{"meta":{"key":"s_id--pass-30","task":"S_ID","title":"SID Idaho ordinary civil appellate costs, attorney fees, and sanction awards","parent_title":"Idaho debt and debt relief law","edition":"pass-30","path":"/research/s_id--pass-30/","kind":"split_pass","category":"state","role":"state","area_numbers":[66],"groups":["collections"],"date":"2026-10-29","tables":34,"claims":51,"sources":8,"review_status":"scoped_review_complete_bounded21cellcompletion_resolved_other_holds_preserved","review_complete":true,"sha256":"c7b351cbd19266ebb47c9adac3c8046bc5d646306499ff11634cedcaa77057f2","headings":["Evidence disposition","Principal findings","1.1 Reuse versus new work","1.2 Courts, actors, and governing procedures","District-appellate procedure hold","2.1 Prevailing party is a determination, not a label","2.2 Dismissal branches","2.3 Current IAR 40 cost categories","Adopted 2022 change","3.1 Higher appellate taxation","3.2 Rule 54 comparison where it governs","4.1 Procedural rule versus legal entitlement","4.2 Section 12-120","4.3 Section 12-121","2017 history","4.4 Section 12-117: public actors","4.5 Public payment, fee waiver, and contract limits","5.1 IAR 41’s two stages","5.2 Civil-rule amount factors","5.3 Proof, allocation, and limits","6.1 Appellate signing and certification","6.2 Enlarged records, nonappearance, and nonfiling","6.3 Section 12-123 is not assumed to be an appellate fee source","7.1 New cost/fee acts and their reference events","7.2 Electronic filing and correction","7.3 Computation and extensions","7.4 Privacy and disclosure boundary","S001 — official Idaho Appellate Rules","Material displayed history","S002 — official civil rules","S003 — official electronic-filing rules","S004 — provisional statutory bodies","S005 — 2017 H0097 legislative-version evidence","S006 — adopted April 28, 2022 order","S007 — official history locator and bounded currentness searches","S008 — fresh failures and unopened sources","11.1 Costs and fees","11.2 Civil-rule comparison and procedure","11.3 Filing, service, correction, and counting","11.4 Opinion, remittitur, and history","Actual research performed","PDF text and pixels","Researcher self-check"],"generation_provenance":{"actual_route":"regular_chat_adaptive_models","actual_model":"GPT-6","actual_mode":"Pro","provenance_limit":"Actual documented capture labels only; missing labels remain unknown. No preferred setting is inferred as actual execution."},"public_id":"S_ID/pass-30","facets":{"geography":["us","us-id"],"debt_type":[],"stage":["repossession","appeal"],"subject":["fees-outcomes","appeals"]},"scope":"Distinctremainingordinarycivilappellatecosttaxation/attorneyfeeentitlement-request-amount-objection/necessarysanctionawardcomponent; priorgateway-record-briefing/furtherreviewmerits excluded.","pending_corrections":0},"markdown":"# S_ID PASS-30 — Idaho ordinary civil appellate costs, attorney fees, and sanction awards\n\n**Fresh public-source access date:** **October 28, 2026, America/Los_Angeles.**\n\n**Scope:** Appellate cost taxation, substantive attorney-fee sources, requests and objections, amount-setting, necessary sanction-award provisions, and postdecision cost/fee handling.\n\n## Evidence disposition\n\nThe **official current-published appellate, civil, and electronic-filing rules were recovered and read** to the bounds recorded below.\n\nA material original source was also recovered: the **Idaho Supreme Court’s April 28, 2022 adopted order**, publicly hosted by the Idaho State Bar. The relevant pages were visually inspected. That order expressly removed the former brief-production cost category and made the amendments effective immediately.\n\nThe attempted official statutory bodies were inaccessible. Statutory findings therefore remain **provisional readings of the identified 2025 reproductions**. The 2017 amendment to § 12-121 was examined in an introduced legislative mirror with reported enactment history; its final official act was not recovered.\n\nNo actual cost, fee, contract, invoice, litigation conduct, prevailing party, award, or financial input was examined. Earlier findings, provenance, C033/C035, and all other holds remain unchanged.\n\n## Principal findings\n\n**Appellate costs, substantive fee entitlement, the amount of fees, and sanctions are separate legal questions.** IAR 41 supplies the procedure for a claimed legal right to fees; it does not make every prevailing party entitled to attorney fees. **[C013–C016.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41)\n\n**The former $6-per-page brief-production category was deleted by the adopted April 28, 2022 order.** The current list should not be supplemented with that historical allowance. At the same time, Rule 40 retains an unresolved reference to the separately repealed Rule 26.1 disk provision. **[C007–C008.]** [Idaho State Bar+2](https://isb.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/Amendments-to-Idaho-Appellate-Rules-11.1-12.1-40-46-eff-April-28-2022.pdf)\n\n**The ordinary statutory fee branches use different conditions.** Section 12-120’s pleaded-amount branch uses $35,000, while § 12-117(7)’s public-actor cross-reference still uses $25,000 in the recovered text. Neither threshold is silently changed to match the other. **[C017–C023.]** [Justia Law+1](https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-120/)\n\n**Unresolved cost or fee amounts do not necessarily delay remittitur.** The rules provide for later itemized statements or amendments to be forwarded and added to the lower judgment or order. **[C040–C041.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+2](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38)\n\n# 1. Reviewed reuse, new evidence, and route distinctions\n\nEvidence labels:\n\n- **O — Official body read:** current-published rule or adopted official instrument.\n- **P — Provisional statute:** dated secondary reproduction.\n- **L — Legislative-version evidence:** introduced text and reported history, not a recovered final official act.\n- **H — Held:** material currentness, original-history, incorporation, construction, or application dependency.\n\n## 1.1 Reuse versus new work\n\n| Earlier material | Retained scope | New P30 evidence | Remaining boundary |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reviewed P27 follow-on record | Complete appellate costs, fees, objections, and security interaction remained open. | IAR 40–41 and necessary related provisions read independently. | No gateway, notice, or stay report regenerated. |\n| P27 LIMITED-01 | Rule 32’s 2022 effectiveness differs from Rule 46’s; Rule 46’s seven-day objection runs from **motion service**. | Fresh complete Rule 46 read; the 2022 original order also recovered for its Rule 46 amendment. | Prior raw report and correction provenance remain unchanged. |\n| P28 record material | Initial deposits, record preparation, and augmentation were separate from later awards. | Only necessary cost-category and excessive-record provisions read. | No unreviewed record-merits premise. |\n| P29 briefing material | First-brief fee claim and signing provisions were narrow interfaces. | Complete IAR 41 and necessary fee-claim, objection, sanction, and amount provisions read. | No full briefing or argument rerun. |\n| P25 trial-cost and post-trial material | Narrow reviewed interfaces retained within their scope. | Rule 54 reread only for relevant prevailing-party, civil fee, amount, and procedural comparisons. | Trial witness/deposition/exhibit cost schedules are not transplanted into appellate taxation. |\n| C033/C035 and other holds | Unchanged. | No provider-access, licensing, or checklist investigation. | No implied closure. |\n\n## 1.2 Courts, actors, and governing procedures\n\n| Route or actor | Supported role | Important limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Ordinary magistrate-to-district appeal | Rule 83(f)(1) addresses appellate treatment; Rule 83(q) supplies IRCP/IAR procedure where unspecified; motions under Rule 83(n) go to the district court unless expressly required below. | Rule 83 does not print a standalone, comprehensive cost-taxation paragraph selecting every deadline and trigger for every district-appellate fee disposition. |\n| District-original or district-appellate decision on higher appeal | IAR 40–41 supply the higher appellate cost/fee procedure. | Substantive entitlement still needs a statute, lawful contract, or other applicable authority. |\n| Court of Appeals | IAR 101 applies the appellate rules; IAR 110 preserves filing through the Supreme Court clerk. | Court assignment is not a new fee source. |\n| Appellate court | Determines cost allocation, claimed fee entitlement, objections, and fee amount or remand for amount. | An applicant’s computation does not bind the court. |\n| Supreme Court clerk | Receives the required papers, prepares the itemized taxed-cost statement, and inserts or later transmits the award as the rules direct. | Ministerial inclusion does not replace a judicial entitlement decision. |\n| District court or agency on an authorized amount remand | Hears additional evidence and determines amount within the remand. | Not authority to reopen unrelated appellate merits. |\n| Receiving lower court | Receives the remittitur or later statement for the prescribed judgment/order treatment. | Full enforcement, lien, interest, and satisfaction law remains separate. |\n\n**[C002.]** Small-claims de novo procedure, criminal and post-conviction proceedings, family/juvenile/probate matters, agencies, extraordinary writs, and special statutory or federal regimes are not treated as interchangeable ordinary civil fee routes. [Idaho Supreme Court+3](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83)\n\n### District-appellate procedure hold\n\nThe read Rule 83 text incorporates appellate treatment and permits IRCP or IAR procedure where unspecified. It does not expressly resolve every interaction between:\n\n- IAR 40’s **opinion-filing/announcement** trigger;\n- Rule 54’s **judgment-entry** trigger;\n- a district-appellate decision or separate fee order; and\n- an applicable court direction.\n\nThe two frameworks are identified below without inventing one universal substituted trigger. No document should be assumed filed in the Supreme Court merely because IAR 40 is relevant to a district appellate proceeding. **[C012.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+2](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83)\n\n# 2. Prevailing status, mixed results, and taxable appellate costs\n\n## 2.1 Prevailing party is a determination, not a label\n\n| Authority | Rule supplied | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| IAR 40(a) | Costs ordinarily follow the prevailing party. | Law or court order may provide otherwise; the rule expressly excludes the listed post-conviction, parental-rights-termination, and adoption appeals from that default. |\n| § 12-107 | Costs are discretionary when a new trial is ordered or judgment modified. In other cases its prevailing-party rule includes the stated costs-below branch for an appeal to district court. | Provisional statutory text; no automatic classification of every reversal or remand. |\n| Rule 54(d)(1)(B) | Where this civil-rule standard governs, the court compares the result with relief sought and may find partial success and allocate costs equitably. | It does not supply a mathematical score or per-issue formula. |\n| Rule 54(d)(2) | Multiple prevailing parties ordinarily each receive costs unless otherwise directed. | Not automatic duplication of the same expense. |\n| IAR 40 | No standalone arithmetic rule for cross-appeals, mixed dispositions, or partial success. | A favorable ruling does not itself settle ultimate prevailing status. |\n\n**[C003–C004.]** No party, claim, disposition, or cost allocation was evaluated. [Idaho Supreme Court+2](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40)\n\n## 2.2 Dismissal branches\n\nIAR 32(b) permits an appealing party to move for dismissal before an opinion issues. The court **may** tax costs and attorney fees as though the nonappealing party prevailed. That language is discretionary and is not treated here as an independent substantive attorney-fee statute.\n\nIAR 33 requires a stipulated dismissal to include an agreement about costs and fees. A stipulation signed by some but not all parties is processed as a Rule 32 motion. Neither provision establishes a particular agreement’s validity or an actual award. **[C005.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/33)\n\n## 2.3 Current IAR 40 cost categories\n\n| Category | Current rule | Conditions and unresolved boundaries |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Filing fees | Listed in Rule 40(b)(1). | A permitted category is not proof of an actual recoverable expenditure. |\n| Reporter’s transcript | Listed in Rule 40(b)(2). | Initial preparation deposits and later taxation are different. |\n| Specified computer-searchable disks | The current sentence still refers to disks filed under Rule 26.1(c), while excluding other disks. | Rule 26.1 is officially marked repealed effective January 24, 2019. Current electronic-copy cost treatment cannot be reconstructed by silently applying its old charges. |\n| Clerk’s or agency’s record | Listed in Rule 40(b)(3). | Agency merits are excluded; an initial estimate is not a final taxed amount. |\n| Supersedeas-bond premium | Listed in Rule 40(b)(4). | Exception when the party taxed agreed in writing, within seven days of notice-of-appeal filing, not to execute pending appeal as provided in Rule 16(b). |\n| Brief reproduction | **No longer an enumerated category.** | The adopted 2022 order deleted the former $6-per-page provision. |\n| Private copies, travel, postage, other expenses | Not independently listed in the current Rule 40 categories read. | The opening “unless otherwise ordered” language and other law prevent a categorical conclusion that such an item can never be allowed. No separate permission was established. |\n\n**[C006–C009.]** The trial-cost list in Rule 54(d)(1)(C) is not automatically added to this appellate list. [Idaho Supreme Court+2](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40)\n\n### Adopted 2022 change\n\nThe recovered order strikes the former provision for production of specified original appellate briefs and rehearing/review briefs, including covers but excluding appendices and copies, at **$6 per page**. The order is dated **April 28, 2022** and states immediate effectiveness.\n\nThe historical allowance is recorded only to explain the deletion. It is not a current reimbursement formula. The order does not supply a complete case-specific transition analysis for expenses incurred before its effective date. **[C007, C044.]** [Idaho State Bar+1](https://isb.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/Amendments-to-Idaho-Appellate-Rules-11.1-12.1-40-46-eff-April-28-2022.pdf)\n\n# 3. Cost requests, objections, and civil-procedure comparison\n\n## 3.1 Higher appellate taxation\n\n| Act | Required content/event | Consequence or limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Cost memorandum | File with the Court and serve **all adverse parties**; itemize each expense. | No actual item or amount supplied. |\n| Period | Within **fourteen days of filing and announcement of the appellate opinion**. | Applies whether or not rehearing or review is sought. |\n| Mailing | Memorandum mailed to the Court is deemed filed on mailing. | Electronic rules govern within their scope. |\n| Untimely memorandum | Rule 40 expressly states waiver of the right to costs. | Any requested enlargement or relief requires its own authority; no automatic revival. |\n| Objection | File and serve adverse party no later than **fourteen days after service of the memorandum**, identifying challenged items and reasons. | The court hears and determines the objection. |\n| Mailed objection | Deemed filed on mailing under Rule 40(d). | Not a universal filing rule for every appellate paper. |\n| Copies | Original only; no additional court copies required. | Service obligations remain. |\n\n**[C010–C011.]** Rule 40(d) does not repeat Rule 54(d)(5)’s express sentence deeming all objections waived if not timely made. That civil-rule sentence is not silently inserted into the appellate rule. Untimeliness may still have consequences under the applicable rules and judicial construction. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40)\n\nIAR 38(a) identifies opinion filing as announcement for its purpose. A mailed copy or later actual receipt is not automatically substituted for the Rule 40 event. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38)\n\n## 3.2 Rule 54 comparison where it governs\n\n| Subject | Civil-rule provision | Why kept separate |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Cost memorandum | After verdict/decision, but no later than fourteen days after judgment entry; premature memorandum is timely. | Different trigger from appellate opinion filing/announcement. |\n| Verification | States correctness and compliance to the party’s best knowledge and belief. | IAR 40 instead expressly requires itemization; its text does not reproduce this verification sentence. |\n| Objection | Motion to disallow within fourteen days of service, filed and served. | Express objection-waiver language appears here. |\n| Effect on execution | Motion does not stay execution of judgment exclusive of costs. | Not a universal statement about every appellate motion or stay. |\n| Settlement | Court enters an order fixing costs after hearing or expiration of objection time. | Distinct from clerk insertion into a higher appellate remittitur. |\n| Fees | Affidavit, same cost-processing route, possible evidentiary hearing, amount order. | Applicable statute or contract may provide otherwise. |\n\n**[C012, C028.]** No universal selection between these procedures for every district-appellate or remanded fee issue is made without the applicable direction and construction. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54)\n\n# 4. Substantive attorney-fee sources\n\n## 4.1 Procedural rule versus legal entitlement\n\nIAR 41 requires the court to determine whether a claimed legal right exists. The relevant statutory or lawful contractual source must independently apply. Merely prevailing, requesting fees in a brief, or supplying an affidavit does not establish that source.\n\nRule 54(e)(1) likewise recognizes reasonable prevailing-party fees **when provided by statute or contract**. No private contract was retrieved, drafted, or assumed enforceable. **[C013–C014, C025.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41)\n\nThe following statutory readings are **provisional**. They identify possible source conditions, not an actual award or a universal rule for every appeal involving debt.\n\n## 4.2 Section 12-120\n\n| Branch | Complete material conditions | Boundary |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **(1): amount pleaded** | Except subsections (3) and (4), amount pleaded **$35,000 or less**; prevailing party receives court-fixed reasonable fees as costs. | Pleaded amount is not necessarily amount recovered. |\n| Plaintiff’s prosecution under (1) | Written payment demand at least **ten days before commencement**. | Not a demand rule for every other fee source. |\n| Tender exception | No plaintiff fee if court finds precommencement tender at least **95% of the amount awarded**. | No tender or award evaluated. |\n| **(2): counterclaim/crossclaim/third-party claim** | Subsection (1) applies to the stated later claims. | The express ten-day-demand exception is for a **counterclaim**; not silently extended to every listed claim. |\n| **(3): enumerated obligations** | Open account, account stated, note, bill, negotiable instrument, guaranty, goods/wares/merchandise/services contract, and the specified commercial-transaction category, unless law provides otherwise. | Actual classification and competing substantive restrictions remain necessary. |\n| Commercial transaction | Excludes transactions for personal or household purposes. | This definition does not by itself delete the separately enumerated account/instrument/contract branches. |\n| Party definition | Includes the listed private and governmental categories. | No actual status determined. |\n| **(4): personal injury** | Separate branch with its own demand, statement, tender, and waiver conditions. | Read but excluded; its periods and percentages are not ordinary-debt rules. |\n| **(5): postjudgment collection** | Reasonable collection fees/costs when entitled under (1)–(4), following memorandum, notice, and hearing. | An appeal is not automatically “collection” merely because it occurs after judgment. |\n| **(6): small-claims collection** | Separate fee measure, factors and cap. | Its principal-value cap and percentage-arrangement restriction are not imported into ordinary appellate awards. |\n\n**[C017–C020.]** The statute does not establish that every alleged consumer obligation fits a listed branch or that every contractual charge is enforceable. Consumer-credit, instrument, contract, and sector-specific restrictions remain separate. [Justia Law](https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-120/)\n\n## 4.3 Section 12-121\n\nThe reproduced statute permits reasonable attorney fees to a prevailing party upon the stated finding that the action was brought, pursued, or defended **frivolously, unreasonably, or without foundation**. It preserves statutes otherwise authorizing fees and defines parties to include the stated private and governmental actors.\n\nRule 54(e)(2), where applicable, requires a written finding with the basis and reasons and bars a § 12-121 award on default judgment. That default restriction is a scope boundary, not a default-procedure rerun. **[C021.]** [Justia Law+1](https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-121/)\n\nLosing does not itself establish the statutory predicate. “Bad faith” is not substituted as the only possible predicate, and no actual conduct is labeled frivolous.\n\n### 2017 history\n\nThe read H0097 introduced text:\n\n- Restates the statutory standard in § 2.\n- Repeals the specified 1987 provision in § 3.\n- Uses an emergency passage-and-approval clause in § 4.\n\nReported history identifies **2017 chapter 47**, effective **March 1, 2017**; Rule 54(e)(2) also identifies that date. The final official act was inaccessible. No retroactive effect or historical entitlement is inferred from the mirror. **[C045.]** [LegiScan+2](https://legiscan.com/ID/text/H0097/id/1493576/Idaho-2017-H0097-Introduced.pdf)\n\n## 4.4 Section 12-117: public actors\n\n| Branch | Conditions and allocation |\n| --- | --- |\n| **(1)** | Unless another statute provides otherwise, adverse state-agency/political-subdivision and private-person categories; proceeding includes appeal; mandatory reasonable fees, witness fees, and expenses when the nonprevailing party acted without a reasonable factual or legal basis. |\n| **(2)** | Partial success with that finding as to the relevant portion; award tied to the portion on which the party prevailed. |\n| **(3)** | Payment from the regular operating budget; insufficiency invokes separate statutory claims routes. |\n| **(4)** | Governmental entity versus governmental entity in a civil judicial proceeding; its own prevailing-party fee/expense provision. The subsection does not repeat subsection (1)’s no-reasonable-basis condition. |\n| **(5)** | Licensing-authority/licensee administrative branch, with a branch-specific prevailing definition and other protections. Excluded from this ordinary debt component. |\n| **(6)** | Definitions of person, political subdivision, proceeding, state agency, and the special licensing roles. |\n| **(7)** | If a person’s pleaded amount is **$25,000 or less**, the person must satisfy § 12-120 **as well as** § 12-117. |\n\n**[C022–C023.]