.pdf.","Fresh reproduced §§ 5–6 and relevant enacted-language presentation. Host labels the bill chaptered, while the body identifies an engrossed text. Both official routes reported inaccessible through the tool. Final chapter-image authentication remains held; no silent upgrade to an official 2010 image."],["S_AZ-P13-S003","Arizona Legislative Council, 2025 Table of Sections Affected. https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_1st_Regular.pdf","Official index, July 18, 2025, chapters 1–265. Title 12 entries read, printed pp. 3–4 / PDF indexes 2–3. Screening evidence, not operative statutory text."],["S_AZ-P13-S004","Arizona Legislative Council, 2026 Table of Sections Affected. https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_2nd_Regular.pdf","Official index, August 19, 2026, chapters 1–264. Title 12 entries read, printed p. 4 / PDF index 3. No complete later-law certificate."],["S_AZ-P13-S005","Arizona Legislature, Uniform Electronic Transactions Act: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07002.htm; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07003.htm; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07005.htm; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07007.htm; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07008.htm; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07009.htm; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07015.htm.","Fresh official bodies: definitions, scope/exclusions, agreement to transact electronically, legal effect, retainability, attribution, sending/receipt. No complete UETA enactment history or unrelated excluded-transaction law was read."],["S_AZ-P13-S006","U.S. House OLRC, Title 9, FAA, section URLs: https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s1/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s2/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s3/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s4/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s5/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s6/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s401/.","Fresh official operative bodies and displayed source/amendment notes, currency through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026. Failed chapter route: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title9/chapter1&edition=prelim returned 404; individual sections recovered. Section 402 routes failed as detailed below; its enactment was recovered as S007."],["S_AZ-P13-S007","Congress/GPO, Public Law 117-90, Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-117publ90/pdf/PLAW-117publ90.pdf","Fresh official §§ 1–3, 136 Stat. 26–28 / PDF indexes 1–3, enacted March 3, 2022. Section 3 application clause read. Recovered after https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s402/ was inaccessible and https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title9-section402&num=0&edition=prelim returned 404. Full special-claim definitions under other titles remain outside scope."],["S_AZ-P13-S008","OLRC, E-SIGN: https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7001/ and https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7006/.","Fresh § 7001(a)–(c), (d)(1)–(2), and pertinent § 7006 definitions. Currency displayed through PL 119-124. § 7001 remainder not comprehensively read. Failed § 7002 routes: https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7002/ inaccessible; https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section7002&num=0&edition=prelim 404. State-preemption interaction held."],["S_AZ-P13-S009","OLRC, federal jurisdiction/appeal statutes: https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1331/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1332/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1292/.","Fresh § 1331; material § 1332(a)–(c); § 1292(b). No class-action jurisdiction analysis or actual citizenship determination."],["S_AZ-P13-S010","U.S. Courts, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, December 1, 2025 edition. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf. Official current-rules page: https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure.","Fresh Rules 5, 6, 7(b), 81(a)(6)(B): printed pp. 8–14, 100 / PDF indexes 26–32, 118. Current-page metadata read. Full Rule 4 and all initial-service methods were not read."],["S_AZ-P13-S011","U.S. Supreme Court, 2025 rules transmission/adoption package, official bankruptcy-court-hosted copy. https://www.mdb.uscourts.gov/files/2025_congressional_package_final.pdf","Fresh April 23, 2025 orders: appellate rules order at printed 00003 / PDF index 2; civil rules order at printed 00106 / PDF index 105. Effective December 1, 2025 with stated new/pending-case application. Not a complete 2026 amendments search."],["S_AZ-P13-S012","Arizona Supreme Court, R-16-0010 civil-rules restyling order. https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2016%20Rules/R-16-0010.pdf","Historical official order, September 2, 2016; effective January 1, 2017, with pending-case qualification. Rule 6 read at printed pp. 27–28 / PDF indexes 59–60."],["S_AZ-P13-S013","Arizona Supreme Court, R-17-0009. https://azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2017%20Rules/17-0009.pdf","Historical official order, August 31, 2017; effective January 1, 2018. Rule 6(d) correction read at order p. 6 / PDF index 5."],["S_AZ-P13-S014","Michigan Legal Publishing, Arizona Civil Rule 6 reproduction. https://www.courtrules.net/arizona/arizona-civil-procedure/rule-6/","Fresh nonofficial full Rule 6(a)–(d) and displayed history. Site copyright 2026 is not legal-effect authentication. Official-hosted route https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N957811E086DC11E6B40FA6262051C5AD?viewType=FullText was inaccessible. S012–S013 are historical official alternatives, not a complete current chain."],["S_AZ-P13-S015","Arizona Supreme Court, R-14-0017 ARCAP restyling order. https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2014%20August%20Rules/R140017.pdf","Historical official order, September 2, 2014, effective January 1, 2015 with pending-appeal qualification. Rule 5: order p. 14 / PDF 13; Rules 8–9: order pp. 18–20 / PDF 17–19. Rule 7 only partially read, not used as current stay authority."],["S_AZ-P13-S016","Arizona Supreme Court, April 22, 2019 amended R-14-0017 order. https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2019%20Rules/R-14-0017-Amended%20Order-Filed%204-22-2019.PDF?ver=2019-04-22-161612-227","Both pages read; immediate technical correction involving a juvenile-rule reference. Does not authenticate a current 2026 Rule 9 body."],["S_AZ-P13-S017","Arizona judiciary, current ARCAP routes and amendment index. https://www.azcourts.gov/rules/Recent-Amendments/Rules-of-Civil-Appellate-Procedure. Failed Rule 9: https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/ND80A48603F9F11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?transitionType=Default. Failed Rule 5: https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N8C476F103F9B11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?viewType=FullText.","Index portions read. Rule 9 returned 403; Rule 5 inaccessible. The current operative bodies were not recovered. S015–S016 preserve what the official alternatives actually establish."],["S_AZ-P13-S018","Ninth Circuit, FRAP and Ninth Circuit Rules handbook, June 1, 2026. https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/frap-June%201%202026.pdf. Official landing page: https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/rules/.","Fresh FRAP 4(a), printed pp. 11–13 / PDF 29–31; Rule 8(a), p. 30 / PDF 48; Rule 26, pp. 87–88 / PDF 105–106. Landing page identifies June 1, 2026 rules; page update October 21 is not an effective date. National route https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure.pdf returned garbled extraction. A December-2025 change link returned internal error without a recoverable target URL. June change document https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/Redlined-Proposed%20Amendments%20to%20Circuit%20Rules%20Jan%2026.pdf was read only as the linked change material; unrelated amendments were not made arbitration rules."],["S_AZ-P13-S019","American Arbitration Association, Consumer Arbitration Rules, amended/effective May 1, 2025. https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf. Discovery page: https://www.adr.org/rules-forms-and-fees/consumer/.","Fresh private policy, R-1, R-2 and material R-5–R-12 passages, printed pp. 6–13 / PDF 5–12; R-7 at p. 11 / PDF 10. No fee schedule or actual registry status was obtained. Policy is neither legislation nor a legal-validity determination."],["S_AZ-P13-S046","Arizona Legislature, general computation and holidays: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00243.htm; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00301.htm.","Fresh complete official § 1-243(A)–(B) and § 1-301(A)–(F). Actual emergency closures, local calendars, and full amendment history remain unverified."]]},{"headers":["Body group","Full literal direct URLs; each body read"],"index":9,"links":[{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03001.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03001.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03002.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03002.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03003.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03003.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03004.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03004.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03005.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03005.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03006.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03006.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03007.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03007.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03008.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03008.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03009.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03009.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03011.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03011.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03012.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03012.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03015.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03015.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03016.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03016.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03019.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03019.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03020.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03020.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03021.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03021.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03022.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03022.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03023.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03023.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03024.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03024.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03025.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03025.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03026.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03026.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03027.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03027.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03029.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03029.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01501.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01501.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01502.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01502.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01503.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01503.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01505.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01505.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01508.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01508.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01509.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01509.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01510.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01510.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01511.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01511.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01512.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01512.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01513.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01513.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01514.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01514.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01515.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01515.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01516.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01516.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01517.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01517.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01518.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01518.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/02101-01.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/02101-01.htm"}],"row_links":[[],[{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03001.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03001.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03002.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03002.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03003.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03003.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03004.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03004.htm"}],[{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03005.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03005.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03006.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03006.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03007.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03007.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03008.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03008.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03009.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03009.htm"}],[{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03011.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03011.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03012.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03012.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03015.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03015.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03016.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03016.htm"}],[{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03019.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03019.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03020.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03020.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03021.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03021.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03022.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03022.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03023.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03023.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03024.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03024.htm"}],[{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03025.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03025.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03026.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03026.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03027.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03027.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03029.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03029.htm"}],[{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01501.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01501.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01502.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01502.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01503.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01503.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01505.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01505.htm"}],[{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01508.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01508.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01509.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01509.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01510.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01510.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01511.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01511.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01512.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01512.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01513.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01513.htm"}],[{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01514.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01514.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01515.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01515.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01516.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01516.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01517.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01517.htm"},{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01518.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01518.htm"}],[{"href":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/02101-01.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/02101-01.htm"}]],"rows":[["Body group","Full literal direct URLs; each body read"],["Revised-act definitions, notice, application, variation","§ 12-3001: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03001.htm; § 12-3002: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03002.htm; § 12-3003: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03003.htm; § 12-3004: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03004.htm"],["Revised-act motions, agreement, stays, initiation","§ 12-3005: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03005.htm; § 12-3006: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03006.htm; § 12-3007: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03007.htm; § 12-3008: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03008.htm; § 12-3009: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03009.htm"],["Revised-act appointment, disclosure, hearing, representation","§ 12-3011: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03011.htm; § 12-3012: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03012.htm; § 12-3015: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03015.htm; § 12-3016: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03016.htm"],["Revised-act award and review","§ 12-3019: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03019.htm; § 12-3020: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03020.htm; § 12-3021: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03021.htm; § 12-3022: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03022.htm; § 12-3023: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03023.htm; § 12-3024: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03024.htm"],["Revised-act judgment, jurisdiction, venue, E-SIGN","§ 12-3025: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03025.htm; § 12-3026: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03026.htm; § 12-3027: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03027.htm; § 12-3029: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03029.htm"],["Older-act agreement, application, appointment, hearing","§ 12-1501: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01501.htm; § 12-1502: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01502.htm; § 12-1503: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01503.htm; § 12-1505: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01505.htm"],["Older-act award, expenses, confirmation, opposition, correction","§ 12-1508: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01508.htm; § 12-1509: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01509.htm; § 12-1510: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01510.htm; § 12-1511: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01511.htm; § 12-1512: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01512.htm; § 12-1513: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01513.htm"],["Older-act judgment, court applications, jurisdiction, exclusions","§ 12-1514: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01514.htm; § 12-1515: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01515.htm; § 12-1516: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01516.htm; § 12-1517: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01517.htm; § 12-1518: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01518.htm"],["State arbitration appeal categories","§ 12-2101.01: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/02101-01.htm"]]},{"headers":["Source ID; court/date","Full literal URL; material read","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits"],"index":10,"links":[{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"azcourts.gov"},{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/1%20CA-CV%2021-0283%20Duncan%20v.%20Public%20Storage%20%20Opinion%20Final.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/1%20CA-CV%2021-0283%20Duncan%20v.%20Public%20Storage%20%20Opinion%20Final.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/1%20CA-CV%2021-0283%20Duncan%20v.%20Public%20Storage%20%20Opinion%20Final.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"azcourts.gov"},{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2021/CV200058PR.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2021/CV200058PR.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2021/CV200058PR.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"azcourts.gov"},{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/CV%2021-0533%20Gray%20%20v.%20GC%20Services%20OP.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/CV%2021-0533%20Gray%20%20v.%20GC%20Services%20OP.pdf"},{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2017/1-ca-cv-16-0255.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2017/1-ca-cv-16-0255.html"},{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2012/1-ca-cv-11-0711.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2012/1-ca-cv-11-0711.html"},{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2012/1-ca-cv-11-0711.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"law.justia.com"},{"href":"https://coa1.azcourts.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=-jtnWmAZZGo%253d&portalid=1&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://coa1.azcourts.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=-jtnWmAZZGo%253d&portalid=1"},{"href":"https://coa1.azcourts.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=-jtnWmAZZGo%253d&portalid=1&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"coa1.azcourts.gov"},{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-514/pdf/USREPORTS-514-938.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-514/pdf/USREPORTS-514-938.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-561/pdf/USREPORTS-561-63.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-561/pdf/USREPORTS-561-63.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-586/pdf/USREPORTS-586-63.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-586/pdf/USREPORTS-586-63.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-328_m6ho.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-328_m6ho.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-411.pdf","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-411.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-1218_5357.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-1218_5357.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-601/pdf/USREPORTS-601-472.pdf","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-601/pdf/USREPORTS-601-472.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-105_5536.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-105_5536.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-599/pdf/USREPORTS-599-736.pdf","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-599/pdf/USREPORTS-599-736.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-49.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-49.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-1.pdf","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-1.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-624.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-624.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-581/pdf/USREPORTS-581-246.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-581/pdf/USREPORTS-581-246.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-552/pdf/USREPORTS-552-576.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-552/pdf/USREPORTS-552-576.pdf"},{"href":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf"},{"href":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-3_879d.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-3_879d.pdf"},{"href":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2020/09/09/19-16746.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2020/09/09/19-16746.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-193.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-193.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-193.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"govinfo.gov"}],"row_links":[[],[{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"azcourts.gov"}],[{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/1%20CA-CV%2021-0283%20Duncan%20v.%20Public%20Storage%20%20Opinion%20Final.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/1%20CA-CV%2021-0283%20Duncan%20v.%20Public%20Storage%20%20Opinion%20Final.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/1%20CA-CV%2021-0283%20Duncan%20v.%20Public%20Storage%20%20Opinion%20Final.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"azcourts.gov"}],[{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2021/CV200058PR.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2021/CV200058PR.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2021/CV200058PR.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"azcourts.gov"}],[{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/CV%2021-0533%20Gray%20%20v.%20GC%20Services%20OP.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/CV%2021-0533%20Gray%20%20v.%20GC%20Services%20OP.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2017/1-ca-cv-16-0255.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2017/1-ca-cv-16-0255.html"}],[{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2012/1-ca-cv-11-0711.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2012/1-ca-cv-11-0711.html"},{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2012/1-ca-cv-11-0711.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"law.justia.com"}],[{"href":"https://coa1.azcourts.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=-jtnWmAZZGo%253d&portalid=1&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://coa1.azcourts.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=-jtnWmAZZGo%253d&portalid=1"},{"href":"https://coa1.azcourts.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=-jtnWmAZZGo%253d&portalid=1&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"coa1.azcourts.gov"}],[{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-514/pdf/USREPORTS-514-938.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-514/pdf/USREPORTS-514-938.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-561/pdf/USREPORTS-561-63.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-561/pdf/USREPORTS-561-63.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-586/pdf/USREPORTS-586-63.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-586/pdf/USREPORTS-586-63.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-328_m6ho.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-328_m6ho.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-411.pdf","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-411.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-1218_5357.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-1218_5357.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-601/pdf/USREPORTS-601-472.pdf","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-601/pdf/USREPORTS-601-472.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-105_5536.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-105_5536.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-599/pdf/USREPORTS-599-736.pdf","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-599/pdf/USREPORTS-599-736.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-49.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-49.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-1.pdf","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-1.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-624.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-624.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-581/pdf/USREPORTS-581-246.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-581/pdf/USREPORTS-581-246.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-552/pdf/USREPORTS-552-576.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-552/pdf/USREPORTS-552-576.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-3_879d.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-3_879d.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2020/09/09/19-16746.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2020/09/09/19-16746.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-193.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-193.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-193.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"govinfo.gov"}]],"rows":[["Source ID; court/date","Full literal URL; material read","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits"],["S_AZ-P13-S020 — Cornell v. Desert Financial Credit Union, Arizona Supreme Court, March 2, 2023","https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf. Official opinion; ¶¶ 1–30, including ¶ 24 n.2; printed pp. 2–12 / PDF 1–11.","Certified question arising from electronic changes to deposit-account terms. Answered the modification question for ongoing at-will consumer relationships; did not itself issue an individual compulsion judgment. See C022–C023. No later-treatment certificate. \nazcourts.gov"],["S_AZ-P13-S021 — Duncan v. Public Storage, Arizona Court of Appeals, March 8, 2022","https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/1%20CA-CV%2021-0283%20Duncan%20v.