{"meta":{"key":"s_ne--pass-33","task":"S_NE","title":"SNE Nebraska post-foreclosure possession, occupants, tenants, and eviction","parent_title":"Nebraska debt and debt relief law","edition":"pass-33","path":"/research/s_ne--pass-33/","kind":"split_pass","category":"state","role":"state","area_numbers":[66],"groups":["collections"],"date":"2026-10-26","tables":13,"claims":45,"sources":25,"review_status":"revise_five_bounded_groups_UNSENT","review_complete":true,"sha256":"fa6cada3a016c862b9c0e1e65e3c0de0e55deb493a6380f37d562ba0a799f348","headings":["Executive findings","A. Role, title, and possession-route findings","A1–A7. Which route can each person use?","Narrow ancillary branches","B. Nebraska notice, hearing, restitution, and appeal procedures","B8–B13, B15–B17. General FED versus residential URLTA","URLTA notice branches","Procedural consequences of defective service or unresolved title","B14, B18–B20. Defenses, agreements, money claims and unlawful removal","C. Federal tenants, servicemembers and bankruptcy","C21–C27. Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act","C28. Bankruptcy boundary","C29. SCRA eviction protection and current 2026 limit","C30. Discrimination, retaliation and utilities","D. Cases, forms, evidence, and possession decision map","D31–D33. Controlling and materially relevant opinions","D31–D32. Official statewide forms and instructions","D34. Practical evidence checklist — what each legal question would require","D35. Urgent-act versus automatic-stay decision map","E. Twelve bounded hypothetical workflows","E01 — Former owner after a nonjudicial trustee sale","E02 — Judicial foreclosure sale not yet confirmed","E03 — Borrower's spouse calls herself a tenant","E04 — Unrelated tenant paying market rent under a surviving fixed-term lease","E05 — Periodic tenancy, low rent and potential subsidy","E06 — Successor asserts a purchaser-primary-residence exception","E07 — Genuine title dispute in summary possession","E08 — Private purchaser proposes a lockout and removal of furniture","E09 — SCRA tenant and indexed monthly-rent limit","E10 — Bankruptcy petition with or without prepetition possession judgment","E11 — Buyer accepts rent and signs a possession agreement","E12 — URLTA tenant belongings and conditional damages","F. Source register — S_NE-P33-S001 onward","Source limitations","G. Claim register — S_NE-P33-C001 onward","H. Complete 36-item component coverage table","Required remaining work","I. Researcher self-check","Primary sources actually read","Numerical and relative-clock checks","Limits and integrity checks"],"generation_provenance":{"actual_route":"regular_chat_adaptive_models","actual_model":"GPT-6","actual_mode":"Extra High","provenance_limit":"Actual documented capture labels only; missing labels remain unknown. No preferred setting is inferred as actual execution."},"public_id":"S_NE/pass-33","facets":{"geography":["us","us-ne"],"debt_type":["rent_lease"],"stage":["eviction","foreclosure"],"subject":["foreclosure-repossession","tenancy-housing"]},"scope":"Distinctremainingresidentialpostforeclosurepossession/occupants/tenants/eviction;freshnecessarygatewaysonly;afterNE32whole saved,unreviewedsale/deficiencynotpremises","pending_corrections":5},"markdown":"# S_NE PASS-33 — Nebraska post-foreclosure possession, occupants, tenants, and eviction\n\nResearch baseline and actual public-source date: October 26, 2026, Pacific / UTC\nScope: Residential mortgage and deed-of-trust foreclosure, subsequent possession, former owners, bona fide tenants, court process, writs, and narrowly necessary federal protections.\nStatus: Distinct Nebraska sector component for later coordinator review; not independent review.\n\nPASS-27, PASS-28, PASS-30, PASS-31, and PASS-32 remain separate, unreviewed legal work and are not adopted as premises. The necessary possession and foreclosure gateways are established independently below.\n\n## Executive findings\n\nForeclosure ownership and the right to physically remove an occupant are different legal questions. Nebraska provides a summary forcible-entry-and-detainer route for qualifying post-sale possession disputes, but the successful bidder or foreclosure beneficiary is not automatically authorized to change locks, remove people, or discard their belongings.\n\nNebraska has two principal statutory possession routes:\n\n- Forcible entry and detainer (FED), §§25-21,219–25-21,235: Covers specified occupants, including certain judgment debtors remaining after judicial sales and persons occupying without color of title. It generally requires a three-day pre-suit notice, a rapidly scheduled hearing, and a court-issued restitution process.\n- Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (URLTA), §§76-1401–76-1449: Governs qualifying residential rental relationships. Its own termination notices, complaint requirements, summons, hearing, restitution, and personal-property provisions apply instead of the general FED statutes.\n\nSection 25-21,219 expressly excludes premises subject to URLTA from the general FED route. A preforeclosure owner's occupancy, a genuine tenant's leasehold interest, and a new rental agreement accepted after foreclosure therefore cannot be classified interchangeably. nebraskalegislature.gov+1\n\nA genuine title or continuing-leasehold dispute can defeat jurisdiction in a summary FED action. In Federal National Mortgage Association v. Marcuzzo, the Nebraska Supreme Court upheld proceeding with a foreclosure purchaser's FED case because a merely asserted title dispute had been resolved before evidence establishing a live title issue was presented. In Woodsonia Hwy 281 v. American Multi-Cinema (2025), the Court required dismissal where resolving possession necessarily required adjudicating whether a disputed leasehold estate had terminated. Neither case makes a bare allegation of defective foreclosure automatically sufficient. govdocs.nebraska.gov+1\n\nFederal bona fide tenants have separate protections. The permanent restoration of the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act (PTFA), effective June 23, 2018, generally requires the immediate successor at foreclosure to give a qualifying tenant at least 90 days' notice before eviction. A protected existing fixed-term lease generally continues to its end, subject to the purchaser-primary-residence exception. These federal protections do not automatically extend to the foreclosed borrower or borrower's spouse, parent, or child. govinfo.gov+1\n\nThe legally decisive first questions are thus who holds the present right of possession, what occupancy relationship exists, which statutory process applies, whether federal protections alter it, and whether a court has issued an effective restitution order and writ.\n\n## A. Role, title, and possession-route findings\n\n### A1–A7. Which route can each person use?\n\n| Actor or occupant | Potential legal position | Required gateway | Consequence or unresolved boundary |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Foreclosing beneficiary or lender | May acquire ownership by valid purchase; otherwise remains secured creditor or agent | Sale, payment, deed/confirmation, and ownership proof | Lien or servicing status alone is not standing for restitution |\n| Trustee | Conducts power-of-sale process | Statutory appointment and deed authority | Trustee status alone does not make the trustee the owner entitled to occupy |\n| Successful nonjudicial bidder | Potential successor owner | Accepted bid, purchase-price payment, trustee-deed execution/delivery, applicable title protections | Bid acceptance terminates the trustor's statutory interests, but incomplete payment or undelivered deed still requires title analysis |\n| Judicial-foreclosure purchaser | Potential successor owner | Court confirmation, sheriff's deed, redemption/stay status | An unconfirmed judicial sale does not establish final possession rights |\n| Deed grantee or assignee | May claim through purchaser | Valid conveyance or assignment, including property/occupancy rights transferred | A deed or agency label cannot convey more than the transferor owned |\n| Loan servicer or collection agent | May act for owner if actually authorized | Agency or power-of-attorney authority | No automatic right to sue personally or remove an occupant |\n| Former borrower or owner | Possession becomes contestable after valid transfer | Actual title, sale and status of any pending court relief | Not automatically a URLTA tenant or PTFA bona fide tenant |\n| Nonborrowing spouse or co-owner | May retain independently owned or possessory interests | Deed, marital/homestead interests, joinder and adjudication | Marriage alone neither proves a lease nor eliminates an independent property interest |\n| Genuine tenant or subtenant | May hold surviving rental or statutory occupancy rights | Actual lease/tenancy, foreclosure timing, bona fides, rental/subsidy evidence | General FED, URLTA and PTFA must be classified separately |\n| Unrelated occupant without a lease or color of title | Potential general FED defendant | Actual possession and plaintiff's present superior right | Written three-day pre-suit notice and judicial determination remain required |\n\nThe independent sale/title gateways are §76-1010(1)–(2) for trustee deeds, and §§25-1530–25-1532 for judicial redemption, confirmation, and sheriff deeds. A trustee's acceptance of the highest bid and a court's confirmation of a judicial sale are not interchangeable. nebraskalegislature.gov+2\n\nNebraska §25-21,220 specifically identifies certain defendants remaining after judicial execution sales, and people occupying without color of title, as potential general FED defendants. That statutory list does not eliminate a bona fide tenant's independent protection or establish that a deed alone authorizes a private lockout. nebraskalegislature.gov\n\nActual title disputes matter. Marcuzzo allows the summary court to proceed until an actual material title controversy is established; Woodsonia requires dismissal when adjudicating possession necessarily requires resolving a disputed leasehold estate or comparable title interest. Summary FED is not a vehicle to adjudicate the full validity of a contested foreclosure, competing ownership, or continuing leasehold. \n\n### Narrow ancillary branches\n\nA valid consensual mortgage can override an ordinary homestead exemption from foreclosure, but homestead or spouse status does not automatically create a post-sale tenancy or negate an unadjudicated co-owner's rights. A recorded assignment of rents, receiver appointment, or mortgagee-in-possession arrangement can affect rent collection and control before final sale. None establishes that a loan servicer personally owns the dwelling or may bypass a possession court. The actual instrument and receivership order remain necessary.\n\n## B. Nebraska notice, hearing, restitution, and appeal procedures\n\n### B8–B13, B15–B17. General FED versus residential URLTA\n\n| Procedural question | General forcible entry and detainer | Residential URLTA restitution |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Courts | District or county court where territorial jurisdiction lies | District or county court |\n| Occupant type | Specified non-URLTA occupants, including some former owners and persons lacking color of title | Tenant under qualifying residential rental relationship |\n| Pre-suit notice | At least three days' written notice to leave under §25-21,221 | Ground-specific URLTA termination notice; not universally three days |\n| Pre-suit service | Personal copy or usual abode if person absent; premises posting/leaving only when person and usual abode cannot be found in county | Delivery under §76-1413 and specific termination provision; consensual electronic notice must meet statutory and UETA predicates |\n| Complaint | Describes premises and unlawful entry/detention | Specifies statutory ground, particular facts, property, and compliance with required URLTA notice |\n| Summons | Complaint attached; answer day for other claims; expedited service | Complaint attached; special URLTA summons and alternate-service rules |\n| Trial setting | 10–14 days after summons issuance | 10–14 days after summons issuance |\n| Default/nonappearance | Court still tries matter on proper service | Court still tries matter on proper service |\n| Jury | General FED can involve jury on demand; legally distinct damages claims preserve jury rights where applicable | URLTA possession is tried by a judge without a jury |\n| Restitution | Judgment for possession; at request court issues writ under §25-21,230 | Court declares forfeiture and at request issues writ under §76-1446 |\n| Officer | Sheriff or constable, not private purchaser's unilateral self-help | Sheriff or constable |\n| Writ period | Officer generally executes within 10 days after receiving writ | Writ directs restitution on a date no later than 10 days after issuance |\n| Appeal/stay | Appeal alone does not stay; approved cash bond or undertaking ordinarily required within 30 days; separate plaintiff bond can allow restitution despite defendant supersedeas | Immediate appeal of possession judgment recognized; stay requires judgment/cost deposit or bond and subsequent monthly rent paid into court |\n| Money claims | Rent or damage claims and other legal causes require their own proof; may be separately tried | Alternate posting-and-mail summons route precludes money judgment in that proceeding |\n\nThese distinctions come from the complete operative general FED §§25-21,219–235 and URLTA §§76-1441–1447. nebraskalegislature.gov+1\n\n### URLTA notice branches\n\nA qualifying residential tenancy can have materially different pre-suit notices:\n\n| Ground | Statutory notice and effect |\n| --- | --- |\n| Material tenant breach | Generally written notice describing violation, termination at least 30 days after receipt if uncured, with 14 days to remedy |\n| Repeat substantially similar breach within six months | Statutory 14-day termination branch when conditions satisfied |\n| Nonpayment of rent | Written notice allowing seven calendar days to pay before termination |\n| Week-to-week tenancy | At least seven days' written termination notice |\n| Month-to-month tenancy | Written notice at least 30 days before the specified periodic rental date |\n| Specified violent acts/threats | Separate five-day branch and applicable domestic-violence victim safeguards |\n| Fixed-term tenant holds over after expiration | §76-1437(3), possession with possible enhanced damages only for willful, non-good-faith holdover |\n\nThe landlord's asserted ground, the actual lease, delivery/receipt, available cure and applicable federal tenant rights all matter. The ordinary three-day general FED notice must not replace a longer or different URLTA notice. nebraskalegislature.gov\n\n### Procedural consequences of defective service or unresolved title\n\nA pre-suit termination notice is not the summons. The complaint must be properly served under the applicable route, with proof and statutory diligence before substitute/post-and-mail procedures.\n\nIn URLTA, the alternate front-door posting plus first-class mailing procedure after unsuccessful diligent service may confer a route to possession, but §76-1446 prohibits a money judgment when that substituted-service method is used. An unsupported assertion that the occupant was served does not establish personal jurisdiction for money damages. nebraskalegislature.gov\n\nA complaint, rent discussion or appeal does not itself stay possession. The exact judgment, writ, undertaking or bond, appellate order, bankruptcy stay and any agreement determine whether court-directed execution remains lawful.\n\n### B14, B18–B20. Defenses, agreements, money claims and unlawful removal\n\nNebraska possession defenses depend on the route. Potentially material issues include:\n\n- plaintiff's actual right to possession and standing;\n- proper pre-suit notice and valid service;\n- the existence and termination of a lease;\n- federal PTFA rights;\n- waiver through acceptance of rent with knowledge of a particular breach;\n- a performing forbearance or new rental agreement;\n- material title/leasehold disputes outside summary jurisdiction;\n- retaliation, discrimination, statutory cure, bankruptcy or SCRA protection where applicable.\n\nUnder §76-1433, a landlord's acceptance of rent with knowledge of a tenant's default can waive the right to terminate for that breach, unless otherwise agreed after the breach. It does not automatically prove a perpetual tenancy, forgive every subsequent default, or establish that a servicer was authorized to accept a new lease on the purchaser's behalf. nebraskalegislature.gov\n\nNebraska distinguishes possession from separate damages. In 132 Ventures v. Active Spine Physical Therapy, the Supreme Court recognized that a general FED possession judgment can be expedited while separately tried legal claims retain their jury rights. A purchaser's possession claim therefore does not automatically establish the amount of rent, use-and-occupancy damages, attorney fees, or security-deposit deductions. \n\nPrivate lockout and personal property. For URLTA tenants, §76-1436 restricts possession recovery and prohibits using essential-service interruption as a way to remove the tenant. Under §76-1430, a tenant wrongfully excluded or deprived of essential services can have a statutory possession/termination remedy, three months' periodic rent as liquidated damages, and reasonable attorney fees, subject to the actual violation and statutory prerequisites. nebraskalegislature.gov\n\nNebraska's separate Disposition of Personal Property Landlord and Tenant Act applies to property remaining after a tenancy has terminated or expired and the tenant has vacated. Section 69-2303 requires a description and appropriate notice to the former tenant and reasonably believed owners, with a claim date at least seven days after personal delivery or fourteen days after mailing. The notice must be given within the statutory six-month outer period. nebraskalegislature.gov\n\nAs amended effective July 18, 2026, §69-2308 permits conditional retention or disposal without auction when the landlord reasonably believes the total resale value of unreleased property is less than $2,000. At $2,000 or above, the statutory public-sale procedure applies unless another exception controls. Proper prior notice, handling, storage, release rights, actual ownership, and costs still matter. The $2,000 figure is not blanket permission to discard everything at a foreclosed property. nebraskalegislature.gov\n\nIn Pan v. IOC Realty Specialist, the Nebraska Supreme Court addressed statutory return of property after a commercial tenancy. It supports careful application of the Act's actual tenancy, claimant and return predicates—not extending that Act automatically to a foreclosed former owner who never rented from the purchaser. \n\n## C. Federal tenants, servicemembers and bankruptcy\n\n### C21–C27. Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act\n\nThe operative PTFA source is Title VII, §§701–703 of Public Law 111-22, as amended by §1484 of Public Law 111-203 and permanently restored by §304 of Public Law 115-174, effective June 23, 2018. It is largely carried as federal statutory-note material, rather than a freestanding newly codified section invented for this report. govinfo.gov+2\n\n| PTFA issue | Actual rule | Required proof or exception |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Covered foreclosure | Foreclosure of a federally related mortgage loan or any dwelling/residential real property | Not limited to loans with a federal guarantee |\n| Protected actor | Bona fide tenant with a tenancy predating the statutory notice-of-foreclosure event | Must not be mortgagor or mortgagor's child, spouse or parent |\n| Arm's-length condition | Tenancy must result from arm's-length transaction | Related-party or sham lease may fail |\n| Rent condition | Rent must not be substantially below fair-market rent, or be reduced/subsidized by a federal, state or local subsidy | Low subsidized rent is not automatically disqualifying |\n| New owner | Immediate successor in interest through foreclosure | Actual completed title transfer is necessary |\n| Notice-of-foreclosure event | Under 2010 §1484, date complete title transfers to successor by court order or security-instrument process | Not automatically the default notice, scheduled auction or initial complaint |\n| Notice to vacate | Successor must give at least 90 days before effective date | Valid notice, delivery and actual effective date remain needed |\n| Preexisting fixed-term lease | Generally honored until remaining term expires | Statutory exception for sale of unit to purchaser who will occupy as primary residence, still subject to 90-day notice |\n| At-will/no-term tenancy | At least 90-day federal notice | Nebraska termination and any greater local rights remain independently relevant |\n| Subsidized tenancy | PTFA expressly preserves additional federally or state-subsidized rules | Section 8/HAP documentation required |\n| Private damages action | No express PTFA statutory damages schedule | Private federal cause remains disputed/not established here; defense and remedies require actual procedural authority |\n\nThe original federal text and subsequent amendment expressly preserve state or local laws providing longer notice periods or additional protections. A Nebraska purchaser therefore cannot assume PTFA's 90 days overrides a longer protected lease term or an independently applicable state/local rule. govinfo.gov+1\n\nSection 703 separately protects Housing Choice Voucher/Section 8 tenancies, including continuing lease and housing-assistance-payment contract interests under specified conditions. A voucher, oral lease, or below-market rent therefore requires program-specific fact analysis rather than automatic exclusion. govinfo.gov\n\nAn existing rental obligation or ordinary tenant breach remains relevant. PTFA is not a universal ban on eviction for nonpayment, serious breach, or other legally sufficient grounds; it restricts foreclosure-based displacement and preserves the other applicable tenant safeguards. The statute does not itself establish one universal attorney-fee or damages award for every notice defect.\n\n### C28. Bankruptcy boundary\n\nUnder 11 U.S.C. §362(a), a bankruptcy petition generally stays acts to obtain possession or control of estate property and certain proceedings against the debtor. But §362(b)(22) separately addresses a landlord's residential eviction when the landlord obtained a qualifying possession judgment before the bankruptcy filing, subject to debtor protections under §362(l). Another exception, §362(b)(23), addresses specified property-endangerment or illegal-drug cases and §362(m) certification procedures. uscode.house.gov\n\nThe actual petition, debtor/tenant status, judgment-entry date, lease relationship, court certifications, stay relief and property-of-estate status determine the outcome. Bankruptcy discharge under §524 does not, without more, give a former owner a new lease, invalidate a surviving property interest, or establish a blanket right to remain. uscode.house.gov\n\n### C29. SCRA eviction protection and current 2026 limit\n\nUnder 50 U.S.C. §3951, a landlord or person with paramount title generally may not evict a servicemember or servicemember's dependents from a qualifying principal residence during military service without a court order, when the monthly rent is within the indexed statutory threshold.\n\nThe official 2026 Department of Defense publication sets the threshold at:\n\n2026 SCRA monthly-rent threshold: $10,542.60\n\nEffective January 1, 2026 · Federal Register, 91 FR 11527, March 10, 2026 · Notice 2026-04689.If a covered servicemember asks and service materially affects ability to pay agreed rent, §3951(b) directs the court to stay proceedings for 90 days, subject to a longer or shorter period justified by justice and equity, or adjust the lease obligation. The statute's eviction order requirement is separate from §3953 mortgage-foreclosure-sale protections, and §3951(e) expressly limits the application of §3932 to the eviction provision. \n\nA home owner's foreclosure, a servicemember's rental eviction, and an ordinary §3931 default judgment must each meet their own predicates. No individual's service or rent eligibility is established here.\n\n### C30. Discrimination, retaliation and utilities\n\nURLTA §76-1439 restricts retaliatory conduct following specified housing-code complaints or tenant organization, with material statutory exceptions including actual rent default and tenant-caused violations. Section 76-1436 restricts landlord utility interruption as eviction self-help. Federal and Nebraska fair-housing laws can provide separate discrimination or interference remedies when protected status, covered housing conduct, causal evidence and enforcement predicates exist.\n\nThese are conditional independent claims—not proof that every foreclosure purchaser is a landlord to every occupant or that any allegation automatically pauses a court writ. Full fair-housing, local housing-code and civil-rights remedies remain outside this pass. nebraskalegislature.gov\n\n## D. Cases, forms, evidence, and possession decision map\n\n### D31–D33. Controlling and materially relevant opinions\n\n| Case and source | Actual facts and posture | Majority holding and outcome | Material pinpoint and limits |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Federal National Mortgage Association v. Marcuzzo, 289 Neb. 301 (2014) | Foreclosure purchaser brought general FED against former owners. Owners referenced an unresolved title action, but no evidence establishing a continuing title dispute was presented before the county court continued the matter. | County court could proceed until a genuine title issue was established; unsupported allegation did not require dismissal. Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed. | Official PDF `https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00004763PUB`; printed pp.307–311/PDF indices 6–10, including p.309/PDF 8.  |\n| Woodsonia Hwy 281 v. American Multi-Cinema, 318 Neb. 592 (2025) | Commercial leasehold dispute arose from asserted termination or conveyance of a leasehold estate. Resolving possession required deciding whether the tenant's property interest remained valid. | FED cannot adjudicate the title issue. Supreme Court vacated the lower judgments and directed dismissal of the FED action. | Official advance opinion `https://www.ne.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011925PUB`; printed pp.607–612/PDF indices 15–20. Commercial facts; jurisdictional principle relevant to residential claims.  |\n| Lund Co. v. Clark, 30 Neb. App. 351 (2021) | Wife was named tenant, husband lived there but was not a tenant or named occupant under the agreement. Landlord gave husband a three-day notice and brought general FED. | URLTA did not apply to the husband's particular occupancy; Court of Appeals found no plain error in general FED restitution and affirmed. | Official advance PDF `https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008172PUB`; pp.356–358/PDF indices 5–7. Does not mean every spouse lacks tenancy rights.  |\n| 132 Ventures v. Active Spine Physical Therapy, 313 Neb. 45 (2022) | Landlord brought general FED with associated contractual and guaranty damage claims. Possession was expedited, but the defendants demanded a jury for the separate legal claims. | Statutory possession procedure did not waive an otherwise applicable jury right on separately tried legal damages. Supreme Court reversed the damages disposition and remanded as appropriate. | Official PDF `https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009079PUB`; pp.52–57/PDF indices 7–12. Commercial lease and personal guaranty facts.  |\n| Johnson v. Vosberg, 316 Neb. 658 (2024) | URLTA possession judgment entered while additional tenancy-related claims remained pending. | URLTA §76-1447 authorizes immediate appeal of the possession judgment; pending tenancy claims do not prevent appeal. | Official advance opinion `https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewOpinion?docId=N00011052PUB`; pp.665–667/PDF indices 7–9.  |\n| TDP Phase One v. The Club at the Yard, 307 Neb. 795 (2020) | General FED possession claims were adjudicated while other claims remained pending. | Unlike URLTA's express immediate-appeal scheme, ordinary final-judgment requirements can prevent appeal of an FED order lacking necessary §25-1315 certification. | Actual published-opinion reproduction `https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2020/s-19-1198.html`; HTML, no verified PDF index. Distinguished expressly in Johnson. |\n| Enterprise Bank v. Knight, 20 Neb. App. 662 (2013) | Former borrower remained after trustee sale; bank obtained FED restitution. Borrower appealed but failed to establish the required supersedeas security. Bankruptcy and sale-confirmation arguments also arose. | The court was not required to create supersedeas security for the appellant. Appeal did not automatically halt writ execution; judgment affirmed. | Official PDF `https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00004294PUB`; pp.665–669/PDF indices 3–7, including p.667/PDF 5. No automatic conclusion that every foreclosure sale is valid.  |\n| Pan v. IOC Realty Specialist, 301 Neb. 256 (2018) | Commercial tenant sought return of movable property retained after the tenancy. | The Court applied the Disposition of Personal Property Landlord and Tenant Act to the proven landlord–tenant relationship and addressed the statutory release and ownership predicates. | Official PDF `https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011278PUB`; pp.267–275/PDF indices 11–19. Not a former-owner-without-tenancy holding.  |\n| Logan v. U.S. Bank, 722 F.3d 1163 (9th Cir. 2013) | Tenant sued a foreclosure successor for damages and injunction after a purportedly inadequate eviction notice. | Ninth Circuit held that PTFA did not create an independent implied federal damages/injunction cause of action; dismissal affirmed. It discussed PTFA's defensive role in state eviction. | Actual published-opinion reproduction `https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/10-55671/10-55671-2013-07-16.html`; reported pp.1168–1173. Persuasive, not binding Eighth Circuit precedent; no complete current private-action citator performed. law.justia.com |\n\nThe holdings above are limited by their procedural posture. A decision affirming an eviction does not establish that every future eviction is lawful, and a successful title or leasehold jurisdiction challenge does not establish the occupant's ultimate ownership or right to remain.\n\n### D31–D32. Official statewide forms and instructions\n\n| Source | Full literal URL | Version, actual read bounds and purpose | Limits |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| CC 3:24 — Praecipe for Writ of Restitution/Execution | `https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-24.pdf` | Nebraska Judicial Branch; NEW 09/2017; printed p.1/PDF index 0, complete page visually inspected. Requests issuance of a writ identifying parties, case number, premises and county sheriff or constable; references §§25-21,230 and 76-1446. | A praecipe is a request, not a possession judgment, signed writ, sheriff order or proof of service.  |\n| Nebraska Judicial Branch landlord self-help page | `https://nebraskajudicial.gov/self-help/renterlandlord/landlord` | Current public official page read October 26, 2026. Distinguishes landlord/tenant restitution from general FED, and states that court forms are not currently available for that category. | A category page's lack of downloadable complaint forms does not establish absence of attorney-drafted, county, court-ordered or other legally usable pleadings. Nebraska Judicial Branch |\n| Statutory general FED writ form | `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,230` | Nebraska Legislature; operative statutory form read through §25-21,230, directed to sheriff/constable to restore possession. | Template is not an actual issued writ or clearance for physical removal. nebraskalegislature.gov |\n| URLTA statutory complaint, summons and restitution requirements | `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/display_html.php?begin_section=76-1440&end_section=76-1447` | Nebraska Legislature; complete current operative text of §§76-1440–1447 read. Defines pleading fields, service, trial, judgment and appeal; not a fill-in PDF. | Specific rental relationship, filing, process and order facts remain necessary. nebraskalegislature.gov |\n\nNo form was filled, filed, sent, submitted or used to seek actual possession.\n\n### D34. Practical evidence checklist — what each legal question would require\n\n| Stage | Necessary evidence | Why it matters |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Foreclosure ownership | Trust deed or mortgage; sale notice and return; bid/payment record; trustee or sheriff deed; judicial confirmation; assignments | Identifies present owner, transfer date and whether title is complete |\n| Plaintiff authority | Deed grantee, entity records, assignment or agency/power of attorney | Separates owner from lender, trustee, servicer and unauthorized agent |\n| Occupant status | Former ownership, deed/title, marriage, residence, rental agreement, consent to occupancy, subtenancy | Determines general FED versus URLTA and retained property rights |\n| Federal PTFA | Mortgage/foreclosure record, complete-title transfer, lease origination and expiration, market rent or subsidy, relationship to mortgagor | Establishes bona fide tenant, 90-day notice and lease-to-end rights |\n| Nebraska termination | Written notice, exact ground, dates, contract provisions, recipient and delivery evidence | Determines statutory prerequisites and cure rights |\n| Court process | Complaint, summons, proof of service/diligence, hearing notice, continuances, judgment | Establishes jurisdiction and judicial opportunity to contest |\n| Restitution | Court's signed judgment, requested and issued writ, sheriff/constable receipt and return | Distinguishes court authority from purchaser's private intentions |\n| Appellate or federal stay | Appeal filing, approved bond/deposit, rent deposits, court stay, bankruptcy docket, SCRA order | Determines whether a writ can presently be executed |\n| Property left behind | Occupant's status, inventory, owner identity, condition/value, storage, notice, response, costs, officer actions | Determines whether the tenant-property statute or another property remedy applies |\n| Payments and agreements | Rent receipts, deposit account, lease amendments, forbearance, possession agreement, authorized signatures | Can change termination, waiver, damages or right to possession |\n\nThis is an evidence specification, not authorization to obtain anyone's private file.\n\n### D35. Urgent-act versus automatic-stay decision map\n\nThe diagram expresses legal decision points, not a determination that any particular property may be entered or occupant removed. An allegation, complaint, unanswered letter, modification request or appeal alone is not a substitute for an actual court order or applicable statutory stay.\n\n## E. Twelve bounded hypothetical workflows\n\nEach workflow uses invented teaching facts, not any actual Nebraska borrower, property, lease, judgment, creditor, occupant, or eviction. Every result remains conditional on the legal and evidentiary predicates stated.\n\n### E01 — Former owner after a nonjudicial trustee sale\n\nHypothetical: A beneficiary purchased a residential property at a trustee sale. The former borrower remains inside. The trustee deed's delivery and payment records are missing. No new lease is alleged.\n\n| Issue | Result |\n| --- | --- |\n| Trustee auction occurred | Assumed |\n| Bid paid and trustee deed delivered | Unknown |\n| Purchaser's present right to possession | Not fully established |\n| Bona fide PTFA tenancy of borrower | Not established; mortgagor is excluded from PTFA bona fide tenant definition |\n| General FED possible | Yes, if plaintiff has a present superior possessory right and applicable §25-21,220 facts |\n| Pre-suit notice | General FED three-day written notice, if that route applies |\n| Private lockout | Not authorized merely by sale |\n\nDecisionmaker: District or county court in a qualifying FED action. Next legal evidence: sale/payment, executed deed, notice, complaint, service and any stay. nebraskalegislature.gov+1\n\n### E02 — Judicial foreclosure sale not yet confirmed\n\nHypothetical: A sheriff accepted a bid, but the district court has not entered confirmation. The former owner has a pending redemption request and an appeal of the foreclosure decree.\n\nThe purchaser cannot simply treat auction day as equivalent to completed judicial title. Redemption remains available before confirmation. An appeal does not automatically stay enforcement, but actual supersedeas or another order may.\n\nConditional result: The possession route is held pending confirmation, redemption, actual decree, appellate security and deed evidence. No move-out date is calculable. nebraskalegislature.gov+1\n\n### E03 — Borrower's spouse calls herself a tenant\n\nHypothetical: The mortgagor's spouse occupied the property before and after foreclosure, but there is no proven independent rental agreement. The spouse also claims an undivided title interest.\n\nThe PTFA's bona fide tenant definition expressly excludes the mortgagor's spouse under the mortgage contract. That does not extinguish a separate ownership, homestead, adjudication or contract right. Nor does marital status alone create a new URLTA tenancy with the purchaser.\n\nConditional result: First resolve actual title and any relevant adjudication; then determine whether general FED is available. A genuine title dispute may require another proceeding.\n\n### E04 — Unrelated tenant paying market rent under a surviving fixed-term lease\n\nHypothetical:\n\n- unrelated tenant;\n- arms-length lease;\n- market rent;\n- lease signed before complete title transfer;\n- fixed lease expiration at event `L`;\n- foreclosure completed at event `F`;\n- no sale to a purchaser who will occupy as primary residence.\n\nThe immediate successor generally must honor the remaining lease term and provide at least 90 days' notice before eviction.\n\nPlain text\n```\nEarliest ordinary foreclosure-displacement date\n    cannot precede both:\n    (1) expiration of the protected remaining lease term, and\n    (2) effective date of a valid notice at least 90 days beforehand\n```\n\nFor this assumed lease, the protected lease-end condition is material. No calendar can be computed without the actual lease, notice and transfer dates.\n\n### E05 — Periodic tenancy, low rent and potential subsidy\n\nHypothetical: An unrelated occupant pays $700 monthly for a dwelling with alleged $1,500 market rent, but receives an unidentified housing subsidy. The parties have no signed lease.\n\nPlain text\n```\n$700 ÷ $1,500 = 46.67% of asserted market rent\n```\n\nThat ratio does not establish that the tenancy is or is not bona fide.\n\n- A valid federal, state or local subsidy can satisfy PTFA's rent alternative.\n- An arms-length tenancy can exist without a signed fixed-term lease, depending on underlying state law and proof.\n- With qualifying at-will/periodic tenancy, PTFA's 90-day floor and Nebraska's own termination requirements remain separate.\n\nHold: Actual subsidy, rental assent, fair-market rent, timing and payment evidence.\n\n### E06 — Successor asserts a purchaser-primary-residence exception\n\nHypothetical: A purchaser says the tenant's fixed lease may end early because the unit will become the purchaser's own primary home.\n\nThe exception is not satisfied by a bare statement of future intention. Section 702(a)(2)(A) refers to termination effective on the sale of the unit to a purchaser who will occupy it as a primary residence, still subject to a qualifying 90-day notice. Actual successor, sale, purchaser status, intended occupancy and notice must be established.\n\nAn unrelated protected fixed-term tenant does not lose the lease-end protection merely because a foreclosure bidder would prefer a vacant house. govinfo.gov\n\n### E07 — Genuine title dispute in summary possession\n\nHypothetical: A foreclosure purchaser brings FED. The occupant offers a recorded deed and evidence that a prior ownership transfer invalidates the purchaser's claimed superior interest.\n\n- A conclusory statement “the foreclosure was illegal” alone does not force dismissal.\n- An actual material issue requiring adjudication of ownership or an existing property interest can place the controversy beyond general FED's summary jurisdiction.\n\nConditional outcome: The general FED court may proceed until the title issue is established. When resolving possession necessarily requires adjudicating a genuine title or continuing leasehold estate, Woodsonia requires dismissal of that FED action, leaving the dispute to an appropriate proceeding. Dismissal is not an adjudication that the occupant owns the property. \n\n### E08 — Private purchaser proposes a lockout and removal of furniture\n\nHypothetical: Buyer obtains a recorded deed but no possession judgment. Occupant remains home, and buyer proposes changing locks and putting furniture on the sidewalk.\n\nEstablished: A deed may support a claim to possession. Missing: judgment, writ, proper process, occupant status, and statutory authority to handle property.\n\n- A URLTA landlord generally cannot employ self-help exclusion or interruption of essential services.\n- General FED provides judicial restitution through a sheriff or constable.\n- The tenant-personal-property disposal statute requires an actual terminated tenancy, vacancy, notice and other conditions; it is not a generic postforeclosure furniture-disposal license.\n\nOutcome: No lawful self-help conclusion follows from the hypothetical buyer's plan.\n\n### E09 — SCRA tenant and indexed monthly-rent limit\n\nHypothetical: A covered servicemember rents a residence during military service. Actual agreed rent is either $10,000 or $10,600 monthly.\n\nCurrent 2026 published threshold:\n\nPlain text\n```\n$10,542.60 per month\n```\n\n| Assumed monthly rent | Comparison | SCRA §3951(a) threshold result |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| $10,000 | $10,542.60 − $10,000 = $542.60 below cap | Within the threshold if all other predicates exist |\n| $10,600 | $10,600 − $10,542.60 = $57.40 above cap | Threshold not met for this specific provision |\n\nIf within the threshold, the landlord or paramount-title holder needs a court order to evict. If military service materially affects ability to pay, the separate §3951(b) stay/adjustment provision can apply under its conditions. The dollar comparison does not establish service status, dependency, court entitlement, a granted stay or any actual deadline. \n\n### E10 — Bankruptcy petition with or without prepetition possession judgment\n\nHypothetical: A tenant files bankruptcy while a new owner seeks possession.\n\nBranch A: No possession judgment entered before petition. Section 362(a) can stay continuation of the action or acts to recover estate possession, subject to applicable relief and exceptions.\n\nBranch B: Landlord obtained a qualifying residential possession judgment before petition. Section 362(b)(22) potentially applies, subject to the specific §362(l) certification, deposit and cure protections.\n\nHold: Petition, lease, judgment date, stay status, certifications and bankruptcy court orders. Neither blanket stay nor automatic eviction is assumed. uscode.house.gov\n\n### E11 — Buyer accepts rent and signs a possession agreement\n\nHypothetical: After foreclosure, a purchaser authorized to lease the unit accepts monthly payments and signs a written agreement allowing the former occupant to remain through event `T`.\n\nThe relationship may now be governed by an actual rental or occupancy agreement rather than the original former-owner status alone. Under URLTA, accepting rent with knowledge of a particular default can waive termination for that breach, subject to the statute's postbreach-agreement exception. The term, capacity, conditions, payments, termination rights, and authority of the signatory must be established.\n\nConditional outcome: No automatic current eviction, permanent tenancy, or unconditional stay is established from one payment or unsigned draft.\n\n### E12 — URLTA tenant belongings and conditional damages\n\nHypothetical A: A genuine URLTA tenant is unlawfully locked out. Monthly periodic rent is $1,200.\n\nPotential §76-1430 liquidated damages:\n\nPlain text\n```\n3 × $1,200 = $3,600\n```\n\nThis is the statutory amount only if the unlawful-exclusion predicates are established, separately from reasonable attorney fees.\n\nHypothetical B: A tenant holds over willfully and without good faith. Monthly periodic rent is $1,200 and the landlord proves actual damages of $800.\n\nPlain text\n```\nThree months' periodic rent = 3 × $1,200 = $3,600\nThreefold proven damages     = 3 ×   $800 = $2,400\nLarger statutory benchmark                $3,600\n```\n\nSection 76-1437(3) permits not more than the greater applicable amount, plus reasonable attorney fees; it does not make the maximum automatic.\n\nHypothetical C: After a terminated tenancy and proper prior notice, the landlord reasonably believes the total resale value of unreleased belongings is $1,999. That is below the current $2,000 threshold; conditional nonauction disposition may be available. At exactly $2,000, that particular low-value exception does not apply. Neither figure authorizes immediate disposal without the other statutory steps. Nebraska Legislature+2\n\n## F. Source register — S_NE-P33-S001 onward\n\nAccess date for fresh readings: October 26, 2026, Pacific and UTC. No individual fetch time is asserted. “Fresh” means the material operative source or opinion body was actually read during this pass. “Partial” means only the identified passages were read. PDF images and text are distinguished from HTML and public-index results.\n\n| Source ID | Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint | Version, access status and limits |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| S_NE-P33-S001 | Nebraska Legislature — General Forcible Entry and Detainer Act. `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/display_html.php?begin_section=25-21,219&end_section=25-21,235` — complete operative §§25-21,219–25-21,235, especially §§219–223, 225–227 and 230–235. | Fresh complete material HTML read. Current published Nebraska codification. §25-21,219 shows 2021 LB320 amendment; section histories differ. HTML has no printed page/PDF index. No entire legislative-history audit. Nebraska Legislature |\n| S_NE-P33-S002 | Nebraska Legislature — URLTA definitions, landlord/tenant remedies, possession and appeals. `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/display_html.php?begin_section=76-1401&end_section=76-1449` — complete material §§76-1408–1414, 1425–1433, 1435–1447, including §§76-1442.01 and 76-1431. | Fresh full material HTML read. Current publication includes 2025 LB80 provisions in the relevant domestic-violence branches. Not an audit of every landlord–tenant regulatory or judicial issue. nebraskalegislature.gov |\n| S_NE-P33-S003 | Nebraska Legislature — FED limitation and time computation. `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-203`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2221`; relevant general civil service cross-reference `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-505.01`. | Fresh §§25-203 and 25-2221 complete text; general service cross-reference used narrowly with S001/S002. Current official HTML. No case-specific dates computed. Nebraska Legislature+1 |\n| S_NE-P33-S004 | Nebraska Legislature — narrow foreclosure/title gateways. `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1010`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1530`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1531`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1532`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2145`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=40-103`. | Fresh complete material §§76-1010, 25-1530, 25-1531. Remaining sections used only as narrow statutory cross-references; no full rereading of PASS-27/PASS-28. Current official HTML. nebraskalegislature.gov+2 |\n| S_NE-P33-S005 | Nebraska Legislature — tenant-property disposition. `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2302`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2303`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2307`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2308`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2309`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2312`. | Fresh complete material current HTML read. Current §69-2308 reflects 2026 LB834's $2,000 threshold, operative July 18, 2026. Personal-property Act applicability requires a tenancy and other statutory facts. Nebraska Legislature+3 |\n| S_NE-P33-S006 | U.S. Congress/GovInfo — Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009. `https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-111publ22/html/PLAW-111publ22.htm` — Title VII §§701–703, printed 123 Stat. 1660–1662, HTML material lines 1798–1878; PDF index N/A. | Fresh actual enacted statute read. Historical 2009 enactment used together with 2010 amendments and 2018 permanent restoration; not treated as unchanged 2009 text in isolation. govinfo.gov |\n| S_NE-P33-S007 | U.S. Congress/GovInfo — Dodd–Frank §1484 PTFA clarification. `https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-111publ203/html/PLAW-111publ203.htm` — §1484, printed 124 Stat. 2204, HTML lines 52531–52546. | Fresh enacted text read. Clarifies complete-title-transfer notice-of-foreclosure date and amends the earlier lease wording. Historical amendment, operative within restored PTFA. GovInfo |\n| S_NE-P33-S008 | U.S. Congress/GovInfo — 2018 permanent PTFA restoration. `https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-115publ174/html/PLAW-115publ174.htm` — §304(a)–(c), printed 132 Stat. 1339, HTML lines 2739–2752. | Fresh enacted text read. Restored §§701–703, repealed sunset, effective 30 days after May 24, 2018. No new sunset was found in these operative provisions. GovInfo |\n| S_NE-P33-S009 | Office of Law Revision Counsel — 50 U.S.C. §3951, SCRA eviction and distress. `https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-118/t50/s3951/` — subsections (a)(1)–(3), (b)–(e). | Fresh complete material HTML read. Despite the literal path segment `119-118`, the displayed official header identifies text through PL 119-120, October 7, 2026. Do not infer currency from the URL path alone. USCode |\n| S_NE-P33-S010 | U.S. Department of Defense/Federal Register — 2026 SCRA rent adjustment. `https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-03-10/pdf/2026-04689.pdf` — printed 91 FR 11527, PDF index 0, column containing maximum $10,542.60. | Fresh one-page official PDF text and image read. Published March 10, 2026; expressly effective January 1, 2026. The notice is the annual adjustment, not a new eviction statute.  |\n| S_NE-P33-S011 | Office of Law Revision Counsel — bankruptcy stay/discharge. `https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t11/s362/`; `https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t11/s524/` — §§362(a), (b)(22)–(23), (l)–(m), 524(a), (e). | Fresh current official HTML read, displayed through PL 119-124, October 15, 2026. Bankruptcy procedure and exceptions limited to eviction gateway; no actual bankruptcy proceeding reviewed. USCode+1 |\n| S_NE-P33-S012 | Nebraska Judicial Branch — CC 3:24 Praecipe for Writ of Restitution/Execution. `https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-24.pdf` — printed p.1/PDF index 0, entire form. | Fresh official page-image inspection, NEW 09/2017. Request form only, not possession adjudication or issued writ.  |\n| S_NE-P33-S013 | Nebraska Judicial Branch — Landlord public instructions. `https://nebraskajudicial.gov/self-help/renterlandlord/landlord` — current page, paragraphs differentiating landlord/tenant restitution and general FED, statement concerning unavailable forms for that category. | Fresh official website read. Public index/guidance, not statutory replacement or complete local-form directory. Nebraska Judicial Branch |\n| S_NE-P33-S014 | Nebraska Supreme Court — Federal National Mortgage Association v. Marcuzzo, 289 Neb. 301 (2014). `https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00004763PUB` — printed pp.303–311/PDF indices 2–10; especially p.309/PDF 8. | Fresh official case text and selected page-image inspection. Final published merits opinion. A mere title allegation was insufficient on its record; not a merits foreclosure-validity adjudication.  |\n| S_NE-P33-S015 | Nebraska Supreme Court — Woodsonia Hwy 281 v. American Multi-Cinema, 318 Neb. 592 (2025). `https://www.ne.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011925PUB` — printed pp.607–612/PDF indices 15–20; particularly pp.610, 612/PDF indices 18, 20. | Fresh official advance opinion text and page images. Court vacated and ordered dismissal of general FED; commercial leasehold title controversy, not a holding that every tenant dispute exceeds URLTA jurisdiction. No separate certified edition or full citator examined.  |\n| S_NE-P33-S016 | Nebraska Court of Appeals — Lund Co. v. Clark, 30 Neb. App. 351 (2021). `https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008172PUB` — printed pp.356–358/PDF indices 5–7, particularly p.357/PDF 6. | Fresh official advance opinion and page image read. Affirmed under plain-error posture; spouse/occupant not party to the relevant tenancy on the case record.  |\n| S_NE-P33-S017 | Nebraska Supreme Court — 132 Ventures v. Active Spine Physical Therapy, 313 Neb. 45 (2022). `https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009079PUB` — printed pp.52–57/PDF indices 7–12; p.55/PDF 10 inspected. | Fresh official advance opinion text and page image read. Jury treatment of separate damages claims; commercial facts. No blanket jury rule for URLTA possession.  |\n| S_NE-P33-S018 | Nebraska Supreme Court — Johnson v. Vosberg, 316 Neb. 658 (2024). `https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewOpinion?docId=N00011052PUB` — printed pp.664–668/PDF indices 6–10; p.666/PDF 8 inspected. | Fresh official opinion body and selected page image. URLTA judgment immediately appealable under §76-1447 despite pending tenancy claims; distinguish general FED.  |\n| S_NE-P33-S019 | Nebraska Supreme Court — TDP Phase One v. The Club at the Yard, 307 Neb. 795 (2020). `https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2020/s-19-1198.html` — actual published-opinion HTML, material finality/certification discussion. | Public reproduction of actual majority opinion, HTML; printed-body page and PDF index not independently mapped. Context corroborated in Johnson. No case-specific current docket reviewed. |\n| S_NE-P33-S020 | Nebraska Court of Appeals — Enterprise Bank v. Knight, 20 Neb. App. 662 (2013). `https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00004294PUB` — printed pp.664–669/PDF indices 2–7; p.667/PDF 5 inspected. | Fresh official opinion body and selected page image. Supersedeas failure and title/bankruptcy arguments in former-borrower FED posture; no general foreclosure validity finding.  |\n| S_NE-P33-S021 | Nebraska Supreme Court — Pan v. IOC Realty Specialist, 301 Neb. 256 (2018). `https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011278PUB` — printed pp.267–275/PDF indices 11–19; p.268/PDF 12 inspected. | Fresh official material opinion and page image. Tenant-property Act application in a commercial lease; not generic former-owner personal-property rule.  |\n| S_NE-P33-S022 | U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit — Logan v. U.S. Bank, 722 F.3d 1163 (2013). `https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/10-55671/10-55671-2013-07-16.html` — actual opinion majority, reported pp.1168–1173; HTML/PDF index N/A. | Fresh published-opinion reproduction read. Denied implied PTFA private federal cause; persuasive only in Nebraska, not controlling Eighth Circuit. No exhaustive modern citator. law.justia.com |\n| S_NE-P33-S023 | Nebraska Legislature — unlawful exclusion, retention and holdover remedies. `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1430`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1433`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1436`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1437`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1439`. | Material provisions freshly read within S002; §76-1430 separately verified. URLs are complete literal locators, not separately counted as independent proof of a new rule. Nebraska Legislature |\n| S_NE-P33-S024 | Nebraska Legislature — specific URLTA restitution/appeal. `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1441`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1442`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1442.01`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1446`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1447`. | Fresh material official HTML, current operative text; source repetitions supplement S002, not independent authorities. Nebraska Legislature+2 |\n| S_NE-P33-S025 | Nebraska Legislature — statutory possession writ, appeal and restitution. `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,230`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,231`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,234`; `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,235`. | Fresh operative text within S001; independent exact locators supplied for procedures. nebraskalegislature.gov |\n\n### Source limitations\n\nThe official legislative texts establish the statutory duties and current published versions. The primary court opinions establish holdings within the facts and appellate posture shown. They do not independently authenticate an individual title, lease, service record or sheriff action.