{"meta":{"key":"s_id--pass-27","task":"S_ID","title":"SID Idaho ordinary civil appellate gateways, timing, motion interactions, and stays","parent_title":"Idaho debt and debt relief law","edition":"pass-27","path":"/research/s_id--pass-27/","kind":"split_pass","category":"state","role":"state","area_numbers":[66],"groups":["collections"],"date":"2026-10-28","tables":31,"claims":55,"sources":8,"review_status":"whole_first_scoped_review_complete_bounded_patches_resolved_other_holds","review_complete":true,"sha256":"fe008444c0d267b8b8379227582690813f81578cf782b1a49979354910d17f69","headings":["Evidence disposition","Principal findings","2.1 Constitutional and statutory framework","2.2 Route comparison","2.3 Court of Appeals assignment and further review","2.4 The new wrong-court transfer rule","3.1 Final judgment is not established by a caption alone","3.2 Ordinary IAR 11 categories","3.3 Permissive interlocutory review","4.1 Distinct notice clocks","4.2 Filing, service, and receipt","4.3 P25 motion distinctions retained; appellate predicates newly verified","4.4 Premature and amended notices","5.1 Notice contents and record gateway","5.2 Appellate fees are not stay security","5.3 Electronic filing and service","5.4 Computation and notice","6.1 Route-specific stay matrix","6.2 Money-judgment security and exceptions","6.3 Retained trial-court powers","6.4 Different stay-review routes","7.1 Magistrate-to-district endpoint","7.2 Higher appellate opinion and remittitur","7.3 Court of Appeals and further-review boundary","S001 — official Idaho Constitution","S002 — official civil rules","Displayed civil-rule history","S003 — official Idaho Appellate Rules","Material displayed appellate history and application","S004 — official special-assignment rule","S005 — official electronic-filing rules","S006 — provisional statutory incorporations","S007 — official history locator and fresh failures","S008 — deliberately unread incorporations","10.1 Routes, notices, motions, and permission","10.2 Fees, electronic filing, and computation","10.3 Stay and security","10.4 Remittitur and history","Actual research performed","PDF text and pixels","Remaining gaps and conclusion"],"generation_provenance":{"actual_route":"regular_chat_adaptive_models","actual_model":"GPT-6","actual_mode":"Pro","provenance_limit":"Actual documented capture labels only; missing labels remain unknown. No preferred setting is inferred as actual execution."},"public_id":"S_ID/pass-27","facets":{"geography":["us","us-id"],"debt_type":[],"stage":["repossession","appeal"],"subject":["appeals"]},"scope":"Distinct ordinary state civil appellate gateway/finality/notice-timing/motion-interaction/stay-security component dimension4; Rule60fullmerits/P22smallclaims/P25trial/P26lifecycle/recordbriefingmerits excluded.","pending_corrections":0},"markdown":"# S_ID PASS-27 — Idaho ordinary civil appellate gateways, timing, motion interactions, and stays\n\n**Fresh public-source access date:** **October 28, 2026, America/Los_Angeles.**\n\n**Scope:** Ordinary civil appeals from magistrate decisions, district-court original and appellate decisions, and the necessary finality, notice, timing, postjudgment-motion, stay, security, and remittitur interfaces.\n\n## Evidence disposition\n\nThe **official current-published civil, appellate, administrative, and electronic-filing rules were recovered and read** to the bounds recorded below. Official constitutional text was read and visually inspected.\n\nThe attempted official statutory route was inaccessible. The relevant statutes therefore remain **provisional readings of identified 2025 reproductions**. Original court-rule orders were not recovered through the ordinary public routes used. Displayed footers establish what the current rule pages report; they are **not a completed original-order audit**.\n\nReviewed P25 findings are retained only within their supplied scope. P21 Rule 60 merits and P26 judgment-lifecycle merits are not used as substantive premises. C033/C035 and all other existing holds remain unchanged.\n\n## Principal findings\n\n**The ordinary magistrate-to-district route and the higher appellate route have different motion and cross-appeal provisions.** Rule 83 lists qualifying timing-reset motions; IAR 14 uses broader wording. Rule 83’s late-filed-appeal cross-appeal branch runs from service, while IAR 15’s additional cross-appeal window runs from filing. **[C012–C018.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+2](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83)\n\n**A 2026 rule addresses certain timely magistrate appeals taken to the wrong court.** IAR 11.3 preserves the original filing date upon the specified transfer. It does not declare every late or misdirected notice curable. **[C005.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.3)\n\n**Appeal, stay, and security are distinct.** The two ordinary routes have limited automatic-stay provisions, but continued stays, money-judgment security, nonmoney relief, partial appeals, and permissive appeals have separate conditions. **[C036–C046.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13)\n\n**Electronic submission, acceptance, service, correction, and technical-failure relief are separate events.** Their rules do not turn a rejected document, a courtesy copy, or an attempted transmission into a universally effective appeal. **[C025–C030.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+3](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/11)\n\n# 1. Reviewed reuse, new appellate evidence, and retained gaps\n\nLabels used below:\n\n- **O — Official body read:** official current-published rule or constitutional publication.\n- **P — Provisional statute:** dated secondary reproduction.\n- **H — Held:** material original-history, incorporation, construction, or application dependency remains unresolved.\n\n| Reviewed material | Retained finding | New P27 inquiry and reading | Remaining boundary |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **P25 C045**, Rules 54/58 | Judgment document, amendment, and entry are distinct events. | Complete necessary finality clauses read with IAR 11, 14, 17 and Rule 83. | No actual finality, amended-judgment restart, or appealability determination. |\n| **P25 C052**, Rule 62(a)–(b) | Post-trial relief does not itself establish a stay; court-ordered relief is conditional. | Full material Rule 62 and IAR 13, 13.4, 16 read for appellate stays and security. | No actual stay, bond, waiver, or enforcement permission. |\n| Reviewed P25 Rule 50/52/59 distinctions | Rule 50 uses service; Rule 52(b) uses filing; Rule 59(b)/(e) require filing and service. | Necessary clauses reread against the appellate rules’ **timely-filing** predicates. | A timely trial motion and a qualifying appellate timing event are not assumed identical. |\n| Reviewed P25 Rule 59.1 | Trial damages remittitur differs from appellate remittitur issuance. | Narrow reread for the appellate-event relationship. | Full damages, rehearing, or enforcement analysis remains separate. |\n| P21 Rule 60 report | Not a substantive premise. | Only express appellate exclusions and retained-jurisdiction references to Rule 60 are used. | No Rule 60 grounds/timing rerun. |\n| P22 small claims | Separate special route. | Ordinary-rule scope and express exceptions read afresh. | Initial small-claims de novo procedure is not imported into Rule 83. |\n| P26 lifecycle | No unreviewed merits reused. | No judgment-interest, renewal, lien-duration, or satisfaction conclusion supplied here. | Those findings retain their own status and holds. |\n| Rule 40 quantity clarification | Resolved and preserved. | Not reopened. | No disqualification inquiry. |\n| C033/C035 and other state holds | Unchanged. | No provider/checklist investigation. | No implied closure. |\n\nThe supplied reviewed records do not provide complete original-order evidence. New source reads below are identified separately from this reuse.\n\n# 2. Ordinary appellate routes and court authority\n\n## 2.1 Constitutional and statutory framework\n\nArticle V, §§ 9, 13, and 20 distinguish the Supreme Court’s appellate authority, constitutionally protected appellate structure, and district-court original and appellate authority. Section 1-2213 separately addresses review of magistrate decisions; § 1-2406 addresses Court of Appeals assignment.\n\nThese provisions do not establish a particular claim’s validity, an actual assignment, or jurisdiction over a particular appeal. The statutory bodies were read only in provisional reproductions. **[C002–C004.]** [Idaho Secretary of State+2](https://sos.idaho.gov/elections/publications/Idaho_Constitution.pdf)\n\n## 2.2 Route comparison\n\n| Origin and posture | Ordinary destination or mechanism | Material qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Ordinary magistrate final civil judgment or qualifying appealable order | District court under IRCP 83 | Special direct-review and statutory proceedings remain separate. |\n| Otherwise nonappealable magistrate interlocutory order | District permission under Rule 83.1 | Permission from the receiving appellate court is indispensable. |\n| Magistrate specially assigned to act as district court under ICAR 6 | Supreme Court under Rule 83(a)(3) | Original assignment may state differently; no actual order examined. |\n| District court acting originally | Supreme Court under the IAR gateway | Requires an appealable category or permission. |\n| District court deciding a magistrate appeal | Supreme Court under IAR 11(a)(2) | Dismissal, affirmance, reversal, and remand decisions are listed; no merits finding follows. |\n| Appeal within Court of Appeals assignment authority | Assigned by the Supreme Court | A party does not select the Court of Appeals merely by captioning a notice differently. |\n| Small claims, family, probate/guardianship, criminal, juvenile, agency and other special proceedings | Their specified routes | Their thresholds, expedited periods, and stay rules are not transferred to ordinary debt litigation. |\n\n**[C003–C004, C006.]** Rule 83 ordinarily uses record-based appellate review. Its inadequate-record branch permits the specified de novo or remand disposition; that is not the automatic small-claims de novo route. [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83)\n\nIAR 2’s definition of “district court” excludes the magistrate division for that rule set. The more inclusive definition in ordinary civil Rule 1 cannot be substituted without regard to the appellate route. [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/2)\n\n## 2.3 Court of Appeals assignment and further review\n\nIAR 101 applies the appellate rules to Court of Appeals practice except where otherwise provided. IAR 108 preserves Supreme Court assignment discretion and its excluded categories. IAR 114 permits reassignment; IAR 110 generally routes subsequent appellate papers through the Supreme Court clerk.\n\nSupreme Court review of a Court of Appeals decision is **discretionary under IAR 118**, not an ordinary appeal as of right. Complete briefing, oral-argument, and review-merits practice remains a follow-on component. **[C006, C051.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+3](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/101)\n\n## 2.4 The new wrong-court transfer rule\n\nIAR 11.3 applies to its defined **timely** magistrate notices:\n\n| Wrong-route branch | Rule consequence |\n| --- | --- |\n| Notice to Supreme Court from a magistrate decision not directly appealable under IAR 11.1(a) | Supreme Court may transfer to district court. |\n| Notice to district court from a magistrate decision that must go directly under IAR 11.1(a) | District clerk must forward; Supreme Court may order transfer. |\n| Ordered transfer | Original filing date is preserved; proceeding continues as specified in the receiving court. |\n| Fee | No additional fee except correction of an existing deficiency. |\n\n**[C005.]** This is not a general extension, an actual jurisdiction finding, or permission to disregard the proper route. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.3)\n\n# 3. Appealability and finality\n\n## 3.1 Final judgment is not established by a caption alone\n\nRule 54(a) requires the prescribed separate judgment document. A judgment is final when it resolves all claims for relief against all parties, except the stated costs/fees issue, or when it satisfies the partial-final mechanism.\n\nRule 54(b)(1) requires more than a label: multiple claims or parties, the express no-just-reason-for-delay determination, and the prescribed certification. Without effective certification, the described partial disposition remains revisable.\n\nAn amended judgment must be entered as a complete amended document under Rule 54(a)(2). That requirement does not itself answer whether every amendment restarts appeal time for every issue. **[C007–C008.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54)\n\nRule 58 supplies the entry event. Proposed rulings, oral announcements, findings, filing, and formal judgment entry remain distinct. Taxation of costs does not postpone entry. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/58)\n\n## 3.2 Ordinary IAR 11 categories\n\nThe complete relevant IAR 11(a) text was read. Its categories include:\n\n| Category | Material limit |\n| --- | --- |\n| Final judgment under Rule 54(a) | Actual finality remains necessary. |\n| District appellate decision | Includes the listed dismissal, affirmance, reversal, and remand dispositions. |\n| Certified partial judgment | Requires Rule 54(b) compliance. |\n| Contempt order/judgment | Full contempt merits remain separate. |\n| Grant/refusal of new trial | Includes conditional additur/remittitur orders. |\n| Grant/denial of JNOV | Different from merely requesting relief. |\n| Post-final order | Includes denial of vacatur; **excludes an order granting vacatur**. |\n| Post-Rule-54(b) order | Must relate to or arise from that certified judgment for the specified branch. |\n| Statutorily appealable order | The statute and its complete predicates must be read. |\n| Vexatious-litigant designation | Separate special branch; denial of permission to commence new litigation is excluded from this route. |\n\n**[C009.]** A copy of the appealed instrument is required; the postjudgment branch also calls for the final judgment. No actual instrument was inspected. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11)\n\nA grant of vacatur excluded from IAR 11(a)(7) is not thereby declared immune from every conceivable review mechanism. The proper alternative, if any, requires its own authority.\n\n## 3.3 Permissive interlocutory review\n\nBoth ordinary permission rules require a controlling legal question, substantial ground for differing opinion, and the stated advancement of orderly resolution. Their courts and sequences differ:\n\n| Step | Magistrate-to-district: IRCP 83.1 | District-to-Supreme: IAR 12 |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Initial request | Motion to magistrate | Motion to district court |\n| Initial period | Fourteen days after order entry | Fourteen days after order entry |\n| Lower ruling | Reasoned ruling within fourteen days after hearing | Same stated hearing-based relation |\n| Next request | District court | Supreme Court |\n| Next period | Fourteen days after approving/disapproving order | Fourteen days after approving/disapproving order |\n| Lower court has not acted | Twenty-one-day filing-based branch | Twenty-one-day filing-based branch |\n| Lower recommendation | Does not itself complete permission | Does not itself complete permission |\n| Acceptance | Receiving court must grant leave and prescribe a time certain for notice | Supreme Court must grant leave and prescribe a time certain |\n| Denial | District denial has the rule’s finality/no-further-request limitation, subject to its express exceptions | No automatic right to permission |\n\n**[C010–C011.]** The time certain in a grant is not replaced with an invented universal notice period. No interlocutory issue or permission request is evaluated. [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83.1)\n\n# 4. Notice, timing, cross-appeals, and motion interactions\n\n## 4.1 Distinct notice clocks\n\n| Route | Required act and reference event | Special cross-appeal relation |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Magistrate-to-district | File notice with district clerk within forty-two days from the clerk’s file stamp on the judgment/order | If the appeal is filed **and served** more than twenty-eight days after entry, the opposing party’s specified cross-appeal window is fourteen days after service. |\n| District-to-higher appellate court | File notice under IAR 14 within forty-two days from the clerk’s file stamp | IAR 15 uses the later of the otherwise applicable forty-two-day period or twenty-one days after the original notice was filed. |\n\n**[C012–C013, C018.]** Service-triggered and filing-triggered windows are not interchangeable. No actual trigger, date, notice, or deadline is supplied. [Idaho Supreme Court+2](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83)\n\nIf a respondent seeks no affirmative reversal, vacation, or modification, IAR 15 and 35(b)(4) permit the stated additional-issue route without a cross-appeal. Whether particular requested relief is affirmative is not decided. [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/15)\n\n## 4.2 Filing, service, and receipt\n\nIAR 20 requires actual filing rather than a mailing-date substitute for notices of appeal and cross-appeal. Its rule deeming other mailed appellate documents filed when mailed is separate.\n\nThe notice-service requirement reaches the specified parties who appeared below, even if not parties to the appeal, and the requested reporter. Rule 83 separately requires immediate service on the magistrate court and the other parties.\n\nThese duties do not make late service automatically identical to an untimely notice. The rules expressly classify certain filing failures as jurisdictional; other defects can still produce sanctions or dismissal. **[C014–C015.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/20)\n\n## 4.3 P25 motion distinctions retained; appellate predicates newly verified\n\n| Motion/interface | Reviewed trial-rule relation retained | Newly read appellate distinction |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| JNOV | Rule 50(b) uses timely **service**; no prior directed-verdict motion is required merely to make the motion. | Rule 83(b)(1)(B)(i) expressly requires a timely **filed** JNOV motion **following a timely directed-verdict motion** for that timing-reset branch. |\n| Amended/additional findings | Rule 52(b) uses timely **filing**. | Rule 83 expressly includes it even when judgment alteration is unnecessary. |\n| Alter/amend judgment | Rule 59(e) requires filing and service. | Rule 83 excludes Rule 60 and cost/fee motions from its listed judgment-alteration branch. |\n| New trial | Rule 59(b) requires filing and service. | Expressly listed in Rule 83. |\n| Higher civil appeal | No trial-motion act is rewritten. | IAR 14 uses timely **filing** of a motion that, if granted, could affect findings, conclusions, or judgment, excluding Rule 60 and costs/fees. |\n| Reconsideration | Rule 11.2 supplies its own permitted/excluded categories. | The word “reconsideration” does not automatically satisfy IAR 14, and Rule 83’s list is not rewritten as an unlimited reconsideration category. |\n| Rule 60 | Merits not rerun. | Excluded from these timing-reset provisions, while lower-court authority to decide it during appeal is separately preserved. |\n\n**[C016–C017.]** Motion availability, timely service, timely filing, appeal-period termination, and an eventual ruling are different legal questions. Judicial construction of their interaction remains held. [Idaho Supreme Court+3](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83)\n\nUnder the qualifying higher-court rule, the appeal time begins anew from the clerk’s file stamp on the granting/denying order. The published rule speaks to all judgments/orders in that action; no actual motion is found to satisfy its predicate.\n\nRule 59(d)’s court-issued notice of intent is treated by that clause as a new-trial motion for the stated purposes. No automatic result is inferred from an informal announcement. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59)\n\n## 4.4 Premature and amended notices\n\n| Situation | IAR 17 relation | Boundary |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Premature notice | A notice from an **appealable** judgment/order before formal written entry becomes valid upon the later prescribed entry. | Does not declare a permanently nonappealable ruling appealable. |\n| Scope of notice | Includes the specified prior interlocutory, unexpired prior final, and subsequent orders, subject to exceptions. | Does not reopen an expired independent appeal by label alone. |\n| Amended notice | May correct information or address later facts; no additional filing fee. | Relation back requires a timely original notice from an appealable judgment/order. |\n| Ordinary amendment cutoff | Except capital cases, no amendment after the record has been filed in the Supreme Court. | Not the same as final-judgment amendment. |\n| Cross-appeal amendment | IAR 18 has its own correction/relation-back provision. | An unstated duplicate cutoff is not invented. |\n\n**[C019–C020.]** The notice’s preliminary issues are nonexclusive, but that does not complete preservation, briefing, or appellate-error law. [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/17)\n\n# 5. Filing gateways, fees, electronic rules, and computation\n\n## 5.1 Notice contents and record gateway\n\nThe rules require court/decision identification, appellate-jurisdiction basis, appropriate judgment/order copies, preliminary issues, and the specified record/transcript, service, and fee information.\n\nFor Rule 83, the preliminary issue statement may be filed separately within fourteen days of the notice and is nonexclusive. The ordinary review is on the record. A qualifying inadequate-record determination can lead to de novo review or remand; no such determination is made here.