%20Public%20Storage%20%20Opinion%20Final.pdf. Official published opinion; ¶¶ 1–32, printed pp. 2–10 / PDF 1–9.","Storage renters alleged fraud; denial of compulsion was vacated and remanded because separability and the clause-specific theory required proper treatment. Formation/proof discussion at ¶¶ 10–18. A later memorandum lead was not opened or used. \nazcourts.gov"],["S_AZ-P13-S022 — Rizzio v. Surpass Senior Living, Arizona Supreme Court, August 17, 2021","https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2021/CV200058PR.pdf. Official opinion; ¶¶ 1–25, especially ¶¶ 11, 16–24; printed pp. 2–10 / PDF 1–9.","Nursing-care agreement and cost barrier after a cost-shifting provision was severed. Reversed the trial disposition and remanded; specified court-of-appeals analysis was vacated. Attorney funding is relevant, not a per se answer. Specialized facts do not establish a consumer fee schedule. \nazcourts.gov"],["S_AZ-P13-S023 — Gray v. GC Services, Arizona Court of Appeals, September 1, 2022","https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/CV%2021-0533%20Gray%20%20v.%20GC%20Services%20OP.pdf. Official published opinion; material majority through disposition, especially ¶¶ 10–12.","Employment dispute, not a consumer collection holding. Merits dismissal without resolving the arbitration request was vacated/remanded. Its brief Morgan reference is bounded; older stay-or-dismiss language is not used against later Smith."],["S_AZ-P13-S024 — Security Alarm Financing Enterprises v. Fuller, Arizona Court of Appeals, July 6, 2017","https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2017/1-ca-cv-16-0255.html. Published majority reproduced by Justia; ¶¶ 1–21 read. Official image not recovered.","Former-employee dispute; ordinary appellate jurisdiction was unavailable under the state arbitration appeal provision in that FAA-only posture, but special-action jurisdiction was accepted. Relief granted. Its prejudice-based waiver discussion is historical after Morgan."],["S_AZ-P13-S025 — Sun Valley Ranch 308 LP v. Robson, Arizona Court of Appeals, November 20, 2012","https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2012/1-ca-cv-11-0711.html. Published majority reproduced by Justia; ¶¶ 1–10, 32–41 and relevant intervening passages read; other commercial-remedy discussion only partially read.","Partnership/construction dispute. Denial of arbitration vacated and remanded; contract-dependent claims and plaintiffs’ alter-ego allegations supported specified nonsignatory enforcement. Parties agreed the revised act applied. Not an ordinary debt-purchase rule. \nlaw.justia.com"],["S_AZ-P13-S026 — Juergensmeyer v. Hickman’s, Arizona Court of Appeals, August 18, 2026","https://coa1.azcourts.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=-jtnWmAZZGo%253d&portalid=1. Official published opinion; ¶¶ 1–39, printed pp. 2–10 / PDF 1–9.","Prison-work injury disputes; special-action jurisdiction accepted and compulsion ordered on remand after rejecting procedural unconscionability on the actual record. ¶¶ 15–17 support the narrow procedural point; ¶¶ 19–39 concern the specialized bargaining facts. \ncoa1.azcourts.gov"],["S_AZ-P13-S027 — First Options of Chicago v. Kaplan, U.S. Supreme Court, May 22, 1995","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-514/pdf/USREPORTS-514-938.pdf. Official U.S. Reports; majority pp. 940–949 / PDF 2–11.","Workout dispute involving company and individual signatory differences. Clear-and-unmistakable delegation standard and independent judicial review explained; judgment affirmed. The ultimate individual arbitrability merits were outside the granted question."],["S_AZ-P13-S028 — Rent-A-Center, West v. Jackson, U.S. Supreme Court, June 21, 2010","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-561/pdf/USREPORTS-561-63.pdf. Official majority pp. 65–76 / PDF 2–13.","Employment unconscionability challenge insufficiently targeted the delegation provision. Ninth Circuit reversed. Formation distinguished at p. 70 n.2. Five-Justice majority; dissent not used. Its older dismissal posture is not current requested-stay authority."],["S_AZ-P13-S029 — Henry Schein v. Archer & White, U.S. Supreme Court, January 8, 2019","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-586/pdf/USREPORTS-586-63.pdf. Official majority pp. 65–72 / PDF 2–9.","Commercial antitrust dispute with an injunction carve-out. Rejected the wholly-groundless exception; vacated/remanded without deciding actual delegation. Unanimous opinion."],["S_AZ-P13-S030 — Morgan v. Sundance, U.S. Supreme Court, May 23, 2022","https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-328_m6ho.pdf. Official slip majority pp. 1–7 / PDF 2–8. Failed bound-volume route: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-411.pdf was inaccessible.","Employment litigation preceded arbitration demand. Rejected arbitration-specific prejudice; vacated/remanded without deciding ultimate waiver. Unanimous majority. Official alternate recovered the operative body."],["S_AZ-P13-S031 — Smith v. Spizzirri, U.S. Supreme Court, May 16, 2024","https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-1218_5357.pdf. Official slip majority pp. 1–6 / PDF 2–7. Failed route: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-601/pdf/USREPORTS-601-472.pdf inaccessible.","Removed Arizona employment case; all claims arbitrable and stay requested. Mandatory § 3 stay; reversed/remanded. Unanimous. Independent jurisdictional dismissal remains distinct."],["S_AZ-P13-S032 — Coinbase v. Bielski, U.S. Supreme Court, June 23, 2023","https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-105_5536.pdf. Official majority slip pp. 1–10 / PDF 3–12. Failed route: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-599/pdf/USREPORTS-599-736.pdf inaccessible.","Federal consumer litigation and appeal from denial of compulsion. Required district pretrial/trial stay; reversed/remanded. Five-Justice majority; dissent not relied on. Collateral matters and frivolous-appeal controls remain bounded."],["S_AZ-P13-S033 — Vaden v. Discover Bank, U.S. Supreme Court, March 9, 2009","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-49.pdf. Official majority material pp. 52–72 / PDF 3–23.","Consumer-account controversy with a federal counterclaim. § 4 look-through did not supply jurisdiction from that counterclaim; reversed. Majority and partial dissent separated. State-procedure reservation at p. 71 n.20."],["S_AZ-P13-S034 — Badgerow v. Walters, U.S. Supreme Court, March 31, 2022","https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf. Official majority slip pp. 1–16 / PDF 3–18. Failed route: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-1.pdf inaccessible.","Employment award challenge removed to federal court. No § 4 look-through for §§ 9–10; reversed/remanded. Eight-Justice majority; dissent not relied on. No determination of award merits."],["S_AZ-P13-S035 — Arthur Andersen LLP v. Carlisle, U.S. Supreme Court, May 4, 2009","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-624.pdf. Official majority pp. 625–632 / PDF 1–8.","Nonsignatory advisers sought a stay. State-law enforcement theories can support FAA relief; appellate jurisdiction did not require proving merits first. Reversed/remanded; actual estoppel merits left open."],["S_AZ-P13-S036 — Kindred Nursing Centers v. Clark, U.S. Supreme Court, May 15, 2017","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-581/pdf/USREPORTS-581-246.pdf. Official majority pp. 248–257 / PDF 2–11.","Nursing agreements signed under powers of attorney. Arbitration-specific special-authority rule preempted; one disposition reversed and the other vacated/remanded for ordinary authority analysis. Majority separated from dissent; one Justice did not participate."],["S_AZ-P13-S037 — Hall Street Associates v. Mattel, U.S. Supreme Court, March 25, 2008","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-552/pdf/USREPORTS-552-576.pdf. Official relevant majority pp. 578–592 / PDF 2–16.","Commercial lease parties contracted for expanded legal-error review. FAA expedited review grounds could not be enlarged that way; vacated/remanded with other possible routes left open. Separate writings not used."],["S_AZ-P13-S038 — Armstrong v. Michaels Stores, Ninth Circuit, February 13, 2023","https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf. Official published majority, printed pp. 4–10 / PDF 3–9; 59 F.4th 1011.","Employment case applying Morgan. Reservations, limited discovery, and lack of a merits-ruling request supported no waiver; compulsion affirmed. Its record is not a numerical safe harbor."],["S_AZ-P13-S039 — Move, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Ninth Circuit, November 4, 2016","https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf. Official published majority, printed pp. 3–14 / PDF 2–13; 840 F.3d 1152.","FINRA award tainted by an arbitrator’s fabricated qualifications. § 12 equitable tolling recognized; specified relief ordered on remand. Substantive tolling objections were partly waived; unique fraud and prejudice facts limit generalization."],["S_AZ-P13-S040 — Coinbase v. Suski, U.S. Supreme Court, May 23, 2024","https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-3_879d.pdf. Official majority slip pp. 1–8 / PDF 2–9.","Earlier platform delegation and later sweepstakes court clause conflicted. Court decides which agreement governs; affirmed. Unanimous majority; separate concurrence not relied on. State-law supersession merits were not decided."],["S_AZ-P13-S041 — Shivkov v. Artex Risk Solutions, Ninth Circuit, September 9, 2020","https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2020/09/09/19-16746.pdf. Official published majority; material pp. 7–10, 14–20, 33–35 / PDF 6–9, 13–19, 32–34; 974 F.3d 1051.","Arizona-law commercial captive-insurance agreements. Relevant survival and nonsignatory-estoppel analysis read; compulsion affirmed. Class-arbitration discussion not comprehensively read or used. Older dismissal disposition does not override Smith."],["S_AZ-P13-S042 — Cortez Byrd Chips v. Bill Harbert Construction, U.S. Supreme Court, March 21, 2000","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-193.pdf. Official majority pp. 195–204 / PDF 2–11.","Construction dispute with competing confirmation/vacatur filings. FAA §§ 9–11 venue provisions permissive; reversed/remanded. Unanimous. This is not a holding on § 9’s one-year limitation question. \ngovinfo.gov"]]},{"headers":["Source ID","Route and actual read status","Disposition"],"index":11,"links":[{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-563/pdf/USREPORTS-563-333.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-563/pdf/USREPORTS-563-333.pdf"},{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2017/CV-16-0260-PR%20Opinion.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2017/CV-16-0260-PR%20Opinion.pdf"},{"href":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/02/28/24-1645.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/02/28/24-1645.pdf"}],"row_links":[[],[{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-563/pdf/USREPORTS-563-333.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-563/pdf/USREPORTS-563-333.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2017/CV-16-0260-PR%20Opinion.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2017/CV-16-0260-PR%20Opinion.pdf"}],[{"href":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/02/28/24-1645.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/02/28/24-1645.pdf"}]],"rows":[["Source ID","Route and actual read status","Disposition"],["S_AZ-P13-S043","AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-563/pdf/USREPORTS-563-333.pdf. Syllabus/caption material only.","Not relied on as a freshly read holding. References to it inside other opinions do not convert it into a full body read."],["S_AZ-P13-S044","Hamblen v. Hatch: https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2017/CV-16-0260-PR%20Opinion.pdf. Caption and initial material only.","Not relied on. Its appearance in Duncan is not a separate fresh underlying-authority read."],["S_AZ-P13-S045","Jones v. Starz: https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/02/28/24-1645.pdf. Partial facts and § 4 discussion; full majority/disposition not completed.","Not relied on. No mass-arbitration fee, consolidation, or refusal-to-arbitrate holding is asserted from this partial read."]]},{"headers":["Currentness item","Established position","Exact remaining limit"],"index":12,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Currentness item","Established position","Exact remaining limit"],["T01 — Arizona compilation","Current displayed Title 12 bodies and 2025/2026 section-affected indexes were read.","No exhaustive amendment search beyond the described index/compilation scope."],["T02 — 2010 transition","Current § 12-3003 states January 1, 2011 application rules; reproduced HB 2430 §§ 5–6 supply the historical savings/effect text.","Official final session-law image and a dispositive historical accrued-right construction remain held."],["T03 — FAA currency","OLRC bodies display currency through PL 119-124, October 15, 2026; the 2022 enacted amendment was read.","Access on October 27 does not independently certify all enactments between the displayed currency date and access."],["T04 — Electronic-law interaction","Arizona UETA and material E-SIGN provisions were read.","E-SIGN § 7002 body failed on both recorded routes; full state-preemption reconciliation remains unresolved."],["T05 — Arizona court rules","Official 2014, 2016, 2017, and 2019 orders establish their own historical changes.","Current official Rule 6 and ARCAP 5/9 bodies were not fully recovered; no complete 2026 chain is certified."],["T06 — Federal court rules","December 2025 FRCP and June 2026 Ninth Circuit handbook supplied the material rules; adoption clauses were examined.","Unread local procedures, future amendments, and actual filing-system conditions remain held."],["T07 — Opinions","Twenty-three responsive published majority sources support the bounded holdings stated. The August 2026 Arizona opinion was freshly read.","No full citator, mandate, rehearing, petition, or live-status verification."],["T08 — Institutional policy","AAA’s May 1, 2025 consumer rules were read in the specified portions.","Actual incorporation, applicable version, administrator acceptance, fees, waivers, and private contract facts remain unknown."]]},{"headers":["Row","Requested issue","Status; claims","Exact remaining evidence or next action"],"index":13,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Row","Requested issue","Status; claims","Exact remaining evidence or next action"],["G001","Fresh access and baseline distinction","Answered; C001, C105","Retain October 27 access and unknown individual opening seconds; do not relabel October 22 as fresh."],["G002","Distinct Arizona arbitration families","Answered; C002–C005","Apply only after agreement/category facts are known."],["G003","2010 savings and accrued-right transition","Partial; C004","Recover official final chapter image and responsive construction for disputed pre-2011 rights."],["G004","Material later Arizona amendments","Partial; C001","Extend beyond the bounded tables/compilation if a later enactment issue is presented."],["G005","Revised-act listed exclusions","Answered; C003","Establish actual institutional and transaction predicates before classification."],["G006","Older-act employment exclusion and court definition","Answered; C005","Do not transfer superior-court definition to every other regime."],["G007","FAA writing and commerce predicates","Answered; C006","Actual writing and commerce evidence remain necessary."],["G008","FAA transportation-worker exclusion","Partial; C007","Full worker-class construction and actual employment facts deferred."],["G009","2022 special-federal exclusion and application date","Partial; C007","Underlying special-claim definitions and actual triggering facts remain outside this ordinary-debt model."],["G010","State versus federal subject-matter jurisdiction","Answered; C008, C012","No actual jurisdictional finding."],["G011","§ 4 look-through","Answered; C009","Identify the actual underlying well-pleaded controversy."],["G012","Award-stage no-look-through distinction","Answered; C010","Establish an independent award-application jurisdictional basis."],["G013","Initial forum, venue, and § 4 geographic restriction","Partial; C011, C039","Actual clause, court competence, and forum facts absent; no general venue dossier."],["G014","Agreement existence and authentic version","Partial; C019–C021","Actual complete agreement, version, delivery, and assent evidence absent."],["G015","Capacity and agency authority","Partial; C018, C020","Ordinary authority instrument and capacity facts absent."],["G016","Consideration","Partial; C020","Actual bargain and applicable contract-law facts absent."],["G017","Electronic record/signature legal effect","Answered; C013–C014","Electronic form alone neither validates nor defeats agreement."],["G018","Electronic delivery, receipt, and notice","Partial; C015–C016","Actual designated system, retainability, transmission content, and consent absent."],["G019","E-SIGN § 7002 interaction","Unresolved; C016","Recover current official § 7002 body through a permitted public source; no bypass."],["G020","Modification, opt-out, and termination reservation","Partial; C022–C023","Establish at-will character, actual notices, rejection, and burden; fixed-term branch needs separate authority."],["G021","Survival and clause scope","Partial; C024, C034","Actual termination/survival language and dispute connection absent."],["G022","Formation versus whole-contract/clause validity","Answered; C020, C024, C026","Apply the distinction to the actual challenge’s target."],["G023","Clear delegation and conflicting later contracts","Answered; C025–C028","No delegation presumed from a label."],["G024","Institutional-rule incorporation as delegation","Partial; C029–C030","Actual incorporation/access and responsive consumer-specific application remain necessary."],["G025","Private administrative suspension versus court stay","Answered; C031","No actual policy request or court order exists."],["G026","Nonsignatory enforcement principles","Answered; C035–C037","Recognized theory must fit actual parties and claims."],["G027","Assignee/debt-buyer transfer of this enforcement right","Partial; C038","Directly responsive Arizona consumer assignment authority and actual chain/account inclusion remain missing."],["G028","National-bank agreement later transferred to nonbank","Unresolved; C003, C038","Need authoritative treatment of this precise statutory/assignment branch and the actual agreement."],["G029","Servicer/affiliate authority","Partial; C038","Need actual authority and enforcement theory; label insufficient."],["G030","Underlying debt validity and amount","Excluded; C094, C098","Separate merits/evidence pass; unreviewed P10 is not a premise."],["G031","Cost-barrier defense","Partial; C032","Applicable fee schedule, relief mechanisms, and individualized evidence absent."],["G032","Neutral contract defenses and arbitration-specific discrimination","Answered; C018, C033","Actual ordinary defense remains fact-dependent."],["G033","Revised-act motion route and opposed determination","Answered; C039–C040","Actual motion and jurisdiction absent."],["G034","Older-act application route","Answered; C041","Apply its particular confirmation exception separately."],["G035","FAA § 4 notice, hearing, and disputed-formation trial","Answered; C042","Actual genuine dispute, service, and timely jury demand absent."],["G036","Exact valid service in a particular proceeding","Unresolved; C039, C041, C055, C089","Current initial-service body, actual forum, residency, method, and proof not supplied."],["G037","Appointment and neutral disclosure gateway","Answered; C043, C064","Actual agreed method and conflict facts absent."],["G038","Federal litigation-conduct waiver after Morgan","Answered; C048–C049","No fixed waiver period; actual totality required."],["G039","Comprehensive Arizona follow-on waiver rule","Partial; C050","Gray is limited; obtain directly responsive current Arizona treatment for the precise state-law posture."],["G040","Arizona judicial-action stays","Answered; C044, C046","Identify applicable act and covered claims."],["G041","Whether arbitration itself continues during court challenge","Answered; C045","Actual court order can change the default."],["G042","Requested federal stay after Smith","Answered; C047","§ 3 predicates and request must be established."],["G043","FAA § 16 appeal categories/finality","Answered; C051","Actual order classification and appeal jurisdiction remain unknown."],["G044","Arizona statutory appeals and FAA-only special-action distinction","Answered; C052–C053","Exact procedural implementation and actual court posture remain separate."],["G045","Covered federal appeal stay after Bielski","Answered; C054, C058","No transfer to every state appeal or collateral matter."],["G046","Current Arizona appellate timing and special-action procedure","Unresolved; C053, C060","Recover current ARCAP and special-action bodies/adoption chain."],["G047","Current Arizona Rule 6 authentication","Partial; C059","Historical official orders and nonofficial reproduction recovered; complete current official chain remains missing."],["G048","Federal computation and appeal timing framework","Answered; C056–C058","Actual entry, motion, court zone, and filing conditions absent."],["G049","Arbitration initiation notice and participation objection","Partial; C062","Actual contract method, initiation record, receipt, and objection timing absent."],["G050","Hearing fairness, nonappearance, and representation","Partial; C063–C064","Full institutional procedure and actual hearing record not investigated."],["G051","Award form, making, delivery, notice, and lateness objection","Answered; C065–C066","Actual dates and documents absent."],["G052","Arbitrator correction versus court correction","Answered; C067–C068","Keep each trigger and potentially variable procedure separate."],["G053","Revised-act confirmation","Answered; C069","No inference of an unlimited time from one section’s silence."],["G054","Revised-act vacatur grounds","Answered; C070–C074","Actual proof and statutory prejudice predicates absent."],["G055","Revised-act ninety-day and discovery triggers","Answered; C075–C076","Actual receipt and reasonable discovery facts absent."],["G056","Revised-act modification/correction","Answered; C077","Actual defect must fit the listed categories."],["G057","Older-act confirmation and twenty-day service trigger","Answered; C081","Actual valid complaint-style service absent."],["G058","Older-act opposition and absence of a stated ninety-day vacatur period","Partial; C082","Responsive construction of outside timing/postjudgment consequences remains needed."],["G059","Older-act correction and Rule 60 cross-reference","Partial; C083","Current rule-number reconciliation and actual judgment posture missing."],["G060","FAA confirmation, one-year text, and late application","Partial; C085","Controlling treatment of an application beyond one year remains held."],["G061","FAA vacatur/modification and limited review","Answered; C086–C087, C092","No general merits appeal or expanded contractual legal-error review."],["G062","FAA notice service, filed/delivered trigger, equitable tolling","Partial; C088–C089, C093","Actual trigger/service and a qualifying tolling record absent; no state discovery-rule substitution."],["G063","Review motion versus enforcement stay","Partial; C090, C095","Actual stay order, scope, and current state implementation absent."],["G064","Award, judgment, fees, and actual cash distinction","Answered; C079–C080, C084, C091, C104","No actual fee entitlement, enforcement permission, or payment finding."],["G065","Published opinions and later treatment","Partial; C105; S020–S042","Full citator and subsequent-history investigation not performed."],["G066","Unpublished-opinion use","Excluded; C105","No unpublished decision relied on; current citation rule would be required before such use."],["G067","Partial candidate opinions versus actual holding reads","Partial; C105; S043–S045","Finish the majority bodies only if a distinct unresolved proposition makes them necessary."],["G068","County/local rules, Justice Court/Small Claims competence, generic forms","Unresolved; C039, C053, C060","No local practice or court-specific form validation; current competent-court and local-rule bodies needed."],["G069","Other-state choice of law and interstate territorial facts","Unresolved; C006, C012, C038","Actual choice clause, forum, commerce, and conflict-law authority absent."],["G070","Tribal law and jurisdiction","Excluded; C096","Separate tribal agreement, jurisdiction, and enforcement investigation required."],["G071","Foreign seat and convention regimes","Excluded; C096","FAA chapters 2–3 and actual international predicates not investigated."],["G072","Military-specific arbitration restrictions","Excluded; C007, C096","Applicable military statute/regulation and actual covered status require a separate pass."],["G073","Full employment arbitration regime","Excluded; C003, C005, C007","Employment cases used only for responsive general procedural holdings."],["G074","Insurance-specific arbitration law","Excluded; C003","Older-act routing identified; full insurance/federal interaction deferred."],["G075","Securities/SRO arbitration regime","Excluded; C003, C093","Classification boundary and Move holding do not establish full FINRA/SRO procedure."],["G076","Secured-debt, mortgage, foreclosure, and repossession arbitration","Excluded; C096","Separate sector and collateral rules required."],["G077","Bankruptcy stay, discharge, and arbitration interaction","Excluded; C096","No bankruptcy jurisdiction, stay, core/noncore, or discharge determination."],["G078","Federal administrative arbitration","Excluded; C086","FAA § 10(c) boundary noted; referenced administrative regime not researched."],["G079","Broader remedies, contract damages, and full surety/fee litigation","Excluded; C080, C094","Only award-gateway distinctions supplied; no damages or fee recovery determination."],["G080","Provider access/fees, CSO, licensing, and collection communications","Excluded; C096","Separate earlier scopes remain unreviewed or separately reviewed as supplied; no incorporation here."],["G081","General service/default, limitations, judgment duration/renewal","Excluded; C095–C096","No unreviewed prior clock or conclusion imported."],["G082","Wage, bank, homestead, and other enforcement/property regimes","Excluded; C091, C094–C096","Award/judgment distinction does not authorize levy or establish exemptions."],["G083","Administrator fee/access schedule and incorporated policy version","Partial; C030–C032, C080","Exact applicable dated schedule, waiver provisions, and contract incorporation absent; unknown fee is not zero."],["G084","M01 electronic-assent/delegation alternatives","Answered; C097","Conditional model complete; actual record remains absent."],["G085","M02 assignment/servicer alternatives and money separation","Answered; C098","Conditional model complete; no ownership finding."],["G086","M03 litigation/stay/appeal sequence","Answered; C099","Conditional model complete; no real deadline or waiver outcome."],["G087","M04 award/calendar/cash alternatives","Answered; C100–C104","Conditional model complete; exact forum, actual service, and current-rule holds preserved."],["G088","Sixteen additional actor/channel/stage postures","Answered; C013–C095","Each is conditional; none is an actual eligibility or collection decision."]]},{"headers":["Foundation item","Supplied provenance/status","Narrow PASS-13 contribution","What remains unchanged"],"index":14,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Foundation item","Supplied provenance/status","Narrow PASS-13 contribution","What remains unchanged"],["X01 — Reviewed P01 broad remainder","User reports the same coordinator’s reviewed statement: “Full agreements/funds/bonds/remedies and all other state categories stay open.”","Supplies the arbitration agreement, enforcement, and award gateway investigated here.","No invented exact P01 arbitration row; no rewriting of the original review or acceptance status."],["X02 — Authorized parent litigation requirement","Parent expressly includes “Service/venue/answer deadlines, court-specific rules, default/vacatur, evidence/standing, arbitration, judgment interest/duration/renewal, satisfaction and lien release.”","Narrows to arbitration, with only necessary court and award distinctions.","Other listed dimensions remain separate; parent/state acceptance is not supplied."],["X03 — P02","Separate provider-renewal review.","No substantive reliance.","Provider renewal is neither arbitration procedure nor judgment renewal."],["X04 — P03–P12","User describes these as saved UNREVIEWED for this purpose.","No legal, factual, clock, fee, title, contract, or merits conclusion imported.","Their raw provenance and unreviewed status remain as supplied."]]},{"headers":["Item","Count or result"],"index":15,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Item","Count or result"],["Unique source families","46, S_AZ-P13-S001–S046"],["Responsive published-majority sources used","23, S020–S042"],["Partially read candidate opinions not used as holdings","3, S043–S045"],["Other source families","20, comprising statutes, enactments, indexes, rules, failed/current-rule routes, and private policy"],["Atomic claims","105, C001–C105"],["Granular coverage rows","88, G001–G088"],["Coverage status reconciliation","40 Answered + 27 Partial + 6 Unresolved + 15 Excluded = 88"],["Counted evidence-hold rows","33, the 27 Partial plus 6 Unresolved rows; no duplicate summary holds added"],["Worked models","4, M01–M04"],["Additional fictional postures","16, P01–P16"],["Currentness-register rows","8, T01–T08; not additional substantive coverage"],["Contribution-crosswalk rows","4, X01–X04; not accepted coverage"],["S001 operative URL map","39 section URLs grouped under one statutory source family; not 39 independent authorities"]]}],"claims":[{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C001","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C001","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"The Arizona legislative compilation identifies the 57th Legislature’s second regular session as its update basis. The 2025 and 2026 tables of sections affected were also examined for the targeted arbitration sections. This establishes the displayed compilation and a bounded amendment screen, not exhaustive subsequent-law clearance.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001 compilation notice; S003 Title 12 entries; S004 Title 12 entries.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; later-law completeness remains held."