| R027-P1-E001 — A/H |
Consumer/business purpose uncertain. Apply primary purpose, including mixed use; a business label alone does not settle it. |
C008; S006 §1002.2(g)–(h), comment 2(g)-1. |
Purpose, use, applicant statement. |
“A business name makes every transaction business credit.” |
Examine published interpretations of §1002.2(g) for the abstract mixed-purpose issue; retain actual purpose as unknown. |
| E002 — A/H |
Applicant/creditor status unknown. Apply the relevant statutory and regulatory definitions and provision-specific expansions. |
C002–C004; S002; S006 §1002.2(e), (l). |
Requester/obligor roles; decision participation; assignment role. |
“Every intermediary or guarantor automatically owes/receives every notice.” |
Compare the definitions and their express cross-reference limits; guarantor litigation/signature issues remain held. |
| E003 — A/H |
Application versus inquiry. Actual procedures and the creditor’s evaluative response matter. |
C005, C009; S006 comments 2(f)-1–4; S008 comment 9-5. |
Exchange content and actual procedures. |
“No signed form means no application.” |
Read the official inquiry and oral-practice examples without investigating a party. |
| E004 — A/H |
Completed versus incomplete. Completion concerns received, regularly considered information; diligence remains required. |
C006; S006 §1002.2(f), comment 2(f)-6. |
Regular requirements, missing material, receipt and diligence facts. |
“Applicant submission proves completion,” or “creditor can delay completion indefinitely.” |
Examine necessary approvals/reports and reasonable-diligence language at the generic level. |
| E005 — A/H |
Incompleteness notice versus adverse action. Paragraph (c) supplies alternative routes with different content. |
C043–C047; S008 §1002.9(c), comments 9(a)(1)-3–4. |
Missing information, sufficiency for decision, notice selected. |
“A request for more information is always a denial,” or the reverse. |
Compare (c)(1)–(3) with the two incompleteness-denial comments. |
| E006 — A/H |
Threshold/revenue period unestablished. Use gross revenue in the preceding fiscal year and recognized special classifications. |
C023–C024; S008 §1002.9(a)(3), comment 9(a)(3)-1. |
Revenue assertion, correct fiscal period, applicant capacity. |
“Current-month sales or a calendar-year figure necessarily answers the test.” |
Investigate only published interpretations of the §1002.9 revenue predicate; do not import another regime’s definition. |
| E007 — A/H |
Revenue versus loan-amount confusion. The notice threshold measures business revenue, not requested credit or collateral. |
C023, C078; S008 §1002.9(a)(3). |
Correctly labeled measurement and period. |
“A loan below $1 million necessarily gets the smaller-business route.” |
Compare the exact noun and period in (a)(3)(i)–(ii); no arithmetic is needed. |
| E008 — P/H |
Trade/factoring/similar category unestablished. Supplier credit and incidental factoring credit have specific guidance; “similar” is not exhaustively resolved by the read comments. |
C025–C026; S008 comments 9(a)(3)-2–3. |
Transaction structure; deferred-payment right; actual category. |
“Anything financing inventory is trade credit,” or “everything called factoring is outside ECOA.” |
Search published agency interpretations of the abstract “other similar types” classification; contract characterization remains held. |
| E009 — A/H |
Standard versus special-business procedure. A qualifying creditor may elect stricter standard or smaller-business treatment. |
C027–C039; S008 comment 9(a)(3)-4. |
Classification and actual compliance route. |
“The special procedure is mandatory,” or “it is a complete exemption.” |
Compare permissible elections with each route’s content and timing. |
| E010 — A/H |
Oral versus written notification. Separate action statement, request-right disclosure, reasons, and written confirmation. |
C032–C040, C061; S008 §1002.9(a)(2)–(3), (d); S009 §1002.4(d). |
Application channel, component content, volume predicate. |
“One permitted oral component makes the whole process oral.” |
Apply each express oral alternative to the particular notice component, abstractly. |
| E011 — A/H |
Reasons statement versus right-to-request. These are alternative compliance mechanisms, not interchangeable documents without conditions. |
C032–C036, C056; S008 §1002.9(a)(2), (b)(2). |
Whether reasons were supplied or the prescribed right disclosed. |
“An ECOA rights paragraph explains the denial.” |
Compare the required elements of (a)(2)(i), (a)(2)(ii), and (b)(1)–(2). |
| E012 — A/H |
Actual request versus elapsed period. A request-dependent obligation requires the relevant request, including writing where specified. |
C033, C039; S001 §1691(d)(2)(B); S008 §1002.9(a)(3)(ii)(B). |
Existence, form, and timeliness of request. |
“Waiting 60 days proves a request was made,” or proves waiver of every possible right. |
Examine the statutory request condition and the special-business writing requirement; infer no request. |
| E013 — A/H |
Request receipt versus response. Request timing and creditor receipt are separate; receipt starts the response interval. |
C033–C034, C039, C041. |
Notification event, request event, receipt, response. |
“The response clock starts at denial,” or automatically at mailing a request. |
Read §1691(d)(2)(B) and §1002.9(a)(2)(ii) together; any delivery convention needs a separately established authority. |
| E014 — A/H |
Counteroffer accepted versus unaccepted. Express acceptance/use and a combined notice affect subsequent notice duties. |
C011, C031, C049; S008 comments 9(a)(1)-5–6. |
Acceptance/use, notification, combined content, offer expiration. |
“Counteroffer issuance equals acceptance,” or “90 days is the offer’s required life.” |
Compare the definition, timing clause, and C-4’s function. |
| E015 — A/H |
Third-party/multiple-creditor notice. Acceptance/use of one offer can remove others’ action notices; otherwise each adverse creditor must comply. |
