{"meta":{"key":"s_ne--pass-29","task":"S_NE","title":"SNE four bounded corrections to collector-conduct remedies","parent_title":"Nebraska debt and debt relief law","edition":"pass-29","path":"/research/s_ne--pass-29/","kind":"split_pass","category":"state","role":"state","area_numbers":[66],"groups":["collections"],"date":"2026-10-26","tables":13,"claims":33,"sources":20,"review_status":"P29P32substantive_and_G4_annotations_supported_with_limits_one_C032search-scope_P34pending","review_complete":true,"sha256":"7beddcb0a1e5be0b2827f3d79921449c89650165cb32a7295a68a46efbe981ab","headings":["Four-group disposition","1. Criminal text and unresolved mental-state construction","Replacement for PASS-26 B1, C006, and Example 1’s legal premise","Corrected criminal matrix","2. Correct §45-602 pinpoints","3. Bond timing, claimant predicates, and aggregate cap","Replacement for PASS-26 B3, C008, and Example 11","Current bond tiers preserved","4. Board proceedings: mandatory and discretionary branches","5. Title 433 rule text and statute-rule distinctions","Material pages actually inspected","1. Corrected primary-case table","2. Litigation privilege correction","Replacement for PASS-26 C035 and the corresponding common-law discussion","3. Correct privacy guardrails","4. Correct abuse-of-process boundary","Replacement for PASS-26 C033 and affected narrative","5. Correct IIED boundary","1. NCPA regulatory exemption and carvebacks","Replacement for PASS-26 C019","2. Precise NCPA suspension rule","Replacement for PASS-26 C021","3. Public NCPA penalty locator","Replacement for PASS-26 C020’s penalty citation","4. UDTPA asset freeze","Replacement for PASS-26 C026’s freeze wording","5. UDTPA filings sent to the Attorney General","Replacement for PASS-26 C030","6. Nebraska punitive-damages scope","Replacement for PASS-26 C018","7. Rotkiske qualification","Replacement for PASS-26 C046","8. Future-effective §87-302 text","9. Holds expressly preserved","1. Full literal URL expansion","Replacement for P26 S002 — Board, applications, branches, renewal, records, and fees","Replacement for P26 S003 — bond and discipline","Replacement for P26 S007 — NCPA","Replacement for P26 S013 — UDTPA","Replacement for P26 S015 — Nebraska privacy statutes","Replacement for P26 S021 — FDCPA","2. Other source-status corrections","Example 1 — five assumed daily unlicensed-operation offenses","Assumptions","Example 2 — month-close accounting and competing bond claims","Assumptions","No competing valid claim","Competing qualifying claims total $7,000","Example 3 — privilege, malicious prosecution, and administrative-process failure case","Facts assumed","Conditional analysis","Example 4 — complaint intake versus qualifying AG action, asset freeze, mailing, and tolling","Step A — consumer files a CART complaint","Step B — AG later files a qualifying NCPA action","Step C — AG seeks connected-asset restraint","Step D — private UDTPA pleading","Preserved and rejected calculations","Freshly read or visually inspected in PASS-29","Numerical self-check","Not performed"],"generation_provenance":{"actual_route":"regular_chat_adaptive_models","actual_model":"GPT-5.6 Sol","actual_mode":"Pro","provenance_limit":"Actual documented capture labels only; missing labels remain unknown. No preferred setting is inferred as actual execution."},"public_id":"S_NE/pass-29","facets":{"geography":["us","us-ne"],"debt_type":[],"stage":["collection","repossession"],"subject":["collection-conduct"]},"scope":"ONLYNE26fourreviewedAct/case/remedy/sourcegroups;originalNEchat afterNE28complete/saved","pending_corrections":0},"markdown":"# S_NE PASS-29 — four bounded corrections to PASS-26 collector-conduct remedies\n\n**Actual public-source verification date:** October 26, 2026, Pacific / October 26, 2026 UTC\n**Status:** Same-coordinator bounded correction to the separately reviewed PASS-26 report; **not independent review**.\n\nPASS-26 remains immutable. Only the affected passages, claims, source annotations, examples, and coverage cells identified below are replaced or qualified. PASS-27 and PASS-28 remain unreviewed and are not used as premises.\n\nAll previously supported PASS-26 formulas and explicit unresolved issues remain intact unless expressly changed here.\n\n## Four-group disposition\n\n| Group | Disposition | Effect on PASS-26 |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **G1 — Collection Agency Act precision** | The daily Class III misdemeanor text is confirmed, but §45-601 contains no express “knowing” or “willful” element. No controlling additional authority establishing that precise culpability formulation was located in this bounded review; criminal mental-state construction remains held. Definition pinpoints, bond timing, Board procedure, appeal effect, and rule/statute distinctions are corrected. | Replace the affected portions of B1, B3, B4, B6, G, I, Examples 1 and 11, and C002/C003/C006/C008/C010. |\n| **G2 — Case identities, holdings, and privacy guardrails** | *McKinney*, *Bohling*, and *Syring* had material court/year/posture errors. Their identities and actual majority holdings are corrected. *Gordon* is narrowed to its administrative-process and appellate posture. Nebraska’s privacy defenses, assignment, survival, single-publication, judgment-bar, and one-year statutes are added. | Replace affected portions of J, S018–S020, C032–C037, related examples, and coverage rows. |\n| **G3 — Remedy and procedure qualifications** | NCPA regulatory-exemption carvebacks, precise tolling, public-penalty source, UDTPA asset-freeze and AG-mailing conditions, Nebraska punitive-damages scope, and *Rotkiske*’s reserved equitable-doctrine issue are corrected. | Replace or qualify C018–C021, C026, C030, C046, and corresponding C5/C6/D/G/H and coverage cells. |\n| **G4 — Source precision and access status** | Grouped ellipses are replaced with full literal URLs. Title 433’s material pages were freshly inspected through the official static PDF, but complete adoption/effective-history metadata remains unavailable. The current §1692n official OLRC body and header were successfully retrieved in PASS-29. Future-effective LB 838 language is separated from October 2026 law. | Replace affected source rows and currentness/access annotations only. |\n\n# G1 — Collection Agency Act precision\n\n## 1. Criminal text and unresolved mental-state construction\n\n### Replacement for PASS-26 B1, C006, and Example 1’s legal premise\n\nNeb. Rev. Stat. §45-601 expressly provides that operating a covered collection-agency business without a license is a **Class III misdemeanor for each day** the unlawful business is conducted. The statute itself contains no express “knowing,” “willful,” “intentionally,” or similar culpability term. No controlling Nebraska appellate decision or separate statutory provision was located in this bounded review that supplies the previously reported “knowing and willful” formulation specifically for §45-601. This correction therefore withdraws that unqualified phrase but does **not** declare the offense strict liability; the criminal culpability construction remains unresolved. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-601&utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nThe statute’s next sentence is broader in subject matter: an officer or agent who personally participates in **any violation of the Collection Agency Act** commits a Class III misdemeanor. That sentence is not limited to personal participation in unlicensed operation. Whether and what culpability the State must prove under that separate sentence likewise remains held. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-601&utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nA Class III misdemeanor authorizes, upon conviction, up to three months’ imprisonment, a fine up to $500, or both, with no minimum. That is an authorized range, not an automatic sentence. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-106&utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n### Corrected criminal matrix\n\n| Conduct | Express statutory text | Unit | Mental element established here? | Private consumer consequence |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Operating a covered collection agency without a Nebraska license | Class III misdemeanor | Each day the unlawful business is conducted | **No express term in §45-601; exact construction held** | No automatic damages award, debt cancellation, dismissal, or judgment vacatur |\n| Officer or agent personally participating in an Act violation | Class III misdemeanor | Each separately established offense | **Exact construction held** | No automatic private recovery |\n| Regular employee of duly licensed collection agency | No separate agency license required by §45-601 | N/A | N/A | Does not immunize unlawful conduct |\n| Nonresident entity regulated as a collection agency in another state | May communicate with a Nebraska debtor under the statute’s narrow branch | Activity-specific | N/A | Not blanket Nebraska operating authority |\n\n## 2. Correct §45-602 pinpoints\n\nThe collection-agency actor pinpoints are:\n\n- **§45-602(2)(a):** third-party collection activity involving claims solicited from more than one creditor;\n- **§45-602(2)(b):** an original creditor using a fictitious or other name that implies a third person is collecting;\n- **§45-602(2)(c):** collection-letter or form systems suggesting an outside collector; and\n- **§45-602(3):** conditional exclusions, including single-creditor employees, specified financial institutions, qualifying attorneys, court-appointed actors, and purchasers collecting acquired claims in their own names. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-602&utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nThese corrections change the subsection citations, not PASS-26’s broader conclusion that actor classification must be performed separately under each statute.\n\n## 3. Bond timing, claimant predicates, and aggregate cap\n\n### Replacement for PASS-26 B3, C008, and Example 11\n\nSection 45-608 conditions the bond on both:\n\n1. faithful performance of agreements with clients or customers; and  \n2. reporting and paying each client or customer **within 45 days after the close of each calendar month** the net proceeds of all collections made during the preceding calendar month and due to that client or customer.\n\nThe clock therefore begins at the close of the collection month—not on each payment’s receipt date, not on the client’s invoice date, and not on a debtor’s complaint date. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-608&utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nA bond action may be brought by a person:\n\n- to whom the licensee failed to account and pay as the bond specifies; or\n- who was damaged by the licensee’s failure to comply with an agreement entered into with that person.\n\nThe surety’s aggregate liability to **all** qualifying claimants may not exceed the bond amount. A debtor contacted by an agency does not automatically qualify merely because the agency violated another part of the Act; the accounting, payment, or agreement nexus still must be proved. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-608&utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n### Current bond tiers preserved\n\n| Agency size | Statutory bond |\n| --- | --- |\n| Fewer than 5 solicitors | $5,000 |\n| 5 through 15 solicitors | $10,000 |\n| 16 or more solicitors | $15,000 |\n| Aggregate bonds required of one person | No more than $100,000 |\n\n## 4. Board proceedings: mandatory and discretionary branches\n\n| Provision | Correct operative rule |\n| --- | --- |\n| **§45-612** | The Board **shall** revoke after specified final fraud or embezzlement convictions or judgments, failure to account within §45-608’s time, bond termination without replacement, loss of required Nebraska office or residency/corporate status, and the statute’s other stated predicates. |\n| **§45-613** | The Board **may** proceed on its own motion and **shall** proceed on the sworn complaint of a **customer or client** of a licensee. The written citation must state the exact charges and be served at least 20 days before hearing. |\n| **§45-615** | After hearing, the Board must issue written findings. If the stated noncompliance, accounting, or financial-responsibility findings are made, the Board **may** suspend or revoke. A certified copy of the findings must be sent by certified mail within five days after issuance. |\n| **§45-616** | Refusal, suspension, or revocation is appealable under the Administrative Procedure Act. |\n| **§45-617** | Pending final determination of that appeal, the holder may continue doing collection-agency business as though the license or certificate remained effective. |\n\nThese are distinct branches: §45-612’s stated revocations are mandatory; §45-615’s posthearing suspension or revocation is discretionary; and continued business pending appeal comes from §45-617, not §45-616. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-612&utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-613&utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-615&utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-616&utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-617&utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nA Board complaint, even if accepted, does not itself revoke or suspend the license, award damages, invalidate a debt, or stay a collection case.\n\n## 5. Title 433 rule text and statute-rule distinctions\n\nThe official static Title 433, Chapter 2 PDF returned no parsed text in the public page parser, but specific pages were available through PDF screenshots and were visually inspected in PASS-29.\n\n### Material pages actually inspected\n\n| Rule or form | Material text inspected | Printed page | Zero-based PDF index |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Rule 001.03 | Defines “sworn complaint” | Unnumbered | 0 |\n| Rule 006.03 | Posttermination cessation, account return/transfer, affidavit, and forwarding consumer payments without retaining fees | Unnumbered | 6–7 |\n| Rule 008.04 | Two-year collection-payment records and allocation details | Unnumbered | 9 |\n| Rule 009.01 | Board informs applicants about the federal FDCPA and how to obtain it | Unnumbered | 10 |\n| Rule 011.01 | Board may investigate on its own and shall on sworn complaint of “any person or client”; 20-day citation | Unnumbered | 12 |\n| Rule 011.04 | Written findings and certified mailing within five days | Unnumbered | 12 |\n| Rule 013 | Fixed fee sheet | Unnumbered | 14 |\n| Bond form | 45-day-after-month-close accounting/payment language | Unnumbered | 24 |\n| Renewal form | Paper renewal form dated 2012 | Unnumbered | 25 |\n\nThe rule’s “any person or client” complaint wording is broader than §45-613’s “customer or client.” This report does not assume that the rule validly expands the statute’s mandatory complaint duty. The Board independently retains authority to proceed on its own motion. The discrepancy remains unresolved and does not establish private standing or a right to damages. [Nebraska Secretary of State](https://sos.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/Chapter-2.pdf)\n\nRule 009.01’s FDCPA reference is an informational licensing requirement; it does not transform every FDCPA violation into a Nebraska private claim. Rule 006.03 and Rule 008.04 can support administrative discipline or proof, but they do not themselves create automatic debtor damages. [Nebraska Secretary of State+2](https://sos.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/Chapter-2.pdf)\n\nThe Rule 013 page should not be treated as the sole current operational fee schedule. Current §45-620 sets maximum statutory fees and permits Board-set amounts no higher than the cost of administering the Act; §45-605.01 authorizes NMLS processing and transaction fees. The current Secretary of State page directs new applications and branches through NMLS and no longer accepts paper applications. Some fixed figures shown in the legacy sheet fall within current caps, so this correction does not declare every displayed number unlawful; its present adoption and operational status as a comprehensive fee schedule remain held. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-620&utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-605.01)) ([sos.nebraska.gov](https://sos.nebraska.gov/licensing/collection-agencies?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n# G2 — Correct case identities, holdings, and privacy guardrails\n\n## 1. Corrected primary-case table\n\n| Case | Correct identity | Actual majority holding and result | Pinpoint |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **McKinney v. Okoye** | **282 Neb. 880, 806 N.W.2d 571, filed December 16, 2011; Nebraska Supreme Court** | The appeal addressed whether absolute judicial-proceeding privilege bars malicious prosecution. The majority held that it does not, reversed, and remanded. The majority did not decide or reinstate separate privacy, defamation, or interference claims. Its conclusion appears at printed p.889; the dissent begins later on that same page. | Majority reasoning printed p.888/PDF index 8; majority conclusion and start of dissent printed p.889/PDF index 9. [Nebraska.gov+1](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003852PUB) |\n| **Bohling v. Tecumseh Poultry LLC** | **314 Neb. 129, filed April 27, 2023; Nebraska Supreme Court** | The Court stated the six malicious-prosecution elements. The appeal was resolved on claim preclusion because an earlier dismissal with prejudice became a final, unappealed merits judgment. The Court did not reach the alternative underlying merits theory. | Elements printed p.131/PDF index 2; claim preclusion pp.136–138/PDF indices 7–9. [Nebraska.gov+3](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009424PUB) |\n| **Syring v. Archdiocese of Omaha** | **317 Neb. 195, filed July 26, 2024; Nebraska Supreme Court** | The IIED claim failed because the challenged conduct was not sufficiently extreme and outrageous. Because that element failed, the Court expressly did not decide the challenged medical-testimony/severe-distress issue. The full judgment was affirmed, with other claims disposed of on separate grounds. | IIED pp.208–210/PDF indices 13–15; final disposition p.216/PDF index 21. [Nebraska.gov+3](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011220PUB) |\n| **Gordon v. Community First State Bank** | **255 Neb. 637, 587 N.W.2d 343, decided December 4, 1998; Nebraska Supreme Court** | Abuse of process requires an ulterior purpose and an improper use of **judicial** process after issuance; regular use with a bad intention is insufficient. Administrative emergency orders did not supply the required judicial process. The Bank’s dismissal was affirmed; the appeal as to individual officers in one consolidated case was dismissed for lack of a final order; the second judgment was affirmed. | Reported pp.351–354; public reproduction, no PDF index. [Justia Law+3](https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/1998/1182-1.html) |\n| **Whipps Land & Cattle Co. v. Level 3 Communications** | **265 Neb. 472, 658 N.W.2d 258, decided March 14, 2003; Nebraska Supreme Court** | Section 20-203 intrusion consists of intentional interference with solitude, seclusion, or private affairs that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person. Ordinary inadvertent trespass, without intrusion into private affairs of the required kind, did not suffice. Judgment was affirmed. | Reported pp.269–271; public reproduction, no PDF index. [Justia Law+1](https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2003/1206-1.html) |\n| **Sabrina W. v. Willman** | **4 Neb. App. 149, 540 N.W.2d 364, decided November 21, 1995; Nebraska Court of Appeals** | Following an admitted voyeuristic intrusion, the claimant did not have to prove the severe emotional distress required for IIED. Available privacy damages include general privacy harm, mental suffering, special damages, and nominal damages if none of the others are proved. The directed verdict was reversed and the case remanded for a new trial. | Reported pp.369–371; public reproduction, no PDF index. [Justia Law](https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/court-of-appeals/1995/a-94-118-8.html) |\n\n## 2. Litigation privilege correction\n\n### Replacement for PASS-26 C035 and the corresponding common-law discussion\n\nNebraska’s privacy statute expressly subjects communication-based privacy claims to applicable qualified or absolute defamation privileges and other common-law privacy defenses. A statement made in a qualifying judicial proceeding can therefore be privileged against a statement-based privacy or defamation claim. