{"meta":{"key":"s_id--pass-25","task":"S_ID","title":"SID Idaho ordinary civil trial, jury, verdict, findings, and post-trial motions","parent_title":"Idaho debt and debt relief law","edition":"pass-25","path":"/research/s_id--pass-25/","kind":"split_pass","category":"state","role":"state","area_numbers":[66],"groups":["collections"],"date":"2026-10-28","tables":39,"claims":56,"sources":9,"review_status":"scoped_review_complete_with_originalhistory_statutory_incorporation_construction_application_holds","review_complete":true,"sha256":"7d283b5551e7f820e8fca4608d98d34adc5b2747bf27a83e5ba0138fce037899","headings":["Evidence disposition","Principal findings","1.1 Procedural posture matters","1.2 Scheduling duties and trial-setting requests","1.3 Modification, disclosures, amendments, and continuance","2.1 Constitutional and rule-based boundaries","2.2 Demand, issue specification, and withdrawal","2.3 Court trial, discretionary jury, advisory jury, and consent","2.4 Jury size and civil agreement threshold","3.1 Statutory qualification is a separate inquiry","3.2 Confidentiality, examination, and challenge categories","Cause and peremptory challenges","3.3 Additional jurors and management","4.1 Open proceedings, testimony, and judicial roles","4.2 Required record versus transcript","4.3 Instruction requests, rulings, and preservation","5.1 Receipt and polling of a verdict","5.2 Special verdict and general verdict with written answers","5.3 Mistrial","5.4 Nonjury dismissal after the plaintiff’s evidence","5.5 Findings and conclusions","6.1 Idaho terminology and prerequisites","6.2 Alternative relief and conditional rulings","7.1 Complete Rule 59 grounds","7.2 Required support and time","7.3 Nonjury new trial and court initiative","7.4 Alteration and additur/remittitur","7.5 Judge unable to complete post-trial duties","8.1 Ruling, verdict, findings, and judgment","8.2 Computation and extensions","8.3 Notice and later-paper service","8.4 Reconsideration, harmless error, and stays","S001 — official Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure","Displayed rule history","S002 — official Idaho Constitution","S003 — official evidence rules, narrow trial interfaces","S004 — official record/reporting rules","S005 — special small-claims boundaries","S006 — government-hosted statutory compilation","S007 — dated jury-qualification reproductions","S008 — access failures and official history locator","S009 — discovery-only version leads","11.1 Setting and jury demand","11.2 Qualification, challenges, and management","11.3 Instructions and trial rulings","11.4 Post-trial motions","11.5 Computation and effect","15.1 Coverage","15.2 Actual read/search/failure log","15.3 PDF text versus pixels","15.4 Researcher self-check"],"generation_provenance":{"actual_route":"regular_chat_adaptive_models","actual_model":"GPT-6","actual_mode":"Pro","provenance_limit":"Actual documented capture labels only; missing labels remain unknown. No preferred setting is inferred as actual execution."},"public_id":"S_ID/pass-25","facets":{"geography":["us","us-id"],"debt_type":[],"stage":["judgment","repossession"],"subject":["trial-post-trial"]},"scope":"Independent required generic ordinary civil trial-setting/jury-demand/bench-jury/verdict-findings/Rule50-52-59posttrial boundary dimension4; priorproof/discovery/initialcourt/smallclaims/fulljudgmentlifecycle/appeal/federalmerits excluded.","pending_corrections":0},"markdown":"# S_ID PASS-25 — Idaho ordinary civil trial, jury, verdict, findings, and post-trial motions\n\n**Fresh public-source access date:** **October 28, 2026, America/Los_Angeles.**\n\n**Scope:** Ordinary civil trial setting and management; jury demand and nonjury boundaries; instructions, verdicts, and findings; directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict; new trial, amended findings, and alteration of judgment.\n\n## Evidence disposition\n\nThe **official current-published Idaho civil, evidence, administrative, and relevant small-claims rule text was recovered and read** to the bounds recorded below. Official constitutional text was read and visually inspected.\n\nThe attempted official jury-qualification statute route failed. A **county-hosted, undated statutory compilation** and **2025 secondary reproductions** supplied bounded statutory text, but do not authenticate current official 2026 statutory currency. Linked original court-rule orders were not opened; displayed footers are **not a complete original-order audit**.\n\nEarlier findings, provenance, C033/C035, and other holds remain unchanged. The resolved Rule 40 quantity clarification is not reopened. No earlier report supplies a substantive trial-law premise.\n\n## Principal findings\n\n**Idaho’s published Rule 50 retains “directed verdict” and “judgment notwithstanding the verdict.”** It expressly permits the latter motion without a prior directed-verdict motion. A federal prerequisite or federal rule formulation is not substituted. **[C032–C036.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/50)\n\n**The ordinary nonjury midtrial provision is Rule 41(b)(2).** The published Rule 52(c) addresses assignment of error; it is not a federal-style judgment-on-partial-findings subsection. **[C028–C031.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/41)\n\n**The post-trial periods use different acts and events.** Rule 50(b) says **served**; Rule 52(b) says **filed**; Rule 59(b) and (e) require **filed and served**. Jury discharge, judgment entry, service of opposing affidavits, and issuance of an appellate remittitur are separate triggers. **[C031, C033, C039–C043.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+3](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/50)\n\n**Verdict inconsistency does not have one universal consequence.** Rule 49 distinguishes internally consistent answers that conflict with a general verdict from answers that also conflict with each other. It preserves different mandatory and discretionary branches. **[C025–C026.]** [isc.idaho.gov](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/49)\n\n# 1. Scope, trial setting, pretrial orders, and continuances\n\nEvidence labels:\n\n- **O — Official body read:** current-published court rule or official constitutional publication.\n- **P — Provisional statutory text:** secondary reproduction or undated government-hosted compilation.\n- **H — Held:** material history, incorporation, construction, or application dependency remains unresolved.\n\n## 1.1 Procedural posture matters\n\n| Posture | Newly read authority | Distinction |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Ordinary district or magistrate civil action | IRCP 1(b) | The ordinary civil rules apply within their scope; assignment and substantive entitlement remain separate. |\n| Original small claims | IRCP 1(b); IRE 101(e)(5); Small-Claims Rule 11 | Special rules govern. The ordinary evidence rules are excluded except privilege, and the original hearing’s informal procedure is not imported into ordinary civil trials. |\n| Small-claims de novo appeal | Small-Claims Rule 15(c), (d)(2), (d)(6) | A separate proceeding with its own jury-request and composition provisions. |\n| Bench trial | Rules 39, 41(b)(2), 52 | The court performs the prescribed factfinding function and makes required findings. |\n| Advisory jury | Rules 39(c), 52(a)(1) | Advisory input does not replace the court’s required findings. |\n| Consensual jury on an issue without an entitlement as of right | Rule 39(c)(2) | Requires party consent and has the stated verdict effect. |\n| Summary judgment | Rule 56(a) | A separate pretrial/adjudicative test; not a trial verdict or a default. |\n| Default | Rule 55 | Separate predicates and safeguards; not rerun here. |\n| Responsive pleading followed by nonparticipation at trial | Rule 55(a)(3) | An **uncontested trial**, not a Rule 55 default hearing. |\n| Special proceedings | IRCP 1(b); IRE 101(d)–(e) | Enumerated special, family, treatment, and other exceptions remain separate. |\n\n**[C002.]** No claim is classified as jury-triable merely because it concerns debt or is called a civil action. [Idaho Supreme Court+3](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ircp)\n\n## 1.2 Scheduling duties and trial-setting requests\n\nRule 16 distinguishes a duty to take scheduling action from a requirement that a completed order already exist by the same date.\n\n| Event | Source-stated relationship |\n| --- | --- |\n| Answer or notice of appearance filed | Within **thirty days**, the court must take the specified scheduling action. |\n| Complaint filed, at least one defendant served, no appearance | Alternative **ninety-day** scheduling-action branch. |\n| Resulting scheduling order | Filed as soon as practicable after the court’s action; must address trial/pretrial dates and the other required subjects. |\n| Court has not set a scheduling conference or trial after all defendants appear | A party may make the Rule 16(b) request. |\n| Response to that request | **Filed and served within seven days after service** of the request. |\n| After response time passes | Court must issue the scheduling order or set the request for hearing. |\n| Final pretrial process | At least **thirty days before trial**; a formal conference is one permitted method, not the only method. |\n\n**[C003.]** No actual trial date, request, schedule, appearance, or order was supplied. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/16)\n\n## 1.3 Modification, disclosures, amendments, and continuance\n\n| Subject | Operative condition | Limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Trial/pretrial dates | Leave of court and good cause under Rule 16(a)(3) | Agreement alone is not stated to modify those dates. |\n| Other scheduling deadlines in Rule 16(a)(2)(B) | Leave and good cause, **or** all-party stipulation **and court approval** | Not an automatic unilateral extension. |\n| Formal pretrial conference | On the record; at least one attorney for each represented party must have the specified stipulation/admission authority | No actual representative’s authority is determined. |\n| Witness/exhibit lists | Court may order them; later discoveries must be supplemented as stated | Untimely exclusion is discretionary, with the **good-cause and prevention-of-injustice** qualification. |\n| Amendments during trial | Rule 15(b) distinguishes objection-based amendment from express/implied consent to an unpleaded issue | Continuance may be allowed; consent or prejudice is not assumed. |\n| Trial or hearing set on court’s initiative | Rule 2.4 requires the stated rule-compliant notice | A setting is not an evidentiary or merits ruling. |\n| Stipulated continuance/vacatur | Rule 2.5 treats it as a joint motion, not a binding agreement on the court | Court may approve, deny, or impose a cutoff; no universal numerical request period is supplied. |\n| Consolidation or separate trials | Rule 42 uses common questions, convenience, prejudice, expedition/economy, and preservation of jury rights | Consolidation does not itself merge substantive entitlements or establish liability. |\n\n**[C004–C006.]** The sanctions portion of Rule 16 was read, but its Rule 37 sanction incorporation is not redeveloped here. Its expense provision retains causal, substantial-justification, and injustice qualifications. **[C056.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+2](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/16)\n\n# 2. Jury right, demand, waiver, and nonjury alternatives\n\n## 2.1 Constitutional and rule-based boundaries\n\nArticle I, § 7 preserves the jury right, permits a civil verdict by three-fourths of the jury, addresses civil waiver in the manner prescribed by law, and distinguishes the ordinary twelve-or-agreed-lesser composition from the not-more-than-six category for civil actions within inferior-court jurisdiction even when tried in district court.\n\nRule 38(a) preserves the right supplied by the Idaho Constitution or statute. It does not itself establish that every claim, issue, or requested remedy is triable by jury. **[C007.]** [Idaho Secretary of State+1](https://sos.idaho.gov/elections/publications/Idaho_Constitution.pdf)\n\nA current separate statutory entitlement for every possible ordinary debt theory was not authenticated. Classification of legal/equitable issues and mixed claims remains a judicial-construction dependency.\n\n## 2.2 Demand, issue specification, and withdrawal\n\n| Branch | Exact procedural relation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Initial demand | Written demand served **no later than fourteen days after service of the last pleading directed to the issue**, and filed under Rule 5(d). |\n| Composition statement in demand | Must state whether the demanding party will stipulate to fewer than twelve but at least six. |\n| Demand specifying no issues | Treated as a demand for all issues triable by jury. |\n| Demand specifying only some issues | Another party may serve a demand for other or all jury-triable factual issues within **fourteen days after service of the limited demand**, or a shorter court-ordered time. |\n| Waiver | Rule 38(d) ties waiver to a demand not properly served and filed. |\n| Withdrawal | A proper demand may be withdrawn only with the parties’ consent. |\n\n**[C008–C009.]** A pleading amendment, new issue, waiver, or actual “last pleading” is not identified. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/38)\n\n## 2.3 Court trial, discretionary jury, advisory jury, and consent\n\nRule 39 separates four situations:\n\n| Situation | Result supplied by the rule |\n| --- | --- |\n| Proper demand on an issue triable by right | Jury trial unless the parties/attorneys stipulate as prescribed or the court finds no right on the issue. |\n| No proper demand | Court trial, but the court may order a jury trial on motion for an issue for which a jury could have been demanded. |\n| No jury right | Court may use an advisory jury. |\n| No jury right, but party consent | Court may use a jury whose verdict has the stated effect of a verdict as of right. |\n\n**[C010.]** These are different sources of authority, not interchangeable findings of entitlement. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/39)\n\n## 2.4 Jury size and civil agreement threshold\n\nRule 47(l) provides:\n\n- Civil actions that **may be assigned to the magistrate division** use not more than six jurors, whether tried before a district or magistrate judge.\n- Other cases use twelve or a lesser number agreed in open court.\n- Three-fourths may render a verdict.\n- Jury cost may not be taxed to a party in a civil action.\n\n**[C011.]** Rule 38’s demand-stipulation wording, Rule 47’s category-specific composition, and Article I, § 7 must be retained together. No actual classification, fractional-vote rounding, minimum-panel determination, or consent is supplied. [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/47)\n\nFor the small-claims **de novo** route only, Rule 15(d)(6) states a fourteen-day jury request after service of the appeal-hearing notice and six jurors unless fewer are agreed. Those special terms are not imported into ordinary civil trial demand. