| B01 — Public-entity scope unknown. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
If the statutory public-entity category is met, the selected Part 35 scope must still be distinguished from its Subtitle B transportation exclusion. C004–C006, C011; S002–S003, S007. |
Entity category, instrumentality relationship, activity and transportation classification. |
Every publicly connected, licensed or funded private actor is covered by this particular rule. |
Trace § 12131(1), § 35.102 and the specific generic instrumentality/transportation category; no institution lookup. |
| B02 — Underlying qualification unknown. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
Essential eligibility is assessed with or without the statutory modifications/barrier removal/aids; the communication duty does not itself establish the underlying award. C007, C038–C040, C066. |
Generic service’s eligibility authority and all application facts. |
Need for accessible communication proves entitlement to the service or financial benefit. |
Read the governing public eligibility provision only after the generic program category is identified; keep it separate from § 35.160. |
| B03 — Necessary definition incomplete. Partial if an unexamined incorporation becomes decisive. |
Coverage must use the applicable disability route, construction rules and exceptions, rather than an ordinary label. C012–C030; S002, S004–S006. |
Any decisive unexamined controlled-substance, territorial, or other incorporated rule; actual predicates. |
A familiar label supplies every statutory element. |
Open only the exact incorporated definition that becomes necessary, such as the referenced clause of 21 USC § 812; no substance/person lookup. |
| B04 — Communication participant unknown. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
Applicants, participants, members of the public and qualifying companions with disabilities are within § 35.160(a)’s stated categories. Companion status additionally requires the defined relationship and appropriate-communication role. C038–C039; S001, S010. |
Participant role, relationship and appropriateness of communication. |
Only approved beneficiaries are protected, or every accompanying person automatically is a covered companion. |
Review § 35.160(a)(1)–(2) and the companion portion of its published analysis. |
| B05 — Communication context unknown. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
Necessary means depend cumulatively on the communication method and nature, length, complexity and context. C040–C041; S001. |
Those contextual facts and the purpose of the communication. |
One method always works for a generic disability category. |
Examine § 35.160(b) and its official method-selection analysis, without constructing a personal scenario. |
| B06 — Auxiliary aid needed. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
An appropriate aid is required where necessary for equal participation/enjoyment, using the broad aid categories while retaining the personal-device boundary. C031–C033, C037, C040. |
Necessity, appropriateness, program connection; current supporting-section history if decisive. |
Every requested device or personal service must be supplied. |
Reopen current § 35.135 when ordinarily accessible and compare its complete boundary with § 35.160(b)(1). |
| B07 — Qualified interpreter category. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
Qualification requires effective, accurate, impartial receptive and expressive interpretation with necessary specialized vocabulary; on-site/VRI form does not remove those requirements. C034, C036; S002. |
Actual competence and communication fit; any additional applicable public qualification rule. |
Job title, presence, family status, or a generic credential alone proves the selected standard. |
Read § 35.104’s complete definition and any indispensable generic qualification authority; no provider search. |
| B08 — Preferred method/primary consideration. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
Give the individual’s request primary consideration; DOJ explains honoring it unless another effective means or a § 35.164 ground is demonstrated. C042–C043. |
Request, effectiveness of alternatives, or complete exception predicates. |
Preference is either irrelevant or an unconditional veto over every alternative. |
Compare § 35.160(b)(2), its published analysis, and § 35.164 if an exception—not merely an effective alternative—is asserted. |
| B09 — Timeliness unknown. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
Aids must be timely; guide discussion of advance notice does not supply a universal fixed deadline or universal request prerequisite. C044, C074, C077. |
Timing context, acquisition constraints and effectiveness; no actual events supplied. |
A standard number of days or an excessive advance-notice condition is established here. |
Read the complete timing discussion in the official guide alongside § 35.160(b)(2); identify any separate public procedural deadline only in a later scoped component. |
