{"meta":{"key":"s_ne--pass-22","task":"S_NE","title":"SNE bounded procedure and source-precision corrections","parent_title":"Nebraska debt and debt relief law","edition":"pass-22","path":"/research/s_ne--pass-22/","kind":"split_pass","category":"state","role":"state","area_numbers":[66],"groups":["collections"],"date":"2026-10-26","tables":7,"claims":14,"sources":15,"review_status":"scoped_followup_groups_resolved_with_limits_after_P25_no_component_acceptance","review_complete":true,"sha256":"65d913c6c34c7cabf390187702dbe9d78ffb38daaf63a8c4a83b32130bd461f2","headings":["Disposition of the three correction groups","1A. Replacement for PASS-19 §C3, “Current pay-period floors”","Correct combined Nebraska formulas","Remaining state-rule gap for uncommon pay periods","1B. Narrow rounding and transition-point correction","Bounded monthly edge example","Effect on original examples","2A. Replacement for PASS-19 C030 and §F3","Correct unsatisfactory-answer trigger","Complete replacement claim for original P19 C030","Separate court-order-noncompliance branch remains held","2B. Replacement master-matrix rows","2C. Replacement for original P19 C021","2D. Narrow replacement for original P19 C037","3A. CC 3:8N source-version replacement","Replacement source annotation","3B. Florence Lake Investments source and outcome replacement","Replacement qualification","3C. Federal CCPA source-currentness replacement","Replacement source-currentness annotation","Freshly read or visually inspected","Not established or not performed"],"generation_provenance":{"actual_route":"regular_chat_adaptive_models","actual_model":"GPT-5.6 Sol","actual_mode":"Pro","provenance_limit":"Actual documented capture labels only; missing labels remain unknown. No preferred setting is inferred as actual execution."},"public_id":"S_NE/pass-22","facets":{"geography":["us","us-ne"],"debt_type":[],"stage":["repossession"],"subject":[]},"scope":"Only three reviewedNE19procedure/state-nonweekly/source-precision groups","pending_corrections":0},"markdown":"# S_NE PASS-22 — bounded PASS-19 procedure and source-precision corrections\n\n**Actual fresh check:** October 26, 2026 Pacific / October 26, 2026 UTC\n**Status:** Same-coordinator bounded correction; **not independent review**. PASS-19 remains immutable. Only the affected sections, claims, source annotations, matrix rows, and coverage classifications below are replaced or qualified. PASS-21 was completed before this response.\n\n## Disposition of the three correction groups\n\n| Group | Disposition | Effect on PASS-19 |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **1. Nonweekly Nebraska rule and rounding edge** | **Common nonweekly periods answered; uncommon periods and legal rounding convention remain partial.** The complete one-page Nebraska Department of Labor rule was visually read. It prescribes 60, 65, and 130 times the federal minimum wage for biweekly, semimonthly, and monthly pay periods. | Replace PASS-19 §C3 and change “Other pay periods” from fully answered to **partial**. Preserve the core lesser-of formulas and all 13 original examples. |\n| **2. Twenty-day trigger and mandatory continuing-lien language** | **Answered for the unsatisfactory-answer branch.** The 20 days run from filing of the garnishee’s interrogatory answers. The separate court-order-noncompliance trigger remains unresolved. Section 25-1056(2) uses mandatory “shall” language once all listed predicates exist. | Replace C030, C021, §F3, the corresponding master-matrix rows, and their coverage rows. |\n| **3. Source versions and limited outcome annotations** | **Answered with explicit source limitations.** The CC 3:8N public PDF has conflicting text-layer and rendered-page revision indicators; Florence Lake’s disclosure discussion and actual ERISA outcome are now precisely separated; the CCPA body is verified from the official 2024 U.S. Code edition, but the prior claimed OLRC 119-124 header was not replicated. | Replace the CC 3:8N form annotation, Florence Lake pinpoint/outcome annotation, P19 S010 currentness statement, and qualify C037’s payment-plan/stay wording. |\n\n# GROUP 1 — Nebraska nonweekly pay-period rule and rounding qualification\n\n## 1A. Replacement for PASS-19 §C3, “Current pay-period floors”\n\nNeb. Rev. Stat. §25-1558(7) directs the Nebraska Commissioner of Labor to prescribe an equivalent federal-minimum-wage multiple for pay periods other than a week. The current Nebraska Department of Labor regulations index lists **Title 230 — Labor Standards, Chapter 2 — Wages; Subject To Garnishment**, and links to a one-page rule. The rule states:\n\n- **Biweekly:** 60 times the federal minimum hourly wage.\n- **Semimonthly:** 65 times the federal minimum hourly wage.\n- **Monthly:** 130 times the federal minimum hourly wage.\n\nThe PDF states that it was adopted under §25-1558(7). It bears an Attorney General approval dated April 10, 1991, Governor approval dated May 17, 1991, and Secretary of State filing stamp dated May 17, 1991. It does not display a separate effective date, later amendment history, or superseding rulemaking order. Its inclusion in NDOL’s current public regulations index supports current publication status, but a complete rulemaking-history audit was not performed. [Nebraska Department of Labor+2](https://dol.nebraska.gov/StatutesAndRegulations/Regulations)\n\nAt the presently verified federal minimum wage of **$7.25 per hour**, the Nebraska regulatory floors are:\n\n| Pay period | Nebraska Title 230 multiplier | Protected floor |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Biweekly | 60 × $7.25 | **$435.00** |\n| Semimonthly | 65 × $7.25 | **$471.25** |\n| Monthly | 130 × $7.25 | **$942.50** |\n\nThe current federal minimum wage remains $7.25. [Department of Labor+2](https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/minimum-wage/state?utm_source=chatgpt.com)\n\n### Correct combined Nebraska formulas\n\nLet:\n\nPlain text\n```\nD = disposable earnings for the pay period\nF = Nebraska regulatory floor for that pay period\n```\n\nFor a debtor who is **not** head of a family:\n\nPlain text\n```\nMaximum ordinary withholding\n    = max(0, lesser of:\n        25% × D\n        D − F)\n```\n\nFor a debtor who **is** head of a family:\n\nPlain text\n```\nMaximum ordinary withholding\n    = max(0, lesser of:\n        25% × D\n        D − F\n        15% × D)\n```\n\nBecause 15% is always less than 25%, the head-of-family formula can be expressed mathematically as:\n\nPlain text\n```\nmax(0, lesser of:\n    15% × D\n    D − F)\n```\n\nThis is a synthesis of §25-1558(1) and (7) with Title 230, Chapter 2; it is not a separate sentence appearing verbatim in the regulation. [Nebraska Legislature+1](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1558)\n\nThe federal rule independently transforms the weekly formula for longer pay periods by using workweeks or fractions of workweeks and treats a month as 4⅓ workweeks. Its present biweekly, semimonthly, and monthly floors agree with Nebraska’s 60/65/130 multipliers. Federal §870.10 also says the date earnings are paid or payable controls the applicable federal minimum wage. [eCFR+2](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870)\n\n### Remaining state-rule gap for uncommon pay periods\n\nNebraska Title 230, Chapter 2 expressly lists only:\n\n- biweekly;\n- semimonthly; and\n- monthly pay periods.\n\nIt does not state a separate Nebraska multiplier for an irregular ten-day, quarterly, four-week, or other uncommon nonweekly pay period. Federal §870.10 supplies a federal workweek-or-fraction method for other longer pay periods, but no separate current Nebraska rule or controlling Nebraska opinion was located prescribing the state-law multiplier for every unlisted pay period.\n\n**Replacement coverage classification:** common nonweekly periods are answered; unlisted Nebraska pay periods remain **partial/unresolved**.\n\n## 1B. Narrow rounding and transition-point correction\n\nThe December 2024 DOL Fact Sheet #30 publishes these rounded transition figures:\n\n- semimonthly: **$628.33**;\n- monthly: **$1,256.66**.\n\nThose are DOL’s published guidance figures, not fabricated amounts and not grounds to reject PASS-19’s 13 worked examples. [Department of Labor+1](https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/30-cppa)\n\nThe exact mathematical crossing between the 25% branch and the amount-above-floor branch is:\n\nPlain text\n```\n0.25D = D − F\n0.75D = F\nD = F ÷ 0.75\n```\n\n| Period | Floor F | Exact crossing F ÷ .75 | Published DOL display |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Semimonthly | $471.25 | $628.333333… | $628.33 |\n| Monthly | $942.50 | $1,256.666666… | $1,256.66 |\n\n### Bounded monthly edge example\n\nAssume:\n\nPlain text\n```\nMonthly disposable earnings D = $1,256.66\nMonthly floor F              =   $942.50\n```\n\nCalculations:\n\nPlain text\n```\n25% branch:\n$1,256.66 × .25 = $314.165\n\nAmount-above-floor branch:\n$1,256.66 − $942.50 = $314.16\n\nExact lesser amount:\nlesser of $314.165 and $314.16 = $314.16\n```\n\nOn those inputs, the mathematical ceiling is **$314.16**, not $314.17.\n\nThe same narrow issue appears at semimonthly disposable earnings of $628.33:\n\nPlain text\n```\n25% branch:\n$628.33 × .25 = $157.0825\n\nAmount-above-floor branch:\n$628.33 − $471.25 = $157.08\n\nExact lesser amount:\n$157.08\n```\n\nNo Nebraska statute, Title 230 clause, federal regulation, or official guidance located in this bounded pass prescribes a universal payroll rule for rounding a half-cent generated by one branch. The safe legal relationship is therefore:\n\nThe published rounded transition table does not displace the statutory lesser-of equation, and a withholding calculation should not exceed the lower branch on the actual disposable-earnings inputs.\n\nThis is a mathematical and source-precision clarification, not a new payroll-rounding rule.\n\n### Effect on original examples\n\nAll 13 PASS-19 examples remain unchanged. None used the $1,256.66 monthly edge in a way that exceeded the lower branch.\n\n# GROUP 2 — twenty-day trigger and mandatory conditional wording\n\n## 2A. Replacement for PASS-19 C030 and §F3\n\n### Correct unsatisfactory-answer trigger\n\nWhen a creditor is dissatisfied with the garnishee’s interrogatory answers, the creditor’s application to determine garnishee liability must be filed within **20 days after the answers are filed with the court**.\n\nIt does not run from:\n\n- service of the answers on the creditor;\n- the creditor’s actual receipt;\n- the creditor’s discovery of the filing; or\n- the date the garnishment summons was served.\n\nIn *Huntington v. Pedersen*, the Nebraska Supreme Court held that failing to apply within 20 days after the garnishee filed its answers produces the mandatory statutory result that the garnishee is released and discharged. The controlling discussion is at printed pages 305–306, zero-based PDF indices 11–12. [Nebraska.gov+2](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010005PUB)\n\n### Complete replacement claim for original P19 C030\n\n**If the creditor is dissatisfied with a garnishee’s filed interrogatory answers, an application to determine garnishee liability must be filed within 20 days after those answers are filed. Failure to do so requires release and discharge of the garnishee in the affected garnishment-liability proceeding. The deadline does not wait for service or actual notice to the creditor.