{"meta":{"key":"s_ne--pass-16","task":"S_NE","title":"SNE bounded correction of five provider-remedy groups","parent_title":"Nebraska debt and debt relief law","edition":"pass-16","path":"/research/s_ne--pass-16/","kind":"split_pass","category":"state","role":"state","area_numbers":[66],"groups":["collections"],"date":"2026-10-26","tables":12,"claims":8,"sources":17,"review_status":"four_groups_resolved_with_limits_one_source_verification_hold","review_complete":true,"sha256":"b89fb978d1559004c9fe342ed2db5ab6af3c7388c5ced8694c26eeb19b73ded0","headings":["1. Five-group disposition","A. Replacement for PASS-07 §D2 and claim S_NE-P7-C023","Replacement substantive paragraph","Replacement claim","B. Replacement PASS-07 Example 4","Example 4 — NCPA actual damages with discretionary-increase amount held","A. Replacement for PASS-07 §B5 narrative","B. Replacement/qualification of S_NE-P7-C010","Replacement for PASS-07 §E6, limitation matrix, and S_NE-P7-C039","Replacement claim","Replacement for PASS-07 §E4 and claim S_NE-P7-C036","Replacement claim","A. P7 S013 replacement source annotation","B. Exact replacement/confirmation of TSR claims","C. P7 S014 and related federal-source annotations","Residual holds","Self-check"],"generation_provenance":{"actual_route":"regular_chat_adaptive_models","actual_model":"GPT-5.6 Sol","actual_mode":"Pro","provenance_limit":"Actual documented capture labels only; missing labels remain unknown. No preferred setting is inferred as actual execution."},"public_id":"S_NE/pass-16","facets":{"geography":["us","us-ne"],"debt_type":[],"stage":["repossession"],"subject":["provider-remedies"]},"scope":"P7fiveboundedremedyclarifications:cap/Pettit/AGnotice/penaltyexceptions/sourcecurrentness","pending_corrections":0},"markdown":"# S_NE PASS-16 — bounded correction of five PASS-07 provider-remedy groups\n\n**Actual fresh research date:** October 26, 2026, Pacific / October 26, 2026 UTC\n**Status:** Same-coordinator bounded correction, **not independent review**. Original PASS-07 remains immutable. Only the affected paragraphs, claims, examples, source annotations, and coverage cells below are replaced or qualified. PASS-15 was completed before this response.\n\n## 1. Five-group disposition\n\n| Group | Disposition | Exact remaining limitation or next evidence |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **1. §59-1609 discretionary increased award** | **Partially answered; cap construction unresolved.** The statute clearly preserves actual damages, costs, reasonable attorney fees, and a discretionary increased-award branch. It does **not** support the prior categorical statement that the court may add an additional $1,000. No controlling public Nebraska appellate interpretation was located resolving whether the $1,000 phrase caps the incremental enhancement or the resulting “increased award.” | A controlling Nebraska appellate construction or authoritative legislative history directly addressing “such increased award” is still needed. The old $2,200 maximum example is withdrawn. |\n| **2. *Pettit* procedural holding** | **Answered and corrected.** *Pettit* expressed considerable doubt about legislative intent, but the issue was not raised below, so the court **assumed without deciding** that a private cause existed. | *Pettit* does not decide Chapter 69’s private-remedy question. A Chapter 69-specific controlling decision or legislative record remains needed. |\n| **3. §87-303.12 Attorney General copies and notices** | **Answered.** The statute has separate initial-pleading, final-judgment, Small Claims appeal, and other-appeal branches; Small Claims trial pleadings and judgments are exempt from subsection (1). Mailing starts with certified mail, with later regular mail permitted only after qualifying prior certified mailing in the same action. | Application to an actual action still requires the filed documents, filing or entry dates, appeal route, and mailing proof. |\n| **4. Class IV felony sentencing description** | **Answered and qualified.** Willful violation of a qualifying injunction, declaratory judgment, or written assurance remains a Class IV felony. The §28-105 table states the currently authorized maximum, not an automatic sentence, and subsections (6)–(8) materially qualify post-release supervision and offense-date treatment. | An actual sentencing result requires offense date, conviction facts, concurrent or consecutive sentences, and the sentencing record. |\n| **5. Federal source currency** | **TSR current text answered; CROA source currency qualified.** Current OLRC bodies for §§6103–6105 now display Public Law 119-124 through October 15, 2026. Current §§1679g–1679i pages display Public Law 119-120 through October 7, 2026—not a universal 119-124 CROA compilation. Current CFPA §§5552, 5564, and 5565 display Public Law 119-124 through October 15, 2026. | The prior §1679f dated-body hold remains. No universal CROA-through-119-124 statement is made. |\n\n# GROUP 1 — §59-1609 increased-award correction\n\n## A. Replacement for PASS-07 §D2 and claim S_NE-P7-C023\n\n### Replacement substantive paragraph\n\nNeb. Rev. Stat. §59-1609 authorizes a qualifying private plaintiff to seek an injunction, actual damages, or both, together with suit costs and a reasonable attorney fee. It then permits the court, in its discretion, to “increase the award of damages to an amount” bearing a reasonable relationship to sustained damages that are not susceptible of ordinary pecuniary measurement. For a §59-1602 violation, the statute says that “such increased award” shall not exceed $1,000. The $1,000 language qualifies the discretionary increased-award branch; it is **not a universal $1,000 ceiling on separately recoverable actual damages**. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1609)\n\nNo controlling publicly available Nebraska appellate decision was located that resolves whether “such increased award” means:\n\n- the **increment added** to actual damages; or\n- the **resulting enhanced damages award** after the discretionary increase.\n\nThe statutory wording therefore does not presently support the former PASS-07 statement that a court may add **an additional $1,000** to actual damages. The District of Nebraska’s *Bassett* order does not resolve the issue: footnote 5 expressly declined to opine on the defendants’ statutory-damages argument because any possible NCPA damages would have duplicated the FDCPA damages in that case. [GovInfo+1](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ned-8_16-cv-00449/pdf/USCOURTS-ned-8_16-cv-00449-11.pdf)\n\n### Replacement claim\n\n| Original claim ID | Complete replacement claim |\n| --- | --- |\n| **S_NE-P7-C023** | **Neb. Rev. Stat. §59-1609 preserves actual damages, costs, and reasonable attorney fees and conditionally permits a discretionary increased award for qualifying damages not susceptible of ordinary pecuniary measurement. For a §59-1602 violation, “such increased award” may not exceed $1,000. No controlling public Nebraska appellate interpretation was located establishing whether that amount caps the incremental enhancement or the resulting increased award. The $1,000 clause does not cap independently proved actual damages.** **Source:** S_NE-P16-S001, §59-1609; S_NE-P16-S002, *Bassett*, printed p.25/PDF index 24 n.5. **Predicates:** private standing under §59-1609; qualifying §59-1602 violation; business-or-property injury and causation; actual damages; damages not susceptible of ordinary pecuniary measurement; court discretion. **Consequence:** no “actual damages plus an additional $1,000” maximum may be stated as verified Nebraska law. **Confidence:** High for statutory text and *Bassett*’s express nondecision; **HOLD** for cap construction. |\n\n## B. Replacement PASS-07 Example 4\n\n### Example 4 — NCPA actual damages with discretionary-increase amount held\n\n**Hypothetical assumptions**\n\n- A qualifying §59-1602 violation and §59-1609 private claim are established.\n- Proved actual business-or-property damages are **$1,200**.\n- Costs and reasonable attorney fees remain to be determined separately.\n- The plaintiff seeks the discretionary increased-award branch.\n- No controlling interpretation resolves how the $1,000 language operates.\n\n**Verified arithmetic**\n\nPlain text\n```\nProved actual damages                         $1,200\nVerified discretionary increment                 HOLD\nVerified enhanced-total ceiling                  HOLD\nCosts and reasonable attorney fees              separate\n```\n\nThe former arithmetic—\n\nPlain text\n```\n$1,200 actual damages + $1,000 = $2,200\n```\n\n—is numerically correct but is **withdrawn as a verified legal maximum**, because the legal premise that the statute authorizes an additional $1,000 has not been established.\n\nThe bounded result is:\n\nPlain text\n```\nRecoverable actual damages, if proved         $1,200\nPossible discretionary increased award         unresolved\nMaximum total damages under that branch        unresolved\n```\n\nThis hold does not reduce the independently recoverable $1,200 actual-damages figure or the separate costs-and-fees route.\n\n# GROUP 2 — precise *Pettit* correction\n\n## A. Replacement for PASS-07 §B5 narrative\n\nIn *Pettit v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services*, the Nebraska Supreme Court stated the general rule that whether a statute creates a private action depends on the statute’s purpose and whether the Legislature intended one. When applying that rule to §83-178, the court expressed “considerable doubt” that the Legislature intended a declaratory-judgment private action and identified textual reasons for that doubt. But the private-action issue had **not been raised in the district court**. The court therefore did not resolve it; for purposes of the opinion, it **assumed without deciding** that a private right of action existed. [Nebraska.gov+2](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00005157PUB)\n\nAccordingly, *Pettit* supports the purpose-and-legislative-intent framework but does **not** hold that §83-178 lacks an implied cause, and it does not resolve whether Chapter 69 creates an implied consumer remedy. PASS-07’s narrower conclusion remains: §69-1216’s reference to a cause of action is limitation language and does not, by itself, identify a plaintiff, defendant, elements, or remedy sufficient to create a standalone Chapter 69 claim.\n\n## B. Replacement/qualification of S_NE-P7-C010\n\n| Original claim ID | Complete replacement claim |\n| --- | --- |\n| **S_NE-P7-C010** | **Nebraska implied-private-action analysis turns on statutory purpose and legislative intent. In *Pettit*, the Supreme Court expressed considerable doubt that the statute before it created a private action, but because the issue was not raised below, it assumed without deciding that such an action existed. *Pettit* therefore supplies the analytical framework, not a holding that no implied action existed and not a Chapter 69 ruling.