** The $25,000 cross-reference is preserved even though § 12-120(1) uses $35,000. Neither source was rewritten to match the other. [Justia Law](https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-117/)\n\nThe incorporated § 67-5201(4) agency definition was read with its exclusions, including the legislative/judicial branches, the stated constitutional-officer functions, militia, and Board of Correction. The constitutional-role and other embedded scope questions remain held. The § 12-117 budget-insufficiency incorporations—§ 67-2018 and title 6, chapter 9—were not completed. [Justia Law](https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-67/chapter-52/section-67-5201/)\n\n## 4.5 Public payment, fee waiver, and contract limits\n\nSections 12-118 and 12-119 describe payment from the specified treasury **when costs have been awarded**. They are not independent proof of an entitlement or a blanket waiver of immunity. [Justia Law+1](https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-118/)\n\nSection 31-3220(8) permits an attorney-fee and cost judgment at the action’s conclusion as in other cases. Thus, a qualifying initial fee waiver is not by itself immunity from adverse costs or fees. The statutory public-fund recovery and later-repayment qualifications remain separate. **[C024.]** [Justia Law](https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-31/chapter-32/section-31-3220/)\n\nNo universal nonwaiver rule, reciprocal-contract term, enforceable fee clause, or substantive consumer exception was established without its own authority. Procedural waiver, permitted later claims, contract enforceability, and substantive nonwaiver are distinct. **[C025.]**\n\n# 5. Attorney-fee request, opposition, and amount\n\n## 5.1 IAR 41’s two stages\n\n| Stage | Required or permitted act | Actor and consequence |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Assert legal right | Fee claim as an issue in the party’s **first appellate brief**, with the basis under Rule 35(a)(5) or (b)(5). | Court may permit a later claim on appropriate conditions. |\n| Entitlement argument | May be addressed at the appeal’s oral argument. | Does not guarantee oral argument or entitlement. |\n| Decision on right | Appellate decision determines the claimed right. | Does not contain the amount under Rule 41(c). |\n| Amount claim after entitlement | Filed concurrently with, or as part of, the Rule 40 cost memorandum. | Affidavit must state the computation method. |\n| Paralegal fees | May be included at the court’s discretion. | Not automatically allowed or excluded. |\n| Automated legal research | Reasonable cost may be included if found reasonably necessary. | A charge label is not proof of reasonableness or necessity. |\n| Opposition to amount | Same manner as Rule 40 cost objections. | Entitlement and amount objections must not be confused. |\n| Amount decision | Court fixes amount or remands for additional evidence and determination. | No automatic evidentiary hearing for every claim. |\n| Final inclusion | Clerk inserts amount in remittitur using Rule 40(f)’s mechanism. | Later determination is accommodated. |\n\n**[C013–C016.]** No affidavit, itemization, hourly rate, time entry, fee request, or award was produced. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41)\n\nThe plain Rule 41 procedure requires a computation-method affidavit; it does not itself print a universal lodestar formula, multiplier, percentage of recovery, or exhaustive invoice checklist.\n\n## 5.2 Civil-rule amount factors\n\nWhere Rule 54(e)(3) governs, the court **must consider** the following twelve factors. IAR 41 does not expressly state that this list is mechanically incorporated into every Supreme Court determination; the proper appellate/remand relationship remains a necessary legal question rather than an assumed federal standard.\n\n| Subdivision | Factor |\n| --- | --- |\n| A | Time and labor required |\n| B | Novelty and difficulty |\n| C | Requisite skill, and attorney experience/ability in the relevant field |\n| D | Prevailing charges for like work |\n| E | Fixed or contingent nature |\n| F | Time limitations imposed by client or circumstances |\n| G | Amount involved and results obtained |\n| H | Undesirability |\n| I | Nature and length of professional relationship |\n| J | Awards in similar cases |\n| K | Reasonable automated-research cost, if reasonably necessary |\n| L | Other factor deemed appropriate |\n\n**[C026.]** No market rate, comparable case, client relationship, service, or factual input was investigated. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54)\n\n## 5.3 Proof, allocation, and limits\n\n| Question | Supported distinction |\n| --- | --- |\n| Claimed hours/rate or other method | A method stated in an affidavit is an assertion, not conclusive proof. |\n| Multiple claims or parties | Statutory portion-specific rules, prevailing-party analysis, court directions, and actual work attribution matter. |\n| Contractual amount | A private fee agreement does not automatically fix the judicial award. Rule 54(e)(7) says the judicial allowance does not determine attorney-client fees. |\n| Percentage/multiplier | No universal ordinary-appellate percentage cap, enhancement, or multiplier was authenticated. The small-claims collection provision is not transferred. |\n| Duplicated work or overlapping theories | No duplicate recovery is approved. The source, causal work, and proper allocation require determination; no universal mathematical rule is invented. |\n| Fees incurred establishing a fee amount | No categorical recovery or exclusion was established from the read generic provisions alone. |\n| Attorney fees as “costs” | Does not remove the separate substantive-entitlement requirement. |\n| Reversal or remand | Does not alone settle final prevailing status, the compensable work period, or every downstream fee issue. |\n\n**[C027.]**\n\nUnder Rule 54(e)(5)–(8), where applicable, the affidavit states basis and method, objections follow the civil cost procedure, an evidentiary hearing is discretionary, and an order fixes amount. A timely amount objection requires reasons and factors in the order. Statute or contract may provide otherwise. **[C028.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54)\n\n# 6. Sanction awards are a separate basis for relief\n\n## 6.1 Appellate signing and certification\n\nIAR 11.2(a) requires the applicable signature and reasonable-inquiry certification concerning factual support, existing law or good-faith legal change, and proper purpose.\n\n| Issue | Rule consequence |\n| --- | --- |\n| Predicate violation | Court, on motion or initiative, **shall impose an appropriate sanction**. |\n| Possible targets | Signer, represented party, or both, as the rule states. |\n| Possible compensatory component | Reasonable expenses incurred by another party because of the filing, including reasonable fees. |\n| Causation | Expenses must have the stated connection to the offending paper. |\n| Prevailing status | The text does not make ordinary prevailing-party status the universal predicate. |\n| Safe harbor | No twenty-one-day safe harbor is stated in this appellate rule. |\n| Referral | The separate ICAR 59 vexatious-litigant incorporation remains held. |\n\n**[C030, C034.]** A mandatory appropriate response upon a proved violation is not a mandatory fee award, predetermined amount, or finding of a violation here. Full due-process and constitutional limits remain open. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.2)\n\n## 6.2 Enlarged records, nonappearance, and nonfiling\n\n| Source | Predicate | Authorized consequence and limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| IAR 19(e) | Irrelevant record/transcript material vexatiously or unreasonably increases cost. | Court may deny the excessive-cost portion and/or impose monetary sanction after notice and opportunity to respond. Unused material is not automatically irrelevant. |\n| IAR 37(d) | Specified counsel nonappearance. | Court may impose penalties/sanctions, including reasonable attorney fees. Recipient, causation, amount, and process are not universally supplied by a fixed formula. |\n| IAR 37(e) | Party failed to file a brief. | Restriction on oral argument; not automatic fee entitlement or merits admission. |\n| IAR 21 | Failure to take a nonjurisdictional step. | Appropriate discretionary action may include dismissal; not every defect produces a fee award. |\n| Rule 83(m) | Comparable district-appellate distinction. | No actual dismissal or sanction determined. |\n| IAR 32(a) | Specified noncompliance dismissal motion. | Its argument-relative filing condition is not transformed into a universal sanction period for every motion or no-argument appeal. |\n\n**[C031–C034.]** No record, brief, appearance, delay, or conduct was evaluated. [Idaho Supreme Court+2](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/19)\n\n## 6.3 Section 12-123 is not assumed to be an appellate fee source\n\nThe complete reproduced statute was read. It defines frivolous conduct, uses a **pretrial or within-twenty-one-days-after-judgment** structure, requires the specified hearing and notice, allows relevant evidence, and limits an award to fees both reasonably incurred and necessitated by the conduct. Targets may be a party, counsel, or both; attorney-client fees are not determined by the award.\n\nThose words alone do not authenticate § 12-123 as an independent source for fees incurred in an appeal. No appellate case construction was researched, and its twenty-one-day period is **not** substituted for IAR 40/41. **[C029.]** [Justia Law](https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-123/)\n\n# 7. Service, filing, computation, extensions, and protected information\n\n## 7.1 New cost/fee acts and their reference events\n\n| Act | Filing and service relationship |\n| --- | --- |\n| Cost memorandum | Both filing and service on adverse parties; period starts with opinion filing/announcement. |\n| Fee amount claim | Concurrent with or part of cost memorandum after entitlement determination. |\n| Cost/fee amount objection | Filing and service; period starts with service of the memorandum/claim. |\n| Higher appellate motion | IAR 32 support/service requirements; ordinarily decided without oral argument unless ordered. |\n| District appellate motion | Rule 83(n) district filing, supporting brief, and fourteen-day opposition relation, subject to the applicable specific provision. |\n| Civil fee affidavit alternative | IRCP 2.7 and provisional § 9-1406 identify qualifying declarations, with exclusions. Their route applicability is not assumed universally. |\n| Proof of service | Separate from the entitlement affidavit or computational support. |\n\n**[C035.]** No affidavit form, declaration, certificate, or proof of service was prepared. [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/32)\n\n## 7.2 Electronic filing and correction\n\nThe necessary electronic rules were read afresh. Their scope and exceptions must be satisfied before applying their mechanics.\n\n| Event | Rule-based condition |\n| --- | --- |\n| Filing | Submission and acknowledged acceptance, read with timestamp and relation-back provisions. |\n| Filing day | Court-local time; not automatically America/Los_Angeles for every court. |\n| Accepted filing | Rule 12’s receipt-timestamp relation, including the error-queue qualification. |\n| Rejected filing | Three-business-day corrected-resubmission/request branch, excluding legal holidays and retaining the next-judicial-day qualification. |\n| Technical receipt failure | Seven-business-day resubmission branch plus satisfactory proof; not merely an asserted technical problem. |\n| Service | Designated system transmission under Rule 17, not a courtesy copy. |\n| After-5-p.m. party electronic service | One-day additional-time provision within its scope. |\n| Court service | Rule 18’s separate registered-user/conventional-service requirements. |\n| Signature | Electronic and other-signer conditions are distinct; no signature specimen reproduced. |\n\n**[C036–C037.]** No system, account, service contact, failed filing, correction, or actual timestamp was inspected. [Idaho Supreme Court+4](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/11)\n\n## 7.3 Computation and extensions\n\nIAR 22 governs its scoped periods, excluding the trigger day and providing the stated last-day weekend/nonjudicial-day treatment. The holiday statutes remain provisional. IRCP 2.2’s mail and inaccessibility provisions do not automatically add time to every appellate fee act.\n\nThe Rule 40 memorandum period is opinion-based; its objection period is service-based. No universal mail or electronic addition is applied to both. **[C038.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/22)\n\nThe resolved Rule 46 relation is retained precisely:\n\n- Good cause is required.\n- Its listed excluded filings remain excluded.\n- The motion must be served on all parties.\n- The court may act immediately and ex parte.\n- A written objection seeking review is due within **seven days of service of the motion**.\n- The Clerk separately serves the order.\n\nThis provision is not automatic relief from Rule 40’s express untimely-memorandum waiver. **[C039, C048.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/46)\n\n## 7.4 Privacy and disclosure boundary\n\nA computation affidavit does not authorize disclosure of privileged communications, protected identifiers, or unrelated confidential material. IREFS 15 assigns redaction responsibility and retains exceptions and protected-copy mechanisms.\n\nOnly this necessary filing boundary is relied on. Complete privilege, sealing, billing-detail discovery, and waiver law remain held. No invoice, private account, medical fact, or protected record was requested. **[C047.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/15)\n\n# 8. Decision, remittitur, amount remand, and postdecision handling\n\n| Event | Supported consequence | Boundary |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Opinion filed/announced | Starts IAR 40’s cost-memorandum relation. | Rehearing/review filing does not itself postpone that obligation. |\n| Right to attorney fees determined | Included in appellate decision under Rule 41(c). | Amount handled separately. |\n| Amount remanded | Lower court/agency may receive evidence and fix amount as directed. | Not a merits remand beyond the order. |\n| Remittitur issued before final taxation | IAR 38(d) permits issuance despite unresolved costs/fees. | No automatic hold on remittitur. |\n| Costs or fee amount later determined/amended | Clerk forwards itemized statement to the lower tribunal for addition to judgment/order. | No new universal objection/reconsideration clock is created by implication. |\n| Section 12-114 | Taxation before Supreme Court clerk subject to court exception/review and rule-prescribed time. | Provisional statute does not supply an extra independent deadline. |\n| Court of Appeals | IAR 122/38 framework applies; granted further review has its specified remittitur consequence. | Full review/remittitur practice remains separate. |\n| Trial-level costs during appeal | IAR 13(b)(9) preserves the stated lower-court function. | Trial fees are not automatically appellate fees. |\n| Advance appellate fees/costs | IAR 13(b)(12) permits the specified lower-court advance, subject to final appellate determination of right and amount. | No independent substantive entitlement or actual advance. |\n| Cost/fee motion and merits-appeal time | IAR 14 and Rule 83 expressly exclude the specified cost/fee motions from their timing-reset branches. | No gateway rerun or actual deadline. |\n\n**[C040–C043.]** Mere filing of a fee claim is not satisfaction, collection permission, a lien, or an automatic stay. [Idaho Supreme Court+3](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38)\n\n# 9. Source and usage register\n\nAll fresh access occurred **October 28, 2026, Pacific time**. Short IDs carry the prefix **S_ID-P30-**.\n\nMultiple pages of one rule collection are uses of that collection, not independent corroboration.\n\n## S001 — official Idaho Appellate Rules\n\n**Issuer:** Idaho Supreme Court.\n**Consolidated URL:** https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/iar\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Actual read bounds and use |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/1 | Complete scope/application provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/2 | Complete definitions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.2 | Complete (a)–(b); ICAR 59 referral merits held |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13 | Complete material (b) introductory clause, (b)(9), (b)(12); other stay/security merits not applied |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/14 | Complete civil timing paragraph; use confined to cost/fee-motion exclusion |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/16 | Complete; cost bond/nonexecution agreement distinguished |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/19 | Complete; substantive reliance on (e), not record-designation mechanics |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/20 | Complete filing/service provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/21 | Complete jurisdictional/nonjurisdictional distinction |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/22 | Complete computation clause |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/23 | Complete relevant fee-waiver/public-actor provisions; current filing amounts not adopted as taxed costs |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/26.1 | Complete historical body and repeal heading; **not current disk-price authority** |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/32 | Complete (a)–(f); printed certificate not reproduced |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/33 | Complete stipulated-dismissal provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/35 | Complete page inspected; substantive reliance on (a)(5), (b)(5), and relevant multi-party context |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/37 | Complete body inspected; reliance on (d)–(e) consequences |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38 | Complete; reliance on announcement and unresolved-taxation/remittitur provisions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40 | **Complete (a)–(f)** |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41 | **Complete (a)–(e)** |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/46 | Complete extension rule; corrected motion-service event retained |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/47 | Complete court-service provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/48 | Complete unspecified-practice provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/101 | Complete Court of Appeals scope |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/110 | Complete subsequent-filing/assignment interface |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/122 | Complete Court of Appeals remittitur provision |\n\n### Material displayed history\n\n| Rule | Displayed history material here |\n| --- | --- |\n| IAR baseline | March 25, 1977 adoption / July 1, 1977 effectiveness, where displayed |\n| **40** | Amendments March 30, 1984/July 1, 1984; March 20, 1985/July 1, 1985; March 28, 1986/July 1, 1986; March 20, 1991/July 1, 1991; January 30, 2001/July 1, 2001; May 5, 2017/July 1, 2017; January 24, 2019/same day; **April 28, 2022/same day** |\n| **41** | March 30, 1984/July 1, 1984; March 23, 1990/July 1, 1990; **January 24, 2019/same day** |\n| **26.1** | Adopted March 20, 1991/July 1, 1991; page heading states **repealed effective January 24, 2019** |\n| **32** | Latest displayed amendment **April 28, 2022, effective July 1, 2022** |\n| **46** | Latest displayed amendment **April 28, 2022, effective April 28, 2022** |\n| 11.2 | June 15, 1987/November 1, 1987; November 20, 2012/January 1, 2013 |\n| 33 | March 28, 1986/July 1, 1986; September 8, 2016/same day; May 5, 2017/July 1, 2017 |\n| 13 and 23 | Current pages include 2026 amendments; only the complete selected cost/fee interfaces are relied on |\n\nThe April 2022 Rule 40/46 amendments have the additional adopted-order evidence in S006. Other original amendments were not opened. No absence-of-later-change certification is made.\n\n## S002 — official civil rules\n\n**Issuer:** Idaho Supreme Court.\n**Consolidated URL:** https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ircp\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Actual read bounds |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1 | Complete scope/local-rule clauses |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2 | Complete computation/extension/mail provisions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.7 | Complete declaration incorporation |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/5 | Complete relevant later-paper service, filing, and proof; initial service excluded |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7 | Complete motion provisions; generic hearing schedule only as necessary |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54 | Complete body inspected; substantive reliance on (a)’s costs/finality distinction, (d)(1)(A)–(B), (D)–(F), (d)(2)–(6), and **all (e)(1)–(8)**. Trial cost-category dollar schedules not applied. |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/58 | Complete entry provision, only to distinguish unresolved costs from entry |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83 | Complete page inspected; substantive reliance on (f)(1), (m)–(q), necessary motion-timing exclusion, and disposition interface |\n\n**Displayed baseline:** March 1, 2016/July 1, 2016.\n**Material additions:** Rule 2.2—September 9, 2016/same day; Rule 54 amendments through April 28, 2021/July 1, 2021, including the April 17, 2017 nunc-pro-tunc March 1, 2017 fee amendment; Rule 83’s current page includes June 30, 2026/July 1, 2026.\n\nOriginal civil-rule orders were not recovered. No full trial-cost or gateway report is claimed.\n\n## S003 — official electronic-filing rules\n\n**Issuer:** Idaho Supreme Court.\n**Consolidated URL:** https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/irefs\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Actual read bounds |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/1 | Complete hierarchy/scope |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/2 | Complete definitions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/4 | Complete filer categories and exceptions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/5 | Complete exceptions; special-proceeding details not applied |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/9 | Complete signature provision; sample identity omitted |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/11 | Complete filing/acceptance rule |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/12 | Complete time-of-filing rule |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/13 | Complete rejection/correction; no prescribed form created |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/14 | Complete technical-failure relief |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/15 | Complete privacy provisions; substantive use limited to filing responsibility and exceptions; no actual disclosure claim |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/17 | Complete party-service rule; discovery details not applied |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/18 | Complete court-service rule; form wording omitted |\n\n**Displayed baseline:** April 15, 2019/July 1, 2019. Material later entries include Rule 4’s September 11, 2024 amendment and Rule 5/9 amendments through June 30, 2025/July 1, 2025. Original orders and technical guide were not opened.