{"meta":{"key":"s_ks--pass-18","task":"S_KS","title":"Kansas ordinary consumer-debt arbitration award to court judgment","parent_title":"Kansas debt and debt relief law","edition":"pass-18","path":"/research/s_ks--pass-18/","kind":"split_pass","category":"state","role":"state","area_numbers":[66],"groups":["collections"],"date":"2026-10-26","tables":18,"claims":65,"sources":24,"review_status":"four_bounded_notice_rehearing_traceability_FAA_qualifications_pending_UNSENT","review_complete":true,"sha256":"7c9340dd46275353d4fbac313878baa6a0deec6fd4d1690555d5aeb650b88fa1","headings":["Kansas ordinary consumer-debt arbitration award to court judgment","A1. Act/version matrix","A2. Award-form matrix","A3. Interim, partial, consent, and final awards","B1. Notice and receipt","B2. Current Kansas arbitrator-correction grounds","B3. Correction and court-clock matrix","C1. Who may move","C2. Court, jurisdiction, venue, and service","C3. Confirmation evidence package","C4. Mandatory confirmation and timing","C5. No express Kansas confirmation outer limit","D1. Complete statutory grounds","D2. Participation and preservation","D3. Fraud and the discovery exception","D4. Hearing defects, materiality, and prejudice","D5. Exceeded powers","D6. Manifest disregard and public-policy-type arguments","Kansas current route","Federal FAA route","D7. Rehearing after vacatur","E1. Grounds","E2. Correction-versus-merits matrix","G1. FAA statutory matrix","G2. FAA confirmation","G3. FAA three-month challenge rule","G4. Federal vacatur and modification","H1. Freestanding application: Badgerow","H2. Existing stayed federal case: Jules","I1. Kansas judgment","I2. Payment and satisfaction boundary","I3. Kansas enforcement stay","I4. Federal enforcement stay","I5. Kansas appeal matrix","I6. Federal appeal","M1. Served signed award","M2. Recipient date missing","M3. Timely fraud discovery versus ordinary legal error","Fraud branch","Legal-error branch","M4. Preserved no-agreement objection versus participation without objection","Preserved branch","Waived branch","M5. Arithmetic correction versus merits rewrite","M6. Arbitrator-correction request and court clock","M7. Early confirmation while challenge period remains open","M8. Incomplete assignment and account link","M9. Freestanding federal confirmation without jurisdiction","M10. Retained federal case under Jules","M11. Paid award, settlement, and satisfaction","Paid-before-confirmation branch","Partial settlement branch","Private settlement without consent award","M12. Appeal without stay","M13. JAMS correction period versus Kansas court period","Actually read or inspected in PASS-18","Material currentness findings","Access and research limits","Not established","Numeric self-check"],"generation_provenance":{"actual_route":"regular_chat_adaptive_models","actual_model":"GPT-5.6 Sol","actual_mode":"Pro","provenance_limit":"Actual documented capture labels only; missing labels remain unknown. No preferred setting is inferred as actual execution."},"public_id":"S_KS/pass-18","facets":{"geography":["us","us-ks"],"debt_type":[],"stage":["judgment"],"subject":["arbitration-adr"]},"scope":"Independent remaining arbitration award confirmation/vacatur/modification/judgment gateway","pending_corrections":4},"markdown":"# SettleADebt.com — S_KS, PASS-18\n\n## Kansas ordinary consumer-debt arbitration award to court judgment\n\n**Fresh research date:** October 26, 2026, Pacific / October 26, 2026, UTC\n**Actual model:** GPT-5.6 Sol Pro\n**Review character:** Same-project continuation in this original authorized Chat; **not an independent review**\n**Component boundary:** Arbitration award form, delivery, arbitrator correction, judicial confirmation, vacatur, modification or correction, resulting judgment, stay and security, and necessary immediate-appeal boundaries for ordinary unsecured consumer-debt and debt-relief-agreement awards.\n\nPASS-17 and the other specified later passes remain saved but unreviewed and are not adopted as premises. The narrow statutes and gateway provisions needed to identify the governing award-to-judgment route were freshly read for PASS-18.\n\nThis pass does **not** decide any actual agreement, consumer assent, award, assignment, provider status, account, balance, fee, arbitrator authority, administrator eligibility, jurisdiction, filing deadline, or court outcome. Award confirmation does not resolve later judgment interest, dormancy, renewal, liens, satisfaction procedure, garnishment, exemptions, or other postjudgment collection topics, which remain separate work.\n\n# Executive determination\n\nKansas’s current arbitration act governs agreements made on or after **July 1, 2018**. A pre-July 1, 2018 agreement remains governed by the repealed act unless all parties agree in a record to apply the current act. The version question matters because the statutes use similar but not identical award-delivery and challenge language. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0025_section/005_004_0025_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nUnder the current act, an arbitration award must be in a retrievable record, signed or otherwise authenticated by a concurring arbitrator, and delivered with notice to every party. With a panel, a majority exercises the arbitrators’ powers, although all arbitrators conduct the hearing. The statute does **not** itself require findings of fact, legal conclusions, or a reasoned explanation. Those additional requirements can arise from the arbitration agreement or incorporated administrator rules. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0041_section/005_004_0041_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0035_section/005_004_0035_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nA Kansas arbitration award is not itself an executable civil judgment. After receiving notice, a party to the arbitration proceeding may move for confirmation. The Kansas court must confirm unless the award is timely vacated, modified, or corrected. The current confirmation statute contains **no express outer filing period**. That does not prove confirmation can be sought forever; any general limitation, laches, waiver, satisfaction, or other outside constraint remains unresolved in this component. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0044_section/005_004_0044_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nKansas supplies three important receipt-based clocks under the current act:\n\nPlain text\n```\nD0 = date the party receives notice of the award\n\nD0 + 20 days:\nmotion to the arbitrator to correct or clarify\n\nD0 + 90 days:\nmotion to the court to vacate\n\nD0 + 90 days:\nmotion to the court to modify or correct\n```\n\nA corruption, fraud, or undue-means vacatur motion instead runs 90 days after the ground was known or reasonably should have been known. Notice of a corrected award can begin a new 90-day court period. A pending arbitrator-correction request does not expressly toll the original court clock; unless a corrected award is issued, the statutory text does not substitute a new trigger. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0042_section/005_004_0042_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0045_section/005_004_0045_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nVacatur is extraordinarily narrow. Ordinary disagreement with the arbitrator’s contract interpretation, factfinding, damages method, or legal reasoning is not enough. The current grounds address corruption or fraud, partiality or misconduct, prejudicial hearing defects, excess of powers, no arbitration agreement where the objection was preserved, and prejudicial failure of initiation notice. Modification is narrower still: evident mathematics or description mistakes, an unsubmitted claim separable from the merits, or a form defect that does not affect the merits. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0045_section/005_004_0045_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0046_section/005_004_0046_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nA 2025 published Kansas Court of Appeals decision applying the current act recognizes a very narrow manifest-disregard theory: the challenger must show the arbitrator knew a clearly governing legal principle and consciously refused to apply it. Mere legal error, even serious error, is insufficient. No current-act Kansas Supreme Court decision squarely resolving that nonstatutory theory was located, so the full subsequent-treatment and citator question remains open. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2025/127043.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nThe Federal Arbitration Act uses a different architecture:\n\n- FAA §9 authorizes confirmation within one year after the award where the parties agreed that judgment may be entered.\n- FAA §12 requires service of notice of a motion to vacate, modify, or correct within three months after the award is filed or delivered.\n- FAA §§10 and 11 provide the exclusive expedited statutory review grounds under *Hall Street*.\n- FAA §13 specifies an award-confirmation record package.\n- FAA §16 governs federal appellate routes. ([U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s9/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s12/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nThe FAA does not itself create federal subject-matter jurisdiction. A freestanding federal §§9–11 application requires an independent jurisdictional basis; *Badgerow* rejects the §4 “look-through” theory for those postaward applications. But when a federal court already had jurisdiction over the underlying case and stayed it under FAA §3, the Supreme Court’s May 14, 2026 *Jules* decision holds that the court retains jurisdiction to confirm or vacate the resulting award in that same pending action. ([supremecourt.gov](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([supremecourt.gov](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-83_3e04.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nAfter a Kansas court confirms, vacates without rehearing, modifies, or corrects an award, it enters a conforming judgment. The judgment can then be recorded, docketed, and enforced like another civil judgment. Entry of judgment—not the bare award or the filing of a confirmation motion—creates the ordinary judgment-enforcement posture. Kansas generally stays enforcement for 14 days after judgment; a challenge or appeal does not create an indefinite stay without the appropriate order or security. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0047_section/005_004_0047_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_002_0000_article/060_002_0062_section/060_002_0062_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n# A. Governing act, transition, and award status\n\n## A1. Act/version matrix\n\n| Agreement or proceeding | Governing Kansas arbitration law | Necessary evidence | Resulting hold |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Agreement made **on or after July 1, 2018** | Current K.S.A. 5-423 through 5-453 | Actual agreement date and version | Current award, correction, confirmation, and challenge provisions ordinarily apply |\n| Agreement made **before July 1, 2018**, with all parties later agreeing in a record to current act | Current act | Actual recorded agreement by all parties | Current act applies only if the statutory opt-in is proved |\n| Agreement made **before July 1, 2018**, without recorded opt-in | Repealed K.S.A. 5-401 et seq., preserved by transition/savings law | Agreement date and absence of current-act opt-in | Old award delivery and challenge provisions govern, subject to applicable FAA questions |\n| Arbitration began under old act before repeal | Savings provision preserves accrued rights and proceedings | Procedural history | Cannot assume current act displaced all prior proceedings |\n| FAA-covered arbitration | FAA substantive and, where properly invoked, procedural provisions | Written clause, commerce nexus, actual federal or state route | Does not displace Kansas procedure automatically in every state-court proceeding |\n| State-law confirmation only | Kansas act | Kansas jurisdiction, venue, service, award, party status | FAA one-year and §16 routes do not automatically attach merely because the original contract involved commerce |\n\nK.S.A. 5-425 provides the agreement-date transition, and K.S.A. 5-453 preserves accrued rights and preexisting proceedings. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0025_section/005_004_0025_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nThe repealed act required a written award signed by the joining arbitrators and delivery personally, by registered mail, or as the agreement provided. It also used 20-day arbitrator-correction and 90-day judicial vacatur/modification periods measured from delivery. Those historical provisions cannot be silently substituted for the current act’s notice-and-receipt language. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0008_section/005_004_0008_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0012_section/005_004_0012_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## A2. Award-form matrix\n\n| Feature | Current Kansas statute | AAA Consumer Rules, effective May 1, 2025 | JAMS Comprehensive Rules, effective June 1, 2021 |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **Record/writing** | Award must be in a record | Award must be written | Award must be a written statement |\n| **Signature/authentication** | Signed or otherwise authenticated by a concurring arbitrator | Signed by majority; electronic/digital signatures allowed | Signed by arbitrator |\n| **Multiple arbitrators** | Majority exercises powers; all conduct hearing | Majority decides and signs final award | Actual panel/agreement controls; Rule 24 applies to award |\n| **Reasons required** | No statutory reasons requirement | Brief written explanation unless all agree otherwise | Concise reasons unless all agree otherwise |\n| **Award deadline** | Agreement or court-set time; extendable | Normally 30 days after hearing closes; 14 days for document-only proceeding, subject to stated extension | Normally 30 days after hearing closes or receipt of materials, subject to agreement or good cause |\n| **Interim or partial award** | Current act does not label every interim ruling confirmable; K.S.A. 5-440 addresses incorporated pre-award rulings | Interim, interlocutory, and partial rulings or awards allowed | Partial Final Awards allowed |\n| **Consent award** | Possible if the arbitrator issues an award satisfying governing law | Settlement may be embodied in consent award on request | Settlement may be embodied in consent award unless unlawful or undermining integrity |\n| **Delivery** | Arbitrator/organization gives notice including a copy to each party | Same communication method used in case, including electronic, or method allowed by law | Service on parties; mail permitted |\n| **Correction** | 20 days after receipt; 10 days for objection | 20 days after transmittal; 10-day response; no merits redetermination | 7-day request; 7-day response; 21-day correction; finality rule in JAMS text |\n\nThe Kansas statutory form and delivery requirements are in K.S.A. 5-435 and 5-441. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0041_section/005_004_0041_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nAAA’s public rules require a written award signed by a majority and ordinarily a brief explanation; they also distinguish interim, partial, final, and consent awards and restrict postaward corrections to clerical, technical, typographical, computational, or clarifying matters rather than merits redetermination. Those rules matter only if the actual contract and case validly used that version. [American Arbitration Association+2](https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf)\n\nJAMS Rule 24 requires a signed written disposition of each claim and ordinarily concise reasons. It also defines its own correction and “final” timing for JAMS purposes. Those private rules cannot lengthen or shorten a statutory court deadline unless applicable law permits that consequence. [JAMS+1](https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration)\n\n## A3. Interim, partial, consent, and final awards\n\nAn award label is not conclusive. The court must determine whether the arbitrator intended a final disposition of the submitted claim or a separable part of it. A merely procedural ruling ordinarily is not transformed into a confirmable money award by being called “interim.” Conversely, Kansas K.S.A. 5-440 permits an arbitrator to incorporate a pre-award ruling into the award and directs expedited confirmation unless the award is vacated, modified, or corrected. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0040_section/005_004_0040_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nA private settlement is not automatically:\n\n- An arbitration award.\n- A consent award.\n- A court judgment.\n- A satisfaction of an already entered judgment.\n\nIt becomes a consent award only when the parties request that result and the arbitrator issues the award under the applicable agreement, rules, and law. AAA and JAMS both expressly recognize consent awards, but the actual administrator and rule version must be proved. [American Arbitration Association+1](https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf)\n\n# B. Award delivery, receipt, and arbitrator correction\n\n## B1. Notice and receipt\n\nK.S.A. 5-424 supplies the current act’s default notice rules:\n\n- A person gives notice by taking action reasonably necessary to inform the other person in the ordinary course.\n- A person has notice through knowledge or receipt.\n- Receipt occurs when notice comes to the person’s attention or is delivered to the person’s residence, business, or another location held out for delivery of such communications. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0024_section/005_004_0024_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nThe arbitrator or arbitration organization must give every party notice including a copy of the award. The receipt date is therefore a material fact for the 20- and 90-day clocks. A document showing only the arbitrator’s signature date or administrator’s internal upload date does not necessarily establish when the particular party received notice. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0041_section/005_004_0041_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nPotential receipt evidence includes:\n\n- Administrator transmission notice.\n- Email delivery record.\n- Portal-access record.\n- Certified or ordinary mail record.\n- Counsel’s receipt.\n- Party acknowledgment.\n- Returned or failed-delivery notice.\n- Agreement-designated address or portal.\n- Evidence of when the award actually came to the person’s attention.\n\nNo individualized deadline should be calculated without resolving the applicable act and receipt event.\n\n## B2. Current Kansas arbitrator-correction grounds\n\nWithin 20 days after receipt, a party can ask the arbitrator to:\n\n1. Correct an evident mathematical miscalculation or evident description mistake.\n2. Correct a form imperfection not affecting the merits.\n3. Address the absence of a final and definite award on a submitted claim.\n4. Clarify the award.\n\nOther parties have 10 days after receiving notice of the request to object. If judicial confirmation, vacatur, or modification proceedings are pending, the court can remit the issue to the arbitrator. The corrected award remains subject to confirmation, vacatur, and modification. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0042_section/005_004_0042_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nThe arbitrator-correction route does not authorize:\n\n- Reconsideration because a party dislikes the evidence.\n- Changing credibility findings.\n- Reweighing the merits.\n- Adding a new claim.\n- Correcting an asserted legal error under the label “clarification.”\n- Replacing a valid merits determination with a different one.\n\nAAA and JAMS similarly limit their ordinary postaward correction mechanisms to clerical, computational, typographical, technical, or similar errors and clarifications. [American Arbitration Association+1](https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf)\n\n## B3. Correction and court-clock matrix\n\n| Event | Kansas consequence |\n| --- | --- |\n| Party receives original award notice on D0 | 20-day arbitrator-correction clock and 90-day court vacatur/modification clocks begin |\n| Correction request filed on D0 + 15 | Timely arbitrator request; original 90-day court clock is not expressly suspended |\n| Arbitrator issues a corrected award | Receipt of corrected-award notice supplies an express new 90-day trigger under §§5-445 and 5-446 |\n| Arbitrator denies correction or issues no corrected award | Statute does not expressly replace the original 90-day trigger |\n| Parties negotiate after award | No express tolling |\n| Administrator reviews a complaint | No express tolling |\n| Confirmation motion filed while correction request is pending | Court can remit under §5-442(d) and coordinate the pending motions |\n| Court challenge filed while correction request is pending | Filing protects the court route; court may remit |\n| Missing receipt evidence | Exact deadline held |\n\nThe older *Alexander v. Everhart* decision shows that asking arbitrators to correct an award does not necessarily waive judicial objections where the party expressly preserved them and separately pursued the court remedy. It does **not** hold that the correction request tolls the statutory court period. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2000/82368.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n# C. Kansas judicial confirmation\n\n## C1. Who may move\n\nK.S.A. 5-444 says a **party to an arbitration proceeding** may move to confirm after receiving award notice. That language comfortably covers the parties who participated in the arbitration. A current-act Kansas case confirms that an arbitration participant has the necessary limited standing to seek confirmation. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2025/127043.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nAn assignee or successor that was not itself an arbitration party presents a more fact-sensitive issue:\n\n- Was the award itself assigned?\n- Did the assignment transfer confirmation and judgment rights?\n- Is the movant the successor to the named award party?\n- Is the consumer’s award obligation included?\n- Does Kansas real-party law permit ratification, joinder, or substitution?\n- Was the assignment made before or after the award?\n- Is the assignment restricted?\n\nAn older-act case permitted confirmation by an assignee where actual assignment rights were proved. It does not establish that any debt buyer with a generic portfolio bill of sale can confirm an award. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2006/93662.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## C2. Court, jurisdiction, venue, and service\n\n| Issue | Current Kansas rule |\n| --- | --- |\n| **Court** | Court of competent jurisdiction in Kansas |\n| **Subject and personal jurisdiction** | Court must have jurisdiction over the controversy and parties |\n| **Kansas-hearing agreement** | An arbitration agreement providing for arbitration in Kansas confers exclusive Kansas-court jurisdiction to enter judgment on the award |\n| **Venue** | County designated for hearing or where hearing occurred; otherwise county where adverse party resides or has business; if none in Kansas, any county |\n| **Later motions** | Subsequent motions ordinarily stay in the court hearing the initial motion |\n| **Freestanding proceeding** | Initial judicial motion served like a civil summons |\n| **Existing court case** | Motion served under ordinary motion-service rules in that case |\n\nThe jurisdiction rule is K.S.A. 5-448, and venue is governed by K.S.A. 5-449. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0048_section/005_004_0048_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0049_section/005_004_0049_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nThe current Kansas act does not create a specialized “petition” title or official mandatory confirmation form. It classifies judicial applications as motions. Where no case is pending, the initiating motion must be served like a summons; where a case remains stayed, motion service applies. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0027_section/005_004_0027_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## C3. Confirmation evidence package\n\nThe current Kansas statute does not list a mandatory exhibit packet comparable to FAA §13. A minimally supportable Kansas motion nevertheless ordinarily needs evidence sufficient to establish:\n\n| Proposition | Likely supporting evidence |\n| --- | --- |\n| Applicable act | Agreement date; current-act opt-in if pre-2018 |\n| Movant’s status | Arbitration caption; award; assignment or succession documents if applicable |\n| Agreement and court authority | Arbitration clause; Kansas-hearing provision; jurisdiction and venue facts |\n| Award authenticity | Signed/authenticated award |\n| Award delivery | Administrator transmittal and receipt evidence |\n| Finality/correction | Original award; correction requests; corrected award; administrator status |\n| Amount or relief | Award’s operative terms |\n| Service | Summons-equivalent or motion-service proof |\n| Challenge status | Any pending vacatur or modification motion |\n| Satisfaction or settlement | Payment records, release, settlement, or consent award where asserted |\n\nA confirmation court does not conduct a de novo trial of the underlying debt. But the movant must still establish the statutory route, authentic award, party or assignee status, court authority, and requested judgment terms.\n\n## C4. Mandatory confirmation and timing\n\nOnce the Kansas predicates are established, the court “shall” confirm unless the award has been vacated, modified, or corrected. The court cannot refuse confirmation merely because it believes the arbitrator made a factual or legal mistake. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0044_section/005_004_0044_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nThe current statute permits a confirmation motion after receipt and contains no express waiting period. Therefore:\n\n- A movant can seek confirmation before the opponent’s 90-day challenge period expires.\n- The opponent can file a timely vacatur or modification motion in response.\n- The court should resolve the competing statutory motions rather than treat early filing as eliminating the challenge period.\n- Prompt confirmation does not convert ordinary legal error into a vacatur ground.\n- A final judgment entered before a later-but-still-timely challenge creates Chapter 60 procedural questions that require the actual judgment, motion, and timing record.