{"meta":{"key":"s_ne--pass-32","task":"S_NE","title":"SNE Residual source mapping and observer annotations","parent_title":"Nebraska debt and debt relief law","edition":"pass-32","path":"/research/s_ne--pass-32/","kind":"split_pass","category":"state","role":"state","area_numbers":[66],"groups":["collections"],"date":"2026-10-26","tables":11,"claims":0,"sources":0,"review_status":"P29G4_requested_URL_map_reporter_access_annotations_resolved_through_P34_with_limits","review_complete":true,"sha256":"76e18ccf3db3ebaed98a84960cad11e5834b2982155cfcc869f0621bdca59144","headings":["G1 — Corrected source-register cells","Replacement S_NE-P29-S013 — Nebraska Consumer Protection Act","Replacement S_NE-P29-S015 — Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act","G2 — Exact source crosslinks for all 33 PASS-29 claims","Crosslink qualification","G3 — Reporter identity and McKinney majority boundary","Corrected case pinpoint table","McKinney: retain the correct PASS-29 pinpoint","G4 — Observer-specific access, source status and coverage","A. Title 433: clause verification remains observer-specific","B. Section 1692n: supported body, unreplicated exact OLRC header","Two concise provenance examples","Preservation of numerical review","Researcher self-check"],"generation_provenance":{"actual_route":"regular_chat_adaptive_models","actual_model":"GPT-6","actual_mode":"Extra High","provenance_limit":"Actual documented capture labels only; missing labels remain unknown. No preferred setting is inferred as actual execution."},"public_id":"S_NE/pass-32","facets":{"geography":["us","us-ne"],"debt_type":[],"stage":[],"subject":[]},"scope":"OnlyNE29G4source/claim-map/reporter/observeraccessannotationsafterNE31saved;originalNEchat","pending_corrections":0},"markdown":"# S_NE PASS-32 — Residual source mapping and observer annotations\n\nDate: October 26, 2026, Pacific / UTC\nScope: PASS-29 source-register corrections, 33 existing claim-to-source links, reporter-page labels, and observer-specific access qualifications.\nReview status: Same-project annotation; not independent review.\n\nPASS-29's substantive corrections remain preserved. PASS-30 and PASS-31 are separate, unreviewed components and supply no legal premises for this addendum.\n\n## G1 — Corrected source-register cells\n\nThe following replace S_NE-P29-S013 and S_NE-P29-S015 in full, eliminating the abbreviated URL fields.\n\nThe access designations distinguish the original P29 research record from this bounded annotation:\n\n- P29 fresh: The original PASS-29 expressly reported a fresh reading.\n- P26 dated: The original PASS-29 attributed the reading to PASS-26; it was not freshly read in PASS-29.\n- P32 confirmation: A separate fresh public-web reading occurred for the specifically identified sections; this does not retroactively change P29 provenance.\n\nAll direct Nebraska statute URLs below are official HTML rather than PDFs; printed-page and PDF-index fields are not applicable.\n\n### Replacement S_NE-P29-S013 — Nebraska Consumer Protection Act\n\nIssuer: Nebraska Legislature · Nebraska Revised Statutes · Current published codification · Source-check date: October 26, 2026 Pacific / UTC\n\n| Section and full literal URL | Material clause or usage | Original P29 read status |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| §59-1601 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1601` | Definitions and statutory scope; no new P29 claim | P26 dated |\n| §59-1602 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1602` | Unfair/deceptive-practice prohibition; C023 cross-reference | P26 dated |\n| §59-1608 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1608` | AG injunction, restoration and public relief; distinguish penalty provision | P26 dated |\n| §59-1609 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1609` | Private actual damages, fees and discretionary increased-award language | P26 dated |\n| §59-1609.01 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1609.01` | Source retained; no new P29 construction | P26 dated |\n| §59-1610 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1610` | Source retained; no new P29 construction | P26 dated |\n| §59-1611 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1611` | Source retained; no new P29 construction | P26 dated |\n| §59-1612 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1612` | Complete limitation/suspension clause; qualifying AG action, related matter, exclusions | P29 fresh; P32 confirmed |\n| §59-1613 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1613` | Source retained; no new P29 construction | P26 dated |\n| §59-1614 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1614` | Complete civil-penalty provision; distinct $2,000 and $500,000 branches | P29 fresh; P32 confirmed |\n| §59-1617 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1617` | Subsections (1) and (2): regulatory exemption, carvebacks, express-remedy limitation | P29 fresh; P32 confirmed |\n\nThe fresh public-text checks confirm that §59-1612's suspension requires a qualifying related Attorney General action, §59-1614 contains the public civil penalties, and §59-1617 contains the express regulatory carvebacks. These are the existing P29 holdings, not newly expanded conclusions. Nebraska Legislature+2\n\nCurrentness limit: No complete legislative-history, full amendment-chain, or statewide litigation-citator audit was performed. The other eight sources remain P26-dated usages, not fresh P29 or P32 readings.\n\n### Replacement S_NE-P29-S015 — Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act\n\nIssuer: Nebraska Legislature · Nebraska Revised Statutes and 2026 LB838 · Source-check date: October 26, 2026 Pacific / UTC\n\n| Section and full literal URL | Material clause or usage | Original P29 read status |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| §87-301 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-301` | Definitions; no new P29 claim | P26 dated |\n| §87-302 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-302` | Enumerated deceptive practices; LB838 future-effective provisions distinguished | P29 fresh; P32 confirmed |\n| §87-303 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303` | Private injunction and equitable-relief context; no new P29 interpretation | P26 dated |\n| §87-303.01 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.01` | Unconscionable-act reference; no new interpretation | P26 dated |\n| §87-303.02 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.02` | Subsections (a), (b)(1)–(3): AG investigation, connected assets, 14-day ex parte freeze, notice/hearing/extension | P29 fresh; P32 confirmed |\n| §87-303.03 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.03` | Public-enforcement authority retained; no new P29 claim | P26 dated |\n| §87-303.04 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.04` | Public-enforcement source retained; no new P29 claim | P26 dated |\n| §87-303.05 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.05` | Public-enforcement source retained; no new P29 claim | P26 dated |\n| §87-303.07 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.07` | Induced sale/lease unenforceability context; not a general debt-cancellation rule | P26 dated |\n| §87-303.08 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.08` | Penalty source retained; no new P29 construction | P26 dated |\n| §87-303.09 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.09` | Criminal classification source retained; no new P29 construction | P26 dated |\n| §87-303.10 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.10` | Purchase-date limitation; later debt-collection accrual application remains unresolved | P26 dated |\n| §87-303.11 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.11` | Public-enforcement source retained; no new P29 claim | P26 dated |\n| §87-303.12 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.12` | Subsections (1)–(5): AG notice, Small Claims appeal, other appeal, intervention, certified/regular mailing and nondismissal | P29 fresh; P32 confirmed |\n| §87-304 `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-304` | Territorial and compliance exceptions; no new P29 interpretation | P26 dated |\n| LB838, §27 and operative-date provision `https://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/109/PDF/Slip/LB838.pdf` | Specified §87-302 social-media additions operative January 1, 2027; not October 2026 current law | P29 fresh; not newly PDF-inspected in P32 |\n\nFresh public text confirms §87-303.02's court-controlled 14-day restraint and §87-303.12's different pleading/appeal triggers, certified-mail and nondismissal provisions. The latter has subsections (1)–(5); the final nondismissal sentence is within subsection (5), not an additional subsection (6). Nebraska Legislature+1\n\nThe official §87-302 page identifies LB838's additions and the January 1, 2027 operative date. This observation does not establish the current operative status of every unrelated provision on that consolidated page. Nebraska Legislature\n\nCurrentness limit: The source's displayed January 2027 operative date remains a legal-status qualification. None of the twelve other UDTPA sections is reclassified as freshly read in P29 merely because its complete URL appears here.\n\n## G2 — Exact source crosslinks for all 33 PASS-29 claims\n\nThis table adds source IDs to the existing S_NE-P29-C001–C033 claims. No claim is renumbered, replaced substantively, or expanded into a new legal conclusion.\n\nThe source IDs refer to the original PASS-29 register, including the two corrected source cells above. Where an item is supported only by a bounded search or synthesis, that limitation is explicit.\n\n| Existing claim ID | Exact existing source ID(s) | Material clause or case pinpoint | Retained hold or limitation |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| S_NE-P29-C001 | S_NE-P29-S001; S019 | §45-601, first offense sentence; §28-106 Class III ceiling | No express mental element; S019 is a bounded search, not culpability authority |\n| C002 | S001 | §45-601, second offense sentence | Personal participation; precise culpability unresolved |\n| C003 | S002 | §45-602(2)(a), (2)(b), (3) | Actual entity/activity classification required |\n| C004 | S003 | §45-608, bond's 45-days-after-calendar-month-close accounting and payment condition | Actual month, net proceeds and agreement |\n| C005 | S003 | §45-608, action on bond and aggregate liability to all claimants | Claimant entitlement, competing claims and actual instrument |\n| C006 | S004 | §§45-612 and 45-615: mandatory revocation grounds versus discretionary posthearing discipline | Actual final findings required |\n| C007 | S004; S006 | §45-613 customer/client sworn complaint; Title 433 Rule 011.01, PDF index 12, “any person or client” | Statute–rule wording unresolved; Title 433 clause observer-specific |\n| C008 | S004 | §45-615, written findings and certified mailing within five days | Actual issuance and mailing unknown |\n| C009 | S004 | §45-616 APA appeal; §45-617 continuation of business pending determination | Actual administrative appeal unknown |\n| C010 | S006 | Title 433 Rule 009.01, PDF index 10, FDCPA-reference material | Claimed P29 reading not coordinator-replicated; no automatic state private action |\n| C011 | S006 | Title 433 Rule 006.03, PDF indices 6–7; Rule 008.04, index 9 | Rule text/status attributed to P29 researcher; no automatic private damages |\n| C012 | S006; S005; S020 | Title 433 Rule 013, index 14; legacy renewal form index 25; §§45-605.01, 45-620; SOS NMLS licensing page | Adoption/current fee and paper-form status remain partial |\n| C013 | S007 | McKinney v. Okoye, 282 Neb. 880 (2011), majority reasoning p.888/PDF 8 and conclusion p.889/PDF 9 | Privilege does not bar malicious prosecution; actual litigation facts required |\n| C014 | S007 | Same majority body, pp.888–889/PDF indices 8–9 | Other privacy/defamation/interference claims were not adjudicated on that appeal |\n| C015 | S008 | Bohling, 314 Neb. 129 (2023), elements p.131/PDF 2; claim preclusion pp.136–138/PDF 7–9 | Underlying malicious-prosecution merits not decided |\n| C016 | S009 | Syring, 317 Neb. 195 (2024), IIED pp.208–210/PDF 13–15; outcome p.216/PDF 21 | Severe-distress evidentiary challenge not decided |\n| C017 | S010 | Gordon, 255 Neb. 637, 587 N.W.2d 351–354 | Reporter pages are N.W.2d; actual judicial process/postissuance misuse needed |\n| C018 | S011; S012 | §20-203; Whipps, 265 Neb. 472, 658 N.W.2d 269–271 | Actual intentional/highly offensive intrusion predicates |\n| C019 | S012 | Sabrina W., 4 Neb. App. 149, 540 N.W.2d 369–371 | Damages discussion under privacy statute; no universal collector award |\n| C020 | S011 | §§20-206, 20-207, 20-208, 20-209, 20-210, 20-211 | Privacy-specific defenses and constraints, not omnibus election |\n| C021 | S013 | §59-1617(1)–(2), regulatory exemption and carvebacks | Actual regulated conduct and actor |\n| C022 | S013 | §59-1612, qualifying related AG action, pending suspension and exclusions | Intake complaint insufficient |\n| C023 | S013 | §59-1614, public penalties and distinct statutory units | Public court-imposed penalties, not private damages |\n| C024 | S015 | §87-303.02(a), (b)(1)–(3), AG requested district-court ex parte restraint, 14-day term and hearing | No private automatic freeze |\n| C025 | S015 | §87-303.12(1)–(5), seven-day notice branches, first certified mailing, later regular-mail condition and nondismissal | Actual litigation events unknown |\n| C026 | S014 | O'Brien, 298 Neb. 109, printed p.139/PDF index 30 | Nebraska substantive law governs the stated punitive-damages result |\n| C027 | S016 | Rotkiske, majority slip p.7/PDF index 8, footnote 3 | Equitable-doctrine question expressly reserved |\n| C028 | S015 | §87-302(a)(26), 2026 LB838 §27 and operative-date provision | Specified additions not effective until January 1, 2027 |\n| C029 | S017 | 15 U.S.C. §1692n; official GovInfo body, printed p.1642/PDF index 0 | Body supported; P29-reported OLRC header not coordinator-replicated |\n| C030 | S018 | Nebraska AG CART announcement, December 2, 2021 | Historical announcement, not 2026 complaint outcomes |\n| C031 | S013; S015; S019 | §59-1609 increased-award wording; §87-303.10 purchase-date limitation; S019 bounded search | Enhanced-cap construction, modern malicious-prosecution period, collection accrual and overlap/election remain unresolved; S019 is not negative-law proof |\n| C032 | S001; S002; S003; S004; S019 | Collection Agency Act licensing, definitions, bond and administrative remedies; bounded private-action search | No express general automatic debtor award identified; implied-action issue unresolved |\n| C033 | S007; S008; S009; S010; S011; S012 | McKinney, Bohling, Syring, Gordon, §20-203 and the privacy opinions | Route-specific tort predicates; no automatic omnibus wrongful-collection tort |\n\n### Crosslink qualification\n\nFor C031, C032 and C033, the combination of source IDs does not manufacture an additional holding.