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-206&utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n*McKinney* does not create the opposite blanket rule. It holds only that absolute judicial-proceeding privilege does **not** bar the distinct tort of malicious prosecution. Malicious prosecution remains subject to its own six elements, including favorable termination, lack of probable cause, malice, and damages. [Nebraska.gov+1](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003852PUB)\n\n## 3. Correct privacy guardrails\n\n| Provision | Correct bounded effect |\n| --- | --- |\n| **§20-203** | Liability for intentional intrusion into solitude, seclusion, or private affairs of a kind highly offensive to a reasonable person. Repeated collection contacts can be relevant, but contact count alone does not establish intent or objective offensiveness. |\n| **§20-206** | Preserves statutory, constitutional, qualified, absolute, and common-law privileges and defenses, including defamation privileges for communications. |\n| **§20-207** | Privacy action is personal to the person whose privacy was invaded and is nonassignable. |\n| **§20-208** | Privacy action generally does not survive the subject’s death, except the stated name-or-likeness exploitation branch. |\n| **§20-209** | A single publication, exhibition, or utterance produces one cause of action encompassing damages in all jurisdictions. It does not force an election among all different tort theories and is not a universal collector-remedy election rule. |\n| **§20-210** | A merits judgment for or against the same plaintiff against the same defendant based on the same publication, exhibition, or utterance bars another damages action based on that same publication. |\n| **§20-211** | Privacy action must be filed within one year from the date the cause arose. |\n\n([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-203&utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-206&utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-207&utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-208&utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-209&utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-210&utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-211&utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 4. Correct abuse-of-process boundary\n\n### Replacement for PASS-26 C033 and affected narrative\n\n*Gordon* supports the following narrower formulation:\n\nPlain text\n```\nAbuse of process requires:\n    an ulterior purpose\n    +\n    an improper act in the use of judicial process\n      after or under cover of its issuance\n    +\n    resulting damage\n```\n\nBad motive attached to regular and legitimate use is insufficient. The case did not recognize administrative agency orders as judicial process for this tort and expressly left open whether an administrative proceeding could support malicious prosecution. Its consolidated appellate disposition also cannot be compressed into a blanket affirmance of every dismissal against every defendant. [Justia Law+2](https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/1998/1182-1.html)\n\n## 5. Correct IIED boundary\n\n*Syring* is a Nebraska Supreme Court decision, not a Court of Appeals decision. It supports the demanding objective outrageousness threshold. It does **not** establish that severe emotional distress was absent on its facts; the majority expressly declined to reach that disputed element after holding the conduct was not sufficiently outrageous. The case is not a debt-collection case and supplies only the general Nebraska element and gatekeeping standard. [Nebraska.gov+2](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011220PUB)\n\n# G3 — Remedy and procedure qualifications\n\n## 1. NCPA regulatory exemption and carvebacks\n\n### Replacement for PASS-26 C019\n\nSection 59-1617(1) generally exempts actions or transactions that are otherwise permitted, prohibited, or regulated under laws administered by listed regulators or another state or federal regulatory body acting under statutory authority.\n\nSection 59-1617(2), however, expressly returns specified categories to the Consumer Protection Act:\n\n- insurance-regulated actions and transactions remain subject to §59-1602 and its implementation and enforcement provisions;\n- funeral-directing and embalming matters;\n- matters administered by the Department of Agriculture; and\n- specified loan-broker activities under §§45-189 through 45-191.11.\n\nThe section also states that no penalty or remedy results from an NCPA violation except those expressly provided by the Act. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1617&utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nThe result remains conduct specific. A regulated entity is not automatically exempt from every NCPA claim, and the carvebacks do not make every activity of a listed business actionable. No private punitive or public-penalty stacking is inferred.\n\n## 2. Precise NCPA suspension rule\n\n### Replacement for PASS-26 C021\n\nA private §59-1609 damages action generally must be commenced within four years after accrual.\n\nSuspension occurs only when:\n\n1. the Attorney General brings an actual action for a violation of §§59-1602 through 59-1606;\n2. the private §59-1609 claim is based in whole or part on a matter complained of in that AG action; and\n3. the AG action remains pending.\n\nThe suspension excludes an action for recovery of a civil penalty for violation of an injunction and excludes actions under §59-1609 itself. An AG intake complaint, CART communication, informal inquiry, voluntary mediation, or consumer submission is not the qualifying action described by §59-1612. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1612&utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 3. Public NCPA penalty locator\n\n### Replacement for PASS-26 C020’s penalty citation\n\nSection 59-1608 authorizes the Attorney General’s injunction, restoration, costs, and fee route. The NCPA civil-penalty amounts are located in **§59-1614**:\n\n- up to $2,000 for each §59-1602 violation, subject to the good-faith media exception; and\n- up to $500,000 for violations of §§59-1603 or 59-1604 or the terms of an NCPA injunction.\n\nThe Attorney General, acting for the State, seeks those penalties. They are not automatic private damages payable to the consumer. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1614&utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 4. UDTPA asset freeze\n\n### Replacement for PASS-26 C026’s freeze wording\n\nWhen the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe a listed deceptive trade practice or unconscionable act occurred, the AG may ask a **district court** for an ex parte order temporarily freezing or impounding connected accounts or assets to preserve resources for restitution or another available consumer remedy.\n\nIf granted:\n\n- the initial ex parte order lasts 14 days;\n- the court must set a hearing;\n- the AG must notify the owner, with publication allowed; and\n- after the hearing, the court may extend the order through the proceedings unless earlier canceled or modified at the AG’s request.\n\nThis is a court-ordered public enforcement remedy. A private claimant, consumer complaint, or AG intake employee cannot unilaterally freeze assets. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.02&utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 5. UDTPA filings sent to the Attorney General\n\n### Replacement for PASS-26 C030\n\n| Event | Required timing | Material sent |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Petition, counterclaim, cross-petition, or intervention pleading alleging a UDTPA violation | Within 7 days after filing | Copy of pleading |\n| Final judgment in such action | Within 7 days after entry | Copy of judgment |\n| Small Claims Court appeal involving a UDTPA issue | Within 7 days after providing notice of appeal | Written notice, relevant pleading, order or judgment |\n| Other appeal involving a UDTPA issue | Within 7 days after filing the notice of appeal | Written notice, relevant pleading, order or judgment |\n\nInitial required mailings in an action must be by certified mail. Once the AG has received required materials by certified mail in the same action, later required mailings may use regular mail. Failure to comply is **not** a dismissal ground, although it may support a later AG action to vacate or modify the judgment. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.12&utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 6. Nebraska punitive-damages scope\n\n### Replacement for PASS-26 C018\n\n*O’Brien v. Cessna Aircraft Co.* supports the rule that when **Nebraska substantive law governs the punitive-damages question**, punitive, vindictive, or exemplary damages are unavailable under Nebraska law. The case itself was a choice-of-law analysis. It does not establish that Nebraska law governs every forum or multistate dispute, and it does not displace federal statutory damages such as the FDCPA’s additional-damages provision. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010408PUB)\n\n## 7. *Rotkiske* qualification\n\n### Replacement for PASS-26 C046\n\n*Rotkiske* holds that §1692k(d)’s one-year period generally runs from the date of the FDCPA violation rather than from a general discovery date.\n\nThe majority’s footnote 3 expressly declined to decide:\n\n- whether §1692k(d) permits application of equitable doctrines; or\n- whether the claim before the Court fit within such a doctrine.\n\nAccordingly, PASS-26 correctly rejects an automatic general discovery rule, but this correction withdraws any affirmative statement that the majority recognized or applied equitable tolling on the facts. Those questions were reserved. [Supreme Court of the United States+1](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-328_pm02.pdf)\n\n## 8. Future-effective §87-302 text\n\nThe current online §87-302 page displays LB 838’s social-media-advertising provisions and identifies an operative date of **January 1, 2027**. As of October 26, 2026, those newly added clauses are future effective and are not operative current law for this PASS-29 analysis. The preexisting UDTPA provisions remain the relevant October 2026 text. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-302&utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/109/PDF/Slip/LB838.pdf))\n\n## 9. Holds expressly preserved\n\nPASS-29 does not resolve or reopen:\n\n- §59-1609’s “such increased award” construction;\n- the modern Nebraska malicious-prosecution limitation period;\n- §87-303.10’s purchase-date clock as applied to pure later collection conduct;\n- tort-specific accrual or continuing-course theories;\n- state/federal overlap, election, and duplicate-recovery allocation;\n- the implied private-action question under the Collection Agency Act; or\n- a universal wrongful-garnishment tort.\n\n# G4 — Source precision and access status\n\n## 1. Full literal URL expansion\n\n### Replacement for P26 S002 — Board, applications, branches, renewal, records, and fees\n\nPlain text\n```\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-603\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-604\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-605\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-605.01\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-606\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-607\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-609\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-610\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-611\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-618\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-619\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-620\n```\n\nSections 45-605.01 and 45-620 were freshly reread for the NMLS and fee correction. The other listed sections retain their dated PASS-26 read status and were not substantively regenerated here.\n\n### Replacement for P26 S003 — bond and discipline\n\nPlain text\n```\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-608\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-612\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-613\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-614\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-615\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-616\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-617\n```\n\nSections 45-608, 45-612, 45-613, 45-615, 45-616, and 45-617 were freshly read for PASS-29. Section 45-614 retains its dated PASS-26 read status.\n\n### Replacement for P26 S007 — NCPA\n\nPlain text\n```\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1601\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1602\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1608\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1609\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1609.01\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1610\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1611\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1612\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1613\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1614\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1617\n```\n\nSections 59-1612, 59-1614, and 59-1617 were freshly read for PASS-29. The remaining URLs preserve their dated PASS-26 read status.\n\n### Replacement for P26 S013 — UDTPA\n\nPlain text\n```\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-301\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-302\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.01\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.02\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.03\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.04\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.05\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.07\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.08\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.09\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.10\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.11\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.12\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-304\n```\n\nSections 87-302, 87-303.02, and 87-303.12 were freshly read. The other URLs preserve their dated PASS-26 read status.\n\n### Replacement for P26 S015 — Nebraska privacy statutes\n\nPlain text\n```\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-201\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-203\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-206\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-207\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-208\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-209\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-210\nhttps://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-211\n```\n\nSections 20-203 and 20-206 through 20-211 were freshly read.\n\n### Replacement for P26 S021 — FDCPA\n\nPlain text\n```\nhttps://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692a/\nhttps://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692e/\nhttps://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692f/\nhttps://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692k/\nhttps://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692l/\nhttps://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692n/\n```\n\nThe §1692a, §1692e, §1692f, §1692k, and §1692l bodies were already read in PASS-26. Although the coordinator’s exact §1692n route failed during review, PASS-29 successfully retrieved the official OLRC page. It displays text in effect through **Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026**, and preserves more-protective consistent state law. The earlier failed access remains an attributed historical observation, not evidence that the statute was unavailable or changed. ([uscode.house.gov](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692n/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 2. Other source-status corrections\n\n- **Title 433:** Official static PDF pages were visually inspected in PASS-29, but no complete adoption, amendment, or effective-date history was displayed. The operational status of legacy fixed-fee and paper-form pages remains held.\n- **Current licensing procedure:** The current Secretary of State page directs new collection-agency applicants and branch applications through NMLS and states that paper applications are no longer accepted. ([sos.nebraska.gov](https://sos.nebraska.gov/licensing/collection-agencies?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n- **Roster:** PASS-26’s July 9, 2026 roster date and December 31, 2026 expiry observations remain researcher-attributed. No provider-specific or fresh named-roster verification was performed in PASS-29.\n- **CART:** The cited CART launch page is a **December 2, 2021** announcement describing voluntary dispute resolution. It is not evidence of 2026 complaint outcomes, adjudications, or present recovery totals. ([ago.nebraska.gov](https://ago.nebraska.gov/news/attorney-general-announces-consumer-affairs-response-team?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n- **§87-302:** LB 838’s relevant additions are future effective January 1, 2027 and were not treated as October 2026 law. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/109/PDF/Slip/LB838.pdf))\n\n# Bounded correction examples\n\n## Example 1 — five assumed daily unlicensed-operation offenses\n\n### Assumptions\n\n- The business activity falls within §45-602(2)(a).\n- No exclusion applies.\n- The entity lacks the required Nebraska license.\n- The prosecution proves whatever criminal culpability Nebraska law ultimately requires.\n- The business operates on five separate days.\n- Each day is charged and established as a separate §45-601 offense.\n\nArithmetic:\n\nPlain text\n```\n5 assumed daily offenses\n× $500 maximum Class III fine per offense\n= $2,500 theoretical aggregate fine ceiling\n```\n\nThis preserves PASS-26’s $2,500 arithmetic but corrects its legal premise:\n\n- §45-601 itself does not say “knowing and willful”;\n- this report does not declare strict liability;\n- $2,500 is not an automatic sentence;\n- imprisonment, concurrency, charging discretion, and prosecution timeliness remain separate;\n- the fine is public, not a private consumer award; and\n- an officer or agent requires proof of personal participation in an Act violation. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-601&utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-106&utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## Example 2 — month-close accounting and competing bond claims\n\n### Assumptions\n\nDuring calendar month M:\n\nPlain text\n```\nGross collections received                  $5,000\nAssumed contractually lawful deductions     -1,000\n                                             ------\nAssumed net proceeds due to client          $4,000\n```\n\nSymbolic deadline:\n\nPlain text\n```\nClose of calendar month M\n+ 45 days\n= statutory report-and-payment point\n```\n\nAssume a $5,000 bond.