FIND THE EXPLANATION

Which place’s debt rules apply—and who can help?

Use the notice, agreement, and places connected to the debt to find the right court, regulator, or legal-help service.

This address preserves a dated source document behind the guide. The complete explanation covers the questions, comparisons and next steps for this subject.

If you came here to check a specific citation, open the original archive below. It includes its source dates and recorded qualifications.

Original source archive (optional)Original working documents, complete tables and revision history

About this archive

The explanation above is written for readers. These original working documents preserve the evidence trail, including technical language, dated passages and known corrections. They have not all received independent professional review. Use the marked limits before relying on a particular rule or figure.

DETAILED RESEARCH · EVIDENCE & LIMITS INCLUDED

SMT Bounded precision and source corrections to

S_MT · pass-27Captured 2026-10-269 tables · 22 claim records · 15 source recordsScoped coordinator review completed

Read the evidence with its boundaries. These are saved research components, including revisions. A scoped coordinator review checks selected evidence; it does not certify every claim, a complete jurisdiction, current law or individual applicability. Dates and access limits remain attached to the records.

How to read the research →

S_MT PASS-27 — Bounded precision and source corrections to PASS-22

Fresh PASS-27 access date: October 26, 2026, Pacific / October 26, 2026, UTC Scope: Only the three requested correction groups affecting PASS-22. PASS-22 remains unreviewed. This patch does not accept PASS-22, PASS-23, PASS-24, or any other pending component as a legal premise.

All sixteen PASS-22 examples and their checked numerical results remain unchanged except for:

The express qualification added to Example 14 concerning HSA contribution timing; and
The labeling of Example 6’s one-third and two-thirds percentages as approximate decimal displays.

I. Effect on the original PASS-22

Group and subissue	Affected PASS-22 location	Correction or qualification	Effect on original
1(a) Debtor-notice contents	Core finding 5; notice matrix; debtor-notice coverage	Add the statutorily required date of judgment, together with case name and creditor.	Timing and service rules remain unchanged.
1(b) Excess proceeds	Workflow row 17 and distribution language	Add §25-13-402(2)’s exception: return excess unless the judgment or a court order directs otherwise.	No universal debtor-return rule is created.
1(c) Converted exempt-property proceeds	Core finding 13; P22-C028; proceeds matrix; coverage	Restore §25-13-610(1)’s two disjunctive branches: sale; or loss/damage/destruction plus indemnification.	Indemnification is not imposed on every voluntary sale.
2(a) HSA statutory interaction	Core finding 11; exemption matrix; P22-C025; Example 14; coverage	Read §25-13-603 together with §25-13-608(1)(l). Section 608 expressly identifies pre-suit contributions and earnings; §603 contains broader account language and its medical-expense-recovery exception.	Exact treatment of post-suit contributions remains held.
2(b) HSA controlling opinion	Same HSA locations	Add In re Giacometto, 2017 MT 162. Its holding concerned the pre-amendment statute, and the Court expressly said the 2017 amendment would supersede that route.	The old “used or will be used for care” route is not silently imported as the current contribution-timing rule.
3(a) P22 S007 URLs	Source register S007	Restore separate full literal URLs for §§25-13-603, 608, 609, and 610.	Locator correction.
3(b) P22 S011 URLs	Source register S011	Restore separate full literal URLs for §§212.2 through 212.11 and Appendix C.	Locator and clause-precision correction.
3(c) Part 212 timing and predicates	P22-C037, C039, C046–C048, C052	Distinguish receipt-only initial Notice-of-Right check from account review after receipt plus sufficient identifying information; preserve §212.6’s covered-benefit predicate.	No new federal framework is added.
3(d) Official forms	P22 S021 and Part XI	Restore two landing pages and six direct form URLs. Five Word bodies remain unread; the generic District Praecipe PDF is a 2010 summons-service form, not a bank packet.	No form content or revision date is inferred.
3(e) Dorwart source omission	Part X decision table; no matching source-register row	Add Dorwart as a historical due-process source and add the narrow Buxbaum later-treatment annotation.	Current §§25-13-211 and 212 remain the operative procedure.
3(f) Dean provenance	P22 S019; P22-C058	Confirm one-based PDF pp.7–10 / zero-based indices 6–9 and the historical joint-account/FIFO holding.	Printed/PDF locator precision only.
3(g) Salminen provenance	P22 S020; P22-C061	Treat the filed December 2, 2014 caption as controlling; preserve pleading-stage posture and partial reversal/remand.	No automatic bank liability or damages conclusion.
3(h) Philpott and Porter	P22 C054–C055 and source rows	Correct majority read bounds and keep separate the statutory VA taxation clause, Porter’s creditor-process reasoning, and Justice Douglas’s separate opinion.	Substantive bounded holdings preserved.
3(i) Coverage crosslinks	Rows using shortened C10/C12/C14 or bare S005	Replace with full existing claim IDs and add only the missing limited-court route claims.	No municipal or deposit-specific form rule is invented.
3(j) Example 6 percentages	Joint-account worked example	State exact fractions as 1/3 and 2/3; label 33.333% and 66.667% as approximate.	$2,000 and $4,000 results remain unchanged.

GROUP 1 — Operative statutory corrections

A. Exact replacement for PASS-22 core finding 5 and debtor-notice content

Montana officer notice after execution

Within five days after executing upon the debtor’s property, the sheriff or levying officer must serve a notice that:

Describes the property or money seized;
States the case name, date of judgment, and judgment creditor’s name;
Advises that state or federal exemptions may apply; and
Explains how the debtor may claim an exemption and request a hearing.

The statute requires the date of judgment. A form may also identify the seizure or levy date for operational clarity, but that does not replace the required judgment date. Personal service and first-class mail remain authorized, and mailed notice is complete when the officer places it in the mail. Montana Code Annotated

The related §25-13-212 conclusions remain unchanged:

Personal service: ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, from actual receipt;
Mail: ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, from the officer’s mailing date;
Same-day copies to the creditor or counsel and the sheriff or levying officer;
Hearing within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after the court receives the request; and
An untimely state claim is barred in the seized property.

No actual calendar is calculated, and filing the request is not converted into an indefinite automatic stay.

Claim effect

P22-C013 remains correct: officer notice is due within five days.
P22-C014 remains correct: mailed notice is complete upon mailing.
P27-C001 supplies the missing required-content proposition.

B. Exact replacement for PASS-22 workflow row 17

Distribution after the statutory hold

After the statutory hold expires and no contrary exemption, ownership, federal-protection, or court order remains pending, the officer may distribute lawful nonexempt proceeds toward the judgment. Any amount exceeding the judgment and accruing costs must be returned to the judgment debtor unless otherwise directed by the judgment or an order of the court. Montana Code Annotated

This qualification preserves:

A judgment’s express distribution terms;
A court’s priority or interpleader order;
A pending exemption or third-party ownership ruling;
Legally established superior interests;
The officer’s applicable hold; and
The difference between partial and full judgment satisfaction.

Corrected workflow row

Stage	Actor	Trigger	Required action	Consequence
17. Distribution	Sheriff or levying officer	Hold expires and no contrary order remains	Apply lawful nonexempt proceeds as directed by statute, judgment, and court order	Return true excess to the debtor unless the judgment or court order directs otherwise

No bank-default, damages, fee, or universal-return theory is added.

C. Exact replacement for PASS-22 core finding 13 and P22-C028

Six-month converted-property proceeds: two statutory branches

MCA §25-13-610(1) supplies a six-month traceable-proceeds exemption through two distinct branches:

Branch 1 — exempt property was sold

If property exempt under §§25-13-608 or 25-13-609 has been sold, the debtor is entitled for six months to an exemption in proceeds that remain traceable.

The sale branch does not textually require that the debtor also have been “indemnified.”

Branch 2 — exempt property was lost, damaged, or destroyed and the debtor was indemnified

If exempt property has been lost, damaged, or destroyed and the debtor has been indemnified, the debtor is entitled for six months to the traceable indemnity proceeds.

Thus, the statute should not be compressed into a cumulative formula requiring that every exempt-property proceeds claim involve sale, loss, damage, destruction, and indemnification. Montana Code Annotated

Unchanged neighboring rules

Exempt wages retain their exemption for 45 days after receipt while traceable.
The debtor may select FIFO, LIFO, or another reasonable tracing method.
Section 25-13-610 does not establish a universal six-month exemption for all money deposited into a bank account.
The underlying property must itself have been exempt under §25-13-608 or §25-13-609.

Corrected P22-C028

MCA §25-13-610(1) creates a six-month traceable-proceeds exemption when qualifying exempt property either (a) has been sold, or (b) has been lost, damaged, or destroyed and the debtor has been indemnified. Indemnification is not an additional predicate for the sale branch.