\n\nThe 2025 *Swope Lees* case involved prompt confirmation and a competing challenge, illustrating that confirmation and vacatur issues can be litigated together under the current act. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2025/127043.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## C5. No express Kansas confirmation outer limit\n\nK.S.A. 5-444 does not state “within one year,” “within five years,” or another outer period. This sharply differs from FAA §9.\n\nThat textual finding does **not** resolve:\n\n- A general Kansas limitation statute.\n- Laches.\n- Waiver.\n- Accord and satisfaction.\n- Release.\n- Assignment after long delay.\n- Death or entity dissolution.\n- Whether an award has already been paid.\n- Whether another state’s law governs.\n- Whether the confirmation agreement itself imposes a period.\n\nNo controlling current Kansas opinion fixing a universal outer limitations period for current-act confirmation was located in the sources reviewed.\n\n# D. Kansas vacatur\n\n## D1. Complete statutory grounds\n\n| K.S.A. 5-445 ground | Required showing | Material limits |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **Corruption, fraud, or undue means** | Award was procured through the misconduct | 90 days from actual or constructive discovery |\n| **Neutral-arbitrator evident partiality** | Facts supporting evident partiality | Not mere dissatisfaction with adverse rulings |\n| **Arbitrator corruption** | Corrupt conduct | Requires actual proof |\n| **Arbitrator misconduct prejudicing rights** | Misconduct plus prejudice | Harmless procedural irregularity is insufficient |\n| **Refusal to postpone** | Sufficient cause was shown; refusal substantially prejudiced rights | Arbitrator has scheduling discretion |\n| **Refusal to consider evidence** | Evidence was material; refusal substantially prejudiced rights | Arbitrator need not admit every offered item |\n| **Hearing contrary to K.S.A. 5-437** | Statutory hearing defect plus substantial prejudice | Technical nonprejudicial deviation insufficient |\n| **Exceeded powers** | Arbitrator decided beyond contractual or submitted authority | Serious interpretation error is ordinarily not enough if arbitrator arguably interpreted the agreement |\n| **No arbitration agreement** | No agreement existed | Lost if person participated without raising objection by beginning of hearing |\n| **Improper initiation notice** | K.S.A. 5-431 notice defect plus substantial prejudice | Actual prejudice required |\n\nThe current vacatur statute is mandatory when a listed ground is established. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0045_section/005_004_0045_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## D2. Participation and preservation\n\nA person asserting that no arbitration agreement existed must ordinarily raise that objection no later than the beginning of the arbitration hearing. Participation without that objection forfeits the statutory no-agreement ground. This does not mean every objection to scope, arbitrator misconduct, fraud, or excess of powers is waived on the same terms; each ground has its own preservation rules. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0045_section/005_004_0045_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nA prior court order compelling arbitration can also affect preservation and preclusion. The postaward court cannot casually relitigate a gateway already finally decided, but the actual order, appealability, parties, and issue identity are essential.\n\nHistorical *MBNA America Bank v. Credit* is instructive but version-limited. The Kansas Supreme Court refused to treat an unsupported arbitration record as conclusive where the record did not establish receipt and the consumer had objected to the absence of an agreement before arbitration. That case involved the old Kansas act, FAA procedures, and a credit-card award; it should not be converted into a current universal production checklist. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/supreme-court/2006/94380.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## D3. Fraud and the discovery exception\n\nThe ordinary 90-day period runs from receipt of the award or corrected award. For corruption, fraud, or undue means, the statute instead runs from when the ground was known or, through reasonable care, should have been known. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0045_section/005_004_0045_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nThe exception does not mean any newly discovered evidence restarts the clock. The movant must connect the newly discovered facts to corruption, fraud, or undue means that procured the award.\n\nAn old-act published case required clear and convincing proof and distinguished fraud affecting the arbitration process from ordinary merits disagreement. The current statute contains similar fraud wording, but no current-act Kansas appellate decision located here separately fixes that exact burden for every case. The old case is persuasive on narrow review, not a substitute for current statutory text. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2006/94513.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## D4. Hearing defects, materiality, and prejudice\n\nA refused continuance or excluded document is not enough by itself. The movant must show:\n\n1. Sufficient cause or material evidence.\n2. A qualifying refusal or statutory hearing defect.\n3. Substantial prejudice to the party’s rights.\n\nThe court does not recreate the arbitration record and decide whether it would have weighed the evidence differently.\n\n## D5. Exceeded powers\n\nThe central question is whether the arbitrator acted within the authority the parties gave, not whether the arbitrator reached the “correct” interpretation.\n\nPossible exceeded-powers issues include:\n\n- Deciding a claim never submitted.\n- Awarding relief contractually excluded.\n- Binding a nonparty outside the clause.\n- Ignoring a clear contractual limit on remedy.\n- Deciding after authority expired where a timely objection was preserved.\n- Issuing a nonfinal award when the submission required final resolution.\n\nIf the arbitrator was arguably interpreting and applying the contract, even a serious error generally does not establish excess of powers. Federal authority applies an especially heavy burden under FAA §10(a)(4), and Kansas current-act review is similarly constrained. ([supreme.justia.com](https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/552/576/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## D6. Manifest disregard and public-policy-type arguments\n\n### Kansas current route\n\nPublished *Swope Lees* treats manifest disregard as a narrow Kansas nonstatutory theory. It requires something materially beyond misinterpretation:\n\nPlain text\n```\nKnown, clearly governing legal principle\n+\nconscious refusal to apply it\n```\n\nAn argument that the arbitrator “got Kansas law wrong” or selected the wrong construction is insufficient. The award remains presumptively valid. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2025/127043.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nThe decision also treats the “positive mandate of law” or criminality concept narrowly. A court does not vacate merely because the result allegedly conflicts with a statute; the challenger must satisfy the exact narrow authority, and ordinary legal error remains outside review. No current Kansas Supreme Court decision applying the 2018 act and endorsing, narrowing, or rejecting *Swope Lees* was located.\n\n### Federal FAA route\n\n*Hall Street* holds that FAA §§10 and 11 are the exclusive expedited statutory grounds and that parties cannot contract for broader merits review under the FAA. The Tenth Circuit has not conclusively treated manifest disregard as a freestanding extra ground after *Hall Street*; it has characterized the issue as potentially a judicial gloss while repeatedly holding that ordinary or serious legal error is insufficient. ([supreme.justia.com](https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/552/576/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([ca10.uscourts.gov](https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/01018716524.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nA Kansas state manifest-disregard theory should therefore not be imported into a federal FAA motion without analyzing the actual route and governing authority.\n\n## D7. Rehearing after vacatur\n\nExcept where the award is vacated because no arbitration agreement existed, the Kansas court may order rehearing.\n\n| Vacatur ground | Rehearing arbitrator |\n| --- | --- |\n| Corruption, fraud, undue means | New arbitrator |\n| Neutral partiality or arbitrator corruption | New arbitrator |\n| Hearing misconduct, excess of powers, or improper initiation notice | Same arbitrator or successor |\n| No arbitration agreement | No rehearing authority under this branch |\n\nThe rehearing award period follows the time rule for awards. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0045_section/005_004_0045_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n# E. Kansas judicial modification or correction\n\n## E1. Grounds\n\nA court must modify or correct within the statutory route only when:\n\n1. There is an evident mathematical miscalculation.\n2. There is an evident mistake in describing a person, thing, or property.\n3. The arbitrator decided a claim not submitted, and correction will not affect the merits of submitted claims.\n4. The award is imperfect in form but not in the merits. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0046_section/005_004_0046_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nIf the court grants correction, it confirms the award as corrected. Otherwise, it confirms unless a vacatur motion remains pending.\n\n## E2. Correction-versus-merits matrix\n\n| Claimed defect | Correctable? | Reason |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| 4,000 + 300 + 200 − 500 shown as $4,500 | Potentially yes | Evident mathematical miscalculation |\n| Consumer’s name misspelled while identity is clear | Potentially yes | Evident description or form issue |\n| Award includes relief on a claim never submitted, severable from others | Potentially yes | Express statutory ground |\n| Award omits final disposition of a submitted claim | Arbitrator clarification/correction route may apply | K.S.A. 5-442(a)(2) |\n| Court believes interest rate should be lower | Ordinarily no | Merits/legal decision, not arithmetic |\n| Court thinks witness was incredible | No | Merits factfinding |\n| Court thinks arbitrator misconstrued contract | No, absent distinct vacatur ground | Ordinary legal error |\n| Court recalculates damages by examining hearing exhibits | Generally not a simple correction | Risks rewriting merits |\n| Award is unclear about payment recipient | Clarification may be available | Depends on whether clarification changes merits |\n\nKansas’s current statute does not expressly state a federal-style “face of the award” rule. Under FAA §11(a), however, the Tenth Circuit holds that an evident material miscalculation must appear on—or be clearly inferable from—the award’s face; courts may not dig through the arbitration record to redesign damages. ([ca10.uscourts.gov](https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/010110333308.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n# F. Kansas deadline and order matrix\n\nLet:\n\nPlain text\n```\nD0 = receipt of original award notice\nDC = receipt of corrected-award notice\nDF = date fraud/corruption/undue-means ground\n     was known or reasonably should have been known\n```\n\n| Application | Filing or notice period | Trigger | Available order |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Arbitrator correction/clarification | 20 days | D0 | Correct, clarify, or complete final award |\n| Objection to arbitrator correction | 10 days | Receipt of correction request notice | Written objection |\n| Kansas vacatur, ordinary grounds | 90 days | D0 or DC | Vacate; potentially rehearing |\n| Kansas vacatur, fraud/corruption/undue means | 90 days | DF | Vacate; new arbitrator if rehearing |\n| Kansas judicial modification/correction | 90 days | D0 or DC | Modify/correct and confirm |\n| Kansas confirmation | No express outer period in §5-444 | After receipt | Confirm unless corrected, modified, or vacated |\n| Appeal from confirm/deny confirmation | Ordinarily 30 days under civil appeal statute | Entry of appealable order/judgment | Appellate review |\n| K.S.A. 60-259 motion | 28 days | Entry of judgment | Can reset appeal time |\n| K.S.A. 60-260 motion | Statutory ground-specific periods | Judgment/order | Does not automatically suspend judgment or reset ordinary appeal time |\n| Automatic judgment-enforcement stay | 14 days | Entry of Kansas judgment | Temporary stay |\n| Stay pending appeal | Court order/security | Application and approval | Enforcement stayed on terms |\n\nKansas day computation excludes the trigger day, counts intermediate weekends and holidays, and extends a terminal weekend or legal holiday. Exact dates remain held without receipt, filing, court-access, and holiday facts. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_002_0000_article/060_002_0006_section/060_002_0006_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n# G. Federal FAA comparison\n\n## G1. FAA statutory matrix\n\n| FAA provision | Operative function | Material condition |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **§6** | Postaward applications are heard as motions | Unless FAA expressly provides otherwise |\n| **§9** | Confirmation within one year after award is made | Parties agreed judgment may be entered; court and jurisdiction requirements met |\n| **§10** | Vacatur grounds | Corruption/fraud; partiality/corruption; prejudicial misconduct; exceeded powers or no mutual final definite award |\n| **§11** | Modification/correction | Evident material math/description error; unsubmitted matter; form imperfection |\n| **§12** | Notice of vacate/modify/correct motion served within three months | Service method depends on residence/district status |\n| **§13** | Confirmation record package | Agreement, appointments/extensions, award, notices, affidavits, and court orders |\n| **§16** | Immediate appeal routes | Distinguishes appealable postaward orders from barred interlocutory arbitration orders |\n\n([U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s9/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s12/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## G2. FAA confirmation\n\nFAA §9 applies where the parties agreed that a court judgment may be entered on the award. It provides an application period of one year after the award is made. In the Tenth Circuit, *KCOM v. EMC* treats that one-year rule as a substantive FAA confirmation limitation when the movant actually invokes §9. But a party can pursue confirmation under applicable state law; a state-law motion does not automatically transform into a §9 motion merely because the FAA could have been invoked. ([ca10.uscourts.gov](https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/01019659058.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nTherefore:\n\nPlain text\n```\nKansas-law confirmation motion:\nKansas act controls unless FAA or another law displaces it.\n\nFAA §9 confirmation motion:\nFAA one-year rule and §9 predicates apply.\n\nPleading both:\nCourt must determine each legal basis and jurisdiction.\n```\n\nFAA §13 requires the moving party to file the arbitration agreement, arbitrator-selection or extension documents, award, and relevant notices, affidavits, or court papers. Kansas’s current act has no identically itemized exhibit statute. ([U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s13/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## G3. FAA three-month challenge rule\n\nFAA §12 requires service of notice of a motion to vacate, modify, or correct within three months after the award is filed or delivered. The statutory text is a service requirement, not merely a filing suggestion. Service rules differ depending on whether the adverse party resides in the district. ([U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s12/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nPublished Tenth Circuit authority treats timely §12 service as a critical statutory condition. *Pfannenstiel* discussed possible equitable tolling but denied relief where the movant lacked diligence; it does not create a broad equitable extension for negotiations, administrator correspondence, correction requests, or ignorance of the award. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/477/1155/606552/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nA private administrator’s correction process does not automatically toll FAA §12. If the administrator issues a genuinely corrected final award, the legal effect on the federal trigger depends on the correction, governing rules, and case law; the statute does not grant blanket tolling merely because a request was pending.\n\n## G4. Federal vacatur and modification\n\n*Hall Street* holds that FAA §§10 and 11 supply the exclusive expedited review grounds; parties cannot contract for full appellate review of legal error under the FAA. ([supreme.justia.com](https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/552/576/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nUnder FAA §10, serious disagreement with the arbitrator is not enough. The court does not reconsider the merits merely because it believes the arbitrator misunderstood the contract or law.\n\nUnder FAA §11(a), *Mid Atlantic Capital v. Bien* holds that an evident material mathematical miscalculation must appear on the face of the award. A court cannot search the full record for a different damages calculation and call that a correction. [Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals+1](https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/010110333308.pdf)\n\nThe Tenth Circuit in *Abbott* left unresolved whether manifest disregard survives *Hall Street* as a gloss on §10 rather than an additional ground. It nevertheless held that ordinary or serious legal error is insufficient and rejected a public-policy theory first raised only in a postjudgment motion on that record. ([ca10.uscourts.gov](https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/01018716524.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n# H. Federal subject-matter jurisdiction\n\n## H1. Freestanding application: *Badgerow*\n\nThe FAA itself is nonjurisdictional. A freestanding federal §9, §10, or §11 application needs an independent basis appearing on the face of the application, such as:\n\n- Complete diversity plus the required amount in controversy.\n- A separate federal question.\n- Another jurisdictional statute.\n\nThe court cannot use §4’s “look-through” method to inspect the underlying arbitration controversy for freestanding §§9–10 jurisdiction. ([supremecourt.gov](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nA motion saying “the award decided an FDCPA claim” is therefore not enough by itself if the confirmation or vacatur application presents only a state-law or FAA issue.\n\n## H2. Existing stayed federal case: *Jules*\n\nOn May 14, 2026, the Supreme Court held that a federal court which:\n\n1. Had original jurisdiction over the underlying lawsuit;\n2. Stayed that lawsuit under FAA §3; and\n3. Retained the action on its docket,\n\nretains jurisdiction to confirm or vacate the resulting award in that same action. No new independent jurisdictional basis is required because the court is completing the case already within its jurisdiction. ([supremecourt.gov](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-83_3e04.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nThis does not rescue:\n\n- A previously dismissed federal case.\n- A freestanding postaward petition filed in a new federal action.\n- A case that never had original federal jurisdiction.\n- A motion by a stranger with no procedural connection to the stayed case.\n\n# I. Resulting judgment, payment, stay, security, and appeal\n\n## I1. Kansas judgment\n\nAfter an order confirming, vacating without rehearing, modifying, or correcting an award, the court must enter a conforming judgment. That judgment:\n\n- May be recorded.\n- May be docketed.\n- May be enforced like another civil judgment.\n- Can include reasonable motion and subsequent judicial costs.\n- Can include reasonable postaward attorney fees and litigation expenses for the prevailing party in a **contested** confirmation, vacatur, or modification proceeding. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0047_section/005_004_0047_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nThe postaward fee provision is discretionary and limited to the judicial proceeding after the award. It does not automatically authorize every underlying arbitration fee, collection fee, or attorney fee.\n\n## I2. Payment and satisfaction boundary\n\n| Event | Legal status |\n| --- | --- |\n| Award issued but unpaid | Arbitration obligation; not yet ordinary court judgment |\n| Award voluntarily paid before confirmation | Payment can satisfy the award; confirmation necessity and residual issues depend on proof and dispute |\n| Parties privately settle after award | Settlement contract; does not automatically erase award or create judgment |\n| Arbitrator enters consent award | Arbitration award that can potentially be confirmed |\n| Court confirms award | Civil judgment entered |\n| Judgment paid | Satisfaction procedure becomes relevant; later separate component |\n| Partial payment | Reduces amount if properly credited; does not automatically satisfy award or judgment |\n| Award creditor seeks full confirmation after full payment | Satisfaction, mootness, release, and double-recovery issues arise |\n| Confirmation judgment entered despite prior payment | Payment must be accounted for; court judgment does not authorize double collection |\n\nA settlement or payment document must identify whether it resolves:\n\n- The award.\n- Interest.\n- Costs.\n- Postaward fees.\n- Pending judicial motions.\n- The underlying claims.\n- The judgment, if already entered.\n\n## I3. Kansas enforcement stay\n\nKansas generally stays execution and enforcement of a judgment for 14 days after entry. The court can impose a stay while a K.S.A. 60-259 or 60-260 motion is pending on appropriate security terms. A stay pending appeal ordinarily requires an approved supersedeas bond or other authorized order. Filing an appeal alone is not a complete enforcement stay. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_002_0000_article/060_002_0062_section/060_002_0062_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nA motion to vacate an **award** before judgment and a motion for relief from the resulting **judgment** are different proceedings. A K.S.A. 60-260 motion does not suspend the judgment automatically. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_002_0000_article/060_002_0060_section/060_002_0060_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## I4. Federal enforcement stay\n\nFederal Rule of Civil Procedure 62 ordinarily stays execution for 30 days after entry of the federal judgment. A longer stay can be obtained through a bond or other court-approved security. [United States Courts+1](https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf)\n\nThat federal 30-day rule does not govern a Kansas state judgment.\n\n## I5. Kansas appeal matrix\n\n| Order | Immediate Kansas appeal under K.S.A. 5-450? | Notes |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Denial of confirmation | Yes | Expressly listed |\n| Confirmation order | Yes | Expressly listed |\n| Modification or correction order | Yes | Expressly listed |\n| Vacatur without rehearing | Yes | Expressly listed |\n| Vacatur with rehearing | Not expressly listed in that branch | Finality and another appellate route require analysis |\n| Denial of vacatur plus confirmation | Confirmation/final judgment supplies appeal route | Actual order structure controls |\n| Final judgment under act | Yes | Expressly listed |\n| Mere administrator correction decision | No statutory court appeal | Must reach court through applicable motion |\n| Private settlement | No award appeal by itself | Contract enforcement questions differ |\n\nK.S.A. 5-450 says arbitration appeals proceed like civil appeals. The ordinary Kansas civil notice-of-appeal period is 30 days after entry, subject to timely postjudgment motions and other statutory rules. A timely K.S.A. 60-259 motion filed within 28 days resets the appeal period after disposition. K.S.A. 60-260 is not among the motions listed as automatically resetting the ordinary appeal period. ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0050_section/005_004_0050_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([kslegislature.gov](https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_021_0000_article/060_021_0003_section/060_021_0003_k/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n*Swope Lees* illustrates the distinction: a timely K.S.A. 60-259 motion can affect appellate timing, while a later K.S.A. 60-260 attack cannot be used simply to obtain a second merits review of the arbitration award. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2025/127043.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## I6. Federal appeal\n\nFAA §16 permits immediate appeal from orders confirming or denying confirmation, modifying or correcting, vacating, and from final decisions with respect to arbitration. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4 ordinarily requires a notice within 30 days, or 60 days where the United States or another listed federal party is involved, subject to its entry, tolling, extension, and reopening rules. ([U.S. Code](https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s16/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ([uscourts.gov](https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-appellate-procedure?