\n\n### No competing valid claim\n\nPlain text\n```\nSupported client loss                       $4,000\nBond limit                                  $5,000\nPotential recovery                          up to $4,000\n```\n\n### Competing qualifying claims total $7,000\n\nPlain text\n```\nAggregate qualifying losses                 $7,000\nSurety aggregate limit                      $5,000\nMaximum total surety liability              $5,000\n```\n\nPASS-29 does not invent an allocation method among competing claimants. The actual month, deductions, agreement, accounting, claimant status, bond, defenses, and other claims remain unknown. The preserved $4,000 calculation is conditional on those predicates. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-608&utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## Example 3 — privilege, malicious prosecution, and administrative-process failure case\n\n### Facts assumed\n\n- A collection lawyer alleges in a filed complaint that a consumer owes a debt.\n- The allegation is later disputed.\n- The lawsuit ends favorably for the consumer.\n- The consumer asserts privacy, defamation, malicious prosecution, and abuse of process.\n\n### Conditional analysis\n\nPlain text\n```\nStatement-based privacy/defamation:\n    may encounter §20-206 litigation privilege\n\nMalicious prosecution:\n    not barred merely by that privilege under McKinney\n    but all six elements still required\n\nAbuse of process:\n    requires improper use of judicial process after issuance\n    bad motive alone is insufficient\n\nComplaint to an administrative regulator:\n    does not itself constitute judicial process under Gordon\n```\n\nIf an earlier with-prejudice judgment already adjudicated the malicious-prosecution claim and was not appealed, *Bohling* shows that claim preclusion can dispose of the later action without deciding the underlying malicious-prosecution merits. [Nebraska.gov+5](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003852PUB)\n\n## Example 4 — complaint intake versus qualifying AG action, asset freeze, mailing, and tolling\n\n### Step A — consumer files a CART complaint\n\nPlain text\n```\nAG intake complaint                     filed\nQualifying §59-1612 court action         no\nAutomatic private limitation suspension no\nAutomatic asset freeze                   no\nAutomatic litigation stay               no\n```\n\nCART’s dispute-resolution process is voluntary and the AG is not the consumer’s private attorney. ([ago.nebraska.gov](https://ago.nebraska.gov/news/attorney-general-announces-consumer-affairs-response-team?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n### Step B — AG later files a qualifying NCPA action\n\nIf the AG files an actual action under §§59-1602 through 59-1606 and the private §59-1609 claim is based in whole or part on the same matter:\n\nPlain text\n```\nPrivate limitation suspension\n= duration of qualifying AG action’s pendency\n```\n\nThe suspension does not arise from intake alone and does not extend to the excluded AG action categories identified in §59-1612. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1612&utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n### Step C — AG seeks connected-asset restraint\n\nThe AG must request a district-court order. If granted:\n\nPlain text\n```\nInitial ex parte duration                14 days\nNotice to owner                          required\nHearing                                  required\nExtension after hearing                  court decision\n```\n\nA private claimant cannot obtain that freeze merely by filing a complaint. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.02&utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n### Step D — private UDTPA pleading\n\nThe filing party must send the required pleading to the AG within seven days. The first required mailing in the action is by certified mail; later required mailings may use regular mail after qualifying prior certified delivery. Failure is not a dismissal ground but may support later AG action to vacate or modify. No actual calendar is computed here. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.12&utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## Preserved and rejected calculations\n\n| Calculation | PASS-29 treatment |\n| --- | --- |\n| 5 assumed daily offenses × $500 = $2,500 | **Preserved**, with mental element, charging, and sentencing held |\n| 3 proven §59-1602 violations × $2,000 = $6,000 | **Preserved as a theoretical public penalty ceiling under §59-1614**, not a private award |\n| $4,000 supported qualifying loss within a $5,000 bond = up to $4,000 | **Preserved**, subject to agreement/accounting predicates, defenses, and aggregate claims |\n| $600 actual NCPA damages + automatic $1,000 = $1,600 | **Rejected and remains rejected**; §59-1609 enhanced-award construction is held |\n| 2 FDCPA letters × $1,000 = $2,000 | **Rejected and remains rejected**; the individual additional-damages ceiling is up to $1,000 per action |\n\n# Old-to-new claim crosswalk\n\n| Affected PASS-26 claim | PASS-29 treatment | Replacement claim |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **S_NE-P26-C002** | Pinpoint corrected | **S_NE-P29-C003** |\n| **S_NE-P26-C003** | Pinpoint corrected | **S_NE-P29-C003** |\n| **S_NE-P26-C006** | Replaced; mental element held | **S_NE-P29-C001–C002** |\n| **S_NE-P26-C008** | Replaced with month-close and aggregate predicates | **S_NE-P29-C004–C005** |\n| **S_NE-P26-C009** | Qualified into mandatory/discretionary Board branches | **S_NE-P29-C006–C008** |\n| **S_NE-P26-C010** | Corrected §§45-616/45-617 roles | **S_NE-P29-C009** |\n| **S_NE-P26-C011** | Preserved but source/read bounds clarified | **S_NE-P29-C010** |\n| **S_NE-P26-C012** | Preserved but administrative effect and source bounds clarified | **S_NE-P29-C011–C012** |\n| **S_NE-P26-C018** | Narrowed to Nebraska-substantive-law context | **S_NE-P29-C026** |\n| **S_NE-P26-C019** | Replaced with complete §59-1617(1)–(2) structure | **S_NE-P29-C021** |\n| **S_NE-P26-C020** | Public-penalty locator corrected to §59-1614 | **S_NE-P29-C023** |\n| **S_NE-P26-C021** | Tolling predicates and exclusions added | **S_NE-P29-C022** |\n| **S_NE-P26-C026** | Freeze actors, court order, 14-day period, notice, and hearing added | **S_NE-P29-C024** |\n| **S_NE-P26-C030** | Seven-day branches and mailing consequences completed | **S_NE-P29-C025** |\n| **S_NE-P26-C032** | Expanded with correct cases and §§20-206–211 | **S_NE-P29-C018–C020** |\n| **S_NE-P26-C033** | *Gordon* posture and judicial-process limitation corrected | **S_NE-P29-C017** |\n| **S_NE-P26-C034** | *Bohling* court/year/outcome corrected | **S_NE-P29-C015** |\n| **S_NE-P26-C035** | *McKinney* identity, majority scope, and privilege boundaries corrected | **S_NE-P29-C013–C014** |\n| **S_NE-P26-C036** | *Syring* court/year/holding corrected | **S_NE-P29-C016** |\n| **S_NE-P26-C037** | Preserved as route-specific, not omnibus liability | **S_NE-P29-C017–C020, C033** |\n| **S_NE-P26-C046** | *Rotkiske* reservation added | **S_NE-P29-C027** |\n| **S_NE-P26-C047** | Current §1692n source access verified | **S_NE-P29-C029** |\n\n# S_NE-P29 claim register\n\n| Claim ID | Precise bounded statement | Source and pinpoint | Confidence or hold |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **S_NE-P29-C001** | Section 45-601 expressly creates a daily Class III misdemeanor for covered unlicensed operation but contains no express culpability term; the exact criminal mental-state construction remains unresolved. | §45-601, first offense sentence | High for text; **HOLD** for culpability |\n| **S_NE-P29-C002** | Section 45-601’s officer/agent sentence reaches personal participation in any Act violation, not solely unlicensed operation. | §45-601, second offense sentence | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C003** | Third-party collection is §45-602(2)(a), false-name own-creditor conduct is §45-602(2)(b), and exclusions are in §45-602(3). | §45-602 | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C004** | Section 45-608’s report/payment duty runs 45 days after the close of the collection month and concerns net proceeds collected in the preceding month and due to each client/customer. | §45-608 | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C005** | Bond recovery requires the specified accounting/payment or agreement nexus, and aggregate surety liability to all claimants cannot exceed the bond. | §45-608 | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C006** | Section 45-612 contains mandatory revocation grounds distinct from §45-615’s discretionary posthearing suspension/revocation. | §§45-612, 45-615 | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C007** | Section 45-613’s mandatory complaint branch is limited to a sworn complaint by a customer or client; Title 433 Rule 011.01’s broader wording remains unreconciled. | §45-613; Title 433 Rule 011.01 | High for texts; **HOLD** on reconciliation |\n| **S_NE-P29-C008** | Written Board findings must be sent by certified mail within five days after issuance; posthearing discipline under §45-615 is discretionary. | §45-615 | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C009** | Section 45-616 supplies APA appeal; §45-617 permits continued business pending final appeal. | §§45-616, 45-617 | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C010** | Title 433 Rule 009.01’s FDCPA-reference requirement does not itself create a Nebraska private FDCPA cause. | Rule 009.01, PDF index 10 | High bounded conclusion |\n| **S_NE-P29-C011** | Title 433 termination and recordkeeping rules can support discipline or proof but do not themselves create automatic private damages. | Rules 006.03 and 008.04, PDF indices 6–7 and 9 | High bounded conclusion |\n| **S_NE-P29-C012** | The legacy Title 433 fee and paper-form pages are not sufficient as the sole current NMLS fee/procedure source; present adoption and operational status remain held. | Rule 013, PDF index 14; renewal form index 25; §§45-605.01, 45-620 | Partial |\n| **S_NE-P29-C013** | *McKinney v. Okoye*, 282 Neb. 880 (2011), held only that judicial-proceeding privilege does not bar malicious prosecution and reversed/remanded. | Printed pp.888–889/PDF indices 8–9 | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C014** | *McKinney* did not decide other privacy, defamation, or interference claims and is not a blanket rejection of litigation privilege. | Same | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C015** | *Bohling*, 314 Neb. 129 (2023), states the six malicious-prosecution elements but resolved the appeal through claim preclusion rather than underlying merits. | Printed pp.131, 136–138/PDF indices 2, 7–9 | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C016** | *Syring*, 317 Neb. 195 (2024), rejected IIED for lack of sufficiently outrageous conduct and did not decide the severe-distress evidence issue. | Printed pp.208–210/PDF indices 13–15 | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C017** | *Gordon* requires misuse of judicial process after issuance; bad motive and administrative process alone are insufficient. | Reported pp.351–354 | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C018** | Section 20-203 intrusion requires intentional, highly offensive interference with solitude, seclusion, or private affairs; mere trespass is insufficient. | §20-203; *Whipps* reported pp.269–271 | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C019** | Privacy damages can include general privacy harm, mental suffering, special damages, and nominal damages; severe IIED-level distress is not required. | *Sabrina W.*, reported pp.369–371 | High, fact-specific |\n| **S_NE-P29-C020** | Sections 20-206–20-211 supply privilege, nonassignment, survival, single-publication, judgment-bar, and one-year constraints; they are not a universal collector-remedy election rule. | §§20-206–20-211 | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C021** | NCPA’s regulatory exemption is subject to the express §59-1617(2) carvebacks and remains conduct specific. | §59-1617(1)–(2) | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C022** | Section 59-1612 tolls a related private claim only during a qualifying AG action’s pendency and excludes the statutory categories it identifies; intake is insufficient. | §59-1612 | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C023** | NCPA public civil penalties are in §59-1614; up to $2,000 per §59-1602 violation is a public penalty, not automatic private damages. | §59-1614 | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C024** | UDTPA connected-asset restraint requires an AG request and district-court order; initial ex parte duration is 14 days, followed by notice and hearing before extension. | §87-303.02 | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C025** | Section 87-303.12 contains distinct seven-day filing, judgment, and appeal branches; first qualifying mailing is certified, failure is not dismissal, and later AG vacatur/modification remains possible. | §87-303.12 | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C026** | Nebraska punitive damages are unavailable when Nebraska substantive law governs; this does not displace federal statutory relief or decide every choice-of-law issue. | *O’Brien*, printed p.139/PDF index 30 | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C027** | *Rotkiske* rejects a general FDCPA discovery rule but expressly reserves whether equitable doctrines are permitted and applicable. | Majority slip p.7/PDF index 8 n.3 | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C028** | LB 838’s identified §87-302 additions are future effective January 1, 2027 and were not operative on October 26, 2026. | §87-302; LB 838 §§27, 40 | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C029** | Current official §1692n preserves consistent, more-protective state law and displays currency through PL 119-124, October 15, 2026. | 15 U.S.C. §1692n | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C030** | CART’s cited source is a 2021 voluntary-dispute-resolution announcement, not a 2026 adjudication or outcome report. | AG announcement dated Dec. 2, 2021 | High |\n| **S_NE-P29-C031** | PASS-26’s NCPA enhancement, malicious-prosecution limitation, later-collection UDTPA clock, and overlap/election issues remain unresolved. | Prior explicit holds | Preserved |\n| **S_NE-P29-C032** | A Collection Agency Act violation still does not expressly create automatic private damages, debt cancellation, dismissal, or judgment invalidity. | §§45-601–45-622 | High bounded textual conclusion |\n| **S_NE-P29-C033** | An invalid or quashed collection writ does not automatically establish privacy, abuse of process, malicious prosecution, IIED, or every other tort. | Corrected tort authorities | High |\n\n# S_NE-P29 source register\n\n| Source ID | Source, exact material read, status, and full URL | Access/read bounds |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **S_NE-P29-S001** | **Neb. Rev. Stat. §45-601**, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-601; complete operative body. **Neb. Rev. Stat. §28-106**: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-106; Class III misdemeanor range. | Fresh October 26, 2026 PT/UTC; current official HTML. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-601&utm_source=chatgpt.com)) |\n| **S_NE-P29-S002** | **Neb. Rev. Stat. §45-602**, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-602; subsections (2)(a)–(c), (3). | Fresh; current official HTML. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-602&utm_source=chatgpt.com)) |\n| **S_NE-P29-S003** | **Neb. Rev. Stat. §45-608**, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-608; complete body. | Fresh; current official HTML. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-608&utm_source=chatgpt.com)) |\n| **S_NE-P29-S004** | **Discipline and appeal statutes:** https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-612; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-613; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-614; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-615; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-616; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-617. | §§45-612, 613, 615, 616, 617 fresh; §45-614 dated PASS-26 reuse. Current official HTML. |\n| **S_NE-P29-S005** | **Fee and NMLS statutes:** https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-605.01; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-620. **Current SOS page:** https://sos.nebraska.gov/licensing/collection-agencies. | Fresh. SOS page directs new applicants to NMLS and says paper applications are no longer accepted. ([sos.nebraska.gov](https://sos.nebraska.gov/licensing/collection-agencies?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) |\n| **S_NE-P29-S006** | **Title 433, Chapter 2**, Nebraska Secretary of State. https://sos.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/Chapter-2.pdf; material PDF indices 0, 6–7, 9–10, 12, 14, 24–25. | Fresh screenshot inspection. Parsed text unavailable; pages unnumbered. No complete adoption/effective-history metadata visible. [Nebraska Secretary of State+7](https://sos.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/Chapter-2.pdf) |\n| **S_NE-P29-S007** | **McKinney v. Okoye**, official Nebraska PDF. https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003852PUB; printed pp.888–889/PDF indices 8–9. | Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion, 282 Neb. 880 (2011); fresh. [Nebraska.gov+1](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003852PUB) |\n| **S_NE-P29-S008** | **Bohling v. Tecumseh Poultry LLC**, official Nebraska PDF. https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009424PUB; printed pp.131, 136–138/PDF indices 2, 7–9. | Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion, 314 Neb. 129 (2023); fresh. [Nebraska.gov+3](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009424PUB) |\n| **S_NE-P29-S009** | **Syring v. Archdiocese of Omaha**, official Nebraska PDF. https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011220PUB; printed pp.208–210, 216/PDF indices 13–15, 21. | Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion, 317 Neb. 195 (2024); fresh. [Nebraska.gov+3](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011220PUB) |\n| **S_NE-P29-S010** | **Gordon v. Community First State Bank**. https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/1998/1182-1.html; reported pp.351–354. | Public reproduction of final Nebraska Supreme Court opinion, 255 Neb. 637 (1998); no PDF index. Freshly read. [Justia Law+3](https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/1998/1182-1.html) |\n| **S_NE-P29-S011** | **Privacy statutes:** https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-201; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-203; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-206; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-207; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-208; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-209; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-210; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-211. | §§20-203 and 20-206–211 fresh; current official HTML. |\n| **S_NE-P29-S012** | **Whipps Land & Cattle Co. v. Level 3 Communications**. https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2003/1206-1.html; reported pp.269–271. **Sabrina W. v. Willman**: https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/court-of-appeals/1995/a-94-118-8.html; reported pp.369–371. | Public reproductions of actual published opinions; fresh; no PDF indices. [Justia Law+2](https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2003/1206-1.html) |\n| **S_NE-P29-S013** | **NCPA full URL group:** https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1601; ...=59-1602; ...=59-1608; ...=59-1609; ...=59-1609.01; ...=59-1610; ...=59-1611; ...=59-1612; ...=59-1613; ...=59-1614; ...=59-1617. | §§59-1612, 1614, 1617 fresh; others dated PASS-26 reuse. Current official HTML. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1617&utm_source=chatgpt.com)) |\n| **S_NE-P29-S014** | **O’Brien v. Cessna Aircraft Co.