{"meta":{"key":"s_mt--pass-26","task":"S_MT","title":"SMT Bounded precision and source corrections to","parent_title":"Montana debt and debt relief law","edition":"pass-26","path":"/research/s_mt--pass-26/","kind":"split_pass","category":"state","role":"state","area_numbers":[66],"groups":["collections"],"date":"2026-10-26","tables":5,"claims":16,"sources":17,"review_status":"three_P21_targeted_precision_groups_resolved_with_limits","review_complete":true,"sha256":"831ae37a19db001bedf347b478dd7f01e030407aa3ae8e8e7c679f24ce72476f","headings":["Effect on the original PASS-21","1(a). Replacement for P21 VI.A notice-content paragraph","Statutory officer notice","Affected original claims","1(b). Replacement for P21 C055 and related excess-proceeds language","Corrected P21 C055","1(c). Replacement for P21 VII.E and C054","Referee-order contempt only","Corrected P21 C054","1(d). Replacement qualification for C009, the route matrix, and Example 13","Outer writ-expiration qualification","Corrected P21 C009","Example 13 qualification only","Replacement for the two affected IV.C table labels","Diagnostic edge calculation 1 — semimonthly $628.33","Diagnostic edge calculation 2 — monthly $1,256.66","Rounding hold","Replacement for P21 S010","Replacement for P21 S012","Exact claimed OLRC URLs","Access and version qualification","Official dated GovInfo alternative","Replacement for P21 S013","Replacement for P21 S021","P21 S018 — In re Marriage of Winters","In re Marriage of Mease","CBI, Inc. v. McCrea","Dorwart and Buxbaum later treatment","Salminen v. Morrison & Frampton","Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp.","Freshly read in this bounded pass","Not freshly read successfully","Preserved without change"],"generation_provenance":{"actual_route":"regular_chat_adaptive_models","actual_model":"GPT-5.6 Sol","actual_mode":"Pro","provenance_limit":"Actual documented capture labels only; missing labels remain unknown. No preferred setting is inferred as actual execution."},"public_id":"S_MT/pass-26","facets":{"geography":["us","us-mt"],"debt_type":[],"stage":[],"subject":[]},"scope":"Only reviewedMT21 threeboundedoperational/formula/sourceprecisioncorrectiongroups; P25 independentpass stillprepared","pending_corrections":0},"markdown":"# S_MT PASS-26 — Bounded precision and source corrections to PASS-21\n\n**Fresh access date:** October 26, 2026, Pacific / October 26, 2026, UTC\n**Scope:** Only the three requested correction groups. PASS-21’s fifteen worked examples, thirty-five checked numerical quantities, substantive supported findings, and unresolved gaps remain intact except for the specific qualifications below. PASS-22 through PASS-24 remain unreviewed and are not adopted.\n\n## Effect on the original PASS-21\n\n| Group / subissue | Original P21 location | Correction or qualification | Effect |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **1(a) Notice content** | VI.A; source S004 | Replace “date of seizure” as a required content item with **date of judgment**. The seizure date may be included operationally but is not the item required by §25-13-211(1)(b). | Content correction only; five-day notice timing and §25-13-212 deadlines remain unchanged. |\n| **1(b) Excess proceeds** | C055 and related distribution prose | Add: excess proceeds are returned **unless otherwise directed by the judgment or an order of court**. | Prevents a universal-return statement. |\n| **1(c) Contempt** | VII.E; C054 | Section 25-14-108 concerns disobedience of a properly made **referee** order. It does not itself establish broad contempt for every court order, employer payroll error, late remittance, or inaccurate response. | Narrow source correction; broader contempt authority remains held. |\n| **1(d) Wage-levy duration** | C009; court/route matrix; Example 13 | Preserve the unresolved interaction between Rule 23’s 120 days from officer receipt and §25-13-402(6)(a)’s service-based wage levy extending only **through expiration of the writ**. | No extra 120 days beyond actual writ expiration may be assumed. |\n| **2(a) Semimonthly display** | IV.C | $628.33 is a rounded guidance display, not the exact algebraic crossover. Exact equality is $628.333…. | Label correction only. |\n| **2(b) Monthly display** | IV.C | Approximately $1,256.66 is a rounded guidance display, not the exact algebraic crossover. Exact equality is $1,256.666…. | Label correction only. |\n| **2(c) Payroll rounding** | IV.C; C027 | MCA §25-13-301(2)’s rejection of fractions of a cent concerns the amount stated in the **writ of execution**. It does not resolve every payroll-branch rounding practice. | Payroll rounding remains expressly held. |\n| **3(a) S010 locators** | Source S010 | Restore full literal URLs for §§25-14-103, 104, 105, 107, and 108. | Locator correction. |\n| **3(b) S012 federal sources** | Source S012 | Restore all exact claimed Title 15 and Title 29 URLs; distinguish failed current Title 15 routes, current successful §1677/§206 reads, and the official dated 2024 GovInfo text. | Source-version and access correction. |\n| **3(c) S013 eCFR** | Source S013 | Restore complete URLs for §§870.10, 870.11, and 870.51 and their October 2026 eCFR status. | Locator/currentness correction. |\n| **3(d) S021 forms** | Source S021 | Restore all five Word-form URLs. Titles and landing pages were read; individual Word bodies and revision dates remain unread. | No implied form-content verification. |\n| **3(e) Opinion pinpoints** | S015–S020, especially S018 | Correct *Winters* to printed pp.18–19/PDF indices 17–18; preserve *Mease*; distinguish the *CBI* majority from Justice Baker’s dissent. | Pinpoint and attribution corrections. |\n| **3(f) Later treatment / posture** | Dorwart, Salminen, Sniadach annotations | Add *Buxbaum*’s narrow attorney-fee overruling; correct *Salminen* filing/status language; narrow *Sniadach* to its majority’s Wisconsin prejudgment-wage holding and unusual-situation qualification. | No substantive expansion of P21. |\n\n# GROUP 1 — Exact operative replacements\n\n## 1(a). Replacement for P21 VI.A notice-content paragraph\n\n### Statutory officer notice\n\nWithin five days after executing upon the debtor’s property, the sheriff or levying officer must serve a notice that:\n\n1. Describes the property or money seized to satisfy the judgment;\n2. States the **case name, date of judgment, and judgment creditor’s name**;\n3. Advises that state or federal exemptions may apply; and\n4. Explains how to claim an exemption and request a hearing.\n\nThe **date of seizure is not the item required by §25-13-211(1)(b)**. It may be operationally useful and may appear on a form, but it must not replace the required date of judgment. Personal service and first-class mail remain authorized; mailed service is complete when the officer places the notice in the mail. [Montana Code Annotated](https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0020/section_0110/0250-0130-0020-0110.html)\n\nThe related PASS-21 timing conclusions remain unchanged:\n\n- Personal notice: ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, from actual receipt;\n- Mailed notice: ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, from the officer’s mailing date;\n- Same-day copies to the creditor or counsel and the officer;\n- Hearing within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after court receipt; and\n- Late state claim barred in the seized property. [Montana Code Annotated](https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/MCA/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0020/section_0120/0250-0130-0020-0120.html)\n\n### Affected original claims\n\n- **P21 C030 remains correct:** officer notice is due within five days after seizure.\n- **P21 C031 remains correct:** mailed notice is complete upon mailing.\n- The correction concerns the **required contents** of the notice, not either timing claim.\n\n## 1(b). Replacement for P21 C055 and related excess-proceeds language\n\n### Corrected P21 C055\n\n**Excess proceeds beyond the judgment and accruing costs must be returned to the judgment debtor, unless the judgment itself or an order of court directs otherwise.**\n\nThis exception is operative. Section 25-13-402(2) does not authorize an unconditional return that overrides:\n\n- A judgment’s express allocation;\n- A court’s distribution order;\n- Legally established priorities;\n- A pending exemption or ownership ruling;\n- An officer’s statutory hold; or\n- Other valid directions in the execution proceeding. [Montana Code Annotated](https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0040/section_0020/0250-0130-0040-0020.html)\n\n**Original claim relationship:** replaces the unqualified wording in **P21 C055**. No mathematical balance, priority, or satisfaction finding is changed.\n\n## 1(c). Replacement for P21 VII.E and C054\n\n### Referee-order contempt only\n\nMCA §25-14-108 provides that a person, party, or witness who disobeys an order of a **referee**, properly made in proceedings before that referee under chapter 14, parts 1 and 2, may be punished for contempt by the court or judge that ordered the reference. It does not itself supply a general contempt rule for all court orders. [Montana Code Annotated](https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0080/0250-0140-0010-0080.html)\n\n### Corrected P21 C054\n\n**Section 25-14-108 supports contempt for disobedience of a properly made referee order in proceedings under chapter 14, parts 1 and 2. It does not by itself establish automatic employer default liability, a payroll penalty, damages, or contempt for every inaccurate answer, late remittance, or other court-order violation. Broader court-order contempt requires separate authority and remains held.**\n\nThe neighboring supplemental-proceeding provisions remain accurately bounded:\n\n- §25-14-103 permits examination of a person or corporation believed to hold debtor property or owe more than $50;\n- §25-14-104 permits a separate action when ownership or indebtedness is denied;\n- §25-14-105 permits witnesses to be required to testify;\n- §25-14-107 permits a judge or referee to order nonexempt debtor property applied to the judgment; and\n- §25-14-108 addresses disobedience of the referee’s order. [Montana Code Annotated+4](https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0030/0250-0140-0010-0030.html)\n\n## 1(d). Replacement qualification for C009, the route matrix, and Example 13\n\n### Outer writ-expiration qualification\n\nTwo distinct clocks appear in the governing texts:\n\n- Justice/City Rule 23 says the writ remains effective for **120 days from the officer’s receipt**; and\n- MCA §25-13-402(6)(a) says a wage levy continues for 120 days or until satisfaction, whichever occurs first, but reaches earnings due from service only **through expiration of the writ**. [Montana Code Annotated+1](https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0230/part_0010/section_0230/0250-0230-0010-0230.html)\n\nThe service-based language may not be read as creating a fresh, unqualified 120-day period that extends beyond the writ’s actual expiration. The precise relationship between:\n\n1. Officer receipt;\n2. Employer service;\n3. The expiration date marked on the served writ;\n4. Satisfaction; and\n5. The general 120-day execution limit\n\nremains held where service occurs materially after officer receipt.\n\n### Corrected P21 C009\n\n**A wage levy begins upon valid employer service and can continue only until the earliest legally controlling termination event, including satisfaction and actual writ expiration. Section 25-13-402(6)(a)’s 120-day language must be read with its express “through expiration of the writ” limit and, in Justice/City Court, Rule 23’s 120-day clock from officer receipt. No extra 120 days beyond writ expiration is established.**\n\n### Example 13 qualification only\n\nThe original Example 13 remains unchanged except for this added condition:\n\nThe conclusion that satisfaction on S + 75 ends the levy assumes that the writ’s independently determined outer expiration occurs after S + 75. If the writ expires earlier, the levy ends at that earlier expiration. If the writ remains valid beyond S + 75, satisfaction ends the levy at S + 75.\n\nNo calendar date is calculated, and none of the other fourteen worked examples changes.\n\n# GROUP 2 — Rounded displays and exact lesser-of branches\n\n## Replacement for the two affected IV.C table labels\n\nThe exact ordinary formula remains:\n\nW(D)=min⁡(0.25D, max⁡(0,D−F))W(D)=\\min\\left(0.25D,\\ \\max(0,D-F)\\right)W(D)=min(0.25D, max(0,D−F))where:\n\n- DDD = disposable earnings for the pay period; and\n- FFF = that pay period’s protected floor.