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n# J. Material cases\n\n| Authority | Court, date, and posture | Material holding for PASS-18 | Limits |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **Swope Lees Commercial Real Estate v. Slaten/Clareview** | Published Kansas Court of Appeals, Oct. 17, 2025; confirmation/vacatur and postjudgment appeal | Current act; narrow review; participant standing; manifest-disregard theory narrowly framed; Chapter 60 cannot become a merits end-run | No Kansas Supreme Court current-act review located; commercial lease dispute |\n| **MBNA America Bank v. Credit** | Kansas Supreme Court, 2006; credit-card award under old act/FAA | Receipt and agreement evidence matter; preserved no-agreement objection; FAA record requirements | Old act, old NAF record; not current statutory delivery rule |\n| **Griffith v. McGovern** | Published Kansas Court of Appeals, 2006; old-act confirmation/vacatur | Strong presumption; ordinary fact/law error insufficient; old-act fraud and manifest-disregard discussion | Old act; current exact fraud burden not separately established |\n| **Alexander v. Everhart** | Kansas Court of Appeals, 2000; old act | Correction request did not waive separately preserved judicial objection | Does not hold that correction request tolls court deadline |\n| **Missouri Bank & Trust v. Gas-Mart** | Published Kansas Court of Appeals, 2006 | Actual assignee could pursue confirmation based on proven assignment | Old act; no automatic debt-buyer succession rule |\n| **Badgerow v. Walters** | U.S. Supreme Court, 2022 | No look-through for freestanding FAA §§9–10 applications | Does not govern retained jurisdiction in an existing stayed case |\n| **Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties** | U.S. Supreme Court, May 14, 2026 | Federal court retaining §3-stayed case retains postaward jurisdiction | Requires original jurisdiction and same pending action |\n| **KCOM v. EMC** | Published Tenth Circuit, 2016 | State-law confirmation does not automatically become FAA §9; §16 route depends on actual legal basis | Valuation-arbitration setting |\n| **Hall Street v. Mattel** | U.S. Supreme Court, 2008 | FAA §§10–11 are exclusive expedited statutory grounds | State-law review routes remain distinct |\n| **Abbott v. Law Office of Patrick Mulligan** | Published Tenth Circuit, 2011 | Ordinary legal error insufficient; post-*Hall Street* manifest-disregard status not resolved as independent ground | Federal FAA case |\n| **Mid Atlantic Capital v. Bien** | Published Tenth Circuit, 2020 | FAA §11(a) miscalculation must appear on face of award | Federal §11 rule, not automatically Kansas §5-446 rule |\n| **Pfannenstiel v. Merrill Lynch** | Published Tenth Circuit, 2007 | FAA §12 three-month service condition strictly applied; tolling denied on facts | Does not categorically foreclose all equitable-tolling arguments |\n\n# K. Master actor/stage/evidence matrix\n\n| Actor or stage | Required evidence or predicate | Burden or decision | Available order | Consequence/gap |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **Arbitrator issuing award** | Submission, authority, record, authentication, timing | Arbitrator | Award | Reasons depend on agreement/rules |\n| **Panel award** | Majority concurrence; all heard proceeding | Majority exercises powers | Award | Dissent not necessarily fatal |\n| **Administrator delivering award** | Copy, transmission, destination, delivery method | Party relying on receipt date should prove it | Notice | Missing receipt date holds clocks |\n| **Party requesting arbitrator correction** | Timely 20-day motion and proper ground | Movant | Correction/clarification | No automatic court-clock tolling |\n| **Party moving to confirm** | Party/successor status, authentic award, receipt, jurisdiction, venue, service | Movant | Confirmation | Mandatory unless challenge succeeds |\n| **Assignee moving to confirm** | Award/claim assignment and account link | Assignee | Confirmation if status proved | Generic sale evidence may be insufficient |\n| **Party moving to vacate** | Timely filing and listed ground; prejudice where required | Challenger | Vacatur, sometimes rehearing | Merits error generally insufficient |\n| **Fraud challenger** | Fraud procuring award; discovery date; diligence | Challenger | Vacatur | Current exact proof standard held |\n| **No-agreement challenger** | Absence of agreement and timely hearing objection | Challenger | Vacatur | Participation without objection defeats ground |\n| **Party moving to modify** | Timely motion and narrow statutory defect | Movant | Corrected award and confirmation | No merits rewrite |\n| **Kansas court** | Jurisdiction, venue, motion, service | Court | Confirm/vacate/modify/judgment | No de novo merits appeal |\n| **Federal freestanding movant** | FAA predicates plus independent jurisdiction | Movant | §§9–11 relief | No *Badgerow* look-through |\n| **Movant in retained federal case** | Existing original jurisdiction, §3 stay, same action | Court under *Jules* | Postaward order | New jurisdiction basis unnecessary |\n| **Judgment creditor** | Entered judgment and unsatisfied amount | Creditor | Enforcement after stay | Award alone not executable judgment |\n| **Appellant** | Appealable order, timely notice | Appellant | Appeal | Appeal alone may not stay enforcement |\n\n# L. Official form and administrator-rule inventory\n\n| Resource | Full literal URL | Status and purpose | Read limitation |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Kansas Court Forms search | https://self-help.kscourts.gov/FindCourtForms | General Kansas court-form index | No dedicated statewide confirmation/vacatur form located in bounded search |\n| Kansas Judicial Council Chapter 60 forms | https://www.kjc.ks.gov/legal-forms/chapter-60-civil-actions | General civil motion and pleading forms | Direct pages were intermittently inaccessible; no arbitration-specific mandatory form verified |\n| AAA Consumer Arbitration Rules | https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf | Private administrator rules, effective May 1, 2025 | PDF indices 23–25 / printed 24–26 read and visually inspected; applies only if actually incorporated and administered |\n| AAA Consumer Rules page | https://www.adr.org/rules-forms-and-fees/consumer/ | Current public rules/status page | No actual case eligibility or fee finding |\n| JAMS Comprehensive Rules | https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration | Private administrator rules, effective June 1, 2021 | Rules 24, 25, and 28 read; applies only if actual agreement/version governs |\n| JAMS Consumer Minimum Standards | https://www.jamsadr.com/consumer-minimum-standards | Private policy, effective May 1, 2024 | Not Kansas statute; actual consumer-arbitration eligibility held |\n| Current Federal Rules of Civil Procedure | https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf | Federal judgment-stay rules, amended through Dec. 1, 2025 | Rule 62 at PDF index 104 / printed page 86 visually inspected |\n| Current Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure | https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-appellate-procedure | Federal appeal timing | Current rules page states latest amendments in 2025 |\n\nNo form, administrator rule, or case-management page proves that an actual party agreed to that administrator, that the selected version governs, that the award is authentic, or that a particular court has jurisdiction.\n\n# M. Bounded workflows and examples\n\n## M1. Served signed award\n\n**Assumptions**\n\n- Agreement made in 2022.\n- Current Kansas act applies.\n- Single arbitrator issues a signed electronic award.\n- Administrator emails the complete award to the address the party used throughout the arbitration.\n- Reliable delivery evidence establishes receipt on D0.\n- No agreement-specific reasoned-award requirement exists.\n\n**Timeline**\n\nPlain text\n```\nD0 + 20 days:\nlast statutory day for arbitrator-correction motion\n\nD0 + 90 days:\nlast statutory day for ordinary Kansas vacatur motion\n\nD0 + 90 days:\nlast statutory day for Kansas judicial modification motion\n\nKansas confirmation:\nmay be sought after D0;\n§5-444 states no express outer filing period\n```\n\nThe absence of detailed findings is not itself a defect because Kansas’s statute does not require reasons.\n\n## M2. Recipient date missing\n\n**Facts**\n\n- Award is dated June 1.\n- Administrator says it uploaded the award June 2.\n- Email log is unavailable.\n- Party says it first saw the award June 18.\n- Portal metadata shows login June 20.\n\n**Result**\n\nThe signature date and upload date do not conclusively establish receipt. The 20- and 90-day Kansas clocks cannot be calculated without resolving when the notice came to the party’s attention or was delivered at a qualifying location. No terminal date is supplied.\n\nRelevant missing evidence:\n\n- Transmission log.\n- Email headers.\n- Portal notification.\n- Agreement-designated delivery route.\n- Counsel receipt.\n- Returned-message record.\n- Party acknowledgment.\n\n## M3. Timely fraud discovery versus ordinary legal error\n\n### Fraud branch\n\n**Assumptions**\n\n- Award received on D0.\n- After the ordinary 90-day period, the movant obtains evidence that the opposing party secretly altered a decisive exhibit.\n- DF is the date the alteration was actually discovered.\n- Reasonable care would not have revealed it earlier.\n- The misconduct procured the award.\n\nPlain text\n```\nFraud-branch deadline:\nDF + 90 days\n```\n\nThe movant must prove the fraud and discovery predicates; calling an adverse factual finding “fraudulent” is insufficient.\n\n### Legal-error branch\n\n**Facts**\n\n- Arbitrator used an allegedly incorrect contract interpretation.\n- All relevant facts were known on D0.\n- No corruption, partiality, misconduct, excess of powers, or conscious refusal to apply known controlling law is shown.\n\n**Result:** No delayed-discovery exception. Ordinary legal error is not vacatur.\n\n## M4. Preserved no-agreement objection versus participation without objection\n\n### Preserved branch\n\n- Respondent objects in writing before hearing that no arbitration agreement exists.\n- Respondent participates under protest.\n- Award issues.\n\nThe respondent can invoke K.S.A. 5-445(a)(5), subject to prior court rulings and proof.\n\n### Waived branch\n\n- Respondent participates through the hearing.\n- No formation objection is raised by the beginning of hearing.\n- After losing, respondent first asserts no agreement.\n\nThe statutory no-agreement ground is unavailable under the participation proviso. Other independent grounds remain separately evaluated.\n\n## M5. Arithmetic correction versus merits rewrite\n\n**Award face states**\n\nPlain text\n```\nPrincipal                                  $4,000\nInterest                                      300\nCosts                                         200\nCredit                                      (500)\n                                           ------\nStated total                               $4,500\n```\n\n**Arithmetic**\n\nPlain text\n```\n$4,000 + $300 + $200 − $500 = $4,000\n```\n\nA stated total of $4,500 is an evident mathematical discrepancy and can fit Kansas correction or modification.\n\nIf the complaint instead is:\n\n“The arbitrator should not have awarded the $300 interest because the contract did not authorize it,”\n\nthat is a merits or excess-of-powers question, not simple arithmetic. The addition itself is correct once the $300 component is accepted.\n\n## M6. Arbitrator-correction request and court clock\n\n**Assumptions**\n\n- Award received D0.\n- Correction request filed D0 + 15.\n- Opponent objects timely.\n- Arbitrator has not ruled by D0 + 75.\n\n**Result**\n\nThe original Kansas court-challenge period continues toward D0 + 90; K.S.A. 5-442 does not expressly toll it.\n\n**Branches**\n\n1. Movant files court motion by D0 + 90: judicial route preserved; court can remit.\n2. Movant waits beyond D0 + 90, and arbitrator denies correction: ordinary court challenge may be untimely.\n3. Arbitrator issues corrected award and party receives it on DC: the statutes expressly use DC as a new 90-day trigger.\n\nNo actual deadline is calculated without day-counting and receipt facts.\n\n## M7. Early confirmation while challenge period remains open\n\n**Assumptions**\n\n- Award received D0.\n- Winner moves to confirm on D0 + 10.\n- Loser files a supported vacatur motion on D0 + 60.\n\n**Result**\n\nThe early confirmation motion does not textually eliminate the timely vacatur route. The court should resolve the motions together. Confirmation remains mandatory only if the award is not vacated, modified, or corrected.\n\n## M8. Incomplete assignment and account link\n\n**Facts**\n\n- Award names Original Creditor A.\n- Debt Buyer B seeks confirmation.\n- B supplies a generic portfolio bill of sale.\n- No document identifies the award, arbitration claim, consumer account, or judgment right.\n- B did not participate in arbitration.\n\n**Result**\n\nB has not yet established that it is the party or successor entitled to confirmation. The court does not retry the underlying debt, but it must determine who may obtain judgment on the award.\n\nMissing evidence includes:\n\n- Assignment terms.\n- Award/account schedule.\n- Chain of transfers.\n- Right to confirm and collect judgment.\n- Ratification or substitution.\n- Any anti-assignment term.\n\n## M9. Freestanding federal confirmation without jurisdiction\n\n**Facts**\n\n- Award resolves only state contract claims.\n- Parties are not completely diverse.\n- Movant files a new federal §9 application.\n- Movant argues that the underlying arbitration involved federal communications and interstate commerce.\n\n**Result**\n\nThe FAA commerce nexus does not create federal jurisdiction. *Badgerow* bars looking through the freestanding §9 application to the underlying dispute. Dismissal for lack of federal subject-matter jurisdiction does not itself invalidate the award or prevent a proper state-court proceeding.\n\n## M10. Retained federal case under *Jules*\n\n**Facts**\n\n- Consumer filed a federal statutory case.\n- Federal court had original jurisdiction.\n- Court compelled arbitration but stayed rather than dismissed.\n- Award issues.\n- A party moves in the same case to confirm or vacate.\n\n**Result**\n\nUnder *Jules*, the federal court retains jurisdiction to complete the same pending case. No new diversity or federal-question basis is required for the postaward motion. ([supremecourt.gov](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-83_3e04.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## M11. Paid award, settlement, and satisfaction\n\n### Paid-before-confirmation branch\n\nPlain text\n```\nAward amount                               $5,000\nPayment after award                        5,000\nUnpaid award principal                         0\n```\n\nIf payment fully satisfies every award component, the movant cannot obtain double recovery. Proof of payment, interest, costs, and release terms controls whether confirmation remains necessary or justiciable.\n\n### Partial settlement branch\n\nPlain text\n```\nAward                                      $5,000\nSettlement payment                         3,500\nExpressly released remainder               1,500\nUnpaid amount under settlement                 0\n```\n\nIf the written settlement actually releases the remainder, a later $5,000 judgment would be inconsistent with the settlement.\n\n### Private settlement without consent award\n\nA private settlement is not automatically a court judgment. If the parties asked the arbitrator to embody it in a consent award and one was issued, confirmation can proceed on the consent award.\n\n## M12. Appeal without stay\n\n**Facts**\n\n- Kansas court confirms a $10,000 award and enters judgment.\n- Judgment debtor files a timely appeal.\n- No supersedeas bond, security, or stay order is obtained.\n\n**Result**\n\n- Kansas’s initial 14-day automatic stay applies.\n- After that period, filing the appeal alone does not establish a continuing enforcement stay.\n- Separate stay/security relief is required.\n- Full garnishment, lien, and execution procedure remains outside PASS-18.\n\nThe same basic separation applies in federal court, except Federal Rule 62 ordinarily supplies a 30-day automatic stay.\n\n## M13. JAMS correction period versus Kansas court period\n\n**Facts**\n\n- Actual agreement validly incorporates current JAMS Comprehensive Rules.\n- JAMS serves award on D0.\n- JAMS rules allow seven days for correction and treat the award as final for judicial enforcement after 14 days if no correction is requested.\n- Kansas current act governs.\n\n**Result**\n\nThe JAMS private timeline controls the administrator’s correction/finality process, but Kansas statutory court rights remain governed by K.S.A. 5-445 and 5-446. The private 14-day JAMS finality rule does not erase Kansas’s 90-day judicial period.\n\n# N. PASS-18 source register\n\n| Source ID | Title, issuer, and full literal URL | Exact read scope and pinpoint | Version, status, access, and limits |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **S_KS-P18-S001** | Kansas current arbitration award and panel provisions — Kansas Revisor https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0035_section/005_004_0035_k/ https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0040_section/005_004_0040_k/ https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0041_section/005_004_0041_k/ https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0042_section/005_004_0042_k/ | K.S.A. 5-435; 5-440; complete 5-441(a)–(b); complete 5-442(a)–(e) | **Fresh Oct. 26, 2026 Pacific/UTC.** Current 2026 official HTML; no printed page or PDF index. No complete legislative-history audit. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S002** | Kansas confirmation, vacatur, and modification — Kansas Revisor https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0044_section/005_004_0044_k/ https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0045_section/005_004_0045_k/ https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0046_section/005_004_0046_k/ | Complete K.S.A. 5-444; 5-445(a)–(d); 5-446(a)–(c) | **Fresh.** Current official codification. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S003** | Kansas judgment, jurisdiction, venue, and appeals — Kansas Revisor https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0047_section/005_004_0047_k/ https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0048_section/005_004_0048_k/ https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0049_section/005_004_0049_k/ https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0050_section/005_004_0050_k/ | Complete §§5-447 through 5-450 | **Fresh.** Full later judgment-enforcement law excluded. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S004** | Kansas notice and transition — Kansas Revisor https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0024_section/005_004_0024_k/ https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0025_section/005_004_0025_k/ https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0053_section/005_004_0053_k/ | Complete K.S.A. 5-424, 5-425, and 5-453 | **Fresh.** Current transition/savings text. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S005** | Repealed Kansas arbitration act, historical sections — Kansas Legislature archive https://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0008_section/005_004_0008_k/ https://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0009_section/005_004_0009_k/ https://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0011_section/005_004_0011_k/ https://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0012_section/005_004_0012_k/ https://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0013_section/005_004_0013_k/ https://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0014_section/005_004_0014_k/ https://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0018_section/005_004_0018_k/ | Award delivery; 20-day correction; confirmation; 90-day vacatur/modification; judgment; appeal | **Fresh historical read.** Repealed July 1, 2018, but preserved for applicable older agreements/proceedings. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S006** | Kansas postjudgment and appeal rules — Kansas Revisor https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_002_0000_article/060_002_0059_section/060_002_0059_k/ https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_002_0000_article/060_002_0060_section/060_002_0060_k/ https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_002_0000_article/060_002_0062_section/060_002_0062_k/ https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_021_0000_article/060_021_0003_section/060_021_0003_k/ https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_002_0000_article/060_002_0006_section/060_002_0006_k/ | K.S.A. 60-259, 60-260, 60-262, 60-2103, and 60-206 | **Fresh.** Only necessary judgment/stay/appeal boundary read. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S007** | *Swope Lees Commercial Real Estate v. Slaten/Clareview* — Kansas Court of Appeals opinion reproduction https://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2025/127043.html | Syllabus; facts and posture; standing/jurisdiction; constrained review; manifest disregard and positive-mandate discussion | **Fresh selected read.** Published Oct. 17, 2025. Public reproduction of court opinion; no complete commercial citator. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S008** | *MBNA America Bank v. Credit* — Kansas Supreme Court https://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/supreme-court/2006/94380.html | Credit-card award; receipt/agreement; preserved objection; FAA record discussion | **Fresh selected read.** Published 2006; old-act and old-administrator setting. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S009** | *Griffith v. McGovern* — Kansas Court of Appeals https://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2006/94513.html | Presumption, old-act fraud/manifest-disregard discussion, legal-error boundary | **Fresh selected read.** Published 2006; historical statute. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S010** | *Alexander v. Everhart* — Kansas Court of Appeals https://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2000/82368.html | Correction request and preservation of judicial objections | **Fresh selected read.** Old-act case; no tolling holding. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S011** | *Missouri Bank & Trust v. Gas-Mart Development* — Kansas Court of Appeals https://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2006/93662.html | Assignee confirmation and assignment proof | **Fresh selected read.** Published old-act case; commercial context. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S012** | Federal Arbitration Act §§6, 9–13, 16 — Office of Law Revision Counsel https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s6/ https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s9/ https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s10/ https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s11/ https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s12/ https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s13/ https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s16/ | Complete material postaward provisions | **Fresh.** OLRC stated currency through Public Law 119-120, Oct. 7, 2026. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S013** | *Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties* — U.S. Supreme Court official PDF https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-83_3e04.pdf | Syllabus PDF index 0/printed 1; opinion PDF index 4/printed 1; retained-jurisdiction discussion PDF index 9/printed 6 | **Fresh PDF read and screenshots.** Decided May 14, 2026. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S014** | *Badgerow v. Walters* — U.S. Supreme Court official PDF https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf | Syllabus PDF index 2/printed 3; opinion PDF index 6/printed 4 | **Fresh PDF read and screenshots.** Decided 2022. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S015** | *KCOM v. EMC* — Tenth Circuit official PDF https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/01019659058.pdf | State-law versus FAA confirmation and §16 appeal; PDF index 11/printed page 12 visually inspected | **Fresh selected PDF read.** Published July 19, 2016. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S016** | *Abbott v. Law Office of Patrick Mulligan* — Tenth Circuit official PDF https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/01018716524.pdf | FAA exclusivity, manifest-disregard uncertainty, legal-error and public-policy discussion; PDF index 8/printed 9 visually inspected | **Fresh selected PDF read.** Published 2011. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S017** | *Mid Atlantic Capital v. Bien* — Tenth Circuit official PDF https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/010110333308.pdf | FAA §11(a) face-of-award rule; printed pages 11–32 and burden at printed 44–45 | **Fresh parsed PDF read.** Published Apr. 14, 2020. Screenshot attempt on later page partly failed; operative parsed text available. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S018** | *Hall Street Associates v. Mattel* — U.S. Supreme Court https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/552/576/ | FAA §§10–11 exclusivity and no contractual expansion | **Fresh selected read.** Court-opinion reproduction. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S019** | *Pfannenstiel v. Merrill Lynch* — Tenth Circuit https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/477/1155/606552/ | FAA §12 service period and rejected tolling claim | **Fresh selected read.** Published 2007. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S020** | AAA Consumer Arbitration Rules, amended May 1, 2025 https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf | PDF indices 23–25 / printed 24–26: Rules 43–49 and 51 | **Fresh PDF read and screenshots.** Private administrator rules; actual incorporation and eligibility unknown. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S021** | JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration | Rules 24, 25, and 28 | **Fresh HTML read.** Effective June 1, 2021; private rules. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S022** | Federal Rules of Civil Procedure — U.S. Courts https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf | Rule 62 at PDF index 104 / printed page 86 | **Fresh PDF read and screenshot.** Rules amended through Dec. 1, 2025. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S023** | Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure — U.S. Courts https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-appellate-procedure | Rule 4 current-rules page and official linked rules | **Fresh public-page check.** Current rules last amended in 2025. |\n| **S_KS-P18-S024** | Kansas forms indexes https://self-help.kscourts.gov/FindCourtForms https://www.kjc.ks.gov/legal-forms/chapter-60-civil-actions | Bounded search for arbitration confirmation/vacatur form | **Fresh bounded search.