** **Source:** S_NE-P16-S003, *Pettit*, printed p.523/PDF index 10. **Consequence:** the standalone Chapter 69 implied-remedy question remains unestablished; §69-1216 cannot be used alone as the substantive cause. **Confidence:** High for *Pettit*’s exact procedural holding; **HOLD** for Chapter 69. |\n\n# GROUP 3 — complete §87-303.12 notice and mailing matrix\n\n## Replacement for PASS-07 §E6, limitation matrix, and S_NE-P7-C039\n\n| Branch | Actor and covered document | Trigger and deadline | Delivery to Attorney General | Consequence or exception |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **Initial non-Small-Claims pleading** | A party filing a **petition, counterclaim, cross-petition, or pleading in intervention** alleging a UDTPA violation | Within **7 days following filing** of that pleading | Certified mail unless the same-action regular-mail condition below has already been satisfied | Subsection (1) does not apply to Small Claims Court actions |\n| **Final judgment in the subsection (1) action** | The party subject to subsection (1) must provide a copy of the **final judgment** | Within **7 days following entry** of the final judgment | Certified mail unless subsequent regular mail is permitted | Not a universal duty for an initial Small Claims judgment |\n| **Small Claims Court trial proceeding** | Initial Small Claims pleading and final Small Claims judgment | **Exempt from subsection (1)** | No subsection (1) mailing | The special appeal branch in subsection (2) still applies |\n| **Small Claims appeal to district court** | A party appealing a Small Claims order or judgment involving a UDTPA issue | Within **7 days of providing notice of the appeal** | Written notice to AG plus copy of the pleading raising the issue and copy of the Small Claims order or judgment; certified mail unless subsequent-mail rule applies | This is the actual Small Claims branch |\n| **Other appeal involving a UDTPA issue** | A party appealing an order or judgment involving an issue raised under the Act | Within **7 days following filing of the notice of appeal with the court** | Written notice plus copy of the pleading raising the issue and copy of the order or judgment appealed; certified mail unless subsequent-mail rule applies | Separate from the Small Claims appeal wording |\n| **Mail-method rule** | All pleadings, orders, judgments, and notices required by §87-303.12 | Applies to every required mailing under the section | **Certified mail** is required unless the AG was previously provided required copies of pleadings, orders, judgments, or notices in the same action by certified mail; qualifying subsequent mailings may then use regular mail | The statute does not make regular mail the initial default |\n| **AG intervention** | Attorney General | On timely application to the court where the action is pending | Court filing rather than the party-copy mailing rule | AG may intervene or be heard at any time; failure to intervene does not bar a separate enforcement action |\n| **Failure to mail** | Party fails to provide a required copy or notice | After noncompliance | N/A | **Not grounds for dismissal** of the UDTPA action; may support a later AG action to vacate or modify the judgment |\n\nThese branches and exceptions appear in the complete current §87-303.12 text. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.12)\n\n### Replacement claim\n\n| Original claim ID | Complete replacement claim |\n| --- | --- |\n| **S_NE-P7-C039** | **Neb. Rev. Stat. §87-303.12 does not impose one universal seven-day mailing rule. It separately requires: (1) copies of specified non-Small-Claims UDTPA pleadings within seven days after filing and the final judgment within seven days after entry; (2) written AG notice and specified documents within seven days after providing notice of a Small Claims appeal; and (3) written AG notice and specified documents within seven days after filing another covered notice of appeal. Initial and final Small Claims documents are exempt from subsection (1). Required copies ordinarily go by certified mail; later mailings in the same action may use regular mail only after the AG has previously received qualifying required materials by certified mail. Noncompliance is not a dismissal ground but may support a later AG action to vacate or modify the judgment.** **Source:** S_NE-P16-S004, §87-303.12(1)–(5). **Confidence:** High. |\n\n# GROUP 4 — Class IV felony and authorized-sentence clarification\n\n## Replacement for PASS-07 §E4 and claim S_NE-P7-C036\n\nNeb. Rev. Stat. §87-303.09 makes it a **Class IV felony** to willfully violate the terms of:\n\n- an injunction;\n- a court declaratory judgment; or\n- a written assurance of voluntary compliance\n\nentered under the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act. The classification applies only after proof of the qualifying order or assurance, its terms, a violation, and willfulness. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.09)\n\nFor an offense governed by the current post-August 30, 2015 Class IV framework, §28-105(1) authorizes:\n\nPlain text\n```\nmaximum:\n    2 years' imprisonment\n    plus 12 months' post-release supervision\n\nor:\n    $10,000 fine\n\nor:\n    both\n\nminimum:\n    none for imprisonment\n    none for post-release supervision\n```\n\nThis is an **authorized maximum classification**, not an automatic sentence. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-105)\n\nMaterial qualifications include:\n\n- Under §28-105(6), a person sentenced to imprisonment for a Class I, IA, IB, IC, ID, II, or IIA felony concurrently or consecutively with a Class III, IIIA, or IV sentence is not subject to the subsection (1) post-release-supervision component.\n- Under §28-105(7), the same removal of post-release supervision applies to the specified mixed sentencing of pre-August 30, 2015 and post-August 30, 2015 Class III, IIIA, or IV felonies.\n- Under §28-105(8) and §28-116, the 2015 penalty changes do not apply to an offense committed before August 30, 2015; an offense is treated as pre-date if any element occurred before that date. [Nebraska Legislature+1](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-105)\n\n### Replacement claim\n\n| Original claim ID | Complete replacement claim |\n| --- | --- |\n| **S_NE-P7-C036** | **A willful violation of a qualifying UDTPA injunction, declaratory judgment, or written assurance is a Class IV felony under §87-303.09. For an offense governed by the current ordinary Class IV framework, §28-105(1) authorizes a maximum of two years’ imprisonment plus twelve months’ post-release supervision, or a $10,000 fine, or both, with no minimum imprisonment or post-release supervision. This is not an automatic sentence. Sections 28-105(6)–(8) and 28-116 create concurrent/consecutive-sentence and offense-date qualifications, including removal of post-release supervision in specified combinations and use of pre-August 30, 2015 law when any offense element occurred before that date.** **Source:** S_NE-P16-S005–S007. **Confidence:** High for classification and statutory ranges; actual sentence held. |\n\n# GROUP 5 — federal source-currentness and exact TSR claim preservation\n\n## A. P7 S013 replacement source annotation\n\nThe complete current OLRC bodies are now verifiable as follows:\n\n| Provision | Actual official URL and current header | Complete read bounds | Access qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **15 U.S.C. §6103** | https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6103/ — Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026 | Subsections (a)–(f), source, 2010 amendment, and effective-date note | A direct initial open failed; the identical current page was recovered through OLRC’s “Previous” link from §6104. |\n| **15 U.S.C. §6104** | https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6104/ — Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026 | Subsections (a)–(f) | Direct current page worked. |\n| **15 U.S.C. §6105** | https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6105/ — Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026 | Subsections (a)–(d), source, 2010 amendment, and effective-date note | Direct current page worked. |\n\nThis prospectively confirms the P7 TSR source currency. It does not rewrite P7’s original source-access provenance.\n\n## B. Exact replacement/confirmation of TSR claims\n\n| Original claim ID | Complete current claim |\n| --- | --- |\n| **S_NE-P7-C042** | **A private action under 15 U.S.C. §6104 requires a person adversely affected by a pattern or practice of telemarketing that violates an FTC rule under §6102; filing within three years after discovery; and an amount in controversy exceeding $50,000 in actual damages for each adversely affected person. The action is in an appropriate federal district court and may seek injunction, compliance, damages, and other appropriate relief. The plaintiff must give the FTC prior written notice and a complaint copy unless prior notice is infeasible, in which case immediate postfiling notice is required. A pending FTC- or CFPB-instituted action against the same defendant on the same rule allegations blocks the private action during its pendency. A final order may award prevailing-party costs and reasonable attorney and expert fees. Section 6104(f) supplies its venue and nationwide-service branch.** **Coverage:** actual telemarketing, FTC-rule, pattern-or-practice, person-specific actual-damages, discovery, and parallel-action facts remain held. **Source:** S_NE-P16-S009, §6104(a)–(f). **Confidence:** High for current text; conditional application. |\n| **S_NE-P7-C043** | **Under 15 U.S.C. §6103, when a State attorney general has reason to believe residents are threatened or adversely affected by a pattern or practice of telemarketing violating an FTC rule under §6102, the State may sue as parens patriae in an appropriate federal district court for injunction, compliance, damages, restitution, compensation, and other appropriate relief. The State ordinarily must provide prior written FTC notice and a complaint copy, with immediate postfiling notice permitted when prior notice is infeasible. A pending FTC- or CFPB-instituted action against the same defendant and rule allegations blocks the overlapping state action during its pendency. Section 6103(e) supplies venue and nationwide service; subsection (f) preserves qualifying actions by other authorized State officials and independent State-law proceedings.** **Source:** S_NE-P16-S008, §6103(a)–(f). **Confidence:** High for current text; actual TSR coverage remains conditional. |\n\nSection 6105 separately confirms FTC enforcement under the FTC Act framework and CFPB enforcement for covered consumer-financial products or services, subject to its stated exceptions and jurisdictional limits. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6105/)\n\n## C. P7 S014 and related federal-source annotations\n\n| P7 source family | Correct current annotation |\n| --- | --- |\n| **CROA §§1679g–1679i** | The official pages currently served at https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679g/, .../s1679h/, and .../s1679i/ each display laws in effect through **Public Law 119-120, October 7, 2026**. The prior 119-118 locator for §1679i should not be treated as a currency statement; the current served body identifies itself as 119-120. No universal claim that all CROA provisions were verified through 119-124 is made. [U.S. Code+2](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679g/) |\n| **CROA §1679f** | Not reopened in this bounded pass. The prior dated-body/source hold remains unchanged. |\n| **CFPA §§5552, 5564, 5565** | The current direct OLRC pages display laws in effect through **Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026**. Their P7 public-enforcement source-currentness is confirmed. [U.S. Code+2](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5552/) |\n| **Original P7 raw records** | Remain historically immutable. These annotations describe what the official pages actually served during PASS-16 and do not retroactively alter P7 access events. |\n\nThe substantive P7 CROA and CFPA claims are unchanged by this source-only correction, subject to the already stated entity, coverage, violation, enforcement, and limitation predicates.\n\n# Replacement-claim register\n\n| Original P7 claim ID | Replacement status | Corrected assertion |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **S_NE-P7-C010** | **Qualified** | *Pettit* states the purpose-and-legislative-intent framework but assumed without deciding that the private cause existed because the issue was not raised below. It did not reject an implied cause and did not decide Chapter 69. |\n| **S_NE-P7-C023** | **Replaced** | Actual damages, fees, costs, and a conditional discretionary increased-award route remain. The meaning of the $1,000 cap—increment versus resulting increased award—is unresolved in controlling public authority; it does not cap actual damages. |\n| **S_NE-P7-C036** | **Replaced/qualified** | Willful violation of a qualifying UDTPA order or assurance is a Class IV felony. The current maximum is an authorized sentencing range, subject to §§28-105(6)–(8) and 28-116, not an automatic sentence. |\n| **S_NE-P7-C039** | **Replaced** | The Attorney General copy regime has distinct initial pleading, final judgment, Small Claims appeal, and other appeal branches, plus certified-mail and subsequent-regular-mail conditions. |\n| **S_NE-P7-C042** | **Current source confirmed** | Private TSR action predicates and branches are retained as set out above. |\n| **S_NE-P7-C043** | **Current source confirmed** | State TSR enforcement predicates and branches are retained as set out above. |\n| **S_NE-P7-C044–C046** | **Substance unchanged; source version qualified** | Current §§1679g–1679i pages display 119-120 through October 7, 2026. No universal 119-124 CROA source claim. |\n| **S_NE-P7-C047** | **Substance unchanged; source currentness confirmed** | CFPA §§5552, 5564, and 5565 display 119-124 through October 15, 2026. |\n\n# Source register\n\n| Source ID | Title, issuer, full literal URL, exact pinpoint | Version/status and actual access | Read bounds and limitations |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **S_NE-P16-S001** | **Neb. Rev. Stat. §59-1609—Civil action for damages**, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1609; complete operative paragraphs, especially the actual-damages, attorney-fee, discretionary increase, and $1,000 language. | Current official codification freshly read October 26, 2026 Pacific/UTC. Source history shows 1974 LB 1028 and 2002 LB 1278. | No complete legislative-history audit. Official annotations do not identify a cap-construction case. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1609) |\n| **S_NE-P16-S002** | ***Bassett v. Credit Bureau Services, Inc.*, No. 8:16CV449, Doc. 234**, U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ned-8_16-cv-00449/pdf/USCOURTS-ned-8_16-cv-00449-11.pdf; printed p.25, zero-based PDF index 24, footnote 5. | Historical final district-court memorandum and order filed August 13, 2021; freshly read and page image inspected October 26, 2026. | Persuasive federal trial authority, not a controlling Nebraska appellate construction. It expressly declines the statutory-damages question. [GovInfo+1](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ned-8_16-cv-00449/pdf/USCOURTS-ned-8_16-cv-00449-11.pdf) |\n| **S_NE-P16-S003** | ***Pettit v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services*, 291 Neb. 513, 867 N.W.2d 553 (2015)**, Nebraska Supreme Court. https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00005157PUB; printed p.523, zero-based PDF index 10. | Final published controlling Nebraska opinion; freshly read and page image inspected October 26, 2026. | Supplies the implied-action analytical framework and exact nondecision; it does not concern Chapter 69. [Nebraska.gov+1](https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00005157PUB) |\n| **S_NE-P16-S004** | **Neb. Rev. Stat. §87-303.12—Copies to Attorney General; intervention**, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.12; subsections (1)–(5). | Current official codification freshly read October 26, 2026. | Complete operative notice, Small Claims, appeal, intervention, mailing, and non-dismissal text. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.12) |\n| **S_NE-P16-S005** | **Neb. Rev. Stat. §87-303.09—Violation of order or assurance**, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.09; complete section. | Current official codification freshly read October 26, 2026. | Establishes offense classification only. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.09) |\n| **S_NE-P16-S006** | **Neb. Rev. Stat. §28-105—Felony penalties**, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-105; subsections (1) and (6)–(8). | Current official codification freshly read October 26, 2026. | Authorized sentencing range and express qualifications; no actual sentencing analysis. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-105) |\n| **S_NE-P16-S007** | **Neb. Rev. Stat. §28-116—2015 penalty changes; applicability**, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-116; complete operative paragraph. | Current official codification freshly read October 26, 2026; page shows 2025 LB 383 source amendment. | Used only for offense-date treatment. [Nebraska Legislature](https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-116) |\n| **S_NE-P16-S008** | **15 U.S.C. §6103—Actions by States**, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6103/; subsections (a)–(f), source, 2010 amendment, effective-date note. | Current page displays laws through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026. Direct initial open failed; current page was recovered through OLRC navigation and freshly read October 26. | Conditional TSR enforcement only; full telemarketing coverage not reopened. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6103/) |\n| **S_NE-P16-S009** | **15 U.S.C. §6104—Actions by private persons**, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6104/; subsections (a)–(f). | Current page displays laws through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026; freshly read October 26. | Conditional private route; no TSR scope rerun. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6104/) |\n| **S_NE-P16-S010** | **15 U.S.C. §6105—Administration and applicability**, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6105/; subsections (a)–(d), source and 2010 amendment. | Current page displays laws through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026; freshly read October 26. | Public enforcement and jurisdictional framework only. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6105/) |\n| **S_NE-P16-S011** | **15 U.S.C. §1679g—CROA civil liability**, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679g/; subsections (a)–(b). | Current served page displays Public Law 119-120, October 7, 2026; freshly read October 26. | No universal 119-124 CROA currency claim. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679g/) |\n| **S_NE-P16-S012** | **15 U.S.C. §1679h—CROA administrative and State enforcement**, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679h/; subsections (a)–(c) as relevant. | Current served page displays Public Law 119-120, October 7, 2026; freshly read October 26. | Full source body read only as necessary for currentness annotation. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679h/) |\n| **S_NE-P16-S013** | **15 U.S.C. §1679i—CROA limitation**, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679i/; complete section. | Current served page displays Public Law 119-120, October 7, 2026; freshly read October 26. | Prior 119-118 locator is not treated as a current-version label. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679i/) |\n| **S_NE-P16-S014** | **12 U.S.C. §5552—State enforcement powers**, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5552/; relevant subsections (a)–(b). | Current page displays Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026; freshly read October 26. | CFPA public-enforcement boundary only. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5552/) |\n| **S_NE-P16-S015** | **12 U.S.C. §5564—CFPB litigation authority**, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5564/; relevant subsections. | Current page displays Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026; freshly read October 26. | No private-action inference. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5564/) |\n| **S_NE-P16-S016** | **12 U.S.C. §5565—Available relief**, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5565/; subsections (a)–(c) as relevant. | Current page displays Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026; freshly read October 26. | Current inflation-adjusted civil penalties were not researched. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5565/) |\n| **S_NE-P16-S017** | **Bounded official cap-construction searches**, Nebraska appellate repository https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ and GovInfo https://www.govinfo.gov/; exact terms included 59-1609, such increased award, increase the award of damages, and $1,000. | Search-only work October 26, 2026. | No controlling public Nebraska appellate cap-construction holding located. This is not a complete commercial citator, trial-docket, unpublished-order, or legislative-history search. |\n\n# Effect on PASS-07 coverage and examples\n\n| PASS-07 location | Effect of PASS-16 |\n| --- | --- |\n| **§D2 / C023 / Example 4** | Replace the additive-$1,000 statement and $2,200 legal maximum with the unresolved-cap language and hold above. Actual damages, costs, attorney fees, discretion, and qualifying nonpecuniary predicates remain. |\n| **§B5 / C010** | Replace “declined to recognize” language with the exact *Pettit* posture: substantial doubt, issue not raised below, assumed without deciding. |\n| **§E6 / limitation matrix / C039** | Replace the abbreviated seven-day description with the complete §87-303.12 matrix. |\n| **§E4 / C036** | Preserve the Class IV classification but replace the unqualified maximum-sentence statement with the authorized-range and subsections (6)–(8) qualifications. |\n| **S_NE-P7-S013 / C042–C043** | Current TSR bodies and version header are now verified; substantive conditional claims retained. |\n| **S_NE-P7-S014 / C044–C046** | Preserve claims, but correct the source-currentness annotation to 119-120 through October 7, 2026 for §§1679g–1679i. |\n| **CFPA source rows / C047** | Current 119-124 through October 15, 2026 confirmed. |\n| **Other nine PASS-07 examples and unaffected claims** | Unchanged and not regenerated. |\n\n## Residual holds\n\nThis patch does not resolve:\n\n- Chapter 69’s implied private action;\n- the §59-1609 cap construction;\n- actual NCPA standing, injury, public-interest, causation, regulatory-exclusion, or damages facts;\n- current Title 433 substantive and adoption history;\n- actual provider classification, contract, funds, account, fee-earning, or federal coverage;\n- actual criminal offense date or sentence;\n- actual §87-303.12 filing and mailing compliance;\n- TSR telemarketing, actor, rule, pattern-or-practice, person-specific damages, discovery, notice, or parallel-action facts;\n- the prior §1679f source hold;\n- full CROA or CFPA currentness beyond the pages actually read;\n- full citator, trial-docket, unpublished-order, local, tribal, country, or parent-state research.\n\nNo component, Nebraska, parent, A066, operational, provider, litigation, or publication acceptance is implied.\n\n## Self-check\n\nFreshly read in PASS-16:\n\n- complete current §§59-1609, 87-303.09, 87-303.12, 28-105, and 28-116;\n- *Pettit* printed p.523/PDF index 10;\n- *Bassett* printed p.25/PDF index 24 n.5;\n- complete current §§6103–6105;\n- current official §§1679g–1679i source headers and bodies;\n- current official CFPA §§5552, 5564, and 5565 source headers and relevant bodies.\n\nNot performed:\n\n- no complete Nebraska or federal citator;\n- no full legislative-history audit;\n- no complete *Bassett*, TSR, CROA, CFPA, criminal-sentencing, or provider-remedy rerun;\n- no private case, account, provider, filing, contact, records request, purchase, browser control, local save, or publication action.\n\nEND S_NE PASS-16.\n\n","tables":[{"headers":["Group","Disposition","Exact remaining limitation or next evidence"],"index":0,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Group","Disposition","Exact remaining limitation or next evidence"],["1. §59-1609 discretionary increased award","Partially answered; cap construction unresolved. The statute clearly preserves actual damages, costs, reasonable attorney fees, and a discretionary increased-award branch. It does not support the prior categorical statement that the court may add an additional $1,000. No controlling public Nebraska appellate interpretation was located resolving whether the $1,000 phrase caps the incremental enhancement or the resulting “increased award.”","A controlling Nebraska appellate construction or authoritative legislative history directly addressing “such increased award” is still needed. The old $2,200 maximum example is withdrawn."],["2. Pettit procedural holding","Answered and corrected. Pettit expressed considerable doubt about legislative intent, but the issue was not raised below, so the court assumed without deciding that a private cause existed.","Pettit does not decide Chapter 69’s private-remedy question. A Chapter 69-specific controlling decision or legislative record remains needed."],["3. §87-303.12 Attorney General copies and notices","Answered. The statute has separate initial-pleading, final-judgment, Small Claims appeal, and other-appeal branches; Small Claims trial pleadings and judgments are exempt from subsection (1). Mailing starts with certified mail, with later regular mail permitted only after qualifying prior certified mailing in the same action.","Application to an actual action still requires the filed documents, filing or entry dates, appeal route, and mailing proof."],["4. Class IV felony sentencing description","Answered and qualified. Willful violation of a qualifying injunction, declaratory judgment, or written assurance remains a Class IV felony. The §28-105 table states the currently authorized maximum, not an automatic sentence, and subsections (6)–(8) materially qualify post-release supervision and offense-date treatment.","An actual sentencing result requires offense date, conviction facts, concurrent or consecutive sentences, and the sentencing record."],["5. Federal source currency","TSR current text answered; CROA source currency qualified. Current OLRC bodies for §§6103–6105 now display Public Law 119-124 through October 15, 2026. Current §§1679g–1679i pages display Public Law 119-120 through October 7, 2026—not a universal 119-124 CROA compilation. Current CFPA §§5552, 5564, and 5565 display Public Law 119-124 through October 15, 2026.","The prior §1679f dated-body hold remains. No universal CROA-through-119-124 statement is made."]]},{"headers":["Original claim ID","Complete replacement claim"],"index":1,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[]],"rows":[["Original claim ID","Complete replacement claim"],["S_NE-P7-C023","Neb. Rev. Stat. §59-1609 preserves actual damages, costs, and reasonable attorney fees and conditionally permits a discretionary increased award for qualifying damages not susceptible of ordinary pecuniary measurement. For a §59-1602 violation, “such increased award” may not exceed $1,000. No controlling public Nebraska appellate interpretation was located establishing whether that amount caps the incremental enhancement or the resulting increased award. The $1,000 clause does not cap independently proved actual damages. Source: S_NE-P16-S001, §59-1609; S_NE-P16-S002, Bassett, printed p.25/PDF index 24 n.5. Predicates: private standing under §59-1609; qualifying §59-1602 violation; business-or-property injury and causation; actual damages; damages not susceptible of ordinary pecuniary measurement; court discretion. Consequence: no “actual damages plus an additional $1,000” maximum may be stated as verified Nebraska law. Confidence: High for statutory text and Bassett’s express nondecision; HOLD for cap construction."]]},{"headers":["Original claim ID","Complete replacement claim"],"index":2,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[]],"rows":[["Original claim ID","Complete replacement claim"],["S_NE-P7-C010","Nebraska implied-private-action analysis turns on statutory purpose and legislative intent. In Pettit, the Supreme Court expressed considerable doubt that the statute before it created a private action, but because the issue was not raised below, it assumed without deciding that such an action existed. Pettit therefore supplies the analytical framework, not a holding that no implied action existed and not a Chapter 69 ruling. Source: S_NE-P16-S003, Pettit, printed p.523/PDF index 10. Consequence: the standalone Chapter 69 implied-remedy question remains unestablished; §69-1216 cannot be used alone as the substantive cause. Confidence: High for Pettit’s exact procedural holding; HOLD for Chapter 69."]]},{"headers":["Branch","Actor and covered document","Trigger and deadline","Delivery to Attorney General","Consequence or exception"],"index":3,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Branch","Actor and covered document","Trigger and deadline","Delivery to Attorney General","Consequence or exception"],["Initial non-Small-Claims pleading","A party filing a petition, counterclaim, cross-petition, or pleading in intervention alleging a UDTPA violation","Within 7 days following filing of that pleading","Certified mail unless the same-action regular-mail condition below has already been satisfied","Subsection (1) does not apply to Small Claims Court actions"],["Final judgment in the subsection (1) action","The party subject to subsection (1) must provide a copy of the final judgment","Within 7 days following entry of the final judgment","Certified mail unless subsequent regular mail is permitted","Not a universal duty for an initial Small Claims judgment"],["Small Claims Court trial proceeding","Initial Small Claims pleading and final Small Claims judgment","Exempt from subsection (1)","No subsection (1) mailing","The special appeal branch in subsection (2) still applies"],["Small Claims appeal to district court","A party appealing a Small Claims order or judgment involving a UDTPA issue","Within 7 days of providing notice of the appeal","Written notice to AG plus copy of the pleading raising the issue and copy of the Small Claims order or judgment; certified mail unless subsequent-mail rule applies","This is the actual Small Claims branch"],["Other appeal involving a UDTPA issue","A party appealing an order or judgment involving an issue raised under the Act","Within 7 days following filing of the notice of appeal with the court","Written notice plus copy of the pleading raising the issue and copy of the order or judgment appealed; certified mail unless subsequent-mail rule applies","Separate from the Small Claims appeal wording"],["Mail-method rule","All pleadings, orders, judgments, and notices required by §87-303.12","Applies to every required mailing under the section","Certified mail is required unless the AG was previously provided required copies of pleadings, orders, judgments, or notices in the same action by certified mail; qualifying subsequent mailings may then use regular mail","The statute does not make regular mail the initial default"],["AG intervention","Attorney General","On timely application to the court where the action is pending","Court filing rather than the party-copy mailing rule","AG may intervene or be heard at any time; failure to intervene does not bar a separate enforcement action"],["Failure to mail","Party fails to provide a required copy or notice","After noncompliance","N/A","Not grounds for dismissal of the UDTPA action; may support a later AG action to vacate or modify the judgment"]]},{"headers":["Original claim ID","Complete replacement claim"],"index":4,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[]],"rows":[["Original claim ID","Complete replacement claim"],["S_NE-P7-C039","Neb. Rev. Stat. §87-303.12 does not impose one universal seven-day mailing rule. It separately requires: (1) copies of specified non-Small-Claims UDTPA pleadings within seven days after filing and the final judgment within seven days after entry; (2) written AG notice and specified documents within seven days after providing notice of a Small Claims appeal; and (3) written AG notice and specified documents within seven days after filing another covered notice of appeal. Initial and final Small Claims documents are exempt from subsection (1). Required copies ordinarily go by certified mail; later mailings in the same action may use regular mail only after the AG has previously received qualifying required materials by certified mail. Noncompliance is not a dismissal ground but may support a later AG action to vacate or modify the judgment. Source: S_NE-P16-S004, §87-303.12(1)–(5). Confidence: High."]]