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irsca/15)\n\n# 3. Ordinary empanelment and qualification boundaries\n\n## 3.1 Statutory qualification is a separate inquiry\n\nA county-hosted compilation supplies generic jury-selection policy, nondiscrimination, and role definitions. The 2025 reproductions of §§ 2-209 and 2-212 supply the following bounded qualification framework:\n\n| Issue | Statutory actor/predicate |\n| --- | --- |\n| Language ability or disabling inability to perform satisfactory service | Administrative district judge or designee, using the specified competent information; the medical-certificate branch has its own conditions. |\n| Citizenship, age, county residence, felony/restoration category | Clerk or jury commissioner under the stated proof framework. |\n| Disqualification duration | Generally two years under § 2-209; the specified disability finding permits longer or permanent excusal. |\n| Age seventy or older | Permanent excusal if the person indicates the stated wish; written request can restore the person to the list. |\n| Postponement | The specified hardship, inconvenience, public-necessity, or breastfeeding category, with written information and court/commission determination. |\n| Postponement duration | As deemed necessary; no fixed universal number of days. |\n\n**[C012.]** The statutes’ official-currentness and complete constitutional/restoration/disability incorporations remain held. No individual, questionnaire, medical information, record, or eligibility determination was examined. [Justia Law+1](https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-2/chapter-2/section-2-209/)\n\n## 3.2 Confidentiality, examination, and challenge categories\n\nRule 47 protects questionnaire information from disclosure except by court order, with its limited trial-preparation access and limiting-order provisions. The court supervises random selection, qualification inquiry, and the order and scope of examination. That procedural access does not authorize an actual roster or questionnaire inquiry here. **[C013.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/47)\n\n### Cause and peremptory challenges\n\n| Category | Material rule |\n| --- | --- |\n| Cause timing | During questioning or by its stated conclusion; later challenge requires court-permitted good cause. |\n| Cause grounds | Statutory disqualification; specified relationship within the fourth degree; listed personal/business/fiduciary relationships; prior jury/witness/subpoena involvement in the same-party/same-cause trial; monetary interest; unqualified merits belief based on facts; hostility or bias. |\n| Cause count | No numerical limit; co-parties need not join. |\n| Cause decision | Tried by the court; replacement follows the rule. |\n| Record | Entire voir dire and challenge rulings reported verbatim unless all parties stipulate otherwise on the record. |\n| Ordinary peremptories | Four per party after cause challenges. |\n| Co-parties | Court allocates based on the degree of conflicting interest; equal, unequal, shared, or full allocations are possible. |\n| Waiver of one peremptory | Waives that challenge only. |\n| Consecutive waiver by all parties | Remaining peremptories are waived and the jury is deemed accepted. |\n\n**[C014–C015.]** Constitutional restrictions on challenges and the calculation of relationship degrees are separate dependencies; the text is not a license to exclude anyone for an unlawful reason. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/47)\n\n## 3.3 Additional jurors and management\n\nRule 47(j) permits additional jurors. One or two additional jurors produce one additional peremptory per party; more than two produce two. After closing arguments, excess jurors are removed by lot. If an alternate replaces a deliberating juror, the court must direct the reconstituted jury to disregard earlier deliberations and begin anew. **[C016.]**\n\nRule 47(k) separately addresses sequestration discretion, juror conduct, notes, optional notebooks, court-screened written juror questions, objections outside the jury’s presence, and deliberation materials. Written instructions and practical admitted exhibits go to deliberations, **excluding depositions**. No notebook or juror question was constructed. **[C017.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/47)\n\n# 4. Trial management, testimony, instructions, and the record\n\n## 4.1 Open proceedings, testimony, and judicial roles\n\nRule 42.1 requires merits trials in open court, while preserving witness-exclusion rules. It distinguishes trials/evidentiary hearings outside the county by stipulation from other hearings that may occur elsewhere.\n\nRule 43 ordinarily requires open-court testimony, subject to its statute/rule exceptions. Contemporaneous remote testimony requires good cause in compelling circumstances and appropriate safeguards. An affirmation may substitute for an oath.\n\nThe interpreter paragraph incorporates ICAR 52 and uses a fourteen-day or as-soon-as-practicable expedited relation. Full interpreter eligibility, appointment, and funding authority was not completed. **[C018.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/42.1)\n\nThe narrowly read evidence rules distinguish:\n\n| Rule | Trial-management boundary |\n| --- | --- |\n| IRE 611 | Reasonable court control of testimony; scope and leading-question qualifications |\n| IRE 614 | Court may call a witness when it is the trier of fact; parties may cross-examine; the court may examine any witness, with the stated objection opportunities |\n| IRE 615 | Court may exclude witnesses, subject to natural-party, designated representative, essential-person, and other stated exceptions |\n| IRE 605 | Presiding judge cannot testify at that trial; objection is not needed to preserve that issue |\n| IRE 606(a) | Juror testimony before the other jurors is prohibited, with the specified opportunity to object outside their presence |\n| IRE 606(b) | Deliberative/vote/mental-process evidence is restricted; extraneous information, outside influence, resort to chance, and verdict-form mistake have separate exceptions |\n\n**[C019.]** The Rule 59 jury-misconduct affidavit requirement does not authorize every juror affidavit or inquiry into deliberations. [Idaho Supreme Court+4](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/611)\n\n## 4.2 Required record versus transcript\n\n| Court setting | Source-stated record rule |\n| --- | --- |\n| Magistrate division | ICAR 25 requires a verbatim record or recording; logs, storage, transcription, and unread statutory reporter qualifications have separate conditions. |\n| District court | ICAR 27(a) requires certified reporter attendance for civil trials unless waived in the prescribed manner. |\n| Electronic recording | ICAR 27(c) generally requires it; the reporter-present/good-cause exception and emergency-absence branches remain. |\n| Official transcript | A certified transcript meeting ICAR 27(d) differs from a raw recording or realtime display. |\n| Jury selection and instructions | Rules 47(h)(4) and 51(f) contain their own record requirements. |\n\n**[C020.]** No transcript request, record, recording, reporter, or certification was examined. Full retention, transcript fees, and appellate-record preparation remain held. [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/icar/25)\n\n## 4.3 Instruction requests, rulings, and preservation\n\n| Event | Rule 51 condition |\n| --- | --- |\n| Initial written requests | Filed no later than seven days before jury trial; served **and received** at least seven days before trial. |\n| Late request | Court need not consider it; unforeseen or overlooked matters may be permitted through and including close of evidence. |\n| Court-proposed instructions | Adequate time to consider and object outside the jury’s presence. |\n| Submission format | Original and copy; citations on the copy; specified numbering/ruling fields. No form was created. |\n| Ruling | At close of evidence, on record or endorsed as prescribed. |\n| Objections/rulings | Must be made part of the record. |\n| Pattern instructions | If the latest IDJI has an applicable instruction and the court decides the subject should be charged, the court should use it unless a different instruction is more adequate, accurate, or clear. |\n| Preliminary instructions | Permissible; instruction conference before trial is required for their consideration. |\n| Preservation | Distinct objection and grounds **before the jury deliberates**. |\n| Final delivery | Written instructions read before final arguments; jury receives original and at least two copies. |\n| Jury follow-up question | Written request; recorded response; party opportunity to be present/heard when available within a reasonable time. |\n\n**[C021–C023.]** The latest IDJI edition and actual substantive instructions were not retrieved. Pattern-instruction references do not establish the elements of any debt claim. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/51)\n\nRule 46 eliminates formal exceptions but still requires the stated action/objection and grounds when an opportunity exists. IRE 103 separately protects the specified definitive-ruling and no-opportunity branches. Its nonjury offer-of-proof provision has plainly inadmissible and privilege exceptions. Full appellate preservation is not certified from these clauses alone. [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/46)\n\n# 5. Verdicts, findings, and the nonjury midtrial route\n\n## 5.1 Receipt and polling of a verdict\n\nRule 47(m) distinguishes:\n\n| Situation | Consequence |\n| --- | --- |\n| All jurors agree | Written verdict signed by the foreperson. |\n| Not all agree | Written verdict signed by all agreeing jurors. |\n| Return | Jury brought into court; verdict delivered and read; inquiry whether it is their verdict. |\n| More than one-fourth disagree | Court returns jury for further deliberation. |\n| Poll requested | Court or clerk asks each juror. |\n| Three-fourths acknowledge | Verdict accepted and jury discharged under the rule. |\n\n**[C024.]** Receipt, acceptance, polling, discharge, and judgment entry are distinct events. No vote, fractional rounding, verdict, or actual result is supplied. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/47)\n\n## 5.2 Special verdict and general verdict with written answers\n\n| Branch | Rule 49 consequence |\n| --- | --- |\n| Special verdict | Court may require written fact findings, with necessary explanations/instructions. |\n| Omitted factual issue | Unless submission is demanded **before the jury retires**, the stated jury right on that issue is waived. Court may find it; absent a finding, the rule supplies the judgment-consistency treatment. |\n| General verdict and answers all consistent | Court must direct appropriate judgment. |\n| Answers mutually consistent but one or more conflicts with general verdict | Court **may** enter judgment according to answers, return the matter to the jury, or order new trial. |\n| Answers conflict with each other and one or more also conflicts with verdict | Judgment **must not** be entered; further jury consideration or new trial is required. |\n\n**[C025–C026.]** The official page places both the consistent-answer and mutually-consistent-but-verdict-conflict clauses in **Rule 49(b)(2)**; the internally inconsistent branch is **(b)(3)**. Federal numbering is not substituted. [isc.idaho.gov](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/49)\n\n## 5.3 Mistrial\n\nRule 48 operates **after trial begins and before a verdict is rendered**. A trial occurrence preventing fairness permits, but does not automatically require, a mistrial. If the court finds deliberate party/attorney misconduct caused it, causal reasonable expenses, including fees, may be imposed. **[C027.]**\n\nThis is not the same as a postjudgment new trial, a harmless error, or automatic underlying liability. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/48)\n\n## 5.4 Nonjury dismissal after the plaintiff’s evidence\n\nRule 41(b)(2), not a federal-style Rule 52(c), supplies the ordinary Idaho provision:\n\n| Predicate/event | Rule consequence |\n| --- | --- |\n| Nonjury action after presentation of plaintiff’s evidence | Defendant may seek dismissal because the facts and law show no right to relief. |\n| Motion denied | Defendant’s right to present evidence is not waived. |\n| Court action | May determine facts and enter judgment, or await all evidence. |\n| Merits judgment against plaintiff | Rule 52 findings required. |\n| Rule 41(b)(3) effect | Unless otherwise stated, the specified dismissal operates on the merits, with the stated jurisdiction and Rule 19 exceptions. |\n\n**[C028.]** This is a defined stage and function, not a universal authorization for any partial-finding judgment at any point. It does not adjudicate debt validity here. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/41)\n\n## 5.5 Findings and conclusions\n\nRule 52 requires separate fact findings and legal conclusions after a factual bench trial or advisory-jury trial. They may be stated on the record after evidence or in a filed opinion/memorandum. Judgment remains a Rule 58 event.\n\nThe rule separately treats interlocutory injunctions, default, motions, and adopted master findings. No master or injunction regime is completed here. **[C029.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/52)\n\nTwo preservation statements must not be collapsed:\n\n- **Evidentiary sufficiency:** Rule 52(a)(1), (6) permits the stated challenge without prior objection or amendment request.\n- **Absence of findings:** Rule 52(c) requires the issue to have been raised by an appropriate trial-court motion.\n\nRule 52(a)(7)’s clearly-erroneous/deference language is recorded only as a narrow review boundary, not a full appeal analysis. **[C030.]**\n\nA Rule 52(b) motion must be **filed no later than fourteen days after judgment entry**. The court may amend/add findings and amend judgment; the motion may accompany Rule 59 relief. **[C031.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/52)\n\n# 6. Directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict\n\n## 6.1 Idaho terminology and prerequisites\n\nRule 50 is titled **Dispositive Trial Motions** and uses **directed verdict** and **judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV)**. Rule 62(b) uses the broader “judgment as a matter of law” label for its stay reference; that does not replace Rule 50’s operative text.\n\n| Rule 50 branch | Complete material relation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Directed verdict | Motion must state specific grounds. |\n| Motion at close of opponent’s evidence | If denied, moving party may offer evidence without a reservation. |\n| Jury right | Denial does not waive jury trial, even if all parties moved. |\n| Grant | Order is effective without jury agreement. |\n| JNOV after judgment | Must be **served no later than fourteen days after entry**. |\n| No verdict returned | Must be **served no later than fourteen days after jury discharge**. |\n| Prior directed-verdict motion | **Not required by Rule 50(b)(1).