{"meta":{"key":"s_wi--pass-21","task":"S_WI","title":"Wisconsin ordinary-civil default-judgment relief under §806.07","parent_title":"Wisconsin debt and debt relief law","edition":"pass-21","path":"/research/s_wi--pass-21/","kind":"split_pass","category":"state","role":"state","area_numbers":[66],"groups":["collections"],"date":"2026-10-27","tables":14,"claims":48,"sources":24,"review_status":"whole_answer_selected_primary_math_coverage_reviewed;current_statutory_gaps_and_minor_Mikrut_date_annotation_pending","review_complete":true,"sha256":"00706f95ab344468631eb2c9b75668d10c9a0defd7f1ebec80cb8d30a22a8582","headings":["Wisconsin ordinary-civil default-judgment relief under §806.07","2.1 What kind of default is involved?","2.2 Who can seek relief?","3.1 Ground-by-ground matrix","3.2 Entry is not rendition, notice, or discovery","3.3 Reasonable time is an additional requirement","3.4 The court cannot simply enlarge the §806.07 period","4.1 Mistake and neglect: a defense is necessary, but it need not be proved victorious","4.2 Newly discovered evidence: exact linkage and the no-verdict gap","4.3 Fraud by an adverse party","4.4 Genuine voidness versus competency or technical error","4.5 Satisfaction, release, discharge, prior judgments, and prospective relief","4.6 Paragraph (h): overlap is possible, but relabeling is insufficient","4.7 Hearing is conditional—not automatic on a conclusory motion","5.1 Two powers are preserved","5.2 Independent equitable relief has demanding predicates","5.3 Contradictory evidence is not automatically fraud on the court","6.1 Required writing and papers","6.2 Exact “made” rule","6.3 Service and filing remain separate duties","6.4 Hearing notice and time computation","6.5 Electronic filing does not erase service conditions","7.1 No automatic stay","7.2 Relief is defined by the court’s order","7.3 Restoration after collection","7.4 Motion, appeal, new trial, satisfaction, and correction are distinct","Model A — One-year trigger is entry, not later notice","Model B — Weekend and clerk closure","Model C — Five-day hearing notice","Model D — Conditional restoration base","Local implementation—all 72 counties unexamined individually","Territorial/special categories","Deferred families"],"generation_provenance":{"actual_route":"regular_chat_adaptive_models","actual_model":"GPT-6","actual_mode":"Pro","provenance_limit":"Actual documented capture labels only; missing labels remain unknown. No preferred setting is inferred as actual execution."},"public_id":"S_WI/pass-21","facets":{"geography":["us","us-wi"],"debt_type":[],"stage":["judgment"],"subject":["court-entry-service"]},"scope":"ReviewedP08D2ordinarylargeclaimcivildefaultjudgment80607reliefONLY;smallclaims/arbitration/appealsseparate.","pending_corrections":0},"markdown":"# SettleADebt S_WI PASS-21\n\n## Wisconsin ordinary-civil default-judgment relief under §806.07\n\n**Fresh access date:** October 26, 2026, America/Los_Angeles; October 27, 2026 UTC. Exact individual source-opening times are unknown.\n\n**Scope:** Relief from an ordinary Wisconsin circuit-court civil default judgment under §806.07, with the necessary default, motion, service, computation, stay, and restoration rules. This does not adopt the small-claims, arbitration, garnishment, execution, or exemption reports as premises.\n\n**Principal finding:** The statute does **not** impose one universal one-year limit. Grounds **(a) and (c)** require a motion within a reasonable time **and** no more than one year after the specified event. Ground **(b)** has a separate cross-reference. Grounds **(e)–(h)** have the reasonable-time requirement without that express one-year cap. Published Wisconsin authority excludes a **genuinely void** judgment from the reasonable-time restriction, but ordinary error or loss of court competency is not automatically voidness.\n\nA second important finding is procedural: **§802.01(2)(e) defines when a noticed motion is “made”—when it is served with its notice of motion. Filing alone is not the definition.** Filing, valid service, supporting papers, hearing notice, and electronic-service conditions must still be satisfied. [Justia Law+2](https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-07/)\n\n# 1. Evidence status and currentness\n\nThe official integrated §806.07 endpoint timed out:\n\nhttps://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/806/07\n\nThe official chapter index reported statutes updated through **2025 Wisconsin Act 247**, but an index is not the operative body. The genuinely different official published-format alternative read was *Bank One Wisconsin v. Kahl*, whose ¶13 reproduces the complete relevant §806.07(1)(a)–(h) and (2) text. That is an **official court publication of historical statutory text**, not a current consolidated statute. The fresh 2025 statutory reproductions supply the complete contiguous provisions but are expressly **nonofficial read-aids**. (Invalid URL)\n\nThe §806.07 reproduction’s history lists the 1975 rules, 1975 chapter 218, and 1997 Act 114. No later amendment is shown there. That supports continuity but does not certify the entire amendment chain through October 2026.\n\nAccordingly:\n\n- statutory conclusions below retain a **current integrated-body hold**;\n- published opinions were freshly read rather than borrowed from earlier passes;\n- historical opinions’ shorthand about “one year” is not substituted for the complete statutory text;\n- no unpublished opinion is relied on as authority; and\n- no complete citator or county-rule review was performed.\n\nAll C references below are full IDs **S_WI-P21-C001 onward**; all S references are **S_WI-P21-S001 onward**.\n\n# 2. Necessary ordinary-default gateway\n\n## 2.1 What kind of default is involved?\n\nSection 806.02 distinguishes several situations:\n\n| Default situation | Necessary predicate | Important qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Failure to join issue | Time to answer the complaint, counterclaim, or cross-claim expired without an issue of law or fact being joined | A party who appeared is entitled to notice of the default motion |\n| No appearance and personal judgment sought | Proof of summons service and facts needed for personal jurisdiction | Actual awareness of the lawsuit is not necessarily lawful service |\n| Express-contract, liquidated-money clerk judgment | Proof of **personal** service and affidavit of failure to join issue | Abode service is expressly not “personal service” for this clerk-entry branch |\n| Party appeared but failed to attend trial | §806.02(5) permits default | Court must receive necessary factual proof |\n| Discovery or other sanction default | May arise under different rules | Not fully analyzed here |\n\nDefault does not eliminate the court’s duty to receive facts necessary to render the judgment or determine the amount. This is only the gateway needed to identify the judgment being challenged—not a full commencement, liability, or damages report. **C004–C006.**\n\nRead-aid body:\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-02/, subsections (1)–(5). [Justia Law](https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-02/)\n\n## 2.2 Who can seek relief?\n\nSection 806.07 permits a **party or legal representative** to seek relief from a judgment, order, or stipulation. It is not restricted to losing defendants. In *Kahl*, the prevailing creditor’s request to escape its own foreclosure judgment fell within §806.07, although relief was denied. Entry of judgment also meant the creditor could not simply use pre-judgment voluntary dismissal to erase it. **C003.**\n\nPrimary opinion:\nhttps://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5090, ¶¶10–18. [Wisconsin Court System](https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5090)\n\n# 3. Complete grounds and clocks\n\n## 3.1 Ground-by-ground matrix\n\nThe following reflects the complete §806.07(1)–(2) text read, with the identified case qualifications.\n\n| Ground | What must be established | Governing time structure | Important limit |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **(a)** Mistake, inadvertence, surprise, excusable neglect | A qualifying explanation for the default; for default relief, a meritorious defense | **Reasonable time and no more than one year** after judgment entry or the order/stipulation was made | Forgetfulness or ordinary carelessness is not automatically excusable |\n| **(b)** Newly discovered evidence | Evidence satisfying §805.15(3)’s diligence, materiality, noncumulative, and probable-result requirements | Within the time supplied by **§805.16** | The linked text uses a **verdict** trigger; exact application to a pure no-trial default remains held |\n| **(c)** Fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party | Actual adverse-party misconduct and a basis for relief | **Reasonable time and no more than one year** after the specified event | Discovery does not replace the statutory entry/made trigger |\n| **(d)** Judgment void | Genuine jurisdictional invalidity, not merely error or lost competency | Published authority says the reasonable-time restriction does not apply to a truly void judgment | Voidness must be proved; the label does not decide it |\n| **(e)** Satisfied, released, or discharged | Payment, release, or discharge applicable to the judgment | Reasonable time; no express one-year cap in (2) | Scope, performance, partial satisfaction, and actual discharge matter |\n| **(f)** Supporting prior judgment reversed or vacated | This judgment was based on a prior judgment subsequently reversed/vacated | Reasonable time; no express one-year cap | Not automatically a later unfavorable precedent or changed interpretation |\n| **(g)** Prospective application no longer equitable | A genuine prospective/equitable feature and changed circumstances making future operation inequitable | Reasonable time; no express one-year cap | Present difficulty paying a fixed debt is not automatically prospective inequity |\n| **(h)** Other reasons justifying relief | Extraordinary circumstances, considering finality and justice | Reasonable time; no express one-year cap | Cannot merely relabel an expired neglect or fraud motion |\n\n**C007–C025.** The statute also contains an adoptive-parent exclusion in subsection (3); that special family-law branch is outside this consumer-money scope. **C047.**\n\nComplete reproduced statute:\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-07/.\n\nOfficial historical quotation:\nhttps://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5090, ¶13. [Justia Law+1](https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-07/)\n\n## 3.2 Entry is not rendition, notice, or discovery\n\nA judgment is entered when filed in the clerk’s office. Signing, oral announcement, service of notice of entry, and the debtor’s discovery of the judgment are distinct events.\n\nFor grounds (a) and (c), §806.07(2) uses:\n\n- **judgment entry**; or\n- the date the **order or stipulation was made**.\n\nIt does not generally restart the one-year period upon learning of the judgment or discovering the asserted misconduct. **C009–C010.**\n\nRead-aid:\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-06/, §806.06(1)(a)–(d). [Justia Law](https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-06/)\n\n## 3.3 Reasonable time is an additional requirement\n\nA motion can be too late even when brought within one year. In *Rhodes v. Terry*, the Supreme Court affirmed denial where a defaulted party waited more than six months after judgment despite notice and opportunities to act. The Court examined the particular facts; it did not establish six months as a universal maximum. **C008.**\n\nPublished opinion reproduced at:\nhttps://law.justia.com/cases/wisconsin/supreme-court/1979/76-661-7.html, **91 Wis. 2d 165, 170–177 (1979)**. This is judicial opinion text on a nonofficial host, not a case-summary substitute. [Justia Law](https://law.justia.com/cases/wisconsin/supreme-court/1979/76-661-7.html)\n\n## 3.4 The court cannot simply enlarge the §806.07 period\n\nSection 801.15(2)(c) excludes §806.07’s prescribed time from discretionary enlargement. *Miro Tool* held that equitable estoppel could not enlarge the one-year period for the ordinary mistake/neglect motion on the facts before it. The circuit court had separately rejected extraordinary circumstances. **C027.**\n\nPrimary opinion:\nhttps://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9790, **DISCUSSION**, beginning with the analysis of §806.07(1)(a) and the one-year limit; **CONCLUSION**. The opinion has unnumbered judicial paragraphs—viewer line numbers are not paragraph numbers. [Wisconsin Court System](https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9790)\n\nThe rule against enlargement is different from applying the statute’s built-in weekend or clerk-closure computation rule.\n\n# 4. Substantive qualifications\n\n## 4.1 Mistake and neglect: a defense is necessary, but it need not be proved victorious\n\n*J.L. Phillips* establishes two requirements for default relief under paragraph (a):\n\n1. qualifying mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; and\n2. a **meritorious defense**.\n\nA meritorious defense is a defense good at law—enough to survive judgment on the pleadings. It is **not** a requirement to demonstrate a probable trial victory or defeat summary judgment through affidavits. Facts explaining the default still need support. The Supreme Court did not review the lower court’s excusable-neglect finding in that case. **C011–C012.**\n\nPrimary opinion:\nhttps://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17178, ¶¶9, 18, 23–31, 33–36 and footnote 5. [Wisconsin Court System+1](https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17178)\n\n## 4.2 Newly discovered evidence: exact linkage and the no-verdict gap\n\nSection 805.15(3) requires that the evidence:\n\n- came to the moving party’s attention after trial;\n- was not missed because of insufficient diligence;\n- is material and noncumulative; and\n- probably would change the result.\n\nSection 805.16(4) describes a newly discovered-evidence motion within **one year after the verdict**, with a decision entered within **90 days after the motion is made** or the motion is deemed denied. **C013–C014.**\n\nRead-aids:\n\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-805/section-805-15/, §805.15(3).\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-805/section-805-16/, §805.16(4). [Justia Law+1](https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-805/section-805-15/)\n\n**Unresolved application:** A pure default may have no trial or verdict. The bounded search did not establish controlling published authority translating this linked verdict trigger into an exact default-judgment clock. This report therefore does **not** invent “one year after entry under (b),” declare paragraph (b) categorically unavailable, or treat it as unlimited.\n\nA newly found receipt might also support another ground, but only if that ground’s own requirements are met.\n\n## 4.3 Fraud by an adverse party\n\nParagraph (c) concerns fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct **of the adverse party**. A factual disagreement, disappointing testimony, or an unsupported suspicion does not itself establish the ground. The moving party must identify the misconduct, its connection to the judgment, supporting evidence, and timing. The ordinary motion retains both reasonable-time and one-year restrictions. **C015.**\n\nFraud on the court and an independent equitable action are distinct preserved avenues, discussed below—not automatic extensions of paragraph (c). [Justia Law+1](https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-07/)\n\n## 4.4 Genuine voidness versus competency or technical error\n\n*Mikrut* distinguishes constitutional subject-matter jurisdiction from a circuit court’s statutory competency. Failure to comply with a statutory prerequisite may affect competency without making the judgment void, and competency objections can be waived. A truly void judgment, by contrast, is not subject to §806.07’s reasonable-time restriction. **C016, C018.**\n\nPrimary opinion:\nhttps://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16730, majority ¶¶8–10, 31–38. The concurrence is not treated as the holding. [Wisconsin Court System](https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16730)\n\n*Cintas* applied the distinction to personal jurisdiction. Naming one separate corporation but obtaining default against another was a fundamental defect. Actual awareness did not cure it. The majority distinguishes fundamental defects from technical defects, for which absence of prejudice can matter, and places the stated service-defect burden on the complainant. **C017.**\n\nPrimary opinion:\nhttps://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80134, majority ¶¶22–28, 38–40. The Bradley dissent is separate. [Wisconsin Court System](https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80134)\n\n**Waiver matters:** Section 802.06(8) provides rules for losing personal-jurisdiction, process, and service defenses through omission from the relevant motion or pleading. An appearance is not universally equivalent to waiver; what was raised, omitted, and preserved must be examined. **C019.**\n\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-802/section-802-06/, subsections (7)–(8). [Justia Law](https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-802/section-802-06/)\n\n## 4.5 Satisfaction, release, discharge, prior judgments, and prospective relief\n\nFor paragraph (e), obtain the actual payment evidence, settlement/release language, performance, and judgment identity. A partial payment supports neither automatic total discharge nor automatic vacatur. Bankruptcy-discharge scope requires separate federal analysis. **C020.**\n\nParagraph (f) requires an actual prior judgment on which the challenged judgment was based—not simply a later case announcing different law. **C021.**\n\nFor paragraph (g), *Kahl* describes equitable prospective relief and still requires reasonable time. The present burdens of paying an ordinary fixed money judgment do not, without more, establish the prospective-equity predicate. **C022.**\n\nPrimary opinion:\nhttps://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5090, ¶¶13–18. Its foreclosure posture is not generalized into this report’s consumer-debt facts. [Wisconsin Court System](https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5090)\n\n## 4.6 Paragraph (h): overlap is possible, but relabeling is insufficient\n\nTwo propositions must be kept together:\n\n- A party cannot escape an expired specific-ground period merely by renaming the claim “extraordinary circumstances.”\n- Wisconsin does **not** impose rigid factual mutual exclusivity: facts involving mistake, newly discovered evidence, or fraud may also support paragraph (h) if genuinely extraordinary circumstances justify relief.\n\n*M.L.B.* expressly reconciles those propositions. Its paternity/support facts are not consumer-debt facts; the legal framework, not its outcome, is used here. **C023–C024.**\n\nPublished opinion reproduced at:\nhttps://law.justia.com/cases/wisconsin/supreme-court/1985/83-1348-9.html, **122 Wis. 2d 536, 549–555 (1985)**. [Justia Law](https://law.justia.com/cases/wisconsin/supreme-court/1985/83-1348-9.html)\n\n*Miller* confirms that a finding of excusable neglect is **not a prerequisite** to paragraph (h). Its nonexclusive factors include informed choice, counsel, whether merits were heard, a meritorious defense, and intervening equities. **C025.