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C001","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C001","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1,3,4],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C002","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C002","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Subject to its exclusions, § 12-3003(A) covers agreements made on or after January 1, 2011; permits recorded agreement to its application to older agreements; and states that on or after January 1, 2011 it governs agreements whenever made. The historical savings clause must also be considered.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-3003(A)(1)–(3); S002, § 5.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; do not resolve an accrued pre-2011 right from the compilation heading alone."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C002","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C002","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1,2],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C003","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C003","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"The revised act excludes employer–employee agreements, insurance-contract arbitration, specified national-bank/federal-savings-association customer agreements, and specified self-regulatory-organization arbitration. Subsection C sends the latter three categories—not the employment category—to the older Arizona act.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-3003(B)(1)–(4), (C).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; actual institutional identity, relationship, and agreement must be established."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C003","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C003","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C004","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C004","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"The recovered HB 2430 text preserves proceedings commenced and rights accrued before January 1, 2011, and makes the new chapter effective after December 31, 2010. The official final chapter image was not recovered; the reproduction’s historical authentication limit remains material.","Authority and pinpoint":"S002, §§ 5–6; current S001, § 12-3003.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D/G; obtain the official enacted chapter and responsive transition construction before deciding a disputed historical application."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C004","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C004","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1,2],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C005","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C005","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"The older act also excludes employer–employee arbitration. For that act, “court” means Arizona superior courts; ordinary civil venue governs, with subsequent applications ordinarily remaining in the initial court.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, §§ 12-1516–1517.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; this does not establish the court competent under every revised-act or federal proceeding."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C005","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C005","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C006","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C006","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"FAA § 2 addresses written arbitration provisions in maritime transactions or contracts evidencing transactions involving commerce, and written submission agreements. Its text is not limited to consumer debt. Ordinary contract-revocation defenses remain available, subject to federal equal-treatment principles and chapter 4.","Authority and pinpoint":"S006, §§ 1–2; S036, pp. 248–257.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D/H; interstate-commerce facts and the agreement remain necessary."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C006","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C006","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[6,36],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C007","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C007","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"FAA § 1 excludes the stated transportation-worker employment classes. Separately, the 2022 Act allows the specified election against predispute arbitration in qualifying sexual-assault/harassment cases and assigns its applicability question to a court despite delegation. Its application clause concerns disputes or claims arising or accruing on or after enactment.","Authority and pinpoint":"S006, §§ 1, 401; S007, § 2 adding § 402, and § 3.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; enacted March 3, 2022. Full employment, military, and special-claim regimes are deferred."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C007","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C007","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[6,7],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C008","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C008","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"The FAA does not independently confer federal subject-matter jurisdiction. A federal applicant needs an applicable jurisdictional basis, such as the requirements of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 or 1332. A small consumer balance and an FAA citation do not supply that basis.","Authority and pinpoint":"S009, §§ 1331–1332; S033, pp. 59–62; S034, slip pp. 4–8.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D/H; citizenship, amount, federal question, and the application’s nature are unknown."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C008","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C008","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[9,33,34],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C009","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C009","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"For a § 4 petition, Vaden permits looking through to the underlying controversy. Federal jurisdiction cannot be manufactured from a federal defense or counterclaim when the well-pleaded underlying action lacks a federal basis.","Authority and pinpoint":"S033, pp. 62–72; S006, § 4.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; § 4’s particular language matters."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C009","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C009","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[6,33],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C010","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C010","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Badgerow rejects importing § 4’s look-through method into §§ 9 and 10 applications. The award application needs an independent jurisdictional foundation. An underlying federal claim alone is insufficient under that method.","Authority and pinpoint":"S034, slip pp. 4–16.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; the decision does not resolve every jurisdictional question under other FAA sections."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C010","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C010","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[34],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":["S_AZ-P13-V001"],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C011","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C011","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Section 4 contains a district-related arbitration-hearing restriction. By contrast, Cortez Byrd Chips holds the venue provisions of §§ 9–11 permissive rather than exclusively confined to the award district. Venue and subject-matter jurisdiction remain separate.","Authority and pinpoint":"S006, § 4; S042, pp. 195–204.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D/H; the actual forum agreement and independently proper venue remain unknown."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C011","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C011","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[6,42],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C012","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C012","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"FAA substantive enforceability does not justify silently substituting all federal motion, service, appeal, or award procedures for Arizona procedures in state court. The Supreme Court opinions read expressly leave aspects of state-court procedural application undecided.","Authority and pinpoint":"S033, p. 71 n.20; S034, slip p. 5 n.2; S001 state procedures.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H/I; identify the actual court, governing agreement, and applicable state procedural statute."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C012","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C012","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1,33,34],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C013","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C013","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Arizona’s electronic-transactions law applies only within its statutory scope and where parties agreed to conduct the transaction electronically, assessed from context and conduct. It does not force a person to transact electronically.","Authority and pinpoint":"S005, §§ 44-7003, 44-7005(A)–(C).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; statutory exclusions and actual consent remain relevant."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C013","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C013","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[5],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C014","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C014","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Electronic form alone does not invalidate an otherwise qualifying record or signature. Attribution depends on the person’s act and surrounding evidence; required written information must be retainable where § 44-7008 applies.","Authority and pinpoint":"S005, §§ 44-7007–7009.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; no universal paper-signature requirement, and no universal checkbox-sufficiency rule."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C014","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C014","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[5],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C015","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C015","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Arizona’s electronic sending/receipt rules depend on designated systems, accessibility, and processability. Human awareness is not invariably required, and an acknowledgment does not itself establish that transmitted content was identical.","Authority and pinpoint":"S005, § 44-7015(A)–(F).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; delivery, content, assent, and notice adequacy remain separate factual questions."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C015","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C015","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[5],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C016","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C016","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"E-SIGN’s consumer provisions impose consent and access-related conditions when legally required written information is supplied electronically. Section 7001(c)(3) limits one asserted invalidity consequence; it does not excuse every delivery defect. The § 7002 state-law interaction body was not recovered.","Authority and pinpoint":"S008, § 7001(a)–(d)(2), especially (c)(1)–(3); § 7006 definitions.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D/G; § 7002 preemption reconciliation remains held."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C016","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C016","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[8],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C017","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C017","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"The revised act permits some variation by agreement but makes specified provisions nonwaivable, including important court-motion and award-review provisions. Its actual lists must be checked rather than assuming every contractual procedural alteration is effective.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-3004(A)–(C).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; actual clause and federal interaction unknown."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C017","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C017","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C018","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C018","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Generally applicable authority and contract defenses survive. An arbitration-specific rule demanding special authorization because arbitration waives court adjudication is impermissible under Kindred Nursing. That holding does not create agency authority that ordinary law otherwise withholds.","Authority and pinpoint":"S036, pp. 248–257; S006, § 2.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; actual capacity, agency instrument, and ordinary authority remain factual/legal predicates."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C018","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C018","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[6,36],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C019","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C019","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"In the Arizona motion posture addressed by Duncan, the proponent must demonstrate an arbitration agreement; material factual disputes require resolution rather than acceptance of unsupported assertions. The challenger bears the burden of a generally applicable contract defense.","Authority and pinpoint":"S021, ¶¶ 10–18.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; actual evidence and the precise disputed issue are absent."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C019","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C019","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[21],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C020","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C020","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Consent, consideration, capacity, fraud, duress, and related ordinary contract issues can matter. A court must distinguish whether any agreement was formed from whether an admittedly formed contract is unenforceable.","Authority and pinpoint":"S021, ¶¶ 12–18; S001, § 12-3006; S028, p. 70 n.2.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H/D; no presumption that every account document proves these elements."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C020","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C020","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1,21,28],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C021","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C021","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"A proponent relying on an electronic clause must connect the asserted version and assent evidence to the relevant person and transaction. A statement, collection notice, or later website copy does not, without more, prove assent to that version.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-3006(A); S005, §§ 44-7002, 44-7009; S021, ¶ 18.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"I; a proof requirement inferred from formation and attribution rules, not a prescribed universal document checklist."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C021","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C021","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1,5,21],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C022","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C022","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Cornell permits modification of standardized terms in an ongoing, at-will consumer relationship when the initial terms reserve change authority, reasonable modification/rejection notice is received, the consumer can preserve the status quo by rejecting, and the relationship continues beyond a reasonable rejection period.","Authority and pinpoint":"S020, ¶¶ 2, 24, 28–30.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; not a holding that every fixed-term loan can be changed by silence."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C022","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C022","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[20],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C023","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C023","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Cornell also preserves good faith, negotiated terms, and ordinary defenses. Its footnote recognizes a separately reserved termination power subject to limits against unreasonable cost, value loss, or personal burden. Its facts do not establish a universal opt-out duration.","Authority and pinpoint":"S020, ¶¶ 24 n.2, 27–29.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; actual reservation, notice, rejection, and burden evidence required."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C023","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C023","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[20],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C024","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C024","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"The revised act’s baseline assigns agreement existence and covered-controversy questions to the court, and conditions precedent and whole-contract enforceability to the arbitrator. Valid delegation and controlling federal law require separate analysis.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-3006(B)–(C); § 12-3004.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; do not treat statutory baseline allocation as resolving an unseen delegation clause."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C024","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C024","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C025","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C025","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"First Options requires clear and unmistakable evidence before treating arbitrability as delegated. Objecting before arbitrators does not itself demonstrate consent to let them conclusively decide their authority.","Authority and pinpoint":"S027, pp. 943–947.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; actual delegation and conduct must be established."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C025","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C025","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[27],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C026","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C026","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Under Rent-A-Center, a challenge directed only to the broader arbitration agreement did not defeat a separately enforceable delegation provision. Formation is analytically distinct; an effective challenge to delegation must actually target that provision.","Authority and pinpoint":"S028, pp. 68–76, especially p. 70 n.2 and pp. 72–75.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; the decision does not presume formation from a disputed signature or version."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C026","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C026","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[28],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C027","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C027","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"With a valid delegation, a court cannot retain a delegated issue merely because the arbitration demand appears wholly groundless. Henry Schein did not itself decide whether the particular contract clearly delegated the dispute.","Authority and pinpoint":"S029, pp. 67–72.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; actual delegation still must be established."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C027","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C027","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[29],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C028","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C028","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"When parties contest which of two agreements controls and the later agreement provides a judicial forum, Coinbase v. Suski assigns that antecedent contract question to the court. It did not decide the ultimate state-law supersession merits.","Authority and pinpoint":"S040, slip pp. 4–8.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; requires actual competing agreements, not merely a later statement."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C028","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C028","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[40],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C029","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C029","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"AAA Consumer Rule R-7 authorizes the arbitrator to address specified jurisdictional questions. Reading that private rule does not alone establish valid incorporation or clear and unmistakable consumer assent to delegation.","Authority and pinpoint":"S019, R-7(a)–(c), p. 11; S027, pp. 943–945.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D/I; actual agreement, incorporation language, access, and applicable case law remain necessary."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C029","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C029","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[19,27],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C030","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C030","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"The AAA consumer rules read are effective May 1, 2025. R-1 supplies the policy’s consumer-relationship and version/application rules. A different contract, administrator, agreed version, or administrative classification can change the policy inquiry.","Authority and pinpoint":"S019, R-1, pp. 6–7.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D, private policy; not a statute or proof of legal enforceability."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C030","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C030","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[19],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C031","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C031","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"AAA R-2 provides a conditional administrative suspension process for judicial intervention. That process is not a court stay and does not itself extend statutory review or debt-response periods.","Authority and pinpoint":"S019, R-2, pp. 7–8; C044–C060.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D/I; no actual AAA proceeding or request was made."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C031","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C031","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[19],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C032","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C032","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"A cost-barrier challenge under Rizzio requires reasonably certain costs and an individualized inability-to-pay showing, with available relief and funding considered. An attorney’s cost-advance agreement is relevant but not categorically dispositive.","Authority and pinpoint":"S022, ¶¶ 11, 16–19, 22–24.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; no current administrator fee, waiver entitlement, or personal inability was established."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C032","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C032","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[22],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C033","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C033","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"The 2026 Juergensmeyer majority requires a fact-dependent procedural-unconscionability inquiry; unequal bargaining power alone was insufficient on its record. Its prison-employment facts do not determine an ordinary debtor’s contract.","Authority and pinpoint":"S026, ¶¶ 19–39.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; later treatment and different factual application remain held."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C033","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C033","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[26],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C034","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C034","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Shivkov enforced arbitration of claims tied to the relevant agreement despite termination arguments on that commercial record. Its reasoning does not make every later dispute arbitrable or eliminate the need to prove the clause’s scope and survival.","Authority and pinpoint":"S041, pp. 14–20.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; Arizona-law commercial case; important appellate premises were not challenged."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C034","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C034","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[41],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C035","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C035","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Arthur Andersen permits a nonsignatory to invoke FAA relief when applicable state contract law gives that actor an enforcement right. The FAA does not categorically confine enforcement to signatories, but the actual state-law theory must succeed.","Authority and pinpoint":"S035, pp. 630–632.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; the Supreme Court did not decide the particular estoppel merits."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C035","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C035","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[35],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C036","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C036","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Sun Valley Ranch applied Arizona nonsignatory theories to contract-dependent claims and the plaintiffs’ own alter-ego allegations. Its holding is not an exemption from proving a relationship and claim-specific basis for enforcement.","Authority and pinpoint":"S025, ¶¶ 32–41.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; commercial partnership context, not an ordinary debt-sale holding."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C036","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C036","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[25],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C037","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C037","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Shivkov applied Arizona alternative estoppel to claims sufficiently dependent on the agreement; it did not decide every asserted close-relationship theory.","Authority and pinpoint":"S041, pp. 33–35, n.14.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; commercial facts and the actual claims matter."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C037","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C037","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[41],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C038","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C038","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"For an assignee, debt buyer, affiliate, or servicer, the necessary inquiry includes the original agreement, identity, applicable transfer language, account inclusion, defenses, and any agency or nonsignatory theory. Assignment cannot supply assent missing at formation.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, §§ 12-3006–3007; S035, pp. 630–632; S025, ¶¶ 32–41.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"I/G; no directly dispositive Arizona unsecured-consumer debt-sale opinion or actual chain was established here."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C038","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C038","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1,25,35],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C039","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C039","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Revised-act relief is requested by motion. Initial notice generally uses summons service unless a civil action involving the agreement is pending. A pending covered claim determines the motion court; otherwise § 12-3027 supplies county venue alternatives. Jurisdiction over the controversy and parties is still required.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, §§ 12-3005, 12-3007(E), 12-3026–3027.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; exact court competence and valid service are not established."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C039","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C039","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C040","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C040","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"A revised-act movant must show an agreement and allege refusal. An opposed application requires summary determination; no enforceable agreement means no compulsion. The court may not refuse arbitration merely because the underlying claim seems meritless.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-3007(A)–(D).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; nonappearance does not remove the statutory agreement showing."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C040","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C040","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C041","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C041","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"The older act provides an application to compel upon agreement/refusal, summary determination of a substantial existence dispute, and a no-agreement route to stay arbitration. Its general court applications are motions, subject to the particular confirmation procedure.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, §§ 12-1502(A)–(C), 12-1515, 12-1511.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; initial notice generally follows summons service unless a permitted agreement provides otherwise."