\n\n## S004 — provisional statutory bodies\n\n**Publisher/edition:** Justia, **2025 Idaho Code**. Complete bodies and displayed histories were read, except where a narrower relied-on definition is stated.\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Material use and displayed credits |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-101/ | Civil cost-rule relationship. Added 1977 ch.4 §1 p.9. |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-107/ | Complete appeal-cost provision. C.C.P.1881 §698; R.S./R.C./C.L.4906; C.S.7212; I.C.A.12-107. |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-114/ | Complete taxation/review/certification provision. C.C.P.1881 §704; 1911 ch.204 §1 p.673 and recodifications. |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-117/ | Complete (1)–(7). Added1984 ch.204 §1 p.501; amendments1993,1994,2000,2010,2012,2018; latest2019 ch.212 §1 p.643. |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-118/ | Complete state-payment clause. C.C.P.1881 §708 lineage; 1994 ch.180 §9 p.428. |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-119/ | Complete county-payment clause. C.C.P.1881 §709 and recodifications. |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-120/ | Complete (1)–(6); personal-injury and small-claims branches excluded from ordinary appeal application. Added1970 ch.44 §1 p.91; amendments through2018 ch.244 §2 p.568. |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-121/ | Complete. Added1976 ch.349 §1 p.1158; 1987 ch.263 §2 p.555; 2017 ch.47 §2 p.76. |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-123/ | Complete (1)–(4), used as a boundary rather than established appellate authority. Added1987 ch.278 §8 p.580. |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-67/chapter-52/section-67-5201/ | Complete relevant **(4)** agency definition and exclusions; section history read. Added1965 ch.273 §1 p.701; latest listed2025 ch.151 §6 p.741. No claim that this latest amendment changed every part of (4). |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-31/chapter-32/section-31-3220/ | Complete (1)–(8); reliance on scope and waiver-versus-adverse-award distinction. Added1977 ch.228 §1 p.680;1979 ch.222 §1 p.617;1996 ch.420 §6 p.1402. |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-9/chapter-14/section-9-1406/ | Complete (1)–(2), including exceptions; generic form not reproduced. Added2013 ch.259 §1 p.636. |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-16/section-1-1607/ | Complete nonjudicial-day provision. C.C.P.1881 §46 lineage;1961 ch.270 §1 p.480;1971 ch.84 §1 p.186. |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-73/chapter-1/section-73-108/ | Complete holiday/substitution provision; latest listed2002 ch.146 §3 p.423. |\n\nThe § 12-120 displayed intervening amendment years are 1975, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1994, 1996, 2001, and 2012. Those original acts were not recovered. All these statutory bodies remain secondary; no official-current 2026 certification follows from the publisher’s edition.\n\n## S005 — 2017 H0097 legislative-version evidence\n\n- Text: https://legiscan.com/ID/text/H0097/id/1493576/Idaho-2017-H0097-Introduced.pdf\n- Status: https://legiscan.com/ID/bill/H0097/2017\n- Text landing page: https://legiscan.com/ID/text/H0097/2017\n\n**Read:** Complete one-page §§ 1–4; substantive use limited to the statutory amendment, repeal, and effective clause. An incidental named judicial reference in the intent paragraph was not investigated or reproduced.\n\n**Pixels:** Page 1/PDF index 0.\n**Version:** Introduced mirror.\n**Reported history:** Chapter 47; March 1, 2017 effectiveness.\n**Limit:** Final official act and full historical application remain held.\n\n## S006 — adopted April 28, 2022 order\n\n**Issuer/title:** Idaho Supreme Court, *Order—Amendments to Idaho Appellate Rules 11.1, 12.1, 40 and 46*.\n**Official institutional host:** Idaho State Bar.\n\n**Literal PDF URL:**\nhttps://isb.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/Amendments-to-Idaho-Appellate-Rules-11.1-12.1-40-46-eff-April-28-2022.pdf\n\n**Locator:**\nhttps://isb.idaho.gov/blog/idaho-supreme-court-order-regarding-rule-amendments-effective-april-28-2022/\n\n**Actual read:**\n\n| Page | Read bounds |\n| --- | --- |\n| PDF index 0, first unnumbered page | Order title and adoption language; unrelated family-rule amendments excluded from merits |\n| PDF index 1, second unnumbered page | Complete Rule 40(b) amendment; complete amended Rule 46 paragraph; immediate-effect clause and instruction that markup is not permanent rule text |\n| PDF index 2, third unnumbered page | Publication directive, **April 28, 2022** date, signature/attestation and certification of copy; personal names not reproduced |\n\nAll three page images were inspected. The PDF returned no parsed text; the findings are based on the actual page images.\n\n**Legal status:** Adopted order, effective immediately as stated.\n**Limit:** It is an amendment order, not a complete replacement of every subdivision of Rule 40 or Rule 46. No broader pending-case transition rule was inferred.\n\n## S007 — official history locator and bounded currentness searches\n\n- https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments\n\n**Read:** Official publication/incorporation statement and available index context.\n**Limit:** No complete original-order sequence recovered.\n\nBounded 2025–2026 searches for the relevant fee statutes and IAR provisions returned, among other things, special small-claims and sector-specific legislative leads. Those were not treated as ordinary appellate amendments without their operative scope. No no-change finding was made from the search results.\n\n## S008 — fresh failures and unopened sources\n\n| Literal URL or material | Actual result |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title12/T12CH1/SECT12-120/ | Fresh official section attempt inaccessible |\n| https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title12/T12CH1/SECT12-121/ | Fresh official section attempt inaccessible |\n| https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/sessioninfo/2017/legislation/H0097.pdf | Actual legislative link followed; restricted/inaccessible |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules/Order-Amending-Appellate-Rules.pdf | Ordinary historical order route returned404 |\n| API-hosted original orders, forms and technical guide | Not opened |\n| Incidental cases/opinions/dockets and legislative roll-call identities | Not opened or relied on |\n\nThe successfully recovered 2022 adopted order is a separate ordinary public source. Earlier failed routes are not relabeled successful, and no final statute is inferred from the later rule order.\n\n# 10. Atomic consequential-claim register\n\nShort IDs carry the prefix **S_ID-P30-**.\n\n| Claim | Precise proposition | Source/pinpoint | Status |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **C001** | Official cost/fee rules and a material adopted amendment were read; statutory currentness remains provisional. | S001–S008 | O/P/L/H |\n| **C002** | District appellate, higher appellate and Court of Appeals roles are distinct. | Rule83(f),(n),(q); IAR101,110 | O/H |\n| **C003** | Prevailing status and mixed allocation require the applicable rule and determination. | IAR40(a); Rule54(d)(1)(A)–(B),(2) | O/H |\n| **C004** | New-trial and modified-judgment cost discretion is separately stated. | §12-107 | P |\n| **C005** | Voluntary/stipulated dismissal cost/fee provisions have different conditions. | IAR32(b),33 | O |\n| **C006** | Current enumerated appellate costs are not the entire trial-cost schedule. | IAR40(b) | O |\n| **C007** | The adopted2022order deleted the former brief-production allowance. | S006, PDF index1 | O |\n| **C008** | The current Rule40disk reference points to a repealed Rule26.1provision. | IAR40(b)(2);26.1 | O/H |\n| **C009** | Supersedeas-premium recovery has a timely written-nonexecution exception. | IAR40(b)(4);16(b) | O |\n| **C010** | Cost memoranda have an opinion-based filing/service period and express untimely waiver. | IAR40(c) | O |\n| **C011** | Cost objections have a service-based period; appellate and civil waiver wording differ. | IAR40(d);Rule54(d)(5) | O/H |\n| **C012** | No single district-appellate cost trigger was invented from the IRCP/IAR fallback. | Rule83;IAR40;Rule54 | O/H |\n| **C013** | First-brief fee claim and later permission are procedural conditions. | IAR41(a);35(a)(5),(b)(5) | O |\n| **C014** | Procedural fee rules do not alone create every substantive entitlement. | IAR41(b)–(c);Rule54(e)(1) | O/H |\n| **C015** | Amount claim, affidavit, paralegal and research costs have separate requirements. | IAR41(d) | O |\n| **C016** | Court may determine amount or remand for evidence and determination. | IAR41(d) | O |\n| **C017** | Section12-120(1)uses the pleaded threshold, demand and tender conditions. | §12-120(1) | P |\n| **C018** | The counterclaim demand exception is not universal for all later claims. | §12-120(2) | P |\n| **C019** | Enumerated debt categories and commercial-transaction definition are distinct. | §12-120(3) | P/H |\n| **C020** | Personal-injury, collection and small-claims branches are not ordinary appellate formulas. | §12-120(4)–(6) | P/H |\n| **C021** | Section12-121requires prevailing status and its specified finding, not mere defeat. | §12-121;Rule54(e)(2) | P/O |\n| **C022** | Section12-117has public/private, partial-success and separate government-to-government branches. | §12-117(1)–(4) | P |\n| **C023** | Definitions and the $25,000cross-reference remain exact and distinct from §12-120. | §12-117(6)–(7);§67-5201(4) | P/H |\n| **C024** | Public payment provisions and initial waivers do not themselves eliminate adverse-award exposure. | §§12-118–119,31-3220(8) | P |\n| **C025** | Actual contract entitlement and substantive nonwaiver remain missing predicates. | Rule54(e)(1),(8);scope | O/H |\n| **C026** | All twelve civil fee-amount factors were read; no federal formula substituted. | Rule54(e)(3) | O/H |\n| **C027** | Claimed method, allocation, reasonableness and judicial amount remain distinct. | IAR41(d);Rule54(e) | O/H |\n| **C028** | Civil fee objections, hearing, reasons and client-fee relationship have specific rules. | Rule54(e)(5)–(8) | O |\n| **C029** | Section12-123was not authenticated as an independent appellate fee source. | §12-123 | P/H |\n| **C030** | Appellate signing sanctions have a predicate, permitted targets and causal expense component. | IAR11.2(a) | O/H |\n| **C031** | Enlarged-record sanctions require the stated finding and notice/opportunity. | IAR19(e) | O |\n| **C032** | Nonappearance sanctions differ from missing-brief argument restrictions. | IAR37(d)–(e) | O |\n| **C033** | Nonjurisdictional procedural failures do not automatically yield fees or merits loss. | IAR21;Rule83(m) | O/H |\n| **C034** | Sanctions and ordinary awards have different procedural and constitutional predicates. | IAR11.2,19,32,37 | O/H |\n| **C035** | Filing, service, support, and declaration qualifications are distinct. | IAR20,32,40–41;Rule2.7;§9-1406 | O/P/H |\n| **C036** | Electronic submission, acceptance and service events are not interchangeable. | IREFS11–12,17–18 | O |\n| **C037** | Rejection correction and technical failure have separate relation-back conditions. | IREFS13–14 | O/H |\n| **C038** | Opinion-based and service-based periods do not receive universal mail/electronic additions. | IAR22;Rule2.2;IREFS17(h) | O/P/H |\n| **C039** | Rule46requires good cause and preserves its excluded filings and exact objection event. | IAR46 | O |\n| **C040** | Unresolved taxation does not necessarily delay remittitur. | IAR38(d),40(f),41(d) | O |\n| **C041** | Later or amended cost/fee statements follow the specified clerk/lower-court mechanism. | IAR40(f),41(d);§12-114 | O/P |\n| **C042** | Lower-court trial fees and provisional appellate advances are not final appellate entitlement. | IAR13(b)(9),(12) | O |\n| **C043** | Cost/fee motions do not automatically restart merits-appeal time or establish a stay. | IAR14;Rule83(b);read boundaries | O/H |\n| **C044** | The2022order supplies actual adopted deletion/effectiveness evidence, within its bounds. | S006 | O |\n| **C045** | The2017fee-amendment mirror is not the final official act. | S005;Rule54(e)(2) | L/O/H |\n| **C046** | Current official statutes and complete intervening histories remain held. | S004–S008 | H |\n| **C047** | A fee affidavit does not authorize disclosure of protected material. | IREFS15 | O/H |\n| **C048** | The prior Rule46motion-service correction is preserved, not reopened or contradicted. | IAR46;S006 | O/reuse |\n| **C049** | Source failures, historical text and actual reads are separately recorded. | S001–S008 | Provenance |\n| **C050** | Special regimes and judicial/constitutional construction remain exact dependencies. | Section13 | H |\n| **C051** | No actual award, conduct, fee amount or outcome was determined; prior holds remain. | Research record | Certain |\n\n# 11. Quantity, base, event, and exception register\n\nNo amount, rate, time entry, invoice, page count, financial input, or calendar result is supplied.\n\n## 11.1 Costs and fees\n\n| Quantity/relation | Legal base/reference event | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Fourteen days | Filing **and announcement** of appellate opinion | Cost memorandum filed and served; rehearing/review does not itself defer |\n| No later than fourteen days | Service of cost memorandum | Cost objection filed and served with reasons |\n| Same procedure as cost objection | Fee amount opposition | IAR41incorporation |\n| Concurrently with/as part of cost memorandum | Fee amount claim after entitlement | Computation-method affidavit |\n| First appellate brief | Fee-right assertion | Later claim only by court permission |\n| Original only; no court copies | Cost/fee memoranda, objections and supporting/opposing briefs | Service remains required |\n| Mailing date | IAR40memo/objection filing treatment | Electronic scope distinguished |\n| Seven days **of notice-of-appeal filing** | Written nonexecution agreement exception | Supersedeas-premium taxation; no stay report |\n| **$6 per page** | Former original-brief production category | **Deleted effective April28,2022**; not current allowance |\n| No current disk charge applied | RepealedRule26.1reference | Historical disk rates not revived |\n| $35,000 or less | §12-120(1)amount pleaded | Subsections(3)/(4)exceptions |\n| Not less than ten days before commencement | Plaintiff’s written demand under(1) | No actual demand; counterclaim exception separately stated |\n| At least95% | Precommencement tender compared with plaintiff’s award | No values or comparison performed |\n| $25,000 or less | §12-117(7)person’s pleaded amount | Additional §12-120requirements; not changed to35,000 |\n| Portion on which party prevailed | §12-117(2) | No-reasonable-basis finding tied to that portion |\n| Twelve factors | Rule54(e)(3) | No numeric weighting or automatic formula |\n| Reasonable cost, reasonably necessary | Automated research | Court finding required |\n| No universal ordinary-appellate percentage/multiplier/cap authenticated | Amount-setting | Small-claims collection cap not transferred |\n| Before trial or within21days after judgment | §12-123text | **Not adopted as appellate fee deadline or authority** |\n| Fees both reasonably incurred and necessitated | §12-123limit | Boundary reading, no actual sanction |\n| Regular operating budget | §12-117payment branch | Insufficiency incorporations held |\n| No automatic adverse-cost immunity | §31-3220(8) | Initial waiver and final judgment differ |\n\n## 11.2 Civil-rule comparison and procedure\n\n| Quantity/relation | Reference event | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| No later than fourteen days after judgment entry | Rule54cost memo | Not silently substituted for higher opinion-based trigger |\n| After verdict/decision; premature memo timely | Rule54(d)(4) | Route/application remains necessary |\n| Fourteen days after service | Rule54motion to disallow | Express waiver if untimely under that rule |\n| After hearing or objection-time expiry | Civil cost/fee amount order | Timely amount objection requires reasons/factors |\n| Fourteen days after service | Rule83/IAR32ordinary motion opposition | More specific cost provision controls where applicable |\n| At least twenty-one days before merits argument | Specified IAR32noncompliance dismissal motion | No invented no-argument-case deadline |\n| Before opinion issuance | Voluntary/stipulated dismissal branch | Cost/fee agreement or discretionary taxation |\n| No fixed numeric period stated | Court’s fee-amount remand or later taxed-cost amendment | Applicable order/construction required |\n| Reasonable causal expenses | Signing/nonappearance/record sanctions | No automatic total or prevailing requirement imported |\n| Notice and opportunity to respond | IAR19(e)monetary sanction | No universal day count stated |\n| No universal safe-harbor period | IAR11.2 | No federal/trial-rule substitution |\n\n## 11.3 Filing, service, correction, and counting\n\n| Quantity/relation | Legal event/base | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Trigger day excluded; qualified last day | IAR22 | Saturday/Sunday/nonjudicial-day qualification |\n| Intermediate days counted; clerk-inaccessibility branch | IRCP2.2within scope | No actual closure or date |\n| Three additional days | Act due after service by mail under applicable civil rule | Not automatically applied to opinion entry or every appellate act |\n| After5p.m.: one additional day | Party electronic service underIREFS17(h) | Not a universal filing extension |\n| 12:01a.m.–midnight | Court-local filing day | Acceptance and nonbusiness-day provisions retained |\n| Three business days excluding legal holidays | Rejected-filing correction | Required request and next-judicial-day qualification |\n| Seven business days excluding legal holidays | Technical-failure resubmission after notice of failure | Satisfactory proof required |\n| Seven days after **motion service** | Written objection seeking review of ex parte extension | Clerk separately serves order |\n| Good cause | IAR46extension | Excluded filing categories remain |\n| Filed written stipulation / court approval where required | General extension interfaces | Not automatic waiver of Rule40deadline |\n| Fourteen/seven/two days before hearing, received | IRCP7ordinary motion papers | Not a replacement for a specific appellate cost period |\n| No automatic confidentiality from fee label | Filing privacy | Protected identifiers/examples not supplied |\n\n## 11.4 Opinion, remittitur, and history\n\n| Quantity/event | Relation | Limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Opinion filing equals announcement | IAR38(a) | Not later actual receipt by default |\n| Remittitur before final taxation | Permitted by IAR38/40 | No automatic delay |\n| Later itemized statement/amendment | Clerk forwards when available | No invented objection restart |\n| Amount added to lower judgment/order | IAR40(f)/41(d) | Full interest/enforcement held |\n| April28,2022 | Adopted order date and immediate effect | Actual order read |\n| January24,2019 | Published Rule26.1repeal and IAR41amendment | Original2019order failed |\n| March1,2017 | Reported statutory effective date and Rule54reference | Final H0097act not recovered |\n| April28,2022/July1,2022 | Rule32amendment/effectiveness | Distinct from Rule46same-day effect |\n| 2025 | Statutory reproduction edition | Not official2026authentication |\n| Unknown | Actual prevailing status, fee source, contract, payment, necessity, causation, service, opinion, remittitur, conduct | None supplied or inferred |\n\nPersonal-injury, small-claims, trial witness/expert/deposition, filing-deposit, bond-amount, and unrelated statutory quantities were read only as necessary boundaries and are not applied as ordinary appellate award formulas.