C053–C055; S008 §1002.9(g), comments 9(g)-1–3. |
Submission roles, decisions, acceptance/use, attribution. |
“One approval or one broker letter necessarily excuses everyone.” |
Examine the acceptance/use condition and combined-notice attribution requirements. |
| E016 — A/H |
Multiple applicants. One notice suffices, directed to an apparent primary applicant. |
C004, C052; S008 §1002.9(f). |
Applicant status and apparent primary applicant. |
“Every signer needs a duplicate,” or “any recipient always suffices.” |
Compare §1002.9(f) with the applicant definition; do not adjudicate guarantor status. |
| E017 — A/H |
Existing account versus default exception. Determine the action and current status of that same account. |
C011–C014, C030. |
Action, account relationship, current versus past status. |
“Any prior missed payment eliminates all notice rights.” |
Read §1002.2(c)(2)(ii) and its current/past-default comment. |
| E018 — A/H |
Actual notice content unavailable. Required fields can be identified, but compliance cannot be found without the notice and its route. |
C032, C056, C061, C071. |
Actual text, delivery form, reason source, appropriate agency. |
“A document titled adverse-action notice is compliant,” or defective merely because unavailable. |
Compare blank required fields with §1002.9; public law cannot supply unseen notice content. |
| E019 — A/H |
Model form versus compliance. Optional samples require proper adaptation and actual reasons. |
C068–C070; S012 paragraphs 3–5. |
Actual completed content and use. |
“Using C-7/C-8 guarantees compliance.” |
Examine Appendix C’s proper-use and modification instructions. |
| E020 — A/H |
Notice compliance versus discrimination merits. The procedural and substantive inquiries remain distinct. |
C001, C014, C074; S001 §1691(a), (c), (d). |
Underwriting facts, protected-basis facts, comparative evidence. |
“A timely notice proves nondiscrimination,” or “a notice defect establishes every merits element.” |
Keep the inquiry confined to procedural elements; merits and remedies remain held. |
| E021 — A/H |
State/contract/FCRA overlay. Federal notice duties do not determine all other rights or obligations. |
C060, C072; S004 §1691d(f)–(g); S014 §1002.11. |
Jurisdiction, applicable exemption, contract, report use. |
“ECOA compliance resolves every notice or contract issue.” |
Examine federal preservation/exemption language only; state, contract, and full FCRA investigations remain held. |
| E022 — A/H |
Startup, sole proprietor, or individual business applicant. The official comment supplies distinct routing instructions. |
C024; S008 comment 9(a)(3)-1. |
Capacity, startup character, revenue statement, product category. |
“No prior revenue automatically removes notice protection.” |
Apply the comment’s separate categories without inventing revenue. |
| E023 — A/H |
Express withdrawal versus special approved-application withdrawal. The latter requires all stated predicates and is optional. |
C050–C051; S008 comment 9-2; §1002.9(e). |
Express withdrawal or approval/status-inquiry arrangement. |
“Silence always withdraws an application.” |
Compare express withdrawal, (e), and incompleteness closure separately. |
| E024 — A/H |
Utilities/securities/incidental/government exceptions. Each has its own definition and exception list. |
C015–C018; S007 §1002.3(a)–(d). |
Qualifying category predicates. |
“Every nonconsumer transaction is exempt,” or “government funding means government credit.” |
Read the complete definition and exception list for the abstract class, without identifying a provider. |
| E025 — A/H |
Small-volume creditor. The test is prior-calendar-year received applications, separate from business revenue. |
C040; S008 §1002.9(d); S001 §1691(d)(5). |
Application count and correct year. |
“A small loan or small business proves the creditor qualifies.” |
Compare statute and implementing count language; retain actual volume as unknown. |
| E026 — A/H |
Retained content and special request. Reasons requests and retention-only requests have different purposes; additional retention predicates remain. |
C021, C063–C066; S010 §1002.12(b)(1)–(5). |
Record type, notice event, written request, other holds. |
“60 days permits destruction of everything,” or “retention request automatically requests reasons.” |
Reconcile only the specified application-record clauses; full retention schedule remains held. |
| E027 — A/H |
Preapproval exception. A qualifying preapproval application has a narrow incompleteness-notice exception. |
C010, C048; S006 comment 2(f)-5; S008 comment 9(c)(1)-1. |
Program commitment and condition structure. |
“Preapproval is never an application,” or “all notices disappear.” |
Compare the complete official preapproval example with the narrow exception. |
| E028 — A/H |
Inadvertent error. Preventive procedures, unintentional error, and correction duties matter; legal misjudgment is excluded. |
C073; S006 §1002.2(s); S015 §1002.16(c). |
Nature of error, procedures, discovery, correction. |
“Calling a mistake inadvertent establishes the exception.” |
Examine the defined error and official examples without making a liability finding. |
| E029 — P/H |
Federal geographic or dealer boundary. Location and the §5519 classification can affect the relevant regulatory instrument. |
C019, C079; S005; S021. |
Activity location and statutory role/function predicates. |
“A U.S. applicant or vehicle-related loan automatically resolves scope.” |
Update the published §5519 cross-reference if needed; Part 202, foreign, and territorial law remain separate held work. |
| E030 — A/H |
Section 1071 versus notification rules. Separate reporting definitions and future compliance dates do not replace §1002.9. |
C075–C078; S016–S020. |
Which provision an asserted classification actually invokes. |
“Removal of a reporting data point abolishes reasons notices.” |
Examine the May 2026 rule’s amendment directions and preservation sentence; do not conduct a full Subpart B investigation. |