** No dedicated statewide form located; not proof no local form exists. |\n\n# O. PASS-18 claim register\n\n| Claim ID | Precise assertion | Source/pinpoint | Predicates, consequence, and confidence |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **S_KS-P18-C001** | Current Kansas act governs arbitration agreements made on or after July 1, 2018. | S004, K.S.A. 5-425(a) | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C002** | Pre-July 2018 agreement uses current act only if all parties agree in a record; otherwise old act remains through savings law. | S004–S005 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C003** | Current award must be in a record and signed or authenticated by a concurring arbitrator. | S001, §5-441(a) | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C004** | Panel powers are exercised by a majority, while all arbitrators conduct the hearing. | S001, §5-435 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C005** | Kansas statute does not itself require a reasoned award. | S001, complete §5-441 | **High bounded reading.** Agreement/rules may require more. |\n| **S_KS-P18-C006** | Award notice must include a copy and be given to every arbitration party. | S001, §5-441(a) | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C007** | Current Kansas timing is based on receipt of notice, not merely signature or upload date. | S001, S004 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C008** | Award-timeliness objection is waived unless raised before award notice is received. | S001, §5-441(b) | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C009** | Arbitrator correction or clarification motion is due within 20 days after receipt; objections within 10 days. | S001, §5-442 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C010** | Arbitrator correction does not authorize merits redetermination. | S001; S020–S021 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C011** | Corrected-award notice supplies an express new 90-day judicial trigger. | S002, §§5-445(b), 5-446(a) | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C012** | Pending correction request does not expressly toll original 90-day court period. | S001–S002 | **High bounded reading.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C013** | Kansas confirmation is mandatory unless award is vacated, modified, or corrected. | S002, §5-444 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C014** | Current K.S.A. 5-444 contains no express outer confirmation filing period. | S002 | **High textual finding; outside limitations/laches held.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C015** | Confirmation can be sought before the 90-day challenge period expires. | S002; S007 | **High textual/practical conclusion.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C016** | Early confirmation filing does not textually extinguish a later timely vacatur or modification motion. | S002; S007 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C017** | Freestanding Kansas confirmation motion is served like summons if no action is pending. | S004, K.S.A. 5-427 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C018** | Pending-case confirmation is served as a motion in that case. | S004, §5-427 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C019** | Kansas court must have jurisdiction over the controversy and parties. | S003, §5-448(a) | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C020** | Kansas arbitration situs clause confers exclusive Kansas-court award-judgment jurisdiction. | S003, §5-448(b) | **High, subject to validity of clause and jurisdictional predicates.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C021** | Venue follows designated/hearing county or adverse-party residence/business branches. | S003, §5-449 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C022** | A participant in arbitration can seek current-act confirmation. | S007 | **High published KCOA holding.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C023** | Nonparticipant assignee must prove succession or assignment of award rights. | S011 and ordinary assignment principles | **High conditional rule.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C024** | Generic debt-sale evidence does not automatically prove assignment of an award or confirmation right. | S011 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C025** | Ordinary Kansas vacatur motion is due within 90 days after receipt of award or corrected award. | S002, §5-445(b) | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C026** | Fraud/corruption/undue-means motion runs 90 days from known or reasonably discoverable ground. | S002, §5-445(b) | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C027** | No-agreement vacatur ground is lost by participation without objection by beginning of hearing. | S002, §5-445(a)(5) | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C028** | Hearing misconduct grounds require materiality or sufficient cause and substantial prejudice. | S002, §5-445(a)(3) | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C029** | Ordinary legal or factual error is not a listed vacatur ground. | S002, S007–S009 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C030** | Published 2025 Kansas authority recognizes a very narrow manifest-disregard theory. | S007 | **High as current published KCOA authority; Kansas Supreme Court/full citator gap.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C031** | Manifest disregard requires awareness of clearly governing law plus conscious refusal to apply it. | S007 | **High within cited decision.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C032** | Old *Griffith* fraud burden and process distinction are version-limited. | S009 | **High source limitation.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C033** | Court modification is limited to evident mathematics/descriptions, severable unsubmitted claims, and nonmerits form defects. | S002, §5-446 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C034** | Kansas modification motion is due within 90 days after receipt of original or corrected award. | S002, §5-446(a) | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C035** | Kansas correction statute does not expressly adopt FAA’s face-of-award limitation. | S002 | **High textual distinction.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C036** | FAA §11(a) miscalculation must appear on the award’s face in the Tenth Circuit. | S017 | **High published holding.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C037** | Court can order rehearing after most vacatur grounds but not no-agreement ground. | S002, §5-445(c) | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C038** | Award is not executable civil judgment until court enters conforming judgment. | S003, §5-447 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C039** | Kansas judgment may be docketed and enforced like another civil judgment. | S003, §5-447(a) | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C040** | Contested postaward prevailing party may receive reasonable judicial fees and expenses. | S003, §5-447(c) | **High; discretionary and postaward only.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C041** | Kansas judgment enforcement is ordinarily stayed 14 days after entry. | S006, §60-262 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C042** | Appeal or challenge does not create an indefinite Kansas enforcement stay without order/security. | S006 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C043** | Kansas confirmation, denial, modification/correction, vacatur without rehearing, and final judgment have express appeal routes. | S003, §5-450 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C044** | Kansas civil appeal ordinarily is due within 30 days after entry. | S006, §60-2103 | **High, subject to tolling/extension.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C045** | Timely K.S.A. 60-259 motion can reset appeal period; K.S.A. 60-260 is not listed as automatic reset. | S006 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C046** | FAA §9 confirmation requires agreed judgment entry and application within one year. | S012, §9 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C047** | Tenth Circuit treats state-law confirmation as distinct from FAA §9. | S015 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C048** | FAA §12 requires service of vacate/modify/correct notice within three months. | S012, §12 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C049** | FAA §12 tolling is not automatic; lack of diligence defeated tolling in *Pfannenstiel*. | S019 | **High case-specific holding.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C050** | FAA §§10–11 are exclusive expedited statutory review grounds. | S018 | **High SCOTUS holding.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C051** | Tenth Circuit has not conclusively recognized manifest disregard as independent post-*Hall Street* ground. | S016 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C052** | FAA §13 specifies filing of agreement, award, and related record. | S012, §13 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C053** | FAA alone supplies no federal subject-matter jurisdiction. | S014 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C054** | Freestanding §§9–10 application cannot use §4 look-through under *Badgerow*. | S014 | **High SCOTUS holding.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C055** | Federal court retaining an originally jurisdictional §3-stayed case has postaward jurisdiction under *Jules*. | S013 | **High current SCOTUS holding.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C056** | Federal judgment enforcement is ordinarily stayed 30 days under Rule 62. | S022 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C057** | Federal longer stay requires approved bond, security, or order. | S022 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C058** | FAA §16 supplies federal appeal routes from confirmation, vacatur, modification, and final decisions. | S012, §16 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C059** | Federal civil notice of appeal ordinarily uses 30-day or specified 60-day branch. | S023 | **High, subject to FRAP 4 details.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C060** | Private administrator correction periods do not automatically alter statutory court periods. | S001–S002, S020–S021 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C061** | AAA/JAMS rule applicability requires actual incorporation, version, and administration facts. | S020–S021 | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C062** | Payment or settlement does not authorize double recovery or automatically create court satisfaction. | S003 and general judgment principles | **High boundary; satisfaction procedure later.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C063** | No dedicated statewide Kansas arbitration-award motion form was located in bounded official search. | S024 | **Bounded negative finding only.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C064** | Actual receipt, agreement, award, assignment, court, service, and payment records remain necessary for case-specific result. | Entire component | **High.** |\n| **S_KS-P18-C065** | PASS-18 supplies no award, judgment, collection, provider, or operational approval. | Scope | **High project-status statement.** |\n\n# P. Granular coverage and remaining gaps\n\n| Assigned issue | Status | Claims | Exact missing evidence or next action |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Current Kansas act/version | **Answered** | C001–C002 | Actual agreement date and opt-in record |\n| Pre-2018 transition | **Answered** | C002 | Actual old agreement/proceeding |\n| Award record/authentication | **Answered** | C003 | Actual award |\n| Panel majority | **Answered** | C004 | Panel composition |\n| Statutory reasons requirement | **Answered—none** | C005 | Contract/admin rule can add requirement |\n| Award notice and copy | **Answered** | C006–C007 | Actual transmission/receipt |\n| Award timing objection | **Answered** | C008 | Actual pre-receipt objection |\n| Interim/partial award | **Partial** | — | Actual award finality and incorporated ruling |\n| Consent award | **Answered generally** | C060–C061 | Actual administrator/agreement/request |\n| Private settlement | **Answered as distinct** | C062 | Actual settlement terms |\n| Arbitrator correction grounds | **Answered** | C009–C012 | Actual error/request |\n| Arbitrator correction ruling deadline | **No Kansas statutory deadline identified** | C009–C012 | Agreement/admin rules |\n| Court-clock tolling from correction | **No express tolling** | C012 | Later controlling case if any |\n| Kansas confirmation duty | **Answered** | C013 | All statutory predicates |\n| Kansas confirmation outer limit | **Unresolved beyond no express §5-444 period** | C014 | General limitations/laches authority |\n| Early confirmation | **Answered conditionally** | C015–C016 | Actual motions/order |\n| Confirmation standing/party | **Answered for participant** | C022 | Nonparticipant succession |\n| Assignee confirmation | **Partial** | C023–C024 | Actual assignment/account link |\n| Kansas jurisdiction | **Answered** | C019–C020 | Actual personal/subject jurisdiction |\n| Kansas venue | **Answered** | C021 | Hearing and party locations |\n| Freestanding Kansas service | **Answered** | C017 | Actual summons-equivalent service |\n| Pending-case service | **Answered** | C018 | Actual case/order |\n| Vacatur grounds | **Answered** | C025–C029 | Actual evidence |\n| Fraud discovery exception | **Answered textually** | C026 | Knowledge/diligence/procurement proof |\n| Current fraud burden | **Unresolved precisely** | C032 | Current-act controlling case |\n| Partiality/corruption | **Answered at statute level** | C025 | Actual disclosures/relationships |\n| Hearing misconduct | **Answered** | C028 | Materiality and prejudice |\n| Exceeded powers | **Answered generally** | C029 | Agreement/submission/award |\n| No-agreement preservation | **Answered** | C027 | Hearing objection and prior orders |\n| Manifest disregard — Kansas | **Answered through current KCOA** | C030–C031 | Kansas Supreme Court/full citator |\n| Manifest disregard — FAA | **Unresolved as independent Tenth ground** | C051 | Later controlling authority |\n| Public-policy/positive mandate | **Partial/narrow** | C030–C031 | Exact current authority and facts |\n| Modification grounds | **Answered** | C033–C036 | Actual award defect |\n| Kansas face-of-award rule | **Not established by text** | C035 | Current Kansas appellate construction |\n| Federal face-of-award rule | **Answered** | C036 | FAA route required |\n| Rehearing | **Answered** | C037 | Actual ground/order |\n| Resulting judgment | **Answered** | C038–C040 | Actual confirmation/vacatur order |\n| Postaward judicial fees | **Answered as discretionary** | C040 | Prevailing party and reasonableness |\n| Kansas 14-day stay | **Answered** | C041 | Court can order otherwise |\n| Stay pending Kansas appeal | **Answered as nonautomatic** | C042 | Bond/security/order |\n| Kansas immediate appeals | **Answered** | C043–C045 | Actual order and postjudgment motions |\n| Vacatur-with-rehearing appeal | **Not expressly listed** | C043 | Finality/other route |\n| FAA §9 one-year route | **Answered** | C046–C047 | Actual FAA basis/agreement |\n| FAA §12 three-month service | **Answered** | C048–C049 | Actual delivery/service |\n| FAA exclusive grounds | **Answered** | C050–C051 | Actual federal route |\n| FAA §13 record | **Answered** | C052 | Actual documents |\n| Freestanding federal jurisdiction | **Answered** | C053–C054 | Diversity/federal question |\n| Retained federal jurisdiction | **Answered under 2026 *Jules*** | C055 | Existing stayed action |\n| Federal 30-day stay | **Answered** | C056–C057 | Court can order otherwise |\n| Federal appeal | **Answered generally** | C058–C059 | Actual order and FRAP tolling |\n| Paid award | **Partial** | C062 | Actual payment/interest/costs |\n| Judgment satisfaction | **Excluded/later** | C062 | Kansas satisfaction procedure |\n| Judgment interest/dormancy/renewal | **Excluded** | — | Separate postjudgment pass |\n| Liens/garnishment/exemptions | **Excluded** | — | Separate enforcement passes |\n| Award merits/underlying debt | **Excluded** | — | Actual arbitration record and claim law |\n| AAA current award rules | **Answered as private rules** | C060–C061 | Actual incorporation/version |\n| JAMS current award rules | **Answered as private rules** | C060–C061 | Actual incorporation/version |\n| Administrator fees | **Held** | — | Actual case/rules/fee schedule |\n| Official Kansas motion form | **Not located in bounded search** | C063 | Local form or clerk instructions |\n| Full local/tribal/country law | **Excluded** | — | Separate jurisdictional review |\n| Complete case citator | **Not performed** | C030–C032, C051 | Commercial/unpublished citator |\n| Actual party/award/case | **Not reviewed** | C064–C065 | Authorized public record required |\n| Component/state/parent/A066 acceptance | **Not evaluated** | C065 | No acceptance follows |\n\n# Q. Researcher self-check\n\n## Actually read or inspected in PASS-18\n\n- Current K.S.A. 5-424, 5-425, 5-435, 5-440 through 5-450, and 5-453.\n- Historical K.S.A. 5-408, 5-409, 5-411 through 5-414, and 5-418.\n- Current K.S.A. 60-206, 60-259, 60-260, 60-262, and 60-2103.\n- FAA §§6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 16.\n- Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62.\n- The current AAA Consumer Arbitration Rules pages governing majority action, award time and form, interim and consent awards, delivery, modification, and court applications.\n- JAMS Comprehensive Rules 24, 25, and 28.\n- Material holdings from:*Swope Lees Commercial Real Estate v. Slaten/Clareview*.*MBNA America Bank v. Credit*.*Griffith v. McGovern*.*Alexander v. Everhart*.*Missouri Bank & Trust v. Gas-Mart*.*Badgerow v. Walters*.*Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties*.*KCOM v. EMC*.*Hall Street v. Mattel*.*Abbott v. Law Office of Patrick Mulligan*.*Mid Atlantic Capital v. Bien*.*Pfannenstiel v. Merrill Lynch*.\n- Relevant pages of the official Supreme Court, Tenth Circuit, AAA, and federal-rule PDFs were visually inspected where available.\n\n## Material currentness findings\n\n- The current Kansas act remains the 2018 framework for post-July 1, 2018 agreements.\n- No future-effective Kansas amendment changing the current confirmation, vacatur, or modification provisions was located.\n- *Swope Lees* is a published October 17, 2025 Kansas Court of Appeals decision applying the current act.\n- *Jules* is a May 14, 2026 Supreme Court decision establishing retained federal jurisdiction in an existing §3-stayed case.\n- AAA’s public Consumer Arbitration Rules are amended and effective May 1, 2025.\n- The current federal civil rules reflect amendments through December 1, 2025.\n\n## Access and research limits\n\n- Some official Kansas Courts opinion pages and forms pages were inaccessible or returned incomplete search results; readable reproductions of actual opinions were used where disclosed.\n- No dedicated statewide Kansas arbitration-confirmation or vacatur form was located in the bounded official search. That is not proof that no local form, standing order, or clerk instruction exists.\n- No subscription citator, paid docket service, private arbitration database, provider record, party record, award, or contract was accessed.\n- A complete subsequent-history audit was not performed for every older case.\n- No complete survey of Kansas local district-court rules was performed.\n- No private AAA or JAMS case record, registration status, fee invoice, or award-delivery log was accessed.\n\n## Not established\n\n- The applicable arbitration statute for any actual agreement.\n- Formation or validity of an actual arbitration clause.\n- The arbitrator’s authority or scope.\n- Authenticity or receipt of any award.\n- Whether an award is final, partial, interim, consent, satisfied, or assigned.\n- Whether corruption, fraud, partiality, misconduct, excess of powers, manifest disregard, or another ground exists.\n- Whether any actual Kansas or federal court has jurisdiction.\n- Whether a motion is timely.\n- Whether a judgment has been entered or stayed.\n- Whether an award or judgment has been paid or satisfied.\n- Any individual filing, opposition, appeal, stay, bond, or enforcement deadline.\n\n## Numeric self-check\n\nThe arithmetic correction example was independently checked:\n\nPlain text\n```\n$4,000 + $300 + $200 − $500 = $4,000\n```\n\nA stated total of $4,500 differs by $500. That numeric result establishes only a mathematical discrepancy. It does not establish that the underlying interest, costs, or credit components were authorized, correctly determined, or within the arbitrator’s powers.\n\n## Method limits\n\n- An award was not treated as a judgment.\n- A signed award was not treated as proof of proper delivery.\n- An upload date was not treated as automatic receipt.\n- A correction request was not treated as automatic tolling.\n- A confirmation motion was not treated as asset-seizure authority.\n- Early confirmation was not treated as destruction of a timely challenge period.\n- Ordinary legal error was not treated as vacatur.\n- Fraud discovery was not treated as a generic newly discovered evidence exception.\n- Modification was not used to rewrite merits.\n- Kansas’s current manifest-disregard authority was not imported automatically into FAA review.\n- FAA jurisdiction was not inferred from interstate commerce or from the underlying federal claim.\n- *Jules* retained jurisdiction was not extended to freestanding federal petitions.\n- An assignment of debt was not treated as automatic assignment of an award or judgment.\n- A private settlement was not treated as a consent award or court satisfaction.\n- Filing an appeal was not treated as an automatic indefinite stay.\n- No award validity, confirmation entitlement, vacatur entitlement, judgment, collection right, provider approval, operational clearance, component acceptance, Kansas acceptance, parent-dossier acceptance, A066 acceptance, or publication readiness is supplied.\n\n## PASS-18 conclusion\n\nKansas’s current award-to-judgment process is narrow and highly event-driven. The award must be an authenticated record and must be delivered with notice. Receipt starts short, separate windows: 20 days for arbitrator correction and 90 days for judicial vacatur or modification, with a distinct fraud-discovery trigger. Confirmation itself is mandatory once the statutory predicates are met and no qualifying challenge succeeds, but the current Kansas statute supplies no express outer confirmation period.\n\nJudicial review is not an appeal on the merits. Vacatur addresses corruption, partiality, prejudicial hearing defects, excess of powers, absence of agreement where preserved, and defective initiation notice. Modification addresses evident mathematics, descriptions, separable unsubmitted claims, and form—not a judge’s disagreement with the arbitrator’s result. Kansas’s current published manifest-disregard authority is exceptionally narrow and remains subject to later Kansas Supreme Court or citator developments.\n\nThe federal route is separate. FAA §9’s one-year confirmation path, §12’s three-month service requirement, §§10–11’s exclusive expedited grounds, and §13’s record package apply only when the FAA route and federal jurisdiction are established. *Badgerow* bars look-through jurisdiction for a new postaward federal case, while the 2026 *Jules* decision preserves jurisdiction in the same federal action that was originally jurisdictional and stayed for arbitration.\n\nOnly after the court enters judgment does ordinary judgment enforcement begin, subject to the applicable automatic stay, any bond or security, appellate orders, payment credits, and later satisfaction and enforcement law.\n\n**END S_KS PASS-18.