**\n\nPrimary opinion:\nhttps://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52041, majority ¶¶29–44, 48–61. [Wisconsin Court System](https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52041)\n\n## 4.7 Hearing is conditional—not automatic on a conclusory motion\n\nUnder *Miller*, the court first tests whether the alleged facts, assumed true for that threshold inquiry, would constitute extraordinary circumstances. If so, it must hold a hearing to determine their truth. The moving party still bears the burden; assuming allegations true at the threshold does not establish them at the evidentiary stage. **C026.**\n\nThe decision’s direction to treat the answer as timely in that particular case is not a universal effect of filing a paragraph (h) motion. [Wisconsin Court System](https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52041)\n\n# 5. Independent action and fraud-on-court boundaries\n\n## 5.1 Two powers are preserved\n\nSection 806.07(2) preserves:\n\n1. an independent action for relief from a judgment, order, or proceeding; and\n2. the power to set aside a judgment for fraud on the court.\n\n*Walker* rejects the proposition that every independent action must itself be a fraud-on-the-court action. **C028.**\n\nPrimary opinion:\nhttps://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10579, unnumbered discussion beginning **“Here, the trial court found…”**, followed by the enumerated equitable prerequisites and the conclusion. [Wisconsin Court System](https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10579)\n\n## 5.2 Independent equitable relief has demanding predicates\n\n*Walker* and *Dekker* identify:\n\n- a judgment inequitable to enforce;\n- a good underlying defense;\n- fraud, accident, or mistake preventing the party from obtaining the benefit of that defense;\n- absence of the claimant’s own fault or negligence; and\n- absence of an adequate remedy at law.\n\nLaches, diligence, and clean hands remain important. An expired ordinary motion does not automatically establish the last two requirements. **C029.**\n\nPrimary opinion:\nhttps://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11692, unnumbered discussion beginning **“The elements of an independent action are…”** and **“Dekker’s hands are not clean.”** [Wisconsin Court System](https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11692)\n\n## 5.3 Contradictory evidence is not automatically fraud on the court\n\n*Dekker* affirmed dismissal where the challenger had failed to participate and protect his rights and later offered contradictory evidence suggesting perjury. It did not establish that every instance of perjury is categorically irrelevant; it rejected that claimant’s inadequate equitable and fraud-on-the-court showing. **C030.**\n\nNo universal independent-action limitation period, damages claim, pleading package, or commencement procedure is supplied here. Those remain separate modules. [Wisconsin Court System](https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11692)\n\n# 6. Making, serving, filing, and hearing the motion\n\n## 6.1 Required writing and papers\n\nUnless made during a hearing or trial, §802.01 requires a written motion stating particular grounds and the requested relief. A properly written notice of hearing can satisfy the writing requirement. Supporting records and papers not previously filed or served must accompany the notice and be identified. Additional hearing evidence requires a reasonable opportunity for the opponent to meet it. **C031.**\n\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-802/section-802-01/, §802.01(2)(a)–(d). [law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-802/section-802-01/)\n\n## 6.2 Exact “made” rule\n\nSection 802.01(2)(e) states that, for statutory procedural periods, a motion requiring notice under §801.15(4) is deemed made **when served with its notice of motion**. Thus:\n\n- filing alone is not the defined event;\n- mailing a draft without a legally sufficient motion/notice is not assumed sufficient;\n- the legally permitted service method matters; and\n- proof of the event must be retained.\n\n**C032.** An official indexed fragment also exposes this rule, but the complete current official section was not rendered.\n\nOfficial indexed locator:\nhttps://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/802.01%282%29%28b%29\n\nContiguous read-aid:\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-802/section-802-01/. [Wisconsin Legislative Documents+1](https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/802.01%282%29%28b%29)\n\n## 6.3 Service and filing remain separate duties\n\nUnder §801.14:\n\n- written motions generally go to the required parties;\n- service ordinarily goes to counsel for a represented party unless the court directs otherwise;\n- the statute has exceptions for parties in default for failure to appear and special treatment of new claims;\n- mail service is generally complete on mailing;\n- email service outside the e-filing system requires the specified consent;\n- limited-scope representation can require service on both counsel and the party; and\n- papers required to be served must be filed within a reasonable time after service.\n\n**C033–C034.**\n\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-801/section-801-14/, subsections (1), (2), (2m), and (4). [Justia Law](https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-801/section-801-14/)\n\n## 6.4 Hearing notice and time computation\n\nSection 801.15 generally requires:\n\n- written motion/hearing notice at least **five days before the hearing**, unless another statute or order applies;\n- supporting affidavits served with the motion;\n- opposing affidavits at least one day before the hearing, unless allowed otherwise;\n- exclusion of the triggering day;\n- inclusion of the last day unless the clerk’s office is closed; and\n- exclusion of Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays for periods shorter than 11 days.\n\n**C035–C036.**\n\nThe three-day mail addition applies when a recipient must act within a period **after service**. It does not add three days to the movant’s entry-based one-year §806.07 deadline. **C037.**\n\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-801/section-801-15/, subsections (1), (2)(c), (4), and (5). [Justia Law](https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-801/section-801-15/)\n\n## 6.5 Electronic filing does not erase service conditions\n\nThe reproduced §801.18(4) provides that a submission completed by **11:59 p.m. Central time**, if subsequently accepted, is treated as filed that day. The notice of activity can constitute service on registered users when personal service is not required. Paper parties must receive traditional service; a rejected submission or an unregistered recipient creates different issues. **C038.**\n\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-801/section-801-18/, subsections (4) and (6). [Justia Law+1](https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-801/section-801-18/)\n\nThis is not an operational clearance for a real last-minute submission. Acceptance, system records, recipient status, outages, local hearing procedures, and any order must be checked.\n\n# 7. Stay, effect of relief, restoration, and separate routes\n\n## 7.1 No automatic stay\n\nSection 806.07(2) expressly says the motion does not affect finality or suspend operation. Section 806.08(2) separately permits a stay pending a relief motion on conditions the court considers proper for the adverse party’s security. No universal bond amount or automatic stay is established. **C039–C040.**\n\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-08/, §806.08(2). [Justia Law](https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-08/)\n\n## 7.2 Relief is defined by the court’s order\n\nA grant can concern all or part of a judgment and can impose just terms. It does not automatically:\n\n- win the underlying case;\n- reinstate a particular answer;\n- remove every lien or public record;\n- return seized property;\n- refund payments;\n- terminate every enforcement proceeding; or\n- restart an appeal period.\n\nThe order’s precise scope and further procedures govern. **C041.**\n\n## 7.3 Restoration after collection\n\nSection 806.09(1) provides for restoration when a judgment or part of it has been collected and is later set aside or reversed. It requires notice, motion, and proof of facts. Restoration includes interest from collection. If a new trial is ordered, retention on a properly secured bond may be allowed. A qualifying good-faith purchaser for value without notice is protected. **C042.**\n\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-09/, subsection (1). [Justia Law](https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-09/)\n\n## 7.4 Motion, appeal, new trial, satisfaction, and correction are distinct\n\n| Route | Function | Boundary |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| §806.07 motion | Relief on an enumerated or extraordinary ground | Not an ordinary appeal of every legal error |\n| Appeal | Review under appellate rules | No appeal deadline recalculated here |\n| New-trial motion | Trial/verdict-specific relief | §§805.15–.16 conditions differ |\n| Satisfaction/release procedure | Records payment or discharge | Does not necessarily reopen liability |\n| Clerical-record correction | Corrects factual record/data error | Not a substitute for changing the judgment’s merits |\n| Independent equitable action | Exceptional separate equitable relief | Not a routine revival of a missed motion |\n\n**C043–C044.** The official GF-184A expressly distinguishes a record error from disagreement with the court’s decision.\n\nhttps://www.wicourts.gov/formdisplay/GF-184A.pdf?formNumber=GF-184A&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en, rev. 11/20, one unnumbered page, zero-based PDF index **0**, visually inspected. [Wisconsin Court System](https://www.wicourts.gov/formdisplay/GF-184A.pdf?formNumber=GF-184A&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en)\n\n# 8. Published-authority grid\n\nAll decisions relied upon below are **published**. No unpublished search result is used as authority. Majority holdings are separated from concurrences, dissents, historical statutory text, and the particular case’s posture.\n\n| Authority | Freshly read pinpoint and posture | Holding used and limitation |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **Miller, 2010 WI 75**, July 13, 2010 | Majority ¶¶29–44, 48–61; insurer default after procedural confusion | Paragraph (h), factors, threshold hearing, no excusable-neglect prerequisite. Relief was fact-specific. Bradley concurrence not treated as majority. |\n| **Mikrut, 2004 WI 79**, June 30, 2004 | Majority ¶¶8–10, 31–38; ordinance case | Competency versus true voidness; waiver; no reasonable-time bar for a truly void judgment. Not a consumer-debt outcome. |\n| **J.L. Phillips**, April 24, 1998 | ¶¶9, 18, 23–36 and n.5; contract default | Meritorious defense means good at law, not probable trial success. Excusable-neglect finding was not reviewed. |\n| **Cintas, 2012 WI 31**, March 27, 2012 | Majority ¶¶22–28, 38–40; wrong separate corporate defendant | Fundamental personal-jurisdiction defect made default void. Mere misnomer and technical defects distinguished. Dissent not adopted. |\n| **Miro Tool**, October 23, 1996 | Published majority, unnumbered DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION | Estoppel could not enlarge paragraph (a)’s one-year period; extraordinary relief had separately been rejected. |\n| **Kahl, 2002 WI App 312**, November 12, 2002 | ¶¶10–18; creditor sought to undo foreclosure judgment | Prevailing party can invoke §806.07; unilateral dismissal not substitute; delay defeated relief. Paragraph 13 quotes historical statute. |\n| **Walker**, February 19, 1997 | Published unnumbered equitable-action discussion and enumerated elements | Independent action distinct from fraud-on-court power; remand to assess merits, not automatic relief. |\n| **Dekker**, September 17, 1997 | Published unnumbered elements, clean-hands and diligence discussion | Contradictory evidence and neglect of original litigation did not establish equitable or fraud-on-court relief. |\n| **Rhodes**, June 29, 1979 | Reporter pp.170–177; malpractice default; reproduced opinion | A motion within one year may still be unreasonably delayed. Historical commencement rules not adopted. |\n| **M.L.B.**, February 27, 1985 | Reporter pp.543–555; paternity/support stipulation; reproduced opinion | No rigid factual exclusivity; extraordinary circumstances can justify (h), but mere relabeling cannot. Remand required. |\n\n**C046.** No complete citator, later-order inventory, or all-source current-law certification is claimed.\n\n# 9. Fictional workflows and conditional models\n\nEach workflow is invented. The “next act” describes the relevant legal route, not instructions for an actual filing.\n\n| # | Fictional facts and route | Required proof/conditional consequence | Adverse branch and unknowns |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **W1 — Mistaken missed answer** | Defendant believed an insurer would answer; ordinary default followed. Potential (a). **C011–C012** | Show communications, reasonable precautions, promptness, and proposed defense good at law | Delegating and doing nothing may be careless. Actual service, policy, and communications absent. |\n| **W2 — Forgetfulness** | Defendant received proper papers but forgot. Potential (a). **C011–C012** | Forgetfulness alone does not establish a reasonably prudent-person explanation | A strong payment defense does not itself excuse default. No actual circumstances supplied. |\n| **W3 — Medical emergency** | Sudden hospitalization overlaps the answer period; defendant acts promptly afterward. **C008, C011–C012** | Records must connect incapacity to default and explain later delay; proposed defense required | An unrelated illness or long unexplained delay may not qualify. |\n| **W4 — Newly discovered document** | After a no-trial default, defendant finds a payment record despite a documented search. **C013–C014** | Diligence, materiality, and likely effect matter; exact (b) timing for no verdict remains held | Do not assume a new year from discovery or call it automatically unavailable. |\n| **W5 — Adverse-party fraud** | Creditor allegedly concealed a release; discovery occurs late. **C009, C015** | Identify misconduct, evidence, causal connection, and dates | Discovery does not automatically reset (c)’s one-year cap; (h)/equity require independent predicates. |\n| **W6 — Paid/released balance** | Judgment later paid partly and remaining amount allegedly released. **C020, C041** | Payment ledger and release terms establish what, if anything, remains | Partial payment is not complete satisfaction; disputed conditions cannot be assumed performed. |\n| **W7 — Personal jurisdiction** | Person never named as defendant is nevertheless subjected to judgment; actual notice alleged. **C016–C017** | Court must classify fundamental defect, technical defect, and jurisdiction using actual papers | Actual notice alone cannot cure every fundamental defect; no judgment declared void here. |\n| **W8 — Competency and waiver** | Litigant calls a missed statutory step “subject-matter jurisdiction” after litigating merits. **C018–C019** | Determine whether it is competency, jurisdiction, technical error, and whether properly preserved | Mikrut rejects automatic voidness; a preserved fundamental jurisdiction defect differs. |\n| **W9 — Delay inside one year** | Judgment known within days; motion made ten months later without explanation. **C008** | Timeliness includes reasonableness, not just an anniversary check | Rhodes supports denial on particular delay facts; no fixed ten-month rule created. |\n| **W10 — Neglect after one year** | Valid service; ordinary neglect motion first made fourteen months after entry. **C009, C027** | Paragraph (a)’s outer bar cannot be enlarged merely through sympathy or negotiations | Extraordinary (h) is separately tested, not presumed. |\n| **W11 — Extraordinary circumstances** | Court/attorney communications allegedly caused serious procedural irregularity; no merits heard. **C023–C026** | Particularized facts may require a hearing if, taken as true, they would be extraordinary | No automatic hearing on labels; truth, defense, intervening equities, and reasonable time remain. |\n| **W12 — Independent fraud claim** | Person ignored the original action and later alleges the winner lied. **C028–C030** | Independent equity requires clean hands, diligence, good defense, prevention, and no adequate legal remedy | Dekker shows why late contradictory evidence is not enough. |\n| **W13 — Enforcement continues** | Ordinary motion filed; no stay order issued. **C039–C040** | Judgment remains operative; stay is a separate judicial decision | No automatic freeze, cancellation, or release follows filing. |\n| **W14 — Restoration** | Court sets aside collected portion; movant seeks money back. **C042** | Notice, motion, collection proof, order scope, interest, and any bond/purchaser issue | Filing a relief motion alone creates no refund. Numerical model below is conditional. |\n| **W15 — Clerical versus merits** | Court record misspells a name; alternative fact is disagreement with the debt amount. **C044** | GF-184A may address the record error; substantive amount challenge needs proper judicial route | A useful form does not create substantive grounds or a deadline extension. |\n| **W16 — One-year, hearing, and electronic submission models** | Dates below illustrate ordinary timing only. **C009–C010, C032–C038** | Correct trigger, completed service, filed papers, and court calendar must be established | No actual deadline, acceptance, or proof of service is supplied. |\n\n## Model A — One-year trigger is entry, not later notice\n\n**Stipulated facts:** Judgment signed February 27, 2026; filed/entered **Monday, March 2, 2026**; notice received June 8, 2026. Ground (a) or (c).\n\n- Entry is day zero.\n- One calendar year from entry reaches **Tuesday, March 2, 2027**.\n- June 8 notice does not restart that statutory year.\n- A noticed motion must be **served with its notice** under §802.01(2)(e); filing and supporting-paper duties remain.\n- A much earlier date may be required by “reasonable time.”\n\nThis models only the outer statutory anniversary, not an actual last permissible instant. **C008–C010, C032–C034.**\n\n## Model B — Weekend and clerk closure\n\n**Stipulated facts:** Entry **Friday, May 15, 2026**. The one-year anniversary is **Saturday, May 15, 2027**. Assume the clerk’s office is closed that Saturday and Monday is not a legal holiday.\n\nUnder the read §801.15 computation, the modeled endpoint moves to **Monday, May 17, 2027**. This is application of the counting rule, not discretionary enlargement for neglect.\n\nActual service completion, electronic-user status, acceptance, and court orders remain necessary. **C009, C032, C036–C038.**\n\n## Model C — Five-day hearing notice\n\n**Stipulated facts:** Hearing **Wednesday, December 16, 2026**; notice personally delivered **Wednesday, December 9**; no intervening legal holiday or different court order.