{"meta":{"key":"s_ne--pass-17","task":"S_NE","title":"SNE Nebraska arbitration award-to-judgment, confirmation, vacatur, modification, appeal, and stay boundaries","parent_title":"Nebraska debt and debt relief law","edition":"pass-17","path":"/research/s_ne--pass-17/","kind":"split_pass","category":"state","role":"state","area_numbers":[66],"groups":["collections"],"date":"2026-10-26","tables":8,"claims":48,"sources":27,"review_status":"seven_bounded_signature_venue_FAAwording_filing_and_traceability_findings_pending_UNSENT","review_complete":true,"sha256":"3bc531cf4c2d606eb8c60394e1c79c0fe1b8b3bf11ace519458b5abd4de10de0","headings":["Focused determination","B1. Nebraska award requirements","B2. Nebraska arbitrator correction or clarification","B3. AAA Consumer Rules, if actually incorporated","B4. JAMS rules, if actually incorporated","B5. No verified tolling from private correction request","C1. Nebraska UAA confirmation","C2. Mandatory rather than discretionary confirmation","C3. Papers needed under Nebraska law","C4. FAA confirmation","C5. FAA §9’s one-year language in the Eighth Circuit","C6. Confirmation versus an untimely modification request","D1. Exhaustive statutory matrix","D2. Ninety-day timing","D3. Formation challenge after the award","D4. Evident partiality","D5. Refusal to hear evidence and fair-hearing prejudice","D6. Exceeding powers","D7. Legal or factual error and manifest disregard","D8. Narrow UAA public-policy doctrine","D9. Rehearing after vacatur","E1. Statutory grounds","E2. “Evident” miscalculation","E3. Form versus merits","F1. FAA §10 grounds","F2. FAA §11 grounds","F3. Exclusive grounds","F4. Excess of powers and legal error","F5. Fair-hearing misconduct","F6. Formation or arbitrability after award","F7. Three-month service requirement","F8. Karo and Seldin after Jules","F9. Confirmation cannot revive an expired review request","G1. Nebraska computation","G2. Federal computation","H1. Nebraska appealability","H2. Nebraska appeal period","H3. Nebraska appeal does not automatically stay","H4. FAA appealability","H5. FAA stay of award enforcement","Example 1 — Nebraska confirmation after review period expires","Example 2 — Postaward formation objection","Preserved branch","Waived branch","Example 3 — Nebraska fraud-discovery branch","Example 4 — Alleged legal error versus statutory ground","Example 5 — Evident arithmetic correction versus merits rewrite","Example 6 — Confirmation motion does not extend opponent’s review period","Example 7 — Award emailed, but governing delivery rule unknown","Example 8 — AAA or JAMS correction request does not safely postpone court review","Example 9 — Freestanding federal motion versus retained federal jurisdiction","Freestanding application","Existing stayed federal case","Example 10 — Nebraska confirmation judgment, appeal, and stay","Freshly read in PASS-17","Numerical self-check","Currentness and status","Bounded unresolved searches","Not read or performed"],"generation_provenance":{"actual_route":"regular_chat_adaptive_models","actual_model":"GPT-5.6 Sol","actual_mode":"Pro","provenance_limit":"Actual documented capture labels only; missing labels remain unknown. No preferred setting is inferred as actual execution."},"public_id":"S_NE/pass-17","facets":{"geography":["us","us-ne"],"debt_type":[],"stage":["judgment","appeal"],"subject":["appeals","arbitration-adr"]},"scope":"Ordinary Nebraska arbitration award confirmation/vacatur/modification/correction and necessary judgment/appeal/stay boundary","pending_corrections":7},"markdown":"# S_NE PASS-17 — Nebraska arbitration award-to-judgment, confirmation, vacatur, modification, appeal, and stay boundaries\n\n**Actual fresh research date:** October 26, 2026, Pacific / October 26, 2026 UTC\n**Mode/model:** Regular Chat; GPT-5.6 Sol Pro\n**Review status:** Same-coordinator continuation, **not independent review**.\n\nThis pass is limited to the treatment of an arbitration award after issuance: award form and delivery, arbitrator correction, judicial confirmation, vacatur, modification or correction, conversion to judgment, limited appealability, and the necessary stay or security boundaries.\n\nPASS-08 through PASS-12, PASS-14, PASS-15, and PASS-16 remain saved but unreviewed or awaiting coordinator review. Their new conclusions are not accepted premises. Necessary formation and jurisdiction points were freshly read only where they control postaward review.\n\nActual arbitration agreement, governing law, FAA-commerce facts, administrator and rule version, award, delivery record, notice, service, court, motion dates, assignment, account, and party status remain unknown.\n\n## Focused determination\n\nNebraska and federal award review use similar but noninterchangeable systems.\n\nUnder the **Nebraska Uniform Arbitration Act**:\n\n- the award must be written, signed by the participating arbitrators, and delivered personally, by registered or certified mail, or by another method agreed by the parties;\n- a party ordinarily has **20 days after delivery** to ask the arbitrators to clarify or correct limited errors;\n- an application to vacate or judicially modify or correct generally must be made within **90 days after delivery**;\n- the fraud, corruption, or undue-means branch instead permits application within 90 days after the ground was known or should have been known;\n- confirmation is mandatory unless timely vacatur or modification grounds are urged;\n- the court must confirm within **60 days after the confirmation application**; and\n- only a Nebraska **district court** is the statutory UAA “court.” [Nebraska Legislature+5](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609)\n\nUnder the **Federal Arbitration Act**:\n\n- §§10 and 11 contain the exclusive statutory vacatur and modification grounds;\n- notice of a motion to vacate, modify, or correct must be **served** within three months after the award is filed or delivered;\n- the statute has no separate fraud-discovery extension comparable to Nebraska’s UAA;\n- §9 confirmation presupposes an agreement that judgment may be entered on the award;\n- the court must confirm unless §§10 or 11 apply; and\n- the FAA itself does not create federal subject-matter jurisdiction. A freestanding §§9–10 application needs an independent federal jurisdictional basis, while a federal court that already had original jurisdiction and stayed the underlying action under FAA §3 retains jurisdiction over the resulting postaward motions. [U.S. Code+6](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/)\n\nJudicial review is exceptionally narrow under either system. A court does not rehear the contract dispute, recalculate the debt because it believes the arbitrator made a better-or-worse choice, or vacate merely for an error of Nebraska or federal law. Nebraska rejects “manifest disregard” as an independent UAA ground, and the FAA’s §§10–11 categories are exclusive. An arbitrator’s serious legal error is still not enough if the arbitrator was arguably interpreting the parties’ agreement rather than abandoning it. [Nebraska.gov+3](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008009PUB)\n\nAn arbitration award is not yet an ordinary Nebraska court judgment. Once a court confirms, modifies, or corrects it, judgment is entered and has the same force as another judgment. Confirmation does not itself cause garnishment, asset seizure, lien attachment, credit-report deletion, a consumer refund, license discipline, or satisfaction of the judgment. Those consequences require their own legal predicates and remain later components. [Nebraska Legislature+1](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2615)\n\n# A. Governing-route matrix\n\n| Question | Nebraska UAA route | FAA route | Exact hold |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **Which law governs?** | Written arbitration agreement within the Nebraska UAA and not displaced by controlling federal law | Written clause in a maritime transaction or contract involving interstate commerce, subject to FAA exclusions | Actual contract, choice-of-law clause, commerce, exclusions, and parties remain unknown |\n| **Which court?** | Nebraska **district court**; county court lacks UAA confirmation jurisdiction | Federal court identified by §9 only if independent federal jurisdiction exists; state courts may apply FAA substantive law | Exact state FAA procedural route and personal jurisdiction depend on the pending case and service |\n| **Award form** | Written and signed by participating arbitrators | FAA §§9–13 do not prescribe the same detailed award form; contract and administrator rules matter | Administrator and incorporated rule version unknown |\n| **Award delivery** | Personal, registered or certified mail, or method stated in agreement | §12 uses award “filed or delivered”; applicable contract and administrator rules can affect delivery facts | Email alone cannot be classified without the agreement and rule set |\n| **Arbitrator correction** | Application within 20 days after delivery; limited correction or clarification | No general FAA arbitrator-correction period in §§9–13; private rules and contract may provide one | A private correction request is not shown to extend the statutory court-review period |\n| **Court confirmation** | Mandatory unless timely vacatur/modification grounds urged; court acts within 60 days after application | Mandatory under §9 unless §§10–11 apply | Nebraska UAA text states no outer confirmation-application period; FAA one-year issue has Eighth Circuit tension |\n| **Vacatur period** | 90 days after delivery; fraud/corruption/undue means 90 days from known or reasonably knowable ground | Notice must be served within 3 months after award filed or delivered | Actual date and valid method of delivery are held |\n| **Modification period** | 90 days after delivery | Notice must be served within 3 months under §12 | No automatic extension from pending confirmation |\n| **Merits review** | No ordinary legal or factual appeal; extremely narrow review | §§10–11 exclusive; no ordinary merits appeal | Claimed “bad result” must fit an actual statutory ground |\n| **Award to judgment** | Order confirming/modifying/correcting followed by judgment under §25-2615 | Papers filed under §13; judgment has force of federal district-court judgment | Enforcement remains separate |\n| **Appeal** | §25-2620 plus Nebraska final-order law; state appeal normally within 30 days after entry of appealable order | FAA §16 controls federal appealability; ordinary federal notice-of-appeal timing not researched here | State and federal appeal routes cannot be mixed |\n| **Stay** | Appeal alone does not stay a Nebraska judgment; supersedeas statute applies | FAA §12 permits a court to stay enforcement on just terms; federal postjudgment stay rules remain separate | Actual bond/security and judgment amount remain unknown |\n\nThe state route is controlled principally by §§25-2609 through 25-2620; the federal route principally by 9 U.S.C. §§9 through 13 and 16. [Nebraska Legislature+15](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609)\n\n# B. Award issuance, form, delivery, and arbitrator correction\n\n## B1. Nebraska award requirements\n\nNebraska §25-2609 requires the award to be:\n\n- in writing;\n- signed by the arbitrators who join in the award; and\n- delivered to each party personally, by registered or certified mail, or as provided in the agreement.\n\nThe award must be made within the time fixed by the arbitration agreement. If the agreement supplies no time, the court may order a deadline no later than 30 days after the hearing. The parties may extend the time in writing. A party waives an objection that the award was late unless it notifies the arbitrators before delivery of the award. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609)\n\nA missing signature can be an imperfection in form rather than a merits defect when the panel decision is otherwise established. That does not mean every signature problem is immaterial; panel composition, who participated, and whether the defect affects the award’s substance remain relevant. [Nebraska Legislature+1](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609)\n\n## B2. Nebraska arbitrator correction or clarification\n\nWithin 20 days after delivery, a party may apply to the arbitrators to:\n\n- correct an evident miscalculation;\n- correct an evident mistake in a person, thing, or property description;\n- correct an imperfection in form not affecting the merits; or\n- clarify the award.\n\nWritten notice must be given promptly to the opposing party, which has ten days from notice to submit objections. A court considering a pending confirmation, vacatur, or modification application may submit the award back to the arbitrators for this limited work. The corrected award remains subject to judicial review under §§25-2612 through 25-2614. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2610)\n\nClarification is not an invitation to reopen the merits. Nebraska appellate authority treats remand for clarification as exceptional. If the award’s intent can be ascertained from the award and record, the court should interpret and confirm it rather than ask the arbitrator to decide the merits again. Remand is appropriate only where the ambiguity is so substantial that the award’s meaning or intent cannot be resolved. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewOpinion?docId=N00008357PUB)\n\n## B3. AAA Consumer Rules, if actually incorporated\n\nThe current AAA Consumer Arbitration Rules are amended and effective May 1, 2025. They provide:\n\n- an award ordinarily within 30 calendar days after hearing closure, or 14 days in a documents-only proceeding, absent party agreement, law, or unusual circumstances;\n- a written award signed by a majority of the arbitrators, including electronic or digital signatures;\n- a brief written explanation unless all parties agree otherwise;\n- delivery through the same communications method AAA used during the case, including electronic transmission where permitted; and\n- a 20-calendar-day request period for clerical, typographical, technical, computational correction, or clarification, with no power to redetermine the merits and ten days for opposition.\n\nIf applicable law provides another procedural period, AAA R-49 says the applicable-law procedure controls. These are private rules, not Nebraska statutes, and apply only if the actual contract and AAA administration make them operative. [American Arbitration Association+2](https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf)\n\n## B4. JAMS rules, if actually incorporated\n\nThe JAMS Comprehensive Rules currently published as effective June 1, 2021 generally require:\n\n- a final or partial final award within 30 calendar days after hearing closure or final written submissions, subject to agreement or good cause;\n- a written and signed disposition of each claim;\n- concise written reasons unless all parties agree otherwise;\n- service of the award on the parties;\n- a correction request within seven calendar days after service;\n- seven days for opposition;\n- correction of computational, typographical, or similar errors rather than a merits redetermination; and\n- private-rule finality 14 days after service if no correction is requested, or on service of the corrected award.\n\nJAMS Rule 25 states that judicial enforcement, confirmation, modification, or vacatur is governed by the FAA or applicable state law. Its private “finality” rule does not conclusively determine whether Nebraska’s 90-day delivery clock or the FAA’s three-month filed-or-delivered clock began earlier. That issue remains dependent on the governing law, contract, and actual service record. [JAMS+1](https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration)\n\n## B5. No verified tolling from private correction request\n\nNeither Nebraska §§25-2610, 25-2613, and 25-2614 nor FAA §12 states that a request to AAA, JAMS, or the arbitrator automatically tolls or restarts the judicial vacatur or modification window. A party should not assume that a pending correction request postpones the Nebraska 90-day or FAA three-month deadline without a controlling statute, court order, or agreement given legal effect. This pass located no controlling Nebraska or Eighth Circuit ordinary consumer-debt decision establishing such tolling. [Nebraska Legislature+3](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2610)\n\n# C. Confirmation and entry of judgment\n\n## C1. Nebraska UAA confirmation\n\nA party applies by motion. Unless the parties agreed otherwise, notice of an **initial** UAA application must be served in the same manner as a summons. The statutory UAA court is a Nebraska district court. Venue is ordinarily:\n\n- the county specified in the agreement for the arbitration hearing;\n- the county where the hearing occurred;\n- the county where the adverse party resides or has a place of business if no controlling hearing location exists; or\n- any Nebraska county if the adverse party has no Nebraska residence or business.\n\nWithin 60 days after the confirmation application, the district court shall confirm unless timely vacatur, modification, or correction grounds are urged. [Nebraska Legislature+3](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2612)\n\nNebraska’s UAA does not state an outer period in §25-2612 for filing a confirmation application. That does not establish that confirmation is forever immune from every other defense, limitation, laches doctrine, satisfaction issue, or jurisdictional objection. No complete alternative-limitations audit was conducted in this pass.\n\nCounty court does not have Nebraska UAA confirmation jurisdiction. In *MBNA America Bank v. Hansen*, a consumer-credit award filed in county court was dismissed because §25-2618 commits UAA confirmation jurisdiction to district court. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00000486PUB)\n\n## C2. Mandatory rather than discretionary confirmation\n\nOnce the prerequisites are met and no timely review ground is established, confirmation is mandatory. A court cannot use confirmation to rehear the merits, alter the arbitrator’s reasoning, or replace the award with relief the judge prefers. [Nebraska Legislature+2](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2612)\n\nNebraska also permits confirmation after the award has been paid. In *Drummond v. State Farm*, the Supreme Court rejected the contention that full payment necessarily made confirmation moot and directed the district court to apply the statute’s mandatory language. Confirmation does not authorize duplicate recovery; payment and judgment satisfaction remain distinct questions. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003559PUB)\n\n## C3. Papers needed under Nebraska law\n\nUnlike FAA §13, the Nebraska UAA does not enumerate one universal document packet for confirmation. The applicant must, at minimum, establish:\n\n- an arbitration agreement within the UAA;\n- the district court’s jurisdiction and proper venue;\n- the award;\n- its delivery;\n- entitlement to invoke the award;\n- compliance with motion and service requirements; and\n- the absence or failure of timely vacatur or modification grounds.\n\nThe actual agreement, award, delivery proof, party identities, assignment, correction history, and notices remain unknown.\n\n## C4. FAA confirmation\n\nFAA §9 applies when the parties agreed that judgment may be entered on the award. If the agreement specifies a court, application may be made there subject to jurisdiction. If no court is specified, §9 identifies a United States court in the district where the award was made. The court must confirm unless the award is vacated, modified, or corrected under §§10 or 11. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/)\n\nFAA §13 requires the moving party to file:\n\n- the arbitration agreement;\n- any papers relating to the appointment of the arbitrator or umpire;\n- any written extension of the award period;\n- the award;\n- notices, affidavits, or other papers used on the confirmation or review application; and\n- each court order.\n\nThe resulting judgment is docketed and has the same force and effect as another federal district-court judgment. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/)\n\n## C5. FAA §9’s one-year language in the Eighth Circuit\n\nFAA §9 says a party “may” apply within one year after the award. The Eighth Circuit squarely held in *Val-U Construction v. Rosebud Sioux Tribe* that the one-year language is permissive rather than a statute of limitations and allowed confirmation after one year. [Justia Law+1](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/146/573/513898/)\n\nA later Eighth Circuit opinion, *RGA Reinsurance v. Ulico*, stated that a party “must” file within one year, but the petition there was timely and the court did not confront or overrule *Val-U*’s direct holding. The two descriptions are in tension. *Val-U* remains the directly reasoned Eighth Circuit holding on the one-year question, but this pass does not claim that every later petition is immune from other limitation, laches, jurisdictional, or contractual defenses. [U.S. Court of Appeals+2](https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/04/01/024036P.pdf)\n\n## C6. Confirmation versus an untimely modification request\n\nA party cannot avoid the review deadline by labeling a substantive change “confirmation.” A court may carry out a ministerial calculation clearly contemplated by an unambiguous award, but it may not use confirmation to add relief, recalculate the merits, or resolve an ambiguity that would require substantive arbitral judgment. [U.S. Court of Appeals+2](https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/04/01/024036P.pdf)\n\nIn *Palagi*, no timely FAA vacatur or modification motion had been filed. The Nebraska Supreme Court held that the district court was required to confirm and could not use the confirmation proceeding to consider belated challenges to the underlying agreement’s validity or legality. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011561PUB)\n\n# D. Nebraska UAA vacatur grounds\n\n## D1. Exhaustive statutory matrix\n\n| Ground | Exact statutory predicate | Burden and practical limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **Corruption, fraud, or undue means** | Award was procured by one of those means | Applicant must connect the misconduct to procurement of the award; timing uses discovery branch |\n| **Evident partiality by neutral arbitrator** | Neutral arbitrator showed evident partiality | Nebraska uses an objective standard; mere adverse rulings or speculative relationships are insufficient |\n| **Corruption of an arbitrator** | Corruption by an arbitrator | Actual proof required |\n| **Misconduct prejudicing rights** | Arbitrator misconduct substantially prejudiced a party | Prejudice is essential |\n| **Exceeded powers** | Arbitrator exceeded contractually delegated authority | Serious legal error is insufficient if arbitrator arguably interpreted the contract |\n| **Refusal to postpone** | Sufficient cause existed and refusal substantially prejudiced rights | Requires preserved request, sufficient cause, and prejudice |\n| **Refusal to hear material evidence** | Material evidence was improperly excluded and rights substantially prejudiced | Not every evidentiary ruling qualifies |\n| **Other contrary hearing conduct** | Hearing violated §25-2606 and substantially prejudiced rights | Fair-hearing inquiry, not a trial-rules appeal |\n| **No arbitration agreement** | No agreement existed, issue was not already adversely determined under §25-2603, and party did not participate without objection | A participant who proceeded without objection can lose this branch |\n| **Disqualified arbitrator failed to withdraw** | Timely demand under §25-2604.01 and statutory disqualification | Requires timely demand before proceedings and qualifying relationship or judicial ground |\n\nNebraska §25-2613 supplies these grounds and states that the arbitrator’s grant of relief unavailable in court is not itself a vacatur ground. [Nebraska Legislature+2](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613)\n\n## D2. Ninety-day timing\n\nA Nebraska UAA application to vacate must generally be made within 90 days after the award is delivered. For corruption, fraud, or undue means, the application must be made within 90 days after the ground was known or should have been known. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613)\n\nThis discovery branch is ground-specific. It does not postpone the deadline for:\n\n- legal error;\n- excess-of-powers arguments known from the award;\n- evident miscalculation;\n- disagreement with damages;\n- refusal to hear evidence known during the hearing;\n- or an ordinary no-agreement objection.\n\n## D3. Formation challenge after the award\n\nNebraska’s no-agreement vacatur ground is available only if:\n\n1. no arbitration agreement existed;\n2. the issue was not previously adversely determined in a §25-2603 proceeding; and\n3. the party did not participate in the arbitration hearing without objection.\n\nA party that timely and explicitly objects to arbitrability before participating can preserve the issue. A party that proceeds through the merits without objection risks losing it. [Nebraska Legislature+1](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613)\n\n## D4. Evident partiality\n\nNebraska asks whether a reasonable person would have to conclude that partiality existed. The standard does not turn every nondisclosure, social connection, prior professional contact, or adverse ruling into evident partiality. The actual relationship, disclosure, materiality, timing, and objection record are necessary. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008009PUB)\n\n## D5. Refusal to hear evidence and fair-hearing prejudice\n\nA party seeking vacatur for refusal to hear material evidence must show more than an incorrect evidentiary ruling. It must demonstrate misconduct and substantial prejudice—effectively, deprivation of a fair hearing. In *Lund-Ross*, the Court of Appeals found prejudicial misconduct where the arbitrator permitted a late counterclaim but denied the opposing party a fair opportunity to present responsive evidence. The court treated partial vacatur as possible where the affected portion was severable. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011227PUB)\n\n## D6. Exceeding powers\n\nThe question is not whether the arbitrator interpreted the contract correctly. It is whether the arbitrator was arguably construing the contract and acting within the submitted dispute. Vacatur is reserved for an award reflecting the arbitrator’s own conception of justice rather than a contractual interpretation. The applicant bears a heavy burden. [Nebraska.gov+1](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008009PUB)\n\n## D7. Legal or factual error and manifest disregard\n\nNebraska courts do not vacate a UAA award merely because an arbitrator committed:\n\n- an error of law;\n- an error of fact;\n- a serious legal error;\n- a mistaken damages calculation that is not facially evident; or\n- “manifest disregard” as an extra-statutory general ground.\n\nThe court’s review is not a substitute appeal on the merits. [Nebraska.gov+1](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008009PUB)\n\n## D8. Narrow UAA public-policy doctrine\n\n*State v. Henderson* recognizes a narrow Nebraska UAA refusal-to-enforce doctrine where an award violates an explicit, well-defined, and dominant public policy derived from law and legal precedent rather than generalized public interests. *Seldin* later confined that doctrine to the Nebraska UAA context and expressly rejected public policy as a FAA ground. [Nebraska.gov+1](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003201PUB)\n\nThis narrow doctrine does not make every disputed fee, license issue, consumer statute, or alleged contract illegality a public-policy vacatur ground. The policy must meet the controlling standard and must be applied without relitigating facts entrusted to the arbitrator.\n\n## D9. Rehearing after vacatur\n\nWhere appropriate, the court may order a rehearing before new arbitrators or the original arbitrators, depending on the vacatur ground. Any contractual award deadline runs from the rehearing order. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613)\n\n# E. Nebraska judicial modification or correction\n\n## E1. Statutory grounds\n\nA Nebraska district court may modify or correct an award only when:\n\n1. there is an evident miscalculation of figures;\n2. there is an evident mistake in the description of a person, thing, or property;\n3. the arbitrators decided a matter not submitted and the correction does not affect the merits of submitted issues; or\n4. the award contains an imperfection in form not affecting the merits.\n\nThe application must be made within 90 days after delivery. It may be joined with an alternative vacatur request. If the ground is proved, the court modifies or corrects the award to effect the arbitrators’ intent and confirms it as modified; otherwise it confirms the award. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2614)\n\n## E2. “Evident” miscalculation\n\nAn evident miscalculation must be obvious and unambiguous from the award or incorporated figures. Judicial correction is not available merely because one party argues that the arbitrator should have valued evidence differently, used another rate, or selected a different component amount. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2614)\n\n## E3. Form versus merits\n\nA missing signature or similar formal defect may be correctable when it does not affect the panel’s actual decision. A modification cannot change who prevailed, supply an omitted merits determination, revisit credibility, or rewrite relief based on the court’s view of the law. [Nebraska Legislature+2](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609)\n\n# F. FAA vacatur and modification\n\n## F1. FAA §10 grounds\n\nFAA §10 permits vacatur where:\n\n1. the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means;\n2. there was evident partiality or corruption in the arbitrators;\n3. the arbitrators were guilty of misconduct in refusing a sufficient postponement, refusing to hear material evidence, or otherwise prejudicing a party’s rights; or\n4. the arbitrators exceeded their powers or so imperfectly executed them that no mutual, final, and definite award was made.