**\n\n","tables":[{"headers":["Agreement or proceeding","Governing Kansas arbitration law","Necessary evidence","Resulting hold"],"index":0,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Agreement or proceeding","Governing Kansas arbitration law","Necessary evidence","Resulting hold"],["Agreement made on or after July 1, 2018","Current K.S.A. 5-423 through 5-453","Actual agreement date and version","Current award, correction, confirmation, and challenge provisions ordinarily apply"],["Agreement made before July 1, 2018, with all parties later agreeing in a record to current act","Current act","Actual recorded agreement by all parties","Current act applies only if the statutory opt-in is proved"],["Agreement made before July 1, 2018, without recorded opt-in","Repealed K.S.A. 5-401 et seq., preserved by transition/savings law","Agreement date and absence of current-act opt-in","Old award delivery and challenge provisions govern, subject to applicable FAA questions"],["Arbitration began under old act before repeal","Savings provision preserves accrued rights and proceedings","Procedural history","Cannot assume current act displaced all prior proceedings"],["FAA-covered arbitration","FAA substantive and, where properly invoked, procedural provisions","Written clause, commerce nexus, actual federal or state route","Does not displace Kansas procedure automatically in every state-court proceeding"],["State-law confirmation only","Kansas act","Kansas jurisdiction, venue, service, award, party status","FAA one-year and §16 routes do not automatically attach merely because the original contract involved commerce"]]},{"headers":["Feature","Current Kansas statute","AAA Consumer Rules, effective May 1, 2025","JAMS Comprehensive Rules, effective June 1, 2021"],"index":1,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Feature","Current Kansas statute","AAA Consumer Rules, effective May 1, 2025","JAMS Comprehensive Rules, effective June 1, 2021"],["Record/writing","Award must be in a record","Award must be written","Award must be a written statement"],["Signature/authentication","Signed or otherwise authenticated by a concurring arbitrator","Signed by majority; electronic/digital signatures allowed","Signed by arbitrator"],["Multiple arbitrators","Majority exercises powers; all conduct hearing","Majority decides and signs final award","Actual panel/agreement controls; Rule 24 applies to award"],["Reasons required","No statutory reasons requirement","Brief written explanation unless all agree otherwise","Concise reasons unless all agree otherwise"],["Award deadline","Agreement or court-set time; extendable","Normally 30 days after hearing closes; 14 days for document-only proceeding, subject to stated extension","Normally 30 days after hearing closes or receipt of materials, subject to agreement or good cause"],["Interim or partial award","Current act does not label every interim ruling confirmable; K.S.A. 5-440 addresses incorporated pre-award rulings","Interim, interlocutory, and partial rulings or awards allowed","Partial Final Awards allowed"],["Consent award","Possible if the arbitrator issues an award satisfying governing law","Settlement may be embodied in consent award on request","Settlement may be embodied in consent award unless unlawful or undermining integrity"],["Delivery","Arbitrator/organization gives notice including a copy to each party","Same communication method used in case, including electronic, or method allowed by law","Service on parties; mail permitted"],["Correction","20 days after receipt; 10 days for objection","20 days after transmittal; 10-day response; no merits redetermination","7-day request; 7-day response; 21-day correction; finality rule in JAMS text"]]},{"headers":["Event","Kansas consequence"],"index":2,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Event","Kansas consequence"],["Party receives original award notice on D0","20-day arbitrator-correction clock and 90-day court vacatur/modification clocks begin"],["Correction request filed on D0 + 15","Timely arbitrator request; original 90-day court clock is not expressly suspended"],["Arbitrator issues a corrected award","Receipt of corrected-award notice supplies an express new 90-day trigger under §§5-445 and 5-446"],["Arbitrator denies correction or issues no corrected award","Statute does not expressly replace the original 90-day trigger"],["Parties negotiate after award","No express tolling"],["Administrator reviews a complaint","No express tolling"],["Confirmation motion filed while correction request is pending","Court can remit under §5-442(d) and coordinate the pending motions"],["Court challenge filed while correction request is pending","Filing protects the court route; court may remit"],["Missing receipt evidence","Exact deadline held"]]},{"headers":["Issue","Current Kansas rule"],"index":3,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Issue","Current Kansas rule"],["Court","Court of competent jurisdiction in Kansas"],["Subject and personal jurisdiction","Court must have jurisdiction over the controversy and parties"],["Kansas-hearing agreement","An arbitration agreement providing for arbitration in Kansas confers exclusive Kansas-court jurisdiction to enter judgment on the award"],["Venue","County designated for hearing or where hearing occurred; otherwise county where adverse party resides or has business; if none in Kansas, any county"],["Later motions","Subsequent motions ordinarily stay in the court hearing the initial motion"],["Freestanding proceeding","Initial judicial motion served like a civil summons"],["Existing court case","Motion served under ordinary motion-service rules in that case"]]},{"headers":["Proposition","Likely supporting evidence"],"index":4,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Proposition","Likely supporting evidence"],["Applicable act","Agreement date; current-act opt-in if pre-2018"],["Movant’s status","Arbitration caption; award; assignment or succession documents if applicable"],["Agreement and court authority","Arbitration clause; Kansas-hearing provision; jurisdiction and venue facts"],["Award authenticity","Signed/authenticated award"],["Award delivery","Administrator transmittal and receipt evidence"],["Finality/correction","Original award; correction requests; corrected award; administrator status"],["Amount or relief","Award’s operative terms"],["Service","Summons-equivalent or motion-service proof"],["Challenge status","Any pending vacatur or modification motion"],["Satisfaction or settlement","Payment records, release, settlement, or consent award where asserted"]]},{"headers":["K.S.A. 5-445 ground","Required showing","Material limits"],"index":5,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["K.S.A. 5-445 ground","Required showing","Material limits"],["Corruption, fraud, or undue means","Award was procured through the misconduct","90 days from actual or constructive discovery"],["Neutral-arbitrator evident partiality","Facts supporting evident partiality","Not mere dissatisfaction with adverse rulings"],["Arbitrator corruption","Corrupt conduct","Requires actual proof"],["Arbitrator misconduct prejudicing rights","Misconduct plus prejudice","Harmless procedural irregularity is insufficient"],["Refusal to postpone","Sufficient cause was shown; refusal substantially prejudiced rights","Arbitrator has scheduling discretion"],["Refusal to consider evidence","Evidence was material; refusal substantially prejudiced rights","Arbitrator need not admit every offered item"],["Hearing contrary to K.S.A. 5-437","Statutory hearing defect plus substantial prejudice","Technical nonprejudicial deviation insufficient"],["Exceeded powers","Arbitrator decided beyond contractual or submitted authority","Serious interpretation error is ordinarily not enough if arbitrator arguably interpreted the agreement"],["No arbitration agreement","No agreement existed","Lost if person participated without raising objection by beginning of hearing"],["Improper initiation notice","K.S.A. 5-431 notice defect plus substantial prejudice","Actual prejudice required"]]},{"headers":["Vacatur ground","Rehearing arbitrator"],"index":6,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Vacatur ground","Rehearing arbitrator"],["Corruption, fraud, undue means","New arbitrator"],["Neutral partiality or arbitrator corruption","New arbitrator"],["Hearing misconduct, excess of powers, or improper initiation notice","Same arbitrator or successor"],["No arbitration agreement","No rehearing authority under this branch"]]},{"headers":["Claimed defect","Correctable?","Reason"],"index":7,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claimed defect","Correctable?","Reason"],["4,000 + 300 + 200 − 500 shown as $4,500","Potentially yes","Evident mathematical miscalculation"],["Consumer’s name misspelled while identity is clear","Potentially yes","Evident description or form issue"],["Award includes relief on a claim never submitted, severable from others","Potentially yes","Express statutory ground"],["Award omits final disposition of a submitted claim","Arbitrator clarification/correction route may apply","K.S.A. 5-442(a)(2)"],["Court believes interest rate should be lower","Ordinarily no","Merits/legal decision, not arithmetic"],["Court thinks witness was incredible","No","Merits factfinding"],["Court thinks arbitrator misconstrued contract","No, absent distinct vacatur ground","Ordinary legal error"],["Court recalculates damages by examining hearing exhibits","Generally not a simple correction","Risks rewriting merits"],["Award is unclear about payment recipient","Clarification may be available","Depends on whether clarification changes merits"]]},{"headers":["Application","Filing or notice period","Trigger","Available order"],"index":8,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Application","Filing or notice period","Trigger","Available order"],["Arbitrator correction/clarification","20 days","D0","Correct, clarify, or complete final award"],["Objection to arbitrator correction","10 days","Receipt of correction request notice","Written objection"],["Kansas vacatur, ordinary grounds","90 days","D0 or DC","Vacate; potentially rehearing"],["Kansas vacatur, fraud/corruption/undue means","90 days","DF","Vacate; new arbitrator if rehearing"],["Kansas judicial modification/correction","90 days","D0 or DC","Modify/correct and confirm"],["Kansas confirmation","No express outer period in §5-444","After receipt","Confirm unless corrected, modified, or vacated"],["Appeal from confirm/deny confirmation","Ordinarily 30 days under civil appeal statute","Entry of appealable order/judgment","Appellate review"],["K.S.A. 60-259 motion","28 days","Entry of judgment","Can reset appeal time"],["K.S.A. 60-260 motion","Statutory ground-specific periods","Judgment/order","Does not automatically suspend judgment or reset ordinary appeal time"],["Automatic judgment-enforcement stay","14 days","Entry of Kansas judgment","Temporary stay"],["Stay pending appeal","Court order/security","Application and approval","Enforcement stayed on terms"]]},{"headers":["FAA provision","Operative function","Material condition"],"index":9,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["FAA provision","Operative function","Material condition"],["§6","Postaward applications are heard as motions","Unless FAA expressly provides otherwise"],["§9","Confirmation within one year after award is made","Parties agreed judgment may be entered; court and jurisdiction requirements met"],["§10","Vacatur grounds","Corruption/fraud; partiality/corruption; prejudicial misconduct; exceeded powers or no mutual final definite award"],["§11","Modification/correction","Evident material math/description error; unsubmitted matter; form imperfection"],["§12","Notice of vacate/modify/correct motion served within three months","Service method depends on residence/district status"],["§13","Confirmation record package","Agreement, appointments/extensions, award, notices, affidavits, and court orders"],["§16","Immediate appeal routes","Distinguishes appealable postaward orders from barred interlocutory arbitration orders"]]},{"headers":["Event","Legal status"],"index":10,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Event","Legal status"],["Award issued but unpaid","Arbitration obligation; not yet ordinary court judgment"],["Award voluntarily paid before confirmation","Payment can satisfy the award; confirmation necessity and residual issues depend on proof and dispute"],["Parties privately settle after award","Settlement contract; does not automatically erase award or create judgment"],["Arbitrator enters consent award","Arbitration award that can potentially be confirmed"],["Court confirms award","Civil judgment entered"],["Judgment paid","Satisfaction procedure becomes relevant; later separate component"],["Partial payment","Reduces amount if properly credited; does not automatically satisfy award or judgment"],["Award creditor seeks full confirmation after full payment","Satisfaction, mootness, release, and double-recovery issues arise"],["Confirmation judgment entered despite prior payment","Payment must be accounted for; court judgment does not authorize double collection"]]},{"headers":["Order","Immediate Kansas appeal under K.S.A. 5-450?","Notes"],"index":11,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Order","Immediate Kansas appeal under K.S.A. 5-450?","Notes"],["Denial of confirmation","Yes","Expressly listed"],["Confirmation order","Yes","Expressly listed"],["Modification or correction order","Yes","Expressly listed"],["Vacatur without rehearing","Yes","Expressly listed"],["Vacatur with rehearing","Not expressly listed in that branch","Finality and another appellate route require analysis"],["Denial of vacatur plus confirmation","Confirmation/final judgment supplies appeal route","Actual order structure controls"],["Final judgment under act","Yes","Expressly listed"],["Mere administrator correction decision","No statutory court appeal","Must reach court through applicable motion"],["Private settlement","No award appeal by itself","Contract enforcement questions differ"]]},{"headers":["Authority","Court, date, and posture","Material holding for PASS-18","Limits"],"index":12,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Authority","Court, date, and posture","Material holding for PASS-18","Limits"],["Swope Lees Commercial Real Estate v. Slaten/Clareview","Published Kansas Court of Appeals, Oct. 17, 2025; confirmation/vacatur and postjudgment appeal","Current act; narrow review; participant standing; manifest-disregard theory narrowly framed; Chapter 60 cannot become a merits end-run","No Kansas Supreme Court current-act review located; commercial lease dispute"],["MBNA America Bank v. Credit","Kansas Supreme Court, 2006; credit-card award under old act/FAA","Receipt and agreement evidence matter; preserved no-agreement objection; FAA record requirements","Old act, old NAF record; not current statutory delivery rule"],["Griffith v. McGovern","Published Kansas Court of Appeals, 2006; old-act confirmation/vacatur","Strong presumption; ordinary fact/law error insufficient; old-act fraud and manifest-disregard discussion","Old act; current exact fraud burden not separately established"],["Alexander v. Everhart","Kansas Court of Appeals, 2000; old act","Correction request did not waive separately preserved judicial objection","Does not hold that correction request tolls court deadline"],["Missouri Bank & Trust v. Gas-Mart","Published Kansas Court of Appeals, 2006","Actual assignee could pursue confirmation based on proven assignment","Old act; no automatic debt-buyer succession rule"],["Badgerow v. Walters","U.S. Supreme Court, 2022","No look-through for freestanding FAA §§9–10 applications","Does not govern retained jurisdiction in an existing stayed case"],["Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties","U.S. Supreme Court, May 14, 2026","Federal court retaining §3-stayed case retains postaward jurisdiction","Requires original jurisdiction and same pending action"],["KCOM v. EMC","Published Tenth Circuit, 2016","State-law confirmation does not automatically become FAA §9; §16 route depends on actual legal basis","Valuation-arbitration setting"],["Hall Street v. Mattel","U.S. Supreme Court, 2008","FAA §§10–11 are exclusive expedited statutory grounds","State-law review routes remain distinct"],["Abbott v. Law Office of Patrick Mulligan","Published Tenth Circuit, 2011","Ordinary legal error insufficient; post-Hall Street manifest-disregard status not resolved as independent ground","Federal FAA case"],["Mid Atlantic Capital v. Bien","Published Tenth Circuit, 2020","FAA §11(a) miscalculation must appear on face of award","Federal §11 rule, not automatically Kansas §5-446 rule"],["Pfannenstiel v. Merrill Lynch","Published Tenth Circuit, 2007","FAA §12 three-month service condition strictly applied; tolling denied on facts","Does not categorically foreclose all equitable-tolling arguments"]]},{"headers":["Actor or stage","Required evidence or predicate","Burden or decision","Available order","Consequence/gap"],"index":13,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Actor or stage","Required evidence or predicate","Burden or decision","Available order","Consequence/gap"],["Arbitrator issuing award","Submission, authority, record, authentication, timing","Arbitrator","Award","Reasons depend on agreement/rules"],["Panel award","Majority concurrence; all heard proceeding","Majority exercises powers","Award","Dissent not necessarily fatal"],["Administrator delivering award","Copy, transmission, destination, delivery method","Party relying on receipt date should prove it","Notice","Missing receipt date holds clocks"],["Party requesting arbitrator correction","Timely 20-day motion and proper ground","Movant","Correction/clarification","No automatic court-clock tolling"],["Party moving to confirm","Party/successor status, authentic award, receipt, jurisdiction, venue, service","Movant","Confirmation","Mandatory unless challenge succeeds"],["Assignee moving to confirm","Award/claim assignment and account link","Assignee","Confirmation if status proved","Generic sale evidence may be insufficient"],["Party moving to vacate","Timely filing and listed ground; prejudice where required","Challenger","Vacatur, sometimes rehearing","Merits error generally insufficient"],["Fraud challenger","Fraud procuring award; discovery date; diligence","Challenger","Vacatur","Current exact proof standard held"],["No-agreement challenger","Absence of agreement and timely hearing objection","Challenger","Vacatur","Participation without objection defeats ground"],["Party moving to modify","Timely motion and narrow statutory defect","Movant","Corrected award and confirmation","No merits rewrite"],["Kansas court","Jurisdiction, venue, motion, service","Court","Confirm/vacate/modify/judgment","No de novo merits appeal"],["Federal freestanding movant","FAA predicates plus independent jurisdiction","Movant","§§9–11 relief","No Badgerow look-through"],["Movant in retained federal case","Existing original jurisdiction, §3 stay, same action","Court under Jules","Postaward order","New jurisdiction basis unnecessary"],["Judgment creditor","Entered judgment and unsatisfied amount","Creditor","Enforcement after stay","Award alone not executable judgment"],["Appellant","Appealable order, timely notice","Appellant","Appeal","Appeal alone may not stay enforcement"]]},{"headers":["Resource","Full literal URL","Status and purpose","Read limitation"],"index":14,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Resource","Full literal URL","Status and purpose","Read limitation"],["Kansas Court Forms search","https://self-help.kscourts.gov/FindCourtForms","General Kansas court-form index","No dedicated statewide confirmation/vacatur form located in bounded search"],["Kansas Judicial Council Chapter 60 forms","https://www.kjc.ks.gov/legal-forms/chapter-60-civil-actions","General civil motion and pleading forms","Direct pages were intermittently inaccessible; no arbitration-specific mandatory form verified"],["AAA Consumer Arbitration Rules","https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","Private administrator rules, effective May 1, 2025","PDF indices 23–25 / printed 24–26 read and visually inspected; applies only if actually incorporated and administered"],["AAA Consumer Rules page","https://www.adr.org/rules-forms-and-fees/consumer/","Current public rules/status page","No actual case eligibility or fee finding"],["JAMS Comprehensive Rules","https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration","Private administrator rules, effective June 1, 2021","Rules 24, 25, and 28 read; applies only if actual agreement/version governs"],["JAMS Consumer Minimum Standards","https://www.jamsadr.com/consumer-minimum-standards","Private policy, effective May 1, 2024","Not Kansas statute; actual consumer-arbitration eligibility held"],["Current Federal Rules of Civil Procedure","https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf","Federal judgment-stay rules, amended through Dec. 1, 2025","Rule 62 at PDF index 104 / printed page 86 visually inspected"],["Current Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure","https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-appellate-procedure","Federal appeal timing","Current rules page states latest amendments in 2025"]]},{"headers":["Source ID","Title, issuer, and full literal URL","Exact read scope and pinpoint","Version, status, access, and limits"],"index":15,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Source ID","Title, issuer, and full literal URL","Exact read scope and pinpoint","Version, status, access, and limits"],["S_KS-P18-S001","Kansas current arbitration award and panel provisions — Kansas Revisor\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0035_section/005_004_0035_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0040_section/005_004_0040_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0041_section/005_004_0041_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0042_section/005_004_0042_k/","K.S.A. 5-435; 5-440; complete 5-441(a)–(b); complete 5-442(a)–(e)","Fresh Oct. 26, 2026 Pacific/UTC. Current 2026 official HTML; no printed page or PDF index. No complete legislative-history audit."],["S_KS-P18-S002","Kansas confirmation, vacatur, and modification — Kansas Revisor\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0044_section/005_004_0044_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0045_section/005_004_0045_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0046_section/005_004_0046_k/","Complete K.S.A. 5-444; 5-445(a)–(d); 5-446(a)–(c)","Fresh. Current official codification."],["S_KS-P18-S003","Kansas judgment, jurisdiction, venue, and appeals — Kansas Revisor\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0047_section/005_004_0047_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0048_section/005_004_0048_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0049_section/005_004_0049_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0050_section/005_004_0050_k/","Complete §§5-447 through 5-450","Fresh. Full later judgment-enforcement law excluded."],["S_KS-P18-S004","Kansas notice and transition — Kansas Revisor\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0024_section/005_004_0024_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0025_section/005_004_0025_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0053_section/005_004_0053_k/","Complete K.S.A. 5-424, 5-425, and 5-453","Fresh. Current transition/savings text."],["S_KS-P18-S005","Repealed Kansas arbitration act, historical sections — Kansas Legislature archive\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0008_section/005_004_0008_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0009_section/005_004_0009_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0011_section/005_004_0011_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0012_section/005_004_0012_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0013_section/005_004_0013_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0014_section/005_004_0014_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0018_section/005_004_0018_k/","Award delivery; 20-day correction; confirmation; 90-day vacatur/modification; judgment; appeal","Fresh historical read. Repealed July 1, 2018, but preserved for applicable older agreements/proceedings."],["S_KS-P18-S006","Kansas postjudgment and appeal rules — Kansas Revisor\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_002_0000_article/060_002_0059_section/060_002_0059_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_002_0000_article/060_002_0060_section/060_002_0060_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_002_0000_article/060_002_0062_section/060_002_0062_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_021_0000_article/060_021_0003_section/060_021_0003_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_002_0000_article/060_002_0006_section/060_002_0006_k/","K.S.A. 60-259, 60-260, 60-262, 60-2103, and 60-206","Fresh. Only necessary judgment/stay/appeal boundary read."],["S_KS-P18-S007","Swope Lees Commercial Real Estate v. Slaten/Clareview — Kansas Court of Appeals opinion reproduction\nhttps://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2025/127043.html","Syllabus; facts and posture; standing/jurisdiction; constrained review; manifest disregard and positive-mandate discussion","Fresh selected read. Published Oct. 17, 2025. Public reproduction of court opinion; no complete commercial citator."],["S_KS-P18-S008","MBNA America Bank v. Credit — Kansas Supreme Court\nhttps://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/supreme-court/2006/94380.html","Credit-card award; receipt/agreement; preserved objection; FAA record discussion","Fresh selected read. Published 2006; old-act and old-administrator setting."],["S_KS-P18-S009","Griffith v. McGovern — Kansas Court of Appeals\nhttps://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2006/94513.html","Presumption, old-act fraud/manifest-disregard discussion, legal-error boundary","Fresh selected read. Published 2006; historical statute."],["S_KS-P18-S010","Alexander v. Everhart — Kansas Court of Appeals\nhttps://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2000/82368.html","Correction request and preservation of judicial objections","Fresh selected read. Old-act case; no tolling holding."],["S_KS-P18-S011","Missouri Bank & Trust v. Gas-Mart Development — Kansas Court of Appeals\nhttps://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2006/93662.html","Assignee confirmation and assignment proof","Fresh selected read. Published old-act case; commercial context."],["S_KS-P18-S012","Federal Arbitration Act §§6, 9–13, 16 — Office of Law Revision Counsel\nhttps://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s6/\nhttps://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s9/\nhttps://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s10/\nhttps://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s11/\nhttps://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s12/\nhttps://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s13/\nhttps://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s16/","Complete material postaward provisions","Fresh. OLRC stated currency through Public Law 119-120, Oct. 7, 2026."],["S_KS-P18-S013","Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties — U.S. Supreme Court official PDF\nhttps://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-83_3e04.pdf","Syllabus PDF index 0/printed 1; opinion PDF index 4/printed 1; retained-jurisdiction discussion PDF index 9/printed 6","Fresh PDF read and screenshots. Decided May 14, 2026."],["S_KS-P18-S014","Badgerow v. Walters — U.S. Supreme Court official PDF\nhttps://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf","Syllabus PDF index 2/printed 3; opinion PDF index 6/printed 4","Fresh PDF read and screenshots. Decided 2022."],["S_KS-P18-S015","KCOM v. EMC — Tenth Circuit official PDF\nhttps://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/01019659058.pdf","State-law versus FAA confirmation and §16 appeal; PDF index 11/printed page 12 visually inspected","Fresh selected PDF read. Published July 19, 2016."],["S_KS-P18-S016","Abbott v. Law Office of Patrick Mulligan — Tenth Circuit official PDF\nhttps://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/01018716524.pdf","FAA exclusivity, manifest-disregard uncertainty, legal-error and public-policy discussion; PDF index 8/printed 9 visually inspected","Fresh selected PDF read. Published 2011."],["S_KS-P18-S017","Mid Atlantic Capital v. Bien — Tenth Circuit official PDF\nhttps://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/010110333308.pdf","FAA §11(a) face-of-award rule; printed pages 11–32 and burden at printed 44–45","Fresh parsed PDF read. Published Apr. 14, 2020. Screenshot attempt on later page partly failed; operative parsed text available."],["S_KS-P18-S018","Hall Street Associates v. Mattel — U.S. Supreme Court\nhttps://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/552/576/","FAA §§10–11 exclusivity and no contractual expansion","Fresh selected read. Court-opinion reproduction."],["S_KS-P18-S019","Pfannenstiel v. Merrill Lynch — Tenth Circuit\nhttps://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/477/1155/606552/","FAA §12 service period and rejected tolling claim","Fresh selected read. Published 2007."],["S_KS-P18-S020","AAA Consumer Arbitration Rules, amended May 1, 2025\nhttps://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","PDF indices 23–25 / printed 24–26: Rules 43–49 and 51","Fresh PDF read and screenshots. Private administrator rules; actual incorporation and eligibility unknown."],["S_KS-P18-S021","JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules\nhttps://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration","Rules 24, 25, and 28","Fresh HTML read. Effective June 1, 2021; private rules."],["S_KS-P18-S022","Federal Rules of Civil Procedure — U.S. Courts\nhttps://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf","Rule 62 at PDF index 104 / printed page 86","Fresh PDF read and screenshot. Rules amended through Dec. 1, 2025."],["S_KS-P18-S023","Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure — U.S. Courts\nhttps://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-appellate-procedure","Rule 4 current-rules page and official linked rules","Fresh public-page check. Current rules last amended in 2025."],["S_KS-P18-S024","Kansas forms indexes\nhttps://self-help.kscourts.gov/FindCourtForms\nhttps://www.kjc.ks.gov/legal-forms/chapter-60-civil-actions","Bounded search for arbitration confirmation/vacatur form","Fresh bounded search. No dedicated statewide form located; not proof no local form exists."]]