\n\nThe crossover occurs where:\n\n0.25D=D−F0.25D=D-F0.25D=D−F0.75D=F0.75D=F0.75D=FD=F0.75D=\\frac{F}{0.75}D=0.75F​The eCFR requires equivalent pay-period transformations, treats a calendar month as 4134\\frac13431​ workweeks, and preserves the lesser-of formula. Its dollar illustrations from 1991 are historical examples, not current minimum-wage figures. [eCFR+2](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870/subpart-B/section-870.10)\n\n| Pay period | Protected floor FFF | P21/DOL rounded guidance display | Exact algebraic crossover | Correct qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Semimonthly | $471.25 | $628.33 | 18853=$628.333333…\\frac{1885}{3}=\\$628.333333\\ldots31885​=$628.333333… | $628.33 is a cent-rounded display, not exact branch equality. |\n| Monthly | $942.50 | Approximately $1,256.66 | 37703=$1,256.666666…\\frac{3770}{3}=\\$1,256.666666\\ldots33770​=$1,256.666666… | The displayed amount is an approximation to a repeating-decimal crossover. |\n\n## Diagnostic edge calculation 1 — semimonthly $628.33\n\n**Inputs**\n\nD=$628.33D=\\$628.33D=$628.33F=$471.25F=\\$471.25F=$471.2525% branch:\n\n0.25×$628.33=$157.08250.25\\times \\$628.33\n=\n\\$157.08250.25×$628.33=$157.0825Excess-over-floor branch:\n\n$628.33−$471.25=$157.08\\$628.33-\\$471.25\n=\n\\$157.08$628.33−$471.25=$157.08Exact lesser branch:\n\nmin⁡($157.0825,$157.08)=$157.08\\min(\\$157.0825,\\$157.08)\n=\n\\boxed{\\$157.08}min($157.0825,$157.08)=$157.08​Thus $628.33 lies just below exact equality; the excess branch remains slightly smaller.\n\n## Diagnostic edge calculation 2 — monthly $1,256.66\n\n**Inputs**\n\nD=$1,256.66D=\\$1,256.66D=$1,256.66F=$942.50F=\\$942.50F=$942.5025% branch:\n\n0.25×$1,256.66=$314.1650.25\\times \\$1,256.66\n=\n\\$314.1650.25×$1,256.66=$314.165Excess-over-floor branch:\n\n$1,256.66−$942.50=$314.16\\$1,256.66-\\$942.50\n=\n\\$314.16$1,256.66−$942.50=$314.16Exact lesser branch:\n\nmin⁡($314.165,$314.16)=$314.16\\min(\\$314.165,\\$314.16)\n=\n\\boxed{\\$314.16}min($314.165,$314.16)=$314.16​Again, the displayed amount lies just below exact algebraic equality.\n\n## Rounding hold\n\nMCA §25-13-301(2) directs that the **amount of the execution** be stated in dollars and cents, rejecting fractions of a cent. That provision does not establish how every employer must round a fractional-cent result produced within the payroll lesser-of calculation. [Montana Code Annotated](https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0030/section_0010/0250-0130-0030-0010.html)\n\nAccordingly:\n\n- The two diagnostics show the full-precision branches and their exact lesser values;\n- No universal “round up,” “round down,” or “nearest cent” payroll rule is inferred from §25-13-301(2);\n- The legal payroll-rounding method remains unresolved; and\n- All fifteen original P21 examples and their checked arithmetic remain unchanged.\n\n# GROUP 3 — Exact source-cell replacements and provenance\n\n## Replacement for P21 S010\n\n**P21 S010 — proceedings in aid of execution, Montana Legislature**\n\n- https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0030/0250-0140-0010-0030.html — MCA §25-14-103;\n- https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0040/0250-0140-0010-0040.html — MCA §25-14-104;\n- https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0050/0250-0140-0010-0050.html — MCA §25-14-105;\n- https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0070/0250-0140-0010-0070.html — MCA §25-14-107; and\n- https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0080/0250-0140-0010-0080.html — MCA §25-14-108.\n\n**Corrected read limit:** §§103–105 and 107 govern examination, denied ownership or indebtedness, testimony, and application of nonexempt property. Section 108 is limited to a referee’s properly made order. It is not independent support for automatic employer default or broad court-order contempt. [Montana Code Annotated+4](https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0030/0250-0140-0010-0030.html)\n\n## Replacement for P21 S012\n\n**P21 S012 — federal garnishment and minimum-wage authorities**\n\n### Exact claimed OLRC URLs\n\n- https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1672/\n- https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1673/\n- https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1674/\n- https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-118/t15/s1677/\n- https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-118/t29/s206/\n\n### Access and version qualification\n\n- Fresh direct attempts to the displayed OLRC routes for §§1672, 1673, and 1674 failed in this session. No blanket statement is made that the statutes or OLRC service were unavailable.\n- Section 1677 opened successfully and displayed laws through Public Law 119-120, October 7, 2026. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-118/t15/s1677/)\n- Section 206 opened successfully and displayed laws through Public Law 119-120, October 7, 2026; subsection (a)(1)(C) states $7.25. [U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-118/t29/s206/)\n- The numerical directory segment in an OLRC URL is not itself proof of the displayed currentness header.\n\n### Official dated GovInfo alternative\n\n- https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/15/1673\n- https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2024-title15/html/USCODE-2024-title15-chap41-subchapII-sec1673.htm\n\nThe official **2024 Edition** material was freshly read at printed pp.1550–1551, zero-based PDF indices 0–1. It contains §§1672–1677, including the definitions, lesser-of ceiling, anti-discharge rule, and state-law preservation clause. It is reliable dated federal text but is not represented here as a complete post-2024 amendment audit for §§1672–1674. [GovInfo+3](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/15/1673)\n\n## Replacement for P21 S013\n\n**P21 S013 — 29 CFR Part 870, eCFR**\n\n- https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870/subpart-B/section-870.10\n- https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870/subpart-B/section-870.11\n- https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870/subpart-C/section-870.51\n\n**Fresh status:** All three sections were read from the eCFR displaying Title 29 as current through October 22, 2026 and last amended October 14, 2026. [eCFR+2](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870/subpart-B/section-870.10)\n\n**Read limits:**\n\n- §870.10 supplies the lesser-of formula, pay-period conversion method, and controlling paid-or-payable date;\n- §870.11 supplies exclusions and aggregation/priority illustrations;\n- §870.51 states that the federal ceiling is not merely an affirmative defense;\n- Dollar illustrations tied to the 1991 $4.25 minimum are historical, not current dollar thresholds. [eCFR+3](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870/subpart-B/section-870.10)\n\n## Replacement for P21 S021\n\n**P21 S021 — Montana Judicial Branch forms**\n\nFreshly read landing pages:\n\n- https://courts.mt.gov/forms/civilforms\n- https://courts.mt.gov/forms/judgement\n\nThe pages identify execution forms and describe judgment collection at an operational level. [Montana Courts+1](https://courts.mt.gov/forms/civilforms)\n\nExact Word-form URLs:\n\n1. https://courts.mt.gov/external/library/forms/civil/city_jp/writ_exe.doc\n2. https://courts.mt.gov/external/library/forms/civil/district/writ_exec.doc\n3. https://courts.mt.gov/external/library/forms/civil/district/execution.doc\n4. https://courts.mt.gov/external/library/forms/civil/district/seizure.doc\n5. https://courts.mt.gov/external/library/forms/civil/district/writ_exec_transc_jud.doc\n\nEach direct Word-form fetch returned an unsupported application/msword content-type response. Therefore:\n\n- The form titles and official locations are verified;\n- The individual form bodies were **not read**;\n- Their revision dates and every field remain unverified;\n- No employer-answer form, employer-fee form, or substantive safe harbor is inferred merely from the links. (Invalid URL)\n\n# Opinion and pinpoint replacements\n\n## P21 S018 — *In re Marriage of Winters*\n\nCorrect locator:\n\n- ¶54 begins on **printed page 18 / zero-based PDF index 17**;\n- ¶54 continues on **printed page 19 / PDF index 18**; and\n- ¶55 is on **printed page 19 / PDF index 18**.\n\nThe material holding remains that the District Court lacked authority to exempt an entire self-employed business account from execution under the cited statutory scheme. The opinion’s $3,000 tools-of-trade figure was the historical amount then in force and is not the current exemption amount. [Justia Law+1](https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2004-04-01-56287D56-D41D-4DC8-880F-5F4DAD3A4731.pdf?ts=1462389272)\n\n**Replacement pinpoint:** printed pp.18–19 / PDF indices 17–18, not pp.19–20 / indices 18–19.\n\n## *In re Marriage of Mease*\n\nNo pinpoint change:\n\n- ¶54’s execution-before-garnishment holding appears on **printed page 19 / PDF index 18**. [Justia Law+1](https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2004-03-11-917F7B02-8EF7-4C4A-A370-6D8375C0C7E7.pdf?ts=1462389266)\n\n## *CBI, Inc. v. McCrea*\n\nSource attribution must distinguish the opinions:\n\n- The **majority**, ¶¶14–18, addressed the statutory exemption-request requirements and affirmed the District Court;\n- Justice Baker’s notice and opportunity-to-supplement discussion, ¶¶23–30, is a **dissent** and is not a majority notice holding. [Justia Law+1](https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2012/da-11-0708.html)\n\nAccordingly, P21 may rely on the majority for claim specificity and documentation. It may not attribute Justice Baker’s ¶¶23–30 reasoning to the Court’s majority.\n\n## *Dorwart* and *Buxbaum* later treatment\n\n*Dorwart* remains historical due-process and search/seizure background for the former execution regime. *Buxbaum*, 2003 MT 97, ¶46, overruled *Dorwart* only to the extent it suggested that MCA §27-8-313 did not provide discretionary attorney-fee authority in a declaratory-judgment action. It did **not** overrule *Dorwart*’s execution-related due-process or search-and-seizure holdings. [Justia Law+1](https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/1998/3d8b9983-6bae-41cf-9de6-2350cbf0cd89.html)\n\nNo complete subsequent-history or paid-citator claim is made. Current §§25-13-211 and 212 govern the modern statutory notice and hearing procedure.\n\n## *Salminen v. Morrison & Frampton*\n\nThe filed opinion caption and docket show:\n\n- 2014 MT 323;\n- decided and filed December 2, 2014; and\n- disposition: reversed in part, affirmed in part, and remanded.\n\nThe browser/PDF’s legacy “PROPOSED OPINION” label does not supersede the filed caption and decision date. [Justia Law](https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2014-da-14-0179.pdf?ts=1417564946)\n\nParagraphs 23–24, printed pp.10–11/PDF indices 9–10, hold that statutory execution and prompt exemption procedure mattered to whether the pleaded conversion claim could proceed. They do not establish automatic damages, automatic conversion liability, or recovery for every procedural defect. [Justia Law+3](https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2014-da-14-0179.pdf?ts=1417564946)\n\n## *Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp.*\n\nThe controlling majority discussion is at printed pp.339–342, zero-based PDF indices 2–5. The majority invalidated the Wisconsin **prejudgment wage-garnishment** procedure at issue, while expressly recognizing that summary procedure may satisfy due process in extraordinary situations and observing that no such special circumstance existed there. [GovInfo+3](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-395/pdf/USREPORTS-395-337.pdf)\n\nJustice Harlan’s separate writing begins on printed p.342/PDF index 5; it is a concurrence, not part of Justice Douglas’s majority reasoning. The dissent is likewise separate. [GovInfo](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-395/pdf/USREPORTS-395-337.pdf)\n\nP21 therefore remains correct to use *Sniadach* only as a bounded prejudgment-Wisconsin due-process distinction—not as a universal rule for Montana postjudgment garnishment.\n\n# PASS-26 source register\n\n| Source ID | Instrument, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint | Status and whose access | Read bounds and limits |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **S_MT-P26-S001** | MCA §§25-13-211 and 212, Montana Legislature. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0020/section_0110/0250-0130-0020-0110.html; https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/MCA/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0020/section_0120/0250-0130-0020-0120.html | **Fresh own access**, Oct. 26, 2026 Pacific/UTC | Complete current MCA 2025 clauses read; Internet-code disclaimer retained. [Montana Code Annotated+1](https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0020/section_0110/0250-0130-0020-0110.html) |\n| **S_MT-P26-S002** | MCA §25-13-402, Montana Legislature. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0040/section_0020/0250-0130-0040-0020.html | **Fresh own access** | Complete relevant subsections (1)–(8), including excess-proceeds exception and wage-levy language. [Montana Code Annotated](https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0040/section_0020/0250-0130-0040-0020.html) |\n| **S_MT-P26-S003** | MCA §25-14-108. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0080/0250-0140-0010-0080.html | **Fresh own access** | Complete section read; expressly limited to referee orders. [Montana Code Annotated](https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0080/0250-0140-0010-0080.html) |\n| **S_MT-P26-S004** | Justice/City Rule 23. Correct URL: https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0230/part_0010/section_0230/0250-0230-0010-0230.html | **Fresh own access** | Complete rule read. The supplied chapter_0250 route failed with 404; the operative chapter is 0230. [Montana Code Annotated](https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0230/part_0010/section_0230/0250-0230-0010-0230.html) |\n| **S_MT-P26-S005** | MCA §25-13-301. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0030/section_0010/0250-0130-0030-0010.html | **Fresh own access** | Complete section read; fractional-cent clause is about the writ’s execution amount. [Montana Code Annotated](https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0030/section_0010/0250-0130-0030-0010.html) |\n| **S_MT-P26-S006** | 29 CFR §§870.10, 870.11, 870.51, eCFR. Full URLs reproduced above. | **Fresh own access** | eCFR displayed current through Oct. 22, 2026; Title 29 last amended Oct. 14, 2026. Historical dollar illustrations not treated as current thresholds. [eCFR+2](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870/subpart-B/section-870.10) |\n| **S_MT-P26-S007** | 15 U.S.C. §§1672–1674 and 1677; 29 U.S.C. §206. Exact OLRC and GovInfo URLs reproduced above. | **Mixed:** fresh successes, fresh failed direct routes, and fresh read of dated official 2024 GovInfo text | §§1672–1674 current OLRC direct routes failed; §1677 and §206 opened through laws effective Oct. 7, 2026. GovInfo 2024 pp.1550–1551/PDF 0–1 read. Exact post-2024 currentness of §§1672–1674 remains held. [U.S. Code+4](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-118/t15/s1677/) |\n| **S_MT-P26-S008** | MCA §§25-14-103, 104, 105, 107, 108. Full literal URLs reproduced in the S010 replacement. | **Fresh own access** | Complete five sections read; no broader contempt claim imported. [Montana Code Annotated+4](https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0030/0250-0140-0010-0030.html) |\n| **S_MT-P26-S009** | Montana Judicial Branch Civil Forms and Collecting a Judgment pages plus five exact Word URLs. | **Fresh landing-page access; direct DOC bodies failed/not read** | Form titles and official locations verified. Individual bodies, fields, and revisions remain unread. [Montana Courts+1](https://courts.mt.gov/forms/civilforms) |\n| **S_MT-P26-S010** | *In re Marriage of Winters*, 2004 MT 82. https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2004/56287d56-d41d-4dc8-880f-5f4dad3a4731.html; court-opinion PDF reached through its observed download link | **Fresh own access** | ¶54 printed pp.18–19/PDF 17–18; ¶55 p.19/PDF 18. Historical exemption amount not current. [Justia Law+3](https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2004/56287d56-d41d-4dc8-880f-5f4dad3a4731.html) |\n| **S_MT-P26-S011** | *In re Marriage of Mease*, 2004 MT 59. https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2004-03-11-917F7B02-8EF7-4C4A-A370-6D8375C0C7E7.pdf?ts=1462389266 | **Fresh own access** | ¶54 printed p.19/PDF 18; no locator change. [Justia Law+1](https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2004-03-11-917F7B02-8EF7-4C4A-A370-6D8375C0C7E7.pdf?ts=1462389266) |\n| **S_MT-P26-S012** | *CBI, Inc. v. McCrea*, 2012 MT 167. https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2012/da-11-0708.html | **Fresh own access** | Majority ¶¶14–18; Justice Baker dissent ¶¶23–30. Old PDF-text failure not generalized to the HTML opinion. [Justia Law+1](https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2012/da-11-0708.html) |\n| **S_MT-P26-S013** | *Dorwart v. Caraway*, 1998 MT 191. https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/1998/3d8b9983-6bae-41cf-9de6-2350cbf0cd89.html | **Fresh own access** | Used as historical due-process/search background; current statutes control modern procedure. [Justia Law](https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/1998/3d8b9983-6bae-41cf-9de6-2350cbf0cd89.html) |\n| **S_MT-P26-S014** | *Trustees of Indiana University v. Buxbaum*, 2003 MT 97. https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2003/eff955bb-6f26-4929-9f2d-b920b9e3977c.html | **Fresh own access** | ¶46 read. Narrow overruling limited to §27-8-313 discretionary attorney-fee proposition. [Justia Law](https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2003/eff955bb-6f26-4929-9f2d-b920b9e3977c.html) |\n| **S_MT-P26-S015** | *Salminen v. Morrison & Frampton*, 2014 MT 323. https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2014-da-14-0179.pdf?ts=1417564946 | **Fresh own access** | Filed Dec. 2, 2014; ¶¶23–24 printed pp.10–11/PDF 9–10. “PROPOSED” is legacy PDF metadata, not case status. [Justia Law+2](https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2014-da-14-0179.pdf?ts=1417564946) |\n| **S_MT-P26-S016** | *Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp.*, 395 U.S. 337. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-395/pdf/USREPORTS-395-337.pdf | **Fresh own access** | Majority printed pp.339–342/PDF 2–5; concurrence begins p.342/PDF 5. Wisconsin prejudgment wages only. [GovInfo+3](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-395/pdf/USREPORTS-395-337.pdf) |\n| **S_MT-P26-S017** | DOL Fact Sheet #30, wage-garnishment landing page, and Employment Law Guide: https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/30-cppa; https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/wage-garnishment; https://webapps.dol.gov/elaws/elg/garnish.htm | **Coordinator-reported dated reuse; not freshly read successfully here** | Fresh attempts were reported as one-time 403 results. Prior same-day reviews read the Dec. 2024 Fact Sheet and Dec. 2016 guide. No new successful-access or blanket-outage claim is made. |\n\n# PASS-26 claim register\n\n| Claim ID | Affected original P21 location/ID | Precise corrected claim | Source/pinpoint, predicates, consequence, confidence |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **S_MT-P26-C001** | VI.A; C030/C031 retained | Statutory notice must state the **date of judgment**, not date of seizure, along with case name and creditor. | S001, §25-13-211(1)(b). Date of seizure optional operational information only. **High.** |\n| **S_MT-P26-C002** | C055 | Excess proceeds are returned unless the judgment or court order directs otherwise. | S002, §25-13-402(2). Priorities and orders remain controlling. **High.** |\n| **S_MT-P26-C003** | VII.E; C054 | Section 25-14-108 concerns contempt for disobeying a properly made referee order. | S003, complete section. **High.** |\n| **S_MT-P26-C004** | VII.E; C054 | Broader court-order contempt, automatic employer default, payroll penalties, and damages are not established by §25-14-108. | S003/S008. Separate authority remains required. **High qualification.** |\n| **S_MT-P26-C005** | C009; route matrix; Example 13 | A wage levy cannot be assumed to continue beyond actual writ expiration; Rule 23’s receipt clock and §402’s service language remain to be reconciled on actual facts. | S002 §402(6)(a); S004 Rule 23(D). **High text; final interaction unresolved.** |\n| **S_MT-P26-C006** | IV.C; C027 | Semimonthly exact crossover is $628.333…; $628.33 is a rounded display. | S006 §870.10 plus exact algebra. At $628.33, lesser branch is $157.08. **High.** |\n| **S_MT-P26-C007** | IV.C; C027 | Monthly exact crossover is $1,256.666…; the displayed $1,256.66 amount is approximate. | S006 §870.10 plus exact algebra. At $1,256.66, lesser branch is $314.16. **High.** |\n| **S_MT-P26-C008** | IV.C; C027 | MCA §25-13-301(2)’s fractional-cent rule applies to the writ’s stated execution amount and does not resolve every payroll-rounding practice. | S005, §301(2). **High textual distinction; payroll rounding held.** |\n| **S_MT-P26-C009** | S012 | Direct current OLRC access succeeded for §1677 and §206 but not the displayed §1672–1674 routes; official 2024 GovInfo text supplies dated operative language. | S007. Exact 2026 currentness for §§1672–1674 held. **High provenance qualification.** |\n| **S_MT-P26-C010** | S013 | Current eCFR §§870.10, 870.11, and 870.51 were read as current through Oct. 22, 2026; historical 1991 dollars are not current thresholds. | S006. **High.** |\n| **S_MT-P26-C011** | S021 | Official form titles and URLs are verified, but the five Word bodies and revision dates are unread. | S009. No substantive inference from links alone. **High.** |\n| **S_MT-P26-C012** | S018 | *Winters* ¶54 begins on printed p.18/PDF 17 and continues p.19/PDF 18; ¶55 is p.19/PDF 18. | S010. **High.** |\n| **S_MT-P26-C013** | CBI source usage | *CBI* majority ¶¶14–18 supports statutory request specificity; ¶¶23–30 is Justice Baker’s dissent. | S012. **High.** |\n| **S_MT-P26-C014** | Dorwart source annotation | *Buxbaum* overruled *Dorwart* only on the inconsistent §27-8-313 fee proposition, not its due-process holding. | S013–S014, *Buxbaum* ¶46. **High, bounded later-treatment conclusion.** |\n| **S_MT-P26-C015** | Salminen source annotation | *Salminen* is a filed Dec. 2, 2014 opinion; ¶¶23–24 support statutory-process pleading sufficiency, not automatic damages. | S015. **High.** |\n| **S_MT-P26-C016** | Sniadach source annotation | *Sniadach* concerns Wisconsin prejudgment wage freezing; majority recognized possible extraordinary-situation exceptions. | S016, majority pp.339–342/PDF 2–5. **High.** |\n\n# Coverage and residual gaps\n\n| Assigned PASS-26 subissue | Status | Claims | Remaining authority or fact needed |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Required notice date | **Corrected** | C001 | Actual notice form and judgment date |\n| Optional seizure date | **Qualified** | C001 | Local form may include it, but it cannot replace judgment date |\n| §25-13-212 timing | **Preserved unchanged** | — | Actual personal/mail trigger and holidays |\n| Excess proceeds exception | **Corrected** | C002 | Actual judgment/order, priorities, costs, and accounting |\n| Referee contempt | **Answered narrowly** | C003 | Actual referee order and disobedience |\n| Broader court contempt | **Unresolved/held** | C004 | Separate contempt statute/rule and actual order |\n| Automatic employer default/penalty | **Not established** | C004 | Specific statutory or court-order authority |\n| Writ receipt versus service | **Partial; original hold preserved** | C005 | Actual receipt, service, marked expiration, and court route |\n| Example 13 termination | **Conditionally qualified** | C005 | Actual outer expiration |\n| Semimonthly crossover | **Corrected exactly** | C006 | Employer’s lawful cents-rounding method |\n| Monthly crossover | **Corrected exactly** | C007 | Employer’s lawful cents-rounding method |\n| DOL displayed thresholds | **Retained as rounded guidance** | C006–C007 | Fresh successful current DOL body if later required |\n| Payroll rounding | **Unresolved** | C008 | Controlling payroll or garnishment-rounding authority |\n| Full S010 locators | **Corrected** | C003–C004 | None |\n| Full S012 locators/currentness | **Corrected with holds** | C009 | Current accessible §§1672–1674 header or later-amendment audit |\n| Full S013 locators | **Corrected** | C010 | None |\n| Full S021 form locators | **Corrected** | C011 | Machine-readable current forms/revision dates |\n| *Winters* pinpoint | **Corrected** | C012 | None |\n| *Mease* pinpoint | **Confirmed unchanged** | — | None |\n| *CBI* majority/dissent attribution | **Corrected** | C013 | No full later-treatment audit |\n| *Dorwart/Buxbaum* later treatment | **Answered narrowly** | C014 | Complete citator remains unperformed |\n| *Salminen* status/posture | **Corrected** | C015 | Merits/damages require actual later proceedings |\n| *Sniadach* scope | **Qualified** | C016 | No broader prejudgment-garnishment dossier |\n| Original fifteen examples | **Preserved** | C005–C008 | Only Example 13 receives the stated outer-expiry qualification |\n| Worker classification/PTO/severance/multiple employer | **Unchanged unresolved** | — | Separate operative authority and facts |\n| Employer fee/default/private retaliation remedy | **Unchanged unresolved** | — | Separate authority and actual facts |\n| Local/municipal/tribal/country rules | **Unchanged excluded** | — | Jurisdiction-specific work |\n| Bank/benefit and other enforcement components | **Not adopted** | — | Separate coordinator review |\n\n# Self-check\n\n## Freshly read in this bounded pass\n\n- MCA §§25-13-211, 212, 301, and 402;\n- Justice/City Rule 23;\n- MCA §§25-14-103, 104, 105, 107, and 108;\n- eCFR §§870.10, 870.11, and 870.51;\n- OLRC §1677 and §206;\n- Official 2024 GovInfo §§1672–1677 pages;\n- Montana Judicial Branch execution-form landing pages;\n- *Winters*, *Mease*, *CBI*, *Dorwart*, *Buxbaum*, *Salminen*, and *Sniadach* in the bounded portions identified above.