** https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010408PUB; printed p.139/PDF index 30. | Final Nebraska Supreme Court opinion, 298 Neb. 109 (2017); fresh relevant page. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010408PUB) |\n| **S_NE-P29-S015** | **UDTPA full URL group:** https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-301; ...=87-302; ...=87-303; ...=87-303.01; ...=87-303.02; ...=87-303.03; ...=87-303.04; ...=87-303.05; ...=87-303.07; ...=87-303.08; ...=87-303.09; ...=87-303.10; ...=87-303.11; ...=87-303.12; ...=87-304. LB 838: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/109/PDF/Slip/LB838.pdf. | §§87-302, 303.02, 303.12 and LB 838 fresh; other sections dated PASS-26 reuse. LB 838 relevant additions future effective Jan. 1, 2027. ([nebraskalegislature.gov](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/109/PDF/Slip/LB838.pdf)) |\n| **S_NE-P29-S016** | **Rotkiske v. Klemm**. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-328_pm02.pdf; majority slip p.7/PDF index 8 n.3. | Final U.S. Supreme Court opinion; fresh relevant page. [Supreme Court of the United States](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-328_pm02.pdf) |\n| **S_NE-P29-S017** | **FDCPA full URL group:** https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692a/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692e/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692f/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692k/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692l/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692n/. | §1692n fresh successful access; all display through PL 119-124, Oct. 15, 2026. Other bodies were read in PASS-26. ([uscode.house.gov](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692n/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) |\n| **S_NE-P29-S018** | **Nebraska AG CART announcement.** https://ago.nebraska.gov/news/attorney-general-announces-consumer-affairs-response-team. | Historical announcement posted Dec. 2, 2021; not 2026 outcome data. Freshly checked. ([ago.nebraska.gov](https://ago.nebraska.gov/news/attorney-general-announces-consumer-affairs-response-team?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) |\n| **S_NE-P29-S019** | **Bounded official searches for §45-601 culpability and current malicious-prosecution limitations:** Nebraska appellate repository https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/; Nebraska Legislature statutes https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-601. | Search-only; no controlling additional authority located. Not a complete commercial citator, unpublished-order, legislative-history, or criminal-docket search. |\n| **S_NE-P29-S020** | **Collection-agency roster and forms status.** Current SOS page: https://sos.nebraska.gov/licensing/collection-agencies; static rules/forms PDF: https://sos.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/Chapter-2.pdf. | Current NMLS page fresh. July 9, 2026 roster and expiry observations remain attributed to P26 researcher; no named-provider or fresh roster verification. |\n\n# Coverage table\n\n| Requested subissue | Status | New claims | Exact remaining evidence or next action |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| §45-601 express mental element | **Answered as absent from text** | C001 | Controlling criminal-construction authority |\n| Exact criminal culpability | **Unresolved** | C001 | Nebraska appellate decision, charging authority, or applicable general culpability statute |\n| Daily offense unit | **Answered** | C001 | Actual operating dates and prosecution |\n| Officer/agent scope | **Answered** | C002 | Personal participation and culpability |\n| §45-602 subsection pinpoints | **Answered** | C003 | Actual actor facts |\n| Bond month-close trigger | **Answered** | C004 | Actual month and ledger |\n| Bond claimant and agreement predicates | **Answered** | C005 | Agreement, accounting, claimant status |\n| Aggregate bond ceiling | **Answered** | C005 | All qualifying claims |\n| §45-612 mandatory grounds | **Answered** | C006 | Actual conviction, judgment, bond, office, or status facts |\n| §45-615 discretionary discipline | **Answered** | C006, C008 | Hearing record and findings |\n| §45-613 20-day citation | **Answered** | C007 | Actual service |\n| Statute/rule complaint wording conflict | **Unresolved** | C007 | Current Board interpretation or rulemaking history |\n| Findings mailed within five days | **Answered** | C008 | Actual issuance and mailing |\n| APA appeal versus continued business | **Answered** | C009 | Actual appeal |\n| Title 433 FDCPA-reference effect | **Answered as administrative only** | C010 | None |\n| Title 433 termination/records duties | **Answered as administrative/proof duties** | C011 | Actual rule violation and proceeding |\n| Title 433 adoption/effective history | **Unresolved** | C012 | Official adoption orders or authenticated rule history |\n| Current fee procedure | **Answered partially** | C012 | Current NMLS checklist and exact transaction fees |\n| McKinney identity and majority holding | **Answered** | C013–C014 | None |\n| Bohling identity and posture | **Answered** | C015 | None |\n| Syring identity and IIED holding | **Answered** | C016 | None |\n| Gordon posture and abuse-of-process rule | **Answered** | C017 | Actual judicial process and postissuance act |\n| Privacy intent/offensiveness | **Answered** | C018 | Actual contact content and circumstances |\n| Privacy damages | **Answered generally** | C019 | Actual injury proof |\n| Privacy privileges and procedural limits | **Answered** | C020 | Exact publication, defendant, judgment, and death facts |\n| NCPA regulatory carvebacks | **Answered** | C021 | Actual regulator and challenged conduct |\n| NCPA limitation suspension | **Answered** | C022 | Actual AG action, related matter, and pendency |\n| NCPA public penalty locator | **Answered** | C023 | Proven statutory units and court finding |\n| UDTPA connected-asset freeze | **Answered** | C024 | AG reasonable cause and district-court order |\n| UDTPA AG mailing | **Answered** | C025 | Actual filing and mailing events |\n| Nebraska punitive-damages scope | **Answered narrowly** | C026 | Choice-of-law determination |\n| Rotkiske occurrence clock | **Answered** | C027 | Actual violation date |\n| FDCPA equitable doctrine | **Unresolved/reserved** | C027 | Later controlling authority and case-specific facts |\n| LB 838 future-effective clauses | **Answered as nonoperative on Oct. 26, 2026** | C028 | Jan. 1, 2027 or later status |\n| §1692n body/current header | **Answered prospectively** | C029 | None for current source; earlier failure remains historical |\n| CART source date and effect | **Answered** | C030 | Current individual complaint record, if ever authorized |\n| §59-1609 enhanced-award construction | **Preserved HOLD** | C031 | Controlling construction |\n| Modern malicious-prosecution limitations | **Preserved HOLD** | C031 | Controlling current authority |\n| UDTPA later-collection purchase clock | **Preserved HOLD** | C031 | Controlling construction |\n| Overlap/election/duplicate recovery | **Preserved HOLD** | C031 | Actual pleadings, verdict, and judgment |\n| Collection Act implied private action | **Preserved unresolved** | C032 | Controlling appellate authority or legislative history |\n| Wrongful-process omnibus tort theory | **Rejected as automatic; route-specific** | C033 | Actual process, intent, termination, privilege, and injury |\n| Current provider/license status | **Not researched** | — | Named-provider lookup prohibited |\n| Sector, local, tribal, and foreign-country law | **Excluded** | — | Separate assignments |\n| Whole Nebraska/component/parent/A066 acceptance | **Not granted** | — | Remaining passes and coordinator review |\n\n# Self-check\n\n## Freshly read or visually inspected in PASS-29\n\n- Neb. Rev. Stat. §§45-601, 45-602, 45-608, 45-612, 45-613, 45-615, 45-616, 45-617, 45-605.01, and 45-620.\n- Material Title 433, Chapter 2 pages at PDF indices 0, 6–7, 9–10, 12, 14, and 24–25.\n- *McKinney v. Okoye* majority and start of dissent.\n- *Bohling v. Tecumseh Poultry* malicious-prosecution elements and claim-preclusion disposition.\n- *Syring v. Archdiocese of Omaha* IIED analysis and final disposition.\n- *Gordon v. Community First State Bank* material procedural and abuse-of-process body.\n- Neb. Rev. Stat. §§20-203 and 20-206 through 20-211.\n- Material privacy holdings in *Whipps* and *Sabrina W.*\n- Neb. Rev. Stat. §§59-1612, 59-1614, and 59-1617.\n- Neb. Rev. Stat. §§87-302, 87-303.02, and 87-303.12, plus LB 838’s operative-date provisions.\n- *O’Brien*’s Nebraska-substantive-law punitive-damages passage.\n- *Rotkiske* majority footnote 3.\n- Current official 15 U.S.C. §1692n.\n- Current SOS NMLS collection-agency page and the dated 2021 CART announcement.\n\n## Numerical self-check\n\nPlain text\n```\nFive assumed daily offenses:\n5 × $500 = $2,500\n\nBond illustration:\n$5,000 gross − $1,000 assumed lawful deductions = $4,000\n$4,000 loss within $5,000 bond = up to $4,000\n$7,000 aggregate claims against $5,000 bond = $5,000 total surety ceiling\n\nNCPA public penalty:\n3 × $2,000 = $6,000\n```\n\nThe calculations establish arithmetic only. They do not establish criminal culpability, charging units, a sentence, bond entitlement, claim allocation, NCPA liability, or statutory penalty units.\n\n## Not performed\n\n- No actual collector, agency, creditor, debtor, communication, account, contract, bond, complaint, license, administrative order, judgment, writ, injury, class, or limitations event was accessed.\n- No provider or named-case docket lookup, complaint, filing, contact, demand, record request, application, account action, or private-data search occurred.\n- No complete Title 433 adoption-history audit, paid citator, unpublished-order search, criminal-docket review, or current Board adjudication database was available.\n- No provider-remedies, secured-debt, medical, bankruptcy, tax, support, education, local, tribal, or foreign-country component was reopened.\n- No local file was written, no browser was controlled, and no operational or publication action occurred.\n\nAll unaffected PASS-26 claims, supported arithmetic, and original actual-record, source-currentness, sector, local, tribal, and country holds remain unchanged. No Nebraska, component, parent, A066, operational, or publication acceptance is implied.\n\n**END S_NE PASS-29.**\n\n","tables":[{"headers":["Group","Disposition","Effect on PASS-26"],"index":0,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Group","Disposition","Effect on PASS-26"],["G1 — Collection Agency Act precision","The daily Class III misdemeanor text is confirmed, but §45-601 contains no express “knowing” or “willful” element. No controlling additional authority establishing that precise culpability formulation was located in this bounded review; criminal mental-state construction remains held. Definition pinpoints, bond timing, Board procedure, appeal effect, and rule/statute distinctions are corrected.","Replace the affected portions of B1, B3, B4, B6, G, I, Examples 1 and 11, and C002/C003/C006/C008/C010."],["G2 — Case identities, holdings, and privacy guardrails","McKinney, Bohling, and Syring had material court/year/posture errors. Their identities and actual majority holdings are corrected. Gordon is narrowed to its administrative-process and appellate posture. Nebraska’s privacy defenses, assignment, survival, single-publication, judgment-bar, and one-year statutes are added.","Replace affected portions of J, S018–S020, C032–C037, related examples, and coverage rows."],["G3 — Remedy and procedure qualifications","NCPA regulatory-exemption carvebacks, precise tolling, public-penalty source, UDTPA asset-freeze and AG-mailing conditions, Nebraska punitive-damages scope, and Rotkiske’s reserved equitable-doctrine issue are corrected.","Replace or qualify C018–C021, C026, C030, C046, and corresponding C5/C6/D/G/H and coverage cells."],["G4 — Source precision and access status","Grouped ellipses are replaced with full literal URLs. Title 433’s material pages were freshly inspected through the official static PDF, but complete adoption/effective-history metadata remains unavailable. The current §1692n official OLRC body and header were successfully retrieved in PASS-29. Future-effective LB 838 language is separated from October 2026 law.","Replace affected source rows and currentness/access annotations only."]]},{"headers":["Conduct","Express statutory text","Unit","Mental element established here?","Private consumer consequence"],"index":1,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Conduct","Express statutory text","Unit","Mental element established here?","Private consumer consequence"],["Operating a covered collection agency without a Nebraska license","Class III misdemeanor","Each day the unlawful business is conducted","No express term in §45-601; exact construction held","No automatic damages award, debt cancellation, dismissal, or judgment vacatur"],["Officer or agent personally participating in an Act violation","Class III misdemeanor","Each separately established offense","Exact construction held","No automatic private recovery"],["Regular employee of duly licensed collection agency","No separate agency license required by §45-601","N/A","N/A","Does not immunize unlawful conduct"],["Nonresident entity regulated as a collection agency in another state","May communicate with a Nebraska debtor under the statute’s narrow branch","Activity-specific","N/A","Not blanket Nebraska operating authority"]]},{"headers":["Agency size","Statutory bond"],"index":2,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Agency size","Statutory bond"],["Fewer than 5 solicitors","$5,000"],["5 through 15 solicitors","$10,000"],["16 or more solicitors","$15,000"],["Aggregate bonds required of one person","No more than $100,000"]]},{"headers":["Provision","Correct operative rule"],"index":3,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Provision","Correct operative rule"],["§45-612","The Board shall revoke after specified final fraud or embezzlement convictions or judgments, failure to account within §45-608’s time, bond termination without replacement, loss of required Nebraska office or residency/corporate status, and the statute’s other stated predicates."],["§45-613","The Board may proceed on its own motion and shall proceed on the sworn complaint of a customer or client of a licensee. The written citation must state the exact charges and be served at least 20 days before hearing."],["§45-615","After hearing, the Board must issue written findings. If the stated noncompliance, accounting, or financial-responsibility findings are made, the Board may suspend or revoke. A certified copy of the findings must be sent by certified mail within five days after issuance."],["§45-616","Refusal, suspension, or revocation is appealable under the Administrative Procedure Act."],["§45-617","Pending final determination of that appeal, the holder may continue doing collection-agency business as though the license or certificate remained effective."]]},{"headers":["Rule or form","Material text inspected","Printed page","Zero-based PDF index"],"index":4,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Rule or form","Material text inspected","Printed page","Zero-based PDF index"],["Rule 001.03","Defines “sworn complaint”","Unnumbered","0"],["Rule 006.03","Posttermination cessation, account return/transfer, affidavit, and forwarding consumer payments without retaining fees","Unnumbered","6–7"],["Rule 008.04","Two-year collection-payment records and allocation details","Unnumbered","9"],["Rule 009.01","Board informs applicants about the federal FDCPA and how to obtain it","Unnumbered","10"],["Rule 011.01","Board may investigate on its own and shall on sworn complaint of “any person or client”; 20-day citation","Unnumbered","12"],["Rule 011.04","Written findings and certified mailing within five days","Unnumbered","12"],["Rule 013","Fixed fee sheet","Unnumbered","14"],["Bond form","45-day-after-month-close accounting/payment language","Unnumbered","24"],["Renewal form","Paper renewal form dated 2012","Unnumbered","25"]]},{"headers":["Case","Correct identity","Actual majority holding and result","Pinpoint"],"index":5,"links":[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003852PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+1"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009424PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+3"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011220PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+3"},{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/1998/1182-1.html","text":"Justia Law\n+3"},{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2003/1206-1.html","text":"Justia Law\n+1"},{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/court-of-appeals/1995/a-94-118-8.html","text":"Justia Law"}],"row_links":[[],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003852PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009424PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+3"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011220PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+3"}],[{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/1998/1182-1.html","text":"Justia Law\n+3"}],[{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2003/1206-1.html","text":"Justia Law\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/court-of-appeals/1995/a-94-118-8.html","text":"Justia Law"}]],"rows":[["Case","Correct identity","Actual majority holding and result","Pinpoint"],["McKinney v. Okoye","282 Neb. 880, 806 N.W.2d 571, filed December 16, 2011; Nebraska Supreme Court","The appeal addressed whether absolute judicial-proceeding privilege bars malicious prosecution. The majority held that it does not, reversed, and remanded. The majority did not decide or reinstate separate privacy, defamation, or interference claims. Its conclusion appears at printed p.889; the dissent begins later on that same page.","Majority reasoning printed p.888/PDF index 8; majority conclusion and start of dissent printed p.889/PDF index 9. \nNebraska.gov\n+1"],["Bohling v. Tecumseh Poultry LLC","314 Neb. 129, filed April 27, 2023; Nebraska Supreme Court","The Court stated the six malicious-prosecution elements. The appeal was resolved on claim preclusion because an earlier dismissal with prejudice became a final, unappealed merits judgment. The Court did not reach the alternative underlying merits theory.","Elements printed p.131/PDF index 2; claim preclusion pp.136–138/PDF indices 7–9. \nNebraska.gov\n+3"],["Syring v. Archdiocese of Omaha","317 Neb. 195, filed July 26, 2024; Nebraska Supreme Court","The IIED claim failed because the challenged conduct was not sufficiently extreme and outrageous. Because that element failed, the Court expressly did not decide the challenged medical-testimony/severe-distress issue. The full judgment was affirmed, with other claims disposed of on separate grounds.","IIED pp.208–210/PDF indices 13–15; final disposition p.216/PDF index 21. \nNebraska.gov\n+3"],["Gordon v. Community First State Bank","255 Neb. 637, 587 N.W.2d 343, decided December 4, 1998; Nebraska Supreme Court","Abuse of process requires an ulterior purpose and an improper use of judicial process after issuance; regular use with a bad intention is insufficient. Administrative emergency orders did not supply the required judicial process. The Bank’s dismissal was affirmed; the appeal as to individual officers in one consolidated case was dismissed for lack of a final order; the second judgment was affirmed.","Reported pp.351–354; public reproduction, no PDF index. \nJustia Law\n+3"],["Whipps Land & Cattle Co. v. Level 3 Communications","265 Neb. 472, 658 N.W.2d 258, decided March 14, 2003; Nebraska Supreme Court","Section 20-203 intrusion consists of intentional interference with solitude, seclusion, or private affairs that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person. Ordinary inadvertent trespass, without intrusion into private affairs of the required kind, did not suffice. Judgment was affirmed.","Reported pp.269–271; public reproduction, no PDF index. \nJustia Law\n+1"],["Sabrina W. v. Willman","4 Neb. App. 149, 540 N.W.2d 364, decided November 21, 1995; Nebraska Court of Appeals","Following an admitted voyeuristic intrusion, the claimant did not have to prove the severe emotional distress required for IIED. Available privacy damages include general privacy harm, mental suffering, special damages, and nominal damages if none of the others are proved. The directed verdict was reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.","Reported pp.369–371; public reproduction, no PDF index. \nJustia Law"]]},{"headers":["Provision","Correct bounded effect"],"index":6,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Provision","Correct bounded effect"],["§20-203","Liability for intentional intrusion into solitude, seclusion, or private affairs of a kind highly offensive to a reasonable person. Repeated collection contacts can be relevant, but contact count alone does not establish intent or objective offensiveness."],["§20-206","Preserves statutory, constitutional, qualified, absolute, and common-law privileges and defenses, including defamation privileges for communications."],["§20-207","Privacy action is personal to the person whose privacy was invaded and is nonassignable."],["§20-208","Privacy action generally does not survive the subject’s death, except the stated name-or-likeness exploitation branch."],["§20-209","A single publication, exhibition, or utterance produces one cause of action encompassing damages in all jurisdictions. It does not force an election among all different tort theories and is not a universal collector-remedy election rule."],["§20-210","A merits judgment for or against the same plaintiff against the same defendant based on the same publication, exhibition, or utterance bars another damages action based on that same publication."],["§20-211","Privacy action must be filed within one year from the date the cause arose."]]