},{"headers":["Claim ID","Precise assertion","Source/pinpoint","Predicates, consequence, and confidence"],"index":16,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claim ID","Precise assertion","Source/pinpoint","Predicates, consequence, and confidence"],["S_KS-P18-C001","Current Kansas act governs arbitration agreements made on or after July 1, 2018.","S004, K.S.A. 5-425(a)","High."],["S_KS-P18-C002","Pre-July 2018 agreement uses current act only if all parties agree in a record; otherwise old act remains through savings law.","S004–S005","High."],["S_KS-P18-C003","Current award must be in a record and signed or authenticated by a concurring arbitrator.","S001, §5-441(a)","High."],["S_KS-P18-C004","Panel powers are exercised by a majority, while all arbitrators conduct the hearing.","S001, §5-435","High."],["S_KS-P18-C005","Kansas statute does not itself require a reasoned award.","S001, complete §5-441","High bounded reading. Agreement/rules may require more."],["S_KS-P18-C006","Award notice must include a copy and be given to every arbitration party.","S001, §5-441(a)","High."],["S_KS-P18-C007","Current Kansas timing is based on receipt of notice, not merely signature or upload date.","S001, S004","High."],["S_KS-P18-C008","Award-timeliness objection is waived unless raised before award notice is received.","S001, §5-441(b)","High."],["S_KS-P18-C009","Arbitrator correction or clarification motion is due within 20 days after receipt; objections within 10 days.","S001, §5-442","High."],["S_KS-P18-C010","Arbitrator correction does not authorize merits redetermination.","S001; S020–S021","High."],["S_KS-P18-C011","Corrected-award notice supplies an express new 90-day judicial trigger.","S002, §§5-445(b), 5-446(a)","High."],["S_KS-P18-C012","Pending correction request does not expressly toll original 90-day court period.","S001–S002","High bounded reading."],["S_KS-P18-C013","Kansas confirmation is mandatory unless award is vacated, modified, or corrected.","S002, §5-444","High."],["S_KS-P18-C014","Current K.S.A. 5-444 contains no express outer confirmation filing period.","S002","High textual finding; outside limitations/laches held."],["S_KS-P18-C015","Confirmation can be sought before the 90-day challenge period expires.","S002; S007","High textual/practical conclusion."],["S_KS-P18-C016","Early confirmation filing does not textually extinguish a later timely vacatur or modification motion.","S002; S007","High."],["S_KS-P18-C017","Freestanding Kansas confirmation motion is served like summons if no action is pending.","S004, K.S.A. 5-427","High."],["S_KS-P18-C018","Pending-case confirmation is served as a motion in that case.","S004, §5-427","High."],["S_KS-P18-C019","Kansas court must have jurisdiction over the controversy and parties.","S003, §5-448(a)","High."],["S_KS-P18-C020","Kansas arbitration situs clause confers exclusive Kansas-court award-judgment jurisdiction.","S003, §5-448(b)","High, subject to validity of clause and jurisdictional predicates."],["S_KS-P18-C021","Venue follows designated/hearing county or adverse-party residence/business branches.","S003, §5-449","High."],["S_KS-P18-C022","A participant in arbitration can seek current-act confirmation.","S007","High published KCOA holding."],["S_KS-P18-C023","Nonparticipant assignee must prove succession or assignment of award rights.","S011 and ordinary assignment principles","High conditional rule."],["S_KS-P18-C024","Generic debt-sale evidence does not automatically prove assignment of an award or confirmation right.","S011","High."],["S_KS-P18-C025","Ordinary Kansas vacatur motion is due within 90 days after receipt of award or corrected award.","S002, §5-445(b)","High."],["S_KS-P18-C026","Fraud/corruption/undue-means motion runs 90 days from known or reasonably discoverable ground.","S002, §5-445(b)","High."],["S_KS-P18-C027","No-agreement vacatur ground is lost by participation without objection by beginning of hearing.","S002, §5-445(a)(5)","High."],["S_KS-P18-C028","Hearing misconduct grounds require materiality or sufficient cause and substantial prejudice.","S002, §5-445(a)(3)","High."],["S_KS-P18-C029","Ordinary legal or factual error is not a listed vacatur ground.","S002, S007–S009","High."],["S_KS-P18-C030","Published 2025 Kansas authority recognizes a very narrow manifest-disregard theory.","S007","High as current published KCOA authority; Kansas Supreme Court/full citator gap."],["S_KS-P18-C031","Manifest disregard requires awareness of clearly governing law plus conscious refusal to apply it.","S007","High within cited decision."],["S_KS-P18-C032","Old Griffith fraud burden and process distinction are version-limited.","S009","High source limitation."],["S_KS-P18-C033","Court modification is limited to evident mathematics/descriptions, severable unsubmitted claims, and nonmerits form defects.","S002, §5-446","High."],["S_KS-P18-C034","Kansas modification motion is due within 90 days after receipt of original or corrected award.","S002, §5-446(a)","High."],["S_KS-P18-C035","Kansas correction statute does not expressly adopt FAA’s face-of-award limitation.","S002","High textual distinction."],["S_KS-P18-C036","FAA §11(a) miscalculation must appear on the award’s face in the Tenth Circuit.","S017","High published holding."],["S_KS-P18-C037","Court can order rehearing after most vacatur grounds but not no-agreement ground.","S002, §5-445(c)","High."],["S_KS-P18-C038","Award is not executable civil judgment until court enters conforming judgment.","S003, §5-447","High."],["S_KS-P18-C039","Kansas judgment may be docketed and enforced like another civil judgment.","S003, §5-447(a)","High."],["S_KS-P18-C040","Contested postaward prevailing party may receive reasonable judicial fees and expenses.","S003, §5-447(c)","High; discretionary and postaward only."],["S_KS-P18-C041","Kansas judgment enforcement is ordinarily stayed 14 days after entry.","S006, §60-262","High."],["S_KS-P18-C042","Appeal or challenge does not create an indefinite Kansas enforcement stay without order/security.","S006","High."],["S_KS-P18-C043","Kansas confirmation, denial, modification/correction, vacatur without rehearing, and final judgment have express appeal routes.","S003, §5-450","High."],["S_KS-P18-C044","Kansas civil appeal ordinarily is due within 30 days after entry.","S006, §60-2103","High, subject to tolling/extension."],["S_KS-P18-C045","Timely K.S.A. 60-259 motion can reset appeal period; K.S.A. 60-260 is not listed as automatic reset.","S006","High."],["S_KS-P18-C046","FAA §9 confirmation requires agreed judgment entry and application within one year.","S012, §9","High."],["S_KS-P18-C047","Tenth Circuit treats state-law confirmation as distinct from FAA §9.","S015","High."],["S_KS-P18-C048","FAA §12 requires service of vacate/modify/correct notice within three months.","S012, §12","High."],["S_KS-P18-C049","FAA §12 tolling is not automatic; lack of diligence defeated tolling in Pfannenstiel.","S019","High case-specific holding."],["S_KS-P18-C050","FAA §§10–11 are exclusive expedited statutory review grounds.","S018","High SCOTUS holding."],["S_KS-P18-C051","Tenth Circuit has not conclusively recognized manifest disregard as independent post-Hall Street ground.","S016","High."],["S_KS-P18-C052","FAA §13 specifies filing of agreement, award, and related record.","S012, §13","High."],["S_KS-P18-C053","FAA alone supplies no federal subject-matter jurisdiction.","S014","High."],["S_KS-P18-C054","Freestanding §§9–10 application cannot use §4 look-through under Badgerow.","S014","High SCOTUS holding."],["S_KS-P18-C055","Federal court retaining an originally jurisdictional §3-stayed case has postaward jurisdiction under Jules.","S013","High current SCOTUS holding."],["S_KS-P18-C056","Federal judgment enforcement is ordinarily stayed 30 days under Rule 62.","S022","High."],["S_KS-P18-C057","Federal longer stay requires approved bond, security, or order.","S022","High."],["S_KS-P18-C058","FAA §16 supplies federal appeal routes from confirmation, vacatur, modification, and final decisions.","S012, §16","High."],["S_KS-P18-C059","Federal civil notice of appeal ordinarily uses 30-day or specified 60-day branch.","S023","High, subject to FRAP 4 details."],["S_KS-P18-C060","Private administrator correction periods do not automatically alter statutory court periods.","S001–S002, S020–S021","High."],["S_KS-P18-C061","AAA/JAMS rule applicability requires actual incorporation, version, and administration facts.","S020–S021","High."],["S_KS-P18-C062","Payment or settlement does not authorize double recovery or automatically create court satisfaction.","S003 and general judgment principles","High boundary; satisfaction procedure later."],["S_KS-P18-C063","No dedicated statewide Kansas arbitration-award motion form was located in bounded official search.","S024","Bounded negative finding only."],["S_KS-P18-C064","Actual receipt, agreement, award, assignment, court, service, and payment records remain necessary for case-specific result.","Entire component","High."],["S_KS-P18-C065","PASS-18 supplies no award, judgment, collection, provider, or operational approval.","Scope","High project-status statement."]]},{"headers":["Assigned issue","Status","Claims","Exact missing evidence or next action"],"index":17,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Assigned issue","Status","Claims","Exact missing evidence or next action"],["Current Kansas act/version","Answered","C001–C002","Actual agreement date and opt-in record"],["Pre-2018 transition","Answered","C002","Actual old agreement/proceeding"],["Award record/authentication","Answered","C003","Actual award"],["Panel majority","Answered","C004","Panel composition"],["Statutory reasons requirement","Answered—none","C005","Contract/admin rule can add requirement"],["Award notice and copy","Answered","C006–C007","Actual transmission/receipt"],["Award timing objection","Answered","C008","Actual pre-receipt objection"],["Interim/partial award","Partial","—","Actual award finality and incorporated ruling"],["Consent award","Answered generally","C060–C061","Actual administrator/agreement/request"],["Private settlement","Answered as distinct","C062","Actual settlement terms"],["Arbitrator correction grounds","Answered","C009–C012","Actual error/request"],["Arbitrator correction ruling deadline","No Kansas statutory deadline identified","C009–C012","Agreement/admin rules"],["Court-clock tolling from correction","No express tolling","C012","Later controlling case if any"],["Kansas confirmation duty","Answered","C013","All statutory predicates"],["Kansas confirmation outer limit","Unresolved beyond no express §5-444 period","C014","General limitations/laches authority"],["Early confirmation","Answered conditionally","C015–C016","Actual motions/order"],["Confirmation standing/party","Answered for participant","C022","Nonparticipant succession"],["Assignee confirmation","Partial","C023–C024","Actual assignment/account link"],["Kansas jurisdiction","Answered","C019–C020","Actual personal/subject jurisdiction"],["Kansas venue","Answered","C021","Hearing and party locations"],["Freestanding Kansas service","Answered","C017","Actual summons-equivalent service"],["Pending-case service","Answered","C018","Actual case/order"],["Vacatur grounds","Answered","C025–C029","Actual evidence"],["Fraud discovery exception","Answered textually","C026","Knowledge/diligence/procurement proof"],["Current fraud burden","Unresolved precisely","C032","Current-act controlling case"],["Partiality/corruption","Answered at statute level","C025","Actual disclosures/relationships"],["Hearing misconduct","Answered","C028","Materiality and prejudice"],["Exceeded powers","Answered generally","C029","Agreement/submission/award"],["No-agreement preservation","Answered","C027","Hearing objection and prior orders"],["Manifest disregard — Kansas","Answered through current KCOA","C030–C031","Kansas Supreme Court/full citator"],["Manifest disregard — FAA","Unresolved as independent Tenth ground","C051","Later controlling authority"],["Public-policy/positive mandate","Partial/narrow","C030–C031","Exact current authority and facts"],["Modification grounds","Answered","C033–C036","Actual award defect"],["Kansas face-of-award rule","Not established by text","C035","Current Kansas appellate construction"],["Federal face-of-award rule","Answered","C036","FAA route required"],["Rehearing","Answered","C037","Actual ground/order"],["Resulting judgment","Answered","C038–C040","Actual confirmation/vacatur order"],["Postaward judicial fees","Answered as discretionary","C040","Prevailing party and reasonableness"],["Kansas 14-day stay","Answered","C041","Court can order otherwise"],["Stay pending Kansas appeal","Answered as nonautomatic","C042","Bond/security/order"],["Kansas immediate appeals","Answered","C043–C045","Actual order and postjudgment motions"],["Vacatur-with-rehearing appeal","Not expressly listed","C043","Finality/other route"],["FAA §9 one-year route","Answered","C046–C047","Actual FAA basis/agreement"],["FAA §12 three-month service","Answered","C048–C049","Actual delivery/service"],["FAA exclusive grounds","Answered","C050–C051","Actual federal route"],["FAA §13 record","Answered","C052","Actual documents"],["Freestanding federal jurisdiction","Answered","C053–C054","Diversity/federal question"],["Retained federal jurisdiction","Answered under 2026 Jules","C055","Existing stayed action"],["Federal 30-day stay","Answered","C056–C057","Court can order otherwise"],["Federal appeal","Answered generally","C058–C059","Actual order and FRAP tolling"],["Paid award","Partial","C062","Actual payment/interest/costs"],["Judgment satisfaction","Excluded/later","C062","Kansas satisfaction procedure"],["Judgment interest/dormancy/renewal","Excluded","—","Separate postjudgment pass"],["Liens/garnishment/exemptions","Excluded","—","Separate enforcement passes"],["Award merits/underlying debt","Excluded","—","Actual arbitration record and claim law"],["AAA current award rules","Answered as private rules","C060–C061","Actual incorporation/version"],["JAMS current award rules","Answered as private rules","C060–C061","Actual incorporation/version"],["Administrator fees","Held","—","Actual case/rules/fee schedule"],["Official Kansas motion form","Not located in bounded search","C063","Local form or clerk instructions"],["Full local/tribal/country law","Excluded","—","Separate jurisdictional review"],["Complete case citator","Not performed","C030–C032, C051","Commercial/unpublished citator"],["Actual party/award/case","Not reviewed","C064–C065","Authorized public record required"],["Component/state/parent/A066 acceptance","Not evaluated","C065","No acceptance follows"]]}],"claims":[{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C001","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C001","Precise assertion":"Current Kansas act governs arbitration agreements made on or after July 1, 2018.","Source/pinpoint":"S004, K.S.A. 5-425(a)","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C002","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C002","Precise assertion":"Pre-July 2018 agreement uses current act only if all parties agree in a record; otherwise old act remains through savings law.","Source/pinpoint":"S004–S005","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C003","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C003","Precise assertion":"Current award must be in a record and signed or authenticated by a concurring arbitrator.","Source/pinpoint":"S001, §5-441(a)","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C004","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C004","Precise assertion":"Panel powers are exercised by a majority, while all arbitrators conduct the hearing.","Source/pinpoint":"S001, §5-435","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C005","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C005","Precise assertion":"Kansas statute does not itself require a reasoned award.","Source/pinpoint":"S001, complete §5-441","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High bounded reading. Agreement/rules may require more."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C006","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C006","Precise assertion":"Award notice must include a copy and be given to every arbitration party.","Source/pinpoint":"S001, §5-441(a)","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C007","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C007","Precise assertion":"Current Kansas timing is based on receipt of notice, not merely signature or upload date.","Source/pinpoint":"S001, S004","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C008","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C008","Precise assertion":"Award-timeliness objection is waived unless raised before award notice is received.","Source/pinpoint":"S001, §5-441(b)","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C009","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C009","Precise assertion":"Arbitrator correction or clarification motion is due within 20 days after receipt; objections within 10 days.","Source/pinpoint":"S001, §5-442","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_narrative_or_locator_qualification_pending_UNSENT_core_not_necessarily_false","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q001"]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C010","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C010","Precise assertion":"Arbitrator correction does not authorize merits redetermination.","Source/pinpoint":"S001; S020–S021","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_interpretation_or_application_unreopened_hold_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C011","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C011","Precise assertion":"Corrected-award notice supplies an express new 90-day judicial trigger.","Source/pinpoint":"S002, §§5-445(b), 5-446(a)","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C012","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C012","Precise assertion":"Pending correction request does not expressly toll original 90-day court period.","Source/pinpoint":"S001–S002","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High bounded reading."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C013","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C013","Precise assertion":"Kansas confirmation is mandatory unless award is vacated, modified, or corrected.","Source/pinpoint":"S002, §5-444","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C014","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C014","Precise assertion":"Current K.S.A. 5-444 contains no express outer confirmation filing period.","Source/pinpoint":"S002","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High textual finding; outside limitations/laches held."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C015","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C015","Precise assertion":"Confirmation can be sought before the 90-day challenge period expires.","Source/pinpoint":"S002; S007","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High textual/practical conclusion."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_interpretation_or_application_unreopened_hold_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C016","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C016","Precise assertion":"Early confirmation filing does not textually extinguish a later timely vacatur or modification motion.","Source/pinpoint":"S002; S007","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_interpretation_or_application_unreopened_hold_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C017","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C017","Precise assertion":"Freestanding Kansas confirmation motion is served like summons if no action is pending.","Source/pinpoint":"S004, K.S.A. 5-427","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_narrative_or_locator_qualification_pending_UNSENT_core_not_necessarily_false","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q003"]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C018","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C018","Precise assertion":"Pending-case confirmation is served as a motion in that case.","Source/pinpoint":"S004, §5-427","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_narrative_or_locator_qualification_pending_UNSENT_core_not_necessarily_false","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q003"]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C019","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C019","Precise assertion":"Kansas court must have jurisdiction over the controversy and parties.","Source/pinpoint":"S003, §5-448(a)","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C020","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C020","Precise assertion":"Kansas arbitration situs clause confers exclusive Kansas-court award-judgment jurisdiction.","Source/pinpoint":"S003, §5-448(b)","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High, subject to validity of clause and jurisdictional predicates."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C021","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C021","Precise assertion":"Venue follows designated/hearing county or adverse-party residence/business branches.","Source/pinpoint":"S003, §5-449","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C022","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C022","Precise assertion":"A participant in arbitration can seek current-act confirmation.","Source/pinpoint":"S007","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High published KCOA holding."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_interpretation_or_application_unreopened_hold_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C023","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C023","Precise assertion":"Nonparticipant assignee must prove succession or assignment of award rights.","Source/pinpoint":"S011 and ordinary assignment principles","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High conditional rule."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_interpretation_or_application_unreopened_hold_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C024","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C024","Precise assertion":"Generic debt-sale evidence does not automatically prove assignment of an award or confirmation right.","Source/pinpoint":"S011","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_interpretation_or_application_unreopened_hold_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C025","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C025","Precise assertion":"Ordinary Kansas vacatur motion is due within 90 days after receipt of award or corrected award.","Source/pinpoint":"S002, §5-445(b)","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C026","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C026","Precise assertion":"Fraud/corruption/undue-means motion runs 90 days from known or reasonably discoverable ground.","Source/pinpoint":"S002, §5-445(b)","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C027","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C027","Precise assertion":"No-agreement vacatur ground is lost by participation without objection by beginning of hearing.","Source/pinpoint":"S002, §5-445(a)(5)","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C028","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C028","Precise assertion":"Hearing misconduct grounds require materiality or sufficient cause and substantial prejudice.","Source/pinpoint":"S002, §5-445(a)(3)","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C029","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C029","Precise assertion":"Ordinary legal or factual error is not a listed vacatur ground.","Source/pinpoint":"S002, S007–S009","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_interpretation_or_application_unreopened_hold_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C030","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C030","Precise assertion":"Published 2025 Kansas authority recognizes a very narrow manifest-disregard theory.","Source/pinpoint":"S007","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High as current published KCOA authority; Kansas Supreme Court/full citator gap."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_interpretation_or_application_unreopened_hold_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C031","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C031","Precise assertion":"Manifest disregard requires awareness of clearly governing law plus conscious refusal to apply it.","Source/pinpoint":"S007","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High within cited decision."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_interpretation_or_application_unreopened_hold_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C032","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C032","Precise assertion":"Old Griffith fraud burden and process distinction are version-limited.","Source/pinpoint":"S009","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High source limitation."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_interpretation_or_application_unreopened_hold_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C033","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C033","Precise assertion":"Court modification is limited to evident mathematics/descriptions, severable unsubmitted claims, and nonmerits form defects.","Source/pinpoint":"S002, §5-446","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C034","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C034","Precise assertion":"Kansas modification motion is due within 90 days after receipt of original or corrected award.","Source/pinpoint":"S002, §5-446(a)","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C035","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C035","Precise assertion":"Kansas correction statute does not expressly adopt FAA’s face-of-award limitation.","Source/pinpoint":"S002","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High textual distinction."