| B10 — Privacy/independence unknown. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
Effective provision must protect both privacy and independence. C044; S001. |
Method, disclosure context, independence implications and separate confidentiality authority. |
Convenience, accompaniment or information access authorizes disclosure or representative control. |
Compare § 35.160(b)(2) with the exact separate confidentiality authority if indispensable; no records or consents. |
| B11 — Accompanying adult, ordinary setting. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
Specific individual request and adult agreement and appropriateness are required; the published explanation rejects coercion. C045–C046, C049. |
Each separate predicate and context. |
Relationship or willingness alone allows reliance, or the entity can require the individual to bring help. |
Read § 35.160(c)(1), (c)(2)(ii) and the voluntary-assistance analysis together. |
| B12 — Accompanying minor. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
Minor-child reliance is barred except for the stated emergency/imminent-threat/no-interpreter conditions. No ordinary requested-assistance route is stated. C048. |
Legal category and every emergency predicate; numerical age definition absent here. |
Adult-rule consent conditions can be transferred to children. |
Read § 35.160(c)(3); investigate a generic age-definition authority only if that narrow interpretive issue becomes necessary. |
| B13 — Emergency condition asserted. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
The relevant adult/minor exception requires the specified imminent safety/welfare threat and interpreter unavailability; the explanation rejects treating ordinary foreseeable operations as sufficient. C047–C049, C064. |
Threat, urgency, availability and meaning of the guide/regulation wording difference. |
An emergency-service label automatically excuses ordinary communication duties. |
Review the complete § 35.160(c) analysis and any later official generic clarification of the availability wording; no incident or case inquiry. |
| B14 — VRI proposed or assumed. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
Qualified interpretation, necessary/effective method selection, timely/privacy/independence conditions, and all four VRI performance clauses must coexist. C034, C036, C040–C044, C050. |
All operational and contextual facts; no technical specifications tested. |
A video connection or available equipment establishes effective communication. |
Read § 35.160(d) with § 35.104; any technical-standard investigation would require separate scope. |
| B15 — Ordinary telephone/automated/relay category. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
Apply the correct § 35.161 paragraph: effective telephone means, accessible real-time automated handling, and same-manner relay response have distinct predicates. C051–C054. |
System function, user method, service category and FCC approval. |
Any telephone system or relay label satisfies all three paragraphs. |
Read § 35.161(a)–(c), then only the indispensable generic clause of 47 USC § 225 or 47 CFR Part 64, Subpart F. |
| B16 — Emergency telephone access. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
Telephone emergency services must provide the specified direct TDD/modem access; ordinary relay access is not simply substituted for direct access. C055. |
Actual service/technology and any separately applicable technical authority. |
A universal text-to-emergency-service requirement or response time is proved here. |
Examine § 35.162 and its direct-access analysis; hold new technical emergency-communications standards for a separate pass. |
| B17 — Information and signage. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
Supply accessible-service existence/location information, all-inaccessible-entrance directions and each-accessible-entrance symbols as the separate clauses require. C056–C057. |
Facility/entrance facts and separate technical sign standards. |
Information or a symbol proves complete building accessibility. |
Read § 35.163; next inspect only necessary public design/program-access provisions in §§ 35.149–35.151 if separately authorized. |
| B18 — Fundamental alteration asserted. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
Entity demonstration, prescribed decision-maker/resource consideration/written reasons, and residual action all remain necessary under § 35.164. C058–C060. |
Nature of alteration, proof, authority, resources, reasons and alternatives. |
Staff disagreement or any program change is a complete defense. |
Read all sentences of § 35.164 and the incorporated burden explanation; no program-specific decision. |
| B19 — Financial/administrative burdens asserted. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
Use Title II’s own financial-and-administrative-burdens formulation, complete resource base and decision procedure. C058–C061. |
Available resources, asserted burden, decision and alternatives. |