\n\nC031 is a register of unresolved constructions. C032 is a bounded statutory-text and search conclusion, not a controlling holding rejecting every conceivable implied action. C033 is a synthesis of distinct tort elements—not an independent Nebraska cause of action.\n\nThe direct public checks of §§59-1612, 59-1614, 59-1617, 87-303.02 and 87-303.12 confirm the material source-to-claim links for C021–C025. Nebraska Legislature+4\n\n## G3 — Reporter identity and McKinney majority boundary\n\n### Corrected case pinpoint table\n\n| Existing source/claim | Actual case and reporter | Meaning of PASS-29 page numbers | Source format and read status |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| S_NE-P29-S010 / C017 | Gordon v. Community First State Bank, 255 Neb. 637, 587 N.W.2d 343 (1998) | 351–354 are 587 N.W.2d reporter pages, not Nebraska Reports pp.351–354 | Actual majority opinion reproduced in HTML at `https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/1998/1182-1.html`; PDF index N/A. P29 reading retained; P32 checked HTML identity. |\n| S_NE-P29-S012 / C018 | Whipps Land & Cattle Co. v. Level 3 Communications, 265 Neb. 472, 658 N.W.2d 258 (2003) | 269–271 are 658 N.W.2d reporter pages, not Nebraska Reports pp.269–271 | Actual majority opinion reproduced in HTML at `https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2003/1206-1.html`; PDF index N/A. Material P29/coordinator readings retained; P32 confirmed reporter identity. |\n| S_NE-P29-S012 / C019 | Sabrina W. v. Willman, 4 Neb. App. 149, 540 N.W.2d 364 (1995) | 369–371 are 540 N.W.2d reporter pages, not Nebraska Appellate Reports pp.369–371 | Actual opinion reproduced in HTML at `https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/court-of-appeals/1995/a-94-118-8.html`; PDF index N/A. Material P29/coordinator readings retained; P32 confirmed reporter identity. |\n\nThese corrections change only the reporter identity, not the retained legal conclusions concerning abuse of process, privacy intrusion or privacy damages. Justia Law+2\n\n### McKinney: retain the correct PASS-29 pinpoint\n\nS_NE-P29-S007 · C013–C014 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Official PDF\n\nFull literal URL:\n`https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003852PUB`\n\nThe actual majority-opinion boundary is:\n\n| Printed page | Zero-based PDF index | Speaker and content |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| 888 | 8 | Justice Connolly's majority reasoning concerning privilege and malicious prosecution |\n| 889, upper portion | 9 | Majority conclusion: absolute privilege does not bar malicious prosecution; district-court dismissal reversed and remanded |\n| 889, following majority conclusion | 9 | Chief Justice Heavican's dissent begins |\n\nThe distinction was verified from the actual official PDF body and the rendered images of PDF indices 8 and 9. Nebraska.gov\n\nThe earlier coordinator lead that placed the majority/dissent boundary at printed page 888 is withdrawn. PASS-29's existing pp.888–889/PDF indices 8–9 citation is correct and must not be changed back.\n\nThe case decided the malicious-prosecution privilege issue on that appeal. It did not adjudicate separate privacy, defamation, or interference causes of action or establish universal liability for collection misconduct.\n\n## G4 — Observer-specific access, source status and coverage\n\n### A. Title 433: clause verification remains observer-specific\n\nOfficial literal URL:\n`https://sos.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/Chapter-2.pdf`\n\n| Observation | What was actually established | What it does not establish |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| PASS-29 researcher report | Reported visually inspecting material Title 433 Chapter 2 pages and identifying Rules 006.03, 008.04, 009.01, 011.01 and 013, plus legacy form pages | Does not establish that the coordinator independently saw those same page images |\n| Coordinator review, October 26, 2026 | Official PDF reached 26 pages but produced zero extractable text lines for the coordinator | Does not prove the PDF has no operative rules |\n| Coordinator's later four-page screenshot request | Requested PDF indices 6, 9, 12 and 14; received references without inspectable image bytes | No independent pixel or clause-content confirmation |\n| PASS-32 | No new attempt to the unchanged PDF route; original separate observations retained | No invented source recovery, cache explanation, pixel review, adoption order or effective-date verification |\n\nThe legal conclusions based independently on Nebraska statutes remain in place. What remains qualified is the unreplicated rule-page text and its current adoption/operative status.\n\n| Affected claim | Correct source-status annotation |\n| --- | --- |\n| C007 | Statutory §45-613 complaint predicate supported; Rule 011.01's “any person or client” phrase remains P29-researcher-attributed and coordinator-unreplicated |\n| C010 | Rule 009.01 FDCPA-reference text remains P29-researcher-attributed. Its precise page body and operative status are not independently confirmed by the coordinator. The separate conclusion that an informational rule reference does not itself create private damages remains a bounded legal interpretation. |\n| C011 | Rule 006.03/008.04 termination and recordkeeping descriptions remain P29-researcher-attributed and coordinator-unreplicated |\n| C012 | Rule 013 fee page and legacy renewal-form observations remain attributed; no verified complete adoption or current fee schedule follows merely from a static PDF |\n| S006 / S020 | Source access and modern SOS licensing-page status are separate. The current NMLS instructions do not authenticate every older rule or form page. |\n\nCoverage replacement: “FDCPA-reference effect — answered; missing evidence: none” is too broad. The more precise classification is substantive bounded conclusion retained / underlying Title 433 clause and adoption verification partial.\n\n### B. Section 1692n: supported body, unreplicated exact OLRC header\n\n| Observation | Result |\n| --- | --- |\n| PASS-29 researcher | Reported successful exact OLRC access to `https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692n/`, displaying currency through PL 119-124, October 15, 2026 |\n| Coordinator's subsequent exact-route attempt | Failed; no complete operative body or header replicated through that exact route |\n| Coordinator alternate official source, October 26, 2026, 18:00:06 UTC | Read the actual operative body from `https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/15/1692n`, printed p.1642/PDF index 0 |\n| PASS-32 fresh check | The two-page official GovInfo PDF was opened and p.1642/PDF index 0 visually inspected; operative §1692n body confirmed |\n| Compilation metadata | The GovInfo PDF did not reproduce the claimed OLRC PL 119-124/October 15, 2026 header or independently identify the applicable GovInfo edition year |\n\nThe verified body preserves the substantive relationship:\n\nFDCPA does not displace consistent state debt-collection law; a state law is not inconsistent merely because it affords greater consumer protection.