FIND THE EXPLANATION
Use the notice, agreement, and places connected to the debt to find the right court, regulator, or legal-help service.
Explore Nebraska information →This address preserves a dated source document behind the guide. The complete explanation covers the questions, comparisons and next steps for this subject.
If you came here to check a specific citation, open the original archive below. It includes its source dates and recorded qualifications.
The explanation above is written for readers. These original working documents preserve the evidence trail, including technical language, dated passages and known corrections. They have not all received independent professional review. Use the marked limits before relying on a particular rule or figure.
Read the evidence with its boundaries. These are saved research components, including revisions. A scoped coordinator review checks selected evidence; it does not certify every claim, a complete jurisdiction, current law or individual applicability. Dates and access limits remain attached to the records.
Actual fresh check: October 26, 2026 Pacific / October 26, 2026 UTC Status: Same-coordinator bounded correction; not independent review. PASS-19 remains immutable. Only the affected sections, claims, source annotations, matrix rows, and coverage classifications below are replaced or qualified. PASS-21 was completed before this response.
| Group | Disposition | Effect on PASS-19 |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Nonweekly Nebraska rule and rounding edge | Common nonweekly periods answered; uncommon periods and legal rounding convention remain partial. The complete one-page Nebraska Department of Labor rule was visually read. It prescribes 60, 65, and 130 times the federal minimum wage for biweekly, semimonthly, and monthly pay periods. | Replace PASS-19 §C3 and change “Other pay periods” from fully answered to partial. Preserve the core lesser-of formulas and all 13 original examples. |
| 2. Twenty-day trigger and mandatory continuing-lien language | Answered for the unsatisfactory-answer branch. The 20 days run from filing of the garnishee’s interrogatory answers. The separate court-order-noncompliance trigger remains unresolved. Section 25-1056(2) uses mandatory “shall” language once all listed predicates exist. | Replace C030, C021, §F3, the corresponding master-matrix rows, and their coverage rows. |
| 3. Source versions and limited outcome annotations | Answered with explicit source limitations. The CC 3:8N public PDF has conflicting text-layer and rendered-page revision indicators; Florence Lake’s disclosure discussion and actual ERISA outcome are now precisely separated; the CCPA body is verified from the official 2024 U.S. Code edition, but the prior claimed OLRC 119-124 header was not replicated. | Replace the CC 3:8N form annotation, Florence Lake pinpoint/outcome annotation, P19 S010 currentness statement, and qualify C037’s payment-plan/stay wording. |
Neb. Rev. Stat. §25-1558(7) directs the Nebraska Commissioner of Labor to prescribe an equivalent federal-minimum-wage multiple for pay periods other than a week. The current Nebraska Department of Labor regulations index lists Title 230 — Labor Standards, Chapter 2 — Wages; Subject To Garnishment, and links to a one-page rule. The rule states:
The PDF states that it was adopted under §25-1558(7). It bears an Attorney General approval dated April 10, 1991, Governor approval dated May 17, 1991, and Secretary of State filing stamp dated May 17, 1991. It does not display a separate effective date, later amendment history, or superseding rulemaking order. Its inclusion in NDOL’s current public regulations index supports current publication status, but a complete rulemaking-history audit was not performed. Nebraska Department of Labor+2
At the presently verified federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour, the Nebraska regulatory floors are:
| Pay period | Nebraska Title 230 multiplier | Protected floor |
|---|---|---|
| Biweekly | 60 × $7.25 | $435.00 |
| Semimonthly | 65 × $7.25 | $471.25 |
| Monthly | 130 × $7.25 | $942.50 |
The current federal minimum wage remains $7.25. Department of Labor+2
Let:
Plain text
D = disposable earnings for the pay period
F = Nebraska regulatory floor for that pay period
For a debtor who is not head of a family:
Plain text
Maximum ordinary withholding
= max(0, lesser of:
25% × D
D − F)
For a debtor who is head of a family:
Plain text
Maximum ordinary withholding
= max(0, lesser of:
25% × D
D − F
15% × D)
Because 15% is always less than 25%, the head-of-family formula can be expressed mathematically as:
Plain text
max(0, lesser of:
15% × D
D − F)
This is a synthesis of §25-1558(1) and (7) with Title 230, Chapter 2; it is not a separate sentence appearing verbatim in the regulation. Nebraska Legislature+1
The federal rule independently transforms the weekly formula for longer pay periods by using workweeks or fractions of workweeks and treats a month as 4⅓ workweeks. Its present biweekly, semimonthly, and monthly floors agree with Nebraska’s 60/65/130 multipliers. Federal §870.10 also says the date earnings are paid or payable controls the applicable federal minimum wage. eCFR+2
Nebraska Title 230, Chapter 2 expressly lists only:
It does not state a separate Nebraska multiplier for an irregular ten-day, quarterly, four-week, or other uncommon nonweekly pay period. Federal §870.10 supplies a federal workweek-or-fraction method for other longer pay periods, but no separate current Nebraska rule or controlling Nebraska opinion was located prescribing the state-law multiplier for every unlisted pay period.
Replacement coverage classification: common nonweekly periods are answered; unlisted Nebraska pay periods remain partial/unresolved.
The December 2024 DOL Fact Sheet #30 publishes these rounded transition figures:
Those are DOL’s published guidance figures, not fabricated amounts and not grounds to reject PASS-19’s 13 worked examples. Department of Labor+1
The exact mathematical crossing between the 25% branch and the amount-above-floor branch is:
Plain text
0.25D = D − F
0.75D = F
D = F ÷ 0.75
| Period | Floor F | Exact crossing F ÷ .75 | Published DOL display |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semimonthly | $471.25 | $628.333333… | $628.33 |
| Monthly | $942.50 | $1,256.666666… | $1,256.66 |
Assume:
Plain text
Monthly disposable earnings D = $1,256.66
Monthly floor F = $942.50
Calculations:
Plain text
25% branch:
$1,256.66 × .25 = $314.165
Amount-above-floor branch:
$1,256.66 − $942.50 = $314.16
Exact lesser amount:
lesser of $314.165 and $314.16 = $314.16
On those inputs, the mathematical ceiling is $314.16, not $314.17.