Corrected proceeds matrix row

Source event	Additional statutory predicate	Duration	Tracing
Exempt property sold	Sale proceeds remain identifiable as proceeds of the exempt property	6 months	FIFO, LIFO, or another reasonable method
Exempt property lost, damaged, or destroyed	Debtor has been indemnified and the indemnity remains traceable	6 months	FIFO, LIFO, or another reasonable method
Exempt wages deposited	Portion was exempt under the wage statute and remains traceable	45 days	FIFO, LIFO, or another reasonable method

GROUP 2 — HSA statutory interaction and controlling authority

A. Exact replacement for PASS-22 core finding 11 and exemption-matrix HSA row

Current HSA/MCSA/MSA exemption requires both current provisions to be read

Section 25-13-603 broadly provides that a qualifying Montana medical care savings account, federal HSA, or medical savings account:

Is exempt from creditor processes;
Is not liable to attachment, garnishment, or similar process;
May not be seized or applied to an account holder’s or beneficiary’s debt;
Includes rights to hold or receive the account’s assets, income, and funds paid into or out of the account; and
Is subject to an exception when the process seeks recovery of eligible medical expenses incurred from that account. Montana Code Annotated

Section 25-13-608(1)(l), however, places these accounts in the general execution-exemption list “as provided in 25-13-603” and expressly refers to:

Contributions made before the suit resulting in judgment was filed; and
Earnings on those contributions. Montana Code Annotated

These two current provisions must be read together. Calling an account a “qualifying HSA” does not by itself resolve:

When each contribution was made;
Which earnings derive from pre-suit contributions;
Whether the creditor’s claim is for eligible medical expenses incurred from the account; or
How the broad language in §603 interacts with §608(1)(l) for post-suit contributions.

Current application held

A bounded search located no post-amendment Montana appellate holding squarely deciding whether:

Section 603 independently protects post-suit contributions despite §608(1)(l);
Section 608(1)(l) limits the ordinary-execution exemption to pre-suit contributions and their earnings; or
The provisions operate through another harmonized construction.

Therefore:

Pre-suit contributions and earnings on them are expressly within §608(1)(l), subject to §603’s account qualification and medical-expense-recovery exception.
Post-suit contributions are neither categorically declared protected nor categorically declared nonexempt in this correction.
Actual contribution dates and earnings records remain necessary.

B. Controlling opinion qualification — In re Giacometto

In In re John Charles Giacometto, 2017 MT 162, the Montana Supreme Court held under the pre-amendment version of §25-13-608(1)(f) that an HSA could be exempt to the extent it was used or would be used for qualifying medical care. The Court then expressly observed that the 2017 legislation added a more specific savings-account exemption and would supersede the applicability of the former §608(1)(f) route to such accounts. The relevant amendment discussion is at ¶14, printed opinion page 7 / zero-based PDF index 6; the pre-amendment holding is at ¶15, printed page 8 / PDF index 7. Justia Law+2

Accordingly:

Giacometto remains controlling for its pre-amendment facts and Montana’s liberal-construction background.
It does not decide the current interaction between §§25-13-603 and 25-13-608(1)(l).
Its old “used or will be used to pay for care” holding should not be substituted for the current contribution-timing text.
The current §603(3) eligible-medical-expense recovery exception remains independently relevant.

C. Corrected P22-C025

A qualifying MCSA, HSA, or MSA receives broad account protection under §25-13-603, subject to its eligible-medical-expense recovery exception. Section 25-13-608(1)(l), while incorporating §603, expressly identifies contributions made before the suit resulting in judgment and earnings on those contributions. Pre-suit contributions and earnings are textually covered; the exact treatment of post-suit contributions under the two current provisions remains unresolved absent controlling post-amendment authority.

Confidence: High for both current statutory texts and Giacometto’s pre-amendment/supersession statement; unresolved for the current post-suit-contribution application.

D. Exact replacement for PASS-22 Example 14

Example 14 — HSA with contribution timing and debt type held

Assumptions

Account balance: $2,500.00.
The account otherwise satisfies the applicable MCSA/HSA/MSA definition.
The judgment arises from an ordinary credit-card claim.
The creditor is not seeking recovery of eligible medical expenses incurred from that account.
Contribution dates and the allocation of earnings are initially unknown.

Branch A — the full $2,500.00 consists of pre-suit contributions and earnings on those contributions

Section 25-13-608(1)(l) expressly identifies those contributions and earnings, as provided in §25-13-603.

Conditional protected amount:

$2,500.00\boxed{$2,500.00}$2,500.00This result still assumes account qualification and that §25-13-603(3)’s medical-expense-recovery exception does not apply.

Branch B — the $2,500.00 includes one or more post-suit contributions

The exact protected amount is held because the current interaction between §603’s broad account language and §608(1)(l)’s pre-suit-contribution language has not been resolved by controlling post-amendment authority located here.

No portion is automatically classified merely from the current balance.

Branch C — the process seeks eligible medical expenses incurred from the account

Section 25-13-603(3) supplies an express exception. No $2,500.00 exemption conclusion follows without the actual expense, account, and recovery facts.

The arithmetic and original $2,500.00 balance remain unchanged. “Qualifying account” does not resolve contribution timing or debt type.

E. Corrected HSA coverage row

Component	Status after PASS-27	Claim IDs	Exact remaining evidence or next action
Qualifying MCSA/HSA/MSA account protection	Answered textually	P27-C005, C006	Actual account type and governing documents
Pre-suit contributions and earnings	Answered textually	P27-C006	Contribution and earnings ledger
Post-suit contributions	Unresolved	P27-C008	Controlling post-2017 construction or claim-specific court ruling
Eligible-medical-expense recovery exception	Answered textually	P27-C007	Actual debt type and expense source
Pre-amendment Giacometto route	Historical/currentness-qualified	P27-C009	Do not use as current contribution-timing rule

GROUP 3 — Source, provenance, and mapping corrections

A. Replacement for PASS-22 S007

S_MT-P22-S007 — Montana exemptions and tracing

Full literal URLs:

MCA §25-13-603 — Medical care, health, or medical savings accounts https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0060/section_0030/0250-0130-0060-0030.html
MCA §25-13-608 — Property exempt without limitation https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0060/section_0080/0250-0130-0060-0080.html
MCA §25-13-609 — Property exempt to specified value https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0060/section_0090/0250-0130-0060-0090.html
MCA §25-13-610 — Tracing of proceeds exempt from execution https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0060/section_0100/0250-0130-0060-0100.html

PASS-27 status: Fresh current MCA 2025 HTML reads. Printed page and PDF index are not applicable to these HTML code pages. Material HSA and tracing clauses were read completely. Montana Code Annotated+3

B. Replacement for PASS-22 S011

S_MT-P22-S011 — 31 CFR Part 212

Full literal section URLs:

Fresh PASS-27 status: eCFR displayed the regulation as current through October 22, 2026, with Title 31 last amended October 15, 2026. HTML pages have no printed-page or PDF-index locator. eCFR+10

Precise operational qualifications

Original P22 claim	Precise qualification
P22-C037 — initial check	Section 212.4 requires the bank, no later than two business days after receipt of the order, and before other action, to determine whether the order contains the required Notice of Right to Garnish Federal Benefits.
P22-C039 — account review	Section 212.5(a) generally requires review within two business days after the bank has received both the order and sufficient identifying information. Creditor-authorized batch processing can affect timing.
P22-C047/C048 — no-repeat and no-continuing rules	Section 212.6’s operative protections—including no repeated action on the same order and no continuing garnishment of later deposits—apply when the account review shows that a benefit agency deposited a covered benefit during the lookback period.
P22-C046 — bank notice	Section 212.7 notice is required only if all three predicates exist: a covered deposit during the lookback; a positive balance and protected amount; and funds above the protected amount.
P22-C052 — records	Section 212.11 requires sufficient compliance records for at least two years from receipt of the garnishment order.

These are clause-precision corrections, not a new federal benefits report.

C. Replacement for PASS-22 S021 and form inventory

Official landing pages

Direct form URLs

Access qualification:

The two official landing pages were freshly read.
The five Word documents returned unsupported Word-document bodies; their text, revision dates, and every field remain not read.
The generic District Praecipe PDF was freshly read and visually inspected. It is two pages, marked 09/10/10, and addresses summons-service information. It is not a bank-garnishment packet or authority for bank duties, fees, answers, or federal-benefit review. Montana Courts+3

No current statewide form specifically titled “bank answer,” “bank interrogatories,” “federal benefit account review,” or “bank processing fee” was identified on those official pages.

D. Added Dorwart source and bounded later treatment

Historical due-process source

Dorwart v. Caraway, 1998 MT 191, Montana Supreme Court:

Material locations freshly verified:

¶¶74–76: displayed PDF p.25 / zero-based PDF index 24;
¶¶93–94: displayed PDF p.31 / index 30;
¶¶95–98: displayed PDF p.32 / index 31;
¶¶99–101: displayed PDF p.33 / index 32;
¶¶102–103: displayed PDF p.34 / index 33.

The opinion recognized a protected property interest in statutory execution exemptions and held the former postjudgment procedure constitutionally inadequate because it lacked proper notice and a prompt hearing route. Current §§25-13-211 and 212 were enacted after the challenged procedure and now supply the operative statutory notice and hearing framework. Justia Law+4

Narrow later-treatment annotation

Trustees of Indiana University v. Buxbaum, 2003 MT 97, ¶46:

https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2003/eff955bb-6f26-4929-9f2d-b920b9e3977c.html

Buxbaum overruled Dorwart only to the extent Dorwart was inconsistent with discretionary attorney-fee authority under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, MCA §27-8-313. It did not overrule Dorwart’s execution-related due-process holdings. Printed-page and PDF-index locators were not separately authenticated because PASS-27 read the HTML opinion at ¶46. Justia Law

No complete citator claim is made.