**\n\n**Source:** Neb. Rev. Stat. §25-1030; *Huntington v. Pedersen*, 294 Neb. 294, printed pp.305–306/PDF indices 11–12.\n\n**Limit:** This correction does not establish universal immunity from a later, valid garnishment directed at different funds, property, or a later service-date obligation.\n\n### Separate court-order-noncompliance branch remains held\n\nSection 25-1030 also applies where a garnishee fails to comply with a court order by:\n\n- delivering property;\n- paying money into court; or\n- giving the undertaking required by §25-1029.\n\nThe statute says the creditor may file an application “within twenty days,” but it does not expressly identify whether that branch runs from:\n\n- entry of the order;\n- service of the order;\n- the compliance date stated in the order;\n- the first act of noncompliance; or\n- another event.\n\n*Huntington* decided the **filed-answer** branch. It did not resolve this separate trigger. The trigger for court-order noncompliance therefore remains **unresolved**. [Nebraska Legislature+1](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1030)\n\n## 2B. Replacement master-matrix rows\n\n| Stage | Correct trigger | Required action | Consequence | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **Creditor challenges an unsatisfactory garnishee answer** | Filing of garnishee’s answers | Application to determine liability within 20 days after filing | Garnishee released and discharged if application is untimely | No service or actual-notice trigger |\n| **Garnishee fails to comply with court delivery/payment/undertaking order** | **Unresolved** | §25-1030 says an application must be filed within 20 days | Untimely failure can result in discharge, but exact trigger is held | Order, service, compliance date, and controlling interpretation needed |\n| **Continuing-lien transfer/order** | Qualifying answer + no successful written objection + creditor application | Court **shall** order transfer of withheld nonexempt earnings; on creditor application, court **shall further order** continuing lien | Mandatory conditional order | No automatic lien without application, predicates, and court order |\n\n## 2C. Replacement for original P19 C021\n\nThe prior “court may order” wording is replaced with:\n\n**If the garnishee’s answer shows that the debtor was employed, that earnings were owed when the garnishment order was served, or that earnings will be owed within 60 days; no successful written objection to the order or answer has been filed; and the judgment creditor applies, the court shall order transfer of the nonexempt earnings withheld after service. Upon the creditor’s application, the court shall further order a continuing lien.**\n\nThe statute’s language is mandatory once every listed predicate is satisfied. It does not create an automatic lien upon service, employment, or filing of the employer’s answer alone. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1056)\n\n## 2D. Narrow replacement for original P19 C037\n\nNeb. Rev. Stat. §25-1056(3)(d) makes a continuing lien invalid when the proceedings are stayed by a court of competent jurisdiction, including the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. Mere:\n\n- negotiations;\n- an administrative complaint;\n- a payment request;\n- a unilateral proposal; or\n- informal discussion\n\ndoes not itself establish that statutory court stay. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1056)\n\nA separate agreed payment plan or forbearance can impose contract-specific restrictions. The current Judicial Branch plaintiff and defendant packets state that payment plans should be written and filed with the court and that garnishment should not proceed while the debtor is performing under the plan. Those statements are operational guidance, not the text of §25-1056(3)(d). The actual agreement, authority, filing, conditions, missed-payment event, enforceability, and any court order remain record dependent. [Nebraska Judicial Branch+3](https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8-20.pdf)\n\n# GROUP 3 — source-version and opinion-outcome annotations\n\n## 3A. CC 3:8N source-version replacement\n\nThe original PASS-19 observation that the rendered CC 3:8N form displayed **Rev. 03/2022** remains historically accurate.\n\nThe fresh October 26, 2026 public-source check produced conflicting official-PDF indicators:\n\n- the direct PDF’s parsed/accessibility text identified **CC 3:8N Rev. 08/2026**;\n- the rendered page image returned through the same public PDF path displayed **Rev. 03/2022**;\n- the current companion instructions, CC 3:8Na, display **Rev. 08/2026**;\n- the current defendant packet displays **Rev. 08/2026** and directs users to CC 3:8N and CC 3:8Na. [Nebraska Judicial Branch+4](https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8N.pdf)\n\n### Replacement source annotation\n\n**CC 3:8N has inconsistent public rendering/version evidence as of October 26, 2026. The extracted text identifies Rev. 08/2026, while a rendered-page image surfaced Rev. 03/2022. Current CC 3:8Na instructions and the defendant packet are Rev. 08/2026. No precise file-replacement date is inferred. The form is operational guidance; §25-1011 and other controlling law govern.**\n\nNo form was completed or submitted.\n\n## 3B. Florence Lake Investments source and outcome replacement\n\nThe prior limited use of *Florence Lake Investments v. Berg* is clarified as follows.\n\nAt printed pages 197–198, zero-based PDF indices 14–15, the Nebraska Supreme Court majority explained that:\n\n- garnishment is a postjudgment procedure;\n- the garnishee must answer and disclose debtor property or credits within its possession or control;\n- liability is measured at the time of service; and\n- the judgment creditor can recover no more against the garnishee than the debtor could recover. [Nebraska.gov+1](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008782PUB)\n\nAt printed page 204, zero-based PDF index 21, the majority held that ERISA’s anti-alienation provision prevented the judgment creditor from acquiring the debtor’s rights to the 401(k) funds. It therefore **affirmed** the ruling that the plan administrator was not liable under the facts. The majority simultaneously emphasized that ERISA plan administrators must comply with Nebraska’s interrogatory-answer requirement and that willful refusal could still be addressed through the court’s contempt power. The concurrence begins after the majority’s conclusion and is not the majority holding. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008782PUB)\n\n### Replacement qualification\n\n**A statutory duty to answer and disclose is not itself a holding that the garnishee is liable for the disclosed property. Florence Lake affirmed no liability because ERISA prevented the creditor from acquiring rights to the plan funds, while preserving the administrator’s duty to answer.**\n\nThis patch does not undertake a complete ERISA or retirement-benefit analysis.\n\n## 3C. Federal CCPA source-currentness replacement\n\nPASS-19 S010 previously identified six OLRC 119-124 pages for 15 U.S.C. §§1672–1677 as displaying currency through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026. That exact header was not replicated in the coordinator’s bounded checks, and the unchanged failed routes were not repeatedly retried in PASS-22.\n\nThe official accessible substitute was:\n\nPlain text\n```\nhttps://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/15/1673\n```\n\nThat two-page official GovInfo PDF contains the complete operative bodies of §§1671–1677 at:\n\n- printed page 1550 / zero-based PDF index 0; and\n- printed page 1551 / zero-based PDF index 1.\n\nGovInfo’s content-details page identifies the material as the **2024 Edition of the United States Code**, which it describes as the most recent edition available on that site. The PDF itself does not display a Public Law 119-124 / October 15, 2026 currency header. [GovInfo+2](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/15/1673)\n\n### Replacement source-currentness annotation\n\n**The substantive bodies of 15 U.S.C. §§1672–1677 were verified from the official 2024 U.S. Code edition on GovInfo. Exact compilation currency through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026 was not independently replicated and remains held. No claim is made that the 2024 Edition proves the absence of later statutory amendments.**\n\nThe current eCFR source is different. Title 29 stated that it was up to date through **October 22, 2026** and last amended **October 14, 2026**. The complete material §870.10 body was checked there. That verifies the current regulatory text; it does not independently authenticate the unreplicated OLRC statutory-compilation header. [eCFR](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870)\n\nThe DOL’s current public minimum-wage pages and December 2024 Fact Sheet #30 identify the federal minimum wage as $7.25, and the July 1, 2026 consolidated state table likewise treats $7.25 as the federal rate. [Department of Labor+2](https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/minimum-wage/state?utm_source=chatgpt.com)\n\n# Replacement-effect table\n\n| PASS-19 location | Replacement or qualification |\n| --- | --- |\n| **§C3 — Current pay-period floors** | Replace with the Nebraska Title 230 multipliers, formula synthesis, current floors, uncommon-period hold, and rounding edge above. |\n| **Coverage: Other pay periods** | Replace “Answered” with **Partial**: biweekly, semimonthly, and monthly are answered under Nebraska’s current published rule; other uncommon Nebraska pay periods remain unresolved. |\n| **C030** | Replace with the 20-days-after-answer-filing trigger and mandatory release/discharge consequence. |\n| **§F3** | Replace the unqualified “within 20 days” wording with the answer-filing trigger and separate unresolved court-order-noncompliance branch. |\n| **Master matrix: garnishee-answer dispute** | Replace with the corrected trigger row above. |\n| **Coverage: employer-answer challenge** | Answered for unsatisfactory filed answers; partial for court-order noncompliance trigger. |\n| **C021** | Replace “may order” with the exact mandatory conditional “shall order” and “shall further order” wording. |\n| **C037** | Preserve court/bankruptcy stay rule; qualify negotiations and complaints; separately recognize record-dependent agreed payment-plan restrictions. |\n| **P19 S008 pinpoint** | Correct to *Huntington*, printed pp.305–306/PDF indices 11–12 for the filed-answer trigger and mandatory discharge holding. |\n| **CC 3:8N inventory row** | Replace with the conflicting 03/2022 rendered-image and 08/2026 parsed-text/current-companion-source annotation. |\n| **Florence Lake annotation** | Add printed pp.197–198/PDF indices 14–15 and majority outcome at printed p.204/PDF index 21; distinguish disclosure duty from