The same narrow issue appears at semimonthly disposable earnings of $628.33:
Plain text
25% branch:
$628.33 × .25 = $157.0825
Amount-above-floor branch:
$628.33 − $471.25 = $157.08
Exact lesser amount:
$157.08
No Nebraska statute, Title 230 clause, federal regulation, or official guidance located in this bounded pass prescribes a universal payroll rule for rounding a half-cent generated by one branch. The safe legal relationship is therefore:
The published rounded transition table does not displace the statutory lesser-of equation, and a withholding calculation should not exceed the lower branch on the actual disposable-earnings inputs.
This is a mathematical and source-precision clarification, not a new payroll-rounding rule.
All 13 PASS-19 examples remain unchanged. None used the $1,256.66 monthly edge in a way that exceeded the lower branch.
When a creditor is dissatisfied with the garnishee’s interrogatory answers, the creditor’s application to determine garnishee liability must be filed within 20 days after the answers are filed with the court.
It does not run from:
In Huntington v. Pedersen, the Nebraska Supreme Court held that failing to apply within 20 days after the garnishee filed its answers produces the mandatory statutory result that the garnishee is released and discharged. The controlling discussion is at printed pages 305–306, zero-based PDF indices 11–12. Nebraska.gov+2
If the creditor is dissatisfied with a garnishee’s filed interrogatory answers, an application to determine garnishee liability must be filed within 20 days after those answers are filed. Failure to do so requires release and discharge of the garnishee in the affected garnishment-liability proceeding. The deadline does not wait for service or actual notice to the creditor.
Source: Neb. Rev. Stat. §25-1030; Huntington v. Pedersen, 294 Neb. 294, printed pp.305–306/PDF indices 11–12.
Limit: This correction does not establish universal immunity from a later, valid garnishment directed at different funds, property, or a later service-date obligation.
Section 25-1030 also applies where a garnishee fails to comply with a court order by:
The statute says the creditor may file an application “within twenty days,” but it does not expressly identify whether that branch runs from:
Huntington decided the filed-answer branch. It did not resolve this separate trigger. The trigger for court-order noncompliance therefore remains unresolved. Nebraska Legislature+1
| Stage | Correct trigger | Required action | Consequence | Qualification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creditor challenges an unsatisfactory garnishee answer | Filing of garnishee’s answers | Application to determine liability within 20 days after filing | Garnishee released and discharged if application is untimely | No service or actual-notice trigger |
| Garnishee fails to comply with court delivery/payment/undertaking order | Unresolved | §25-1030 says an application must be filed within 20 days | Untimely failure can result in discharge, but exact trigger is held | Order, service, compliance date, and controlling interpretation needed |
| Continuing-lien transfer/order | Qualifying answer + no successful written objection + creditor application | Court shall order transfer of withheld nonexempt earnings; on creditor application, court shall further order continuing lien | Mandatory conditional order | No automatic lien without application, predicates, and court order |
The prior “court may order” wording is replaced with:
If the garnishee’s answer shows that the debtor was employed, that earnings were owed when the garnishment order was served, or that earnings will be owed within 60 days; no successful written objection to the order or answer has been filed; and the judgment creditor applies, the court shall order transfer of the nonexempt earnings withheld after service. Upon the creditor’s application, the court shall further order a continuing lien.
The statute’s language is mandatory once every listed predicate is satisfied. It does not create an automatic lien upon service, employment, or filing of the employer’s answer alone. Nebraska Legislature
Neb. Rev. Stat. §25-1056(3)(d) makes a continuing lien invalid when the proceedings are stayed by a court of competent jurisdiction, including the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. Mere:
does not itself establish that statutory court stay. Nebraska Legislature
A separate agreed payment plan or forbearance can impose contract-specific restrictions. The current Judicial Branch plaintiff and defendant packets state that payment plans should be written and filed with the court and that garnishment should not proceed while the debtor is performing under the plan. Those statements are operational guidance, not the text of §25-1056(3)(d). The actual agreement, authority, filing, conditions, missed-payment event, enforceability, and any court order remain record dependent. Nebraska Judicial Branch+3
The original PASS-19 observation that the rendered CC 3:8N form displayed Rev. 03/2022 remains historically accurate.
The fresh October 26, 2026 public-source check produced conflicting official-PDF indicators:
CC 3:8N has inconsistent public rendering/version evidence as of October 26, 2026. The extracted text identifies Rev. 08/2026, while a rendered-page image surfaced Rev. 03/2022. Current CC 3:8Na instructions and the defendant packet are Rev. 08/2026. No precise file-replacement date is inferred. The form is operational guidance; §25-1011 and other controlling law govern.
No form was completed or submitted.
The prior limited use of Florence Lake Investments v. Berg is clarified as follows.
At printed pages 197–198, zero-based PDF indices 14–15, the Nebraska Supreme Court majority explained that:
At printed page 204, zero-based PDF index 21, the majority held that ERISA’s anti-alienation provision prevented the judgment creditor from acquiring the debtor’s rights to the 401(k) funds. It therefore affirmed the ruling that the plan administrator was not liable under the facts. The majority simultaneously emphasized that ERISA plan administrators must comply with Nebraska’s interrogatory-answer requirement and that willful refusal could still be addressed through the court’s contempt power. The concurrence begins after the majority’s conclusion and is not the majority holding. Nebraska.gov
A statutory duty to answer and disclose is not itself a holding that the garnishee is liable for the disclosed property. Florence Lake affirmed no liability because ERISA prevented the creditor from acquiring rights to the plan funds, while preserving the administrator’s duty to answer.