E. Dean, Salminen, Philpott, and Porter source annotations

1. Dean v. Hoepfner

Material opinion pages were freshly inspected at printed PDF pp.7–10 / zero-based indices 6–9. The decision supports the historical proposition that traceable Social Security funds—including a spouse’s benefits—in a joint account could retain protection and that a reasonable FIFO tracing approach was permissible. The judgment was affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. It does not make every unidentified joint-account balance exempt. Justia Law+3

2. Salminen v. Morrison & Frampton, PLLP

The filed caption controls: 2014 MT 323, filed December 2, 2014. The PDF’s legacy “PROPOSED OPINION” metadata does not change the filed status.

Read bounds:

¶¶23–33: printed pp.10–15 / PDF indices 9–14;
¶34: printed p.16 / index 15;
¶36 disposition: printed p.17 / index 16.

The Court reversed in part, affirmed in part, and remanded. Its execution and private-property discussion arose at the pleading stage. It does not establish automatic bank liability, conversion damages, or relief for every delayed exemption determination. Paragraph 34 separately affirmed dismissal of the constitutional claim. Justia Law+7

3. Philpott v. Essex County Welfare Board

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-409/pdf/USREPORTS-409-413.pdf

Majority read bounds: printed pp.415–417 / zero-based PDF indices 2–4. The Court held that deposited Social Security funds remained protected where they retained the quality of money and were readily withdrawable. The holding does not protect unrelated funds or eliminate source-tracing requirements. GovInfo

4. Porter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-370/pdf/USREPORTS-370-159.pdf

Majority read bounds: printed pp.159–162 / zero-based PDF indices 0–3. The majority protected deposited veterans’ benefits while they remained readily available for support and maintenance and retained the qualities of money rather than becoming permanent investments.

Justice Douglas’s separate writing begins after the majority’s conclusion on printed p.162 / PDF index 3 and must not be attributed to the majority. The statutory provision concerning property purchased with VA benefits as to taxation is distinct from Porter’s creditor-process analysis of permanent investment. GovInfo

F. Federal benefit statute access annotation

The following are retained as coordinator-reported dated primary-source reuse, not new PASS-27 reads:

https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/38/5301 — 38 U.S.C. §5301, printed p.1052 / PDF index 0;
https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/45/231m — 45 U.S.C. §231m, printed p.83 / PDF index 0;
https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/45/352 — 45 U.S.C. §352(e), printed p.109 / PDF index 4;
https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/5/8346 — 5 U.S.C. §8346, printed p.1086 / PDF index 0;
https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/5/8470 — 5 U.S.C. §8470, printed p.1191 / PDF index 0.

Also retained as dated reuse:

The reported OLRC headers were:

§§407 and 1383: laws through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026;
§§352, 8346, and 8470: laws through Public Law 119-120, October 7, 2026.

No GovInfo edition year, later-amendment completeness, or current VA OLRC header is inferred beyond those attributed checks.

G. Coverage-claim crosslink replacements

PASS-22 coverage row	Original shorthand	Replacement
Officer’s ten-day hold	C12	S_MT-P22-C012, sourced to P22-S002, MCA §25-13-402(4)
Mailed debtor notice	C14	S_MT-P22-C014, sourced to P22-S003, MCA §25-13-211(2)
Ordinary bank levy not continuing	C10	S_MT-P22-C010, sourced to P22-S002, MCA §25-13-402(3), contrasted with wage/state-payment subsections
Justice/City execution route	C001, S005	S_MT-P22-C001 plus S_MT-P27-C012, sourced to Justice/City Rule 23
Small Claims enforcement	S005	S_MT-P27-C013, sourced to MCA §25-35-807
Six-month converted-property proceeds	C028	S_MT-P27-C003 and C004, replacing P22-C028’s cumulative phrasing
HSA account protection	C025	S_MT-P27-C005–C009, replacing the unqualified account label

Limited-court sources

Justice/City Rule 23:

https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0230/part_0010/section_0230/0250-0230-0010-0230.html

Small Claims enforcement:

https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0350/part_0080/section_0070/0250-0350-0080-0070.html

Rule 23 permits statewide execution after docketed judgment under the limited-court writ procedure. Section 25-35-807 sends Small Claims judgment enforcement to Justice Court execution law. These provisions do not resolve the still-held municipal and bank-specific form questions. Montana Code Annotated+1

H. Example 6 percentage-label correction

The original dollar inputs remain:

Debtor contribution: $2,000;
Nondebtor contribution: $4,000;
Total: $6,000.

Exact fractions:

$2,000$6,000=13\frac{$2,000}{$6,000}=\frac13$6,000$2,000=31$4,000$6,000=23\frac{$4,000}{$6,000}=\frac23$6,000$4,000=32Decimal displays:

13≈33.333%\frac13\approx 33.333%31≈33.333%23≈66.667%\frac23\approx 66.667%32≈66.667%The dollar shares remain exactly:

Debtor: $2,000;
Nondebtor: $4,000.

The percentages must be labeled approximately because the exact decimals repeat. Montana’s ownership rule remains based on net contributions unless clear and convincing evidence shows a different intent. Montana Code Annotated

IV. PASS-27 source register

Source ID	Authority, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint	Version/status and access classification	Read bounds and limits
S_MT-P27-S001	MCA §25-13-211, Montana Legislature. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0020/section_0110/0250-0130-0020-0110.html	Fresh PASS-27 public read, October 26, 2026 Pacific/UTC; current MCA 2025 HTML	Complete section. HTML: printed page/PDF index not applicable. Montana Code Annotated
S_MT-P27-S002	MCA §25-13-402, Montana Legislature. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0040/section_0020/0250-0130-0040-0020.html	Fresh PASS-27 public read	Complete material subsections, including snapshot levy, return exception, repeated levy, and wage/state-payment distinctions. Montana Code Annotated
S_MT-P27-S003	MCA §§25-13-603, 608, 609, 610, Montana Legislature. Full URLs reproduced in Group 3.A.	Fresh PASS-27 public reads	Complete material HSA, exemption, value-limited-property, and tracing clauses. HTML; no PDF locator. Montana Code Annotated+3
S_MT-P27-S004	In re John Charles Giacometto, 2017 MT 162, Montana Supreme Court. HTML: https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2017/op-16-0709.html; PDF: https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2017-op-16-0709.pdf?ts=1498777360	Fresh PASS-27 full opinion read and page inspection	¶14 printed p.7/PDF index 6; ¶15 p.8/index 7. Pre-amendment certified question; majority said 2017 legislation superseded the old route. Justia Law+2
S_MT-P27-S005	Justice/City Rule 23 and MCA §25-35-807, Montana Legislature. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0230/part_0010/section_0230/0250-0230-0010-0230.html; https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0350/part_0080/section_0070/0250-0350-0080-0070.html	Fresh PASS-27 public reads	Limited route and Small Claims cross-reference only. No municipal or bank-answer form inferred. Montana Code Annotated+1
S_MT-P27-S006	MCA §72-6-211, Montana Legislature. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0720/chapter_0060/part_0020/section_0110/0720-0060-0020-0110.html	Fresh PASS-27 public read	Complete lifetime beneficial-ownership provision. HTML; no PDF locator. Montana Code Annotated
S_MT-P27-S007	31 CFR Part 212 §§212.2–212.11 and Appendix C, eCFR. Full URLs reproduced in Group 3.B.	Fresh PASS-27 public reads; eCFR current through October 22, 2026, last amended October 15, 2026	Complete material operational clauses. HTML; no printed page/PDF index. eCFR+9
S_MT-P27-S008	Montana Judicial Branch judgment/forms resources and six direct form URLs, full URLs in Group 3.C.	Landing pages and generic PDF freshly read; five Word bodies failed/not read	Generic Praecipe printed pp.1–2/PDF indices 0–1, dated 09/10/10; summons-service form, not bank packet. Montana Courts+3
S_MT-P27-S009	Dorwart v. Caraway, 1998 MT 191, full HTML/PDF URLs in Group 3.D.	Fresh PASS-27 opinion and page-image read; historical currentness	¶¶74–76 displayed PDF p.25/index 24; ¶¶93–103 displayed pp.31–34/indices 30–33. Current §§211–212 postdate challenged regime. Justia Law+4
S_MT-P27-S010	Trustees of Indiana University v. Buxbaum, 2003 MT 97, https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2003/eff955bb-6f26-4929-9f2d-b920b9e3977c.html	Fresh PASS-27 HTML read	¶46; HTML only, printed page/PDF index not authenticated. Narrow fee-proposition overruling. Justia Law
S_MT-P27-S011	Dean v. Hoepfner, full HTML/PDF URLs in Group 3.E.	Fresh PASS-27 full opinion/PDF-page read	Printed PDF pp.7–10 / indices 6–9. Historical source/tracing facts. Justia Law+3
S_MT-P27-S012	Salminen v. Morrison & Frampton, PLLP, 2014 MT 323, full HTML/PDF URLs in Group 3.E.	Fresh PASS-27 full opinion/page read	¶¶23–33 pp.10–15/indices 9–14; ¶34 p.16/index 15; ¶36 p.17/index 16. Filed Dec. 2, 2014. Justia Law+3
S_MT-P27-S013	Philpott v. Essex County Welfare Board, 409 U.S. 413 (1973), https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-409/pdf/USREPORTS-409-413.pdf	Fresh PASS-27 official U.S. Reports read	Majority printed pp.415–417/PDF indices 2–4. GovInfo
S_MT-P27-S014	Porter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 370 U.S. 159 (1962), https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-370/pdf/USREPORTS-370-159.pdf	Fresh PASS-27 official U.S. Reports read	Majority printed pp.159–162/PDF indices 0–3; separate opinion begins at p.162/index 3. GovInfo
S_MT-P27-S015	Federal benefit statutes, exact GovInfo and OLRC URLs in Group 3.F.	Coordinator-reported dated reuse, not fresh PASS-27 reads	Pinpoints and header dates preserved exactly as attributed; no later-amendment completeness inferred.