liability. |\n| **P19 S010** | Replace the unreplicated 119-124 currentness assertion with the official GovInfo 2024 Edition body source and explicit currentness hold. |\n| **Original 13 examples** | Unchanged. |\n| **All other PASS-19 claims, sources, and gaps** | Unchanged. |\n\n# S_NE-P22 claim register\n\n| Claim ID | Precise corrected claim | Source and pinpoint | Conditions, consequence, confidence |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **S_NE-P22-C001** | Nebraska Title 230, Chapter 2 prescribes federal-minimum-wage multiples of 60 for biweekly, 65 for semimonthly, and 130 for monthly disposable earnings. | S_NE-P22-S001–S003; Title 230 Ch.2 §§001–002, printed 230-2.1/PDF index 0. | Applies with §25-1558; **high for text**. |\n| **S_NE-P22-C002** | For the three listed nonweekly periods, Nebraska’s ordinary limit is the lesser of 25%, the amount above the applicable Title 230 floor, and 15% where head-of-family status applies. | S_NE-P22-S001–S004. | Statutory/regulatory synthesis; exceptions in §25-1558(2) remain; **high**. |\n| **S_NE-P22-C003** | Nebraska’s current published Title 230 rule does not state a multiplier for every uncommon nonweekly pay period. | S_NE-P22-S002–S004. | Federal §870.10 still supplies the federal ceiling; exact Nebraska state multiplier remains **held**. |\n| **S_NE-P22-C004** | DOL’s $628.33 and $1,256.66 transition figures are rounded published guidance; the exact lesser-of equation continues to control the actual mathematical ceiling. | S_NE-P22-S004–S005. | No universal legal payroll-rounding convention located; **high for relationship, hold for rounding practice**. |\n| **S_NE-P22-C005** | At monthly disposable earnings of $1,256.66 and a $942.50 floor, the exact lesser branch is $314.16. | S_NE-P22-S001–S005. | Arithmetic only; no entitlement or payroll-rounding rule established; **high**. |\n| **S_NE-P22-C006** | For an unsatisfactory garnishee answer, §25-1030’s 20 days run from filing of the garnishee’s interrogatory answers. | S_NE-P22-S006–S007; *Huntington*, printed pp.305–306/PDF indices 11–12. | Not service or actual receipt; **high**. |\n| **S_NE-P22-C007** | Untimely failure to challenge the filed answer requires release and discharge of the garnishee in the affected liability proceeding. | Same. | No universal immunity from later writs or different property established; **high**. |\n| **S_NE-P22-C008** | The 20-day trigger for §25-1030’s separate failure-to-comply-with-court-order branch is not identified by the statute or decided in *Huntington*. | S_NE-P22-S006–S007. | **Unresolved.** |\n| **S_NE-P22-C009** | Once §25-1056(2)’s answer, no-successful-objection, and creditor-application predicates exist, the court shall order transfer and shall further order a continuing lien. | S_NE-P22-S008, §25-1056(2). | No automatic lien without all predicates and court order; **high**. |\n| **S_NE-P22-C010** | Mere negotiation, complaint, or unilateral request does not itself establish the statutory court stay in §25-1056(3)(d). | S_NE-P22-S008. | An actual payment plan or forbearance can impose separate agreement-specific conditions; **high/conditional**. |\n| **S_NE-P22-C011** | The current public CC 3:8N source presents conflicting revision indicators: 08/2026 in extracted text and current companion materials, but 03/2022 in a rendered page image. | S_NE-P22-S009–S012. | Exact file-replacement timing not inferred; statute controls; **high for observed discrepancy**. |\n| **S_NE-P22-C012** | *Florence Lake* requires disclosure but held the plan administrator not liable because ERISA prevented the creditor from acquiring rights to the 401(k) funds. | S_NE-P22-S013, printed pp.197–198/PDF 14–15 and p.204/PDF 21. | Disclosure is not itself liability; **high**. |\n| **S_NE-P22-C013** | The official accessible CCPA body source verified here is the GovInfo 2024 U.S. Code edition, not a replicated OLRC 119-124/October 15, 2026 compilation. | S_NE-P22-S014–S015. | Exact 2026 statutory-compilation currency remains held; **high**. |\n| **S_NE-P22-C014** | Current eCFR Title 29 was displayed as up to date through October 22, 2026 and last amended October 14, 2026. | S_NE-P22-S004. | Regulatory currentness only; does not authenticate OLRC metadata; **high**. |\n\n# S_NE-P22 source register\n\n| Source ID | Title, issuer, full literal URL, pinpoint/read bounds | Status, version, and access limits |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| **S_NE-P22-S001** | **Neb. Rev. Stat. §25-1558 — Wages; subject to garnishment; amount; exceptions**, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1558; subsections (1), (2), and (7), HTML/no PDF page. | Official current codification freshly read October 26, 2026 PT/UTC. Source history displays amendments through 2001 LB 489. No full later session-law audit. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1558) |\n| **S_NE-P22-S002** | **NDOL Regulations Index**, Nebraska Department of Labor. https://dol.nebraska.gov/StatutesAndRegulations/Regulations; lines 138–140, Title 230 Labor Standards, Chapter 02 Wages; Subject To Garnishment. | Current official index freshly read October 26, 2026. Confirms present public listing and link; does not itself supply amendment history. [Nebraska Department of Labor+1](https://dol.nebraska.gov/StatutesAndRegulations/Regulations) |\n| **S_NE-P22-S003** | **Title 230, Chapter 2 — Wages; Subject To Garnishment**, Nebraska Department of Labor. https://dol.nebraska.gov/webdocs/Regulations/230%20-%20Safety%20and%20Labor%20Standards/230-02.pdf; §§001–002, printed page 230-2.1/PDF index 0. | One-page official PDF freshly inspected October 26, 2026. Stamps show AG approval Apr. 10, 1991, Governor approval May 17, 1991, SOS filing May 17, 1991. No express effective date or amendment history displayed. Current publication supported by S002; full adoption history not read. [Nebraska Department of Labor+1](https://dol.nebraska.gov/webdocs/Regulations/230%20-%20Safety%20and%20Labor%20Standards/230-02.pdf) |\n| **S_NE-P22-S004** | **29 C.F.R. Part 870, especially §870.10**, eCFR. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870; §870.10(a)–(d), especially lines 127–170. | eCFR displayed Title 29 current through Oct. 22, 2026 and last amended Oct. 14, 2026. Authoritative but unofficial eCFR. Freshly read Oct. 26, 2026. [eCFR+2](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870) |\n| **S_NE-P22-S005** | **Fact Sheet #30: Wage Garnishment Protections of the CCPA**, U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/30-cppa; December 2024, lines 107–120 and 153–159. | Current public DOL guidance freshly read Oct. 26, 2026. General guidance, not regulation. Supplies the rounded $628.33 and $1,256.66 chart. [Department of Labor+1](https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/30-cppa) |\n| **S_NE-P22-S006** | **Neb. Rev. Stat. §25-1030 — Garnishee; answer; controvert; liability; release**, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1030; complete operative text, HTML/no PDF page. | Official current text freshly read Oct. 26, 2026. Statute does not identify the separate court-order-noncompliance trigger. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1030) |\n| **S_NE-P22-S007** | ***Huntington v. Pedersen*, 294 Neb. 294, 883 N.W.2d 48 (2016)**, Nebraska Supreme Court. https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010005PUB; printed pp.305–306/PDF indices 11–12. | Final published opinion filed July 29, 2016; freshly read and page images inspected Oct. 26, 2026. Exact trigger and mandatory-discharge holding. [Nebraska.gov+1](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010005PUB) |\n| **S_NE-P22-S008** | **Neb. Rev. Stat. §25-1056**, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1056; subsection (2), and subsection (3)(d). | Official current text freshly read Oct. 26, 2026. Mandatory conditional transfer/lien language and court-stay branch. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1056) |\n| **S_NE-P22-S009** | **CC 3:8N — Request for Hearing on Garnishment**, Nebraska Judicial Branch. https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8N.pdf; printed p.1/PDF index 0. | Fresh Oct. 26, 2026 access produced conflicting layers: parsed text stated Rev. 08/2026; rendered page image showed Rev. 03/2022. Exact replacement date not inferred. Operational form only. [Nebraska Judicial Branch+1](https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8N.pdf) |\n| **S_NE-P22-S010** | **CC 3:8Na — Completing the Request for Hearing on Garnishment**, Nebraska Judicial Branch. https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8Na.pdf; printed p.1/PDF index 0. | Rev. 08/2026; freshly read and page image inspected Oct. 26, 2026. Operational instructions only. [Nebraska Judicial Branch+1](https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8Na.pdf) |\n| **S_NE-P22-S011** | **CC 3:8.20 — Garnishment Packet, Plaintiff**, Nebraska Judicial Branch. https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8-20.pdf; printed p.2/PDF index 3, payment-plan branch. | NEW 06/2026; freshly read and page image inspected Oct. 26, 2026. Self-help guidance, not controlling contract or stay law. [Nebraska Judicial Branch+1](https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8-20.pdf) |\n| **S_NE-P22-S012** | **CC 3:8.21 — Garnishment Packet, Defendant**, Nebraska Judicial Branch. https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8-21.pdf; printed p.2/PDF index 3, payment-plan branch; printed pp.4–5/PDF indices 5–6 for garnishment workflow. | Rev. 08/2026; freshly read and page image inspected Oct. 26, 2026. Operational guidance only. [Nebraska Judicial Branch+1](https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8-21.pdf) |\n| **S_NE-P22-S013** | ***Florence Lake Investments, LLC v. Berg*, 312 Neb. 183, 978 N.W.2d 308 (2022)**, Nebraska Supreme Court. https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008782PUB; printed pp.197–198/PDF indices 14–15; majority outcome printed p.204/PDF index 21. | Final published opinion filed Aug. 12, 2022; freshly read and page images inspected Oct. 26, 2026. Retirement/ERISA merits not otherwise expanded. [Nebraska.gov+2](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008782PUB) |\n| **S_NE-P22-S014** | **15 U.S.C. §§1671–1677, official 2024 Edition**, GovInfo. PDF: https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/15/1673; content details: https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2024-title15/USCODE-2024-title15-chap41-subchapII-sec1673; printed pp.1550–1551/PDF indices 0–1. | Official GovInfo 2024 U.S. Code edition freshly read and page images inspected Oct. 26, 2026. Complete bodies of §§1671–1677. Does not establish currency through PL 119-124/Oct. 15, 2026. [GovInfo+2](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/15/1673) |\n| **S_NE-P22-S015** | **Unreplicated OLRC routes and alternate chapter route.