Cost, absence of a budget line, or another ADA title’s hardship test alone establishes an exception. |
Compare § 35.164 with its published § 35.150(a) explanation; do not import Title I/III tests. |
| B20 — Decision-maker/resources/reasons missing. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
The codified head/designee decision follows consideration of all available program-operating/funding resources and must have written reasons; the published explanation adds its high-level/budget-authority description. C059, C061. |
Delegation, resource scope, actual consideration and statement. |
An informal refusal is the prescribed determination. |
Examine the generic decision-authority text and current official explanation; actual delegations remain held. |
| B21 — Residual action unknown. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
Even when the particular action would cause the stated alteration/burdens, other action avoiding them must preserve benefits/services to the maximum extent possible. C060. |
Feasible alternatives and their effectiveness/limitations. |
Denial of one method ends every communication obligation. |
Read § 35.164’s final sentence together with § 35.160(b), without selecting an actual alternative. |
| B22 — Charge or personal service assumed. Answered boundary; supporting currentness partial. |
Required nondiscriminatory measures cannot be surcharged under the republished § 35.130(f); the separate § 35.135 personal-device/service boundary remains. C037, C062. |
Whether the measure is required; its program/personal character; supporting-section currentness after the accessible republication. |
All assistance is free professional representation, or every personal device is a required aid. |
Reopen the complete current §§ 35.130(f), 35.135 through ordinary public access. |
| B23 — Regarded-as or exclusion issue. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
Preserve the applicable prong, objective transitory-and-minor exception, sole-regarded-as modification limitation and every relevant exclusion qualification. C021–C030. |
Actual predicates and any indispensable later interpretation. |
A duration, identity label, diagnosis label or history alone determines coverage or liability. |
Read the precise § 12102/§ 12210/§ 12211 clause and § 35.108 subdivision implicated; no patient or case query. |
| B24 — Current source inaccessible. Partial. |
An access failure establishes a source-access limitation only. A historical/republication alternative must retain its own date and legal status. C075–C076. |
Unread current supporting bodies or original enactment pages. |
Failure proves repeal, no protection, withdrawal or a technical quota. |
Retry the exact public original through ordinary access, or identify a clearly dated official publication; no gate workaround. |
| B25 — History/cross-reference transition incomplete. Partial. |
Current compilation, actual amendment, historical republication and unresolved reference alignment are separate evidence states. C011, C067–C076. |
Rail recodification chain; original 1990 pages; later amendment/judicial chain. |
A host timestamp or source credit proves the whole legal history. |
Read the exact enacted renumbering or amendment/date clause implicated by the discrepancy; no opinion/docket inquiry in this pass. |
| B26 — Other title, web or language-access regime. Excluded beyond boundary. |
The selected communication duty does not complete separate private-entity, employment, technical-web, translation or other access regimes. C004, C065, C078. |
Separate jurisdiction, actor, activity and governing authority. |
All access barriers use the same test, or exclusion from this selected component means no other protection. |
Generic next leads: 28 CFR § 36.303; 42 USC §§ 12111–12117; Part 35 Subpart H; 29 USC § 794; 42 USC § 2000d, as appropriate to a separately authorized category. |
| B27 — Actual remedy or financial outcome. Unresolved/excluded. |
Definition, communication duty and remedy are distinct; § 12133’s incorporated remedy chain and substantive financial/benefit law remain separate. C007, C009, C066, C078. |
Every actual qualification, act, decision, obligation, jurisdiction and remedy predicate. |
Accessible communication proves cancellation, immunity from collection, damages, approval or permission to ignore notices. |
Read the narrow generic remedy or substantive program provision in a separately scoped pass; no actual record or action. |
| B28 — Companion treated as representative. Answered boundary; application unresolved. |
Companion status concerns an appropriate communication participant; it does not itself establish agency, consent, privilege, disclosure authority or power to make decisions. C039, C044. |
Separate representation/confidentiality authority and all actual facts. |
Family/friend/associate status creates universal authority over legal, medical or financial decisions. |
Identify the exact generic representation/confidentiality authority only if indispensable to a later component. |