\n\nThe Rule 83 transcript-payment gateway and statutory-fee incorporation were read. Complete transcript designation, settlement, correction, augmentation, and preparation are reserved for a later component. **[C021–C022.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83)\n\n## 5.2 Appellate fees are not stay security\n\nIAR 23 lists **$94** for the ordinary higher civil appeal and **$94** for its cross-appeal. Those figures are not a complete record/transcript/system-cost quote or the district-appellate filing-fee schedule.\n\nIAR 16(a) says no undertaking for **appeal costs** is required. That is not an exemption from a money-judgment stay bond.\n\nFee waiver under IAR 23 uses district recommendation and Supreme Court decision. Its four automatic representation categories are expressly listed, but actual representation or financial eligibility is not determined. The referenced indigency/public-actor statutes remain unread dependencies. **[C023–C024.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/23)\n\nThe automatic categories named by the rule are representation through the Idaho Law Foundation Volunteer Lawyers Program, University of Idaho Legal Aid Clinic, Idaho Legal Aid Program, or the specified private attorney contract with Legal Aid. No program, attorney, roster, or applicant was investigated.\n\n## 5.3 Electronic filing and service\n\nThe Idaho Rules for Electronic Filing and Service govern within their scope and control conflicting filing/format/service provisions. Their exceptions and self-represented-party choices remain material.\n\n| Event | Source-stated relationship |\n| --- | --- |\n| Submission and acceptance | Rule 11 requires electronic submission and acknowledged acceptance, subject to the other filing-date rules. |\n| Electronic filing day | Uses the court’s location/time zone, with the rule’s midnight and nonbusiness-day provisions. |\n| Accepted filing | Relates to the system’s received timestamp as stated, including the error-queue qualification. |\n| Proposed order | Not file-stamped merely because submitted; judicial signature is required under Rule 12(b). |\n| Rejected filing | Rule 13 provides a conditional corrected-resubmission and relation-back request. |\n| Technical receipt failure | Rule 14 requires satisfactory proof and its timely resubmission procedure; then its mandatory relation-back language applies. |\n| Electronic service | Completion is the system’s transmission to the selected service contact under Rule 17; courtesy copy is not equivalent. |\n| Party service after 5 p.m. local time | Rule 17(h) adds one day to the prescribed period. |\n| Court service | Rule 18 has its separate designated-address and conventional-service conditions. |\n\n**[C025–C030.]** No system log, failed submission, accepted filing, consent, contact, or actual transmission was examined. Technical relation-back is not simply a discretionary extension of an expired jurisdictional appeal period. [Idaho Supreme Court+4](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/11)\n\nRule 10(c) gives Supreme Court notices a specific original-submission-date treatment while fee waiver is considered. It is not replaced with the general Rule 10(b) fee-denial branch. **[C029.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/10)\n\n## 5.4 Computation and notice\n\n| Rule family | Complete material distinction |\n| --- | --- |\n| IAR 22 | Excludes the trigger day; includes the last day unless Saturday, Sunday, or statutory nonjudicial day, then uses the specified next day. |\n| Statutory nonjudicial days | Sections 1-1607 and 73-108 contain holiday definitions and exceptions; no calendar was selected. |\n| IAR 46 | General good-cause extensions exclude notices of appeal/cross-appeal and the other specified petitions. |\n| Rule 83(m)/IAR 21 | The prescribed notice/cross-appeal filing period is jurisdictional; other steps are treated differently but may still result in dismissal. |\n| IRCP 2.2 | Applies within its scope; contains inaccessibility, extension, nonextension, and service-by-mail provisions. |\n| Clerk notice, Rule 2.3 | The no-recorded-mailing **and** no-actual-notice exception is conjunctive. |\n| Electronic correction/technical failure | Separate filing-date rules; not automatic relief from every defect. |\n\n**[C031–C035.]** No universal three-day mail addition is applied to the forty-two-day entry-based notice period. No universal excuse, notice-based restart, or clerk-inaccessibility outcome is determined. [Idaho Supreme Court+4](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/22)\n\n# 6. Appeal effects, stays, security, and retained jurisdiction\n\n## 6.1 Route-specific stay matrix\n\n| Route/category | Source-stated stay relationship |\n| --- | --- |\n| Magistrate-to-district | Rule 83(e) gives its fourteen-day automatic protection for the appealed proceeding/judgment; further protection requires a magistrate or district order. |\n| Higher ordinary civil appeal/cross-appeal | IAR 13(a) supplies a fourteen-day automatic stay unless otherwise ordered; its specified protection-order exclusions remain. |\n| Post-trial motion before/during appeal | Rule 62(b) permits a court-ordered stay on appropriate security terms; filing alone does not establish one. |\n| Nonmoney judgment, injunction, or mandatory order | IAR 13(b)(8), (14), and (g) use their discretionary/security and likely-success/irreparable-harm predicates. |\n| Money judgment | Separate security provisions below. |\n| Permission request pending | IAR 13(f)(1) does not automatically stay proceedings or enforcement. |\n| Permission granted | Rule 13(f)(2)’s text is expressly subject to its exceptions; enforcement and unaffected matters are separately addressed. |\n| Certified partial/permissive appeal | IAR 13.4 preserves jurisdiction over unaffected matters unless the specified stay is entered. |\n\n**[C036–C042.]** No protection-order, agency, criminal, tenancy, bankruptcy, or military exception is imported as an ordinary money-judgment result. [Idaho Supreme Court+3](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83)\n\n## 6.2 Money-judgment security and exceptions\n\nIAR 13(b)(15) requires the stated authorized-company bond or cash measure, with a nonexecution agreement alternative. It separately regulates copies, objections, possible lien release, continuation after an amount-only remand, and remittitur-related payment.\n\nThe quantity register below gives the complete relied-on numerical conditions without applying them. Section 13-202 separately corroborates the punitive-excess waiver, good-cause waiver, and dissipation-related reinstatement structure, provisionally. **[C039–C040.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13)\n\nAdditional distinctions:\n\n| Rule | Narrow effect |\n| --- | --- |\n| IAR 16(b) | A filed written agreement not to execute by the party entitled to execution requires the district court to issue the stated stay without a supersedeas bond. |\n| IRCP 62(e) | When granting a stay to the specified state/public actor, the court must not require a bond. |\n| IRCP 62(f) | All-party written stipulation may waive the stated security requirement. |\n| IAR 23 | Filing-fee exemptions are a different question from these bond provisions. |\n\n**[C041.]** None establishes actual eligibility, creditworthiness, insurer authorization, waiver, or debt forgiveness. [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/16)\n\n## 6.3 Retained trial-court powers\n\nAn appeal does not eliminate every lower-court function. IAR 13(b), incorporated for the magistrate route by Rule 83(e)(2), preserves specified authority over transcripts, listed postjudgment motions, costs/fees, property preservation, enforcement subject to stays, partial-final certification, unaffected issues, and other enumerated matters.\n\nAuthority to decide a Rule 60 motion is not the same as a Rule 60 motion extending the appeal period. **[C043.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13)\n\n## 6.4 Different stay-review routes\n\n| Stay request | Lower-court nonaction event permitting the specified higher request | Other condition |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| General IAR 13(g) stay | Fourteen days after filing, or denial | Lower-court application ordinarily comes first. |\n| Stay of remaining matters under IAR 13.4 | Twenty-one days after filing, or denial | Lower court must issue its reasoned order within fourteen days after hearing. |\n| Stay already granted | Specified request to modify/vacate is permitted | Supreme Court order takes precedence. |\n| Magistrate appeal | Rule 83(e) identifies magistrate/district authority | Not automatically the same as direct IAR 13(g) relief to the Supreme Court. |\n\n**[C044–C046.]** Neither timing branch is a finding of delay in an actual proceeding or permission to bypass the prescribed forum. [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13)\n\n# 7. Appellate decision, remittitur, and restoration boundaries\n\n## 7.1 Magistrate-to-district endpoint\n\nRule 83(r) requires the district appellate decision and directions to be filed and transmitted as stated. If no further appeal is filed within its forty-two-day relation, the district remittitur returns the matter to the magistrate division with the decision’s directions. A higher remittitur has its separate transmission branch.\n\nA Rule 83 de novo judgment follows its trial-court judgment route instead. Full review standards, record correction, and mandate construction remain outside this component. **[C047.]** [isc.idaho.gov](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83)\n\n## 7.2 Higher appellate opinion and remittitur\n\nIAR 38 distinguishes opinion filing/announcement, finality, and issuance/filing of the remittitur. Its twenty-one-day last-event relation covers the original, rehearing, and modified-opinion categories. Costs/fees do not necessarily postpone remittitur.\n\nRehearing and Court of Appeals review rules can affect the procedural setting. Therefore, the report does not declare that every opinion produces an enforceable mandate automatically on a fixed date without checking those branches. **[C048–C050.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+3](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38)\n\nIAR 13.3 also permits a limited temporary remand for good cause before an opinion. The appeal remains pending, and the lower court’s authority is bounded by the remand. **[C049.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13.3)\n\n## 7.3 Court of Appeals and further-review boundary\n\nIAR 118 supplies a discretionary petition-for-review route, with its stated opinion/rehearing/modification events. It does not require a prior rehearing petition. IAR 122 prevents a Court of Appeals remittitur after review is granted and ends that assignment as provided.\n\nThe full petition, briefing, rehearing, and review-merits process remains a later inquiry. Only the indispensable finality effects and source periods are registered here. **[C051.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/118)\n\nReviewed Rule 59.1’s fourteen-day postaffirmance election runs from **issuance of the appellate remittitur**. That differs from the bond language using **filing of remittitur**, and from the trial court’s damages-reduction remittitur. **[C052.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59.1)\n\n# 8. Source and usage register\n\nAll fresh access occurred **October 28, 2026, Pacific time**. Short source IDs carry the prefix **S_ID-P27-**.\n\nIndividual print and consolidated pages within one rule collection are usages of the same instruments—not independent corroboration.\n\n## S001 — official Idaho Constitution\n\n**Issuer/title:** Idaho Secretary of State, *Constitution of the State of Idaho*.\n**Literal URL:** https://sos.idaho.gov/elections/publications/Idaho_Constitution.pdf\n\n**Publication label:** Last amended November 5, 2024.\n**Read:** Complete Article V §§ 9, 13, 20.\n**Pixels:** Printed pages **15–17**, PDF indices **20–22**.\n**Limit:** Original constitutional amendment history and substantive constitutional construction not completed.\n\n## S002 — official civil rules\n\n**Issuer:** Idaho Supreme Court.\n**Consolidated URL:** https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ircp\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Actual read bounds/use |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1 | Complete (a)–(c), scope only |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2 | Complete computation/extension/mail provisions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.3 | Complete notice and no-notice exception |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11.2 | Complete material (b); reconsideration boundaries only |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/50 | Necessary complete (b)(1) and related reviewed motion-availability interface; trial merits not rerun |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/52 | Complete material (b); surrounding findings merits not rerun |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54 | Complete (a)–(b); reliance on finality, amendment, certification and retained jurisdiction |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/58 | Complete entry provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59 | Complete necessary (b), (c), (d), (e); trial-ground merits not rerun |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59.1 | Complete, limited to remittitur/election boundary |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/62 | Complete (a)–(h) |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83 | Complete (a)–(r); substantive use limited to route, notice, timing, gateway, jurisdiction, stay and endpoint; full record/briefing practice deferred |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83.1 | Complete permissive district-appeal provision |\n\n### Displayed civil-rule history\n\nMost listed rules display **March 1, 2016 adoption / July 1, 2016 effectiveness**. Material additional entries:\n\n| Rule | Displayed additional history |\n| --- | --- |\n| 1 | April 30, 2024/same day; September 30, 2024/October 1, 2024 |\n| 2.2, 11.2 | September 9, 2016/same day |\n| 54 | Listed amendments through April 28, 2021/July 1, 2021 |\n| 83 | April 28, 2021/July 1, 2021; April 28, 2022/same day; August 31, 2023/nunc pro tunc March 2, 2023; May 1, 2024/July 1, 2024; September 11, 2024/same day; **June 30, 2026/July 1, 2026** |\n| 83.1 | **Adopted May 1, 2024, effective July 1, 2024** |\n\nOriginal linked orders were not opened. The footers are not a complete original-history or no-later-change certification.\n\n## S003 — official Idaho Appellate Rules\n\n**Issuer:** Idaho Supreme Court.\n**Consolidated URL:** https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/iar\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Actual read bounds/use |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/1 | Complete scope and historical application |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/2 | Complete definitions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/4 | Complete aggrieved-party provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11 | Complete body; ordinary findings limited to (a), (g); special categories distinguished |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.1 | Complete, only to identify direct special magistrate routes and Rule 11.3 incorporation |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.3 | Complete (a)–(e) |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/12 | Complete permissive route |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13 | Complete operative text inspected; ordinary reliance on (a), (b), (f), (g); criminal/agency merits excluded |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13.3 | Complete temporary-remand provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13.4 | Complete unaffected-matters/stay provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/14 | Complete; civil (a) applied, criminal/agency branches excluded |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/15 | Complete cross-appeal/additional-issue rule |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/16 | Complete cost-bond/nonexecution-agreement rule |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/17 | Complete (a)–(n) and form reference; linked form not opened |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/18 | Complete cross-appeal notice/amendment provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/20 | Complete filing/service provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/21 | Complete jurisdictional/nonjurisdictional distinction |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/22 | Complete time computation |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/23 | Complete fee/waiver clauses; special fees not applied; certificate form unopened |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/32 | Complete motion provision; only gateway/service/opportunity boundaries relied on |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/35 | Page inspected; substantive use only (b)(4) additional issues |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38 | Complete opinion/finality/remittitur rule |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/42 | Complete; limited finality/rehearing-period interface, not a rehearing handbook |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/46 | Complete extensions and exclusions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/47 | Complete court-service provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/48 | Complete unspecified-practice clause |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/101 | Complete Court of Appeals scope |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/108 | Complete; assignment and exclusions used, oral-argument practice deferred |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/110 | Complete subsequent-filing/assignment interface |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/114 | Complete reassignment provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/116 | Complete; rehearing/finality boundary only |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/118 | Complete; discretionary review and finality boundary only |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/122 | Complete Court of Appeals remittitur rule |\n\n### Material displayed appellate history and application\n\n| Provision | Evidence recorded |\n| --- | --- |\n| IAR 1 | Rules effective July 1, 1977 for stated pending/later proceedings; notice time for pre-effective judgments retains the stated former-law qualification |\n| Common original IAR baseline | March 25, 1977 adoption / July 1, 1977 effectiveness, where displayed |\n| IAR 11, 13, 17, 23 | Displayed latest amendment **April 29, 2026, effective July 1, 2026** |\n| IAR 11.3 | **Adopted April 29, 2026, effective July 1, 2026** |\n| IAR 14 | Displayed latest May 1, 2024/July 1, 2024 |\n| IAR 12 | Adopted March 24, 1982/July 1, 1982; displayed later November 20, 2012/January 1, 2013 |\n| IAR 13.4 | March 27, 1989/July 1, 1989 baseline; displayed latest April 28, 2022/July 1, 2022 |\n| IAR 15 | March 27, 1989/July 1, 1989; later March 1, 2004 and March 29, 2010, each July 1 effectiveness |\n| IAR 32, 46 | Displayed April 28, 2022 amendments, effective that day |\n| IAR 38 | March 25, 1977/July 1, 1977; January 30, 2001/July 1, 2002; March 22, 2002/July 1, 2002 |\n| IAR 23 historical anomaly | Footer displays an April 28, 1983 amendment with July 1, 1993 effectiveness. It is not silently corrected. |\n\nComplete displayed footers were read where the body was read completely. Older credits are not represented as separately opened original orders. Historical applicability and any original-order transitional text remain qualified.\n\n## S004 — official special-assignment rule\n\n**Issuer/title:** Idaho Supreme Court, *ICAR 6—Additional Jurisdiction of Magistrates—Special Assignment*.\n**URL:** https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/icar/6\n\n**Read:** Complete rule and displayed history.\n**Material date:** August 1, 2025 amendment, effective that day.\n**Limit:** No actual assignment order, judge, or case inspected.\n\n## S005 — official electronic-filing rules\n\n**Issuer:** Idaho Supreme Court.\n**Consolidated URL:** https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/irefs\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Actual read bounds/use |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/1 | Complete scope/conflict clause |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/2 | Complete definitions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/4 | Complete required/optional filing categories and exceptions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/5 | Complete exceptions; special-proceeding details not applied |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/10 | Complete fees/waiver; appeal-specific (c) emphasized |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/11 | Complete filing/acceptance provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/12 | Complete time-of-filing provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/13 | Complete correction/rejection provision; prescribed text not reproduced or populated |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/14 | Complete technical-failure relief; prescribed text not reproduced or populated |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/17 | Complete service and late-service addition |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/18 | Complete court-service provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/20 | Complete appeal-specific rule; record/brief mechanics reserved for follow-on work |\n\n**Displayed baseline:** April 15, 2019 adoption / July 1, 2019 effectiveness.