},{"headers":["Event","Required timing","Material sent"],"index":7,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Event","Required timing","Material sent"],["Petition, counterclaim, cross-petition, or intervention pleading alleging a UDTPA violation","Within 7 days after filing","Copy of pleading"],["Final judgment in such action","Within 7 days after entry","Copy of judgment"],["Small Claims Court appeal involving a UDTPA issue","Within 7 days after providing notice of appeal","Written notice, relevant pleading, order or judgment"],["Other appeal involving a UDTPA issue","Within 7 days after filing the notice of appeal","Written notice, relevant pleading, order or judgment"]]},{"headers":["Calculation","PASS-29 treatment"],"index":8,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Calculation","PASS-29 treatment"],["5 assumed daily offenses × $500 = $2,500","Preserved, with mental element, charging, and sentencing held"],["3 proven §59-1602 violations × $2,000 = $6,000","Preserved as a theoretical public penalty ceiling under §59-1614, not a private award"],["$4,000 supported qualifying loss within a $5,000 bond = up to $4,000","Preserved, subject to agreement/accounting predicates, defenses, and aggregate claims"],["$600 actual NCPA damages + automatic $1,000 = $1,600","Rejected and remains rejected; §59-1609 enhanced-award construction is held"],["2 FDCPA letters × $1,000 = $2,000","Rejected and remains rejected; the individual additional-damages ceiling is up to $1,000 per action"]]},{"headers":["Affected PASS-26 claim","PASS-29 treatment","Replacement claim"],"index":9,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Affected PASS-26 claim","PASS-29 treatment","Replacement claim"],["S_NE-P26-C002","Pinpoint corrected","S_NE-P29-C003"],["S_NE-P26-C003","Pinpoint corrected","S_NE-P29-C003"],["S_NE-P26-C006","Replaced; mental element held","S_NE-P29-C001–C002"],["S_NE-P26-C008","Replaced with month-close and aggregate predicates","S_NE-P29-C004–C005"],["S_NE-P26-C009","Qualified into mandatory/discretionary Board branches","S_NE-P29-C006–C008"],["S_NE-P26-C010","Corrected §§45-616/45-617 roles","S_NE-P29-C009"],["S_NE-P26-C011","Preserved but source/read bounds clarified","S_NE-P29-C010"],["S_NE-P26-C012","Preserved but administrative effect and source bounds clarified","S_NE-P29-C011–C012"],["S_NE-P26-C018","Narrowed to Nebraska-substantive-law context","S_NE-P29-C026"],["S_NE-P26-C019","Replaced with complete §59-1617(1)–(2) structure","S_NE-P29-C021"],["S_NE-P26-C020","Public-penalty locator corrected to §59-1614","S_NE-P29-C023"],["S_NE-P26-C021","Tolling predicates and exclusions added","S_NE-P29-C022"],["S_NE-P26-C026","Freeze actors, court order, 14-day period, notice, and hearing added","S_NE-P29-C024"],["S_NE-P26-C030","Seven-day branches and mailing consequences completed","S_NE-P29-C025"],["S_NE-P26-C032","Expanded with correct cases and §§20-206–211","S_NE-P29-C018–C020"],["S_NE-P26-C033","Gordon posture and judicial-process limitation corrected","S_NE-P29-C017"],["S_NE-P26-C034","Bohling court/year/outcome corrected","S_NE-P29-C015"],["S_NE-P26-C035","McKinney identity, majority scope, and privilege boundaries corrected","S_NE-P29-C013–C014"],["S_NE-P26-C036","Syring court/year/holding corrected","S_NE-P29-C016"],["S_NE-P26-C037","Preserved as route-specific, not omnibus liability","S_NE-P29-C017–C020, C033"],["S_NE-P26-C046","Rotkiske reservation added","S_NE-P29-C027"],["S_NE-P26-C047","Current §1692n source access verified","S_NE-P29-C029"]]},{"headers":["Claim ID","Precise bounded statement","Source and pinpoint","Confidence or hold"],"index":10,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claim ID","Precise bounded statement","Source and pinpoint","Confidence or hold"],["S_NE-P29-C001","Section 45-601 expressly creates a daily Class III misdemeanor for covered unlicensed operation but contains no express culpability term; the exact criminal mental-state construction remains unresolved.","§45-601, first offense sentence","High for text; HOLD for culpability"],["S_NE-P29-C002","Section 45-601’s officer/agent sentence reaches personal participation in any Act violation, not solely unlicensed operation.","§45-601, second offense sentence","High"],["S_NE-P29-C003","Third-party collection is §45-602(2)(a), false-name own-creditor conduct is §45-602(2)(b), and exclusions are in §45-602(3).","§45-602","High"],["S_NE-P29-C004","Section 45-608’s report/payment duty runs 45 days after the close of the collection month and concerns net proceeds collected in the preceding month and due to each client/customer.","§45-608","High"],["S_NE-P29-C005","Bond recovery requires the specified accounting/payment or agreement nexus, and aggregate surety liability to all claimants cannot exceed the bond.","§45-608","High"],["S_NE-P29-C006","Section 45-612 contains mandatory revocation grounds distinct from §45-615’s discretionary posthearing suspension/revocation.","§§45-612, 45-615","High"],["S_NE-P29-C007","Section 45-613’s mandatory complaint branch is limited to a sworn complaint by a customer or client; Title 433 Rule 011.01’s broader wording remains unreconciled.","§45-613; Title 433 Rule 011.01","High for texts; HOLD on reconciliation"],["S_NE-P29-C008","Written Board findings must be sent by certified mail within five days after issuance; posthearing discipline under §45-615 is discretionary.","§45-615","High"],["S_NE-P29-C009","Section 45-616 supplies APA appeal; §45-617 permits continued business pending final appeal.","§§45-616, 45-617","High"],["S_NE-P29-C010","Title 433 Rule 009.01’s FDCPA-reference requirement does not itself create a Nebraska private FDCPA cause.","Rule 009.01, PDF index 10","High bounded conclusion"],["S_NE-P29-C011","Title 433 termination and recordkeeping rules can support discipline or proof but do not themselves create automatic private damages.","Rules 006.03 and 008.04, PDF indices 6–7 and 9","High bounded conclusion"],["S_NE-P29-C012","The legacy Title 433 fee and paper-form pages are not sufficient as the sole current NMLS fee/procedure source; present adoption and operational status remain held.","Rule 013, PDF index 14; renewal form index 25; §§45-605.01, 45-620","Partial"],["S_NE-P29-C013","McKinney v. Okoye, 282 Neb. 880 (2011), held only that judicial-proceeding privilege does not bar malicious prosecution and reversed/remanded.","Printed pp.888–889/PDF indices 8–9","High"],["S_NE-P29-C014","McKinney did not decide other privacy, defamation, or interference claims and is not a blanket rejection of litigation privilege.","Same","High"],["S_NE-P29-C015","Bohling, 314 Neb. 129 (2023), states the six malicious-prosecution elements but resolved the appeal through claim preclusion rather than underlying merits.","Printed pp.131, 136–138/PDF indices 2, 7–9","High"],["S_NE-P29-C016","Syring, 317 Neb. 195 (2024), rejected IIED for lack of sufficiently outrageous conduct and did not decide the severe-distress evidence issue.","Printed pp.208–210/PDF indices 13–15","High"],["S_NE-P29-C017","Gordon requires misuse of judicial process after issuance; bad motive and administrative process alone are insufficient.","Reported pp.351–354","High"],["S_NE-P29-C018","Section 20-203 intrusion requires intentional, highly offensive interference with solitude, seclusion, or private affairs; mere trespass is insufficient.","§20-203; Whipps reported pp.269–271","High"],["S_NE-P29-C019","Privacy damages can include general privacy harm, mental suffering, special damages, and nominal damages; severe IIED-level distress is not required.","Sabrina W., reported pp.369–371","High, fact-specific"],["S_NE-P29-C020","Sections 20-206–20-211 supply privilege, nonassignment, survival, single-publication, judgment-bar, and one-year constraints; they are not a universal collector-remedy election rule.","§§20-206–20-211","High"],["S_NE-P29-C021","NCPA’s regulatory exemption is subject to the express §59-1617(2) carvebacks and remains conduct specific.","§59-1617(1)–(2)","High"],["S_NE-P29-C022","Section 59-1612 tolls a related private claim only during a qualifying AG action’s pendency and excludes the statutory categories it identifies; intake is insufficient.","§59-1612","High"],["S_NE-P29-C023","NCPA public civil penalties are in §59-1614; up to $2,000 per §59-1602 violation is a public penalty, not automatic private damages.","§59-1614","High"],["S_NE-P29-C024","UDTPA connected-asset restraint requires an AG request and district-court order; initial ex parte duration is 14 days, followed by notice and hearing before extension.","§87-303.02","High"],["S_NE-P29-C025","Section 87-303.12 contains distinct seven-day filing, judgment, and appeal branches; first qualifying mailing is certified, failure is not dismissal, and later AG vacatur/modification remains possible.","§87-303.12","High"],["S_NE-P29-C026","Nebraska punitive damages are unavailable when Nebraska substantive law governs; this does not displace federal statutory relief or decide every choice-of-law issue.","O’Brien, printed p.139/PDF index 30","High"],["S_NE-P29-C027","Rotkiske rejects a general FDCPA discovery rule but expressly reserves whether equitable doctrines are permitted and applicable.","Majority slip p.7/PDF index 8 n.3","High"],["S_NE-P29-C028","LB 838’s identified §87-302 additions are future effective January 1, 2027 and were not operative on October 26, 2026.","§87-302; LB 838 §§27, 40","High"],["S_NE-P29-C029","Current official §1692n preserves consistent, more-protective state law and displays currency through PL 119-124, October 15, 2026.","15 U.S.C. §1692n","High"],["S_NE-P29-C030","CART’s cited source is a 2021 voluntary-dispute-resolution announcement, not a 2026 adjudication or outcome report.","AG announcement dated Dec. 2, 2021","High"],["S_NE-P29-C031","PASS-26’s NCPA enhancement, malicious-prosecution limitation, later-collection UDTPA clock, and overlap/election issues remain unresolved.","Prior explicit holds","Preserved"],["S_NE-P29-C032","A Collection Agency Act violation still does not expressly create automatic private damages, debt cancellation, dismissal, or judgment invalidity.","§§45-601–45-622","High bounded textual conclusion"],["S_NE-P29-C033","An invalid or quashed collection writ does not automatically establish privacy, abuse of process, malicious prosecution, IIED, or every other tort.","Corrected tort authorities","High"]]},{"headers":["Source ID","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL","Access/read bounds"],"index":11,"links":[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-601&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"nebraskalegislature.gov"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-602&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"nebraskalegislature.gov"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-608&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"nebraskalegislature.gov"},{"href":"https://sos.nebraska.gov/licensing/collection-agencies?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"sos.nebraska.gov"},{"href":"https://sos.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/Chapter-2.pdf","text":"Nebraska Secretary of State\n+7"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003852PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+1"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009424PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+3"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011220PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+3"},{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/1998/1182-1.html","text":"Justia Law\n+3"},{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2003/1206-1.html","text":"Justia Law\n+2"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1617&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"nebraskalegislature.gov"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010408PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/109/PDF/Slip/LB838.pdf","text":"nebraskalegislature.gov"},{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-328_pm02.pdf","text":"Supreme Court of the United States"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692n/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"uscode.house.gov"},{"href":"https://ago.nebraska.gov/news/attorney-general-announces-consumer-affairs-response-team?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"ago.nebraska.gov"}],"row_links":[[],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-601&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"nebraskalegislature.gov"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-602&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"nebraskalegislature.gov"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-608&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"nebraskalegislature.gov"}],[],[{"href":"https://sos.nebraska.gov/licensing/collection-agencies?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"sos.nebraska.gov"}],[{"href":"https://sos.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/Chapter-2.pdf","text":"Nebraska Secretary of State\n+7"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003852PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009424PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+3"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011220PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+3"}],[{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/1998/1182-1.html","text":"Justia Law\n+3"}],[],[{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2003/1206-1.html","text":"Justia Law\n+2"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1617&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"nebraskalegislature.gov"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010408PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/109/PDF/Slip/LB838.pdf","text":"nebraskalegislature.gov"}],[{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-328_pm02.pdf","text":"Supreme Court of the United States"}],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692n/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"uscode.house.gov"}],[{"href":"https://ago.nebraska.gov/news/attorney-general-announces-consumer-affairs-response-team?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"ago.nebraska.gov"}],[],[]],"rows":[["Source ID","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL","Access/read bounds"],["S_NE-P29-S001","Neb. Rev. Stat. §45-601, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-601; complete operative body. Neb. Rev. Stat. §28-106: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-106; Class III misdemeanor range.","Fresh October 26, 2026 PT/UTC; current official HTML. (nebraskalegislature.gov)"],["S_NE-P29-S002","Neb. Rev. Stat. §45-602, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-602; subsections (2)(a)–(c), (3).","Fresh; current official HTML. (nebraskalegislature.gov)"],["S_NE-P29-S003","Neb. Rev. Stat. §45-608, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-608; complete body.","Fresh; current official HTML. (nebraskalegislature.gov)"],["S_NE-P29-S004","Discipline and appeal statutes: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-612; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-613; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-614; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-615; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-616; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-617.","§§45-612, 613, 615, 616, 617 fresh; §45-614 dated PASS-26 reuse. Current official HTML."],["S_NE-P29-S005","Fee and NMLS statutes: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-605.01; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-620. Current SOS page: https://sos.nebraska.gov/licensing/collection-agencies.","Fresh. SOS page directs new applicants to NMLS and says paper applications are no longer accepted. (sos.nebraska.gov)"],["S_NE-P29-S006","Title 433, Chapter 2, Nebraska Secretary of State. https://sos.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/Chapter-2.pdf; material PDF indices 0, 6–7, 9–10, 12, 14, 24–25.","Fresh screenshot inspection. Parsed text unavailable; pages unnumbered. No complete adoption/effective-history metadata visible. \nNebraska Secretary of State\n+7"],["S_NE-P29-S007","McKinney v. Okoye, official Nebraska PDF. https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003852PUB; printed pp.888–889/PDF indices 8–9.","Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion, 282 Neb. 880 (2011); fresh. \nNebraska.gov\n+1"],["S_NE-P29-S008","Bohling v. Tecumseh Poultry LLC, official Nebraska PDF. https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009424PUB; printed pp.131, 136–138/PDF indices 2, 7–9.","Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion, 314 Neb. 129 (2023); fresh. \nNebraska.gov\n+3"],["S_NE-P29-S009","Syring v. Archdiocese of Omaha, official Nebraska PDF. https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011220PUB; printed pp.208–210, 216/PDF indices 13–15, 21.","Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion, 317 Neb. 195 (2024); fresh. \nNebraska.gov\n+3"],["S_NE-P29-S010","Gordon v. Community First State Bank. https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/1998/1182-1.html; reported pp.351–354.","Public reproduction of final Nebraska Supreme Court opinion, 255 Neb. 637 (1998); no PDF index. Freshly read. \nJustia Law\n+3"],["S_NE-P29-S011","Privacy statutes: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-201; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-203; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-206; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-207; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-208; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-209; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-210; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-211.","§§20-203 and 20-206–211 fresh; current official HTML."],["S_NE-P29-S012","Whipps Land & Cattle Co. v. Level 3 Communications. https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2003/1206-1.html; reported pp.269–271. Sabrina W. v. Willman: https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/court-of-appeals/1995/a-94-118-8.html; reported pp.369–371.","Public reproductions of actual published opinions; fresh; no PDF indices. \nJustia Law\n+2"],["S_NE-P29-S013","NCPA full URL group: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1601; ...