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C041","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C041","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C042","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C042","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"FAA § 4 requires five days’ written notice using the prescribed federal service framework. A genuine making/refusal issue goes to summary trial; the allegedly defaulting party has the stated timely jury-demand right outside admiralty.","Authority and pinpoint":"S006, § 4, second–fifth paragraphs.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; no universal “decide everything on affidavits” rule, and no actual service or jury-demand deadline is calculated."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C042","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C042","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[6],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C043","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C043","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Appointment begins with the agreed method. The FAA and both Arizona acts provide court appointment in specified failure, vacancy, or unavailable-method circumstances; the precise statute and agreement govern.","Authority and pinpoint":"S006, § 5; S001, §§ 12-1503, 12-3011.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; no finding that a named administrator or arbitrator is unavailable."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C043","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C043","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1,6],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C044","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C044","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Under the revised act, a motion to order arbitration requires a court stay, on just terms, of judicial proceedings involving the alleged covered claim pending decision. An order compelling arbitration requires a stay of the covered claim; severability can limit its reach.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-3007(F)–(G).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; concerns covered judicial proceedings, not every unrelated obligation."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C044","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C044","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C045","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C045","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"A court challenge to existence or scope does not itself halt the arbitration under the revised act: arbitration may continue unless the court orders otherwise.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-3006(D).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; distinguish a judicial-action stay from a stay of arbitration."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C045","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C045","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C046","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C046","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"The older act directs a stay of an action involving an arbitrable issue when the specified arbitration application or order has been made, with possible limitation to a severable issue.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-1502(D).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; the actual application, issue, and court order matter."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C046","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C046","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C047","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C047","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"In a federal case satisfying FAA § 3, a party’s requested stay must be granted rather than dismissal merely because the claims are arbitrable. The applicant must not be in default in proceeding with arbitration.","Authority and pinpoint":"S006, § 3; S031, slip pp. 3–6 and n.2.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D/H; an independent dismissal ground, such as lack of jurisdiction, is different."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C047","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C047","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[6,31],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C048","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C048","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Morgan rejects an arbitration-specific prejudice requirement for litigation-conduct waiver. It remanded rather than deciding ultimate waiver or every choice between state and federal waiver frameworks.","Authority and pinpoint":"S030, slip pp. 4–7.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; no fixed number of days, motions, or discovery requests constitutes the rule."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C048","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C048","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[30],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C049","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C049","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"The Ninth Circuit’s post-Morgan test examines knowledge of the arbitration right and intentional acts inconsistent with it, considering the circumstances without the former special heavy burden or prejudice element.","Authority and pinpoint":"S038, pp. 6–10.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; Armstrong found no waiver on its particular record."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C049","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C049","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[38],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C050","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C050","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Fuller’s older federal prejudice formulation cannot be used unchanged after Morgan and Armstrong. Gray notes Morgan but does not supply a comprehensive Arizona rule for every state-law waiver dispute.","Authority and pinpoint":"S024, ¶¶ 10–17; S023, ¶ 12; S030; S038.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H/G; a comprehensive current Arizona-specific waiver formulation remains unestablished."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C050","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C050","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[23,24,30,38],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C051","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C051","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"FAA § 16 permits the listed appeals from denials of stays/compulsion, specified award orders, anti-arbitration injunctions, and final decisions. It generally bars the listed interlocutory appeals allowing arbitration, subject to § 1292(b).","Authority and pinpoint":"S006, § 16(a)–(b); S009, § 1292(b).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; actual finality, certification, and jurisdiction must be established."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C051","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C051","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[6,9],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C052","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C052","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Arizona § 12-2101.01 lists denial of compulsion, grant of a stay of arbitration, denial of confirmation, modification/correction, vacatur without rehearing, and qualifying judgments/decrees. It does not list an ordinary interlocutory grant of compulsion.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-2101.01(A)–(B).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; confirmation judgments fall under the judgment category; do not rewrite item (3) as both granting and denying confirmation."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C052","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C052","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C053","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C053","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Fuller and the 2026 Juergensmeyer opinion used discretionary special-action review in FAA-only employment postures rather than assuming the state statutory ordinary appeal applied.","Authority and pinpoint":"S024, ¶¶ 4–8; S026, ¶¶ 15–17.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; current special-action rules were not independently read, and ordinary consumer jurisdiction must be separately tested."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C053","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C053","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[24,26],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C054","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C054","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Coinbase v. Bielski requires a federal district court to stay pretrial and trial proceedings during the covered § 16 appeal from denial of compulsion. Its holding is not a universal state-court appellate-stay rule.","Authority and pinpoint":"S032, slip pp. 3–10, especially n.2.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; collateral matters and treatment of frivolous appeals are bounded exceptions discussed in the opinion."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C054","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C054","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[32],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C055","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C055","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"FRCP 81(a)(6)(B) applies federal civil rules to FAA proceedings except where the statute supplies other procedures. Rule 7(b) addresses motion content; Rule 5 distinguishes service from filing.","Authority and pinpoint":"S010, Rules 5, 7(b), 81(a)(6)(B).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; full initial-service mechanics were not investigated."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C055","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C055","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[10],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C056","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C056","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Federal Rule 6 excludes the triggering day, counts intermediate days, and adjusts qualifying last days. Electronic filing generally ends at midnight in the court’s time zone. Extra service days are conditional, not automatically added to an award-receipt clock.","Authority and pinpoint":"S010, Rule 6(a), (d).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; statutory extension power is not assumed."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C056","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C056","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[10],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C057","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C057","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"FRAP 4(a) ordinarily measures a civil notice of appeal from entry, with a 30-day period and specified governmental-party, postjudgment-motion, extension, and reopening provisions.","Authority and pinpoint":"S018, FRAP 4(a)(1), (4)–(7).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; actual entry and triggering orders are absent; no actual appeal deadline is determined."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C057","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C057","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[18],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C058","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C058","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"FRAP 8 ordinarily starts a requested enforcement stay in the district court; FRAP 26 supplies computation and extension limits. These rules do not erase Bielski’s distinct covered-appeal holding or create a universal award-enforcement stay.","Authority and pinpoint":"S018, FRAP 8(a), 26; S032.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D/H; the actual order, appellate posture, and local requirements remain necessary."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C058","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C058","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[18,32],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C059","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C059","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"The official Arizona Rule 6 adoption and amendment bodies recovered are historical. A current-looking nonofficial reproduction matches the reviewed core computation provisions, but the complete official 2026 amendment chain was not authenticated.","Authority and pinpoint":"S012, Rule 6; S013, Rule 6(d); S014.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D/G; current official body remains a hold."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C059","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C059","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[12,13,14],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C060","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C060","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"The 2014 ARCAP adoption order contains a general 30-day appeal rule and specified exceptions. The 2019 document recovered makes a different technical correction. Neither establishes a complete current 2026 ARCAP 9 text by itself.","Authority and pinpoint":"S015, Rules 5, 8–9; S016; failed S017 routes.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D/G; no current Arizona appeal endpoint is certified."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C060","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C060","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[15,16,17],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C061","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C061","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"A.R.S. § 1-243 generally excludes the first day and includes the last unless the last is a holiday, subject to its narrow subsection B exception. Section 1-301 identifies state holidays and specified observation rules.","Authority and pinpoint":"S046, §§ 1-243(A)–(B), 1-301(A)–(F).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; an actual court closure or special order remains unknown."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C061","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C061","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[46],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C062","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C062","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Revised-act initiation notice must follow the agreement or the statutory alternative, identify the controversy and remedy, and satisfy the prescribed delivery method. A participation-based notice objection must be made by the statutory stage. General notice/receipt definitions also matter.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, §§ 12-3002, 12-3009(A)–(B).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; the statutory certified-mail alternative calls for a requested and obtained return receipt."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C062","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C062","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C063","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C063","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Under the older act, absent a permitted contrary agreement, hearing notice uses the prescribed delivery and at least five days’ notice. A duly notified party’s nonappearance does not necessarily stop the hearing; participation can affect a notice objection.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-1505(A)–(C).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; actual notice and any variation must be proved."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C063","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C063","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C064","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C064","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"The revised act requires fair hearing procedures, provides for specified summary disposition and representation, and imposes neutral-arbitrator disclosure duties. Material nondisclosure and procedural prejudice have specific statutory consequences, not automatic debt cancellation.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, §§ 12-3012, 12-3015–3016.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; detailed discovery, institutional procedure, and a particular challenge record remain outside this gateway."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C064","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C064","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C065","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C065","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"A revised-act award must be recorded and signed or otherwise authenticated by a concurring arbitrator; each party receives notice including a copy. An objection that the award was made late must be notified before receipt of award notice.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-3019(A)–(B).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; making, authentication, and notice dates are distinct."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C065","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C065","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C066","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C066","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"The older act requires a written signed award and delivery by its specified methods or agreement. Its late-award objection must precede delivery.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-1508(A)–(B).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; do not substitute revised-act “receipt of notice” terminology without identifying the regime."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C066","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C066","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C067","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C067","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Under the revised act, a qualifying arbitrator-correction/clarification motion and notice are due within 20 days after award-notice receipt; objection notice is due within 10 days after receipt of the motion notice.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-3020(A)–(E), read with § 12-3004.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; distinguish potentially variable arbitral procedure from nonwaivable judicial-review provisions."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C067","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C067","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C068","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C068","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"The older act permits the specified arbitrator correction/clarification application within 20 days after delivery, with notice and a 10-day objection opportunity.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-1509.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; actual delivery, notice, and the correction ground remain necessary."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C068","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C068","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C069","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C069","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"After revised-act award notice, a party may move to confirm; the court must confirm unless the award is modified, corrected, or vacated under the specified provisions. Section 12-3022 does not itself state the FAA’s one-year period.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-3022.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; absence of that period in this section is not a certificate that no other timing doctrine could apply."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C069","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C069","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C070","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C070","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Under the revised act, an award procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means is a statutory vacatur ground.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-3023(A)(1).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; allegation alone is not proof of procurement."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C070","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C070","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C071","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C071","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Revised-act vacatur grounds include neutral-arbitrator evident partiality, arbitrator corruption, or misconduct prejudicing a party’s rights.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-3023(A)(2).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; the specified actor and predicate must be shown."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C071","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C071","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C072","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C072","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"A substantially prejudicial refusal to postpone or consider material evidence, qualifying hearing misconduct, or exceeding arbitral powers can support revised-act vacatur.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-3023(A)(3)–(4).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; disagreement with the result is not itself these grounds."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C072","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C072","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C073","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C073","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Lack of an arbitration agreement is a revised-act vacatur ground, subject to the participation/objection restriction stated in subsection (A)(5).","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-3023(A)(5), cross-reference § 12-3015(C).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; this text differs from the older act’s additional prior-determination language."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C073","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C073","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C074","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C074","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Improper revised-act initiation notice supports vacatur only with the substantial prejudice required by the statute.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-3023(A)(6); § 12-3009.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; not every notice imperfection automatically invalidates an award."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C074","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C074","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C075","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C075","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"A revised-act vacatur motion ordinarily must be filed within 90 days after receipt of notice of the award or the specified modified/corrected award.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-3023(B).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; a pending correction request is not itself proof of a newly triggered period."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C075","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C075","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C076","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C076","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"For alleged procurement by corruption, fraud, or undue means, the revised act measures 90 days from when the ground was known or reasonably should have been known.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-3023(B).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; discovery and reasonable-care facts must be established."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C076","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C076","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C077","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C077","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Revised-act judicial modification/correction requires a motion within 90 days after award-notice receipt and a listed mathematical, descriptive, unsubmitted-matter, or nonmerits form defect.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-3024(A)–(C).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; the unsubmitted-matter ground has its own no-merits-effect condition."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C077","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C077","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C078","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C078","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Revised-act vacatur can lead to rehearing, with the required new-arbitrator distinctions. Denial of vacatur ordinarily leads to confirmation unless modification/correction is pending.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-3023(C)–(D).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; vacatur does not itself decide underlying debt merits."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C078","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C078","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C079","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C079","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"The revised act directs entry of a judgment conforming to the specified confirmation, modification, correction, or qualifying vacatur order. Ordinary judgment consequences follow through that judicial step.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-3025(A)–(B).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; award possession alone is not a completed judgment-enforcement process."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C079","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C079","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C080","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C080","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Revised-act attorney-fee and punitive-award provisions require their stated law/agreement and proof predicates; judicial fees in contested post-award proceedings are separately addressed. The older act’s default arbitrator-expense provision excludes counsel fees unless the agreement otherwise provides.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, §§ 12-3021, 12-3025(C), 12-1510.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; no administrator price, recoverable fee, premium, or consumer charge is established."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C080","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C080","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C081","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C081","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Older-act confirmation requires filing and service as a civil complaint. After 20 days from service, the statute directs judgment unless opposition is made under § 12-1512.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-1511.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; service completion and an actual opposition record matter."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C081","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C081","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C082","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C082","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Older-act opposition requires a pleading and adequate showing of one of its specified grounds. Section 12-1512 does not state the revised act’s 90-day vacatur period; its no-agreement ground also addresses prior determination and participation.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-1512(A)–(B).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D/G; no invented universal outside deadline or postjudgment cure follows from this omission."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C082","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C082","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C083","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C083","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Older-act judicial correction is limited to an application within 90 days after delivery and before judgment. After judgment, § 12-1513(D) refers to Rule 60(c); current numbering and the applicable relief route need reconciliation.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-1513(A)–(D).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D/G; later attempted relief is not guaranteed."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C083","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C083","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C084","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C084","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Older-act confirmation produces a judgment enforceable as other judgments, with the stated court-cost provision.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, § 12-1514.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; actual enforcement procedure is deferred."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C084","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C084","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C085","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C085","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"FAA § 9 addresses agreements permitting judgment on the award and an application within one year after the award is made. Confirmation follows absent statutory vacatur/modification/correction. Whether every later application is categorically barred in the controlling circuit was not resolved here.","Authority and pinpoint":"S006, § 9; S034, jurisdiction limits.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D/G; do not confuse the one-year question with Cortez Byrd’s venue holding."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C085","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C085","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[6,34],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C086","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C086","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"FAA § 10 lists procurement misconduct, arbitrator partiality/corruption, specified prejudicial hearing misconduct, and excess/imperfect execution of powers preventing the required definite award. Its rehearing authority has a time condition.","Authority and pinpoint":"S006, § 10(a)–(b).