},{"headers":["Original claim ID","Complete replacement claim"],"index":5,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[]],"rows":[["Original claim ID","Complete replacement claim"],["S_NE-P7-C036","A willful violation of a qualifying UDTPA injunction, declaratory judgment, or written assurance is a Class IV felony under §87-303.09. For an offense governed by the current ordinary Class IV framework, §28-105(1) authorizes a maximum of two years’ imprisonment plus twelve months’ post-release supervision, or a $10,000 fine, or both, with no minimum imprisonment or post-release supervision. This is not an automatic sentence. Sections 28-105(6)–(8) and 28-116 create concurrent/consecutive-sentence and offense-date qualifications, including removal of post-release supervision in specified combinations and use of pre-August 30, 2015 law when any offense element occurred before that date. Source: S_NE-P16-S005–S007. Confidence: High for classification and statutory ranges; actual sentence held."]]},{"headers":["Provision","Actual official URL and current header","Complete read bounds","Access qualification"],"index":6,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Provision","Actual official URL and current header","Complete read bounds","Access qualification"],["15 U.S.C. §6103","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6103/ — Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026","Subsections (a)–(f), source, 2010 amendment, and effective-date note","A direct initial open failed; the identical current page was recovered through OLRC’s “Previous” link from §6104."],["15 U.S.C. §6104","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6104/ — Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026","Subsections (a)–(f)","Direct current page worked."],["15 U.S.C. §6105","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6105/ — Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026","Subsections (a)–(d), source, 2010 amendment, and effective-date note","Direct current page worked."]]},{"headers":["Original claim ID","Complete current claim"],"index":7,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[]],"rows":[["Original claim ID","Complete current claim"],["S_NE-P7-C042","A private action under 15 U.S.C. §6104 requires a person adversely affected by a pattern or practice of telemarketing that violates an FTC rule under §6102; filing within three years after discovery; and an amount in controversy exceeding $50,000 in actual damages for each adversely affected person. The action is in an appropriate federal district court and may seek injunction, compliance, damages, and other appropriate relief. The plaintiff must give the FTC prior written notice and a complaint copy unless prior notice is infeasible, in which case immediate postfiling notice is required. A pending FTC- or CFPB-instituted action against the same defendant on the same rule allegations blocks the private action during its pendency. A final order may award prevailing-party costs and reasonable attorney and expert fees. Section 6104(f) supplies its venue and nationwide-service branch. Coverage: actual telemarketing, FTC-rule, pattern-or-practice, person-specific actual-damages, discovery, and parallel-action facts remain held. Source: S_NE-P16-S009, §6104(a)–(f). Confidence: High for current text; conditional application."],["S_NE-P7-C043","Under 15 U.S.C. §6103, when a State attorney general has reason to believe residents are threatened or adversely affected by a pattern or practice of telemarketing violating an FTC rule under §6102, the State may sue as parens patriae in an appropriate federal district court for injunction, compliance, damages, restitution, compensation, and other appropriate relief. The State ordinarily must provide prior written FTC notice and a complaint copy, with immediate postfiling notice permitted when prior notice is infeasible. A pending FTC- or CFPB-instituted action against the same defendant and rule allegations blocks the overlapping state action during its pendency. Section 6103(e) supplies venue and nationwide service; subsection (f) preserves qualifying actions by other authorized State officials and independent State-law proceedings. Source: S_NE-P16-S008, §6103(a)–(f). Confidence: High for current text; actual TSR coverage remains conditional."]]},{"headers":["P7 source family","Correct current annotation"],"index":8,"links":[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679g/","text":"U.S. Code\n+2"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5552/","text":"U.S. Code\n+2"}],"row_links":[[],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679g/","text":"U.S. Code\n+2"}],[],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5552/","text":"U.S. Code\n+2"}],[]],"rows":[["P7 source family","Correct current annotation"],["CROA §§1679g–1679i","The official pages currently served at https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679g/, .../s1679h/, and .../s1679i/ each display laws in effect through Public Law 119-120, October 7, 2026. The prior 119-118 locator for §1679i should not be treated as a currency statement; the current served body identifies itself as 119-120. No universal claim that all CROA provisions were verified through 119-124 is made. \nU.S. Code\n+2"],["CROA §1679f","Not reopened in this bounded pass. The prior dated-body/source hold remains unchanged."],["CFPA §§5552, 5564, 5565","The current direct OLRC pages display laws in effect through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026. Their P7 public-enforcement source-currentness is confirmed. \nU.S. Code\n+2"],["Original P7 raw records","Remain historically immutable. These annotations describe what the official pages actually served during PASS-16 and do not retroactively alter P7 access events."]]},{"headers":["Original P7 claim ID","Replacement status","Corrected assertion"],"index":9,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Original P7 claim ID","Replacement status","Corrected assertion"],["S_NE-P7-C010","Qualified","Pettit states the purpose-and-legislative-intent framework but assumed without deciding that the private cause existed because the issue was not raised below. It did not reject an implied cause and did not decide Chapter 69."],["S_NE-P7-C023","Replaced","Actual damages, fees, costs, and a conditional discretionary increased-award route remain. The meaning of the $1,000 cap—increment versus resulting increased award—is unresolved in controlling public authority; it does not cap actual damages."],["S_NE-P7-C036","Replaced/qualified","Willful violation of a qualifying UDTPA order or assurance is a Class IV felony. The current maximum is an authorized sentencing range, subject to §§28-105(6)–(8) and 28-116, not an automatic sentence."],["S_NE-P7-C039","Replaced","The Attorney General copy regime has distinct initial pleading, final judgment, Small Claims appeal, and other appeal branches, plus certified-mail and subsequent-regular-mail conditions."],["S_NE-P7-C042","Current source confirmed","Private TSR action predicates and branches are retained as set out above."],["S_NE-P7-C043","Current source confirmed","State TSR enforcement predicates and branches are retained as set out above."],["S_NE-P7-C044–C046","Substance unchanged; source version qualified","Current §§1679g–1679i pages display 119-120 through October 7, 2026. No universal 119-124 CROA source claim."],["S_NE-P7-C047","Substance unchanged; source currentness confirmed","CFPA §§5552, 5564, and 5565 display 119-124 through October 15, 2026."]]},{"headers":["Source ID","Title, issuer, full literal URL, exact pinpoint","Version/status and actual access","Read bounds and limitations"],"index":10,"links":[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1609","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ned-8_16-cv-00449/pdf/USCOURTS-ned-8_16-cv-00449-11.pdf","text":"GovInfo\n+1"},{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00005157PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+1"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.12","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.09","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-105","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-116","text":"Nebraska Legislature"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6103/","text":"U.S. Code"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6104/","text":"U.S. Code"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6105/","text":"U.S. Code"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679g/","text":"U.S. Code"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679h/","text":"U.S. Code"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679i/","text":"U.S. Code"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5552/","text":"U.S. Code"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5564/","text":"U.S. Code"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5565/","text":"U.S. Code"}],"row_links":[[],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1609","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ned-8_16-cv-00449/pdf/USCOURTS-ned-8_16-cv-00449-11.pdf","text":"GovInfo\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00005157PUB","text":"Nebraska.gov\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.12","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.09","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-105","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-116","text":"Nebraska Legislature"}],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6103/","text":"U.S. Code"}],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6104/","text":"U.S. Code"}],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6105/","text":"U.S. Code"}],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679g/","text":"U.S. Code"}],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679h/","text":"U.S. Code"}],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679i/","text":"U.S. Code"}],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5552/","text":"U.S. Code"}],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5564/","text":"U.S. Code"}],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5565/","text":"U.S. Code"}],[]],"rows":[["Source ID","Title, issuer, full literal URL, exact pinpoint","Version/status and actual access","Read bounds and limitations"],["S_NE-P16-S001","Neb. Rev. Stat. §59-1609—Civil action for damages, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1609; complete operative paragraphs, especially the actual-damages, attorney-fee, discretionary