V. PASS-27 claim register

Claim ID	Affected original P22 location or claim	Precise corrected claim	Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence
S_MT-P27-C001	Core 5; notice matrix; P22-C013/C014 context	Officer notice must state case name, date of judgment, and creditor; seizure date is not a substitute.	P27-S001, §25-13-211(1)(b). High.
S_MT-P27-C002	Workflow row 17	True excess is returned unless the judgment or court order directs otherwise.	P27-S002, §25-13-402(2). High.
S_MT-P27-C003	Replaces P22-C028 in part	Six-month tracing applies when qualifying exempt property has been sold, without adding indemnification as a sale predicate.	P27-S003, §25-13-610(1). High.
S_MT-P27-C004	Replaces P22-C028 in part	For property lost, damaged, or destroyed, six-month tracing requires that the debtor was indemnified.	P27-S003, §25-13-610(1). High.
S_MT-P27-C005	Qualifies P22-C025	Section 603 broadly protects qualifying savings-account rights, assets, income, and funds, subject to the eligible-medical-expense recovery exception.	P27-S003, §25-13-603. High.
S_MT-P27-C006	Qualifies P22-C025	Section 608(1)(l) expressly identifies pre-suit contributions and earnings on them, as provided in §603.	P27-S003, §25-13-608(1)(l). High.
S_MT-P27-C007	Core 11; Example 14	Section 603 does not apply to the extent process seeks recovery of eligible medical expenses incurred from the account.	P27-S003, §25-13-603(3). High.
S_MT-P27-C008	Example 14 and HSA coverage	Exact protection for post-suit contributions under current §§603 and 608(1)(l) remains unresolved.	Current texts plus bounded search. High as a gap statement.
S_MT-P27-C009	HSA currentness	Giacometto construed pre-amendment §608(1)(f) and expressly said the 2017 amendment would supersede that route.	P27-S004, ¶¶14–15. High.
S_MT-P27-C010	P22-C037/C039	§212.4’s initial check follows receipt of the order; §212.5 account review follows receipt plus sufficient identifying information.	P27-S007, §§212.4–212.5. High.
S_MT-P27-C011	P22-C047/C048	Section 212.6’s same-order/no-continuing rules depend on the review finding a covered benefit deposit.	P27-S007, §212.6 lead-in, (f)–(g). High.
S_MT-P27-C012	Replaces bare S005 in Justice/City coverage	Justice/City execution proceeds under Rule 23 after docketed judgment and issuance of the limited-court writ.	P27-S005, Rule 23. High; bank-specific form remains held.
S_MT-P27-C013	Replaces bare S005 in Small Claims coverage	Small Claims judgment collection follows Justice Court execution law.	P27-S005, §25-35-807. High.
S_MT-P27-C014	Adds missing Dorwart crosslink	Dorwart historically recognized a protected interest in execution exemptions and the need for adequate notice and prompt hearing.	P27-S009, ¶¶74–76, 93–103. High historical holding.
S_MT-P27-C015	Dorwart later treatment	Buxbaum overruled only Dorwart’s inconsistent UDJA attorney-fee proposition, not its due-process holding.	P27-S010, ¶46. High and bounded.
S_MT-P27-C016	P22-C058	Dean supports historical tracing of identifiable Social Security funds in a joint account and reasonable FIFO analysis.	P27-S011, PDF pp.7–10/indices 6–9. High, fact-specific.
S_MT-P27-C017	P22-C061	Salminen was a filed opinion reversing in part, affirming in part, and remanding at the pleading stage; it does not establish automatic bank liability or damages.	P27-S012, ¶¶23–36. High.
S_MT-P27-C018	P22-C054	Philpott protected deposited Social Security funds retaining the quality of money and ready withdrawal.	P27-S013, pp.415–417/indices 2–4. High, source-specific.
S_MT-P27-C019	P22-C055	Porter protected deposited VA funds while readily available for support and not converted to permanent investment; separate-opinion language is not majority law.	P27-S014, pp.159–162/indices 0–3. High, fact-specific.
S_MT-P27-C020	P22-C046/C052	Part 212 notice requires all three §212.7 predicates; compliance records run at least two years from receipt of the order.	P27-S007, §§212.7, 212.11. High.
S_MT-P27-C021	Example 6	One-third and two-thirds are exact fractions; 33.333% and 66.667% are approximate decimal displays.	Arithmetic plus P27-S006. Dollar results unchanged. High.
S_MT-P27-C022	P22 S021/forms	Five official Word-form bodies and their revision dates remain unread; the 2010 generic District Praecipe is not a bank packet.	P27-S008. High provenance qualification.

VI. Coverage and residual-gap table

PASS-27 subissue	Status	Claims	Exact missing evidence or next action
Required judgment date in debtor notice	Corrected	C001	Actual notice and judgment record
Five-day notice timing	Preserved	P22-C013	Actual execution date
Personal-versus-mail claim trigger	Preserved	P22-C014 and original §212 claim	Actual service or mailing record
Same-day copies/hearing/late claim	Preserved	Original P22 claims	Actual filing and receipt dates
Excess-return exception	Corrected	C002	Judgment, court order, priorities, and final accounting
Sale proceeds branch under §610	Corrected	C003	Proof that exempt property was sold and proceeds remain traceable
Casualty/indemnity branch under §610	Corrected	C004	Loss, damage, destruction, indemnification, and tracing
Six-month universal bank exemption	Rejected/preserved as no	C003–C004	Another specific exemption must apply
Forty-five-day deposited-wage tracing	Unchanged	P22-C026/C027	Source, receipt date, and transaction history
HSA §603 protection	Answered textually	C005, C007	Actual account and debt type
HSA §608(1)(l) timing	Answered textually	C006	Contribution and earnings records
Post-suit HSA contributions	Unresolved	C008	Post-2017 controlling construction or claim-specific order
Giacometto current reach	Qualified	C009	Its pre-amendment route is not current timing law
Part 212 initial check/review distinction	Corrected	C010	Order receipt and sufficient identifying information
Part 212 no-repeat/no-continuing predicate	Corrected	C011	Covered-benefit finding and whether order is same/new
Part 212 notice predicates	Corrected	C020	Actual review balance and protected/excess amounts
Part 212 records trigger	Corrected	C020	Actual receipt date
Full §212 URLs	Corrected	C010–C011, C020	None
Justice/City route claim link	Corrected	C012	Actual court and writ
Small Claims route claim link	Corrected	C013	Actual judgment
Municipal route	Still unresolved	—	Current municipal-specific execution authority
Official form URLs	Corrected	C022	Readable current form bodies and revision dates
Dorwart missing source	Corrected	C014	No full subsequent-history audit
Buxbaum narrow later treatment	Answered	C015	No complete citator
Dean locator and scope	Corrected	C016	Actual account tracing remains private/fact-specific
Salminen status and posture	Corrected	C017	Merits and later proceedings not researched
Philpott read bounds	Corrected	C018	Actual Social Security source and tracing
Porter majority boundary	Corrected	C019	Actual VA source, availability, and investment status
Federal benefit statute provenance	Qualified as dated reuse	Original P22 benefit claims	Complete later-amendment audit if required
Example 6 percentages	Corrected as approximate	C021	Dollar allocation unchanged
All other sixteen examples	Preserved	Original P22 claims	No recomputation or new assumptions
Actual bank fee/account review/service/order	Unresolved	Original P22 holds	Actual records prohibited/outside scope
Local/tribal/country/sector rules	Excluded unchanged	—	Separate jurisdiction-specific work
Private Part 212 cause of action	Unresolved unchanged	Original P22 hold	Controlling cause-of-action authority
Whole bank report acceptance	Not supplied	—	Coordinator review remains pending

VII. Self-check

Freshly read in PASS-27

MCA §§25-13-211, 402, 603, 608, 609, 610, 72-6-211;
Justice/City Rule 23 and MCA §25-35-807;
31 CFR §§212.2 through 212.11 and Appendix C;
Montana Judicial Branch judgment and civil-form pages;
The generic District Praecipe PDF;
In re Giacometto;
Dorwart;
Buxbaum;
Dean;
Salminen;
Philpott; and
Porter.