** |\n\n**[C032–C033.]** The rule does not itself state a complete universal evidence-sufficiency test for granting these motions. That test and any constitutional limits require Idaho judicial construction; a federal formulation is not imported. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/50)\n\n## 6.2 Alternative relief and conditional rulings\n\n| Event | Rule 50 relationship |\n| --- | --- |\n| JNOV motion plus new-trial request | May be joined or pleaded alternatively, conforming to Rule 59(a). |\n| Motion to set aside/nullify verdict or for new trial | Includes the rule’s JNOV alternative. This is not a blanket cure for untimeliness or missing grounds. |\n| Verdict returned | Court may leave judgment, reopen and order new trial, or direct judgment as authorized. |\n| No verdict | Court may direct judgment or new trial. |\n| JNOV granted with new-trial motion | Court **must** rule conditionally on new trial in case of later vacatur/reversal. |\n| Conditional grant | Grounds must be specified; finality of the judgment is not altered by that conditional order. |\n| Party whose verdict is set aside | Separate opportunity to **serve** a new-trial motion no later than fourteen days after judgment entry; conditional ruling required. |\n| Failure under that subsection | Waiver of the right to apply for new trial under the stated provision. |\n\n**[C034–C035.]** The scope of the “includes” clause is not turned into permission to disregard Rules 50 and 59. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/50)\n\nRule 50(b)(3) preserves the stated sufficiency review despite failure to move for directed verdict, JNOV, or new trial, when error is properly assigned on appeal. That does not erase every trial-preservation rule. The appellate alternatives following conditional rulings or denied JNOV are recorded only to preserve the rule’s structure. **[C036.]**\n\n# 7. New trial, altered findings, and alteration of judgment\n\n## 7.1 Complete Rule 59 grounds\n\nRule 59(a)(1) permits a new trial on all or some issues, to any party, upon the applicable ground:\n\n| Subdivision | Ground and material qualification |\n| --- | --- |\n| **A** | Irregularity in court, jury, or adverse-party proceedings |\n| **B** | Court order or abuse of discretion preventing a fair trial |\n| **C** | Jury misconduct |\n| **D** | Accident or surprise that ordinary prudence could not have guarded against |\n| **E** | Material newly discovered evidence that reasonable diligence could not have discovered and produced at trial |\n| **F** | Excessive or inadequate damages appearing influenced by passion or prejudice |\n| **G** | Evidentiary insufficiency to justify verdict/decision, or decision against law |\n| **H** | Legal error occurring at trial |\n\n**[C037.]** These are not automatic findings of misconduct, unfairness, invalid debt, or entitlement to relief. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59)\n\n## 7.2 Required support and time\n\n| Provision | Requirement |\n| --- | --- |\n| Grounds A–E | Motion accompanied by an affidavit detailing relied-on facts. |\n| Grounds G–H | Particular factual grounds must be stated. |\n| Ground F | The rule does not place it in those two specified support lists; that does not establish an evidence-free entitlement. |\n| New-trial motion | **Filed and served within fourteen days after judgment entry.** |\n| Supporting affidavits | Filed and served with the motion. |\n| Opposing affidavits | Filed and served within fourteen days after service. |\n| Opposing-affidavit extension | Up to twenty-one additional days by court order or written stipulation. |\n| Reply affidavits | Court may permit. |\n| All Rule 59 affidavits | Must satisfy Rule 56(c)(4). |\n\n**[C038–C039.]** Rule 56(c)(4) requires personal knowledge, admissible facts, competence, and the stated sworn/certified attachments. Rule 2.7’s declaration alternative depends on § 9-1406, not freshly authenticated here. No affidavit or declaration was created. [Idaho Supreme Court+2](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59)\n\n## 7.3 Nonjury new trial and court initiative\n\nAfter a nonjury trial, Rule 59(a)(3) permits opening an entered judgment, taking additional testimony, changing or making findings/conclusions, and directing a new judgment. **[C040.]**\n\nThe court-initiative branch is precise:\n\n| Event | Rule 59(d) consequence |\n| --- | --- |\n| No later than fourteen days after judgment entry | Court may give **notice of intent** to order a new trial. |\n| That notice | Treated as a new-trial motion for the stated civil/appellate purposes. |\n| Timely served party motion | Court may grant on a reason not stated in the motion. |\n| Before new-trial order | Notice and opportunity to be heard required. |\n| Order granting new trial | Must specify grounds. |\n\n**[C041.]** The fourteen-day court-initiative clause concerns **notice of intent**, not a universal requirement that the final new-trial order be entered by then. Full appellate tolling is not determined. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59)\n\n## 7.4 Alteration and additur/remittitur\n\nRule 59(e) requires a motion to alter or amend judgment to be **filed and served no later than fourteen days after entry**. The rule does not supply an unrestricted right to relitigate every issue or a complete substantive standard for relief. **[C042.]**\n\nRule 59.1 separately governs a conditional new-trial disposition involving additur or remittitur:\n\n| Branch | Period and event |\n| --- | --- |\n| Ordinary acceptance/rejection | Forty-two days from entry of the conditional order |\n| Notice of appeal filed | Does not itself accept or reject; choice deferred until appeal determination |\n| Successful appeal | Further proceedings follow appellate opinion |\n| Conditional new-trial order affirmed | Fourteen days from **issuance of the appellate remittitur** |\n\n**[C043.]** The appellate *remittitur* is not the same event as a trial court’s damages-reduction *remittitur*. No amount, appeal, choice, or damages calculation is supplied. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59.1)\n\n## 7.5 Judge unable to complete post-trial duties\n\nRule 63 applies after a verdict has been returned or findings/conclusions filed and the original judge cannot perform the remaining duties for the stated reasons. Another regularly sitting or assigned judge may perform them; inability to do so permits a new trial.\n\nThe text is not generalized into unrestricted midtrial substitution. **[C044.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/63)\n\n# 8. Judgment, computation, notice, reconsideration, and stay boundaries\n\n## 8.1 Ruling, verdict, findings, and judgment\n\nRule 54 requires a separate judgment/decree document stating relief, with its stated prohibition on embedding reasoning or findings except where expressly required. A verdict or memorandum is not automatically that document.\n\nRule 58 makes filing/entry distinct. Costs do not postpone judgment entry. An amended judgment becomes effective through entry of the complete amended judgment. Partial-final certification has its own conditions; its appendix and complete appellate consequences remain held. **[C045.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54)\n\n## 8.2 Computation and extensions\n\n| Issue | Rule 2.2 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Trigger day | Excluded |\n| Intermediate days | Included, including weekends and legal holidays |\n| Last day | Included, subject to weekend/holiday extension |\n| Clerk inaccessibility | Filing extension to the stated accessible nonweekend/nonholiday day unless otherwise ordered |\n| Before expiration | Good-cause extension under the stated request/action conditions |\n| After expiration | Motion and excusable-neglect condition |\n| Written stipulation | Subject to court-business/convenience limits and other governing provisions |\n| Nonextendable periods | Court must not extend Rule 50(b), 52(b), 59(b), (d), (e), or 60(b) periods |\n| Mail addition | Three days only when the act is due a specified time **after service** and service is by mail |\n\n**[C046–C047.]** Judgment entry, jury discharge, and appellate-remittitur issuance are not silently converted into service events. Rule 59(c)’s express opposing-affidavit extension is a distinct provision. No actual date is calculated. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2)\n\n## 8.3 Notice and later-paper service\n\nRule 2.3 requires the clerk’s immediate service of an entered order/judgment and recording of mailing. Lack of notice ordinarily does not alter appeal or postjudgment-motion periods, subject to its exact **no recorded mailing and no actual notice** exception.\n\nThe exception is not a newly supplied automatic restart formula. **[C048.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.3)\n\nRule 5 distinguishes service completion, filing, and electronic-consent conditions. Rule 7’s ordinary fourteen-/seven-/two-day hearing-relative receipt schedule yields when another governing provision supplies a different period. It does not turn Rule 50(b)’s service deadline into a fourteen-day filing deadline or change Rule 59’s dual requirement. **[C049.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/5)\n\n## 8.4 Reconsideration, harmless error, and stays\n\nRule 11.2(b)(2) bars reconsideration of the specified orders on motions under Rules **50(a), 52(b), 55(c), 59(a), 59(e), 59.1, 60(a), and 60(b)**. Rule 50(b) is not listed there; that omission is not treated as a universal affirmative authorization or a way around another deadline. **[C050.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11.2)\n\nRule 61 requires attention to substantial rights and the stated justice qualification. An identified error is not automatically harmless or automatically grounds for a new trial. **[C051.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/61)\n\nRule 62(b) permits a stay on appropriate security terms while the listed post-trial motions are resolved. Merely requesting relief does not establish a stay. The rest of the judgment-enforcement and appellate-stay lifecycle remains outside this pass. **[C052.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/62)\n\n# 9. Source and usage register\n\nAll fresh reads occurred **October 28, 2026, Pacific time**. Short source IDs carry the prefix **S_ID-P25-**.\n\n## S001 — official Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure\n\n**Issuer/title:** Idaho Supreme Court, *Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure*.\n**Consolidated URL:** https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ircp\n\nThe print pages are usages of the same official rule collection, not independent corroborating authorities.\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Actual read bounds and use |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1 | Complete (a)–(c) in consolidated text; scope and local-rule qualifications |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2 | Complete computation/extension provisions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.3 | Complete proposed/entered-order notice and lack-of-notice clause |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.4 | Complete in consolidated text; court-initiative setting |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.5 | Complete in consolidated text; stipulated continuance |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.7 | Complete declaration incorporation; § 9-1406 not newly read |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/5 | Complete material later-paper service, filing, and proof clauses; fax mechanics not applied |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7 | Complete; reliance on motion form/timing/exception interface |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11.2 | Complete; substantive use limited to (b)(2), with surrounding limitation preserved |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/15 | Complete body inspected; substantive use limited to (b)(1)–(2) |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/16 | Complete (a)–(e); discovery/ADR merits not rerun |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/38 | Complete (a)–(d) |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/39 | Complete (a)–(c) |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/41 | Complete body inspected; substantive use limited to (b)(2)–(3) |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/42 | Complete consolidation/separate-trial provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/42.1 | Complete open-court/location provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/43 | Complete testimony provision; interpreter/other incorporations held as stated |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/46 | Complete objection/exception provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/47 | **Complete (a)–(m)** |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/48 | Complete mistrial provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/49 | **Complete (a)–(b)**, including published numbering |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/50 | **Complete (a)–(b)(5)** |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/51 | **Complete (a)–(i)** |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/52 | **Complete (a)–(c)** |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54 | Complete material (a)–(b)(1), (c); fee/cost schedule not applied |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/55 | Subsection (a)(3) and necessary surrounding context only |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/56 | Complete (a), (c)(4) for posture and Rule 59 affidavit incorporation only |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/58 | Complete entry provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59 | **Complete (a)–(e)** |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59.1 | Complete (a)–(b) |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/61 | Complete harmless-error provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/62 | Complete (a)–(b) for narrow stay boundary; other displayed branches not applied |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/63 | Complete inability-to-proceed provision |\n\n### Displayed rule history\n\nAll listed civil rules display adoption **March 1, 2016**, effective **July 1, 2016**. Additional displayed entries material to the source record:\n\n| Rule | Additional footer entries |\n| --- | --- |\n| 1 | April 30, 2024/effective same day; September 30, 2024/effective October 1, 2024 |\n| 2.2 and 11.2 | September 9, 2016/effective same day |\n| 15 | September 9, 2016/effective same day; May 5, 2017/effective July 1, 2017 |\n| 41 | May 5, 2017/effective July 1, 2017 |\n| 54 | April 27, 2016/July 1, 2016; October 6, 2016/March 1, 2017; April 17, 2017/nunc pro tunc March 1, 2017; December 14, 2017/January 1, 2018; April 28, 2021/July 1, 2021 |\n| 55 | September 9, 2016/effective same day |\n\nThese are **displayed source credits**. Original API-hosted orders were not opened, and a complete original amendment/application audit is not claimed.