SettleADebt.

Read a Colorado quote in the right order

How should you compare debt-help fees in Colorado?

Different services can use different fee bases and charging conditions. First identify the service and the point when a fee is earned; then check the current Colorado rule.

How should you compare debt-help fees in Colorado?
What you are comparingIn this illustration
Identify the serviceDebt management and settlement can have different rules.
Identify the fee basisFind what amount the percentage or formula uses.
Identify the charging conditionAsk what must happen before the charge is allowed.

Read a Colorado quote in the right order

First identify whether the quoted service is debt management or settlement. Next find the balance or other measure used by the fee formula. Then identify the event that allows the charge to be collected.

This saved comparison explains the reading method. It is not a current Colorado fee quote or a statement that one cap applies to every service. Confirm the current official rule and the provider’s actual agreement.

This is a saved illustration with stated assumptions, not an offer or prediction for your circumstances. The full calculation and original limitations are in the optional archive.

Explore the complete state local territorial and tribal rules guide →
Open the complete calculation, tables and source notesOriginal working documents, complete tables and revision history
About this archive

The explanation above is written for readers. These original working documents preserve the evidence trail, including technical language, dated passages and known corrections. They have not all received independent professional review. Use the marked limits before relying on a particular rule or figure.

DATA & WORKED EXAMPLE

Colorado: fee limits use different bases, triggers and completion conditions

The saved 12-row matrix distinguishes a $50 DMP setup ceiling, monthly min($10 × remaining creditors, $50), settlement performance conditions, a completion-dependent aggregate constraint, and separate dishonor/contribution/anti-stacking rules.

Saved research, explicit assumptions and source limits. Full investigation → · All original tables →

Colorado fee structure as described in the saved October 2026 research; unresolved authority remains visible

Fee or chargeSaved statutory findingCondition or unresolved issue
DMP setupUp to $50 for consultation, obtaining a credit report, and setting up an account.§223(d)(1)(A); applicable concession-based plan and compliant signed agreement.
DMP monthly serviceUp to $10 × creditors remaining in the plan when assessed, capped at $50 in any month.The statutory unit is creditors, not accounts, original enrolled debts, or original creditor count.
DMP lifetime or debt-percentage capSection 223(d)(1) supplies setup and monthly limits, not a separate debt-percentage or plan-lifetime ceiling.This does not remove suitability, unfairness, agreement, or other-law constraints.
Principal-reduction settlement feeNo payment request or receipt before the state performance conditions in §223(d)(2)(A).Any fee or consideration is covered; relabeling a charge as enrollment or setup does not bypass the condition.
Completed settlement plan aggregateFees plus the aggregate settlement offers obtained may not exceed agreement-date principal when the individual completes all obligations under the agreement.§223(d)(2)(B). Preserve the completion condition and the statutory “offers of settlement” measure.
Fixed numerical settlement percentageNo current fixed percentage ceiling was established from the verified current primary text.Do not use 18%, 20%, 25%, or another commercial rate as a verified Colorado cap. Full current Rule 4 remains a primary-text hold.
Education/counseling after assent to a provider agreementGenerally no separate charge. The administrator may authorize a fee based on the nature and extent of the services; §228(d) also matters.No particular provider’s authorization or approved amount was verified.
DMP plus settlement fee stackingFees may not be imposed or received under both §223(d)(1) and §223(d)(2).§223(d)(3).
Dishonored consumer paymentReasonable charge no greater than the lesser of $25 and the amount permitted by other law.$25 is not automatic authorization; the other-law ceiling and reasonableness must also be satisfied.
“Voluntary” contributionMay not be solicited from the individual or affiliate. Accepted contributions count toward the permitted aggregate through 30 days after plan completion or termination.§224 prevents using contributions to exceed ordinary limits during that period.
Settlement-fee financingDeferral is permitted only at no additional expense to the individual.§228(b)(3).
Unrelated products and referral compensationRestrictions cover unrelated insurance, clubs, coupons, computer access, and specified compensation for arranging credit or other services.§§228(b)(7), 228(d); the latter includes a government-program education/counseling exception.

What to keep attached

  • Saved research baseline October 22, 2026. Selected prior coordinator support checks do not certify every state clause or legal premise.
  • There is no cleared current fixed Colorado settlement percentage in this chain. Final official Rule 4 and final basis remain unread after P2. The reproduced standalone $100/90-day route is held.
  • Fee ceilings are not earning permission. Federal coverage/timing, plan suitability, signed terms, actual performance and provider authorization remain separate.

Source trail

Get debt settlement help