increase, and $1,000 language.","Current official codification freshly read October 26, 2026 Pacific/UTC. Source history shows 1974 LB 1028 and 2002 LB 1278.","No complete legislative-history audit. Official annotations do not identify a cap-construction case. \nNebraska Legislature"],["S_NE-P16-S002","Bassett v. Credit Bureau Services, Inc., No. 8:16CV449, Doc. 234, U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ned-8_16-cv-00449/pdf/USCOURTS-ned-8_16-cv-00449-11.pdf; printed p.25, zero-based PDF index 24, footnote 5.","Historical final district-court memorandum and order filed August 13, 2021; freshly read and page image inspected October 26, 2026.","Persuasive federal trial authority, not a controlling Nebraska appellate construction. It expressly declines the statutory-damages question. \nGovInfo\n+1"],["S_NE-P16-S003","Pettit v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, 291 Neb. 513, 867 N.W.2d 553 (2015), Nebraska Supreme Court. https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00005157PUB; printed p.523, zero-based PDF index 10.","Final published controlling Nebraska opinion; freshly read and page image inspected October 26, 2026.","Supplies the implied-action analytical framework and exact nondecision; it does not concern Chapter 69. \nNebraska.gov\n+1"],["S_NE-P16-S004","Neb. Rev. Stat. §87-303.12—Copies to Attorney General; intervention, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.12; subsections (1)–(5).","Current official codification freshly read October 26, 2026.","Complete operative notice, Small Claims, appeal, intervention, mailing, and non-dismissal text. \nNebraska Legislature"],["S_NE-P16-S005","Neb. Rev. Stat. §87-303.09—Violation of order or assurance, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.09; complete section.","Current official codification freshly read October 26, 2026.","Establishes offense classification only. \nNebraska Legislature"],["S_NE-P16-S006","Neb. Rev. Stat. §28-105—Felony penalties, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-105; subsections (1) and (6)–(8).","Current official codification freshly read October 26, 2026.","Authorized sentencing range and express qualifications; no actual sentencing analysis. \nNebraska Legislature"],["S_NE-P16-S007","Neb. Rev. Stat. §28-116—2015 penalty changes; applicability, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-116; complete operative paragraph.","Current official codification freshly read October 26, 2026; page shows 2025 LB 383 source amendment.","Used only for offense-date treatment. \nNebraska Legislature"],["S_NE-P16-S008","15 U.S.C. §6103—Actions by States, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6103/; subsections (a)–(f), source, 2010 amendment, effective-date note.","Current page displays laws through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026. Direct initial open failed; current page was recovered through OLRC navigation and freshly read October 26.","Conditional TSR enforcement only; full telemarketing coverage not reopened. \nU.S. Code"],["S_NE-P16-S009","15 U.S.C. §6104—Actions by private persons, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6104/; subsections (a)–(f).","Current page displays laws through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026; freshly read October 26.","Conditional private route; no TSR scope rerun. \nU.S. Code"],["S_NE-P16-S010","15 U.S.C. §6105—Administration and applicability, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6105/; subsections (a)–(d), source and 2010 amendment.","Current page displays laws through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026; freshly read October 26.","Public enforcement and jurisdictional framework only. \nU.S. Code"],["S_NE-P16-S011","15 U.S.C. §1679g—CROA civil liability, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679g/; subsections (a)–(b).","Current served page displays Public Law 119-120, October 7, 2026; freshly read October 26.","No universal 119-124 CROA currency claim. \nU.S. Code"],["S_NE-P16-S012","15 U.S.C. §1679h—CROA administrative and State enforcement, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679h/; subsections (a)–(c) as relevant.","Current served page displays Public Law 119-120, October 7, 2026; freshly read October 26.","Full source body read only as necessary for currentness annotation. \nU.S. Code"],["S_NE-P16-S013","15 U.S.C. §1679i—CROA limitation, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679i/; complete section.","Current served page displays Public Law 119-120, October 7, 2026; freshly read October 26.","Prior 119-118 locator is not treated as a current-version label. \nU.S. Code"],["S_NE-P16-S014","12 U.S.C. §5552—State enforcement powers, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5552/; relevant subsections (a)–(b).","Current page displays Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026; freshly read October 26.","CFPA public-enforcement boundary only. \nU.S. Code"],["S_NE-P16-S015","12 U.S.C. §5564—CFPB litigation authority, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5564/; relevant subsections.","Current page displays Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026; freshly read October 26.","No private-action inference. \nU.S. Code"],["S_NE-P16-S016","12 U.S.C. §5565—Available relief, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5565/; subsections (a)–(c) as relevant.","Current page displays Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026; freshly read October 26.","Current inflation-adjusted civil penalties were not researched. \nU.S. Code"],["S_NE-P16-S017","Bounded official cap-construction searches, Nebraska appellate repository https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ and GovInfo https://www.govinfo.gov/; exact terms included 59-1609, such increased award, increase the award of damages, and $1,000.","Search-only work October 26, 2026.","No controlling public Nebraska appellate cap-construction holding located. This is not a complete commercial citator, trial-docket, unpublished-order, or legislative-history search."]]},{"headers":["PASS-07 location","Effect of PASS-16"],"index":11,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["PASS-07 location","Effect of PASS-16"],["§D2 / C023 / Example 4","Replace the additive-$1,000 statement and $2,200 legal maximum with the unresolved-cap language and hold above. Actual damages, costs, attorney fees, discretion, and qualifying nonpecuniary predicates remain."],["§B5 / C010","Replace “declined to recognize” language with the exact Pettit posture: substantial doubt, issue not raised below, assumed without deciding."],["§E6 / limitation matrix / C039","Replace the abbreviated seven-day description with the complete §87-303.12 matrix."],["§E4 / C036","Preserve the Class IV classification but replace the unqualified maximum-sentence statement with the authorized-range and subsections (6)–(8) qualifications."],["S_NE-P7-S013 / C042–C043","Current TSR bodies and version header are now verified; substantive conditional claims retained."],["S_NE-P7-S014 / C044–C046","Preserve claims, but correct the source-currentness annotation to 119-120 through October 7, 2026 for §§1679g–1679i."],["CFPA source rows / C047","Current 119-124 through October 15, 2026 confirmed."],["Other nine PASS-07 examples and unaffected claims","Unchanged and not regenerated."]]}],"claims":[{"claim_id":"S_NE-P7-C010","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Original P7 claim ID":"S_NE-P7-C010","Replacement status":"Qualified","Corrected assertion":"Pettit states the purpose-and-legislative-intent framework but assumed without deciding that the private cause existed because the issue was not raised below. It did not reject an implied cause and did not decide Chapter 69."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_checked_with_explicit_limits","verbatim_replacement_detail":[{"raw_table_index":2,"researcher_record":{"Original claim ID":"S_NE-P7-C010","Complete replacement claim":"Nebraska implied-private-action analysis turns on statutory purpose and legislative intent. In Pettit, the Supreme Court expressed considerable doubt that the statute before it created a private action, but because the issue was not raised below, it assumed without deciding that such an action existed. Pettit therefore supplies the analytical framework, not a holding that no implied action existed and not a Chapter 69 ruling. Source: S_NE-P16-S003, Pettit, printed p.523/PDF index 10. Consequence: the standalone Chapter 69 implied-remedy question remains unestablished; §69-1216 cannot be used alone as the substantive cause. Confidence: High for Pettit’s exact procedural holding; HOLD for Chapter 69."}}],"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P7-C023","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Original P7 claim ID":"S_NE-P7-C023","Replacement status":"Replaced","Corrected assertion":"Actual damages, fees, costs, and a conditional discretionary increased-award route remain. The meaning of the $1,000 cap—increment versus resulting increased award—is unresolved in controlling public authority; it does not cap actual damages."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_checked_with_explicit_limits","verbatim_replacement_detail":[{"raw_table_index":1,"researcher_record":{"Original claim ID":"S_NE-P7-C023","Complete replacement claim":"Neb. Rev. Stat. §59-1609 preserves actual damages, costs, and reasonable attorney fees and conditionally permits a discretionary increased award for qualifying damages not susceptible of ordinary pecuniary measurement. For a §59-1602 violation, “such increased award” may not exceed $1,000. No controlling public Nebraska appellate interpretation was located establishing whether that amount caps the incremental enhancement or the resulting increased award. The $1,000 clause does not cap independently proved actual damages. Source: S_NE-P16-S001, §59-1609; S_NE-P16-S002, Bassett, printed p.25/PDF index 24 n.5. Predicates: private standing under §59-1609; qualifying §59-1602 violation; business-or-property injury and causation; actual damages; damages not susceptible of ordinary pecuniary measurement; court discretion. Consequence: no “actual damages plus an additional $1,000” maximum may be stated as verified Nebraska law. Confidence: High for statutory text and Bassett’s express nondecision; HOLD for cap construction."}}],"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P7-C036","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Original P7 claim ID":"S_NE-P7-C036","Replacement status":"Replaced/qualified","Corrected assertion":"Willful violation of a qualifying UDTPA order or assurance is a Class IV felony. The current maximum is an authorized sentencing range, subject to §§28-105(6)–(8) and 28-116, not an automatic sentence."