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C036","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C036","Precise assertion":"FAA §11(a) miscalculation must appear on the award’s face in the Tenth Circuit.","Source/pinpoint":"S017","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High published holding."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_interpretation_or_application_unreopened_hold_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C037","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C037","Precise assertion":"Court can order rehearing after most vacatur grounds but not no-agreement ground.","Source/pinpoint":"S002, §5-445(c)","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_narrative_or_locator_qualification_pending_UNSENT_core_not_necessarily_false","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q002"]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C038","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C038","Precise assertion":"Award is not executable civil judgment until court enters conforming judgment.","Source/pinpoint":"S003, §5-447","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C039","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C039","Precise assertion":"Kansas judgment may be docketed and enforced like another civil judgment.","Source/pinpoint":"S003, §5-447(a)","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C040","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C040","Precise assertion":"Contested postaward prevailing party may receive reasonable judicial fees and expenses.","Source/pinpoint":"S003, §5-447(c)","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High; discretionary and postaward only."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C041","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C041","Precise assertion":"Kansas judgment enforcement is ordinarily stayed 14 days after entry.","Source/pinpoint":"S006, §60-262","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C042","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C042","Precise assertion":"Appeal or challenge does not create an indefinite Kansas enforcement stay without order/security.","Source/pinpoint":"S006","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C043","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C043","Precise assertion":"Kansas confirmation, denial, modification/correction, vacatur without rehearing, and final judgment have express appeal routes.","Source/pinpoint":"S003, §5-450","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C044","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C044","Precise assertion":"Kansas civil appeal ordinarily is due within 30 days after entry.","Source/pinpoint":"S006, §60-2103","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High, subject to tolling/extension."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C045","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C045","Precise assertion":"Timely K.S.A. 60-259 motion can reset appeal period; K.S.A. 60-260 is not listed as automatic reset.","Source/pinpoint":"S006","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C046","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C046","Precise assertion":"FAA §9 confirmation requires agreed judgment entry and application within one year.","Source/pinpoint":"S012, §9","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C047","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C047","Precise assertion":"Tenth Circuit treats state-law confirmation as distinct from FAA §9.","Source/pinpoint":"S015","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_interpretation_or_application_unreopened_hold_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C048","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C048","Precise assertion":"FAA §12 requires service of vacate/modify/correct notice within three months.","Source/pinpoint":"S012, §12","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C049","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C049","Precise assertion":"FAA §12 tolling is not automatic; lack of diligence defeated tolling in Pfannenstiel.","Source/pinpoint":"S019","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High case-specific holding."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_interpretation_or_application_unreopened_hold_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C050","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C050","Precise assertion":"FAA §§10–11 are exclusive expedited statutory review grounds.","Source/pinpoint":"S018","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High SCOTUS holding."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_interpretation_or_application_unreopened_hold_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C051","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C051","Precise assertion":"Tenth Circuit has not conclusively recognized manifest disregard as independent post-Hall Street ground.","Source/pinpoint":"S016","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_interpretation_or_application_unreopened_hold_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C052","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C052","Precise assertion":"FAA §13 specifies filing of agreement, award, and related record.","Source/pinpoint":"S012, §13","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"bounded_narrative_or_locator_qualification_pending_UNSENT_core_not_necessarily_false","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q004"]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C053","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C053","Precise assertion":"FAA alone supplies no federal subject-matter jurisdiction.","Source/pinpoint":"S014","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_interpretation_or_application_unreopened_hold_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C054","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C054","Precise assertion":"Freestanding §§9–10 application cannot use §4 look-through under Badgerow.","Source/pinpoint":"S014","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High SCOTUS holding."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_interpretation_or_application_unreopened_hold_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C055","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C055","Precise assertion":"Federal court retaining an originally jurisdictional §3-stayed case has postaward jurisdiction under Jules.","Source/pinpoint":"S013","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High current SCOTUS holding."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_interpretation_or_application_unreopened_hold_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C056","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C056","Precise assertion":"Federal judgment enforcement is ordinarily stayed 30 days under Rule 62.","Source/pinpoint":"S022","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C057","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C057","Precise assertion":"Federal longer stay requires approved bond, security, or order.","Source/pinpoint":"S022","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C058","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C058","Precise assertion":"FAA §16 supplies federal appeal routes from confirmation, vacatur, modification, and final decisions.","Source/pinpoint":"S012, §16","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C059","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C059","Precise assertion":"Federal civil notice of appeal ordinarily uses 30-day or specified 60-day branch.","Source/pinpoint":"S023","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High, subject to FRAP 4 details."},"coordinator_verification_status":"federal_Rule4_body_unread_parsed_location_limit_and_all_application_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C060","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C060","Precise assertion":"Private administrator correction periods do not automatically alter statutory court periods.","Source/pinpoint":"S001–S002, S020–S021","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C061","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C061","Precise assertion":"AAA/JAMS rule applicability requires actual incorporation, version, and administration facts.","Source/pinpoint":"S020–S021","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C062","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C062","Precise assertion":"Payment or settlement does not authorize double recovery or automatically create court satisfaction.","Source/pinpoint":"S003 and general judgment principles","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High boundary; satisfaction procedure later."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_interpretation_or_application_unreopened_hold_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C063","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C063","Precise assertion":"No dedicated statewide Kansas arbitration-award motion form was located in bounded official search.","Source/pinpoint":"S024","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"Bounded negative finding only."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C064","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C064","Precise assertion":"Actual receipt, agreement, award, assignment, court, service, and payment records remain necessary for case-specific result.","Source/pinpoint":"Entire component","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]},{"claim_id":"S_KS-P18-C065","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"S_KS-P18-C065","Precise assertion":"PASS-18 supplies no award, judgment, collection, provider, or operational approval.","Source/pinpoint":"Scope","Predicates, consequence, and confidence":"High project-status statement."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_text_or_project_boundary_checked_no_parent_acceptance","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[]}],"sources":[{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S001","urls":["https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0035_section/005_004_0035_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0040_section/005_004_0040_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0041_section/005_004_0041_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0042_section/005_004_0042_k/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S001","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"Kansas current arbitration award and panel provisions — Kansas Revisor\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0035_section/005_004_0035_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0040_section/005_004_0040_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0041_section/005_004_0041_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0042_section/005_004_0042_k/","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"K.S.A. 5-435; 5-440; complete 5-441(a)–(b); complete 5-442(a)–(e)","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh Oct. 26, 2026 Pacific/UTC. Current 2026 official HTML; no printed page or PDF index. No complete legislative-history audit."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_or_dated_reuse_checked_with_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q001"],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S002","urls":["https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0044_section/005_004_0044_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0045_section/005_004_0045_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0046_section/005_004_0046_k/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S002","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"Kansas confirmation, vacatur, and modification — Kansas Revisor\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0044_section/005_004_0044_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0045_section/005_004_0045_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0046_section/005_004_0046_k/","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"Complete K.S.A. 5-444; 5-445(a)–(d); 5-446(a)–(c)","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh. Current official codification."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_or_dated_reuse_checked_with_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q002"],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S003","urls":["https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0047_section/005_004_0047_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0048_section/005_004_0048_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0049_section/005_004_0049_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0050_section/005_004_0050_k/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S003","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"Kansas judgment, jurisdiction, venue, and appeals — Kansas Revisor\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0047_section/005_004_0047_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0048_section/005_004_0048_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0049_section/005_004_0049_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0050_section/005_004_0050_k/","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"Complete §§5-447 through 5-450","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh. Full later judgment-enforcement law excluded."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_or_dated_reuse_checked_with_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S004","urls":["https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0024_section/005_004_0024_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0025_section/005_004_0025_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0053_section/005_004_0053_k/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S004","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"Kansas notice and transition — Kansas Revisor\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0024_section/005_004_0024_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0025_section/005_004_0025_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0053_section/005_004_0053_k/","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"Complete K.S.A. 5-424, 5-425, and 5-453","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh. Current transition/savings text."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_or_dated_reuse_checked_with_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q003"],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S005","urls":["https://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0008_section/005_004_0008_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0009_section/005_004_0009_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0011_section/005_004_0011_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0012_section/005_004_0012_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0013_section/005_004_0013_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0014_section/005_004_0014_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0018_section/005_004_0018_k/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S005","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"Repealed Kansas arbitration act, historical sections — Kansas Legislature archive\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0008_section/005_004_0008_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0009_section/005_004_0009_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0011_section/005_004_0011_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0012_section/005_004_0012_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0013_section/005_004_0013_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0014_section/005_004_0014_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/li_2018/b2017_18/statute/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0018_section/005_004_0018_k/","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"Award delivery; 20-day correction; confirmation; 90-day vacatur/modification; judgment; appeal","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh historical read. Repealed July 1, 2018, but preserved for applicable older agreements/proceedings."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_or_dated_reuse_checked_with_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S006","urls":["https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_002_0000_article/060_002_0059_section/060_002_0059_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_002_0000_article/060_002_0060_section/060_002_0060_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_002_0000_article/060_002_0062_section/060_002_0062_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_021_0000_article/060_021_0003_section/060_021_0003_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_002_0000_article/060_002_0006_section/060_002_0006_k/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S006","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"Kansas postjudgment and appeal rules — Kansas Revisor\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_002_0000_article/060_002_0059_section/060_002_0059_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_002_0000_article/060_002_0060_section/060_002_0060_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_002_0000_article/060_002_0062_section/060_002_0062_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_021_0000_article/060_021_0003_section/060_021_0003_k/\nhttps://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/060_000_0000_chapter/060_002_0000_article/060_002_0006_section/060_002_0006_k/","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"K.S.A. 60-259, 60-260, 60-262, 60-2103, and 60-206","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh. Only necessary judgment/stay/appeal boundary read."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_or_dated_reuse_checked_with_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S007","urls":["https://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2025/127043.html"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S007","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"Swope Lees Commercial Real Estate v. Slaten/Clareview — Kansas Court of Appeals opinion reproduction\nhttps://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2025/127043.html","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"Syllabus; facts and posture; standing/jurisdiction; constrained review; manifest disregard and positive-mandate discussion","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh selected read. Published Oct. 17, 2025. Public reproduction of court opinion; no complete commercial citator."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_source_unreopened_original_primary_secondary_pixel_currentness_application_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S008","urls":["https://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/supreme-court/2006/94380.html"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S008","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"MBNA America Bank v. Credit — Kansas Supreme Court\nhttps://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/supreme-court/2006/94380.html","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"Credit-card award; receipt/agreement; preserved objection; FAA record discussion","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh selected read. Published 2006; old-act and old-administrator setting."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_source_unreopened_original_primary_secondary_pixel_currentness_application_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S009","urls":["https://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2006/94513.html"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S009","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"Griffith v. McGovern — Kansas Court of Appeals\nhttps://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2006/94513.html","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"Presumption, old-act fraud/manifest-disregard discussion, legal-error boundary","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh selected read. Published 2006; historical statute."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_source_unreopened_original_primary_secondary_pixel_currentness_application_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S010","urls":["https://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2000/82368.html"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S010","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"Alexander v. Everhart — Kansas Court of Appeals\nhttps://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2000/82368.html","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"Correction request and preservation of judicial objections","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh selected read. Old-act case; no tolling holding."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_source_unreopened_original_primary_secondary_pixel_currentness_application_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S011","urls":["https://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2006/93662.html"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S011","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"Missouri Bank & Trust v. Gas-Mart Development — Kansas Court of Appeals\nhttps://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/2006/93662.html","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"Assignee confirmation and assignment proof","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh selected read. Published old-act case; commercial context."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_source_unreopened_original_primary_secondary_pixel_currentness_application_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S012","urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s6/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s9/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s10/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s11/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s12/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s13/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s16/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S012","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"Federal Arbitration Act §§6, 9–13, 16 — Office of Law Revision Counsel\nhttps://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s6/\nhttps://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s9/\nhttps://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s10/\nhttps://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s11/\nhttps://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s12/\nhttps://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s13/\nhttps://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t9/s16/","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"Complete material postaward provisions","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh. OLRC stated currency through Public Law 119-120, Oct. 7, 2026."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_or_dated_reuse_checked_with_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q004"],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S013","urls":["https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-83_3e04.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S013","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties — U.S. Supreme Court official PDF\nhttps://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-83_3e04.pdf","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"Syllabus PDF index 0/printed 1; opinion PDF index 4/printed 1; retained-jurisdiction discussion PDF index 9/printed 6","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh PDF read and screenshots. Decided May 14, 2026."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_source_unreopened_original_primary_secondary_pixel_currentness_application_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S014","urls":["https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S014","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"Badgerow v. Walters — U.S. Supreme Court official PDF\nhttps://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1143_m6hn.pdf","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"Syllabus PDF index 2/printed 3; opinion PDF index 6/printed 4","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh PDF read and screenshots. Decided 2022."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_source_unreopened_original_primary_secondary_pixel_currentness_application_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S015","urls":["https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/01019659058.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S015","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"KCOM v. EMC — Tenth Circuit official PDF\nhttps://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/01019659058.pdf","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"State-law versus FAA confirmation and §16 appeal; PDF index 11/printed page 12 visually inspected","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh selected PDF read. Published July 19, 2016."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_source_unreopened_original_primary_secondary_pixel_currentness_application_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S016","urls":["https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/01018716524.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S016","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"Abbott v. Law Office of Patrick Mulligan — Tenth Circuit official PDF\nhttps://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/01018716524.pdf","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"FAA exclusivity, manifest-disregard uncertainty, legal-error and public-policy discussion; PDF index 8/printed 9 visually inspected","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh selected PDF read. Published 2011."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_source_unreopened_original_primary_secondary_pixel_currentness_application_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S017","urls":["https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/010110333308.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S017","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"Mid Atlantic Capital v. Bien — Tenth Circuit official PDF\nhttps://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/010110333308.pdf","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"FAA §11(a) face-of-award rule; printed pages 11–32 and burden at printed 44–45","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh parsed PDF read. Published Apr. 14, 2020. Screenshot attempt on later page partly failed; operative parsed text available."