This patch does not undertake a complete ERISA or retirement-benefit analysis.
PASS-19 S010 previously identified six OLRC 119-124 pages for 15 U.S.C. §§1672–1677 as displaying currency through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026. That exact header was not replicated in the coordinator’s bounded checks, and the unchanged failed routes were not repeatedly retried in PASS-22.
The official accessible substitute was:
Plain text
https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/15/1673
That two-page official GovInfo PDF contains the complete operative bodies of §§1671–1677 at:
GovInfo’s content-details page identifies the material as the 2024 Edition of the United States Code, which it describes as the most recent edition available on that site. The PDF itself does not display a Public Law 119-124 / October 15, 2026 currency header. GovInfo+2
The substantive bodies of 15 U.S.C. §§1672–1677 were verified from the official 2024 U.S. Code edition on GovInfo. Exact compilation currency through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026 was not independently replicated and remains held. No claim is made that the 2024 Edition proves the absence of later statutory amendments.
The current eCFR source is different. Title 29 stated that it was up to date through October 22, 2026 and last amended October 14, 2026. The complete material §870.10 body was checked there. That verifies the current regulatory text; it does not independently authenticate the unreplicated OLRC statutory-compilation header. eCFR
The DOL’s current public minimum-wage pages and December 2024 Fact Sheet #30 identify the federal minimum wage as $7.25, and the July 1, 2026 consolidated state table likewise treats $7.25 as the federal rate. Department of Labor+2
| PASS-19 location | Replacement or qualification |
|---|---|
| §C3 — Current pay-period floors | Replace with the Nebraska Title 230 multipliers, formula synthesis, current floors, uncommon-period hold, and rounding edge above. |
| Coverage: Other pay periods | Replace “Answered” with Partial: biweekly, semimonthly, and monthly are answered under Nebraska’s current published rule; other uncommon Nebraska pay periods remain unresolved. |
| C030 | Replace with the 20-days-after-answer-filing trigger and mandatory release/discharge consequence. |
| §F3 | Replace the unqualified “within 20 days” wording with the answer-filing trigger and separate unresolved court-order-noncompliance branch. |
| Master matrix: garnishee-answer dispute | Replace with the corrected trigger row above. |
| Coverage: employer-answer challenge | Answered for unsatisfactory filed answers; partial for court-order noncompliance trigger. |
| C021 | Replace “may order” with the exact mandatory conditional “shall order” and “shall further order” wording. |
| C037 | Preserve court/bankruptcy stay rule; qualify negotiations and complaints; separately recognize record-dependent agreed payment-plan restrictions. |
| P19 S008 pinpoint | Correct to Huntington, printed pp.305–306/PDF indices 11–12 for the filed-answer trigger and mandatory discharge holding. |
| CC 3:8N inventory row | Replace with the conflicting 03/2022 rendered-image and 08/2026 parsed-text/current-companion-source annotation. |
| Florence Lake annotation | Add printed pp.197–198/PDF indices 14–15 and majority outcome at printed p.204/PDF index 21; distinguish disclosure duty from liability. |
| P19 S010 | Replace the unreplicated 119-124 currentness assertion with the official GovInfo 2024 Edition body source and explicit currentness hold. |
| Original 13 examples | Unchanged. |
| All other PASS-19 claims, sources, and gaps | Unchanged. |
| Claim ID | Precise corrected claim | Source and pinpoint | Conditions, consequence, confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| S_NE-P22-C001 | Nebraska Title 230, Chapter 2 prescribes federal-minimum-wage multiples of 60 for biweekly, 65 for semimonthly, and 130 for monthly disposable earnings. | S_NE-P22-S001–S003; Title 230 Ch.2 §§001–002, printed 230-2.1/PDF index 0. | Applies with §25-1558; high for text. |
| S_NE-P22-C002 | For the three listed nonweekly periods, Nebraska’s ordinary limit is the lesser of 25%, the amount above the applicable Title 230 floor, and 15% where head-of-family status applies. | S_NE-P22-S001–S004. | Statutory/regulatory synthesis; exceptions in §25-1558(2) remain; high. |
| S_NE-P22-C003 | Nebraska’s current published Title 230 rule does not state a multiplier for every uncommon nonweekly pay period. | S_NE-P22-S002–S004. | Federal §870.10 still supplies the federal ceiling; exact Nebraska state multiplier remains held. |
| S_NE-P22-C004 | DOL’s $628.33 and $1,256.66 transition figures are rounded published guidance; the exact lesser-of equation continues to control the actual mathematical ceiling. | S_NE-P22-S004–S005. | No universal legal payroll-rounding convention located; high for relationship, hold for rounding practice. |
| S_NE-P22-C005 | At monthly disposable earnings of $1,256.66 and a $942.50 floor, the exact lesser branch is $314.16. | S_NE-P22-S001–S005. | Arithmetic only; no entitlement or payroll-rounding rule established; high. |
| S_NE-P22-C006 | For an unsatisfactory garnishee answer, §25-1030’s 20 days run from filing of the garnishee’s interrogatory answers. | S_NE-P22-S006–S007; Huntington, printed pp.305–306/PDF indices 11–12. | Not service or actual receipt; high. |
| S_NE-P22-C007 | Untimely failure to challenge the filed answer requires release and discharge of the garnishee in the affected liability proceeding. | Same. | No universal immunity from later writs or different property established; high. |