\n\n## S002 — official Idaho Constitution\n\n**Issuer/title:** Idaho Secretary of State, *Constitution of the State of Idaho*.\n**URL:** https://sos.idaho.gov/elections/publications/Idaho_Constitution.pdf\n\n**Publication label:** Last amended November 5, 2024.\n**Read:** Complete **Article I, § 7**; other visible text not used as an expanded constitutional report.\n**Pixels:** Printed page **2**, PDF index **7**.\n**Limit:** Original constitutional adoption/amendment history and debt-claim entitlement construction remain held.\n\n## S003 — official evidence rules, narrow trial interfaces\n\n**Issuer/title:** Idaho Supreme Court, *Idaho Rules of Evidence*.\n**Consolidated URL:** https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ire\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Actual read bounds |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/101 | Complete (a)–(f); scope exceptions only |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/103 | Complete ruling/offer/preservation provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/605 | Complete judge-as-witness restriction |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/606 | Complete juror testimony and verdict-validity exceptions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/611 | Complete control, cross-examination, and leading-question clauses |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/614 | Complete court-called/examined-witness provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/615 | Complete exclusion rule; criminal/child branches not applied |\n\n**Footers:** Rules 103, 605, 606, 611, 614, and 615 display March 26, 2018 adoption/July 1, 2018 effectiveness. Rule 101 displays its 1985 adoption and listed amendments through May 28, 2019.\n\n**Limit:** No full P23 authentication/hearsay/originals rerun. Privilege, expert, victim-rights, and original-order history remain held.\n\n## S004 — official record/reporting rules\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Actual read bounds | Displayed history |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/icar/25 | Complete (a)–(g); substantive use limited to recording, reporter qualification dependency, log/storage/transcription distinction | Adopted December 27, 1979/effective July 1, 1980; amended January 10, 2001/effective same day; December 2, 2015/effective July 1, 2016 |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/icar/27 | Complete body inspected; reliance on (a)–(e), (h); transcript-fee/request/office provisions not applied | March 15, 2004/July 1, 2004; January 3, 2008/March 1, 2008; March 29, 2010/May 1, 2010; September 9, 2016/effective same day |\n\n**Limits:** ICAR 21, 37, 38, 52, 71; § 1-2212; and the Rule 83(g) transcript-certification incorporation were not completed. No log form, transcript, fee estimate, or actual record was requested.\n\n## S005 — special small-claims boundaries\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Read bounds | Footer |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irsca/11 | Complete informal-proceeding/record provision | March 1, 2016/July 1, 2016 |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irsca/15 | Complete page inspected; substantive use confined to (c), (d)(2), (d)(6) | March 1, 2016/July 1, 2016; June 30, 2026/July 1, 2026 |\n\nNo small-claims monetary ceiling, fee, service, default, reconsideration, or appeal-merits revalidation is claimed.\n\n## S006 — government-hosted statutory compilation\n\n**Host/title:** Cassia County public website, *Title 2—Juries and Jurors, Chapter 2—Jury Selection and Service*.\n**URL:** https://www.cassia.gov/media/Jury/IC%20Title%202%20Chapter%202.pdf\n\n**Edition:** Undated compilation. It is not authenticated as the current Legislature’s official 2026 code.\n\n**Read:**\n\n- Complete §§ 2-202 and 2-203.\n- Necessary complete § 2-204(1)–(2).\n- Complete §§ 2-209, 2-211, and 2-212.\n- Adjacent provisions visible on pages were not used as a full jury-administration or jury-selection-challenge report.\n\n**Pixels:** Printed page 1/PDF index 0; printed pages 4–6/indices 3–5.\n\n**Displayed credits:** Section 2-202—1971 ch.169 §1 p.799; §2-203—1971 ch.169 §2 p.799; §2-204 amendments through 2005 ch.190 §1 p.583; §2-209 amendments through 2005 ch.190 §6 p.587. The compilation’s §2-212 credit ends in 2005, while the 2025 reproduction includes a 2019 amendment.\n\n**Limit:** Government hosting does not close edition, currentness, or original-enactment gaps. The differing history credits are retained.\n\n## S007 — dated jury-qualification reproductions\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Actual read | Displayed credits |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-2/chapter-2/section-2-209/ | Complete 2025 body (1)–(3), history, disclaimer | Added 1971 ch.169 §8 p.799; amendments 1972 ch.8 §1 p.12; 1981 ch.266 §1 p.565; 1996 ch.189 §1 p.598; 2002 ch.94 §4 p.259; 2005 ch.190 §6 p.587 |\n| https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-2/chapter-2/section-2-212/ | Complete 2025 body (1)–(3), history, disclaimer | Added 1971 ch.169 §11 p.799; amendments 1986 ch.295 §1 p.742; 2002 ch.94 §6 p.261; 2005 ch.190 §9 p.588; 2019 ch.222 §5 p.685 |\n\n**Status:** Secondary 2025 reproductions. No actual qualification, medical condition, criminal status, restoration of rights, or excusal was investigated.\n\n## S008 — access failures and official history locator\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Actual observation |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title2/T2CH2/SECT2-209/ | Fresh official statutory attempt inaccessible |\n| https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title10/T10CH1/SECT10-105/ | Historical jury-right locator attempt inaccessible; no operative entitlement derived |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments | Official page states incorporation of amendments on effective dates; retrieved response did not supply a completed original-order history |\n| API-hosted orders and forms | Not opened |\n\nThe county-hosted compilation was a materially different ordinary public route for generic jury statutes. No failed route was retried through guessed variants or access workarounds.\n\n## S009 — discovery-only version leads\n\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-10/chapter-1/\n\nThis chapter index was inspected only as a locator after the historical §10-105 lead. It was not used to prove repeal, absence of a jury right, or current statutory entitlement. Historical search results and incidental case/opinion results were not investigated or relied on.\n\n# 10. Atomic consequential-claim register\n\nShort IDs carry the prefix **S_ID-P25-**.\n\n| Claim | Precise proposition | Source/pinpoint | Status/limit |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **C001** | Official current rule bodies were read; statutory and original-history gaps remain. | S001–S009 | O/P/H |\n| **C002** | Ordinary, small-claims, de novo, default, summary, bench, and jury postures differ. | IRCP1; IRE101; Small-Claims11/15; Rule55(a)(3) | O/H |\n| **C003** | Scheduling action, scheduling order, and party trial-setting request have distinct triggers. | Rule16(a)–(b) | O |\n| **C004** | Pretrial process and date modification require their stated order/good-cause/approval conditions. | Rule16(a)(3),(c)–(d) | O |\n| **C005** | Continuance stipulations and trial amendments are not automatic. | Rules2.4–2.5,15(b) | O |\n| **C006** | Consolidation/separation must retain jury-right protections. | Rule42 | O |\n| **C007** | Jury entitlement derives from the Constitution/statute, not the generic debt label. | Art.I§7; Rule38(a) | O/H |\n| **C008** | Jury-demand service, filing, issue designation, and additional-issue timing differ. | Rule38(b)–(c) | O |\n| **C009** | Jury waiver and withdrawal require the stated conditions. | Rule38(d) | O |\n| **C010** | Demanded, discretionary, advisory, and consensual juries are separate branches. | Rule39 | O |\n| **C011** | Jury composition and civil verdict agreement depend on category and consent. | Art.I§7; Rule47(l) | O/H |\n| **C012** | Statutory qualification/excusal findings remain provisional and fact-dependent. | S006–S007 | P/H |\n| **C013** | Confidentiality and supervised selection do not authorize actual roster inquiry here. | Rule47(a)–(g) | O |\n| **C014** | Cause challenges have stated grounds, timing, unlimited count, and record conditions. | Rule47(h) | O/H |\n| **C015** | Peremptory allocation and waiver distinguish co-parties and sequential waiver. | Rule47(i) | O |\n| **C016** | Additional-juror counts and deliberation replacement have specific effects. | Rule47(j) | O |\n| **C017** | Juror notes, questions, sequestration and deliberation materials are controlled by separate clauses. | Rule47(k) | O |\n| **C018** | Open/remote testimony and interpreter provisions have express qualifications. | Rules42.1,43 | O/H |\n| **C019** | Judicial/juror testimony and witness exclusion are not unrestricted. | IRE605–606,611,614–615 | O/H |\n| **C020** | Required records, recordings, and official transcripts are distinct. | ICAR25,27 | O/H |\n| **C021** | Instruction timing includes receipt, late-request discretion, and close-of-evidence limits. | Rule51(a)–(b),(e) | O |\n| **C022** | Court-proposed/pattern/preliminary instructions retain their predicates. | Rule51(c)–(i) | O/H |\n| **C023** | Instruction and evidentiary preservation rules are issue-specific. | Rule51(f),(i)(3); Rule46; IRE103 | O/H |\n| **C024** | Verdict signatures, polling, further deliberations, acceptance, and discharge differ. | Rule47(m) | O |\n| **C025** | Special-verdict omitted issues have a pre-retirement demand and judicial-finding branch. | Rule49(a) | O |\n| **C026** | Verdict/answer inconsistencies have different mandatory/discretionary outcomes. | Rule49(b) | O |\n| **C027** | Mistrial and causal-expense consequences require separate findings. | Rule48 | O |\n| **C028** | Rule41(b)(2), not a federal-style52(c), supplies the read nonjury midtrial route. | Rule41(b)(2)–(3) | O |\n| **C029** | Bench/advisory findings and motion/default exceptions are distinct. | Rule52(a) | O |\n| **C030** | Sufficiency challenge and absence-of-findings preservation are different. | Rule52(a)(1),(6)–(7),(c) | O/H |\n| **C031** | Amended-findings motion has a filing deadline and discretionary consequence. | Rule52(b) | O |\n| **C032** | Directed-verdict text preserves specified evidence/jury rights and requires specific grounds. | Rule50(a) | O/H |\n| **C033** | JNOV has service-based deadlines and no prior-directed-verdict prerequisite in the rule. | Rule50(b)(1) | O |\n| **C034** | Joined/alternative relief is subject to the rule and Rule59(a). | Rule50(b)(2) | O/H |\n| **C035** | Conditional new-trial rulings and the displaced-verdict party’s motion have separate duties. | Rule50(b)(4) | O |\n| **C036** | Sufficiency-review preservation does not erase all trial-preservation rules. | Rule50(b)(3),(5) | O/H |\n| **C037** | All eight Rule59grounds retain their stated predicates. | Rule59(a)(1) | O |\n| **C038** | New-trial support and affidavit admissibility requirements differ by ground. | Rule59(a)(2),(c); Rule56(c)(4) | O/H |\n| **C039** | New-trial motion and affidavit periods use distinct filing/service events. | Rule59(b)–(c) | O |\n| **C040** | Nonjury new-trial relief can include additional testimony and new findings. | Rule59(a)(3) | O |\n| **C041** | Court initiative concerns timely notice of intent plus later hearing/order requirements. | Rule59(d) | O |\n| **C042** | Alter/amend requires both filing and service by the stated entry-based deadline. | Rule59(e) | O |\n| **C043** | Additur/remittitur acceptance and appellate-remittitur issuance are separate events. | Rule59.1 | O |\n| **C044** | Rule63’s substitute-judge authority has postverdict/postfindings predicates. | Rule63 | O |\n| **C045** | Verdict/findings, judgment form, entry, amendment, and finality differ. | Rules54(a)–(b),58 | O/H |\n| **C046** | Time computation is governed by complete Rule2.2conditions. | Rule2.2(a)–(b) | O |\n| **C047** | Nonextension and mail-addition provisions must not be collapsed. | Rule2.2(b)(3),(c); Rule59(c) | O/H |\n| **C048** | Lack of notice has a conjunctive exception, not a universal new period. | Rule2.3 | O/H |\n| **C049** | Service completion, receipt, filing and hearing schedules remain distinct. | Rules5,7 | O |\n| **C050** | Rule11.2’s listed reconsideration exclusions are not rewritten to include or authorize other motions. | Rule11.2(b)(2) | O/H |\n| **C051** | Harmless error requires the rule’s substantial-rights/justice analysis. | Rule61 | O/H |\n| **C052** | A post-trial request does not establish an automatic stay. | Rule62(a)–(b) | O/H |\n| **C053** | Displayed footers and government hosting do not complete original/current statutory history. | S001–S009 | Provenance limit |\n| **C054** | Federal, substantive, appellate, and special-regime dependencies remain open. | Section13 | H |\n| **C055** | No actual trial event or outcome was evaluated; previous holds remain. | Research record | Certain |\n| **C056** | Pretrial sanctions retain separate order/participation and expense predicates. | Rule16(e) | O/H |\n\n# 11. Quantity, event, exception, and counting register\n\nNo actual number of jurors, vote, amount, date, deadline, affidavit, or judgment is supplied.