\n\nThe court may direct a rehearing where the award period has not expired. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/)\n\n## F2. FAA §11 grounds\n\nFAA §11 permits modification or correction for:\n\n- evident material miscalculation;\n- evident material mistake in a person, thing, or property description;\n- an award on a matter not submitted, where correction does not affect submitted merits; or\n- an imperfection in form not affecting the merits.\n\nThe court modifies or corrects to effect the award’s intent and promote justice between the parties. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/)\n\n## F3. Exclusive grounds\n\n*Hall Street* holds that FAA §§10 and 11 provide the exclusive statutory grounds for expedited judicial review under the FAA. Parties cannot create broader federal judicial review merely by contract. [Supreme Court](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/552bv.pdf)\n\nNebraska’s *Seldin* applies that rule and expressly rejects a nonstatutory public-policy vacatur ground under the FAA. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00012201PUB)\n\n## F4. Excess of powers and legal error\n\nUnder *Oxford Health Plans*, a party challenging under §10(a)(4) bears a heavy burden. So long as the arbitrator was arguably interpreting the contract, even a serious interpretive error does not permit vacatur. The court asks whether the arbitrator acted within the source of delegated authority—not whether the court agrees with the result. [Supreme Court](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/569bv.pdf?ref=theindiaenclave.com)\n\n## F5. Fair-hearing misconduct\n\nFAA §10(a)(3) requires proof that the challenged conduct deprived the party of a fair hearing or caused legally material prejudice. Nebraska’s *Lund-Ross* applied that standard to an FAA award and permitted relief only where the hearing structure actually denied an opportunity to respond to a late claim. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011227PUB)\n\n## F6. Formation or arbitrability after award\n\nUnder *First Options*, a court independently reviews whether parties agreed to arbitrate arbitrability unless clear and unmistakable delegation was established. A person who objected to arbitral jurisdiction does not become bound merely by appearing to contest it. [Supreme Court](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/514bv.pdf)\n\nThe postaward claimant must still comply with FAA §12’s timing and service requirements. A formation objection does not, by itself, erase the statutory review window.\n\n## F7. Three-month service requirement\n\nFAA §12 requires **notice of the motion** to vacate, modify, or correct to be served on the adverse party or attorney within three months after the award is filed or delivered. It is not enough merely to draft or file a motion if statutory service was not completed. The statute also specifies different resident and nonresident service routes. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/)\n\nUnlike Nebraska’s UAA, §12 contains no separate extension measured from discovery of fraud or corruption. This pass did not establish a generally available equitable tolling rule that overrides the statutory text.\n\n## F8. Karo and Seldin after *Jules*\n\n*Karo* and *Seldin* characterized FAA §§9 and 12 notice and timing requirements as jurisdictional in Nebraska state proceedings. [Nebraska.gov+3](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010327PUB)\n\nThe U.S. Supreme Court’s May 14, 2026 decision in *Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties* holds that a federal court with preexisting original jurisdiction that stayed the underlying case under FAA §3 retains subject-matter jurisdiction over the resulting §§9 and 10 motions. *Jules* rejects the proposition that the postaward service provisions necessarily destroy federal subject-matter jurisdiction in that pending-case posture. [Supreme Court](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-83_3e04.pdf)\n\nThe correct bounded conclusion is:\n\n- §§9 and 12’s timing and service requirements remain mandatory statutory requirements;\n- failure can forfeit or bar expedited FAA relief;\n- *Karo* and *Seldin* remain material Nebraska precedent concerning state-court FAA applications;\n- but their broad subject-matter-jurisdiction terminology is no longer safe as a universal description of every federal postaward proceeding after *Jules*.\n\n## F9. Confirmation cannot revive an expired review request\n\nA party that did not timely seek FAA vacatur or modification ordinarily cannot resurrect those grounds by opposing confirmation. *Palagi* confirms that once the statutory review period has passed, the court’s role is confirmation rather than a belated merits or contract-legality review. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011561PUB)\n\n# G. Timing, service, computation, and trigger matrix\n\n| Procedure | Trigger | Window | Filing or service requirement | Extension or special branch |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **Nebraska arbitrator correction** | Delivery of award | 20 days | Application to arbitrators; prompt written notice to opponent | Opponent has 10 days from notice |\n| **Nebraska UAA vacatur** | Delivery | 90 days | Application; initial application notice served like summons | Fraud/corruption/undue means: 90 days from known or should-have-known ground |\n| **Nebraska UAA modification** | Delivery | 90 days | Application; may be joined with vacatur | No statutory discovery extension |\n| **Nebraska UAA confirmation** | Application to district court | Court acts within 60 days | Motion; initial application served like summons | No outer confirmation filing period stated in §25-2612 |\n| **AAA correction** | Transmittal | 20 calendar days | Request through AAA; notice to other parties | Private rule; applicable law can supersede |\n| **JAMS correction** | Service | 7 calendar days | Serve parties and file with JAMS | Private rule; opposition 7 days |\n| **FAA vacatur/modification** | Award filed or delivered | 3 months | **Notice must be served** within period | No statutory fraud-discovery branch |\n| **FAA confirmation** | Award made | §9 says “within one year” | Application and §9 service | Eighth Circuit’s direct *Val-U* holding treats period as permissive; later language creates tension |\n| **Nebraska appeal** | Entry of appealable order or judgment | 30 days | Notice of appeal plus required fee | Listed timely postjudgment motions can terminate and restart appeal period |\n| **Federal FAA appeal** | Appealable order under §16 | Federal notice period not researched here | Governed by federal appellate rules | §16 determines appealability, not the full filing process |\n\nAuthorities for these periods include Nebraska §§25-2610 through 25-2614, §25-1912, FAA §§9 and 12, and the current AAA and JAMS rules. [Nebraska Legislature+8](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2610)\n\n## G1. Nebraska computation\n\nNebraska excludes the triggering day and includes the last day. If the last day falls on Saturday, Sunday, a statutory court holiday, or a day the court office is closed by order, the period extends to the next open day. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2221)\n\nNebraska’s Rule §6-1106 three-day mail extension applies when a party must act after later Rule 5 service by specified mail methods. It should not be added automatically to a 90-day UAA period that runs directly from statutory delivery of the award. [Nebraska Judicial Branch](https://nebraskajudicial.gov/supreme-court-rules/chapter-6-trial-courts/article-11-nebraska-court-rules-pleading-civil-cases/%C2%A7-6-1106-time)\n\nAn electronically filed Nebraska document is filed on the date received by the authorized system by 11:59:59 p.m. local time where the court is located. [Nebraska Judicial Branch](https://nebraskajudicial.gov/supreme-court-rules/chapter-2-appeals/article-2-electronic-filing-service-and-notice-system-nebraska-trial-and-appellate-courts/%C2%A7-2-206-time-filing-and-time-service)\n\n## G2. Federal computation\n\nFederal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a) governs federal time computation where applicable: exclude the triggering day, count every day, and extend a weekend or legal-holiday endpoint. Rule 6(d)’s additional three days applies when a period runs after specified service of a document; it does not automatically extend FAA §12’s three-month period, which runs from the award being filed or delivered rather than from service of the motion. The current federal rules PDF reflects amendments through December 1, 2025. [United States Courts+1](https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf)\n\nA Nebraska state court applying FAA substantive law does not automatically import every federal procedural computation rule. The governing state procedural rule, FAA command, and court posture must be identified.\n\n# H. Appeals, finality, stays, and security\n\n## H1. Nebraska appealability\n\nNebraska §25-2620 permits appeal from:\n\n- an order denying an application to compel arbitration;\n- an order granting an application to stay arbitration;\n- an order confirming or denying confirmation;\n- an order modifying or correcting an award;\n- an order vacating an award **without** directing rehearing;\n- and a judgment or decree entered under the UAA.\n\nAn order denying vacatur is not separately listed as immediately appealable. Nebraska authority permits review of that denial on appeal from the later confirmation judgment. [Nebraska Legislature+1](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2620)\n\nAn order vacating and directing rehearing is not within the express “vacating without directing a rehearing” branch. General final-order law may still need examination; that complete analysis is outside this pass.\n\n## H2. Nebraska appeal period\n\nA Nebraska notice of appeal and required docket fee ordinarily must be filed within 30 days after entry of the appealable judgment or final order. Specified timely postjudgment motions terminate the running of that period and require a new notice after disposition. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1912)\n\n## H3. Nebraska appeal does not automatically stay\n\nAn appeal does not itself stay enforcement of a Nebraska money judgment. Section 25-1916 requires a qualifying supersedeas bond or cash deposit within the statutory period. For a money judgment, the security is generally the lesser of:\n\n- judgment, costs, and estimated interest and appeal costs;\n- 50% of the appellant’s net worth; or\n- $50 million,\n\nsubject to statutory anti-dissipation protection and court determinations. Full supersedeas litigation and postjudgment enforcement are outside this pass. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1916)\n\n## H4. FAA appealability\n\nFAA §16 generally allows immediate appeal from:\n\n- denial of a §3 stay;\n- denial of a §4 petition to compel;\n- denial of confirmation;\n- an order confirming or denying confirmation;\n- an order modifying, correcting, or vacating an award;\n- certain injunction orders; and\n- a final decision concerning arbitration.\n\nIt generally bars interlocutory appeal from an order compelling arbitration or granting a stay, subject to ordinary federal interlocutory certification rules. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/)\n\nFAA §16 governs federal appealability. Nebraska state appellate jurisdiction is governed by §25-2620 and Nebraska final-order law, not automatically by FAA §16.\n\n## H5. FAA stay of award enforcement\n\nFAA §12 permits a judge, upon motion and notice, to stay proceedings to enforce an award on terms the court considers just. The statute does not create an automatic stay merely because a vacatur motion or appeal exists. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/)\n\nAfter a federal confirmation judgment, ordinary federal postjudgment stay and security rules may apply. Those rules were not comprehensively researched here.\n\n# I. Master actor/event/order matrix\n\n| Actor/event | Court or decisionmaker | Required evidence | Burden or timing | Available order | Principal consequence or gap |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **Award recipient seeking Nebraska confirmation** | Nebraska district court | Agreement, award, delivery, party entitlement, motion/service record | No timely §2613/§2614 ground; court acts within 60 days after application | Confirm and enter judgment | No UAA outer filing period stated; satisfaction and enforcement later |\n| **Party seeking Nebraska vacatur** | Nebraska district court | Award, delivery, statutory ground, prejudice where required | 90 days after delivery; fraud branch from knowledge | Vacate and potentially order rehearing | No merits appeal |\n| **Party seeking Nebraska modification** | Nebraska district court | Facial miscalculation, description error, unsubmitted matter, or form defect | 90 days after delivery | Modify/correct and confirm | Cannot rewrite merits |\n| **Party requesting Nebraska arbitrator correction** | Arbitrator | Award and limited error or ambiguity | 20 days after delivery | Clarified/corrected award | No verified automatic tolling of court deadline |\n| **FAA award creditor seeking federal confirmation** | Federal district court with independent jurisdiction, or court retained after §3 stay | §13 papers, §9 consent-to-judgment predicate, service | One-year statutory text subject to Eighth Circuit *Val-U* holding | Confirm and enter judgment | FAA alone supplies no jurisdiction |\n| **FAA award debtor seeking vacatur** | Court with jurisdiction | §10 ground, award, timely service | Notice served within 3 months | Vacate; possible rehearing | No statutory fraud-discovery extension |\n| **Party seeking FAA modification** | Court with jurisdiction | §11 facial error or form defect | Notice served within 3 months | Modify/correct | No merits rewrite |\n| **Party disputing formation postaward** | Court | No agreement, no valid delegation or preserved objection, contract record | UAA/FAA review deadline still applies | Deny confirmation or vacate if statutory route applies | Participation without objection can defeat UAA ground |\n| **Party alleging legal error** | Court | Award and alleged mistake | Must fit exceeded-powers or another statutory ground | Usually confirmation | Serious error alone insufficient |\n| **Party alleging hearing misconduct** | Court | Hearing record, excluded evidence/request, objection, prejudice | Timely review application | Full or partial vacatur if statutory test met | No relief for harmless procedural disagreement |\n| **Party seeking appeal of Nebraska confirmation** | Nebraska appellate court | Appealable order, notice, fee | Ordinarily 30 days | Affirm/reverse/remand | Appeal does not stay without security |\n| **Party seeking federal appeal** | Federal appellate court | FAA §16 appealable order and federal appellate compliance | Federal appeal deadline held | Appellate review | Grant of arbitration/stay usually not immediately appealable |\n| **AAA/JAMS party seeking correction** | Arbitrator/administrator | Applicable contract and rule version | AAA 20 days; JAMS 7 days under current published rules | Limited correction | Private deadline does not necessarily change statutory court clock |\n| **Award recipient seeking collection** | Court enforcement process after judgment | Confirmed judgment and separate enforcement predicates | Later law | Lien, execution, garnishment, etc. | Entire enforcement component remains open |\n\n# J. Bounded examples\n\n## Example 1 — Nebraska confirmation after review period expires\n\n**Hypothetical facts**\n\n- Award personally delivered: **Monday, February 2, 2026**.\n- No correction, vacatur, or modification application.\n- No fraud issue.\n- Confirmation application filed in Nebraska district court: **Monday, June 1, 2026**.\n- Proper initial motion service is assumed.\n- No court closure or separate defense.\n\n**Vacatur/modification computation**\n\nPlain text\n```\nDelivery day excluded                         February 2\nDay 90                                        Sunday, May 3, 2026\nWeekend extension                             Monday, May 4, 2026\n```\n\nThe ordinary Nebraska vacatur/modification period conditionally ended May 4.\n\n**Confirmation directive**\n\nPlain text\n```\nConfirmation application                      June 1, 2026\n60th day after application                    Friday, July 31, 2026\n```\n\nWith no timely statutory ground, §25-2612 directs confirmation. The court’s failure to act by the 60th day was not separately analyzed for jurisdictional consequence. [Nebraska Legislature+3](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2612)\n\n## Example 2 — Postaward formation objection\n\n### Preserved branch\n\n- Consumer expressly objected before the arbitration hearing that no arbitration agreement existed.\n- Consumer participated only under that objection.\n- No earlier §25-2603 court decision rejected the objection.\n- A timely §25-2613 application follows delivery.\n\nThe court can consider the no-agreement vacatur branch.\n\n### Waived branch\n\n- Consumer participated through the merits.\n- No formation or arbitrability objection was made.\n- The first objection appears after an adverse award.\n\nSection 25-2613(a)(5) does not provide the same postaward route because participation occurred without objection. [Nebraska Legislature+1](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613)\n\nUnder the FAA, *First Options* protects an objecting nonsignatory or party where arbitrability was not clearly delegated, but FAA §12’s three-month service window still must be addressed. [Supreme Court+1](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/514bv.pdf)\n\n## Example 3 — Nebraska fraud-discovery branch\n\nDefine:\n\nPlain text\n```\nD = award delivery date\nK = date fraud was actually known or reasonably should have been known\n```\n\nIf the fraud or undue means could not reasonably have been known at delivery:\n\nPlain text\n```\nVacatur application deadline = K + 90 days\n```\n\nThe applicant still must prove:\n\n- fraud, corruption, or undue means;\n- when it was known or reasonably discoverable;\n- causal connection to procurement of the award; and\n- timely application under the discovery branch.\n\nUnder the FAA, §12 contains no equivalent discovery trigger; the statutory text runs three months from filing or delivery of the award. [Nebraska Legislature+1](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613)\n\n## Example 4 — Alleged legal error versus statutory ground\n\n**Assumed award components**\n\nPlain text\n```\nPrincipal found by arbitrator                 $5,000\nInterest included in award                     1,000\nTotal award                                   $6,000\n```\n\nThe losing party argues the arbitrator applied the wrong interest rule and should have awarded only $500 interest.\n\nPlain text\n```\nCourt-preferred arithmetic:\n$5,000 + $500 = $5,500\n```\n\nThe $500 mathematical difference does not establish a vacatur or modification ground. If the arbitrator interpreted the contract and applicable law, even serious legal error is insufficient. Relief would require proof that the arbitrator exceeded delegated powers or that another actual statutory ground applies. The example does not approve either interest figure. [Nebraska.gov+2](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008009PUB)\n\n## Example 5 — Evident arithmetic correction versus merits rewrite\n\n**Award text**\n\nPlain text\n```\nPrincipal                                      $1,000\nInterest                                          200\nStated total                                    1,300\n```\n\nThe component arithmetic is:\n\nPlain text\n```\n$1,000 + $200 = $1,200\n```\n\nIf the award unambiguously establishes that the stated total is the only mistake, the $100 discrepancy can qualify as an evident miscalculation.\n\nIf the dispute is instead whether the arbitrator intended:\n\n- $200 interest and a $1,200 total; or\n- $300 interest and a $1,300 total,\n\nthe court cannot choose between competing merits intentions unless the award and record resolve the question. Clarification or vacatur analysis may be required; judicial modification cannot become a merits rewrite. [Nebraska Legislature+1](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2614)\n\n## Example 6 — Confirmation motion does not extend opponent’s review period\n\n**Relative sequence**\n\nPlain text\n```\nDay 0      award delivered\nDay 30     prevailing party applies to confirm\nDay 90     Nebraska ordinary vacatur/modification deadline\n```\n\nThe confirmation application does not restart or extend the opponent’s 90-day period. The opponent must timely assert a qualifying §25-2613 or §25-2614 ground rather than wait to raise it after the period as a defense to confirmation. [Nebraska Legislature+3](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2612)\n\nThe same bounded principle applies under the FAA: a confirmation proceeding does not revive a §12 period that has expired.\n\n## Example 7 — Award emailed, but governing delivery rule unknown\n\n**Facts**\n\n- An award PDF is emailed.\n- No certified-mail copy is shown.\n- The arbitration agreement is unavailable.\n- It is unknown whether AAA, JAMS, or another rule set applies.\n\n**Classification**\n\nPlain text\n```\nNebraska statutory personal/certified delivery        not established\nAgreement-authorized electronic delivery              unknown\nAAA R-48 electronic delivery                           unknown applicability\nJAMS service and private finality                      unknown applicability\nFAA filed-or-delivered trigger                         factually unresolved\n```\n\nThe 20-day, 90-day, and three-month endpoints cannot be safely calculated until the agreement, administrator, rule version, transmission record, and governing law are identified. [Nebraska Legislature+3](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609)\n\n## Example 8 — AAA or JAMS correction request does not safely postpone court review\n\n**AAA branch**\n\nPlain text\n```\nAAA correction request                  within 20 calendar days\nNebraska UAA court deadline             90 days from delivery\nFAA court deadline                      3 months from filed/delivered\n```\n\n**JAMS branch**\n\nPlain text\n```\nJAMS correction request                 within 7 calendar days\nJAMS private finality                   generally 14 days absent correction\nNebraska/FAA judicial deadline          governed by applicable law\n```\n\nNo reviewed statute or controlling case states that the private request tolls the judicial clock. Both must be protected independently unless actual governing authority says otherwise. [American Arbitration Association+4](https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf)\n\n## Example 9 — Freestanding federal motion versus retained federal jurisdiction\n\n### Freestanding application\n\nA party files a standalone FAA §9 confirmation petition in federal court. The petition supplies no federal question apart from the FAA and does not establish diversity jurisdiction.\n\n**Result:** Under *Badgerow*, the FAA alone does not create federal jurisdiction, and the court cannot use a look-through approach for §§9–10. [Supreme Court](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf)\n\n### Existing stayed federal case\n\nA federal court had original jurisdiction over the underlying action, stayed it under FAA §3, and the arbitration produced an award.\n\n**Result:** Under *Jules*, the court retains jurisdiction to hear resulting §§9 and 10 motions in that same action. [Supreme Court](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-83_3e04.pdf)\n\n## Example 10 — Nebraska confirmation judgment, appeal, and stay\n\n**Facts**\n\n- District court confirms a Nebraska UAA award and enters a money judgment.\n- Losing party files a timely appeal.\n- No supersedeas bond or qualifying deposit is made.\n\n**Result**\n\nPlain text\n```\nAppealability                                established under §25-2620\nAppeal notice                                ordinarily within 30 days\nAutomatic stay from appeal                   no\nEnforcement stay                             requires statutory security/order\nGarnishment or execution                     separate later procedure\n```\n\nThe confirmation judgment is appealable, but the appeal alone does not suspend enforcement. The exact security depends on the judgment, costs, estimated interest, net worth, and court findings. [Nebraska Legislature+2](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2620)\n\n# K. Public form and rule inventory\n\n| Resource | Full direct URL | Status/version | Purpose | Limitation |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **Nebraska Judicial Branch Forms** | https://nebraskajudicial.gov/forms | Current public page checked October 26, 2026 | Official statewide form inventory | No standardized statewide Nebraska arbitration-confirmation, vacatur, or correction form was located in the bounded search; local or unpublished forms may exist |\n| **AAA Consumer Arbitration Rules** | https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf | Amended and effective May 1, 2025 | Private award, delivery, correction, and administration procedures | Applies only if AAA and the Consumer Rules actually govern |\n| **AAA Consumer Forms and Fees** | https://www.adr.org/rules-forms-and-fees/consumer/ | Current public administrator page | Private demand, forms, and current fee resources | Not a court form or legal determination |\n| **JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules** | https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration | Effective June 1, 2021 | Private award, correction, finality, and enforcement procedures | Actual agreement can select another rule set or version |\n| **JAMS Arbitration Forms** | https://www.jamsadr.com/adr-forms | Current public page | Sample private arbitration forms | Not Nebraska court forms; JAMS identifies them as samples |\n| **Federal Rules of Civil Procedure** | https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf | Current through amendments effective December 1, 2025 | Federal computation and filing rules | Does not create federal FAA jurisdiction |\n\nThe absence of a statewide form on the public forms page is a bounded search result, not proof that no local template, court instruction, or attorney-drafted form exists. [Nebraska Judicial Branch+3](https://nebraskajudicial.gov/forms)\n\n# L. Source register\n\n| Source ID | Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint | Version/status and access | Read bounds and limits |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **S_NE-P17-S001** | **Nebraska UAA award and review provisions**, Nebraska Legislature: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2604.01; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2606; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2610; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2611; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2612; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2614; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2615. Complete operative sections. | Current official codification freshly read October 26, 2026 Pacific/UTC. No proposed or future text relied upon. | Award form, delivery, arbitrator correction, expenses, confirmation, vacatur, judicial modification, and judgment. Annotations are not treated as independently read opinions unless separately listed. [Nebraska Legislature+8](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2604.01) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S002** | **Nebraska UAA procedure, jurisdiction, venue, Small Claims crossover, appeal, and prospective operation**: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2617; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2618; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2618.01; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2619; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2620; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2621. | Current official codification freshly read October 26, 2026. | Motion, initial service, district-court definition, venue, appeal list, and agreements after August 30, 1987. [Nebraska Legislature+4](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2617) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S003** | **Nebraska appeal, security, and computation provisions**: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1912; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1916; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2221; https://nebraskajudicial.gov/supreme-court-rules/chapter-6-trial-courts/article-11-nebraska-court-rules-pleading-civil-cases/%C2%A7-6-1106-time; https://nebraskajudicial.gov/supreme-court-rules/chapter-2-appeals/article-2-electronic-filing-service-and-notice-system-nebraska-trial-and-appellate-courts/%C2%A7-2-206-time-filing-and-time-service. | Current statutes and rules freshly read October 26, 2026. | State appeal notice, supersedeas, computation, three-day rule, and e-filing cutoff. [Nebraska Legislature+4](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1912) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S004** | **Federal Arbitration Act postaward provisions**, OLRC: https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/. | Each page displays laws in effect through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026; freshly read October 26. | Confirmation, exclusive review grounds, service, filed papers, judgment effect, and federal appealability. [U.S. Code+5](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S005** | **Federal Rules of Civil Procedure**, U.S. Courts: https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf; Rule 6, printed pp.12–14/PDF indices 30–32. | Current through amendments effective December 1, 2025; freshly read and page images inspected October 26, 2026. | Federal computation and extra-day rule only. [United States Courts+1](https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S006** | ***Signal 88, LLC v. Lyconic, LLC*, 310 Neb. 824 (2022)**: https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewOpinion?docId=N00008357PUB; printed p.832/PDF index 8, p.836/index 12, p.838/index 14. | Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read and relevant pages inspected October 26, 2026. | UAA deference, ambiguity, confirmation, and narrow remand for clarification. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewOpinion?docId=N00008357PUB) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S007** | ***City of Omaha v. Professional Firefighters Association*, 309 Neb. 918 (2021)**: https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008009PUB; printed p.930/PDF index 12 and p.931/index 13. | Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026. | Evident partiality and exceeded-powers standards. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008009PUB) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S008** | ***Lund-Ross Constructors v. Duke of Omaha*, 33 Neb. App. 73 (2024)**: https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011227PUB; printed p.92/PDF index 19 and p.95/index 22. | Final published Nebraska Court of Appeals opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026. | FAA fair-hearing prejudice, excess of powers, and partial vacatur. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011227PUB) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S009** | ***Cinatl v. Prososki*, 307 Neb. 477 (2020)**: https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00012622PUB; printed p.492/PDF index 15. | Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026. | Mandatory confirmation and appeal from confirmation after denial of vacatur. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00012622PUB) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S010** | ***State v. Nebraska Association of Public Employees*, 313 Neb. 259 (2023)**: https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009151PUB; printed p.269/PDF index 10. | Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026. | Narrow UAA review and no vacatur for immaterial/form issues. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009151PUB) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S011** | ***MBNA America Bank v. Hansen*, 16 Neb. App. 536 (2008)**: https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00000486PUB; printed p.537/PDF index 1 and p.538/index 2. | Final published Nebraska Court of Appeals opinion; petition for further review denied. Freshly read October 26, 2026. | District-court-exclusive UAA confirmation jurisdiction in a consumer-credit award. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00000486PUB) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S012** | ***Ronald J. Palagi, P.C. v. Prospect Funding Holdings*, 302 Neb. 769 (2019)**: https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011561PUB; printed pp.780–784/PDF indices 11–15. | Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026. | FAA confirmation after untimely vacatur/modification challenge. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011561PUB) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S013** | ***Drummond v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.*, 280 Neb. 258 (2010)**: https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003559PUB; printed p.260/PDF index 2 and p.262/index 4. | Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026. | UAA confirmation remains available after payment of award. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003559PUB) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S014** | ***Garlock v. 3DS Properties, LLC*, 303 Neb. 521 (2019)**: https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011615PUB; relevant participation/objection discussion. | Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026. | Participation without objection and preservation of arbitrability objection. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011615PUB) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S015** | ***State v. Henderson*, 277 Neb. 240 (2009)**: https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003201PUB; printed p.249/PDF index 10 and related holding. | Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026. | Narrow UAA public-policy doctrine; later *Seldin* limits it to UAA. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003201PUB) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S016** | ***Karo v. NAU Country Insurance Co.*, 297 Neb. 798 (2017)**: https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010327PUB; printed p.814/PDF index 16 and p.815/index 17; complete relevant §§9/12 discussion. | Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read and pages inspected October 26, 2026. | Strict FAA notice/timing characterization; subject-matter-jurisdiction terminology qualified by 2026 *Jules*. [Nebraska.gov+1](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010327PUB) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S017** | ***Seldin v. Estate of Silverman*, 305 Neb. 185 (2020)**: https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00012201PUB; printed p.199/PDF index 14, pp.205–208/indices 20–23. | Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026. | FAA three-month service, exclusive review grounds, no FAA public-policy ground, serious-error limit. [Nebraska.gov+2](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00012201PUB) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S018** | ***Val-U Construction Co. v. Rosebud Sioux Tribe*, 146 F.3d 573, 581 (8th Cir. 1998)**: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/146/573/513898/; full published-opinion reproduction, especially reported p.581. | Final published Eighth Circuit opinion; public HTML reproduction freshly read October 26, 2026. No official PDF index available through this route. | Direct holding that FAA §9’s one-year period is permissive. [Justia Law+1](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/146/573/513898/) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S019** | ***RGA Reinsurance Co. v. Ulico Casualty Co.*, No. 02-4036 (8th Cir. Jan. 28, 2004)**: https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/04/01/024036P.pdf; slip pp.4–5/PDF indices 3–4. | Final published Eighth Circuit opinion; freshly read and pages inspected October 26, 2026. | Confirmation versus modification and later one-year wording; did not decide a late confirmation case. [U.S. Court of Appeals+1](https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/04/01/024036P.pdf) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S020** | ***Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc.*, 552 U.S. 576 (2008)**: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/552bv.pdf; printed pp.584 and 586/PDF indices 840 and 842. | Final U.S. Supreme Court opinion; relevant pages freshly inspected October 26, 2026. | FAA §§10–11 exclusive statutory grounds. [Supreme Court](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/552bv.pdf) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S021** | ***Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter*, 569 U.S. 564 (2013)**: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/569bv.pdf; printed pp.564 and 569/PDF indices 649 and 654. | Final U.S. Supreme Court opinion; freshly inspected October 26, 2026. | Heavy §10(a)(4) burden and serious-error limit. [Supreme Court](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/569bv.pdf?ref=theindiaenclave.com) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S022** | ***First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan*, 514 U.S. 938 (1995)**: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/514bv.pdf; printed pp.942 and 944/PDF indices 1012 and 1014. | Final U.S. Supreme Court opinion; relevant pages freshly inspected October 26, 2026. | Independent judicial arbitrability review absent clear delegation. [Supreme Court](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/514bv.pdf) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S023** | ***Badgerow v. Walters*, 596 U.S. 1 (2022)**: official Supreme Court opinion reached through https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf; printed p.5/PDF index 7 and p.9/index 11. | Final U.S. Supreme Court opinion; freshly read and inspected October 26, 2026. | No FAA-created jurisdiction and no look-through for freestanding §§9–10 applications. [Supreme Court](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S024** | ***Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties*, 608 U.S. ___ (2026)**: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-83_3e04.pdf; syllabus printed p.2/PDF index 1; opinion printed p.7/index 10 and p.12/index 15. | Final U.S. Supreme Court opinion filed May 14, 2026; freshly read and inspected October 26, 2026. | Retained jurisdiction in a federal case originally within jurisdiction and stayed under FAA §3; qualifies universal jurisdictional readings of §§9/12. [Supreme Court](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-83_3e04.pdf) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S025** | **AAA Consumer Arbitration Rules**, AAA: https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf; R-44 and R-45 printed p.24/PDF index 23; R-48 and R-49 printed p.25/index 24. | Amended and effective May 1, 2025; freshly read and pages inspected October 26, 2026. | Private rules only; actual incorporation and administrator unknown. [American Arbitration Association+2](https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S026** | **JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules**, JAMS: https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration; Rule 24(a), (h)–(k), Rule 25. | Published as effective June 1, 2021; freshly read October 26, 2026. HTML source has no PDF index. | Private rules only; actual contract may select another version. [JAMS+1](https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration) |\n| **S_NE-P17-S027** | **Nebraska Judicial Branch Forms**, https://nebraskajudicial.gov/forms; bounded search for arbitration confirmation, vacatur, correction, and award. | Current public page checked October 26, 2026. | No statewide standardized form located; not a local-form or unpublished-order search. [Nebraska Judicial Branch](https://nebraskajudicial.gov/forms) |\n\n# M. Claim register\n\n| Claim ID | Precise claim | Source and pinpoint | Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **S_NE-P17-C001** | Nebraska UAA award must be written, signed by participating arbitrators, and delivered through a statutory or agreed method. | S001, §25-2609. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609) | Arbitrator/parties; award issuance; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C002** | Objection that a Nebraska award was late is waived unless made to arbitrators before delivery. | S001, §25-2609. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609) | Party; pre-delivery; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C003** | Timely arbitrator correction application under Nebraska UAA is 20 days after delivery, with ten days for opposition. | S001, §25-2610. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2610) | Party/arbitrator; postaward; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C004** | Nebraska arbitrator correction is limited and cannot redetermine merits. | S001, §§25-2610, 25-2614; S006. [Nebraska Legislature+2](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2610) | Arbitrator/court; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C005** | Nebraska confirmation is mandatory absent timely review grounds, and court acts within 60 days after application. | S001, §25-2612. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2612) | District court; confirmation; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C006** | Section 25-2612 states no outer filing deadline for confirmation. | S001, §25-2612. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2612) | Confirmation; other defenses not audited; **high for text, broader hold** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C007** | Nebraska UAA “court” is district court; county court lacks UAA confirmation jurisdiction. | S002, §25-2618; S011. [Nebraska Legislature+1](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2618) | Court; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C008** | UAA application is by motion; initial application notice is served like summons unless otherwise agreed. | S002, §25-2617. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2617) | Procedure/personal jurisdiction; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C009** | Nebraska UAA venue follows hearing location or adverse-party residence/business under §25-2619. | S002, §25-2619. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2619) | District court; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C010** | Award becomes an ordinary court judgment only after confirmation/modification/correction order and judgment entry. | S001, §25-2615. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2615) | Judgment stage; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C011** | Payment of a Nebraska award does not necessarily moot confirmation. | S013, *Drummond*. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003559PUB) | District court; no duplicate recovery implied; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C012** | Nebraska vacatur is limited to §25-2613 grounds plus the narrow controlling UAA public-policy doctrine. | S001, §25-2613; S015. [Nebraska Legislature+1](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613) | Vacatur; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C013** | Ordinary Nebraska vacatur deadline is 90 days after delivery. | S001, §25-2613(b). [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613) | Applicant; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C014** | Fraud/corruption/undue-means branch runs 90 days from known or reasonably knowable ground. | S001, §25-2613(b). [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613) | Applicant; discovery proof required; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C015** | Nebraska no-agreement postaward ground requires no prior adverse §25-2603 ruling and no participation without objection. | S001, §25-2613(a)(5). [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613) | Formation postaward; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C016** | Evident partiality requires an objective basis on which a reasonable person would have to conclude partiality. | S007. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008009PUB) | Neutral arbitrator; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C017** | UAA hearing misconduct requires substantial prejudice; harmless evidentiary disagreement is insufficient. | S001, §25-2613(a)(4); S008. [Nebraska Legislature+1](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613) | Hearing review; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C018** | Serious legal or factual error is not an independent Nebraska UAA vacatur ground. | S007, S010. [Nebraska.gov+1](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008009PUB) | Merits review; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C019** | Arbitrator exceeds powers only when abandoning delegated contractual interpretation, not merely construing it incorrectly. | S007, S010. [Nebraska.gov+1](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008009PUB) | Vacatur; heavy burden; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C020** | Nebraska UAA public-policy refusal is narrow, explicit, well-defined, and dominant; it is not a FAA ground. | S015, S017. [Nebraska.gov+1](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003201PUB) | UAA only; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C021** | Nebraska judicial modification application must be made within 90 days after delivery. | S001, §25-2614. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2614) | Modification; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C022** | Nebraska modification grounds are evident miscalculation/description error, unsubmitted matter, or form imperfection without merits effect. | S001, §25-2614. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2614) | Modification; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C023** | Judicial clarification or remand cannot become a merits rewrite; remand is exceptional when meaning cannot otherwise be determined. | S006. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewOpinion?docId=N00008357PUB) | Confirmation/modification; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C024** | A confirmation application does not restart or extend the opposing party’s review period. | S001; S012. [Nebraska Legislature+2](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2612) | Timing; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C025** | Nebraska §25-2620 lists appealable UAA orders. | S002, §25-2620. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2620) | Appeal; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C026** | Denial of vacatur is ordinarily reviewed after confirmation rather than as a standalone listed appeal. | S009. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00012622PUB) | Appeal; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C027** | Nebraska civil appeal ordinarily requires notice and fee within 30 days after entry. | S003, §25-1912. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1912) | Appeal; postjudgment-motion exceptions apply; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C028** | Nebraska appeal does not automatically stay a money judgment; §25-1916 security is required. | S003, §25-1916. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1916) | Stay/security; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C029** | Nebraska excludes trigger day and extends weekend/holiday endpoint. | S003, §25-2221. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2221) | Computation; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C030** | Nebraska Rule 6 three-mail-days provision does not automatically extend a delivery-triggered UAA statutory period. | S003, Rule §6-1106. [Nebraska Judicial Branch](https://nebraskajudicial.gov/supreme-court-rules/chapter-6-trial-courts/article-11-nebraska-court-rules-pleading-civil-cases/%C2%A7-6-1106-time) | Timing; **high bounded conclusion** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C031** | FAA itself does not create federal subject-matter jurisdiction. | S023, *Badgerow*. [Supreme Court](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf) | Federal court; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C032** | Federal court that had original jurisdiction and stayed the case under §3 retains jurisdiction over resulting §§9–10 motions. | S024, *Jules*. [Supreme Court](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-83_3e04.pdf) | Pending federal case; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C033** | FAA §9 requires confirmation when its predicates are met and no §§10–11 ground applies. | S004, §9. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/) | Confirmation; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C034** | Eighth Circuit directly held §9’s one-year language permissive; later inconsistent wording did not decide a late case. | S018–S019. [Justia Law+2](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/146/573/513898/) | Federal confirmation; **high for direct holding, current tension noted** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C035** | FAA §§10–11 provide exclusive expedited judicial review grounds. | S004, S020, S017. [U.S. Code+3](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/) | FAA review; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C036** | FAA §12 requires service of notice within three months after award filed or delivered and supplies no fraud-discovery branch. | S004, §12. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/) | FAA review; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C037** | Karo/Seldin’s universal jurisdictional terminology is qualified by *Jules*, though statutory timing/service remains consequential. | S016–S017, S024. [Nebraska.gov+3](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010327PUB) | Federal/state FAA procedure; **high qualification** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C038** | FAA legal or factual error is insufficient unless it fits an actual §10 ground. | S020–S021, S017. [Supreme Court+2](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/552bv.pdf) | Merits review; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C039** | FAA hearing-misconduct vacatur requires fair-hearing prejudice. | S008. [Nebraska.gov](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011227PUB) | §10(a)(3); **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C040** | Postaward arbitrability challenge remains judicial absent clear delegation, but the review deadline still applies. | S022, S004. [Supreme Court+1](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/514bv.pdf) | Formation/arbitrability; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C041** | FAA §12 authorizes a discretionary enforcement stay on motion, notice, and just terms. | S004, §12. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/) | Stay; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C042** | FAA §16 controls federal appealability, not Nebraska state appeal procedure. | S004, §16; S002, §25-2620. [U.S. Code+1](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/) | Appeal; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C043** | Current AAA Consumer Rules permit limited correction within 20 calendar days after transmittal and no merits redetermination. | S025, R-49. [American Arbitration Association](https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf) | Private administration; actual incorporation held; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C044** | Current JAMS Comprehensive Rules permit correction requests within seven days and private-rule finality after 14 days absent correction. | S026, Rule 24(j)–(k). [JAMS](https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration) | Private administration; actual incorporation held; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C045** | No automatic statutory tolling of court-review periods from AAA/JAMS correction request was verified. | S001, S004, S025–S026. [Nebraska Legislature+4](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2610) | Timing; **HOLD beyond negative text finding** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C046** | Electronic award delivery cannot be classified without governing agreement and rule version. | S001, S025–S026. [Nebraska Legislature+2](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609) | Trigger date; **unresolved** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C047** | Confirmation creates a judgment but does not itself execute, garnish, satisfy, refund, or delete reporting. | S001, §25-2615; S004, §13. [Nebraska Legislature+1](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2615) | Judgment boundary; **high** |\n| **S_NE-P17-C048** | No statewide Nebraska confirmation/vacatur form was located in the official form inventory. | S027. [Nebraska Judicial Branch](https://nebraskajudicial.gov/forms) | Forms; **bounded negative finding** |\n\n# N. Granular coverage and remaining gaps\n\n| Assigned issue | Status | Claim IDs | Exact missing evidence or next action |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Nebraska UAA current text | **Answered** | C001–C030 | Actual agreement, award, and dates |\n| FAA current text | **Answered** | C031–C042 | Actual FAA commerce, exclusions, and court |\n| Governing state/federal route | **Partial** | C007, C031–C033 | Contract, commerce, choice clause, pending-case posture |\n| Nebraska award form | **Answered** | C001–C002 | Actual award and panel record |\n| FAA award form | **Partial** | — | Actual contract/administrator; FAA §§9–13 do not duplicate UAA form rules |\n| Nebraska award delivery | **Answered textually** | C001, C046 | Actual transmission and agreement |\n| Electronic award delivery | **Unresolved factually** | C046 | Agreement, AAA/JAMS version, email logs |\n| Late award | **Answered** | C002 | Actual time limit and pre-delivery objection |\n| Arbitrator correction | **Answered** | C003–C004 | Actual request and notice |\n| AAA correction | **Answered privately** | C043 | Actual incorporation and case version |\n| JAMS correction | **Answered privately** | C044 | Actual incorporation and case version |\n| Correction-request tolling | **Not established** | C045 | Controlling statute, order, or case |\n| Nebraska confirmation | **Answered** | C005–C011 | Actual motion, service, award, jurisdiction |\n| Nebraska outer confirmation period | **Unresolved beyond statutory silence** | C006 | Other limitation/laches authority |\n| FAA confirmation | **Answered** | C031–C034 | Consent-to-judgment clause and independent jurisdiction |\n| FAA one-year question | **Answered with Eighth Circuit tension** | C034 | En banc or later controlling treatment if any |\n| Federal subject-matter jurisdiction | **Answered** | C031–C032 | Diversity/federal question or stayed-case record |\n| Personal jurisdiction and service | **Answered generally** | C008, C036–C037 | Actual residence, attorney, service method |\n| FAA §13 papers | **Answered** | S004 | Actual documents |\n| Award versus judgment | **Answered** | C010, C047 | Confirmation order and later enforcement |\n| Paid award confirmation | **Answered** | C011 | Satisfaction record |\n| Nebraska vacatur grounds | **Answered exhaustively** | C012–C020 | Actual hearing/award evidence |\n| Nebraska fraud discovery | **Answered** | C014 | Discovery date and diligence |\n| Nebraska no-agreement ground | **Answered** | C015 | Prior §2603 ruling and objection record |\n| Nebraska public policy | **Answered narrowly** | C020 | Explicit legal policy and award conflict |\n| FAA vacatur grounds | **Answered exhaustively** | C035–C040 | Actual record and timely service |\n| FAA fraud discovery extension | **Not in statutory text** | C036 | Any valid equitable exception remains unestablished |\n| Legal or factual error | **Answered as insufficient alone** | C018, C038 | Must identify statutory ground |\n| Evident partiality | **Answered generally** | C016 | Relationship, disclosure, timing, objection |\n| Refusal to hear evidence | **Answered generally** | C017, C039 | Material evidence, objection, prejudice |\n| Exceeded powers | **Answered generally** | C019, C038 | Submission, contract, award reasoning |\n| Partial vacatur | **Answered only as severability possibility** | C017 | Actual award structure |\n| Nebraska modification grounds | **Answered** | C021–C023 | Award and evident defect |\n| FAA modification grounds | **Answered** | C035 | Award and evident defect |\n| Clarification versus merits rewrite | **Answered** | C023 | Award and full arbitral record |\n| Confirmation pending review deadline | **Answered** | C024 | Actual filings |\n| Nebraska appealability | **Answered** | C025–C028 | Actual order and entry date |\n| Federal appealability | **Answered as FAA §16 boundary** | C042 | Actual federal order and appellate rules |\n| Federal appeal notice deadline | **Excluded/not researched** | — | Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure |\n| Nebraska appeal notice period | **Answered** | C027 | Entry and postjudgment motions |\n| Nebraska stay/security | **Answered as boundary** | C028 | Judgment, net worth, bond, court order |\n| FAA predecision enforcement stay | **Answered** | C041 | Motion, notice, terms |\n| Federal postjudgment security | **Excluded/later** | — | Federal Rule 62 and case-specific order |\n| State time computation | **Answered** | C029–C030 | Actual closure/holiday and filing receipt |\n| Federal time computation | **Answered generally** | S005 | Actual federal filing/service |\n| Three extra mail days | **Answered as not automatic** | C030, S005 | Exact period and service trigger |\n| State court applying FAA computation | **Partial** | — | Actual procedural posture and controlling court decision |\n| Administrator rules | **Answered for current public AAA/JAMS versions** | C043–C046 | Actual contract and incorporated version |\n| Official court forms | **Not located** | C048 | Local forms or court instructions |\n| Award preclusive effect | **Excluded** | — | Separate res judicata/collateral-estoppel analysis |\n| Award interest | **Excluded** | — | Contract, award, state/federal interest law |\n| Judgment duration/renewal | **Excluded** | — | Separate postjudgment pass |\n| Lien/satisfaction/release | **Excluded** | — | Separate judgment component |\n| Execution/garnishment/exemptions | **Excluded** | — | Separate enforcement component |\n| Credit reporting consequence | **Excluded** | — | Separate FCRA/state-reporting component |\n| Provider licensing/remedies | **Excluded** | — | Reviewed provider passes and future work |\n| Secured/medical/government/support/tax sectors | **Excluded** | — | Separate sector passes |\n| Local/tribal/country law | **Excluded** | — | Separate jurisdictional component |\n| Named award or case result | **Not performed** | — | Actual private documents and docket |\n| Component/Nebraska/parent/A066 acceptance | **Not granted** | — | Remaining registry work and scoped review |\n\n# O. Researcher self-check\n\n## Freshly read in PASS-17\n\n- Complete current Nebraska statutory provisions for:arbitrator disqualification;hearing and evidence rights;award form, timing, and delivery;arbitrator correction;confirmation;vacatur;judicial modification;judgment;application method;district-court definition;Small Claims crossover;venue;appeal;prospective application;Nebraska appeal timing;supersedeas; andtime computation.