\n\nNo full 2025–2026 legislative amendment reconciliation, trial-docket search, county rules survey, commercial citator, private lease database, or complete federal housing-program regulatory audit was performed.\n\n## G. Claim register — S_NE-P33-C001 onward\n\n| Claim ID | Precise proposition | Source ID and pinpoint | Conditions, exceptions, confidence |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| S_NE-P33-C001 | Foreclosure sale and immediate physical possession are distinct legal events; the purchaser needs present possession rights and lawful judicial process. | S001 §§219–230; S004 §§76-1010, 25-1530–1532 | Route-specific; high |\n| C002 | Trustee deed conveys the defined trustor interests without ordinary post-sale redemption; bid acceptance terminates statutory trustor interests, with deed/payment and title predicates separate. | S004 §76-1010(1)–(2) | High |\n| C003 | Judicial sale is subject to redemption before confirmation and requires confirmation and sheriff deed for the completed title route. | S004 §§25-1530–1532 | High |\n| C004 | Qualified general FED lies in district or county court, including specified judicial-sale judgment debtors and no-color-of-title occupants; URLTA premises are excluded. | S001 §§25-21,219–220 | High |\n| C005 | A true title or continuing leasehold-estate controversy requiring adjudication defeats general FED jurisdiction; a bare unresolved allegation alone may not. | S014 Marcuzzo, S015 Woodsonia | High, facts decisive |\n| C006 | A lender, trustee, servicer or agent does not establish ownership/standing from its label alone. | S004, S001, S014 | Actual title/agency authority required |\n| C007 | Former-owner homestead, spouse, title or redemption claims are not interchangeable with a new tenancy or federal PTFA rights. | S004 §§25-1530, 40-103; S006 §702(b) | High bounded conclusion |\n| C008 | General FED requires at least three days' written pre-suit notice with the specified personal, abode or conditional property service. | S001 §25-21,221 | High |\n| C009 | General FED complaint must describe property and unlawful entry/detention; summons attaches complaint and uses statutory expedited service/trial rules. | S001 §§25-21,222–223 | High |\n| C010 | General FED summons service is within three nonjudicial-day-excluding days, return within five, and trial 10–14 days after issuance; alternative service needs failed diligent efforts and affidavit. | S001 §25-21,223 | High; real issuance and service records required |\n| C011 | Properly served nonappearance still requires a trial; general FED may involve jury on demand. | S001 §§25-21,224–227 | High |\n| C012 | General FED restitution requires court judgment and requested writ directed to sheriff or constable, with ten-day officer execution rule. | S001 §§25-21,230–231 | High |\n| C013 | General FED appeal alone is not supersedeas; approved cash bond/undertaking generally required within 30 days, subject to plaintiff's separate §235 restitution-bond branch. | S001 §§25-21,234–235; S020 Knight | High |\n| C014 | FED action has a one-year suit limitation from accrual; that period is not a universal URLTA tenancy or title-action limitation. | S003 §25-203; S001 | High |\n| C015 | URLTA requires a qualifying tenant under an actual rental agreement, which can be oral or written; general FED exclusion follows from actual tenancy status. | S002 §§76-1408, 76-1410, 76-1414; S016 Lund | High |\n| C016 | URLTA notices differ by ground: 30/14 material breach, 7-day nonpayment, 7-day weekly, 30-day monthly and specified five-day exception branches. | S002 §§76-1431, 76-1437 | High, exact tenant facts required |\n| C017 | URLTA permits consensual electronic tenancy notices only under §76-1413 and the UETA-related conditions. | S002 §76-1413 | High; no blanket email-service conclusion |\n| C018 | URLTA complaint must specify statutory authority, particular facts, property and notice compliance. | S002/S024 §76-1441 | High |\n| C019 | URLTA summons has expedited timing, diligence-based alternate posting plus mail, and no plaintiff money judgment under that alternate service method. | S002/S024 §§76-1442, 76-1442.01, 76-1446 | High |\n| C020 | URLTA possession trial is judge without jury; tenant may assert legal/equitable defenses and counterclaims; nonappearance still requires trial. | S002 §§76-1444–1446 | High |\n| C021 | URLTA restitution uses a court-requested writ with possession date no later than ten days after writ issuance; appeal stay requires security and continued monthly rent deposits. | S002/S024 §§76-1446–1447; S018 Johnson | High |\n| C022 | URLTA possession judgment can be immediately appealed despite tenancy damages claims pending; general FED finality can differ. | S018 Johnson, S019 TDP | High, procedural context matters |\n| C023 | Acceptance of rent with knowledge of default waives the right to terminate for that breach unless postbreach agreement provides otherwise. | S002/S023 §76-1433 | High; actual acceptance and authority |\n| C024 | URLTA bars wrongful landlord self-help lockout/utility interruption and provides conditional restitution, liquidated damages and fee remedies. | S002/S023 §§76-1430, 76-1436 | High |\n| C025 | Bad-faith willful tenant holdover allows enhanced amount no greater than the specified three-month-rent/threefold-actual-damage alternative, plus fees. | S002/S023 §76-1437(3) | High, not automatic |\n| C026 | Tenant-property statute requires qualifying terminated tenancy, vacated premises, notice, release process and conditional $2,000 low-value branch under current law. | S005 §§69-2302–2309; S021 Pan | High, non-tenant owner application held |\n| C027 | PTFA enacted 2009, amended 2010, permanently restored effective June 23, 2018. | S006–S008 | High |\n| C028 | PTFA covers foreclosures of federally related mortgages or residential real property, not exclusively federally insured loans. | S006 §702(a) | High |\n| C029 | Bona fide tenancy excludes mortgagor/parent/spouse/child, requires arms-length terms and market rent or qualifying government subsidy. | S006 §702(b) | High, actual tenant facts |\n| C030 | PTFA's foreclosure-notice event is complete title transfer under 2010 §1484; not automatically default notice or auction. | S007 §1484 | High |\n| C031 | PTFA successor must give qualifying tenant at least 90-day notice; existing fixed lease generally runs to term, with precise purchaser-primary-residence exception. | S006 §702(a)(1)–(2), S007 | High |\n| C032 | PTFA preserves greater state/local and federal/state-subsidized tenancy protections. | S006 §702(a); S006 §703 | High |\n| C033 | Separate Section 8 lease/HAP continuity requirements can apply after foreclosure. | S006 §703 | High as gateway, program facts missing |\n| C034 | PTFA lacks an express damages schedule; Logan rejects an independent implied private federal action in the Ninth Circuit, not binding Eighth Circuit authority. | S022 Logan; S006 | High for Logan; Nebraska application held |\n| C035 | Bankruptcy §362 may stay possession action, subject to specified prepetition residential possession-judgment and other exceptions and certification/cure branches. | S011 §362(a), (b)(22)–(23), (l)–(m) | High conditional |\n| C036 | Discharge alone does not award possession, create a new lease or necessarily extinguish surviving in-rem rights. | S011 §524 | High boundary |\n| C037 | SCRA §3951 requires court order for covered servicemember/dependent eviction by landlord or paramount-title actor, within indexed rent threshold. | S009 §3951(a); S010 | High |\n| C038 | 2026 §3951 monthly rent threshold is $10,542.60; conditional court stay/adjustment differs from mortgage-sale §3953. | S009 §3951(b), S010 p.11527/PDF0 | High |\n| C039 | URLTA anti-retaliation, anti-lockout and limited fair-housing boundaries are separate from foreclosure title claims. | S002 §§76-1436, 76-1439 | High narrowly; full fair-housing dossier excluded |\n| C040 | Nebraska official CC 3:24 is a praecipe requesting restitution writ, not a judgment or actual writ. | S012 p.1/PDF0 | High |\n| C041 | Judicial Branch public landlord page currently lacks downloadable eviction complaint forms in that category; no universal statewide-absence finding follows. | S013 | High bounded observation |\n| C042 | Plaintiff/occupant must prove their own title, lease, notice, process, appeal, stay and writ facts; no record was inspected here. | S001–S025 synthesis | Conditional, no actual-case conclusion |\n| C043 | One year for ordinary general FED does not automatically govern URLTA holdover or every separate title/ejectment cause. | S003 §25-203; S002 §76-1437 | High boundary |\n| C044 | A genuine disagreement over a leasehold estate is not automatically resolvable in general FED merely by awarding possession based on disputed title. | S015 Woodsonia, S014 Marcuzzo | High, jurisdiction fact-specific |\n| C045 | Property-return and tenant-damage remedies require actual tenancy, statutory violation, causal facts and proof; no foreclosure deed alone creates them. | S005, S002, S021 Pan | High bounded synthesis |\n\nNo new private cause of action is inferred from a regulatory violation, filing, notice defect or case citation merely because one of these claims identifies a potential defense.\n\n## H. Complete 36-item component coverage table\n\nEach row maps the corresponding numbered research request to claim IDs, evidence status, and the next missing proof or authority. “Partial” is not accepted completion of the broader Nebraska category.\n\n| Assigned item | Status | Claim IDs | Missing authority/evidence or precise next action |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| 1. Actor standing and roles | Answered conditionally | C001–C007, C042 | Actual deed, transferee, assignment, agency authority and ownership |\n| 2. Nonjudicial versus judicial transfer | Answered as gateway | C002–C003 | Actual sale payment, delivery, judicial confirmation, stays |\n| 3. Foreclosure order versus possession action | Answered generally | C001, C004, C012, C021 | Decree wording, named parties and actual restitution order |\n| 4. Competent court/title dispute | Answered with jurisdiction boundary | C004–C005, C044 | Evidence of genuine title/leasehold controversy and proper alternative action |\n| 5. Pre-/post-sale and defective title | Partial | C002–C005 | Title challenge, payment, BFP, void/voidable and deed proof; separate sale component not adopted |\n| 6. Former owner spouse/homestead/redemption | Answered narrowly | C003, C007, C029 | Actual spouse ownership, signature, redemption and tenant status |\n| 7. Assignment of rents/receiver | Partial/excluded beyond gateway | C006, C042 | Assignment instrument, receiver order, statutory receiver/rents provisions and authority |\n| 8. Pre-suit notice for each route | Answered for main routes | C008, C016–C017, C031 | Exact occupant classification, reason, notice and receipt |\n| 9. Former-owner tenant status/new agreement | Answered conditionally | C007, C015, C023 | Actual new lease/attornment, consent, rent acceptance |\n| 10. Federal versus longer state/local notice | Answered generally | C031–C032 | Applicable specific municipality, lease and program |\n| 11. Complaint/pleading | Answered for FED/URLTA | C009, C018 | Actual allegations, exhibits, authorized plaintiff |\n| 12. Service/unknown occupants | Answered for statutory methods; actual nonparty effect partial | C010, C019 | Diligence affidavit, named occupants, process returns and due process |\n| 13. Appearance, trial, default, jury, clocks | Answered statutory branches | C010–C011, C019–C022 | Summons issuance and service; actual court order/closure |\n| 14. Defenses and title challenge | Answered generally; separate merits held | C005, C017, C023, C029, C035, C044 | Title/lease/foreclosure/stay evidence and actual defenses |\n| 15. Judgment and writ | Answered | C012, C021, C040 | Signed restitution judgment, writ request and issuance |\n| 16. Officer execution and possessions/belongings | Answered for principal writ; belongings partial | C012, C021, C026, C045 | Sheriff/constable return, occupant status, inventory and property procedure |\n| 17. Appeal/default relief and stay security | Answered main distinction; vacatur partial | C013, C021–C022 | Actual appeal, approved surety/deposit, rent payments, default grounds |\n| 18. Accepted forbearance or possession agreement | Conditional; not independently established | C023, C042 | Actual authorized contract, waiver, breach, duration and assent |\n| 19. Rent, use/occupancy, mesne profits, costs and deposits | Partial | C011, C023–C025, C045 | Contract, proof of loss, lawful costs, deposit ledger; full mesne-profits doctrine not researched |\n| 20. Wrongful removal/lockout/conversion | Answered URLTA route; other torts partial | C024, C026, C045 | Actor, harm, tenancy and tort-specific legal evidence; general former-owner tort report excluded |\n| 21. PTFA enactment/current status/scope | Answered | C027–C028 | Actual dwelling/foreclosure facts |\n| 22. Bona fide tenancy conditions | Answered statute; application factual | C029 | Lease, rent, relationship, arm's-length and subsidy records |\n| 23. Immediate successor/complete title transfer | Answered | C030 | Court order/deed and completed title event |\n| 24. Ninety-day/lease-to-end/primary-home exception | Answered legally | C031 | Notice/lease/purchaser sale and intended primary occupancy |\n| 25. State/local longer protections | Answered preservation rule; local check open | C032 | Jurisdiction-specific current tenant protections |\n| 26. Section 8/subsidized housing | Answered as statutory gateway; broader application partial | C032–C033 | Voucher/HAP agreement, PHA/agency conditions |\n| 27. PTFA breach and private enforcement | Partial | C031, C034 | Breach, rental notice; controlling Eighth Circuit/private state remedy and later-treatment search |\n| 28. Bankruptcy stay/discharge | Answered narrow gateway | C035–C036 | Bankruptcy petition, judgment, certifications, exceptions and orders |\n| 29. SCRA eviction/default/rent threshold | Answered applicable federal threshold and route | C037–C038 | Military service, dependency, rent, material effect and order |\n| 30. Housing discrimination, retaliation, utilities | Partial boundary only | C024, C039 | Protected status, causation, housing-code record, independent rights |\n| 31. Current official court forms | Answered for located CC 3:24; other forms partial | C040–C041 | Actual complaint and writ forms from local court if relevant |\n| 32. Statewide versus county form searches | Bounded index result | C041 | County/local judge forms and revision archive not comprehensively searched |\n| 33. Controlling cases and procedural holdings | Answered selected material opinions; broader citator open | C005, C015, C022, C034, C044 | Full subsequent-treatment/case universe, narrower federal PTFA remedies |\n| 34. Fact evidence checklist | Answered specification | C042 | Actual facts deliberately absent |\n| 35. Urgent/stay decision map | Answered conditional structure | C012–C013, C021, C035, C037, C042 | Actual injunction, bond, stay, case and warrant records |\n| 36. Special jurisdictions/sectors/currentness | Excluded or unresolved as specified | C027–C039, C042 | Farm, tax, HOA, tribal, local, probate, federally insured program and international legal research |\n\n### Required remaining work\n\nThe following remain open, without implied acceptance from this possession component:\n\n- actual deed validity, title, foreclosure defects, assignments and superior interests;\n- separate ejectment/quiet-title and receivership/assignment-of-rents analysis;\n- local Nebraska housing codes and municipal tenant protections;\n- manufactured-home/mobile-home rental legislation;\n- federal program-specific eviction and Housing Choice Voucher requirements;\n- PTFA private enforcement after the 2018 restoration and current Eighth Circuit treatment;\n- full Fair Housing Act and Nebraska Fair Housing Act claims;\n- non-tenant former-owner torts, conversion and personal-property recovery;\n- probate/decedent occupancy, divorce and spousal possession;\n- eviction and foreclosure within bankruptcy proceedings;\n- tax, HOA, farm and commercial foreclosure;\n- tribal jurisdiction, foreign-country and federal-enclave questions;\n- actual contracts, judicial records, writs, notices, property inventory and possession agreements.\n\n## I. Researcher self-check\n\n### Primary sources actually read\n\nThis pass read the operative material of Nebraska's complete general FED statutory sequence §§25-21,219–25-21,235, the material URLTA provisions in §§76-1401–76-1449, the relevant tenant-property provisions, the narrow judicial/nonjudicial title gateways, and current §25-2221 computation rules.\n\nIt also read and reconciled the original federal PTFA enactment, Dodd–Frank §1484 clarification, and 2018 permanent restoration; the current 50 U.S.C. §3951; the official 2026 Department of Defense rent notice; and the necessary bankruptcy §§362 and 524 provisions.\n\nThe material actual majority opinions of Marcuzzo, Woodsonia, Lund, 132 Ventures, Johnson, Enterprise Bank, Pan, TDP Phase One, and Logan were reviewed. The official court PDF page images identified in the source table were visually inspected; HTML reproductions are labeled as such. No dissent was treated as a majority holding.\n\n### Numerical and relative-clock checks\n\n| Test | Verified arithmetic or relationship |\n| --- | --- |\n| PTFA tenant notice | At least 90 days before effective vacate date, plus protected lease-end condition where applicable |\n| SCRA threshold, assumed $10,000 rent | $10,542.60 − $10,000 = $542.60 under cap |\n| SCRA threshold, assumed $10,600 rent | $10,600 − $10,542.60 = $57.40 over cap |\n| URLTA unlawful exclusion, assumed $1,200 periodic rent | 3 × $1,200 = $3,600, conditional liquidated damages |\n| Bad-faith holdover | Greater of 3 × $1,200 = $3,600 or 3 × $800 = $2,400; no automatic maximum recovery |\n| Unreleased tenant-property example | $1,999 is below $2,000; $2,000 is not below $2,000 |\n| General FED hearing | 10–14 days after summons issuance, not automatically after notice receipt |\n| URLTA hearing | 10–14 days after summons issuance, subject to valid process |\n| General FED writ | Officer ordinarily executes within 10 days after receiving writ |\n| URLTA restitution writ | Court-directed possession date within 10 days after writ issuance |\n\nNo actual deadline, hearing date, notice expiration, holiday calculation, rent amount, damage award, lease expiration or move-out date has been calculated for any person or property.\n\n### Limits and integrity checks\n\n- No actual borrower, purchaser, owner, tenant, servicer, property, county, court docket, title record, lease, agreement, mailing record or private data was accessed.\n- No form was filled, no case or person searched, and no filing, contact, complaint, records request, transaction, account change, website action or browser control occurred.\n- No local files were written; no publication, real estate action or eviction step was performed.\n- No complete local/county procedures audit, legislative amendment history, unpublished-opinion universe, commercial citator or statewide eviction-forms archive was performed.\n- A source's failure to supply a form or specific statutory branch is not asserted to prove its universal nonexistence.\n- A foreclosure sale or possession claim is not represented as a verified lawful sale, tenancy termination, restitution judgment, writ or removal authorization.\n\nFocused disposition: Nebraska post-foreclosure possession requires independent classification of completed ownership, occupant rights, applicable general FED or URLTA procedure, federal bona fide tenant protections, notice/service, court judgment and writ, and operative stays. The current permanent PTFA protects qualifying tenants independently of state eviction notices. Federal servicemember and bankruptcy protections add their own conditional branches. Purchaser title does not create a unilateral right to lock out occupants or dispose of their belongings.\n\nNo whole mortgage component, Nebraska dossier, registry item, parent project, A066, operational clearance, independent review or publication acceptance is claimed.\n\nEND S_NE PASS-33.\n\n","tables":[{"headers":[],"index":0,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Actor or occupant","Potential legal position","Required gateway","Consequence or unresolved boundary"],["Foreclosing beneficiary or lender","May acquire ownership by valid purchase; otherwise remains secured creditor or agent","Sale, payment, deed/confirmation, and ownership proof","Lien or servicing status alone is not standing for restitution"],["Trustee","Conducts power-of-sale process","Statutory appointment and deed authority","Trustee status alone does not make the trustee the owner entitled to occupy"],["Successful nonjudicial bidder","Potential successor owner","Accepted bid, purchase-price payment, trustee-deed execution/delivery, applicable title protections","Bid acceptance terminates the trustor's statutory interests, but incomplete payment or undelivered deed still requires title analysis"],["Judicial-foreclosure purchaser","Potential successor owner","Court confirmation, sheriff's deed, redemption/stay status","An unconfirmed judicial sale does not establish final possession rights"],["Deed grantee or assignee","May claim through purchaser","Valid conveyance or assignment, including property/occupancy rights transferred","A deed or agency label cannot convey more than the transferor owned"],["Loan servicer or collection agent","May act for owner if actually authorized","Agency or power-of-attorney authority","No automatic right to sue personally or remove an occupant"],["Former borrower or owner","Possession becomes contestable after valid transfer","Actual title, sale and status of any pending court relief","Not automatically a URLTA tenant or PTFA bona fide tenant"],["Nonborrowing spouse or co-owner","May retain independently owned or possessory interests","Deed, marital/homestead interests, joinder and adjudication","Marriage alone neither proves a lease nor eliminates an independent property interest"],["Genuine tenant or subtenant","May hold surviving rental or statutory occupancy rights","Actual lease/tenancy, foreclosure timing, bona fides, rental/subsidy evidence","General FED, URLTA and PTFA must be classified separately"],["Unrelated occupant without a lease or color of title","Potential general FED defendant","Actual possession and plaintiff's present superior right","Written three-day pre-suit notice and judicial determination remain required"]]},{"headers":[],"index":1,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Procedural question","General forcible entry and detainer","Residential URLTA restitution"],["Courts","District or county court where territorial jurisdiction lies","District or county court"],["Occupant type","Specified non-URLTA occupants, including some former owners and persons lacking color of title","Tenant under qualifying residential rental relationship"],["Pre-suit notice","At least three days' written notice to leave under §25-21,221","Ground-specific URLTA termination notice; not universally three days"],["Pre-suit service","Personal copy or usual abode if person absent; premises posting/leaving only when person and usual abode cannot be found in county","Delivery under §76-1413 and specific termination provision; consensual electronic notice must meet statutory and UETA predicates"],["Complaint","Describes premises and unlawful entry/detention","Specifies statutory ground, particular facts, property, and compliance with required URLTA notice"],["Summons","Complaint attached; answer day for other claims; expedited service","Complaint attached; special URLTA summons and alternate-service rules"],["Trial setting","10–14 days after summons issuance","10–14 days after summons issuance"],["Default/nonappearance","Court still tries matter on proper service","Court still tries matter on proper service"],["Jury","General FED can involve jury on demand; legally distinct damages claims preserve jury rights where applicable","URLTA possession is tried by a judge without a jury"],["Restitution","Judgment for possession; at request court issues writ under §25-21,230","Court declares forfeiture and at request issues writ under §76-1446"],["Officer","Sheriff or constable, not private purchaser's unilateral self-help","Sheriff or constable"],["Writ period","Officer generally executes within 10 days after receiving writ","Writ directs restitution on a date no later than 10 days after issuance"],["Appeal/stay","Appeal alone does not stay; approved cash bond or undertaking ordinarily required within 30 days; separate plaintiff bond can allow restitution despite defendant supersedeas","Immediate appeal of possession judgment recognized; stay requires judgment/cost deposit or bond and subsequent monthly rent paid into court"],["Money claims","Rent or damage claims and other legal causes require their own proof; may be separately tried","Alternate posting-and-mail summons route precludes money judgment in that proceeding"]]},{"headers":[],"index":2,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Ground","Statutory notice and effect"],["Material tenant breach","Generally written notice describing violation, termination at least 30 days after receipt if uncured, with 14 days to remedy"],["Repeat substantially similar breach within six months","Statutory 14-day termination branch when conditions satisfied"],["Nonpayment of rent","Written notice allowing seven calendar days to pay before termination"],["Week-to-week tenancy","At least seven days' written termination notice"],["Month-to-month tenancy","Written notice at least 30 days before the specified periodic rental date"],["Specified violent acts/threats","Separate five-day branch and applicable domestic-violence victim safeguards"],["Fixed-term tenant holds over after expiration","§76-1437(3), possession with possible enhanced damages only for willful, non-good-faith holdover"]]},{"headers":[],"index":3,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["PTFA issue","Actual rule","Required proof or exception"],["Covered foreclosure","Foreclosure of a federally related mortgage loan or any dwelling/residential real property","Not limited to loans with a federal guarantee"],["Protected actor","Bona fide tenant with a tenancy predating the statutory notice-of-foreclosure event","Must not be mortgagor or mortgagor's child, spouse or parent"],["Arm's-length condition","Tenancy must result from arm's-length transaction","Related-party or sham lease may fail"],["Rent condition","Rent must not be substantially below fair-market rent, or be reduced/subsidized by a federal, state or local subsidy","Low subsidized rent is not automatically disqualifying"],["New owner","Immediate successor in interest through foreclosure","Actual completed title transfer is necessary"],["Notice-of-foreclosure event","Under 2010 §1484, date complete title transfers to successor by court order or security-instrument process","Not automatically the default notice, scheduled auction or initial complaint"],["Notice to vacate","Successor must give at least 90 days before effective date","Valid notice, delivery and actual effective date remain needed"],["Preexisting fixed-term lease","Generally honored until remaining term expires","Statutory exception for sale of unit to purchaser who will occupy as primary residence, still subject to 90-day notice"],["At-will/no-term tenancy","At least 90-day federal notice","Nebraska termination and any greater local rights remain independently relevant"],["Subsidized tenancy","PTFA expressly preserves additional federally or state-subsidized rules","Section 8/HAP documentation required"],["Private damages action","No express PTFA statutory damages schedule","Private federal cause remains disputed/not established here; defense and remedies require actual procedural authority"]]},{"headers":[],"index":4,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Case and source","Actual facts and posture","Majority holding and outcome","Material pinpoint and limits"],["Federal National Mortgage Association v. Marcuzzo, 289 Neb. 301 (2014)","Foreclosure purchaser brought general FED against former owners. Owners referenced an unresolved title action, but no evidence establishing a continuing title dispute was presented before the county court continued the matter.","County court could proceed until a genuine title issue was established; unsupported allegation did not require dismissal. Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed.","Official PDF https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00004763PUB; printed pp.307–311/PDF indices 6–10, including p.309/PDF 8."],["Woodsonia Hwy 281 v. American Multi-Cinema, 318 Neb. 592 (2025)","Commercial leasehold dispute arose from asserted termination or conveyance of a leasehold estate. Resolving possession required deciding whether the tenant's property interest remained valid.","FED cannot adjudicate the title issue. Supreme Court vacated the lower judgments and directed dismissal of the FED action.","Official advance opinion https://www.ne.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011925PUB; printed pp.607–612/PDF indices 15–20. Commercial facts; jurisdictional principle relevant to residential claims."],["Lund Co. v. Clark, 30 Neb. App. 351 (2021)","Wife was named tenant, husband lived there but was not a tenant or named occupant under the agreement. Landlord gave husband a three-day notice and brought general FED.","URLTA did not apply to the husband's particular occupancy; Court of Appeals found no plain error in general FED restitution and affirmed.","Official advance PDF https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008172PUB; pp.356–358/PDF indices 5–7. Does not mean every spouse lacks tenancy rights."],["132 Ventures v. Active Spine Physical Therapy, 313 Neb. 45 (2022)","Landlord brought general FED with associated contractual and guaranty damage claims. Possession was expedited, but the defendants demanded a jury for the separate legal claims.","Statutory possession procedure did not waive an otherwise applicable jury right on separately tried legal damages. Supreme Court reversed the damages disposition and remanded as appropriate.","Official PDF https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009079PUB; pp.52–57/PDF indices 7–12. Commercial lease and personal guaranty facts."],["Johnson v. Vosberg, 316 Neb. 658 (2024)","URLTA possession judgment entered while additional tenancy-related claims remained pending.","URLTA §76-1447 authorizes immediate appeal of the possession judgment; pending tenancy claims do not prevent appeal.","Official advance opinion https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewOpinion?docId=N00011052PUB; pp.665–667/PDF indices 7–9."],["TDP Phase One v. The Club at the Yard, 307 Neb. 795 (2020)","General FED possession claims were adjudicated while other claims remained pending.","Unlike URLTA's express immediate-appeal scheme, ordinary final-judgment requirements can prevent appeal of an FED order lacking necessary §25-1315 certification.","Actual published-opinion reproduction https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2020/s-19-1198.html; HTML, no verified PDF index. Distinguished expressly in Johnson."],["Enterprise Bank v. Knight, 20 Neb. App. 662 (2013)","Former borrower remained after trustee sale; bank obtained FED restitution. Borrower appealed but failed to establish the required supersedeas security. Bankruptcy and sale-confirmation arguments also arose.","The court was not required to create supersedeas security for the appellant. Appeal did not automatically halt writ execution; judgment affirmed.","Official PDF https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00004294PUB; pp.665–669/PDF indices 3–7, including p.667/PDF 5. No automatic conclusion that every foreclosure sale is valid."],["Pan v. IOC Realty Specialist, 301 Neb. 256 (2018)","Commercial tenant sought return of movable property retained after the tenancy.","The Court applied the Disposition of Personal Property Landlord and Tenant Act to the proven landlord–tenant relationship and addressed the statutory release and ownership predicates.","Official PDF https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011278PUB; pp.267–275/PDF indices 11–19. Not a former-owner-without-tenancy holding."],["Logan v. U.S. Bank, 722 F.3d 1163 (9th Cir. 2013)","Tenant sued a foreclosure successor for damages and injunction after a purportedly inadequate eviction notice.","Ninth Circuit held that PTFA did not create an independent implied federal damages/injunction cause of action; dismissal affirmed. It discussed PTFA's defensive role in state eviction.","Actual published-opinion reproduction https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/10-55671/10-55671-2013-07-16.html; reported pp.1168–1173. Persuasive, not binding Eighth Circuit precedent; no complete current private-action citator performed. \nlaw.justia.com"]]},{"headers":[],"index":5,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Source","Full literal URL","Version, actual read bounds and purpose","Limits"],["CC 3:24 — Praecipe for Writ of Restitution/Execution","https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-24.pdf","Nebraska Judicial Branch; NEW 09/2017; printed p.1/PDF index 0, complete page visually inspected. Requests issuance of a writ identifying parties, case number, premises and county sheriff or constable; references §§25-21,230 and 76-1446.","A praecipe is a request, not a possession judgment, signed writ, sheriff order or proof of service."],["Nebraska Judicial Branch landlord self-help page","https://nebraskajudicial.gov/self-help/renterlandlord/landlord","Current public official page read October 26, 2026. Distinguishes landlord/tenant restitution from general FED, and states that court forms are not currently available for that category.","A category page's lack of downloadable complaint forms does not establish absence of attorney-drafted, county, court-ordered or other legally usable pleadings. \nNebraska Judicial Branch"],["Statutory general FED writ form","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,230","Nebraska Legislature; operative statutory form read through §25-21,230, directed to sheriff/constable to restore possession.","Template is not an actual issued writ or clearance for physical removal. \nnebraskalegislature.gov"],["URLTA statutory complaint, summons and restitution requirements","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/display_html.php?begin_section=76-1440&end_section=76-1447","Nebraska Legislature; complete current operative text of §§76-1440–1447 read. Defines pleading fields, service, trial, judgment and appeal; not a fill-in PDF.","Specific rental relationship, filing, process and order facts remain necessary. \nnebraskalegislature.gov"]]},{"headers":[],"index":6,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Stage","Necessary evidence","Why it matters"],["Foreclosure ownership","Trust deed or mortgage; sale notice and return; bid/payment record; trustee or sheriff deed; judicial confirmation; assignments","Identifies present owner, transfer date and whether title is complete"],["Plaintiff authority","Deed grantee, entity records, assignment or agency/power of attorney","Separates owner from lender, trustee, servicer and unauthorized agent"],["Occupant status","Former ownership, deed/title, marriage, residence, rental agreement, consent to occupancy, subtenancy","Determines general FED versus URLTA and retained property rights"],["Federal PTFA","Mortgage/foreclosure record, complete-title transfer, lease origination and expiration, market rent or subsidy, relationship to mortgagor","Establishes bona fide tenant, 90-day notice and lease-to-end rights"],["Nebraska termination","Written notice, exact ground, dates, contract provisions, recipient and delivery evidence","Determines statutory prerequisites and cure rights"],["Court process","Complaint, summons, proof of service/diligence, hearing notice, continuances, judgment","Establishes jurisdiction and judicial opportunity to contest"],["Restitution","Court's signed judgment, requested and issued writ, sheriff/constable receipt and return","Distinguishes court authority from purchaser's private intentions"],["Appellate or federal stay","Appeal filing, approved bond/deposit, rent deposits, court stay, bankruptcy docket, SCRA order","Determines whether a writ can presently be executed"],["Property left behind","Occupant's status, inventory, owner identity, condition/value, storage, notice, response, costs, officer actions","Determines whether the tenant-property statute or another property remedy applies"],["Payments and agreements","Rent receipts, deposit account, lease amendments, forbearance, possession agreement, authorized signatures","Can change termination, waiver, damages or right to possession"]]},{"headers":[],"index":7,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Issue","Result"],["Trustee auction occurred","Assumed"],["Bid paid and trustee deed delivered","Unknown"],["Purchaser's present right to possession","Not fully established"],["Bona fide PTFA tenancy of borrower","Not established; mortgagor is excluded from PTFA bona fide tenant definition"],["General FED possible","Yes, if plaintiff has a present superior possessory right and applicable §25-21,220 facts"],["Pre-suit notice","General FED three-day written notice, if that route applies"],["Private lockout","Not authorized merely by sale"]]},{"headers":[],"index":8,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[]],"rows":[["Assumed monthly rent","Comparison","SCRA §3951(a) threshold result"],["$10,000","$10,542.60 − $10,000 = $542.60 below cap","Within the threshold if all other predicates exist"],["$10,600","$10,600 − $10,542.60 = $57.40 above cap","Threshold not met for this specific provision"]]},{"headers":[],"index":9,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Source ID","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint","Version, access status and limits"],["S_NE-P33-S001","Nebraska Legislature — General Forcible Entry and Detainer Act. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/display_html.php?begin_section=25-21,219&end_section=25-21,235 — complete operative §§25-21,219–25-21,235, especially §§219–223, 225–227 and 230–235.","Fresh complete material HTML read. Current published Nebraska codification. §25-21,219 shows 2021 LB320 amendment; section histories differ. HTML has no printed page/PDF index. No entire legislative-history audit. \nNebraska Legislature"],["S_NE-P33-S002","Nebraska Legislature — URLTA definitions, landlord/tenant remedies, possession and appeals. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/display_html.php?begin_section=76-1401&end_section=76-1449 — complete material §§76-1408–1414, 1425–1433, 1435–1447, including §§76-1442.01 and 76-1431.","Fresh full material HTML read. Current publication includes 2025 LB80 provisions in the relevant domestic-violence branches. Not an audit of every landlord–tenant regulatory or judicial issue. \nnebraskalegislature.gov"],["S_NE-P33-S003","Nebraska Legislature — FED limitation and time computation. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-203; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2221; relevant general civil service cross-reference https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-505.01.","Fresh §§25-203 and 25-2221 complete text; general service cross-reference used narrowly with S001/S002. Current official HTML. No case-specific dates computed. \nNebraska Legislature\n+1"],["S_NE-P33-S004","Nebraska Legislature — narrow foreclosure/title gateways. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1010; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1530; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1531; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1532; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2145; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=40-103.","Fresh complete material §§76-1010, 25-1530, 25-1531. Remaining sections used only as narrow statutory cross-references; no full rereading of PASS-27/PASS-28. Current official HTML. \nnebraskalegislature.gov\n+2"],["S_NE-P33-S005","Nebraska Legislature — tenant-property disposition. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2302; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2303; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2307; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2308; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2309; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2312.","Fresh complete material current HTML read. Current §69-2308 reflects 2026 LB834's $2,000 threshold, operative July 18, 2026. Personal-property Act applicability requires a tenancy and other statutory facts. \nNebraska Legislature\n+3"],["S_NE-P33-S006","U.S. Congress/GovInfo — Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-111publ22/html/PLAW-111publ22.htm — Title VII §§701–703, printed 123 Stat. 1660–1662, HTML material lines 1798–1878; PDF index N/A.","Fresh actual enacted statute read. Historical 2009 enactment used together with 2010 amendments and 2018 permanent restoration; not treated as unchanged 2009 text in isolation. \ngovinfo.gov"],["S_NE-P33-S007","U.S. Congress/GovInfo — Dodd–Frank §1484 PTFA clarification. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-111publ203/html/PLAW-111publ203.htm — §1484, printed 124 Stat. 2204, HTML lines 52531–52546.","Fresh enacted text read. Clarifies complete-title-transfer notice-of-foreclosure date and amends the earlier lease wording. Historical amendment, operative within restored PTFA. \nGovInfo"],["S_NE-P33-S008","U.S. Congress/GovInfo — 2018 permanent PTFA restoration. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-115publ174/html/PLAW-115publ174.htm — §304(a)–(c), printed 132 Stat. 1339, HTML lines 2739–2752.","Fresh enacted text read. Restored §§701–703, repealed sunset, effective 30 days after May 24, 2018. No new sunset was found in these operative provisions. \nGovInfo"],["S_NE-P33-S009","Office of Law Revision Counsel — 50 U.S.C. §3951, SCRA eviction and distress. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-118/t50/s3951/ — subsections (a)(1)–(3), (b)–(e).","Fresh complete material HTML read. Despite the literal path segment 119-118, the displayed official header identifies text through PL 119-120, October 7, 2026. Do not infer currency from the URL path alone. \nUSCode"],["S_NE-P33-S010","U.S. Department of Defense/Federal Register — 2026 SCRA rent adjustment. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-03-10/pdf/2026-04689.pdf — printed 91 FR 11527, PDF index 0, column containing maximum $10,542.60.","Fresh one-page official PDF text and image read. Published March 10, 2026; expressly effective January 1, 2026. The notice is the annual adjustment, not a new eviction statute."],["S_NE-P33-S011","Office of Law Revision Counsel — bankruptcy stay/discharge. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t11/s362/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t11/s524/ — §§362(a), (b)(22)–(23), (l)–(m), 524(a), (e).","Fresh current official HTML read, displayed through PL 119-124, October 15, 2026. Bankruptcy procedure and exceptions limited to eviction gateway; no actual bankruptcy proceeding reviewed. \nUSCode\n+1"],["S_NE-P33-S012","Nebraska Judicial Branch — CC 3:24 Praecipe for Writ of Restitution/Execution. https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-24.pdf — printed p.1/PDF index 0, entire form.","Fresh official page-image inspection, NEW 09/2017. Request form only, not possession adjudication or issued writ."],["S_NE-P33-S013","Nebraska Judicial Branch — Landlord public instructions. https://nebraskajudicial.gov/self-help/renterlandlord/landlord — current page, paragraphs differentiating landlord/tenant restitution and general FED, statement concerning unavailable forms for that category.","Fresh official website read. Public index/guidance, not statutory replacement or complete local-form directory. \nNebraska Judicial Branch"],["S_NE-P33-S014","Nebraska Supreme Court — Federal National Mortgage Association v. Marcuzzo, 289 Neb. 301 (2014). https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00004763PUB — printed pp.303–311/PDF indices 2–10; especially p.309/PDF 8.","Fresh official case text and selected page-image inspection. Final published merits opinion. A mere title allegation was insufficient on its record; not a merits foreclosure-validity adjudication."],["S_NE-P33-S015","Nebraska Supreme Court — Woodsonia Hwy 281 v. American Multi-Cinema, 318 Neb. 592 (2025). https://www.ne.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011925PUB — printed pp.607–612/PDF indices 15–20; particularly pp.610, 612/PDF indices 18, 20.","Fresh official advance opinion text and page images. Court vacated and ordered dismissal of general FED; commercial leasehold title controversy, not a holding that every tenant dispute exceeds URLTA jurisdiction. No separate certified edition or full citator examined."],["S_NE-P33-S016","Nebraska Court of Appeals — Lund Co. v. Clark, 30 Neb. App. 351 (2021). https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008172PUB — printed pp.356–358/PDF indices 5–7, particularly p.357/PDF 6.","Fresh official advance opinion and page image read. Affirmed under plain-error posture; spouse/occupant not party to the relevant tenancy on the case record."],["S_NE-P33-S017","Nebraska Supreme Court — 132 Ventures v. Active Spine Physical Therapy, 313 Neb. 45 (2022). https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009079PUB — printed pp.52–57/PDF indices 7–12; p.55/PDF 10 inspected.","Fresh official advance opinion text and page image read. Jury treatment of separate damages claims; commercial facts. No blanket jury rule for URLTA possession."],["S_NE-P33-S018","Nebraska Supreme Court — Johnson v. Vosberg, 316 Neb. 658 (2024). https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewOpinion?docId=N00011052PUB — printed pp.664–668/PDF indices 6–10; p.666/PDF 8 inspected.","Fresh official opinion body and selected page image. URLTA judgment immediately appealable under §76-1447 despite pending tenancy claims; distinguish general FED."],["S_NE-P33-S019","Nebraska Supreme Court — TDP Phase One v. The Club at the Yard, 307 Neb. 795 (2020). https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2020/s-19-1198.html — actual published-opinion HTML, material finality/certification discussion.","Public reproduction of actual majority opinion, HTML; printed-body page and PDF index not independently mapped. Context corroborated in Johnson. No case-specific current docket reviewed."],["S_NE-P33-S020","Nebraska Court of Appeals — Enterprise Bank v. Knight, 20 Neb. App. 662 (2013). https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00004294PUB — printed pp.664–669/PDF indices 2–7; p.667/PDF 5 inspected.","Fresh official opinion body and selected page image. Supersedeas failure and title/bankruptcy arguments in former-borrower FED posture; no general foreclosure validity finding."],["S_NE-P33-S021","Nebraska Supreme Court — Pan v. IOC Realty Specialist, 301 Neb. 256 (2018). https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011278PUB — printed pp.267–275/PDF indices 11–19; p.268/PDF 12 inspected.","Fresh official material opinion and page image. Tenant-property Act application in a commercial lease; not generic former-owner personal-property rule."],["S_NE-P33-S022","U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit — Logan v. U.S. Bank, 722 F.3d 1163 (2013). https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/10-55671/10-55671-2013-07-16.html — actual opinion majority, reported pp.1168–1173; HTML/PDF index N/A.","Fresh published-opinion reproduction read. Denied implied PTFA private federal cause; persuasive only in Nebraska, not controlling Eighth Circuit. No exhaustive modern citator. \nlaw.justia.com"],["S_NE-P33-S023","Nebraska Legislature — unlawful exclusion, retention and holdover remedies. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1430; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1433; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1436; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1437; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1439.","Material provisions freshly read within S002; §76-1430 separately verified. URLs are complete literal locators, not separately counted as independent proof of a new rule. \nNebraska Legislature"],["S_NE-P33-S024","Nebraska Legislature — specific URLTA restitution/appeal. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1441; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1442; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1442.01; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1446; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1447.","Fresh material official HTML, current operative text; source repetitions supplement S002, not independent authorities. \nNebraska Legislature\n+2"],["S_NE-P33-S025","Nebraska Legislature — statutory possession writ, appeal and restitution. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,230; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,231; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,234; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,235.","Fresh operative text within S001; independent exact locators supplied for procedures. \nnebraskalegislature.gov"]]},{"headers":[],"index":10,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claim ID","Precise proposition","Source ID and pinpoint","Conditions, exceptions, confidence"],["S_NE-P33-C001","Foreclosure sale and immediate physical possession are distinct legal events; the purchaser needs present possession rights and lawful judicial process.","S001 §§219–230; S004 §§76-1010, 25-1530–1532","Route-specific; high"],["C002","Trustee deed conveys the defined trustor interests without ordinary post-sale redemption; bid acceptance terminates statutory trustor interests, with deed/payment and title predicates separate.","S004 §76-1010(1)–(2)","High"],["C003","Judicial sale is subject to redemption before confirmation and requires confirmation and sheriff deed for the completed title route.","S004 §§25-1530–1532","High"],["C004","Qualified general FED lies in district or county court, including specified judicial-sale judgment debtors and no-color-of-title occupants; URLTA premises are excluded.","S001 §§25-21,219–220","High"],["C005","A true title or continuing leasehold-estate controversy requiring adjudication defeats general FED jurisdiction; a bare unresolved allegation alone may not.","S014 Marcuzzo, S015 Woodsonia","High, facts decisive"],["C006","A lender, trustee, servicer or agent does not establish ownership/standing from its label alone.","S004, S001, S014","Actual title/agency authority required"],["C007","Former-owner homestead, spouse, title or redemption claims are not interchangeable with a new tenancy or federal PTFA rights.","S004 §§25-1530, 40-103; S006 §702(b)","High bounded conclusion"],["C008","General FED requires at least three days' written pre-suit notice with the specified personal, abode or conditional property service.","S001 §25-21,221","High"],["C009","General FED complaint must describe property and unlawful entry/detention; summons attaches complaint and uses statutory expedited service/trial rules.","S001 §§25-21,222–223","High"],["C010","General FED summons service is within three nonjudicial-day-excluding days, return within five, and trial 10–14 days after issuance; alternative service needs failed diligent efforts and affidavit.","S001 §25-21,223","High; real issuance and service records required"],["C011","Properly served nonappearance still requires a trial; general FED may involve jury on demand.","S001 §§25-21,224–227","High"],["C012","General FED restitution requires court judgment and requested writ directed to sheriff or constable, with ten-day officer execution rule.","S001 §§25-21,230–231","High"],["C013","General FED appeal alone is not supersedeas; approved cash bond/undertaking generally required within 30 days, subject to plaintiff's separate §235 restitution-bond branch.","S001 §§25-21,234–235; S020 Knight","High"],["C014","FED action has a one-year suit limitation from accrual; that period is not a universal URLTA tenancy or title-action limitation.","S003 §25-203; S001","High"],["C015","URLTA requires a qualifying tenant under an actual rental agreement, which can be oral or written; general FED exclusion follows from actual tenancy status.","S002 §§76-1408, 76-1410, 76-1414; S016 Lund","High"],["C016","URLTA notices differ by ground: 30/14 material breach, 7-day nonpayment, 7-day weekly, 30-day monthly and specified five-day exception branches.","S002 §§76-1431, 76-1437","High, exact tenant facts required"],["C017","URLTA permits consensual electronic tenancy notices only under §76-1413 and the UETA-related conditions.","S002 §76-1413","High; no blanket email-service conclusion"],["C018","URLTA complaint must specify statutory authority, particular facts, property and notice compliance.","S002/S024 §76-1441","High"],["C019","URLTA summons has expedited timing, diligence-based alternate posting plus mail, and no plaintiff money judgment under that alternate service method.","S002/S024 §§76-1442, 76-1442.01, 76-1446","High"],["C020","URLTA possession trial is judge without jury; tenant may assert legal/equitable defenses and counterclaims; nonappearance still requires trial.","S002 §§76-1444–1446","High"],["C021","URLTA restitution uses a court-requested writ with possession date no later than ten days after writ issuance; appeal stay requires security and continued monthly rent deposits.","S002/S024 §§76-1446–1447; S018 Johnson","High"],["C022","URLTA possession judgment can be immediately appealed despite tenancy damages claims pending; general FED finality can differ.","S018 Johnson, S019 TDP","High, procedural context matters"],["C023","Acceptance of rent with knowledge of default waives the right to terminate for that breach unless postbreach agreement provides otherwise.","S002/S023 §76-1433","High; actual acceptance and authority"],["C024","URLTA bars wrongful landlord self-help lockout/utility interruption and provides conditional restitution, liquidated damages and fee remedies.","S002/S023 §§76-1430, 76-1436","High"],["C025","Bad-faith willful tenant holdover allows enhanced amount no greater than the specified three-month-rent/threefold-actual-damage alternative, plus fees.","S002/S023 §76-1437(3)","High, not automatic"],["C026","Tenant-property statute requires qualifying terminated tenancy, vacated premises, notice, release process and conditional $2,000 low-value branch under current law.","S005 §§69-2302–2309; S021 Pan","High, non-tenant owner application held"],["C027","PTFA enacted 2009, amended 2010, permanently restored effective June 23, 2018.","S006–S008","High"],["C028","PTFA covers foreclosures of federally related mortgages or residential real property, not exclusively federally insured loans.","S006 §702(a)","High"],["C029","Bona fide tenancy excludes mortgagor/parent/spouse/child, requires arms-length terms and market rent or qualifying government subsidy.","S006 §702(b)","High, actual tenant facts"],["C030","PTFA's foreclosure-notice event is complete title transfer under 2010 §1484; not automatically default notice or auction.","S007 §1484","High"],["C031","PTFA successor must give qualifying tenant at least 90-day notice; existing fixed lease generally runs to term, with precise purchaser-primary-residence exception.","S006 §702(a)(1)–(2), S007","High"],["C032","PTFA preserves greater state/local and federal/state-subsidized tenancy protections.","S006 §702(a); S006 §703","High"],["C033","Separate Section 8 lease/HAP continuity requirements can apply after foreclosure.","S006 §703","High as gateway, program facts missing"],["C034","PTFA lacks an express damages schedule; Logan rejects an independent implied private federal action in the Ninth Circuit, not binding Eighth Circuit authority.","S022 Logan; S006","High for Logan; Nebraska application held"],["C035","Bankruptcy §362 may stay possession action, subject to specified prepetition residential possession-judgment and other exceptions and certification/cure branches.","S011 §362(a), (b)(22)–(23), (l)–(m)","High conditional"],["C036","Discharge alone does not award possession, create a new lease or necessarily extinguish surviving in-rem rights.","S011 §524","High boundary"],["C037","SCRA §3951 requires court order for covered servicemember/dependent eviction by landlord or paramount-title actor, within indexed rent threshold.","S009 §3951(a); S010","High"],["C038","2026 §3951 monthly rent threshold is $10,542.60; conditional court stay/adjustment differs from mortgage-sale §3953.","S009 §3951(b), S010 p.11527/PDF0","High"],["C039","URLTA anti-retaliation, anti-lockout and limited fair-housing boundaries are separate from foreclosure title claims.","S002 §§76-1436, 76-1439","High narrowly; full fair-housing dossier excluded"],["C040","Nebraska official CC 