\n\n## Not freshly read successfully\n\n- OLRC current routes for §§1672–1674;\n- The five Word-form bodies;\n- Current DOL Fact Sheet #30 and wage-garnishment page bodies.\n\nThose limits are recorded source by source and are not converted into a blanket unavailability claim.\n\n## Preserved without change\n\n- All fifteen P21 worked examples, except the explicit conditional sentence added to Example 13;\n- The thirty-five previously checked arithmetic quantities;\n- Receipt/service/local-practice, worker-classification, mixed-income, employer-liability, late-exemption, federal-remedy, form-version, and broader enforcement holds;\n- No P22, P23, P24, or future P25 conclusion is adopted.\n\nNo filing, employer instruction, payroll calculation for an actual person, provider or case lookup, contact, records request, local write, independent-review conclusion, component acceptance, Montana acceptance, parent-dossier acceptance, A066 acceptance, operational approval, or publication-readiness determination occurred.\n\nEND S_MT PASS-26.\n\n","tables":[{"headers":["Group / subissue","Original P21 location","Correction or qualification","Effect"],"index":0,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Group / subissue","Original P21 location","Correction or qualification","Effect"],["1(a) Notice content","VI.A; source S004","Replace “date of seizure” as a required content item with date of judgment. The seizure date may be included operationally but is not the item required by §25-13-211(1)(b).","Content correction only; five-day notice timing and §25-13-212 deadlines remain unchanged."],["1(b) Excess proceeds","C055 and related distribution prose","Add: excess proceeds are returned unless otherwise directed by the judgment or an order of court.","Prevents a universal-return statement."],["1(c) Contempt","VII.E; C054","Section 25-14-108 concerns disobedience of a properly made referee order. It does not itself establish broad contempt for every court order, employer payroll error, late remittance, or inaccurate response.","Narrow source correction; broader contempt authority remains held."],["1(d) Wage-levy duration","C009; court/route matrix; Example 13","Preserve the unresolved interaction between Rule 23’s 120 days from officer receipt and §25-13-402(6)(a)’s service-based wage levy extending only through expiration of the writ.","No extra 120 days beyond actual writ expiration may be assumed."],["2(a) Semimonthly display","IV.C","$628.33 is a rounded guidance display, not the exact algebraic crossover. Exact equality is $628.333….","Label correction only."],["2(b) Monthly display","IV.C","Approximately $1,256.66 is a rounded guidance display, not the exact algebraic crossover. Exact equality is $1,256.666….","Label correction only."],["2(c) Payroll rounding","IV.C; C027","MCA §25-13-301(2)’s rejection of fractions of a cent concerns the amount stated in the writ of execution. It does not resolve every payroll-branch rounding practice.","Payroll rounding remains expressly held."],["3(a) S010 locators","Source S010","Restore full literal URLs for §§25-14-103, 104, 105, 107, and 108.","Locator correction."],["3(b) S012 federal sources","Source S012","Restore all exact claimed Title 15 and Title 29 URLs; distinguish failed current Title 15 routes, current successful §1677/§206 reads, and the official dated 2024 GovInfo text.","Source-version and access correction."],["3(c) S013 eCFR","Source S013","Restore complete URLs for §§870.10, 870.11, and 870.51 and their October 2026 eCFR status.","Locator/currentness correction."],["3(d) S021 forms","Source S021","Restore all five Word-form URLs. Titles and landing pages were read; individual Word bodies and revision dates remain unread.","No implied form-content verification."],["3(e) Opinion pinpoints","S015–S020, especially S018","Correct Winters to printed pp.18–19/PDF indices 17–18; preserve Mease; distinguish the CBI majority from Justice Baker’s dissent.","Pinpoint and attribution corrections."],["3(f) Later treatment / posture","Dorwart, Salminen, Sniadach annotations","Add Buxbaum’s narrow attorney-fee overruling; correct Salminen filing/status language; narrow Sniadach to its majority’s Wisconsin prejudgment-wage holding and unusual-situation qualification.","No substantive expansion of P21."]]},{"headers":["Pay period","Protected floor \n𝐹\nF","P21/DOL rounded guidance display","Exact algebraic crossover","Correct qualification"],"index":1,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[]],"rows":[["Pay period","Protected floor \n𝐹\nF","P21/DOL rounded guidance display","Exact algebraic crossover","Correct qualification"],["Semimonthly","$471.25","$628.33","1885\n3\n=\n$\n628.333333\n…\n3\n1885\n\t​\n\n=$628.333333…","$628.33 is a cent-rounded display, not exact branch equality."],["Monthly","$942.50","Approximately $1,256.66","3770\n3\n=\n$\n1\n,\n256.666666\n…\n3\n3770\n\t​\n\n=$1,256.666666…","The displayed amount is an approximation to a repeating-decimal crossover."]]},{"headers":["Source ID","Instrument, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint","Status and whose access","Read bounds and limits"],"index":2,"links":[{"href":"https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0020/section_0110/0250-0130-0020-0110.html","text":"Montana Code Annotated\n+1"},{"href":"https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0040/section_0020/0250-0130-0040-0020.html","text":"Montana Code Annotated"},{"href":"https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0080/0250-0140-0010-0080.html","text":"Montana Code Annotated"},{"href":"https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0230/part_0010/section_0230/0250-0230-0010-0230.html","text":"Montana Code Annotated"},{"href":"https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0030/section_0010/0250-0130-0030-0010.html","text":"Montana Code Annotated"},{"href":"https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870/subpart-B/section-870.10","text":"eCFR\n+2"},{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-118/t15/s1677/","text":"U.S. Code\n+4"},{"href":"https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0030/0250-0140-0010-0030.html","text":"Montana Code Annotated\n+4"},{"href":"https://courts.mt.gov/forms/civilforms","text":"Montana Courts\n+1"},{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2004/56287d56-d41d-4dc8-880f-5f4dad3a4731.html","text":"Justia Law\n+3"},{"href":"https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2004-03-11-917F7B02-8EF7-4C4A-A370-6D8375C0C7E7.pdf?ts=1462389266","text":"Justia Law\n+1"},{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2012/da-11-0708.html","text":"Justia Law\n+1"},{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/1998/3d8b9983-6bae-41cf-9de6-2350cbf0cd89.html","text":"Justia Law"},{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2003/eff955bb-6f26-4929-9f2d-b920b9e3977c.html","text":"Justia Law"},{"href":"https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2014-da-14-0179.pdf?ts=1417564946","text":"Justia Law\n+2"},{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-395/pdf/USREPORTS-395-337.pdf","text":"GovInfo\n+3"}],"row_links":[[],[{"href":"https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0020/section_0110/0250-0130-0020-0110.html","text":"Montana Code Annotated\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0040/section_0020/0250-0130-0040-0020.html","text":"Montana Code Annotated"}],[{"href":"https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0080/0250-0140-0010-0080.html","text":"Montana Code Annotated"}],[{"href":"https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0230/part_0010/section_0230/0250-0230-0010-0230.html","text":"Montana Code Annotated"}],[{"href":"https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0030/section_0010/0250-0130-0030-0010.html","text":"Montana Code Annotated"}],[{"href":"https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870/subpart-B/section-870.10","text":"eCFR\n+2"}],[{"href":"https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-118/t15/s1677/","text":"U.S. Code\n+4"}],[{"href":"https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0030/0250-0140-0010-0030.html","text":"Montana Code Annotated\n+4"}],[{"href":"https://courts.mt.gov/forms/civilforms","text":"Montana Courts\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2004/56287d56-d41d-4dc8-880f-5f4dad3a4731.html","text":"Justia Law\n+3"}],[{"href":"https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2004-03-11-917F7B02-8EF7-4C4A-A370-6D8375C0C7E7.pdf?ts=1462389266","text":"Justia Law\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2012/da-11-0708.html","text":"Justia Law\n+1"}],[{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/1998/3d8b9983-6bae-41cf-9de6-2350cbf0cd89.html","text":"Justia Law"}],[{"href":"https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2003/eff955bb-6f26-4929-9f2d-b920b9e3977c.html","text":"Justia Law"}],[{"href":"https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2014-da-14-0179.pdf?ts=1417564946","text":"Justia Law\n+2"}],[{"href":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-395/pdf/USREPORTS-395-337.pdf","text":"GovInfo\n+3"}],[]],"rows":[["Source ID","Instrument, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint","Status and whose access","Read bounds and limits"],["S_MT-P26-S001","MCA §§25-13-211 and 212, Montana Legislature. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0020/section_0110/0250-0130-0020-0110.html; https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/MCA/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0020/section_0120/0250-0130-0020-0120.html","Fresh own access, Oct. 26, 2026 Pacific/UTC","Complete current MCA 2025 clauses read; Internet-code disclaimer retained. \nMontana Code Annotated\n+1"],["S_MT-P26-S002","MCA §25-13-402, Montana Legislature. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0040/section_0020/0250-0130-0040-0020.html","Fresh own access","Complete relevant subsections (1)–(8), including excess-proceeds exception and wage-levy language. \nMontana Code Annotated"],["S_MT-P26-S003","MCA §25-14-108. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0080/0250-0140-0010-0080.html","Fresh own access","Complete section read; expressly limited to referee orders. \nMontana Code Annotated"],["S_MT-P26-S004","Justice/City Rule 23. Correct URL: https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0230/part_0010/section_0230/0250-0230-0010-0230.html","Fresh own access","Complete rule read. The supplied chapter_0250 route failed with 404; the operative chapter is 0230. \nMontana Code Annotated"],["S_MT-P26-S005","MCA §25-13-301. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0030/section_0010/0250-0130-0030-0010.html","Fresh own access","Complete section read; fractional-cent clause is about the writ’s execution amount. \nMontana Code Annotated"],["S_MT-P26-S006","29 CFR §§870.10, 870.11, 870.51, eCFR. Full URLs reproduced above.","Fresh own access","eCFR displayed current through Oct. 22, 2026; Title 29 last amended Oct. 14, 2026. Historical dollar illustrations not treated as current thresholds. \neCFR\n+2"],["S_MT-P26-S007","15 U.S.C. §§1672–1674 and 1677; 29 U.S.C. §206. Exact OLRC and GovInfo URLs reproduced above.","Mixed: fresh successes, fresh failed direct routes, and fresh read of dated official 2024 GovInfo text","§§1672–1674 current OLRC direct routes failed; §1677 and §206 opened through laws effective Oct. 7, 2026. GovInfo 2024 pp.1550–1551/PDF 0–1 read. Exact post-2024 currentness of §§1672–1674 remains held. \nU.S. Code\n+4"],["S_MT-P26-S008","MCA §§25-14-103, 104, 105, 107, 108. Full literal URLs reproduced in the S010 replacement.","Fresh own access","Complete five sections read; no broader contempt claim imported. \nMontana Code Annotated\n+4"],["S_MT-P26-S009","Montana Judicial Branch Civil Forms and Collecting a Judgment pages plus five exact Word URLs.","Fresh landing-page access; direct DOC bodies failed/not read","Form titles and official locations verified. Individual bodies, fields, and revisions remain unread. \nMontana Courts\n+1"],["S_MT-P26-S010","In re Marriage of Winters, 2004 MT 82. https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2004/56287d56-d41d-4dc8-880f-5f4dad3a4731.html; court-opinion PDF reached through its observed download link","Fresh own access","¶54 printed pp.18–19/PDF 17–18; ¶55 p.19/PDF 18. Historical exemption amount not current. \nJustia Law\n+3"],["S_MT-P26-S011","In re Marriage of Mease, 2004 MT 59. https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2004-03-11-917F7B02-8EF7-4C4A-A370-6D8375C0C7E7.pdf?ts=1462389266","Fresh own access","¶54 printed p.19/PDF 18; no locator change. \nJustia Law\n+1"],["S_MT-P26-S012","CBI, Inc. v. McCrea, 2012 MT 167. https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2012/da-11-0708.html","Fresh own access","Majority ¶¶14–18; Justice Baker dissent ¶¶23–30. Old PDF-text failure not generalized to the HTML opinion. \nJustia Law\n+1"],["S_MT-P26-S013","Dorwart v. Caraway, 1998 MT 191. https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/1998/3d8b9983-6bae-41cf-9de6-2350cbf0cd89.html","Fresh own access","Used as historical due-process/search background; current statutes control modern procedure. \nJustia Law"],["S_MT-P26-S014","Trustees of Indiana University v. Buxbaum, 2003 MT 97. https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2003/eff955bb-6f26-4929-9f2d-b920b9e3977c.html","Fresh own access","¶46 read. Narrow overruling limited to §27-8-313 discretionary attorney-fee proposition. \nJustia Law"],["S_MT-P26-S015","Salminen v. Morrison & Frampton, 2014 MT 323. https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2014-da-14-0179.pdf?ts=1417564946","Fresh own access","Filed Dec. 2, 2014; ¶¶23–24 printed pp.10–11/PDF 9–10. “PROPOSED” is legacy PDF metadata, not case status. \nJustia Law\n+2"],["S_MT-P26-S016","Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-395/pdf/USREPORTS-395-337.pdf","Fresh own access","Majority printed pp.339–342/PDF 2–5; concurrence begins p.342/PDF 5. Wisconsin prejudgment wages only. \nGovInfo\n+3"],["S_MT-P26-S017","DOL Fact Sheet #30, wage-garnishment landing page, and Employment Law Guide: https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/30-cppa; https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/wage-garnishment; https://webapps.dol.gov/elaws/elg/garnish.htm","Coordinator-reported dated reuse; not freshly read successfully here","Fresh attempts were reported as one-time 403 results. Prior same-day reviews read the Dec. 2024 Fact Sheet and Dec. 2016 guide. No new successful-access or blanket-outage claim is made."]]},{"headers":["Claim ID","Affected original P21 location/ID","Precise corrected claim","Source/pinpoint, predicates, consequence, confidence"],"index":3,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claim ID","Affected original P21 location/ID","Precise corrected claim","Source/pinpoint, predicates, consequence, confidence"],["S_MT-P26-C001","VI.A; C030/C031 retained","Statutory notice must state the date of judgment, not date of seizure, along with case name and creditor.","S001, §25-13-211(1)(b). Date of seizure optional operational information only. High."],["S_MT-P26-C002","C055","Excess proceeds are returned unless the judgment or court order directs otherwise.","S002, §25-13-402(2). Priorities and orders remain controlling. High."],["S_MT-P26-C003","VII.E; C054","Section 25-14-108 concerns contempt for disobeying a properly made referee order.","S003, complete section. High."],["S_MT-P26-C004","VII.E; C054","Broader court-order contempt, automatic employer default, payroll penalties, and damages are not established by §25-14-108.","S003/S008. Separate authority remains required. High qualification."],["S_MT-P26-C005","C009; route matrix; Example 13","A wage levy cannot be assumed to continue beyond actual writ expiration; Rule 23’s receipt clock and §402’s service language remain to be reconciled on actual facts.","S002 §402(6)(a); S004 Rule 23(D). High text; final interaction unresolved."],["S_MT-P26-C006","IV.C; C027","Semimonthly exact crossover is $628.333…; $628.33 is a rounded display.","S006 §870.10 plus exact algebra. At $628.33, lesser branch is $157.08. High."],["S_MT-P26-C007","IV.C; C027","Monthly exact crossover is $1,256.666…; the displayed $1,256.66 amount is approximate.","S006 §870.10 plus exact algebra. At $1,256.66, lesser branch is $314.16. High."],["S_MT-P26-C008","IV.C; C027","MCA §25-13-301(2)’s fractional-cent rule applies to the writ’s stated execution amount and does not resolve every payroll-rounding practice.","S005, §301(2). High textual distinction; payroll rounding held."],["S_MT-P26-C009","S012","Direct current OLRC access succeeded for §1677 and §206 but not the displayed §1672–1674 routes; official 2024 GovInfo text supplies dated operative language.","S007. Exact 2026 currentness for §§1672–1674 held. High provenance qualification."],["S_MT-P26-C010","S013","Current eCFR §§870.10, 870.11, and 870.51 were read as current through Oct. 22, 2026; historical 1991 dollars are not current thresholds.","S006. High."],["S_MT-P26-C011","S021","Official form titles and URLs are verified, but the five Word bodies and revision dates are unread.","S009. No substantive inference from links alone. High."],["S_MT-P26-C012","S018","Winters ¶54 begins on printed p.18/PDF 17 and continues p.19/PDF 18; ¶55 is p.19/PDF 18.","S010. High."],["S_MT-P26-C013","CBI source usage","CBI majority ¶¶14–18 supports statutory request specificity; ¶¶23–30 is Justice Baker’s dissent.","S012. High."],["S_MT-P26-C014","Dorwart source annotation","Buxbaum overruled Dorwart only on the inconsistent §27-8-313 fee proposition, not its due-process holding.","S013–S014, Buxbaum ¶46. High, bounded later-treatment conclusion."],["S_MT-P26-C015","Salminen source annotation","Salminen is a filed Dec. 2, 2014 opinion; ¶¶23–24 support statutory-process pleading sufficiency, not automatic damages.","S015. High."],["S_MT-P26-C016","Sniadach source annotation","Sniadach concerns Wisconsin prejudgment wage freezing; majority recognized possible extraordinary-situation exceptions.","S016, majority pp.339–342/PDF 2–5. High."]]},{"headers":["Assigned PASS-26 subissue","Status","Claims","Remaining authority or fact needed"],"index":4,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Assigned PASS-26 subissue","Status","Claims","Remaining authority or fact needed"],["Required notice date","Corrected","C001","Actual notice form and judgment date"],["Optional seizure date","Qualified","C001","Local form may include it, but it cannot replace judgment date"],["§25-13-212 timing","Preserved unchanged","—","Actual personal/mail trigger and holidays"],["Excess proceeds exception","Corrected","C002","Actual judgment/order, priorities, costs, and accounting"],["Referee contempt","Answered narrowly","C003","Actual referee order and disobedience"],["Broader court contempt","Unresolved/held","C004","Separate contempt statute/rule and actual order"],["Automatic employer default/penalty","Not established","C004","Specific statutory or court-order authority"],["Writ receipt versus service","Partial; original hold preserved","C005","Actual receipt, service, marked expiration, and court route"],["Example 13 termination","Conditionally qualified","C005","Actual outer expiration"],["Semimonthly crossover","Corrected exactly","C006","Employer’s lawful cents-rounding method"],["Monthly crossover","Corrected exactly","C007","Employer’s lawful cents-rounding method"],["DOL displayed thresholds","Retained as rounded guidance","C006–C007","Fresh successful current DOL body if later required"],["Payroll rounding","Unresolved","C008","Controlling payroll or garnishment-rounding authority"],["Full S010 locators","Corrected","C003–C004","None"],["Full S012 locators/currentness","Corrected with holds","C009","Current accessible §§1672–1674 header or later-amendment audit"],["Full S013 locators","Corrected","C010","None"],["Full S021 form locators","Corrected","C011","Machine-readable current forms/revision dates"],["Winters pinpoint","Corrected","C012","None"],["Mease pinpoint","Confirmed unchanged","—","None"],["CBI majority/dissent attribution","Corrected","C013","No full later-treatment audit"],["Dorwart/Buxbaum later treatment","Answered narrowly","C014","Complete citator remains unperformed"],["Salminen status/posture","Corrected","C015","Merits/damages require actual later proceedings"],["Sniadach scope","Qualified","C016","No broader prejudgment-garnishment dossier"],["Original fifteen examples","Preserved","C005–C008","Only Example 13 receives the stated outer-expiry qualification"],["Worker classification/PTO/severance/multiple employer","Unchanged unresolved","—","Separate operative authority and facts"],["Employer fee/default/private retaliation remedy","Unchanged unresolved","—","Separate authority and actual facts"],["Local/municipal/tribal/country rules","Unchanged excluded","—","Jurisdiction-specific work"],["Bank/benefit and other enforcement components","Not adopted","—","Separate coordinator review"]]}],"claims":[{"claim_id":"S_MT-P26-C001","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_MT-P26-C001","Affected original P21 location/ID":"VI.A; C030/C031 retained","Precise corrected claim":"Statutory notice must state the date of judgment, not date of seizure, along with case name and creditor.","Source/pinpoint, predicates, consequence, confidence":"S001, §25-13-211(1)(b). Date of seizure optional operational information only. High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_precision_correction_supported_with_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"Fresh1677body/headeronly;otherdatedsourcechecksretainactualdates,current1672-74/laterhistory/payrollrounding/actualrecords/writinteraction/form/local/tribal/countryholdsremain."},{"claim_id":"S_MT-P26-C002","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_MT-P26-C002","Affected original P21 location/ID":"C055","Precise corrected claim":"Excess proceeds are returned unless the judgment or court order directs otherwise.","Source/pinpoint, predicates, consequence, confidence":"S002, §25-13-402(2). Priorities and orders remain controlling. High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_precision_correction_supported_with_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"Fresh1677body/headeronly;otherdatedsourcechecksretainactualdates,current1672-74/laterhistory/payrollrounding/actualrecords/writinteraction/form/local/tribal/countryholdsremain."},{"claim_id":"S_MT-P26-C003","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_MT-P26-C003","Affected original P21 location/ID":"VII.E; C054","Precise corrected claim":"Section 25-14-108 concerns contempt for disobeying a properly made referee order.","Source/pinpoint, predicates, consequence, confidence":"S003, complete section. High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_precision_correction_supported_with_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"Fresh1677body/headeronly;otherdatedsourcechecksretainactualdates,current1672-74/laterhistory/payrollrounding/actualrecords/writinteraction/form/local/tribal/countryholdsremain."},{"claim_id":"S_MT-P26-C004","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_MT-P26-C004","Affected original P21 location/ID":"VII.E; C054","Precise corrected claim":"Broader court-order contempt, automatic employer default, payroll penalties, and damages are not established by §25-14-108.","Source/pinpoint, predicates, consequence, confidence":"S003/S008. Separate authority remains required. High qualification."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_precision_correction_supported_with_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"Fresh1677body/headeronly;otherdatedsourcechecksretainactualdates,current1672-74/laterhistory/payrollrounding/actualrecords/writinteraction/form/local/tribal/countryholdsremain."},{"claim_id":"S_MT-P26-C005","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_MT-P26-C005","Affected original P21 location/ID":"C009; route matrix; Example 13","Precise corrected claim":"A wage levy cannot be assumed to continue beyond actual writ expiration; Rule 23’s receipt clock and §402’s service language remain to be reconciled on actual facts.","Source/pinpoint, predicates, consequence, confidence":"S002 §402(6)(a); S004 Rule 23(D). High text; final interaction unresolved."