\n- Complete current FAA §§9 through 13 and §16.\n- Current Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6.\n- Current AAA Consumer Award and Correction Rules.\n- Current JAMS award, correction, finality, and enforcement provisions.\n- Material relevant portions and page images of:*Signal 88 v. Lyconic*;*City of Omaha v. Professional Firefighters*;*Lund-Ross Constructors v. Duke of Omaha*;*Cinatl v. Prososki*;*State v. Nebraska Association of Public Employees*;*MBNA America Bank v. Hansen*;*Palagi v. Prospect Funding*;*Drummond v. State Farm*;*Garlock v. 3DS Properties*;*State v. Henderson*;*Karo v. NAU Country Insurance*;*Seldin v. Estate of Silverman*;*Val-U Construction v. Rosebud Sioux Tribe*;*RGA Reinsurance v. Ulico*;*Hall Street v. Mattel*;*Oxford Health Plans v. Sutter*;*First Options v. Kaplan*;*Badgerow v. Walters*; and*Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties*.\n\n## Numerical self-check\n\nThe concrete Nebraska example was recalculated:\n\nPlain text\n```\nAward delivered                         Monday, February 2, 2026\n20th day                                Sunday, February 22, 2026\n90th day                                Sunday, May 3, 2026\nWeekend-adjusted 90-day endpoint        Monday, May 4, 2026\n\nConfirmation application               Monday, June 1, 2026\n60th day after application             Friday, July 31, 2026\n```\n\nThe calculation assumes:\n\n- personal delivery on February 2;\n- Nebraska §25-2221 applies;\n- no special closure order;\n- no different contractual rule;\n- no correction that legally changes the award or delivery trigger; and\n- no fraud-discovery branch.\n\nThe arithmetic does not establish any actual deadline.\n\n## Currentness and status\n\n- Nebraska statutes and Judicial Branch rules were checked in their current public form on October 26, 2026.\n- OLRC FAA pages display laws in effect through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026.\n- Federal civil rules reflect amendments effective December 1, 2025.\n- AAA Consumer Rules are amended and effective May 1, 2025.\n- JAMS Comprehensive Rules are published as effective June 1, 2021.\n- *Jules* was filed May 14, 2026 and was treated as current controlling U.S. Supreme Court authority.\n- No proposed, future-effective, stayed, withdrawn, or vacated authority was used as operative law.\n- This was not a complete legislative-history or commercial-citator audit.\n\n## Bounded unresolved searches\n\nNo controlling public Nebraska or Eighth Circuit authority was located that conclusively resolves:\n\n- an outer Nebraska UAA confirmation-application period beyond §25-2612’s silence;\n- automatic tolling of Nebraska or FAA court-review periods by an AAA, JAMS, or arbitrator correction request;\n- the exact state-court computation rule for every FAA three-month motion;\n- a uniform effect of electronic delivery where the agreement and administrator version are missing;\n- a statewide Nebraska arbitration-award motion form;\n- or the full present interaction between *Jules* and Nebraska’s older *Karo/Seldin* jurisdictional terminology in every state-court FAA posture.\n\nThese are bounded search results, not proof that no unpublished, trial-level, local, or commercial-database authority exists.\n\n## Not read or performed\n\n- No actual arbitration agreement, award, administrator correspondence, delivery email, certified-mail receipt, correction request, motion, court order, notice, appeal, bond, judgment, account, provider agreement, assignment, or docket.\n- No named consumer, creditor, debt buyer, provider, arbitrator, administrator, court, or case search.\n- No filing, contact, records request, fee quote, paid database, private data, account access, or court-account access.\n- No complete:award interest analysis;award preclusion analysis;federal appellate deadline report;confirmation-judgment duration or renewal report;lien, satisfaction, release, execution, garnishment, or exemption report;provider-remedy, secured-debt, medical, government, tax, support, education, probate, local, tribal, or foreign-law dossier.\n- No Deep Research, Work, Codex research generation, API, purchase, account change, website action, publication, browser control, other Chat, CAPTCHA bypass, security workaround, or local-file save.\n\n**Focused disposition:** Nebraska converts an arbitration award into an enforceable court judgment only through district-court confirmation, modification, or correction. State review ordinarily must be initiated within 90 days after delivery, with a separate fraud-discovery branch; federal review requires service within three months after the award is filed or delivered. Neither system permits a conventional merits appeal. Courts may correct obvious arithmetic or form defects but may not rewrite the arbitrator’s decision. Confirmation does not revive an expired challenge, and neither an administrator correction request nor an appeal automatically stays judicial enforcement.\n\nEND S_NE PASS-17. \n\n","tables":[{"headers":["Question","Nebraska UAA route","FAA route","Exact hold"],"index":0,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Question","Nebraska UAA route","FAA route","Exact hold"],["Which law governs?","Written arbitration agreement within the Nebraska UAA and not displaced by controlling federal law","Written clause in a maritime transaction or contract involving interstate commerce, subject to FAA exclusions","Actual contract, choice-of-law clause, commerce, exclusions, and parties remain unknown"],["Which court?","Nebraska district court; county court lacks UAA confirmation jurisdiction","Federal court identified by §9 only if independent federal jurisdiction exists; state courts may apply FAA substantive law","Exact state FAA procedural route and personal jurisdiction depend on the pending case and service"],["Award form","Written and signed by participating arbitrators","FAA §§9–13 do not prescribe the same detailed award form; contract and administrator rules matter","Administrator and incorporated rule version unknown"],["Award delivery","Personal, registered or certified mail, or method stated in agreement","§12 uses award “filed or delivered”; applicable contract and administrator rules can affect delivery facts","Email alone cannot be classified without the agreement and rule set"],["Arbitrator correction","Application within 20 days after delivery; limited correction or clarification","No general FAA arbitrator-correction period in §§9–13; private rules and contract may provide one","A private correction request is not shown to extend the statutory court-review period"],["Court confirmation","Mandatory unless timely vacatur/modification grounds urged; court acts within 60 days after application","Mandatory under §9 unless §§10–11 apply","Nebraska UAA text states no outer confirmation-application period; FAA one-year issue has Eighth Circuit tension"],["Vacatur period","90 days after delivery; fraud/corruption/undue means 90 days from known or reasonably knowable ground","Notice must be served within 3 months after award filed or delivered","Actual date and valid method of delivery are held"],["Modification period","90 days after delivery","Notice must be served within 3 months under §12","No automatic extension from pending confirmation"],["Merits review","No ordinary legal or factual appeal; extremely narrow review","§§10–11 exclusive; no ordinary merits appeal","Claimed “bad result” must fit an actual statutory ground"],["Award to judgment","Order confirming/modifying/correcting followed by judgment under §25-2615","Papers filed under §13; judgment has force of federal district-court judgment","Enforcement remains separate"],["Appeal","§25-2620 plus Nebraska final-order law; state appeal normally within 30 days after entry of appealable order","FAA §16 controls federal appealability; ordinary federal notice-of-appeal timing not researched here","State and federal appeal routes cannot be mixed"],["Stay","Appeal alone does not stay a Nebraska judgment; supersedeas statute applies","FAA §12 permits a court to stay enforcement on just terms; federal postjudgment stay rules remain separate","Actual bond/security and judgment amount remain unknown"]]},{"headers":["Ground","Exact statutory predicate","Burden and practical limit"],"index":1,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Ground","Exact statutory predicate","Burden and practical limit"],["Corruption, fraud, or undue means","Award was procured by one of those means","Applicant must connect the misconduct to procurement of the award; timing uses discovery branch"],["Evident partiality by neutral arbitrator","Neutral arbitrator showed evident partiality","Nebraska uses an objective standard; mere adverse rulings or speculative relationships are insufficient"],["Corruption of an arbitrator","Corruption by an arbitrator","Actual proof required"],["Misconduct prejudicing rights","Arbitrator misconduct substantially prejudiced a party","Prejudice is essential"],["Exceeded powers","Arbitrator exceeded contractually delegated authority","Serious legal error is insufficient if arbitrator arguably interpreted the contract"],["Refusal to postpone","Sufficient cause existed and refusal substantially prejudiced rights","Requires preserved request, sufficient cause, and prejudice"],["Refusal to hear material evidence","Material evidence was improperly excluded and rights substantially prejudiced","Not every evidentiary ruling qualifies"],["Other contrary hearing conduct","Hearing violated §25-2606 and substantially prejudiced rights","Fair-hearing inquiry, not a trial-rules appeal"],["No arbitration agreement","No agreement existed, issue was not already adversely determined under §25-2603, and party did not participate without objection","A participant who proceeded without objection can lose this branch"],["Disqualified arbitrator failed to withdraw","Timely demand under §25-2604.01 and statutory disqualification","Requires timely demand before proceedings and qualifying relationship or judicial ground"]]},{"headers":["Procedure","Trigger","Window","Filing or service requirement","Extension or special branch"],"index":2,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Procedure","Trigger","Window","Filing or service requirement","Extension or special branch"],["Nebraska arbitrator correction","Delivery of award","20 days","Application to arbitrators; prompt written notice to opponent","Opponent has 10 days from notice"],["Nebraska UAA vacatur","Delivery","90 days","Application; initial application notice served like summons","Fraud/corruption/undue means: 90 days from known or should-have-known ground"],["Nebraska UAA modification","Delivery","90 days","Application; may be joined with vacatur","No statutory discovery extension"],["Nebraska UAA confirmation","Application to district court","Court acts within 60 days","Motion; initial application served like summons","No outer confirmation filing period stated in §25-2612"],["AAA correction","Transmittal","20 calendar days","Request through AAA; notice to other parties","Private rule; applicable law can supersede"],["JAMS correction","Service","7 calendar days","Serve parties and file with JAMS","Private rule; opposition 7 days"],["FAA vacatur/modification","Award filed or delivered","3 months","Notice must be served within period","No statutory fraud-discovery branch"],["FAA confirmation","Award made","§9 says “within one year”","Application and §9 service","Eighth Circuit’s direct Val-U holding treats period as permissive; later language creates tension"],["Nebraska appeal","Entry of appealable order or judgment","30 days","Notice of appeal plus required fee","Listed timely postjudgment motions can terminate and restart appeal period"],["Federal FAA appeal","Appealable order under §16","Federal notice period not researched here","Governed by federal appellate rules","§16 determines appealability, not the full filing process"]]},{"headers":["Actor/event","Court or decisionmaker","Required evidence","Burden or timing","Available order","Principal consequence or gap"],"index":3,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Actor/event","Court or decisionmaker","Required evidence","Burden or timing","Available order","Principal consequence or gap"],["Award recipient seeking Nebraska confirmation","Nebraska district court","Agreement, award, delivery, party entitlement, motion/service record","No timely §2613/§2614 ground; court acts within 60 days after application","Confirm and enter judgment","No UAA outer filing period stated; satisfaction and enforcement later"],["Party seeking Nebraska vacatur","Nebraska district court","Award, delivery, statutory ground, prejudice where required","90 days after delivery; fraud branch from knowledge","Vacate and potentially order rehearing","No merits appeal"],["Party seeking Nebraska modification","Nebraska district court","Facial miscalculation, description error, unsubmitted matter, or form defect","90 days after delivery","Modify/correct and confirm","Cannot rewrite merits"],["Party requesting Nebraska arbitrator correction","Arbitrator","Award and limited error or ambiguity","20 days after delivery","Clarified/corrected award","No verified automatic tolling of court deadline"],["FAA award creditor seeking federal confirmation","Federal district court with independent jurisdiction, or court retained after §3 stay","§13 papers, §9 consent-to-judgment predicate, service","One-year statutory text subject to Eighth Circuit Val-U holding","Confirm and enter judgment","FAA alone supplies no jurisdiction"],["FAA award debtor seeking vacatur","Court with jurisdiction","§10 ground, award, timely service","Notice served within 3 months","Vacate; possible rehearing","No statutory fraud-discovery extension"],["Party seeking FAA modification","Court with jurisdiction","§11 facial error or form defect","Notice served within 3 months","Modify/correct","No merits rewrite"],["Party disputing formation postaward","Court","No agreement, no valid delegation or preserved objection, contract record","UAA/FAA review deadline still applies","Deny confirmation or vacate if statutory route applies","Participation without objection can defeat UAA ground"],["Party alleging legal error","Court","Award and alleged mistake","Must fit exceeded-powers or another statutory ground","Usually confirmation","Serious error alone insufficient"],["Party alleging hearing misconduct","Court","Hearing record, excluded evidence/request, objection, prejudice","Timely review application","Full or partial vacatur if statutory test met","No relief for harmless procedural disagreement"],["Party seeking appeal of Nebraska confirmation","Nebraska appellate court","Appealable order, notice, fee","Ordinarily 30 days","Affirm/reverse/remand","Appeal does not stay without security"],["Party seeking federal appeal","Federal appellate court","FAA §16 appealable order and federal appellate compliance","Federal appeal deadline held","Appellate review","Grant of arbitration/stay usually not immediately appealable"],["AAA/JAMS party seeking correction","Arbitrator/administrator","Applicable contract and rule version","AAA 20 days; JAMS 7 days under current published rules","Limited correction","Private deadline does not necessarily change statutory court clock"],["Award recipient seeking collection","Court enforcement process after judgment","Confirmed judgment and separate enforcement predicates","Later law","Lien, execution, garnishment, etc.","Entire enforcement component remains open"]]},{"headers":["Resource","Full direct URL","Status/version","Purpose","Limitation"],"index":4,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Resource","Full direct URL","Status/version","Purpose","Limitation"],["Nebraska Judicial Branch Forms","https://nebraskajudicial.gov/forms","Current public page checked October 26, 2026","Official statewide form inventory","No standardized statewide Nebraska arbitration-confirmation, vacatur, or correction form was located in the bounded search; local or unpublished forms may exist"],["AAA Consumer Arbitration Rules","https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","Amended and effective May 1, 2025","Private award, delivery, correction, and administration procedures","Applies only if AAA and the Consumer Rules actually govern"],["AAA Consumer Forms and Fees","https://www.adr.org/rules-forms-and-fees/consumer/","Current public administrator page","Private demand, forms, and current fee resources","Not a court form or legal determination"],["JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules","https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration","Effective June 1, 2021","Private award, correction, finality, and enforcement procedures","Actual agreement can select another rule set or version"],["JAMS Arbitration Forms","https://www.jamsadr.com/adr-forms","Current public page","Sample private arbitration forms","Not Nebraska court forms; JAMS identifies them as samples"],["Federal Rules of Civil Procedure","https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf","Current through amendments effective December 1, 2025","Federal computation and filing rules","Does not create federal FAA jurisdiction"]]},{"headers":["Source ID","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint","Version/status and access","Read bounds and limits"],"index":5,"links":[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2604.01","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+8"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2617","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+4"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1912","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+4"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/","text":"U.S. Code\n+5"},{"href":"https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf","text":"United States Courts\n+1"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewOpinion?docId=N00008357PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008009PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011227PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00012622PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009151PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00000486PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011561PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003559PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011615PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003201PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010327PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+1"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00012201PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+2"},{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/146/573/513898/","text":"Justia Law\n+1"},{"href":"https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/04/01/024036P.pdf","text":"U.S. Court of Appeals\n+1"},{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/552bv.pdf","text":"Supreme Court"},{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/569bv.pdf?ref=theindiaenclave.com","text":"Supreme Court"},{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/514bv.pdf","text":"Supreme Court"},{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf","text":"Supreme Court"},{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-83_3e04.pdf","text":"Supreme Court"},{"href":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","text":"American Arbitration Association\n+2"},{"href":"https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration","text":"JAMS\n+1"},{"href":"https://nebraskajudicial.gov/forms","text":"Nebraska Judicial Branch"}],"row_links":[[],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2604.01","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+8"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2617","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+4"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1912","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+4"}],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/","text":"U.S. Code\n+5"}],[{"href":"https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf","text":"United States Courts\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewOpinion?docId=N00008357PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008009PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011227PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00012622PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009151PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00000486PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011561PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003559PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011615PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003201PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010327PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00012201PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+2"}],[{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/146/573/513898/","text":"Justia Law\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/04/01/024036P.pdf","text":"U.S. Court of Appeals\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/552bv.pdf","text":"Supreme Court"}],[{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/569bv.pdf?ref=theindiaenclave.com","text":"Supreme Court"}],[{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/514bv.pdf","text":"Supreme Court"}],[{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf","text":"Supreme Court"}],[{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-83_3e04.pdf","text":"Supreme Court"}],[{"href":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","text":"American Arbitration Association\n+2"}],[{"href":"https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration","text":"JAMS\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskajudicial.gov/forms","text":"Nebraska Judicial Branch"}]],"rows":[["Source ID","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint","Version/status and access","Read bounds and limits"],["S_NE-P17-S001","Nebraska UAA award and review provisions, Nebraska Legislature: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2604.01; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2606; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2610; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2611; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2612; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2614; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2615. Complete operative sections.","Current official codification freshly read October 26, 2026 Pacific/UTC. No proposed or future text relied upon.","Award form, delivery, arbitrator correction, expenses, confirmation, vacatur, judicial modification, and judgment. Annotations are not treated as independently read opinions unless separately listed. \nNebraska Legislature\n+8"],["S_NE-P17-S002","Nebraska UAA procedure, jurisdiction, venue, Small Claims crossover, appeal, and prospective operation: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2617; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2618; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2618.01; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2619; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2620; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2621.","Current official codification freshly read October 26, 2026.","Motion, initial service, district-court definition, venue, appeal list, and agreements after August 30, 1987. \nNebraska Legislature\n+4"],["S_NE-P17-S003","Nebraska appeal, security, and computation provisions: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1912; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1916; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2221; https://nebraskajudicial.gov/supreme-court-rules/chapter-6-trial-courts/article-11-nebraska-court-rules-pleading-civil-cases/%C2%A7-6-1106-time; https://nebraskajudicial.gov/supreme-court-rules/chapter-2-appeals/article-2-electronic-filing-service-and-notice-system-nebraska-trial-and-appellate-courts/%C2%A7-2-206-time-filing-and-time-service.","Current statutes and rules freshly read October 26, 2026.","State appeal notice, supersedeas, computation, three-day rule, and e-filing cutoff. \nNebraska Legislature\n+4"],["S_NE-P17-S004","Federal Arbitration Act postaward provisions, OLRC: https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/.","Each page displays laws in effect through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026; freshly read October 26.","Confirmation, exclusive review grounds, service, filed papers, judgment effect, and federal appealability. \nU.S. Code\n+5"],["S_NE-P17-S005","Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, U.S. Courts: https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf; Rule 6, printed pp.12–14/PDF indices 30–32.","Current through amendments effective December 1, 2025; freshly read and page images inspected October 26, 2026.","Federal computation and extra-day rule only. \nUnited States Courts\n+1"],["S_NE-P17-S006","Signal 88, LLC v. Lyconic, LLC, 310 Neb. 824 (2022): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewOpinion?docId=N00008357PUB; printed p.832/PDF index 8, p.836/index 12, p.838/index 14.","Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read and relevant pages inspected October 26, 2026.","UAA deference, ambiguity, confirmation, and narrow remand for clarification. \nNebraska.gov"],["S_NE-P17-S007","City of Omaha v. Professional Firefighters Association, 309 Neb. 918 (2021): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008009PUB; printed p.930/PDF index 12 and p.931/index 13.","Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026.","Evident partiality and exceeded-powers standards. \nNebraska.gov"],["S_NE-P17-S008","Lund-Ross Constructors v. Duke of Omaha, 33 Neb. App. 73 (2024): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011227PUB; printed p.92/PDF index 19 and p.95/index 22.","Final published Nebraska Court of Appeals opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026.","FAA fair-hearing prejudice, excess of powers, and partial vacatur. \nNebraska.gov"],["S_NE-P17-S009","Cinatl v. Prososki, 307 Neb. 477 (2020): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00012622PUB; printed p.492/PDF index 15.","Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026.","Mandatory confirmation and appeal from confirmation after denial of vacatur. \nNebraska.gov"],["S_NE-P17-S010","State v. Nebraska Association of Public Employees, 313 Neb. 259 (2023): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009151PUB; printed p.269/PDF index 10.","Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026.","Narrow UAA review and no vacatur for immaterial/form issues. \nNebraska.gov"],["S_NE-P17-S011","MBNA America Bank v. Hansen, 16 Neb. App. 536 (2008): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00000486PUB; printed p.537/PDF index 1 and p.538/index 2.","Final published Nebraska Court of Appeals opinion; petition for further review denied. Freshly read October 26, 2026.","District-court-exclusive UAA confirmation jurisdiction in a consumer-credit award. \nNebraska.gov"],["S_NE-P17-S012","Ronald J. Palagi, P.C. v. Prospect Funding Holdings, 302 Neb. 769 (2019): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011561PUB; printed pp.780–784/PDF indices 11–15.","Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026.","FAA confirmation after untimely vacatur/modification challenge. \nNebraska.gov"],["S_NE-P17-S013","Drummond v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 280 Neb. 258 (2010): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003559PUB; printed p.260/PDF index 2 and p.262/index 4.","Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026.","UAA confirmation remains available after payment of award. \nNebraska.gov"],["S_NE-P17-S014","Garlock v. 3DS Properties, LLC, 303 Neb. 521 (2019): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011615PUB; relevant participation/objection discussion.","Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026.","Participation without objection and preservation of arbitrability objection. \nNebraska.gov"],["S_NE-P17-S015","State v. Henderson, 277 Neb. 240 (2009): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003201PUB; printed p.249/PDF index 10 and related holding.","Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026.","Narrow UAA public-policy doctrine; later Seldin limits it to UAA. \nNebraska.gov"],["S_NE-P17-S016","Karo v. NAU Country Insurance Co., 297 Neb. 798 (2017): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010327PUB; printed p.814/PDF index 16 and p.815/index 17; complete relevant §§9/12 discussion.","Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read and pages inspected October 26, 2026.","Strict FAA notice/timing characterization; subject-matter-jurisdiction terminology qualified by 2026 Jules. \nNebraska.gov\n+1"],["S_NE-P17-S017","Seldin v. Estate of Silverman, 305 Neb. 185 (2020): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00012201PUB; printed p.199/PDF index 14, pp.205–208/indices 20–23.","Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026.","FAA three-month service, exclusive review grounds, no FAA