** https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1672/; .../s1673/; .../s1674/; .../s1675/; .../s1676/; .../s1677/; alternate: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title15/chapter41/subchapter2&edition=prelim. | Coordinator-reported failures supplied in the assignment. PASS-22 did not repeat unchanged failed requests. Exact 119-124 header remains unverified. Not used as substantive authority. |\n\n# Coverage table\n\n| Requested issue | Status after PASS-22 | Linked claims | Exact remaining gap or next action |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Nebraska biweekly multiplier | **Answered** | C001–C002 | Actual disposable earnings |\n| Nebraska semimonthly multiplier | **Answered** | C001–C002 | Actual disposable earnings |\n| Nebraska monthly multiplier | **Answered** | C001–C002 | Actual disposable earnings |\n| Nebraska uncommon nonweekly period | **Unresolved/partial** | C003 | Current state rule or controlling interpretation for that period |\n| Current federal minimum wage input | **Answered** | C001–C005 | Future statutory change not predicted |\n| Federal/state formula reconciliation | **Answered** | C002–C004 | Actual head-of-family and pay-period facts |\n| Legal payroll-rounding convention | **Not located** | C004–C005 | Controlling Nebraska/federal rule or payroll authority |\n| DOL rounded transition figures | **Answered and preserved** | C004 | Guidance remains rounded display |\n| Original 13 examples | **Unchanged** | — | No recalculation needed |\n| Unsatisfactory-answer 20-day trigger | **Answered** | C006–C007 | Actual answer filing date |\n| Court-order-noncompliance trigger | **Unresolved** | C008 | Controlling case or express order/statutory trigger |\n| Effect of missed answer challenge | **Answered narrowly** | C007 | Later writ/different-property effects require their own record |\n| Mandatory continuing-lien order | **Answered** | C009 | All statutory predicates and actual application/order |\n| Negotiations or complaint as stay | **Answered as no automatic statutory stay** | C010 | Actual court order or enforceable agreement |\n| Payment-plan branch | **Partial/record dependent** | C010 | Written agreement, filing, authority, breach, and enforceability |\n| CC 3:8N revision | **Partially authenticated; source conflict preserved** | C011 | Clean current rendered PDF or formal revision notice |\n| Florence Lake disclosure duty | **Answered** | C012 | Actual garnishee and property facts |\n| Florence Lake liability outcome | **Answered** | C012 | Full retirement/ERISA analysis remains excluded |\n| CCPA operative body | **Verified through official 2024 Edition** | C013 | Later statutory amendments/current compilation |\n| Claimed OLRC 119-124 header | **Unverified** | C013 | Working official current OLRC compilation |\n| Current Part 870 regulation | **Answered** | C014 | No statutory-version inference |\n| Direct tips, worker classification, retirement, Nebraska private retaliation remedy, successive writs, appeal, bank, sector, local, tribal, and foreign-country questions | **Unchanged holds** | Original PASS-19 claims | Separate assigned research |\n\n# Self-check\n\n## Freshly read or visually inspected\n\n- Neb. Rev. Stat. §§25-1558, 25-1030, and 25-1056.\n- NDOL’s current regulations index.\n- The complete one-page Title 230, Chapter 2 rule.\n- Current 29 C.F.R. §870.10 and its eCFR currentness header.\n- DOL Fact Sheet #30 and current federal-minimum-wage pages.\n- *Huntington v. Pedersen*, printed pp.305–306/PDF indices 11–12.\n- *Florence Lake Investments v. Berg*, printed pp.197–198/PDF indices 14–15 and p.204/PDF index 21.\n- CC 3:8N’s parsed text and rendered page image.\n- CC 3:8Na and the current plaintiff and defendant packets.\n- GovInfo’s official 2024 Edition pages containing 15 U.S.C. §§1671–1677.\n\n## Not established or not performed\n\n- No complete Nebraska administrative-rule adoption or amendment history beyond the stamps shown on Title 230, Chapter 2.\n- No state multiplier for every uncommon nonweekly pay period.\n- No universal payroll half-cent rounding convention.\n- No trigger for §25-1030’s court-order-noncompliance branch.\n- No precise CC 3:8N file-replacement date.\n- No successful replication of the claimed OLRC PL 119-124/October 15, 2026 header.\n- No full ERISA, retirement, wage, bank, judgment, execution, appellate, or remedies rerun.\n- No actual employer, debtor, creditor, judgment, answer filing, payment plan, garnishment, court order, account, or docket was examined.\n- No filing, contact, private-data access, local write, browser control, records request, account action, or publication occurred.\n\nAll original PASS-19 direct-tips, classification, retirement, private-employment-remedy, successive-writ, appellate, bank, sector, local, tribal, country, source-history, and actual-record gaps remain open. No Nebraska, component, parent, A066, operational, or publication acceptance is implied.\n\nEND S_NE PASS-22.\n\n","tables":[{"headers":["Group","Disposition","Effect on PASS-19"],"index":0,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Group","Disposition","Effect on PASS-19"],["1. Nonweekly Nebraska rule and rounding edge","Common nonweekly periods answered; uncommon periods and legal rounding convention remain partial. The complete one-page Nebraska Department of Labor rule was visually read. It prescribes 60, 65, and 130 times the federal minimum wage for biweekly, semimonthly, and monthly pay periods.","Replace PASS-19 §C3 and change “Other pay periods” from fully answered to partial. Preserve the core lesser-of formulas and all 13 original examples."],["2. Twenty-day trigger and mandatory continuing-lien language","Answered for the unsatisfactory-answer branch. The 20 days run from filing of the garnishee’s interrogatory answers. The separate court-order-noncompliance trigger remains unresolved. Section 25-1056(2) uses mandatory “shall” language once all listed predicates exist.","Replace C030, C021, §F3, the corresponding master-matrix rows, and their coverage rows."],["3. Source versions and limited outcome annotations","Answered with explicit source limitations. The CC 3:8N public PDF has conflicting text-layer and rendered-page revision indicators; Florence Lake’s disclosure discussion and actual ERISA outcome are now precisely separated; the CCPA body is verified from the official 2024 U.S. Code edition, but the prior claimed OLRC 119-124 header was not replicated.","Replace the CC 3:8N form annotation, Florence Lake pinpoint/outcome annotation, P19 S010 currentness statement, and qualify C037’s payment-plan/stay wording."]]},{"headers":["Pay period","Nebraska Title 230 multiplier","Protected floor"],"index":1,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Pay period","Nebraska Title 230 multiplier","Protected floor"],["Biweekly","60 × $7.25","$435.00"],["Semimonthly","65 × $7.25","$471.25"],["Monthly","130 × $7.25","$942.50"]]},{"headers":["Period","Floor F","Exact crossing F ÷ .75","Published DOL display"],"index":2,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[]],"rows":[["Period","Floor F","Exact crossing F ÷ .75","Published DOL display"],["Semimonthly","$471.25","$628.333333…","$628.33"],["Monthly","$942.50","$1,256.666666…","$1,256.66"]]},{"headers":["Stage","Correct trigger","Required action","Consequence","Qualification"],"index":3,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Stage","Correct trigger","Required action","Consequence","Qualification"],["Creditor challenges an unsatisfactory garnishee answer","Filing of garnishee’s answers","Application to determine liability within 20 days after filing","Garnishee released and discharged if application is untimely","No service or actual-notice trigger"],["Garnishee fails to comply with court delivery/payment/undertaking order","Unresolved","§25-1030 says an application must be filed within 20 days","Untimely failure can result in discharge, but exact trigger is held","Order, service, compliance date, and controlling interpretation needed"],["Continuing-lien transfer/order","Qualifying answer + no successful written objection + creditor application","Court shall order transfer of withheld nonexempt earnings; on creditor application, court shall further order continuing lien","Mandatory conditional order","No automatic lien without application, predicates, and court order"]]},{"headers":["PASS-19 location","Replacement or qualification"],"index":4,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["PASS-19 location","Replacement or qualification"],["§C3 — Current pay-period floors","Replace with the Nebraska Title 230 multipliers, formula synthesis, current floors, uncommon-period hold, and rounding edge above."],["Coverage: Other pay periods","Replace “Answered” with Partial: biweekly, semimonthly, and monthly are answered under Nebraska’s current published rule; other uncommon Nebraska pay periods remain unresolved."],["C030","Replace with the 20-days-after-answer-filing trigger and mandatory release/discharge consequence."],["§F3","Replace the unqualified “within 20 days” wording with the answer-filing trigger and separate unresolved court-order-noncompliance branch."],["Master matrix: garnishee-answer dispute","Replace with the corrected trigger row above."],["Coverage: employer-answer challenge","Answered for unsatisfactory filed answers; partial for court-order noncompliance trigger."],["C021","Replace “may order” with the exact mandatory conditional “shall order” and “shall further order” wording."],["C037","Preserve court/bankruptcy stay rule; qualify negotiations and complaints; separately recognize record-dependent agreed payment-plan restrictions."],["P19 S008 pinpoint","Correct to Huntington, printed pp.305–306/PDF indices 11–12 for the filed-answer trigger and mandatory discharge holding."],["CC 3:8N inventory row","Replace with the conflicting 03/2022 rendered-image and 08/2026 parsed-text/current-companion-source annotation."],["Florence Lake annotation","Add printed pp.197–198/PDF indices 14–15 and majority outcome at printed p.204/PDF index 21; distinguish disclosure duty from liability."],["P19 S010","Replace the unreplicated 119-124 currentness assertion with the official GovInfo 2024 Edition body source and explicit currentness hold."],["Original 13 examples","Unchanged."],["All other PASS-19 claims, sources, and gaps","Unchanged."]]