\n\n## 11.1 Setting and jury demand\n\n| Quantity/relation | Reference event or base | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Thirty days | Answer/appearance filed | Court scheduling action, not necessarily completed order |\n| Ninety days | Complaint filed with served defendant and no appearance | Alternative scheduling branch |\n| As soon as practicable | Scheduling order after court action | No fixed substitute date |\n| Seven days | Trial-setting request served | Response **filed and served** |\n| At least thirty days before trial | Final pretrial process | Formal conference not invariably required |\n| At least one attorney per represented party | Formal pretrial conference | Required authority; no person evaluated |\n| No universal numeric continuance period | Rule2.5 | Court may impose cutoff; stipulation not binding |\n| No later than fourteen days | Last pleading directed to jury issue served | Demand served and filed under Rule5(d) |\n| Fourteen days, or shorter court time | Limited jury demand served | Other jury-triable factual issues |\n| Fewer than twelve but at least six | Rule38demand-stipulation statement | Not substituted for every Rule47category |\n| Not more than six | Actions that may be assigned to magistrate division | Applies regardless of district/magistrate trial judge |\n| Twelve or agreed lesser number in open court | Other Rule47(l)cases | No actual agreement/count |\n| Three-fourths | Civil verdict threshold | No rounding or vote calculation |\n| Fourteen days after service of appeal-hearing notice | Small-claims de novo jury request | Separate route only |\n| Six, or fewer by agreement | Small-claims de novo jury | Not ordinary demand rule |\n\n## 11.2 Qualification, challenges, and management\n\n| Quantity/relation | Legal base/event | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Eighteen-year age condition | §2-209 qualification category | Other citizenship/residence/restoration predicates |\n| Two years following disqualification | §2-209(3) | Specified disability finding may support longer/permanent excusal |\n| Seventy or older | §2-212 request-based permanent excuse | Not automatic exclusion; reinstatement request branch |\n| Necessary period; no fixed duration | Statutory postponement | Required grounds and decision |\n| Within fourth degree | Rule47cause relationship | Computation law not completed |\n| No numerical limit | Challenges for cause | Proper ground/timing still required |\n| During questioning/by conclusion; later good cause | Cause-challenge timing | Not a fixed day period |\n| Four per party | Ordinary peremptories | Court allocation among co-parties |\n| One or two additional jurors | Additional-juror branch | One added peremptory per party |\n| More than two additional jurors | Alternate branch | Two added peremptories per party |\n| Final jurors + additional jurors + authorized peremptories | Optional struck-panel relation | Source-stated symbolic relation only |\n| All parties consecutively waive | Remaining peremptories lost/jury accepted | A single waiver alone has narrower effect |\n| End of closing arguments | Excess jurors removed by lot | Retention/custody conditions |\n| Replacement during deliberations | Restart deliberations | Prior deliberations disregarded |\n| No cost taxed for jury | Rule47(l) | Not a general fee/cost ruling |\n| More than one-fourth disagree | Verdict-return inquiry | Further deliberation required |\n| Three-fourths acknowledge on poll | Acceptance/discharge | No actual poll or fraction rounded |\n| All agree / not all agree | Foreperson signature versus all agreeing signatures | Written verdict required |\n| Fourteen days before proceeding or as soon as practicable | Rule43interpreter notice | ICAR52complete regime held |\n| No fixed time stated | Remote-testimony safeguards, exclusion rulings, jury-question response | Reasonableness and applicable conditions |\n\n## 11.3 Instructions and trial rulings\n\n| Quantity/relation | Reference event | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| No later than seven days before jury trial | Written instruction requests filed | Separate service/receipt requirement |\n| At least seven days before jury trial | Requests served **and received** | Not merely mailed |\n| Through and including close of evidence | Late unforeseen/overlooked instruction requests | Court permission |\n| Original and one copy | Instruction submission | Different content/numbering fields |\n| Close of evidence | Court ruling on requested instructions | Recorded/endorsed method |\n| Before trial | Preliminary-instruction conference | If those initial instructions are considered under rule |\n| Before jury deliberates | Instruction objection and distinct grounds | Not same event as special-verdict retirement demand |\n| Before final arguments | Final instructions read | After rulings/notice to parties |\n| Original and minimum two copies | Instructions furnished to deliberating jury | No constructed packet |\n| Before jury retires | Demand to submit omitted special-verdict issue | Otherwise statutory waiver/finding relation |\n| After trial begins, before verdict | Mistrial window | Fair-trial finding |\n| Reasonable causal expenses | Deliberate misconduct causing mistrial | Discretionary; no amount |\n| After plaintiff’s evidence | Rule41(b)(2)nonjury motion | Court may wait for all evidence |\n| After close of evidence | Oral Rule52findings option | Filed opinion/memorandum alternative |\n\n## 11.4 Post-trial motions\n\n| Quantity/relation | Required act and trigger | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| No later than fourteen days after judgment entry | **Serve** Rule50(b)(1)JNOV motion | Prior directed-verdict motion not required by text |\n| No later than fourteen days after jury discharge | **Serve** JNOV where no verdict returned | Different event |\n| No later than fourteen days after judgment entry | Displaced-verdict party **serves** Rule50(b)(4)(C)new-trial motion | Conditional ruling; waiver provision |\n| No later than fourteen days after judgment entry | **File** Rule52(b)motion | Court may amend/add findings/judgment |\n| Within fourteen days after judgment entry | **File and serve** Rule59(b)new-trial motion | Nonextendable category |\n| With new-trial motion | File and serve supporting affidavits | Ground-specific support requirements |\n| Fourteen days after service | File and serve opposing affidavits | Service-based event |\n| Up to twenty-one additional days | Opposing-affidavit extension | Court order or written stipulation |\n| No fixed period in clause | Reply affidavits | Court permission |\n| No later than fourteen days after judgment entry | Court gives Rule59(d)(1)**notice of intent** | Not automatically final-order deadline |\n| Before order granting new trial | Notice and opportunity to be heard | Grounds must be specified |\n| No later than fourteen days after entry | **File and serve** Rule59(e)alter/amend motion | Different from Rule52file-only wording |\n| Forty-two days from conditional order entry | Accept/reject additur or remittitur | Appeal-deferment clause |\n| Fourteen days from issuance of appellate remittitur | Postaffirmance accept/reject branch | Not service or trial-order entry |\n| After verdict or filed findings/conclusions | Rule63successor-judge duties | Not unrestricted midtrial substitution |\n| No separate numeric period | Rule52(c)appropriate-motion requirement | No borrowed deadline assigned to that clause |\n\n## 11.5 Computation and effect\n\n| Rule | Relation | Limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Rule2.2(a) | Exclude trigger day, count intermediates, qualified last-day extension | No actual calendar |\n| Clerk inaccessible | Filing extended to stated accessible day | Unless court orders otherwise |\n| General extension | Good cause; after-expiration excusable-neglect motion | Subject to listed nonextensions |\n| Nonextendable list | 50(b),52(b),59(b),(d),(e),60(b) | Rule60merits not completed |\n| Three additional days | Action due specified time after service **by mail** | Not added automatically to entry/discharge/remittitur issuance |\n| Rule7ordinary papers | Fourteen/seven/two days before hearing, **received** | Other rule/statute and good-cause exceptions |\n| At least one day before hearing | Denial of oral argument | No hearing result |\n| Immediately after entry | Clerk notice of order/judgment | Rule2.3exception preserved |\n| No recorded mailing **and** no actual notice | Lack-of-notice exception | No automatic new period supplied |\n| Reasonable causal expenses | Rule16sanction branch | Justification/injustice exceptions |\n| No fixed bond/security amount established | Rule62(b)stay | No actual stay |\n| March1/July1,2016 | Civil-rule footer baseline | Original orders unopened |\n| March26/July1,2018 | Selected evidence-rule footer baseline | Original history held |\n| November5,2024 | Constitution publication label | Not clause-specific amendment date |\n| 2025/undated | Statutory reproduction/compilation versions | Not official2026authentication |\n\nQuantities visible only in unrelied-on cost schedules, criminal rules, transcript-fee estimates, discovery provisions, or general appeal rules are not adopted into this component.\n\n# 12. Conditional branches and exact next inquiries\n\n| Branch | Missing predicate | Supported consequence | Adverse inference to avoid | Next generic inquiry |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **B01—ordinary scope** | Correct proceeding | Ordinary trial rules may apply | All civil proceedings identical | Governing special law |\n| **B02—setting** | Filed answer/appearance or alternative conditions | Rule16scheduling duty | Mandatory completed order by same day | Exact order/construction, no event assessed |\n| **B03—continuance** | Court approval/good cause or applicable authority | Possible date change | Party stipulation alone binds court | Rules2.5/16interaction |\n| **B04—jury right** | Constitutional/statutory issue classification | Preserved right | “Debt” automatically establishes jury entitlement | Current statutory and judicial construction |\n| **B05—demand** | Correct issue, last pleading, service and filing | Rule38effect | Any jury reference is sufficient | Rule38construction |\n| **B06—waiver/withdrawal** | Specific procedural or consent predicates | Rule38/39branch | Actual waiver from abstract facts | No actual determination |\n| **B07—composition** | Assignment-capable category and lawful agreement | Correct jury-size rule | One universal panel size | Constitution/Rule47construction |\n| **B08—qualification** | Statutory category and competent evidence | Defined decision process | Age/occupation/condition alone decides | Official statutes/restoration/disability law |\n| **B09—challenges** | Proper grounds, timing, allocation | Cause/peremptory procedure | Unlimited cause means no legal constraints | Constitutional challenge law |\n| **B10—alternates** | Lawful added-juror/replacement event | Stated counts and restart | Earlier deliberations automatically remain valid | Rule47application |\n| **B11—testimony** | Open/remote/exclusion predicates | Court-managed evidence presentation | Remote platform or exclusion request suffices | ICAR52 and evidence law |\n| **B12—record** | Applicable reporting branch | Required record/certification | Recording always equals official transcript | ICARincorporations |\n| **B13—instructions** | Applicable subject/request/timing | Rule51ruling framework | Late request always barred or always allowed | Pattern-instruction/current law |\n| **B14—preservation** | Actual ruling, opportunity, distinct objection | Specific preservation relation | Any objection preserves every issue | Rule46/51/IRE103construction |\n| **B15—special verdict** | Omitted factual issue and demand event | Waiver/judicial-finding branch | All omissions automatically require retrial | Rule49construction |\n| **B16—general plus answers** | Exact consistency category | Correct judicial options | Every inconsistency produces same remedy | Rule49classification |\n| **B17—bench dismissal** | Nonjury stage after plaintiff evidence | Rule41(b)(2)route | Federal52(c)automatically applies | Idaho substantive sufficiency standard |\n| **B18—findings** | Factual bench/advisory trial or other explicit duty | Required findings | Every motion requires findings | Rule52exceptions |\n| **B19—lack versus sufficiency** | Nature of asserted error | Different preservation rules | No-findings motion unnecessary for all issues | Rule52construction |\n| **B20—directed/JNOV** | Specific grounds and correct posture | Rule50route | Federal prerequisite imported | Idaho merits standard |\n| **B21—conditional ruling** | JNOVgrant and new-trial request | Mandatory conditional determination | Conditional order changes finality automatically | Rule50/appeal boundary |\n| **B22—new trial** | One complete ground, support and timing | Discretionary relief | Defeat alone proves error/misconduct | Rule59construction |\n| **B23—juror affidavit** | Permitted IRE606subject | Limited possible evidence | Jury-misconduct claim permits all deliberation inquiry | Privilege/constitutional law |\n| **B24—court initiative** | Timely notice and opportunity to be heard | Rule59(d)route | Final order necessarily due within same14days | Exact rule/application |\n| **B25—additur/remittitur** | Conditional new-trial order and appeal posture | Specific acceptance periods | Trial remittitur equals appellate remittitur | Full appellate law later |\n| **B26—alter/findings** | Correct motion and act | File-only versus file-and-serve distinction | All post-trial motions share one act |  |\n| **B27—computation** | Correct trigger and service method | Rule2.2application | Mail adds days to entry-based deadline | Applicable computation construction |\n| **B28—notice/stay** | Recorded mailing/actual notice or lawful stay | Limited exception/discretion | Request or lack of notice automatically suspends judgment | Full stay/appeal law |\n| **B29—history** | Original orders and official statute chain | Exact gap can close | Footer or county hosting proves complete history | Ordinary official source recovery |\n| **B30—actual outcome** | Facts, orders, lawful proof and claim law | No outcome supplied | Generic rule is operational permission | Separate authorized application, not performed |\n\n# 13. Exact remaining dependencies\n\n| Separate subject | Required later generic authority |\n| --- | --- |\n| Substantive debt and damages | Contract, assignment, instruments, licensing, sector rules, lawful charges, burden of proof, damages and offsets |\n| Jury entitlement construction | Legal/equitable classifications, mixed issues, constitutional history, specific statutory rights and proper composition |\n| Juror qualifications | Current official §§2-209/2-212, restoration statutes, constitutional ArticleVI§3, disability/discrimination and applicable federal law |\n| Jury selection/privacy | Full statutory selection challenge, protected-class challenge law, questionnaire access, public-record and confidentiality rules |\n| Jury instructions | Current IDJI edition and relevant substantive instruction authority; no actual instruction selected |\n| Evidence/experts | Full privilege, authentication, hearsay, expert and specific evidentiary questions; no P23rerun |\n| Interpreters and accommodations | Complete ICAR52, applicable disability/language law, authority and cost allocation |\n| Records and exhibits | ICAR21,37,38,71; §1-2212; transcript-certification forms and current Rule83relationship |\n| Declarations | Current official §9-1406, foreign declaration and electronic-record rules |\n| Sanctions/contempt | Full Rule37incorporation and constitutional/procedural limits; causal fees and actual misconduct not determined |\n| Finality and appellate review | Complete Idaho Appellate Rules, appeal periods, tolling, preservation, standards, remittitur and mandate effects |\n| Stay and enforcement | Full Rule62, judgment duration/renewal, liens, execution, exemptions, satisfaction and discharge |\n| Rule60 | Separate grounds, timing and independent-action interfaces; not a substitute for the present post-trial rules |\n| Protected parties/federal | Bankruptcy, SCRA, capacity, representation, disability, federal collection/reporting and other special statutes |\n| Local/tribal/interstate | Valid local rules/orders, sovereignty, jurisdiction and conflicts |\n| Original history | Original court orders, statutory enactments/amendments/application/savings provisions |\n\n**[C053–C054.]