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_precision_correction_supported_with_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"Fresh1677body/headeronly;otherdatedsourcechecksretainactualdates,current1672-74/laterhistory/payrollrounding/actualrecords/writinteraction/form/local/tribal/countryholdsremain."},{"claim_id":"S_MT-P26-C006","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_MT-P26-C006","Affected original P21 location/ID":"IV.C; C027","Precise corrected claim":"Semimonthly exact crossover is $628.333…; $628.33 is a rounded display.","Source/pinpoint, predicates, consequence, confidence":"S006 §870.10 plus exact algebra. At $628.33, lesser branch is $157.08. High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_precision_correction_supported_with_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"Fresh1677body/headeronly;otherdatedsourcechecksretainactualdates,current1672-74/laterhistory/payrollrounding/actualrecords/writinteraction/form/local/tribal/countryholdsremain."},{"claim_id":"S_MT-P26-C007","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_MT-P26-C007","Affected original P21 location/ID":"IV.C; C027","Precise corrected claim":"Monthly exact crossover is $1,256.666…; the displayed $1,256.66 amount is approximate.","Source/pinpoint, predicates, consequence, confidence":"S006 §870.10 plus exact algebra. At $1,256.66, lesser branch is $314.16. High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_precision_correction_supported_with_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"Fresh1677body/headeronly;otherdatedsourcechecksretainactualdates,current1672-74/laterhistory/payrollrounding/actualrecords/writinteraction/form/local/tribal/countryholdsremain."},{"claim_id":"S_MT-P26-C008","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_MT-P26-C008","Affected original P21 location/ID":"IV.C; C027","Precise corrected claim":"MCA §25-13-301(2)’s fractional-cent rule applies to the writ’s stated execution amount and does not resolve every payroll-rounding practice.","Source/pinpoint, predicates, consequence, confidence":"S005, §301(2). High textual distinction; payroll rounding held."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_precision_correction_supported_with_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"Fresh1677body/headeronly;otherdatedsourcechecksretainactualdates,current1672-74/laterhistory/payrollrounding/actualrecords/writinteraction/form/local/tribal/countryholdsremain."},{"claim_id":"S_MT-P26-C009","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_MT-P26-C009","Affected original P21 location/ID":"S012","Precise corrected claim":"Direct current OLRC access succeeded for §1677 and §206 but not the displayed §1672–1674 routes; official 2024 GovInfo text supplies dated operative language.","Source/pinpoint, predicates, consequence, confidence":"S007. Exact 2026 currentness for §§1672–1674 held. High provenance qualification."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_precision_correction_supported_with_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"Fresh1677body/headeronly;otherdatedsourcechecksretainactualdates,current1672-74/laterhistory/payrollrounding/actualrecords/writinteraction/form/local/tribal/countryholdsremain."},{"claim_id":"S_MT-P26-C010","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_MT-P26-C010","Affected original P21 location/ID":"S013","Precise corrected claim":"Current eCFR §§870.10, 870.11, and 870.51 were read as current through Oct. 22, 2026; historical 1991 dollars are not current thresholds.","Source/pinpoint, predicates, consequence, confidence":"S006. High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_precision_correction_supported_with_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"Fresh1677body/headeronly;otherdatedsourcechecksretainactualdates,current1672-74/laterhistory/payrollrounding/actualrecords/writinteraction/form/local/tribal/countryholdsremain."},{"claim_id":"S_MT-P26-C011","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_MT-P26-C011","Affected original P21 location/ID":"S021","Precise corrected claim":"Official form titles and URLs are verified, but the five Word bodies and revision dates are unread.","Source/pinpoint, predicates, consequence, confidence":"S009. No substantive inference from links alone. High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_precision_correction_supported_with_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"Fresh1677body/headeronly;otherdatedsourcechecksretainactualdates,current1672-74/laterhistory/payrollrounding/actualrecords/writinteraction/form/local/tribal/countryholdsremain."},{"claim_id":"S_MT-P26-C012","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_MT-P26-C012","Affected original P21 location/ID":"S018","Precise corrected claim":"Winters ¶54 begins on printed p.18/PDF 17 and continues p.19/PDF 18; ¶55 is p.19/PDF 18.","Source/pinpoint, predicates, consequence, confidence":"S010. High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_precision_correction_supported_with_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"Fresh1677body/headeronly;otherdatedsourcechecksretainactualdates,current1672-74/laterhistory/payrollrounding/actualrecords/writinteraction/form/local/tribal/countryholdsremain."},{"claim_id":"S_MT-P26-C013","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_MT-P26-C013","Affected original P21 location/ID":"CBI source usage","Precise corrected claim":"CBI majority ¶¶14–18 supports statutory request specificity; ¶¶23–30 is Justice Baker’s dissent.","Source/pinpoint, predicates, consequence, confidence":"S012. High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_precision_correction_supported_with_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"Fresh1677body/headeronly;otherdatedsourcechecksretainactualdates,current1672-74/laterhistory/payrollrounding/actualrecords/writinteraction/form/local/tribal/countryholdsremain."},{"claim_id":"S_MT-P26-C014","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_MT-P26-C014","Affected original P21 location/ID":"Dorwart source annotation","Precise corrected claim":"Buxbaum overruled Dorwart only on the inconsistent §27-8-313 fee proposition, not its due-process holding.","Source/pinpoint, predicates, consequence, confidence":"S013–S014, Buxbaum ¶46. High, bounded later-treatment conclusion."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_precision_correction_supported_with_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"Fresh1677body/headeronly;otherdatedsourcechecksretainactualdates,current1672-74/laterhistory/payrollrounding/actualrecords/writinteraction/form/local/tribal/countryholdsremain."},{"claim_id":"S_MT-P26-C015","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_MT-P26-C015","Affected original P21 location/ID":"Salminen source annotation","Precise corrected claim":"Salminen is a filed Dec. 2, 2014 opinion; ¶¶23–24 support statutory-process pleading sufficiency, not automatic damages.","Source/pinpoint, predicates, consequence, confidence":"S015. High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_precision_correction_supported_with_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"Fresh1677body/headeronly;otherdatedsourcechecksretainactualdates,current1672-74/laterhistory/payrollrounding/actualrecords/writinteraction/form/local/tribal/countryholdsremain."},{"claim_id":"S_MT-P26-C016","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_MT-P26-C016","Affected original P21 location/ID":"Sniadach source annotation","Precise corrected claim":"Sniadach concerns Wisconsin prejudgment wage freezing; majority recognized possible extraordinary-situation exceptions.","Source/pinpoint, predicates, consequence, confidence":"S016, majority pp.339–342/PDF 2–5. High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"targeted_precision_correction_supported_with_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_limits":"Fresh1677body/headeronly;otherdatedsourcechecksretainactualdates,current1672-74/laterhistory/payrollrounding/actualrecords/writinteraction/form/local/tribal/countryholdsremain."}],"sources":[{"source_id":"S_MT-P26-S001","urls":["https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0020/section_0110/0250-0130-0020-0110.html","https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/MCA/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0020/section_0120/0250-0130-0020-0120.html"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_MT-P26-S001","Instrument, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint":"MCA §§25-13-211 and 212, Montana Legislature. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0020/section_0110/0250-0130-0020-0110.html; https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/MCA/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0020/section_0120/0250-0130-0020-0120.html","Status and whose access":"Fresh own access, Oct. 26, 2026 Pacific/UTC","Read bounds and limits":"Complete current MCA 2025 clauses read; Internet-code disclaimer retained. \nMontana Code Annotated\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_supported_with_explicit_source_and_application_limits","coordinator_access":"Datedsame-dayMT21S004/primary1 and freshMT22primary6 actual211complete","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Judgment-dateitem and unchanged212personalreceipt/mailingsplit/10dayno-weekendholiday/samedaycopy/hearing/latebar supported; actualcalendarheld.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_visible_body_crossref_urls":[]},{"source_id":"S_MT-P26-S002","urls":["https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0040/section_0020/0250-0130-0040-0020.html"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_MT-P26-S002","Instrument, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint":"MCA §25-13-402, Montana Legislature. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0040/section_0020/0250-0130-0040-0020.html","Status and whose access":"Fresh own access","Read bounds and limits":"Complete relevant subsections (1)–(8), including excess-proceeds exception and wage-levy language. \nMontana Code Annotated"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_supported_with_explicit_source_and_application_limits","coordinator_access":"DatedMT21S003 and freshMT22primary2 complete402(1)-(8)","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Courtjudgment/orderexcessreturnexception and wageouterexpiration supported; no newpriorityoractualbalance.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_visible_body_crossref_urls":[]},{"source_id":"S_MT-P26-S003","urls":["https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0080/0250-0140-0010-0080.html"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_MT-P26-S003","Instrument, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint":"MCA §25-14-108. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0080/0250-0140-0010-0080.html","Status and whose access":"Fresh own access","Read bounds and limits":"Complete section read; expressly limited to referee orders. \nMontana Code Annotated"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_supported_with_explicit_source_and_application_limits","coordinator_access":"DatedMT21S010/primary3 actual108complete","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Refereeorderonly; broadercourtcontempt/automaticemployerdefault/penalty/damages remainheld.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_visible_body_crossref_urls":[]},{"source_id":"S_MT-P26-S004","urls":["https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0230/part_0010/section_0230/0250-0230-0010-0230.html"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_MT-P26-S004","Instrument, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint":"Justice/City Rule 23. Correct URL: https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0230/part_0010/section_0230/0250-0230-0010-0230.html","Status and whose access":"Fresh own access","Read bounds and limits":"Complete rule read. The supplied chapter_0250 route failed with 404; the operative chapter is 0230. \nMontana Code Annotated"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_supported_with_explicit_source_and_application_limits","coordinator_access":"DatedMT21S007/primary2 actualJusticeCityRule23A-F complete,correctchapter0230","coordinator_result_and_limits":"ResearcherfixedcoordinatorP26briefbadchapter0250URL. Correctactualsourceandreceiptclock used; noadditionalwageresearchneededforbrief typo.