\n\nThat proposition is supported by the official GovInfo statute body. The specific OLRC compilation header remains a separate access/currentness qualification. GovInfo\n\nC029 replacement annotation: Substantive §1692n body answered and independently replicated; exact OLRC 119-124/October 15 header reported by PASS-29 researcher but not coordinator-replicated.\n\nThe coordinator's October 26, 2026, approximately 17:13:11 UTC review of §§1692a, 1692e, 1692f, 1692k and 1692l remains a dated separate observation. The §1692n route difficulty is not generalized to those provisions.\n\n### Two concise provenance examples\n\n| Situation | Correct handling |\n| --- | --- |\n| A rule PDF is reported as visually read by the researcher, but the coordinator receives only screenshot references | Preserve the researcher's attributed account, mark coordinator visual confirmation unavailable, and retain statutory authority separately. Do not declare the rule nonexistent or the prior observation fabricated. |\n| An exact OLRC URL is reported successful by the researcher and fails for the coordinator, while GovInfo supplies the operative body | Treat the body as supported; retain the exact OLRC header as an unreplicated observer-specific metadata claim. Do not infer statute repeal, site-wide failure or successful current-compilation verification. |\n\n# Complete bounded PASS-32 coverage\n\n| Requested subissue | Status | Existing claim IDs | Exact remaining evidence or action |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| NCPA source-cell URL expansion | Answered | C021–C023, C031 | None for literal URLs |\n| NCPA original source read status | Preserved | C021–C023, C031 | No full new audit of P26-dated sections |\n| NCPA fresh P29 sections | Confirmed | C021–C023 | No whole amendment/citator audit |\n| UDTPA source-cell URL expansion | Answered | C024–C025, C028, C031 | None for literal URLs |\n| UDTPA original source read status | Preserved | C024–C025, C028, C031 | P26-dated usages remain dated |\n| LB838 January 2027 operative date | Answered | C028 | Full future-law dossier excluded |\n| All 33 claim-to-source-ID mappings | Answered | C001–C033 | No source-ID gaps remain in the crosslink table |\n| Existing substantive legal claims | Unchanged | C001–C033 | Original individual holds retain |\n| C031 bounded negative searches | Qualified | C031 | Modern malicious-prosecution limitation and other controlling constructions remain held |\n| C032 implied private action | Unresolved beyond express-text finding | C032 | On-point controlling authority or legislative history |\n| C033 omnibus tort theory | Retained only as synthesis | C033 | Actual elements and case record |\n| Gordon reporter type | Answered | C017 | N.W.2d pages identified; HTML PDF index N/A |\n| Whipps reporter type | Answered | C018 | N.W.2d pages identified; HTML PDF index N/A |\n| Sabrina W. reporter type | Answered | C019 | N.W.2d pages identified; HTML PDF index N/A |\n| McKinney majority reasoning | Answered | C013–C014 | p.888/PDF 8 verified |\n| McKinney majority conclusion | Answered | C013–C014 | Upper p.889/PDF 9 verified |\n| McKinney dissent commencement | Answered | C013–C014 | Later p.889/PDF 9 verified |\n| Earlier incorrect coordinator boundary lead | Corrected | C013–C014 | PASS-29 correct pinpoint preserved |\n| Title 433 coordinator parsed text | Unavailable | C007, C010–C012 | Authenticated text or readable official page |\n| Title 433 coordinator screenshot content | Not independently viewed | C007, C010–C012 | Inspectable page images if later necessary |\n| Title 433 researcher clause reports | Attributed; not disproved | C007, C010–C012 | Exact version/adoption and independent verification |\n| Title 433 operative fee/adoption status | Unresolved | C012 | Rulemaking/adoption orders, current schedule |\n| FDCPA-reference clause source verification | Partial | C010 | Rule body independently readable from authoritative source |\n| §1692n substantive body | Answered | C029 | None for the material body |\n| §1692n exact OLRC compilation header | Unreplicated by coordinator | C029 | Exact official header, if subsequently required |\n| Other FDCPA source/header observations | Preserved dated reuse | C029 context | No blanket reclassification |\n| CART current outcomes | Excluded/unverified | C030 | 2021 announcement not 2026 outcomes |\n| Provider/license/claimant-specific facts | Not performed | C001–C033 | Private or actual records outside authorization |\n| P29 correction examples | Unchanged | Related C001–C033 | No new legal examples or deadlines |\n| Whole collector-conduct component | Not accepted | C001–C033 | Remaining reviews and holds |\n| Nebraska, parent, A066, operational/publication status | Not accepted | — | Separate required work |\n\n## Preservation of numerical review\n\nPASS-32 does not reopen the four PASS-29 correction examples or the original eleven PASS-26 examples.\n\nThe existing seven numerical checks remain:\n\n| Calculation | Preserved treatment |\n| --- | --- |\n| `5 × $500 = $2,500` | Correct scalar arithmetic; criminal culpability, prosecution and sentencing remain held |\n| `$5,000 − $1,000 = $4,000` | Correct illustrative net amount, assuming deductions were lawful |\n| `min($4,000, $5,000) = $4,000` | Correct illustrative single-claim bond ceiling, subject to predicates |\n| `min($7,000, $5,000) = $5,000` | Correct aggregate bond ceiling, not claimant allocation |\n| `3 × $2,000 = $6,000` | Correct hypothetical public penalty ceiling if statutory units and findings are proved |\n| `$600 + $1,000 = $1,600` | Not approved as an automatic NCPA enhanced award |\n| `2 × $1,000 = $2,000` | Not approved as an automatic FDCPA individual additional-damages award |\n\nNo actual loss, penalty, recovery, sentence, fee, or lawsuit deadline is determined.\n\n## Researcher self-check\n\nFresh public material inspected in PASS-32: Nebraska §§59-1612, 59-1614, 59-1617, 87-302, 87-303.02 and 87-303.12; the actual published-opinion HTML for Gordon, Whipps and Sabrina W.; the official McKinney PDF body and rendered pages 888–889; and the official GovInfo §1692n PDF body and rendered page 1642.\n\nAttributed rather than independently replicated: The coordinator's Title 433 page-count, zero-text, screenshot-reference and read-bound observations; the PASS-29 researcher's Title 433 visual-clause reports; the PASS-29 reported successful §1692n OLRC header; the coordinator's failed OLRC retry; and the precise `2026-10-26T18:00:06Z` GovInfo observation.\n\nNot performed: No unchanged Title 433 screenshot loop, no unchanged OLRC-route retry, no local-file access, no hash computation, no provider or private case lookup, no complaint, filing, contact, records request, account action, browser control, full citator, adoption-history audit, or publication action.