},{"headers":["Claim ID","Precise corrected claim","Source and pinpoint","Conditions, consequence, confidence"],"index":5,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claim ID","Precise corrected claim","Source and pinpoint","Conditions, consequence, confidence"],["S_NE-P22-C001","Nebraska Title 230, Chapter 2 prescribes federal-minimum-wage multiples of 60 for biweekly, 65 for semimonthly, and 130 for monthly disposable earnings.","S_NE-P22-S001–S003; Title 230 Ch.2 §§001–002, printed 230-2.1/PDF index 0.","Applies with §25-1558; high for text."],["S_NE-P22-C002","For the three listed nonweekly periods, Nebraska’s ordinary limit is the lesser of 25%, the amount above the applicable Title 230 floor, and 15% where head-of-family status applies.","S_NE-P22-S001–S004.","Statutory/regulatory synthesis; exceptions in §25-1558(2) remain; high."],["S_NE-P22-C003","Nebraska’s current published Title 230 rule does not state a multiplier for every uncommon nonweekly pay period.","S_NE-P22-S002–S004.","Federal §870.10 still supplies the federal ceiling; exact Nebraska state multiplier remains held."],["S_NE-P22-C004","DOL’s $628.33 and $1,256.66 transition figures are rounded published guidance; the exact lesser-of equation continues to control the actual mathematical ceiling.","S_NE-P22-S004–S005.","No universal legal payroll-rounding convention located; high for relationship, hold for rounding practice."],["S_NE-P22-C005","At monthly disposable earnings of $1,256.66 and a $942.50 floor, the exact lesser branch is $314.16.","S_NE-P22-S001–S005.","Arithmetic only; no entitlement or payroll-rounding rule established; high."],["S_NE-P22-C006","For an unsatisfactory garnishee answer, §25-1030’s 20 days run from filing of the garnishee’s interrogatory answers.","S_NE-P22-S006–S007; Huntington, printed pp.305–306/PDF indices 11–12.","Not service or actual receipt; high."],["S_NE-P22-C007","Untimely failure to challenge the filed answer requires release and discharge of the garnishee in the affected liability proceeding.","Same.","No universal immunity from later writs or different property established; high."],["S_NE-P22-C008","The 20-day trigger for §25-1030’s separate failure-to-comply-with-court-order branch is not identified by the statute or decided in Huntington.","S_NE-P22-S006–S007.","Unresolved."],["S_NE-P22-C009","Once §25-1056(2)’s answer, no-successful-objection, and creditor-application predicates exist, the court shall order transfer and shall further order a continuing lien.","S_NE-P22-S008, §25-1056(2).","No automatic lien without all predicates and court order; high."],["S_NE-P22-C010","Mere negotiation, complaint, or unilateral request does not itself establish the statutory court stay in §25-1056(3)(d).","S_NE-P22-S008.","An actual payment plan or forbearance can impose separate agreement-specific conditions; high/conditional."],["S_NE-P22-C011","The current public CC 3:8N source presents conflicting revision indicators: 08/2026 in extracted text and current companion materials, but 03/2022 in a rendered page image.","S_NE-P22-S009–S012.","Exact file-replacement timing not inferred; statute controls; high for observed discrepancy."],["S_NE-P22-C012","Florence Lake requires disclosure but held the plan administrator not liable because ERISA prevented the creditor from acquiring rights to the 401(k) funds.","S_NE-P22-S013, printed pp.197–198/PDF 14–15 and p.204/PDF 21.","Disclosure is not itself liability; high."],["S_NE-P22-C013","The official accessible CCPA body source verified here is the GovInfo 2024 U.S. Code edition, not a replicated OLRC 119-124/October 15, 2026 compilation.","S_NE-P22-S014–S015.","Exact 2026 statutory-compilation currency remains held; high."],["S_NE-P22-C014","Current eCFR Title 29 was displayed as up to date through October 22, 2026 and last amended October 14, 2026.","S_NE-P22-S004.","Regulatory currentness only; does not authenticate OLRC metadata; high."]]},{"headers":["Requested issue","Status after PASS-22","Linked claims","Exact remaining gap or next action"],"index":6,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Requested issue","Status after PASS-22","Linked claims","Exact remaining gap or next action"],["Nebraska biweekly multiplier","Answered","C001–C002","Actual disposable earnings"],["Nebraska semimonthly multiplier","Answered","C001–C002","Actual disposable earnings"],["Nebraska monthly multiplier","Answered","C001–C002","Actual disposable earnings"],["Nebraska uncommon nonweekly period","Unresolved/partial","C003","Current state rule or controlling interpretation for that period"],["Current federal minimum wage input","Answered","C001–C005","Future statutory change not predicted"],["Federal/state formula reconciliation","Answered","C002–C004","Actual head-of-family and pay-period facts"],["Legal payroll-rounding convention","Not located","C004–C005","Controlling Nebraska/federal rule or payroll authority"],["DOL rounded transition figures","Answered and preserved","C004","Guidance remains rounded display"],["Original 13 examples","Unchanged","—","No recalculation needed"],["Unsatisfactory-answer 20-day trigger","Answered","C006–C007","Actual answer filing date"],["Court-order-noncompliance trigger","Unresolved","C008","Controlling case or express order/statutory trigger"],["Effect of missed answer challenge","Answered narrowly","C007","Later writ/different-property effects require their own record"],["Mandatory continuing-lien order","Answered","C009","All statutory predicates and actual application/order"],["Negotiations or complaint as stay","Answered as no automatic statutory stay","C010","Actual court order or enforceable agreement"],["Payment-plan branch","Partial/record dependent","C010","Written agreement, filing, authority, breach, and enforceability"],["CC 3:8N revision","Partially authenticated; source conflict preserved","C011","Clean current rendered PDF or formal revision notice"],["Florence Lake disclosure duty","Answered","C012","Actual garnishee and property facts"],["Florence Lake liability outcome","Answered","C012","Full retirement/ERISA analysis remains excluded"],["CCPA operative body","Verified through official 2024 Edition","C013","Later statutory amendments/current compilation"],["Claimed OLRC 119-124 header","Unverified","C013","Working official current OLRC compilation"],["Current Part 870 regulation","Answered","C014","No statutory-version inference"],["Direct tips, worker classification, retirement, Nebraska private retaliation remedy, successive writs, appeal, bank, sector, local, tribal, and foreign-country questions","Unchanged holds","Original PASS-19 claims","Separate assigned research"]]}],"claims":[{"claim_id":"S_NE-P22-C001","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P22-C001","Precise corrected claim":"Nebraska Title 230, Chapter 2 prescribes federal-minimum-wage multiples of 60 for biweekly, 65 for semimonthly, and 130 for monthly disposable earnings.","Source and pinpoint":"S_NE-P22-S001–S003; Title 230 Ch.2 §§001–002, printed 230-2.1/PDF index 0.","Conditions, consequence, confidence":"Applies with §25-1558; high for text."},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_in_examined_conditional_scope","coordinator_limits":"Actual records and all unaddressed P19 source, sector and jurisdiction holds remain.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P22-C002","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P22-C002","Precise corrected claim":"For the three listed nonweekly periods, Nebraska’s ordinary limit is the lesser of 25%, the amount above the applicable Title 230 floor, and 15% where head-of-family status applies.","Source and pinpoint":"S_NE-P22-S001–S004.","Conditions, consequence, confidence":"Statutory/regulatory synthesis; exceptions in §25-1558(2) remain; high."},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_in_examined_conditional_scope","coordinator_limits":"Actual records and all unaddressed P19 source, sector and jurisdiction holds remain.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P22-C003","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P22-C003","Precise corrected claim":"Nebraska’s current published Title 230 rule does not state a multiplier for every uncommon nonweekly pay period.","Source and pinpoint":"S_NE-P22-S002–S004.","Conditions, consequence, confidence":"Federal §870.10 still supplies the federal ceiling; exact Nebraska state multiplier remains held."},"coordinator_verification_status":"appropriately_explicit_unresolved_question_retained","coordinator_limits":"Actual records and all unaddressed P19 source, sector and jurisdiction holds remain.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P22-C004","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P22-C004","Precise corrected claim":"DOL’s $628.33 and $1,256.66 transition figures are rounded published guidance; the exact lesser-of equation continues to control the actual mathematical ceiling.","Source and pinpoint":"S_NE-P22-S004–S005.","Conditions, consequence, confidence":"No universal legal payroll-rounding convention located; high for relationship, hold for rounding practice."},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_in_examined_conditional_scope","coordinator_limits":"Actual records and all unaddressed P19 source, sector and jurisdiction holds remain. Exact lesser-of arithmetic; no universal payroll rounding rule.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P22-C005","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P22-C005","Precise corrected claim":"At monthly disposable earnings of $1,256.66 and a $942.50 floor, the exact lesser branch is $314.16.","Source and pinpoint":"S_NE-P22-S001–S005.","Conditions, consequence, confidence":"Arithmetic only; no entitlement or payroll-rounding rule established; high."},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_in_examined_conditional_scope","coordinator_limits":"Actual records and all unaddressed P19 source, sector and jurisdiction holds remain. Exact lesser-of arithmetic; no universal payroll rounding rule.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P22-C006","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P22-C006","Precise corrected claim":"For an unsatisfactory garnishee answer, §25-1030’s 20 days run from filing of the garnishee’s interrogatory answers.","Source and pinpoint":"S_NE-P22-S006–S007; Huntington, printed pp.305–306/PDF indices 11–12.","Conditions, consequence, confidence":"Not service or actual receipt; high."},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_in_examined_conditional_scope","coordinator_limits":"Actual records and all unaddressed P19 source, sector and jurisdiction holds remain.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P22-C007","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P22-C007","Precise corrected claim":"Untimely failure to challenge the filed answer requires release and discharge of the garnishee in the affected liability proceeding.","Source and pinpoint":"Same.","Conditions, consequence, confidence":"No universal immunity from later writs or different property established; high."},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_in_examined_conditional_scope","coordinator_limits":"Actual records and all unaddressed P19 source, sector and jurisdiction holds remain.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P22-C008","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P22-C008","Precise corrected claim":"The 20-day trigger for §25-1030’s separate failure-to-comply-with-court-order branch is not identified by the statute or decided in Huntington.","Source and pinpoint":"S_NE-P22-S006–S007.","Conditions, consequence, confidence":"Unresolved."},"coordinator_verification_status":"appropriately_explicit_unresolved_question_retained","coordinator_limits":"Actual records and all unaddressed P19 source, sector and jurisdiction holds remain.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P22-C009","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P22-C009","Precise corrected claim":"Once §25-1056(2)’s answer, no-successful-objection, and creditor-application predicates exist, the court shall order transfer and shall further order a continuing lien.","Source and pinpoint":"S_NE-P22-S008, §25-1056(2).","Conditions, consequence, confidence":"No automatic lien without all predicates and court order; high."