\n\n# 12. Conditional branches and precise next inquiries\n\n| Branch | Missing predicate | Supported consequence | Adverse inference to avoid | Exact next inquiry |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **B01—route** | Correct appellate posture and governing procedure | Applicable cost/fee framework | Same clerk and trigger for every route | Rule83/IAR/IRCP construction |\n| **B02—prevailing** | Actual result compared with relief and governing law | Possible costs/fee status | Any favorable issue guarantees all fees | Mixed-result/remand construction |\n| **B03—dismissal** | Correct voluntary/stipulated branch | Conditional allocation | Dismissal always produces mandatory fees | Rule32/33and substantive source |\n| **B04—cost item** | Listed or otherwise lawfully ordered expense | Possible taxation | Deposit or invoice proves recoverability | Rule40and applicable order |\n| **B05—disks** | Current valid basis beyond repealed reference | Exact hold | Old disk prices or new copy fees silently substituted | Adopted reconciliation/current authority |\n| **B06—bond premium** | Written agreement and exact timing | Exception may apply | Bond principal or security waiver equals premium taxation | Rule40/16relation |\n| **B07—memo** | Correct opinion event, filing and service | Claim considered under rule | Rehearing automatically suspends filing |  |\n| **B08—objection** | Proper service event and specified grounds | Court determination | Trial-rule objection waiver copied wholesale |  |\n| **B09—first brief** | Timely claim or permitted later claim | Fee-right request | Claim alone supplies substantive entitlement |  |\n| **B10—§12-120(1)** | Pleaded threshold/demand/tender predicates | Statutory fee branch | Award amount substitutes for pleaded amount |  |\n| **B11—§12-120(3)** | Covered obligation and no contrary law | Possible mandatory reasonable fee | Personal-purpose definition erases every listed category |  |\n| **B12—§12-121** | Prevailing status and required finding | Discretionary reasonable fee | Losing proves frivolity |  |\n| **B13—public actor** | Defined adverse parties and statutory conditions | Applicable §12-117branch | Every government participant has identical standard |  |\n| **B14—contract** | Lawful applicable fee term and authority | Possible contractual source | Boilerplate or alleged agreement proves entitlement |  |\n| **B15—amount** | Competent support and applicable factors | Judicial amount determination | Claimed method or invoice proves necessity |  |\n| **B16—allocation** | Compensable claims/work and governing standard | Conditional apportionment | Universal percentage or multiplier |  |\n| **B17—fee waiver** | Actual lawful waiver and statute | Initial payment relief | Immunity from later adverse award |  |\n| **B18—signing sanction** | Specific certification violation and process | Appropriate sanction | Every defective paper automatically yields fees |  |\n| **B19—record sanction** | Irrelevance, vexatious/unreasonable enlargement, cost effect | Defined cost denial/sanction | Every unused document sanctionable |  |\n| **B20—nonappearance** | Applicable actor/event and lawful determination | Possible sanction | Nonappearance proves merits |  |\n| **B21—§12-123** | Appellate applicability not authenticated | Held boundary | Trial period becomes IARfee deadline |  |\n| **B22—electronic correction** | Rule-specific timely request and proof | Conditional relation back | Technical allegation automatically excuses |  |\n| **B23—counting** | Correct event, method and applicable rule | Scoped computation | Universal mail/after-hours addition |  |\n| **B24—remittitur** | Actual award and later determination | Ministerial insertion/transmission | Unresolved amount always blocks finality |  |\n| **B25—advance** | Proper authority/order and later review | Provisional amount possible | Advance settles ultimate fee entitlement |  |\n| **B26—history** | Final statutes/original orders | Exact gap may close | Mirror/footer proves all application dates |  |\n| **B27—constitutional/special** | Independent legal coverage | Held dependency | State generic rule resolves federal or sector law |  |\n\n# 13. Exact remaining dependencies\n\n| Separate inquiry | Required authority or question |\n| --- | --- |\n| Current official statutory text | Legislature-hosted §§12-101,107,114,117–123 and indispensable incorporations; complete adopted histories |\n| District-appellate taxation mechanics | Exact treatment of Rule83’s IRCP/IAR fallback, governing trigger, court direction, and remand-specific procedure |\n| Substantive contract/consumer restrictions | Actual lawful fee authority cannot be established without the appropriate generic contract, consumer-credit, instrument, sector, and nonwaiver law |\n| Prevailing-party construction | Mixed judgments, cross-appeals, interlocutory success, remands, partial victories, and multiple-party allocation |\n| Fee-amount construction | Applicable appellate factors, compensable work, fee-litigation work, allocation, enhancements, and duplicate-recovery limits |\n| Objection/correction after taxation | Complete authority for later correction, reconsideration, amended statements, and any new response opportunity; no invented universal period |\n| Section12-123appellate scope | Judicial construction or complete controlling generic authority; not assumed from civil-case wording |\n| Public-budget insufficiency | §67-2018 and title6 chapter9; state/agency capacity and constitutional-function exclusions |\n| Sanction process | Constitutional notice/hearing requirements, proportionality, permissible targets/recipients, inherent authority, ICAR59 and professional discipline |\n| Security/enforcement | Full bond, stay, judgment interest, lien, collection, satisfaction and bankruptcy rules |\n| Privacy and privilege | Disclosure of billing/support materials, confidentiality, redaction, sealing, privilege waiver and access |\n| Federal/local/tribal/interstate | Independent fee-shifting, jurisdictional, sovereignty, special-proceeding and applicable federal regimes |\n| Original-order history | Unrecovered 2019 cost/fee order and other intervening orders; only the identified2022adopted order was authenticated here |\n| Further appellate practice | Rehearing, discretionary review, remittitur recall/enforcement, standards and merits |\n\n# 14. Wholly blank conceptual worksheet\n\n| Field | Entry |\n| --- | --- |\n| Appellate route |  |\n| Authority and edition |  |\n| Official-current-text status |  |\n| Prevailing-party provision |  |\n| Mixed-result/allocation condition |  |\n| Cost category |  |\n| Cost exclusion or exception |  |\n| Substantive fee source |  |\n| Statutory actor/claim predicate |  |\n| Contract dependency |  |\n| First-brief claim requirement |  |\n| Entitlement determination |  |\n| Cost-memorandum trigger |  |\n| Filing and service acts |  |\n| Fee-support requirement |  |\n| Objection reference event |  |\n| Amount factors |  |\n| Compensable-work boundary |  |\n| Court/remand amount authority |  |\n| Sanction source |  |\n| Conduct/causation predicate |  |\n| Notice/opportunity requirement |  |\n| Electronic filing condition |  |\n| Counting/extension rule |  |\n| Remittitur treatment |  |\n| Receiving-court duty |  |\n| Public-payment/waiver distinction |  |\n| Privacy/privilege dependency |  |\n| Missing original authority |  |\n| Review status |  |\n\nNo field is completed.\n\n# 15. Granular coverage\n\n| Requested issue | Disposition | Claims/sources | Exact remaining gap |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **1—ordinary rule scope** | Complete IAR40–41and necessary routes read | C001–C002 | Current statutes and route-specific construction |\n| Magistrate-to-district | Necessary Rule83clauses read | C002,C012 | Universal trigger selection not invented |\n| Higher/Court of Appeals | Rules101/110and complete taxation rules | C002,C040–C041 | No actual assignment/award |\n| Actors/decision functions | Distinguished | C014–C016,C041 | No actual entitlement |\n| Special routes | Explicitly excluded | C050 | Separate regimes |\n| **2—cost categories** | Complete Rule40list | C006–C009 | Repealed-disk reference |\n| Former reproduction allowance | Adopted deletion authenticated | C007,C044 | Historical application not selected |\n| Prevailing/mixed/reversal/remand | Rule/statute relations read | C003–C005 | Judicial construction |\n| Deposits versus taxation | Distinguished | C006,C024 | No initial-fee report rerun |\n| Fee waiver versus immunity | Necessary statute read | C024 | No eligibility |\n| **3—substantive fees** | Complete material statutory bodies provisionally read | C017–C025 | Official current/final originals |\n| Consumer/commercial/instrument | Exact branches retained | C019 | Actual classification/other law |\n| Frivolous/unreasonable basis | §121and§117distinguished | C021–C023 | No conduct finding |\n| Public actors | Definitions/portion/payment branches | C022–C024 | Budget and constitutional incorporations |\n| Contract/nonwaiver | Explicit predicate and hold | C025 | No private contract |\n| **4—requests/objections** | Complete IAR40–41mechanics | C010–C016 | Actual events absent |\n| Civil-rule comparison | Read without universal substitution | C012,C028 | District/remand construction |\n| Electronic service/computation | Necessary complete bodies | C035–C039 | Actual failure/service and statutory currency |\n| Rule46corrected relation | Preserved and freshly confirmed | C039,C048 | No calendar |\n| **5—amount** | All Rule54factors and IAR41method read | C015–C016,C026–C028 | No universal formula |\n| Allocation/adjustment | Source-specific boundaries | C027 | Actual work and judicial construction |\n| Blank worksheet | Supplied | Section14 | No inputs |\n| **6—sanctions** | Necessary appellate clauses complete | C029–C034 | Full due process/discipline |\n| Notice/opportunity/causation | Preserved by branch | C030–C034 | No actual predicate |\n| Nonfiling/nonappearance | Distinguished | C032–C033 | No automatic merits/fee result |\n| **7—postdecision handling** | Complete narrow rules | C040–C043 | Full review/enforcement excluded |\n| Original adopted evidence | 2022order visually read | C044 | Other orders/final statutes held |\n| 2017statutory history | Mirror/version status retained | C045–C046 | Final official act |\n| 2025–2026status searches | Bounded discovery | S007 | No no-change assertion |\n| Sources/read bounds/failures | Supplied | Section9 | Exact limitations preserved |\n| Quantities/branches | Supplied | Sections11–12 | No calculations |\n| Prior findings/holds | Unchanged | C051 | No earlier gap closed by implication |\n| Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent | **Not accepted complete** | Entire report | Recorded dependencies remain |\n\n# 16. Read/search/failure log and researcher self-check\n\n## Actual research performed\n\n| Material | Actual use |\n| --- | --- |\n| Official IAR 40–41 | Complete operative bodies and displayed histories |\n| Necessary IAR/IRCP/e-filing provisions | Complete or expressly bounded reads listed above |\n| 2022 adopted order | Relevant actual page images read, including deletion, effectiveness, date and certification |\n| 2017 H0097 | Complete introduced mirror and generic reported status; incidental named judicial reference not investigated |\n| Official statutory routes | Fresh failures recorded |\n| 2025 statutory reproductions | Complete listed bodies and necessary definitions, kept provisional |\n| Currentness searches | Generic section/rule/year queries; special-sector results not treated as ordinary appellate law |\n| Rule26.1 | Complete historical text read only to identify repeal/reference conflict; old rates not revived |\n| Cases/opinions/dockets/rosters | Incidental results not opened or relied on |\n| Actual invoices, contracts, billing, accounts, costs, fees, parties or conduct | Not requested or assessed |\n| Prior local review files/raw reports | Supplied scope and correction descriptions only; no local-file inspection claim |\n\n## PDF text and pixels\n\n| Document | Read bounds | Pixel inspection |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| 2017 H0097 introduced mirror | Complete one-page §§1–4; substantive reliance on amendment/repeal/effective clauses | Page1/PDFindex0 |\n| April28,2022adopted order | Relevant Rule40/46amendments, effectiveness, date/attestation; unrelated family amendments not applied | Unnumbered pages1–3/PDFindices0–2 |\n| Failed official H0097 and 2019order routes | No operative body recovered | None |\n\nThe adopted-order PDF supplied no parsed text; its relevant content was read from the page images. The bill mirror and adopted order have different legal statuses. Neither is represented as a complete original history of all current provisions.\n\n## Researcher self-check\n\nThe strongest new findings are the **complete cost/fee separation in IAR 40–41**, the **actual adopted deletion of the former brief-production allowance**, the **unresolved repealed-disk cross-reference**, the **distinct statutory fee predicates**, and the **ability to complete taxation after remittitur**.\n\nThe principal gaps remain current official statutory codification, original enactment chains, district-appellate procedural construction, substantive contract and sector restrictions, mixed-result prevailing status, fee allocation and adjustment, sanction due process, and later correction/review of taxed amounts.\n\nNo actual or invented litigant, lawyer, judge, contract, invoice, legal service, billing entry, rate, hour, page count, payment, award, financial input, filing event, or calendar was supplied or constructed. No frivolity, bad faith, misconduct, fee liability, entitlement, recovery amount, sanction, or outcome was determined.\n\nThis is a **researcher self-check, not independent review**. The component is supported by newly read official rules, a material adopted original order, and expressly provisional statutory and legislative evidence. Earlier findings, corrections, provenance, and holds remain preserved. No Idaho, dimension4, A066, parent, operational, or publication acceptance follows.\n\nEND S_ID PASS-30.\n\n","tables":[{"headers":["Earlier material","Retained scope","New P30 evidence","Remaining boundary"],"index":0,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Earlier material","Retained scope","New P30 evidence","Remaining boundary"],["Reviewed P27 follow-on record","Complete appellate costs, fees, objections, and security interaction remained open.","IAR 40–41 and necessary related provisions read independently.","No gateway, notice, or stay report regenerated."],["P27 LIMITED-01","Rule 32’s 2022 effectiveness differs from Rule 46’s; Rule 46’s seven-day objection runs from motion service.","Fresh complete Rule 46 read; the 2022 original order also recovered for its Rule 46 amendment.","Prior raw report and correction provenance remain unchanged."],["P28 record material","Initial deposits, record preparation, and augmentation were separate from later awards.","Only necessary cost-category and excessive-record provisions read.","No unreviewed record-merits premise."],["P29 briefing material","First-brief fee claim and signing provisions were narrow interfaces.","Complete IAR 41 and necessary fee-claim, objection, sanction, and amount provisions read.","No full briefing or argument rerun."],["P25 trial-cost and post-trial material","Narrow reviewed interfaces retained within their scope.","Rule 54 reread only for relevant prevailing-party, civil fee, amount, and procedural comparisons.","Trial witness/deposition/exhibit cost schedules are not transplanted into appellate taxation."],["C033/C035 and other holds","Unchanged.","No provider-access, licensing, or checklist investigation.","No implied closure."]]},{"headers":["Route or actor","Supported role","Important limit"],"index":1,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Route or actor","Supported role","Important limit"],["Ordinary magistrate-to-district appeal","Rule 83(f)(1) addresses appellate treatment; Rule 83(q) supplies IRCP/IAR procedure where unspecified; motions under Rule 83(n) go to the district court unless expressly required below.","Rule 83 does not print a standalone, comprehensive cost-taxation paragraph selecting every deadline and trigger for every district-appellate fee disposition."],["District-original or district-appellate decision on higher appeal","IAR 40–41 supply the higher appellate cost/fee procedure.","Substantive entitlement still needs a statute, lawful contract, or other applicable authority."],["Court of Appeals","IAR 101 applies the appellate rules; IAR 110 preserves filing through the Supreme Court clerk.","Court assignment is not a new fee source."],["Appellate court","Determines cost allocation, claimed fee entitlement, objections, and fee amount or remand for amount.","An applicant’s computation does not bind the court."],["Supreme Court clerk","Receives the required papers, prepares the itemized taxed-cost statement, and inserts or later transmits the award as the rules direct.","Ministerial inclusion does not replace a judicial entitlement decision."],["District court or agency on an authorized amount remand","Hears additional evidence and determines amount within the remand.","Not authority to reopen unrelated appellate merits."],["Receiving lower court","Receives the remittitur or later statement for the prescribed judgment/order treatment.","Full enforcement, lien, interest, and satisfaction law remains separate."]]},{"headers":["Authority","Rule supplied","Qualification"],"index":2,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Authority","Rule supplied","Qualification"],["IAR 40(a)","Costs ordinarily follow the prevailing party.","Law or court order may provide otherwise; the rule expressly excludes the listed post-conviction, parental-rights-termination, and adoption appeals from that default."],["§ 12-107","Costs are discretionary when a new trial is ordered or judgment modified. In other cases its prevailing-party rule includes the stated costs-below branch for an appeal to district court.","Provisional statutory text; no automatic classification of every reversal or remand."],["Rule 54(d)(1)(B)","Where this civil-rule standard governs, the court compares the result with relief sought and may find partial success and allocate costs equitably.","It does not supply a mathematical score or per-issue formula."],["Rule 54(d)(2)","Multiple prevailing parties ordinarily each receive costs unless otherwise directed.","Not automatic duplication of the same expense."],["IAR 40","No standalone arithmetic rule for cross-appeals, mixed dispositions, or partial success.","A favorable ruling does not itself settle ultimate prevailing status."]]},{"headers":["Category","Current rule","Conditions and unresolved boundaries"],"index":3,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Category","Current rule","Conditions and unresolved boundaries"],["Filing fees","Listed in Rule 40(b)(1).","A permitted category is not proof of an actual recoverable expenditure."],["Reporter’s transcript","Listed in Rule 40(b)(2).","Initial preparation deposits and later taxation are different."],["Specified computer-searchable disks","The current sentence still refers to disks filed under Rule 26.1(c), while excluding other disks.","Rule 26.1 is officially marked repealed effective January 24, 2019. Current electronic-copy cost treatment cannot be reconstructed by silently applying its old charges."],["Clerk’s or agency’s record","Listed in Rule 40(b)(3).","Agency merits are excluded; an initial estimate is not a final taxed amount."],["Supersedeas-bond premium","Listed in Rule 40(b)(4).","Exception when the party taxed agreed in writing, within seven days of notice-of-appeal filing, not to execute pending appeal as provided in Rule 16(b)."],["Brief reproduction","No longer an enumerated category.","The adopted 2022 order deleted the former $6-per-page provision."],["Private copies, travel, postage, other expenses","Not independently listed in the current Rule 40 categories read.","The opening “unless otherwise ordered” language and other law prevent a categorical conclusion that such an item can never be allowed. No separate permission was established."]]},{"headers":["Act","Required content/event","Consequence or limit"],"index":4,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Act","Required content/event","Consequence or limit"],["Cost memorandum","File with the Court and serve all adverse parties; itemize each expense.","No actual item or amount supplied."],["Period","Within fourteen days of filing and announcement of the appellate opinion.","Applies whether or not rehearing or review is sought."],["Mailing","Memorandum mailed to the Court is deemed filed on mailing.","Electronic rules govern within their scope."],["Untimely memorandum","Rule 40 expressly states waiver of the right to costs.","Any requested enlargement or relief requires its own authority; no automatic revival."],["Objection","File and serve adverse party no later than fourteen days after service of the memorandum, identifying challenged items and reasons.","The court hears and determines the objection."],["Mailed objection","Deemed filed on mailing under Rule 40(d).","Not a universal filing rule for every appellate paper."],["Copies","Original only; no additional court copies required.","Service obligations remain."]]},{"headers":["Subject","Civil-rule provision","Why kept separate"],"index":5,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Subject","Civil-rule provision","Why kept separate"],["Cost memorandum","After verdict/decision, but no later than fourteen days after judgment entry; premature memorandum is timely.","Different trigger from appellate opinion filing/announcement."],["Verification","States correctness and compliance to the party’s best knowledge and belief.","IAR 40 instead expressly requires itemization; its text does not reproduce this verification sentence."],["Objection","Motion to disallow within fourteen days of service, filed and served.","Express objection-waiver language appears here."],["Effect on execution","Motion does not stay execution of judgment exclusive of costs.","Not a universal statement about every appellate motion or stay."],["Settlement","Court enters an order fixing costs after hearing or expiration of objection time.","Distinct from clerk insertion into a higher appellate remittitur."],["Fees","Affidavit, same cost-processing route, possible evidentiary hearing, amount order.","Applicable statute or contract may provide otherwise."]]},{"headers":["Branch","Complete material conditions","Boundary"],"index":6,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Branch","Complete material conditions","Boundary"],["(1): amount pleaded","Except subsections (3) and (4), amount pleaded $35,000 or less; prevailing party receives court-fixed reasonable fees as costs.","Pleaded amount is not necessarily amount recovered."],["Plaintiff’s prosecution under (1)","Written payment demand at least ten days before commencement.","Not a demand rule for every other fee source."],["Tender exception","No plaintiff fee if court finds precommencement tender at least 95% of the amount awarded.","No tender or award evaluated."],["(2): counterclaim/crossclaim/third-party claim","Subsection (1) applies to the stated later claims.","The express ten-day-demand exception is for a counterclaim; not silently extended to every listed claim."],["(3): enumerated obligations","Open account, account stated, note, bill, negotiable instrument, guaranty, goods/wares/merchandise/services contract, and the specified commercial-transaction category, unless law provides otherwise.","Actual classification and competing substantive restrictions remain necessary."],["Commercial transaction","Excludes transactions for personal or household purposes.","This definition does not by itself delete the separately enumerated account/instrument/contract branches."],["Party definition","Includes the listed private and governmental categories.","No actual status determined."],["(4): personal injury","Separate branch with its own demand, statement, tender, and waiver conditions.","Read but excluded; its periods and percentages are not ordinary-debt rules."],["(5): postjudgment collection","Reasonable collection fees/costs when entitled under (1)–(4), following memorandum, notice, and hearing.","An appeal is not automatically “collection” merely because it occurs after judgment."],["(6): small-claims collection","Separate fee measure, factors and cap.","Its principal-value cap and percentage-arrangement restriction are not imported into ordinary appellate awards."]]},{"headers":["Branch","Conditions and allocation"],"index":7,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Branch","Conditions and allocation"],["(1)","Unless another statute provides otherwise, adverse state-agency/political-subdivision and private-person categories; proceeding includes appeal; mandatory reasonable fees, witness fees, and expenses when the nonprevailing party acted without a reasonable factual or legal basis."],["(2)","Partial success with that finding as to the relevant portion; award tied to the portion on which the party prevailed."],["(3)","Payment from the regular operating budget; insufficiency invokes separate statutory claims routes."],["(4)","Governmental entity versus governmental entity in a civil judicial proceeding; its own prevailing-party fee/expense provision. The subsection does not repeat subsection (1)’s no-reasonable-basis condition."],["(5)","Licensing-authority/licensee administrative branch, with a branch-specific prevailing definition and other protections. Excluded from this ordinary debt component."],["(6)","Definitions of person, political subdivision, proceeding, state agency, and the special licensing roles."],["(7)","If a person’s pleaded amount is $25,000 or less, the person must satisfy § 12-120 as well as § 12-117."]]},{"headers":["Stage","Required or permitted act","Actor and consequence"],"index":8,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Stage","Required or permitted act","Actor and consequence"],["Assert legal right","Fee claim as an issue in the party’s first appellate brief, with the basis under Rule 35(a)(5) or (b)(5).","Court may permit a later claim on appropriate conditions."],["Entitlement argument","May be addressed at the appeal’s oral argument.","Does not guarantee oral argument or entitlement."],["Decision on right","Appellate decision determines the claimed right.","Does not contain the amount under Rule 41(c)."],["Amount claim after entitlement","Filed concurrently with, or as part of, the Rule 40 cost memorandum.","Affidavit must state the computation method."],["Paralegal fees","May be included at the court’s discretion.","Not automatically allowed or excluded."],["Automated legal research","Reasonable cost may be included if found reasonably necessary.","A charge label is not proof of reasonableness or necessity."],["Opposition to amount","Same manner as Rule 40 cost objections.","Entitlement and amount objections must not be confused."],["Amount decision","Court fixes amount or remands for additional evidence and determination.","No automatic evidentiary hearing for every claim."],["Final inclusion","Clerk inserts amount in remittitur using Rule 40(f)’s mechanism.","Later determination is accommodated."]]