\nRule 5 displays later amendments through **June 30, 2025, effective July 1, 2025**. The current Rule 4 exceptions were read with their displayed later history. No original e-filing order, guide, account setting, or actual system operation was investigated.\n\n## S006 — provisional statutory incorporations\n\n**Publisher/edition:** Justia, **2025 Idaho Code**. Complete bodies and displayed histories were read.\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Material use | Displayed source credit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-22/section-1-2213/ | Magistrate appellate route and review alternatives | 1969 ch.104 §13 p.353 |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-24/section-1-2406/ | Court of Appeals assignment and excluded categories | 1980 ch.245 §1 p.567; 1981 ch.271 §2 p.574 |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-13/chapter-2/section-13-201/ | Supreme Court procedural-rule relationship | 1977 ch.170 §6 p.438 |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-13/chapter-2/section-13-202/ | Stay/security and waiver structure | 1977 ch.170 §7 p.438; 2003 ch.122 §4 p.372 |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-16/section-1-1607/ | Nonjudicial days and exceptions | C.C.P.1881 §46 lineage; 1961 ch.270 §1 p.480; 1971 ch.84 §1 p.186 |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-73/chapter-1/section-73-108/ | Complete holiday definition/substitution provisions | Displayed history through 2002 ch.146 §3 p.423 |\n\nNo original statutory enactment/application chain or current official 2026 body was recovered.\n\n## S007 — official history locator and fresh failures\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL or material | Actual observation |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments | Official statement about incorporating rules on effective dates read; retrieved body did not provide a completed original-order history |\n| https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title1/T1CH22/SECT1-2213/ | Fresh ordinary official statutory attempt failed |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/57 | Search-discovered ordinary historical route returned 404 |\n| API-hosted original orders/forms | Not opened |\n| Official search-index references to 2026 orders | Discovery only; not promoted to original-order reads |\n\nNo failed route was repeatedly retried or used to infer absence of law or amendment.\n\n## S008 — deliberately unread incorporations\n\nThe following were identified but not completed: §§ 31-3220, 31-3220A, 67-2301, 31-3212(2), 67-1401(1), 1-1105; Rule 54(b)’s standalone appendix certificate; IAR 17/18 notice forms and IAR 23 clerk certificate; full record rules; underlying authorized-surety law; complete special statutory appeal regimes.\n\nNo actual form, financial affidavit, security instrument, record, or transcript was inspected.\n\n# 9. Atomic consequential-claim register\n\nShort IDs carry the prefix **S_ID-P27-**.\n\n| Claim | Precise proposition | Source/pinpoint | Status/limit |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **C001** | Official current rule bodies were read; statutory and original-order gaps remain. | S001–S008 | O/P/H |\n| **C002** | Constitutional court authority is distinct from a particular appeal’s eligibility. | Constitution Art.V§§9,13,20 | O/H |\n| **C003** | Ordinary magistrate review differs from direct special or assigned-district review. | IRCP83(a); ICAR6 | O |\n| **C004** | District original and appellate decisions use the relevant IAR gateway. | IAR2,4,11 | O |\n| **C005** | IAR11.3preserves filing dates only within its timely-notice transfer predicates. | IAR11.3 | O |\n| **C006** | Court of Appeals assignment/reassignment is controlled by the Supreme Court. | IAR101,108,110,114; §1-2406 | O/P |\n| **C007** | Finality requires Rule54conditions, not a caption or adverse result alone. | Rule54(a) | O |\n| **C008** | Partial certification and complete amended judgment entry do not universally restart appeal time. | Rule54(a)(2),(b)(1) | O/H |\n| **C009** | IAR11lists distinct appealable categories and excludes the specified grant-of-vacatur branch. | IAR11(a),(g) | O |\n| **C010** | District permission from a magistrate interlocutory order requires Rule83.1conditions. | Rule83.1 | O |\n| **C011** | Supreme permissive review requires IAR12acceptance, not merely lower-court recommendation. | IAR12 | O |\n| **C012** | Rule83’s notice and late-appeal cross-appeal triggers differ. | Rule83(b) | O |\n| **C013** | Higher civil notice uses the entry-based IAR14period. | IAR14(a) | O |\n| **C014** | Notice filing and service are distinct acts with different recipients/events. | Rule83(c); IAR20 | O |\n| **C015** | Jurisdictional notice periods differ from other sanctionable procedural defects. | Rule83(m); IAR21 | O |\n| **C016** | Rule83has an enumerated timing-reset list, including its JNOV predicate. | Rule83(b)(1)(B) | O |\n| **C017** | IAR14’s broader civil-motion language still excludes Rule60and costs/fees. | IAR14(a); Rule11.2 | O/H |\n| **C018** | Higher cross-appeal timing and additional-issue treatment have their own conditions. | IAR15;35(b)(4) | O |\n| **C019** | Premature notice validation requires later formal entry of an appealable instrument. | IAR17(e)(2) | O |\n| **C020** | Notice scope/amendment/relationship back are limited by the rule. | IAR17(e),(m);18 | O |\n| **C021** | Notice contents and fee/record certifications are gateway requirements, not substantive proof. | Rule83(d);IAR17–18,23 | O/H |\n| **C022** | Ordinary magistrate review is not automatically de novo. | Rule83(f)–(g) | O/H |\n| **C023** | Listed appellate filing fees are distinct from record costs and stay security. | IAR16,23 | O/H |\n| **C024** | Fee waiver has specific recommendation, decision, automatic-category and denial branches. | IAR23(c)–(e);IREFS10(c) | O/H |\n| **C025** | E-filing applicability and exceptions must be established before its mechanics are applied. | IREFS1–5 | O/H |\n| **C026** | Submission, receipt, acceptance and proposed-order signature have separate effects. | IREFS11–12 | O |\n| **C027** | Rejected-filing correction differs from technical receipt-failure relief. | IREFS13–14 | O/H |\n| **C028** | Electronic service completion and late-service addition differ from filing time. | IREFS17–18 | O |\n| **C029** | Appeal-notice fee-waiver handling is not the general fee-denial branch. | IREFS10(c) | O |\n| **C030** | No actual system failure, consent, receipt, correction or filing result is established. | Read bounds | H |\n| **C031** | Appellate computation uses its specific rule and statutory nonjudicial-day incorporation. | IAR22;§§1-1607,73-108 | O/P |\n| **C032** | General extension authority does not establish permission to extend jurisdictional notices. | IAR46;Rule83(m);IAR21 | O |\n| **C033** | IRCPmail/inaccessibility provisions are not universal additions to higher notice periods. | Rule2.2;IAR22,48 | O/H |\n| **C034** | The clerk-notice exception is conjunctive and not an automatic quantified restart. | Rule2.3(c) | O/H |\n| **C035** | Electronic relation-back and deadline-extension questions remain legally distinct. | IREFS13–14;IAR21,46 | O/H |\n| **C036** | The two ordinary appeal routes have separate limited automatic-stay texts. | Rule83(e);IAR13(a) | O |\n| **C037** | Rule62post-trial and category-specific stay provisions do not create a universal automatic stay. | Rule62 | O |\n| **C038** | Nonmoney stay requests have the specified likelihood/security conditions. | IAR13(b)(8),(14),(g) | O |\n| **C039** | Money-judgment security uses the stated amount, form, objection and remittitur relations. | IAR13(b)(15) | O |\n| **C040** | Punitive-excess, good-cause and dissipation branches are conditional. | §13-202;IAR13(b)(15) | P/O |\n| **C041** | Cost bonds, nonexecution agreements, public-actor bond rules and security waivers differ. | IAR16;Rule62(e)–(f) | O/H |\n| **C042** | Permissive/partial appeals retain express unaffected-matter and enforcement distinctions. | IAR13(f),13.4 | O |\n| **C043** | An appeal does not remove all lower-court authority. | IAR13(b);Rule83(e)(2) | O |\n| **C044** | General stay review and remaining-matter stay review have different nonaction periods. | IAR13(g),13.4(c) | O |\n| **C045** | Supreme stay orders have the stated controlling effect. | IAR13(g),13.4(c) | O |\n| **C046** | Security, waiver, lien release or cash application is not an actual outcome here. | Relevant stay clauses | H |\n| **C047** | District appellate disposition and remittitur have their own finality/transmission relation. | Rule83(r) | O |\n| **C048** | Opinion announcement, finality, remittitur issuance and filing differ. | IAR38 | O |\n| **C049** | Temporary remand preserves the pending appeal and limited lower authority. | IAR13.3 | O |\n| **C050** | Rehearing/review events must be checked before a universal finality conclusion. | IAR42,116,118,122 | O/H |\n| **C051** | Court of Appeals review is discretionary; granted review changes remittitur/assignment status. | IAR118,122 | O |\n| **C052** | Rule59.1issuance and bond-remittitur filing are different events. | Rule59.1;IAR13(b)(15) | O |\n| **C053** | Full record, briefing, argument, standards, fees and further-review practice remain separate. | Follow-on register | H |\n| **C054** | Displayed histories do not complete original adoption/application evidence. | S001–S008 | Provenance |\n| **C055** | No actual appellate event, eligibility, amount or result was determined; all earlier holds remain. | Research record | Certain |\n\n# 10. Complete relied-on quantity and event register\n\nNo actual date, calendar, claim amount, bond amount, fee payment, or filing result is supplied.\n\n## 10.1 Routes, notices, motions, and permission\n\n| Quantity/relation | Reference event or base | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Forty-two days | Rule83notice from clerk file stamp | Ordinary route; statutory/special exceptions separate |\n| More than twenty-eight days | Rule83appeal filed **and served** after judgment entry | Activates the specified cross-appeal branch |\n| Fourteen days | Service of that appeal on opposing party | Rule83cross-appeal event |\n| Immediately | Rule83notice service | Separate from filing |\n| Fourteen days after notice filing | Optional separate preliminary issues statement | Nonexclusive issues |\n| Forty-two days | IAR14ordinary civil notice from clerk file stamp | Not measured from routine receipt of notice |\n| Later of applicable forty-two days or twenty-one days | IAR15cross-appeal | Twenty-one-day branch runs from original notice **filing** |\n| Timely filing | Qualifying motion terminates/restarts appellate time | Underlying motion may also require service |\n| Prior timely directed-verdict motion | Rule83JNOV timing-reset predicate | Not universal prerequisite to making Rule50JNOVmotion |\n| File-stamped granting/denying order | Restart event for qualifying motion | Not motion filing or hearing date |\n| Fourteen days after judgment entry | Reviewed Rule50service; Rule52filing; Rule59filing and service | Different required acts retained |\n| Fourteen days after jury discharge | Rule50no-verdict service branch | Not judgment-entry branch |\n| Fourteen days after order entry | Initial permission motion under83.1/12 | Distinct receiving courts |\n| Fourteen days after permission hearing | Lower reasoned ruling | Not identical to filing-based noaction period |\n| Fourteen days after lower permission ruling | Next-stage permission request | Approval/disapproval both addressed |\n| Twenty-one days without ruling after motion filing | Permission-request escalation branch | Not automatic permission |\n| Time certain in grant | Notice after permission accepted | No fixed substitute invented |\n| Before formal entry, then later entry | Premature-notice validation | Must concern an appealable instrument |\n| Before Supreme Court record filing | Ordinary IAR17amended-notice cutoff | Capital exception not applied |\n| Original timely appealable notice | Amendment relation-back predicate | Not a cure for every original defect |\n| Twenty-one days | IAR17transcript-format election if relied on | Record practice otherwise deferred |\n| Fourteen days after notice filing | Rule83estimated-transcript-fee gateway | Statutory rate/waiver held |\n| Fourteen days after order entry | Transcript requested despite no-transcript alternative | Complete record process deferred |\n| No numeric new fee | IAR11.3ordered transfer | Existing fee deficiency may be corrected |\n\n## 10.2 Fees, electronic filing, and computation\n\n| Quantity/relation | Legal object | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| $94 | Ordinary higher civil appeal filing fee | Not total record/system cost or district-appellate fee |\n| $94 | Qualifying higher cross-appeal fee | Separate filing |\n| No appeal-cost undertaking | IAR16(a) | Not a stay-bond exemption |\n| Twenty-one days from waiver-denial order entry | IAR23payment branch | Otherwise stated dismissal consequence |\n| Four automatic representation categories | IAR23(e) | No actual status or provider lookup |\n| 12:01 a.m. through midnight | Electronic filing day | Court’s time zone, not automatically Pacific |\n| Submitted and received before midnight | Rule12filing-day relation | Weekend/holiday provision preserved |\n| Acceptance relates to received timestamp | IREFS12 | Submission, error queue and acceptance clauses read together |\n| Three business days, excluding legal holidays | Corrected filing after correction request | Relation-back request; next-judicial-day qualification |\n| Seven business days, excluding legal holidays | Technical-failure resubmission after notice of unsuccessful submission | Satisfactory proof and rule requirements |\n| After 5 p.m. local time; one additional day | Electronic service by a party | Not universal extension of entry-based appeal period |\n| Trigger day excluded; qualified last day included | IAR22 | Saturday/Sunday/nonjudicial-day qualification |\n| New Year’s, specified January/February/Memorial/Labor/Columbus/Thanksgiving holidays, Independence/Veterans/Christmas, Sunday, and designated special days | §73-108definition read | No actual holiday calendar or office closure selected |\n| Saturday/Sunday substitution provisions | Statutory holiday definition | Exact statutory exceptions remain |\n| General-election/nonjudicial-day qualification | §1-1607 | Complete statute read; special court acts not applied |\n| Three added days | IRCPact due after service by mail | Not automatically added to IARentry-based notices |\n| First qualifying accessible day | IRCPclerk-inaccessibility branch | Scope and interaction with jurisdictional rules held |\n| No extension under IAR46 | Notices of appeal/cross-appeal and listed petitions | Technical relation-back is a separate question |\n| Seven days after service | Objection to specified ex parte extension order under IAR46 | Not notice-of-appeal extension |\n| Fourteen days after service | Ordinary appellate-motion opposition under IAR32 | Different rule may control |\n| At least twenty-one days before oral argument | Certain IAR32dismissal motions | Untimely-notice jurisdictional challenge has separate anytime clause |\n| No recorded mailing **and** no actual notice | Rule2.3exception | No quantified new period supplied |\n\n## 10.3 Stay and security\n\n| Quantity/relation | Legal object/reference event | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Fourteen days | Rule83automatic stay after appeal filing | Appealed proceeding/judgment; protection-order exception |\n| Fourteen days | IAR13automatic stay after appeal or cross-appeal filing | Unless otherwise ordered; specified exceptions |\n| Judgment/order amount **plus 36% of that amount** | Money-judgment cash/bond measure | No financial substitution or calculation |\n| Authorized fidelity/surety/guaranty/title/trust company | Bond issuer category | Actual authorization not established |\n| At stay application | Required copy/notification service | Not merely eventual filing |\n| Twenty-one days after bond/deposit filing | Sufficiency objection by motion | Otherwise stated waiver |\n| Thirty days after Supreme remittitur filing | Bond payment undertaking | Up to full bond; outcome amounts not calculated |\n| Upon remittitur filing | Possible cash application | Not automatic liability determination |\n| Punitive portion exceeding $1,000,000 | Mandatory security-waiver branch | Not forgiveness or a cap on all damages |\n| Good cause | Additional security waiver | Discretionary |\n| Preponderance | Creditor’s purposeful-dissipation/diversion showing | Possible rescission/reinstatement; no misconduct found |\n| All-party written stipulation | Rule62security waiver | Separate from one entitled party’s nonexecution agreement |\n| No bond when granting specified public-actor stay | Rule62(e) | Does not itself grant stay |\n| Fourteen days after general stay-application filing | IAR13(g)nonaction route to Supreme Court | Lower denial also qualifies |\n| Twenty-one days after remaining-matters stay filing | IAR13.4nonaction route | Distinct from general fourteen-day branch |\n| Fourteen days after remaining-matters stay hearing | Lower reasoned-order duty | Filing and hearing events differ |\n| Likely success **and** likely irreparable harm | Specified nonmoney stay request | No actual merits prediction |\n| No automatic enforcement stay merely from permission request/grant | IAR13(f) | Express exceptions and retained powers read together |\n\n## 10.4 Remittitur and history\n\n| Quantity/relation | Reference event | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Forty-two days after district appellate decision filed | Rule83(r)no-further-appeal remittitur branch | Higher-appeal branch differs |\n| Twenty-one days after last listed opinion event | IAR38finality framework | Rehearing/review setting must be checked |\n| Twenty-one days after opinion filing | Rehearing gateway read for finality | Nonclerical modified-opinion and special cases distinguished |\n| Twenty-one days after specified opinion/order/rehearing event | IAR118review gateway | Discretionary review; complete practice deferred |\n| Review granted | No Court of Appeals remittitur; assignment ends as stated | Supreme remittitur follows its procedure |\n| Fourteen days from appellate remittitur **issuance** | Reviewed Rule59.1postaffirmance election | Different from bond-payment remittitur **filing** |\n| Before opinion; good cause | IAR13.3temporary remand | Appeal remains pending; limited authority |\n| July1,1977 | IARgeneral effective/application rule | Pre-effective notice-time qualification retained |\n| April29/July1,2026 | Material IARamendments and new11.3 | Footers, not original-order audit |\n| June30/July1,2026 | CurrentRule83amendment | Same provenance limit |\n| April15/July1,2019 | E-filing rule baseline | Later listed amendments distinguished |\n| Unknown | Actual entry, service, receipt, acceptance, appealability, order, waiver, security, remittitur, or actual notice | None supplied or inferred |\n\n# 11. Conditional branches and exact next inquiries\n\n| Branch | Missing predicate | Supported consequence | Adverse inference to avoid | Next generic inquiry |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **B01—route** | Correct originating court/category | Ordinary route may apply | Every magistrate appeal goes to same court | Special statute/assignment scope |\n| **B02—wrong court** | Timely notice and IAR11.3category | Possible ordered transfer/date preservation | Universal late-notice cure | Exact rule construction |\n| **B03—finality** | Complete claims/parties disposition or valid certification | Potential appealable judgment | Caption/file stamp alone proves finality | Rule54and substantive relief |\n| **B04—partial judgment** | Valid express determination/certificate | IAR11(a)(3)route | Every partial order immediately appealable | Certificate and construction |\n| **B05—postjudgment order** | Correct enumerated category | Possible separate appeal | Grant and denial of vacatur treated alike | IAR11scope |\n| **B06—permission** | Controlling-law/disagreement/advancement predicates | Discretionary receiving-court permission | Lower approval alone commences appeal | Rule83.1/IAR12 |\n| **B07—motion timing** | Timely required act and qualifying motion | Applicable termination/restart | All postjudgment motions toll | Route-specific rule construction |\n| **B08—JNOV contrast** | Rule83prior-directed predicate and timely filing | That branch may operate | Rule50availability alone proves tolling | Exact Idaho interaction |\n| **B09—cross-appeal** | Filing/service events and affirmative relief | Correct additional window/issue route | Universal fourteen- or twenty-one-day rule | Rule83/IAR15 |\n| **B10—premature notice** | Later formal appealable entry | Possible validation | Any announced ruling qualifies | IAR17construction |\n| **B11—amendment** | Timely valid original notice and allowed stage | Relation back/correction | Amendment cures every late appeal | IAR17–18 |\n| **B12—electronic filing** | Applicable system, receipt, acceptance | Rule-specific filing event | Email/courtesy copy equals filing | IREFSrules and lawful orders |\n| **B13—correction/failure** | Timely request and satisfactory predicates | Conditional relation-back relief | Technical explanation automatically establishes relief | Rule13/14and jurisdictional interaction |\n| **B14—fee waiver** | Statutory/representation conditions | Rule23procedure | Recommendation itself grants waiver | Unread waiver statutes |\n| **B15—notice of entry** | Mailing record and actual-notice facts | NarrowRule2.3exception | No mailing alone automatically resets all time | Exact notice/jurisdiction construction |\n| **B16—automatic stay** | Correct appeal route and excluded-category check | Limited temporary protection | Whole appeal always stays execution | Rule83/IAR13 |\n| **B17—money security** | Lawful amount, authorized instrument, approval | Conditional stay framework | Bond measure establishes judgment validity | Surety and stay law |\n| **B18—waiver** | Public-actor/agreement/good-cause/punitive predicate | Defined exception | All fees or all security automatically waived | Exact incorporated authority |\n| **B19—nonmoney relief** | Likelihood and harm predicates | Discretionary stay | Ordinary money-bond rule controls every order | IAR13category |\n| **B20—partial/permissive appeal** | Affected versus unaffected matters | Retained jurisdiction unless stayed | Entire trial court always powerless | IAR13/13.4 |\n| **B21—stay review** | Correct lower request, denial/nonaction period | Higher review route | General fourteen days replaces special twenty-one days | Exact procedural branch |\n| **B22—remittitur** | Correct finality/rehearing/review posture | Return/directive relationship | Opinion publication equals immediate enforcement authority | IAR38/42/118/122 |\n| **B23—record** | Adequate record and lawful designation/fees | Correct review method | Every magistrate appeal is de novo | Full record follow-on |\n| **B24—special regimes** | Independent scope | Held dependency | State rules complete federal/tribal/bankruptcy law | Authorities below |\n| **B25—history** | Original orders and current statutes | Exact gap may close | Footers authenticate all transitions | Ordinary official originals |\n\n# 12. Exact follow-on inquiries\n\n| Separate component | Required authority or question |\n| --- | --- |\n| Record and transcript | Complete IAR 24–31, Rule83(g)–(l), transcript certification, exhibits, settlement, correction, augmentation, fee schedules and waivers |\n| Briefing and argument | Complete IAR 34–37, Court of Appeals argument provisions, electronic appendices, formatting and sanctions |\n| Standards and preservation | Claim-specific review standards, record sufficiency, harmless error, issue preservation and scope of review |\n| Appellate costs and attorney fees | Complete IAR 40–41, fee sources, objections, awards and security interaction |\n| Rehearing and further review | Full IAR42/116/118practice, disposition, briefing, stays and finality construction |\n| Full remittitur operation | Compliance, trial-court authority on remand, recall or modification, and enforcement consequences |\n| Rule60 | Separate relief merits and appealability of particular resulting orders; no complete rerun here |\n| Statutory fee waivers/public actors | §§31-3220,31-3220A,67-2301,31-3212(2), and required factual/legal predicates |\n| Bond/surety law | Authorized issuer status, enforceability, release, discharge, execution against security and due process |\n| Protected/special proceedings | Family, probate/guardianship, juvenile, criminal, civil protection, agencies and special statutory appeals |\n| Bankruptcy/military/federal | Applicable stay, discharge, SCRA, federal collection/reporting, and federal appellate regimes |\n| Local/tribal/interstate | Approved local rules, actual lawful assignment, sovereignty, conflicts and interstate judgments |\n| Original history | Original adopted rule orders, final statutory enactments, effective/application/savings clauses |\n\nNo regime is declared inapplicable solely because it remains unexamined.