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_visible_body_crossref_urls":[]},{"source_id":"S_MT-P26-S005","urls":["https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0030/section_0010/0250-0130-0030-0010.html"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_MT-P26-S005","Instrument, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint":"MCA §25-13-301. https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0130/part_0030/section_0010/0250-0130-0030-0010.html","Status and whose access":"Fresh own access","Read bounds and limits":"Complete section read; fractional-cent clause is about the writ’s execution amount. \nMontana Code Annotated"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_supported_with_explicit_source_and_application_limits","coordinator_access":"DatedMT21S002/primary2 actual301complete","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Executionamountcentfractionclause notuniversalpayrollroundingrule, originalholdsretained.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_visible_body_crossref_urls":[]},{"source_id":"S_MT-P26-S006","urls":["https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870/subpart-B/section-870.10","https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870/subpart-B/section-870.11","https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870/subpart-C/section-870.51"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_MT-P26-S006","Instrument, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint":"29 CFR §§870.10, 870.11, 870.51, eCFR. Full URLs reproduced above.","Status and whose access":"Fresh own access","Read bounds and limits":"eCFR displayed current through Oct. 22, 2026; Title 29 last amended Oct. 14, 2026. Historical dollar illustrations not treated as current thresholds. \neCFR\n+2"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_supported_with_explicit_source_and_application_limits","coordinator_access":"DatedMT21S013/primary9-10 actual870.10/11/51 materialbodies/header10/22lastamended10/14","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Exactformulas/equivalentperiods/historical1991figures/nonaffirmativedefense supported. Fullvisiblebody3URLcrossrefsresolvedinderivedJSON,notnewfetches.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_visible_body_crossref_urls":["https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870/subpart-B/section-870.10","https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870/subpart-B/section-870.11","https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-870/subpart-C/section-870.51"]},{"source_id":"S_MT-P26-S007","urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-118/t15/s1677/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1672/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1673/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1674/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-118/t29/s206/","https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/15/1673","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2024-title15/html/USCODE-2024-title15-chap41-subchapII-sec1673.htm"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_MT-P26-S007","Instrument, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint":"15 U.S.C. §§1672–1674 and 1677; 29 U.S.C. §206. Exact OLRC and GovInfo URLs reproduced above.","Status and whose access":"Mixed: fresh successes, fresh failed direct routes, and fresh read of dated official 2024 GovInfo text","Read bounds and limits":"§§1672–1674 current OLRC direct routes failed; §1677 and §206 opened through laws effective Oct. 7, 2026. GovInfo 2024 pp.1550–1551/PDF 0–1 read. Exact post-2024 currentness of §§1672–1674 remains held. \nU.S. Code\n+4"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_supported_with_explicit_source_and_application_limits","coordinator_access":"FRESH exact1677 completeoperativebody/header119-120Oct7,MT26primary1;datedMT21S012/primary10 actual206header/body andcompletedNE19/NE22/NE25actual2024Govinfobody","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Newreported1677successNOWreplicatedbycoordinatorafterreportedfreshsuccess;earliersearchrender-onlyholdresolvedONLYfor1677. OtherTitle15current1672-74headers/lateramendmentauditremainheld;noexactreset/modelinference. ResearcherfreshGovinfo/failedOLRCobservationsdistinctfromcoordinatordatedreuse.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_visible_body_crossref_urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1672/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1673/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t15/s1674/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-118/t15/s1677/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-118/t29/s206/","https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/15/1673","https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2024-title15/html/USCODE-2024-title15-chap41-subchapII-sec1673.htm"]},{"source_id":"S_MT-P26-S008","urls":["https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0030/0250-0140-0010-0030.html","https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0040/0250-0140-0010-0040.html","https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0050/0250-0140-0010-0050.html","https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0070/0250-0140-0010-0070.html","https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0080/0250-0140-0010-0080.html"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_MT-P26-S008","Instrument, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint":"MCA §§25-14-103, 104, 105, 107, 108. Full literal URLs reproduced in the S010 replacement.","Status and whose access":"Fresh own access","Read bounds and limits":"Complete five sections read; no broader contempt claim imported. \nMontana Code Annotated\n+4"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_supported_with_explicit_source_and_application_limits","coordinator_access":"DatedMT21S010/primary3 actual103/104/105/107/108complete","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Correctliteral5URL/bodyandrefereequalification; noautomaticprivatepayrollconsequence.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_visible_body_crossref_urls":["https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0030/0250-0140-0010-0030.html","https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0040/0250-0140-0010-0040.html","https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0050/0250-0140-0010-0050.html","https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0070/0250-0140-0010-0070.html","https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0250/chapter_0140/part_0010/section_0080/0250-0140-0010-0080.html"]},{"source_id":"S_MT-P26-S009","urls":["https://courts.mt.gov/forms/civilforms","https://courts.mt.gov/forms/judgement","https://courts.mt.gov/external/library/forms/civil/city_jp/writ_exe.doc","https://courts.mt.gov/external/library/forms/civil/district/writ_exec.doc","https://courts.mt.gov/external/library/forms/civil/district/execution.doc","https://courts.mt.gov/external/library/forms/civil/district/seizure.doc","https://courts.mt.gov/external/library/forms/civil/district/writ_exec_transc_jud.doc"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_MT-P26-S009","Instrument, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint":"Montana Judicial Branch Civil Forms and Collecting a Judgment pages plus five exact Word URLs.","Status and whose access":"Fresh landing-page access; direct DOC bodies failed/not read","Read bounds and limits":"Form titles and official locations verified. Individual bodies, fields, and revisions remain unread. \nMontana Courts\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_supported_with_explicit_source_and_application_limits","coordinator_access":"DatedMT21S021/primary8 actualformslandingpagesand5visibleDOCURLs","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Researchernewunsupportedmswordobservationsattributed;coordinatornoDOCbodyfetch/visualclaim; bodies/revisionsunread andnosafeharbor/feeconclusion.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_visible_body_crossref_urls":["https://courts.mt.gov/forms/civilforms","https://courts.mt.gov/forms/judgement","https://courts.mt.gov/external/library/forms/civil/city_jp/writ_exe.doc","https://courts.mt.gov/external/library/forms/civil/district/writ_exec.doc","https://courts.mt.gov/external/library/forms/civil/district/execution.doc","https://courts.mt.gov/external/library/forms/civil/district/seizure.doc","https://courts.mt.gov/external/library/forms/civil/district/writ_exec_transc_jud.doc"]},{"source_id":"S_MT-P26-S010","urls":["https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2004/56287d56-d41d-4dc8-880f-5f4dad3a4731.html","https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2004-04-01-56287D56-D41D-4DC8-880F-5F4DAD3A4731.pdf?ts=1462389272"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_MT-P26-S010","Instrument, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint":"In re Marriage of Winters, 2004 MT 82. https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2004/56287d56-d41d-4dc8-880f-5f4dad3a4731.html; court-opinion PDF reached through its observed download link","Status and whose access":"Fresh own access","Read bounds and limits":"¶54 printed pp.18–19/PDF 17–18; ¶55 p.19/PDF 18. Historical exemption amount not current. \nJustia Law\n+3"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_supported_with_explicit_source_and_application_limits","coordinator_access":"DatedMT21S018/primary8-9 actualWintersPDF54-55","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Correct18-19/PDF17-18andhistorical3000notcurrentamount;fullbusiness/wageclassificationheld.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_visible_body_crossref_urls":["https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2004-04-01-56287D56-D41D-4DC8-880F-5F4DAD3A4731.pdf?ts=1462389272"]},{"source_id":"S_MT-P26-S011","urls":["https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2004-03-11-917F7B02-8EF7-4C4A-A370-6D8375C0C7E7.pdf?ts=1462389266"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_MT-P26-S011","Instrument, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint":"In re Marriage of Mease, 2004 MT 59. https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2004-03-11-917F7B02-8EF7-4C4A-A370-6D8375C0C7E7.pdf?ts=1462389266","Status and whose access":"Fresh own access","Read bounds and limits":"¶54 printed p.19/PDF 18; no locator change. \nJustia Law\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_supported_with_explicit_source_and_application_limits","coordinator_access":"DatedMT21S015/primary4-5 actualMease54bodyPDF19/index18","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Pinpointsupportedunchanged, actualsupportcontextretained.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_visible_body_crossref_urls":[]},{"source_id":"S_MT-P26-S012","urls":["https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2012/da-11-0708.html"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_MT-P26-S012","Instrument, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint":"CBI, Inc. v. McCrea, 2012 MT 167. https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2012/da-11-0708.html","Status and whose access":"Fresh own access","Read bounds and limits":"Majority ¶¶14–18; Justice Baker dissent ¶¶23–30. Old PDF-text failure not generalized to the HTML opinion. \nJustia Law\n+1"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_supported_with_explicit_source_and_application_limits","coordinator_access":"DatedMT21S017/primary5-7 actualCBIHTMLmajority14-18/dissent23-30","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Correctmajorityspecificrequest/documentationanddissentattribution;oldPDFfailurehistoric,notall-hostoutage.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_visible_body_crossref_urls":[]},{"source_id":"S_MT-P26-S013","urls":["https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/1998/3d8b9983-6bae-41cf-9de6-2350cbf0cd89.html"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_MT-P26-S013","Instrument, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint":"Dorwart v. Caraway, 1998 MT 191. https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/1998/3d8b9983-6bae-41cf-9de6-2350cbf0cd89.html","Status and whose access":"Fresh own access","Read bounds and limits":"Used as historical due-process/search background; current statutes control modern procedure. \nJustia Law"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_supported_with_explicit_source_and_application_limits","coordinator_access":"DatedMT21S019/primary4-7 actualDorwart1998material74-76/93-103","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Historicaldueprocessbackground/current211-212separated;sourceURLcorrect, notfullcitator.