** No regime is declared inapplicable because it was not completed.\n\n# 14. Wholly blank conceptual worksheet\n\n| Field | Entry |\n| --- | --- |\n| Governing proceeding |  |\n| Authority and edition |  |\n| Official-current-text status |  |\n| Special-proceeding exclusion |  |\n| Trial-setting trigger |  |\n| Scheduling-order requirement |  |\n| Modification/continuance condition |  |\n| Jury-right source |  |\n| Jury-demand issue and trigger |  |\n| Service/filing distinction |  |\n| Waiver/withdrawal condition |  |\n| Composition provision |  |\n| Advisory/consensual-jury branch |  |\n| Qualification dependency |  |\n| Challenge provision |  |\n| Record requirement |  |\n| Testimony/interpreter condition |  |\n| Instruction-request requirement |  |\n| Instruction-preservation condition |  |\n| Verdict form/category |  |\n| Polling/discharge condition |  |\n| Inconsistency branch |  |\n| Nonjury midtrial provision |  |\n| Findings requirement |  |\n| Findings-amendment provision |  |\n| Directed-verdict/JNOV provision |  |\n| Conditional-ruling requirement |  |\n| New-trial ground |  |\n| Supporting-material requirement |  |\n| Alter/amend provision |  |\n| Additur/remittitur event |  |\n| Computation/nonextension rule |  |\n| Notice/stay boundary |  |\n| Missing primary authority |  |\n| Review status |  |\n\nNo field is completed.\n\n# 15. Granular coverage, read log, and self-check\n\n## 15.1 Coverage\n\n| Requested issue | Disposition | Claims/sources | Exact remaining gap |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **1—ordinary trial scope** | Official rules read | C002; S001,S003,S005 | Specialized actual application |\n| District/magistrate | Relevant distinctions preserved | C002,C011,C020 | No assignment investigation |\n| Small claims/de novo | Narrow fresh comparison | S005 | No small-claims merits rerun |\n| Setting/pretrial/modification | Complete material rules | C003–C005 | Actual order and good cause absent |\n| Consolidation/separation | Complete Rule42 | C006 | No common-issue/prejudice finding |\n| Continuance | Rule2.5andRule16conditions | C005 | No universal fixed request period |\n| **2—jury right** | Constitution and Rules38–39read | C007–C010 | Specific claim entitlement and history |\n| Demand/issues/withdrawal | Complete clauses | C008–C009 | No actual pleading/service/consent |\n| Advisory/consensual/nonjury | Distinguished | C010 | No actual election |\n| Composition/majority | Complete material rule/constitutional text | C011 | Actual category/rounding not determined |\n| **3—empanelment** | Complete Rule47 | C012–C017 | Current statutory incorporations |\n| Qualification/excusal | Provisional text with limits | S006–S007 | Original/current statute chain |\n| Judge/jury/witness roles | Narrow evidence rules read | C018–C019 | Full evidence/privilege law |\n| Record/testimony | Complete necessary rules | C020 | Recorder/interpreter/exhibit incorporations |\n| Instructions/preservation | Complete Rule51andnecessaryrules | C021–C023 | Current IDJI/substantive law |\n| **4—verdicts/polling** | Complete material clauses | C024–C026 | No vote/verdict supplied |\n| Inconsistencies | Separate branches retained | C026 | Judicial reconciliation construction |\n| Bench findings | Complete Rule52 | C029–C031 | No actual factfinding |\n| Nonjury partial decision | Actual Rule41(b)(2)identified | C028 | No federal52(c)substitution |\n| **5—Rule50** | Complete body read | C032–C036 | Merits standard/judicial construction |\n| Rule52amendment | Complete body read | C031 | No actual motion |\n| Rule59grounds/support/timing | Complete body read | C037–C042 | No actual proof or ground |\n| Conditional rulings | Complete Rule50/59.1branches | C035,C043 | Full appeal law held |\n| Successor judge | Complete Rule63 | C044 | No actual inability |\n| Rule56/60distinction | Narrow boundaries retained | C002,C047,C054 | No rerun or imported standards |\n| **6—judgment form/entry** | Narrow complete interface | C045 | Full lifecycle excluded |\n| Computation/mail/nonextension | Complete Rule2.2 | C046–C049 | No calendar |\n| Reconsideration/harmless error | Exact limited text | C050–C051 | No actual preservation/outcome |\n| Stay/appeal | Necessary boundary only | C052 | Full regime held |\n| Other substantive/federal/local law | Exact dependencies | C054; Section13 | No broad overview counted |\n| **7—literal sources/history** | Complete visible register | Section9 | Original orders/statutes incomplete |\n| Current/provisional/history distinction | Preserved | C053 | No no-change certification |\n| PDF text/pixels | Separately logged below | S002,S006 | No unviewed-page claim |\n| Quantities/branches/worksheet | Supplied visibly | Sections11–14 | No inputs/forms/calendar |\n| Prior findings and Rule40Q001 | Preserved; not reopened | C055 | No earlier hold closed |\n| Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent | **Not accepted complete** | Entire report | Exact remaining boundaries |\n\n## 15.2 Actual read/search/failure log\n\n| Material | Actual use |\n| --- | --- |\n| Official IRCP bodies | Complete or expressly bounded clauses listed in S001 |\n| Official constitutional PDF | Complete ArticleI§7, visually inspected |\n| Official IRE/ICAR bodies | Necessary trial, record and juror-evidence interfaces |\n| Official small-claims rules | Narrow distinction only |\n| Official statutory routes | Fresh failures recorded in S008 |\n| Materially different public source | Undated government-hosted jury-statute compilation |\n| Dated secondary statutes | Complete §§2-209and2-212with histories/disclaimers |\n| Official amendment index | Current-publication statement; original orders not recovered |\n| Historical jury-right leads | Discovery only; no repeal or entitlement conclusion |\n| Cases/opinions/dockets | Incidental results not opened or relied on |\n| Juror rosters/questionnaires/medical data | Not queried or examined |\n| Actual trial orders, evidence, affidavits, motions, verdicts, judgments | Not supplied, constructed, or evaluated |\n| Prior saved reports/local metadata | Supplied exclusions only; not substantive authority |\n\n## 15.3 PDF text versus pixels\n\n| PDF | Parsed/read scope | Pixels inspected |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Official Idaho Constitution | ArticleI§7 | Printedp.2/PDFindex7 |\n| County-hosted Title2compilation | Selected complete provisions identified in S006 | Printedpp.1,4,5,6/indices0,3,4,5 |\n| Original court orders | Not opened | None |\n| Failed official statutory routes | No operative body | None |\n\nNo adopted original, unviewed page, or actual jury record is represented as visually inspected. HTML and print versions of one instrument are not independent corroboration.\n\n## 15.4 Researcher self-check\n\nThe strongest completed findings are the **current rule-text distinctions**: jury-right source versus demand procedure; general versus special verdicts; the Idaho nonjury Rule 41(b)(2) route; directed verdict and JNOV without a mandatory prior directed-verdict motion; findings versus absence-of-findings preservation; and the separate service, filing, entry, discharge, notice-of-intent, and appellate-remittitur events.\n\nThe principal remaining gaps are original adoption history, current official statutory qualification text, substantive entitlement and burdens, referenced forms/instructions and special regimes, and judicial construction.\n\nNo actual or invented party, lawyer, witness, juror, panel, account, debt, evidence, record, order, case, event, motion, verdict, judgment, amount, or date was supplied or constructed. No jury entitlement, waiver, challenge, admissibility, preservation, liability, relief, deadline, or outcome was determined.\n\nThis is a **researcher self-check, not independent review**. The component is supported by newly read official rules and constitutional text, but remains **conditional at the exact statutory, historical, incorporation, construction, and actual-application boundaries recorded above**. Earlier findings and holds remain preserved. No Idaho, dimension4, A066, parent, operational, or publication acceptance follows.\n\nEND S_ID PASS-25.\n\n","tables":[{"headers":["Posture","Newly read authority","Distinction"],"index":0,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Posture","Newly read authority","Distinction"],["Ordinary district or magistrate civil action","IRCP 1(b)","The ordinary civil rules apply within their scope; assignment and substantive entitlement remain separate."],["Original small claims","IRCP 1(b); IRE 101(e)(5); Small-Claims Rule 11","Special rules govern. The ordinary evidence rules are excluded except privilege, and the original hearing’s informal procedure is not imported into ordinary civil trials."],["Small-claims de novo appeal","Small-Claims Rule 15(c), (d)(2), (d)(6)","A separate proceeding with its own jury-request and composition provisions."],["Bench trial","Rules 39, 41(b)(2), 52","The court performs the prescribed factfinding function and makes required findings."],["Advisory jury","Rules 39(c), 52(a)(1)","Advisory input does not replace the court’s required findings."],["Consensual jury on an issue without an entitlement as of right","Rule 39(c)(2)","Requires party consent and has the stated verdict effect."],["Summary judgment","Rule 56(a)","A separate pretrial/adjudicative test; not a trial verdict or a default."],["Default","Rule 55","Separate predicates and safeguards; not rerun here."],["Responsive pleading followed by nonparticipation at trial","Rule 55(a)(3)","An uncontested trial, not a Rule 55 default hearing."],["Special proceedings","IRCP 1(b); IRE 101(d)–(e)","Enumerated special, family, treatment, and other exceptions remain separate."]]},{"headers":["Event","Source-stated relationship"],"index":1,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Event","Source-stated relationship"],["Answer or notice of appearance filed","Within thirty days, the court must take the specified scheduling action."],["Complaint filed, at least one defendant served, no appearance","Alternative ninety-day scheduling-action branch."],["Resulting scheduling order","Filed as soon as practicable after the court’s action; must address trial/pretrial dates and the other required subjects."],["Court has not set a scheduling conference or trial after all defendants appear","A party may make the Rule 16(b) request."],["Response to that request","Filed and served within seven days after service of the request."],["After response time passes","Court must issue the scheduling order or set the request for hearing."],["Final pretrial process","At least thirty days before trial; a formal conference is one permitted method, not the only method."]]},{"headers":["Subject","Operative condition","Limit"],"index":2,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Subject","Operative condition","Limit"],["Trial/pretrial dates","Leave of court and good cause under Rule 16(a)(3)","Agreement alone is not stated to modify those dates."],["Other scheduling deadlines in Rule 16(a)(2)(B)","Leave and good cause, or all-party stipulation and court approval","Not an automatic unilateral extension."],["Formal pretrial conference","On the record; at least one attorney for each represented party must have the specified stipulation/admission authority","No actual representative’s authority is determined."],["Witness/exhibit lists","Court may order them; later discoveries must be supplemented as stated","Untimely exclusion is discretionary, with the good-cause and prevention-of-injustice qualification."],["Amendments during trial","Rule 15(b) distinguishes objection-based amendment from express/implied consent to an unpleaded issue","Continuance may be allowed; consent or prejudice is not assumed."],["Trial or hearing set on court’s initiative","Rule 2.4 requires the stated rule-compliant notice","A setting is not an evidentiary or merits ruling."],["Stipulated continuance/vacatur","Rule 2.5 treats it as a joint motion, not a binding agreement on the court","Court may approve, deny, or impose a cutoff; no universal numerical request period is supplied."],["Consolidation or separate trials","Rule 42 uses common questions, convenience, prejudice, expedition/economy, and preservation of jury rights","Consolidation does not itself merge substantive entitlements or establish liability."]]},{"headers":["Branch","Exact procedural relation"],"index":3,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Branch","Exact procedural relation"],["Initial demand","Written demand served no later than fourteen days after service of the last pleading directed to the issue, and filed under Rule 5(d)."],["Composition statement in demand","Must state whether the demanding party will stipulate to fewer than twelve but at least six."],["Demand specifying no issues","Treated as a demand for all issues triable by jury."],["Demand specifying only some issues","Another party may serve a demand for other or all jury-triable factual issues within fourteen days after service of the limited demand, or a shorter court-ordered time."],["Waiver","Rule 38(d) ties waiver to a demand not properly served and filed."],["Withdrawal","A proper demand may be withdrawn only with the parties’ consent."]]},{"headers":["Situation","Result supplied by the rule"],"index":4,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Situation","Result supplied by the rule"],["Proper demand on an issue triable by right","Jury trial unless the parties/attorneys stipulate as prescribed or the court finds no right on the issue."],["No proper demand","Court trial, but the court may order a jury trial on motion for an issue for which a jury could have been demanded."],["No jury right","Court may use an advisory jury."],["No jury right, but party consent","Court may use a jury whose verdict has the stated effect of a verdict as of right."]]},{"headers":["Issue","Statutory actor/predicate"],"index":5,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Issue","Statutory actor/predicate"],["Language ability or disabling inability to perform satisfactory service","Administrative district judge or designee, using the specified competent information; the medical-certificate branch has its own conditions."],["Citizenship, age, county residence, felony/restoration category","Clerk or jury commissioner under the stated proof framework."],["Disqualification duration","Generally two years under § 2-209; the specified disability finding permits longer or permanent excusal."],["Age seventy or older","Permanent excusal if the person indicates the stated wish; written request can restore the person to the list."],["Postponement","The specified hardship, inconvenience, public-necessity, or breastfeeding category, with written information and court/commission determination."],["Postponement duration","As deemed necessary; no fixed universal number of days."]]