},{"headers":["Subdivision","Factor"],"index":9,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Subdivision","Factor"],["A","Time and labor required"],["B","Novelty and difficulty"],["C","Requisite skill, and attorney experience/ability in the relevant field"],["D","Prevailing charges for like work"],["E","Fixed or contingent nature"],["F","Time limitations imposed by client or circumstances"],["G","Amount involved and results obtained"],["H","Undesirability"],["I","Nature and length of professional relationship"],["J","Awards in similar cases"],["K","Reasonable automated-research cost, if reasonably necessary"],["L","Other factor deemed appropriate"]]},{"headers":["Question","Supported distinction"],"index":10,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Question","Supported distinction"],["Claimed hours/rate or other method","A method stated in an affidavit is an assertion, not conclusive proof."],["Multiple claims or parties","Statutory portion-specific rules, prevailing-party analysis, court directions, and actual work attribution matter."],["Contractual amount","A private fee agreement does not automatically fix the judicial award. Rule 54(e)(7) says the judicial allowance does not determine attorney-client fees."],["Percentage/multiplier","No universal ordinary-appellate percentage cap, enhancement, or multiplier was authenticated. The small-claims collection provision is not transferred."],["Duplicated work or overlapping theories","No duplicate recovery is approved. The source, causal work, and proper allocation require determination; no universal mathematical rule is invented."],["Fees incurred establishing a fee amount","No categorical recovery or exclusion was established from the read generic provisions alone."],["Attorney fees as “costs”","Does not remove the separate substantive-entitlement requirement."],["Reversal or remand","Does not alone settle final prevailing status, the compensable work period, or every downstream fee issue."]]},{"headers":["Issue","Rule consequence"],"index":11,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Issue","Rule consequence"],["Predicate violation","Court, on motion or initiative, shall impose an appropriate sanction."],["Possible targets","Signer, represented party, or both, as the rule states."],["Possible compensatory component","Reasonable expenses incurred by another party because of the filing, including reasonable fees."],["Causation","Expenses must have the stated connection to the offending paper."],["Prevailing status","The text does not make ordinary prevailing-party status the universal predicate."],["Safe harbor","No twenty-one-day safe harbor is stated in this appellate rule."],["Referral","The separate ICAR 59 vexatious-litigant incorporation remains held."]]},{"headers":["Source","Predicate","Authorized consequence and limit"],"index":12,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Source","Predicate","Authorized consequence and limit"],["IAR 19(e)","Irrelevant record/transcript material vexatiously or unreasonably increases cost.","Court may deny the excessive-cost portion and/or impose monetary sanction after notice and opportunity to respond. Unused material is not automatically irrelevant."],["IAR 37(d)","Specified counsel nonappearance.","Court may impose penalties/sanctions, including reasonable attorney fees. Recipient, causation, amount, and process are not universally supplied by a fixed formula."],["IAR 37(e)","Party failed to file a brief.","Restriction on oral argument; not automatic fee entitlement or merits admission."],["IAR 21","Failure to take a nonjurisdictional step.","Appropriate discretionary action may include dismissal; not every defect produces a fee award."],["Rule 83(m)","Comparable district-appellate distinction.","No actual dismissal or sanction determined."],["IAR 32(a)","Specified noncompliance dismissal motion.","Its argument-relative filing condition is not transformed into a universal sanction period for every motion or no-argument appeal."]]},{"headers":["Act","Filing and service relationship"],"index":13,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Act","Filing and service relationship"],["Cost memorandum","Both filing and service on adverse parties; period starts with opinion filing/announcement."],["Fee amount claim","Concurrent with or part of cost memorandum after entitlement determination."],["Cost/fee amount objection","Filing and service; period starts with service of the memorandum/claim."],["Higher appellate motion","IAR 32 support/service requirements; ordinarily decided without oral argument unless ordered."],["District appellate motion","Rule 83(n) district filing, supporting brief, and fourteen-day opposition relation, subject to the applicable specific provision."],["Civil fee affidavit alternative","IRCP 2.7 and provisional § 9-1406 identify qualifying declarations, with exclusions. Their route applicability is not assumed universally."],["Proof of service","Separate from the entitlement affidavit or computational support."]]},{"headers":["Event","Rule-based condition"],"index":14,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Event","Rule-based condition"],["Filing","Submission and acknowledged acceptance, read with timestamp and relation-back provisions."],["Filing day","Court-local time; not automatically America/Los_Angeles for every court."],["Accepted filing","Rule 12’s receipt-timestamp relation, including the error-queue qualification."],["Rejected filing","Three-business-day corrected-resubmission/request branch, excluding legal holidays and retaining the next-judicial-day qualification."],["Technical receipt failure","Seven-business-day resubmission branch plus satisfactory proof; not merely an asserted technical problem."],["Service","Designated system transmission under Rule 17, not a courtesy copy."],["After-5-p.m. party electronic service","One-day additional-time provision within its scope."],["Court service","Rule 18’s separate registered-user/conventional-service requirements."],["Signature","Electronic and other-signer conditions are distinct; no signature specimen reproduced."]]},{"headers":["Event","Supported consequence","Boundary"],"index":15,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Event","Supported consequence","Boundary"],["Opinion filed/announced","Starts IAR 40’s cost-memorandum relation.","Rehearing/review filing does not itself postpone that obligation."],["Right to attorney fees determined","Included in appellate decision under Rule 41(c).","Amount handled separately."],["Amount remanded","Lower court/agency may receive evidence and fix amount as directed.","Not a merits remand beyond the order."],["Remittitur issued before final taxation","IAR 38(d) permits issuance despite unresolved costs/fees.","No automatic hold on remittitur."],["Costs or fee amount later determined/amended","Clerk forwards itemized statement to the lower tribunal for addition to judgment/order.","No new universal objection/reconsideration clock is created by implication."],["Section 12-114","Taxation before Supreme Court clerk subject to court exception/review and rule-prescribed time.","Provisional statute does not supply an extra independent deadline."],["Court of Appeals","IAR 122/38 framework applies; granted further review has its specified remittitur consequence.","Full review/remittitur practice remains separate."],["Trial-level costs during appeal","IAR 13(b)(9) preserves the stated lower-court function.","Trial fees are not automatically appellate fees."],["Advance appellate fees/costs","IAR 13(b)(12) permits the specified lower-court advance, subject to final appellate determination of right and amount.","No independent substantive entitlement or actual advance."],["Cost/fee motion and merits-appeal time","IAR 14 and Rule 83 expressly exclude the specified cost/fee motions from their timing-reset branches.","No gateway rerun or actual deadline."]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds and use"],"index":16,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds and use"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/1","Complete scope/application provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/2","Complete definitions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.2","Complete (a)–(b); ICAR 59 referral merits held"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13","Complete material (b) introductory clause, (b)(9), (b)(12); other stay/security merits not applied"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/14","Complete civil timing paragraph; use confined to cost/fee-motion exclusion"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/16","Complete; cost bond/nonexecution agreement distinguished"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/19","Complete; substantive reliance on (e), not record-designation mechanics"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/20","Complete filing/service provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/21","Complete jurisdictional/nonjurisdictional distinction"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/22","Complete computation clause"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/23","Complete relevant fee-waiver/public-actor provisions; current filing amounts not adopted as taxed costs"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/26.1","Complete historical body and repeal heading; not current disk-price authority"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/32","Complete (a)–(f); printed certificate not reproduced"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/33","Complete stipulated-dismissal provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/35","Complete page inspected; substantive reliance on (a)(5), (b)(5), and relevant multi-party context"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/37","Complete body inspected; reliance on (d)–(e) consequences"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38","Complete; reliance on announcement and unresolved-taxation/remittitur provisions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40","Complete (a)–(f)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41","Complete (a)–(e)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/46","Complete extension rule; corrected motion-service event retained"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/47","Complete court-service provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/48","Complete unspecified-practice provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/101","Complete Court of Appeals scope"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/110","Complete subsequent-filing/assignment interface"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/122","Complete Court of Appeals remittitur provision"]]},{"headers":["Rule","Displayed history material here"],"index":17,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Rule","Displayed history material here"],["IAR baseline","March 25, 1977 adoption / July 1, 1977 effectiveness, where displayed"],["40","Amendments March 30, 1984/July 1, 1984; March 20, 1985/July 1, 1985; March 28, 1986/July 1, 1986; March 20, 1991/July 1, 1991; January 30, 2001/July 1, 2001; May 5, 2017/July 1, 2017; January 24, 2019/same day; April 28, 2022/same day"],["41","March 30, 1984/July 1, 1984; March 23, 1990/July 1, 1990; January 24, 2019/same day"],["26.1","Adopted March 20, 1991/July 1, 1991; page heading states repealed effective January 24, 2019"],["32","Latest displayed amendment April 28, 2022, effective July 1, 2022"],["46","Latest displayed amendment April 28, 2022, effective April 28, 2022"],["11.2","June 15, 1987/November 1, 1987; November 20, 2012/January 1, 2013"],["33","March 28, 1986/July 1, 1986; September 8, 2016/same day; May 5, 2017/July 1, 2017"],["13 and 23","Current pages include 2026 amendments; only the complete selected cost/fee interfaces are relied on"]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds"],"index":18,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1","Complete scope/local-rule clauses"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2","Complete computation/extension/mail provisions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.7","Complete declaration incorporation"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/5","Complete relevant later-paper service, filing, and proof; initial service excluded"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7","Complete motion provisions; generic hearing schedule only as necessary"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54","Complete body inspected; substantive reliance on (a)’s costs/finality distinction, (d)(1)(A)–(B), (D)–(F), (d)(2)–(6), and all (e)(1)–(8). Trial cost-category dollar schedules not applied."],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/58","Complete entry provision, only to distinguish unresolved costs from entry"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83","Complete page inspected; substantive reliance on (f)(1), (m)–(q), necessary motion-timing exclusion, and disposition interface"]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds"],"index":19,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/1","Complete hierarchy/scope"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/2","Complete definitions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/4","Complete filer categories and exceptions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/5","Complete exceptions; special-proceeding details not applied"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/9","Complete signature provision; sample identity omitted"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/11","Complete filing/acceptance rule"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/12","Complete time-of-filing rule"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/13","Complete rejection/correction; no prescribed form created"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/14","Complete technical-failure relief"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/15","Complete privacy provisions; substantive use limited to filing responsibility and exceptions; no actual disclosure claim"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/17","Complete party-service rule; discovery details not applied"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/18","Complete court-service rule; form wording omitted"]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Material use and displayed credits"],"index":20,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Material use and displayed credits"],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-101/","Civil cost-rule relationship. Added 1977 ch.4 §1 p.9."],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-107/","Complete appeal-cost provision. C.C.P.1881 §698; R.S./R.C./C.L.4906; C.S.7212; I.C.A.12-107."],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-114/","Complete taxation/review/certification provision. C.C.P.1881 §704; 1911 ch.204 §1 p.673 and recodifications."],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-117/","Complete (1)–(7). Added1984 ch.204 §1 p.501; amendments1993,1994,2000,2010,2012,2018; latest2019 ch.212 §1 p.643."],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-118/","Complete state-payment clause. C.C.P.1881 §708 lineage; 1994 ch.180 §9 p.428."],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-119/","Complete county-payment clause. C.C.P.1881 §709 and recodifications."],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-120/","Complete (1)–(6); personal-injury and small-claims branches excluded from ordinary appeal application. Added1970 ch.44 §1 p.91; amendments through2018 ch.244 §2 p.568."],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-121/","Complete. Added1976 ch.349 §1 p.1158; 1987 ch.263 §2 p.555; 2017 ch.47 §2 p.76."],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-123/","Complete (1)–(4), used as a boundary rather than established appellate authority. Added1987 ch.278 §8 p.580."],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-67/chapter-52/section-67-5201/","Complete relevant (4) agency definition and exclusions; section history read. Added1965 ch.273 §1 p.701; latest listed2025 ch.151 §6 p.741. No claim that this latest amendment changed every part of (4)."],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-31/chapter-32/section-31-3220/","Complete (1)–(8); reliance on scope and waiver-versus-adverse-award distinction. Added1977 ch.228 §1 p.680;1979 ch.222 §1 p.617;1996 ch.420 §6 p.1402."],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-9/chapter-14/section-9-1406/","Complete (1)–(2), including exceptions; generic form not reproduced. Added2013 ch.259 §1 p.636."],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-16/section-1-1607/","Complete nonjudicial-day provision. C.C.P.1881 §46 lineage;1961 ch.270 §1 p.480;1971 ch.84 §1 p.186."],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-73/chapter-1/section-73-108/","Complete holiday/substitution provision; latest listed2002 ch.146 §3 p.423."]]},{"headers":["Page","Read bounds"],"index":21,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Page","Read bounds"],["PDF index 0, first unnumbered page","Order title and adoption language; unrelated family-rule amendments excluded from merits"],["PDF index 1, second unnumbered page","Complete Rule 40(b) amendment; complete amended Rule 46 paragraph; immediate-effect clause and instruction that markup is not permanent rule text"],["PDF index 2, third unnumbered page","Publication directive, April 28, 2022 date, signature/attestation and certification of copy; personal names not reproduced"]]},{"headers":["Literal URL or material","Actual result"],"index":22,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal URL or material","Actual result"],["https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title12/T12CH1/SECT12-120/","Fresh official section attempt inaccessible"],["https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title12/T12CH1/SECT12-121/","Fresh official section attempt inaccessible"],["https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/sessioninfo/2017/legislation/H0097.pdf","Actual legislative link followed; restricted/inaccessible"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules/Order-Amending-Appellate-Rules.pdf","Ordinary historical order route returned404"],["API-hosted original orders, forms and technical guide","Not opened"],["Incidental cases/opinions/dockets and legislative roll-call identities","Not opened or relied on"]]},{"headers":["Claim","Precise proposition","Source/pinpoint","Status"],"index":23,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claim","Precise proposition","Source/pinpoint","Status"],["C001","Official cost/fee rules and a material adopted amendment were read; statutory currentness remains provisional.","S001–S008","O/P/L/H"],["C002","District appellate, higher appellate and Court of Appeals roles are distinct.","Rule83(f),(n),(q); IAR101,110","O/H"],["C003","Prevailing status and mixed allocation require the applicable rule and determination.","IAR40(a); Rule54(d)(1)(A)–(B),(2)","O/H"],["C004","New-trial and modified-judgment cost discretion is separately stated.","§12-107","P"],["C005","Voluntary/stipulated dismissal cost/fee provisions have different conditions.","IAR32(b),33","O"],["C006","Current enumerated appellate costs are not the entire trial-cost schedule.","IAR40(b)","O"],["C007","The adopted2022order deleted the former brief-production allowance.","S006, PDF index1","O"],["C008","The current Rule40disk reference points to a repealed Rule26.1provision.","IAR40(b)(2);26.1","O/H"],["C009","Supersedeas-premium recovery has a timely written-nonexecution exception.","IAR40(b)(4);16(b)","O"],["C010","Cost memoranda have an opinion-based filing/service period and express untimely waiver.","IAR40(c)","O"],["C011","Cost objections have a service-based period; appellate and civil waiver wording differ.","IAR40(d);Rule54(d)(5)","O/H"],["C012","No single district-appellate cost trigger was invented from the IRCP/IAR fallback.","Rule83;IAR40;Rule54","O/H"],["C013","First-brief fee claim and later permission are procedural conditions.","IAR41(a);35(a)(5),(b)(5)","O"],["C014","Procedural fee rules do not alone create every substantive entitlement.","IAR41(b)–(c);Rule54(e)(1)","O/H"],["C015","Amount claim, affidavit, paralegal and research costs have separate requirements.","IAR41(d)","O"],["C016","Court may determine amount or remand for evidence and determination.","IAR41(d)","O"],["C017","Section12-120(1)uses the pleaded threshold, demand and tender conditions.","§12-120(1)","P"],["C018","The counterclaim demand exception is not universal for all later claims.","§12-120(2)","P"],["C019","Enumerated debt categories and commercial-transaction definition are distinct.","§12-120(3)","P/H"],["C020","Personal-injury, collection and small-claims branches are not ordinary appellate formulas.","§12-120(4)–(6)","P/H"],["C021","Section12-121requires prevailing status and its specified finding, not mere defeat.","§12-121;Rule54(e)(2)","P/O"],["C022","Section12-117has public/private, partial-success and separate government-to-government branches.","§12-117(1)–(4)","P"],["C023","Definitions and the $25,000cross-reference remain exact and distinct from §12-120.","§12-117(6)–(7);§67-5201(4)","P/H"],["C024","Public payment provisions and initial waivers do not themselves eliminate adverse-award exposure.","§§12-118–119,31-3220(8)","P"],["C025","Actual contract entitlement and substantive nonwaiver remain missing predicates.","Rule54(e)(1),(8);scope","O/H"],["C026","All twelve civil fee-amount factors were read; no federal formula substituted.","Rule54(e)(3)","O/H"],["C027","Claimed method, allocation, reasonableness and judicial amount remain distinct.","IAR41(d);Rule54(e)","O/H"],["C028","Civil fee objections, hearing, reasons and client-fee relationship have specific rules.","Rule54(e)(5)–(8)","O"],["C029","Section12-123was not authenticated as an independent appellate fee source.","§12-123","P/H"],["C030","Appellate signing sanctions have a predicate, permitted targets and causal expense component.","IAR11.2(a)","O/H"],["C031","Enlarged-record sanctions require the stated finding and notice/opportunity.","IAR19(e)","O"],["C032","Nonappearance sanctions differ from missing-brief argument restrictions.","IAR37(d)–(e)","O"],["C033","Nonjurisdictional procedural failures do not automatically yield fees or merits loss.","IAR21;Rule83(m)","O/H"],["C034","Sanctions and ordinary awards have different procedural and constitutional predicates.","IAR11.2,19,32,37","O/H"],["C035","Filing, service, support, and declaration qualifications are distinct.","IAR20,32,40–41;Rule2.7;§9-1406","O/P/H"],["C036","Electronic submission, acceptance and service events are not interchangeable.","IREFS11–12,17–18","O"],["C037","Rejection correction and technical failure have separate relation-back conditions.","IREFS13–14","O/H"],["C038","Opinion-based and service-based periods do not receive universal mail/electronic additions.","IAR22;Rule2.2;IREFS17(h)","O/P/H"],["C039","Rule46requires good cause and preserves its excluded filings and exact objection event.","IAR46","O"],["C040","Unresolved taxation does not necessarily delay remittitur.","IAR38(d),40(f),41(d)","O"],["C041","Later or amended cost/fee statements follow the specified clerk/lower-court mechanism.","IAR40(f),41(d);§12-114","O/P"],["C042","Lower-court