\n\nAll remaining enhanced-damages, implied-action, tort limitations, regulatory-interpretation, currentness, actual-record, sector, local, tribal, and foreign-country holds remain preserved.\n\nFinal bounded disposition: Both abbreviated source-register cells are expanded to complete literal URLs; all 33 existing PASS-29 claims have explicit source-ID and pinpoint crosslinks; the three reporter-page labels and McKinney majority/dissent boundary are clarified; and the Title 433 and §1692n observations are accurately separated by researcher, coordinator and current public-source access. No substantive PASS-29 result, numerical example or outstanding legal hold is silently changed.\n\nEND S_NE PASS-32.\n\n","tables":[{"headers":[],"index":0,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Section and full literal URL","Material clause or usage","Original P29 read status"],["§59-1601 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1601","Definitions and statutory scope; no new P29 claim","P26 dated"],["§59-1602 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1602","Unfair/deceptive-practice prohibition; C023 cross-reference","P26 dated"],["§59-1608 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1608","AG injunction, restoration and public relief; distinguish penalty provision","P26 dated"],["§59-1609 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1609","Private actual damages, fees and discretionary increased-award language","P26 dated"],["§59-1609.01 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1609.01","Source retained; no new P29 construction","P26 dated"],["§59-1610 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1610","Source retained; no new P29 construction","P26 dated"],["§59-1611 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1611","Source retained; no new P29 construction","P26 dated"],["§59-1612 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1612","Complete limitation/suspension clause; qualifying AG action, related matter, exclusions","P29 fresh; P32 confirmed"],["§59-1613 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1613","Source retained; no new P29 construction","P26 dated"],["§59-1614 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1614","Complete civil-penalty provision; distinct $2,000 and $500,000 branches","P29 fresh; P32 confirmed"],["§59-1617 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1617","Subsections (1) and (2): regulatory exemption, carvebacks, express-remedy limitation","P29 fresh; P32 confirmed"]]},{"headers":[],"index":1,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Section and full literal URL","Material clause or usage","Original P29 read status"],["§87-301 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-301","Definitions; no new P29 claim","P26 dated"],["§87-302 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-302","Enumerated deceptive practices; LB838 future-effective provisions distinguished","P29 fresh; P32 confirmed"],["§87-303 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303","Private injunction and equitable-relief context; no new P29 interpretation","P26 dated"],["§87-303.01 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.01","Unconscionable-act reference; no new interpretation","P26 dated"],["§87-303.02 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.02","Subsections (a), (b)(1)–(3): AG investigation, connected assets, 14-day ex parte freeze, notice/hearing/extension","P29 fresh; P32 confirmed"],["§87-303.03 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.03","Public-enforcement authority retained; no new P29 claim","P26 dated"],["§87-303.04 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.04","Public-enforcement source retained; no new P29 claim","P26 dated"],["§87-303.05 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.05","Public-enforcement source retained; no new P29 claim","P26 dated"],["§87-303.07 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.07","Induced sale/lease unenforceability context; not a general debt-cancellation rule","P26 dated"],["§87-303.08 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.08","Penalty source retained; no new P29 construction","P26 dated"],["§87-303.09 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.09","Criminal classification source retained; no new P29 construction","P26 dated"],["§87-303.10 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.10","Purchase-date limitation; later debt-collection accrual application remains unresolved","P26 dated"],["§87-303.11 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.11","Public-enforcement source retained; no new P29 claim","P26 dated"],["§87-303.12 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.12","Subsections (1)–(5): AG notice, Small Claims appeal, other appeal, intervention, certified/regular mailing and nondismissal","P29 fresh; P32 confirmed"],["§87-304 https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-304","Territorial and compliance exceptions; no new P29 interpretation","P26 dated"],["LB838, §27 and operative-date provision https://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/109/PDF/Slip/LB838.pdf","Specified §87-302 social-media additions operative January 1, 2027; not October 2026 current law","P29 fresh; not newly PDF-inspected in P32"]]},{"headers":[],"index":2,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Existing claim ID","Exact existing source ID(s)","Material clause or case pinpoint","Retained hold or limitation"],["S_NE-P29-C001","S_NE-P29-S001; S019","§45-601, first offense sentence; §28-106 Class III ceiling","No express mental element; S019 is a bounded search, not culpability authority"],["C002","S001","§45-601, second offense sentence","Personal participation; precise culpability unresolved"],["C003","S002","§45-602(2)(a), (2)(b), (3)","Actual entity/activity classification required"],["C004","S003","§45-608, bond's 45-days-after-calendar-month-close accounting and payment condition","Actual month, net proceeds and agreement"],["C005","S003","§45-608, action on bond and aggregate liability to all claimants","Claimant entitlement, competing claims and actual instrument"],["C006","S004","§§45-612 and 45-615: mandatory revocation grounds versus discretionary posthearing discipline","Actual final findings required"],["C007","S004; S006","§45-613 customer/client sworn complaint; Title 433 Rule 011.01, PDF index 12, “any person or client”","Statute–rule wording unresolved; Title 433 clause observer-specific"],["C008","S004","§45-615, written findings and certified mailing within five days","Actual issuance and mailing unknown"],["C009","S004","§45-616 APA appeal; §45-617 continuation of business pending determination","Actual administrative appeal unknown"],["C010","S006","Title 433 Rule 009.01, PDF index 10, FDCPA-reference material","Claimed P29 reading not coordinator-replicated; no automatic state private action"],["C011","S006","Title 433 Rule 006.03, PDF indices 6–7; Rule 008.04, index 9","Rule text/status attributed to P29 researcher; no automatic private damages"],["C012","S006; S005; S020","Title 433 Rule 013, index 14; legacy renewal form index 25; §§45-605.01, 45-620; SOS NMLS licensing