\n\n# 13. Wholly blank conceptual worksheet\n\n| Field | Entry |\n| --- | --- |\n| Governing appellate route |  |\n| Authority and edition |  |\n| Official-current-text status |  |\n| Originating court/category |  |\n| Appealability provision |  |\n| Finality/certification predicate |  |\n| Aggrieved-party condition |  |\n| Notice filing act |  |\n| Filing court/recipient |  |\n| Service recipients |  |\n| Reference event |  |\n| Cross-appeal branch |  |\n| Postjudgment-motion interaction |  |\n| Premature/amended-notice provision |  |\n| Electronic-filing condition |  |\n| Correction/technical-failure provision |  |\n| Fee/waiver authority |  |\n| Record/transcript dependency |  |\n| Computation/additional-time rule |  |\n| Automatic-stay branch |  |\n| Court-ordered-stay condition |  |\n| Security measure/source |  |\n| Security waiver exception |  |\n| Retained-jurisdiction provision |  |\n| Remittitur/finality event |  |\n| Special-regime dependency |  |\n| Missing original authority |  |\n| Review status |  |\n\nNo field is completed.\n\n# 14. Granular coverage\n\n| Requested issue | Disposition | Claims/sources | Exact remaining gap |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **1—ordinary appellate routes** | Official rules and constitutional clauses read | C002–C006 | Current official statutory chain |\n| Magistrate-to-district | Complete Rule83route read | C003,C012,C022 | Actual assignment/category absent |\n| District original/appellate to higher court | IARgateway read | C004,C009 | Particular finality/entitlement |\n| Court of Appeals role | Assignment/reassignment/review distinguished | C006,C051 | Full merits/review practice |\n| Exclusions | Expressly retained | C003,C053 | Special regimes separate |\n| **2—appealability/finality** | Complete material Rule54/IAR11clauses | C007–C009 | No instrument classified |\n| Partial certification | Conditions read | C008 | Standalone certificate form/original history |\n| Permission | Complete83.1/12 | C010–C011 | No permission determination |\n| Cross/additional issues | Rule distinction read | C018 | Affirmative-relief construction |\n| Amended/postjudgment orders | Boundaries preserved | C008,C019–C020 | Universal restart not inferred |\n| **3—notice act/court/service** | Rules83,14,17–20read | C012–C015,C021 | Actual events absent |\n| Filing versus mailing/receipt | Distinguished | C014,C025–C030 | No accepted filing found |\n| Periods/additional time | Registered | C031–C035 | Actual counting and interpretation |\n| Fees/waiver | Rule process read | C023–C024 | Unread statutory eligibility |\n| Record gateway | Necessary clauses read | C021–C022 | Full record process deferred |\n| Jurisdiction versus defect | Express rule distinction | C015,C032 | Constitutional/constructive exceptions |\n| **4—motion interactions** | Exact route-specific text | C016–C017 | Judicial construction |\n| P25acts preserved | Explicit reuse and fresh incorporation | Reuse table | No trial-merits rerun |\n| Rule60 | Timing exclusion/retained power only | C017,C043 | Merits separate |\n| Premature/amended notices | Complete relevant clauses | C019–C020 | Actual appealability absent |\n| Clerk/actual notice | Complete narrow exception | C034 | No automatic new period |\n| **5—stay/authority** | Complete material62/83/13/13.4 | C036–C046 | No actual stay/security |\n| Money/nonmoney | Separate branches | C038–C040 | No value, issuer, or likely-success finding |\n| Waiver/public actors | Specific conditions | C041 | Actual status and statutory scope |\n| Trial-court powers | Enumerated retention read | C043 | No unrestricted authority inferred |\n| Remittitur | Necessary finality and direction clauses | C047–C052 | Full enforcement/further review |\n| **6—follow-on components** | Precisely registered | Section12 | Not counted as completed merits |\n| Federal/local/tribal/special | Held | C053 | No positive federal outcome |\n| Cases/records/strategy | Not investigated | C055 | Judicial construction remains |\n| **7—sources/read bounds/history** | Complete visible register | Section8 | Original orders/final statutes held |\n| Current versus historical | Footers/application limits separated | C054 | No no-change certification |\n| PDF text/pixels | Logged below | S001 | No unviewed-original claim |\n| Quantities/branches/worksheet | Supplied | Sections10–13 | No inputs/calendar |\n| Prior holds | Preserved | C055 | No earlier gap closed |\n| Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent | **Not accepted complete** | Entire report | Exact dependencies remain |\n\n# 15. Read/search/failure log and researcher self-check\n\n## Actual research performed\n\n| Material | Actual use |\n| --- | --- |\n| Official IAR, IRCP, ICAR and e-filing bodies | Complete or expressly bounded provisions listed above |\n| Official constitutional PDF | Selected complete court-authority clauses; pixels inspected |\n| Official statutory route | Fresh failed attempt; no identical retry or bypass |\n| Secondary statutes | Complete listed bodies and displayed histories, kept provisional |\n| Official amendment locator | Publication/effective-incorporation statement; original orders not recovered |\n| Ordinary historical PDF route | Fresh 404, preserved |\n| Generic searches | Court-rule scope, current amendments and statutory locators only |\n| Incidental cases/opinions/roster results | Not opened, investigated, named, or relied on |\n| Actual notices, orders, judgments, transcripts, parties, security instruments | Not requested or examined |\n| API-hosted forms/orders | Not opened |\n| Prior local files/review packets | Supplied reuse descriptions only; no inspection claim |\n\n## PDF text and pixels\n\n| PDF | Read bounds | Pixels inspected |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Official Idaho Constitution | ArticleV§§9,13,20 | Printed15–17/PDFindices20–22 |\n| Failed historical rule PDF | No operative body recovered | None |\n| Original API-hosted orders | Not opened | None |\n\nAll remaining operative sources used here were HTML. Multiple formats of the same rule were not counted as independent authority.\n\n## Remaining gaps and conclusion\n\nThe most important unresolved matters are:\n\n- Original rule adoption/amendment orders and current official statutory codification.\n- Claim-specific finality, aggrievement, amended-judgment effects, and motion-timing construction.\n- Exact statutory fee-waiver and authorized-surety predicates.\n- Complete record, briefing, argument, rehearing, further-review, costs, and remittitur-enforcement practice.\n- Special statutory, protected-party, federal, bankruptcy, military, local, tribal, and interstate regimes.\n- Any actual order, notice, filing, service, system failure, security, or appellate event.\n\nNo actual or invented party, judgment, order, account, property, notice, payment, security amount, filing event, motion, or calendar was supplied or constructed. No appealability, timeliness, waiver, stay, bond sufficiency, liability, strategy, or outcome determination was made.\n\nThis is a **researcher self-check, not independent review**. The component is supported by newly read official rules and constitutional text, with explicitly provisional statutory support and preserved original-history and construction gaps. Earlier findings and holds remain unchanged. No Idaho, dimension4, A066, parent, operational, or publication acceptance follows.\n\nEND S_ID PASS-27.\n\n","tables":[{"headers":["Reviewed material","Retained finding","New P27 inquiry and reading","Remaining boundary"],"index":0,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Reviewed material","Retained finding","New P27 inquiry and reading","Remaining boundary"],["P25 C045, Rules 54/58","Judgment document, amendment, and entry are distinct events.","Complete necessary finality clauses read with IAR 11, 14, 17 and Rule 83.","No actual finality, amended-judgment restart, or appealability determination."],["P25 C052, Rule 62(a)–(b)","Post-trial relief does not itself establish a stay; court-ordered relief is conditional.","Full material Rule 62 and IAR 13, 13.4, 16 read for appellate stays and security.","No actual stay, bond, waiver, or enforcement permission."],["Reviewed P25 Rule 50/52/59 distinctions","Rule 50 uses service; Rule 52(b) uses filing; Rule 59(b)/(e) require filing and service.","Necessary clauses reread against the appellate rules’ timely-filing predicates.","A timely trial motion and a qualifying appellate timing event are not assumed identical."],["Reviewed P25 Rule 59.1","Trial damages remittitur differs from appellate remittitur issuance.","Narrow reread for the appellate-event relationship.","Full damages, rehearing, or enforcement analysis remains separate."],["P21 Rule 60 report","Not a substantive premise.","Only express appellate exclusions and retained-jurisdiction references to Rule 60 are used.","No Rule 60 grounds/timing rerun."],["P22 small claims","Separate special route.","Ordinary-rule scope and express exceptions read afresh.","Initial small-claims de novo procedure is not imported into Rule 83."],["P26 lifecycle","No unreviewed merits reused.","No judgment-interest, renewal, lien-duration, or satisfaction conclusion supplied here.","Those findings retain their own status and holds."],["Rule 40 quantity clarification","Resolved and preserved.","Not reopened.","No disqualification inquiry."],["C033/C035 and other state holds","Unchanged.","No provider/checklist investigation.","No implied closure."]]},{"headers":["Origin and posture","Ordinary destination or mechanism","Material qualification"],"index":1,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Origin and posture","Ordinary destination or mechanism","Material qualification"],["Ordinary magistrate final civil judgment or qualifying appealable order","District court under IRCP 83","Special direct-review and statutory proceedings remain separate."],["Otherwise nonappealable magistrate interlocutory order","District permission under Rule 83.1","Permission from the receiving appellate court is indispensable."],["Magistrate specially assigned to act as district court under ICAR 6","Supreme Court under Rule 83(a)(3)","Original assignment may state differently; no actual order examined."],["District court acting originally","Supreme Court under the IAR gateway","Requires an appealable category or permission."],["District court deciding a magistrate appeal","Supreme Court under IAR 11(a)(2)","Dismissal, affirmance, reversal, and remand decisions are listed; no merits finding follows."],["Appeal within Court of Appeals assignment authority","Assigned by the Supreme Court","A party does not select the Court of Appeals merely by captioning a notice differently."],["Small claims, family, probate/guardianship, criminal, juvenile, agency and other special proceedings","Their specified routes","Their thresholds, expedited periods, and stay rules are not transferred to ordinary debt litigation."]]},{"headers":["Wrong-route branch","Rule consequence"],"index":2,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Wrong-route branch","Rule consequence"],["Notice to Supreme Court from a magistrate decision not directly appealable under IAR 11.1(a)","Supreme Court may transfer to district court."],["Notice to district court from a magistrate decision that must go directly under IAR 11.1(a)","District clerk must forward; Supreme Court may order transfer."],["Ordered transfer","Original filing date is preserved; proceeding continues as specified in the receiving court."],["Fee","No additional fee except correction of an existing deficiency."]]},{"headers":["Category","Material limit"],"index":3,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Category","Material limit"],["Final judgment under Rule 54(a)","Actual finality remains necessary."],["District appellate decision","Includes the listed dismissal, affirmance, reversal, and remand dispositions."],["Certified partial judgment","Requires Rule 54(b) compliance."],["Contempt order/judgment","Full contempt merits remain separate."],["Grant/refusal of new trial","Includes conditional additur/remittitur orders."],["Grant/denial of JNOV","Different from merely requesting relief."],["Post-final order","Includes denial of vacatur; excludes an order granting vacatur."],["Post-Rule-54(b) order","Must relate to or arise from that certified judgment for the specified branch."],["Statutorily appealable order","The statute and its complete predicates must be read."],["Vexatious-litigant designation","Separate special branch; denial of permission to commence new litigation is excluded from this route."]]},{"headers":["Step","Magistrate-to-district: IRCP 83.1","District-to-Supreme: IAR 12"],"index":4,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Step","Magistrate-to-district: IRCP 83.1","District-to-Supreme: IAR 12"],["Initial request","Motion to magistrate","Motion to district court"],["Initial period","Fourteen days after order entry","Fourteen days after order entry"],["Lower ruling","Reasoned ruling within fourteen days after hearing","Same stated hearing-based relation"],["Next request","District court","Supreme Court"],["Next period","Fourteen days after approving/disapproving order","Fourteen days after approving/disapproving order"],["Lower court has not acted","Twenty-one-day filing-based branch","Twenty-one-day filing-based branch"],["Lower recommendation","Does not itself complete permission","Does not itself complete permission"],["Acceptance","Receiving court must grant leave and prescribe a time certain for notice","Supreme Court must grant leave and prescribe a time certain"],["Denial","District denial has the rule’s finality/no-further-request limitation, subject to its express exceptions","No automatic right to permission"]]},{"headers":["Route","Required act and reference event","Special cross-appeal relation"],"index":5,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[]],"rows":[["Route","Required act and reference event","Special cross-appeal relation"],["Magistrate-to-district","File notice with district clerk within forty-two days from the clerk’s file stamp on the judgment/order","If the appeal is filed and served more than twenty-eight days after entry, the opposing party’s specified cross-appeal window is fourteen days after service."],["District-to-higher appellate court","File notice under IAR 14 within forty-two days from the clerk’s file stamp","IAR 15 uses the later of the otherwise applicable forty-two-day period or twenty-one days after the original notice was filed."]]},{"headers":["Motion/interface","Reviewed trial-rule relation retained","Newly read appellate distinction"],"index":6,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Motion/interface","Reviewed trial-rule relation retained","Newly read appellate distinction"],["JNOV","Rule 50(b) uses timely service; no prior directed-verdict motion is required merely to make the motion.","Rule 83(b)(1)(B)(i) expressly requires a timely filed JNOV motion following a timely directed-verdict motion for that timing-reset branch."],["Amended/additional findings","Rule 52(b) uses timely filing.","Rule 83 expressly includes it even when judgment alteration is unnecessary."],["Alter/amend judgment","Rule 59(e) requires filing and service.","Rule 83 excludes Rule 60 and cost/fee motions from its listed judgment-alteration branch."],["New trial","Rule 59(b) requires filing and service.","Expressly listed in Rule 83."],["Higher civil appeal","No trial-motion act is rewritten.","IAR 14 uses timely filing of a motion that, if granted, could affect findings, conclusions, or judgment, excluding Rule 60 and costs/fees."],["Reconsideration","Rule 11.2 supplies its own permitted/excluded categories.","The word “reconsideration” does not automatically satisfy IAR 14, and Rule 83’s list is not rewritten as an unlimited reconsideration category."],["Rule 60","Merits not rerun.","Excluded from these timing-reset provisions, while lower-court authority to decide it during appeal is separately preserved."]]},{"headers":["Situation","IAR 17 relation","Boundary"],"index":7,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Situation","IAR 17 relation","Boundary"],["Premature notice","A notice from an appealable judgment/order before formal written entry becomes valid upon the later prescribed entry.","Does not declare a permanently nonappealable ruling appealable."],["Scope of notice","Includes the specified prior interlocutory, unexpired prior final, and subsequent orders, subject to exceptions.","Does not reopen an expired independent appeal by label alone."],["Amended notice","May correct information or address later facts; no additional filing fee.","Relation back requires a timely original notice from an appealable judgment/order."],["Ordinary amendment cutoff","Except capital cases, no amendment after the record has been filed in the Supreme Court.","Not the same as final-judgment amendment."],["Cross-appeal amendment","IAR 18 has its own correction/relation-back provision.","An unstated duplicate cutoff is not invented."]]},{"headers":["Event","Source-stated relationship"],"index":8,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Event","Source-stated relationship"],["Submission and acceptance","Rule 11 requires electronic submission and acknowledged acceptance, subject to the other filing-date rules."],["Electronic filing day","Uses the court’s location/time zone, with the rule’s midnight and nonbusiness-day provisions."],["Accepted filing","Relates to the system’s received timestamp as stated, including the error-queue qualification."],["Proposed order","Not file-stamped merely because submitted; judicial signature is required under Rule 12(b)."],["Rejected filing","Rule 13 provides a conditional corrected-resubmission and relation-back request."],["Technical receipt failure","Rule 14 requires satisfactory proof and its timely resubmission procedure; then its mandatory relation-back language applies."],["Electronic service","Completion is the system’s transmission to the selected service contact under Rule 17; courtesy copy is not equivalent."],["Party service after 5 p.m. local time","Rule 17(h) adds one day to the prescribed period."],["Court service","Rule 18 has its separate designated-address and conventional-service conditions."]]},{"headers":["Rule family","Complete material distinction"],"index":9,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Rule family","Complete material distinction"],["IAR 22","Excludes the trigger day; includes the last day unless Saturday, Sunday, or statutory nonjudicial day, then uses the specified next day."],["Statutory nonjudicial days","Sections 1-1607 and 73-108 contain holiday definitions and exceptions; no calendar was selected."],["IAR 46","General good-cause extensions exclude notices of appeal/cross-appeal and the other specified petitions."],["Rule 83(m)/IAR 21","The prescribed notice/cross-appeal filing period is jurisdictional; other steps are treated differently but may still result in dismissal."],["IRCP 2.2","Applies within its scope; contains inaccessibility, extension, nonextension, and service-by-mail provisions."],["Clerk notice, Rule 2.3","The no-recorded-mailing and no-actual-notice exception is conjunctive."],["Electronic correction/technical failure","Separate filing-date rules; not automatic relief from every defect."]]