},{"headers":["Category","Material rule"],"index":6,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Category","Material rule"],["Cause timing","During questioning or by its stated conclusion; later challenge requires court-permitted good cause."],["Cause grounds","Statutory disqualification; specified relationship within the fourth degree; listed personal/business/fiduciary relationships; prior jury/witness/subpoena involvement in the same-party/same-cause trial; monetary interest; unqualified merits belief based on facts; hostility or bias."],["Cause count","No numerical limit; co-parties need not join."],["Cause decision","Tried by the court; replacement follows the rule."],["Record","Entire voir dire and challenge rulings reported verbatim unless all parties stipulate otherwise on the record."],["Ordinary peremptories","Four per party after cause challenges."],["Co-parties","Court allocates based on the degree of conflicting interest; equal, unequal, shared, or full allocations are possible."],["Waiver of one peremptory","Waives that challenge only."],["Consecutive waiver by all parties","Remaining peremptories are waived and the jury is deemed accepted."]]},{"headers":["Rule","Trial-management boundary"],"index":7,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Rule","Trial-management boundary"],["IRE 611","Reasonable court control of testimony; scope and leading-question qualifications"],["IRE 614","Court may call a witness when it is the trier of fact; parties may cross-examine; the court may examine any witness, with the stated objection opportunities"],["IRE 615","Court may exclude witnesses, subject to natural-party, designated representative, essential-person, and other stated exceptions"],["IRE 605","Presiding judge cannot testify at that trial; objection is not needed to preserve that issue"],["IRE 606(a)","Juror testimony before the other jurors is prohibited, with the specified opportunity to object outside their presence"],["IRE 606(b)","Deliberative/vote/mental-process evidence is restricted; extraneous information, outside influence, resort to chance, and verdict-form mistake have separate exceptions"]]},{"headers":["Court setting","Source-stated record rule"],"index":8,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Court setting","Source-stated record rule"],["Magistrate division","ICAR 25 requires a verbatim record or recording; logs, storage, transcription, and unread statutory reporter qualifications have separate conditions."],["District court","ICAR 27(a) requires certified reporter attendance for civil trials unless waived in the prescribed manner."],["Electronic recording","ICAR 27(c) generally requires it; the reporter-present/good-cause exception and emergency-absence branches remain."],["Official transcript","A certified transcript meeting ICAR 27(d) differs from a raw recording or realtime display."],["Jury selection and instructions","Rules 47(h)(4) and 51(f) contain their own record requirements."]]},{"headers":["Event","Rule 51 condition"],"index":9,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Event","Rule 51 condition"],["Initial written requests","Filed no later than seven days before jury trial; served and received at least seven days before trial."],["Late request","Court need not consider it; unforeseen or overlooked matters may be permitted through and including close of evidence."],["Court-proposed instructions","Adequate time to consider and object outside the jury’s presence."],["Submission format","Original and copy; citations on the copy; specified numbering/ruling fields. No form was created."],["Ruling","At close of evidence, on record or endorsed as prescribed."],["Objections/rulings","Must be made part of the record."],["Pattern instructions","If the latest IDJI has an applicable instruction and the court decides the subject should be charged, the court should use it unless a different instruction is more adequate, accurate, or clear."],["Preliminary instructions","Permissible; instruction conference before trial is required for their consideration."],["Preservation","Distinct objection and grounds before the jury deliberates."],["Final delivery","Written instructions read before final arguments; jury receives original and at least two copies."],["Jury follow-up question","Written request; recorded response; party opportunity to be present/heard when available within a reasonable time."]]},{"headers":["Situation","Consequence"],"index":10,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Situation","Consequence"],["All jurors agree","Written verdict signed by the foreperson."],["Not all agree","Written verdict signed by all agreeing jurors."],["Return","Jury brought into court; verdict delivered and read; inquiry whether it is their verdict."],["More than one-fourth disagree","Court returns jury for further deliberation."],["Poll requested","Court or clerk asks each juror."],["Three-fourths acknowledge","Verdict accepted and jury discharged under the rule."]]},{"headers":["Branch","Rule 49 consequence"],"index":11,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Branch","Rule 49 consequence"],["Special verdict","Court may require written fact findings, with necessary explanations/instructions."],["Omitted factual issue","Unless submission is demanded before the jury retires, the stated jury right on that issue is waived. Court may find it; absent a finding, the rule supplies the judgment-consistency treatment."],["General verdict and answers all consistent","Court must direct appropriate judgment."],["Answers mutually consistent but one or more conflicts with general verdict","Court may enter judgment according to answers, return the matter to the jury, or order new trial."],["Answers conflict with each other and one or more also conflicts with verdict","Judgment must not be entered; further jury consideration or new trial is required."]]},{"headers":["Predicate/event","Rule consequence"],"index":12,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Predicate/event","Rule consequence"],["Nonjury action after presentation of plaintiff’s evidence","Defendant may seek dismissal because the facts and law show no right to relief."],["Motion denied","Defendant’s right to present evidence is not waived."],["Court action","May determine facts and enter judgment, or await all evidence."],["Merits judgment against plaintiff","Rule 52 findings required."],["Rule 41(b)(3) effect","Unless otherwise stated, the specified dismissal operates on the merits, with the stated jurisdiction and Rule 19 exceptions."]]},{"headers":["Rule 50 branch","Complete material relation"],"index":13,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Rule 50 branch","Complete material relation"],["Directed verdict","Motion must state specific grounds."],["Motion at close of opponent’s evidence","If denied, moving party may offer evidence without a reservation."],["Jury right","Denial does not waive jury trial, even if all parties moved."],["Grant","Order is effective without jury agreement."],["JNOV after judgment","Must be served no later than fourteen days after entry."],["No verdict returned","Must be served no later than fourteen days after jury discharge."],["Prior directed-verdict motion","Not required by Rule 50(b)(1)."]]},{"headers":["Event","Rule 50 relationship"],"index":14,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Event","Rule 50 relationship"],["JNOV motion plus new-trial request","May be joined or pleaded alternatively, conforming to Rule 59(a)."],["Motion to set aside/nullify verdict or for new trial","Includes the rule’s JNOV alternative. This is not a blanket cure for untimeliness or missing grounds."],["Verdict returned","Court may leave judgment, reopen and order new trial, or direct judgment as authorized."],["No verdict","Court may direct judgment or new trial."],["JNOV granted with new-trial motion","Court must rule conditionally on new trial in case of later vacatur/reversal."],["Conditional grant","Grounds must be specified; finality of the judgment is not altered by that conditional order."],["Party whose verdict is set aside","Separate opportunity to serve a new-trial motion no later than fourteen days after judgment entry; conditional ruling required."],["Failure under that subsection","Waiver of the right to apply for new trial under the stated provision."]]},{"headers":["Subdivision","Ground and material qualification"],"index":15,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Subdivision","Ground and material qualification"],["A","Irregularity in court, jury, or adverse-party proceedings"],["B","Court order or abuse of discretion preventing a fair trial"],["C","Jury misconduct"],["D","Accident or surprise that ordinary prudence could not have guarded against"],["E","Material newly discovered evidence that reasonable diligence could not have discovered and produced at trial"],["F","Excessive or inadequate damages appearing influenced by passion or prejudice"],["G","Evidentiary insufficiency to justify verdict/decision, or decision against law"],["H","Legal error occurring at trial"]]},{"headers":["Provision","Requirement"],"index":16,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Provision","Requirement"],["Grounds A–E","Motion accompanied by an affidavit detailing relied-on facts."],["Grounds G–H","Particular factual grounds must be stated."],["Ground F","The rule does not place it in those two specified support lists; that does not establish an evidence-free entitlement."],["New-trial motion","Filed and served within fourteen days after judgment entry."],["Supporting affidavits","Filed and served with the motion."],["Opposing affidavits","Filed and served within fourteen days after service."],["Opposing-affidavit extension","Up to twenty-one additional days by court order or written stipulation."],["Reply affidavits","Court may permit."],["All Rule 59 affidavits","Must satisfy Rule 56(c)(4)."]]},{"headers":["Event","Rule 59(d) consequence"],"index":17,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Event","Rule 59(d) consequence"],["No later than fourteen days after judgment entry","Court may give notice of intent to order a new trial."],["That notice","Treated as a new-trial motion for the stated civil/appellate purposes."],["Timely served party motion","Court may grant on a reason not stated in the motion."],["Before new-trial order","Notice and opportunity to be heard required."],["Order granting new trial","Must specify grounds."]]},{"headers":["Branch","Period and event"],"index":18,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Branch","Period and event"],["Ordinary acceptance/rejection","Forty-two days from entry of the conditional order"],["Notice of appeal filed","Does not itself accept or reject; choice deferred until appeal determination"],["Successful appeal","Further proceedings follow appellate opinion"],["Conditional new-trial order affirmed","Fourteen days from issuance of the appellate remittitur"]]},{"headers":["Issue","Rule 2.2"],"index":19,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Issue","Rule 2.2"],["Trigger day","Excluded"],["Intermediate days","Included, including weekends and legal holidays"],["Last day","Included, subject to weekend/holiday extension"],["Clerk inaccessibility","Filing extension to the stated accessible nonweekend/nonholiday day unless otherwise ordered"],["Before expiration","Good-cause extension under the stated request/action conditions"],["After expiration","Motion and excusable-neglect condition"],["Written stipulation","Subject to court-business/convenience limits and other governing provisions"],["Nonextendable periods","Court must not extend Rule 50(b), 52(b), 59(b), (d), (e), or 60(b) periods"],["Mail addition","Three days only when the act is due a specified time after service and service is by mail"]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds and use"],"index":20,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds and use"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1","Complete (a)–(c) in consolidated text; scope and local-rule qualifications"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2","Complete computation/extension provisions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.3","Complete proposed/entered-order notice and lack-of-notice clause"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.4","Complete in consolidated text; court-initiative setting"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.5","Complete in consolidated text; stipulated continuance"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.7","Complete declaration incorporation; § 9-1406 not newly read"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/5","Complete material later-paper service, filing, and proof clauses; fax mechanics not applied"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7","Complete; reliance on motion form/timing/exception interface"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11.2","Complete; substantive use limited to (b)(2), with surrounding limitation preserved"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/15","Complete body inspected; substantive use limited to (b)(1)–(2)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/16","Complete (a)–(e); discovery/ADR merits not rerun"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/38","Complete (a)–(d)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/39","Complete (a)–(c)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/41","Complete body inspected; substantive use limited to (b)(2)–(3)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/42","Complete consolidation/separate-trial provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/42.1","Complete open-court/location provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/43","Complete testimony provision; interpreter/other incorporations held as stated"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/46","Complete objection/exception provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/47","Complete (a)–(m)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/48","Complete mistrial provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/49","Complete (a)–(b), including published numbering"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/50","Complete (a)–(b)(5)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/51","Complete (a)–(i)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/52","Complete (a)–(c)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54","Complete material (a)–(b)(1), (c); fee/cost schedule not applied"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/55","Subsection (a)(3) and necessary surrounding context only"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/56","Complete (a), (c)(4) for posture and Rule 59 affidavit incorporation only"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/58","Complete entry provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59","Complete (a)–(e)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59.1","Complete (a)–(b)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/61","Complete harmless-error provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/62","Complete (a)–(b) for