},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_in_examined_conditional_scope","coordinator_limits":"Actual records and all unaddressed P19 source, sector and jurisdiction holds remain.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P22-C010","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P22-C010","Precise corrected claim":"Mere negotiation, complaint, or unilateral request does not itself establish the statutory court stay in §25-1056(3)(d).","Source and pinpoint":"S_NE-P22-S008.","Conditions, consequence, confidence":"An actual payment plan or forbearance can impose separate agreement-specific conditions; high/conditional."},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_in_examined_conditional_scope","coordinator_limits":"Actual records and all unaddressed P19 source, sector and jurisdiction holds remain.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P22-C011","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P22-C011","Precise corrected claim":"The current public CC 3:8N source presents conflicting revision indicators: 08/2026 in extracted text and current companion materials, but 03/2022 in a rendered page image.","Source and pinpoint":"S_NE-P22-S009–S012.","Conditions, consequence, confidence":"Exact file-replacement timing not inferred; statute controls; high for observed discrepancy."},"coordinator_verification_status":"dated_source_annotation_followup_required","coordinator_limits":"Actual records and all unaddressed P19 source, sector and jurisdiction holds remain. Current downloaded/hash-identified CC3N renders08/2026 on all3pages; historical03/2022 report preserved, same-byte conflict unreplicated. FollowupNE25 in original chat.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_followup_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_followup_disposition":"dated_annotation_patch_resolved_with_attribution_currentness_and_cross_route_discrepancy_holds"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P22-C012","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P22-C012","Precise corrected claim":"Florence Lake requires disclosure but held the plan administrator not liable because ERISA prevented the creditor from acquiring rights to the 401(k) funds.","Source and pinpoint":"S_NE-P22-S013, printed pp.197–198/PDF 14–15 and p.204/PDF 21.","Conditions, consequence, confidence":"Disclosure is not itself liability; high."},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_in_examined_conditional_scope","coordinator_limits":"Actual records and all unaddressed P19 source, sector and jurisdiction holds remain. Actual majority ERISA shield preserved, no disclosure-to-liability inference.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P22-C013","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P22-C013","Precise corrected claim":"The official accessible CCPA body source verified here is the GovInfo 2024 U.S. Code edition, not a replicated OLRC 119-124/October 15, 2026 compilation.","Source and pinpoint":"S_NE-P22-S014–S015.","Conditions, consequence, confidence":"Exact 2026 statutory-compilation currency remains held; high."},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_in_examined_conditional_scope","coordinator_limits":"Actual records and all unaddressed P19 source, sector and jurisdiction holds remain. 2024body only, no later-amendment audit/119-124 header; most-recent edition-site claim unreplicated.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_followup_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_followup_disposition":"dated_annotation_patch_resolved_with_attribution_currentness_and_cross_route_discrepancy_holds"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P22-C014","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P22-C014","Precise corrected claim":"Current eCFR Title 29 was displayed as up to date through October 22, 2026 and last amended October 14, 2026.","Source and pinpoint":"S_NE-P22-S004.","Conditions, consequence, confidence":"Regulatory currentness only; does not authenticate OLRC metadata; high."},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_in_examined_conditional_scope","coordinator_limits":"Actual records and all unaddressed P19 source, sector and jurisdiction holds remain.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"}],"sources":[{"source_id":"S_NE-P22-S001","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1558"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P22-S001","Title, issuer, full literal URL, pinpoint/read bounds":"Neb. Rev. Stat. §25-1558 — Wages; subject to garnishment; amount; exceptions, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1558; subsections (1), (2), and (7), HTML/no PDF page.","Status, version, and access limits":"Official current codification freshly read October 26, 2026 PT/UTC. Source history displays amendments through 2001 LB 489. No full later session-law audit. \nNebraska Legislature"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_material_check_with_recorded_qualifications","coordinator_import_reconciliation":"Verbatim complete visible literal-pipe source table; not an HTML table and missed by importer. No fresh source access inferred.","coordinator_access":"Dated reuse NE19 S003/primary1 complete25-1558(1)-(7), reread material clauses in this review","coordinator_result_and_limits":"State25%/federal30x/conditional15% lesser-of, exceptions and Commissioner nonweekly delegation support synthesis. No actual payroll/head-status/exception facts.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P22-S002","urls":["https://dol.nebraska.gov/StatutesAndRegulations/Regulations"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P22-S002","Title, issuer, full literal URL, pinpoint/read bounds":"NDOL Regulations Index, Nebraska Department of Labor. https://dol.nebraska.gov/StatutesAndRegulations/Regulations; lines 138–140, Title 230 Labor Standards, Chapter 02 Wages; Subject To Garnishment.","Status, version, and access limits":"Current official index freshly read October 26, 2026. Confirms present public listing and link; does not itself supply amendment history. \nNebraska Department of Labor\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_material_check_with_recorded_qualifications","coordinator_import_reconciliation":"Verbatim complete visible literal-pipe source table; not an HTML table and missed by importer. No fresh source access inferred.","coordinator_access":"Fresh official NDOL index, [internal evidence reference], lines138-140","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Current index links Title230 Chapter02; publication supported, full adoption/amendment history not established.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P22-S003","urls":["https://dol.nebraska.gov/webdocs/Regulations/230%20-%20Safety%20and%20Labor%20Standards/230-02.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P22-S003","Title, issuer, full literal URL, pinpoint/read bounds":"Title 230, Chapter 2 — Wages; Subject To Garnishment, Nebraska Department of Labor. https://dol.nebraska.gov/webdocs/Regulations/230%20-%20Safety%20and%20Labor%20Standards/230-02.pdf; §§001–002, printed page 230-2.1/PDF index 0.","Status, version, and access limits":"One-page official PDF freshly inspected October 26, 2026. Stamps show AG approval Apr. 10, 1991, Governor approval May 17, 1991, SOS filing May 17, 1991. No express effective date or amendment history displayed. Current publication supported by S002; full adoption history not read. \nNebraska Department of Labor\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_material_check_with_recorded_qualifications","coordinator_import_reconciliation":"Verbatim complete visible literal-pipe source table; not an HTML table and missed by importer. No fresh source access inferred.","coordinator_access":"Fresh official PDF bytes retained with UTC/hash provenance; complete one-page Poppler rendering visually inspected, printed230-2.1/PDF0; pypdf text empty","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Sections001-002 confirm60/65/130 multiples. AG April10,1991 / SOS and Governor May17,1991 stamps visible. No separate effective date or complete amendment history.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P22-S004","urls":["https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P22-S004","Title, issuer, full literal URL, pinpoint/read bounds":"29 C.F.R. Part 870, especially §870.10, eCFR. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870; §870.10(a)–(d), especially lines 127–170.","Status, version, and access limits":"eCFR displayed Title 29 current through Oct. 22, 2026 and last amended Oct. 14, 2026. Authoritative but unofficial eCFR. Freshly read Oct. 26, 2026. \neCFR\n+2"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_material_check_with_recorded_qualifications","coordinator_import_reconciliation":"Verbatim complete visible literal-pipe source table; not an HTML table and missed by importer. No fresh source access inferred.","coordinator_access":"Dated reuse NE19 S011 and primary1-4/12-13, complete material870.10 and header/exceptions","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Regulatory conversion agrees common periods; header10/22/2026 lastamended10/14 separately supported. Old illustrative dollars not current wage; no current statutory compilation inferred.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P22-S005","urls":["https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/30-cppa"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P22-S005","Title, issuer, full literal URL, pinpoint/read bounds":"Fact Sheet #30: Wage Garnishment Protections of the CCPA, U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/30-cppa; December 2024, lines 107–120 and 153–159.","Status, version, and access limits":"Current public DOL guidance freshly read Oct. 26, 2026. General guidance, not regulation. Supplies the rounded $628.33 and $1,256.66 chart. \nDepartment of Labor\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_material_check_with_recorded_qualifications","coordinator_import_reconciliation":"Verbatim complete visible literal-pipe source table; not an HTML table and missed by importer. No fresh source access inferred.","coordinator_access":"Dated reuse NE19 S012/primary1-3, December2024 DOLFS30 material definitions,7.25 and chart","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Guidance actually publishes628.33/1256.66; exact crossover fractions and lesser branches checked. No legal universal rounding convention established.