Coordinator-reported dated reuse, not fresh PASS-27 reads

38 U.S.C. §5301;
45 U.S.C. §§231m and 352(e);
5 U.S.C. §§8346 and 8470;
OLRC currentness headers for §§407, 1383, 352, 8346, and 8470.

Failed or unread

Five official Word-form bodies and their internal revision dates;
A post-amendment Montana appellate decision squarely resolving current §§25-13-603 and 608(1)(l) for post-suit HSA contributions;
Any actual bank account, contribution ledger, ACH coding, benefit record, order, notice, fee, ownership record, or exemption filing.

Preserved unchanged

All sixteen P22 examples except the two stated textual qualifications;
All checked dollar results;
The state snapshot levy;
State-repeat versus Part 212 same-order distinction;
No-continuing-garnishment rule;
Actual-account, source, fee, service, order, title, contribution, currentness, local, tribal, country, and private-cause holds;
No adoption of PASS-22, PASS-23, PASS-24, or P26 as an accepted whole.

No filing, account movement, bank instruction, exemption claim, records request, provider or person lookup, local write, independent-review conclusion, component acceptance, Montana acceptance, parent-dossier acceptance, A066 acceptance, operational approval, or publication-readiness determination occurred.

END S_MT PASS-27.

Every captured table

Captured cells with original header handling and explicitly labeled bounded correction overlays. Downloaded JSON retains original cells. Tables may contain source limitations, historical examples and identified corrections; the complete reading supplies context.

How to read the research →

Captured table 01

Group and subissue · Affected PASS-22 location · Correction or qualification · 15 data rows

Group and subissue	Affected PASS-22 location	Correction or qualification	Effect on original
1(a) Debtor-notice contents	Core finding 5; notice matrix; debtor-notice coverage	Add the statutorily required date of judgment, together with case name and creditor.	Timing and service rules remain unchanged.
1(b) Excess proceeds	Workflow row 17 and distribution language	Add §25-13-402(2)’s exception: return excess unless the judgment or a court order directs otherwise.	No universal debtor-return rule is created.
1(c) Converted exempt-property proceeds	Core finding 13; P22-C028; proceeds matrix; coverage	Restore §25-13-610(1)’s two disjunctive branches: sale; or loss/damage/destruction plus indemnification.	Indemnification is not imposed on every voluntary sale.
2(a) HSA statutory interaction	Core finding 11; exemption matrix; P22-C025; Example 14; coverage	Read §25-13-603 together with §25-13-608(1)(l). Section 608 expressly identifies pre-suit contributions and earnings; §603 contains broader account language and its medical-expense-recovery exception.	Exact treatment of post-suit contributions remains held.
2(b) HSA controlling opinion	Same HSA locations	Add In re Giacometto, 2017 MT 162. Its holding concerned the pre-amendment statute, and the Court expressly said the 2017 amendment would supersede that route.	The old “used or will be used for care” route is not silently imported as the current contribution-timing rule.
3(a) P22 S007 URLs	Source register S007	Restore separate full literal URLs for §§25-13-603, 608, 609, and 610.	Locator correction.
3(b) P22 S011 URLs	Source register S011	Restore separate full literal URLs for §§212.2 through 212.11 and Appendix C.	Locator and clause-precision correction.
3(c) Part 212 timing and predicates	P22-C037, C039, C046–C048, C052	Distinguish receipt-only initial Notice-of-Right check from account review after receipt plus sufficient identifying information; preserve §212.6’s covered-benefit predicate.	No new federal framework is added.
3(d) Official forms	P22 S021 and Part XI	Restore two landing pages and six direct form URLs. Five Word bodies remain unread; the generic District Praecipe PDF is a 2010 summons-service form, not a bank packet.	No form content or revision date is inferred.
3(e) Dorwart source omission	Part X decision table; no matching source-register row	Add Dorwart as a historical due-process source and add the narrow Buxbaum later-treatment annotation.	Current §§25-13-211 and 212 remain the operative procedure.
3(f) Dean provenance	P22 S019; P22-C058	Confirm one-based PDF pp.7–10 / zero-based indices 6–9 and the historical joint-account/FIFO holding.	Printed/PDF locator precision only.
3(g) Salminen provenance	P22 S020; P22-C061	Treat the filed December 2, 2014 caption as controlling; preserve pleading-stage posture and partial reversal/remand.	No automatic bank liability or damages conclusion.
3(h) Philpott and Porter	P22 C054–C055 and source rows	Correct majority read bounds and keep separate the statutory VA taxation clause, Porter’s creditor-process reasoning, and Justice Douglas’s separate opinion.	Substantive bounded holdings preserved.
3(i) Coverage crosslinks	Rows using shortened C10/C12/C14 or bare S005	Replace with full existing claim IDs and add only the missing limited-court route claims.	No municipal or deposit-specific form rule is invented.
3(j) Example 6 percentages	Joint-account worked example	State exact fractions as 1/3 and 2/3; label 33.333% and 66.667% as approximate.	$2,000 and $4,000 results remain unchanged.

Captured table 02

Stage · Actor · Trigger · 1 data rows

Stage	Actor	Trigger	Required action	Consequence
17. Distribution	Sheriff or levying officer	Hold expires and no contrary order remains	Apply lawful nonexempt proceeds as directed by statute, judgment, and court order	Return true excess to the debtor unless the judgment or court order directs otherwise

Captured table 03

Source event · Additional statutory predicate · Duration · 3 data rows

Source event	Additional statutory predicate	Duration	Tracing
Exempt property sold	Sale proceeds remain identifiable as proceeds of the exempt property	6 months	FIFO, LIFO, or another reasonable method
Exempt property lost, damaged, or destroyed	Debtor has been indemnified and the indemnity remains traceable	6 months	FIFO, LIFO, or another reasonable method
Exempt wages deposited	Portion was exempt under the wage statute and remains traceable	45 days	FIFO, LIFO, or another reasonable method

Captured table 04

Component · Status after PASS-27 · Claim IDs · 5 data rows

Component	Status after PASS-27	Claim IDs	Exact remaining evidence or next action
Qualifying MCSA/HSA/MSA account protection	Answered textually	P27-C005, C006	Actual account type and governing documents
Pre-suit contributions and earnings	Answered textually	P27-C006	Contribution and earnings ledger
Post-suit contributions	Unresolved	P27-C008	Controlling post-2017 construction or claim-specific court ruling
Eligible-medical-expense recovery exception	Answered textually	P27-C007	Actual debt type and expense source
Pre-amendment Giacometto route	Historical/currentness-qualified	P27-C009	Do not use as current contribution-timing rule

Captured table 05

Original P22 claim · Precise qualification · 5 data rows

Original P22 claim	Precise qualification
P22-C037 — initial check	Section 212.4 requires the bank, no later than two business days after receipt of the order, and before other action, to determine whether the order contains the required Notice of Right to Garnish Federal Benefits.
P22-C039 — account review	Section 212.5(a) generally requires review within two business days after the bank has received both the order and sufficient identifying information. Creditor-authorized batch processing can affect timing.
P22-C047/C048 — no-repeat and no-continuing rules	Section 212.6’s operative protections—including no repeated action on the same order and no continuing garnishment of later deposits—apply when the account review shows that a benefit agency deposited a covered benefit during the lookback period.
P22-C046 — bank notice	Section 212.7 notice is required only if all three predicates exist: a covered deposit during the lookback; a positive balance and protected amount; and funds above the protected amount.
P22-C052 — records	Section 212.11 requires sufficient compliance records for at least two years from receipt of the garnishment order.

Captured table 06

PASS-22 coverage row · Original shorthand · Replacement · 7 data rows

PASS-22 coverage row	Original shorthand	Replacement
Officer’s ten-day hold	C12	S_MT-P22-C012, sourced to P22-S002, MCA §25-13-402(4)
Mailed debtor notice	C14	S_MT-P22-C014, sourced to P22-S003, MCA §25-13-211(2)
Ordinary bank levy not continuing	C10	S_MT-P22-C010, sourced to P22-S002, MCA §25-13-402(3), contrasted with wage/state-payment subsections
Justice/City execution route	C001, S005	S_MT-P22-C001 plus S_MT-P27-C012, sourced to Justice/City Rule 23
Small Claims enforcement	S005	S_MT-P27-C013, sourced to MCA §25-35-807
Six-month converted-property proceeds	C028	S_MT-P27-C003 and C004, replacing P22-C028’s cumulative phrasing
HSA account protection	C025	S_MT-P27-C005–C009, replacing the unqualified account label

Captured table 07

Source ID · Authority, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint · Version/status and access classification · 15 data rows