},{"headers":["Route/category","Source-stated stay relationship"],"index":10,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Route/category","Source-stated stay relationship"],["Magistrate-to-district","Rule 83(e) gives its fourteen-day automatic protection for the appealed proceeding/judgment; further protection requires a magistrate or district order."],["Higher ordinary civil appeal/cross-appeal","IAR 13(a) supplies a fourteen-day automatic stay unless otherwise ordered; its specified protection-order exclusions remain."],["Post-trial motion before/during appeal","Rule 62(b) permits a court-ordered stay on appropriate security terms; filing alone does not establish one."],["Nonmoney judgment, injunction, or mandatory order","IAR 13(b)(8), (14), and (g) use their discretionary/security and likely-success/irreparable-harm predicates."],["Money judgment","Separate security provisions below."],["Permission request pending","IAR 13(f)(1) does not automatically stay proceedings or enforcement."],["Permission granted","Rule 13(f)(2)’s text is expressly subject to its exceptions; enforcement and unaffected matters are separately addressed."],["Certified partial/permissive appeal","IAR 13.4 preserves jurisdiction over unaffected matters unless the specified stay is entered."]]},{"headers":["Rule","Narrow effect"],"index":11,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Rule","Narrow effect"],["IAR 16(b)","A filed written agreement not to execute by the party entitled to execution requires the district court to issue the stated stay without a supersedeas bond."],["IRCP 62(e)","When granting a stay to the specified state/public actor, the court must not require a bond."],["IRCP 62(f)","All-party written stipulation may waive the stated security requirement."],["IAR 23","Filing-fee exemptions are a different question from these bond provisions."]]},{"headers":["Stay request","Lower-court nonaction event permitting the specified higher request","Other condition"],"index":12,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Stay request","Lower-court nonaction event permitting the specified higher request","Other condition"],["General IAR 13(g) stay","Fourteen days after filing, or denial","Lower-court application ordinarily comes first."],["Stay of remaining matters under IAR 13.4","Twenty-one days after filing, or denial","Lower court must issue its reasoned order within fourteen days after hearing."],["Stay already granted","Specified request to modify/vacate is permitted","Supreme Court order takes precedence."],["Magistrate appeal","Rule 83(e) identifies magistrate/district authority","Not automatically the same as direct IAR 13(g) relief to the Supreme Court."]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds/use"],"index":13,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds/use"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1","Complete (a)–(c), scope only"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2","Complete computation/extension/mail provisions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.3","Complete notice and no-notice exception"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11.2","Complete material (b); reconsideration boundaries only"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/50","Necessary complete (b)(1) and related reviewed motion-availability interface; trial merits not rerun"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/52","Complete material (b); surrounding findings merits not rerun"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54","Complete (a)–(b); reliance on finality, amendment, certification and retained jurisdiction"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/58","Complete entry provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59","Complete necessary (b), (c), (d), (e); trial-ground merits not rerun"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59.1","Complete, limited to remittitur/election boundary"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/62","Complete (a)–(h)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83","Complete (a)–(r); substantive use limited to route, notice, timing, gateway, jurisdiction, stay and endpoint; full record/briefing practice deferred"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83.1","Complete permissive district-appeal provision"]]},{"headers":["Rule","Displayed additional history"],"index":14,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Rule","Displayed additional history"],["1","April 30, 2024/same day; September 30, 2024/October 1, 2024"],["2.2, 11.2","September 9, 2016/same day"],["54","Listed amendments through April 28, 2021/July 1, 2021"],["83","April 28, 2021/July 1, 2021; April 28, 2022/same day; August 31, 2023/nunc pro tunc March 2, 2023; May 1, 2024/July 1, 2024; September 11, 2024/same day; June 30, 2026/July 1, 2026"],["83.1","Adopted May 1, 2024, effective July 1, 2024"]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds/use"],"index":15,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds/use"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/1","Complete scope and historical application"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/2","Complete definitions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/4","Complete aggrieved-party provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11","Complete body; ordinary findings limited to (a), (g); special categories distinguished"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.1","Complete, only to identify direct special magistrate routes and Rule 11.3 incorporation"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.3","Complete (a)–(e)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/12","Complete permissive route"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13","Complete operative text inspected; ordinary reliance on (a), (b), (f), (g); criminal/agency merits excluded"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13.3","Complete temporary-remand provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13.4","Complete unaffected-matters/stay provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/14","Complete; civil (a) applied, criminal/agency branches excluded"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/15","Complete cross-appeal/additional-issue rule"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/16","Complete cost-bond/nonexecution-agreement rule"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/17","Complete (a)–(n) and form reference; linked form not opened"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/18","Complete cross-appeal notice/amendment provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/20","Complete filing/service provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/21","Complete jurisdictional/nonjurisdictional distinction"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/22","Complete time computation"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/23","Complete fee/waiver clauses; special fees not applied; certificate form unopened"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/32","Complete motion provision; only gateway/service/opportunity boundaries relied on"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/35","Page inspected; substantive use only (b)(4) additional issues"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38","Complete opinion/finality/remittitur rule"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/42","Complete; limited finality/rehearing-period interface, not a rehearing handbook"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/46","Complete extensions and exclusions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/47","Complete court-service provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/48","Complete unspecified-practice clause"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/101","Complete Court of Appeals scope"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/108","Complete; assignment and exclusions used, oral-argument practice deferred"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/110","Complete subsequent-filing/assignment interface"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/114","Complete reassignment provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/116","Complete; rehearing/finality boundary only"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/118","Complete; discretionary review and finality boundary only"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/122","Complete Court of Appeals remittitur rule"]]},{"headers":["Provision","Evidence recorded"],"index":16,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Provision","Evidence recorded"],["IAR 1","Rules effective July 1, 1977 for stated pending/later proceedings; notice time for pre-effective judgments retains the stated former-law qualification"],["Common original IAR baseline","March 25, 1977 adoption / July 1, 1977 effectiveness, where displayed"],["IAR 11, 13, 17, 23","Displayed latest amendment April 29, 2026, effective July 1, 2026"],["IAR 11.3","Adopted April 29, 2026, effective July 1, 2026"],["IAR 14","Displayed latest May 1, 2024/July 1, 2024"],["IAR 12","Adopted March 24, 1982/July 1, 1982; displayed later November 20, 2012/January 1, 2013"],["IAR 13.4","March 27, 1989/July 1, 1989 baseline; displayed latest April 28, 2022/July 1, 2022"],["IAR 15","March 27, 1989/July 1, 1989; later March 1, 2004 and March 29, 2010, each July 1 effectiveness"],["IAR 32, 46","Displayed April 28, 2022 amendments, effective that day"],["IAR 38","March 25, 1977/July 1, 1977; January 30, 2001/July 1, 2002; March 22, 2002/July 1, 2002"],["IAR 23 historical anomaly","Footer displays an April 28, 1983 amendment with July 1, 1993 effectiveness. It is not silently corrected."]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds/use"],"index":17,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds/use"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/1","Complete scope/conflict clause"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/2","Complete definitions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/4","Complete required/optional filing categories and exceptions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/5","Complete exceptions; special-proceeding details not applied"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/10","Complete fees/waiver; appeal-specific (c) emphasized"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/11","Complete filing/acceptance provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/12","Complete time-of-filing provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/13","Complete correction/rejection provision; prescribed text not reproduced or populated"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/14","Complete technical-failure relief; prescribed text not reproduced or populated"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/17","Complete service and late-service addition"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/18","Complete court-service provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/20","Complete appeal-specific rule; record/brief mechanics reserved for follow-on work"]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Material use","Displayed source credit"],"index":18,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Material use","Displayed source credit"],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-22/section-1-2213/","Magistrate appellate route and review alternatives","1969 ch.104 §13 p.353"],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-24/section-1-2406/","Court of Appeals assignment and excluded categories","1980 ch.245 §1 p.567; 1981 ch.271 §2 p.574"],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-13/chapter-2/section-13-201/","Supreme Court procedural-rule relationship","1977 ch.170 §6 p.438"],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-13/chapter-2/section-13-202/","Stay/security and waiver structure","1977 ch.170 §7 p.438; 2003 ch.122 §4 p.372"],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-16/section-1-1607/","Nonjudicial days and exceptions","C.C.P.1881 §46 lineage; 1961 ch.270 §1 p.480; 1971 ch.84 §1 p.186"],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-73/chapter-1/section-73-108/","Complete holiday definition/substitution provisions","Displayed history through 2002 ch.146 §3 p.423"]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL or material","Actual observation"],"index":19,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL or material","Actual observation"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments","Official statement about incorporating rules on effective dates read; retrieved body did not provide a completed original-order history"],["https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title1/T1CH22/SECT1-2213/","Fresh ordinary official statutory attempt failed"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/57","Search-discovered ordinary historical route returned 404"],["API-hosted original orders/forms","Not opened"],["Official search-index references to 2026 orders","Discovery only; not promoted to original-order reads"]]},{"headers":["Claim","Precise proposition","Source/pinpoint","Status/limit"],"index":20,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claim","Precise proposition","Source/pinpoint","Status/limit"],["C001","Official current rule bodies were read; statutory and original-order gaps remain.","S001–S008","O/P/H"],["C002","Constitutional court authority is distinct from a particular appeal’s eligibility.","Constitution Art.V§§9,13,20","O/H"],["C003","Ordinary magistrate review differs from direct special or assigned-district review.","IRCP83(a); ICAR6","O"],["C004","District original and appellate decisions use the relevant IAR gateway.","IAR2,4,11","O"],["C005","IAR11.3preserves filing dates only within its timely-notice transfer predicates.","IAR11.3","O"],["C006","Court of Appeals assignment/reassignment is controlled by the Supreme Court.","IAR101,108,110,114; §1-2406","O/P"],["C007","Finality requires Rule54conditions, not a caption or adverse result alone.","Rule54(a)","O"],["C008","Partial certification and complete amended judgment entry do not universally restart appeal time.","Rule54(a)(2),(b)(1)","O/H"],["C009","IAR11lists distinct appealable categories and excludes the specified grant-of-vacatur branch.","IAR11(a),(g)","O"],["C010","District permission from a magistrate interlocutory order requires Rule83.1conditions.","Rule83.1","O"],["C011","Supreme permissive review requires IAR12acceptance, not merely lower-court recommendation.","IAR12","O"],["C012","Rule83’s notice and late-appeal cross-appeal triggers differ.","Rule83(b)","O"],["C013","Higher civil notice uses the entry-based IAR14period.","IAR14(a)","O"],["C014","Notice filing and service are distinct acts with different recipients/events.","Rule83(c); IAR20","O"],["C015","Jurisdictional notice periods differ from other sanctionable procedural defects.","Rule83(m); IAR21","O"],["C016","Rule83has an enumerated timing-reset list, including its JNOV predicate.","Rule83(b)(1)(B)","O"],["C017","IAR14’s broader civil-motion language still excludes Rule60and costs/fees.","IAR14(a); Rule11.2","O/H"],["C018","Higher cross-appeal timing and additional-issue treatment have their own conditions.","IAR15;35(b)(4)","O"],["C019","Premature notice validation requires later formal entry of an appealable instrument.","IAR17(e)(2)","O"],["C020","Notice scope/amendment/relationship back are limited by the rule.","IAR17(e),(m);18","O"],["C021","Notice contents and fee/record certifications are gateway requirements, not substantive proof.","Rule83(d);IAR17–18,23","O/H"],["C022","Ordinary magistrate review is not automatically de novo.","Rule83(f)–(g)","O/H"],["C023","Listed appellate filing fees are distinct from record costs and stay security.","IAR16,23","O/H"],["C024","Fee waiver has specific recommendation, decision, automatic-category and denial branches.","IAR23(c)–(e);IREFS10(c)","O/H"],["C025","E-filing applicability and exceptions must be established before its mechanics are applied.","IREFS1–5","O/H"],["C026","Submission, receipt, acceptance and proposed-order signature have separate effects.","IREFS11–12","O"],["C027","Rejected-filing correction differs from technical receipt-failure relief.","IREFS13–14","O/H"],["C028","Electronic service completion and late-service addition differ from filing time.","IREFS17–18","O"],["C029","Appeal-notice fee-waiver handling is not the general fee-denial branch.","IREFS10(c)","O"],["C030","No actual system failure, consent, receipt, correction or filing result is established.","Read bounds","H"],["C031","Appellate computation uses its specific rule and statutory nonjudicial-day incorporation.","IAR22;§§1-1607,73-108","O/P"],["C032","General extension authority does not establish permission to extend jurisdictional notices.","IAR46;Rule83(m);IAR21","O"],["C033","IRCPmail/inaccessibility provisions are not universal additions to higher notice periods.","Rule2.2;IAR22,48","O/H"],["C034","The clerk-notice exception is conjunctive and not an automatic quantified restart.","Rule2.3(c)","O/H"],["C035","Electronic relation-back and deadline-extension questions remain legally distinct.","IREFS13–14;IAR21,46","O/H"],["C036","The two ordinary appeal routes have separate limited automatic-stay texts.","Rule83(e);IAR13(a)","O"],["C037","Rule62post-trial and category-specific stay provisions do not create a universal automatic stay.","Rule62","O"],["C038","Nonmoney stay requests have the specified likelihood/security conditions.","IAR13(b)(8),(14),(g)","O"],["C039","Money-judgment security uses the stated amount, form, objection and remittitur relations.","IAR13(b)(15)","O"],["C040","Punitive-excess, good-cause and dissipation branches are conditional.","§13-202;IAR13(b)(15)","P/O"],["C041","Cost bonds, nonexecution agreements, public-actor bond rules and security waivers differ.","IAR16;Rule62(e)–(f)","O/H"],["C042","Permissive/partial appeals retain express unaffected-matter and enforcement distinctions.","IAR13(f),13.4","O"],["C043","An appeal does not remove all lower-court authority.","IAR13(b);Rule83(e)(2)","O"],["C044","General stay review and remaining-matter stay review have different nonaction periods.","IAR13(g),13.4(c)","O"],["C045","Supreme stay orders have the stated controlling effect.","IAR13(g),13.4(c)","O"],["C046","Security, waiver, lien release or cash application is not an actual outcome here.","Relevant stay clauses","H"],["C047","District appellate disposition and remittitur have their own finality/transmission relation.","Rule83(r)","O"],["C048","Opinion announcement, finality, remittitur issuance and filing differ.","IAR38","O"],["C049","Temporary remand preserves the pending appeal and limited lower authority.","IAR13.3","O"],["C050","Rehearing/review events must be checked before a universal finality conclusion.","IAR42,116,118,122","O/H"],["C051","Court of Appeals review is discretionary; granted review changes remittitur/assignment status.","IAR118,122","O"],["C052","Rule59.1issuance and bond-remittitur filing are different events.","Rule59.1;IAR13(b)(15)","O"],["C053","Full record, briefing, argument, standards, fees and further-review practice remain separate.","Follow-on register","H"],["C054","Displayed histories do not complete original adoption/application evidence.","S001–S008","Provenance"],["C055","No actual appellate event, eligibility, amount or result was determined; all earlier holds remain.","Research record","Certain"]]},{"headers":["Quantity/relation","Reference event or base","Qualification"],"index":21,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Quantity/relation","Reference event or base","Qualification"],["Forty-two days","Rule83notice from clerk file stamp","Ordinary route; statutory/special exceptions separate"],["More than twenty-eight days","Rule83appeal filed and served after judgment entry","Activates the specified cross-appeal branch"],["Fourteen days","Service of that appeal on opposing party","Rule83cross-appeal event"],["Immediately","Rule83notice service","Separate from filing"],["Fourteen days after notice filing","Optional separate preliminary issues statement","Nonexclusive issues"],["Forty-two days","IAR14ordinary civil notice from clerk file stamp","Not measured from routine receipt of notice"],["Later of applicable forty-two days or twenty-one days","IAR15cross-appeal","Twenty-one-day branch runs from original notice filing"],["Timely filing","Qualifying motion terminates/restarts appellate time","Underlying motion may also require service"],["Prior timely directed-verdict motion","Rule83JNOV timing-reset predicate","Not universal prerequisite to making Rule50JNOVmotion"],["File-stamped granting/denying order","Restart event for qualifying motion","Not motion filing or hearing date"],["Fourteen days after judgment entry","Reviewed Rule50service; Rule52filing; Rule59filing and service","Different required acts retained"],["Fourteen days after jury discharge","Rule50no-verdict service branch","Not judgment-entry branch"],["Fourteen days after order entry","Initial permission motion under83.1/12","Distinct receiving courts"],["Fourteen days after permission hearing","Lower reasoned ruling","Not identical to filing-based noaction period"],["Fourteen days after lower permission ruling","Next-stage permission request","Approval/disapproval both addressed"],["Twenty-one days without ruling after motion filing","Permission-request escalation branch","Not automatic permission"],["Time certain in grant","Notice after permission accepted","No fixed substitute invented"],["Before