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P22-S006","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1030"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P22-S006","Title, issuer, full literal URL, pinpoint/read bounds":"Neb. Rev. Stat. §25-1030 — Garnishee; answer; controvert; liability; release, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1030; complete operative text, HTML/no PDF page.","Status, version, and access limits":"Official current text freshly read Oct. 26, 2026. Statute does not identify the separate court-order-noncompliance trigger. \nNebraska Legislature"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_material_check_with_recorded_qualifications","coordinator_import_reconciliation":"Verbatim complete visible literal-pipe source table; not an HTML table and missed by importer. No fresh source access inferred.","coordinator_access":"Dated reuse NE19 S004/primary2 complete25-1030 operative text, reread here","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Separate unsatisfactory-answer/noncompliance alternatives; statute says20days without noncompliance trigger; actual answer-filing interpretation supplied by Huntington.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P22-S007","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010005PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P22-S007","Title, issuer, full literal URL, pinpoint/read bounds":"Huntington v. Pedersen, 294 Neb. 294, 883 N.W.2d 48 (2016), Nebraska Supreme Court. https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010005PUB; printed pp.305–306/PDF indices 11–12.","Status, version, and access limits":"Final published opinion filed July 29, 2016; freshly read and page images inspected Oct. 26, 2026. Exact trigger and mandatory-discharge holding. \nNebraska.gov\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_material_check_with_recorded_qualifications","coordinator_import_reconciliation":"Verbatim complete visible literal-pipe source table; not an HTML table and missed by importer. No fresh source access inferred.","coordinator_access":"Dated reuse NE19 S008/primary10/12 actual Huntington305-306/PDF11-12; exact mandatory passage reread here","coordinator_result_and_limits":"20days after answers FILED; no service/receipt/actualnotice substitute. Mandatory discharge limited affected liability proceeding; not universal immunity for later writs/different property.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P22-S008","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1056"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P22-S008","Title, issuer, full literal URL, pinpoint/read bounds":"Neb. Rev. Stat. §25-1056, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1056; subsection (2), and subsection (3)(d).","Status, version, and access limits":"Official current text freshly read Oct. 26, 2026. Mandatory conditional transfer/lien language and court-stay branch. \nNebraska Legislature"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_material_check_with_recorded_qualifications","coordinator_import_reconciliation":"Verbatim complete visible literal-pipe source table; not an HTML table and missed by importer. No fresh source access inferred.","coordinator_access":"Dated reuse NE19 S001/primary1-3 complete25-1056 material2/3(d), exact2 reread here","coordinator_result_and_limits":"SHALL transfer and further SHALL continuing lien once statutory alternatives, no successful objection, application and actual order predicates apply. Negotiation alone not court stay.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P22-S009","urls":["https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8N.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P22-S009","Title, issuer, full literal URL, pinpoint/read bounds":"CC 3:8N — Request for Hearing on Garnishment, Nebraska Judicial Branch. https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8N.pdf; printed p.1/PDF index 0.","Status, version, and access limits":"Fresh Oct. 26, 2026 access produced conflicting layers: parsed text stated Rev. 08/2026; rendered page image showed Rev. 03/2022. Exact replacement date not inferred. Operational form only. \nNebraska Judicial Branch\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_material_check_with_recorded_qualifications","coordinator_import_reconciliation":"Verbatim complete visible literal-pipe source table; not an HTML table and missed by importer. No fresh source access inferred.","coordinator_access":"Fresh original official3pagePDF plus extraction and Poppler pixels ALL3pages; metadata/hash in [internal evidence reference]","coordinator_result_and_limits":"All three current rendered pages show Rev08/2026. Historical researcher03/2022 rendering observation preserved but same-byte layer conflict NOT replicated. C011/source009/group3/replacement-effect/coverage need dated qualification in original Chat, preparedNE25. Form5000banksummary is not current exemption authority.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_followup_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_followup_disposition":"dated_annotation_patch_resolved_with_attribution_currentness_and_cross_route_discrepancy_holds"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P22-S010","urls":["https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8Na.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P22-S010","Title, issuer, full literal URL, pinpoint/read bounds":"CC 3:8Na — Completing the Request for Hearing on Garnishment, Nebraska Judicial Branch. https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8Na.pdf; printed p.1/PDF index 0.","Status, version, and access limits":"Rev. 08/2026; freshly read and page image inspected Oct. 26, 2026. Operational instructions only. \nNebraska Judicial Branch\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_material_check_with_recorded_qualifications","coordinator_import_reconciliation":"Verbatim complete visible literal-pipe source table; not an HTML table and missed by importer. No fresh source access inferred.","coordinator_access":"Fresh official3pagePDF extraction plus ALL3page Poppler renderings; metadata/hash retained","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Instructions Rev08/2026, wage/head-family versus bank selections and three-business-day receipt hearing guidance read. No filing or completed form; operative statute controls.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P22-S011","urls":["https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8-20.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P22-S011","Title, issuer, full literal URL, pinpoint/read bounds":"CC 3:8.20 — Garnishment Packet, Plaintiff, Nebraska Judicial Branch. https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8-20.pdf; printed p.2/PDF index 3, payment-plan branch.","Status, version, and access limits":"NEW 06/2026; freshly read and page image inspected Oct. 26, 2026. Self-help guidance, not controlling contract or stay law. \nNebraska Judicial Branch\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_material_check_with_recorded_qualifications","coordinator_import_reconciliation":"Verbatim complete visible literal-pipe source table; not an HTML table and missed by importer. No fresh source access inferred.","coordinator_access":"Dated reuse NE19 S015/primary10-12 actualCC3:8.20 NEW06/2026 materialpayment-plan branch","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Written/filed plan guidance distinct from unilateral negotiation and statutory court stay; enforceability/application remain record dependent.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P22-S012","urls":["https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8-21.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P22-S012","Title, issuer, full literal URL, pinpoint/read bounds":"CC 3:8.21 — Garnishment Packet, Defendant, Nebraska Judicial Branch. https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-8-21.pdf; printed p.2/PDF index 3, payment-plan branch; printed pp.4–5/PDF indices 5–6 for garnishment workflow.","Status, version, and access limits":"Rev. 08/2026; freshly read and page image inspected Oct. 26, 2026. Operational guidance only. \nNebraska Judicial Branch\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_material_check_with_recorded_qualifications","coordinator_import_reconciliation":"Verbatim complete visible literal-pipe source table; not an HTML table and missed by importer. No fresh source access inferred.","coordinator_access":"Dated reuse NE19 S015/primary10-12 actualCC3:8.21 Rev08/2026 materialplan andworkflow branch, exactplan text reread here","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Packet guidance that performing plan restricts garnishment is not adjudication of actual contract/order; conditions/breach/authority held.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P22-S013","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008782PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P22-S013","Title, issuer, full literal URL, pinpoint/read bounds":"Florence Lake Investments, LLC v. Berg, 312 Neb. 183, 978 N.W.2d 308 (2022), Nebraska Supreme Court. https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008782PUB; printed pp.197–198/PDF indices 14–15; majority outcome printed p.204/PDF index 21.","Status, version, and access limits":"Final published opinion filed Aug. 12, 2022; freshly read and page images inspected Oct. 26, 2026. Retirement/ERISA merits not otherwise expanded. \nNebraska.gov\n+2"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_material_check_with_recorded_qualifications","coordinator_import_reconciliation":"Verbatim complete visible literal-pipe source table; not an HTML table and missed by importer. No fresh source access inferred.","coordinator_access":"Dated reuse NE19 S007/primary6/10-13 actual Florence197-198/PDF14-15 and204/PDF21 majority","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Disclosure duty and creditor-right/time-of-service limits supported; majority ERISA shield defeats liability under facts. No automatic disclosure liability/full ERISA or later-treatment acceptance.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P22-S014","urls":["https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/15/1673","https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2024-title15/USCODE-2024-title15-chap41-subchapII-sec1673","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2024-title15/html/USCODE-2024-title15-chap41-subchapII-sec1673.htm"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P22-S014","Title, issuer, full literal URL, pinpoint/read bounds":"15 U.S.C. §§1671–1677, official 2024 Edition, GovInfo. PDF: https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/15/1673; content details: https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2024-title15/USCODE-2024-title15-chap41-subchapII-sec1673; printed pp.1550–1551/PDF indices 0–1.","Status, version, and access limits":"Official GovInfo 2024 U.S. Code edition freshly read and page images inspected Oct. 26, 2026. Complete bodies of §§1671–1677. Does not establish currency through PL 119-124/Oct. 15, 2026. \nGovInfo\n+2"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_material_check_with_recorded_qualifications","coordinator_import_reconciliation":"Verbatim complete visible literal-pipe source table; not an HTML table and missed by importer. No fresh source access inferred.","coordinator_access":"Fresh Govinfo linked2page body and official2024HTML edition heading, [internal evidence reference]; app/details returned0parsedlines once","coordinator_result_and_limits":"1671-1677 operative bodies supported. 