trial fees and provisional appellate advances are not final appellate entitlement.","IAR13(b)(9),(12)","O"],["C043","Cost/fee motions do not automatically restart merits-appeal time or establish a stay.","IAR14;Rule83(b);read boundaries","O/H"],["C044","The2022order supplies actual adopted deletion/effectiveness evidence, within its bounds.","S006","O"],["C045","The2017fee-amendment mirror is not the final official act.","S005;Rule54(e)(2)","L/O/H"],["C046","Current official statutes and complete intervening histories remain held.","S004–S008","H"],["C047","A fee affidavit does not authorize disclosure of protected material.","IREFS15","O/H"],["C048","The prior Rule46motion-service correction is preserved, not reopened or contradicted.","IAR46;S006","O/reuse"],["C049","Source failures, historical text and actual reads are separately recorded.","S001–S008","Provenance"],["C050","Special regimes and judicial/constitutional construction remain exact dependencies.","Section13","H"],["C051","No actual award, conduct, fee amount or outcome was determined; prior holds remain.","Research record","Certain"]]},{"headers":["Quantity/relation","Legal base/reference event","Qualification"],"index":24,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Quantity/relation","Legal base/reference event","Qualification"],["Fourteen days","Filing and announcement of appellate opinion","Cost memorandum filed and served; rehearing/review does not itself defer"],["No later than fourteen days","Service of cost memorandum","Cost objection filed and served with reasons"],["Same procedure as cost objection","Fee amount opposition","IAR41incorporation"],["Concurrently with/as part of cost memorandum","Fee amount claim after entitlement","Computation-method affidavit"],["First appellate brief","Fee-right assertion","Later claim only by court permission"],["Original only; no court copies","Cost/fee memoranda, objections and supporting/opposing briefs","Service remains required"],["Mailing date","IAR40memo/objection filing treatment","Electronic scope distinguished"],["Seven days of notice-of-appeal filing","Written nonexecution agreement exception","Supersedeas-premium taxation; no stay report"],["$6 per page","Former original-brief production category","Deleted effective April28,2022; not current allowance"],["No current disk charge applied","RepealedRule26.1reference","Historical disk rates not revived"],["$35,000 or less","§12-120(1)amount pleaded","Subsections(3)/(4)exceptions"],["Not less than ten days before commencement","Plaintiff’s written demand under(1)","No actual demand; counterclaim exception separately stated"],["At least95%","Precommencement tender compared with plaintiff’s award","No values or comparison performed"],["$25,000 or less","§12-117(7)person’s pleaded amount","Additional §12-120requirements; not changed to35,000"],["Portion on which party prevailed","§12-117(2)","No-reasonable-basis finding tied to that portion"],["Twelve factors","Rule54(e)(3)","No numeric weighting or automatic formula"],["Reasonable cost, reasonably necessary","Automated research","Court finding required"],["No universal ordinary-appellate percentage/multiplier/cap authenticated","Amount-setting","Small-claims collection cap not transferred"],["Before trial or within21days after judgment","§12-123text","Not adopted as appellate fee deadline or authority"],["Fees both reasonably incurred and necessitated","§12-123limit","Boundary reading, no actual sanction"],["Regular operating budget","§12-117payment branch","Insufficiency incorporations held"],["No automatic adverse-cost immunity","§31-3220(8)","Initial waiver and final judgment differ"]]},{"headers":["Quantity/relation","Reference event","Qualification"],"index":25,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Quantity/relation","Reference event","Qualification"],["No later than fourteen days after judgment entry","Rule54cost memo","Not silently substituted for higher opinion-based trigger"],["After verdict/decision; premature memo timely","Rule54(d)(4)","Route/application remains necessary"],["Fourteen days after service","Rule54motion to disallow","Express waiver if untimely under that rule"],["After hearing or objection-time expiry","Civil cost/fee amount order","Timely amount objection requires reasons/factors"],["Fourteen days after service","Rule83/IAR32ordinary motion opposition","More specific cost provision controls where applicable"],["At least twenty-one days before merits argument","Specified IAR32noncompliance dismissal motion","No invented no-argument-case deadline"],["Before opinion issuance","Voluntary/stipulated dismissal branch","Cost/fee agreement or discretionary taxation"],["No fixed numeric period stated","Court’s fee-amount remand or later taxed-cost amendment","Applicable order/construction required"],["Reasonable causal expenses","Signing/nonappearance/record sanctions","No automatic total or prevailing requirement imported"],["Notice and opportunity to respond","IAR19(e)monetary sanction","No universal day count stated"],["No universal safe-harbor period","IAR11.2","No federal/trial-rule substitution"]]},{"headers":["Quantity/relation","Legal event/base","Qualification"],"index":26,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Quantity/relation","Legal event/base","Qualification"],["Trigger day excluded; qualified last day","IAR22","Saturday/Sunday/nonjudicial-day qualification"],["Intermediate days counted; clerk-inaccessibility branch","IRCP2.2within scope","No actual closure or date"],["Three additional days","Act due after service by mail under applicable civil rule","Not automatically applied to opinion entry or every appellate act"],["After5p.m.: one additional day","Party electronic service underIREFS17(h)","Not a universal filing extension"],["12:01a.m.–midnight","Court-local filing day","Acceptance and nonbusiness-day provisions retained"],["Three business days excluding legal holidays","Rejected-filing correction","Required request and next-judicial-day qualification"],["Seven business days excluding legal holidays","Technical-failure resubmission after notice of failure","Satisfactory proof required"],["Seven days after motion service","Written objection seeking review of ex parte extension","Clerk separately serves order"],["Good cause","IAR46extension","Excluded filing categories remain"],["Filed written stipulation / court approval where required","General extension interfaces","Not automatic waiver of Rule40deadline"],["Fourteen/seven/two days before hearing, received","IRCP7ordinary motion papers","Not a replacement for a specific appellate cost period"],["No automatic confidentiality from fee label","Filing privacy","Protected identifiers/examples not supplied"]]},{"headers":["Quantity/event","Relation","Limit"],"index":27,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Quantity/event","Relation","Limit"],["Opinion filing equals announcement","IAR38(a)","Not later actual receipt by default"],["Remittitur before final taxation","Permitted by IAR38/40","No automatic delay"],["Later itemized statement/amendment","Clerk forwards when available","No invented objection restart"],["Amount added to lower judgment/order","IAR40(f)/41(d)","Full interest/enforcement held"],["April28,2022","Adopted order date and immediate effect","Actual order read"],["January24,2019","Published Rule26.1repeal and IAR41amendment","Original2019order failed"],["March1,2017","Reported statutory effective date and Rule54reference","Final H0097act not recovered"],["April28,2022/July1,2022","Rule32amendment/effectiveness","Distinct from Rule46same-day effect"],["2025","Statutory reproduction edition","Not official2026authentication"],["Unknown","Actual prevailing status, fee source, contract, payment, necessity, causation, service, opinion, remittitur, conduct","None supplied or inferred"]]},{"headers":["Branch","Missing predicate","Supported consequence","Adverse inference to avoid","Exact next inquiry"],"index":28,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Branch","Missing predicate","Supported consequence","Adverse inference to avoid","Exact next inquiry"],["B01—route","Correct appellate posture and governing procedure","Applicable cost/fee framework","Same clerk and trigger for every route","Rule83/IAR/IRCP construction"],["B02—prevailing","Actual result compared with relief and governing law","Possible costs/fee status","Any favorable issue guarantees all fees","Mixed-result/remand construction"],["B03—dismissal","Correct voluntary/stipulated branch","Conditional allocation","Dismissal always produces mandatory fees","Rule32/33and substantive source"],["B04—cost item","Listed or otherwise lawfully ordered expense","Possible taxation","Deposit or invoice proves recoverability","Rule40and applicable order"],["B05—disks","Current valid basis beyond repealed reference","Exact hold","Old disk prices or new copy fees silently substituted","Adopted reconciliation/current authority"],["B06—bond premium","Written agreement and exact timing","Exception may apply","Bond principal or security waiver equals premium taxation","Rule40/16relation"],["B07—memo","Correct opinion event, filing and service","Claim considered under rule","Rehearing automatically suspends filing",""],["B08—objection","Proper service event and specified grounds","Court determination","Trial-rule objection waiver copied wholesale",""],["B09—first brief","Timely claim or permitted later claim","Fee-right request","Claim alone supplies substantive entitlement",""],["B10—§12-120(1)","Pleaded threshold/demand/tender predicates","Statutory fee branch","Award amount substitutes for pleaded amount",""],["B11—§12-120(3)","Covered obligation and no contrary law","Possible mandatory reasonable fee","Personal-purpose definition erases every listed category",""],["B12—§12-121","Prevailing status and required finding","Discretionary reasonable fee","Losing proves frivolity",""],["B13—public actor","Defined adverse parties and statutory conditions","Applicable §12-117branch","Every government participant has identical standard",""],["B14—contract","Lawful applicable fee term and authority","Possible contractual source","Boilerplate or alleged agreement proves entitlement",""],["B15—amount","Competent support and applicable factors","Judicial amount determination","Claimed method or invoice proves necessity",""],["B16—allocation","Compensable claims/work and governing standard","Conditional apportionment","Universal percentage or multiplier",""],["B17—fee waiver","Actual lawful waiver and statute","Initial payment relief","Immunity from later adverse award",""],["B18—signing sanction","Specific certification violation and process","Appropriate sanction","Every defective paper automatically yields fees",""],["B19—record sanction","Irrelevance, vexatious/unreasonable enlargement, cost effect","Defined cost denial/sanction","Every unused document sanctionable",""],["B20—nonappearance","Applicable actor/event and lawful determination","Possible sanction","Nonappearance proves merits",""],["B21—§12-123","Appellate applicability not authenticated","Held boundary","Trial period becomes IARfee deadline",""],["B22—electronic correction","Rule-specific timely request and proof","Conditional relation back","Technical allegation automatically excuses",""],["B23—counting","Correct event, method and applicable rule","Scoped computation","Universal mail/after-hours addition",""],["B24—remittitur","Actual award and later determination","Ministerial insertion/transmission","Unresolved amount always blocks finality",""],["B25—advance","Proper authority/order and later review","Provisional amount possible","Advance settles ultimate fee entitlement",""],["B26—history","Final statutes/original orders","Exact gap may close","Mirror/footer proves all application dates",""],["B27—constitutional/special","Independent legal coverage","Held dependency","State generic rule resolves federal or sector law",""]]},{"headers":["Separate inquiry","Required authority or question"],"index":29,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Separate inquiry","Required authority or question"],["Current official statutory text","Legislature-hosted §§12-101,107,114,117–123 and indispensable incorporations; complete adopted histories"],["District-appellate taxation mechanics","Exact treatment of Rule83’s IRCP/IAR fallback, governing trigger, court direction, and remand-specific procedure"],["Substantive contract/consumer restrictions","Actual lawful fee authority cannot be established without the appropriate generic contract, consumer-credit, instrument, sector, and nonwaiver law"],["Prevailing-party construction","Mixed judgments, cross-appeals, interlocutory success, remands, partial victories, and multiple-party allocation"],["Fee-amount construction","Applicable appellate factors, compensable work, fee-litigation work, allocation, enhancements, and duplicate-recovery limits"],["Objection/correction after taxation","Complete authority for later correction, reconsideration, amended statements, and any new response opportunity; no invented universal period"],["Section12-123appellate scope","Judicial construction or complete controlling generic authority; not assumed from civil-case wording"],["Public-budget insufficiency","§67-2018 and title6 chapter9; state/agency capacity and constitutional-function exclusions"],["Sanction process","Constitutional notice/hearing requirements, proportionality, permissible targets/recipients, inherent authority, ICAR59 and professional discipline"],["Security/enforcement","Full bond, stay, judgment interest, lien, collection, satisfaction and bankruptcy rules"],["Privacy and privilege","Disclosure of billing/support materials, confidentiality, redaction, sealing, privilege waiver and access"],["Federal/local/tribal/interstate","Independent fee-shifting, jurisdictional, sovereignty, special-proceeding and applicable federal regimes"],["Original-order history","Unrecovered 2019 cost/fee order and other intervening orders; only the identified2022adopted order was authenticated here"],["Further appellate practice","Rehearing, discretionary review, remittitur recall/enforcement, standards and merits"]]},{"headers":["Field","Entry"],"index":30,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Field","Entry"],["Appellate route",""],["Authority and edition",""],["Official-current-text status",""],["Prevailing-party provision",""],["Mixed-result/allocation condition",""],["Cost category",""],["Cost exclusion or exception",""],["Substantive fee source",""],["Statutory actor/claim predicate",""],["Contract dependency",""],["First-brief claim requirement",""],["Entitlement determination",""],["Cost-memorandum trigger",""],["Filing and service acts",""],["Fee-support requirement",""],["Objection reference event",""],["Amount factors",""],["Compensable-work boundary",""],["Court/remand amount authority",""],["Sanction source",""],["Conduct/causation predicate",""],["Notice/opportunity requirement",""],["Electronic filing condition",""],["Counting/extension rule",""],["Remittitur treatment",""],["Receiving-court duty",""],["Public-payment/waiver distinction",""],["Privacy/privilege dependency",""],["Missing original authority",""],["Review status",""]]},{"headers":["Requested issue","Disposition","Claims/sources","Exact remaining gap"],"index":31,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Requested issue","Disposition","Claims/sources","Exact remaining gap"],["1—ordinary rule scope","Complete IAR40–41and necessary routes read","C001–C002","Current statutes and route-specific construction"],["Magistrate-to-district","Necessary Rule83clauses read","C002,C012","Universal trigger selection not invented"],["Higher/Court of Appeals","Rules101/110and complete taxation rules","C002,C040–C041","No actual assignment/award"],["Actors/decision functions","Distinguished","C014–C016,C041","No actual entitlement"],["Special routes","Explicitly excluded","C050","Separate regimes"],["2—cost categories","Complete Rule40list","C006–C009","Repealed-disk reference"],["Former reproduction allowance","Adopted deletion authenticated","C007,C044","Historical application not selected"],["Prevailing/mixed/reversal/remand","Rule/statute relations read","C003–C005","Judicial construction"],["Deposits versus taxation","Distinguished","C006,C024","No initial-fee report rerun"],["Fee waiver versus immunity","Necessary statute read","C024","No eligibility"],["3—substantive fees","Complete material statutory bodies provisionally read","C017–C025","Official current/final originals"],["Consumer/commercial/instrument","Exact branches retained","C019","Actual classification/other law"],["Frivolous/unreasonable basis","§121and§117distinguished","C021–C023","No conduct finding"],["Public actors","Definitions/portion/payment branches","C022–C024","Budget and constitutional incorporations"],["Contract/nonwaiver","Explicit predicate and hold","C025","No private contract"],["4—requests/objections","Complete IAR40–41mechanics","C010–C016","Actual events absent"],["Civil-rule comparison","Read without universal substitution","C012,C028","District/remand construction"],["Electronic service/computation","Necessary complete bodies","C035–C039","Actual failure/service and statutory currency"],["Rule46corrected relation","Preserved and freshly confirmed","C039,C048","No calendar"],["5—amount","All Rule54factors and IAR41method read","C015–C016,C026–C028","No universal formula"],["Allocation/adjustment","Source-specific boundaries","C027","Actual work and judicial construction"],["Blank worksheet","Supplied","Section14","No inputs"],["6—sanctions","Necessary appellate clauses complete","C029–C034","Full due process/discipline"],["Notice/opportunity/causation","Preserved by branch","C030–C034","No actual predicate"],["Nonfiling/nonappearance","Distinguished","C032–C033","No automatic merits/fee result"],["7—postdecision handling","Complete narrow rules","C040–C043","Full review/enforcement excluded"],["Original adopted evidence","2022order visually read","C044","Other orders/final statutes held"],["2017statutory history","Mirror/version status retained","C045–C046","Final official act"],["2025–2026status searches","Bounded discovery","S007","No no-change assertion"],["Sources/read bounds/failures","Supplied","Section9","Exact limitations preserved"],["Quantities/branches","Supplied","Sections11–12","No calculations"],["Prior findings/holds","Unchanged","C051","No earlier gap closed by implication"],["Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent","Not accepted complete","Entire report","Recorded dependencies remain"]]},{"headers":["Material","Actual use"],"index":32,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Material","Actual use"],["Official IAR 40–41","Complete operative bodies and displayed histories"],["Necessary IAR/IRCP/e-filing provisions","Complete or expressly bounded reads listed above"],["2022 adopted order","Relevant actual page images read, including deletion, effectiveness, date and certification"],["2017 H0097","Complete introduced mirror and generic reported status; incidental named judicial reference not investigated"],["Official statutory routes","Fresh failures recorded"],["2025 statutory reproductions","Complete listed bodies and necessary definitions, kept provisional"],["Currentness searches","Generic section/rule/year queries; special-sector results not treated as ordinary appellate law"],["Rule26.1","Complete historical text read only to identify repeal/reference conflict; old rates not revived"],["Cases/opinions/dockets/rosters","Incidental results not opened or relied on"],["Actual invoices, contracts, billing, accounts, costs, fees, parties or conduct","Not requested or assessed"],["Prior local review files/raw reports","Supplied scope and correction descriptions only; no local-file inspection claim"]]},{"headers":["Document","Read bounds","Pixel inspection"],"index":33,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Document","Read bounds","Pixel inspection"],["2017 H0097 introduced mirror","Complete one-page §§1–4; substantive reliance on amendment/repeal/effective clauses","Page1/PDFindex0"],["April28,2022adopted order","Relevant Rule40/46amendments, effectiveness, date/attestation; unrelated family amendments not applied","Unnumbered pages1–3/PDFindices0–2"],["Failed official H0097 and 2019order routes","No operative body recovered","None"]]}],"claims":[{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C001","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C001","Precise proposition":"Official cost/fee rules and a material adopted amendment were read; statutory currentness remains provisional.","Source/pinpoint":"S001–S008","Status":"O/P/L/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"provenance_or_scoped_gap_statement_not_general_negative_legal_proof","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C002","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C002","Precise proposition":"District appellate, higher appellate and Court of Appeals roles are distinct.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule83(f),(n),(q); IAR101,110","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C003","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C003","Precise proposition":"Prevailing status and mixed allocation require the applicable rule and determination.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR40(a); Rule54(d)(1)(A)–(B),(2)","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C004","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C004","Precise proposition":"New-trial and modified-judgment cost discretion is separately stated.","Source/pinpoint":"§12-107","Status":"P"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"secondary_statutory_relation_retained_provisional_not_current_primary_verified","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C005","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C005","Precise proposition":"Voluntary/stipulated dismissal cost/fee provisions have different conditions.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR32(b),33","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C006","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C006","Precise proposition":"Current enumerated appellate costs are not the entire trial-cost schedule.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR40(b)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C007","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C007","Precise proposition":"The adopted2022order deleted the former brief-production allowance.","Source/pinpoint":"S006, PDF index1","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"adopted_order_actual_pixels_compared_no_broader_history_or_transition_inferred","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C008","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C008","Precise proposition":"The current Rule40disk reference points to a repealed Rule26.1provision.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR40(b)(2);26.1","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"current_crossreference_and_historical_repeal_heading_compared_current_disk_treatment_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C009","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C009","Precise proposition":"Supersedeas-premium recovery has a timely written-nonexecution exception.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR40(b)(4);16(b)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C010","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C010","Precise proposition":"Cost memoranda have an opinion-based filing/service period and express untimely waiver.