3:24 is a praecipe requesting restitution writ, not a judgment or actual writ.","S012 p.1/PDF0","High"],["C041","Judicial Branch public landlord page currently lacks downloadable eviction complaint forms in that category; no universal statewide-absence finding follows.","S013","High bounded observation"],["C042","Plaintiff/occupant must prove their own title, lease, notice, process, appeal, stay and writ facts; no record was inspected here.","S001–S025 synthesis","Conditional, no actual-case conclusion"],["C043","One year for ordinary general FED does not automatically govern URLTA holdover or every separate title/ejectment cause.","S003 §25-203; S002 §76-1437","High boundary"],["C044","A genuine disagreement over a leasehold estate is not automatically resolvable in general FED merely by awarding possession based on disputed title.","S015 Woodsonia, S014 Marcuzzo","High, jurisdiction fact-specific"],["C045","Property-return and tenant-damage remedies require actual tenancy, statutory violation, causal facts and proof; no foreclosure deed alone creates them.","S005, S002, S021 Pan","High bounded synthesis"]]},{"headers":[],"index":11,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Assigned item","Status","Claim IDs","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action"],["1. Actor standing and roles","Answered conditionally","C001–C007, C042","Actual deed, transferee, assignment, agency authority and ownership"],["2. Nonjudicial versus judicial transfer","Answered as gateway","C002–C003","Actual sale payment, delivery, judicial confirmation, stays"],["3. Foreclosure order versus possession action","Answered generally","C001, C004, C012, C021","Decree wording, named parties and actual restitution order"],["4. Competent court/title dispute","Answered with jurisdiction boundary","C004–C005, C044","Evidence of genuine title/leasehold controversy and proper alternative action"],["5. Pre-/post-sale and defective title","Partial","C002–C005","Title challenge, payment, BFP, void/voidable and deed proof; separate sale component not adopted"],["6. Former owner spouse/homestead/redemption","Answered narrowly","C003, C007, C029","Actual spouse ownership, signature, redemption and tenant status"],["7. Assignment of rents/receiver","Partial/excluded beyond gateway","C006, C042","Assignment instrument, receiver order, statutory receiver/rents provisions and authority"],["8. Pre-suit notice for each route","Answered for main routes","C008, C016–C017, C031","Exact occupant classification, reason, notice and receipt"],["9. Former-owner tenant status/new agreement","Answered conditionally","C007, C015, C023","Actual new lease/attornment, consent, rent acceptance"],["10. Federal versus longer state/local notice","Answered generally","C031–C032","Applicable specific municipality, lease and program"],["11. Complaint/pleading","Answered for FED/URLTA","C009, C018","Actual allegations, exhibits, authorized plaintiff"],["12. Service/unknown occupants","Answered for statutory methods; actual nonparty effect partial","C010, C019","Diligence affidavit, named occupants, process returns and due process"],["13. Appearance, trial, default, jury, clocks","Answered statutory branches","C010–C011, C019–C022","Summons issuance and service; actual court order/closure"],["14. Defenses and title challenge","Answered generally; separate merits held","C005, C017, C023, C029, C035, C044","Title/lease/foreclosure/stay evidence and actual defenses"],["15. Judgment and writ","Answered","C012, C021, C040","Signed restitution judgment, writ request and issuance"],["16. Officer execution and possessions/belongings","Answered for principal writ; belongings partial","C012, C021, C026, C045","Sheriff/constable return, occupant status, inventory and property procedure"],["17. Appeal/default relief and stay security","Answered main distinction; vacatur partial","C013, C021–C022","Actual appeal, approved surety/deposit, rent payments, default grounds"],["18. Accepted forbearance or possession agreement","Conditional; not independently established","C023, C042","Actual authorized contract, waiver, breach, duration and assent"],["19. Rent, use/occupancy, mesne profits, costs and deposits","Partial","C011, C023–C025, C045","Contract, proof of loss, lawful costs, deposit ledger; full mesne-profits doctrine not researched"],["20. Wrongful removal/lockout/conversion","Answered URLTA route; other torts partial","C024, C026, C045","Actor, harm, tenancy and tort-specific legal evidence; general former-owner tort report excluded"],["21. PTFA enactment/current status/scope","Answered","C027–C028","Actual dwelling/foreclosure facts"],["22. Bona fide tenancy conditions","Answered statute; application factual","C029","Lease, rent, relationship, arm's-length and subsidy records"],["23. Immediate successor/complete title transfer","Answered","C030","Court order/deed and completed title event"],["24. Ninety-day/lease-to-end/primary-home exception","Answered legally","C031","Notice/lease/purchaser sale and intended primary occupancy"],["25. State/local longer protections","Answered preservation rule; local check open","C032","Jurisdiction-specific current tenant protections"],["26. Section 8/subsidized housing","Answered as statutory gateway; broader application partial","C032–C033","Voucher/HAP agreement, PHA/agency conditions"],["27. PTFA breach and private enforcement","Partial","C031, C034","Breach, rental notice; controlling Eighth Circuit/private state remedy and later-treatment search"],["28. Bankruptcy stay/discharge","Answered narrow gateway","C035–C036","Bankruptcy petition, judgment, certifications, exceptions and orders"],["29. SCRA eviction/default/rent threshold","Answered applicable federal threshold and route","C037–C038","Military service, dependency, rent, material effect and order"],["30. Housing discrimination, retaliation, utilities","Partial boundary only","C024, C039","Protected status, causation, housing-code record, independent rights"],["31. Current official court forms","Answered for located CC 3:24; other forms partial","C040–C041","Actual complaint and writ forms from local court if relevant"],["32. Statewide versus county form searches","Bounded index result","C041","County/local judge forms and revision archive not comprehensively searched"],["33. Controlling cases and procedural holdings","Answered selected material opinions; broader citator open","C005, C015, C022, C034, C044","Full subsequent-treatment/case universe, narrower federal PTFA remedies"],["34. Fact evidence checklist","Answered specification","C042","Actual facts deliberately absent"],["35. Urgent/stay decision map","Answered conditional structure","C012–C013, C021, C035, C037, C042","Actual injunction, bond, stay, case and warrant records"],["36. Special jurisdictions/sectors/currentness","Excluded or unresolved as specified","C027–C039, C042","Farm, tax, HOA, tribal, local, probate, federally insured program and international legal research"]]},{"headers":[],"index":12,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Test","Verified arithmetic or relationship"],["PTFA tenant notice","At least 90 days before effective vacate date, plus protected lease-end condition where applicable"],["SCRA threshold, assumed $10,000 rent","$10,542.60 − $10,000 = $542.60 under cap"],["SCRA threshold, assumed $10,600 rent","$10,600 − $10,542.60 = $57.40 over cap"],["URLTA unlawful exclusion, assumed $1,200 periodic rent","3 × $1,200 = $3,600, conditional liquidated damages"],["Bad-faith holdover","Greater of 3 × $1,200 = $3,600 or 3 × $800 = $2,400; no automatic maximum recovery"],["Unreleased tenant-property example","$1,999 is below $2,000; $2,000 is not below $2,000"],["General FED hearing","10–14 days after summons issuance, not automatically after notice receipt"],["URLTA hearing","10–14 days after summons issuance, subject to valid process"],["General FED writ","Officer ordinarily executes within 10 days after receiving writ"],["URLTA restitution writ","Court-directed possession date within 10 days after writ issuance"]]}],"claims":[{"claim_id":"S_NE-P33-C001","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P33-C001","Precise proposition":"Foreclosure sale and immediate physical possession are distinct legal events; the purchaser needs present possession rights and lawful judicial process.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S001 §§219–230; S004 §§76-1010, 25-1530–1532","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"Route-specific; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C001","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C001","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-P33-C001","original_visible_id":"S_NE-P33-C001","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S001","S_NE-P33-S004"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C002","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C002","Precise proposition":"Trustee deed conveys the defined trustor interests without ordinary post-sale redemption; bid acceptance terminates statutory trustor interests, with deed/payment and title predicates separate.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S004 §76-1010(1)–(2)","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C002","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C002","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C002","original_visible_id":"C002","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S004"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C003","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C003","Precise proposition":"Judicial sale is subject to redemption before confirmation and requires confirmation and sheriff deed for the completed title route.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S004 §§25-1530–1532","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C003","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C003","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C003","original_visible_id":"C003","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S004"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C004","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C004","Precise proposition":"Qualified general FED lies in district or county court, including specified judicial-sale judgment debtors and no-color-of-title occupants; URLTA premises are excluded.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S001 §§25-21,219–220","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C004","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C004","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C004","original_visible_id":"C004","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S001"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C005","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C005","Precise proposition":"A true title or continuing leasehold-estate controversy requiring adjudication defeats general FED jurisdiction; a bare unresolved allegation alone may not.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S014 Marcuzzo, S015 Woodsonia","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High, facts decisive"},"coordinator_verification_status":"statutory_portion_only_judicial_hold_retained","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C005","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C005","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C005","original_visible_id":"C005","status":"statutory_portion_only_judicial_hold_retained","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S014","S_NE-P33-S015"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C006","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C006","Precise proposition":"A lender, trustee, servicer or agent does not establish ownership/standing from its label alone.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S004, S001, S014","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"Actual title/agency authority required"},"coordinator_verification_status":"conditional_scope_or_method_statement_no_actual_application_acceptance","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C006","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C006","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C006","original_visible_id":"C006","status":"conditional_scope_or_method_statement_no_actual_application_acceptance","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S001","S_NE-P33-S004","S_NE-P33-S014"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C007","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C007","Precise proposition":"Former-owner homestead, spouse, title or redemption claims are not interchangeable with a new tenancy or federal PTFA rights.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S004 §§25-1530, 40-103; S006 §702(b)","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High bounded conclusion"},"coordinator_verification_status":"statutory_portion_only_judicial_hold_retained","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C007","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C007","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C007","original_visible_id":"C007","status":"statutory_portion_only_judicial_hold_retained","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S004","S_NE-P33-S006"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C008","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C008","Precise proposition":"General FED requires at least three days' written pre-suit notice with the specified personal, abode or conditional property service.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S001 §25-21,221","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C008","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C008","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C008","original_visible_id":"C008","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S001"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C009","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C009","Precise proposition":"General FED complaint must describe property and unlawful entry/detention; summons attaches complaint and uses statutory expedited service/trial rules.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S001 §§25-21,222–223","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C009","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C009","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C009","original_visible_id":"C009","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S001"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C010","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C010","Precise proposition":"General FED summons service is within three nonjudicial-day-excluding days, return within five, and trial 10–14 days after issuance; alternative service needs failed diligent efforts and affidavit.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S001 §25-21,223","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High; real issuance and service records required"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C010","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C010","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C010","original_visible_id":"C010","status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S001"],"bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q001","S_NE-P33-Q005"],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C011","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C011","Precise proposition":"Properly served nonappearance still requires a trial; general FED may involve jury on demand.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S001 §§25-21,224–227","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"statutory_portion_only_judicial_hold_retained","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C011","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C011","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C011","original_visible_id":"C011","status":"statutory_portion_only_judicial_hold_retained","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S001"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C012","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C012","Precise proposition":"General FED restitution requires court judgment and requested writ directed to sheriff or constable, with ten-day officer execution rule.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S001 §§25-21,230–231","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C012","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C012","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C012","original_visible_id":"C012","status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S001"],"bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q001"],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C013","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C013","Precise proposition":"General FED appeal alone is not supersedeas; approved cash bond/undertaking generally required within 30 days, subject to plaintiff's separate §235 restitution-bond branch.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S001 §§25-21,234–235; S020 Knight","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C013","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C013","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C013","original_visible_id":"C013","status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S001","S_NE-P33-S020"],"bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q001"],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C014","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C014","Precise proposition":"FED action has a one-year suit limitation from accrual; that period is not a universal URLTA tenancy or title-action limitation.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S003 §25-203; S001","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C014","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C014","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C014","original_visible_id":"C014","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S001","S_NE-P33-S003"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C015","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C015","Precise proposition":"URLTA requires a qualifying tenant under an actual rental agreement, which can be oral or written; general FED exclusion follows from actual tenancy status.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S002 §§76-1408, 76-1410, 76-1414; S016 Lund","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"statutory_portion_only_judicial_hold_retained","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C015","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C015","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C015","original_visible_id":"C015","status":"statutory_portion_only_judicial_hold_retained","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S002","S_NE-P33-S016"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C016","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C016","Precise proposition":"URLTA notices differ by ground: 30/14 material breach, 7-day nonpayment, 7-day weekly, 30-day monthly and specified five-day exception branches.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S002 §§76-1431, 76-1437","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High, exact tenant facts required"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C016","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C016","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C016","original_visible_id":"C016","status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S002"],"bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q002"],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C017","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C017","Precise proposition":"URLTA permits consensual electronic tenancy notices only under §76-1413 and the UETA-related conditions.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S002 §76-1413","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High; no blanket email-service conclusion"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C017","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C017","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C017","original_visible_id":"C017","status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S002"],"bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q002"],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C018","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C018","Precise proposition":"URLTA complaint must specify statutory authority, particular facts, property and notice compliance.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S002/S024 §76-1441","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C018","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C018","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C018","original_visible_id":"C018","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S002","S_NE-P33-S024"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C019","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C019","Precise proposition":"URLTA summons has expedited timing, diligence-based alternate posting plus mail, and no plaintiff money judgment under that alternate service method.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S002/S024 §§76-1442, 76-1442.01, 76-1446","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C019","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C019","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C019","original_visible_id":"C019","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S002","S_NE-P33-S024"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C020","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C020","Precise proposition":"URLTA possession trial is judge without jury; tenant may assert legal/equitable defenses and counterclaims; nonappearance still requires trial.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S002 §§76-1444–1446","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C020","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C020","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C020","original_visible_id":"C020","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S002"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C021","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C021","Precise proposition":"URLTA restitution uses a court-requested writ with possession date no later than ten days after writ issuance; appeal stay requires security and continued monthly rent deposits.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S002/S024 §§76-1446–1447; S018 Johnson","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C021","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C021","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C021","original_visible_id":"C021","status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S002","S_NE-P33-S018","S_NE-P33-S024"],"bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q001","S_NE-P33-Q005"],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C022","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C022","Precise proposition":"URLTA possession judgment can be immediately appealed despite tenancy damages claims pending; general FED finality can differ.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S018 Johnson, S019 TDP","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High, procedural context matters"},"coordinator_verification_status":"statutory_portion_only_judicial_hold_retained","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C022","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C022","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C022","original_visible_id":"C022","status":"statutory_portion_only_judicial_hold_retained","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S018","S_NE-P33-S019"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C023","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C023","Precise proposition":"Acceptance of rent with knowledge of default waives the right to terminate for that breach unless postbreach agreement provides otherwise.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S002/S023 §76-1433","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High; actual acceptance and authority"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C023","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C023","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C023","original_visible_id":"C023","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S002","S_NE-P33-S023"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C024","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C024","Precise proposition":"URLTA bars wrongful landlord self-help lockout/utility interruption and provides conditional restitution, liquidated damages and fee remedies.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S002/S023 §§76-1430, 76-1436","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C024","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C024","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C024","original_visible_id":"C024","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S002","S_NE-P33-S023"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C025","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C025","Precise proposition":"Bad-faith willful tenant holdover allows enhanced amount no greater than the specified three-month-rent/threefold-actual-damage alternative, plus fees.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S002/S023 §76-1437(3)","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High, not automatic"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C025","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C025","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C025","original_visible_id":"C025","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S002","S_NE-P33-S023"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C026","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C026","Precise proposition":"Tenant-property statute requires qualifying terminated tenancy, vacated premises, notice, release process and conditional $2,000 low-value branch under current law.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S005 §§69-2302–2309; S021 Pan","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High, non-tenant owner application held"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C026","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C026","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C026","original_visible_id":"C026","status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S005","S_NE-P33-S021"],"bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q003"],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C027","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C027","Precise proposition":"PTFA enacted 2009, amended 2010, permanently restored effective June 23, 2018.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S006–S008","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C027","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C027","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C027","original_visible_id":"C027","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S006","S_NE-P33-S008"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C028","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C028","Precise proposition":"PTFA covers foreclosures of federally related mortgages or residential real property, not exclusively federally insured loans.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S006 §702(a)","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C028","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C028","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C028","original_visible_id":"C028","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S006"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C029","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C029","Precise proposition":"Bona fide tenancy excludes mortgagor/parent/spouse/child, requires arms-length terms and market rent or qualifying government subsidy.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S006 §702(b)","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High, actual tenant facts"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C029","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C029","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C029","original_visible_id":"C029","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S006"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C030","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C030","Precise proposition":"PTFA's foreclosure-notice event is complete title transfer under 2010 §1484; not automatically default notice or auction.