public-policy ground, serious-error limit. \nNebraska.gov\n+2"],["S_NE-P17-S018","Val-U Construction Co. v. Rosebud Sioux Tribe, 146 F.3d 573, 581 (8th Cir. 1998): https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/146/573/513898/; full published-opinion reproduction, especially reported p.581.","Final published Eighth Circuit opinion; public HTML reproduction freshly read October 26, 2026. No official PDF index available through this route.","Direct holding that FAA §9’s one-year period is permissive. \nJustia Law\n+1"],["S_NE-P17-S019","RGA Reinsurance Co. v. Ulico Casualty Co., No. 02-4036 (8th Cir. Jan. 28, 2004): https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/04/01/024036P.pdf; slip pp.4–5/PDF indices 3–4.","Final published Eighth Circuit opinion; freshly read and pages inspected October 26, 2026.","Confirmation versus modification and later one-year wording; did not decide a late confirmation case. \nU.S. Court of Appeals\n+1"],["S_NE-P17-S020","Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008): https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/552bv.pdf; printed pp.584 and 586/PDF indices 840 and 842.","Final U.S. Supreme Court opinion; relevant pages freshly inspected October 26, 2026.","FAA §§10–11 exclusive statutory grounds. \nSupreme Court"],["S_NE-P17-S021","Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter, 569 U.S. 564 (2013): https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/569bv.pdf; printed pp.564 and 569/PDF indices 649 and 654.","Final U.S. Supreme Court opinion; freshly inspected October 26, 2026.","Heavy §10(a)(4) burden and serious-error limit. \nSupreme Court"],["S_NE-P17-S022","First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938 (1995): https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/514bv.pdf; printed pp.942 and 944/PDF indices 1012 and 1014.","Final U.S. Supreme Court opinion; relevant pages freshly inspected October 26, 2026.","Independent judicial arbitrability review absent clear delegation. \nSupreme Court"],["S_NE-P17-S023","Badgerow v. Walters, 596 U.S. 1 (2022): official Supreme Court opinion reached through https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf; printed p.5/PDF index 7 and p.9/index 11.","Final U.S. Supreme Court opinion; freshly read and inspected October 26, 2026.","No FAA-created jurisdiction and no look-through for freestanding §§9–10 applications. \nSupreme Court"],["S_NE-P17-S024","Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties, 608 U.S. ___ (2026): https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-83_3e04.pdf; syllabus printed p.2/PDF index 1; opinion printed p.7/index 10 and p.12/index 15.","Final U.S. Supreme Court opinion filed May 14, 2026; freshly read and inspected October 26, 2026.","Retained jurisdiction in a federal case originally within jurisdiction and stayed under FAA §3; qualifies universal jurisdictional readings of §§9/12. \nSupreme Court"],["S_NE-P17-S025","AAA Consumer Arbitration Rules, AAA: https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf; R-44 and R-45 printed p.24/PDF index 23; R-48 and R-49 printed p.25/index 24.","Amended and effective May 1, 2025; freshly read and pages inspected October 26, 2026.","Private rules only; actual incorporation and administrator unknown. \nAmerican Arbitration Association\n+2"],["S_NE-P17-S026","JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules, JAMS: https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration; Rule 24(a), (h)–(k), Rule 25.","Published as effective June 1, 2021; freshly read October 26, 2026. HTML source has no PDF index.","Private rules only; actual contract may select another version. \nJAMS\n+1"],["S_NE-P17-S027","Nebraska Judicial Branch Forms, https://nebraskajudicial.gov/forms; bounded search for arbitration confirmation, vacatur, correction, and award.","Current public page checked October 26, 2026.","No statewide standardized form located; not a local-form or unpublished-order search. \nNebraska Judicial Branch"]]},{"headers":["Claim ID","Precise claim","Source and pinpoint","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence"],"index":6,"links":[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2610","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2610","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+2"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2612","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2612","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2618","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+1"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2617","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2619","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2615","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003559PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+1"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008009PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+1"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008009PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+1"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008009PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+1"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003201PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+1"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2614","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2614","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewOpinion?docId=N00008357PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2612","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+2"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2620","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00012622PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1912","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1916","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2221","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://nebraskajudicial.gov/supreme-court-rules/chapter-6-trial-courts/article-11-nebraska-court-rules-pleading-civil-cases/%C2%A7-6-1106-time","text":"Nebraska Judicial Branch"},{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf","text":"Supreme Court"},{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-83_3e04.pdf","text":"Supreme Court"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/","text":"U.S. Code"},{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/146/573/513898/","text":"Justia Law\n+2"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/","text":"U.S. Code\n+3"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/","text":"U.S. Code"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010327PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+3"},{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/552bv.pdf","text":"Supreme Court\n+2"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011227PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"},{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/514bv.pdf","text":"Supreme Court\n+1"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/","text":"U.S. Code"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/","text":"U.S. Code\n+1"},{"href":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","text":"American Arbitration Association"},{"href":"https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration","text":"JAMS"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2610","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+4"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+2"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2615","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+1"},{"href":"https://nebraskajudicial.gov/forms","text":"Nebraska Judicial Branch"}],"row_links":[[],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2610","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2610","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+2"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2612","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2612","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2618","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2617","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2619","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2615","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003559PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008009PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008009PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008009PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003201PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2614","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2614","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewOpinion?docId=N00008357PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2612","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+2"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2620","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00012622PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1912","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1916","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2221","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskajudicial.gov/supreme-court-rules/chapter-6-trial-courts/article-11-nebraska-court-rules-pleading-civil-cases/%C2%A7-6-1106-time","text":"Nebraska Judicial Branch"}],[{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf","text":"Supreme Court"}],[{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-83_3e04.pdf","text":"Supreme Court"}],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/","text":"U.S. Code"}],[{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/146/573/513898/","text":"Justia Law\n+2"}],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/","text":"U.S. Code\n+3"}],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/","text":"U.S. Code"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010327PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+3"}],[{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/552bv.pdf","text":"Supreme Court\n+2"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011227PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov"}],[{"href":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/514bv.pdf","text":"Supreme Court\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/","text":"U.S. Code"}],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/","text":"U.S. Code\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","text":"American Arbitration Association"}],[{"href":"https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration","text":"JAMS"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2610","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+4"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+2"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2615","text":"Nebraska Legislature\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskajudicial.gov/forms","text":"Nebraska Judicial Branch"}]],"rows":[["Claim ID","Precise claim","Source and pinpoint","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence"],["S_NE-P17-C001","Nebraska UAA award must be written, signed by participating arbitrators, and delivered through a statutory or agreed method.","S001, §25-2609. \nNebraska Legislature","Arbitrator/parties; award issuance; high"],["S_NE-P17-C002","Objection that a Nebraska award was late is waived unless made to arbitrators before delivery.","S001, §25-2609. \nNebraska Legislature","Party; pre-delivery; high"],["S_NE-P17-C003","Timely arbitrator correction application under Nebraska UAA is 20 days after delivery, with ten days for opposition.","S001, §25-2610. \nNebraska Legislature","Party/arbitrator; postaward; high"],["S_NE-P17-C004","Nebraska arbitrator correction is limited and cannot redetermine merits.","S001, §§25-2610, 25-2614; S006. \nNebraska Legislature\n+2","Arbitrator/court; high"],["S_NE-P17-C005","Nebraska confirmation is mandatory absent timely review grounds, and court acts within 60 days after application.","S001, §25-2612. \nNebraska Legislature","District court; confirmation; high"],["S_NE-P17-C006","Section 25-2612 states no outer filing deadline for confirmation.","S001, §25-2612. \nNebraska Legislature","Confirmation; other defenses not audited; high for text, broader hold"],["S_NE-P17-C007","Nebraska UAA “court” is district court; county court lacks UAA confirmation jurisdiction.","S002, §25-2618; S011. \nNebraska Legislature\n+1","Court; high"],["S_NE-P17-C008","UAA application is by motion; initial application notice is served like summons unless otherwise agreed.","S002, §25-2617. \nNebraska Legislature","Procedure/personal jurisdiction; high"],["S_NE-P17-C009","Nebraska UAA venue follows hearing location or adverse-party residence/business under §25-2619.","S002, §25-2619. \nNebraska Legislature","District court; high"],["S_NE-P17-C010","Award becomes an ordinary court judgment only after confirmation/modification/correction order and judgment entry.","S001, §25-2615. \nNebraska Legislature","Judgment stage; high"],["S_NE-P17-C011","Payment of a Nebraska award does not necessarily moot confirmation.","S013, Drummond. \nNebraska.gov","District court; no duplicate recovery implied; high"],["S_NE-P17-C012","Nebraska vacatur is limited to §25-2613 grounds plus the narrow controlling UAA public-policy doctrine.","S001, §25-2613; S015. \nNebraska Legislature\n+1","Vacatur; high"],["S_NE-P17-C013","Ordinary Nebraska vacatur deadline is 90 days after delivery.","S001, §25-2613(b). \nNebraska Legislature","Applicant; high"],["S_NE-P17-C014","Fraud/corruption/undue-means branch runs 90 days from known or reasonably knowable ground.","S001, §25-2613(b). \nNebraska Legislature","Applicant; discovery proof required; high"],["S_NE-P17-C015","Nebraska no-agreement postaward ground requires no prior adverse §25-2603 ruling and no participation without objection.","S001, §25-2613(a)(5). \nNebraska Legislature","Formation postaward; high"],["S_NE-P17-C016","Evident partiality requires an objective basis on which a reasonable person would have to conclude partiality.","S007. \nNebraska.gov","Neutral arbitrator; high"],["S_NE-P17-C017","UAA hearing misconduct requires substantial prejudice; harmless evidentiary disagreement is insufficient.","S001, §25-2613(a)(4); S008. \nNebraska Legislature\n+1","Hearing review; high"],["S_NE-P17-C018","Serious legal or factual error is not an independent Nebraska UAA vacatur ground.","S007, S010. \nNebraska.gov\n+1","Merits review; high"],["S_NE-P17-C019","Arbitrator exceeds powers only when abandoning delegated contractual interpretation, not merely construing it incorrectly.","S007, S010. \nNebraska.gov\n+1","Vacatur; heavy burden; high"],["S_NE-P17-C020","Nebraska UAA public-policy refusal is narrow, explicit, well-defined, and dominant; it is not a FAA ground.","S015, S017. \nNebraska.gov\n+1","UAA only; high"],["S_NE-P17-C021","Nebraska judicial modification application must be made within 90 days after delivery.","S001, §25-2614. \nNebraska Legislature","Modification; high"],["S_NE-P17-C022","Nebraska modification grounds are evident miscalculation/description error, unsubmitted matter, or form imperfection without merits effect.","S001, §25-2614. \nNebraska Legislature","Modification; high"],["S_NE-P17-C023","Judicial clarification or remand cannot become a merits rewrite; remand is exceptional when meaning cannot otherwise be determined.","S006. \nNebraska.gov","Confirmation/modification; high"],["S_NE-P17-C024","A confirmation application does not restart or extend the opposing party’s review period.","S001; S012. \nNebraska Legislature\n+2","Timing; high"],["S_NE-P17-C025","Nebraska §25-2620 lists appealable UAA orders.","S002, §25-2620. \nNebraska Legislature","Appeal; high"],["S_NE-P17-C026","Denial of vacatur is ordinarily reviewed after confirmation rather than as a standalone listed appeal.","S009. \nNebraska.gov","Appeal; high"],["S_NE-P17-C027","Nebraska civil appeal ordinarily requires notice and fee within 30 days after entry.","S003, §25-1912. \nNebraska Legislature","Appeal; postjudgment-motion exceptions apply; high"],["S_NE-P17-C028","Nebraska appeal does not automatically stay a money judgment; §25-1916 security is required.","S003, §25-1916. \nNebraska Legislature","Stay/security; high"],["S_NE-P17-C029","Nebraska excludes trigger day and extends weekend/holiday endpoint.","S003, §25-2221. \nNebraska Legislature","Computation; high"],["S_NE-P17-C030","Nebraska Rule 6 three-mail-days provision does not automatically extend a delivery-triggered UAA statutory period.","S003, Rule §6-1106. \nNebraska Judicial Branch","Timing; high bounded conclusion"],["S_NE-P17-C031","FAA itself does not create federal subject-matter jurisdiction.","S023, Badgerow. \nSupreme Court","Federal court; high"],["S_NE-P17-C032","Federal court that had original jurisdiction and stayed the case under §3 retains jurisdiction over resulting §§9–10 motions.","S024, Jules. \nSupreme Court","Pending federal case; high"],["S_NE-P17-C033","FAA §9 requires confirmation when its predicates are met and no §§10–11 ground applies.","S004, §9. \nU.S. Code","Confirmation; high"],["S_NE-P17-C034","Eighth Circuit directly held §9’s one-year language permissive; later inconsistent wording did not decide a late case.","S018–S019. \nJustia Law\n+2","Federal confirmation; high for direct holding, current tension noted"],["S_NE-P17-C035","FAA §§10–11 provide exclusive expedited judicial review grounds.","S004, S020, S017. \nU.S. Code\n+3","FAA review; high"],["S_NE-P17-C036","FAA §12 requires service of notice within three months after award filed or delivered and supplies no fraud-discovery branch.","S004, §12. \nU.S. Code","FAA review; high"],["S_NE-P17-C037","Karo/Seldin’s universal jurisdictional terminology is qualified by Jules, though statutory timing/service remains consequential.","S016–S017, S024. \nNebraska.gov\n+3","Federal/state FAA procedure; high qualification"],["S_NE-P17-C038","FAA legal or factual error is insufficient unless it fits an actual §10 ground.","S020–S021, S017. \nSupreme Court\n+2","Merits review; high"],["S_NE-P17-C039","FAA hearing-misconduct vacatur requires fair-hearing prejudice.","S008. \nNebraska.gov","§10(a)(3); high"],["S_NE-P17-C040","Postaward arbitrability challenge remains judicial absent clear delegation, but the review deadline still applies.","S022, S004. \nSupreme Court\n+1","Formation/arbitrability; high"],["S_NE-P17-C041","FAA §12 authorizes a discretionary enforcement stay on motion, notice, and just terms.","S004, §12. \nU.S. Code","Stay; high"],["S_NE-P17-C042","FAA §16 controls federal appealability, not Nebraska state appeal procedure.","S004, §16; S002, §25-2620. \nU.S. Code\n+1","Appeal; high"],["S_NE-P17-C043","Current AAA Consumer Rules permit limited correction within 20 calendar days after transmittal and no merits redetermination.","S025, R-49. \nAmerican Arbitration Association","Private administration; actual incorporation held; high"],["S_NE-P17-C044","Current JAMS Comprehensive Rules permit correction requests within seven days and private-rule finality after 14 days absent correction.","S026, Rule 24(j)–(k). \nJAMS","Private administration; actual incorporation held; high"],["S_NE-P17-C045","No automatic statutory tolling of court-review periods from AAA/JAMS correction request was verified.","S001, S004, S025–S026. \nNebraska Legislature\n+4","Timing; HOLD beyond negative text finding"],["S_NE-P17-C046","Electronic award delivery cannot be classified without governing agreement and rule version.","S001, S025–S026. \nNebraska Legislature\n+2","Trigger date; unresolved"],["S_NE-P17-C047","Confirmation creates a judgment but does not itself execute, garnish, satisfy, refund, or delete reporting.","S001, §25-2615; S004, §13. \nNebraska Legislature\n+1","Judgment boundary; high"],["S_NE-P17-C048","No statewide Nebraska confirmation/vacatur form was located in the official form inventory.","S027. \nNebraska Judicial Branch","Forms; bounded negative finding"]]},{"headers":["Assigned issue","Status","Claim IDs","Exact missing evidence or next action"],"index":7,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Assigned issue","Status","Claim IDs","Exact missing evidence or next action"],["Nebraska UAA current text","Answered","C001–C030","Actual agreement, award, and dates"],["FAA current text","Answered","C031–C042","Actual FAA commerce, exclusions, and court"],["Governing state/federal route","Partial","C007, C031–C033","Contract, commerce, choice clause, pending-case posture"],["Nebraska award form","Answered","C001–C002","Actual award and panel record"],["FAA award form","Partial","—","Actual contract/administrator; FAA §§9–13 do not duplicate UAA form rules"],["Nebraska award delivery","Answered textually","C001, C046","Actual transmission and agreement"],["Electronic award delivery","Unresolved factually","C046","Agreement, AAA/JAMS version, email logs"],["Late award","Answered","C002","Actual time limit and pre-delivery objection"],["Arbitrator correction","Answered","C003–C004","Actual request and notice"],["AAA correction","Answered privately","C043","Actual incorporation and case version"],["JAMS correction","Answered privately","C044","Actual incorporation and case version"],["Correction-request tolling","Not established","C045","Controlling statute, order, or case"],["Nebraska confirmation","Answered","C005–C011","Actual motion, service, award, jurisdiction"],["Nebraska outer confirmation period","Unresolved beyond statutory silence","C006","Other limitation/laches authority"],["FAA confirmation","Answered","C031–C034","Consent-to-judgment clause and independent jurisdiction"],["FAA one-year question","Answered with Eighth Circuit tension","C034","En banc or later controlling treatment if any"],["Federal subject-matter jurisdiction","Answered","C031–C032","Diversity/federal question or stayed-case record"],["Personal jurisdiction and service","Answered generally","C008, C036–C037","Actual residence, attorney, service method"],["FAA §13 papers","Answered","S004","Actual documents"],["Award versus judgment","Answered","C010, C047","Confirmation order and later enforcement"],["Paid award confirmation","Answered","C011","Satisfaction record"],["Nebraska vacatur grounds","Answered exhaustively","C012–C020","Actual hearing/award evidence"],["Nebraska fraud discovery","Answered","C014","Discovery date and diligence"],["Nebraska no-agreement ground","Answered","C015","Prior §2603 ruling and objection record"],["Nebraska public policy","Answered narrowly","C020","Explicit legal policy and award conflict"],["FAA vacatur grounds","Answered exhaustively","C035–C040","Actual record and timely service"],["FAA fraud discovery extension","Not in statutory text","C036","Any valid equitable exception remains unestablished"],["Legal or factual error","Answered as insufficient alone","C018, C038","Must identify statutory ground"],["Evident partiality","Answered generally","C016","Relationship, disclosure, timing, objection"],["Refusal to hear evidence","Answered generally","C017, C039","Material evidence, objection, prejudice"],["Exceeded powers","Answered generally","C019, C038","Submission, contract, award reasoning"],["Partial vacatur","Answered only as severability possibility","C017","Actual award structure"],["Nebraska modification grounds","Answered","C021–C023","Award and evident defect"],["FAA modification grounds","Answered","C035","Award and evident defect"],["Clarification versus merits rewrite","Answered","C023","Award and full arbitral record"],["Confirmation pending review deadline","Answered","C024","Actual filings"],["Nebraska appealability","Answered","C025–C028","Actual order and entry date"],["Federal appealability","Answered as FAA §16 boundary","C042","Actual federal order and appellate rules"],["Federal appeal notice deadline","Excluded/not researched","—","Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure"],["Nebraska appeal notice period","Answered","C027","Entry and postjudgment motions"],["Nebraska stay/security","Answered as boundary","C028","Judgment, net worth, bond, court order"],["FAA predecision enforcement stay","Answered","C041","Motion, notice, terms"],["Federal postjudgment security","Excluded/later","—","Federal Rule 62 and case-specific order"],["State time computation","Answered","C029–C030","Actual closure/holiday and filing receipt"],["Federal time computation","Answered generally","S005","Actual federal filing/service"],["Three extra mail days","Answered as not automatic","C030, S005","Exact period and service trigger"],["State court applying FAA computation","Partial","—","Actual procedural posture and controlling court decision"],["Administrator rules","Answered for current public AAA/JAMS versions","C043–C046","Actual contract and incorporated version"],["Official court forms","Not located","C048","Local forms or court instructions"],["Award preclusive effect","Excluded","—","Separate res judicata/collateral-estoppel analysis"],["Award interest","Excluded","—","Contract, award, state/federal interest law"],["Judgment duration/renewal","Excluded","—","Separate postjudgment pass"],["Lien/satisfaction/release","Excluded","—","Separate judgment component"],["Execution/garnishment/exemptions","Excluded","—","Separate enforcement component"],["Credit reporting consequence","Excluded","—","Separate FCRA/state-reporting component"],["Provider licensing/remedies","Excluded","—","Reviewed provider passes and future work"],["Secured/medical/government/support/tax sectors","Excluded","—","Separate sector passes"],["Local/tribal/country law","Excluded","—","Separate jurisdictional component"],["Named award or case result","Not performed","—","Actual private documents and docket"],["Component/Nebraska/parent/A066 acceptance","Not granted","—","Remaining registry work and scoped review"]]}],"claims":[{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C001","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C001","Precise claim":"Nebraska UAA award must be written, signed by participating arbitrators, and delivered through a statutory or agreed method.","Source and pinpoint":"S001, §25-2609. \nNebraska Legislature","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Arbitrator/parties; award issuance; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_text_predicate_attribution_or_traceability_correction_pending_UNSENT_other_core_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_NE-P17-Q001"]},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C002","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C002","Precise claim":"Objection that a Nebraska award was late is waived unless made to arbitrators before delivery.","Source and pinpoint":"S001, §25-2609. \nNebraska Legislature","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Party; pre-delivery; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_statutory_or_private_rule_core_application_and_currentness_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C003","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C003","Precise claim":"Timely arbitrator correction application under Nebraska UAA is 20 days after delivery, with ten days for opposition.","Source and pinpoint":"S001, §25-2610. \nNebraska Legislature","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Party/arbitrator; postaward; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C004","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C004","Precise claim":"Nebraska arbitrator correction is limited and cannot redetermine merits.","Source and pinpoint":"S001, §§25-2610, 25-2614; S006. \nNebraska Legislature\n+2","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Arbitrator/court; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C005","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C005","Precise claim":"Nebraska confirmation is mandatory absent timely review grounds, and court acts within 60 days after application.","Source and pinpoint":"S001, §25-2612. \nNebraska Legislature","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"District court; confirmation; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_statutory_or_private_rule_core_application_and_currentness_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C006","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C006","Precise claim":"Section 25-2612 states no outer filing deadline for confirmation.","Source and pinpoint":"S001, §25-2612. \nNebraska Legislature","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Confirmation; other defenses not audited; high for text, broader hold"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C007","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C007","Precise claim":"Nebraska UAA “court” is district court; county court lacks UAA confirmation jurisdiction.","Source and pinpoint":"S002, §25-2618; S011. \nNebraska Legislature\n+1","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Court; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C008","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C008","Precise claim":"UAA application is by motion; initial application notice is served like summons unless otherwise agreed.","Source and pinpoint":"S002, §25-2617. \nNebraska Legislature","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Procedure/personal jurisdiction; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_statutory_or_private_rule_core_application_and_currentness_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C009","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C009","Precise claim":"Nebraska UAA venue follows hearing location or adverse-party residence/business under §25-2619.","Source and pinpoint":"S002, §25-2619. \nNebraska Legislature","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"District court; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_text_predicate_attribution_or_traceability_correction_pending_UNSENT_other_core_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_NE-P17-Q002"]},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C010","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C010","Precise