| S_NE-P22-C008 | The 20-day trigger for §25-1030’s separate failure-to-comply-with-court-order branch is not identified by the statute or decided in Huntington. | S_NE-P22-S006–S007. | Unresolved. |
| S_NE-P22-C009 | Once §25-1056(2)’s answer, no-successful-objection, and creditor-application predicates exist, the court shall order transfer and shall further order a continuing lien. | S_NE-P22-S008, §25-1056(2). | No automatic lien without all predicates and court order; high. |
| S_NE-P22-C010 | Mere negotiation, complaint, or unilateral request does not itself establish the statutory court stay in §25-1056(3)(d). | S_NE-P22-S008. | An actual payment plan or forbearance can impose separate agreement-specific conditions; high/conditional. |
| S_NE-P22-C011 | The current public CC 3:8N source presents conflicting revision indicators: 08/2026 in extracted text and current companion materials, but 03/2022 in a rendered page image. | S_NE-P22-S009–S012. | Exact file-replacement timing not inferred; statute controls; high for observed discrepancy. |
| S_NE-P22-C012 | Florence Lake requires disclosure but held the plan administrator not liable because ERISA prevented the creditor from acquiring rights to the 401(k) funds. | S_NE-P22-S013, printed pp.197–198/PDF 14–15 and p.204/PDF 21. | Disclosure is not itself liability; high. |
| S_NE-P22-C013 | The official accessible CCPA body source verified here is the GovInfo 2024 U.S. Code edition, not a replicated OLRC 119-124/October 15, 2026 compilation. | S_NE-P22-S014–S015. | Exact 2026 statutory-compilation currency remains held; high. |
| S_NE-P22-C014 | Current eCFR Title 29 was displayed as up to date through October 22, 2026 and last amended October 14, 2026. | S_NE-P22-S004. | Regulatory currentness only; does not authenticate OLRC metadata; high. |
| Source ID | Title, issuer, full literal URL, pinpoint/read bounds | Status, version, and access limits | |---|---|---|---| | S_NE-P22-S001 | Neb. Rev. Stat. §25-1558 — Wages; subject to garnishment; amount; exceptions, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1558; subsections (1), (2), and (7), HTML/no PDF page. | Official current codification freshly read October 26, 2026 PT/UTC. Source history displays amendments through 2001 LB 489. No full later session-law audit. Nebraska Legislature | | S_NE-P22-S002 | NDOL Regulations Index, Nebraska Department of Labor. https://dol.nebraska.gov/StatutesAndRegulations/Regulations; lines 138–140, Title 230 Labor Standards, Chapter 02 Wages; Subject To Garnishment. | Current official index freshly read October 26, 2026. Confirms present public listing and link; does not itself supply amendment history. Nebraska Department of Labor+1 | | S_NE-P22-S003 | Title 230, Chapter 2 — Wages; Subject To Garnishment, Nebraska Department of Labor. https://dol.nebraska.gov/webdocs/Regulations/230%20-%20Safety%20and%20Labor%20Standards/230-02.pdf; §§001–002, printed page 230-2.1/PDF index 0. | One-page official PDF freshly inspected October 26, 2026. Stamps show AG approval Apr. 10, 1991, Governor approval May 17, 1991, SOS filing May 17, 1991. No express effective date or amendment history displayed. Current publication supported by S002; full adoption history not read. Nebraska Department of Labor+1 | | S_NE-P22-S004 | 29 C.F.R. Part 870, especially §870.10, eCFR. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870; §870.10(a)–(d), especially lines 127–170. | eCFR displayed Title 29 current through Oct. 22, 2026 and last amended Oct. 14, 2026. Authoritative but unofficial eCFR. Freshly read Oct. 26, 2026. eCFR+2 | | S_NE-P22-S005 | Fact Sheet #30: Wage Garnishment Protections of the CCPA, U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/30-cppa; December 2024, lines 107–120 and 153–159. | Current public DOL guidance freshly read Oct. 26, 2026. General guidance, not regulation. Supplies the rounded $628.33 and $1,256.66 chart. Department of Labor+1 | | S_NE-P22-S006 | Neb. Rev. Stat. §25-1030 — Garnishee; answer; controvert; liability; release, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1030; complete operative text, HTML/no PDF page. | Official current text freshly read Oct. 26, 2026. Statute does not identify the separate court-order-noncompliance trigger. Nebraska Legislature | | S_NE-P22-S007 | Huntington v. Pedersen, 294 Neb. 294, 883 N.W.2d 48 (2016), Nebraska Supreme Court. https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010005PUB; printed pp.305–306/PDF indices 11–12. | Final published opinion filed July 29, 2016; freshly read and page images inspected Oct. 26, 2026. Exact trigger and mandatory-discharge holding. Nebraska.gov+1 | | S_NE-P22-S008 | Neb. Rev. Stat. §25-1056, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1056; subsection (2), and subsection (3)(d). | Official current text freshly read Oct. 26, 2026. Mandatory conditional transfer/lien language and court-stay branch. Nebraska Legislature | | S_NE-P22-S009 | CC 3:8N — Request for Hearing on Garnishment, Nebraska Judicial Branch. https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8N.pdf; printed p.1/PDF index 0. | Fresh Oct. 26, 2026 access produced conflicting layers: parsed text stated Rev. 08/2026; rendered page image showed Rev. 03/2022. Exact replacement date not inferred. Operational form only. Nebraska Judicial Branch+1 | | S_NE-P22-S010 | CC 3:8Na — Completing the Request for Hearing on Garnishment, Nebraska Judicial Branch. https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8Na.pdf; printed p.1/PDF index 0. | Rev. 08/2026; freshly read and page image inspected Oct. 26, 2026. Operational instructions only. Nebraska Judicial