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; administrative-arbitration subsection (c) is a separate boundary."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C086","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C086","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[6],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C087","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C087","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"FAA § 11 permits the stated material calculation/description corrections, certain unsubmitted-matter corrections, and nonmerits form corrections.","Authority and pinpoint":"S006, § 11(a)–(c).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; no general merits reconsideration power is supplied."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C087","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C087","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[6],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C088","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C088","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"FAA § 12 requires service of notice of a vacatur/modification/correction motion within three months after the award is filed or delivered. Filing a motion and serving its notice are not interchangeable acts.","Authority and pinpoint":"S006, § 12, first paragraph.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; three months must not be rewritten as 90 days."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C088","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C088","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[6],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C089","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C089","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"FAA §§ 9 and 12 contain different resident/nonresident service language, including marshal language for nonresidents. This report preserves that text rather than assuming an email or ordinary e-filing satisfies every application.","Authority and pinpoint":"S006, §§ 9, 12; S010, Rules 5, 81(a)(6).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D/G; exact modern procedural reconciliation and valid actual service remain held."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C089","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C089","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[6,10],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C090","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C090","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"FAA § 12 permits a judge to issue an order staying the adverse party’s enforcement proceedings, to be served with the motion notice. The statute does not make the review motion itself an automatic enforcement stay.","Authority and pinpoint":"S006, § 12, second paragraph.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; actual order and scope required."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C090","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C090","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[6],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C091","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C091","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"FAA § 13 requires the listed agreement/appointment/extensions, award, and application papers with the order for judgment entry. The entered judgment—not merely the award—has the stated ordinary judgment force.","Authority and pinpoint":"S006, § 13(a)–(c).","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"D; underlying debt, fees, interest, and collection methods are not independently adjudicated by this report."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C091","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C091","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[6],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C092","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C092","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Hall Street treats §§ 10 and 11 as exclusive grounds for the FAA’s expedited review mechanism; parties cannot enlarge that mechanism simply by agreeing to review legal error. Other possible legal routes were not comprehensively resolved.","Authority and pinpoint":"S037, pp. 584–592.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; no blanket conclusion about every asserted “manifest disregard” formulation."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C092","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C092","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[37],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C093","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C093","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Move holds FAA § 12 subject to equitable tolling and granted relief on an unusual fraud record involving an arbitrator’s fabricated qualifications. It does not create the revised Arizona act’s automatic 90-day discovery formulation in federal law.","Authority and pinpoint":"S039, pp. 7–14.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"H; substantive tolling objections were partly waived on appeal; diligence and extraordinary facts remain necessary inquiries."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C093","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C093","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[39],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C094","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C094","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"Defeating compulsion, invalidating delegation, vacating an award, obtaining confirmation, and prevailing on the underlying debt are distinct results. Neither an assignment price nor an unremitted amount is a consumer payment.","Authority and pinpoint":"S001, §§ 12-3007(D), 12-3023–3025; S006, §§ 10–13; models below.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"I; actual debt and payment adjudication remain outside this pass."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C094","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C094","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1,6],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C095","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C095","Precise proposition; actor, predicate, and consequence":"No authority read makes every arbitration motion or appeal suspend every response, limitation, collection, garnishment, or judgment clock. Only the particular statutory/order-based stays identified here are established.","Authority and pinpoint":"C044–C060, C090; respective primary pinpoints.","Classification, limits, and missing facts":"I/G; this is a bounded non-inference, not a claim that no additional stay law exists."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C095","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C095","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C096","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C096","Precise proposition":"Actual contract, identity, status, transfer, jurisdiction, service, award, payment, and local-calendar facts remain unestablished.","Authority and limit":"G; user supplied no such records and authorized no private lookup."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C096","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C096","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C097","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C097","Precise proposition":"M01’s alternatives turn on actual formation/version proof and then the distinct delegation inquiry; neither branch determines debt merits.","Authority and limit":"K; C013–C029."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C097","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C097","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C098","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C098","Precise proposition":"M02’s $900 portfolio purchase is separate from consumer payments; with no credited consumer payment, the stipulated $6,000 claimed balance remains $6,000 arithmetically, while legal liability remains held.","Authority and limit":"K/I; C035–C038, C094."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C098","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C098","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C099","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C099","Precise proposition":"M03’s dated litigation acts are inputs to waiver analysis, not a numerical waiver formula; stay and appeal outcomes depend on the applicable regime and actual orders.","Authority and limit":"K; C044–C060."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C099","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C099","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C100","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C100","Precise proposition":"M04’s assumed April 15 receipt produces the conditional May 5 twenty-day and July 14 ninety-day candidates shown below, subject to the stated procedural assumptions.","Authority and limit":"K; S001, §§ 12-3020(B), 12-3023(B), 12-3024(A); S046."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C100","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C100","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1,46],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C101","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C101","Precise proposition":"M04’s three-calendar-month candidate is July 15, not the ninety-day July 14 candidate. Its § 9 anniversary uses the different award-made date.","Authority and limit":"K; S006, §§ 9, 12; S010, Rule 6(a)."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C101","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C101","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[6,10],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C102","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C102","Precise proposition":"M04’s older-act confirmation-service candidate is May 26; its correction branch separately requires both the ninety-day delivery condition and absence of an entered judgment.","Authority and limit":"K; S001, §§ 12-1511, 12-1513; S046."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C102","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C102","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1,46],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C103","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C103","Precise proposition":"M04’s stipulated July 10 discovery produces October 8 only if that is legally the known-or-reasonably-knowable date under the revised act. It supplies no automatic FAA extension.","Authority and limit":"K; S001, § 12-3023(B); S039."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C103","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C103","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1,39],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C104","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C104","Precise proposition":"M04 separates a $6,200 assumed award total, judicial judgment, and a later $500 actual credit; only the stipulated actual credit reduces the illustrated remaining amount to $5,700.","Authority and limit":"K/I; S001, § 12-3025; S006, § 13; arithmetic below."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C104","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C104","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[1,6],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}},{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C105","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_AZ-P13-C105","Precise proposition":"The source register distinguishes operative text, historical orders, primary-text republications, private policy, partial reads, and failed routes. No full citator, all-source verification, independent review, or component acceptance is claimed.","Authority and limit":"Researcher record; see source, currentness, and coverage registers."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_record_reconciled_selected_bodies_and_dated_text_with_currentness_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"claim_id":"S_AZ-P13-C105","original_visible_id":"S_AZ-P13-C105","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"original_area_numbers_preserved":[66],"explicit_source_numbers":[],"source_ranges_expanded":[],"selected_source_presence_not_entire_claim_primary_validation":true,"all_primary_claim_accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[],"all_original_predicates_confidence_and_holds_retained":true}}],"sources":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","urls":["https://www.azleg.gov/arsDetail/?title=12","https://www.azleg.gov/arsDetail/?title=12&utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S001","Issuer, document, and full literal URL":"Arizona Legislature, Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 12. https://www.azleg.gov/arsDetail/?title=12. Direct section URLs are mapped immediately below.","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations":"Fresh official bodies for all mapped sections. Compilation displays 57th Legislature, second regular session update basis. Specific statutory dates are identified in claims; compilation metadata is not a universal effective date. Historical amendment chain remains bounded."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_selected_body_or_dated_reuse_with_limits","coordinator_direct_section_url_map":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","all39_original_map_bodies":["https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03001.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03002.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03003.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03004.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03005.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03006.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03007.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03008.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03009.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03011.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03012.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03015.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03016.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03019.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03020.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03021.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03022.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03023.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03024.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03025.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03026.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03027.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03029.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01501.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01502.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01503.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01505.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01508.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01509.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01510.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01511.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01512.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01513.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01514.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01515.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01516.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01517.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01518.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/02101-01.htm"],"raw_table":9,"separate_family_count":1,"URLs_are_locators_not_independent_verification":true,"original_urls_and_researcher_cells_unchanged":true},"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[{"chunk":0,"URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03003.htm","packet_character_bounds":[0,1539],"PDF_page_tags":[],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[0,18]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[0,18]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":1,"URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03004.htm","packet_character_bounds":[1619,3549],"PDF_page_tags":[],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[0,11]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[0,11]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":2,"URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03007.htm","packet_character_bounds":[3629,5854],"PDF_page_tags":[],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[0,15]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[0,15]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":3,"URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03023.htm","packet_character_bounds":[5934,8832],"PDF_page_tags":[],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[0,22]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[0,22]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":4,"URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03024.htm","packet_character_bounds":[8912,10344],"PDF_page_tags":[],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[0,10]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[0,10]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":5,"URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01511.htm","packet_character_bounds":[10424,11138],"PDF_page_tags":[],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[0,2]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[0,2]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":6,"URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01512.htm","packet_character_bounds":[11218,13347],"PDF_page_tags":[],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[0,12]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[0,12]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":7,"URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01513.htm","packet_character_bounds":[13427,14942],"PDF_page_tags":[],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[0,12]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[0,12]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":8,"URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/02101-01.htm","packet_character_bounds":[15022,15999],"PDF_page_tags":[],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[0,15]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[0,15]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":0,"URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03006.htm","packet_character_bounds":[0,1180],"PDF_page_tags":[],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[0,7]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[0,7]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":1,"URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03020.htm","packet_character_bounds":[1260,2880],"PDF_page_tags":[],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[0,20]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[0,20]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false}],"selected_body_checks":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","evidence_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03003.htm","line_range":[0,18],"scope":"Completepostedapplicability:Jan1,2011;B1employment/B2insurance/B3nationalbank-federalsavingsaffiliate/customer/B4SRO;ConlyB2–4olderactrouting. Actualidentity/assignmenttransitionheld","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","actual_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03003.htm","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":0,"actual_numbered_lines":[[0,18]],"packet_character_bounds":[0,1539],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","evidence_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03004.htm","line_range":[0,11],"scope":"Completepostedvariation/nonwaiverlistsincludingdifferentbefore-controversyandcategoricalrestrictions","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","actual_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03004.htm","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":1,"actual_numbered_lines":[[0,11]],"packet_character_bounds":[1619,3549],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","evidence_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03006.htm","line_range":[0,7],"scope":"Completepostedrecordagreement/courtformation-scope/arbitratorconditionsprecedent/enforceability/arbitrationcontinuesunlesscourtorders","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","actual_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03006.htm","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":0,"actual_numbered_lines":[[0,7]],"packet_character_bounds":[0,1180],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","evidence_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03007.htm","line_range":[0,15],"scope":"Completepostedcompulsion/refusal/opposition/meritssummary/courtvenue/stayF/G; noalloutsideclocksuspension","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","actual_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03007.htm","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":2,"actual_numbered_lines":[[0,15]],"packet_character_bounds":[3629,5854],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","evidence_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03020.htm","line_range":[0,20],"scope":"Completepostedarbitratorcorrection20daymotion-and-notice/10dayobjection/specificgrounds/courtsubmissionandmodifiedaward","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","actual_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03020.htm","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":1,"actual_numbered_lines":[[0,20]],"packet_character_bounds":[1260,2880],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","evidence_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03023.htm","line_range":[0,22],"scope":"Completepostedsixvacaturgrounds/90dayreceiptmodifiedaward/discovery/reasonablecare/prejudicerehearingconfirmationconditions","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","actual_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03023.htm","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":3,"actual_numbered_lines":[[0,22]],"packet_character_bounds":[5934,8832],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","evidence_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03024.htm","line_range":[0,10],"scope":"Completeposted90dayreceipt/modifiedawardcorrectionnarrowgrounds/no-meritseffect/confirmationjoinder","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","actual_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/03024.htm","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":4,"actual_numbered_lines":[[0,10]],"packet_character_bounds":[8912,10344],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","evidence_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01511.htm","line_range":[0,2],"scope":"Completepostedolderconfirmationcomplaintfilingandservice/20days/opposition1512; noactualservicefinding","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","actual_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01511.htm","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":5,"actual_numbered_lines":[[0,2]],"packet_character_bounds":[10424,11138],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","evidence_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01512.htm","line_range":[0,12],"scope":"Completepostedolderoppositionadequateshowing/fivegrounds/prioradverse1502andparticipationcondition/rehearing; noexpressrevised90dayvacaturperiod","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","actual_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01512.htm","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":6,"actual_numbered_lines":[[0,12]],"packet_character_bounds":[11218,13347],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","evidence_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01513.htm","line_range":[0,12],"scope":"Completepostedoldercorrection90daysdeliveryANDbeforejudgment/Rule60cafterjudgmentcrossreferencecurrentnumberingheld","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","actual_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01513.htm","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":7,"actual_numbered_lines":[[0,12]],"packet_character_bounds":[13427,14942],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","evidence_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/02101-01.htm","line_range":[0,15],"scope":"Completepostedstateappealcategories;item3DENIALconfirmation;judgmentcategorydistinct; ordinaryinterlocutorycompulsionnotlisted","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S001","actual_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/02101-01.htm","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":8,"actual_numbered_lines":[[0,15]],"packet_character_bounds":[15022,15999],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false}],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Selectedpostedprimaryorprivatepolicytextswithversioncurrentnessapplicationholds","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S002","urls":["https://legiscan.com/AZ/text/HB2430/2010","https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.pdf","https://legiscan.com/AZ/text/HB2430/2010?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S002","Issuer, document, and full literal URL":"Arizona HB 2430 (2010), primary legislative text reproduced by LegiScan: https://legiscan.com/AZ/text/HB2430/2010. Failed official routes: https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.htm and https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/laws/0139.pdf.","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations":"Fresh reproduced §§ 5–6 and relevant enacted-language presentation. Host labels the bill chaptered, while the body identifies an engrossed text. Both official routes reported inaccessible through the tool. Final chapter-image authentication remains held; no silent upgrade to an official 2010 image."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S002","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S003","urls":["https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_1st_Regular.pdf","https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_1st_Regular.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S003","Issuer, document, and full literal URL":"Arizona Legislative Council, 2025 Table of Sections Affected. https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_1st_Regular.pdf","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations":"Official index, July 18, 2025, chapters 1–265. Title 12 entries read, printed pp. 3–4 / PDF indexes 2–3. Screening evidence, not operative statutory text."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S003","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S004","urls":["https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_2nd_Regular.pdf","https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_2nd_Regular.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S004","Issuer, document, and full literal URL":"Arizona Legislative Council, 2026 Table of Sections Affected. https://www.azleg.gov/alisPDFs/council/TOSA_57th_2nd_Regular.pdf","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations":"Official index, August 19, 2026, chapters 1–264. Title 12 entries read, printed p. 4 / PDF index 3. No complete later-law certificate."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S004","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S005","urls":["https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07002.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07003.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07005.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07007.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07008.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07009.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07015.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07002.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07003.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07005.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07007.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07008.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07009.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07015.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S005","Issuer, document, and full literal URL":"Arizona Legislature, Uniform Electronic Transactions Act: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07002.htm; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07003.htm; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07005.htm; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07007.htm; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07008.htm; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07009.htm; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/44/07015.htm.","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations":"Fresh official bodies: definitions, scope/exclusions, agreement to transact electronically, legal effect, retainability, attribution, sending/receipt. No complete UETA enactment history or unrelated excluded-transaction law was read."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S005","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S006","urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s1/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s2/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s3/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s4/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s5/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s6/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s401/","https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title9/chapter1&edition=prelim","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s1/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s2/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s3/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s4/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s5/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s6/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s401/?