=59-1602; ...=59-1608; ...=59-1609; ...=59-1609.01; ...=59-1610; ...=59-1611; ...=59-1612; ...=59-1613; ...=59-1614; ...=59-1617.","§§59-1612, 1614, 1617 fresh; others dated PASS-26 reuse. Current official HTML. (nebraskalegislature.gov)"],["S_NE-P29-S014","O’Brien v. Cessna Aircraft Co. https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010408PUB; printed p.139/PDF index 30.","Final Nebraska Supreme Court opinion, 298 Neb. 109 (2017); fresh relevant page. \nNebraska.gov"],["S_NE-P29-S015","UDTPA full URL group: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-301; ...=87-302; ...=87-303; ...=87-303.01; ...=87-303.02; ...=87-303.03; ...=87-303.04; ...=87-303.05; ...=87-303.07; ...=87-303.08; ...=87-303.09; ...=87-303.10; ...=87-303.11; ...=87-303.12; ...=87-304. LB 838: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/109/PDF/Slip/LB838.pdf.","§§87-302, 303.02, 303.12 and LB 838 fresh; other sections dated PASS-26 reuse. LB 838 relevant additions future effective Jan. 1, 2027. (nebraskalegislature.gov)"],["S_NE-P29-S016","Rotkiske v. Klemm. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-328_pm02.pdf; majority slip p.7/PDF index 8 n.3.","Final U.S. Supreme Court opinion; fresh relevant page. \nSupreme Court of the United States"],["S_NE-P29-S017","FDCPA full URL group: https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692a/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692e/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692f/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692k/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692l/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692n/.","§1692n fresh successful access; all display through PL 119-124, Oct. 15, 2026. Other bodies were read in PASS-26. (uscode.house.gov)"],["S_NE-P29-S018","Nebraska AG CART announcement. https://ago.nebraska.gov/news/attorney-general-announces-consumer-affairs-response-team.","Historical announcement posted Dec. 2, 2021; not 2026 outcome data. Freshly checked. (ago.nebraska.gov)"],["S_NE-P29-S019","Bounded official searches for §45-601 culpability and current malicious-prosecution limitations: Nebraska appellate repository https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/; Nebraska Legislature statutes https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-601.","Search-only; no controlling additional authority located. Not a complete commercial citator, unpublished-order, legislative-history, or criminal-docket search."],["S_NE-P29-S020","Collection-agency roster and forms status. Current SOS page: https://sos.nebraska.gov/licensing/collection-agencies; static rules/forms PDF: https://sos.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/Chapter-2.pdf.","Current NMLS page fresh. July 9, 2026 roster and expiry observations remain attributed to P26 researcher; no named-provider or fresh roster verification."]]},{"headers":["Requested subissue","Status","New claims","Exact remaining evidence or next action"],"index":12,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Requested subissue","Status","New claims","Exact remaining evidence or next action"],["§45-601 express mental element","Answered as absent from text","C001","Controlling criminal-construction authority"],["Exact criminal culpability","Unresolved","C001","Nebraska appellate decision, charging authority, or applicable general culpability statute"],["Daily offense unit","Answered","C001","Actual operating dates and prosecution"],["Officer/agent scope","Answered","C002","Personal participation and culpability"],["§45-602 subsection pinpoints","Answered","C003","Actual actor facts"],["Bond month-close trigger","Answered","C004","Actual month and ledger"],["Bond claimant and agreement predicates","Answered","C005","Agreement, accounting, claimant status"],["Aggregate bond ceiling","Answered","C005","All qualifying claims"],["§45-612 mandatory grounds","Answered","C006","Actual conviction, judgment, bond, office, or status facts"],["§45-615 discretionary discipline","Answered","C006, C008","Hearing record and findings"],["§45-613 20-day citation","Answered","C007","Actual service"],["Statute/rule complaint wording conflict","Unresolved","C007","Current Board interpretation or rulemaking history"],["Findings mailed within five days","Answered","C008","Actual issuance and mailing"],["APA appeal versus continued business","Answered","C009","Actual appeal"],["Title 433 FDCPA-reference effect","Answered as administrative only","C010","None"],["Title 433 termination/records duties","Answered as administrative/proof duties","C011","Actual rule violation and proceeding"],["Title 433 adoption/effective history","Unresolved","C012","Official adoption orders or authenticated rule history"],["Current fee procedure","Answered partially","C012","Current NMLS checklist and exact transaction fees"],["McKinney identity and majority holding","Answered","C013–C014","None"],["Bohling identity and posture","Answered","C015","None"],["Syring identity and IIED holding","Answered","C016","None"],["Gordon posture and abuse-of-process rule","Answered","C017","Actual judicial process and postissuance act"],["Privacy intent/offensiveness","Answered","C018","Actual contact content and circumstances"],["Privacy damages","Answered generally","C019","Actual injury proof"],["Privacy privileges and procedural limits","Answered","C020","Exact publication, defendant, judgment, and death facts"],["NCPA regulatory carvebacks","Answered","C021","Actual regulator and challenged conduct"],["NCPA limitation suspension","Answered","C022","Actual AG action, related matter, and pendency"],["NCPA public penalty locator","Answered","C023","Proven statutory units and court finding"],["UDTPA connected-asset freeze","Answered","C024","AG reasonable cause and district-court order"],["UDTPA AG mailing","Answered","C025","Actual filing and mailing events"],["Nebraska punitive-damages scope","Answered narrowly","C026","Choice-of-law determination"],["Rotkiske occurrence clock","Answered","C027","Actual violation date"],["FDCPA equitable doctrine","Unresolved/reserved","C027","Later controlling authority and case-specific facts"],["LB 838 future-effective clauses","Answered as nonoperative on Oct. 26, 2026","C028","Jan. 1, 2027 or later status"],["§1692n body/current header","Answered prospectively","C029","None for current source; earlier failure remains historical"],["CART source date and effect","Answered","C030","Current individual complaint record, if ever authorized"],["§59-1609 enhanced-award construction","Preserved HOLD","C031","Controlling construction"],["Modern malicious-prosecution limitations","Preserved HOLD","C031","Controlling current authority"],["UDTPA later-collection purchase clock","Preserved HOLD","C031","Controlling construction"],["Overlap/election/duplicate recovery","Preserved HOLD","C031","Actual pleadings, verdict, and judgment"],["Collection Act implied private action","Preserved unresolved","C032","Controlling appellate authority or legislative history"],["Wrongful-process omnibus tort theory","Rejected as automatic; route-specific","C033","Actual process, intent, termination, privilege, and injury"],["Current provider/license status","Not researched","—","Named-provider lookup prohibited"],["Sector, local, tribal, and foreign-country law","Excluded","—","Separate assignments"],["Whole Nebraska/component/parent/A066 acceptance","Not granted","—","Remaining passes and coordinator review"]]}],"claims":[{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C001","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C001","Precise bounded statement":"Section 45-601 expressly creates a daily Class III misdemeanor for covered unlicensed operation but contains no express culpability term; the exact criminal mental-state construction remains unresolved.","Source and pinpoint":"§45-601, first offense sentence","Confidence or hold":"High for text; HOLD for culpability"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S001","S_NE-P29-S019"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C002","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C002","Precise bounded statement":"Section 45-601’s officer/agent sentence reaches personal participation in any Act violation, not solely unlicensed operation.","Source and pinpoint":"§45-601, second offense sentence","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S001"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C003","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C003","Precise bounded statement":"Third-party collection is §45-602(2)(a), false-name own-creditor conduct is §45-602(2)(b), and exclusions are in §45-602(3).","Source and pinpoint":"§45-602","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S002"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C004","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C004","Precise bounded statement":"Section 45-608’s report/payment duty runs 45 days after the close of the collection month and concerns net proceeds collected in the preceding month and due to each client/customer.","Source and pinpoint":"§45-608","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S003"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C005","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C005","Precise bounded statement":"Bond recovery requires the specified accounting/payment or agreement nexus, and aggregate surety liability to all claimants cannot exceed the bond.","Source and pinpoint":"§45-608","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S003"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C006","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C006","Precise bounded statement":"Section 45-612 contains mandatory revocation grounds distinct from §45-615’s discretionary posthearing suspension/revocation.","Source and pinpoint":"§§45-612, 45-615","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S004"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C007","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C007","Precise bounded statement":"Section 45-613’s mandatory complaint branch is limited to a sworn complaint by a customer or client; Title 433 Rule 011.01’s broader wording remains unreconciled.","Source and pinpoint":"§45-613; Title 433 Rule 011.01","Confidence or hold":"High for texts; HOLD on reconciliation"},"coordinator_verification_status":"partly_supported_title433_text_access_and_adoption_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance. Researcher433clause/pixelassertionsattributed; coordinator26pagePDFzeroextractabletext/reference-onlyscreenshots didnotreplicatepixels/clauses/currentness.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S004","S_NE-P29-S006"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C008","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C008","Precise bounded statement":"Written Board findings must be sent by certified mail within five days after issuance; posthearing discipline under §45-615 is discretionary.","Source and pinpoint":"§45-615","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S004"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C009","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C009","Precise bounded statement":"Section 45-616 supplies APA appeal; §45-617 permits continued business pending final appeal.","Source and pinpoint":"§§45-616, 45-617","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S004"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C010","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C010","Precise bounded statement":"Title 433 Rule 009.01’s FDCPA-reference requirement does not itself create a Nebraska private FDCPA cause.","Source and pinpoint":"Rule 009.01, PDF index 10","Confidence or hold":"High bounded conclusion"},"coordinator_verification_status":"partly_supported_title433_text_access_and_adoption_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance. Researcher433clause/pixelassertionsattributed; coordinator26pagePDFzeroextractabletext/reference-onlyscreenshots didnotreplicatepixels/clauses/currentness.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S006"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C011","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C011","Precise bounded statement":"Title 433 termination and recordkeeping rules can support discipline or proof but do not themselves create automatic private damages.","Source and pinpoint":"Rules 006.03 and 008.04, PDF indices 6–7 and 9","Confidence or hold":"High bounded conclusion"},"coordinator_verification_status":"partly_supported_title433_text_access_and_adoption_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance. Researcher433clause/pixelassertionsattributed; coordinator26pagePDFzeroextractabletext/reference-onlyscreenshots didnotreplicatepixels/clauses/currentness.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S006"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C012","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C012","Precise bounded statement":"The legacy Title 433 fee and paper-form pages are not sufficient as the sole current NMLS fee/procedure source; present adoption and operational status remain held.","Source and pinpoint":"Rule 013, PDF index 14; renewal form index 25; §§45-605.01, 45-620","Confidence or hold":"Partial"},"coordinator_verification_status":"partly_supported_title433_text_access_and_adoption_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance. Researcher433clause/pixelassertionsattributed; coordinator26pagePDFzeroextractabletext/reference-onlyscreenshots didnotreplicatepixels/clauses/currentness.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S006","S_NE-P29-S005","S_NE-P29-S020"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C013","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C013","Precise bounded statement":"McKinney v. Okoye, 282 Neb. 880 (2011), held only that judicial-proceeding privilege does not bar malicious prosecution and reversed/remanded.","Source and pinpoint":"Printed pp.888–889/PDF indices 8–9","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S007"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C014","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C014","Precise bounded statement":"McKinney did not decide other privacy, defamation, or interference claims and is not a blanket rejection of litigation privilege.","Source and pinpoint":"Same","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S007"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C015","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C015","Precise bounded statement":"Bohling, 314 Neb. 129 (2023), states the six malicious-prosecution elements but resolved the appeal through claim preclusion rather than underlying merits.","Source and pinpoint":"Printed pp.131, 136–138/PDF indices 2, 7–9","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S008"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C016","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C016","Precise bounded statement":"Syring, 317 Neb. 195 (2024), rejected IIED for lack of sufficiently outrageous conduct and did not decide the severe-distress evidence issue.","Source and pinpoint":"Printed pp.208–210/PDF indices 13–15","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S009"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C017","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C017","Precise bounded statement":"Gordon requires misuse of judicial process after issuance; bad motive and administrative process alone are insufficient.","Source and pinpoint":"Reported pp.351–354","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S010"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C018","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C018","Precise bounded statement":"Section 20-203 intrusion requires intentional, highly offensive interference with solitude, seclusion, or private affairs; mere trespass is insufficient.","Source and pinpoint":"§20-203; Whipps reported pp.269–271","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S011","S_NE-P29-S012"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C019","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C019","Precise bounded statement":"Privacy damages can include general privacy harm, mental suffering, special damages, and nominal damages; severe IIED-level distress is not required.","Source and pinpoint":"Sabrina W., reported pp.369–371","Confidence or hold":"High, fact-specific"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S012"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C020","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C020","Precise bounded statement":"Sections 20-206–20-211 supply privilege, nonassignment, survival, single-publication, judgment-bar, and one-year constraints; they are not a universal collector-remedy election rule.","Source and pinpoint":"§§20-206–20-211","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S011"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C021","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C021","Precise bounded statement":"NCPA’s regulatory exemption is subject to the express §59-1617(2) carvebacks and remains conduct specific.","Source and pinpoint":"§59-1617(1)–(2)","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S013"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C022","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C022","Precise bounded statement":"Section 59-1612 tolls a related private claim only during a qualifying AG action’s pendency and excludes the statutory categories it identifies; intake is insufficient.","Source and pinpoint":"§59-1612","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S013"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C023","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C023","Precise bounded statement":"NCPA public civil penalties are in §59-1614; up to $2,000 per §59-1602 violation is a public penalty, not automatic private damages.","Source and pinpoint":"§59-1614","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S013"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C024","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C024","Precise bounded statement":"UDTPA connected-asset restraint requires an AG request and district-court order; initial ex parte duration is 14 days, followed by notice and hearing before extension.","Source and pinpoint":"§87-303.02","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S015"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C025","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C025","Precise bounded statement":"Section 87-303.12 contains distinct seven-day filing, judgment, and appeal branches; first qualifying mailing is certified, failure is not dismissal, and later AG vacatur/modification remains possible.","Source and pinpoint":"§87-303.12","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S015"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C026","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C026","Precise bounded statement":"Nebraska punitive damages are unavailable when Nebraska substantive law governs; this does not displace federal statutory relief or decide every choice-of-law issue.","Source and pinpoint":"O’Brien, printed p.139/PDF index 30","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S014"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C027","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C027","Precise bounded statement":"Rotkiske rejects a general FDCPA discovery rule but expressly reserves whether equitable doctrines are permitted and applicable.","Source and pinpoint":"Majority slip p.7/PDF index 8 n.3","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S016"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C028","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C028","Precise bounded statement":"LB 838’s identified §87-302 additions are future effective January 1, 2027 and were not operative on October 26, 2026.","Source and pinpoint":"§87-302; LB 838 §§27, 40","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S015"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C029","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C029","Precise bounded statement":"Current official §1692n preserves consistent, more-protective state law and displays currency through PL 119-124, October 15, 2026.","Source and pinpoint":"15 U.S.C. §1692n","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"operative_body_supported_exact_OLRC_currency_header_unreplicated","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance. GovInfo1692nbodyfreshsupported printed1642/PDF0; exactOLRCfetchfailed, researcherclaimed119-124Oct15header remainsattributed. No blanketunavailability/disproof.