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S007 §1484","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C030","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C030","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C030","original_visible_id":"C030","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S007"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C031","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C031","Precise proposition":"PTFA successor must give qualifying tenant at least 90-day notice; existing fixed lease generally runs to term, with precise purchaser-primary-residence exception.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S006 §702(a)(1)–(2), S007","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C031","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C031","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C031","original_visible_id":"C031","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S006","S_NE-P33-S007"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C032","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C032","Precise proposition":"PTFA preserves greater state/local and federal/state-subsidized tenancy protections.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S006 §702(a); S006 §703","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C032","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C032","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C032","original_visible_id":"C032","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S006"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C033","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C033","Precise proposition":"Separate Section 8 lease/HAP continuity requirements can apply after foreclosure.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S006 §703","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High as gateway, program facts missing"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C033","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C033","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C033","original_visible_id":"C033","status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S006"],"bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q005"],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C034","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C034","Precise proposition":"PTFA lacks an express damages schedule; Logan rejects an independent implied private federal action in the Ninth Circuit, not binding Eighth Circuit authority.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S022 Logan; S006","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High for Logan; Nebraska application held"},"coordinator_verification_status":"statutory_portion_only_judicial_hold_retained","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C034","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C034","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C034","original_visible_id":"C034","status":"statutory_portion_only_judicial_hold_retained","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S006","S_NE-P33-S022"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C035","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C035","Precise proposition":"Bankruptcy §362 may stay possession action, subject to specified prepetition residential possession-judgment and other exceptions and certification/cure branches.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S011 §362(a), (b)(22)–(23), (l)–(m)","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High conditional"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C035","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C035","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C035","original_visible_id":"C035","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S011"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent. Selected 362(a),b22/23,l/m compared; certifications/deposit/cure/objections and 30/15/10-day mechanics retained as actual-document holds, not a full bankruptcy analysis."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C036","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C036","Precise proposition":"Discharge alone does not award possession, create a new lease or necessarily extinguish surviving in-rem rights.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S011 §524","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High boundary"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C036","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C036","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C036","original_visible_id":"C036","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S011"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent. Selected 524(a)/(e) only; no complete lien-survival/reaffirmation/discharge opinion."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C037","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C037","Precise proposition":"SCRA §3951 requires court order for covered servicemember/dependent eviction by landlord or paramount-title actor, within indexed rent threshold.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S009 §3951(a); S010","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C037","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C037","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C037","original_visible_id":"C037","status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S009","S_NE-P33-S010"],"bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q004"],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C038","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C038","Precise proposition":"2026 §3951 monthly rent threshold is $10,542.60; conditional court stay/adjustment differs from mortgage-sale §3953.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S009 §3951(b), S010 p.11527/PDF0","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C038","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C038","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C038","original_visible_id":"C038","status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S009","S_NE-P33-S010"],"bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q004"],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C039","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C039","Precise proposition":"URLTA anti-retaliation, anti-lockout and limited fair-housing boundaries are separate from foreclosure title claims.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S002 §§76-1436, 76-1439","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High narrowly; full fair-housing dossier excluded"},"coordinator_verification_status":"conditional_scope_or_method_statement_no_actual_application_acceptance","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C039","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C039","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C039","original_visible_id":"C039","status":"conditional_scope_or_method_statement_no_actual_application_acceptance","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S002"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent. URLTA retaliation/utility portion read; fair-housing statutes and full discrimination claim not newly checked."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C040","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C040","Precise proposition":"Nebraska official CC 3:24 is a praecipe requesting restitution writ, not a judgment or actual writ.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S012 p.1/PDF0","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C040","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C040","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C040","original_visible_id":"C040","status":"selected_primary_text_matches_with_conditions_and_limits","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S012"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C041","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C041","Precise proposition":"Judicial Branch public landlord page currently lacks downloadable eviction complaint forms in that category; no universal statewide-absence finding follows.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S013","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High bounded observation"},"coordinator_verification_status":"conditional_scope_or_method_statement_no_actual_application_acceptance","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C041","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C041","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C041","original_visible_id":"C041","status":"conditional_scope_or_method_statement_no_actual_application_acceptance","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S013"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent. The selected guide statement is not a full forms universe or statewide-absence proof."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C042","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C042","Precise proposition":"Plaintiff/occupant must prove their own title, lease, notice, process, appeal, stay and writ facts; no record was inspected here.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S001–S025 synthesis","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"Conditional, no actual-case conclusion"},"coordinator_verification_status":"conditional_scope_or_method_statement_no_actual_application_acceptance","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C042","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C042","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C042","original_visible_id":"C042","status":"conditional_scope_or_method_statement_no_actual_application_acceptance","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S001","S_NE-P33-S025"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C043","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C043","Precise proposition":"One year for ordinary general FED does not automatically govern URLTA holdover or every separate title/ejectment cause.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S003 §25-203; S002 §76-1437","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High boundary"},"coordinator_verification_status":"statutory_portion_only_judicial_hold_retained","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C043","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C043","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C043","original_visible_id":"C043","status":"statutory_portion_only_judicial_hold_retained","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S002","S_NE-P33-S003"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C044","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C044","Precise proposition":"A genuine disagreement over a leasehold estate is not automatically resolvable in general FED merely by awarding possession based on disputed title.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S015 Woodsonia, S014 Marcuzzo","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High, jurisdiction fact-specific"},"coordinator_verification_status":"statutory_portion_only_judicial_hold_retained","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C044","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C044","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C044","original_visible_id":"C044","status":"statutory_portion_only_judicial_hold_retained","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S014","S_NE-P33-S015"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}},{"claim_id":"S_NE-C045","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C045","Precise proposition":"Property-return and tenant-damage remedies require actual tenancy, statutory violation, causal facts and proof; no foreclosure deed alone creates them.","Source ID and pinpoint":"S005, S002, S021 Pan","Conditions, exceptions, confidence":"High bounded synthesis"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C045","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","scoped_alias":"S_NE-P33-C045","imported_claim_id":"S_NE-C045","original_visible_id":"C045","status":"bounded_correction_or_coverage_clarification_required_UNSENT","source_ids_from_original_cell":["S_NE-P33-S002","S_NE-P33-S005","S_NE-P33-S021"],"bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q003"],"note":"No parent or operational acceptance; actual actor/debt/title/tenancy/notice/service/order and currentness predicates remain absent."}}],"sources":[{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S001","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/display_html.php?begin_section=25-21,219&end_section=25-21,235"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S001","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"Nebraska Legislature — General Forcible Entry and Detainer Act. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/display_html.php?begin_section=25-21,219&end_section=25-21,235 — complete operative §§25-21,219–25-21,235, especially §§219–223, 225–227 and 230–235.","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh complete material HTML read. Current published Nebraska codification. §25-21,219 shows 2021 LB320 amendment; section histories differ. HTML has no printed page/PDF index. No entire legislative-history audit. \nNebraska Legislature"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S001","coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","fresh_read_ids":["NE33-R001"],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q001"],"note":"Read-map references delimit complete selected bodies versus untouched range/cross-reference/history/application; repeated source usages are not independent authorities."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S002","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/display_html.php?begin_section=76-1401&end_section=76-1449"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S002","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"Nebraska Legislature — URLTA definitions, landlord/tenant remedies, possession and appeals. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/display_html.php?begin_section=76-1401&end_section=76-1449 — complete material §§76-1408–1414, 1425–1433, 1435–1447, including §§76-1442.01 and 76-1431.","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh full material HTML read. Current publication includes 2025 LB80 provisions in the relevant domestic-violence branches. Not an audit of every landlord–tenant regulatory or judicial issue. \nnebraskalegislature.gov"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S002","coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","fresh_read_ids":["NE33-R002","NE33-R003","NE33-R004","NE33-R005","NE33-R006","NE33-R007","NE33-R008","NE33-R009","NE33-R010","NE33-R011","NE33-R018","NE33-R028","NE33-R029","NE33-R030","NE33-R031","NE33-R032","NE33-R035","NE33-R036"],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q001","S_NE-P33-Q002"],"note":"Read-map references delimit complete selected bodies versus untouched range/cross-reference/history/application; repeated source usages are not independent authorities."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S003","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-203","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2221","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-505.01"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S003","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"Nebraska Legislature — FED limitation and time computation. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-203; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2221; relevant general civil service cross-reference https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-505.01.","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh §§25-203 and 25-2221 complete text; general service cross-reference used narrowly with S001/S002. Current official HTML. No case-specific dates computed. \nNebraska Legislature\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S003","coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","fresh_read_ids":["NE33-R033","NE33-R034"],"dated_reuse_read_ids":["NE33-D002"],"bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q005"],"note":"Read-map references delimit complete selected bodies versus untouched range/cross-reference/history/application; repeated source usages are not independent authorities."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S004","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1010","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1530","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1531","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1532","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2145","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=40-103"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S004","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"Nebraska Legislature — narrow foreclosure/title gateways. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1010; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1530; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1531; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1532; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2145; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=40-103.","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh complete material §§76-1010, 25-1530, 25-1531. Remaining sections used only as narrow statutory cross-references; no full rereading of PASS-27/PASS-28. Current official HTML. \nnebraskalegislature.gov\n+2"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S004","coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","fresh_read_ids":[],"dated_reuse_read_ids":["NE33-D001","NE33-D003","NE33-D004","NE33-D005","NE33-D006","NE33-D007"],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"Read-map references delimit complete selected bodies versus untouched range/cross-reference/history/application; repeated source usages are not independent authorities."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S005","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2302","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2303","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2307","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2308","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2309","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2312"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S005","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"Nebraska Legislature — tenant-property disposition. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2302; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2303; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2307; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2308; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2309; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2312.","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh complete material current HTML read. Current §69-2308 reflects 2026 LB834's $2,000 threshold, operative July 18, 2026. Personal-property Act applicability requires a tenancy and other statutory facts. \nNebraska Legislature\n+3"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S005","coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","fresh_read_ids":["NE33-R012","NE33-R013","NE33-R014","NE33-R015","NE33-R016","NE33-R017"],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q003"],"note":"Read-map references delimit complete selected bodies versus untouched range/cross-reference/history/application; repeated source usages are not independent authorities."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S006","urls":["https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-111publ22/html/PLAW-111publ22.htm"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S006","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"U.S. Congress/GovInfo — Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-111publ22/html/PLAW-111publ22.htm — Title VII §§701–703, printed 123 Stat. 1660–1662, HTML material lines 1798–1878; PDF index N/A.","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh actual enacted statute read. Historical 2009 enactment used together with 2010 amendments and 2018 permanent restoration; not treated as unchanged 2009 text in isolation. \ngovinfo.gov"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S006","coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","fresh_read_ids":["NE33-R019"],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q005"],"note":"Read-map references delimit complete selected bodies versus untouched range/cross-reference/history/application; repeated source usages are not independent authorities."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S007","urls":["https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-111publ203/html/PLAW-111publ203.htm"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S007","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"U.S. Congress/GovInfo — Dodd–Frank §1484 PTFA clarification. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-111publ203/html/PLAW-111publ203.htm — §1484, printed 124 Stat. 2204, HTML lines 52531–52546.","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh enacted text read. Clarifies complete-title-transfer notice-of-foreclosure date and amends the earlier lease wording. Historical amendment, operative within restored PTFA. \nGovInfo"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S007","coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","fresh_read_ids":["NE33-R020"],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"Read-map references delimit complete selected bodies versus untouched range/cross-reference/history/application; repeated source usages are not independent authorities."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S008","urls":["https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-115publ174/html/PLAW-115publ174.htm"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S008","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"U.S. Congress/GovInfo — 2018 permanent PTFA restoration. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-115publ174/html/PLAW-115publ174.htm — §304(a)–(c), printed 132 Stat. 1339, HTML lines 2739–2752.","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh enacted text read. Restored §§701–703, repealed sunset, effective 30 days after May 24, 2018. No new sunset was found in these operative provisions. \nGovInfo"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S008","coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","fresh_read_ids":["NE33-R021"],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"Read-map references delimit complete selected bodies versus untouched range/cross-reference/history/application; repeated source usages are not independent authorities."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S009","urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-118/t50/s3951/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S009","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"Office of Law Revision Counsel — 50 U.S.C. §3951, SCRA eviction and distress. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-118/t50/s3951/ — subsections (a)(1)–(3), (b)–(e).","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh complete material HTML read. Despite the literal path segment 119-118, the displayed official header identifies text through PL 119-120, October 7, 2026. Do not infer currency from the URL path alone. \nUSCode"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S009","coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","fresh_read_ids":["NE33-R022"],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q004"],"note":"Read-map references delimit complete selected bodies versus untouched range/cross-reference/history/application; repeated source usages are not independent authorities."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S010","urls":["https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-03-10/pdf/2026-04689.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S010","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"U.S. Department of Defense/Federal Register — 2026 SCRA rent adjustment. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-03-10/pdf/2026-04689.pdf — printed 91 FR 11527, PDF index 0, column containing maximum $10,542.60.","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh one-page official PDF text and image read. Published March 10, 2026; expressly effective January 1, 2026. The notice is the annual adjustment, not a new eviction statute."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S010","coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","fresh_read_ids":["NE33-R023"],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q004"],"note":"Read-map references delimit complete selected bodies versus untouched range/cross-reference/history/application; repeated source usages are not independent authorities."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S011","urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t11/s362/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t11/s524/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S011","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"Office of Law Revision Counsel — bankruptcy stay/discharge. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t11/s362/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t11/s524/ — §§362(a), (b)(22)–(23), (l)–(m), 524(a), (e).","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh current official HTML read, displayed through PL 119-124, October 15, 2026. Bankruptcy procedure and exceptions limited to eviction gateway; no actual bankruptcy proceeding reviewed. \nUSCode\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S011","coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","fresh_read_ids":["NE33-R024","NE33-R025"],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"Read-map references delimit complete selected bodies versus untouched range/cross-reference/history/application; repeated source usages are not independent authorities."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S012","urls":["https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-24.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S012","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"Nebraska Judicial Branch — CC 3:24 Praecipe for Writ of Restitution/Execution. https://nebraskajudicial.gov/sites/default/files/CC-3-24.pdf — printed p.1/PDF index 0, entire form.","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh official page-image inspection, NEW 09/2017. Request form only, not possession adjudication or issued writ."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S012","coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","fresh_read_ids":["NE33-R026"],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"Read-map references delimit complete selected bodies versus untouched range/cross-reference/history/application; repeated source usages are not independent authorities."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S013","urls":["https://nebraskajudicial.gov/self-help/renterlandlord/landlord"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S013","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"Nebraska Judicial Branch — Landlord public instructions. https://nebraskajudicial.gov/self-help/renterlandlord/landlord — current page, paragraphs differentiating landlord/tenant restitution and general FED, statement concerning unavailable forms for that category.","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh official website read. Public index/guidance, not statutory replacement or complete local-form directory. \nNebraska Judicial Branch"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S013","coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","fresh_read_ids":["NE33-R027"],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"Read-map references delimit complete selected bodies versus untouched range/cross-reference/history/application; repeated source usages are not independent authorities."