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S006","Issuer, document, and full literal URL":"U.S. House OLRC, Title 9, FAA, section URLs: https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s1/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s2/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s3/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s4/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s5/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s6/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s401/.","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations":"Fresh official operative bodies and displayed source/amendment notes, currency through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026. Failed chapter route: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title9/chapter1&edition=prelim returned 404; individual sections recovered. Section 402 routes failed as detailed below; its enactment was recovered as S007."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_selected_body_or_dated_reuse_with_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S006","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S006","evidence_URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/","line_range":[15,24],"scope":"DatedAR14officialFAA9awardmade/year/agreement/forum/notice; nofreshfederalcurrentnessorafteryearuniversalbar","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S006","actual_URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":2,"actual_numbered_lines":[[15,24]],"packet_character_bounds":[7497,10309],"dated_reuse":true}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S006","evidence_URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/","line_range":[15,23],"scope":"DatedAR14officialFAA12threemonthnoticeSERVICE/filedordelivered/nonresidentmarshal/stayorder; actualmodernmethodheld","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S006","actual_URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":2,"actual_numbered_lines":[[15,23]],"packet_character_bounds":[13351,15773],"dated_reuse":true}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false}],"dated_reuse":[{"original_complete_packet":"[internal evidence reference]","complete_unmodified_copy":"[internal evidence reference]","sha256":"ce8c2caa74494bbf470698ea8acf8a44394e494beef348a3354a6db0218469c0","original_sha256":"ce8c2caa74494bbf470698ea8acf8a44394e494beef348a3354a6db0218469c0","chunk":2,"URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/","packet_character_bounds":[13351,15773],"actual_numbered_lines_read_now":[[15,23]],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S006","coordinator_context_id":null,"prior_program_capture_date":"2026-10-29 review batch; individual opening clock unknown","PDFpixels":false,"not_fresh_fetch_or_entire_AR14_conclusion_adoption":true,"imported_source_count_unchanged":true},{"original_complete_packet":"[internal evidence reference]","complete_unmodified_copy":"[internal evidence reference]","sha256":"f78544310636b7f6d90ebeb39d0df7abc09d50b9b97dfa487a850eca40e589bb","original_sha256":"f78544310636b7f6d90ebeb39d0df7abc09d50b9b97dfa487a850eca40e589bb","chunk":2,"URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/","packet_character_bounds":[7497,10309],"actual_numbered_lines_read_now":[[15,24]],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S006","coordinator_context_id":null,"prior_program_capture_date":"2026-10-29 review batch; individual opening clock unknown","PDFpixels":false,"not_fresh_fetch_or_entire_AR14_conclusion_adoption":true,"imported_source_count_unchanged":true}],"status":"Datedselectedfederalbodyreuseonly","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S007","urls":["https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-117publ90/pdf/PLAW-117publ90.pdf","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s402/","https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title9-section402&num=0&edition=prelim","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-117publ90/pdf/PLAW-117publ90.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S007","Issuer, document, and full literal URL":"Congress/GPO, Public Law 117-90, Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-117publ90/pdf/PLAW-117publ90.pdf","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations":"Fresh official §§ 1–3, 136 Stat. 26–28 / PDF indexes 1–3, enacted March 3, 2022. Section 3 application clause read. Recovered after https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s402/ was inaccessible and https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title9-section402&num=0&edition=prelim returned 404. Full special-claim definitions under other titles remain outside scope."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S007","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S008","urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7001/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7006/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7002/","https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section7002&num=0&edition=prelim","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7001/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7006/?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S008","Issuer, document, and full literal URL":"OLRC, E-SIGN: https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7001/ and https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7006/.","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations":"Fresh § 7001(a)–(c), (d)(1)–(2), and pertinent § 7006 definitions. Currency displayed through PL 119-124. § 7001 remainder not comprehensively read. Failed § 7002 routes: https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s7002/ inaccessible; https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section7002&num=0&edition=prelim 404. State-preemption interaction held."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S008","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S009","urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1331/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1332/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1292/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1331/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1332/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1292/?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S009","Issuer, document, and full literal URL":"OLRC, federal jurisdiction/appeal statutes: https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1331/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1332/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t28/s1292/.","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations":"Fresh § 1331; material § 1332(a)–(c); § 1292(b). No class-action jurisdiction analysis or actual citizenship determination."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S009","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S010","urls":["https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf","https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure","https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S010","Issuer, document, and full literal URL":"U.S. Courts, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, December 1, 2025 edition. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf. Official current-rules page: https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure.","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations":"Fresh Rules 5, 6, 7(b), 81(a)(6)(B): printed pp. 8–14, 100 / PDF indexes 26–32, 118. Current-page metadata read. Full Rule 4 and all initial-service methods were not read."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S010","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S011","urls":["https://www.mdb.uscourts.gov/files/2025_congressional_package_final.pdf","https://www.mdb.uscourts.gov/files/2025_congressional_package_final.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S011","Issuer, document, and full literal URL":"U.S. Supreme Court, 2025 rules transmission/adoption package, official bankruptcy-court-hosted copy. https://www.mdb.uscourts.gov/files/2025_congressional_package_final.pdf","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations":"Fresh April 23, 2025 orders: appellate rules order at printed 00003 / PDF index 2; civil rules order at printed 00106 / PDF index 105. Effective December 1, 2025 with stated new/pending-case application. Not a complete 2026 amendments search."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S011","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S012","urls":["https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2016%20Rules/R-16-0010.pdf","https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2016%20Rules/R-16-0010.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S012","Issuer, document, and full literal URL":"Arizona Supreme Court, R-16-0010 civil-rules restyling order. https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2016%20Rules/R-16-0010.pdf","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations":"Historical official order, September 2, 2016; effective January 1, 2017, with pending-case qualification. Rule 6 read at printed pp. 27–28 / PDF indexes 59–60."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S012","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S013","urls":["https://azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2017%20Rules/17-0009.pdf","https://azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2017%20Rules/17-0009.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S013","Issuer, document, and full literal URL":"Arizona Supreme Court, R-17-0009. https://azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2017%20Rules/17-0009.pdf","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations":"Historical official order, August 31, 2017; effective January 1, 2018. Rule 6(d) correction read at order p. 6 / PDF index 5."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S013","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S014","urls":["https://www.courtrules.net/arizona/arizona-civil-procedure/rule-6/","https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N957811E086DC11E6B40FA6262051C5AD?viewType=FullText","https://www.courtrules.net/arizona/arizona-civil-procedure/rule-6/?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S014","Issuer, document, and full literal URL":"Michigan Legal Publishing, Arizona Civil Rule 6 reproduction. https://www.courtrules.net/arizona/arizona-civil-procedure/rule-6/","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations":"Fresh nonofficial full Rule 6(a)–(d) and displayed history. Site copyright 2026 is not legal-effect authentication. Official-hosted route https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N957811E086DC11E6B40FA6262051C5AD?viewType=FullText was inaccessible. S012–S013 are historical official alternatives, not a complete current chain."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S014","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S015","urls":["https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2014%20August%20Rules/R140017.pdf","https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2014%20August%20Rules/R140017.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S015","Issuer, document, and full literal URL":"Arizona Supreme Court, R-14-0017 ARCAP restyling order. https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2014%20August%20Rules/R140017.pdf","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations":"Historical official order, September 2, 2014, effective January 1, 2015 with pending-appeal qualification. Rule 5: order p. 14 / PDF 13; Rules 8–9: order pp. 18–20 / PDF 17–19. Rule 7 only partially read, not used as current stay authority."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S015","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S016","urls":["https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2019%20Rules/R-14-0017-Amended%20Order-Filed%204-22-2019.PDF?ver=2019-04-22-161612-227","https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2019%20Rules/R-14-0017-Amended%20Order-Filed%204-22-2019.PDF?ver=2019-04-22-161612-227&utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S016","Issuer, document, and full literal URL":"Arizona Supreme Court, April 22, 2019 amended R-14-0017 order. https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/20/2019%20Rules/R-14-0017-Amended%20Order-Filed%204-22-2019.PDF?ver=2019-04-22-161612-227","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations":"Both pages read; immediate technical correction involving a juvenile-rule reference. Does not authenticate a current 2026 Rule 9 body."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S016","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S017","urls":["https://www.azcourts.gov/rules/Recent-Amendments/Rules-of-Civil-Appellate-Procedure","https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/ND80A48603F9F11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?transitionType=Default","https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N8C476F103F9B11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?viewType=FullText","https://www.azcourts.gov/rules/Recent-Amendments/Rules-of-Civil-Appellate-Procedure?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/ND80A48603F9F11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?transitionType=Default&utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S017","Issuer, document, and full literal URL":"Arizona judiciary, current ARCAP routes and amendment index. https://www.azcourts.gov/rules/Recent-Amendments/Rules-of-Civil-Appellate-Procedure. Failed Rule 9: https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/ND80A48603F9F11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?transitionType=Default. Failed Rule 5: https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/N8C476F103F9B11E4B4D7C67CCE44C05C?viewType=FullText.","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations":"Index portions read. Rule 9 returned 403; Rule 5 inaccessible. The current operative bodies were not recovered. S015–S016 preserve what the official alternatives actually establish."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S017","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S018","urls":["https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/frap-June%201%202026.pdf","https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/rules/","https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure.pdf","https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/Redlined-Proposed%20Amendments%20to%20Circuit%20Rules%20Jan%2026.pdf","https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/frap-June%201%202026.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/rules/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/Redlined-Proposed%20Amendments%20to%20Circuit%20Rules%20Jan%2026.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S018","Issuer, document, and full literal URL":"Ninth Circuit, FRAP and Ninth Circuit Rules handbook, June 1, 2026. https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/frap-June%201%202026.pdf. Official landing page: https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/rules/.","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations":"Fresh FRAP 4(a), printed pp. 11–13 / PDF 29–31; Rule 8(a), p. 30 / PDF 48; Rule 26, pp. 87–88 / PDF 105–106. Landing page identifies June 1, 2026 rules; page update October 21 is not an effective date. National route https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure.pdf returned garbled extraction. A December-2025 change link returned internal error without a recoverable target URL. June change document https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/Redlined-Proposed%20Amendments%20to%20Circuit%20Rules%20Jan%2026.pdf was read only as the linked change material; unrelated amendments were not made arbitration rules."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S018","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S019","urls":["https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","https://www.adr.org/rules-forms-and-fees/consumer/","https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://www.adr.org/rules-forms-and-fees/consumer/?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S019","Issuer, document, and full literal URL":"American Arbitration Association, Consumer Arbitration Rules, amended/effective May 1, 2025. https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf. Discovery page: https://www.adr.org/rules-forms-and-fees/consumer/.","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations":"Fresh private policy, R-1, R-2 and material R-5–R-12 passages, printed pp. 6–13 / PDF 5–12; R-7 at p. 11 / PDF 10. No fee schedule or actual registry status was obtained. Policy is neither legislation nor a legal-validity determination."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_selected_body_or_dated_reuse_with_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S019","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[{"chunk":3,"URL":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[19390,25509],"PDF_page_tags":["P0","P0-1","P1","P1-2","P2","P2-3","P3"],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S019","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[0,63]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":true,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":3,"URL":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[21935,27597],"PDF_page_tags":["P10","P2","P9","P9-10"],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S019","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[14,23],[249,302]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":true,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":6,"URL":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[21718,25115],"PDF_page_tags":["P5","P5-6","P6"],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S019","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[94,132]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[94,132]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":7,"URL":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[25195,28981],"PDF_page_tags":["P10","P9","P9-10"],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S019","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[262,303]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[262,303]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":6,"URL":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[21813,29562],"PDF_page_tags":["P5-6","P6","P6-7","P7","P7-8","P8"],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S019","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[120,212]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[120,212]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false}],"selected_body_checks":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S019","evidence_URL":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","line_range":[104,165],"scope":"AAA2025privateR1scope/version/classification/writtenchanges/R2conditional30dayjudicialintervention/90dayadministrativesuspension; notcourtstay","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S019","actual_URL":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":6,"actual_numbered_lines":[[104,132]],"packet_character_bounds":[21718,25115],"dated_reuse":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S019","actual_URL":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":6,"actual_numbered_lines":[[120,165]],"packet_character_bounds":[21813,29562],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S019","evidence_URL":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","line_range":[283,295],"scope":"AAAprivateR7jurisdiction/delegationpolicy; actuallegalassent/formation/incorporationstillrequired","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S019","actual_URL":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":7,"actual_numbered_lines":[[283,295]],"packet_character_bounds":[25195,28981],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false}],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Selectedpostedprimaryorprivatepolicytextswithversioncurrentnessapplicationholds","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S046","urls":["https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00243.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00301.htm","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00243.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com","https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00301.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S046","Issuer, document, and full literal URL":"Arizona Legislature, general computation and holidays: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00243.htm; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00301.htm.","Material actually read; version/effect and limitations":"Fresh complete official § 1-243(A)–(B) and § 1-301(A)–(F). Actual emergency closures, local calendars, and full amendment history remain unverified."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_selected_body_or_dated_reuse_with_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S046","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[{"chunk":4,"URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00243.htm","packet_character_bounds":[25589,26534],"PDF_page_tags":[],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S046","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[0,3]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[0,3]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":5,"URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00301.htm","packet_character_bounds":[26614,28858],"PDF_page_tags":[],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S046","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[0,42]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[0,42]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false}],"selected_body_checks":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S046","evidence_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00243.htm","line_range":[0,3],"scope":"Completepostedgeneralexclude-first/include-last/holidayruleandnarrowlessthan10dayadministrativeappealexception; actualcourtapplicabilityheld","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S046","actual_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00243.htm","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":4,"actual_numbered_lines":[[0,3]],"packet_character_bounds":[25589,26534],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S046","evidence_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00301.htm","line_range":[0,42],"scope":"Completepostedholidayenumerationandobservation; noactualclosures/e-filingavailability/courtcalendarcertification","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S046","actual_URL":"https://www.azleg.gov/ars/1/00301.htm","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":5,"actual_numbered_lines":[[0,42]],"packet_character_bounds":[26614,28858],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false}],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Selectedpostedprimaryorprivatepolicytextswithversioncurrentnessapplicationholds","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S020","urls":["https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf","https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S020 — Cornell v. Desert Financial Credit Union, Arizona Supreme Court, March 2, 2023","Full literal URL; material read":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf. Official opinion; ¶¶ 1–30, including ¶ 24 n.2; printed pp. 2–12 / PDF 1–11.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Certified question arising from electronic changes to deposit-account terms. Answered the modification question for ongoing at-will consumer relationships; did not itself issue an individual compulsion judgment. See C022–C023. No later-treatment certificate. \nazcourts.gov"},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_selected_body_or_dated_reuse_with_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S020","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[{"chunk":0,"URL":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[0,6206],"PDF_page_tags":["P0","P0-1","P1","P1-2","P2"],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S020","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[0,89]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[25,89]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":0,"URL":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[0,5327],"PDF_page_tags":["P4","P4-5","P5","P8"],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S020","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[165,215],[308,324]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":true,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":0,"URL":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[0,3471],"PDF_page_tags":["P8","P8-9","P9"],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S020","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[301,349]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[301,349]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":1,"URL":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[3551,7457],"PDF_page_tags":["P10","P9","P9-10"],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S020","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[358,405]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[358,405]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":2,"URL":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[2960,11512],"PDF_page_tags":["P10","P10-11","P11","P8","P8-9","P9","P9-10"],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S020","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[301,417]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[349,357]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":3,"URL":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[11592,14869],"PDF_page_tags":["P10","P10-11","P11"],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S020","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[379,417]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[379,417]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false}],"selected_body_checks":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S020","evidence_URL":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf","line_range":[30,53],"scope":"Cornellofficial¶1–2certifiedquestion/narrowongoingat-willrelationshipholding","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S020","actual_URL":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":0,"actual_numbered_lines":[[30,53]],"packet_character_bounds":[0,6206],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S020","evidence_URL":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf","line_range":[314,417],"scope":"Cornell¶24/note2reserve-terminationlimits;reasonableactualorconstructivenotice/rejection/goodfaith/negotiatedterms/otherdefensesandanswer; nofixedtermoruniversaloptoutduration","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S020","actual_URL":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":0,"actual_numbered_lines":[[314,349]],"packet_character_bounds":[0,3471],"dated_reuse":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S020","actual_URL":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":1,"actual_numbered_lines":[[358,405]],"packet_character_bounds":[3551,7457],"dated_reuse":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S020","actual_URL":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":2,"actual_numbered_lines":[[349,357]],"packet_character_bounds":[2960,11512],"dated_reuse":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S020","actual_URL":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2023/CV220071CQ.pdf","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":3,"actual_numbered_lines":[[379,417]],"packet_character_bounds":[11592,14869],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false}],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Selectedpostedprimaryorprivatepolicytextswithversioncurrentnessapplicationholds","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S021","urls":["https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/1%20CA-CV%2021-0283%20Duncan%20v.%20Public%20Storage%20%20Opinion%20Final.pdf","https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/1%20CA-CV%2021-0283%20Duncan%20v.%20Public%20Storage%20%20Opinion%20Final.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S021 — Duncan v. Public Storage, Arizona Court of Appeals, March 8, 2022","Full literal URL; material read":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/1%20CA-CV%2021-0283%20Duncan%20v.%20Public%20Storage%20%20Opinion%20Final.pdf. Official published opinion; ¶¶ 1–32, printed pp. 2–10 / PDF 1–9.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Storage renters alleged fraud; denial of compulsion was vacated and remanded because separability and the clause-specific theory required proper treatment. Formation/proof discussion at ¶¶ 10–18. A later memorandum lead was not opened or used. \nazcourts.gov"},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S021","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S022","urls":["https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2021/CV200058PR.pdf","https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2021/CV200058PR.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S022 — Rizzio v. Surpass Senior Living, Arizona Supreme Court, August 17, 2021","Full literal URL; material read":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2021/CV200058PR.pdf. Official opinion; ¶¶ 1–25, especially ¶¶ 11, 16–24; printed pp. 2–10 / PDF 1–9.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Nursing-care agreement and cost barrier after a cost-shifting provision was severed. Reversed the trial disposition and remanded; specified court-of-appeals analysis was vacated. Attorney funding is relevant, not a per se answer. Specialized facts do not establish a consumer fee schedule. \nazcourts.gov"},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S022","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S023","urls":["https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/CV%2021-0533%20Gray%20%20v.%20GC%20Services%20OP.pdf","https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/CV%2021-0533%20Gray%20%20v.%20GC%20Services%20OP.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S023 — Gray v. GC Services, Arizona Court of Appeals, September 1, 2022","Full literal URL; material read":"https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2022/CV%2021-0533%20Gray%20%20v.%20GC%20Services%20OP.pdf. Official published opinion; material majority through disposition, especially ¶¶ 10–12.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Employment dispute, not a consumer collection holding. Merits dismissal without resolving the arbitration request was vacated/remanded. Its brief Morgan reference is bounded; older stay-or-dismiss language is not used against later Smith."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S023","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S024","urls":["https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2017/1-ca-cv-16-0255.html","https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2017/1-ca-cv-16-0255.