formal entry, then later entry","Premature-notice validation","Must concern an appealable instrument"],["Before Supreme Court record filing","Ordinary IAR17amended-notice cutoff","Capital exception not applied"],["Original timely appealable notice","Amendment relation-back predicate","Not a cure for every original defect"],["Twenty-one days","IAR17transcript-format election if relied on","Record practice otherwise deferred"],["Fourteen days after notice filing","Rule83estimated-transcript-fee gateway","Statutory rate/waiver held"],["Fourteen days after order entry","Transcript requested despite no-transcript alternative","Complete record process deferred"],["No numeric new fee","IAR11.3ordered transfer","Existing fee deficiency may be corrected"]]},{"headers":["Quantity/relation","Legal object","Qualification"],"index":22,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Quantity/relation","Legal object","Qualification"],["$94","Ordinary higher civil appeal filing fee","Not total record/system cost or district-appellate fee"],["$94","Qualifying higher cross-appeal fee","Separate filing"],["No appeal-cost undertaking","IAR16(a)","Not a stay-bond exemption"],["Twenty-one days from waiver-denial order entry","IAR23payment branch","Otherwise stated dismissal consequence"],["Four automatic representation categories","IAR23(e)","No actual status or provider lookup"],["12:01 a.m. through midnight","Electronic filing day","Court’s time zone, not automatically Pacific"],["Submitted and received before midnight","Rule12filing-day relation","Weekend/holiday provision preserved"],["Acceptance relates to received timestamp","IREFS12","Submission, error queue and acceptance clauses read together"],["Three business days, excluding legal holidays","Corrected filing after correction request","Relation-back request; next-judicial-day qualification"],["Seven business days, excluding legal holidays","Technical-failure resubmission after notice of unsuccessful submission","Satisfactory proof and rule requirements"],["After 5 p.m. local time; one additional day","Electronic service by a party","Not universal extension of entry-based appeal period"],["Trigger day excluded; qualified last day included","IAR22","Saturday/Sunday/nonjudicial-day qualification"],["New Year’s, specified January/February/Memorial/Labor/Columbus/Thanksgiving holidays, Independence/Veterans/Christmas, Sunday, and designated special days","§73-108definition read","No actual holiday calendar or office closure selected"],["Saturday/Sunday substitution provisions","Statutory holiday definition","Exact statutory exceptions remain"],["General-election/nonjudicial-day qualification","§1-1607","Complete statute read; special court acts not applied"],["Three added days","IRCPact due after service by mail","Not automatically added to IARentry-based notices"],["First qualifying accessible day","IRCPclerk-inaccessibility branch","Scope and interaction with jurisdictional rules held"],["No extension under IAR46","Notices of appeal/cross-appeal and listed petitions","Technical relation-back is a separate question"],["Seven days after service","Objection to specified ex parte extension order under IAR46","Not notice-of-appeal extension"],["Fourteen days after service","Ordinary appellate-motion opposition under IAR32","Different rule may control"],["At least twenty-one days before oral argument","Certain IAR32dismissal motions","Untimely-notice jurisdictional challenge has separate anytime clause"],["No recorded mailing and no actual notice","Rule2.3exception","No quantified new period supplied"]]},{"headers":["Quantity/relation","Legal object/reference event","Qualification"],"index":23,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Quantity/relation","Legal object/reference event","Qualification"],["Fourteen days","Rule83automatic stay after appeal filing","Appealed proceeding/judgment; protection-order exception"],["Fourteen days","IAR13automatic stay after appeal or cross-appeal filing","Unless otherwise ordered; specified exceptions"],["Judgment/order amount plus 36% of that amount","Money-judgment cash/bond measure","No financial substitution or calculation"],["Authorized fidelity/surety/guaranty/title/trust company","Bond issuer category","Actual authorization not established"],["At stay application","Required copy/notification service","Not merely eventual filing"],["Twenty-one days after bond/deposit filing","Sufficiency objection by motion","Otherwise stated waiver"],["Thirty days after Supreme remittitur filing","Bond payment undertaking","Up to full bond; outcome amounts not calculated"],["Upon remittitur filing","Possible cash application","Not automatic liability determination"],["Punitive portion exceeding $1,000,000","Mandatory security-waiver branch","Not forgiveness or a cap on all damages"],["Good cause","Additional security waiver","Discretionary"],["Preponderance","Creditor’s purposeful-dissipation/diversion showing","Possible rescission/reinstatement; no misconduct found"],["All-party written stipulation","Rule62security waiver","Separate from one entitled party’s nonexecution agreement"],["No bond when granting specified public-actor stay","Rule62(e)","Does not itself grant stay"],["Fourteen days after general stay-application filing","IAR13(g)nonaction route to Supreme Court","Lower denial also qualifies"],["Twenty-one days after remaining-matters stay filing","IAR13.4nonaction route","Distinct from general fourteen-day branch"],["Fourteen days after remaining-matters stay hearing","Lower reasoned-order duty","Filing and hearing events differ"],["Likely success and likely irreparable harm","Specified nonmoney stay request","No actual merits prediction"],["No automatic enforcement stay merely from permission request/grant","IAR13(f)","Express exceptions and retained powers read together"]]},{"headers":["Quantity/relation","Reference event","Qualification"],"index":24,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Quantity/relation","Reference event","Qualification"],["Forty-two days after district appellate decision filed","Rule83(r)no-further-appeal remittitur branch","Higher-appeal branch differs"],["Twenty-one days after last listed opinion event","IAR38finality framework","Rehearing/review setting must be checked"],["Twenty-one days after opinion filing","Rehearing gateway read for finality","Nonclerical modified-opinion and special cases distinguished"],["Twenty-one days after specified opinion/order/rehearing event","IAR118review gateway","Discretionary review; complete practice deferred"],["Review granted","No Court of Appeals remittitur; assignment ends as stated","Supreme remittitur follows its procedure"],["Fourteen days from appellate remittitur issuance","Reviewed Rule59.1postaffirmance election","Different from bond-payment remittitur filing"],["Before opinion; good cause","IAR13.3temporary remand","Appeal remains pending; limited authority"],["July1,1977","IARgeneral effective/application rule","Pre-effective notice-time qualification retained"],["April29/July1,2026","Material IARamendments and new11.3","Footers, not original-order audit"],["June30/July1,2026","CurrentRule83amendment","Same provenance limit"],["April15/July1,2019","E-filing rule baseline","Later listed amendments distinguished"],["Unknown","Actual entry, service, receipt, acceptance, appealability, order, waiver, security, remittitur, or actual notice","None supplied or inferred"]]},{"headers":["Branch","Missing predicate","Supported consequence","Adverse inference to avoid","Next generic inquiry"],"index":25,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Branch","Missing predicate","Supported consequence","Adverse inference to avoid","Next generic inquiry"],["B01—route","Correct originating court/category","Ordinary route may apply","Every magistrate appeal goes to same court","Special statute/assignment scope"],["B02—wrong court","Timely notice and IAR11.3category","Possible ordered transfer/date preservation","Universal late-notice cure","Exact rule construction"],["B03—finality","Complete claims/parties disposition or valid certification","Potential appealable judgment","Caption/file stamp alone proves finality","Rule54and substantive relief"],["B04—partial judgment","Valid express determination/certificate","IAR11(a)(3)route","Every partial order immediately appealable","Certificate and construction"],["B05—postjudgment order","Correct enumerated category","Possible separate appeal","Grant and denial of vacatur treated alike","IAR11scope"],["B06—permission","Controlling-law/disagreement/advancement predicates","Discretionary receiving-court permission","Lower approval alone commences appeal","Rule83.1/IAR12"],["B07—motion timing","Timely required act and qualifying motion","Applicable termination/restart","All postjudgment motions toll","Route-specific rule construction"],["B08—JNOV contrast","Rule83prior-directed predicate and timely filing","That branch may operate","Rule50availability alone proves tolling","Exact Idaho interaction"],["B09—cross-appeal","Filing/service events and affirmative relief","Correct additional window/issue route","Universal fourteen- or twenty-one-day rule","Rule83/IAR15"],["B10—premature notice","Later formal appealable entry","Possible validation","Any announced ruling qualifies","IAR17construction"],["B11—amendment","Timely valid original notice and allowed stage","Relation back/correction","Amendment cures every late appeal","IAR17–18"],["B12—electronic filing","Applicable system, receipt, acceptance","Rule-specific filing event","Email/courtesy copy equals filing","IREFSrules and lawful orders"],["B13—correction/failure","Timely request and satisfactory predicates","Conditional relation-back relief","Technical explanation automatically establishes relief","Rule13/14and jurisdictional interaction"],["B14—fee waiver","Statutory/representation conditions","Rule23procedure","Recommendation itself grants waiver","Unread waiver statutes"],["B15—notice of entry","Mailing record and actual-notice facts","NarrowRule2.3exception","No mailing alone automatically resets all time","Exact notice/jurisdiction construction"],["B16—automatic stay","Correct appeal route and excluded-category check","Limited temporary protection","Whole appeal always stays execution","Rule83/IAR13"],["B17—money security","Lawful amount, authorized instrument, approval","Conditional stay framework","Bond measure establishes judgment validity","Surety and stay law"],["B18—waiver","Public-actor/agreement/good-cause/punitive predicate","Defined exception","All fees or all security automatically waived","Exact incorporated authority"],["B19—nonmoney relief","Likelihood and harm predicates","Discretionary stay","Ordinary money-bond rule controls every order","IAR13category"],["B20—partial/permissive appeal","Affected versus unaffected matters","Retained jurisdiction unless stayed","Entire trial court always powerless","IAR13/13.4"],["B21—stay review","Correct lower request, denial/nonaction period","Higher review route","General fourteen days replaces special twenty-one days","Exact procedural branch"],["B22—remittitur","Correct finality/rehearing/review posture","Return/directive relationship","Opinion publication equals immediate enforcement authority","IAR38/42/118/122"],["B23—record","Adequate record and lawful designation/fees","Correct review method","Every magistrate appeal is de novo","Full record follow-on"],["B24—special regimes","Independent scope","Held dependency","State rules complete federal/tribal/bankruptcy law","Authorities below"],["B25—history","Original orders and current statutes","Exact gap may close","Footers authenticate all transitions","Ordinary official originals"]]},{"headers":["Separate component","Required authority or question"],"index":26,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Separate component","Required authority or question"],["Record and transcript","Complete IAR 24–31, Rule83(g)–(l), transcript certification, exhibits, settlement, correction, augmentation, fee schedules and waivers"],["Briefing and argument","Complete IAR 34–37, Court of Appeals argument provisions, electronic appendices, formatting and sanctions"],["Standards and preservation","Claim-specific review standards, record sufficiency, harmless error, issue preservation and scope of review"],["Appellate costs and attorney fees","Complete IAR 40–41, fee sources, objections, awards and security interaction"],["Rehearing and further review","Full IAR42/116/118practice, disposition, briefing, stays and finality construction"],["Full remittitur operation","Compliance, trial-court authority on remand, recall or modification, and enforcement consequences"],["Rule60","Separate relief merits and appealability of particular resulting orders; no complete rerun here"],["Statutory fee waivers/public actors","§§31-3220,31-3220A,67-2301,31-3212(2), and required factual/legal predicates"],["Bond/surety law","Authorized issuer status, enforceability, release, discharge, execution against security and due process"],["Protected/special proceedings","Family, probate/guardianship, juvenile, criminal, civil protection, agencies and special statutory appeals"],["Bankruptcy/military/federal","Applicable stay, discharge, SCRA, federal collection/reporting, and federal appellate regimes"],["Local/tribal/interstate","Approved local rules, actual lawful assignment, sovereignty, conflicts and interstate judgments"],["Original history","Original adopted rule orders, final statutory enactments, effective/application/savings clauses"]]},{"headers":["Field","Entry"],"index":27,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Field","Entry"],["Governing appellate route",""],["Authority and edition",""],["Official-current-text status",""],["Originating court/category",""],["Appealability provision",""],["Finality/certification predicate",""],["Aggrieved-party condition",""],["Notice filing act",""],["Filing court/recipient",""],["Service recipients",""],["Reference event",""],["Cross-appeal branch",""],["Postjudgment-motion interaction",""],["Premature/amended-notice provision",""],["Electronic-filing condition",""],["Correction/technical-failure provision",""],["Fee/waiver authority",""],["Record/transcript dependency",""],["Computation/additional-time rule",""],["Automatic-stay branch",""],["Court-ordered-stay condition",""],["Security measure/source",""],["Security waiver exception",""],["Retained-jurisdiction provision",""],["Remittitur/finality event",""],["Special-regime dependency",""],["Missing original authority",""],["Review status",""]]},{"headers":["Requested issue","Disposition","Claims/sources","Exact remaining gap"],"index":28,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Requested issue","Disposition","Claims/sources","Exact remaining gap"],["1—ordinary appellate routes","Official rules and constitutional clauses read","C002–C006","Current official statutory chain"],["Magistrate-to-district","Complete Rule83route read","C003,C012,C022","Actual assignment/category absent"],["District original/appellate to higher court","IARgateway read","C004,C009","Particular finality/entitlement"],["Court of Appeals role","Assignment/reassignment/review distinguished","C006,C051","Full merits/review practice"],["Exclusions","Expressly retained","C003,C053","Special regimes separate"],["2—appealability/finality","Complete material Rule54/IAR11clauses","C007–C009","No instrument classified"],["Partial certification","Conditions read","C008","Standalone certificate form/original history"],["Permission","Complete83.1/12","C010–C011","No permission determination"],["Cross/additional issues","Rule distinction read","C018","Affirmative-relief construction"],["Amended/postjudgment orders","Boundaries preserved","C008,C019–C020","Universal restart not inferred"],["3—notice act/court/service","Rules83,14,17–20read","C012–C015,C021","Actual events absent"],["Filing versus mailing/receipt","Distinguished","C014,C025–C030","No accepted filing found"],["Periods/additional time","Registered","C031–C035","Actual counting and interpretation"],["Fees/waiver","Rule process read","C023–C024","Unread statutory eligibility"],["Record gateway","Necessary clauses read","C021–C022","Full record process deferred"],["Jurisdiction versus defect","Express rule distinction","C015,C032","Constitutional/constructive exceptions"],["4—motion interactions","Exact route-specific text","C016–C017","Judicial construction"],["P25acts preserved","Explicit reuse and fresh incorporation","Reuse table","No trial-merits rerun"],["Rule60","Timing exclusion/retained power only","C017,C043","Merits separate"],["Premature/amended notices","Complete relevant clauses","C019–C020","Actual appealability absent"],["Clerk/actual notice","Complete narrow exception","C034","No automatic new period"],["5—stay/authority","Complete material62/83/13/13.4","C036–C046","No actual stay/security"],["Money/nonmoney","Separate branches","C038–C040","No value, issuer, or likely-success finding"],["Waiver/public actors","Specific conditions","C041","Actual status and statutory scope"],["Trial-court powers","Enumerated retention read","C043","No unrestricted authority inferred"],["Remittitur","Necessary finality and direction clauses","C047–C052","Full enforcement/further review"],["6—follow-on components","Precisely registered","Section12","Not counted as completed merits"],["Federal/local/tribal/special","Held","C053","No positive federal outcome"],["Cases/records/strategy","Not investigated","C055","Judicial construction remains"],["7—sources/read bounds/history","Complete visible register","Section8","Original orders/final statutes held"],["Current versus historical","Footers/application limits separated","C054","No no-change certification"],["PDF text/pixels","Logged below","S001","No unviewed-original claim"],["Quantities/branches/worksheet","Supplied","Sections10–13","No inputs/calendar"],["Prior holds","Preserved","C055","No earlier gap closed"],["Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent","Not accepted complete","Entire report","Exact dependencies remain"]]},{"headers":["Material","Actual use"],"index":29,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Material","Actual use"],["Official IAR, IRCP, ICAR and e-filing bodies","Complete or expressly bounded provisions listed above"],["Official constitutional PDF","Selected complete court-authority clauses; pixels inspected"],["Official statutory route","Fresh failed attempt; no identical retry or bypass"],["Secondary statutes","Complete listed bodies and displayed histories, kept provisional"],["Official amendment locator","Publication/effective-incorporation statement; original orders not recovered"],["Ordinary historical PDF route","Fresh 404, preserved"],["Generic searches","Court-rule scope, current amendments and statutory locators only"],["Incidental cases/opinions/roster results","Not opened, investigated, named, or relied on"],["Actual notices, orders, judgments, transcripts, parties, security instruments","Not requested or examined"],["API-hosted forms/orders","Not opened"],["Prior local files/review packets","Supplied reuse descriptions only; no inspection claim"]]},{"headers":["PDF","Read bounds","Pixels inspected"],"index":30,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["PDF","Read bounds","Pixels inspected"],["Official Idaho Constitution","ArticleV§§9,13,20","Printed15–17/PDFindices20–22"],["Failed historical rule PDF","No operative body recovered","None"],["Original API-hosted orders","Not opened","None"]]}],"claims":[{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C001","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C001","Precise proposition":"Official current rule bodies were read; statutory and original-order gaps remain.","Source/pinpoint":"S001–S008","Status/limit":"O/P/H"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C002","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C002","Precise proposition":"Constitutional court authority is distinct from a particular appeal’s eligibility.","Source/pinpoint":"Constitution Art.V§§9,13,20","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C003","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C003","Precise proposition":"Ordinary magistrate review differs from direct special or assigned-district review.","Source/pinpoint":"IRCP83(a); ICAR6","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C004","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C004","Precise proposition":"District original and appellate decisions use the relevant IAR gateway.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR2,4,11","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C005","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C005","Precise proposition":"IAR11.3preserves filing dates only within its timely-notice transfer predicates.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR11.3","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C006","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C006","Precise proposition":"Court of Appeals assignment/reassignment is controlled by the Supreme Court.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR101,108,110,114; §1-2406","Status/limit":"O/P"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C007","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C007","Precise proposition":"Finality requires Rule54conditions, not a caption or adverse result alone.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule54(a)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C008","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C008","Precise proposition":"Partial certification and complete amended judgment entry do not universally restart appeal time.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule54(a)(2),(b)(1)","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C009","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C009","Precise proposition":"IAR11lists distinct appealable categories and excludes the specified grant-of-vacatur branch.