\n\nExclude service day and, because the period is under 11 days, skip Saturday/Sunday:\n\n| Counted day | Date |\n| --- | --- |\n| 1 | Thursday, December 10 |\n| 2 | Friday, December 11 |\n| 3 | Monday, December 14 |\n| 4 | Tuesday, December 15 |\n| 5 | Wednesday, December 16 |\n\nThis illustrates the five-day notice period. No mail addition is used. Supporting affidavits accompany the motion; opposing-paper rules remain separate. **C035–C037.**\n\n## Model D — Conditional restoration base\n\n**Stipulated facts:** The court later sets aside the relevant judgment portion. Proof shows collections of $2,000 and $750 from the movant, with no allocation dispute.\n\nModeled collected principal to be addressed = $2,000 + $750 = $2,750.\n\nSection 806.09 separately requires the restoration process and applicable interest. No interest rate is assumed, no actual award is calculated, and a new-trial bond or good-faith purchaser issue could alter the remedy. **C042.**\n\n# 10. Source register — S_WI-P21-S001 onward\n\n**Access convention for every row:** fresh access on October 26, 2026 Pacific / October 27, 2026 UTC; exact opening time unknown. HTML sources have no PDF index. Unnumbered judicial paragraphs are identified by headings or text anchors—not browser line numbers.\n\n| Source | Issuer/title and complete literal URL | Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **S001** | Wisconsin Legislature, §806.07/current chapter index. https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/806/07 and https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/806/_31?up=1 | Section fetch failed once; official index reported updates through Act 247. **No current integrated body read.** |\n| **S002** | Justia reproduction, **2025 §806.07**. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-07/ | Full (1)(a)–(h), (2), (3), history read. Nonofficial read-aid; no full 2026 amendment certification. |\n| **S003** | Justia reproduction, **2025 §806.02**. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-02/ | Full (1)–(5); notice, proof, personal-service/liquidated branch. History includes 2018 WI 102. |\n| **S004** | Justia reproduction, **2025 §806.06**. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-06/ | (1)(a)–(d), necessary entry/notice distinctions. Other costs/enforcement content not adopted. |\n| **S005** | Justia reproduction, **2025 §805.15**. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-805/section-805-15/ | (3)(a)–(d) and linked exceptions. Four newly discovered-evidence elements read. |\n| **S006** | Justia reproduction, **2025 §805.16**. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-805/section-805-16/ | Full relevant (1)–(5), especially (4): verdict-based year and 90-day decision. No default-trigger translation invented. |\n| **S007** | Justia reproduction and official indexed fragment, **§802.01**. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-802/section-802-01/ and https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/802.01%282%29%28b%29 | Full reproduced (2)(a)–(e) read; official indexed fragment only. Motion deemed made upon service with notice. |\n| **S008** | Justia reproduction, **2025 §801.14**. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-801/section-801-14/ | (1), (2), (2m), (4); recipient, method, default-party exceptions, and filing-after-service duties. |\n| **S009** | Justia reproduction, **2025 §801.15**. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-801/section-801-15/ | (1), (2)(a),(c), (4),(5); counting, nonenlargement, hearing notice, response additions. |\n| **S010** | Justia reproduction, **2025 §801.18**. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-801/section-801-18/ | (4), (6), necessary definitions; accepted filing time, notices, paper parties. No runtime accessed. |\n| **S011** | Justia reproduction, **2025 §802.06**. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-802/section-802-06/ | (7)–(8), jurisdiction/process/service defense preservation. Full merits-motion regime not analyzed. |\n| **S012** | Justia reproduction, **2025 §806.08**. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-08/ | (2) and adjoining stay branches; discretionary security conditions. |\n| **S013** | Justia reproduction, **2025 §806.09**. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-09/ | (1)–(2); restoration, notice/proof, bond, purchaser protection. |\n| **S014** | Wisconsin Supreme Court, **Miller, 2010 WI 75**. https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52041 | Majority ¶¶29–44, 48–61; July 13, 2010. Fresh official opinion; concurrence separated. |\n| **S015** | Wisconsin Supreme Court, **Mikrut, 2004 WI 79**. https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16730 | Majority ¶¶8–10, 31–38; June 30, 2004. General competency/voidness, not consumer merits. |\n| **S016** | Wisconsin Supreme Court, **J.L. Phillips & Associates v. E & H Plastic**. https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17178 | April 24, 1998; ¶¶9, 18, 23–36, n.5; applies 1993–94 statutes. Fresh official opinion. |\n| **S017** | Wisconsin Supreme Court, **Johnson v. Cintas Corp. No. 2, 2012 WI 31**. https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80134 | March 27, 2012; majority ¶¶22–28, 38–40; dissent separated. Fresh official opinion. |\n| **S018** | Wisconsin Court of Appeals, **Miro Tool & Manufacturing v. Midland Machinery**. https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9790 | October 23, 1996; published majority, DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION. Unnumbered; concurrence not adopted. |\n| **S019** | Wisconsin Court of Appeals, **Bank One Wisconsin v. Kahl, 2002 WI App 312**. https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5090 | November 12, 2002; ¶¶10–18; ¶13 full historical statutory quotation; 1999–2000 edition. |\n| **S020** | Wisconsin Court of Appeals, **Walker v. Tobin**. https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10579 | February 19, 1997; published, unnumbered independent-action discussion, five elements, concluding remand/laches discussion. |\n| **S021** | Wisconsin Court of Appeals, **Dekker v. Wergin**. https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11692 | September 17, 1997; published; unnumbered elements, clean-hands, diligence, and fraud-on-court passages. |\n| **S022** | Wisconsin Supreme Court opinion reproduced by Justia, **Rhodes v. Terry, 91 Wis. 2d 165**. https://law.justia.com/cases/wisconsin/supreme-court/1979/76-661-7.html | June 29, 1979; reporter pp.170–177. Judicial body read, not AI summary. HTML reporter labels; PDF index N/A. |\n| **S023** | Wisconsin Supreme Court opinion reproduced by Justia, **State ex rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H., 122 Wis. 2d 536**. https://law.justia.com/cases/wisconsin/supreme-court/1985/83-1348-9.html | February 27, 1985; reporter pp.543–555; 1981–82 statute. Judicial body read; PDF index N/A. |\n| **S024** | Wisconsin Court System, **GF-184A—Request to Correct Court Records**. https://www.wicourts.gov/formdisplay/GF-184A.pdf?formNumber=GF-184A&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en | Rev. 11/20; one unnumbered page, zero PDF index **0**. Full text and image inspected. No motion form completed. |\n\n**Source rows: 24.** Repeated uses are not independent authorities.\n\n# 11. Atomic claim register — S_WI-P21-C001 onward\n\nEvery claim remains **A066/A097/A098 open**. “Supported” here means supported within the stated source and application limits—not coordinator acceptance.\n\n| Claim | Actor/predicate and atomic assertion | Act, clock, or consequence | Evidence/limit |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **C001** | Ordinary civil, not small-claims/arbitration, relief is this component | No prior module adopted | Scope; P08 D2 |\n| **C002** | Current integrated statutes not recovered | Read-aid and historical quotation limits retained | S001–S013; S019 ¶13 |\n| **C003** | Party or legal representative may seek relief; not only losing defendant | Prevailing creditor also subject to §806.07 | S002; S019 ¶¶10–18 |\n| **C004** | Default can arise from unanswered claims or trial nonappearance | Identify actual default type | S003(1)–(5) |\n| **C005** | Appeared defendant entitled to default-motion notice; jurisdiction/proof remain | Default not proof-free | S003(1)–(3),(5) |\n| **C006** | Clerk liquidated-contract branch requires personal service | Abode service insufficient for that branch | S003(4) |\n| **C007** | Relief is on motion, just terms, established grounds | No automatic merits win | S002(1); S014 |\n| **C008** | Reasonable time is independent of outer anniversary | Delay inside year can defeat motion | S022 pp.170–177 |\n| **C009** | Grounds (a),(c) have reasonable-time plus one-year cap | Entry/order-or-stipulation-made trigger, not discovery | S002(2); S018 |\n| **C010** | Entry means filing with clerk | Signing/oral grant/notice differs | S004(1) |\n| **C011** | Paragraph (a) neglect uses prudent-person standard | Carelessness not automatically excusable | S016 n.5 |\n| **C012** | Paragraph (a) default relief requires defense good at law | No probable-victory requirement | S016 ¶¶18,23–31 |\n| **C013** | Newly discovered evidence requires four statutory elements | Diligence/materiality/noncumulation/probable change | S005(3) |\n| **C014** | Paragraph (b) links to §805.16 | Verdict-year/90-day text; pure-default translation held | S002(2); S006(4) |\n| **C015** | Paragraph (c) concerns adverse-party misconduct | Evidence and judgment connection required | S002(1)(c) |\n| **C016** | Genuine void judgment not governed by reasonable-time restriction | Voidness must first be established | S015 ¶34 |\n| **C017** | Fundamental and technical service defects differ | Actual notice alone not cure; complainant’s stated burden | S017 ¶¶23–28,39–40 |\n| **C018** | Competency loss is not necessarily voidness | Can be waived; (h) not automatic | S015 ¶¶31–38 |\n| **C019** | Process/jurisdiction defenses can be waived by omission | Examine first motions/pleadings, not “appearance” alone | S011(7)–(8) |\n| **C020** | Payment/release/discharge can support (e) | Scope and proof required; no express one-year cap | S002(1)(e),(2) |\n| **C021** | Prior foundational judgment reversal can support (f) | Actual dependency required | S002(1)(f),(2) |\n| **C022** | Prospective equitable change can support (g) | Fixed-debt hardship alone insufficiently established | S019 ¶¶17–18; S023 pp.543–544 |\n| **C023** | Paragraph (h) requires extraordinary circumstances | Reasonable time; sparing equitable relief | S014 ¶¶34–44 |\n| **C024** | Facts can overlap (a)–(c) and (h) | Extraordinary facts—not relabeling—needed | S023 pp.549–555 |\n| **C025** | No excusable-neglect prerequisite for (h) | Nonexclusive finality/fairness factors | S014 ¶¶36–44 |\n| **C026** | Sufficient extraordinary allegations trigger factual hearing | Threshold assumption is not final proof | S014 ¶34 |\n| **C027** | §806.07 time cannot be discretionarily enlarged | Ordinary (a) estoppel extension rejected | S009(2)(c); S018 |\n| **C028** | Independent action and fraud-on-court powers separately preserved | Not identical routes | S002(2); S020 |\n| **C029** | Independent equity requires five prerequisites | Clean hands, diligence, no adequate legal remedy | S020–S021 |\n| **C030** | Contradictory evidence alone not automatic fraud on court | Actual fraud and equitable predicates remain | S021 concluding discussion |\n| **C031** | Motion must identify grounds/relief and supporting papers | Written unless hearing/trial exception | S007(2)(a)–(d) |\n| **C032** | Noticed motion deemed made on service with notice | Filing alone not defined event | S007(2)(e) |\n| **C033** | Required parties/counsel must receive permitted service | Default-party and limited-appearance exceptions retained | S008(1),(2),(2m) |\n| **C034** | Served papers filed within reasonable time | Filing and service are distinct | S008(4) |\n| **C035** | Hearing notice generally five days; affidavits have linked timing | Court/statute may alter | S009(4) |\n| **C036** | Exclude day zero; short-period weekends/holidays excluded | Closed-clerk last day adjusts | S009(1) |\n| **C037** | Mail addition concerns response-after-service | No automatic addition to entry-based cap | S009(5) |\n| **C038** | E-filing needs accepted submission and proper recipient service | 11:59 p.m. Central rule; paper parties differ | S010(4),(6) |\n| **C039** | Filing relief motion does not suspend judgment | Enforcement not automatically stayed | S002(2) |\n| **C040** | Court may separately stay enforcement | Security conditions discretionary | S012(2) |\n| **C041** | Relief/order scope governs next stage | No automatic reinstatement, dismissal, lien release, or refund | S002; S014 ¶60 |\n| **C042** | Collection followed by set-aside can trigger restoration | Notice, motion, proof, interest; bond/purchaser exceptions | S013(1) |\n| **C043** | Appeal/new trial/satisfaction are distinct routes | No automatic appeal reset asserted | S002(2); S005–S006 |\n| **C044** | Clerical correction is not merits review | GF-184A cannot substitute for substantive relief | S024 p.1/zero 0 |\n| **C045** | Motion package needs facts, proposed defense, dates, and service proof | Hypothetical checklist only | S007–S010; S014–S016 |\n| **C046** | All relied-on cases are published; posture/version matters | No unpublished authority or full citator claim | S014–S023 |\n| **C047** | Adoption exception and special regimes remain outside scope | No universal application of §806.07 | S002(3) |\n| **C048** | Only ordinary-civil P08 D2 component is augmented | No state/parent/publication acceptance | Crosswalk below |\n\n**Atomic claims: 48.**\n\n# 12. Granular core coverage\n\n| # | Subissue | Status and claim references | Exact remaining fact/source or next action |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| 1 | Current §806.07 integrated body | Partial, C002 | Obtain current official body; no repeated failed loop |\n| 2 | Amendment/version chain | Partial, C002 | Reproduction/history and index do not complete 2026 certification |\n| 3 | Ordinary civil versus special procedure | Defined, C001/C047 | Classify actual judgment |\n| 4 | Eligible moving party/legal representative | Supported, C003 | Actual capacity/representation |\n| 5 | Creditor seeking its own relief | Supported, C003 | Kahl’s posture limits |\n| 6 | Failure-to-answer default | Supported, C004 | Actual pleading and response period |\n| 7 | Failure-to-attend-trial default | Supported, C004 | Actual notice and court order |\n| 8 | Appeared-party default notice | Supported, C005 | Appearance and service facts |\n| 9 | Nonappearance jurisdiction proof | Supported, C005 | Actual summons/service |\n| 10 | Damages/entitlement proof | Supported gateway, C005 | Full merits/account records deferred |\n| 11 | Liquidated-contract clerk branch | Supported, C006 | Express contract, liquidation, personal service |\n| 12 | Sanction default | Deferred, C004 | Separate governing sanction rule |\n| 13 | Just terms/discretion | Supported, C007 | Actual grounds/order |\n| 14 | Reasonable time | Supported, C008 | Knowledge, diligence, prejudice |\n| 15 | One-year cap for (a) | Supported, C009 | Entry and motion-made dates |\n| 16 | One-year cap for (c) | Supported, C009 | No discovery substitution |\n| 17 | Entry versus rendition | Supported, C010 | Clerk filing stamp |\n| 18 | Order/stipulation “made” date | Text established, C009 | Actual event/order language |\n| 19 | Notice or knowledge trigger | Not general cap trigger, C009 | Can matter to reasonable time |\n| 20 | Excusable neglect | Supported, C011 | Concrete explanation |\n| 21 | Mistake/inadvertence/surprise | Supported, C011–C012 | Ground-specific evidence |\n| 22 | Meritorious defense | Supported, C012 | Proposed legally sufficient defense |\n| 23 | Probable victory requirement | Rejected, C012 | Pleadings standard, not trial by affidavit |\n| 24 | New evidence—diligence | Supported, C013 | Search/discovery chronology |\n| 25 | New evidence—material/noncumulative | Supported, C013 | Actual evidence |\n| 26 | New evidence—probable result | Supported, C013 | Link to judgment |\n| 27 | §805.16 verdict clock | Text supported, C014 | Actual verdict required |\n| 28 | §805.16 90-day decision | Text supported, C014 | Motion-made and order dates |\n| 29 | New evidence after pure default | **Unresolved**, C014 | Controlling no-verdict application needed |\n| 30 | Adverse-party fraud/misconduct | Supported gateway, C015 | Specific conduct and causation |\n| 31 | Fraud discovered after year | No automatic restart, C009/C015 | Separate extraordinary/equitable predicates |\n| 32 | True voidness time exception | Supported, C016 | Court must establish genuine invalidity |\n| 33 | Fundamental personal-jurisdiction defect | Supported, C017 | Actual pleadings/service |\n| 34 | Technical service defect | Supported distinction, C017 | Prejudice and burden |\n| 35 | Actual notice | Not universal cure, C017 | Statutory service compliance |\n| 36 | Competency versus jurisdiction | Supported, C018 | Particular statutory condition |\n| 37 | Waiver/forfeiture | Partial application, C019 | First motions, pleadings, conduct |\n| 38 | Satisfaction/release/discharge | Supported gateway, C020 | Actual agreement/payment/discharge |\n| 39 | Prior judgment reversed/vacated | Supported gateway, C021 | Foundational relationship |\n| 40 | Prospective inequity | Supported boundary, C022 | Equitable feature/changed conditions |\n| 41 | Catchall extraordinary circumstances | Supported, C023 | Complete facts |\n| 42 | Catchall overlap with other grounds | Supported, C024 | No mere relabeling |\n| 43 | Excusable-neglect prerequisite to (h) | Rejected, C025 | Miller factors still apply |\n| 44 | Threshold hearing under (h) | Supported, C026 | Particularized sufficient allegations |\n| 45 | Statutory enlargement | Prohibited as described, C027 | Built-in counting rule separate |\n| 46 | Independent equitable action | Supported boundary, C028–C029 | Separate action/limitations/laches analysis |\n| 47 | Fraud on court | Narrow boundary, C030 | More than conflicting evidence |\n| 48 | Written motion and particularity | Supported, C031 | Actual grounds/relief |\n| 49 | Supporting papers | Supported, C031 | Serve new materials and identify prior record |\n| 50 | Motion deemed “made” | Supported with currentness hold, C032 | Actual valid service with notice |\n| 51 | Counsel versus party service | Supported, C033 | Representation/limited appearance |\n| 52 | Default-party service exceptions | Text read, C033 | Actual party posture |\n| 53 | Filing after service | Supported, C034 | Reasonable-time filing and proof |\n| 54 | Five-day hearing notice | Supported, C035 | Different statute/order/local schedule |\n| 55 | Supporting/opposing affidavits | Supported, C035 | Service dates and judicial permission |\n| 56 | Day-zero/short-period computation | Supported, C036 | Holiday and closure calendar |\n| 57 | Mail response addition | Supported qualification, C037 | Not entry-based deadline extension |\n| 58 | Electronic submission/acceptance | Supported text, C038 | Actual system notice/rejection |\n| 59 | Electronic versus paper recipients | Supported, C038 | Party registration and required service |\n| 60 | Automatic stay | Rejected, C039 | Actual stay order |\n| 61 | Court stay/security | Supported gateway, C040 | Discretion and order conditions |\n| 62 | Partial/full relief consequences | Supported boundary, C041 | Exact order and further procedures |\n| 63 | Automatic answer reinstatement | Not universal, C041 | Court’s schedule/order |\n| 64 | Restoration | Supported gateway, C042 | Notice, proof, interest, bond, purchaser |\n| 65 | Appeal/new trial distinction | Preserved, C043 | Full appellate/new-trial module |\n| 66 | Clerical record correction | Supported boundary, C044 | Actual record error, not merits disagreement |\n| 67 | Generic evidence package | Supported design, C045 | No documents supplied |\n| 68 | Published-case status/majority | Verified within read sources, C046 | Complete later treatment held |\n| 69 | Adoption and special exclusions | Read boundary, C047 | Separate statutory route |\n| 70 | P08 D2 addition | Completed as research scope, C048 | No acceptance or prior-report revision |\n\n**Core coverage rows: 70.