Source ID	Authority, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint	Version/status and access classification	Read bounds and limits
S_MT-P27-S001	MCA §25-13-211, Montana Legislature. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0020/section_0110/0250-0130-0020-0110.html	Fresh PASS-27 public read, October 26, 2026 Pacific/UTC; current MCA 2025 HTML	Complete section. HTML: printed page/PDF index not applicable. Montana Code Annotated
S_MT-P27-S002	MCA §25-13-402, Montana Legislature. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0040/section_0020/0250-0130-0040-0020.html	Fresh PASS-27 public read	Complete material subsections, including snapshot levy, return exception, repeated levy, and wage/state-payment distinctions. Montana Code Annotated
S_MT-P27-S003	MCA §§25-13-603, 608, 609, 610, Montana Legislature. Full URLs reproduced in Group 3.A.	Fresh PASS-27 public reads	Complete material HSA, exemption, value-limited-property, and tracing clauses. HTML; no PDF locator. Montana Code Annotated +3
S_MT-P27-S004	In re John Charles Giacometto, 2017 MT 162, Montana Supreme Court. HTML: https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2017/op-16-0709.html; PDF: https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2017-op-16-0709.pdf?ts=1498777360	Fresh PASS-27 full opinion read and page inspection	¶14 printed p.7/PDF index 6; ¶15 p.8/index 7. Pre-amendment certified question; majority said 2017 legislation superseded the old route. Justia Law +2
S_MT-P27-S005	Justice/City Rule 23 and MCA §25-35-807, Montana Legislature. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0230/part_0010/section_0230/0250-0230-0010-0230.html; https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0350/part_0080/section_0070/0250-0350-0080-0070.html	Fresh PASS-27 public reads	Limited route and Small Claims cross-reference only. No municipal or bank-answer form inferred. Montana Code Annotated +1
S_MT-P27-S006	MCA §72-6-211, Montana Legislature. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0720/chapter_0060/part_0020/section_0110/0720-0060-0020-0110.html	Fresh PASS-27 public read	Complete lifetime beneficial-ownership provision. HTML; no PDF locator. Montana Code Annotated
S_MT-P27-S007	31 CFR Part 212 §§212.2–212.11 and Appendix C, eCFR. Full URLs reproduced in Group 3.B.	Fresh PASS-27 public reads; eCFR current through October 22, 2026, last amended October 15, 2026	Complete material operational clauses. HTML; no printed page/PDF index. eCFR +9
S_MT-P27-S008	Montana Judicial Branch judgment/forms resources and six direct form URLs, full URLs in Group 3.C.	Landing pages and generic PDF freshly read; five Word bodies failed/not read	Generic Praecipe printed pp.1–2/PDF indices 0–1, dated 09/10/10; summons-service form, not bank packet. Montana Courts +3
S_MT-P27-S009	Dorwart v. Caraway, 1998 MT 191, full HTML/PDF URLs in Group 3.D.	Fresh PASS-27 opinion and page-image read; historical currentness	¶¶74–76 displayed PDF p.25/index 24; ¶¶93–103 displayed pp.31–34/indices 30–33. Current §§211–212 postdate challenged regime. Justia Law +4
S_MT-P27-S010	Trustees of Indiana University v. Buxbaum, 2003 MT 97, https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2003/eff955bb-6f26-4929-9f2d-b920b9e3977c.html	Fresh PASS-27 HTML read	¶46; HTML only, printed page/PDF index not authenticated. Narrow fee-proposition overruling. Justia Law
S_MT-P27-S011	Dean v. Hoepfner, full HTML/PDF URLs in Group 3.E.	Fresh PASS-27 full opinion/PDF-page read	Printed PDF pp.7–10 / indices 6–9. Historical source/tracing facts. Justia Law +3
S_MT-P27-S012	Salminen v. Morrison & Frampton, PLLP, 2014 MT 323, full HTML/PDF URLs in Group 3.E.	Fresh PASS-27 full opinion/page read	¶¶23–33 pp.10–15/indices 9–14; ¶34 p.16/index 15; ¶36 p.17/index 16. Filed Dec. 2, 2014. Justia Law +3
S_MT-P27-S013	Philpott v. Essex County Welfare Board, 409 U.S. 413 (1973), https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-409/pdf/USREPORTS-409-413.pdf	Fresh PASS-27 official U.S. Reports read	Majority printed pp.415–417/PDF indices 2–4. GovInfo
S_MT-P27-S014	Porter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 370 U.S. 159 (1962), https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-370/pdf/USREPORTS-370-159.pdf	Fresh PASS-27 official U.S. Reports read	Majority printed pp.159–162/PDF indices 0–3; separate opinion begins at p.162/index 3. GovInfo
S_MT-P27-S015	Federal benefit statutes, exact GovInfo and OLRC URLs in Group 3.F.	Coordinator-reported dated reuse, not fresh PASS-27 reads	Pinpoints and header dates preserved exactly as attributed; no later-amendment completeness inferred.

Source links captured in this table

Captured table 08

Claim ID · Affected original P22 location or claim · Precise corrected claim · 22 data rows

Claim ID	Affected original P22 location or claim	Precise corrected claim	Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence
S_MT-P27-C001	Core 5; notice matrix; P22-C013/C014 context	Officer notice must state case name, date of judgment, and creditor; seizure date is not a substitute.	P27-S001, §25-13-211(1)(b). High.
S_MT-P27-C002	Workflow row 17	True excess is returned unless the judgment or court order directs otherwise.	P27-S002, §25-13-402(2). High.
S_MT-P27-C003	Replaces P22-C028 in part	Six-month tracing applies when qualifying exempt property has been sold, without adding indemnification as a sale predicate.	P27-S003, §25-13-610(1). High.
S_MT-P27-C004	Replaces P22-C028 in part	For property lost, damaged, or destroyed, six-month tracing requires that the debtor was indemnified.	P27-S003, §25-13-610(1). High.
S_MT-P27-C005	Qualifies P22-C025	Section 603 broadly protects qualifying savings-account rights, assets, income, and funds, subject to the eligible-medical-expense recovery exception.	P27-S003, §25-13-603. High.
S_MT-P27-C006	Qualifies P22-C025	Section 608(1)(l) expressly identifies pre-suit contributions and earnings on them, as provided in §603.	P27-S003, §25-13-608(1)(l). High.
S_MT-P27-C007	Core 11; Example 14	Section 603 does not apply to the extent process seeks recovery of eligible medical expenses incurred from the account.	P27-S003, §25-13-603(3). High.
S_MT-P27-C008	Example 14 and HSA coverage	Exact protection for post-suit contributions under current §§603 and 608(1)(l) remains unresolved.	Current texts plus bounded search. High as a gap statement.
S_MT-P27-C009	HSA currentness	Giacometto construed pre-amendment §608(1)(f) and expressly said the 2017 amendment would supersede that route.	P27-S004, ¶¶14–15. High.
S_MT-P27-C010	P22-C037/C039	§212.4’s initial check follows receipt of the order; §212.5 account review follows receipt plus sufficient identifying information.	P27-S007, §§212.4–212.5. High.
S_MT-P27-C011	P22-C047/C048	Section 212.6’s same-order/no-continuing rules depend on the review finding a covered benefit deposit.	P27-S007, §212.6 lead-in, (f)–(g). High.
S_MT-P27-C012	Replaces bare S005 in Justice/City coverage	Justice/City execution proceeds under Rule 23 after docketed judgment and issuance of the limited-court writ.	P27-S005, Rule 23. High; bank-specific form remains held.
S_MT-P27-C013	Replaces bare S005 in Small Claims coverage	Small Claims judgment collection follows Justice Court execution law.	P27-S005, §25-35-807. High.
S_MT-P27-C014	Adds missing Dorwart crosslink	Dorwart historically recognized a protected interest in execution exemptions and the need for adequate notice and prompt hearing.	P27-S009, ¶¶74–76, 93–103. High historical holding.
S_MT-P27-C015	Dorwart later treatment	Buxbaum overruled only Dorwart’s inconsistent UDJA attorney-fee proposition, not its due-process holding.	P27-S010, ¶46. High and bounded.
S_MT-P27-C016	P22-C058	Dean supports historical tracing of identifiable Social Security funds in a joint account and reasonable FIFO analysis.	P27-S011, PDF pp.7–10/indices 6–9. High, fact-specific.
S_MT-P27-C017	P22-C061	Salminen was a filed opinion reversing in part, affirming in part, and remanding at the pleading stage; it does not establish automatic bank liability or damages.	P27-S012, ¶¶23–36. High.
S_MT-P27-C018	P22-C054	Philpott protected deposited Social Security funds retaining the quality of money and ready withdrawal.	P27-S013, pp.415–417/indices 2–4. High, source-specific.
S_MT-P27-C019	P22-C055	Porter protected deposited VA funds while readily available for support and not converted to permanent investment; separate-opinion language is not majority law.	P27-S014, pp.159–162/indices 0–3. High, fact-specific.
S_MT-P27-C020	P22-C046/C052	Part 212 notice requires all three §212.7 predicates; compliance records run at least two years from receipt of the order.	P27-S007, §§212.7, 212.11. High.
S_MT-P27-C021	Example 6	One-third and two-thirds are exact fractions; 33.333% and 66.667% are approximate decimal displays.	Arithmetic plus P27-S006. Dollar results unchanged. High.
S_MT-P27-C022	P22 S021/forms	Five official Word-form bodies and their revision dates remain unread; the 2010 generic District Praecipe is not a bank packet.	P27-S008. High provenance qualification.