page","Adoption/current fee and paper-form status remain partial"],["C013","S007","McKinney v. Okoye, 282 Neb. 880 (2011), majority reasoning p.888/PDF 8 and conclusion p.889/PDF 9","Privilege does not bar malicious prosecution; actual litigation facts required"],["C014","S007","Same majority body, pp.888–889/PDF indices 8–9","Other privacy/defamation/interference claims were not adjudicated on that appeal"],["C015","S008","Bohling, 314 Neb. 129 (2023), elements p.131/PDF 2; claim preclusion pp.136–138/PDF 7–9","Underlying malicious-prosecution merits not decided"],["C016","S009","Syring, 317 Neb. 195 (2024), IIED pp.208–210/PDF 13–15; outcome p.216/PDF 21","Severe-distress evidentiary challenge not decided"],["C017","S010","Gordon, 255 Neb. 637, 587 N.W.2d 351–354","Reporter pages are N.W.2d; actual judicial process/postissuance misuse needed"],["C018","S011; S012","§20-203; Whipps, 265 Neb. 472, 658 N.W.2d 269–271","Actual intentional/highly offensive intrusion predicates"],["C019","S012","Sabrina W., 4 Neb. App. 149, 540 N.W.2d 369–371","Damages discussion under privacy statute; no universal collector award"],["C020","S011","§§20-206, 20-207, 20-208, 20-209, 20-210, 20-211","Privacy-specific defenses and constraints, not omnibus election"],["C021","S013","§59-1617(1)–(2), regulatory exemption and carvebacks","Actual regulated conduct and actor"],["C022","S013","§59-1612, qualifying related AG action, pending suspension and exclusions","Intake complaint insufficient"],["C023","S013","§59-1614, public penalties and distinct statutory units","Public court-imposed penalties, not private damages"],["C024","S015","§87-303.02(a), (b)(1)–(3), AG requested district-court ex parte restraint, 14-day term and hearing","No private automatic freeze"],["C025","S015","§87-303.12(1)–(5), seven-day notice branches, first certified mailing, later regular-mail condition and nondismissal","Actual litigation events unknown"],["C026","S014","O'Brien, 298 Neb. 109, printed p.139/PDF index 30","Nebraska substantive law governs the stated punitive-damages result"],["C027","S016","Rotkiske, majority slip p.7/PDF index 8, footnote 3","Equitable-doctrine question expressly reserved"],["C028","S015","§87-302(a)(26), 2026 LB838 §27 and operative-date provision","Specified additions not effective until January 1, 2027"],["C029","S017","15 U.S.C. §1692n; official GovInfo body, printed p.1642/PDF index 0","Body supported; P29-reported OLRC header not coordinator-replicated"],["C030","S018","Nebraska AG CART announcement, December 2, 2021","Historical announcement, not 2026 complaint outcomes"],["C031","S013; S015; S019","§59-1609 increased-award wording; §87-303.10 purchase-date limitation; S019 bounded search","Enhanced-cap construction, modern malicious-prosecution period, collection accrual and overlap/election remain unresolved; S019 is not negative-law proof"],["C032","S001; S002; S003; S004; S019","Collection Agency Act licensing, definitions, bond and administrative remedies; bounded private-action search","No express general automatic debtor award identified; implied-action issue unresolved"],["C033","S007; S008; S009; S010; S011; S012","McKinney, Bohling, Syring, Gordon, §20-203 and the privacy opinions","Route-specific tort predicates; no automatic omnibus wrongful-collection tort"]]},{"headers":[],"index":3,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Existing source/claim","Actual case and reporter","Meaning of PASS-29 page numbers","Source format and read status"],["S_NE-P29-S010 / C017","Gordon v. Community First State Bank, 255 Neb. 637, 587 N.W.2d 343 (1998)","351–354 are 587 N.W.2d reporter pages, not Nebraska Reports pp.351–354","Actual majority opinion reproduced in HTML at https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/1998/1182-1.html; PDF index N/A. P29 reading retained; P32 checked HTML identity."],["S_NE-P29-S012 / C018","Whipps Land & Cattle Co. v. Level 3 Communications, 265 Neb. 472, 658 N.W.2d 258 (2003)","269–271 are 658 N.W.2d reporter pages, not Nebraska Reports pp.269–271","Actual majority opinion reproduced in HTML at https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2003/1206-1.html; PDF index N/A. Material P29/coordinator readings retained; P32 confirmed reporter identity."],["S_NE-P29-S012 / C019","Sabrina W. v. Willman, 4 Neb. App. 149, 540 N.W.2d 364 (1995)","369–371 are 540 N.W.2d reporter pages, not Nebraska Appellate Reports pp.369–371","Actual opinion reproduced in HTML at https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/court-of-appeals/1995/a-94-118-8.html; PDF index N/A. Material P29/coordinator readings retained; P32 confirmed reporter identity."]]},{"headers":[],"index":4,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Printed page","Zero-based PDF index","Speaker and content"],["888","8","Justice Connolly's majority reasoning concerning privilege and malicious prosecution"],["889, upper portion","9","Majority conclusion: absolute privilege does not bar malicious prosecution; district-court dismissal reversed and remanded"],["889, following majority conclusion","9","Chief Justice Heavican's dissent begins"]]},{"headers":[],"index":5,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Observation","What was actually established","What it does not establish"],["PASS-29 researcher report","Reported visually inspecting material Title 433 Chapter 2 pages and identifying Rules 006.03, 008.04, 009.01, 011.01 and 013, plus legacy form pages","Does not establish that the coordinator independently saw those same page images"],["Coordinator review, October 26, 2026","Official PDF reached 26 pages but produced zero extractable text lines for the coordinator","Does not prove the PDF has no operative rules"],["Coordinator's later four-page screenshot request","Requested PDF indices 6, 9, 12 and 14; received references without inspectable image bytes","No independent pixel or clause-content confirmation"],["PASS-32","No new attempt to the unchanged PDF route; original separate observations retained","No invented source recovery, cache explanation, pixel review, adoption order or effective-date verification"]]},{"headers":[],"index":6,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Affected claim","Correct source-status annotation"],["C007","Statutory §45-613 complaint predicate supported; Rule 011.01's “any person or client” phrase remains P29-researcher-attributed and coordinator-unreplicated"],["C010","Rule 009.01 FDCPA-reference text remains P29-researcher-attributed. Its precise page body and operative status are not independently confirmed by the coordinator. The separate conclusion that an informational rule reference does not itself create private damages remains a bounded legal interpretation."],["C011","Rule 006.03/008.04 termination and recordkeeping descriptions remain P29-researcher-attributed and coordinator-unreplicated"],["C012","Rule 013 fee page and legacy renewal-form observations remain attributed; no verified complete adoption or current fee schedule follows merely from a static PDF"],["S006 / S020","Source access and modern SOS licensing-page status are separate. The current NMLS instructions do not authenticate every older rule or form page."]]