**\n\n# 13. Local and territorial gap inventory\n\n## Local implementation—all 72 counties unexamined individually\n\n| # | Local issue | Status/next check |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| L1 | Case type, branch, and assigned judge | Actual court record required; none accessed |\n| L2 | Motion scheduling and reserved hearing date | County/judge procedure not certified |\n| L3 | Brief, affidavit, proposed-order requirements | Statutory minimums do not clear local practice |\n| L4 | Electronic-user and paper-party status | Actual case notices required |\n| L5 | Filing acceptance, rejection, outage, cutoff application | No runtime or account accessed |\n| L6 | Clerk holidays and office closures | Actual calendar must be verified |\n| L7 | Service proof and limited-scope counsel | Actual representation/service record required |\n| L8 | Motion fees, waiver, remote hearing, interpreters | Current county/order-specific requirements held |\n\n**Local rows: 8.**\n\n## Territorial/special categories\n\n| # | Category | Boundary |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| T1 | Wisconsin ordinary civil money default | Principal component |\n| T2 | Wisconsin small claims | Separate; no chapter 799 clocks imported |\n| T3 | Arbitration-award judgment | Separate; no chapter 788 route imported |\n| T4 | Federal judgment | Federal Rule 60 and federal procedure not supplied |\n| T5 | Tribal judgment | Tribal law/recognition unexamined |\n| T6 | Other-state or foreign-country judgment | Recognition, original-forum validity, and local relief unexamined |\n| T7 | Bankruptcy discharge or stay | Actual federal effect requires separate work |\n| T8 | Family/adoption, support, tax, administrative, criminal/municipal judgments | Special statutes and exceptions not generalized |\n\n**Territorial rows: 8.**\n\n## Deferred families\n\n| # | Deferred subject | Reason |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| D1 | Full commencement and merits proof | Only necessary default gateway addressed |\n| D2 | Current full official statutory consolidation | Access hold |\n| D3 | Pure-default application of paragraph (b)’s verdict-linked period | Exact controlling authority not established |\n| D4 | Full appeal/reconsideration/new-trial procedure | Distinct route |\n| D5 | Complete independent-action pleading, limitation, and fraud-on-court law | Exceptional gateway only |\n| D6 | Actual service, waiver, jurisdiction, military status | No private facts |\n| D7 | Full WCA/contract/licensing/assignment/limitations defenses | Unreviewed modules not adopted |\n| D8 | Satisfaction, liens, garnishment, execution, exemptions | No enforcement rerun |\n| D9 | Bankruptcy and other sovereign/special procedures | Separate |\n| D10 | Actual fees, damages, sanctions, bond amount, restoration rate | Not established |\n| D11 | Complete citator and unpublished-decision inventory | Not performed; none relied upon |\n| D12 | Publication, operation, state/component/parent acceptance | Expressly withheld |\n\n**Deferred rows: 12.**\n\n# 14. P08 D2 crosswalk and opportunities\n\n| Original boundary | PASS-21 addition | What remains separate |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **“D2 Motion to vacate or reopen judgment — Separate validity/remedy component”** | Ordinary-civil §806.07 grounds, timing, service, discretion, and stay/restoration gateway | No retroactive P08 acceptance |\n| Small-claims portion | Not rerun or adopted | P17/P19 retain their own scope |\n| Arbitration portion | Not rerun or adopted | P18/P20 retain their own scope |\n| General civil procedural linkages | §§802.01, 801.14–.15/.18, 806.02/.06/.08/.09 researched | Current integrated bodies/local implementation held |\n| Actual merits and enforcement consequences | Boundary identified only | Contract, payment, liens, refund, and collection facts absent |\n| Appellate and independent-action modules | Necessary distinctions supplied | Full procedure and deadlines remain future work |\n\n**Crosswalk rows: 6.**\n\nThree evidence-backed opportunities follow from this research: an ordinary-civil **ground classifier** that distinguishes (a)–(h); a **service-and-deadline worksheet** that separates entry, service, filing, hearing, and reasonable time; and a **relief-versus-enforcement checklist** that distinguishes filing, stay, vacatur, merits litigation, and restoration. None was built or approved for publication.\n\n# Final researcher self-check\n\n**Freshness:** No legal conclusion was adopted from an unreviewed earlier pass. The statutory reproductions, official published opinions, and GF-184A were freshly accessed. Kahl’s official statutory quotation is labeled historical; Justia reproductions are not called current official bodies.\n\n**Opinion status:** Ten published decisions are used. No unpublished discovery result is cited as authority. Majority holdings, case facts, historical versions, concurrences, and dissents remain distinct.\n\n**Specific unresolved points:** Current integrated Wisconsin bodies; the precise paragraph (b) clock for a no-verdict default; complete later case treatment; actual service/filing acceptance; and every county-specific implementation question.\n\n**Calculations:** The three date models and restoration sum are conditional. They establish no actual deadline, timely motion, void judgment, stay, award, or refund.\n\n| Count unit | Visible count |\n| --- | --- |\n| Source register | **24** |\n| Atomic claims | **48** |\n| Core coverage | **70** |\n| Local gap inventory | **8** |\n| Territorial/special categories | **8** |\n| Deferred families | **12** |\n| Fictional workflows | **16** |\n| Separate conditional models | **4** |\n| Published-case comparison rows | **10** |\n| P08 D2 crosswalk | **6** |\n| Content/tool opportunities | **3** |\n\nComparisons, models, opportunities, and audits are not counted again as new core coverage.\n\nNo actual party, docket, judgment, service return, account, creditor, borrower, provider, property, or private record was queried. No filing, contact, complaint, account action, local coordinator-file write, or publication occurred.\n\nThis is a scoped research report—not independent review, complete current-law certification, an individualized relief opinion, or acceptance of Wisconsin PASS-21, any component, A066/A097/A098, or the parent dossier.\n\nEND S_WI PASS-21 \n\n","tables":[{"headers":["Default situation","Necessary predicate","Important qualification"],"index":0,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Default situation","Necessary predicate","Important qualification"],["Failure to join issue","Time to answer the complaint, counterclaim, or cross-claim expired without an issue of law or fact being joined","A party who appeared is entitled to notice of the default motion"],["No appearance and personal judgment sought","Proof of summons service and facts needed for personal jurisdiction","Actual awareness of the lawsuit is not necessarily lawful service"],["Express-contract, liquidated-money clerk judgment","Proof of personal service and affidavit of failure to join issue","Abode service is expressly not “personal service” for this clerk-entry branch"],["Party appeared but failed to attend trial","§806.02(5) permits default","Court must receive necessary factual proof"],["Discovery or other sanction default","May arise under different rules","Not fully analyzed here"]]},{"headers":["Ground","What must be established","Governing time structure","Important limit"],"index":1,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Ground","What must be established","Governing time structure","Important limit"],["(a) Mistake, inadvertence, surprise, excusable neglect","A qualifying explanation for the default; for default relief, a meritorious defense","Reasonable time and no more than one year after judgment entry or the order/stipulation was made","Forgetfulness or ordinary carelessness is not automatically excusable"],["(b) Newly discovered evidence","Evidence satisfying §805.15(3)’s diligence, materiality, noncumulative, and probable-result requirements","Within the time supplied by §805.16","The linked text uses a verdict trigger; exact application to a pure no-trial default remains held"],["(c) Fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party","Actual adverse-party misconduct and a basis for relief","Reasonable time and no more than one year after the specified event","Discovery does not replace the statutory entry/made trigger"],["(d) Judgment void","Genuine jurisdictional invalidity, not merely error or lost competency","Published authority says the reasonable-time restriction does not apply to a truly void judgment","Voidness must be proved; the label does not decide it"],["(e) Satisfied, released, or discharged","Payment, release, or discharge applicable to the judgment","Reasonable time; no express one-year cap in (2)","Scope, performance, partial satisfaction, and actual discharge matter"],["(f) Supporting prior judgment reversed or vacated","This judgment was based on a prior judgment subsequently reversed/vacated","Reasonable time; no express one-year cap","Not automatically a later unfavorable precedent or changed interpretation"],["(g) Prospective application no longer equitable","A genuine prospective/equitable feature and changed circumstances making future operation inequitable","Reasonable time; no express one-year cap","Present difficulty paying a fixed debt is not automatically prospective inequity"],["(h) Other reasons justifying relief","Extraordinary circumstances, considering finality and justice","Reasonable time; no express one-year cap","Cannot merely relabel an expired neglect or fraud motion"]]},{"headers":["Route","Function","Boundary"],"index":2,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Route","Function","Boundary"],["§806.07 motion","Relief on an enumerated or extraordinary ground","Not an ordinary appeal of every legal error"],["Appeal","Review under appellate rules","No appeal deadline recalculated here"],["New-trial motion","Trial/verdict-specific relief","§§805.15–.16 conditions differ"],["Satisfaction/release procedure","Records payment or discharge","Does not necessarily reopen liability"],["Clerical-record correction","Corrects factual record/data error","Not a substitute for changing the judgment’s merits"],["Independent equitable action","Exceptional separate equitable relief","Not a routine revival of a missed motion"]]},{"headers":["Authority","Freshly read pinpoint and posture","Holding used and limitation"],"index":3,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Authority","Freshly read pinpoint and posture","Holding used and limitation"],["Miller, 2010 WI 75, July 13, 2010","Majority ¶¶29–44, 48–61; insurer default after procedural confusion","Paragraph (h), factors, threshold hearing, no excusable-neglect prerequisite. Relief was fact-specific. Bradley concurrence not treated as majority."],["Mikrut, 2004 WI 79, June 30, 2004","Majority ¶¶8–10, 31–38; ordinance case","Competency versus true voidness; waiver; no reasonable-time bar for a truly void judgment. Not a consumer-debt outcome."],["J.L. Phillips, April 24, 1998","¶¶9, 18, 23–36 and n.5; contract default","Meritorious defense means good at law, not probable trial success. Excusable-neglect finding was not reviewed."],["Cintas, 2012 WI 31, March 27, 2012","Majority ¶¶22–28, 38–40; wrong separate corporate defendant","Fundamental personal-jurisdiction defect made default void. Mere misnomer and technical defects distinguished. Dissent not adopted."],["Miro Tool, October 23, 1996","Published majority, unnumbered DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION","Estoppel could not enlarge paragraph (a)’s one-year period; extraordinary relief had separately been rejected."],["Kahl, 2002 WI App 312, November 12, 2002","¶¶10–18; creditor sought to undo foreclosure judgment","Prevailing party can invoke §806.07; unilateral dismissal not substitute; delay defeated relief. Paragraph 13 quotes historical statute."],["Walker, February 19, 1997","Published unnumbered equitable-action discussion and enumerated elements","Independent action distinct from fraud-on-court power; remand to assess merits, not automatic relief."],["Dekker, September 17, 1997","Published unnumbered elements, clean-hands and diligence discussion","Contradictory evidence and neglect of original litigation did not establish equitable or fraud-on-court relief."],["Rhodes, June 29, 1979","Reporter pp.170–177; malpractice default; reproduced opinion","A motion within one year may still be unreasonably delayed. Historical commencement rules not adopted."],["M.L.B., February 27, 1985","Reporter pp.543–555; paternity/support stipulation; reproduced opinion","No rigid factual exclusivity; extraordinary circumstances can justify (h), but mere relabeling cannot. Remand required."]]},{"headers":["#","Fictional facts and route","Required proof/conditional consequence","Adverse branch and unknowns"],"index":4,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["#","Fictional facts and route","Required proof/conditional consequence","Adverse branch and unknowns"],["W1 — Mistaken missed answer","Defendant believed an insurer would answer; ordinary default followed. Potential (a). C011–C012","Show communications, reasonable precautions, promptness, and proposed defense good at law","Delegating and doing nothing may be careless. Actual service, policy, and communications absent."],["W2 — Forgetfulness","Defendant received proper papers but forgot. Potential (a). C011–C012","Forgetfulness alone does not establish a reasonably prudent-person explanation","A strong payment defense does not itself excuse default. No actual circumstances supplied."],["W3 — Medical emergency","Sudden hospitalization overlaps the answer period; defendant acts promptly afterward. C008, C011–C012","Records must connect incapacity to default and explain later delay; proposed defense required","An unrelated illness or long unexplained delay may not qualify."],["W4 — Newly discovered document","After a no-trial default, defendant finds a payment record despite a documented search. C013–C014","Diligence, materiality, and likely effect matter; exact (b) timing for no verdict remains held","Do not assume a new year from discovery or call it automatically unavailable."],["W5 — Adverse-party fraud","Creditor allegedly concealed a release; discovery occurs late. C009, C015","Identify misconduct, evidence, causal connection, and dates","Discovery does not automatically reset (c)’s one-year cap; (h)/equity require independent predicates."],["W6 — Paid/released balance","Judgment later paid partly and remaining amount allegedly released. C020, C041","Payment ledger and release terms establish what, if anything, remains","Partial payment is not complete satisfaction; disputed conditions cannot be assumed performed."],["W7 — Personal jurisdiction","Person never named as defendant is nevertheless subjected to judgment; actual notice alleged. C016–C017","Court must classify fundamental defect, technical defect, and jurisdiction using actual papers","Actual notice alone cannot cure every fundamental defect; no judgment declared void here."],["W8 — Competency and waiver","Litigant calls a missed statutory step “subject-matter jurisdiction” after litigating merits. C018–C019","Determine whether it is competency, jurisdiction, technical error, and whether properly preserved","Mikrut rejects automatic voidness; a preserved fundamental jurisdiction defect differs."],["W9 — Delay inside one year","Judgment known within days; motion made ten months later without explanation. C008","Timeliness includes reasonableness, not just an anniversary check","Rhodes supports denial on particular delay facts; no fixed ten-month rule created."],["W10 — Neglect after one year","Valid service; ordinary neglect motion first made fourteen months after entry. C009, C027","Paragraph (a)’s outer bar cannot be enlarged merely through sympathy or negotiations","Extraordinary (h) is separately tested, not presumed."],["W11 — Extraordinary circumstances","Court/attorney communications allegedly caused serious procedural irregularity; no merits heard. C023–C026","Particularized facts may require a hearing if, taken as true, they would be extraordinary","No automatic hearing on labels; truth, defense, intervening equities, and reasonable time remain."],["W12 — Independent fraud claim","Person ignored the original action and later alleges the winner lied. C028–C030","Independent equity requires clean hands, diligence, good defense, prevention, and no adequate legal remedy","Dekker shows why late contradictory evidence is not enough."],["W13 — Enforcement continues","Ordinary motion filed; no stay order issued. C039–C040","Judgment remains operative; stay is a separate judicial decision","No automatic freeze, cancellation, or release follows filing."],["W14 — Restoration","Court sets aside collected portion; movant seeks money back. C042","Notice, motion, collection proof, order scope, interest, and any bond/purchaser issue","Filing a relief motion alone creates no refund. Numerical model below is conditional."],["W15 — Clerical versus merits","Court record misspells a name; alternative fact is disagreement with the debt amount. C044","GF-184A may address the record error; substantive amount challenge needs proper judicial route","A useful form does not create substantive grounds or a deadline extension."],["W16 — One-year, hearing, and electronic submission models","Dates below illustrate ordinary timing only. C009–C010, C032–C038","Correct trigger, completed service, filed papers, and court calendar must be established","No actual deadline, acceptance, or proof of service is supplied."]]},{"headers":["Counted day","Date"],"index":5,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Counted day","Date"],["1","Thursday, December 10"],["2","Friday, December 11"],["3","Monday, December 14"],["4","Tuesday, December 15"],["5","Wednesday, December 16"]]},{"headers":["Source","Issuer/title and complete literal URL","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit"],"index":6,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Source","Issuer/title and complete literal URL","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit"],["S001","Wisconsin Legislature, §806.07/current chapter index. https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/806/07 and https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/806/_31?up=1","Section fetch failed once; official index reported updates through Act 247. No current integrated body read."],["S002","Justia reproduction, 2025 §806.07. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-07/","Full (1)(a)–(h), (2), (3), history read. Nonofficial read-aid; no full 2026 amendment certification."],["S003","Justia reproduction, 2025 §806.02. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-02/","Full (1)–(5); notice, proof, personal-service/liquidated branch. History includes 2018 WI 102."],["S004","Justia reproduction, 2025 §806.06. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-06/","(1)(a)–(d), necessary entry/notice distinctions. Other costs/enforcement content not adopted."],["S005","Justia reproduction, 2025 §805.15. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-805/section-805-15/","(3)(a)–(d) and linked exceptions. Four newly discovered-evidence elements read."],["S006","Justia reproduction, 2025 §805.16. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-805/section-805-16/","Full relevant (1)–(5), especially (4): verdict-based year and 90-day decision. No default-trigger translation invented."],["S007","Justia reproduction and official indexed fragment, §802.01. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-802/section-802-01/ and https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/802.01%282%29%28b%29","Full reproduced (2)(a)–(e) read; official indexed fragment only. Motion deemed made upon service with notice."],["S008","Justia reproduction, 2025 §801.14. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-801/section-801-14/","(1), (2), (2m), (4); recipient, method, default-party exceptions, and filing-after-service duties."],["S009","Justia reproduction, 2025 §801.15. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-801/section-801-15/","(1), (2)(a),(c), (4),(5); counting, nonenlargement, hearing notice, response additions."],["S010","Justia reproduction, 2025 §801.18. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-801/section-801-18/","(4), (6), necessary definitions; accepted filing time, notices, paper parties. No runtime accessed."],["S011","Justia reproduction, 2025 §802.06. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-802/section-802-06/","(7)–(8), jurisdiction/process/service defense preservation. Full merits-motion regime not analyzed."],["S012","Justia reproduction, 2025 §806.08. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-08/","(2) and adjoining stay branches; discretionary security conditions."],["S013","Justia reproduction, 2025 §806.09. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-09/","(1)–(2); restoration, notice/proof, bond, purchaser protection."],["S014","Wisconsin Supreme Court, Miller, 2010 WI 75. https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52041","Majority ¶¶29–44, 48–61; July 13, 2010. Fresh official opinion; concurrence separated."],["S015","Wisconsin Supreme Court, Mikrut, 2004 WI 79. https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16730","Majority ¶¶8–10, 31–38; June 30, 2004. General competency/voidness, not consumer merits."],["S016","Wisconsin Supreme Court, J.L. Phillips & Associates v. E & H Plastic. https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17178","April 24, 1998; ¶¶9, 18, 23–36, n.5; applies 1993–94 statutes. Fresh official opinion."],["S017","Wisconsin Supreme Court, Johnson v. Cintas Corp. No. 2, 2012 WI 31. https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80134","March 27, 2012; majority ¶¶22–28, 38–40; dissent separated. Fresh official opinion."],["S018","Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Miro Tool & Manufacturing v. Midland Machinery. https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9790","October 23, 1996; published majority, DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION. Unnumbered; concurrence not adopted."],["S019","Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Bank One Wisconsin v. Kahl, 2002 WI App 312. https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5090","November 12, 2002; ¶¶10–18; ¶13 full historical statutory quotation; 1999–2000 edition."],["S020","Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Walker v. Tobin. https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10579","February 19, 1997; published, unnumbered independent-action discussion, five elements, concluding remand/laches discussion."],["S021","Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Dekker v. Wergin. https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11692","September 17, 1997; published; unnumbered elements, clean-hands, diligence, and fraud-on-court passages."],["S022","Wisconsin Supreme Court opinion reproduced by Justia, Rhodes v. Terry, 91 Wis. 2d 165. https://law.justia.com/cases/wisconsin/supreme-court/1979/76-661-7.html","June 29, 1979; reporter pp.170–177. Judicial body read, not AI summary. HTML reporter labels; PDF index N/A."],["S023","Wisconsin Supreme Court opinion reproduced by Justia, State ex rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H., 122 Wis. 2d 536. https://law.justia.com/cases/wisconsin/supreme-court/1985/83-1348-9.html","February 27, 1985; reporter pp.543–555; 1981–82 statute. Judicial body read; PDF index N/A."],["S024","Wisconsin Court System, GF-184A—Request to Correct Court Records. https://www.wicourts.gov/formdisplay/GF-184A.pdf?formNumber=GF-184A&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en","Rev. 11/20; one unnumbered page, zero PDF index 0. Full text and image inspected. No motion form completed."]]},{"headers":["Claim","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion","Act, clock, or consequence","Evidence/limit"],"index":7,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claim","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion","Act, clock, or consequence","Evidence/limit"],["C001","Ordinary civil, not small-claims/arbitration, relief is this component","No prior module adopted","Scope; P08 D2"],["C002","Current integrated statutes not recovered","Read-aid and historical quotation limits retained","S001–S013; S019 ¶13"],["C003","Party or legal representative may seek relief; not only losing defendant","Prevailing creditor also subject to §806.07","S002; S019 ¶¶10–18"],["C004","Default can arise from unanswered claims or trial nonappearance","Identify actual default type","S003(1)–(5)"],["C005","Appeared defendant entitled to default-motion notice; jurisdiction/proof remain","Default not proof-free","S003(1)–(3),(5)"],["C006","Clerk liquidated-contract branch requires personal service","Abode service insufficient for that branch","S003(4)"],["C007","Relief is on motion, just terms, established grounds","No automatic merits win","S002(1); S014"],["C008","Reasonable time is independent of outer anniversary","Delay inside year can defeat motion","S022 pp.170–177"],["C009","Grounds (a),(c) have reasonable-time plus one-year cap","Entry/order-or-stipulation-made trigger, not discovery","S002(2); S018"],["C010","Entry means filing with clerk","Signing/oral grant/notice differs","S004(1)"],["C011","Paragraph (a) neglect uses prudent-person standard","Carelessness not automatically excusable","S016 n.5"],["C012","Paragraph (a) default relief requires defense good at law","No probable-victory requirement","S016 ¶¶18,23–31"],["C013","Newly discovered evidence requires four statutory elements","Diligence/materiality/noncumulation/probable change","S005(3)"],["C014","Paragraph (b) links to §805.16","Verdict-year/90-day text; pure-default translation held","S002(2); S006(4)"],["C015","Paragraph (c) concerns adverse-party misconduct","Evidence and judgment connection required","S002(1)(c)"],["C016","Genuine void judgment not governed by reasonable-time restriction","Voidness must first be established","S015 ¶34"],["C017","Fundamental and technical service defects differ","Actual notice alone not cure; complainant’s stated burden","S017 ¶¶23–28,39–40"],["C018","Competency loss is not necessarily voidness","Can be waived; (h) not automatic","S015 ¶¶31–38"],["C019","Process/jurisdiction defenses can be waived by omission","Examine first motions/pleadings, not “appearance” alone","S011(7)–(8)"],["C020","Payment/release/discharge can support (e)","Scope and proof required; no express one-year cap","S002(1)(e),(2)"],["C021","Prior foundational judgment reversal can support (f)","Actual dependency required","S002(1)(f),(2)"],["C022","Prospective equitable change can support (g)","Fixed-debt hardship alone insufficiently established","S019 ¶¶17–18; S023 pp.543–544"],["C023","Paragraph (h) requires extraordinary circumstances","Reasonable time; sparing equitable relief","S014 ¶¶34–44"],["C024","Facts can overlap (a)–(c) and (h)","Extraordinary facts—not relabeling—needed","S023 pp.549–555"],["C025","No excusable-neglect prerequisite for (h)","Nonexclusive finality/fairness factors","S014 ¶¶36–44"],["C026","Sufficient extraordinary allegations trigger factual hearing","Threshold assumption is not final proof","S014 ¶34"],["C027","§806.07 time cannot be discretionarily enlarged","Ordinary (a) estoppel extension rejected","S009(2)(c); S018"],["C028","Independent action and fraud-on-court powers separately preserved","Not identical routes","S002(2); S020"],["C029","Independent equity requires five prerequisites","Clean hands, diligence, no adequate legal remedy","S020–S021"],["C030","Contradictory evidence alone not automatic fraud on court","Actual fraud and equitable predicates remain","S021 concluding discussion"],["C031","Motion must identify grounds/relief and supporting papers","Written unless hearing/trial exception","S007(2)(a)–(d)"],["C032","Noticed motion deemed made on service with notice","Filing alone not defined event","S007(2)(e)"],["C033","Required parties/counsel must receive permitted service","Default-party and limited-appearance exceptions retained","S008(1),(2),(2m)"],["C034","Served papers filed within reasonable time","Filing and service are distinct","S008(4)"],["C035","Hearing notice generally five days; affidavits have linked timing","Court/statute may alter","S009(4)"],["C036","Exclude day zero; short-period weekends/holidays excluded","Closed-clerk last day adjusts","S009(1)"],["C037","Mail addition concerns response-after-service","No automatic addition to entry-based cap","S009(5)"],["C038","E-filing needs accepted submission and proper recipient service","11:59 p.m. Central rule; paper parties differ","S010(4),(6)"],["C039","Filing relief motion does not suspend judgment","Enforcement not automatically stayed","S002(2)"],["C040","Court may separately stay enforcement","Security conditions discretionary","S012(2)"],["C041","Relief/order scope governs next stage","No automatic reinstatement, dismissal, lien release, or refund","S002; S014 ¶60"],["C042","Collection followed by set-aside can trigger restoration","Notice, motion, proof, interest; bond/purchaser exceptions","S013(1)"],["C043","Appeal/new trial/satisfaction are distinct routes","No automatic appeal reset asserted","S002(2); S005–S006"],["C044","Clerical correction is not merits review","GF-184A cannot substitute for substantive relief","S024 p.1/zero 0"],["C045","Motion package needs facts, proposed defense, dates, and service proof","Hypothetical checklist only","S007–S010; S014–S016"],["C046","All relied-on cases are published; posture/version matters","No unpublished authority or full citator claim","S014–S023"],["C047","Adoption exception and special regimes remain outside scope","No universal application of §806.07","S002(3)"],["C048","Only ordinary-civil P08 D2 component is augmented","No state/parent/publication acceptance","Crosswalk below"]]},{"headers":["#","Subissue","Status and claim references","Exact remaining fact/source or next action"],"index":8,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["#","Subissue","Status and claim references","Exact remaining fact/source or next action"],["1","Current §806.07 integrated body","Partial, C002","Obtain current official body; no repeated failed loop"],["2","Amendment/version chain","Partial, C002","Reproduction/history and index do not complete 2026 certification"],["3","Ordinary civil versus special procedure","Defined, C001/C047","Classify actual judgment"],["4","Eligible moving party/legal representative","Supported, C003","Actual capacity/representation"],["5","Creditor seeking its own relief","Supported, C003","Kahl’s posture limits"],["6","Failure-to-answer default","Supported, C004","Actual pleading and response period"],["7","Failure-to-attend-trial default","Supported, C004","Actual notice and court order"],["8","Appeared-party default notice","Supported, C005","Appearance and service facts"],["9","Nonappearance jurisdiction proof","Supported, C005","Actual summons/service"],["10","Damages/entitlement proof","Supported gateway, C005","Full merits/account records deferred"],["11","Liquidated-contract clerk branch","Supported, C006","Express contract, liquidation, personal service"],["12","Sanction default","Deferred, C004","Separate governing sanction rule"],["13","Just terms/discretion","Supported, C007","Actual grounds/order"],["14","Reasonable time","Supported, C008","Knowledge, diligence, prejudice"],["15","One-year cap for (a)","Supported, C009","Entry and motion-made dates"],["16","One-year cap for (c)","Supported, C009","No discovery substitution"],["17","Entry versus rendition","Supported, C010","Clerk filing stamp"],["18","Order/stipulation “made” date","Text established, C009","Actual event/order language"],["19","Notice or knowledge trigger","Not general cap trigger, C009","Can matter to reasonable time"],["20","Excusable neglect","Supported, C011","Concrete explanation"],["21","Mistake/inadvertence/surprise","Supported, C011–C012","Ground-specific evidence"],["22","Meritorious defense","Supported, C012","Proposed legally sufficient defense"],["23","Probable victory requirement","Rejected, C012","Pleadings standard, not trial by affidavit"],["24","New evidence—diligence","Supported, C013","Search/discovery chronology"],["25","New evidence—material/noncumulative","Supported, C013","Actual evidence"],["26","New evidence—probable result","Supported, C013","Link to judgment"],["27","§805.16 verdict clock","Text supported, C014","Actual verdict required"],["28","§805.16 90-day decision","Text supported, C014","Motion-made and order dates"],["29","New evidence after pure default","Unresolved, C014","Controlling no-verdict application needed"],["30","Adverse-party fraud/misconduct","Supported gateway, C015","Specific conduct and causation"],["31","Fraud discovered after year","No automatic restart, C009/C015","Separate extraordinary/equitable predicates"],["32","True voidness time exception","Supported, C016","Court must establish genuine invalidity"],["33","Fundamental personal-jurisdiction defect","Supported, C017","Actual pleadings/service"],["34","Technical service defect","Supported distinction, C017","Prejudice and burden"],["35","Actual notice","Not universal cure, C017","Statutory service compliance"],["36","Competency versus jurisdiction","Supported, C018","Particular statutory condition"],["37","Waiver/forfeiture","Partial application, C019","First motions, pleadings, conduct"],["38","Satisfaction/release/discharge","Supported gateway, C020","Actual agreement/payment/discharge"],["39","Prior judgment reversed/vacated","Supported gateway, C021","Foundational relationship"],["40","Prospective inequity","Supported boundary, C022","Equitable feature/changed conditions"],["41","Catchall extraordinary circumstances","Supported, C023","Complete facts"],["42","Catchall overlap with other grounds","Supported, C024","No mere relabeling"],["43","Excusable-neglect prerequisite to (h)","Rejected, C025","Miller factors still apply"],["44","Threshold hearing under (h)","Supported, C026","Particularized sufficient allegations"],["45","Statutory enlargement","Prohibited as described, C027","Built-in counting rule separate"],["46","Independent equitable action","Supported boundary, C028–C029","Separate action/limitations/laches analysis"],["47","Fraud on court","Narrow boundary, C030","More than conflicting evidence"],["48","Written motion and particularity","Supported, C031","Actual grounds/relief"],["49","Supporting papers","Supported, C031","Serve new materials and identify prior record"],["50","Motion deemed “made”","Supported with currentness hold, C032","Actual valid service with notice"],["51","Counsel versus party service","Supported, C033","Representation/limited appearance"],["52","Default-party service exceptions","Text read, C033","Actual party posture"],["53","Filing after service","Supported, C034","Reasonable-time filing and proof"],["54","Five-day hearing notice","Supported, C035","Different statute/order/local schedule"],["55","Supporting/opposing affidavits","Supported, C035","Service dates and judicial permission"],["56","Day-zero/short-period computation","Supported, C036","Holiday and closure calendar"],["57","Mail response addition","Supported qualification, C037","Not entry-based deadline extension"],["58","Electronic submission/acceptance","Supported text, C038","Actual system notice/rejection"],["59","Electronic versus paper recipients","Supported, C038","Party registration and required service"],["60","Automatic stay","Rejected, C039","Actual stay order"],["61","Court stay/security","Supported gateway, C040","Discretion and order conditions"],["62","Partial/full relief consequences","Supported boundary, C041","Exact order and further procedures"],["63","Automatic answer reinstatement","Not universal, C041","Court’s schedule/order"],["64","Restoration","Supported gateway, C042","Notice, proof, interest, bond, purchaser"],["65","Appeal/new trial distinction","Preserved, C043","Full appellate/new-trial module"],["66","Clerical record correction","Supported boundary, C044","Actual record error, not merits disagreement"],["67","Generic evidence package","Supported design, C045","No documents supplied"],["68","Published-case status/majority","Verified within read sources, C046","Complete later treatment held"],["69","Adoption and special exclusions","Read boundary, C047","Separate statutory route"],["70","P08 D2 addition","Completed as research scope, C048","No acceptance or prior-report revision"]]},{"headers":["#","Local issue","Status/next check"],"index":9,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["#","Local issue","Status/next check"],["L1","Case type, branch, and assigned judge","Actual court record required; none accessed"],["L2","Motion scheduling and reserved hearing date","County/judge procedure not certified"],["L3","Brief, affidavit, proposed-order requirements","Statutory minimums do not clear local practice"],["L4","Electronic-user and paper-party status","Actual case notices required"],["L5","Filing acceptance, rejection, outage, cutoff application","No runtime or account accessed"],["L6","Clerk holidays and office closures","Actual calendar must be verified"],["L7","Service proof and limited-scope counsel","Actual representation/service record required"],["L8","Motion fees, waiver, remote hearing, interpreters","Current county/order-specific requirements held"]]},{"headers":["#","Category","Boundary"],"index":10,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["#","Category","Boundary"],["T1","Wisconsin ordinary civil money default","Principal component"],["T2","Wisconsin small claims","Separate; no chapter 799 clocks imported"],["T3","Arbitration-award judgment","Separate; no chapter 788 route imported"],["T4","Federal judgment","Federal Rule 60 and federal procedure not supplied"],["T5","Tribal judgment","Tribal law/recognition unexamined"],["T6","Other-state or foreign-country judgment","Recognition, original-forum validity, and local relief unexamined"],["T7","Bankruptcy discharge or stay","Actual federal effect requires separate work"],["T8","Family/adoption, support, tax, administrative, criminal/municipal judgments","Special