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_checked_with_explicit_limits","verbatim_replacement_detail":[{"raw_table_index":5,"researcher_record":{"Original claim ID":"S_NE-P7-C036","Complete replacement claim":"A willful violation of a qualifying UDTPA injunction, declaratory judgment, or written assurance is a Class IV felony under §87-303.09. For an offense governed by the current ordinary Class IV framework, §28-105(1) authorizes a maximum of two years’ imprisonment plus twelve months’ post-release supervision, or a $10,000 fine, or both, with no minimum imprisonment or post-release supervision. This is not an automatic sentence. Sections 28-105(6)–(8) and 28-116 create concurrent/consecutive-sentence and offense-date qualifications, including removal of post-release supervision in specified combinations and use of pre-August 30, 2015 law when any offense element occurred before that date. Source: S_NE-P16-S005–S007. Confidence: High for classification and statutory ranges; actual sentence held."}}],"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_note":"ClassIVqualificationonly; originalseparateClassII87-303.08branchretainedunchanged."},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P7-C039","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Original P7 claim ID":"S_NE-P7-C039","Replacement status":"Replaced","Corrected assertion":"The Attorney General copy regime has distinct initial pleading, final judgment, Small Claims appeal, and other appeal branches, plus certified-mail and subsequent-regular-mail conditions."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_checked_with_explicit_limits","verbatim_replacement_detail":[{"raw_table_index":4,"researcher_record":{"Original claim ID":"S_NE-P7-C039","Complete replacement claim":"Neb. Rev. Stat. §87-303.12 does not impose one universal seven-day mailing rule. It separately requires: (1) copies of specified non-Small-Claims UDTPA pleadings within seven days after filing and the final judgment within seven days after entry; (2) written AG notice and specified documents within seven days after providing notice of a Small Claims appeal; and (3) written AG notice and specified documents within seven days after filing another covered notice of appeal. Initial and final Small Claims documents are exempt from subsection (1). Required copies ordinarily go by certified mail; later mailings in the same action may use regular mail only after the AG has previously received qualifying required materials by certified mail. Noncompliance is not a dismissal ground but may support a later AG action to vacate or modify the judgment. Source: S_NE-P16-S004, §87-303.12(1)–(5). Confidence: High."}}],"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P7-C042","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Original P7 claim ID":"S_NE-P7-C042","Replacement status":"Current source confirmed","Corrected assertion":"Private TSR action predicates and branches are retained as set out above."},"coordinator_verification_status":"current_primary_body_header_not_replicated_hold","verbatim_replacement_detail":[{"raw_table_index":7,"researcher_record":{"Original claim ID":"S_NE-P7-C042","Complete current claim":"A private action under 15 U.S.C. §6104 requires a person adversely affected by a pattern or practice of telemarketing that violates an FTC rule under §6102; filing within three years after discovery; and an amount in controversy exceeding $50,000 in actual damages for each adversely affected person. The action is in an appropriate federal district court and may seek injunction, compliance, damages, and other appropriate relief. The plaintiff must give the FTC prior written notice and a complaint copy unless prior notice is infeasible, in which case immediate postfiling notice is required. A pending FTC- or CFPB-instituted action against the same defendant on the same rule allegations blocks the private action during its pendency. A final order may award prevailing-party costs and reasonable attorney and expert fees. Section 6104(f) supplies its venue and nationwide-service branch. Coverage: actual telemarketing, FTC-rule, pattern-or-practice, person-specific actual-damages, discovery, and parallel-action facts remain held. Source: S_NE-P16-S009, §6104(a)–(f). Confidence: High for current text; conditional application."}}],"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P7-C043","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Original P7 claim ID":"S_NE-P7-C043","Replacement status":"Current source confirmed","Corrected assertion":"State TSR enforcement predicates and branches are retained as set out above."},"coordinator_verification_status":"current_primary_body_header_not_replicated_hold","verbatim_replacement_detail":[{"raw_table_index":7,"researcher_record":{"Original claim ID":"S_NE-P7-C043","Complete current claim":"Under 15 U.S.C. §6103, when a State attorney general has reason to believe residents are threatened or adversely affected by a pattern or practice of telemarketing violating an FTC rule under §6102, the State may sue as parens patriae in an appropriate federal district court for injunction, compliance, damages, restitution, compensation, and other appropriate relief. The State ordinarily must provide prior written FTC notice and a complaint copy, with immediate postfiling notice permitted when prior notice is infeasible. A pending FTC- or CFPB-instituted action against the same defendant and rule allegations blocks the overlapping state action during its pendency. Section 6103(e) supplies venue and nationwide service; subsection (f) preserves qualifying actions by other authorized State officials and independent State-law proceedings. Source: S_NE-P16-S008, §6103(a)–(f). Confidence: High for current text; actual TSR coverage remains conditional."}}],"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P7-C044–C046","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Original P7 claim ID":"S_NE-P7-C044–C046","Replacement status":"Substance unchanged; source version qualified","Corrected assertion":"Current §§1679g–1679i pages display 119-120 through October 7, 2026. No universal 119-124 CROA source claim."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_checked_with_explicit_limits","verbatim_replacement_detail":[],"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"S_NE-P7-C047","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Original P7 claim ID":"S_NE-P7-C047","Replacement status":"Substance unchanged; source currentness confirmed","Corrected assertion":"CFPA §§5552, 5564, and 5565 display 119-124 through October 15, 2026."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_checked_with_explicit_limits","verbatim_replacement_detail":[],"coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"}],"sources":[{"source_id":"S_NE-P16-S001","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1609"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P16-S001","Title, issuer, full literal URL, exact pinpoint":"Neb. Rev. Stat. §59-1609—Civil action for damages, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=59-1609; complete operative paragraphs, especially the actual-damages, attorney-fee, discretionary increase, and $1,000 language.","Version/status and actual access":"Current official codification freshly read October 26, 2026 Pacific/UTC. Source history shows 1974 LB 1028 and 2002 LB 1278.","Read bounds and limitations":"No complete legislative-history audit. Official annotations do not identify a cap-construction case. \nNebraska Legislature"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P16-S002","urls":["https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ned-8_16-cv-00449/pdf/USCOURTS-ned-8_16-cv-00449-11.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P16-S002","Title, issuer, full literal URL, exact pinpoint":"Bassett v. Credit Bureau Services, Inc., No. 8:16CV449, Doc. 234, U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ned-8_16-cv-00449/pdf/USCOURTS-ned-8_16-cv-00449-11.pdf; printed p.25, zero-based PDF index 24, footnote 5.","Version/status and actual access":"Historical final district-court memorandum and order filed August 13, 2021; freshly read and page image inspected October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limitations":"Persuasive federal trial authority, not a controlling Nebraska appellate construction. It expressly declines the statutory-damages question. \nGovInfo\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P16-S003","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00005157PUB"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P16-S003","Title, issuer, full literal URL, exact pinpoint":"Pettit v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, 291 Neb. 513, 867 N.W.2d 553 (2015), Nebraska Supreme Court. https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/public/viewCertified?docId=N00005157PUB; printed p.523, zero-based PDF index 10.","Version/status and actual access":"Final published controlling Nebraska opinion; freshly read and page image inspected October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limitations":"Supplies the implied-action analytical framework and exact nondecision; it does not concern Chapter 69. \nNebraska.gov\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P16-S004","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.12"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P16-S004","Title, issuer, full literal URL, exact pinpoint":"Neb. Rev. Stat. §87-303.12—Copies to Attorney General; intervention, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.12; subsections (1)–(5).","Version/status and actual access":"Current official codification freshly read October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limitations":"Complete operative notice, Small Claims, appeal, intervention, mailing, and non-dismissal text. \nNebraska Legislature"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P16-S005","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.09"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P16-S005","Title, issuer, full literal URL, exact pinpoint":"Neb. Rev. Stat. §87-303.09—Violation of order or assurance, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=87-303.09; complete section.","Version/status and actual access":"Current official codification freshly read October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limitations":"Establishes offense classification only. \nNebraska Legislature"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P16-S006","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-105"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P16-S006","Title, issuer, full literal URL, exact pinpoint":"Neb. Rev. Stat. §28-105—Felony penalties, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-105; subsections (1) and (6)–(8).","Version/status and actual access":"Current official codification freshly read October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limitations":"Authorized sentencing range and express qualifications; no actual sentencing analysis. \nNebraska Legislature"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P16-S007","urls":["https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-116"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P16-S007","Title, issuer, full literal URL, exact pinpoint":"Neb. Rev. Stat. §28-116—2015 penalty changes; applicability, Nebraska Legislature. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-116; complete operative paragraph.","Version/status and actual access":"Current official codification freshly read October 26, 2026; page shows 2025 LB 383 source amendment.","Read bounds and limitations":"Used only for offense-date treatment. \nNebraska Legislature"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P16-S008","urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6103/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P16-S008","Title, issuer, full literal URL, exact pinpoint":"15 U.S.C. §6103—Actions by States, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6103/; subsections (a)–(f), source, 2010 amendment, effective-date note.","Version/status and actual access":"Current page displays laws through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026. Direct initial open failed; current page was recovered through OLRC navigation and freshly read October 26.","Read bounds and limitations":"Conditional TSR enforcement only; full telemarketing coverage not reopened. \nU.S. Code"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P16-S009","urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6104/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P16-S009","Title, issuer, full literal URL, exact pinpoint":"15 U.S.C. §6104—Actions by private persons, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6104/; subsections (a)–(f).","Version/status and actual access":"Current page displays laws through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026; freshly read October 26.","Read bounds and limitations":"Conditional private route; no TSR scope rerun. \nU.S. Code"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P16-S010","urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6105/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P16-S010","Title, issuer, full literal URL, exact pinpoint":"15 U.S.C. §6105—Administration and applicability, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s6105/; subsections (a)–(d), source and 2010 amendment.","Version/status and actual access":"Current page displays laws through Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026; freshly read October 26.","Read bounds and limitations":"Public enforcement and jurisdictional framework only. \nU.S. Code"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P16-S011","urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679g/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P16-S011","Title, issuer, full literal URL, exact pinpoint":"15 U.S.C. §1679g—CROA civil liability, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679g/; subsections (a)–(b).","Version/status and actual access":"Current served page displays Public Law 119-120, October 7, 2026; freshly read October 26.","Read bounds and limitations":"No universal 119-124 CROA currency claim. \nU.S. Code"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P16-S012","urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679h/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P16-S012","Title, issuer, full literal URL, exact pinpoint":"15 U.S.C. §1679h—CROA administrative and State enforcement, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679h/; subsections (a)–(c) as relevant.","Version/status and actual access":"Current served page displays Public Law 119-120, October 7, 2026; freshly read October 26.","Read bounds and limitations":"Full source body read only as necessary for currentness annotation. \nU.S. Code"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P16-S013","urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679i/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P16-S013","Title, issuer, full literal URL, exact pinpoint":"15 U.S.C. §1679i—CROA limitation, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t15/s1679i/; complete section.","Version/status and actual access":"Current served page displays Public Law 119-120, October 7, 2026; freshly read October 26.","Read bounds and limitations":"Prior 119-118 locator is not treated as a current-version label. \nU.S. Code"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P16-S014","urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5552/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P16-S014","Title, issuer, full literal URL, exact pinpoint":"12 U.S.C. §5552—State enforcement powers, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5552/; relevant subsections (a)–(b).","Version/status and actual access":"Current page displays Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026; freshly read October 26.","Read bounds and limitations":"CFPA public-enforcement boundary only. \nU.S. Code"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P16-S015","urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5564/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P16-S015","Title, issuer, full literal URL, exact pinpoint":"12 U.S.C. §5564—CFPB litigation authority, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5564/; relevant subsections.","Version/status and actual access":"Current page displays Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026; freshly read October 26.","Read bounds and limitations":"No private-action inference. \nU.S. Code"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P16-S016","urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5565/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P16-S016","Title, issuer, full literal URL, exact pinpoint":"12 U.S.C. §5565—Available relief, OLRC. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t12/s5565/; subsections (a)–(c) as relevant.","Version/status and actual access":"Current page displays Public Law 119-124, October 15, 2026; freshly read October 26.","Read bounds and limitations":"Current inflation-adjusted civil penalties were not researched. \nU.S. Code"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"source_id":"S_NE-P16-S017","urls":["https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/","https://www.govinfo.gov/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_NE-P16-S017","Title, issuer, full literal URL, exact pinpoint":"Bounded official cap-construction searches, Nebraska appellate repository https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ and GovInfo https://www.govinfo.gov/; exact terms included 59-1609, such increased award, increase the award of damages, and $1,000.","Version/status and actual access":"Search-only work October 26, 2026.","Read bounds and limitations":"No controlling public Nebraska appellate cap-construction holding located. This is not a complete commercial citator, trial-docket, unpublished-order, or legislative-history search."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"}],"coverage":[{"topic":"1. §59-1609 discretionary increased award","researcher_record":{"Group":"1. §59-1609 discretionary increased award","Disposition":"Partially answered; cap construction unresolved. The statute clearly preserves actual damages, costs, reasonable attorney fees, and a discretionary increased-award branch. It does not support the prior categorical statement that the court may add an additional $1,000. No controlling public Nebraska appellate interpretation was located resolving whether the $1,000 phrase caps the incremental enhancement or the resulting “increased award.”","Exact remaining limitation or next evidence":"A controlling Nebraska appellate construction or authoritative legislative history directly addressing “such increased award” is still needed. The old $2,200 maximum example is withdrawn."},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_wording_resolved_with_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"2. Pettit procedural holding","researcher_record":{"Group":"2. Pettit procedural holding","Disposition":"Answered and corrected. Pettit expressed considerable doubt about legislative intent, but the issue was not raised below, so the court assumed without deciding that a private cause existed.","Exact remaining limitation or next evidence":"Pettit does not decide Chapter 69’s private-remedy question. A Chapter 69-specific controlling decision or legislative record remains needed."},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_wording_resolved_with_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"3. §87-303.12 Attorney General copies and notices","researcher_record":{"Group":"3. §87-303.12 Attorney General copies and notices","Disposition":"Answered. The statute has separate initial-pleading, final-judgment, Small Claims appeal, and other-appeal branches; Small Claims trial pleadings and judgments are exempt from subsection (1). Mailing starts with certified mail, with later regular mail permitted only after qualifying prior certified mailing in the same action.","Exact remaining limitation or next evidence":"Application to an actual action still requires the filed documents, filing or entry dates, appeal route, and mailing proof."},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_wording_resolved_with_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"4. Class IV felony sentencing description","researcher_record":{"Group":"4. Class IV felony sentencing description","Disposition":"Answered and qualified. Willful violation of a qualifying injunction, declaratory judgment, or written assurance remains a Class IV felony. The §28-105 table states the currently authorized maximum, not an automatic sentence, and subsections (6)–(8) materially qualify post-release supervision and offense-date treatment.","Exact remaining limitation or next evidence":"An actual sentencing result requires offense date, conviction facts, concurrent or consecutive sentences, and the sentencing record."},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_wording_resolved_with_limits","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"5. Federal source currency","researcher_record":{"Group":"5. Federal source currency","Disposition":"TSR current text answered; CROA source currency qualified. Current OLRC bodies for §§6103–6105 now display Public Law 119-124 through October 15, 2026. Current §§1679g–1679i pages display Public Law 119-120 through October 7, 2026—not a universal 119-124 CROA compilation. Current CFPA §§5552, 5564, and 5565 display Public Law 119-124 through October 15, 2026.","Exact remaining limitation or next evidence":"The prior §1679f dated-body hold remains. No universal CROA-through-119-124 statement is made."},"coordinator_acceptance":"researcher_recovery_not_replicated_source_hold","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"}],"annotations":{},"corrections":[],"resolved_corrections":[],"review_history":[]}