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S014","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00004763PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S014","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"Nebraska Supreme Court — Federal National Mortgage Association v. Marcuzzo, 289 Neb. 301 (2014). https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00004763PUB — printed pp.303–311/PDF indices 2–10; especially p.309/PDF 8.","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh official case text and selected page-image inspection. Final published merits opinion. A mere title allegation was insufficient on its record; not a merits foreclosure-validity adjudication."},"coordinator_verification_status":"unreopened_judicial_authority_researcher_attribution_only","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S014","coordinator_verification_status":"unreopened_judicial_authority_researcher_attribution_only","fresh_read_ids":[],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No new opinion body, locator identity, posture, holding, citation/currentness or pixels certified; preserve exact original provenance and judicial hold."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S015","urls":["https://www.ne.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011925PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S015","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"Nebraska Supreme Court — Woodsonia Hwy 281 v. American Multi-Cinema, 318 Neb. 592 (2025). https://www.ne.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011925PUB — printed pp.607–612/PDF indices 15–20; particularly pp.610, 612/PDF indices 18, 20.","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh official advance opinion text and page images. Court vacated and ordered dismissal of general FED; commercial leasehold title controversy, not a holding that every tenant dispute exceeds URLTA jurisdiction. No separate certified edition or full citator examined."},"coordinator_verification_status":"unreopened_judicial_authority_researcher_attribution_only","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S015","coordinator_verification_status":"unreopened_judicial_authority_researcher_attribution_only","fresh_read_ids":[],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No new opinion body, locator identity, posture, holding, citation/currentness or pixels certified; preserve exact original provenance and judicial hold."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S016","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008172PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S016","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"Nebraska Court of Appeals — Lund Co. v. Clark, 30 Neb. App. 351 (2021). https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008172PUB — printed pp.356–358/PDF indices 5–7, particularly p.357/PDF 6.","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh official advance opinion and page image read. Affirmed under plain-error posture; spouse/occupant not party to the relevant tenancy on the case record."},"coordinator_verification_status":"unreopened_judicial_authority_researcher_attribution_only","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S016","coordinator_verification_status":"unreopened_judicial_authority_researcher_attribution_only","fresh_read_ids":[],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No new opinion body, locator identity, posture, holding, citation/currentness or pixels certified; preserve exact original provenance and judicial hold."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S017","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009079PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S017","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"Nebraska Supreme Court — 132 Ventures v. Active Spine Physical Therapy, 313 Neb. 45 (2022). https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009079PUB — printed pp.52–57/PDF indices 7–12; p.55/PDF 10 inspected.","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh official advance opinion text and page image read. Jury treatment of separate damages claims; commercial facts. No blanket jury rule for URLTA possession."},"coordinator_verification_status":"unreopened_judicial_authority_researcher_attribution_only","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S017","coordinator_verification_status":"unreopened_judicial_authority_researcher_attribution_only","fresh_read_ids":[],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No new opinion body, locator identity, posture, holding, citation/currentness or pixels certified; preserve exact original provenance and judicial hold."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S018","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewOpinion?docId=N00011052PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S018","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"Nebraska Supreme Court — Johnson v. Vosberg, 316 Neb. 658 (2024). https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewOpinion?docId=N00011052PUB — printed pp.664–668/PDF indices 6–10; p.666/PDF 8 inspected.","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh official opinion body and selected page image. URLTA judgment immediately appealable under §76-1447 despite pending tenancy claims; distinguish general FED."},"coordinator_verification_status":"unreopened_judicial_authority_researcher_attribution_only","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S018","coordinator_verification_status":"unreopened_judicial_authority_researcher_attribution_only","fresh_read_ids":[],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No new opinion body, locator identity, posture, holding, citation/currentness or pixels certified; preserve exact original provenance and judicial hold."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S019","urls":["https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2020/s-19-1198.html"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S019","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"Nebraska Supreme Court — TDP Phase One v. The Club at the Yard, 307 Neb. 795 (2020). https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2020/s-19-1198.html — actual published-opinion HTML, material finality/certification discussion.","Version, access status and limits":"Public reproduction of actual majority opinion, HTML; printed-body page and PDF index not independently mapped. Context corroborated in Johnson. No case-specific current docket reviewed."},"coordinator_verification_status":"unreopened_judicial_authority_researcher_attribution_only","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S019","coordinator_verification_status":"unreopened_judicial_authority_researcher_attribution_only","fresh_read_ids":[],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No new opinion body, locator identity, posture, holding, citation/currentness or pixels certified; preserve exact original provenance and judicial hold."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S020","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00004294PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S020","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"Nebraska Court of Appeals — Enterprise Bank v. Knight, 20 Neb. App. 662 (2013). https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00004294PUB — printed pp.664–669/PDF indices 2–7; p.667/PDF 5 inspected.","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh official opinion body and selected page image. Supersedeas failure and title/bankruptcy arguments in former-borrower FED posture; no general foreclosure validity finding."},"coordinator_verification_status":"unreopened_judicial_authority_researcher_attribution_only","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S020","coordinator_verification_status":"unreopened_judicial_authority_researcher_attribution_only","fresh_read_ids":[],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No new opinion body, locator identity, posture, holding, citation/currentness or pixels certified; preserve exact original provenance and judicial hold."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S021","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011278PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S021","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"Nebraska Supreme Court — Pan v. IOC Realty Specialist, 301 Neb. 256 (2018). https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011278PUB — printed pp.267–275/PDF indices 11–19; p.268/PDF 12 inspected.","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh official material opinion and page image. Tenant-property Act application in a commercial lease; not generic former-owner personal-property rule."},"coordinator_verification_status":"unreopened_judicial_authority_researcher_attribution_only","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S021","coordinator_verification_status":"unreopened_judicial_authority_researcher_attribution_only","fresh_read_ids":[],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No new opinion body, locator identity, posture, holding, citation/currentness or pixels certified; preserve exact original provenance and judicial hold."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S022","urls":["https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/10-55671/10-55671-2013-07-16.html"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S022","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit — Logan v. U.S. Bank, 722 F.3d 1163 (2013). https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/10-55671/10-55671-2013-07-16.html — actual opinion majority, reported pp.1168–1173; HTML/PDF index N/A.","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh published-opinion reproduction read. Denied implied PTFA private federal cause; persuasive only in Nebraska, not controlling Eighth Circuit. No exhaustive modern citator. \nlaw.justia.com"},"coordinator_verification_status":"unreopened_judicial_authority_researcher_attribution_only","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S022","coordinator_verification_status":"unreopened_judicial_authority_researcher_attribution_only","fresh_read_ids":[],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"No new opinion body, locator identity, posture, holding, citation/currentness or pixels certified; preserve exact original provenance and judicial hold."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S023","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1430","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1433","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1436","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1437","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1439"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S023","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"Nebraska Legislature — unlawful exclusion, retention and holdover remedies. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1430; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1433; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1436; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1437; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1439.","Version, access status and limits":"Material provisions freshly read within S002; §76-1430 separately verified. URLs are complete literal locators, not separately counted as independent proof of a new rule. \nNebraska Legislature"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S023","coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","fresh_read_ids":["NE33-R009","NE33-R011","NE33-R018","NE33-R031","NE33-R032"],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":[],"note":"Read-map references delimit complete selected bodies versus untouched range/cross-reference/history/application; repeated source usages are not independent authorities."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S024","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1441","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1442","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1442.01","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1446","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1447"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S024","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"Nebraska Legislature — specific URLTA restitution/appeal. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1441; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1442; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1442.01; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1446; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1447.","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh material official HTML, current operative text; source repetitions supplement S002, not independent authorities. \nNebraska Legislature\n+2"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S024","coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","fresh_read_ids":["NE33-R002","NE33-R003","NE33-R004","NE33-R005","NE33-R006"],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q001"],"note":"Read-map references delimit complete selected bodies versus untouched range/cross-reference/history/application; repeated source usages are not independent authorities."}},{"source_id":"S_NE-P33-S025","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,230","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,231","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,234","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,235"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P33-S025","Issuer, title, full literal direct URL and material pinpoint":"Nebraska Legislature — statutory possession writ, appeal and restitution. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,230; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,231; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,234; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,235.","Version, access status and limits":"Fresh operative text within S001; independent exact locators supplied for procedures. \nnebraskalegislature.gov"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","source_id":"S_NE-P33-S025","coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_comparison_with_scoped_limits","fresh_read_ids":["NE33-R001"],"dated_reuse_read_ids":[],"bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q001"],"note":"Read-map references delimit complete selected bodies versus untouched range/cross-reference/history/application; repeated source usages are not independent authorities."}}],"coverage":[{"topic":"1. Actor standing and roles","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"1. Actor standing and roles","Status":"Answered conditionally","Claim IDs":"C001–C007, C042","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Actual deed, transferee, assignment, agency authority and ownership"},"coordinator_acceptance":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C001","S_NE-P33-C002","S_NE-P33-C003","S_NE-P33-C004","S_NE-P33-C005","S_NE-P33-C006","S_NE-P33-C007","S_NE-P33-C042"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":1,"topic":"1. Actor standing and roles","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C001","S_NE-P33-C002","S_NE-P33-C003","S_NE-P33-C004","S_NE-P33-C005","S_NE-P33-C006","S_NE-P33-C007","S_NE-P33-C042"],"status":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Actual deed, transferee, assignment, agency authority and ownership","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"2. Nonjudicial versus judicial transfer","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"2. Nonjudicial versus judicial transfer","Status":"Answered as gateway","Claim IDs":"C002–C003","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Actual sale payment, delivery, judicial confirmation, stays"},"coordinator_acceptance":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C002","S_NE-P33-C003"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":2,"topic":"2. Nonjudicial versus judicial transfer","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C002","S_NE-P33-C003"],"status":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Actual sale payment, delivery, judicial confirmation, stays","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"3. Foreclosure order versus possession action","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"3. Foreclosure order versus possession action","Status":"Answered generally","Claim IDs":"C001, C004, C012, C021","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Decree wording, named parties and actual restitution order"},"coordinator_acceptance":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C001","S_NE-P33-C004","S_NE-P33-C012","S_NE-P33-C021"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":3,"topic":"3. Foreclosure order versus possession action","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C001","S_NE-P33-C004","S_NE-P33-C012","S_NE-P33-C021"],"status":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Decree wording, named parties and actual restitution order","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"4. Competent court/title dispute","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"4. Competent court/title dispute","Status":"Answered with jurisdiction boundary","Claim IDs":"C004–C005, C044","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Evidence of genuine title/leasehold controversy and proper alternative action"},"coordinator_acceptance":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C004","S_NE-P33-C005","S_NE-P33-C044"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":4,"topic":"4. Competent court/title dispute","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C004","S_NE-P33-C005","S_NE-P33-C044"],"status":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Evidence of genuine title/leasehold controversy and proper alternative action","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"5. Pre-/post-sale and defective title","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"5. Pre-/post-sale and defective title","Status":"Partial","Claim IDs":"C002–C005","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Title challenge, payment, BFP, void/voidable and deed proof; separate sale component not adopted"},"coordinator_acceptance":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C002","S_NE-P33-C003","S_NE-P33-C004","S_NE-P33-C005"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":5,"topic":"5. Pre-/post-sale and defective title","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C002","S_NE-P33-C003","S_NE-P33-C004","S_NE-P33-C005"],"status":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Title challenge, payment, BFP, void/voidable and deed proof; separate sale component not adopted","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"6. Former owner spouse/homestead/redemption","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"6. Former owner spouse/homestead/redemption","Status":"Answered narrowly","Claim IDs":"C003, C007, C029","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Actual spouse ownership, signature, redemption and tenant status"},"coordinator_acceptance":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C003","S_NE-P33-C007","S_NE-P33-C029"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":6,"topic":"6. Former owner spouse/homestead/redemption","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C003","S_NE-P33-C007","S_NE-P33-C029"],"status":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Actual spouse ownership, signature, redemption and tenant status","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"7. Assignment of rents/receiver","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"7. Assignment of rents/receiver","Status":"Partial/excluded beyond gateway","Claim IDs":"C006, C042","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Assignment instrument, receiver order, statutory receiver/rents provisions and authority"},"coordinator_acceptance":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C006","S_NE-P33-C042"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":7,"topic":"7. Assignment of rents/receiver","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C006","S_NE-P33-C042"],"status":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Assignment instrument, receiver order, statutory receiver/rents provisions and authority","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"8. Pre-suit notice for each route","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"8. Pre-suit notice for each route","Status":"Answered for main routes","Claim IDs":"C008, C016–C017, C031","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Exact occupant classification, reason, notice and receipt"},"coordinator_acceptance":"partial_bounded_corrections_UNSENT","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C008","S_NE-P33-C016","S_NE-P33-C017","S_NE-P33-C031"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":8,"topic":"8. Pre-suit notice for each route","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C008","S_NE-P33-C016","S_NE-P33-C017","S_NE-P33-C031"],"status":"partial_bounded_corrections_UNSENT","bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q002"],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Exact occupant classification, reason, notice and receipt","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"9. Former-owner tenant status/new agreement","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"9. Former-owner tenant status/new agreement","Status":"Answered conditionally","Claim IDs":"C007, C015, C023","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Actual new lease/attornment, consent, rent acceptance"},"coordinator_acceptance":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C007","S_NE-P33-C015","S_NE-P33-C023"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":9,"topic":"9. Former-owner tenant status/new agreement","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C007","S_NE-P33-C015","S_NE-P33-C023"],"status":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Actual new lease/attornment, consent, rent acceptance","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"10. Federal versus longer state/local notice","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"10. Federal versus longer state/local notice","Status":"Answered generally","Claim IDs":"C031–C032","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Applicable specific municipality, lease and program"},"coordinator_acceptance":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C031","S_NE-P33-C032"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":10,"topic":"10. Federal versus longer state/local notice","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C031","S_NE-P33-C032"],"status":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Applicable specific municipality, lease and program","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"11. Complaint/pleading","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"11. Complaint/pleading","Status":"Answered for FED/URLTA","Claim IDs":"C009, C018","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Actual allegations, exhibits, authorized plaintiff"},"coordinator_acceptance":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C009","S_NE-P33-C018"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":11,"topic":"11. Complaint/pleading","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C009","S_NE-P33-C018"],"status":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Actual allegations, exhibits, authorized plaintiff","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"12. Service/unknown occupants","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"12. Service/unknown occupants","Status":"Answered for statutory methods; actual nonparty effect partial","Claim IDs":"C010, C019","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Diligence affidavit, named occupants, process returns and due process"},"coordinator_acceptance":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C010","S_NE-P33-C019"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":12,"topic":"12. Service/unknown occupants","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C010","S_NE-P33-C019"],"status":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Diligence affidavit, named occupants, process returns and due process","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"13. Appearance, trial, default, jury, clocks","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"13. Appearance, trial, default, jury, clocks","Status":"Answered statutory branches","Claim IDs":"C010–C011, C019–C022","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Summons issuance and service; actual court order/closure"},"coordinator_acceptance":"partial_bounded_corrections_UNSENT","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C010","S_NE-P33-C011","S_NE-P33-C019","S_NE-P33-C020","S_NE-P33-C021","S_NE-P33-C022"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":13,"topic":"13. Appearance, trial, default, jury, clocks","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C010","S_NE-P33-C011","S_NE-P33-C019","S_NE-P33-C020","S_NE-P33-C021","S_NE-P33-C022"],"status":"partial_bounded_corrections_UNSENT","bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q001","S_NE-P33-Q002","S_NE-P33-Q005"],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Summons issuance and service; actual court order/closure","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"14. Defenses and title challenge","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"14. Defenses and title challenge","Status":"Answered generally; separate merits held","Claim IDs":"C005, C017, C023, C029, C035, C044","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Title/lease/foreclosure/stay evidence and actual defenses"},"coordinator_acceptance":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C005","S_NE-P33-C017","S_NE-P33-C023","S_NE-P33-C029","S_NE-P33-C035","S_NE-P33-C044"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":14,"topic":"14. Defenses and title challenge","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C005","S_NE-P33-C017","S_NE-P33-C023","S_NE-P33-C029","S_NE-P33-C035","S_NE-P33-C044"],"status":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Title/lease/foreclosure/stay evidence and actual defenses","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"15. Judgment and writ","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"15. Judgment and writ","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C012, C021, C040","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Signed restitution judgment, writ request and issuance"},"coordinator_acceptance":"partial_bounded_corrections_UNSENT","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C012","S_NE-P33-C021","S_NE-P33-C040"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":15,"topic":"15. Judgment and writ","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C012","S_NE-P33-C021","S_NE-P33-C040"],"status":"partial_bounded_corrections_UNSENT","bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q001"],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Signed restitution judgment, writ request and issuance","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"16. Officer execution and possessions/belongings","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"16. Officer execution and possessions/belongings","Status":"Answered for principal writ; belongings partial","Claim IDs":"C012, C021, C026, C045","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Sheriff/constable return, occupant status, inventory and property procedure"},"coordinator_acceptance":"partial_bounded_corrections_UNSENT","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C012","S_NE-P33-C021","S_NE-P33-C026","S_NE-P33-C045"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":16,"topic":"16. Officer execution and possessions/belongings","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C012","S_NE-P33-C021","S_NE-P33-C026","S_NE-P33-C045"],"status":"partial_bounded_corrections_UNSENT","bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q001","S_NE-P33-Q003"],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Sheriff/constable return, occupant status, inventory and property procedure","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"17. Appeal/default relief and stay security","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"17. Appeal/default relief and stay security","Status":"Answered main distinction; vacatur partial","Claim IDs":"C013, C021–C022","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Actual appeal, approved surety/deposit, rent payments, default grounds"},"coordinator_acceptance":"partial_bounded_corrections_UNSENT","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C013","S_NE-P33-C021","S_NE-P33-C022"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":17,"topic":"17. Appeal/default