statutes and exceptions not generalized"]]},{"headers":["#","Deferred subject","Reason"],"index":11,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["#","Deferred subject","Reason"],["D1","Full commencement and merits proof","Only necessary default gateway addressed"],["D2","Current full official statutory consolidation","Access hold"],["D3","Pure-default application of paragraph (b)’s verdict-linked period","Exact controlling authority not established"],["D4","Full appeal/reconsideration/new-trial procedure","Distinct route"],["D5","Complete independent-action pleading, limitation, and fraud-on-court law","Exceptional gateway only"],["D6","Actual service, waiver, jurisdiction, military status","No private facts"],["D7","Full WCA/contract/licensing/assignment/limitations defenses","Unreviewed modules not adopted"],["D8","Satisfaction, liens, garnishment, execution, exemptions","No enforcement rerun"],["D9","Bankruptcy and other sovereign/special procedures","Separate"],["D10","Actual fees, damages, sanctions, bond amount, restoration rate","Not established"],["D11","Complete citator and unpublished-decision inventory","Not performed; none relied upon"],["D12","Publication, operation, state/component/parent acceptance","Expressly withheld"]]},{"headers":["Original boundary","PASS-21 addition","What remains separate"],"index":12,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Original boundary","PASS-21 addition","What remains separate"],["“D2 Motion to vacate or reopen judgment — Separate validity/remedy component”","Ordinary-civil §806.07 grounds, timing, service, discretion, and stay/restoration gateway","No retroactive P08 acceptance"],["Small-claims portion","Not rerun or adopted","P17/P19 retain their own scope"],["Arbitration portion","Not rerun or adopted","P18/P20 retain their own scope"],["General civil procedural linkages","§§802.01, 801.14–.15/.18, 806.02/.06/.08/.09 researched","Current integrated bodies/local implementation held"],["Actual merits and enforcement consequences","Boundary identified only","Contract, payment, liens, refund, and collection facts absent"],["Appellate and independent-action modules","Necessary distinctions supplied","Full procedure and deadlines remain future work"]]},{"headers":["Count unit","Visible count"],"index":13,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Count unit","Visible count"],["Source register","24"],["Atomic claims","48"],["Core coverage","70"],["Local gap inventory","8"],["Territorial/special categories","8"],["Deferred families","12"],["Fictional workflows","16"],["Separate conditional models","4"],["Published-case comparison rows","10"],["P08 D2 crosswalk","6"],["Content/tool opportunities","3"]]}],"claims":[{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C001","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C001","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Ordinary civil, not small-claims/arbitration, relief is this component","Act, clock, or consequence":"No prior module adopted","Evidence/limit":"Scope; P08 D2"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C002","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C002","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Current integrated statutes not recovered","Act, clock, or consequence":"Read-aid and historical quotation limits retained","Evidence/limit":"S001–S013; S019 ¶13"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C003","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C003","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Party or legal representative may seek relief; not only losing defendant","Act, clock, or consequence":"Prevailing creditor also subject to §806.07","Evidence/limit":"S002; S019 ¶¶10–18"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C004","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C004","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Default can arise from unanswered claims or trial nonappearance","Act, clock, or consequence":"Identify actual default type","Evidence/limit":"S003(1)–(5)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C005","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C005","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Appeared defendant entitled to default-motion notice; jurisdiction/proof remain","Act, clock, or consequence":"Default not proof-free","Evidence/limit":"S003(1)–(3),(5)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C006","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C006","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Clerk liquidated-contract branch requires personal service","Act, clock, or consequence":"Abode service insufficient for that branch","Evidence/limit":"S003(4)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C007","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C007","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Relief is on motion, just terms, established grounds","Act, clock, or consequence":"No automatic merits win","Evidence/limit":"S002(1); S014"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C008","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C008","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Reasonable time is independent of outer anniversary","Act, clock, or consequence":"Delay inside year can defeat motion","Evidence/limit":"S022 pp.170–177"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C009","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C009","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Grounds (a),(c) have reasonable-time plus one-year cap","Act, clock, or consequence":"Entry/order-or-stipulation-made trigger, not discovery","Evidence/limit":"S002(2); S018"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C010","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C010","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Entry means filing with clerk","Act, clock, or consequence":"Signing/oral grant/notice differs","Evidence/limit":"S004(1)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C011","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C011","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Paragraph (a) neglect uses prudent-person standard","Act, clock, or consequence":"Carelessness not automatically excusable","Evidence/limit":"S016 n.5"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C012","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C012","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Paragraph (a) default relief requires defense good at law","Act, clock, or consequence":"No probable-victory requirement","Evidence/limit":"S016 ¶¶18,23–31"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C013","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C013","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Newly discovered evidence requires four statutory elements","Act, clock, or consequence":"Diligence/materiality/noncumulation/probable change","Evidence/limit":"S005(3)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C014","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C014","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Paragraph (b) links to §805.16","Act, clock, or consequence":"Verdict-year/90-day text; pure-default translation held","Evidence/limit":"S002(2); S006(4)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C015","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C015","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Paragraph (c) concerns adverse-party misconduct","Act, clock, or consequence":"Evidence and judgment connection required","Evidence/limit":"S002(1)(c)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C016","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C016","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Genuine void judgment not governed by reasonable-time restriction","Act, clock, or consequence":"Voidness must first be established","Evidence/limit":"S015 ¶34"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C017","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C017","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Fundamental and technical service defects differ","Act, clock, or consequence":"Actual notice alone not cure; complainant’s stated burden","Evidence/limit":"S017 ¶¶23–28,39–40"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C018","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C018","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Competency loss is not necessarily voidness","Act, clock, or consequence":"Can be waived; (h) not automatic","Evidence/limit":"S015 ¶¶31–38"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C019","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C019","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Process/jurisdiction defenses can be waived by omission","Act, clock, or consequence":"Examine first motions/pleadings, not “appearance” alone","Evidence/limit":"S011(7)–(8)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C020","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C020","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Payment/release/discharge can support (e)","Act, clock, or consequence":"Scope and proof required; no express one-year cap","Evidence/limit":"S002(1)(e),(2)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C021","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C021","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Prior foundational judgment reversal can support (f)","Act, clock, or consequence":"Actual dependency required","Evidence/limit":"S002(1)(f),(2)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C022","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C022","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Prospective equitable change can support (g)","Act, clock, or consequence":"Fixed-debt hardship alone insufficiently established","Evidence/limit":"S019 ¶¶17–18; S023 pp.543–544"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C023","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C023","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Paragraph (h) requires extraordinary circumstances","Act, clock, or consequence":"Reasonable time; sparing equitable relief","Evidence/limit":"S014 ¶¶34–44"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C024","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C024","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Facts can overlap (a)–(c) and (h)","Act, clock, or consequence":"Extraordinary facts—not relabeling—needed","Evidence/limit":"S023 pp.549–555"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C025","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C025","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"No excusable-neglect prerequisite for (h)","Act, clock, or consequence":"Nonexclusive finality/fairness factors","Evidence/limit":"S014 ¶¶36–44"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C026","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C026","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Sufficient extraordinary allegations trigger factual hearing","Act, clock, or consequence":"Threshold assumption is not final proof","Evidence/limit":"S014 ¶34"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C027","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C027","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"§806.07 time cannot be discretionarily enlarged","Act, clock, or consequence":"Ordinary (a) estoppel extension rejected","Evidence/limit":"S009(2)(c); S018"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C028","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C028","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Independent action and fraud-on-court powers separately preserved","Act, clock, or consequence":"Not identical routes","Evidence/limit":"S002(2); S020"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C029","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C029","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Independent equity requires five prerequisites","Act, clock, or consequence":"Clean hands, diligence, no adequate legal remedy","Evidence/limit":"S020–S021"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C030","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C030","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Contradictory evidence alone not automatic fraud on court","Act, clock, or consequence":"Actual fraud and equitable predicates remain","Evidence/limit":"S021 concluding discussion"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C031","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C031","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Motion must identify grounds/relief and supporting papers","Act, clock, or consequence":"Written unless hearing/trial exception","Evidence/limit":"S007(2)(a)–(d)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C032","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C032","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Noticed motion deemed made on service with notice","Act, clock, or consequence":"Filing alone not defined event","Evidence/limit":"S007(2)(e)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C033","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C033","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Required parties/counsel must receive permitted service","Act, clock, or consequence":"Default-party and limited-appearance exceptions retained","Evidence/limit":"S008(1),(2),(2m)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C034","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C034","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Served papers filed within reasonable time","Act, clock, or consequence":"Filing and service are distinct","Evidence/limit":"S008(4)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C035","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C035","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Hearing notice generally five days; affidavits have linked timing","Act, clock, or consequence":"Court/statute may alter","Evidence/limit":"S009(4)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C036","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C036","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Exclude day zero; short-period weekends/holidays excluded","Act, clock, or consequence":"Closed-clerk last day adjusts","Evidence/limit":"S009(1)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C037","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C037","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Mail addition concerns response-after-service","Act, clock, or consequence":"No automatic addition to entry-based cap","Evidence/limit":"S009(5)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C038","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C038","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"E-filing needs accepted submission and proper recipient service","Act, clock, or consequence":"11:59 p.m. Central rule; paper parties differ","Evidence/limit":"S010(4),(6)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C039","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C039","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Filing relief motion does not suspend judgment","Act, clock, or consequence":"Enforcement not automatically stayed","Evidence/limit":"S002(2)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C040","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C040","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Court may separately stay enforcement","Act, clock, or consequence":"Security conditions discretionary","Evidence/limit":"S012(2)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C041","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C041","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Relief/order scope governs next stage","Act, clock, or consequence":"No automatic reinstatement, dismissal, lien release, or refund","Evidence/limit":"S002; S014 ¶60"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C042","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C042","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Collection followed by set-aside can trigger restoration","Act, clock, or consequence":"Notice, motion, proof, interest; bond/purchaser exceptions","Evidence/limit":"S013(1)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C043","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C043","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Appeal/new trial/satisfaction are distinct routes","Act, clock, or consequence":"No automatic appeal reset asserted","Evidence/limit":"S002(2); S005–S006"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C044","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C044","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Clerical correction is not merits review","Act, clock, or consequence":"GF-184A cannot substitute for substantive relief","Evidence/limit":"S024 p.1/zero 0"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C045","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C045","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Motion package needs facts, proposed defense, dates, and service proof","Act, clock, or consequence":"Hypothetical checklist only","Evidence/limit":"S007–S010; S014–S016"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C046","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C046","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"All relied-on cases are published; posture/version matters","Act, clock, or consequence":"No unpublished authority or full citator claim","Evidence/limit":"S014–S023"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C047","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C047","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Adoption exception and special regimes remain outside scope","Act, clock, or consequence":"No universal application of §806.07","Evidence/limit":"S002(3)"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"claim_id":"S_WI-P21-C048","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C048","Actor/predicate and atomic assertion":"Only ordinary-civil P08 D2 component is augmented","Act, clock, or consequence":"No state/parent/publication acceptance","Evidence/limit":"Crosswalk below"},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"}],"sources":[{"source_id":"S_WI-S001","urls":["https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/806/07","https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/806/_31?up=1"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S001","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Wisconsin Legislature, §806.07/current chapter index. https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/806/07 and https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/806/_31?up=1","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"Section fetch failed once; official index reported updates through Act 247. No current integrated body read."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S002","urls":["https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-07/"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S002","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Justia reproduction, 2025 §806.07. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-07/","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"Full (1)(a)–(h), (2), (3), history read. Nonofficial read-aid; no full 2026 amendment certification."