Branch+1 | | S_NE-P22-S011 | CC 3:8.20 — Garnishment Packet, Plaintiff, Nebraska Judicial Branch. https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8-20.pdf; printed p.2/PDF index 3, payment-plan branch. | NEW 06/2026; freshly read and page image inspected Oct. 26, 2026. Self-help guidance, not controlling contract or stay law. Nebraska Judicial Branch+1 | | S_NE-P22-S012 | CC 3:8.21 — Garnishment Packet, Defendant, Nebraska Judicial Branch. https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8-21.pdf; printed p.2/PDF index 3, payment-plan branch; printed pp.4–5/PDF indices 5–6 for garnishment workflow. | Rev. 08/2026; freshly read and page image inspected Oct. 26, 2026. Operational guidance only. Nebraska Judicial Branch+1 | | S_NE-P22-S013 | Florence Lake Investments, LLC v. Berg, 312 Neb. 183, 978 N.W.2d 308 (2022), Nebraska Supreme Court. https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008782PUB; printed pp.197–198/PDF indices 14–15; majority outcome printed p.204/PDF index 21. | Final published opinion filed Aug. 12, 2022; freshly read and page images inspected Oct. 26, 2026. Retirement/ERISA merits not otherwise expanded. Nebraska.gov+2 | | S_NE-P22-S014 | 15 U.S.C. §§1671–1677, official 2024 Edition, GovInfo. PDF: https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/15/1673; content details: https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2024-title15/USCODE-2024-title15-chap41-subchapII-sec1673; printed pp.1550–1551/PDF indices 0–1. | Official GovInfo 2024 U.S. Code edition freshly read and page images inspected Oct. 26, 2026. Complete bodies of §§1671–1677. Does not establish currency through PL 119-124/Oct. 15, 2026. GovInfo+2 | | S_NE-P22-S015 | Unreplicated OLRC routes and alternate chapter route. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1672/; .../s1673/; .../s1674/; .../s1675/; .../s1676/; .../s1677/; alternate: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title15/chapter41/subchapter2&edition=prelim. | Coordinator-reported failures supplied in the assignment. PASS-22 did not repeat unchanged failed requests. Exact 119-124 header remains unverified. Not used as substantive authority. |
| Requested issue | Status after PASS-22 | Linked claims | Exact remaining gap or next action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nebraska biweekly multiplier | Answered | C001–C002 | Actual disposable earnings |
| Nebraska semimonthly multiplier | Answered | C001–C002 | Actual disposable earnings |
| Nebraska monthly multiplier | Answered | C001–C002 | Actual disposable earnings |
| Nebraska uncommon nonweekly period | Unresolved/partial | C003 | Current state rule or controlling interpretation for that period |
| Current federal minimum wage input | Answered | C001–C005 | Future statutory change not predicted |
| Federal/state formula reconciliation | Answered | C002–C004 | Actual head-of-family and pay-period facts |
| Legal payroll-rounding convention | Not located | C004–C005 | Controlling Nebraska/federal rule or payroll authority |
| DOL rounded transition figures | Answered and preserved | C004 | Guidance remains rounded display |
| Original 13 examples | Unchanged | — | No recalculation needed |
| Unsatisfactory-answer 20-day trigger | Answered | C006–C007 | Actual answer filing date |
| Court-order-noncompliance trigger | Unresolved | C008 | Controlling case or express order/statutory trigger |
| Effect of missed answer challenge | Answered narrowly | C007 | Later writ/different-property effects require their own record |
| Mandatory continuing-lien order | Answered | C009 | All statutory predicates and actual application/order |
| Negotiations or complaint as stay | Answered as no automatic statutory stay | C010 | Actual court order or enforceable agreement |
| Payment-plan branch | Partial/record dependent | C010 | Written agreement, filing, authority, breach, and enforceability |
| CC 3:8N revision | Partially authenticated; source conflict preserved | C011 | Clean current rendered PDF or formal revision notice |
| Florence Lake disclosure duty | Answered | C012 | Actual garnishee and property facts |
| Florence Lake liability outcome | Answered | C012 | Full retirement/ERISA analysis remains excluded |
| CCPA operative body | Verified through official 2024 Edition | C013 | Later statutory amendments/current compilation |
| Claimed OLRC 119-124 header | Unverified | C013 | Working official current OLRC compilation |
| Current Part 870 regulation | Answered | C014 | No statutory-version inference |
| Direct tips, worker classification, retirement, Nebraska private retaliation remedy, successive writs, appeal, bank, sector, local, tribal, and foreign-country questions | Unchanged holds | Original PASS-19 claims | Separate assigned research |
All original PASS-19 direct-tips, classification, retirement, private-employment-remedy, successive-writ, appellate, bank, sector, local, tribal, country, source-history, and actual-record gaps remain open. No Nebraska, component, parent, A066, operational, or publication acceptance is implied.
END S_NE PASS-22.
Captured cells with original header handling and explicitly labeled bounded correction overlays. Downloaded JSON retains original cells. Tables may contain source limitations, historical examples and identified corrections; the complete reading supplies context.
Read the evidence with its boundaries. These are saved research components, including revisions. A scoped coordinator review checks selected evidence; it does not certify every claim, a complete jurisdiction, current law or individual applicability. Dates and access limits remain attached to the records.