claim":"Award becomes an ordinary court judgment only after confirmation/modification/correction order and judgment entry.","Source and pinpoint":"S001, §25-2615. \nNebraska Legislature","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Judgment stage; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_statutory_or_private_rule_core_application_and_currentness_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C011","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C011","Precise claim":"Payment of a Nebraska award does not necessarily moot confirmation.","Source and pinpoint":"S013, Drummond. \nNebraska.gov","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"District court; no duplicate recovery implied; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C012","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C012","Precise claim":"Nebraska vacatur is limited to §25-2613 grounds plus the narrow controlling UAA public-policy doctrine.","Source and pinpoint":"S001, §25-2613; S015. \nNebraska Legislature\n+1","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Vacatur; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C013","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C013","Precise claim":"Ordinary Nebraska vacatur deadline is 90 days after delivery.","Source and pinpoint":"S001, §25-2613(b). \nNebraska Legislature","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Applicant; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_statutory_or_private_rule_core_application_and_currentness_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C014","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C014","Precise claim":"Fraud/corruption/undue-means branch runs 90 days from known or reasonably knowable ground.","Source and pinpoint":"S001, §25-2613(b). \nNebraska Legislature","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Applicant; discovery proof required; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_statutory_or_private_rule_core_application_and_currentness_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C015","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C015","Precise claim":"Nebraska no-agreement postaward ground requires no prior adverse §25-2603 ruling and no participation without objection.","Source and pinpoint":"S001, §25-2613(a)(5). \nNebraska Legislature","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Formation postaward; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_statutory_or_private_rule_core_application_and_currentness_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C016","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C016","Precise claim":"Evident partiality requires an objective basis on which a reasonable person would have to conclude partiality.","Source and pinpoint":"S007. \nNebraska.gov","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Neutral arbitrator; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C017","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C017","Precise claim":"UAA hearing misconduct requires substantial prejudice; harmless evidentiary disagreement is insufficient.","Source and pinpoint":"S001, §25-2613(a)(4); S008. \nNebraska Legislature\n+1","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Hearing review; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C018","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C018","Precise claim":"Serious legal or factual error is not an independent Nebraska UAA vacatur ground.","Source and pinpoint":"S007, S010. \nNebraska.gov\n+1","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Merits review; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C019","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C019","Precise claim":"Arbitrator exceeds powers only when abandoning delegated contractual interpretation, not merely construing it incorrectly.","Source and pinpoint":"S007, S010. \nNebraska.gov\n+1","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Vacatur; heavy burden; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C020","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C020","Precise claim":"Nebraska UAA public-policy refusal is narrow, explicit, well-defined, and dominant; it is not a FAA ground.","Source and pinpoint":"S015, S017. \nNebraska.gov\n+1","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"UAA only; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C021","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C021","Precise claim":"Nebraska judicial modification application must be made within 90 days after delivery.","Source and pinpoint":"S001, §25-2614. \nNebraska Legislature","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Modification; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_statutory_or_private_rule_core_application_and_currentness_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C022","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C022","Precise claim":"Nebraska modification grounds are evident miscalculation/description error, unsubmitted matter, or form imperfection without merits effect.","Source and pinpoint":"S001, §25-2614. \nNebraska Legislature","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Modification; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_statutory_or_private_rule_core_application_and_currentness_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C023","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C023","Precise claim":"Judicial clarification or remand cannot become a merits rewrite; remand is exceptional when meaning cannot otherwise be determined.","Source and pinpoint":"S006. \nNebraska.gov","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Confirmation/modification; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C024","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C024","Precise claim":"A confirmation application does not restart or extend the opposing party’s review period.","Source and pinpoint":"S001; S012. \nNebraska Legislature\n+2","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Timing; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C025","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C025","Precise claim":"Nebraska §25-2620 lists appealable UAA orders.","Source and pinpoint":"S002, §25-2620. \nNebraska Legislature","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Appeal; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_limit":"2620failed once; actual appealability/finality and originalcase holdings remain held."},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C026","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C026","Precise claim":"Denial of vacatur is ordinarily reviewed after confirmation rather than as a standalone listed appeal.","Source and pinpoint":"S009. \nNebraska.gov","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Appeal; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_limit":"2620failed once; actual appealability/finality and originalcase holdings remain held."},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C027","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C027","Precise claim":"Nebraska civil appeal ordinarily requires notice and fee within 30 days after entry.","Source and pinpoint":"S003, §25-1912. \nNebraska Legislature","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Appeal; postjudgment-motion exceptions apply; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_statutory_or_private_rule_core_application_and_currentness_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C028","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C028","Precise claim":"Nebraska appeal does not automatically stay a money judgment; §25-1916 security is required.","Source and pinpoint":"S003, §25-1916. \nNebraska Legislature","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Stay/security; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_statutory_or_private_rule_core_application_and_currentness_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C029","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C029","Precise claim":"Nebraska excludes trigger day and extends weekend/holiday endpoint.","Source and pinpoint":"S003, §25-2221. \nNebraska Legislature","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Computation; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_text_predicate_attribution_or_traceability_correction_pending_UNSENT_other_core_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_NE-P17-Q006"]},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C030","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C030","Precise claim":"Nebraska Rule 6 three-mail-days provision does not automatically extend a delivery-triggered UAA statutory period.","Source and pinpoint":"S003, Rule §6-1106. \nNebraska Judicial Branch","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Timing; high bounded conclusion"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_text_predicate_attribution_or_traceability_correction_pending_UNSENT_other_core_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_NE-P17-Q006"]},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C031","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C031","Precise claim":"FAA itself does not create federal subject-matter jurisdiction.","Source and pinpoint":"S023, Badgerow. \nSupreme Court","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Federal court; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C032","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C032","Precise claim":"Federal court that had original jurisdiction and stayed the case under §3 retains jurisdiction over resulting §§9–10 motions.","Source and pinpoint":"S024, Jules. \nSupreme Court","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Pending federal case; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C033","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C033","Precise claim":"FAA §9 requires confirmation when its predicates are met and no §§10–11 ground applies.","Source and pinpoint":"S004, §9. \nU.S. Code","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Confirmation; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_statutory_or_private_rule_core_application_and_currentness_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C034","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C034","Precise claim":"Eighth Circuit directly held §9’s one-year language permissive; later inconsistent wording did not decide a late case.","Source and pinpoint":"S018–S019. \nJustia Law\n+2","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Federal confirmation; high for direct holding, current tension noted"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C035","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C035","Precise claim":"FAA §§10–11 provide exclusive expedited judicial review grounds.","Source and pinpoint":"S004, S020, S017. \nU.S. Code\n+3","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"FAA review; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_text_predicate_attribution_or_traceability_correction_pending_UNSENT_other_core_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_NE-P17-Q003","S_NE-P17-Q007"]},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C036","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C036","Precise claim":"FAA §12 requires service of notice within three months after award filed or delivered and supplies no fraud-discovery branch.","Source and pinpoint":"S004, §12. \nU.S. Code","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"FAA review; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_statutory_or_private_rule_core_application_and_currentness_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C037","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C037","Precise claim":"Karo/Seldin’s universal jurisdictional terminology is qualified by Jules, though statutory timing/service remains consequential.","Source and pinpoint":"S016–S017, S024. \nNebraska.gov\n+3","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Federal/state FAA procedure; high qualification"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C038","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C038","Precise claim":"FAA legal or factual error is insufficient unless it fits an actual §10 ground.","Source and pinpoint":"S020–S021, S017. \nSupreme Court\n+2","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Merits review; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C039","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C039","Precise claim":"FAA hearing-misconduct vacatur requires fair-hearing prejudice.","Source and pinpoint":"S008. \nNebraska.gov","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"§10(a)(3); high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C040","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C040","Precise claim":"Postaward arbitrability challenge remains judicial absent clear delegation, but the review deadline still applies.","Source and pinpoint":"S022, S004. \nSupreme Court\n+1","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Formation/arbitrability; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C041","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C041","Precise claim":"FAA §12 authorizes a discretionary enforcement stay on motion, notice, and just terms.","Source and pinpoint":"S004, §12. \nU.S. Code","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Stay; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_text_predicate_attribution_or_traceability_correction_pending_UNSENT_other_core_holds_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_NE-P17-Q004"]},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C042","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C042","Precise claim":"FAA §16 controls federal appealability, not Nebraska state appeal procedure.","Source and pinpoint":"S004, §16; S002, §25-2620. \nU.S. Code\n+1","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Appeal; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_statutory_or_private_rule_core_application_and_currentness_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C043","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C043","Precise claim":"Current AAA Consumer Rules permit limited correction within 20 calendar days after transmittal and no merits redetermination.","Source and pinpoint":"S025, R-49. \nAmerican Arbitration Association","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Private administration; actual incorporation held; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_statutory_or_private_rule_core_application_and_currentness_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C044","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C044","Precise claim":"Current JAMS Comprehensive Rules permit correction requests within seven days and private-rule finality after 14 days absent correction.","Source and pinpoint":"S026, Rule 24(j)–(k). \nJAMS","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Private administration; actual incorporation held; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_statutory_or_private_rule_core_application_and_currentness_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C045","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C045","Precise claim":"No automatic statutory tolling of court-review periods from AAA/JAMS correction request was verified.","Source and pinpoint":"S001, S004, S025–S026. \nNebraska Legislature\n+4","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Timing; HOLD beyond negative text finding"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C046","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C046","Precise claim":"Electronic award delivery cannot be classified without governing agreement and rule version.","Source and pinpoint":"S001, S025–S026. \nNebraska Legislature\n+2","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Trigger date; unresolved"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_statutory_or_private_rule_core_application_and_currentness_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C047","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C047","Precise claim":"Confirmation creates a judgment but does not itself execute, garnish, satisfy, refund, or delete reporting.","Source and pinpoint":"S001, §25-2615; S004, §13. \nNebraska Legislature\n+1","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Judgment boundary; high"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_statutory_or_private_rule_core_application_and_currentness_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P17-C048","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_NE-P17-C048","Precise claim":"No statewide Nebraska confirmation/vacatur form was located in the official form inventory.","Source and pinpoint":"S027. \nNebraska Judicial Branch","Actor, court, stage, consequence, confidence":"Forms; bounded negative finding"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_annotation_gateway_only_underlying_judicial_negative_search_or_unresolved_scope_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false}],"sources":[{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S001","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2604.01","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2606","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2610","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2611","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2612","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2614","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2615"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S001","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"Nebraska UAA award and review provisions, Nebraska Legislature: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2604.01; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2606; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2610; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2611; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2612; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2614; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2615. Complete operative sections.","Version/status and access":"Current official codification freshly read October 26, 2026 Pacific/UTC. No proposed or future text relied upon.","Read bounds and limits":"Award form, delivery, arbitrator correction, expenses, confirmation, vacatur, judicial modification, and judgment. Annotations are not treated as independently read opinions unless separately listed. \nNebraska Legislature\n+8"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_scope_with_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S001","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2604.01","operative_or_selected_lines":[18,18],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Nebraska Legislature (https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2604.01)","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2604.01","packet_character_bounds":[0,1765],"returned_lines_read":[[0,41]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete selected operative body. Neutral-arbitrator disqualification, precommencement demand and known/knowable grounds; judicial24-739crossreference not reopened.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S001","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2606","operative_or_selected_lines":[19,26],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Nebraska Legislature (https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2606)","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2606","packet_character_bounds":[1847,5241],"returned_lines_read":[[0,53]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete selected operative body. Agreement qualification, notice/appearance, goodcause adjournment, material evidence/cross-examination, majority award and county rule.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S001","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609","operative_or_selected_lines":[19,20],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Nebraska Legislature (https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609)","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609","packet_character_bounds":[0,2566],"returned_lines_read":[[0,46]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete selected operative body. Writing/signatures of arbitrators JOINING award, delivery, contractual/court timing, written extension before/after and objection waiver.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S001","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2610","operative_or_selected_lines":[18,19],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Nebraska Legislature (https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2610)","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2610","packet_character_bounds":[0,3266],"returned_lines_read":[[0,47]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete selected operative body. Twenty-day party request, forthwith notice and ten-day served objections; court-submission/limited grounds and further review. Court remand timing construction remains held.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S001","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2611","operative_or_selected_lines":[19,19],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Nebraska Legislature (https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2611)","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2611","packet_character_bounds":[5323,6751],"returned_lines_read":[[0,42]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete selected operative body. Agreement-controlled expenses/fees, not counsel fees, payable as award provides; no actual fee entitlement.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S001","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2612","operative_or_selected_lines":[19,19],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Nebraska Legislature (https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2612)","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2612","packet_character_bounds":[2648,6376],"returned_lines_read":[[0,54]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete selected operative body. Sixty-day court confirmation directive with timely review grounds; no outer filing period stated, no immunity from other defenses.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S001","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613","operative_or_selected_lines":[19,35],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Nebraska Legislature (https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613)","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2613","packet_character_bounds":[6458,15259],"returned_lines_read":[[0,96]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete selected operative body. All six vacatur branches, distinct prejudice wording, ninety-day/delivery and fraud discovery, rehearing and confirmation-after-denial.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S001","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2614","operative_or_selected_lines":[19,27],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Nebraska Legislature (https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2614)","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2614","packet_character_bounds":[15341,18172],"returned_lines_read":[[0,53]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete selected operative body. All judicial modification conditions, ninety-day trigger, effect of intent and alternative joinder.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S001","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2615","operative_or_selected_lines":[19,19],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Nebraska Legislature (https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2615)","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2615","packet_character_bounds":[3348,4839],"returned_lines_read":[[0,42]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete selected operative body. Judgment conforming to order, ordinary enforcement and discretionary costs/disbursements.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S001","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2602.01","operative_or_selected_lines":[19,35],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Nebraska Legislature (https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2602.01)","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2602.01","packet_character_bounds":[6833,12055],"returned_lines_read":[[0,74]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete selected operative body. Additional necessary scope/voluntariness/contract-control and exclusions, not acceptance of NE15gateway. Actual choice/variation/FAA preemption remains held.","additional_related_gateway":true},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S001","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2603","operative_or_selected_lines":[19,23],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Nebraska Legislature (https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2603)","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2603","packet_character_bounds":[15528,20278],"returned_lines_read":[[0,54]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete selected operative body. Additional necessary prior-formation-adjudication/court-stay gateway, not a new general gateway report.","additional_related_gateway":true}],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_NE-P17-Q001"]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S002","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2617","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2618","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2618.01","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2619","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2620","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2621"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S002","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"Nebraska UAA procedure, jurisdiction, venue, Small Claims crossover, appeal, and prospective operation: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2617; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2618; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2618.01; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2619; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2620; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2621.","Version/status and access":"Current official codification freshly read October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"Motion, initial service, district-court definition, venue, appeal list, and agreements after August 30, 1987. \nNebraska Legislature\n+4"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_scope_with_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S002","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2617","operative_or_selected_lines":[19,19],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Nebraska Legislature (https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2617)","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2617","packet_character_bounds":[4921,6528],"returned_lines_read":[[0,42]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete operative body. Motion/hearing notice and initial summons-method unless parties agree otherwise.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S002","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2618","operative_or_selected_lines":[19,20],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Nebraska Legislature (https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2618)","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2618","packet_character_bounds":[6610,8624],"returned_lines_read":[[0,46]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete operative body. District court definition; in-state arbitration agreement jurisdiction and industrial-relations restriction.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S002","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2618.01","operative_or_selected_lines":[19,32],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Nebraska Legislature (https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2618.01)","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2618.01","packet_character_bounds":[0,2806],"returned_lines_read":[[0,55]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete operative body. SmallClaims direct controversy-resolution alternative and limited appeal. Not confirmation of an arbitrator award; no actual jurisdictional threshold researched.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S002","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2619","operative_or_selected_lines":[18,19],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Nebraska Legislature (https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2619)","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2619","packet_character_bounds":[2888,4599],"returned_lines_read":[[0,42]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete operative body. Initial venue sequence and all subsequent applications in the initial court unless otherwise directed.