Captured table 09

PASS-27 subissue · Status · Claims · 35 data rows

PASS-27 subissue	Status	Claims	Exact missing evidence or next action
Required judgment date in debtor notice	Corrected	C001	Actual notice and judgment record
Five-day notice timing	Preserved	P22-C013	Actual execution date
Personal-versus-mail claim trigger	Preserved	P22-C014 and original §212 claim	Actual service or mailing record
Same-day copies/hearing/late claim	Preserved	Original P22 claims	Actual filing and receipt dates
Excess-return exception	Corrected	C002	Judgment, court order, priorities, and final accounting
Sale proceeds branch under §610	Corrected	C003	Proof that exempt property was sold and proceeds remain traceable
Casualty/indemnity branch under §610	Corrected	C004	Loss, damage, destruction, indemnification, and tracing
Six-month universal bank exemption	Rejected/preserved as no	C003–C004	Another specific exemption must apply
Forty-five-day deposited-wage tracing	Unchanged	P22-C026/C027	Source, receipt date, and transaction history
HSA §603 protection	Answered textually	C005, C007	Actual account and debt type
HSA §608(1)(l) timing	Answered textually	C006	Contribution and earnings records
Post-suit HSA contributions	Unresolved	C008	Post-2017 controlling construction or claim-specific order
Giacometto current reach	Qualified	C009	Its pre-amendment route is not current timing law
Part 212 initial check/review distinction	Corrected	C010	Order receipt and sufficient identifying information
Part 212 no-repeat/no-continuing predicate	Corrected	C011	Covered-benefit finding and whether order is same/new
Part 212 notice predicates	Corrected	C020	Actual review balance and protected/excess amounts
Part 212 records trigger	Corrected	C020	Actual receipt date
Full §212 URLs	Corrected	C010–C011, C020	None
Justice/City route claim link	Corrected	C012	Actual court and writ
Small Claims route claim link	Corrected	C013	Actual judgment
Municipal route	Still unresolved	—	Current municipal-specific execution authority
Official form URLs	Corrected	C022	Readable current form bodies and revision dates
Dorwart missing source	Corrected	C014	No full subsequent-history audit
Buxbaum narrow later treatment	Answered	C015	No complete citator
Dean locator and scope	Corrected	C016	Actual account tracing remains private/fact-specific
Salminen status and posture	Corrected	C017	Merits and later proceedings not researched
Philpott read bounds	Corrected	C018	Actual Social Security source and tracing
Porter majority boundary	Corrected	C019	Actual VA source, availability, and investment status
Federal benefit statute provenance	Qualified as dated reuse	Original P22 benefit claims	Complete later-amendment audit if required
Example 6 percentages	Corrected as approximate	C021	Dollar allocation unchanged
All other sixteen examples	Preserved	Original P22 claims	No recomputation or new assumptions
Actual bank fee/account review/service/order	Unresolved	Original P22 holds	Actual records prohibited/outside scope
Local/tribal/country/sector rules	Excluded unchanged	—	Separate jurisdiction-specific work
Private Part 212 cause of action	Unresolved unchanged	Original P22 hold	Controlling cause-of-action authority
Whole bank report acceptance	Not supplied	—	Coordinator review remains pending

Find the assertion and its boundaries

Search this report’s claim records

How to read the research →

S_MT-P27-C001 Saved research record

Core 5; notice matrix; P22-C013/C014 context

Recorded check status: supported with express application or dated access limits

Precise corrected claim: Officer notice must state case name, date of judgment, and creditor; seizure date is not a substitute.
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: P27-S001, §25-13-211(1)(b). High.

S_MT-P27-C002 Saved research record

True excess is returned unless the judgment or court order directs otherwise.

Recorded check status: supported with express application or dated access limits

Affected original P22 location or claim: Workflow row 17
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: P27-S002, §25-13-402(2). High.

S_MT-P27-C003 Saved research record

Six-month tracing applies when qualifying exempt property has been sold, without adding indemnification as a sale predicate.

Recorded check status: supported with express application or dated access limits

Affected original P22 location or claim: Replaces P22-C028 in part
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: P27-S003, §25-13-610(1). High.

S_MT-P27-C004 Saved research record

For property lost, damaged, or destroyed, six-month tracing requires that the debtor was indemnified.

Recorded check status: supported with express application or dated access limits

Affected original P22 location or claim: Replaces P22-C028 in part
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: P27-S003, §25-13-610(1). High.

S_MT-P27-C005 Saved research record

Section 603 broadly protects qualifying savings-account rights, assets, income, and funds, subject to the eligible-medical-expense recovery exception.

Recorded check status: supported with express application or dated access limits

Affected original P22 location or claim: Qualifies P22-C025
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: P27-S003, §25-13-603. High.

S_MT-P27-C006 Saved research record

Section 608(1)(l) expressly identifies pre-suit contributions and earnings on them, as provided in §603.

Recorded check status: supported with express application or dated access limits

Affected original P22 location or claim: Qualifies P22-C025
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: P27-S003, §25-13-608(1)(l). High.

S_MT-P27-C007 Saved research record

Section 603 does not apply to the extent process seeks recovery of eligible medical expenses incurred from the account.

Recorded check status: supported with express application or dated access limits

Affected original P22 location or claim: Core 11; Example 14
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: P27-S003, §25-13-603(3). High.

S_MT-P27-C008 Saved research record

Exact protection for post-suit contributions under current §§603 and 608(1)(l) remains unresolved.

Recorded check status: explicit gap or access hold retained

Affected original P22 location or claim: Example 14 and HSA coverage
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: Current texts plus bounded search. High as a gap statement.

S_MT-P27-C009 Saved research record

Giacometto construed pre-amendment §608(1)(f) and expressly said the 2017 amendment would supersede that route.

Recorded check status: supported with express application or dated access limits

Affected original P22 location or claim: HSA currentness
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: P27-S004, ¶¶14–15. High.

S_MT-P27-C010 Saved research record

§212.4’s initial check follows receipt of the order; §212.5 account review follows receipt plus sufficient identifying information.

Recorded check status: supported with express application or dated access limits

Affected original P22 location or claim: P22-C037/C039
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: P27-S007, §§212.4–212.5. High.

S_MT-P27-C011 Saved research record

Section 212.6’s same-order/no-continuing rules depend on the review finding a covered benefit deposit.

Recorded check status: supported with express application or dated access limits

Affected original P22 location or claim: P22-C047/C048
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: P27-S007, §212.6 lead-in, (f)–(g). High.

S_MT-P27-C012 Saved research record

Replaces bare S005 in Justice/City coverage

Recorded check status: supported with express application or dated access limits

Precise corrected claim: Justice/City execution proceeds under Rule 23 after docketed judgment and issuance of the limited-court writ.
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: P27-S005, Rule 23. High; bank-specific form remains held.

S_MT-P27-C013 Saved research record

Replaces bare S005 in Small Claims coverage

Recorded check status: supported with express application or dated access limits

Precise corrected claim: Small Claims judgment collection follows Justice Court execution law.
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: P27-S005, §25-35-807. High.

S_MT-P27-C014 Saved research record

Dorwart historically recognized a protected interest in execution exemptions and the need for adequate notice and prompt hearing.

Recorded check status: supported with express application or dated access limits

Affected original P22 location or claim: Adds missing Dorwart crosslink
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: P27-S009, ¶¶74–76, 93–103. High historical holding.

S_MT-P27-C015 Saved research record

Buxbaum overruled only Dorwart’s inconsistent UDJA attorney-fee proposition, not its due-process holding.

Recorded check status: supported with express application or dated access limits

Affected original P22 location or claim: Dorwart later treatment
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: P27-S010, ¶46. High and bounded.

S_MT-P27-C016 Saved research record

Dean supports historical tracing of identifiable Social Security funds in a joint account and reasonable FIFO analysis.

Recorded check status: supported with express application or dated access limits

Affected original P22 location or claim: P22-C058
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: P27-S011, PDF pp.7–10/indices 6–9. High, fact-specific.

S_MT-P27-C017 Saved research record

Salminen was a filed opinion reversing in part, affirming in part, and remanding at the pleading stage; it does not establish automatic bank liability or damages.

Recorded check status: supported with express application or dated access limits

Affected original P22 location or claim: P22-C061
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: P27-S012, ¶¶23–36. High.

S_MT-P27-C018 Saved research record

Philpott protected deposited Social Security funds retaining the quality of money and ready withdrawal.

Recorded check status: supported with express application or dated access limits

Affected original P22 location or claim: P22-C054
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: P27-S013, pp.415–417/indices 2–4. High, source-specific.

S_MT-P27-C019 Saved research record

Porter protected deposited VA funds while readily available for support and not converted to permanent investment; separate-opinion language is not majority law.

Recorded check status: supported with express application or dated access limits

Affected original P22 location or claim: P22-C055
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: P27-S014, pp.159–162/indices 0–3. High, fact-specific.

S_MT-P27-C020 Saved research record

Part 212 notice requires all three §212.7 predicates; compliance records run at least two years from receipt of the order.

Recorded check status: supported with express application or dated access limits

Affected original P22 location or claim: P22-C046/C052
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: P27-S007, §§212.7, 212.11. High.

S_MT-P27-C021 Saved research record

One-third and two-thirds are exact fractions; 33.333% and 66.667% are approximate decimal displays.

Recorded check status: supported with express application or dated access limits

Affected original P22 location or claim: Example 6
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: Arithmetic plus P27-S006. Dollar results unchanged. High.

S_MT-P27-C022 Saved research record

Five official Word-form bodies and their revision dates remain unread; the 2010 generic District Praecipe is not a bank packet.