Group · Disposition · Effect on PASS-19 · 3 data rows
| Group | Disposition | Effect on PASS-19 |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Nonweekly Nebraska rule and rounding edge | Common nonweekly periods answered; uncommon periods and legal rounding convention remain partial. The complete one-page Nebraska Department of Labor rule was visually read. It prescribes 60, 65, and 130 times the federal minimum wage for biweekly, semimonthly, and monthly pay periods. | Replace PASS-19 §C3 and change “Other pay periods” from fully answered to partial. Preserve the core lesser-of formulas and all 13 original examples. |
| 2. Twenty-day trigger and mandatory continuing-lien language | Answered for the unsatisfactory-answer branch. The 20 days run from filing of the garnishee’s interrogatory answers. The separate court-order-noncompliance trigger remains unresolved. Section 25-1056(2) uses mandatory “shall” language once all listed predicates exist. | Replace C030, C021, §F3, the corresponding master-matrix rows, and their coverage rows. |
| 3. Source versions and limited outcome annotations | Answered with explicit source limitations. The CC 3:8N public PDF has conflicting text-layer and rendered-page revision indicators; Florence Lake’s disclosure discussion and actual ERISA outcome are now precisely separated; the CCPA body is verified from the official 2024 U.S. Code edition, but the prior claimed OLRC 119-124 header was not replicated. | Replace the CC 3:8N form annotation, Florence Lake pinpoint/outcome annotation, P19 S010 currentness statement, and qualify C037’s payment-plan/stay wording. |
Pay period · Nebraska Title 230 multiplier · Protected floor · 3 data rows
| Pay period | Nebraska Title 230 multiplier | Protected floor |
|---|---|---|
| Biweekly | 60 × $7.25 | $435.00 |
| Semimonthly | 65 × $7.25 | $471.25 |
| Monthly | 130 × $7.25 | $942.50 |
Period · Floor F · Exact crossing F ÷ .75 · 2 data rows
| Period | Floor F | Exact crossing F ÷ .75 | Published DOL display |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semimonthly | $471.25 | $628.333333… | $628.33 |
| Monthly | $942.50 | $1,256.666666… | $1,256.66 |
Stage · Correct trigger · Required action · 3 data rows
| Stage | Correct trigger | Required action | Consequence | Qualification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creditor challenges an unsatisfactory garnishee answer | Filing of garnishee’s answers | Application to determine liability within 20 days after filing | Garnishee released and discharged if application is untimely | No service or actual-notice trigger |
| Garnishee fails to comply with court delivery/payment/undertaking order | Unresolved | §25-1030 says an application must be filed within 20 days | Untimely failure can result in discharge, but exact trigger is held | Order, service, compliance date, and controlling interpretation needed |
| Continuing-lien transfer/order | Qualifying answer + no successful written objection + creditor application | Court shall order transfer of withheld nonexempt earnings; on creditor application, court shall further order continuing lien | Mandatory conditional order | No automatic lien without application, predicates, and court order |
PASS-19 location · Replacement or qualification · 14 data rows
| PASS-19 location | Replacement or qualification |
|---|---|
| §C3 — Current pay-period floors | Replace with the Nebraska Title 230 multipliers, formula synthesis, current floors, uncommon-period hold, and rounding edge above. |
| Coverage: Other pay periods | Replace “Answered” with Partial: biweekly, semimonthly, and monthly are answered under Nebraska’s current published rule; other uncommon Nebraska pay periods remain unresolved. |
| C030 | Replace with the 20-days-after-answer-filing trigger and mandatory release/discharge consequence. |
| §F3 | Replace the unqualified “within 20 days” wording with the answer-filing trigger and separate unresolved court-order-noncompliance branch. |
| Master matrix: garnishee-answer dispute | Replace with the corrected trigger row above. |
| Coverage: employer-answer challenge | Answered for unsatisfactory filed answers; partial for court-order noncompliance trigger. |
| C021 | Replace “may order” with the exact mandatory conditional “shall order” and “shall further order” wording. |
| C037 | Preserve court/bankruptcy stay rule; qualify negotiations and complaints; separately recognize record-dependent agreed payment-plan restrictions. |
| P19 S008 pinpoint | Correct to Huntington, printed pp.305–306/PDF indices 11–12 for the filed-answer trigger and mandatory discharge holding. |
| CC 3:8N inventory row | Replace with the conflicting 03/2022 rendered-image and 08/2026 parsed-text/current-companion-source annotation. |
| Florence Lake annotation | Add printed pp.197–198/PDF indices 14–15 and majority outcome at printed p.204/PDF index 21; distinguish disclosure duty from liability. |
| P19 S010 | Replace the unreplicated 119-124 currentness assertion with the official GovInfo 2024 Edition body source and explicit currentness hold. |
| Original 13 examples | Unchanged. |
| All other PASS-19 claims, sources, and gaps | Unchanged. |
Claim ID · Precise corrected claim · Source and pinpoint · 14 data rows
| Claim ID | Precise corrected claim | Source and pinpoint | Conditions, consequence, confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| S_NE-P22-C001 | Nebraska Title 230, Chapter 2 prescribes federal-minimum-wage multiples of 60 for biweekly, 65 for semimonthly, and 130 for monthly disposable earnings. | S_NE-P22-S001–S003; Title 230 Ch.2 §§001–002, printed 230-2.1/PDF index 0. | Applies with §25-1558; high for text. |
| S_NE-P22-C002 | For the three listed nonweekly periods, Nebraska’s ordinary limit is the lesser of 25%, the amount above the applicable Title 230 floor, and 15% where head-of-family status applies. | S_NE-P22-S001–S004. | Statutory/regulatory synthesis; exceptions in §25-1558(2) remain; high. |