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S024 — Security Alarm Financing Enterprises v. Fuller, Arizona Court of Appeals, July 6, 2017","Full literal URL; material read":"https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2017/1-ca-cv-16-0255.html. Published majority reproduced by Justia; ¶¶ 1–21 read. Official image not recovered.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Former-employee dispute; ordinary appellate jurisdiction was unavailable under the state arbitration appeal provision in that FAA-only posture, but special-action jurisdiction was accepted. Relief granted. Its prejudice-based waiver discussion is historical after Morgan."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S024","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S025","urls":["https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2012/1-ca-cv-11-0711.html","https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2012/1-ca-cv-11-0711.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S025 — Sun Valley Ranch 308 LP v. Robson, Arizona Court of Appeals, November 20, 2012","Full literal URL; material read":"https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2012/1-ca-cv-11-0711.html. Published majority reproduced by Justia; ¶¶ 1–10, 32–41 and relevant intervening passages read; other commercial-remedy discussion only partially read.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Partnership/construction dispute. Denial of arbitration vacated and remanded; contract-dependent claims and plaintiffs’ alter-ego allegations supported specified nonsignatory enforcement. Parties agreed the revised act applied. Not an ordinary debt-purchase rule. \nlaw.justia.com"},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S025","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S026","urls":["https://coa1.azcourts.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=-jtnWmAZZGo%253d&portalid=1","https://coa1.azcourts.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=-jtnWmAZZGo%253d&portalid=1&utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S026 — Juergensmeyer v. Hickman’s, Arizona Court of Appeals, August 18, 2026","Full literal URL; material read":"https://coa1.azcourts.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=-jtnWmAZZGo%253d&portalid=1. Official published opinion; ¶¶ 1–39, printed pp. 2–10 / PDF 1–9.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Prison-work injury disputes; special-action jurisdiction accepted and compulsion ordered on remand after rejecting procedural unconscionability on the actual record. ¶¶ 15–17 support the narrow procedural point; ¶¶ 19–39 concern the specialized bargaining facts. \ncoa1.azcourts.gov"},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S026","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S027","urls":["https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-514/pdf/USREPORTS-514-938.pdf","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-514/pdf/USREPORTS-514-938.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S027 — First Options of Chicago v. Kaplan, U.S. Supreme Court, May 22, 1995","Full literal URL; material read":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-514/pdf/USREPORTS-514-938.pdf. Official U.S. Reports; majority pp. 940–949 / PDF 2–11.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Workout dispute involving company and individual signatory differences. Clear-and-unmistakable delegation standard and independent judicial review explained; judgment affirmed. The ultimate individual arbitrability merits were outside the granted question."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S027","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S028","urls":["https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-561/pdf/USREPORTS-561-63.pdf","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-561/pdf/USREPORTS-561-63.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S028 — Rent-A-Center, West v. Jackson, U.S. Supreme Court, June 21, 2010","Full literal URL; material read":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-561/pdf/USREPORTS-561-63.pdf. Official majority pp. 65–76 / PDF 2–13.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Employment unconscionability challenge insufficiently targeted the delegation provision. Ninth Circuit reversed. Formation distinguished at p. 70 n.2. Five-Justice majority; dissent not used. Its older dismissal posture is not current requested-stay authority."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S028","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S029","urls":["https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-586/pdf/USREPORTS-586-63.pdf","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-586/pdf/USREPORTS-586-63.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S029 — Henry Schein v. Archer & White, U.S. Supreme Court, January 8, 2019","Full literal URL; material read":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-586/pdf/USREPORTS-586-63.pdf. Official majority pp. 65–72 / PDF 2–9.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Commercial antitrust dispute with an injunction carve-out. Rejected the wholly-groundless exception; vacated/remanded without deciding actual delegation. Unanimous opinion."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S029","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S030","urls":["https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-328_m6ho.pdf","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-411.pdf","https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-328_m6ho.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S030 — Morgan v. Sundance, U.S. Supreme Court, May 23, 2022","Full literal URL; material read":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-328_m6ho.pdf. Official slip majority pp. 1–7 / PDF 2–8. Failed bound-volume route: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-411.pdf was inaccessible.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Employment litigation preceded arbitration demand. Rejected arbitration-specific prejudice; vacated/remanded without deciding ultimate waiver. Unanimous majority. Official alternate recovered the operative body."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S030","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S031","urls":["https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-1218_5357.pdf","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-601/pdf/USREPORTS-601-472.pdf","https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-1218_5357.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S031 — Smith v. Spizzirri, U.S. Supreme Court, May 16, 2024","Full literal URL; material read":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-1218_5357.pdf. Official slip majority pp. 1–6 / PDF 2–7. Failed route: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-601/pdf/USREPORTS-601-472.pdf inaccessible.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Removed Arizona employment case; all claims arbitrable and stay requested. Mandatory § 3 stay; reversed/remanded. Unanimous. Independent jurisdictional dismissal remains distinct."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S031","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S032","urls":["https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-105_5536.pdf","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-599/pdf/USREPORTS-599-736.pdf","https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-105_5536.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S032 — Coinbase v. Bielski, U.S. Supreme Court, June 23, 2023","Full literal URL; material read":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-105_5536.pdf. Official majority slip pp. 1–10 / PDF 3–12. Failed route: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-599/pdf/USREPORTS-599-736.pdf inaccessible.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Federal consumer litigation and appeal from denial of compulsion. Required district pretrial/trial stay; reversed/remanded. Five-Justice majority; dissent not relied on. Collateral matters and frivolous-appeal controls remain bounded."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S032","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S033","urls":["https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-49.pdf","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-49.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S033 — Vaden v. Discover Bank, U.S. Supreme Court, March 9, 2009","Full literal URL; material read":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-49.pdf. Official majority material pp. 52–72 / PDF 3–23.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Consumer-account controversy with a federal counterclaim. § 4 look-through did not supply jurisdiction from that counterclaim; reversed. Majority and partial dissent separated. State-procedure reservation at p. 71 n.20."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S033","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S034","urls":["https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-1.pdf","https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S034 — Badgerow v. Walters, U.S. Supreme Court, March 31, 2022","Full literal URL; material read":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf. Official majority slip pp. 1–16 / PDF 3–18. Failed route: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-596/pdf/USREPORTS-596-1.pdf inaccessible.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Employment award challenge removed to federal court. No § 4 look-through for §§ 9–10; reversed/remanded. Eight-Justice majority; dissent not relied on. No determination of award merits."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S034","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S035","urls":["https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-624.pdf","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-624.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S035 — Arthur Andersen LLP v. Carlisle, U.S. Supreme Court, May 4, 2009","Full literal URL; material read":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-556/pdf/USREPORTS-556-624.pdf. Official majority pp. 625–632 / PDF 1–8.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Nonsignatory advisers sought a stay. State-law enforcement theories can support FAA relief; appellate jurisdiction did not require proving merits first. Reversed/remanded; actual estoppel merits left open."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S035","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S036","urls":["https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-581/pdf/USREPORTS-581-246.pdf","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-581/pdf/USREPORTS-581-246.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S036 — Kindred Nursing Centers v. Clark, U.S. Supreme Court, May 15, 2017","Full literal URL; material read":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-581/pdf/USREPORTS-581-246.pdf. Official majority pp. 248–257 / PDF 2–11.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Nursing agreements signed under powers of attorney. Arbitration-specific special-authority rule preempted; one disposition reversed and the other vacated/remanded for ordinary authority analysis. Majority separated from dissent; one Justice did not participate."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S036","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S037","urls":["https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-552/pdf/USREPORTS-552-576.pdf","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-552/pdf/USREPORTS-552-576.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S037 — Hall Street Associates v. Mattel, U.S. Supreme Court, March 25, 2008","Full literal URL; material read":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-552/pdf/USREPORTS-552-576.pdf. Official relevant majority pp. 578–592 / PDF 2–16.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Commercial lease parties contracted for expanded legal-error review. FAA expedited review grounds could not be enlarged that way; vacated/remanded with other possible routes left open. Separate writings not used."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S037","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S038","urls":["https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf","https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S038 — Armstrong v. Michaels Stores, Ninth Circuit, February 13, 2023","Full literal URL; material read":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf. Official published majority, printed pp. 4–10 / PDF 3–9; 59 F.4th 1011.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Employment case applying Morgan. Reservations, limited discovery, and lack of a merits-ruling request supported no waiver; compulsion affirmed. Its record is not a numerical safe harbor."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_selected_body_or_dated_reuse_with_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S038","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[{"chunk":1,"URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[6286,12736],"PDF_page_tags":["P0","P0-1","P1","P1-2","P2","P2-3","P3","P3-4","P4"],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S038","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[0,105]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[25,89]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":1,"URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[5407,5716],"PDF_page_tags":[],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S038","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":true,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":true,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":2,"URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[7537,10514],"PDF_page_tags":["P6","P6-7","P7"],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S038","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[160,200]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[160,200]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":3,"URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[10594,14043],"PDF_page_tags":["P8","P8-9","P9"],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S038","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[225,271]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[225,271]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":4,"URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[14949,18231],"PDF_page_tags":["P8","P8-9","P9"],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S038","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[233,278]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[270,278]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false}],"selected_body_checks":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S038","evidence_URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf","line_range":[160,200],"scope":"Armstrongpublishedmajorityordinaryburden/knowledgeintentionalinconsistentactsafterMorgan; summarynotprimaryholding","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S038","actual_URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":2,"actual_numbered_lines":[[160,200]],"packet_character_bounds":[7537,10514],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S038","evidence_URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf","line_range":[225,278],"scope":"Armstrongactualreservation/lackmeritsdecision/limiteddiscoveryandAFFIRMED; notnumbersafeharbor","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S038","actual_URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":3,"actual_numbered_lines":[[225,271]],"packet_character_bounds":[10594,14043],"dated_reuse":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S038","actual_URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/02/13/21-15397.pdf","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":4,"actual_numbered_lines":[[270,278]],"packet_character_bounds":[14949,18231],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false}],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Selectedpostedprimaryorprivatepolicytextswithversioncurrentnessapplicationholds","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S039","urls":["https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf","https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S039 — Move, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Ninth Circuit, November 4, 2016","Full literal URL; material read":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf. Official published majority, printed pp. 3–14 / PDF 2–13; 840 F.3d 1152.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"FINRA award tainted by an arbitrator’s fabricated qualifications. § 12 equitable tolling recognized; specified relief ordered on remand. Substantive tolling objections were partly waived; unique fraud and prejudice facts limit generalization."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_selected_body_or_dated_reuse_with_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S039","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[{"chunk":2,"URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[12816,19310],"PDF_page_tags":["P0","P0-1","P1","P1-2","P2","P2-3","P3","P3-4","P4"],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S039","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[0,108]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[25,89]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":2,"URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[5796,21855],"PDF_page_tags":["P1","P10","P10-11","P11","P2","P4","P4-5","P5","P5-6","P6","P6-7","P7","P7-8","P8","P8-9","P9","P9-10"],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S039","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[30,37],[57,64],[118,336]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":true,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":4,"URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[14123,18202],"PDF_page_tags":["P10","P8","P8-9","P9","P9-10"],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S039","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[249,303]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[249,303]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":5,"URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[18282,21638],"PDF_page_tags":["P11","P11-12","P12","P12-13","P13"],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S039","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[337,383]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[337,383]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false},{"chunk":5,"URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[18311,21733],"PDF_page_tags":["P11","P11-12","P12","P12-13","P13"],"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S039","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","all_returned_numbered_ranges":[[337,384]],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[375,384]],"no_matching_text_find_not_HTTP_failure":false,"location_or_metadata_only_when_empty":false,"PDFpixels":false}],"selected_body_checks":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S039","evidence_URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf","line_range":[50,66],"scope":"Movepublishedmajorityintro/jurisdictionandholding/reverseinpartremand","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S039","actual_URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":2,"actual_numbered_lines":[[50,66]],"packet_character_bounds":[12816,19310],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S039","evidence_URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf","line_range":[249,303],"scope":"Movelimitedequitabletolling/rarecase/heavyshowing/substantiveissuewaivedanddiligencefindings; noautomaticstatediscoveryextension","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S039","actual_URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":4,"actual_numbered_lines":[[249,303]],"packet_character_bounds":[14123,18202],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S039","evidence_URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf","line_range":[337,384],"scope":"Moveuniquequalificationfraud/prejudice/10a3vacatur/noreach10a4/reverseinpartremandentryjudgment","evidence":[{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S039","actual_URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":5,"actual_numbered_lines":[[337,383]],"packet_character_bounds":[18282,21638],"dated_reuse":false},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S039","actual_URL":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/11/04/14-56650.pdf","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":5,"actual_numbered_lines":[[375,384]],"packet_character_bounds":[18311,21733],"dated_reuse":false}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false}],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Selectedpostedprimaryorprivatepolicytextswithversioncurrentnessapplicationholds","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S040","urls":["https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-3_879d.pdf","https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-3_879d.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S040 — Coinbase v. Suski, U.S. Supreme Court, May 23, 2024","Full literal URL; material read":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-3_879d.pdf. Official majority slip pp. 1–8 / PDF 2–9.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Earlier platform delegation and later sweepstakes court clause conflicted. Court decides which agreement governs; affirmed. Unanimous majority; separate concurrence not relied on. State-law supersession merits were not decided."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S040","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S041","urls":["https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2020/09/09/19-16746.pdf","https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2020/09/09/19-16746.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S041 — Shivkov v. Artex Risk Solutions, Ninth Circuit, September 9, 2020","Full literal URL; material read":"https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2020/09/09/19-16746.pdf. Official published majority; material pp. 7–10, 14–20, 33–35 / PDF 6–9, 13–19, 32–34; 974 F.3d 1051.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Arizona-law commercial captive-insurance agreements. Relevant survival and nonsignatory-estoppel analysis read; compulsion affirmed. Class-arbitration discussion not comprehensively read or used. Older dismissal disposition does not override Smith."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S041","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S042","urls":["https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-193.pdf","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-193.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID; court/date":"S_AZ-P13-S042 — Cortez Byrd Chips v. Bill Harbert Construction, U.S. Supreme Court, March 21, 2000","Full literal URL; material read":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-193.pdf. Official majority pp. 195–204 / PDF 2–11.","Facts, posture, holding/disposition, and limits":"Construction dispute with competing confirmation/vacatur filings. FAA §§ 9–11 venue provisions permissive; reversed/remanded. Unanimous. This is not a holding on § 9’s one-year limitation question. \ngovinfo.gov"},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S042","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S043","urls":["https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-563/pdf/USREPORTS-563-333.pdf","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-563/pdf/USREPORTS-563-333.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S043","Route and actual read status":"AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-563/pdf/USREPORTS-563-333.pdf. Syllabus/caption material only.","Disposition":"Not relied on as a freshly read holding. References to it inside other opinions do not convert it into a full body read."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S043","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S044","urls":["https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2017/CV-16-0260-PR%20Opinion.pdf","https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2017/CV-16-0260-PR%20Opinion.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S044","Route and actual read status":"Hamblen v. Hatch: https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2017/CV-16-0260-PR%20Opinion.pdf. Caption and initial material only.","Disposition":"Not relied on. Its appearance in Duncan is not a separate fresh underlying-authority read."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S044","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}},{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S045","urls":["https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/02/28/24-1645.pdf","https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/02/28/24-1645.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_AZ-P13-S045","Route and actual read status":"Jones v. Starz: https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/02/28/24-1645.pdf. Partial facts and § 4 discussion; full majority/disposition not completed.","Disposition":"Not relied on. No mass-arbitration fee, consolidation, or refusal-to-arbitrate holding is asserted from this partial read."},"coordinator_verification_status":"source_record_reconciled_unreopened_body_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"source_id":"S_AZ-P13-S045","all_original_cells_read":true,"researcher_record_unchanged":true,"fresh_read_map_entries":[],"selected_body_checks":[],"dated_reuse":[],"status":"Originalrecordreconciled;underlyingbodynotfreshlyreopened","all_current_primary_source_accepted":false,"all_original_failures_partial_version_judicial_pixels_application_holds_preserved":true}}],"coverage":[{"topic":"G001","researcher_record":{"Row":"G001","Requested issue":"Fresh access and baseline distinction","Status; claims":"Answered; C001, C105","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Retain October 27 access and unknown individual opening seconds; do not relabel October 22 as fresh."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":0,"topic":"G001","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G002","researcher_record":{"Row":"G002","Requested issue":"Distinct Arizona arbitration families","Status; claims":"Answered; C002–C005","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Apply only after agreement/category facts are known."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":1,"topic":"G002","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G003","researcher_record":{"Row":"G003","Requested issue":"2010 savings and accrued-right transition","Status; claims":"Partial; C004","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Recover official final chapter image and responsive construction for disputed pre-2011 rights."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":2,"topic":"G003","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G004","researcher_record":{"Row":"G004","Requested issue":"Material later Arizona amendments","Status; claims":"Partial; C001","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Extend beyond the bounded tables/compilation if a later enactment issue is presented."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":3,"topic":"G004","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G005","researcher_record":{"Row":"G005","Requested issue":"Revised-act listed exclusions","Status; claims":"Answered; C003","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Establish actual institutional and transaction predicates before classification."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":4,"topic":"G005","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G006","researcher_record":{"Row":"G006","Requested issue":"Older-act employment exclusion and court definition","Status; claims":"Answered; C005","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Do not transfer superior-court definition to every other regime."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":5,"topic":"G006","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G007","researcher_record":{"Row":"G007","Requested issue":"FAA writing and commerce predicates","Status; claims":"Answered; C006","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual writing and commerce evidence remain necessary."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":6,"topic":"G007","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G008","researcher_record":{"Row":"G008","Requested issue":"FAA transportation-worker exclusion","Status; claims":"Partial; C007","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Full worker-class construction and actual employment facts deferred."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":7,"topic":"G008","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G009","researcher_record":{"Row":"G009","Requested issue":"2022 special-federal exclusion and application date","Status; claims":"Partial; C007","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Underlying special-claim definitions and actual triggering facts remain outside this ordinary-debt model."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":8,"topic":"G009","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G010","researcher_record":{"Row":"G010","Requested issue":"State versus federal subject-matter jurisdiction","Status; claims":"Answered; C008, C012","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"No actual jurisdictional finding."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":9,"topic":"G010","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":["S_AZ-P13-V001"]}},{"topic":"G011","researcher_record":{"Row":"G011","Requested issue":"§ 4 look-through","Status; claims":"Answered; C009","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Identify the actual underlying well-pleaded controversy."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":10,"topic":"G011","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G012","researcher_record":{"Row":"G012","Requested issue":"Award-stage no-look-through distinction","Status; claims":"Answered; C010","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Establish an independent award-application jurisdictional basis."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":11,"topic":"G012","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":["S_AZ-P13-V001"]}},{"topic":"G013","researcher_record":{"Row":"G013","Requested issue":"Initial forum, venue, and § 4 geographic restriction","Status; claims":"Partial; C011, C039","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual clause, court competence, and forum facts absent; no general venue dossier."