},{"headers":[],"index":7,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Observation","Result"],["PASS-29 researcher","Reported successful exact OLRC access to https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692n/, displaying currency through PL 119-124, October 15, 2026"],["Coordinator's subsequent exact-route attempt","Failed; no complete operative body or header replicated through that exact route"],["Coordinator alternate official source, October 26, 2026, 18:00:06 UTC","Read the actual operative body from https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/15/1692n, printed p.1642/PDF index 0"],["PASS-32 fresh check","The two-page official GovInfo PDF was opened and p.1642/PDF index 0 visually inspected; operative §1692n body confirmed"],["Compilation metadata","The GovInfo PDF did not reproduce the claimed OLRC PL 119-124/October 15, 2026 header or independently identify the applicable GovInfo edition year"]]},{"headers":[],"index":8,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[]],"rows":[["Situation","Correct handling"],["A rule PDF is reported as visually read by the researcher, but the coordinator receives only screenshot references","Preserve the researcher's attributed account, mark coordinator visual confirmation unavailable, and retain statutory authority separately. Do not declare the rule nonexistent or the prior observation fabricated."],["An exact OLRC URL is reported successful by the researcher and fails for the coordinator, while GovInfo supplies the operative body","Treat the body as supported; retain the exact OLRC header as an unreplicated observer-specific metadata claim. Do not infer statute repeal, site-wide failure or successful current-compilation verification."]]},{"headers":[],"index":9,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Requested subissue","Status","Existing claim IDs","Exact remaining evidence or action"],["NCPA source-cell URL expansion","Answered","C021–C023, C031","None for literal URLs"],["NCPA original source read status","Preserved","C021–C023, C031","No full new audit of P26-dated sections"],["NCPA fresh P29 sections","Confirmed","C021–C023","No whole amendment/citator audit"],["UDTPA source-cell URL expansion","Answered","C024–C025, C028, C031","None for literal URLs"],["UDTPA original source read status","Preserved","C024–C025, C028, C031","P26-dated usages remain dated"],["LB838 January 2027 operative date","Answered","C028","Full future-law dossier excluded"],["All 33 claim-to-source-ID mappings","Answered","C001–C033","No source-ID gaps remain in the crosslink table"],["Existing substantive legal claims","Unchanged","C001–C033","Original individual holds retain"],["C031 bounded negative searches","Qualified","C031","Modern malicious-prosecution limitation and other controlling constructions remain held"],["C032 implied private action","Unresolved beyond express-text finding","C032","On-point controlling authority or legislative history"],["C033 omnibus tort theory","Retained only as synthesis","C033","Actual elements and case record"],["Gordon reporter type","Answered","C017","N.W.2d pages identified; HTML PDF index N/A"],["Whipps reporter type","Answered","C018","N.W.2d pages identified; HTML PDF index N/A"],["Sabrina W. reporter type","Answered","C019","N.W.2d pages identified; HTML PDF index N/A"],["McKinney majority reasoning","Answered","C013–C014","p.888/PDF 8 verified"],["McKinney majority conclusion","Answered","C013–C014","Upper p.889/PDF 9 verified"],["McKinney dissent commencement","Answered","C013–C014","Later p.889/PDF 9 verified"],["Earlier incorrect coordinator boundary lead","Corrected","C013–C014","PASS-29 correct pinpoint preserved"],["Title 433 coordinator parsed text","Unavailable","C007, C010–C012","Authenticated text or readable official page"],["Title 433 coordinator screenshot content","Not independently viewed","C007, C010–C012","Inspectable page images if later necessary"],["Title 433 researcher clause reports","Attributed; not disproved","C007, C010–C012","Exact version/adoption and independent verification"],["Title 433 operative fee/adoption status","Unresolved","C012","Rulemaking/adoption orders, current schedule"],["FDCPA-reference clause source verification","Partial","C010","Rule body independently readable from authoritative source"],["§1692n substantive body","Answered","C029","None for the material body"],["§1692n exact OLRC compilation header","Unreplicated by coordinator","C029","Exact official header, if subsequently required"],["Other FDCPA source/header observations","Preserved dated reuse","C029 context","No blanket reclassification"],["CART current outcomes","Excluded/unverified","C030","2021 announcement not 2026 outcomes"],["Provider/license/claimant-specific facts","Not performed","C001–C033","Private or actual records outside authorization"],["P29 correction examples","Unchanged","Related C001–C033","No new legal examples or deadlines"],["Whole collector-conduct component","Not accepted","C001–C033","Remaining reviews and holds"],["Nebraska, parent, A066, operational/publication status","Not accepted","—","Separate required work"]]},{"headers":[],"index":10,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Calculation","Preserved treatment"],["5 × $500 = $2,500","Correct scalar arithmetic; criminal culpability, prosecution and sentencing remain held"],["$5,000 − $1,000 = $4,000","Correct illustrative net amount, assuming deductions were lawful"],["min($4,000, $5,000) = $4,000","Correct illustrative single-claim bond ceiling, subject to predicates"],["min($7,000, $5,000) = $5,000","Correct aggregate bond ceiling, not claimant allocation"],["3 × $2,000 = $6,000","Correct hypothetical public penalty ceiling if statutory units and findings are proved"],["$600 + $1,000 = $1,600","Not approved as an automatic NCPA enhanced award"],["2 × $1,000 = $2,000","Not approved as an automatic FDCPA individual additional-damages award"]]}],"claims":[],"sources":[],"coverage":[{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"NCPA source-cell URL expansion","Status":"Answered","Existing claim IDs":"C021–C023, C031","Exact remaining evidence or action":"None for literal URLs"},"topic":"NCPA source-cell URL expansion","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"NCPA original source read status","Status":"Preserved","Existing claim IDs":"C021–C023, C031","Exact remaining evidence or action":"No full new audit of P26-dated sections"},"topic":"NCPA original source read status","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"NCPA fresh P29 sections","Status":"Confirmed","Existing claim IDs":"C021–C023","Exact remaining evidence or action":"No whole amendment/citator audit"},"topic":"NCPA fresh P29 sections","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"UDTPA source-cell URL expansion","Status":"Answered","Existing claim IDs":"C024–C025, C028, C031","Exact remaining evidence or action":"None for literal URLs"},"topic":"UDTPA source-cell URL expansion","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"UDTPA original source read status","Status":"Preserved","Existing claim IDs":"C024–C025, C028, C031","Exact remaining evidence or action":"P26-dated usages remain dated"},"topic":"UDTPA original source read status","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"LB838 