Recorded check status: explicit gap or access hold retained

Affected original P22 location or claim: P22 S021/forms
Source/pinpoint, consequence, confidence: P27-S008. High provenance qualification.

Sources, pinpoints and access limits

Keep the source version, actual read extent and jurisdiction with the proposition. A link or researcher access claim is not a substitute for an operative primary passage.

Search this report’s sources

S_MT-P27-S001 Saved research record

MCA §25-13-211, Montana Legislature. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0020/section_0110/0250-0130-0020-0110.html

Recorded check status: scoped review complete substantive groups resolved with limits residual provenance mapping patch required

Version/status and access classification: Fresh PASS-27 public read, October 26, 2026 Pacific/UTC; current MCA 2025 HTML
Read bounds and limits: Complete section. HTML: printed page/PDF index not applicable. Montana Code Annotated
Direct source URLs: https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0020/section_0110/0250-0130-0020-0110.html
https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0020/section_0110/0250-0130-0020-0110.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com

S_MT-P27-S002 Saved research record

MCA §25-13-402, Montana Legislature. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0040/section_0020/0250-0130-0040-0020.html

Recorded check status: scoped review complete substantive groups resolved with limits residual provenance mapping patch required

Version/status and access classification: Fresh PASS-27 public read
Read bounds and limits: Complete material subsections, including snapshot levy, return exception, repeated levy, and wage/state-payment distinctions. Montana Code Annotated
Direct source URLs: https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0040/section_0020/0250-0130-0040-0020.html

S_MT-P27-S003 Saved research record

MCA §§25-13-603, 608, 609, 610, Montana Legislature. Full URLs reproduced in Group 3.A.

Recorded check status: scoped review complete substantive groups resolved with limits residual provenance mapping patch required

Version/status and access classification: Fresh PASS-27 public reads
Read bounds and limits: Complete material HSA, exemption, value-limited-property, and tracing clauses. HTML; no PDF locator. Montana Code Annotated +3
Direct source URLs: https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0060/section_0100/0250-0130-0060-0100.html

S_MT-P27-S004 Saved research record

In re John Charles Giacometto, 2017 MT 162, Montana Supreme Court. HTML: https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2017/op-16-0709.html; PDF: https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2017-op-16-0709.pdf?ts=1498777360

Recorded check status: scoped review complete substantive groups resolved with limits residual provenance mapping patch required

Version/status and access classification: Fresh PASS-27 full opinion read and page inspection
Read bounds and limits: ¶14 printed p.7/PDF index 6; ¶15 p.8/index 7. Pre-amendment certified question; majority said 2017 legislation superseded the old route. Justia Law +2
Direct source URLs: https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2017/op-16-0709.html
https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2017-op-16-0709.pdf?ts=1498777360

S_MT-P27-S005 Saved research record

Justice/City Rule 23 and MCA §25-35-807, Montana Legislature. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0230/part_0010/section_0230/0250-0230-0010-0230.html; https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0350/part_0080/section_0070/0250-0350-0080-0070.html

Recorded check status: scoped review complete substantive groups resolved with limits residual provenance mapping patch required

Version/status and access classification: Fresh PASS-27 public reads
Read bounds and limits: Limited route and Small Claims cross-reference only. No municipal or bank-answer form inferred. Montana Code Annotated +1
Direct source URLs: https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0230/part_0010/section_0230/0250-0230-0010-0230.html
https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0350/part_0080/section_0070/0250-0350-0080-0070.html

S_MT-P27-S006 Saved research record

MCA §72-6-211, Montana Legislature. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0720/chapter_0060/part_0020/section_0110/0720-0060-0020-0110.html

Recorded check status: scoped review complete substantive groups resolved with limits residual provenance mapping patch required

Version/status and access classification: Fresh PASS-27 public read
Read bounds and limits: Complete lifetime beneficial-ownership provision. HTML; no PDF locator. Montana Code Annotated
Direct source URLs: https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0720/chapter_0060/part_0020/section_0110/0720-0060-0020-0110.html

S_MT-P27-S007 Saved research record

31 CFR Part 212 §§212.2–212.11 and Appendix C, eCFR. Full URLs reproduced in Group 3.B.

Recorded check status: scoped review complete substantive groups resolved with limits residual provenance mapping patch required

Version/status and access classification: Fresh PASS-27 public reads; eCFR current through October 22, 2026, last amended October 15, 2026
Read bounds and limits: Complete material operational clauses. HTML; no printed page/PDF index. eCFR +9
Direct source URLs: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-31/subtitle-B/chapter-II/subchapter-A/part-212/section-212.2

S_MT-P27-S008 Saved research record

Montana Judicial Branch judgment/forms resources and six direct form URLs, full URLs in Group 3.C.

Recorded check status: scoped review complete substantive groups resolved with limits residual provenance mapping patch required

Version/status and access classification: Landing pages and generic PDF freshly read; five Word bodies failed/not read
Read bounds and limits: Generic Praecipe printed pp.1–2/PDF indices 0–1, dated 09/10/10; summons-service form, not bank packet. Montana Courts +3
Direct source URLs: https://courts.mt.gov/forms/judgement

S_MT-P27-S009 Saved research record

Dorwart v. Caraway, 1998 MT 191, full HTML/PDF URLs in Group 3.D.

Recorded check status: scoped review complete substantive groups resolved with limits residual provenance mapping patch required

Version/status and access classification: Fresh PASS-27 opinion and page-image read; historical currentness
Read bounds and limits: ¶¶74–76 displayed PDF p.25/index 24; ¶¶93–103 displayed pp.31–34/indices 30–33. Current §§211–212 postdate challenged regime. Justia Law +4
Direct source URLs: https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/1998-08-04-3D8B9983-6BAE-41CF-9DE6-2350CBF0CD89.pdf?ts=1462388683

S_MT-P27-S010 Saved research record

Trustees of Indiana University v. Buxbaum, 2003 MT 97, https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2003/eff955bb-6f26-4929-9f2d-b920b9e3977c.html

Recorded check status: scoped review complete substantive groups resolved with limits residual provenance mapping patch required

Version/status and access classification: Fresh PASS-27 HTML read
Read bounds and limits: ¶46; HTML only, printed page/PDF index not authenticated. Narrow fee-proposition overruling. Justia Law
Direct source URLs: https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2003/eff955bb-6f26-4929-9f2d-b920b9e3977c.html

S_MT-P27-S011 Saved research record

Dean v. Hoepfner, full HTML/PDF URLs in Group 3.E.

Recorded check status: scoped review complete substantive groups resolved with limits residual provenance mapping patch required

Version/status and access classification: Fresh PASS-27 full opinion/PDF-page read
Read bounds and limits: Printed PDF pp.7–10 / indices 6–9. Historical source/tracing facts. Justia Law +3
Direct source URLs: https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/1990-11-26-880C834C-CF0A-48B3-ACB0-C37B3979DA4A.pdf?ts=1462387647

S_MT-P27-S012 Saved research record

Salminen v. Morrison & Frampton, PLLP, 2014 MT 323, full HTML/PDF URLs in Group 3.E.

Recorded check status: scoped review complete substantive groups resolved with limits residual provenance mapping patch required

Version/status and access classification: Fresh PASS-27 full opinion/page read
Read bounds and limits: ¶¶23–33 pp.10–15/indices 9–14; ¶34 p.16/index 15; ¶36 p.17/index 16. Filed Dec. 2, 2014. Justia Law +3
Direct source URLs: https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2014-da-14-0179.pdf?ts=1417564946

S_MT-P27-S013 Saved research record

Philpott v. Essex County Welfare Board, 409 U.S. 413 (1973), https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-409/pdf/USREPORTS-409-413.pdf

Recorded check status: scoped review complete substantive groups resolved with limits residual provenance mapping patch required

Version/status and access classification: Fresh PASS-27 official U.S. Reports read
Read bounds and limits: Majority printed pp.415–417/PDF indices 2–4. GovInfo
Direct source URLs: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-409/pdf/USREPORTS-409-413.pdf

S_MT-P27-S014 Saved research record

Porter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 370 U.S. 159 (1962), https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-370/pdf/USREPORTS-370-159.pdf

Recorded check status: scoped review complete substantive groups resolved with limits residual provenance mapping patch required

Version/status and access classification: Fresh PASS-27 official U.S. Reports read
Read bounds and limits: Majority printed pp.159–162/PDF indices 0–3; separate opinion begins at p.162/index 3. GovInfo
Direct source URLs: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-370/pdf/USREPORTS-370-159.pdf

S_MT-P27-S015 Saved research record

Federal benefit statutes, exact GovInfo and OLRC URLs in Group 3.F.

Recorded check status: scoped review complete substantive groups resolved with limits residual provenance mapping patch required

Version/status and access classification: Coordinator-reported dated reuse, not fresh PASS-27 reads
Read bounds and limits: Pinpoints and header dates preserved exactly as attributed; no later-amendment completeness inferred.

What was examined—and what is still missing

The saved component-level coverage record keeps answered, partial, blank and unresolved branches distinct. A coverage label is not acceptance of a whole subject or jurisdiction.

Search this report’s coverage and gaps

coverage-1 Saved research record