2024 edition heading confirmed via officialHTML alternate. App/details most-recent-on-site representation not replicated; no119-124/Oct15header, no absence-of-later-amendment inference.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_supplementary_body_url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2024-title15/html/USCODE-2024-title15-chap41-subchapII-sec1673.htm","coordinator_followup_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_followup_disposition":"dated_annotation_patch_resolved_with_attribution_currentness_and_cross_route_discrepancy_holds"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P22-S015","urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1672/","https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title15/chapter41/subchapter2&edition=prelim."],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P22-S015","Title, issuer, full literal URL, pinpoint/read bounds":"Unreplicated OLRC routes and alternate chapter route. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1672/; .../s1673/; .../s1674/; .../s1675/; .../s1676/; .../s1677/; alternate: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title15/chapter41/subchapter2&edition=prelim.","Status, version, and access limits":"Coordinator-reported failures supplied in the assignment. PASS-22 did not repeat unchanged failed requests. Exact 119-124 header remains unverified. Not used as substantive authority."},"coordinator_verification_status":"historical_failed_not_authority","coordinator_import_reconciliation":"Verbatim complete visible literal-pipe source table; not an HTML table and missed by importer. No fresh source access inferred.","coordinator_access":"Historical NE19 failed exactOLRC routes/alternate maintenance preserved; deliberately not retried","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Not substantive authority; exact2026 compilation metadata remains held. No inferred blanket service/model/source failure.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"}],"coverage":[{"topic":"Nebraska biweekly multiplier","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Nebraska biweekly multiplier","Status after PASS-22":"Answered","Linked claims":"C001–C002","Exact remaining gap or next action":"Actual disposable earnings"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_original_holds_remain","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Nebraska semimonthly multiplier","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Nebraska semimonthly multiplier","Status after PASS-22":"Answered","Linked claims":"C001–C002","Exact remaining gap or next action":"Actual disposable earnings"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_original_holds_remain","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Nebraska monthly multiplier","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Nebraska monthly multiplier","Status after PASS-22":"Answered","Linked claims":"C001–C002","Exact remaining gap or next action":"Actual disposable earnings"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_original_holds_remain","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Nebraska uncommon nonweekly period","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Nebraska uncommon nonweekly period","Status after PASS-22":"Unresolved/partial","Linked claims":"C003","Exact remaining gap or next action":"Current state rule or controlling interpretation for that period"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_original_holds_remain","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Current federal minimum wage input","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Current federal minimum wage input","Status after PASS-22":"Answered","Linked claims":"C001–C005","Exact remaining gap or next action":"Future statutory change not predicted"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_original_holds_remain","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Federal/state formula reconciliation","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Federal/state formula reconciliation","Status after PASS-22":"Answered","Linked claims":"C002–C004","Exact remaining gap or next action":"Actual head-of-family and pay-period facts"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_original_holds_remain","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Legal payroll-rounding convention","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Legal payroll-rounding convention","Status after PASS-22":"Not located","Linked claims":"C004–C005","Exact remaining gap or next action":"Controlling Nebraska/federal rule or payroll authority"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_original_holds_remain","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"DOL rounded transition figures","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"DOL rounded transition figures","Status after PASS-22":"Answered and preserved","Linked claims":"C004","Exact remaining gap or next action":"Guidance remains rounded display"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_original_holds_remain","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Original 13 examples","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Original 13 examples","Status after PASS-22":"Unchanged","Linked claims":"—","Exact remaining gap or next action":"No recalculation needed"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_original_holds_remain","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Unsatisfactory-answer 20-day trigger","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Unsatisfactory-answer 20-day trigger","Status after PASS-22":"Answered","Linked claims":"C006–C007","Exact remaining gap or next action":"Actual answer filing date"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_original_holds_remain","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Court-order-noncompliance trigger","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Court-order-noncompliance trigger","Status after PASS-22":"Unresolved","Linked claims":"C008","Exact remaining gap or next action":"Controlling case or express order/statutory trigger"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_original_holds_remain","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Effect of missed answer challenge","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Effect of missed answer challenge","Status after PASS-22":"Answered narrowly","Linked claims":"C007","Exact remaining gap or next action":"Later writ/different-property effects require their own record"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_original_holds_remain","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Mandatory continuing-lien order","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Mandatory continuing-lien order","Status after PASS-22":"Answered","Linked claims":"C009","Exact remaining gap or next action":"All statutory predicates and actual application/order"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_original_holds_remain","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Negotiations or complaint as stay","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Negotiations or complaint as stay","Status after PASS-22":"Answered as no automatic statutory stay","Linked claims":"C010","Exact remaining gap or next action":"Actual court order or enforceable agreement"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_original_holds_remain","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Payment-plan branch","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Payment-plan branch","Status after PASS-22":"Partial/record dependent","Linked claims":"C010","Exact remaining gap or next action":"Written agreement, filing, authority, breach, and enforceability"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_original_holds_remain","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"CC 3:8N revision","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"CC 3:8N revision","Status after PASS-22":"Partially authenticated; source conflict preserved","Linked claims":"C011","Exact remaining gap or next action":"Clean current rendered PDF or formal revision notice"},"coordinator_acceptance":"clean_current_08_2026_render_observed_historical_conflict_unreplicated_dated_original_chat_qualification_pending","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Florence Lake disclosure duty","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Florence Lake disclosure duty","Status after PASS-22":"Answered","Linked claims":"C012","Exact remaining gap or next action":"Actual garnishee and property facts"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_original_holds_remain","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Florence Lake liability outcome","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Florence Lake liability outcome","Status after PASS-22":"Answered","Linked claims":"C012","Exact remaining gap or next action":"Full retirement/ERISA analysis remains excluded"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_original_holds_remain","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"CCPA operative body","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"CCPA operative body","Status after PASS-22":"Verified through official 2024 Edition","Linked claims":"C013","Exact remaining gap or next action":"Later statutory amendments/current compilation"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_original_holds_remain","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Claimed OLRC 119-124 header","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Claimed OLRC 119-124 header","Status after PASS-22":"Unverified","Linked claims":"C013","Exact remaining gap or next action":"Working official current OLRC compilation"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_original_holds_remain","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Current Part 870 regulation","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Current Part 870 regulation","Status after PASS-22":"Answered","Linked claims":"C014","Exact remaining gap or next action":"No statutory-version inference"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_original_holds_remain","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Direct tips, worker classification, retirement, Nebraska private retaliation remedy, successive writs, appeal, bank, sector, local, tribal, and foreign-country questions","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Direct tips, worker classification, retirement, Nebraska private retaliation remedy, successive writs, appeal, bank, sector, local, tribal, and foreign-country questions","Status after PASS-22":"Unchanged holds","Linked claims":"Original PASS-19 claims","Exact remaining gap or next action":"Separate assigned research"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_review_complete_original_holds_remain","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"}],"annotations":{},"corrections":[],"resolved_corrections":[],"review_history":[]}