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":12,"topic":"G013","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G014","researcher_record":{"Row":"G014","Requested issue":"Agreement existence and authentic version","Status; claims":"Partial; C019–C021","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual complete agreement, version, delivery, and assent evidence absent."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":13,"topic":"G014","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G015","researcher_record":{"Row":"G015","Requested issue":"Capacity and agency authority","Status; claims":"Partial; C018, C020","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Ordinary authority instrument and capacity facts absent."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":14,"topic":"G015","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G016","researcher_record":{"Row":"G016","Requested issue":"Consideration","Status; claims":"Partial; C020","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual bargain and applicable contract-law facts absent."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":15,"topic":"G016","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G017","researcher_record":{"Row":"G017","Requested issue":"Electronic record/signature legal effect","Status; claims":"Answered; C013–C014","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Electronic form alone neither validates nor defeats agreement."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":16,"topic":"G017","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G018","researcher_record":{"Row":"G018","Requested issue":"Electronic delivery, receipt, and notice","Status; claims":"Partial; C015–C016","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual designated system, retainability, transmission content, and consent absent."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":17,"topic":"G018","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G019","researcher_record":{"Row":"G019","Requested issue":"E-SIGN § 7002 interaction","Status; claims":"Unresolved; C016","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Recover current official § 7002 body through a permitted public source; no bypass."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":18,"topic":"G019","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Unresolved","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G020","researcher_record":{"Row":"G020","Requested issue":"Modification, opt-out, and termination reservation","Status; claims":"Partial; C022–C023","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Establish at-will character, actual notices, rejection, and burden; fixed-term branch needs separate authority."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":19,"topic":"G020","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G021","researcher_record":{"Row":"G021","Requested issue":"Survival and clause scope","Status; claims":"Partial; C024, C034","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual termination/survival language and dispute connection absent."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":20,"topic":"G021","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G022","researcher_record":{"Row":"G022","Requested issue":"Formation versus whole-contract/clause validity","Status; claims":"Answered; C020, C024, C026","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Apply the distinction to the actual challenge’s target."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":21,"topic":"G022","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G023","researcher_record":{"Row":"G023","Requested issue":"Clear delegation and conflicting later contracts","Status; claims":"Answered; C025–C028","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"No delegation presumed from a label."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":22,"topic":"G023","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G024","researcher_record":{"Row":"G024","Requested issue":"Institutional-rule incorporation as delegation","Status; claims":"Partial; C029–C030","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual incorporation/access and responsive consumer-specific application remain necessary."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":23,"topic":"G024","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G025","researcher_record":{"Row":"G025","Requested issue":"Private administrative suspension versus court stay","Status; claims":"Answered; C031","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"No actual policy request or court order exists."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":24,"topic":"G025","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G026","researcher_record":{"Row":"G026","Requested issue":"Nonsignatory enforcement principles","Status; claims":"Answered; C035–C037","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Recognized theory must fit actual parties and claims."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":25,"topic":"G026","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G027","researcher_record":{"Row":"G027","Requested issue":"Assignee/debt-buyer transfer of this enforcement right","Status; claims":"Partial; C038","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Directly responsive Arizona consumer assignment authority and actual chain/account inclusion remain missing."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":26,"topic":"G027","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G028","researcher_record":{"Row":"G028","Requested issue":"National-bank agreement later transferred to nonbank","Status; claims":"Unresolved; C003, C038","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Need authoritative treatment of this precise statutory/assignment branch and the actual agreement."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":27,"topic":"G028","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Unresolved","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G029","researcher_record":{"Row":"G029","Requested issue":"Servicer/affiliate authority","Status; claims":"Partial; C038","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Need actual authority and enforcement theory; label insufficient."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":28,"topic":"G029","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G030","researcher_record":{"Row":"G030","Requested issue":"Underlying debt validity and amount","Status; claims":"Excluded; C094, C098","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Separate merits/evidence pass; unreviewed P10 is not a premise."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":29,"topic":"G030","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Excluded","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G031","researcher_record":{"Row":"G031","Requested issue":"Cost-barrier defense","Status; claims":"Partial; C032","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Applicable fee schedule, relief mechanisms, and individualized evidence absent."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":30,"topic":"G031","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G032","researcher_record":{"Row":"G032","Requested issue":"Neutral contract defenses and arbitration-specific discrimination","Status; claims":"Answered; C018, C033","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual ordinary defense remains fact-dependent."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":31,"topic":"G032","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G033","researcher_record":{"Row":"G033","Requested issue":"Revised-act motion route and opposed determination","Status; claims":"Answered; C039–C040","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual motion and jurisdiction absent."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":32,"topic":"G033","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G034","researcher_record":{"Row":"G034","Requested issue":"Older-act application route","Status; claims":"Answered; C041","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Apply its particular confirmation exception separately."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":33,"topic":"G034","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G035","researcher_record":{"Row":"G035","Requested issue":"FAA § 4 notice, hearing, and disputed-formation trial","Status; claims":"Answered; C042","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual genuine dispute, service, and timely jury demand absent."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":34,"topic":"G035","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G036","researcher_record":{"Row":"G036","Requested issue":"Exact valid service in a particular proceeding","Status; claims":"Unresolved; C039, C041, C055, C089","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Current initial-service body, actual forum, residency, method, and proof not supplied."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":35,"topic":"G036","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Unresolved","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G037","researcher_record":{"Row":"G037","Requested issue":"Appointment and neutral disclosure gateway","Status; claims":"Answered; C043, C064","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual agreed method and conflict facts absent."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":36,"topic":"G037","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G038","researcher_record":{"Row":"G038","Requested issue":"Federal litigation-conduct waiver after Morgan","Status; claims":"Answered; C048–C049","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"No fixed waiver period; actual totality required."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":37,"topic":"G038","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G039","researcher_record":{"Row":"G039","Requested issue":"Comprehensive Arizona follow-on waiver rule","Status; claims":"Partial; C050","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Gray is limited; obtain directly responsive current Arizona treatment for the precise state-law posture."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":38,"topic":"G039","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G040","researcher_record":{"Row":"G040","Requested issue":"Arizona judicial-action stays","Status; claims":"Answered; C044, C046","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Identify applicable act and covered claims."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":39,"topic":"G040","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G041","researcher_record":{"Row":"G041","Requested issue":"Whether arbitration itself continues during court challenge","Status; claims":"Answered; C045","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual court order can change the default."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":40,"topic":"G041","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G042","researcher_record":{"Row":"G042","Requested issue":"Requested federal stay after Smith","Status; claims":"Answered; C047","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"§ 3 predicates and request must be established."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":41,"topic":"G042","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G043","researcher_record":{"Row":"G043","Requested issue":"FAA § 16 appeal categories/finality","Status; claims":"Answered; C051","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual order classification and appeal jurisdiction remain unknown."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":42,"topic":"G043","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G044","researcher_record":{"Row":"G044","Requested issue":"Arizona statutory appeals and FAA-only special-action distinction","Status; claims":"Answered; C052–C053","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Exact procedural implementation and actual court posture remain separate."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":43,"topic":"G044","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G045","researcher_record":{"Row":"G045","Requested issue":"Covered federal appeal stay after Bielski","Status; claims":"Answered; C054, C058","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"No transfer to every state appeal or collateral matter."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":44,"topic":"G045","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G046","researcher_record":{"Row":"G046","Requested issue":"Current Arizona appellate timing and special-action procedure","Status; claims":"Unresolved; C053, C060","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Recover current ARCAP and special-action bodies/adoption chain."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":45,"topic":"G046","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Unresolved","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G047","researcher_record":{"Row":"G047","Requested issue":"Current Arizona Rule 6 authentication","Status; claims":"Partial; C059","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Historical official orders and nonofficial reproduction recovered; complete current official chain remains missing."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":46,"topic":"G047","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G048","researcher_record":{"Row":"G048","Requested issue":"Federal computation and appeal timing framework","Status; claims":"Answered; C056–C058","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual entry, motion, court zone, and filing conditions absent."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":47,"topic":"G048","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G049","researcher_record":{"Row":"G049","Requested issue":"Arbitration initiation notice and participation objection","Status; claims":"Partial; C062","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual contract method, initiation record, receipt, and objection timing absent."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":48,"topic":"G049","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G050","researcher_record":{"Row":"G050","Requested issue":"Hearing fairness, nonappearance, and representation","Status; claims":"Partial; C063–C064","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Full institutional procedure and actual hearing record not investigated."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":49,"topic":"G050","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G051","researcher_record":{"Row":"G051","Requested issue":"Award form, making, delivery, notice, and lateness objection","Status; claims":"Answered; C065–C066","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual dates and documents absent."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":50,"topic":"G051","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G052","researcher_record":{"Row":"G052","Requested issue":"Arbitrator correction versus court correction","Status; claims":"Answered; C067–C068","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Keep each trigger and potentially variable procedure separate."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":51,"topic":"G052","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G053","researcher_record":{"Row":"G053","Requested issue":"Revised-act confirmation","Status; claims":"Answered; C069","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"No inference of an unlimited time from one section’s silence."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":52,"topic":"G053","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G054","researcher_record":{"Row":"G054","Requested issue":"Revised-act vacatur grounds","Status; claims":"Answered; C070–C074","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual proof and statutory prejudice predicates absent."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":53,"topic":"G054","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G055","researcher_record":{"Row":"G055","Requested issue":"Revised-act ninety-day and discovery triggers","Status; claims":"Answered; C075–C076","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual receipt and reasonable discovery facts absent."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":54,"topic":"G055","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G056","researcher_record":{"Row":"G056","Requested issue":"Revised-act modification/correction","Status; claims":"Answered; C077","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual defect must fit the listed categories."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":55,"topic":"G056","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G057","researcher_record":{"Row":"G057","Requested issue":"Older-act confirmation and twenty-day service trigger","Status; claims":"Answered; C081","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual valid complaint-style service absent."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":56,"topic":"G057","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G058","researcher_record":{"Row":"G058","Requested issue":"Older-act opposition and absence of a stated ninety-day vacatur period","Status; claims":"Partial; C082","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Responsive construction of outside timing/postjudgment consequences remains needed."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":57,"topic":"G058","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G059","researcher_record":{"Row":"G059","Requested issue":"Older-act correction and Rule 60 cross-reference","Status; claims":"Partial; C083","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Current rule-number reconciliation and actual judgment posture missing."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":58,"topic":"G059","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G060","researcher_record":{"Row":"G060","Requested issue":"FAA confirmation, one-year text, and late application","Status; claims":"Partial; C085","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Controlling treatment of an application beyond one year remains held."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":59,"topic":"G060","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G061","researcher_record":{"Row":"G061","Requested issue":"FAA vacatur/modification and limited review","Status; claims":"Answered; C086–C087, C092","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"No general merits appeal or expanded contractual legal-error review."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":60,"topic":"G061","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G062","researcher_record":{"Row":"G062","Requested issue":"FAA notice service, filed/delivered trigger, equitable tolling","Status; claims":"Partial; C088–C089, C093","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual trigger/service and a qualifying tolling record absent; no state discovery-rule substitution."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":61,"topic":"G062","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G063","researcher_record":{"Row":"G063","Requested issue":"Review motion versus enforcement stay","Status; claims":"Partial; C090, C095","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual stay order, scope, and current state implementation absent."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":62,"topic":"G063","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G064","researcher_record":{"Row":"G064","Requested issue":"Award, judgment, fees, and actual cash distinction","Status; claims":"Answered; C079–C080, C084, C091, C104","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"No actual fee entitlement, enforcement permission, or payment finding."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":63,"topic":"G064","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G065","researcher_record":{"Row":"G065","Requested issue":"Published opinions and later treatment","Status; claims":"Partial; C105; S020–S042","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Full citator and subsequent-history investigation not performed."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":64,"topic":"G065","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":["S_AZ-P13-V001"]}},{"topic":"G066","researcher_record":{"Row":"G066","Requested issue":"Unpublished-opinion use","Status; claims":"Excluded; C105","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"No unpublished decision relied on; current citation rule would be required before such use."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":65,"topic":"G066","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Excluded","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G067","researcher_record":{"Row":"G067","Requested issue":"Partial candidate opinions versus actual holding reads","Status; claims":"Partial; C105; S043–S045","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Finish the majority bodies only if a distinct unresolved proposition makes them necessary."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":66,"topic":"G067","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G068","researcher_record":{"Row":"G068","Requested issue":"County/local rules, Justice Court/Small Claims competence, generic forms","Status; claims":"Unresolved; C039, C053, C060","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"No local practice or court-specific form validation; current competent-court and local-rule bodies needed."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":67,"topic":"G068","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Unresolved","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G069","researcher_record":{"Row":"G069","Requested issue":"Other-state choice of law and interstate territorial facts","Status; claims":"Unresolved; C006, C012, C038","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual choice clause, forum, commerce, and conflict-law authority absent."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":68,"topic":"G069","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Unresolved","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G070","researcher_record":{"Row":"G070","Requested issue":"Tribal law and jurisdiction","Status; claims":"Excluded; C096","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Separate tribal agreement, jurisdiction, and enforcement investigation required."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":69,"topic":"G070","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Excluded","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G071","researcher_record":{"Row":"G071","Requested issue":"Foreign seat and convention regimes","Status; claims":"Excluded; C096","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"FAA chapters 2–3 and actual international predicates not investigated."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":70,"topic":"G071","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Excluded","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G072","researcher_record":{"Row":"G072","Requested issue":"Military-specific arbitration restrictions","Status; claims":"Excluded; C007, C096","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Applicable military statute/regulation and actual covered status require a separate pass."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":71,"topic":"G072","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Excluded","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G073","researcher_record":{"Row":"G073","Requested issue":"Full employment arbitration regime","Status; claims":"Excluded; C003, C005, C007","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Employment cases used only for responsive general procedural holdings."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":72,"topic":"G073","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Excluded","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G074","researcher_record":{"Row":"G074","Requested issue":"Insurance-specific arbitration law","Status; claims":"Excluded; C003","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Older-act routing identified; full insurance/federal interaction deferred."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":73,"topic":"G074","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Excluded","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G075","researcher_record":{"Row":"G075","Requested issue":"Securities/SRO arbitration regime","Status; claims":"Excluded; C003, C093","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Classification boundary and Move holding do not establish full FINRA/SRO procedure."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":74,"topic":"G075","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Excluded","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G076","researcher_record":{"Row":"G076","Requested issue":"Secured-debt, mortgage, foreclosure, and repossession arbitration","Status; claims":"Excluded; C096","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Separate sector and collateral rules required."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":75,"topic":"G076","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Excluded","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G077","researcher_record":{"Row":"G077","Requested issue":"Bankruptcy stay, discharge, and arbitration interaction","Status; claims":"Excluded; C096","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"No bankruptcy jurisdiction, stay, core/noncore, or discharge determination."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":76,"topic":"G077","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Excluded","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G078","researcher_record":{"Row":"G078","Requested issue":"Federal administrative arbitration","Status; claims":"Excluded; C086","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"FAA § 10(c) boundary noted; referenced administrative regime not researched."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":77,"topic":"G078","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Excluded","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G079","researcher_record":{"Row":"G079","Requested issue":"Broader remedies, contract damages, and full surety/fee litigation","Status; claims":"Excluded; C080, C094","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Only award-gateway distinctions supplied; no damages or fee recovery determination."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":78,"topic":"G079","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Excluded","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G080","researcher_record":{"Row":"G080","Requested issue":"Provider access/fees, CSO, licensing, and collection communications","Status; claims":"Excluded; C096","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Separate earlier scopes remain unreviewed or separately reviewed as supplied; no incorporation here."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":79,"topic":"G080","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Excluded","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G081","researcher_record":{"Row":"G081","Requested issue":"General service/default, limitations, judgment duration/renewal","Status; claims":"Excluded; C095–C096","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"No unreviewed prior clock or conclusion imported."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":80,"topic":"G081","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Excluded","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G082","researcher_record":{"Row":"G082","Requested issue":"Wage, bank, homestead, and other enforcement/property regimes","Status; claims":"Excluded; C091, C094–C096","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Award/judgment distinction does not authorize levy or establish exemptions."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":81,"topic":"G082","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Excluded","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G083","researcher_record":{"Row":"G083","Requested issue":"Administrator fee/access schedule and incorporated policy version","Status; claims":"Partial; C030–C032, C080","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Exact applicable dated schedule, waiver provisions, and contract incorporation absent; unknown fee is not zero."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":82,"topic":"G083","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Partial","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G084","researcher_record":{"Row":"G084","Requested issue":"M01 electronic-assent/delegation alternatives","Status; claims":"Answered; C097","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Conditional model complete; actual record remains absent."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":83,"topic":"G084","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G085","researcher_record":{"Row":"G085","Requested issue":"M02 assignment/servicer alternatives and money separation","Status; claims":"Answered; C098","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Conditional model complete; no ownership finding."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":84,"topic":"G085","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G086","researcher_record":{"Row":"G086","Requested issue":"M03 litigation/stay/appeal sequence","Status; claims":"Answered; C099","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Conditional model complete; no real deadline or waiver outcome."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":85,"topic":"G086","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G087","researcher_record":{"Row":"G087","Requested issue":"M04 award/calendar/cash alternatives","Status; claims":"Answered; C100–C104","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Conditional model complete; exact forum, actual service, and current-rule holds preserved."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":86,"topic":"G087","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}},{"topic":"G088","researcher_record":{"Row":"G088","Requested issue":"Sixteen additional actor/channel/stage postures","Status; claims":"Answered; C013–C095","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Each is conditional; none is an actual eligibility or collection decision."},"raw_table":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_coordinator_review_all_remaining_source_currentness_application_parent_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_review_note":{"row_zero_based":87,"topic":"G088","raw_table":13,"all_original_cells_read":true,"original_researcher_status":"Answered","researcher_record_unchanged":true,"remaining_question_and_next_source_action_unchanged":true,"accepted":false,"validation_only_questions":[]}}],"annotations":{},"corrections":[],"resolved_corrections":[],"review_history":[{"id":"S_AZ-P13-REVIEW-SCOPE","status":"scoped_coordinator_review_complete_with_validation_source_currentness_judicial_application_holds","at":null},{"id":"S_AZ-P13-V001","status":"UNSENT_validation_question","at":null}]}