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_source_unreopened_original_primary_secondary_pixel_currentness_application_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S018","urls":["https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/552/576/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S018","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"Hall Street Associates v. Mattel — U.S. Supreme Court\nhttps://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/552/576/","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"FAA §§10–11 exclusivity and no contractual expansion","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh selected read. Court-opinion reproduction."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_source_unreopened_original_primary_secondary_pixel_currentness_application_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S019","urls":["https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/477/1155/606552/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S019","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"Pfannenstiel v. Merrill Lynch — Tenth Circuit\nhttps://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/477/1155/606552/","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"FAA §12 service period and rejected tolling claim","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh selected read. Published 2007."},"coordinator_verification_status":"judicial_source_unreopened_original_primary_secondary_pixel_currentness_application_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S020","urls":["https://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S020","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"AAA Consumer Arbitration Rules, amended May 1, 2025\nhttps://www.adr.org/media/yawntdvs/2025_consumer_arbitration_rules.pdf","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"PDF indices 23–25 / printed 24–26: Rules 43–49 and 51","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh PDF read and screenshots. Private administrator rules; actual incorporation and eligibility unknown."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_or_dated_reuse_checked_with_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S021","urls":["https://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S021","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules\nhttps://www.jamsadr.com/rules-comprehensive-arbitration","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"Rules 24, 25, and 28","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh HTML read. Effective June 1, 2021; private rules."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_or_dated_reuse_checked_with_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S022","urls":["https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S022","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"Federal Rules of Civil Procedure — U.S. Courts\nhttps://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"Rule 62 at PDF index 104 / printed page 86","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh PDF read and screenshot. Rules amended through Dec. 1, 2025."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_text_or_dated_reuse_checked_with_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S023","urls":["https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-appellate-procedure"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S023","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure — U.S. Courts\nhttps://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-appellate-procedure","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"Rule 4 current-rules page and official linked rules","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh public-page check. Current rules last amended in 2025."},"coordinator_verification_status":"landing_metadata_only_linked_Rule4_body_not_located_unread_no_pixels","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q003"],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"source_id":"S_KS-P18-S024","urls":["https://self-help.kscourts.gov/FindCourtForms","https://www.kjc.ks.gov/legal-forms/chapter-60-civil-actions"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_KS-P18-S024","Title, issuer, and full literal URL":"Kansas forms indexes\nhttps://self-help.kscourts.gov/FindCourtForms\nhttps://www.kjc.ks.gov/legal-forms/chapter-60-civil-actions","Exact read scope and pinpoint":"Bounded search for arbitration confirmation/vacatur form","Version, status, access, and limits":"Fresh bounded search. No dedicated statewide form located; not proof no local form exists."},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_forms_and_bounded_negative_search_unreopened_no_retry","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_parent_acceptance":false,"coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_read_map":"[internal evidence reference]"}],"coverage":[{"topic":"Current Kansas act/version","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Current Kansas act/version","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C001–C002","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual agreement date and opt-in record"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Pre-2018 transition","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Pre-2018 transition","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C002","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual old agreement/proceeding"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Award record/authentication","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Award record/authentication","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C003","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual award"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Panel majority","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Panel majority","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C004","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Panel composition"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Statutory reasons requirement","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Statutory reasons requirement","Status":"Answered—none","Claims":"C005","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Contract/admin rule can add requirement"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Award notice and copy","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Award notice and copy","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C006–C007","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual transmission/receipt"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Award timing objection","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Award timing objection","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C008","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual pre-receipt objection"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Interim/partial award","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Interim/partial award","Status":"Partial","Claims":"—","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual award finality and incorporated ruling"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Consent award","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Consent award","Status":"Answered generally","Claims":"C060–C061","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual administrator/agreement/request"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q003"],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Private settlement","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Private settlement","Status":"Answered as distinct","Claims":"C062","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual settlement terms"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Arbitrator correction grounds","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Arbitrator correction grounds","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C009–C012","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual error/request"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q001","S_KS-P18-Q003"],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Arbitrator correction ruling deadline","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Arbitrator correction ruling deadline","Status":"No Kansas statutory deadline identified","Claims":"C009–C012","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Agreement/admin rules"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q001"],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Court-clock tolling from correction","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Court-clock tolling from correction","Status":"No express tolling","Claims":"C012","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Later controlling case if any"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q001"],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Kansas confirmation duty","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Kansas confirmation duty","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C013","Exact missing evidence or next action":"All statutory predicates"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Kansas confirmation outer limit","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Kansas confirmation outer limit","Status":"Unresolved beyond no express §5-444 period","Claims":"C014","Exact missing evidence or next action":"General limitations/laches authority"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Early confirmation","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Early confirmation","Status":"Answered conditionally","Claims":"C015–C016","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual motions/order"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Confirmation standing/party","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Confirmation standing/party","Status":"Answered for participant","Claims":"C022","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Nonparticipant succession"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Assignee confirmation","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Assignee confirmation","Status":"Partial","Claims":"C023–C024","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual assignment/account link"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Kansas jurisdiction","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Kansas jurisdiction","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C019–C020","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual personal/subject jurisdiction"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Kansas venue","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Kansas venue","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C021","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Hearing and party locations"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Freestanding Kansas service","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Freestanding Kansas service","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C017","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual summons-equivalent service"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q003"],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Pending-case service","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Pending-case service","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C018","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual case/order"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q003"],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Vacatur grounds","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Vacatur grounds","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C025–C029","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual evidence"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Fraud discovery exception","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Fraud discovery exception","Status":"Answered textually","Claims":"C026","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Knowledge/diligence/procurement proof"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Current fraud burden","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Current fraud burden","Status":"Unresolved precisely","Claims":"C032","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Current-act controlling case"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Partiality/corruption","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Partiality/corruption","Status":"Answered at statute level","Claims":"C025","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual disclosures/relationships"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q003"],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Hearing misconduct","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Hearing misconduct","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C028","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Materiality and prejudice"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Exceeded powers","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Exceeded powers","Status":"Answered generally","Claims":"C029","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Agreement/submission/award"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q003"],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"No-agreement preservation","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"No-agreement preservation","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C027","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Hearing objection and prior orders"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Manifest disregard — Kansas","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Manifest disregard — Kansas","Status":"Answered through current KCOA","Claims":"C030–C031","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Kansas Supreme Court/full citator"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Manifest disregard — FAA","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Manifest disregard — FAA","Status":"Unresolved as independent Tenth ground","Claims":"C051","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Later controlling authority"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Public-policy/positive mandate","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Public-policy/positive mandate","Status":"Partial/narrow","Claims":"C030–C031","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Exact current authority and facts"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Modification grounds","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Modification grounds","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C033–C036","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual award defect"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Kansas face-of-award rule","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Kansas face-of-award rule","Status":"Not established by text","Claims":"C035","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Current Kansas appellate construction"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Federal face-of-award rule","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Federal face-of-award rule","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C036","Exact missing evidence or next action":"FAA route required"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Rehearing","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Rehearing","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C037","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual ground/order"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q002"],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Resulting judgment","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Resulting judgment","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C038–C040","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual confirmation/vacatur order"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Postaward judicial fees","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Postaward judicial fees","Status":"Answered as discretionary","Claims":"C040","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Prevailing party and reasonableness"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Kansas 14-day stay","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Kansas 14-day stay","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C041","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Court can order otherwise"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Stay pending Kansas appeal","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Stay pending Kansas appeal","Status":"Answered as nonautomatic","Claims":"C042","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Bond/security/order"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Kansas immediate appeals","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Kansas immediate appeals","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C043–C045","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual order and postjudgment motions"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Vacatur-with-rehearing appeal","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Vacatur-with-rehearing appeal","Status":"Not expressly listed","Claims":"C043","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Finality/other route"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"FAA §9 one-year route","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"FAA §9 one-year route","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C046–C047","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual FAA basis/agreement"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"FAA §12 three-month service","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"FAA §12 three-month service","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C048–C049","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual delivery/service"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"FAA exclusive grounds","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"FAA exclusive grounds","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C050–C051","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual federal route"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q004"],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"FAA §13 record","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"FAA §13 record","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C052","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual documents"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q004"],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Freestanding federal jurisdiction","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Freestanding federal jurisdiction","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C053–C054","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Diversity/federal question"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Retained federal jurisdiction","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Retained federal jurisdiction","Status":"Answered under 2026 Jules","Claims":"C055","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Existing stayed action"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Federal 30-day stay","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Federal 30-day stay","Status":"Answered","Claims":"C056–C057","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Court can order otherwise"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Federal appeal","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Federal appeal","Status":"Answered generally","Claims":"C058–C059","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual order and FRAP tolling"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q003"],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Paid award","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Paid award","Status":"Partial","Claims":"C062","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual payment/interest/costs"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Judgment satisfaction","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Judgment satisfaction","Status":"Excluded/later","Claims":"C062","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Kansas satisfaction procedure"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Judgment interest/dormancy/renewal","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Judgment interest/dormancy/renewal","Status":"Excluded","Claims":"—","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Separate postjudgment pass"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Liens/garnishment/exemptions","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Liens/garnishment/exemptions","Status":"Excluded","Claims":"—","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Separate enforcement passes"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Award merits/underlying debt","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Award merits/underlying debt","Status":"Excluded","Claims":"—","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual arbitration record and claim law"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"AAA current award rules","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"AAA current award rules","Status":"Answered as private rules","Claims":"C060–C061","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual incorporation/version"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q003"],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"JAMS current award rules","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"JAMS current award rules","Status":"Answered as private rules","Claims":"C060–C061","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual incorporation/version"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":["S_KS-P18-Q003"],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Administrator fees","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Administrator fees","Status":"Held","Claims":"—","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Actual case/rules/fee schedule"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Official Kansas motion form","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Official Kansas motion form","Status":"Not located in bounded search","Claims":"C063","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Local form or clerk instructions"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Full local/tribal/country law","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Full local/tribal/country law","Status":"Excluded","Claims":"—","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Separate jurisdictional review"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Complete case citator","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Complete case citator","Status":"Not performed","Claims":"C030–C032, C051","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Commercial/unpublished citator"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Actual party/award/case","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Actual party/award/case","Status":"Not reviewed","Claims":"C064–C065","Exact missing evidence or next action":"Authorized public record required"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false},{"topic":"Component/state/parent/A066 acceptance","researcher_record":{"Assigned issue":"Component/state/parent/A066 acceptance","Status":"Not evaluated","Claims":"C065","Exact missing evidence or next action":"No acceptance follows"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_scoped_review_complete_original_and_new_holds_retained","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-29T03:57:58.015462+00:00","coordinator_pending_findings":[],"coordinator_parent_acceptance":false}],"annotations":{},"corrections":[{"issue_id":"S_KS-P18-Q001","finding":"Arbitrator correction requires timely motion and notice to every party","affected_claim_ids":["S_KS-P18-C009"],"related_claim_ids":[],"validated_exact_raw_rows":[],"exact_original_cell_matches":[],"source_urls":["https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0042_section/005_004_0042_k/"],"localization":"claim_row_matches_available_no_complete_narrative_localization","public_status":"Recorded correction pending; working-paper assertion requires the stated repair or qualification."},{"issue_id":"S_KS-P18-Q002","finding":"Rehearing matrix must include prejudicial arbitrator misconduct in the new-arbitrator branch","affected_claim_ids":["S_KS-P18-C037"],"related_claim_ids":[],"validated_exact_raw_rows":[],"exact_original_cell_matches":[],"source_urls":["https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0045_section/005_004_0045_k/"],"localization":"claim_row_matches_available_no_complete_narrative_localization","public_status":"Recorded correction pending; working-paper assertion requires the stated repair or qualification."},{"issue_id":"S_KS-P18-Q003","finding":"Source locators and six positive coverage links need precise atomic support","affected_claim_ids":["S_KS-P18-C017","S_KS-P18-C018"],"related_claim_ids":[],"validated_exact_raw_rows":[],"exact_original_cell_matches":[],"source_urls":["https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0027_section/005_004_0027_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0023_section/005_004_0023_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0031_section/005_004_0031_k/","https://www.kslegislature.gov/b2025_26/laws/005_000_0000_chapter/005_004_0000_article/005_004_0037_section/005_004_0037_k/"],"localization":"claim_row_matches_available_no_complete_narrative_localization","public_status":"Recorded correction pending; working-paper assertion requires the stated repair or qualification."},{"issue_id":"S_KS-P18-Q004","finding":"Abbreviated FAA grounds and filing-package table needs statutory qualifications","affected_claim_ids":["S_KS-P18-C052"],"related_claim_ids":[],"validated_exact_raw_rows":[],"exact_original_cell_matches":[],"source_urls":["https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s11/","https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-124/t9/s13/"],"localization":"claim_row_matches_available_no_complete_narrative_localization","public_status":"Recorded correction pending; working-paper assertion requires the stated repair or qualification."}],"resolved_corrections":[],"review_history":[{"id":"S_KS-P18-SCOPED","status":"scoped_review_complete_with_corrections_and_holds","at":null}]}