relief and stay security","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C013","S_NE-P33-C021","S_NE-P33-C022"],"status":"partial_bounded_corrections_UNSENT","bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q001"],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Actual appeal, approved surety/deposit, rent payments, default grounds","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"18. Accepted forbearance or possession agreement","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"18. Accepted forbearance or possession agreement","Status":"Conditional; not independently established","Claim IDs":"C023, C042","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Actual authorized contract, waiver, breach, duration and assent"},"coordinator_acceptance":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C023","S_NE-P33-C042"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":18,"topic":"18. Accepted forbearance or possession agreement","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C023","S_NE-P33-C042"],"status":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Actual authorized contract, waiver, breach, duration and assent","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"19. Rent, use/occupancy, mesne profits, costs and deposits","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"19. Rent, use/occupancy, mesne profits, costs and deposits","Status":"Partial","Claim IDs":"C011, C023–C025, C045","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Contract, proof of loss, lawful costs, deposit ledger; full mesne-profits doctrine not researched"},"coordinator_acceptance":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C011","S_NE-P33-C023","S_NE-P33-C024","S_NE-P33-C025","S_NE-P33-C045"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":19,"topic":"19. Rent, use/occupancy, mesne profits, costs and deposits","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C011","S_NE-P33-C023","S_NE-P33-C024","S_NE-P33-C025","S_NE-P33-C045"],"status":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Contract, proof of loss, lawful costs, deposit ledger; full mesne-profits doctrine not researched","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"20. Wrongful removal/lockout/conversion","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"20. Wrongful removal/lockout/conversion","Status":"Answered URLTA route; other torts partial","Claim IDs":"C024, C026, C045","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Actor, harm, tenancy and tort-specific legal evidence; general former-owner tort report excluded"},"coordinator_acceptance":"partial_bounded_corrections_UNSENT","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C024","S_NE-P33-C026","S_NE-P33-C045"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":20,"topic":"20. Wrongful removal/lockout/conversion","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C024","S_NE-P33-C026","S_NE-P33-C045"],"status":"partial_bounded_corrections_UNSENT","bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q003"],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Actor, harm, tenancy and tort-specific legal evidence; general former-owner tort report excluded","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"21. PTFA enactment/current status/scope","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"21. PTFA enactment/current status/scope","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C027–C028","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Actual dwelling/foreclosure facts"},"coordinator_acceptance":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C027","S_NE-P33-C028"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":21,"topic":"21. PTFA enactment/current status/scope","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C027","S_NE-P33-C028"],"status":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Actual dwelling/foreclosure facts","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"22. Bona fide tenancy conditions","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"22. Bona fide tenancy conditions","Status":"Answered statute; application factual","Claim IDs":"C029","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Lease, rent, relationship, arm's-length and subsidy records"},"coordinator_acceptance":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C029"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":22,"topic":"22. Bona fide tenancy conditions","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C029"],"status":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Lease, rent, relationship, arm's-length and subsidy records","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"23. Immediate successor/complete title transfer","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"23. Immediate successor/complete title transfer","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C030","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Court order/deed and completed title event"},"coordinator_acceptance":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C030"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":23,"topic":"23. Immediate successor/complete title transfer","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C030"],"status":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Court order/deed and completed title event","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"24. Ninety-day/lease-to-end/primary-home exception","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"24. Ninety-day/lease-to-end/primary-home exception","Status":"Answered legally","Claim IDs":"C031","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Notice/lease/purchaser sale and intended primary occupancy"},"coordinator_acceptance":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C031"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":24,"topic":"24. Ninety-day/lease-to-end/primary-home exception","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C031"],"status":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Notice/lease/purchaser sale and intended primary occupancy","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"25. State/local longer protections","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"25. State/local longer protections","Status":"Answered preservation rule; local check open","Claim IDs":"C032","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Jurisdiction-specific current tenant protections"},"coordinator_acceptance":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C032"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":25,"topic":"25. State/local longer protections","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C032"],"status":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Jurisdiction-specific current tenant protections","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"26. Section 8/subsidized housing","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"26. Section 8/subsidized housing","Status":"Answered as statutory gateway; broader application partial","Claim IDs":"C032–C033","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Voucher/HAP agreement, PHA/agency conditions"},"coordinator_acceptance":"partial_bounded_corrections_UNSENT","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C032","S_NE-P33-C033"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":26,"topic":"26. Section 8/subsidized housing","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C032","S_NE-P33-C033"],"status":"partial_bounded_corrections_UNSENT","bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q005"],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Voucher/HAP agreement, PHA/agency conditions","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"27. PTFA breach and private enforcement","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"27. PTFA breach and private enforcement","Status":"Partial","Claim IDs":"C031, C034","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Breach, rental notice; controlling Eighth Circuit/private state remedy and later-treatment search"},"coordinator_acceptance":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C031","S_NE-P33-C034"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":27,"topic":"27. PTFA breach and private enforcement","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C031","S_NE-P33-C034"],"status":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Breach, rental notice; controlling Eighth Circuit/private state remedy and later-treatment search","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"28. Bankruptcy stay/discharge","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"28. Bankruptcy stay/discharge","Status":"Answered narrow gateway","Claim IDs":"C035–C036","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Bankruptcy petition, judgment, certifications, exceptions and orders"},"coordinator_acceptance":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C035","S_NE-P33-C036"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":28,"topic":"28. Bankruptcy stay/discharge","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C035","S_NE-P33-C036"],"status":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Bankruptcy petition, judgment, certifications, exceptions and orders","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"29. SCRA eviction/default/rent threshold","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"29. SCRA eviction/default/rent threshold","Status":"Answered applicable federal threshold and route","Claim IDs":"C037–C038","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Military service, dependency, rent, material effect and order"},"coordinator_acceptance":"partial_bounded_corrections_UNSENT","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C037","S_NE-P33-C038"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":29,"topic":"29. SCRA eviction/default/rent threshold","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C037","S_NE-P33-C038"],"status":"partial_bounded_corrections_UNSENT","bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q004"],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Military service, dependency, rent, material effect and order","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"30. Housing discrimination, retaliation, utilities","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"30. Housing discrimination, retaliation, utilities","Status":"Partial boundary only","Claim IDs":"C024, C039","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Protected status, causation, housing-code record, independent rights"},"coordinator_acceptance":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C024","S_NE-P33-C039"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":30,"topic":"30. Housing discrimination, retaliation, utilities","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C024","S_NE-P33-C039"],"status":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Protected status, causation, housing-code record, independent rights","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"31. Current official court forms","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"31. Current official court forms","Status":"Answered for located CC 3:24; other forms partial","Claim IDs":"C040–C041","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Actual complaint and writ forms from local court if relevant"},"coordinator_acceptance":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C040","S_NE-P33-C041"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":31,"topic":"31. Current official court forms","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C040","S_NE-P33-C041"],"status":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Actual complaint and writ forms from local court if relevant","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"32. Statewide versus county form searches","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"32. Statewide versus county form searches","Status":"Bounded index result","Claim IDs":"C041","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"County/local judge forms and revision archive not comprehensively searched"},"coordinator_acceptance":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C041"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":32,"topic":"32. Statewide versus county form searches","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C041"],"status":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"County/local judge forms and revision archive not comprehensively searched","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"33. Controlling cases and procedural holdings","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"33. Controlling cases and procedural holdings","Status":"Answered selected material opinions; broader citator open","Claim IDs":"C005, C015, C022, C034, C044","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Full subsequent-treatment/case universe, narrower federal PTFA remedies"},"coordinator_acceptance":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C005","S_NE-P33-C015","S_NE-P33-C022","S_NE-P33-C034","S_NE-P33-C044"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":33,"topic":"33. Controlling cases and procedural holdings","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C005","S_NE-P33-C015","S_NE-P33-C022","S_NE-P33-C034","S_NE-P33-C044"],"status":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Full subsequent-treatment/case universe, narrower federal PTFA remedies","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"34. Fact evidence checklist","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"34. Fact evidence checklist","Status":"Answered specification","Claim IDs":"C042","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Actual facts deliberately absent"},"coordinator_acceptance":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C042"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":34,"topic":"34. Fact evidence checklist","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C042"],"status":"conditional_primary_boundary_compared_actual_application_held","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Actual facts deliberately absent","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"35. Urgent/stay decision map","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"35. Urgent/stay decision map","Status":"Answered conditional structure","Claim IDs":"C012–C013, C021, C035, C037, C042","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Actual injunction, bond, stay, case and warrant records"},"coordinator_acceptance":"partial_bounded_corrections_UNSENT","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C012","S_NE-P33-C013","S_NE-P33-C021","S_NE-P33-C035","S_NE-P33-C037","S_NE-P33-C042"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":35,"topic":"35. Urgent/stay decision map","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C012","S_NE-P33-C013","S_NE-P33-C021","S_NE-P33-C035","S_NE-P33-C037","S_NE-P33-C042"],"status":"partial_bounded_corrections_UNSENT","bounded_findings":["S_NE-P33-Q001"],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Actual injunction, bond, stay, case and warrant records","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}},{"topic":"36. Special jurisdictions/sectors/currentness","researcher_record":{"Assigned item":"36. Special jurisdictions/sectors/currentness","Status":"Excluded or unresolved as specified","Claim IDs":"C027–C039, C042","Missing authority/evidence or precise next action":"Farm, tax, HOA, tribal, local, probate, federally insured program and international legal research"},"coordinator_acceptance":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","coordinator_scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C027","S_NE-P33-C028","S_NE-P33-C029","S_NE-P33-C030","S_NE-P33-C031","S_NE-P33-C032","S_NE-P33-C033","S_NE-P33-C034","S_NE-P33-C035","S_NE-P33-C036","S_NE-P33-C037","S_NE-P33-C038","S_NE-P33-C039","S_NE-P33-C042"],"coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T04:34:30.017831+00:00","reviewer_role":"delegated_coordinator_review","independent_review":false,"review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","one_based_row":36,"topic":"36. Special jurisdictions/sectors/currentness","scoped_claim_aliases":["S_NE-P33-C027","S_NE-P33-C028","S_NE-P33-C029","S_NE-P33-C030","S_NE-P33-C031","S_NE-P33-C032","S_NE-P33-C033","S_NE-P33-C034","S_NE-P33-C035","S_NE-P33-C036","S_NE-P33-C037","S_NE-P33-C038","S_NE-P33-C039","S_NE-P33-C042"],"status":"held_unreopened_judicial_or_separate_scope","bounded_findings":[],"original_missing_evidence_preserved":"Farm, tax, HOA, tribal, local, probate, federally insured program and international legal research","scope":"A bounded comparison does not accept all researcher Answered language. Original actual-fact, case, program, currentness, local/tribal/sector and whole-parent holds remain."}}],"annotations":{},"corrections":[{"issue_id":"S_NE-P33-Q001","finding":"Complete the distinct continuance and execution-stay branches","affected_claim_ids":[],"related_claim_ids":[],"validated_exact_raw_rows":[{"raw_table_index_zero_based":10,"raw_array_row_index_zero_based_including_header":10,"header_repeated_at_row_zero":false,"row_cells_sha256":"637a25c27743d902d0b2d2ea7fc6a9c8de434273313157866d216e393d12f5da","verbatim_cells":["C010","General FED summons service is within three nonjudicial-day-excluding days, return within five, and trial 10–14 days after issuance; alternative service needs failed diligent efforts and affidavit.","S001 §25-21,223","High; real issuance and service records required"]},{"raw_table_index_zero_based":10,"raw_array_row_index_zero_based_including_header":12,"header_repeated_at_row_zero":false,"row_cells_sha256":"f084c3a8727ed4b0fa632bd912d0aae3cf611aa3c4cda3465f21a3c4273a67e8","verbatim_cells":["C012","General FED restitution requires court judgment and requested writ directed to sheriff or constable, with ten-day officer execution rule.","S001 §§25-21,230–231","High"]},{"raw_table_index_zero_based":10,"raw_array_row_index_zero_based_including_header":13,"header_repeated_at_row_zero":false,"row_cells_sha256":"55f5b7c85e6e843dcffa43ad031a16998ff63b108953845a8e802be54145c838","verbatim_cells":["C013","General FED appeal alone is not supersedeas; approved cash bond/undertaking generally required within 30 days, subject to plaintiff's separate §235 restitution-bond branch.","S001 §§25-21,234–235; S020 Knight","High"]},{"raw_table_index_zero_based":10,"raw_array_row_index_zero_based_including_header":21,"header_repeated_at_row_zero":false,"row_cells_sha256":"4b0c2e00cd5a0cdf0e5c9dce3a50e30ffffefb092533e20b4b2294618e6ff1cd","verbatim_cells":["C021","URLTA restitution uses a court-requested writ with possession date no later than ten days after writ issuance; appeal stay requires security and continued monthly rent deposits.","S002/S024 §§76-1446–1447; S018 Johnson","High"]},{"raw_table_index_zero_based":11,"raw_array_row_index_zero_based_including_header":13,"header_repeated_at_row_zero":false,"row_cells_sha256":"ada6bbc2f5215601fd1567b095f040d90f4800dc58f68d0e72d44220c224a789","verbatim_cells":["13. Appearance, trial, default, jury, clocks","Answered statutory branches","C010–C011, C019–C022","Summons issuance and service; actual court order/closure"]},{"raw_table_index_zero_based":11,"raw_array_row_index_zero_based_including_header":17,"header_repeated_at_row_zero":false,"row_cells_sha256":"41a089136ea40d4e3f26b157fd66c2f3217bb52593d26c2661c0b3066ab95377","verbatim_cells":["17. Appeal/default relief and stay security","Answered main distinction; vacatur partial","C013, C021–C022","Actual appeal, approved surety/deposit, rent payments, default grounds"]}],"exact_original_cell_matches":[],"source_urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/display_html.php?begin_section=25-21,219&end_section=25-21,235","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1443","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1447"],"localization":"exact_native_row_or_cell_matches_available","public_status":"Recorded correction pending; working-paper assertion requires the stated repair or qualification."},{"issue_id":"S_NE-P33-Q002","finding":"Expose the material URLTA electronic-notice and cure conditions","affected_claim_ids":[],"related_claim_ids":[],"validated_exact_raw_rows":[{"raw_table_index_zero_based":1,"raw_array_row_index_zero_based_including_header":4,"header_repeated_at_row_zero":false,"row_cells_sha256":"4fce75d703e3df19ea781e933f967d27b4fd9a987f787f6b2de9d8895ab588bb","verbatim_cells":["Pre-suit service","Personal copy or usual abode if person absent; premises posting/leaving only when person and usual abode cannot be found in county","Delivery under §76-1413 and specific termination provision; consensual electronic notice must meet statutory and UETA predicates"]},{"raw_table_index_zero_based":2,"raw_array_row_index_zero_based_including_header":1,"header_repeated_at_row_zero":false,"row_cells_sha256":"7cec1dbd9ea58f30585869ea1cf6cb4ff703247239f826b212ee4b1b5816f7c0","verbatim_cells":["Material tenant breach","Generally written notice describing violation, termination at least 30 days after receipt if uncured, with 14 days to remedy"]},{"raw_table_index_zero_based":10,"raw_array_row_index_zero_based_including_header":16,"header_repeated_at_row_zero":false,"row_cells_sha256":"f645885a1d486b76035e4ee5da2da04697ad8fbb9b87042650b2e00cef512ae3","verbatim_cells":["C016","URLTA notices differ by ground: 30/14 material breach, 7-day nonpayment, 7-day weekly, 30-day monthly and specified five-day exception branches.","S002 §§76-1431, 76-1437","High, exact tenant facts required"]},{"raw_table_index_zero_based":10,"raw_array_row_index_zero_based_including_header":17,"header_repeated_at_row_zero":false,"row_cells_sha256":"b44c5946163058e65103e9356f292b301b395c0c982ab720e4efd0730e82ca4b","verbatim_cells":["C017","URLTA permits consensual electronic tenancy notices only under §76-1413 and the UETA-related conditions.","S002 §76-1413","High; no blanket email-service conclusion"]},{"raw_table_index_zero_based":11,"raw_array_row_index_zero_based_including_header":8,"header_repeated_at_row_zero":false,"row_cells_sha256":"ebc6125b3096d83211a827d1c2e4e265108f89e50f0434a06f9f623fb035a9d7","verbatim_cells":["8. Pre-suit notice for each route","Answered for main routes","C008, C016–C017, C031","Exact occupant classification, reason, notice and receipt"]}],"exact_original_cell_matches":[],"source_urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1413","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=76-1431"],"localization":"exact_native_row_or_cell_matches_available","public_status":"Recorded correction pending; working-paper assertion requires the stated repair or qualification."},{"issue_id":"S_NE-P33-Q003","finding":"Anchor the tenant-property notice and later release/disposal steps","affected_claim_ids":[],"related_claim_ids":[],"validated_exact_raw_rows":[{"raw_table_index_zero_based":10,"raw_array_row_index_zero_based_including_header":26,"header_repeated_at_row_zero":false,"row_cells_sha256":"955b71f029e6b186e5b93a4079c6cbaa049542a4d3f6d101dd55787aa64d68c7","verbatim_cells":["C026","Tenant-property statute requires qualifying terminated tenancy, vacated premises, notice, release process and conditional $2,000 low-value branch under current law.","S005 §§69-2302–2309; S021 Pan","High, non-tenant owner application held"]},{"raw_table_index_zero_based":11,"raw_array_row_index_zero_based_including_header":16,"header_repeated_at_row_zero":false,"row_cells_sha256":"174c0aeaf484a62f2ecb8b62f7c7f1124289d1726ebaa803fc3c945f5959e0d5","verbatim_cells":["16. Officer execution and possessions/belongings","Answered for principal writ; belongings partial","C012, C021, C026, C045","Sheriff/constable return, occupant status, inventory and property procedure"]},{"raw_table_index_zero_based":11,"raw_array_row_index_zero_based_including_header":20,"header_repeated_at_row_zero":false,"row_cells_sha256":"e75c5cd9798903905f7e2e770ef5a576322c32c576414cdbddb96c92cbbd576c","verbatim_cells":["20. Wrongful removal/lockout/conversion","Answered URLTA route; other torts partial","C024, C026, C045","Actor, harm, tenancy and tort-specific legal evidence; general former-owner tort report excluded"]}],"exact_original_cell_matches":[],"source_urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2303","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2307","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=69-2308"],"localization":"exact_native_row_or_cell_matches_available","public_status":"Recorded correction pending; working-paper assertion requires the stated repair or qualification."},{"issue_id":"S_NE-P33-Q004","finding":"Use the actual SCRA residential-use predicate","affected_claim_ids":[],"related_claim_ids":[],"validated_exact_raw_rows":[{"raw_table_index_zero_based":10,"raw_array_row_index_zero_based_including_header":37,"header_repeated_at_row_zero":false,"row_cells_sha256":"8ecc388ba65d38a18fbb2ea0b8a9127b880b30ea93b9d79c780ee3156bf56714","verbatim_cells":["C037","SCRA §3951 requires court order for covered servicemember/dependent eviction by landlord or paramount-title actor, within indexed rent threshold.","S009 §3951(a); S010","High"]},{"raw_table_index_zero_based":10,"raw_array_row_index_zero_based_including_header":38,"header_repeated_at_row_zero":false,"row_cells_sha256":"7f55d6d60e806cf90f811ccd8742543c7e2c5f992ce73fdcb52aab34741f1adc","verbatim_cells":["C038","2026 §3951 monthly rent threshold is $10,542.60; conditional court stay/adjustment differs from mortgage-sale §3953.","S009 §3951(b), S010 p.11527/PDF0","High"]},{"raw_table_index_zero_based":11,"raw_array_row_index_zero_based_including_header":29,"header_repeated_at_row_zero":false,"row_cells_sha256":"a9f7a5ffed3606fe642b5bfc16d050805d093d0be85d315392d217ebf518e9b2","verbatim_cells":["29. SCRA eviction/default/rent threshold","Answered applicable federal threshold and route","C037–C038","Military service, dependency, rent, material effect and order"]}],"exact_original_cell_matches":[],"source_urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-118/t50/s3951/","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-03-10/pdf/2026-04689.pdf"],"localization":"exact_native_row_or_cell_matches_available","public_status":"Recorded correction pending; working-paper assertion requires the stated repair or qualification."},{"issue_id":"S_NE-P33-Q005","finding":"Repair source read bounds and pass-scoped atomic traceability","affected_claim_ids":[],"related_claim_ids":[],"validated_exact_raw_rows":[{"raw_table_index_zero_based":9,"raw_array_row_index_zero_based_including_header":6,"header_repeated_at_row_zero":false,"row_cells_sha256":"85e4e3244e1c36b0e0fe276d7d29d81f6c9065aefca270edd7e3ba803e7cd941","verbatim_cells":["S_NE-P33-S006","U.S. Congress/GovInfo — Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-111publ22/html/PLAW-111publ22.htm — Title VII §§701–703, printed 123 Stat. 1660–1662, HTML material lines 1798–1878; PDF index N/A.","Fresh actual enacted statute read. Historical 2009 enactment used together with 2010 amendments and 2018 permanent restoration; not treated as unchanged 2009 text in isolation. \ngovinfo.gov"]},{"raw_table_index_zero_based":10,"raw_array_row_index_zero_based_including_header":33,"header_repeated_at_row_zero":false,"row_cells_sha256":"2fa2482d6d63a1a103a3f534cc08e4b6369561a53fab6f3d5ae335641480d03d","verbatim_cells":["C033","Separate Section 8 lease/HAP continuity requirements can apply after foreclosure.","S006 §703","High as gateway, program facts missing"]},{"raw_table_index_zero_based":11,"raw_array_row_index_zero_based_including_header":13,"header_repeated_at_row_zero":false,"row_cells_sha256":"ada6bbc2f5215601fd1567b095f040d90f4800dc58f68d0e72d44220c224a789","verbatim_cells":["13. Appearance, trial, default, jury, clocks","Answered statutory branches","C010–C011, C019–C022","Summons issuance and service; actual court order/closure"]},{"raw_table_index_zero_based":11,"raw_array_row_index_zero_based_including_header":26,"header_repeated_at_row_zero":false,"row_cells_sha256":"7ed46917abfb73acdc008b39ad907891c4b312ea985ee375dc96b44ae9057aff","verbatim_cells":["26. Section 8/subsidized housing","Answered as statutory gateway; broader application partial","C032–C033","Voucher/HAP agreement, PHA/agency conditions"]}],"exact_original_cell_matches":[],"source_urls":["https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-111publ22/html/PLAW-111publ22.htm","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2221"],"localization":"exact_native_row_or_cell_matches_available","public_status":"Recorded correction pending; working-paper assertion requires the stated repair or qualification."}],"resolved_corrections":[],"review_history":[{"id":"S_NE-P33-SCOPED","status":"revise_five_bounded_groups_UNSENT","at":null}]}