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S017"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C030","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C030","Precise bounded statement":"CART’s cited source is a 2021 voluntary-dispute-resolution announcement, not a 2026 adjudication or outcome report.","Source and pinpoint":"AG announcement dated Dec. 2, 2021","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S018"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C031","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C031","Precise bounded statement":"PASS-26’s NCPA enhancement, malicious-prosecution limitation, later-collection UDTPA clock, and overlap/election issues remain unresolved.","Source and pinpoint":"Prior explicit holds","Confidence or hold":"Preserved"},"coordinator_verification_status":"explicit_unresolved_substantive_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S013","S_NE-P29-S015","S_NE-P29-S019"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C032","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C032","Precise bounded statement":"A Collection Agency Act violation still does not expressly create automatic private damages, debt cancellation, dismissal, or judgment invalidity.","Source and pinpoint":"§§45-601–45-622","Confidence or hold":"High bounded textual conclusion"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"DatedP26/P29statutorytext only; no controllingjudicialabsenceholding/newprivate-actionsearch/automaticprivateaward,cancellation,dismissal,judgmentinvalidity finding. Otheralloriginalclaim/application/source/currentness/local/tribal/countryholds retained.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S001","S_NE-P29-S002","S_NE-P29-S003","S_NE-P29-S004"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"Exact fullP29source IDs in P34 replacement row; datedP26/P29statutory read scope only, no private-action-search attribution.","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_source_scope_issue":"PriorP32unsupportedS019private-actionsearchrole REMOVED byP34; impliedprivatecause remainsunresolved.","coordinator_crosslink_status":"P34_requested_source_scope_correction_resolved_with_limits","coordinator_source_scope_issue_resolved_at":"2026-10-26T19:17:00.000561+00:00"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P29-C033","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P29-C033","Precise bounded statement":"An invalid or quashed collection writ does not automatically establish privacy, abuse of process, malicious prosecution, IIED, or every other tort.","Source and pinpoint":"Corrected tort authorities","Confidence or hold":"High"},"coordinator_verification_status":"supported_with_explicit_application_or_dated_source_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"ExactsourceIDcrosslinks still require P32 annotation; no actualcriminal/client/bond/claim/injury/contract/record/calendar/tort/privateaward finding. No wholecomponent/state/parentacceptance.","coordinator_source_crosslinks":["S_NE-P29-S007","S_NE-P29-S008","S_NE-P29-S009","S_NE-P29-S010","S_NE-P29-S011","S_NE-P29-S012"],"coordinator_source_crosslink_context":"ExistingP29namespace mechanicallyexpandedfromP32table2,rawunchanged","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]"}],"sources":[{"source_id":"S_NE-P29-S001","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-601","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-106","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-601&utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P29-S001","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL":"Neb. Rev. Stat. §45-601, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-601; complete operative body. Neb. Rev. Stat. §28-106: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-106; Class III misdemeanor range.","Access/read bounds":"Fresh October 26, 2026 PT/UTC; current official HTML. (nebraskalegislature.gov)"},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_material_review_with_explicit_access_limits_residual_annotation_required","coordinator_access":"Dated actual NE26 primary bodies, review17:13:11.891662UTC","coordinator_limits":"45-601/28-106 text supports daily offense/any violation participation/mental-element omission without declaring strict liability.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P29-S002","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-602","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-602&utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P29-S002","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL":"Neb. Rev. Stat. §45-602, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-602; subsections (2)(a)–(c), (3).","Access/read bounds":"Fresh; current official HTML. (nebraskalegislature.gov)"},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_material_review_with_explicit_access_limits_residual_annotation_required","coordinator_access":"Dated actual NE26 statutory body at17:13:11.891662UTC","coordinator_limits":"45-602(2)(a)/(b)/(3) corrected pinpoints supported.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P29-S003","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-608","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-608&utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P29-S003","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL":"Neb. Rev. Stat. §45-608, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-608; complete body.","Access/read bounds":"Fresh; current official HTML. (nebraskalegislature.gov)"},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_material_review_with_explicit_access_limits_residual_annotation_required","coordinator_access":"Dated actual NE26 statutory body","coordinator_limits":"608 month-close45days/client agreement/allclaimants cap supported; no actual client/claim/bond.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P29-S004","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-612","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-613","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-614","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-615","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-616","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-617"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P29-S004","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL":"Discipline and appeal statutes: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-612; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-613; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-614; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-615; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-616; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-617.","Access/read bounds":"§§45-612, 613, 615, 616, 617 fresh; §45-614 dated PASS-26 reuse. Current official HTML."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_material_review_with_explicit_access_limits_residual_annotation_required","coordinator_access":"Dated actual NE26 full612/613/614/615/616/617 bodies","coordinator_limits":"Mandatory/discretionary/certified5days/continuedbusiness617 restored; customer-client complaint versus attributed rule wording remains held.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P29-S005","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-605.01","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-620","https://sos.nebraska.gov/licensing/collection-agencies","https://sos.nebraska.gov/licensing/collection-agencies?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P29-S005","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL":"Fee and NMLS statutes: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-605.01; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-620. Current SOS page: https://sos.nebraska.gov/licensing/collection-agencies.","Access/read bounds":"Fresh. SOS page directs new applicants to NMLS and says paper applications are no longer accepted. (sos.nebraska.gov)"},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_material_review_with_explicit_access_limits_residual_annotation_required","coordinator_access":"Dated NE26 actual605.01/620 and SOS currentpage checks","coordinator_limits":"NMLS versus legacy paper/fees qualified; no current fee quote/adoption clearance.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P29-S006","urls":["https://sos.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/Chapter-2.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P29-S006","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL":"Title 433, Chapter 2, Nebraska Secretary of State. https://sos.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/Chapter-2.pdf; material PDF indices 0, 6–7, 9–10, 12, 14, 24–25.","Access/read bounds":"Fresh screenshot inspection. Parsed text unavailable; pages unnumbered. No complete adoption/effective-history metadata visible. \nNebraska Secretary of State\n+7"},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_material_review_with_explicit_access_limits_residual_annotation_required","coordinator_access":"Fresh exact static433PDF reached26pages zeroextractabletext; one4page screenshotbatch indices6/9/12/14 referencesONLY (primary1/2)","coordinator_limits":"Researcher fresh pixel/clause assertions remain attributed; coordinator did NOT inspect image bytes or independently replicate clause text/adoption/current-fee status. No repeated unchanged fetch loop.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P29-S007","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003852PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P29-S007","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL":"McKinney v. Okoye, official Nebraska PDF. https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003852PUB; printed pp.888–889/PDF indices 8–9.","Access/read bounds":"Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion, 282 Neb. 880 (2011); fresh. \nNebraska.gov\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_material_review_with_explicit_access_limits_residual_annotation_required","coordinator_access":"Fresh actual officialMcKinney majority primary1/3","coordinator_limits":"282Neb880(2011), reasoning888/PDF8 and majority conclusion/reverse-remand889/PDF9 then dissent begins889/PDF9. Prior coordinator888boundary withdrawn by addendum; P29 correct.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P29-S008","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009424PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P29-S008","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL":"Bohling v. Tecumseh Poultry LLC, official Nebraska PDF. https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009424PUB; printed pp.131, 136–138/PDF indices 2, 7–9.","Access/read bounds":"Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion, 314 Neb. 129 (2023); fresh. \nNebraska.gov\n+3"},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_material_review_with_explicit_access_limits_residual_annotation_required","coordinator_access":"Dated actual NE26 officialBohling majority/header","coordinator_limits":"314Neb129(2023)SupremeCourt, sixelements recited but claimpreclusion disposition; not malicious-prosecution merits determination.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P29-S009","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011220PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P29-S009","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL":"Syring v. Archdiocese of Omaha, official Nebraska PDF. https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011220PUB; printed pp.208–210, 216/PDF indices 13–15, 21.","Access/read bounds":"Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion, 317 Neb. 195 (2024); fresh. \nNebraska.gov\n+3"},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_material_review_with_explicit_access_limits_residual_annotation_required","coordinator_access":"Dated actual NE26 officialSyring majority/header","coordinator_limits":"317Neb195(2024)SupremeCourt, outrageousness ground; severe-distress disputedissue expressly not decided.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P29-S010","urls":["https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/1998/1182-1.html"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P29-S010","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL":"Gordon v. Community First State Bank. https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/1998/1182-1.html; reported pp.351–354.","Access/read bounds":"Public reproduction of final Nebraska Supreme Court opinion, 255 Neb. 637 (1998); no PDF index. Freshly read. \nJustia Law\n+3"},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_material_review_with_explicit_access_limits_residual_annotation_required","coordinator_access":"Dated actual NE26 Gordon actual-opinion HTML","coordinator_limits":"Administrativeprocess/partialappellatejurisdiction preserved;351-354 refers N.W.2dreporter, explicit reporterlabel still needed.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P29-S011","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-201","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-203","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-206","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-207","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-208","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-209","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-210","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-211"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P29-S011","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL":"Privacy statutes: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-201; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-203; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-206; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-207; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-208; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-209; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-210; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=20-211.","Access/read bounds":"§§20-203 and 20-206–211 fresh; current official HTML."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_material_review_with_explicit_access_limits_residual_annotation_required","coordinator_access":"Dated actual NE26 complete privacy bodies","coordinator_limits":"203 and206-211 supported with privilege/assignment/survival/publication/judgment-bar/one-year limits; not omnibus remedy election.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P29-S012","urls":["https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2003/1206-1.html","https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/court-of-appeals/1995/a-94-118-8.html"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P29-S012","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL":"Whipps Land & Cattle Co. v. Level 3 Communications. https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2003/1206-1.html; reported pp.269–271. Sabrina W. v. Willman: https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/court-of-appeals/1995/a-94-118-8.html; reported pp.369–371.","Access/read bounds":"Public reproductions of actual published opinions; fresh; no PDF indices. \nJustia Law\n+2"},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_material_review_with_explicit_access_limits_residual_annotation_required","coordinator_access":"Fresh actualWhipps andSabrinaW HTML material bodies primary1/2/3","coordinator_limits":"Whipps intentional/highlyoffensive intrusion and no mere trespass; Sabrina privacy/generalmental/special/nominal damages distinguished from IIED. Pinpoint269-271 and369-371 needs explicitN.W.2dlabel; no fresh coordinatorpixels.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P29-S013","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1601","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1602","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1608","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1609","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1609.01","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1610","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1611","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1612","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1613","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1614","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1617"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P29-S013","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL":"NCPA full URL group: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1601; ...=59-1602; ...=59-1608; ...=59-1609; ...=59-1609.01; ...=59-1610; ...=59-1611; ...=59-1612; ...=59-1613; ...=59-1614; ...=59-1617.","Access/read bounds":"§§59-1612, 1614, 1617 fresh; others dated PASS-26 reuse. Current official HTML. (nebraskalegislature.gov)"},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_material_review_with_explicit_access_limits_residual_annotation_required","coordinator_access":"Dated actual NE26 NCPA complete bodies","coordinator_limits":"1617(2)carvebacks/1612relatedAGpendencyexceptions/1614publicpenalty supported. Source row still ellipses although G4 body has fullURLs; exactsourceclaimlinks pending.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_source_cell_annotation":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_url_expansion_status":"literalURLscorrectedWITHLIMITS;P26datedversusP29/P32freshstatuspreserved_notallfresh"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P29-S014","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010408PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P29-S014","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL":"O’Brien v. Cessna Aircraft Co. https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010408PUB; printed p.139/PDF index 30.","Access/read bounds":"Final Nebraska Supreme Court opinion, 298 Neb. 109 (2017); fresh relevant page. \nNebraska.gov"},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_material_review_with_explicit_access_limits_residual_annotation_required","coordinator_access":"Dated actual NE26 OBrien majority p139/PDF30","coordinator_limits":"Nebraska substantive law punitive rule qualified, no universalchoice-of-law displacement.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P29-S015","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-301","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-302","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.01","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.02","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.03","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.04","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.05","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.07","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.08","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.09","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.10","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.11","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.12","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-304","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/109/PDF/Slip/LB838.