January 2027 operative date","Status":"Answered","Existing claim IDs":"C028","Exact remaining evidence or action":"Full future-law dossier excluded"},"topic":"LB838 January 2027 operative date","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"All 33 claim-to-source-ID mappings","Status":"Answered","Existing claim IDs":"C001–C033","Exact remaining evidence or action":"No source-ID gaps remain in the crosslink table"},"topic":"All 33 claim-to-source-ID mappings","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Existing substantive legal claims","Status":"Unchanged","Existing claim IDs":"C001–C033","Exact remaining evidence or action":"Original individual holds retain"},"topic":"Existing substantive legal claims","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"C031 bounded negative searches","Status":"Qualified","Existing claim IDs":"C031","Exact remaining evidence or action":"Modern malicious-prosecution limitation and other controlling constructions remain held"},"topic":"C031 bounded negative searches","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"C032 implied private action","Status":"Unresolved beyond express-text finding","Existing claim IDs":"C032","Exact remaining evidence or action":"On-point controlling authority or legislative history"},"topic":"C032 implied private action","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"C033 omnibus tort theory","Status":"Retained only as synthesis","Existing claim IDs":"C033","Exact remaining evidence or action":"Actual elements and case record"},"topic":"C033 omnibus tort theory","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Gordon reporter type","Status":"Answered","Existing claim IDs":"C017","Exact remaining evidence or action":"N.W.2d pages identified; HTML PDF index N/A"},"topic":"Gordon reporter type","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Whipps reporter type","Status":"Answered","Existing claim IDs":"C018","Exact remaining evidence or action":"N.W.2d pages identified; HTML PDF index N/A"},"topic":"Whipps reporter type","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Sabrina W. reporter type","Status":"Answered","Existing claim IDs":"C019","Exact remaining evidence or action":"N.W.2d pages identified; HTML PDF index N/A"},"topic":"Sabrina W. reporter type","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"McKinney majority reasoning","Status":"Answered","Existing claim IDs":"C013–C014","Exact remaining evidence or action":"p.888/PDF 8 verified"},"topic":"McKinney majority reasoning","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"McKinney majority conclusion","Status":"Answered","Existing claim IDs":"C013–C014","Exact remaining evidence or action":"Upper p.889/PDF 9 verified"},"topic":"McKinney majority conclusion","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"McKinney dissent commencement","Status":"Answered","Existing claim IDs":"C013–C014","Exact remaining evidence or action":"Later p.889/PDF 9 verified"},"topic":"McKinney dissent commencement","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Earlier incorrect coordinator boundary lead","Status":"Corrected","Existing claim IDs":"C013–C014","Exact remaining evidence or action":"PASS-29 correct pinpoint preserved"},"topic":"Earlier incorrect coordinator boundary lead","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Title 433 coordinator parsed text","Status":"Unavailable","Existing claim IDs":"C007, C010–C012","Exact remaining evidence or action":"Authenticated text or readable official page"},"topic":"Title 433 coordinator parsed text","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Title 433 coordinator screenshot content","Status":"Not independently viewed","Existing claim IDs":"C007, C010–C012","Exact remaining evidence or action":"Inspectable page images if later necessary"},"topic":"Title 433 coordinator screenshot content","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Title 433 researcher clause reports","Status":"Attributed; not disproved","Existing claim IDs":"C007, C010–C012","Exact remaining evidence or action":"Exact version/adoption and independent verification"},"topic":"Title 433 researcher clause reports","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Title 433 operative fee/adoption status","Status":"Unresolved","Existing claim IDs":"C012","Exact remaining evidence or action":"Rulemaking/adoption orders, current schedule"},"topic":"Title 433 operative fee/adoption status","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"FDCPA-reference clause source verification","Status":"Partial","Existing claim IDs":"C010","Exact remaining evidence or action":"Rule body independently readable from authoritative source"},"topic":"FDCPA-reference clause source verification","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"§1692n substantive body","Status":"Answered","Existing claim IDs":"C029","Exact remaining evidence or action":"None for the material body"},"topic":"§1692n substantive body","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"§1692n exact OLRC compilation header","Status":"Unreplicated by coordinator","Existing claim IDs":"C029","Exact remaining evidence or action":"Exact official header, if subsequently required"},"topic":"§1692n exact OLRC compilation header","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Other FDCPA source/header observations","Status":"Preserved dated reuse","Existing claim IDs":"C029 context","Exact remaining evidence or action":"No blanket reclassification"},"topic":"Other FDCPA source/header observations","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"CART current outcomes","Status":"Excluded/unverified","Existing claim IDs":"C030","Exact remaining evidence or action":"2021 announcement not 2026 outcomes"},"topic":"CART current outcomes","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Provider/license/claimant-specific facts","Status":"Not performed","Existing claim IDs":"C001–C033","Exact remaining evidence or action":"Private or actual records outside authorization"},"topic":"Provider/license/claimant-specific facts","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"P29 correction examples","Status":"Unchanged","Existing claim IDs":"Related C001–C033","Exact remaining evidence or action":"No new legal examples or deadlines"},"topic":"P29 correction examples","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Whole collector-conduct component","Status":"Not accepted","Existing claim IDs":"C001–C033","Exact remaining evidence or action":"Remaining reviews and holds"},"topic":"Whole collector-conduct component","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Nebraska, parent, A066, operational/publication status","Status":"Not accepted","Existing claim IDs":"—","Exact remaining evidence or action":"Separate required work"},"topic":"Nebraska, parent, A066, operational/publication status","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_limits","coordinator_status":"same_coordinator_scoped_review_complete_with_limits","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"requested_correction_annotations_reviewed_with_remaining_application_source_holds_not_component_accepted"}],"annotations":{},"corrections":[],"resolved_corrections":[],"review_history":[]}