| S_NE-P22-C003 | Nebraska’s current published Title 230 rule does not state a multiplier for every uncommon nonweekly pay period. | S_NE-P22-S002–S004. | Federal §870.10 still supplies the federal ceiling; exact Nebraska state multiplier remains held. |
| S_NE-P22-C004 | DOL’s $628.33 and $1,256.66 transition figures are rounded published guidance; the exact lesser-of equation continues to control the actual mathematical ceiling. | S_NE-P22-S004–S005. | No universal legal payroll-rounding convention located; high for relationship, hold for rounding practice. |
| S_NE-P22-C005 | At monthly disposable earnings of $1,256.66 and a $942.50 floor, the exact lesser branch is $314.16. | S_NE-P22-S001–S005. | Arithmetic only; no entitlement or payroll-rounding rule established; high. |
| S_NE-P22-C006 | For an unsatisfactory garnishee answer, §25-1030’s 20 days run from filing of the garnishee’s interrogatory answers. | S_NE-P22-S006–S007; Huntington, printed pp.305–306/PDF indices 11–12. | Not service or actual receipt; high. |
| S_NE-P22-C007 | Untimely failure to challenge the filed answer requires release and discharge of the garnishee in the affected liability proceeding. | Same. | No universal immunity from later writs or different property established; high. |
| S_NE-P22-C008 | The 20-day trigger for §25-1030’s separate failure-to-comply-with-court-order branch is not identified by the statute or decided in Huntington. | S_NE-P22-S006–S007. | Unresolved. |
| S_NE-P22-C009 | Once §25-1056(2)’s answer, no-successful-objection, and creditor-application predicates exist, the court shall order transfer and shall further order a continuing lien. | S_NE-P22-S008, §25-1056(2). | No automatic lien without all predicates and court order; high. |
| S_NE-P22-C010 | Mere negotiation, complaint, or unilateral request does not itself establish the statutory court stay in §25-1056(3)(d). | S_NE-P22-S008. | An actual payment plan or forbearance can impose separate agreement-specific conditions; high/conditional. |
| S_NE-P22-C011 | The current public CC 3:8N source presents conflicting revision indicators: 08/2026 in extracted text and current companion materials, but 03/2022 in a rendered page image. | S_NE-P22-S009–S012. | Exact file-replacement timing not inferred; statute controls; high for observed discrepancy. |
| S_NE-P22-C012 | Florence Lake requires disclosure but held the plan administrator not liable because ERISA prevented the creditor from acquiring rights to the 401(k) funds. | S_NE-P22-S013, printed pp.197–198/PDF 14–15 and p.204/PDF 21. | Disclosure is not itself liability; high. |
| S_NE-P22-C013 | The official accessible CCPA body source verified here is the GovInfo 2024 U.S. Code edition, not a replicated OLRC 119-124/October 15, 2026 compilation. | S_NE-P22-S014–S015. | Exact 2026 statutory-compilation currency remains held; high. |
| S_NE-P22-C014 | Current eCFR Title 29 was displayed as up to date through October 22, 2026 and last amended October 14, 2026. | S_NE-P22-S004. | Regulatory currentness only; does not authenticate OLRC metadata; high. |
Requested issue · Status after PASS-22 · Linked claims · 22 data rows
| Requested issue | Status after PASS-22 | Linked claims | Exact remaining gap or next action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nebraska biweekly multiplier | Answered | C001–C002 | Actual disposable earnings |
| Nebraska semimonthly multiplier | Answered | C001–C002 | Actual disposable earnings |
| Nebraska monthly multiplier | Answered | C001–C002 | Actual disposable earnings |
| Nebraska uncommon nonweekly period | Unresolved/partial | C003 | Current state rule or controlling interpretation for that period |
| Current federal minimum wage input | Answered | C001–C005 | Future statutory change not predicted |
| Federal/state formula reconciliation | Answered | C002–C004 | Actual head-of-family and pay-period facts |
| Legal payroll-rounding convention | Not located | C004–C005 | Controlling Nebraska/federal rule or payroll authority |
| DOL rounded transition figures | Answered and preserved | C004 | Guidance remains rounded display |
| Original 13 examples | Unchanged | — | No recalculation needed |
| Unsatisfactory-answer 20-day trigger | Answered | C006–C007 | Actual answer filing date |
| Court-order-noncompliance trigger | Unresolved | C008 | Controlling case or express order/statutory trigger |
| Effect of missed answer challenge | Answered narrowly | C007 | Later writ/different-property effects require their own record |
| Mandatory continuing-lien order | Answered | C009 | All statutory predicates and actual application/order |
| Negotiations or complaint as stay | Answered as no automatic statutory stay | C010 | Actual court order or enforceable agreement |
| Payment-plan branch | Partial/record dependent | C010 | Written agreement, filing, authority, breach, and enforceability |
| CC 3:8N revision | Partially authenticated; source conflict preserved | C011 | Clean current rendered PDF or formal revision notice |
| Florence Lake disclosure duty | Answered | C012 | Actual garnishee and property facts |
| Florence Lake liability outcome | Answered | C012 | Full retirement/ERISA analysis remains excluded |
| CCPA operative body | Verified through official 2024 Edition | C013 | Later statutory amendments/current compilation |
| Claimed OLRC 119-124 header | Unverified | C013 | Working official current OLRC compilation |
| Current Part 870 regulation | Answered | C014 | No statutory-version inference |
| Direct tips, worker classification, retirement, Nebraska private retaliation remedy, successive writs, appeal, bank, sector, local, tribal, and foreign-country questions | Unchanged holds | Original PASS-19 claims | Separate assigned research |
Read the evidence with its boundaries. These are saved research components, including revisions. A scoped coordinator review checks selected evidence; it does not certify every claim, a complete jurisdiction, current law or individual applicability. Dates and access limits remain attached to the records.