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_visible_body_crossref_urls":[]},{"source_id":"S_MT-P26-S014","urls":["https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2003/eff955bb-6f26-4929-9f2d-b920b9e3977c.html"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_MT-P26-S014","Instrument, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint":"Trustees of Indiana University v. Buxbaum, 2003 MT 97. https://law.justia.com/cases/montana/supreme-court/2003/eff955bb-6f26-4929-9f2d-b920b9e3977c.html","Status and whose access":"Fresh own access","Read bounds and limits":"¶46 read. Narrow overruling limited to §27-8-313 discretionary attorney-fee proposition. \nJustia Law"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_supported_with_explicit_source_and_application_limits","coordinator_access":"DatedMT21S019/primary11-12 actualBuxbaum2003MT97para46","coordinator_result_and_limits":"NarrowUDJAfeeoverruling,notdueprocessholding;fulllaterhistoryheld.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_visible_body_crossref_urls":[]},{"source_id":"S_MT-P26-S015","urls":["https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2014-da-14-0179.pdf?ts=1417564946"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_MT-P26-S015","Instrument, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint":"Salminen v. Morrison & Frampton, 2014 MT 323. https://cases.justia.com/montana/supreme-court/2014-da-14-0179.pdf?ts=1417564946","Status and whose access":"Fresh own access","Read bounds and limits":"Filed Dec. 2, 2014; ¶¶23–24 printed pp.10–11/PDF 9–10. “PROPOSED” is legacy PDF metadata, not case status. \nJustia Law\n+2"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_supported_with_explicit_source_and_application_limits","coordinator_access":"DatedMT21S016/primary4-7 actualSalminenfiled2014caption/23-24 and freshMT22primary5-9 actual23-36","coordinator_result_and_limits":"FiledDec2/reversepartaffirmremand/pleadingstagepropertyprocedure supported;noautomaticdamagesorallproceduralerrors.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_visible_body_crossref_urls":[]},{"source_id":"S_MT-P26-S016","urls":["https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-395/pdf/USREPORTS-395-337.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_MT-P26-S016","Instrument, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint":"Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-395/pdf/USREPORTS-395-337.pdf","Status and whose access":"Fresh own access","Read bounds and limits":"Majority printed pp.339–342/PDF 2–5; concurrence begins p.342/PDF 5. Wisconsin prejudgment wages only. \nGovInfo\n+3"},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_supported_with_explicit_source_and_application_limits","coordinator_access":"DatedMT21S020/primary4-5 actualSniadachmajority339-342/PDF2-5","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Wisconsinprejudgmentwages/extraordinarysituations/beginsHarlanconcurrence342 distinguished,notallpostjudgmentMT.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_visible_body_crossref_urls":[]},{"source_id":"S_MT-P26-S017","urls":["https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/30-cppa","https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/wage-garnishment","https://webapps.dol.gov/elaws/elg/garnish.htm"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_MT-P26-S017","Instrument, issuer, full literal URL, and pinpoint":"DOL Fact Sheet #30, wage-garnishment landing page, and Employment Law Guide: https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/30-cppa; https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/wage-garnishment; https://webapps.dol.gov/elaws/elg/garnish.htm","Status and whose access":"Coordinator-reported dated reuse; not freshly read successfully here","Read bounds and limits":"Fresh attempts were reported as one-time 403 results. Prior same-day reviews read the Dec. 2024 Fact Sheet and Dec. 2016 guide. No new successful-access or blanket-outage claim is made."},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_correction_supported_with_explicit_source_and_application_limits","coordinator_access":"DatedMT21S014/primary9-10onefresh403perDOLroute plus datedNE19S012/S013 actualFS30Dec2024/guideDec2016","coordinator_result_and_limits":"Correctattributeddatedreuse/failedobservation, no newsuccess/blanketoutageclaim. DOLpublishedcentsapproximation notfabricatedguidanceorpayrollroundingrule.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_visible_body_crossref_urls":[]}],"coverage":[{"topic":"Required notice date","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Required notice date","Status":"Corrected","Claims":"C001","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Actual notice form and judgment date"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Optional seizure date","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Optional seizure date","Status":"Qualified","Claims":"C001","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Local form may include it, but it cannot replace judgment date"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"§25-13-212 timing","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"§25-13-212 timing","Status":"Preserved unchanged","Claims":"—","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Actual personal/mail trigger and holidays"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Excess proceeds exception","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Excess proceeds exception","Status":"Corrected","Claims":"C002","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Actual judgment/order, priorities, costs, and accounting"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Referee contempt","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Referee contempt","Status":"Answered narrowly","Claims":"C003","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Actual referee order and disobedience"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Broader court contempt","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Broader court contempt","Status":"Unresolved/held","Claims":"C004","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Separate contempt statute/rule and actual order"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Automatic employer default/penalty","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Automatic employer default/penalty","Status":"Not established","Claims":"C004","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Specific statutory or court-order authority"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Writ receipt versus service","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Writ receipt versus service","Status":"Partial; original hold preserved","Claims":"C005","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Actual receipt, service, marked expiration, and court route"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Example 13 termination","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Example 13 termination","Status":"Conditionally qualified","Claims":"C005","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Actual outer expiration"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Semimonthly crossover","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Semimonthly crossover","Status":"Corrected exactly","Claims":"C006","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Employer’s lawful cents-rounding method"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Monthly crossover","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Monthly crossover","Status":"Corrected exactly","Claims":"C007","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Employer’s lawful cents-rounding method"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"DOL displayed thresholds","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"DOL displayed thresholds","Status":"Retained as rounded guidance","Claims":"C006–C007","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Fresh successful current DOL body if later required"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Payroll rounding","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Payroll rounding","Status":"Unresolved","Claims":"C008","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Controlling payroll or garnishment-rounding authority"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Full S010 locators","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Full S010 locators","Status":"Corrected","Claims":"C003–C004","Remaining authority or fact needed":"None"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Full S012 locators/currentness","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Full S012 locators/currentness","Status":"Corrected with holds","Claims":"C009","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Current accessible §§1672–1674 header or later-amendment audit"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Full S013 locators","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Full S013 locators","Status":"Corrected","Claims":"C010","Remaining authority or fact needed":"None"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Full S021 form locators","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Full S021 form locators","Status":"Corrected","Claims":"C011","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Machine-readable current forms/revision dates"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Winters pinpoint","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Winters pinpoint","Status":"Corrected","Claims":"C012","Remaining authority or fact needed":"None"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Mease pinpoint","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Mease pinpoint","Status":"Confirmed unchanged","Claims":"—","Remaining authority or fact needed":"None"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"CBI majority/dissent attribution","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"CBI majority/dissent attribution","Status":"Corrected","Claims":"C013","Remaining authority or fact needed":"No full later-treatment audit"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Dorwart/Buxbaum later treatment","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Dorwart/Buxbaum later treatment","Status":"Answered narrowly","Claims":"C014","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Complete citator remains unperformed"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Salminen status/posture","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Salminen status/posture","Status":"Corrected","Claims":"C015","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Merits/damages require actual later proceedings"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Sniadach scope","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Sniadach scope","Status":"Qualified","Claims":"C016","Remaining authority or fact needed":"No broader prejudgment-garnishment dossier"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Original fifteen examples","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Original fifteen examples","Status":"Preserved","Claims":"C005–C008","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Only Example 13 receives the stated outer-expiry qualification"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Worker classification/PTO/severance/multiple employer","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Worker classification/PTO/severance/multiple employer","Status":"Unchanged unresolved","Claims":"—","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Separate operative authority and facts"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Employer fee/default/private retaliation remedy","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Employer fee/default/private retaliation remedy","Status":"Unchanged unresolved","Claims":"—","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Separate authority and actual facts"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Local/municipal/tribal/country rules","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Local/municipal/tribal/country rules","Status":"Unchanged excluded","Claims":"—","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Jurisdiction-specific work"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Bank/benefit and other enforcement components","researcher_record":{"Assigned PASS-26 subissue":"Bank/benefit and other enforcement components","Status":"Not adopted","Claims":"—","Remaining authority or fact needed":"Separate coordinator review"},"coordinator_acceptance":"targeted_correction_group_resolved_with_explicit_original_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"}],"annotations":{},"corrections":[],"resolved_corrections":[],"review_history":[]}