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P29-S015","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL":"UDTPA full URL group: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-301; ...=87-302; ...=87-303; ...=87-303.01; ...=87-303.02; ...=87-303.03; ...=87-303.04; ...=87-303.05; ...=87-303.07; ...=87-303.08; ...=87-303.09; ...=87-303.10; ...=87-303.11; ...=87-303.12; ...=87-304. LB 838: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/109/PDF/Slip/LB838.pdf.","Access/read bounds":"§§87-302, 303.02, 303.12 and LB 838 fresh; other sections dated PASS-26 reuse. LB 838 relevant additions future effective Jan. 1, 2027. (nebraskalegislature.gov)"},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_material_review_with_explicit_access_limits_residual_annotation_required","coordinator_access":"Dated actual NE26 UDTPA/LB838 operative bodies","coordinator_limits":"14dayinitialfreeze/seven-day303.12/certifiedfirstmail/notdismissal/AGvacate-modify andJan1,2027futureoperative metadata supported. Source row still ellipses although G4 bodyfullURLs.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_source_cell_annotation":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_url_expansion_status":"literalURLscorrectedWITHLIMITS;P26datedversusP29/P32freshstatuspreserved_notallfresh"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P29-S016","urls":["https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-328_pm02.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P29-S016","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL":"Rotkiske v. Klemm. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-328_pm02.pdf; majority slip p.7/PDF index 8 n.3.","Access/read bounds":"Final U.S. Supreme Court opinion; fresh relevant page. \nSupreme Court of the United States"},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_material_review_with_explicit_access_limits_residual_annotation_required","coordinator_access":"Dated actual NE26 officialRotkiske majority slip7/PDF8n3","coordinator_limits":"Occurrence rule and reservedWHETHER equitable doctrines permitted/applicable supported, not affirmativeuniversalavailability.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P29-S017","urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692a/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692e/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692f/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692k/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692l/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692n/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692n/?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P29-S017","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL":"FDCPA full URL group: https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692a/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692e/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692f/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692k/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692l/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1692n/.","Access/read bounds":"§1692n fresh successful access; all display through PL 119-124, Oct. 15, 2026. Other bodies were read in PASS-26. (uscode.house.gov)"},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_material_review_with_explicit_access_limits_residual_annotation_required","coordinator_access":"Fresh exactOLRC1692n route failed primary1; alternateofficialGovInfo1692n actualoperative body succeeded primary4 at18:00:06UTC","coordinator_limits":"GovInfo printed1642/PDF0 actual1692n confirmsconsistentmoreprotectivestate-law rule. No exactOLRC119-124Oct15header replicated; researcherclaimedaccess stays attributed, notdisproved. Othera/e/f/k/l actualbody/header checks documented datedNE26reuse. No GovInfoeditionyear inferred.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P29-S018","urls":["https://ago.nebraska.gov/news/attorney-general-announces-consumer-affairs-response-team","https://ago.nebraska.gov/news/attorney-general-announces-consumer-affairs-response-team?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P29-S018","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL":"Nebraska AG CART announcement. https://ago.nebraska.gov/news/attorney-general-announces-consumer-affairs-response-team.","Access/read bounds":"Historical announcement posted Dec. 2, 2021; not 2026 outcome data. Freshly checked. (ago.nebraska.gov)"},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_material_review_with_explicit_access_limits_residual_annotation_required","coordinator_access":"Dated actual NE26 AG2021CARTannouncement","coordinator_limits":"HistoricalvoluntaryADRannouncement not2026adjudication/outcome evidence.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P29-S019","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-601"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P29-S019","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL":"Bounded official searches for §45-601 culpability and current malicious-prosecution limitations: Nebraska appellate repository https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/; Nebraska Legislature statutes https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=45-601.","Access/read bounds":"Search-only; no controlling additional authority located. Not a complete commercial citator, unpublished-order, legislative-history, or criminal-docket search."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_material_review_with_explicit_access_limits_residual_annotation_required","coordinator_access":"Researcher boundedsearch asattributed; dated NE26 construction holds retained","coordinator_limits":"Researcher-attributedboundedsearch ONLYculpability/modernmalicious-prosecutionperiod, notproofabsence/fullcitator. P34removedthissourcefromC032support; no private-actionsearch isattributed. Originalresearcherrecordunchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_source_scope_correction_resolved_at":"2026-10-26T19:17:00.000561+00:00"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P29-S020","urls":["https://sos.nebraska.gov/licensing/collection-agencies","https://sos.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/Chapter-2.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P29-S020","Source, exact material read, status, and full URL":"Collection-agency roster and forms status. Current SOS page: https://sos.nebraska.gov/licensing/collection-agencies; static rules/forms PDF: https://sos.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/Chapter-2.pdf.","Access/read bounds":"Current NMLS page fresh. July 9, 2026 roster and expiry observations remain attributed to P26 researcher; no named-provider or fresh roster verification."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_material_review_with_explicit_access_limits_residual_annotation_required","coordinator_access":"Dated actual NE26 SOS currentNMLS/page/form observations; exact433limited asabove","coordinator_limits":"July9roster/expiry remains researcherattributed; no entity or freshrosterlookup; adoption/currentfees held.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"}],"coverage":[{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"§45-601 express mental element","Status":"Answered as absent from text","New claims":"C001","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Controlling criminal-construction authority"},"topic":"§45-601 express mental element","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Exact criminal culpability","Status":"Unresolved","New claims":"C001","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Nebraska appellate decision, charging authority, or applicable general culpability statute"},"topic":"Exact criminal culpability","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Daily offense unit","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C001","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual operating dates and prosecution"},"topic":"Daily offense unit","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Officer/agent scope","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C002","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Personal participation and culpability"},"topic":"Officer/agent scope","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"§45-602 subsection pinpoints","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C003","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual actor facts"},"topic":"§45-602 subsection pinpoints","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Bond month-close trigger","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C004","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual month and ledger"},"topic":"Bond month-close trigger","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Bond claimant and agreement predicates","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C005","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Agreement, accounting, claimant status"},"topic":"Bond claimant and agreement predicates","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Aggregate bond ceiling","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C005","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"All qualifying claims"},"topic":"Aggregate bond ceiling","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"§45-612 mandatory grounds","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C006","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual conviction, judgment, bond, office, or status facts"},"topic":"§45-612 mandatory grounds","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"§45-615 discretionary discipline","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C006, C008","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Hearing record and findings"},"topic":"§45-615 discretionary discipline","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"§45-613 20-day citation","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C007","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual service"},"topic":"§45-613 20-day citation","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Statute/rule complaint wording conflict","Status":"Unresolved","New claims":"C007","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Current Board interpretation or rulemaking history"},"topic":"Statute/rule complaint wording conflict","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Findings mailed within five days","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C008","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual issuance and mailing"},"topic":"Findings mailed within five days","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"APA appeal versus continued business","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C009","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual appeal"},"topic":"APA appeal versus continued business","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Title 433 FDCPA-reference effect","Status":"Answered as administrative only","New claims":"C010","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"None"},"topic":"Title 433 FDCPA-reference effect","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Title 433 termination/records duties","Status":"Answered as administrative/proof duties","New claims":"C011","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual rule violation and proceeding"},"topic":"Title 433 termination/records duties","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Title 433 adoption/effective history","Status":"Unresolved","New claims":"C012","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Official adoption orders or authenticated rule history"},"topic":"Title 433 adoption/effective history","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Current fee procedure","Status":"Answered partially","New claims":"C012","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Current NMLS checklist and exact transaction fees"},"topic":"Current fee procedure","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"McKinney identity and majority holding","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C013–C014","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"None"},"topic":"McKinney identity and majority holding","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Bohling identity and posture","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C015","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"None"},"topic":"Bohling identity and posture","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Syring identity and IIED holding","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C016","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"None"},"topic":"Syring identity and IIED holding","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Gordon posture and abuse-of-process rule","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C017","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual judicial process and postissuance act"},"topic":"Gordon posture and abuse-of-process rule","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Privacy intent/offensiveness","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C018","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual contact content and circumstances"},"topic":"Privacy intent/offensiveness","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Privacy damages","Status":"Answered generally","New claims":"C019","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual injury proof"},"topic":"Privacy damages","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Privacy privileges and procedural limits","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C020","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Exact publication, defendant, judgment, and death facts"},"topic":"Privacy privileges and procedural limits","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"NCPA regulatory carvebacks","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C021","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual regulator and challenged conduct"},"topic":"NCPA regulatory carvebacks","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"NCPA limitation suspension","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C022","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual AG action, related matter, and pendency"},"topic":"NCPA limitation suspension","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"NCPA public penalty locator","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C023","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Proven statutory units and court finding"},"topic":"NCPA public penalty locator","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"UDTPA connected-asset freeze","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C024","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"AG reasonable cause and district-court order"},"topic":"UDTPA connected-asset freeze","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"UDTPA AG mailing","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C025","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual filing and mailing events"},"topic":"UDTPA AG mailing","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Nebraska punitive-damages scope","Status":"Answered narrowly","New claims":"C026","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Choice-of-law determination"},"topic":"Nebraska punitive-damages scope","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Rotkiske occurrence clock","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C027","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual violation date"},"topic":"Rotkiske occurrence clock","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"FDCPA equitable doctrine","Status":"Unresolved/reserved","New claims":"C027","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Later controlling authority and case-specific facts"},"topic":"FDCPA equitable doctrine","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"LB 838 future-effective clauses","Status":"Answered as nonoperative on Oct. 26, 2026","New claims":"C028","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Jan. 1, 2027 or later status"},"topic":"LB 838 future-effective clauses","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"§1692n body/current header","Status":"Answered prospectively","New claims":"C029","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"None for current source; earlier failure remains historical"},"topic":"§1692n body/current header","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"CART source date and effect","Status":"Answered","New claims":"C030","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Current individual complaint record, if ever authorized"},"topic":"CART source date and effect","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"§59-1609 enhanced-award construction","Status":"Preserved HOLD","New claims":"C031","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Controlling construction"},"topic":"§59-1609 enhanced-award construction","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Modern malicious-prosecution limitations","Status":"Preserved HOLD","New claims":"C031","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Controlling current authority"},"topic":"Modern malicious-prosecution limitations","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"UDTPA later-collection purchase clock","Status":"Preserved HOLD","New claims":"C031","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Controlling construction"},"topic":"UDTPA later-collection purchase clock","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Overlap/election/duplicate recovery","Status":"Preserved HOLD","New claims":"C031","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual pleadings, verdict, and judgment"},"topic":"Overlap/election/duplicate recovery","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Collection Act implied private action","Status":"Preserved unresolved","New claims":"C032","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Controlling appellate authority or legislative history"},"topic":"Collection Act implied private action","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Wrongful-process omnibus tort theory","Status":"Rejected as automatic; route-specific","New claims":"C033","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Actual process, intent, termination, privilege, and injury"},"topic":"Wrongful-process omnibus tort theory","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Current provider/license status","Status":"Not researched","New claims":"—","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Named-provider lookup prohibited"},"topic":"Current provider/license status","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Sector, local, tribal, and foreign-country law","Status":"Excluded","New claims":"—","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Separate assignments"},"topic":"Sector, local, tribal, and foreign-country law","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"},{"researcher_record":{"Requested subissue":"Whole Nebraska/component/parent/A066 acceptance","Status":"Not granted","New claims":"—","Exact remaining evidence or next action":"Remaining passes and coordinator review"},"topic":"Whole Nebraska/component/parent/A066 acceptance","status":"not_yet_reviewed","coordinator_status":"awaiting_same_coordinator_review","is_not_acceptance":true,"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_acceptance":"bounded_substantive_corrections_supported_with_limits_source_mapping_access_annotation_pending"}],"annotations":{},"corrections":[],"resolved_corrections":[],"review_history":[]}