Recorded check status: supported in examined conditional scope
Recorded check status: supported in examined conditional scope
Recorded check status: appropriately explicit unresolved question retained
Recorded check status: supported in examined conditional scope
Recorded check status: supported in examined conditional scope
Recorded check status: supported in examined conditional scope
Recorded check status: supported in examined conditional scope
Recorded check status: appropriately explicit unresolved question retained
Recorded check status: supported in examined conditional scope
Recorded check status: supported in examined conditional scope
Recorded check status: dated source annotation followup required
Recorded check status: supported in examined conditional scope
Recorded check status: supported in examined conditional scope
Recorded check status: supported in examined conditional scope
Keep the source version, actual read extent and jurisdiction with the proposition. A link or researcher access claim is not a substitute for an operative primary passage.
Recorded check status: bounded material check with recorded qualifications
Recorded check status: bounded material check with recorded qualifications
Recorded check status: bounded material check with recorded qualifications
Recorded check status: bounded material check with recorded qualifications
Recorded check status: bounded material check with recorded qualifications
Recorded check status: bounded material check with recorded qualifications
Recorded check status: bounded material check with recorded qualifications
Recorded check status: bounded material check with recorded qualifications
Recorded check status: bounded material check with recorded qualifications
Recorded check status: bounded material check with recorded qualifications
Recorded check status: bounded material check with recorded qualifications
Recorded check status: bounded material check with recorded qualifications
Recorded check status: bounded material check with recorded qualifications
Recorded check status: bounded material check with recorded qualifications
Recorded check status: historical failed not authority
The saved component-level coverage record keeps answered, partial, blank and unresolved branches distinct. A coverage label is not acceptance of a whole subject or jurisdiction.
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Recorded check status: recorded; no individual primary acceptance inferred
Read the evidence with its boundaries. These are saved research components, including revisions. A scoped coordinator review checks selected evidence; it does not certify every claim, a complete jurisdiction, current law or individual applicability. Dates and access limits remain attached to the records.
No currently queued material correction is mapped to this component. This does not remove its currentness, access, jurisdiction or application limits.
scoped followup groups resolved with limits after P25 no component acceptance
Inside: Executive determination · Model disposition matrix · 1. Definitions and classification
Inside: A. Federal wording replacements · A1. Replacement for PASS-01 §4.4 and old claim S_NE-P1-C026 · A2. Replacement for old claim S_NE-P1-C024
Inside:
Inside: Executive determination · 1. Chapter 69 custody entry point and model classification · 1.1 Operative entry point
Inside: Executive determination · 1. Operative security requirements by model · 1.1 Licensed custodial debt management
Inside: Executive determination · B1. Pre-acceptance suitability · B2. Mandatory DMP contract clauses
Inside: Focused determination · B1. Licensing discipline · B2. Examination and investigation
Inside: Focused determination · A1. Core state definition · Commercial versus consumer claims
Inside: Executive determination · B2. State records retained by collection agencies · B3. Bounded “no general counterpart verified” conclusion
Inside: Executive determination · B1. Consumer-file access under §20-149 · Charge and format limits
Inside: Executive determination · B1. Written contract—five years · B2. Oral, implied, or materially parol-dependent agreement—four years
Inside: Executive determination · A1. Small Claims Court eligibility · A2. Regular civil real-party and assignment rules
Inside: GROUP 1 — corrected source cells and literal URLs · GROUP 2 — E-SIGN/UETA relationship correction
Inside: Executive determination · B1. Real-party requirement and cure · B2. Written assignment and the specific account
Inside: Executive determination · B1. Nebraska Uniform Arbitration Act · B2. Nebraska’s special arbitration warning
Inside: 1. Five-group disposition · A. Replacement for PASS-07 §D2 and claim S_NE-P7-C023 · Replacement substantive paragraph
Inside: Focused determination · B1. Nebraska award requirements · B2. Nebraska arbitrator correction or clarification
Inside: Executive determination · B1. Rate-selection rule · Recent official Nebraska judgment rates
Inside: Executive findings · B1. Judgment prerequisite · B2. Creditor affidavit and summons
Inside: Focused determination · B1. Existing court judgment is required · B2. Filing court and affidavit
Inside: Executive findings · B1. Creditor request and clerk issuance · B2. Service and notice to the debtor
Inside: Five-group disposition · 1A. Replacement for PASS-20 §D2 · Initial examination of the garnishment order — §212.4(a)
Inside: Executive findings · A1. Entry, judgment lien, levy, and sale are different events · A2. What interest is reachable
Inside: GROUP 1 — CC 3:8N and CC 3:8Na observed-version replacement · Correct bounded conclusion · GROUP 2 — VA §5301 exact-header provenance replacement
Inside: Focused determination · B1. Licensing and prohibited conduct · B2. Conditional exclusions are not immunity
Inside: Executive determination · A1. Actor and authority matrix · A2. Eligible trustee
Inside: A. Proper court and venue · B. Commencement and the federal “first filing” · C. Plaintiff standing and enforcement authority
Inside: Four-group disposition · 1. Criminal text and unresolved mental-state construction · Replacement for PASS-26 B1, C006, and Example 1’s legal premise
Inside: I. Core determination · A. Nonjudicial trustee sale · B. Judicial mortgage or deed-of-trust foreclosure
Inside: G1 — Statutory gateways and mandatory consequences · 1. Section 76-1012: both payment branches require acceleration before fixed maturity · 2. Section 76-1006: precise farm-operations gateway
Inside: G1 — Corrected source-register cells · Replacement S_NE-P29-S013 — Nebraska Consumer Protection Act · Replacement S_NE-P29-S015 — Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act
Inside: Executive findings · A. Role, title, and possession-route findings · A1–A7. Which route can each person use?
Inside: 1. Replacement PASS-32 C032 crosslink row · 4. Observer and currentness preservation
Original saved Markdown SHA-256: 65d913c6c34c7cabf390187702dbe9d78ffb38daaf63a8c4a83b32130bd461f2. Public formatting, private-reference removal and correction annotations are separate from that immutable original.