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR11(a),(g)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C010","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C010","Precise proposition":"District permission from a magistrate interlocutory order requires Rule83.1conditions.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule83.1","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C011","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C011","Precise proposition":"Supreme permissive review requires IAR12acceptance, not merely lower-court recommendation.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR12","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C012","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C012","Precise proposition":"Rule83’s notice and late-appeal cross-appeal triggers differ.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule83(b)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C013","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C013","Precise proposition":"Higher civil notice uses the entry-based IAR14period.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR14(a)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C014","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C014","Precise proposition":"Notice filing and service are distinct acts with different recipients/events.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule83(c); IAR20","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C015","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C015","Precise proposition":"Jurisdictional notice periods differ from other sanctionable procedural defects.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule83(m); IAR21","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C016","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C016","Precise proposition":"Rule83has an enumerated timing-reset list, including its JNOV predicate.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule83(b)(1)(B)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C017","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C017","Precise proposition":"IAR14’s broader civil-motion language still excludes Rule60and costs/fees.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR14(a); Rule11.2","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C018","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C018","Precise proposition":"Higher cross-appeal timing and additional-issue treatment have their own conditions.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR15;35(b)(4)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C019","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C019","Precise proposition":"Premature notice validation requires later formal entry of an appealable instrument.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR17(e)(2)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C020","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C020","Precise proposition":"Notice scope/amendment/relationship back are limited by the rule.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR17(e),(m);18","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C021","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C021","Precise proposition":"Notice contents and fee/record certifications are gateway requirements, not substantive proof.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule83(d);IAR17–18,23","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C022","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C022","Precise proposition":"Ordinary magistrate review is not automatically de novo.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule83(f)–(g)","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C023","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C023","Precise proposition":"Listed appellate filing fees are distinct from record costs and stay security.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR16,23","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C024","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C024","Precise proposition":"Fee waiver has specific recommendation, decision, automatic-category and denial branches.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR23(c)–(e);IREFS10(c)","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C025","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C025","Precise proposition":"E-filing applicability and exceptions must be established before its mechanics are applied.","Source/pinpoint":"IREFS1–5","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C026","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C026","Precise proposition":"Submission, receipt, acceptance and proposed-order signature have separate effects.","Source/pinpoint":"IREFS11–12","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C027","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C027","Precise proposition":"Rejected-filing correction differs from technical receipt-failure relief.","Source/pinpoint":"IREFS13–14","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C028","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C028","Precise proposition":"Electronic service completion and late-service addition differ from filing time.","Source/pinpoint":"IREFS17–18","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C029","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C029","Precise proposition":"Appeal-notice fee-waiver handling is not the general fee-denial branch.","Source/pinpoint":"IREFS10(c)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C030","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C030","Precise proposition":"No actual system failure, consent, receipt, correction or filing result is established.","Source/pinpoint":"Read bounds","Status/limit":"H"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C031","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C031","Precise proposition":"Appellate computation uses its specific rule and statutory nonjudicial-day incorporation.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR22;§§1-1607,73-108","Status/limit":"O/P"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C032","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C032","Precise proposition":"General extension authority does not establish permission to extend jurisdictional notices.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR46;Rule83(m);IAR21","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C033","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C033","Precise proposition":"IRCPmail/inaccessibility provisions are not universal additions to higher notice periods.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule2.2;IAR22,48","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C034","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C034","Precise proposition":"The clerk-notice exception is conjunctive and not an automatic quantified restart.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule2.3(c)","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C035","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C035","Precise proposition":"Electronic relation-back and deadline-extension questions remain legally distinct.","Source/pinpoint":"IREFS13–14;IAR21,46","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C036","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C036","Precise proposition":"The two ordinary appeal routes have separate limited automatic-stay texts.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule83(e);IAR13(a)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C037","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C037","Precise proposition":"Rule62post-trial and category-specific stay provisions do not create a universal automatic stay.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule62","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C038","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C038","Precise proposition":"Nonmoney stay requests have the specified likelihood/security conditions.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR13(b)(8),(14),(g)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C039","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C039","Precise proposition":"Money-judgment security uses the stated amount, form, objection and remittitur relations.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR13(b)(15)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C040","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C040","Precise proposition":"Punitive-excess, good-cause and dissipation branches are conditional.","Source/pinpoint":"§13-202;IAR13(b)(15)","Status/limit":"P/O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C041","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C041","Precise proposition":"Cost bonds, nonexecution agreements, public-actor bond rules and security waivers differ.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR16;Rule62(e)–(f)","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C042","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C042","Precise proposition":"Permissive/partial appeals retain express unaffected-matter and enforcement distinctions.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR13(f),13.4","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C043","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C043","Precise proposition":"An appeal does not remove all lower-court authority.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR13(b);Rule83(e)(2)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C044","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C044","Precise proposition":"General stay review and remaining-matter stay review have different nonaction periods.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR13(g),13.4(c)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C045","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C045","Precise proposition":"Supreme stay orders have the stated controlling effect.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR13(g),13.4(c)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C046","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C046","Precise proposition":"Security, waiver, lien release or cash application is not an actual outcome here.","Source/pinpoint":"Relevant stay clauses","Status/limit":"H"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C047","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C047","Precise proposition":"District appellate disposition and remittitur have their own finality/transmission relation.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule83(r)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C048","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C048","Precise proposition":"Opinion announcement, finality, remittitur issuance and filing differ.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR38","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C049","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C049","Precise proposition":"Temporary remand preserves the pending appeal and limited lower authority.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR13.3","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C050","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C050","Precise proposition":"Rehearing/review events must be checked before a universal finality conclusion.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR42,116,118,122","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C051","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C051","Precise proposition":"Court of Appeals review is discretionary; granted review changes remittitur/assignment status.","Source/pinpoint":"IAR118,122","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C052","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C052","Precise proposition":"Rule59.1issuance and bond-remittitur filing are different events.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule59.1;IAR13(b)(15)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C053","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C053","Precise proposition":"Full record, briefing, argument, standards, fees and further-review practice remain separate.","Source/pinpoint":"Follow-on register","Status/limit":"H"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C054","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C054","Precise proposition":"Displayed histories do not complete original adoption/application evidence.","Source/pinpoint":"S001–S008","Status/limit":"Provenance"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P27-C055","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C055","Precise proposition":"No actual appellate event, eligibility, amount or result was determined; all earlier holds remain.","Source/pinpoint":"Research record","Status/limit":"Certain"},"raw_table_index":20,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_comparisons_two_bounded_patches_pending","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false}],"sources":[{"source_id":"S_ID-P27-S001","urls":["https://sos.idaho.gov/elections/publications/Idaho_Constitution.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P27-S001","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S001 — official Idaho Constitution\n\nIssuer/title: Idaho Secretary of State, Constitution of the State of Idaho.\nLiteral URL: https://sos.idaho.gov/elections/publications/Idaho_Constitution.pdf\n\nPublication label: Last amended November 5, 2024.\nRead: Complete Article V §§ 9, 13, 20.\nPixels: Printed pages 15–17, PDF indices 20–22.\nLimit: Original constitutional amendment history and substantive constitutional construction not completed."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"whole_record_read_not_freshly_reopened","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Complete selected constitutional clauses/pixels are researcherreported; no new coordinatorPDF/history/constitutionalconstruction.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P27-S002","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ircp","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.3","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11.2","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/50","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/52","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/58","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59.1","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/62","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83.1"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P27-S002","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S002 — official civil rules\n\nIssuer: Idaho Supreme Court.\nConsolidated URL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ircp\n\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tActual read bounds/use\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1\tComplete (a)–(c), scope only\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2\tComplete computation/extension/mail provisions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.3\tComplete notice and no-notice exception\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11.2\tComplete material (b); reconsideration boundaries only\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/50\tNecessary complete (b)(1) and related reviewed motion-availability interface; trial merits not rerun\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/52\tComplete material (b); surrounding findings merits not rerun\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54\tComplete (a)–(b); reliance on finality, amendment, certification and retained jurisdiction\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/58\tComplete entry provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59\tComplete necessary (b), (c), (d), (e); trial-ground merits not rerun\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59.1\tComplete, limited to remittitur/election boundary\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/62\tComplete (a)–(h)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83\tComplete (a)–(r); substantive use limited to route, notice, timing, gateway, jurisdiction, stay and endpoint; full record/briefing practice deferred\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/83.1\tComplete permissive district-appeal provision\nDisplayed civil-rule history\n\nMost listed rules display March 1, 2016 adoption / July 1, 2016 effectiveness. Material additional entries:\n\nRule\tDisplayed additional history\n1\tApril 30, 2024/same day; September 30, 2024/October 1, 2024\n2.2, 11.2\tSeptember 9, 2016/same day\n54\tListed amendments through April 28, 2021/July 1, 2021\n83\tApril 28, 2021/July 1, 2021; April 28, 2022/same day; August 31, 2023/nunc pro tunc March 2, 2023; May 1, 2024/July 1, 2024; September 11, 2024/same day; June 30, 2026/July 1, 2026\n83.1\tAdopted May 1, 2024, effective July 1, 2024\n\nOriginal linked orders were not opened. The footers are not a complete original-history or no-later-change certification."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"fresh83_83_1_plus11_documented_actual_prior_current_IRCP_reads","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Fresh complete83/83.1 and credits; prior complete1/2.2/2.3/11.2/50/52/54/58/59/59.1/62 bodies mapped by exact Sourceopen/packet hash. Selected material scope/finality/motion/entry/stay branches compared again; truncated local54display recovered through selected a-b andfooter. No originalorders/AppendixB/fulltrialmerits.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P27-S003","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/iar","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/1","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/2","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/4","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.1","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.3","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/12","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13.3","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13.4","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/14","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/15","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/16","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/17","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/18","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/20","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/21","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/22","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/23","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/32","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/35","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/42","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/46","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/47","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/48","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/101","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/108","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/110","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/114","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/116","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/118","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/122"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P27-S003","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S003 — official Idaho Appellate Rules\n\nIssuer: Idaho Supreme Court.\nConsolidated URL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/iar\n\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tActual read bounds/use\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/1\tComplete scope and historical application\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/2\tComplete definitions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/4\tComplete aggrieved-party provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11\tComplete body; ordinary findings limited to (a), (g); special categories distinguished\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.1\tComplete, only to identify direct special magistrate routes and Rule 11.3 incorporation\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/11.3\tComplete (a)–(e)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/12\tComplete permissive route\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13\tComplete operative text inspected; ordinary reliance on (a), (b), (f), (g); criminal/agency merits excluded\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13.3\tComplete temporary-remand provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/13.4\tComplete unaffected-matters/stay provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/14\tComplete; civil (a) applied, criminal/agency branches excluded\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/15\tComplete cross-appeal/additional-issue rule\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/16\tComplete cost-bond/nonexecution-agreement rule\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/17\tComplete (a)–(n) and form reference; linked form not opened\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/18\tComplete cross-appeal notice/amendment provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/20\tComplete filing/service provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/21\tComplete jurisdictional/nonjurisdictional distinction\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/22\tComplete time computation\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/23\tComplete fee/waiver clauses; special fees not applied; certificate form unopened\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/32\tComplete motion provision; only gateway/service/opportunity boundaries relied on\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/35\tPage inspected; substantive use only (b)(4) additional issues\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/38\tComplete opinion/finality/remittitur rule\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/42\tComplete; limited finality/rehearing-period interface, not a rehearing handbook\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/46\tComplete extensions and exclusions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/47\tComplete court-service provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/48\tComplete unspecified-practice clause\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/101\tComplete Court of Appeals scope\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/108\tComplete; assignment and exclusions used, oral-argument practice deferred\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/110\tComplete subsequent-filing/assignment interface\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/114\tComplete reassignment provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/116\tComplete; rehearing/finality boundary only\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/118\tComplete; discretionary review and finality boundary only\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/iar/122\tComplete Court of Appeals remittitur rule\nMaterial displayed appellate history and application\nProvision\tEvidence recorded\nIAR 1\tRules effective July 1, 1977 for stated pending/later proceedings; notice time for pre-effective judgments retains the stated former-law qualification\nCommon original IAR baseline\tMarch 25, 1977 adoption / July 1, 1977 effectiveness, where displayed\nIAR 11, 13, 17, 23\tDisplayed latest amendment April 29, 2026, effective July 1, 2026\nIAR 11.3\tAdopted April 29, 2026, effective July 1, 2026\nIAR 14\tDisplayed latest May 1, 2024/July 1, 2024\nIAR 12\tAdopted March 24, 1982/July 1, 1982; displayed later November 20, 2012/January 1, 2013\nIAR 13.4\tMarch 27, 1989/July 1, 1989 baseline; displayed latest April 28, 2022/July 1, 2022\nIAR 15\tMarch 27, 1989/July 1, 1989; later March 1, 2004 and March 29, 2010, each July 1 effectiveness\nIAR 32, 46\tDisplayed April 28, 2022 amendments, effective that day\nIAR 38\tMarch 25, 1977/July 1, 1977; January 30, 2001/July 1, 2002; March 22, 2002/July 1, 2002\nIAR 23 historical anomaly\tFooter displays an April 28, 1983 amendment with July 1, 1993 effectiveness. It is not silently corrected.