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR40(c)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C011","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C011","Precise proposition":"Cost objections have a service-based period; appellate and civil waiver wording differ.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR40(d);Rule54(d)(5)","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C012","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C012","Precise proposition":"No single district-appellate cost trigger was invented from the IRCP/IAR fallback.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule83;IAR40;Rule54","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C013","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C013","Precise proposition":"First-brief fee claim and later permission are procedural conditions.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR41(a);35(a)(5),(b)(5)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C014","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C014","Precise proposition":"Procedural fee rules do not alone create every substantive entitlement.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR41(b)–(c);Rule54(e)(1)","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C015","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C015","Precise proposition":"Amount claim, affidavit, paralegal and research costs have separate requirements.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR41(d)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C016","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C016","Precise proposition":"Court may determine amount or remand for evidence and determination.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR41(d)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C017","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C017","Precise proposition":"Section12-120(1)uses the pleaded threshold, demand and tender conditions.","Source/pinpoint":"§12-120(1)","Status":"P"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"secondary_statutory_relation_retained_provisional_not_current_primary_verified","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C018","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C018","Precise proposition":"The counterclaim demand exception is not universal for all later claims.","Source/pinpoint":"§12-120(2)","Status":"P"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"secondary_statutory_relation_retained_provisional_not_current_primary_verified","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C019","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C019","Precise proposition":"Enumerated debt categories and commercial-transaction definition are distinct.","Source/pinpoint":"§12-120(3)","Status":"P/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"secondary_statutory_relation_retained_provisional_not_current_primary_verified","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C020","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C020","Precise proposition":"Personal-injury, collection and small-claims branches are not ordinary appellate formulas.","Source/pinpoint":"§12-120(4)–(6)","Status":"P/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"secondary_statutory_relation_retained_provisional_not_current_primary_verified","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C021","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C021","Precise proposition":"Section12-121requires prevailing status and its specified finding, not mere defeat.","Source/pinpoint":"§12-121;Rule54(e)(2)","Status":"P/O"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"current_rule_portion_compared_secondary_statute_currentness_or_incorporation_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C022","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C022","Precise proposition":"Section12-117has public/private, partial-success and separate government-to-government branches.","Source/pinpoint":"§12-117(1)–(4)","Status":"P"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"secondary_statutory_relation_retained_provisional_not_current_primary_verified","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C023","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C023","Precise proposition":"Definitions and the $25,000cross-reference remain exact and distinct from §12-120.","Source/pinpoint":"§12-117(6)–(7);§67-5201(4)","Status":"P/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"secondary_statutory_relation_retained_provisional_not_current_primary_verified","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C024","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C024","Precise proposition":"Public payment provisions and initial waivers do not themselves eliminate adverse-award exposure.","Source/pinpoint":"§§12-118–119,31-3220(8)","Status":"P"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"secondary_statutory_relation_retained_provisional_not_current_primary_verified","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C025","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C025","Precise proposition":"Actual contract entitlement and substantive nonwaiver remain missing predicates.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule54(e)(1),(8);scope","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C026","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C026","Precise proposition":"All twelve civil fee-amount factors were read; no federal formula substituted.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule54(e)(3)","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C027","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C027","Precise proposition":"Claimed method, allocation, reasonableness and judicial amount remain distinct.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR41(d);Rule54(e)","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C028","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C028","Precise proposition":"Civil fee objections, hearing, reasons and client-fee relationship have specific rules.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule54(e)(5)–(8)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C029","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C029","Precise proposition":"Section12-123was not authenticated as an independent appellate fee source.","Source/pinpoint":"§12-123","Status":"P/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"secondary_statutory_relation_retained_provisional_not_current_primary_verified","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C030","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C030","Precise proposition":"Appellate signing sanctions have a predicate, permitted targets and causal expense component.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR11.2(a)","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C031","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C031","Precise proposition":"Enlarged-record sanctions require the stated finding and notice/opportunity.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR19(e)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C032","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C032","Precise proposition":"Nonappearance sanctions differ from missing-brief argument restrictions.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR37(d)–(e)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C033","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C033","Precise proposition":"Nonjurisdictional procedural failures do not automatically yield fees or merits loss.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR21;Rule83(m)","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C034","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C034","Precise proposition":"Sanctions and ordinary awards have different procedural and constitutional predicates.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR11.2,19,32,37","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C035","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C035","Precise proposition":"Filing, service, support, and declaration qualifications are distinct.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR20,32,40–41;Rule2.7;§9-1406","Status":"O/P/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"current_rule_portion_compared_secondary_statute_currentness_or_incorporation_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C036","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C036","Precise proposition":"Electronic submission, acceptance and service events are not interchangeable.","Source/pinpoint":"IREFS11–12,17–18","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C037","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C037","Precise proposition":"Rejection correction and technical failure have separate relation-back conditions.","Source/pinpoint":"IREFS13–14","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C038","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C038","Precise proposition":"Opinion-based and service-based periods do not receive universal mail/electronic additions.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR22;Rule2.2;IREFS17(h)","Status":"O/P/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"current_rule_portion_compared_secondary_statute_currentness_or_incorporation_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C039","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C039","Precise proposition":"Rule46requires good cause and preserves its excluded filings and exact objection event.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR46","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C040","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C040","Precise proposition":"Unresolved taxation does not necessarily delay remittitur.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR38(d),40(f),41(d)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C041","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C041","Precise proposition":"Later or amended cost/fee statements follow the specified clerk/lower-court mechanism.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR40(f),41(d);§12-114","Status":"O/P"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"current_rule_portion_compared_secondary_statute_currentness_or_incorporation_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C042","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C042","Precise proposition":"Lower-court trial fees and provisional appellate advances are not final appellate entitlement.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR13(b)(9),(12)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C043","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C043","Precise proposition":"Cost/fee motions do not automatically restart merits-appeal time or establish a stay.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR14;Rule83(b);read boundaries","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C044","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C044","Precise proposition":"The2022order supplies actual adopted deletion/effectiveness evidence, within its bounds.","Source/pinpoint":"S006","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"adopted_order_actual_pixels_compared_no_broader_history_or_transition_inferred","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C045","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C045","Precise proposition":"The2017fee-amendment mirror is not the final official act.","Source/pinpoint":"S005;Rule54(e)(2)","Status":"L/O/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"researcher_introduced_mirror_version_report_retained_not_final_act_or_coordinator_pixels_verified","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C046","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C046","Precise proposition":"Current official statutes and complete intervening histories remain held.","Source/pinpoint":"S004–S008","Status":"H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"provenance_or_scoped_gap_statement_not_general_negative_legal_proof","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C047","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C047","Precise proposition":"A fee affidavit does not authorize disclosure of protected material.","Source/pinpoint":"IREFS15","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C048","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C048","Precise proposition":"The prior Rule46motion-service correction is preserved, not reopened or contradicted.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR46;S006","Status":"O/reuse"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"scoped_current_rule_text_compared_with_application_construction_and_actual_predicates_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C049","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C049","Precise proposition":"Source failures, historical text and actual reads are separately recorded.","Source/pinpoint":"S001–S008","Status":"Provenance"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"provenance_or_scoped_gap_statement_not_general_negative_legal_proof","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C050","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C050","Precise proposition":"Special regimes and judicial/constitutional construction remain exact dependencies.","Source/pinpoint":"Section13","Status":"H"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"provenance_or_scoped_gap_statement_not_general_negative_legal_proof","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P30-C051","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C051","Precise proposition":"No actual award, conduct, fee amount or outcome was determined; prior holds remain.","Source/pinpoint":"Research record","Status":"Certain"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actualtask ANDpass; rawcellunchanged.","coordinator_review_disposition":"provenance_or_scoped_gap_statement_not_general_negative_legal_proof","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_actual_outcome_accepted":false}],"sources":[{"source_id":"S_ID-P30-S001","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/iar","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/1","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/2","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.2","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/14","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/16","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/19","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/20","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/21","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/22","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/23","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/26.1","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/32","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/33","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/35","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/37","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/46","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/47","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/48","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/101","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/110","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/122"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P30-S001","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S001 — official Idaho Appellate Rules\n\nIssuer: Idaho Supreme Court.\nConsolidated URL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/iar\n\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tActual read bounds and use\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/1\tComplete scope/application provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/2\tComplete definitions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.2\tComplete (a)–(b); ICAR 59 referral merits held\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13\tComplete material (b) introductory clause, (b)(9), (b)(12); other stay/security merits not applied\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/14\tComplete civil timing paragraph; use confined to cost/fee-motion exclusion\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/16\tComplete; cost bond/nonexecution agreement distinguished\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/19\tComplete; substantive reliance on (e), not record-designation mechanics\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/20\tComplete filing/service provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/21\tComplete jurisdictional/nonjurisdictional distinction\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/22\tComplete computation clause\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/23\tComplete relevant fee-waiver/public-actor provisions; current filing amounts not adopted as taxed costs\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/26.1\tComplete historical body and repeal heading; not current disk-price authority\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/32\tComplete (a)–(f); printed certificate not reproduced\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/33\tComplete stipulated-dismissal provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/35\tComplete page inspected; substantive reliance on (a)(5), (b)(5), and relevant multi-party context\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/37\tComplete body inspected; reliance on (d)–(e) consequences\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38\tComplete; reliance on announcement and unresolved-taxation/remittitur provisions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/40\tComplete (a)–(f)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/41\tComplete (a)–(e)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/46\tComplete extension rule; corrected motion-service event retained\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/47\tComplete court-service provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/48\tComplete unspecified-practice provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/101\tComplete Court of Appeals scope\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/110\tComplete subsequent-filing/assignment interface\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/122\tComplete Court of Appeals remittitur provision\nMaterial displayed history\nRule\tDisplayed history material here\nIAR baseline\tMarch 25, 1977 adoption / July 1, 1977 effectiveness, where displayed\n40\tAmendments March 30, 1984/July 1, 1984; March 20, 1985/July 1, 1985; March 28, 1986/July 1, 1986; March 20, 1991/July 1, 1991; January 30, 2001/July 1, 2001; May 5, 2017/July 1, 2017; January 24, 2019/same day; April 28, 2022/same day\n41\tMarch 30, 1984/July 1, 1984; March 23, 1990/July 1, 1990; January 24, 2019/same day\n26.1\tAdopted March 20, 1991/July 1, 1991; page heading states repealed effective January 24, 2019\n32\tLatest displayed amendment April 28, 2022, effective July 1, 2022\n46\tLatest displayed amendment April 28, 2022, effective April 28, 2022\n11.2\tJune 15, 1987/November 1, 1987; November 20, 2012/January 1, 2013\n33\tMarch 28, 1986/July 1, 1986; September 8, 2016/same day; May 5, 2017/July 1, 2017\n13 and 23\tCurrent pages include 2026 amendments; only the complete selected cost/fee interfaces are relied on\n\nThe April 2022 Rule 40/46 amendments have the additional adopted-order evidence in S006. Other original amendments were not opened. No absence-of-later-change certification is made."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"current_IAR_fresh_and_documented_prior_text_compared","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading sourcegroup, not coordinator primary authentication.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Freshcomplete40/41/33plusrepealed26.1;21actualpriorIARbodiesin19documents,selectedcost-feesanction/remittiturclauses. AdoptedorderseparateS006. Fulloriginalhistory/currentdiskreconciliation/judicialactualheld.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_original_history_accepted":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P30-S002","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ircp","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.7","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/5","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/58","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P30-S002","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S002 — official civil rules\n\nIssuer: Idaho Supreme Court.\nConsolidated URL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ircp\n\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tActual read bounds\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1\tComplete scope/local-rule clauses\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2\tComplete computation/extension/mail provisions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.7\tComplete declaration incorporation\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/5\tComplete relevant later-paper service, filing, and proof; initial service excluded\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7\tComplete motion provisions; generic hearing schedule only as necessary\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54\tComplete body inspected; substantive reliance on (a)’s costs/finality distinction, (d)(1)(A)–(B), (D)–(F), (d)(2)–(6), and all (e)(1)–(8). Trial cost-category dollar schedules not applied.\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/58\tComplete entry provision, only to distinguish unresolved costs from entry\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83\tComplete page inspected; substantive reliance on (f)(1), (m)–(q), necessary motion-timing exclusion, and disposition interface\n\nDisplayed baseline: March 1, 2016/July 1, 2016.\nMaterial additions: Rule 2.2—September 9, 2016/same day; Rule 54 amendments through April 28, 2021/July 1, 2021, including the April 17, 2017 nunc-pro-tunc March 1, 2017 fee amendment; Rule 83’s current page includes June 30, 2026/July 1, 2026.\n\nOriginal civil-rule orders were not recovered. No full trial-cost or gateway report is claimed."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"current_IRCP_fresh_and_documented_prior_text_compared","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading sourcegroup, not coordinator primary authentication.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Freshcomplete54and2.7;6actualpriorbodies1/2.2/5/7/58/83. All12feeamountfactorscompared. TrialcostscheduleanduniversalIARfactor/triggertransplantnotaccepted. 9-1406currentofficialheld.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_original_history_accepted":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P30-S003","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/irefs","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/1","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/2","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/4","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/5","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/9","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/11","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/12","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/13","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/14","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/15","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/17","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/18"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P30-S003","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S003 — official electronic-filing rules\n\nIssuer: Idaho Supreme Court.