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S003","urls":["https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-02/"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S003","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Justia reproduction, 2025 §806.02. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-02/","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"Full (1)–(5); notice, proof, personal-service/liquidated branch. History includes 2018 WI 102."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S004","urls":["https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-06/"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S004","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Justia reproduction, 2025 §806.06. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-06/","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"(1)(a)–(d), necessary entry/notice distinctions. Other costs/enforcement content not adopted."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S005","urls":["https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-805/section-805-15/"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S005","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Justia reproduction, 2025 §805.15. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-805/section-805-15/","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"(3)(a)–(d) and linked exceptions. Four newly discovered-evidence elements read."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S006","urls":["https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-805/section-805-16/"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S006","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Justia reproduction, 2025 §805.16. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-805/section-805-16/","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"Full relevant (1)–(5), especially (4): verdict-based year and 90-day decision. No default-trigger translation invented."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S007","urls":["https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-802/section-802-01/","https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/802.01%282%29%28b%29"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S007","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Justia reproduction and official indexed fragment, §802.01. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-802/section-802-01/ and https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/802.01%282%29%28b%29","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"Full reproduced (2)(a)–(e) read; official indexed fragment only. Motion deemed made upon service with notice."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S008","urls":["https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-801/section-801-14/"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S008","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Justia reproduction, 2025 §801.14. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-801/section-801-14/","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"(1), (2), (2m), (4); recipient, method, default-party exceptions, and filing-after-service duties."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S009","urls":["https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-801/section-801-15/"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S009","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Justia reproduction, 2025 §801.15. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-801/section-801-15/","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"(1), (2)(a),(c), (4),(5); counting, nonenlargement, hearing notice, response additions."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S010","urls":["https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-801/section-801-18/"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S010","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Justia reproduction, 2025 §801.18. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-801/section-801-18/","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"(4), (6), necessary definitions; accepted filing time, notices, paper parties. No runtime accessed."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S011","urls":["https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-802/section-802-06/"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S011","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Justia reproduction, 2025 §802.06. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-802/section-802-06/","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"(7)–(8), jurisdiction/process/service defense preservation. Full merits-motion regime not analyzed."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S012","urls":["https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-08/"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S012","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Justia reproduction, 2025 §806.08. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-08/","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"(2) and adjoining stay branches; discretionary security conditions."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S013","urls":["https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-09/"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S013","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Justia reproduction, 2025 §806.09. https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/chapter-806/section-806-09/","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"(1)–(2); restoration, notice/proof, bond, purchaser protection."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S014","urls":["https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52041"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S014","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Wisconsin Supreme Court, Miller, 2010 WI 75. https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52041","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"Majority ¶¶29–44, 48–61; July 13, 2010. Fresh official opinion; concurrence separated."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S015","urls":["https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16730"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S015","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Wisconsin Supreme Court, Mikrut, 2004 WI 79. https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16730","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"Majority ¶¶8–10, 31–38; June 30, 2004. General competency/voidness, not consumer merits."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S016","urls":["https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17178"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S016","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Wisconsin Supreme Court, J.L. Phillips & Associates v. E & H Plastic. https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17178","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"April 24, 1998; ¶¶9, 18, 23–36, n.5; applies 1993–94 statutes. Fresh official opinion."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S017","urls":["https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80134"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S017","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Wisconsin Supreme Court, Johnson v. Cintas Corp. No. 2, 2012 WI 31. https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80134","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"March 27, 2012; majority ¶¶22–28, 38–40; dissent separated. Fresh official opinion."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S018","urls":["https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9790"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S018","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Miro Tool & Manufacturing v. Midland Machinery. https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9790","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"October 23, 1996; published majority, DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION. Unnumbered; concurrence not adopted."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S019","urls":["https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5090"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S019","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Bank One Wisconsin v. Kahl, 2002 WI App 312. https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5090","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"November 12, 2002; ¶¶10–18; ¶13 full historical statutory quotation; 1999–2000 edition."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S020","urls":["https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10579"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S020","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Walker v. Tobin. https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10579","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"February 19, 1997; published, unnumbered independent-action discussion, five elements, concluding remand/laches discussion."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S021","urls":["https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11692"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S021","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Dekker v. Wergin. https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11692","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"September 17, 1997; published; unnumbered elements, clean-hands, diligence, and fraud-on-court passages."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S022","urls":["https://law.justia.com/cases/wisconsin/supreme-court/1979/76-661-7.html"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S022","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Wisconsin Supreme Court opinion reproduced by Justia, Rhodes v. Terry, 91 Wis. 2d 165. https://law.justia.com/cases/wisconsin/supreme-court/1979/76-661-7.html","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"June 29, 1979; reporter pp.170–177. Judicial body read, not AI summary. HTML reporter labels; PDF index N/A."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S023","urls":["https://law.justia.com/cases/wisconsin/supreme-court/1985/83-1348-9.html"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S023","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Wisconsin Supreme Court opinion reproduced by Justia, State ex rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H., 122 Wis. 2d 536. https://law.justia.com/cases/wisconsin/supreme-court/1985/83-1348-9.html","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"February 27, 1985; reporter pp.543–555; 1981–82 statute. Judicial body read; PDF index N/A."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"S_WI-S024","urls":["https://www.wicourts.gov/formdisplay/GF-184A.pdf?formNumber=GF-184A&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en"],"researcher_record":{"Source":"S024","Issuer/title and complete literal URL":"Wisconsin Court System, GF-184A—Request to Correct Court Records. https://www.wicourts.gov/formdisplay/GF-184A.pdf?formNumber=GF-184A&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en","Pinpoint, edition/status, actual read limit":"Rev. 11/20; one unnumbered page, zero PDF index 0. Full text and image inspected. No motion form completed."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."}],"coverage":[{"topic":"1 Current §806.07 integrated body","researcher_record":{"#":"1","Subissue":"Current §806.07 integrated body","Status and claim references":"Partial, C002","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Obtain current official body; no repeated failed loop"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"2 Amendment/version chain","researcher_record":{"#":"2","Subissue":"Amendment/version chain","Status and claim references":"Partial, C002","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Reproduction/history and index do not complete 2026 certification"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"3 Ordinary civil versus special procedure","researcher_record":{"#":"3","Subissue":"Ordinary civil versus special procedure","Status and claim references":"Defined, C001/C047","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Classify actual judgment"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"4 Eligible moving party/legal representative","researcher_record":{"#":"4","Subissue":"Eligible moving party/legal representative","Status and claim references":"Supported, C003","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Actual capacity/representation"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"5 Creditor seeking its own relief","researcher_record":{"#":"5","Subissue":"Creditor seeking its own relief","Status and claim references":"Supported, C003","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Kahl’s posture limits"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"6 Failure-to-answer default","researcher_record":{"#":"6","Subissue":"Failure-to-answer default","Status and claim references":"Supported, C004","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Actual pleading and response period"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"7 Failure-to-attend-trial default","researcher_record":{"#":"7","Subissue":"Failure-to-attend-trial default","Status and claim references":"Supported, C004","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Actual notice and court order"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"8 Appeared-party default notice","researcher_record":{"#":"8","Subissue":"Appeared-party default notice","Status and claim references":"Supported, C005","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Appearance and service facts"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"9 Nonappearance jurisdiction proof","researcher_record":{"#":"9","Subissue":"Nonappearance jurisdiction proof","Status and claim references":"Supported, C005","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Actual summons/service"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"10 Damages/entitlement proof","researcher_record":{"#":"10","Subissue":"Damages/entitlement proof","Status and claim references":"Supported gateway, C005","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Full merits/account records deferred"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"11 Liquidated-contract clerk branch","researcher_record":{"#":"11","Subissue":"Liquidated-contract clerk branch","Status and claim references":"Supported, C006","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Express contract, liquidation, personal service"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"12 Sanction default","researcher_record":{"#":"12","Subissue":"Sanction default","Status and claim references":"Deferred, C004","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Separate governing sanction rule"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"13 Just terms/discretion","researcher_record":{"#":"13","Subissue":"Just terms/discretion","Status and claim references":"Supported, C007","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Actual grounds/order"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"14 Reasonable time","researcher_record":{"#":"14","Subissue":"Reasonable time","Status and claim references":"Supported, C008","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Knowledge, diligence, prejudice"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"15 One-year cap for (a)","researcher_record":{"#":"15","Subissue":"One-year cap for (a)","Status and claim references":"Supported, C009","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Entry and motion-made dates"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"16 One-year cap for (c)","researcher_record":{"#":"16","Subissue":"One-year cap for (c)","Status and claim references":"Supported, C009","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"No discovery substitution"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"17 Entry versus rendition","researcher_record":{"#":"17","Subissue":"Entry versus rendition","Status and claim references":"Supported, C010","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Clerk filing stamp"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"18 Order/stipulation “made” date","researcher_record":{"#":"18","Subissue":"Order/stipulation “made” date","Status and claim references":"Text established, C009","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Actual event/order language"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"19 Notice or knowledge trigger","researcher_record":{"#":"19","Subissue":"Notice or knowledge trigger","Status and claim references":"Not general cap trigger, C009","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Can matter to reasonable time"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"20 Excusable neglect","researcher_record":{"#":"20","Subissue":"Excusable neglect","Status and claim references":"Supported, C011","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Concrete explanation"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"21 Mistake/inadvertence/surprise","researcher_record":{"#":"21","Subissue":"Mistake/inadvertence/surprise","Status and claim references":"Supported, C011–C012","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Ground-specific evidence"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"22 Meritorious defense","researcher_record":{"#":"22","Subissue":"Meritorious defense","Status and claim references":"Supported, C012","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Proposed legally sufficient defense"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"23 Probable victory requirement","researcher_record":{"#":"23","Subissue":"Probable victory requirement","Status and claim references":"Rejected, C012","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Pleadings standard, not trial by affidavit"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"24 New evidence—diligence","researcher_record":{"#":"24","Subissue":"New evidence—diligence","Status and claim references":"Supported, C013","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Search/discovery chronology"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"25 New evidence—material/noncumulative","researcher_record":{"#":"25","Subissue":"New evidence—material/noncumulative","Status and claim references":"Supported, C013","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Actual evidence"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"26 New evidence—probable result","researcher_record":{"#":"26","Subissue":"New evidence—probable result","Status and claim references":"Supported, C013","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Link to judgment"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"27 §805.16 verdict clock","researcher_record":{"#":"27","Subissue":"§805.16 verdict clock","Status and claim references":"Text supported, C014","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Actual verdict required"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"28 §805.16 90-day decision","researcher_record":{"#":"28","Subissue":"§805.16 90-day decision","Status