\n\nComplete displayed footers were read where the body was read completely. Older credits are not represented as separately opened original orders. Historical applicability and any original-order transitional text remain qualified."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"fresh33_current_IAR_bodies_selected_gateway_and_endpoint_scope_two_bounded_patches_pending","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"26directcurrentIARbodies plus7bodies in sameofficialconsolidatedURL. Allmaterialgateway/motion/service/timing/stay/assignment/finality relationscompared;35substantiverelianceonlyb4. 11.3/13.4/110 failedindividualroutes recoveredinconsolidatedcurrentbody. PublishedRule32historyincorrectlygroupedwith46; seven-day46motionserviceeventmustbeexplicit. Nooriginalorders/fullrecord/briefing/rehearing/meritsacceptance.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P27-S004","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/icar/6"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P27-S004","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S004 — official special-assignment rule\n\nIssuer/title: Idaho Supreme Court, ICAR 6—Additional Jurisdiction of Magistrates—Special Assignment.\nURL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/icar/6\n\nRead: Complete rule and displayed history.\nMaterial date: August 1, 2025 amendment, effective that day.\nLimit: No actual assignment order, judge, or case inspected."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_complete_current_ICAR6_and_credit","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Generic specialassignment and servednotice; August1,2025same-day amendment displayed. Noactualassignment/judge/case.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P27-S005","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/irefs","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/1","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/2","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/4","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/5","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/10","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/11","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/12","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/13","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/14","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/17","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/18","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/20"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P27-S005","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S005 — official electronic-filing rules\n\nIssuer: Idaho Supreme Court.\nConsolidated URL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/irefs\n\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tActual read bounds/use\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/1\tComplete scope/conflict clause\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/2\tComplete definitions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/4\tComplete required/optional filing categories and exceptions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/5\tComplete exceptions; special-proceeding details not applied\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/10\tComplete fees/waiver; appeal-specific (c) emphasized\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/11\tComplete filing/acceptance provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/12\tComplete time-of-filing provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/13\tComplete correction/rejection provision; prescribed text not reproduced or populated\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/14\tComplete technical-failure relief; prescribed text not reproduced or populated\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/17\tComplete service and late-service addition\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/18\tComplete court-service provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irefs/20\tComplete appeal-specific rule; record/brief mechanics reserved for follow-on work\n\nDisplayed baseline: April 15, 2019 adoption / July 1, 2019 effectiveness.\nRule 5 displays later amendments through June 30, 2025, effective July 1, 2025. The current Rule 4 exceptions were read with their displayed later history. No original e-filing order, guide, account setting, or actual system operation was investigated."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"fresh12_complete_current_IREFS_bodies_and_credits_selected_scope","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Complete1/2/4/5/10/11/12/13/14/17/18/20 returned/read; selected filing/service/appealnotice and failure relationscompared;scopeexceptions/conflict/waiverconditionsexplicit. Nooriginalorders/guide/systemevents/fullrecordorbriefingacceptance.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P27-S006","urls":["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-22/section-1-2213/","https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-24/section-1-2406/","https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-13/chapter-2/section-13-201/","https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-13/chapter-2/section-13-202/","https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-16/section-1-1607/","https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-73/chapter-1/section-73-108/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P27-S006","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S006 — provisional statutory incorporations\n\nPublisher/edition: Justia, 2025 Idaho Code. Complete bodies and displayed histories were read.\n\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tMaterial use\tDisplayed source credit\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-22/section-1-2213/\tMagistrate appellate route and review alternatives\t1969 ch.104 §13 p.353\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-24/section-1-2406/\tCourt of Appeals assignment and excluded categories\t1980 ch.245 §1 p.567; 1981 ch.271 §2 p.574\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-13/chapter-2/section-13-201/\tSupreme Court procedural-rule relationship\t1977 ch.170 §6 p.438\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-13/chapter-2/section-13-202/\tStay/security and waiver structure\t1977 ch.170 §7 p.438; 2003 ch.122 §4 p.372\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-1/chapter-16/section-1-1607/\tNonjudicial days and exceptions\tC.C.P.1881 §46 lineage; 1961 ch.270 §1 p.480; 1971 ch.84 §1 p.186\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-73/chapter-1/section-73-108/\tComplete holiday definition/substitution provisions\tDisplayed history through 2002 ch.146 §3 p.423\n\nNo original statutory enactment/application chain or current official 2026 body was recovered."},"source_access_status":"provisional_secondary","coordinator_verification_status":"whole_secondary2025_record_read_not_freshly_reopened","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"All6provisionalstatutorysource-records retained; no newcurrentofficial2026body/originalenactment/applicationauthentication. Relatedsecuritytext independently comparedinIAR13; holiday/calendar/assignmentstatutoryholdsremain.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P27-S007","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments","https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title1/T1CH22/SECT1-2213/","https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/57"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P27-S007","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S007 — official history locator and fresh failures\nLiteral HTTPS URL or material\tActual observation\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments\tOfficial statement about incorporating rules on effective dates read; retrieved body did not provide a completed original-order history\nhttps://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title1/T1CH22/SECT1-2213/\tFresh ordinary official statutory attempt failed\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/57\tSearch-discovered ordinary historical route returned 404\nAPI-hosted original orders/forms\tNot opened\nOfficial search-index references to 2026 orders\tDiscovery only; not promoted to original-order reads\n\nNo failed route was repeatedly retried or used to infer absence of law or amendment."},"source_access_status":"locator_and_failure_log","coordinator_verification_status":"actual_prior_current_publishing_statement_reused_original_failures_unreopened","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Exactpreviouscurrentrecent-amendmentsbody/packetmapped; priorstatutory/printpdf57failures retainedwithoutnewretry/absenceinference. Newcoordinator3differentfailedIARroutes separatelylogged/recovered.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P27-S008","urls":[],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P27-S008","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S008 — deliberately unread incorporations\n\nThe following were identified but not completed: §§ 31-3220, 31-3220A, 67-2301, 31-3212(2), 67-1401(1), 1-1105; Rule 54(b)’s standalone appendix certificate; IAR 17/18 notice forms and IAR 23 clerk certificate; full record rules; underlying authorized-surety law; complete special statutory appeal regimes.\n\nNo actual form, financial affidavit, security instrument, record, or transcript was inspected."},"source_access_status":"deliberately_unread_dependencies","coordinator_verification_status":"whole_deliberately_unread_dependency_record_preserved","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"No fabricatedURLs/readclaims for waivedfees/specialstatutes/forms/suretyauthority/fullrecordregime. All exact incorporations remain open.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false}],"coverage":[{"topic":"1—ordinary appellate routes","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"1—ordinary appellate routes","Disposition":"Official rules and constitutional clauses read","Claims/sources":"C002–C006","Exact remaining gap":"Current official statutory chain"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Magistrate-to-district","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Magistrate-to-district","Disposition":"Complete Rule83route read","Claims/sources":"C003,C012,C022","Exact remaining gap":"Actual assignment/category absent"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"District original/appellate to higher court","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"District original/appellate to higher court","Disposition":"IARgateway read","Claims/sources":"C004,C009","Exact remaining gap":"Particular finality/entitlement"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Court of Appeals role","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Court of Appeals role","Disposition":"Assignment/reassignment/review distinguished","Claims/sources":"C006,C051","Exact remaining gap":"Full merits/review practice"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Exclusions","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Exclusions","Disposition":"Expressly retained","Claims/sources":"C003,C053","Exact remaining gap":"Special regimes separate"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"2—appealability/finality","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"2—appealability/finality","Disposition":"Complete material Rule54/IAR11clauses","Claims/sources":"C007–C009","Exact remaining gap":"No instrument classified"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Partial certification","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Partial certification","Disposition":"Conditions read","Claims/sources":"C008","Exact remaining gap":"Standalone certificate form/original history"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Permission","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Permission","Disposition":"Complete83.1/12","Claims/sources":"C010–C011","Exact remaining gap":"No permission determination"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Cross/additional issues","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Cross/additional issues","Disposition":"Rule distinction read","Claims/sources":"C018","Exact remaining gap":"Affirmative-relief construction"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Amended/postjudgment orders","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Amended/postjudgment orders","Disposition":"Boundaries preserved","Claims/sources":"C008,C019–C020","Exact remaining gap":"Universal restart not inferred"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"3—notice act/court/service","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"3—notice act/court/service","Disposition":"Rules83,14,17–20read","Claims/sources":"C012–C015,C021","Exact remaining gap":"Actual events absent"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Filing versus mailing/receipt","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Filing versus mailing/receipt","Disposition":"Distinguished","Claims/sources":"C014,C025–C030","Exact remaining gap":"No accepted filing found"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Periods/additional time","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Periods/additional time","Disposition":"Registered","Claims/sources":"C031–C035","Exact remaining gap":"Actual counting and interpretation"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Fees/waiver","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Fees/waiver","Disposition":"Rule process read","Claims/sources":"C023–C024","Exact remaining gap":"Unread statutory eligibility"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Record gateway","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Record gateway","Disposition":"Necessary clauses read","Claims/sources":"C021–C022","Exact remaining gap":"Full record process deferred"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Jurisdiction versus defect","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Jurisdiction versus defect","Disposition":"Express rule distinction","Claims/sources":"C015,C032","Exact remaining gap":"Constitutional/constructive exceptions"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"4—motion interactions","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"4—motion interactions","Disposition":"Exact route-specific text","Claims/sources":"C016–C017","Exact remaining gap":"Judicial construction"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"P25acts preserved","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"P25acts preserved","Disposition":"Explicit reuse and fresh incorporation","Claims/sources":"Reuse table","Exact remaining gap":"No trial-merits rerun"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Rule60","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Rule60","Disposition":"Timing exclusion/retained power only","Claims/sources":"C017,C043","Exact remaining gap":"Merits separate"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Premature/amended notices","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Premature/amended notices","Disposition":"Complete relevant clauses","Claims/sources":"C019–C020","Exact remaining gap":"Actual appealability absent"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Clerk/actual notice","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Clerk/actual notice","Disposition":"Complete narrow exception","Claims/sources":"C034","Exact remaining gap":"No automatic new period"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"5—stay/authority","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"5—stay/authority","Disposition":"Complete material62/83/13/13.4","Claims/sources":"C036–C046","Exact remaining gap":"No actual stay/security"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Money/nonmoney","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Money/nonmoney","Disposition":"Separate branches","Claims/sources":"C038–C040","Exact remaining gap":"No value, issuer, or likely-success finding"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Waiver/public actors","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Waiver/public actors","Disposition":"Specific conditions","Claims/sources":"C041","Exact remaining gap":"Actual status and statutory scope"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Trial-court powers","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Trial-court powers","Disposition":"Enumerated retention read","Claims/sources":"C043","Exact remaining gap":"No unrestricted authority inferred"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Remittitur","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Remittitur","Disposition":"Necessary finality and direction clauses","Claims/sources":"C047–C052","Exact remaining gap":"Full enforcement/further review"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"6—follow-on components","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"6—follow-on components","Disposition":"Precisely registered","Claims/sources":"Section12","Exact remaining gap":"Not counted as completed merits"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Federal/local/tribal/special","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Federal/local/tribal/special","Disposition":"Held","Claims/sources":"C053","Exact remaining gap":"No positive federal outcome"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Cases/records/strategy","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Cases/records/strategy","Disposition":"Not investigated","Claims/sources":"C055","Exact remaining gap":"Judicial construction remains"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"7—sources/read bounds/history","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"7—sources/read bounds/history","Disposition":"Complete visible register","Claims/sources":"Section8","Exact remaining gap":"Original orders/final statutes held"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Current versus historical","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Current versus historical","Disposition":"Footers/application limits separated","Claims/sources":"C054","Exact remaining gap":"No no-change certification"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"PDF text/pixels","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"PDF text/pixels","Disposition":"Logged below","Claims/sources":"S001","Exact remaining gap":"No unviewed-original claim"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Quantities/branches/worksheet","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Quantities/branches/worksheet","Disposition":"Supplied","Claims/sources":"Sections10–13","Exact remaining gap":"No inputs/calendar"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Prior holds","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Prior holds","Disposition":"Preserved","Claims/sources":"C055","Exact remaining gap":"No earlier gap closed"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent","Disposition":"Not accepted complete","Claims/sources":"Entire report","Exact remaining gap":"Exact dependencies remain"},"raw_table_index":28,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_first_scoped_review_two_bounded_patches_pending_all_explicit_source_and_application_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true}],"annotations":{},"corrections":[],"resolved_corrections":[],"review_history":[{"id":"S_ID-P27-gateway-scoped-review-20261028","status":"whole_first_scoped_review_complete_bounded_patches_resolved_other_holds","at":"2026-10-28T23:33:26.282020+00:00"}]}