\nConsolidated URL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/irefs\n\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tActual read bounds\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/1\tComplete hierarchy/scope\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/2\tComplete definitions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/4\tComplete filer categories and exceptions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/5\tComplete exceptions; special-proceeding details not applied\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/9\tComplete signature provision; sample identity omitted\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/11\tComplete filing/acceptance rule\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/12\tComplete time-of-filing rule\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/13\tComplete rejection/correction; no prescribed form created\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/14\tComplete technical-failure relief\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/15\tComplete privacy provisions; substantive use limited to filing responsibility and exceptions; no actual disclosure claim\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/17\tComplete party-service rule; discovery details not applied\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/18\tComplete court-service rule; form wording omitted\n\nDisplayed baseline: April 15, 2019/July 1, 2019. Material later entries include Rule 4’s September 11, 2024 amendment and Rule 5/9 amendments through June 30, 2025/July 1, 2025. Original orders and technical guide were not opened."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"12_actual_prior_IREFS_bodies_scoped_comparison","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading sourcegroup, not coordinator primary authentication.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Actuallyread1/2/4/5/9/11/12/13/14/15/17/18incompletedpriorreviews;necessaryhierarchy/signature/service/filing/correctionclausescompared. Notnewfetch/independentcorroboration/fullguideprivacyactual.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_original_history_accepted":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P30-S004","urls":["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-101/","https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-107/","https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-114/","https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-117/","https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-118/","https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-119/","https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-120/","https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-121/","https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-123/","https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-67/chapter-52/section-67-5201/","https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-31/chapter-32/section-31-3220/","https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-9/chapter-14/section-9-1406/","https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-16/section-1-1607/","https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-73/chapter-1/section-73-108/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P30-S004","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S004 — provisional statutory bodies\n\nPublisher/edition: Justia, 2025 Idaho Code. Complete bodies and displayed histories were read, except where a narrower relied-on definition is stated.\n\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tMaterial use and displayed credits\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-101/\tCivil cost-rule relationship. Added 1977 ch.4 §1 p.9.\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-107/\tComplete appeal-cost provision. C.C.P.1881 §698; R.S./R.C./C.L.4906; C.S.7212; I.C.A.12-107.\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-114/\tComplete taxation/review/certification provision. C.C.P.1881 §704; 1911 ch.204 §1 p.673 and recodifications.\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-117/\tComplete (1)–(7). Added1984 ch.204 §1 p.501; amendments1993,1994,2000,2010,2012,2018; latest2019 ch.212 §1 p.643.\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-118/\tComplete state-payment clause. C.C.P.1881 §708 lineage; 1994 ch.180 §9 p.428.\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-119/\tComplete county-payment clause. C.C.P.1881 §709 and recodifications.\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-120/\tComplete (1)–(6); personal-injury and small-claims branches excluded from ordinary appeal application. Added1970 ch.44 §1 p.91; amendments through2018 ch.244 §2 p.568.\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-121/\tComplete. Added1976 ch.349 §1 p.1158; 1987 ch.263 §2 p.555; 2017 ch.47 §2 p.76.\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-12/chapter-1/section-12-123/\tComplete (1)–(4), used as a boundary rather than established appellate authority. Added1987 ch.278 §8 p.580.\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-67/chapter-52/section-67-5201/\tComplete relevant (4) agency definition and exclusions; section history read. Added1965 ch.273 §1 p.701; latest listed2025 ch.151 §6 p.741. No claim that this latest amendment changed every part of (4).\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-31/chapter-32/section-31-3220/\tComplete (1)–(8); reliance on scope and waiver-versus-adverse-award distinction. Added1977 ch.228 §1 p.680;1979 ch.222 §1 p.617;1996 ch.420 §6 p.1402.\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-9/chapter-14/section-9-1406/\tComplete (1)–(2), including exceptions; generic form not reproduced. Added2013 ch.259 §1 p.636.\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-16/section-1-1607/\tComplete nonjudicial-day provision. C.C.P.1881 §46 lineage;1961 ch.270 §1 p.480;1971 ch.84 §1 p.186.\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-73/chapter-1/section-73-108/\tComplete holiday/substitution provision; latest listed2002 ch.146 §3 p.423.\n\nThe § 12-120 displayed intervening amendment years are 1975, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1994, 1996, 2001, and 2012. Those original acts were not recovered. All these statutory bodies remain secondary; no official-current 2026 certification follows from the publisher’s edition."},"source_access_status":"provisional_secondary","coordinator_verification_status":"secondary_statutes_not_current_primary_verified","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading sourcegroup, not coordinator primary authentication.","coordinator_read_bounds":"All14sourceusagerecordsandclaimsread;2025Justiabodiesremainprovisional. Noofficial2026statutes/adoptedactchainoractualclassificationauthenticated.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_original_history_accepted":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P30-S005","urls":["https://legiscan.com/ID/text/H0097/id/1493576/Idaho-2017-H0097-Introduced.pdf","https://legiscan.com/ID/bill/H0097/2017","https://legiscan.com/ID/text/H0097/2017"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P30-S005","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S005 — 2017 H0097 legislative-version evidence\nText: https://legiscan.com/ID/text/H0097/id/1493576/Idaho-2017-H0097-Introduced.pdf\nStatus: https://legiscan.com/ID/bill/H0097/2017\nText landing page: https://legiscan.com/ID/text/H0097/2017\n\nRead: Complete one-page §§ 1–4; substantive use limited to the statutory amendment, repeal, and effective clause. An incidental named judicial reference in the intent paragraph was not investigated or reproduced.\n\nPixels: Page 1/PDF index 0.\nVersion: Introduced mirror.\nReported history: Chapter 47; March 1, 2017 effectiveness.\nLimit: Final official act and full historical application remain held."},"source_access_status":"nonfinal_legislative_mirror_reported_pixels","coordinator_verification_status":"introduced_mirror_status_retained_not_final_act_verified","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading sourcegroup, not coordinator primary authentication.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Researcherreportedonepagepixels;coordinatordidnotreadmirrorpixelsorfinaIofficialact. NotfinalH0097/currentcodification/fullhistoryproof.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_original_history_accepted":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P30-S006","urls":["https://isb.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/Amendments-to-Idaho-Appellate-Rules-11.1-12.1-40-46-eff-April-28-2022.pdf","https://isb.idaho.gov/blog/idaho-supreme-court-order-regarding-rule-amendments-effective-april-28-2022/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P30-S006","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S006 — adopted April 28, 2022 order\n\nIssuer/title: Idaho Supreme Court, Order—Amendments to Idaho Appellate Rules 11.1, 12.1, 40 and 46.\nOfficial institutional host: Idaho State Bar.\n\nLiteral PDF URL:\nhttps://isb.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/Amendments-to-Idaho-Appellate-Rules-11.1-12.1-40-46-eff-April-28-2022.pdf\n\nLocator:\nhttps://isb.idaho.gov/blog/idaho-supreme-court-order-regarding-rule-amendments-effective-april-28-2022/\n\nActual read:\n\nPage\tRead bounds\nPDF index 0, first unnumbered page\tOrder title and adoption language; unrelated family-rule amendments excluded from merits\nPDF index 1, second unnumbered page\tComplete Rule 40(b) amendment; complete amended Rule 46 paragraph; immediate-effect clause and instruction that markup is not permanent rule text\nPDF index 2, third unnumbered page\tPublication directive, April 28, 2022 date, signature/attestation and certification of copy; personal names not reproduced\n\nAll three page images were inspected. The PDF returned no parsed text; the findings are based on the actual page images.\n\nLegal status: Adopted order, effective immediately as stated.\nLimit: It is an amendment order, not a complete replacement of every subdivision of Rule 40 or Rule 46. No broader pending-case transition rule was inferred."},"source_access_status":"adopted_order_reported_actual_pixels","coordinator_verification_status":"adopted_2022_order_actual_three_page_pixels_verified","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading sourcegroup, not coordinator primary authentication.","coordinator_read_bounds":"CourtorderhostedatIdahoStateBar;actualdownloadSHAandall3localrendersread. Page0title/adoption;1complete40bdeletion/46/immediateeffect/markup;2date/publication/attestation/certification. Unrelatedfamilymerits/incidentalnamesexcluded. Nobroadertransition/fullreplacements.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_original_history_accepted":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P30-S007","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P30-S007","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S007 — official history locator and bounded currentness searches\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments\n\nRead: Official publication/incorporation statement and available index context.\nLimit: No complete original-order sequence recovered.\n\nBounded 2025–2026 searches for the relevant fee statutes and IAR provisions returned, among other things, special small-claims and sector-specific legislative leads. Those were not treated as ordinary appellate amendments without their operative scope. No no-change finding was made from the search results."},"source_access_status":"locator_and_bounded_search_only","coordinator_verification_status":"prior_locator_and_bounded_search_record_not_history_authentication","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading sourcegroup, not coordinator primary authentication.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Publicationlocatorand2025-26discoveryrecordonly;notnewoperativebodies/originalorderchain/nochangeproof.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_original_history_accepted":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P30-S008","urls":["https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title12/T12CH1/SECT12-120/","https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title12/T12CH1/SECT12-121/","https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/sessioninfo/2017/legislation/H0097.pdf","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules/Order-Amending-Appellate-Rules.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P30-S008","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S008 — fresh failures and unopened sources\nLiteral URL or material\tActual result\nhttps://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title12/T12CH1/SECT12-120/\tFresh official section attempt inaccessible\nhttps://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title12/T12CH1/SECT12-121/\tFresh official section attempt inaccessible\nhttps://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/sessioninfo/2017/legislation/H0097.pdf\tActual legislative link followed; restricted/inaccessible\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules/Order-Amending-Appellate-Rules.pdf\tOrdinary historical order route returned404\nAPI-hosted original orders, forms and technical guide\tNot opened\nIncidental cases/opinions/dockets and legislative roll-call identities\tNot opened or relied on\n\nThe successfully recovered 2022 adopted order is a separate ordinary public source. Earlier failed routes are not relabeled successful, and no final statute is inferred from the later rule order."},"source_access_status":"failure_and_unopened_incorporation_log","coordinator_verification_status":"historical_source_failures_and_unopened_incorporations_retained","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading sourcegroup, not coordinator primary authentication.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Researcherfailedofficialstatutes/H0097/2019orderroutesremainfailures;nofailedURLretry/API/guessedvariant/securitybypass. CoordinatorlocalDNSfailurewaslocalnetworkexecutiononlyandapprovedordinaryPDFdownloadthenworked.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_source_checks":"[internal evidence reference]","all_applicability_or_original_history_accepted":false}],"coverage":[{"topic":"1—ordinary rule scope","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"1—ordinary rule scope","Disposition":"Complete IAR40–41and necessary routes read","Claims/sources":"C001–C002","Exact remaining gap":"Current statutes and route-specific construction"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Magistrate-to-district","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Magistrate-to-district","Disposition":"Necessary Rule83clauses read","Claims/sources":"C002,C012","Exact remaining gap":"Universal trigger selection not invented"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Higher/Court of Appeals","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Higher/Court of Appeals","Disposition":"Rules101/110and complete taxation rules","Claims/sources":"C002,C040–C041","Exact remaining gap":"No actual assignment/award"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Actors/decision functions","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Actors/decision functions","Disposition":"Distinguished","Claims/sources":"C014–C016,C041","Exact remaining gap":"No actual entitlement"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Special routes","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Special routes","Disposition":"Explicitly excluded","Claims/sources":"C050","Exact remaining gap":"Separate regimes"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"2—cost categories","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"2—cost categories","Disposition":"Complete Rule40list","Claims/sources":"C006–C009","Exact remaining gap":"Repealed-disk reference"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Former reproduction allowance","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Former reproduction allowance","Disposition":"Adopted deletion authenticated","Claims/sources":"C007,C044","Exact remaining gap":"Historical application not selected"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Prevailing/mixed/reversal/remand","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Prevailing/mixed/reversal/remand","Disposition":"Rule/statute relations read","Claims/sources":"C003–C005","Exact remaining gap":"Judicial construction"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Deposits versus taxation","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Deposits versus taxation","Disposition":"Distinguished","Claims/sources":"C006,C024","Exact remaining gap":"No initial-fee report rerun"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Fee waiver versus immunity","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Fee waiver versus immunity","Disposition":"Necessary statute read","Claims/sources":"C024","Exact remaining gap":"No eligibility"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"3—substantive fees","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"3—substantive fees","Disposition":"Complete material statutory bodies provisionally read","Claims/sources":"C017–C025","Exact remaining gap":"Official current/final originals"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Consumer/commercial/instrument","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Consumer/commercial/instrument","Disposition":"Exact branches retained","Claims/sources":"C019","Exact remaining gap":"Actual classification/other law"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Frivolous/unreasonable basis","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Frivolous/unreasonable basis","Disposition":"§121and§117distinguished","Claims/sources":"C021–C023","Exact remaining gap":"No conduct finding"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Public actors","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Public actors","Disposition":"Definitions/portion/payment branches","Claims/sources":"C022–C024","Exact remaining gap":"Budget and constitutional incorporations"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Contract/nonwaiver","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Contract/nonwaiver","Disposition":"Explicit predicate and hold","Claims/sources":"C025","Exact remaining gap":"No private contract"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"4—requests/objections","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"4—requests/objections","Disposition":"Complete IAR40–41mechanics","Claims/sources":"C010–C016","Exact remaining gap":"Actual events absent"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Civil-rule comparison","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Civil-rule comparison","Disposition":"Read without universal substitution","Claims/sources":"C012,C028","Exact remaining gap":"District/remand construction"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Electronic service/computation","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Electronic service/computation","Disposition":"Necessary complete bodies","Claims/sources":"C035–C039","Exact remaining gap":"Actual failure/service and statutory currency"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Rule46corrected relation","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Rule46corrected relation","Disposition":"Preserved and freshly confirmed","Claims/sources":"C039,C048","Exact remaining gap":"No calendar"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"5—amount","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"5—amount","Disposition":"All Rule54factors and IAR41method read","Claims/sources":"C015–C016,C026–C028","Exact remaining gap":"No universal formula"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Allocation/adjustment","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Allocation/adjustment","Disposition":"Source-specific boundaries","Claims/sources":"C027","Exact remaining gap":"Actual work and judicial construction"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Blank worksheet","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Blank worksheet","Disposition":"Supplied","Claims/sources":"Section14","Exact remaining gap":"No inputs"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"6—sanctions","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"6—sanctions","Disposition":"Necessary appellate clauses complete","Claims/sources":"C029–C034","Exact remaining gap":"Full due process/discipline"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Notice/opportunity/causation","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Notice/opportunity/causation","Disposition":"Preserved by branch","Claims/sources":"C030–C034","Exact remaining gap":"No actual predicate"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Nonfiling/nonappearance","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Nonfiling/nonappearance","Disposition":"Distinguished","Claims/sources":"C032–C033","Exact remaining gap":"No automatic merits/fee result"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"7—postdecision handling","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"7—postdecision handling","Disposition":"Complete narrow rules","Claims/sources":"C040–C043","Exact remaining gap":"Full review/enforcement excluded"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Original adopted evidence","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Original adopted evidence","Disposition":"2022order visually read","Claims/sources":"C044","Exact remaining gap":"Other orders/final statutes held"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"2017statutory history","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"2017statutory history","Disposition":"Mirror/version status retained","Claims/sources":"C045–C046","Exact remaining gap":"Final official act"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"2025–2026status searches","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"2025–2026status searches","Disposition":"Bounded discovery","Claims/sources":"S007","Exact remaining gap":"No no-change assertion"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Sources/read bounds/failures","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Sources/read bounds/failures","Disposition":"Supplied","Claims/sources":"Section9","Exact remaining gap":"Exact limitations preserved"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Quantities/branches","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Quantities/branches","Disposition":"Supplied","Claims/sources":"Sections11–12","Exact remaining gap":"No calculations"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Prior findings/holds","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Prior findings/holds","Disposition":"Unchanged","Claims/sources":"C051","Exact remaining gap":"No earlier gap closed by implication"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"},{"topic":"Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent","Disposition":"Not accepted complete","Claims/sources":"Entire report","Exact remaining gap":"Recorded dependencies remain"},"raw_table_index":31,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_yet_reviewed"}],"annotations":{},"corrections":[],"resolved_corrections":[],"review_history":[{"id":"S_ID-P30-costfee-scoped-review-20261029","status":"reviewed_with_holds_21cell_completion_pending","at":"2026-10-29T00:38:23.124333+00:00"}]}