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S002","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2621","operative_or_selected_lines":[20,20],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Nebraska Legislature (https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2621)","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2621","packet_character_bounds":[5028,6308],"returned_lines_read":[[0,43]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete operative body. Agreements subsequent toAugust30,1987; original gateway/history and actual agreement date held.","additional_related_gateway":false}],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_NE-P17-Q002"],"coordinator_limit":"2620exactfetchfailed; other specified bodies do not certify appeal list. Additional2618.01not arbitralawardconfirmation."},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S003","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1912","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1916","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2221","https://nebraskajudicial.gov/supreme-court-rules/chapter-6-trial-courts/article-11-nebraska-court-rules-pleading-civil-cases/%C2%A7-6-1106-time","https://nebraskajudicial.gov/supreme-court-rules/chapter-2-appeals/article-2-electronic-filing-service-and-notice-system-nebraska-trial-and-appellate-courts/%C2%A7-2-206-time-filing-and-time-service"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S003","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"Nebraska appeal, security, and computation provisions: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1912; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1916; https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2221; https://nebraskajudicial.gov/supreme-court-rules/chapter-6-trial-courts/article-11-nebraska-court-rules-pleading-civil-cases/%C2%A7-6-1106-time; https://nebraskajudicial.gov/supreme-court-rules/chapter-2-appeals/article-2-electronic-filing-service-and-notice-system-nebraska-trial-and-appellate-courts/%C2%A7-2-206-time-filing-and-time-service.","Version/status and access":"Current statutes and rules freshly read October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"State appeal notice, supersedeas, computation, three-day rule, and e-filing cutoff. \nNebraska Legislature\n+4"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_scope_with_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S003","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1912","operative_or_selected_lines":[18,27],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Nebraska Legislature (https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1912)","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1912","packet_character_bounds":[0,7545],"returned_lines_read":[[0,74]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete operative appeal procedure, fee exceptions, premature notices, specific terminating motions/new notice, clerical steps; no full annotation/judicial/history audit.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S003","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1916","operative_or_selected_lines":[18,27],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Nebraska Legislature (https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1916)","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-1916","packet_character_bounds":[7627,15446],"returned_lines_read":[[0,69]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete operative security body, thirty-day trigger, government-bond/cash/surety alternatives, lesser-of money amount, anti-dissipation, approval/filing/lien and nonmoney branches; no actual bond calculated.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S003","URL":"https://nebraskajudicial.gov/supreme-court-rules/chapter-6-trial-courts/article-11-nebraska-court-rules-pleading-civil-cases/%C2%A7-6-1106-time","operative_or_selected_lines":[29,45],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"§ 6-1106. Time. | Nebraska Judicial Branch (https://nebraskajudicial.gov/supreme-court-rules/chapter-6-trial-courts/article-11-nebraska-court-rules-pleading-civil-cases/%C2%A7-6-1106-time)","URL":"https://nebraskajudicial.gov/supreme-court-rules/chapter-6-trial-courts/article-11-nebraska-court-rules-pleading-civil-cases/%C2%A7-6-1106-time","packet_character_bounds":[20360,28715],"returned_lines_read":[[0,139]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete displayed operative time rule and2024comments/history: statutory computation, court cannot extend statutory time except statute, mail3days after normal expiry. Navigation only beyond45.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S003","URL":"https://nebraskajudicial.gov/supreme-court-rules/chapter-2-appeals/article-2-electronic-filing-service-and-notice-system-nebraska-trial-and-appellate-courts/%C2%A7-2-206-time-filing-and-time-service","operative_or_selected_lines":[29,36],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"§ 2-206. Time of filing and time of service. | Nebraska Judicial Branch (https://nebraskajudicial.gov/supreme-court-rules/chapter-2-appeals/article-2-electronic-filing-service-and-notice-system-nebraska-trial-and-appellate-courts/%C2%A7-2-206-time-filing-and-time-service)","URL":"https://nebraskajudicial.gov/supreme-court-rules/chapter-2-appeals/article-2-electronic-filing-service-and-notice-system-nebraska-trial-and-appellate-courts/%C2%A7-2-206-time-filing-and-time-service","packet_character_bounds":[10792,20018],"returned_lines_read":[[0,178]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete displayed time-of-filing/service rule and history. Clerk receipt governs filing; authorized-provider receipt governs e-service. Localcourt seat and appellateLincoln specified; navigation not substantive authority.","additional_related_gateway":false}],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S003","URL":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2221","evidence":"[internal evidence reference]","unmodified_local_copy":"[internal evidence reference]","sha256":"bdae8d0e1d722f822bb2691f45e265c83286a97e2c2de3acbea19e4d2aa3e1f3","operative_lines":[18,22],"classification":"Explicit dated own NE11primary reuse, locally reread selected complete operative body; not new NE17fetch.","prior_review_completed_at":"2026-10-29T03:02:59.464468+00:00","limit":"Only25-2221body and stated holiday list used; other copied packet contents not newly reviewed here. Actual closures/proclamations and application held."}],"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_NE-P17-Q006"]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S004","urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S004","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"Federal Arbitration Act postaward provisions, OLRC: https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/; https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/.","Version/status and access":"Each page displays laws in effect through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026; freshly read October 26.","Read bounds and limits":"Confirmation, exclusive review grounds, service, filed papers, judgment effect, and federal appealability. \nU.S. Code\n+5"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_scope_with_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S004","URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/","operative_or_selected_lines":[21,23],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"9 U.S.C. § 9: Award of arbitrators; confirmation; jurisdiction; procedure (https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/)","URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s9/","packet_character_bounds":[0,2814],"returned_lines_read":[[0,31]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete operative FAAsection body. Consent-to-judgment, one-year literal text, court/venue and resident/nonresident service. Later judicial construction/actualjurisdiction held.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S004","URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/","operative_or_selected_lines":[22,31],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"9 U.S.C. § 10: Same; vacation; grounds; rehearing (https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/)","URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s10/","packet_character_bounds":[2896,7511],"returned_lines_read":[[0,52]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete operative FAAsection body. Complete vacatur/rehearing body, including separate administrative-arbitration nonparty branch, outside ordinary debt application.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S004","URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/","operative_or_selected_lines":[22,27],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"9 U.S.C. § 11: Same; modification or correction; grounds; order (https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/)","URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/","packet_character_bounds":[7593,9889],"returned_lines_read":[[0,36]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete operative FAAsection body. Complete modification body; subsection(b)UNLESS qualifier must not be replaced with NebraskaUAAwording.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S004","URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/","operative_or_selected_lines":[21,22],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"9 U.S.C. § 12: Notice of motions to vacate or modify; service; stay of proceedings (https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/)","URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/","packet_character_bounds":[9971,12392],"returned_lines_read":[[0,30]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete operative FAAsection body. Complete notice/service/threemonths and stay-order-to-be-served-with-notice text. No just-terms phrase in this section.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S004","URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/","operative_or_selected_lines":[22,27],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"9 U.S.C. § 13: Papers filed with order on motions; judgment; docketing; force and effect; enforcement (https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/)","URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/","packet_character_bounds":[0,2540],"returned_lines_read":[[0,35]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete operative FAAsection body. Complete papers filed when confirmation/modification/correction order filed for judgment, additional-arbitrator/umpire selection if any, notices/orders on such application and judgment effect.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S004","URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/","operative_or_selected_lines":[22,46],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"9 U.S.C. § 16: Appeals (https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/)","URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s16/","packet_character_bounds":[2622,5372],"returned_lines_read":[[0,57]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete operative FAAsection body. Complete appealability body, partial awards, injunction direction and1292(b)qualification; no full federal appellate notice period.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S004","URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s1/","operative_or_selected_lines":[21,21],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"9 U.S.C. § 1: “Maritime transactions” and “commerce” defined; exceptions to operation of title (https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s1/)","URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s1/","packet_character_bounds":[5454,8417],"returned_lines_read":[[0,36]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete operative FAAsection body. Additional scope/commerce/transport-worker exclusion gateway only; no actual employment or commerce result.","additional_related_gateway":true},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S004","URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s2/","operative_or_selected_lines":[20,20],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"9 U.S.C. § 2: Validity, irrevocability, and enforcement of agreements to arbitrate (https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s2/)","URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s2/","packet_character_bounds":[8499,11269],"returned_lines_read":[[0,39]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete operative FAAsection body. Additional written agreement/generaldefenses/chapter4gateway only; chapter4and actual preemption/formation facts unreviewed.","additional_related_gateway":true},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S004","URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s3/","operative_or_selected_lines":[21,21],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"9 U.S.C. § 3: Stay of proceedings where issue therein referable to arbitration (https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s3/)","URL":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s3/","packet_character_bounds":[0,2108],"returned_lines_read":[[0,29]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete operative FAAsection body. Additional written-referable-issue/application/nondefault stay gateway only. Retained-jurisdiction Jules holding not freshly verified by this statutory text.","additional_related_gateway":true}],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_NE-P17-Q003","S_NE-P17-Q004","S_NE-P17-Q005","S_NE-P17-Q007"]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S005","urls":["https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S005","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, U.S. Courts: https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf; Rule 6, printed pp.12–14/PDF indices 30–32.","Version/status and access":"Current through amendments effective December 1, 2025; freshly read and page images inspected October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"Federal computation and extra-day rule only. \nUnited States Courts\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_scope_with_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S005","URL":"https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf","operative_or_selected_lines":[1145,1217],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"CPRT-119HPRT61922.pdf (https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf)","URL":"https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[3779,7616],"returned_lines_read":[[0,86]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":["0","0-1","1","1-2","2","2-3","3","3-5","5"],"failure":false},{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"CPRT-119HPRT61922.pdf (https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf)","URL":"https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[22469,31478],"returned_lines_read":[[495,515],[1130,1222]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":["15","30","30-31","31","31-32","32"],"failure":false}],"scope":"Parsed complete Rule6body only, printed12–14/PDFindices30–32 andDecember1,2025cover. No full142pagePDF, no pixels, no full amendment/case audit or automatic state-court application.","additional_related_gateway":false}],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_NE-P17-Q007"],"coordinator_limit":"Selected parsedPDFtext only, no fullPDF or pixels; actual rule version/incorporation/currentness and unrelated bodies held."},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S006","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewOpinion?docId=N00008357PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S006","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"Signal 88, LLC v. Lyconic, LLC, 310 Neb. 824 (2022): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewOpinion?docId=N00008357PUB; printed p.832/PDF index 8, p.836/index 12, p.838/index 14.","Version/status and access":"Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read and relevant pages inspected October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"UAA deference, ambiguity, confirmation, and narrow remand for clarification. \nNebraska.gov"},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_judicial_source_unreopened_with_all_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S007","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008009PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S007","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"City of Omaha v. Professional Firefighters Association, 309 Neb. 918 (2021): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00008009PUB; printed p.930/PDF index 12 and p.931/index 13.","Version/status and access":"Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"Evident partiality and exceeded-powers standards. \nNebraska.gov"},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_judicial_source_unreopened_with_all_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S008","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011227PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S008","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"Lund-Ross Constructors v. Duke of Omaha, 33 Neb. App. 73 (2024): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00011227PUB; printed p.92/PDF index 19 and p.95/index 22.","Version/status and access":"Final published Nebraska Court of Appeals opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"FAA fair-hearing prejudice, excess of powers, and partial vacatur. \nNebraska.gov"},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_judicial_source_unreopened_with_all_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S009","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00012622PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S009","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"Cinatl v. Prososki, 307 Neb. 477 (2020): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00012622PUB; printed p.492/PDF index 15.","Version/status and access":"Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"Mandatory confirmation and appeal from confirmation after denial of vacatur. \nNebraska.gov"},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_judicial_source_unreopened_with_all_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S010","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009151PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S010","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"State v. Nebraska Association of Public Employees, 313 Neb. 259 (2023): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewAdvanced?docId=N00009151PUB; printed p.269/PDF index 10.","Version/status and access":"Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"Narrow UAA review and no vacatur for immaterial/form issues. \nNebraska.gov"},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_judicial_source_unreopened_with_all_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S011","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00000486PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S011","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"MBNA America Bank v. Hansen, 16 Neb. App. 536 (2008): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00000486PUB; printed p.537/PDF index 1 and p.538/index 2.","Version/status and access":"Final published Nebraska Court of Appeals opinion; petition for further review denied. Freshly read October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"District-court-exclusive UAA confirmation jurisdiction in a consumer-credit award. \nNebraska.gov"},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_judicial_source_unreopened_with_all_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S012","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011561PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S012","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"Ronald J. Palagi, P.C. v. Prospect Funding Holdings, 302 Neb. 769 (2019): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011561PUB; printed pp.780–784/PDF indices 11–15.","Version/status and access":"Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"FAA confirmation after untimely vacatur/modification challenge. \nNebraska.gov"},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_judicial_source_unreopened_with_all_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S013","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003559PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S013","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"Drummond v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 280 Neb. 258 (2010): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003559PUB; printed p.260/PDF index 2 and p.262/index 4.","Version/status and access":"Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"UAA confirmation remains available after payment of award. \nNebraska.gov"},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_judicial_source_unreopened_with_all_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S014","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011615PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S014","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"Garlock v. 3DS Properties, LLC, 303 Neb. 521 (2019): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00011615PUB; relevant participation/objection discussion.","Version/status and access":"Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"Participation without objection and preservation of arbitrability objection. \nNebraska.gov"},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_judicial_source_unreopened_with_all_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S015","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003201PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S015","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"State v. Henderson, 277 Neb. 240 (2009): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00003201PUB; printed p.249/PDF index 10 and related holding.","Version/status and access":"Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"Narrow UAA public-policy doctrine; later Seldin limits it to UAA. \nNebraska.gov"},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_judicial_source_unreopened_with_all_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S016","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010327PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S016","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"Karo v. NAU Country Insurance Co., 297 Neb. 798 (2017): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00010327PUB; printed p.814/PDF index 16 and p.815/index 17; complete relevant §§9/12 discussion.","Version/status and access":"Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read and pages inspected October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"Strict FAA notice/timing characterization; subject-matter-jurisdiction terminology qualified by 2026 Jules. \nNebraska.gov\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_judicial_source_unreopened_with_all_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S017","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00012201PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S017","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"Seldin v. Estate of Silverman, 305 Neb. 185 (2020): https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00012201PUB; printed p.199/PDF index 14, pp.205–208/indices 20–23.","Version/status and access":"Final published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; freshly read October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"FAA three-month service, exclusive review grounds, no FAA public-policy ground, serious-error limit. \nNebraska.gov\n+2"},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_judicial_source_unreopened_with_all_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S018","urls":["https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/146/573/513898/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S018","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"Val-U Construction Co. v. Rosebud Sioux Tribe, 146 F.3d 573, 581 (8th Cir. 1998): https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/146/573/513898/; full published-opinion reproduction, especially reported p.581.","Version/status and access":"Final published Eighth Circuit opinion; public HTML reproduction freshly read October 26, 2026. No official PDF index available through this route.","Read bounds and limits":"Direct holding that FAA §9’s one-year period is permissive. \nJustia Law\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_judicial_source_unreopened_with_all_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S019","urls":["https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/04/01/024036P.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S019","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"RGA Reinsurance Co. v. Ulico Casualty Co., No. 02-4036 (8th Cir. Jan. 28, 2004): https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/04/01/024036P.pdf; slip pp.4–5/PDF indices 3–4.","Version/status and access":"Final published Eighth Circuit opinion; freshly read and pages inspected October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"Confirmation versus modification and later one-year wording; did not decide a late confirmation case. \nU.S. Court of Appeals\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_judicial_source_unreopened_with_all_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S020","urls":["https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/552bv.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S020","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008): https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/552bv.pdf; printed pp.584 and 586/PDF indices 840 and 842.","Version/status and access":"Final U.S. Supreme Court opinion; relevant pages freshly inspected October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"FAA §§10–11 exclusive statutory grounds. \nSupreme Court"},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_judicial_source_unreopened_with_all_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S021","urls":["https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/569bv.pdf","https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/569bv.pdf?ref=theindiaenclave.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S021","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter, 569 U.S. 564 (2013): https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/569bv.pdf; printed pp.564 and 569/PDF indices 649 and 654.","Version/status and access":"Final U.S. Supreme Court opinion; freshly inspected October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"Heavy §10(a)(4) burden and serious-error limit. \nSupreme Court"},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_judicial_source_unreopened_with_all_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S022","urls":["https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/514bv.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S022","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938 (1995): https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/514bv.pdf; printed pp.942 and 944/PDF indices 1012 and 1014.","Version/status and access":"Final U.S. Supreme Court opinion; relevant pages freshly inspected October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"Independent judicial arbitrability review absent clear delegation. \nSupreme Court"},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_judicial_source_unreopened_with_all_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S023","urls":["https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S023","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"Badgerow v. Walters, 596 U.S. 1 (2022): official Supreme Court opinion reached through https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf; printed p.5/PDF index 7 and p.9/index 11.","Version/status and access":"Final U.S. Supreme Court opinion; freshly read and inspected October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"No FAA-created jurisdiction and no look-through for freestanding §§9–10 applications. \nSupreme Court"},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_judicial_source_unreopened_with_all_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S024","urls":["https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-83_3e04.