and claim references":"Text supported, C014","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Motion-made and order dates"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"29 New evidence after pure default","researcher_record":{"#":"29","Subissue":"New evidence after pure default","Status and claim references":"Unresolved, C014","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Controlling no-verdict application needed"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"30 Adverse-party fraud/misconduct","researcher_record":{"#":"30","Subissue":"Adverse-party fraud/misconduct","Status and claim references":"Supported gateway, C015","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Specific conduct and causation"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"31 Fraud discovered after year","researcher_record":{"#":"31","Subissue":"Fraud discovered after year","Status and claim references":"No automatic restart, C009/C015","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Separate extraordinary/equitable predicates"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"32 True voidness time exception","researcher_record":{"#":"32","Subissue":"True voidness time exception","Status and claim references":"Supported, C016","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Court must establish genuine invalidity"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"33 Fundamental personal-jurisdiction defect","researcher_record":{"#":"33","Subissue":"Fundamental personal-jurisdiction defect","Status and claim references":"Supported, C017","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Actual pleadings/service"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"34 Technical service defect","researcher_record":{"#":"34","Subissue":"Technical service defect","Status and claim references":"Supported distinction, C017","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Prejudice and burden"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"35 Actual notice","researcher_record":{"#":"35","Subissue":"Actual notice","Status and claim references":"Not universal cure, C017","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Statutory service compliance"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"36 Competency versus jurisdiction","researcher_record":{"#":"36","Subissue":"Competency versus jurisdiction","Status and claim references":"Supported, C018","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Particular statutory condition"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"37 Waiver/forfeiture","researcher_record":{"#":"37","Subissue":"Waiver/forfeiture","Status and claim references":"Partial application, C019","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"First motions, pleadings, conduct"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"38 Satisfaction/release/discharge","researcher_record":{"#":"38","Subissue":"Satisfaction/release/discharge","Status and claim references":"Supported gateway, C020","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Actual agreement/payment/discharge"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"39 Prior judgment reversed/vacated","researcher_record":{"#":"39","Subissue":"Prior judgment reversed/vacated","Status and claim references":"Supported gateway, C021","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Foundational relationship"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"40 Prospective inequity","researcher_record":{"#":"40","Subissue":"Prospective inequity","Status and claim references":"Supported boundary, C022","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Equitable feature/changed conditions"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"41 Catchall extraordinary circumstances","researcher_record":{"#":"41","Subissue":"Catchall extraordinary circumstances","Status and claim references":"Supported, C023","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Complete facts"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"42 Catchall overlap with other grounds","researcher_record":{"#":"42","Subissue":"Catchall overlap with other grounds","Status and claim references":"Supported, C024","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"No mere relabeling"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"43 Excusable-neglect prerequisite to (h)","researcher_record":{"#":"43","Subissue":"Excusable-neglect prerequisite to (h)","Status and claim references":"Rejected, C025","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Miller factors still apply"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"44 Threshold hearing under (h)","researcher_record":{"#":"44","Subissue":"Threshold hearing under (h)","Status and claim references":"Supported, C026","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Particularized sufficient allegations"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"45 Statutory enlargement","researcher_record":{"#":"45","Subissue":"Statutory enlargement","Status and claim references":"Prohibited as described, C027","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Built-in counting rule separate"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"46 Independent equitable action","researcher_record":{"#":"46","Subissue":"Independent equitable action","Status and claim references":"Supported boundary, C028–C029","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Separate action/limitations/laches analysis"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"47 Fraud on court","researcher_record":{"#":"47","Subissue":"Fraud on court","Status and claim references":"Narrow boundary, C030","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"More than conflicting evidence"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"48 Written motion and particularity","researcher_record":{"#":"48","Subissue":"Written motion and particularity","Status and claim references":"Supported, C031","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Actual grounds/relief"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"49 Supporting papers","researcher_record":{"#":"49","Subissue":"Supporting papers","Status and claim references":"Supported, C031","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Serve new materials and identify prior record"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"50 Motion deemed “made”","researcher_record":{"#":"50","Subissue":"Motion deemed “made”","Status and claim references":"Supported with currentness hold, C032","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Actual valid service with notice"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"51 Counsel versus party service","researcher_record":{"#":"51","Subissue":"Counsel versus party service","Status and claim references":"Supported, C033","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Representation/limited appearance"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"52 Default-party service exceptions","researcher_record":{"#":"52","Subissue":"Default-party service exceptions","Status and claim references":"Text read, C033","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Actual party posture"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"53 Filing after service","researcher_record":{"#":"53","Subissue":"Filing after service","Status and claim references":"Supported, C034","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Reasonable-time filing and proof"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"54 Five-day hearing notice","researcher_record":{"#":"54","Subissue":"Five-day hearing notice","Status and claim references":"Supported, C035","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Different statute/order/local schedule"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"55 Supporting/opposing affidavits","researcher_record":{"#":"55","Subissue":"Supporting/opposing affidavits","Status and claim references":"Supported, C035","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Service dates and judicial permission"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"56 Day-zero/short-period computation","researcher_record":{"#":"56","Subissue":"Day-zero/short-period computation","Status and claim references":"Supported, C036","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Holiday and closure calendar"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"57 Mail response addition","researcher_record":{"#":"57","Subissue":"Mail response addition","Status and claim references":"Supported qualification, C037","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Not entry-based deadline extension"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"58 Electronic submission/acceptance","researcher_record":{"#":"58","Subissue":"Electronic submission/acceptance","Status and claim references":"Supported text, C038","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Actual system notice/rejection"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"59 Electronic versus paper recipients","researcher_record":{"#":"59","Subissue":"Electronic versus paper recipients","Status and claim references":"Supported, C038","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Party registration and required service"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"60 Automatic stay","researcher_record":{"#":"60","Subissue":"Automatic stay","Status and claim references":"Rejected, C039","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Actual stay order"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"61 Court stay/security","researcher_record":{"#":"61","Subissue":"Court stay/security","Status and claim references":"Supported gateway, C040","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Discretion and order conditions"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"62 Partial/full relief consequences","researcher_record":{"#":"62","Subissue":"Partial/full relief consequences","Status and claim references":"Supported boundary, C041","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Exact order and further procedures"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"63 Automatic answer reinstatement","researcher_record":{"#":"63","Subissue":"Automatic answer reinstatement","Status and claim references":"Not universal, C041","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Court’s schedule/order"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"64 Restoration","researcher_record":{"#":"64","Subissue":"Restoration","Status and claim references":"Supported gateway, C042","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Notice, proof, interest, bond, purchaser"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"65 Appeal/new trial distinction","researcher_record":{"#":"65","Subissue":"Appeal/new trial distinction","Status and claim references":"Preserved, C043","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Full appellate/new-trial module"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"66 Clerical record correction","researcher_record":{"#":"66","Subissue":"Clerical record correction","Status and claim references":"Supported boundary, C044","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Actual record error, not merits disagreement"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"67 Generic evidence package","researcher_record":{"#":"67","Subissue":"Generic evidence package","Status and claim references":"Supported design, C045","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"No documents supplied"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"68 Published-case status/majority","researcher_record":{"#":"68","Subissue":"Published-case status/majority","Status and claim references":"Verified within read sources, C046","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Complete later treatment held"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"69 Adoption and special exclusions","researcher_record":{"#":"69","Subissue":"Adoption and special exclusions","Status and claim references":"Read boundary, C047","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"Separate statutory route"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"70 P08 D2 addition","researcher_record":{"#":"70","Subissue":"P08 D2 addition","Status and claim references":"Completed as research scope, C048","Exact remaining fact/source or next action":"No acceptance or prior-report revision"},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"L1 Case type, branch, and assigned judge","researcher_record":{"#":"L1","Local issue":"Case type, branch, and assigned judge","Status/next check":"Actual court record required; none accessed"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"L2 Motion scheduling and reserved hearing date","researcher_record":{"#":"L2","Local issue":"Motion scheduling and reserved hearing date","Status/next check":"County/judge procedure not certified"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"L3 Brief, affidavit, proposed-order requirements","researcher_record":{"#":"L3","Local issue":"Brief, affidavit, proposed-order requirements","Status/next check":"Statutory minimums do not clear local practice"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"L4 Electronic-user and paper-party status","researcher_record":{"#":"L4","Local issue":"Electronic-user and paper-party status","Status/next check":"Actual case notices required"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"L5 Filing acceptance, rejection, outage, cutoff application","researcher_record":{"#":"L5","Local issue":"Filing acceptance, rejection, outage, cutoff application","Status/next check":"No runtime or account accessed"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"L6 Clerk holidays and office closures","researcher_record":{"#":"L6","Local issue":"Clerk holidays and office closures","Status/next check":"Actual calendar must be verified"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"L7 Service proof and limited-scope counsel","researcher_record":{"#":"L7","Local issue":"Service proof and limited-scope counsel","Status/next check":"Actual representation/service record required"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"L8 Motion fees, waiver, remote hearing, interpreters","researcher_record":{"#":"L8","Local issue":"Motion fees, waiver, remote hearing, interpreters","Status/next check":"Current county/order-specific requirements held"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"T1 Wisconsin ordinary civil money default","researcher_record":{"#":"T1","Category":"Wisconsin ordinary civil money default","Boundary":"Principal component"},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"T2 Wisconsin small claims","researcher_record":{"#":"T2","Category":"Wisconsin small claims","Boundary":"Separate; no chapter 799 clocks imported"},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"T3 Arbitration-award judgment","researcher_record":{"#":"T3","Category":"Arbitration-award judgment","Boundary":"Separate; no chapter 788 route imported"},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"T4 Federal judgment","researcher_record":{"#":"T4","Category":"Federal judgment","Boundary":"Federal Rule 60 and federal procedure not supplied"},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"T5 Tribal judgment","researcher_record":{"#":"T5","Category":"Tribal judgment","Boundary":"Tribal law/recognition unexamined"},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"T6 Other-state or foreign-country judgment","researcher_record":{"#":"T6","Category":"Other-state or foreign-country judgment","Boundary":"Recognition, original-forum validity, and local relief unexamined"},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"T7 Bankruptcy discharge or stay","researcher_record":{"#":"T7","Category":"Bankruptcy discharge or stay","Boundary":"Actual federal effect requires separate work"},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"T8 Family/adoption, support, tax, administrative, criminal/municipal judgments","researcher_record":{"#":"T8","Category":"Family/adoption, support, tax, administrative, criminal/municipal judgments","Boundary":"Special statutes and exceptions not generalized"},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"D1 Full commencement and merits proof","researcher_record":{"#":"D1","Deferred subject":"Full commencement and merits proof","Reason":"Only necessary default gateway addressed"},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"D2 Current full official statutory consolidation","researcher_record":{"#":"D2","Deferred subject":"Current full official statutory consolidation","Reason":"Access hold"},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"D3 Pure-default application of paragraph (b)’s verdict-linked period","researcher_record":{"#":"D3","Deferred subject":"Pure-default application of paragraph (b)’s verdict-linked period","Reason":"Exact controlling authority not established"},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"D4 Full appeal/reconsideration/new-trial procedure","researcher_record":{"#":"D4","Deferred subject":"Full appeal/reconsideration/new-trial procedure","Reason":"Distinct route"},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"D5 Complete independent-action pleading, limitation, and fraud-on-court law","researcher_record":{"#":"D5","Deferred subject":"Complete independent-action pleading, limitation, and fraud-on-court law","Reason":"Exceptional gateway only"},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"D6 Actual service, waiver, jurisdiction, military status","researcher_record":{"#":"D6","Deferred subject":"Actual service, waiver, jurisdiction, military status","Reason":"No private facts"},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"D7 Full WCA/contract/licensing/assignment/limitations defenses","researcher_record":{"#":"D7","Deferred subject":"Full WCA/contract/licensing/assignment/limitations defenses","Reason":"Unreviewed modules not adopted"},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"D8 Satisfaction, liens, garnishment, execution, exemptions","researcher_record":{"#":"D8","Deferred subject":"Satisfaction, liens, garnishment, execution, exemptions","Reason":"No enforcement rerun"},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"D9 Bankruptcy and other sovereign/special procedures","researcher_record":{"#":"D9","Deferred subject":"Bankruptcy and other sovereign/special procedures","Reason":"Separate"},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"D10 Actual fees, damages, sanctions, bond amount, restoration rate","researcher_record":{"#":"D10","Deferred subject":"Actual fees, damages, sanctions, bond amount, restoration rate","Reason":"Not established"},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"D11 Complete citator and unpublished-decision inventory","researcher_record":{"#":"D11","Deferred subject":"Complete citator and unpublished-decision inventory","Reason":"Not performed; none relied upon"},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"D12 Publication, operation, state/component/parent acceptance","researcher_record":{"#":"D12","Deferred subject":"Publication, operation, state/component/parent acceptance","Reason":"Expressly withheld"},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"}],"annotations":{},"corrections":[],"resolved_corrections":[],"review_history":[{"id":"S_WI-P21-current-motion-rule-source-and-date-20261027","status":"minor_date_annotation_addressed_current_primary_gap_retained","at":"2026-10-27T07:40:23.313524+00:00"}]}