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S024","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties, 608 U.S. ___ (2026): https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-83_3e04.pdf; syllabus printed p.2/PDF index 1; opinion printed p.7/index 10 and p.12/index 15.","Version/status and access":"Final U.S. Supreme Court opinion filed May 14, 2026; freshly read and inspected October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"Retained jurisdiction in a federal case originally within jurisdiction and stayed under FAA §3; qualifies universal jurisdictional readings of §§9/12. \nSupreme Court"},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_judicial_source_unreopened_with_all_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S025","urls":["https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S025","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"AAA Consumer Arbitration Rules, AAA: https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf; R-44 and R-45 printed p.24/PDF index 23; R-48 and R-49 printed p.25/index 24.","Version/status and access":"Amended and effective May 1, 2025; freshly read and pages inspected October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"Private rules only; actual incorporation and administrator unknown. \nAmerican Arbitration Association\n+2"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_scope_with_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S025","URL":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","operative_or_selected_lines":[[0,4],[105,156],[738,800],[805,812],[909,934]],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":" (https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf)","URL":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[0,3697],"returned_lines_read":[[0,38]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":["0","0-1","1","1-2","2"],"failure":false},{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":" (https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf)","URL":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[3156,13067],"returned_lines_read":[[44,84],[735,802],[920,927]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":["23","23-24","24","24-25","25","28","3","3-4","4"],"failure":false},{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":" (https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf)","URL":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[13149,22387],"returned_lines_read":[[44,78],[743,814]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":["23","23-24","24","24-25","25","3","3-4","4"],"failure":false},{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":" (https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf)","URL":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[9078,18378],"returned_lines_read":[[94,205]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":["5","5-6","6","6-7","7","7-8","8"],"failure":false},{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":" (https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf)","URL":"https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","packet_character_bounds":[18460,27917],"returned_lines_read":[[885,1005]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":["27","27-28","28","28-29","29","29-30","30","30-31","31"],"failure":false}],"scope":"Parsed selected May1,2025rules1/43–49/51consent/D1–3 only. Material award44–45printed24/PDF23, delivery/correction48–49printed25/PDF24. Not complete37pages, no pixels, no actual applicability or current fee quote.","additional_related_gateway":false},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S025","URL":"https://www.adr.org/rules-forms-and-fees/consumer/","operative_or_selected_lines":[0,69],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"AAA Consumer Arbitration Rules & Fees (https://www.adr.org/rules-forms-and-fees/consumer/)","URL":"https://www.adr.org/rules-forms-and-fees/consumer/","packet_character_bounds":[27999,34374],"returned_lines_read":[[0,69]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Selected returned administrator landing text only; files/forms/fees not followed or priced; no administrative action.","additional_related_gateway":false}],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_limit":"Selected parsedPDFtext only, no fullPDF or pixels; actual rule version/incorporation/currentness and unrelated bodies held."},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S026","urls":["https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S026","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules, JAMS: https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration; Rule 24(a), (h)–(k), Rule 25.","Version/status and access":"Published as effective June 1, 2021; freshly read October 26, 2026. HTML source has no PDF index.","Read bounds and limits":"Private rules only; actual contract may select another version. \nJAMS\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_scope_with_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S026","URL":"https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration","operative_or_selected_lines":[[11,13],[60,73],[296,314]],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Comprehensive Arbitration Rules and Procedures | JAMS Mediation, Arbitration, ADR Services (https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration)","URL":"https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration","packet_character_bounds":[2190,10710],"returned_lines_read":[[0,81]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false},{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Comprehensive Arbitration Rules and Procedures | JAMS Mediation, Arbitration, ADR Services (https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration)","URL":"https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration","packet_character_bounds":[7698,22500],"returned_lines_read":[[24,72],[286,306],[342,392]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false},{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Comprehensive Arbitration Rules and Procedures | JAMS Mediation, Arbitration, ADR Services (https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration)","URL":"https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration","packet_character_bounds":[22582,31942],"returned_lines_read":[[24,72],[308,332]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false},{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Comprehensive Arbitration Rules and Procedures | JAMS Mediation, Arbitration, ADR Services (https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration)","URL":"https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration","packet_character_bounds":[0,3074],"returned_lines_read":[[289,302]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false},{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Comprehensive Arbitration Rules and Procedures | JAMS Mediation, Arbitration, ADR Services (https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration)","URL":"https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration","packet_character_bounds":[0,8996],"returned_lines_read":[[289,329]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Complete selected Rules24–25 and Rule1/2scope/variation June1,2021text. Other returned passages read but no full393line/complete ruleset claim. Actual rule/fees31/service8/closure22history remains held; no actual administration.","additional_related_gateway":false}],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S027","urls":["https://nebraskajudicial.gov/forms"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P17-S027","Title, issuer, full literal URL, and exact pinpoint":"Nebraska Judicial Branch Forms, https://nebraskajudicial.gov/forms; bounded search for arbitration confirmation, vacatur, correction, and award.","Version/status and access":"Current public page checked October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limits":"No statewide standardized form located; not a local-form or unpublished-order search. \nNebraska Judicial Branch"},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_scope_with_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_fresh_read_scope":[{"source_id":"S_NE-P17-S027","URL":"https://nebraskajudicial.gov/forms","operative_or_selected_lines":[6,85],"read_evidence":[{"packet":"[internal evidence reference]","header":"Master Forms List | Nebraska Judicial Branch (https://nebraskajudicial.gov/forms)","URL":"https://nebraskajudicial.gov/forms","packet_character_bounds":[20100,28289],"returned_lines_read":[[0,85]],"returned_PDF_page_labels_read":[],"failure":false}],"scope":"Returned forms landing prefix only, not whole538linecatalog or a fresh exhaustive search. Original bounded notlocated result remains researcher provenance, not a coordinator absence finding.","additional_related_gateway":false}],"coordinator_dated_reuse_scope":[],"coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_limit":"Landingprefix only; original negative search not newly repeated/certified."}],"coverage":[{"topic":"Nebraska UAA current text","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Nebraska UAA current text","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C001–C030","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual agreement, award, and dates"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"FAA current text","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"FAA current text","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C031–C042","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual FAA commerce, exclusions, and court"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Governing state/federal route","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Governing state/federal route","Status":"Partial","Claim IDs":"C007, C031–C033","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Contract, commerce, choice clause, pending-case posture"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Nebraska award form","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Nebraska award form","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C001–C002","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual award and panel record"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_NE-P17-Q001"]},{"topic":"FAA award form","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"FAA award form","Status":"Partial","Claim IDs":"—","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual contract/administrator; FAA §§9–13 do not duplicate UAA form rules"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Nebraska award delivery","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Nebraska award delivery","Status":"Answered textually","Claim IDs":"C001, C046","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual transmission and agreement"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Electronic award delivery","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Electronic award delivery","Status":"Unresolved factually","Claim IDs":"C046","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Agreement, AAA/JAMS version, email logs"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Late award","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Late award","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C002","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual time limit and pre-delivery objection"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Arbitrator correction","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Arbitrator correction","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C003–C004","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual request and notice"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"AAA correction","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"AAA correction","Status":"Answered privately","Claim IDs":"C043","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual incorporation and case version"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"JAMS correction","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"JAMS correction","Status":"Answered privately","Claim IDs":"C044","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual incorporation and case version"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Correction-request tolling","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Correction-request tolling","Status":"Not established","Claim IDs":"C045","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Controlling statute, order, or case"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Nebraska confirmation","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Nebraska confirmation","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C005–C011","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual motion, service, award, jurisdiction"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_NE-P17-Q002"]},{"topic":"Nebraska outer confirmation period","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Nebraska outer confirmation period","Status":"Unresolved beyond statutory silence","Claim IDs":"C006","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Other limitation/laches authority"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"FAA confirmation","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"FAA confirmation","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C031–C034","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Consent-to-judgment clause and independent jurisdiction"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"FAA one-year question","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"FAA one-year question","Status":"Answered with Eighth Circuit tension","Claim IDs":"C034","Exact missing evidence or next action":"En banc or later controlling treatment if any"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Federal subject-matter jurisdiction","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Federal subject-matter jurisdiction","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C031–C032","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Diversity/federal question or stayed-case record"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Personal jurisdiction and service","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Personal jurisdiction and service","Status":"Answered generally","Claim IDs":"C008, C036–C037","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual residence, attorney, service method"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"FAA §13 papers","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"FAA §13 papers","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"S004","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual documents"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_NE-P17-Q005","S_NE-P17-Q007"]},{"topic":"Award versus judgment","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Award versus judgment","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C010, C047","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Confirmation order and later enforcement"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Paid award confirmation","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Paid award confirmation","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C011","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Satisfaction record"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Nebraska vacatur grounds","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Nebraska vacatur grounds","Status":"Answered exhaustively","Claim IDs":"C012–C020","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual hearing/award evidence"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Nebraska fraud discovery","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Nebraska fraud discovery","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C014","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Discovery date and diligence"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Nebraska no-agreement ground","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Nebraska no-agreement ground","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C015","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Prior §2603 ruling and objection record"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Nebraska public policy","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Nebraska public policy","Status":"Answered narrowly","Claim IDs":"C020","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Explicit legal policy and award conflict"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"FAA vacatur grounds","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"FAA vacatur grounds","Status":"Answered exhaustively","Claim IDs":"C035–C040","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual record and timely service"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"FAA fraud discovery extension","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"FAA fraud discovery extension","Status":"Not in statutory text","Claim IDs":"C036","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Any valid equitable exception remains unestablished"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Legal or factual error","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Legal or factual error","Status":"Answered as insufficient alone","Claim IDs":"C018, C038","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Must identify statutory ground"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Evident partiality","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Evident partiality","Status":"Answered generally","Claim IDs":"C016","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Relationship, disclosure, timing, objection"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Refusal to hear evidence","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Refusal to hear evidence","Status":"Answered generally","Claim IDs":"C017, C039","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Material evidence, objection, prejudice"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Exceeded powers","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Exceeded powers","Status":"Answered generally","Claim IDs":"C019, C038","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Submission, contract, award reasoning"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Partial vacatur","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Partial vacatur","Status":"Answered only as severability possibility","Claim IDs":"C017","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual award structure"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Nebraska modification grounds","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Nebraska modification grounds","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C021–C023","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Award and evident defect"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"FAA modification grounds","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"FAA modification grounds","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C035","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Award and evident defect"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_NE-P17-Q003","S_NE-P17-Q007"]},{"topic":"Clarification versus merits rewrite","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Clarification versus merits rewrite","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C023","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Award and full arbitral record"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Confirmation pending review deadline","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Confirmation pending review deadline","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C024","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual filings"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Nebraska appealability","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Nebraska appealability","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C025–C028","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual order and entry date"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Federal appealability","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Federal appealability","Status":"Answered as FAA §16 boundary","Claim IDs":"C042","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual federal order and appellate rules"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Federal appeal notice deadline","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Federal appeal notice deadline","Status":"Excluded/not researched","Claim IDs":"—","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Nebraska appeal notice period","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Nebraska appeal notice period","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C027","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Entry and postjudgment motions"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Nebraska stay/security","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Nebraska stay/security","Status":"Answered as boundary","Claim IDs":"C028","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Judgment, net worth, bond, court order"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"FAA predecision enforcement stay","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"FAA predecision enforcement stay","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C041","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Motion, notice, terms"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_NE-P17-Q004"]},{"topic":"Federal postjudgment security","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Federal postjudgment security","Status":"Excluded/later","Claim IDs":"—","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Federal Rule 62 and case-specific order"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"State time computation","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"State time computation","Status":"Answered","Claim IDs":"C029–C030","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual closure/holiday and filing receipt"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_NE-P17-Q006"]},{"topic":"Federal time computation","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Federal time computation","Status":"Answered generally","Claim IDs":"S005","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual federal filing/service"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_NE-P17-Q007"]},{"topic":"Three extra mail days","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Three extra mail days","Status":"Answered as not automatic","Claim IDs":"C030, S005","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Exact period and service trigger"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"State court applying FAA computation","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"State court applying FAA computation","Status":"Partial","Claim IDs":"—","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual procedural posture and controlling court decision"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Administrator rules","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Administrator rules","Status":"Answered for current public AAA/JAMS versions","Claim IDs":"C043–C046","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual contract and incorporated version"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Official court forms","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Official court forms","Status":"Not located","Claim IDs":"C048","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Local forms or court instructions"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Award preclusive effect","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Award preclusive effect","Status":"Excluded","Claim IDs":"—","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Separate res judicata/collateral-estoppel analysis"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Award interest","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Award interest","Status":"Excluded","Claim IDs":"—","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Contract, award, state/federal interest law"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Judgment duration/renewal","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Judgment duration/renewal","Status":"Excluded","Claim IDs":"—","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Separate postjudgment pass"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Lien/satisfaction/release","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Lien/satisfaction/release","Status":"Excluded","Claim IDs":"—","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Separate judgment component"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Execution/garnishment/exemptions","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Execution/garnishment/exemptions","Status":"Excluded","Claim IDs":"—","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Separate enforcement component"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Credit reporting consequence","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Credit reporting consequence","Status":"Excluded","Claim IDs":"—","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Separate FCRA/state-reporting component"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Provider licensing/remedies","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Provider licensing/remedies","Status":"Excluded","Claim IDs":"—","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Reviewed provider passes and future work"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Secured/medical/government/support/tax sectors","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Secured/medical/government/support/tax sectors","Status":"Excluded","Claim IDs":"—","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Separate sector passes"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Local/tribal/country law","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Local/tribal/country law","Status":"Excluded","Claim IDs":"—","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Separate jurisdictional component"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Named award or case result","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Named award or case result","Status":"Not performed","Claim IDs":"—","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual private documents and docket"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."},{"topic":"Component/Nebraska/parent/A066 acceptance","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Component/Nebraska/parent/A066 acceptance","Status":"Not granted","Claim IDs":"—","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Remaining registry work and scoped review"},"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_saved_component_scoped_review_seven_bounded_corrections_and_all_remaining_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_reviewed_at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_scope_limit":"Original actual agreement/award, judicial/currentness, negative-search, state/federal/local, excluded or parent dimension remains open; no outcome or whole-source verification."}],"annotations":{},"corrections":[{"issue_id":"S_NE-P17-Q001","finding":"Award signatures concern arbitrators joining the award","affected_claim_ids":["S_NE-P17-C001"],"related_claim_ids":[],"validated_exact_raw_rows":[],"exact_original_cell_matches":[],"source_urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2609","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2606"],"localization":"claim_row_matches_available_no_complete_narrative_localization","public_status":"Recorded correction pending; working-paper assertion requires the stated repair or qualification."},{"issue_id":"S_NE-P17-Q002","finding":"Venue needs the initial sequence and subsequent-application rule","affected_claim_ids":["S_NE-P17-C009"],"related_claim_ids":[],"validated_exact_raw_rows":[],"exact_original_cell_matches":[],"source_urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2619"],"localization":"claim_row_matches_available_no_complete_narrative_localization","public_status":"Recorded correction pending; working-paper assertion requires the stated repair or qualification."},{"issue_id":"S_NE-P17-Q003","finding":"Keep FAA §11(b) wording distinct from Nebraska modification text","affected_claim_ids":["S_NE-P17-C035"],"related_claim_ids":[],"validated_exact_raw_rows":[],"exact_original_cell_matches":[],"source_urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/","https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-2614"],"localization":"claim_row_matches_available_no_complete_narrative_localization","public_status":"Recorded correction pending; working-paper assertion requires the stated repair or qualification."},{"issue_id":"S_NE-P17-Q004","finding":"Attribute FAA §12 stay mechanics precisely","affected_claim_ids":["S_NE-P17-C041"],"related_claim_ids":[],"validated_exact_raw_rows":[],"exact_original_cell_matches":[],"source_urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s12/"],"localization":"claim_row_matches_available_no_complete_narrative_localization","public_status":"Recorded correction pending; working-paper assertion requires the stated repair or qualification."},{"issue_id":"S_NE-P17-Q005","finding":"FAA §13 paper list needs its judgment-entry timing and limited appointment item","affected_claim_ids":[],"related_claim_ids":[],"validated_exact_raw_rows":[],"exact_original_cell_matches":[],"source_urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/"],"localization":"report_level_pending_localization_required","public_status":"Recorded correction pending; working-paper assertion requires the stated repair or qualification."},{"issue_id":"S_NE-P17-Q006","finding":"Nebraska filing and electronic-service receipt recipients differ","affected_claim_ids":["S_NE-P17-C029","S_NE-P17-C030"],"related_claim_ids":[],"validated_exact_raw_rows":[],"exact_original_cell_matches":[],"source_urls":["https://nebraskajudicial.gov/supreme-court-rules/chapter-2-appeals/article-2-electronic-filing-service-and-notice-system-nebraska-trial-and-appellate-courts/%C2%A7-2-206-time-filing-and-time-service"],"localization":"claim_row_matches_available_no_complete_narrative_localization","public_status":"Recorded correction pending; working-paper assertion requires the stated repair or qualification."},{"issue_id":"S_NE-P17-Q007","finding":"Paper, modification-ground and federal-computation coverage need matching claims","affected_claim_ids":["S_NE-P17-C035"],"related_claim_ids":[],"validated_exact_raw_rows":[],"exact_original_cell_matches":[],"source_urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/","https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf"],"localization":"claim_row_matches_available_no_complete_narrative_localization","public_status":"Recorded correction pending; working-paper assertion requires the stated repair or qualification."}],"resolved_corrections":[],"review_history":[{"id":"S_NE-P17-scoped-review-20261029","status":"whole_first_scoped_delegated_coordinator_review_complete_seven_bounded_findings_UNSENT","at":"2026-10-29T03:36:31.850165+00:00"}]}