narrow stay boundary; other displayed branches not applied"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/63","Complete inability-to-proceed provision"]]},{"headers":["Rule","Additional footer entries"],"index":21,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Rule","Additional footer entries"],["1","April 30, 2024/effective same day; September 30, 2024/effective October 1, 2024"],["2.2 and 11.2","September 9, 2016/effective same day"],["15","September 9, 2016/effective same day; May 5, 2017/effective July 1, 2017"],["41","May 5, 2017/effective July 1, 2017"],["54","April 27, 2016/July 1, 2016; October 6, 2016/March 1, 2017; April 17, 2017/nunc pro tunc March 1, 2017; December 14, 2017/January 1, 2018; April 28, 2021/July 1, 2021"],["55","September 9, 2016/effective same day"]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds"],"index":22,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/101","Complete (a)–(f); scope exceptions only"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/103","Complete ruling/offer/preservation provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/605","Complete judge-as-witness restriction"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/606","Complete juror testimony and verdict-validity exceptions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/611","Complete control, cross-examination, and leading-question clauses"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/614","Complete court-called/examined-witness provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/615","Complete exclusion rule; criminal/child branches not applied"]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds","Displayed history"],"index":23,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds","Displayed history"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/icar/25","Complete (a)–(g); substantive use limited to recording, reporter qualification dependency, log/storage/transcription distinction","Adopted December 27, 1979/effective July 1, 1980; amended January 10, 2001/effective same day; December 2, 2015/effective July 1, 2016"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/icar/27","Complete body inspected; reliance on (a)–(e), (h); transcript-fee/request/office provisions not applied","March 15, 2004/July 1, 2004; January 3, 2008/March 1, 2008; March 29, 2010/May 1, 2010; September 9, 2016/effective same day"]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Read bounds","Footer"],"index":24,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Read bounds","Footer"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irsca/11","Complete informal-proceeding/record provision","March 1, 2016/July 1, 2016"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irsca/15","Complete page inspected; substantive use confined to (c), (d)(2), (d)(6)","March 1, 2016/July 1, 2016; June 30, 2026/July 1, 2026"]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read","Displayed credits"],"index":25,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read","Displayed credits"],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-2/chapter-2/section-2-209/","Complete 2025 body (1)–(3), history, disclaimer","Added 1971 ch.169 §8 p.799; amendments 1972 ch.8 §1 p.12; 1981 ch.266 §1 p.565; 1996 ch.189 §1 p.598; 2002 ch.94 §4 p.259; 2005 ch.190 §6 p.587"],["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-2/chapter-2/section-2-212/","Complete 2025 body (1)–(3), history, disclaimer","Added 1971 ch.169 §11 p.799; amendments 1986 ch.295 §1 p.742; 2002 ch.94 §6 p.261; 2005 ch.190 §9 p.588; 2019 ch.222 §5 p.685"]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual observation"],"index":26,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual observation"],["https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title2/T2CH2/SECT2-209/","Fresh official statutory attempt inaccessible"],["https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title10/T10CH1/SECT10-105/","Historical jury-right locator attempt inaccessible; no operative entitlement derived"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments","Official page states incorporation of amendments on effective dates; retrieved response did not supply a completed original-order history"],["API-hosted orders and forms","Not opened"]]},{"headers":["Claim","Precise proposition","Source/pinpoint","Status/limit"],"index":27,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claim","Precise proposition","Source/pinpoint","Status/limit"],["C001","Official current rule bodies were read; statutory and original-history gaps remain.","S001–S009","O/P/H"],["C002","Ordinary, small-claims, de novo, default, summary, bench, and jury postures differ.","IRCP1; IRE101; Small-Claims11/15; Rule55(a)(3)","O/H"],["C003","Scheduling action, scheduling order, and party trial-setting request have distinct triggers.","Rule16(a)–(b)","O"],["C004","Pretrial process and date modification require their stated order/good-cause/approval conditions.","Rule16(a)(3),(c)–(d)","O"],["C005","Continuance stipulations and trial amendments are not automatic.","Rules2.4–2.5,15(b)","O"],["C006","Consolidation/separation must retain jury-right protections.","Rule42","O"],["C007","Jury entitlement derives from the Constitution/statute, not the generic debt label.","Art.I§7; Rule38(a)","O/H"],["C008","Jury-demand service, filing, issue designation, and additional-issue timing differ.","Rule38(b)–(c)","O"],["C009","Jury waiver and withdrawal require the stated conditions.","Rule38(d)","O"],["C010","Demanded, discretionary, advisory, and consensual juries are separate branches.","Rule39","O"],["C011","Jury composition and civil verdict agreement depend on category and consent.","Art.I§7; Rule47(l)","O/H"],["C012","Statutory qualification/excusal findings remain provisional and fact-dependent.","S006–S007","P/H"],["C013","Confidentiality and supervised selection do not authorize actual roster inquiry here.","Rule47(a)–(g)","O"],["C014","Cause challenges have stated grounds, timing, unlimited count, and record conditions.","Rule47(h)","O/H"],["C015","Peremptory allocation and waiver distinguish co-parties and sequential waiver.","Rule47(i)","O"],["C016","Additional-juror counts and deliberation replacement have specific effects.","Rule47(j)","O"],["C017","Juror notes, questions, sequestration and deliberation materials are controlled by separate clauses.","Rule47(k)","O"],["C018","Open/remote testimony and interpreter provisions have express qualifications.","Rules42.1,43","O/H"],["C019","Judicial/juror testimony and witness exclusion are not unrestricted.","IRE605–606,611,614–615","O/H"],["C020","Required records, recordings, and official transcripts are distinct.","ICAR25,27","O/H"],["C021","Instruction timing includes receipt, late-request discretion, and close-of-evidence limits.","Rule51(a)–(b),(e)","O"],["C022","Court-proposed/pattern/preliminary instructions retain their predicates.","Rule51(c)–(i)","O/H"],["C023","Instruction and evidentiary preservation rules are issue-specific.","Rule51(f),(i)(3); Rule46; IRE103","O/H"],["C024","Verdict signatures, polling, further deliberations, acceptance, and discharge differ.","Rule47(m)","O"],["C025","Special-verdict omitted issues have a pre-retirement demand and judicial-finding branch.","Rule49(a)","O"],["C026","Verdict/answer inconsistencies have different mandatory/discretionary outcomes.","Rule49(b)","O"],["C027","Mistrial and causal-expense consequences require separate findings.","Rule48","O"],["C028","Rule41(b)(2), not a federal-style52(c), supplies the read nonjury midtrial route.","Rule41(b)(2)–(3)","O"],["C029","Bench/advisory findings and motion/default exceptions are distinct.","Rule52(a)","O"],["C030","Sufficiency challenge and absence-of-findings preservation are different.","Rule52(a)(1),(6)–(7),(c)","O/H"],["C031","Amended-findings motion has a filing deadline and discretionary consequence.","Rule52(b)","O"],["C032","Directed-verdict text preserves specified evidence/jury rights and requires specific grounds.","Rule50(a)","O/H"],["C033","JNOV has service-based deadlines and no prior-directed-verdict prerequisite in the rule.","Rule50(b)(1)","O"],["C034","Joined/alternative relief is subject to the rule and Rule59(a).","Rule50(b)(2)","O/H"],["C035","Conditional new-trial rulings and the displaced-verdict party’s motion have separate duties.","Rule50(b)(4)","O"],["C036","Sufficiency-review preservation does not erase all trial-preservation rules.","Rule50(b)(3),(5)","O/H"],["C037","All eight Rule59grounds retain their stated predicates.","Rule59(a)(1)","O"],["C038","New-trial support and affidavit admissibility requirements differ by ground.","Rule59(a)(2),(c); Rule56(c)(4)","O/H"],["C039","New-trial motion and affidavit periods use distinct filing/service events.","Rule59(b)–(c)","O"],["C040","Nonjury new-trial relief can include additional testimony and new findings.","Rule59(a)(3)","O"],["C041","Court initiative concerns timely notice of intent plus later hearing/order requirements.","Rule59(d)","O"],["C042","Alter/amend requires both filing and service by the stated entry-based deadline.","Rule59(e)","O"],["C043","Additur/remittitur acceptance and appellate-remittitur issuance are separate events.","Rule59.1","O"],["C044","Rule63’s substitute-judge authority has postverdict/postfindings predicates.","Rule63","O"],["C045","Verdict/findings, judgment form, entry, amendment, and finality differ.","Rules54(a)–(b),58","O/H"],["C046","Time computation is governed by complete Rule2.2conditions.","Rule2.2(a)–(b)","O"],["C047","Nonextension and mail-addition provisions must not be collapsed.","Rule2.2(b)(3),(c); Rule59(c)","O/H"],["C048","Lack of notice has a conjunctive exception, not a universal new period.","Rule2.3","O/H"],["C049","Service completion, receipt, filing and hearing schedules remain distinct.","Rules5,7","O"],["C050","Rule11.2’s listed reconsideration exclusions are not rewritten to include or authorize other motions.","Rule11.2(b)(2)","O/H"],["C051","Harmless error requires the rule’s substantial-rights/justice analysis.","Rule61","O/H"],["C052","A post-trial request does not establish an automatic stay.","Rule62(a)–(b)","O/H"],["C053","Displayed footers and government hosting do not complete original/current statutory history.","S001–S009","Provenance limit"],["C054","Federal, substantive, appellate, and special-regime dependencies remain open.","Section13","H"],["C055","No actual trial event or outcome was evaluated; previous holds remain.","Research record","Certain"],["C056","Pretrial sanctions retain separate order/participation and expense predicates.","Rule16(e)","O/H"]]},{"headers":["Quantity/relation","Reference event or base","Qualification"],"index":28,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Quantity/relation","Reference event or base","Qualification"],["Thirty days","Answer/appearance filed","Court scheduling action, not necessarily completed order"],["Ninety days","Complaint filed with served defendant and no appearance","Alternative scheduling branch"],["As soon as practicable","Scheduling order after court action","No fixed substitute date"],["Seven days","Trial-setting request served","Response filed and served"],["At least thirty days before trial","Final pretrial process","Formal conference not invariably required"],["At least one attorney per represented party","Formal pretrial conference","Required authority; no person evaluated"],["No universal numeric continuance period","Rule2.5","Court may impose cutoff; stipulation not binding"],["No later than fourteen days","Last pleading directed to jury issue served","Demand served and filed under Rule5(d)"],["Fourteen days, or shorter court time","Limited jury demand served","Other jury-triable factual issues"],["Fewer than twelve but at least six","Rule38demand-stipulation statement","Not substituted for every Rule47category"],["Not more than six","Actions that may be assigned to magistrate division","Applies regardless of district/magistrate trial judge"],["Twelve or agreed lesser number in open court","Other Rule47(l)cases","No actual agreement/count"],["Three-fourths","Civil verdict threshold","No rounding or vote calculation"],["Fourteen days after service of appeal-hearing notice","Small-claims de novo jury request","Separate route only"],["Six, or fewer by agreement","Small-claims de novo jury","Not ordinary demand rule"]]},{"headers":["Quantity/relation","Legal base/event","Qualification"],"index":29,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Quantity/relation","Legal base/event","Qualification"],["Eighteen-year age condition","§2-209 qualification category","Other citizenship/residence/restoration predicates"],["Two years following disqualification","§2-209(3)","Specified disability finding may support longer/permanent excusal"],["Seventy or older","§2-212 request-based permanent excuse","Not automatic exclusion; reinstatement request branch"],["Necessary period; no fixed duration","Statutory postponement","Required grounds and decision"],["Within fourth degree","Rule47cause relationship","Computation law not completed"],["No numerical limit","Challenges for cause","Proper ground/timing still required"],["During questioning/by conclusion; later good cause","Cause-challenge timing","Not a fixed day period"],["Four per party","Ordinary peremptories","Court allocation among co-parties"],["One or two additional jurors","Additional-juror branch","One added peremptory per party"],["More than two additional jurors","Alternate branch","Two added peremptories per party"],["Final jurors + additional jurors + authorized peremptories","Optional struck-panel relation","Source-stated symbolic relation only"],["All parties consecutively waive","Remaining peremptories lost/jury accepted","A single waiver alone has narrower effect"],["End of closing arguments","Excess jurors removed by lot","Retention/custody conditions"],["Replacement during deliberations","Restart deliberations","Prior deliberations disregarded"],["No cost taxed for jury","Rule47(l)","Not a general fee/cost ruling"],["More than one-fourth disagree","Verdict-return inquiry","Further deliberation required"],["Three-fourths acknowledge on poll","Acceptance/discharge","No actual poll or fraction rounded"],["All agree / not all agree","Foreperson signature versus all agreeing signatures","Written verdict required"],["Fourteen days before proceeding or as soon as practicable","Rule43interpreter notice","ICAR52complete regime held"],["No fixed time stated","Remote-testimony safeguards, exclusion rulings, jury-question response","Reasonableness and applicable conditions"]]},{"headers":["Quantity/relation","Reference event","Qualification"],"index":30,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Quantity/relation","Reference event","Qualification"],["No later than seven days before jury trial","Written instruction requests filed","Separate service/receipt requirement"],["At least seven days before jury trial","Requests served and received","Not merely mailed"],["Through and including close of evidence","Late unforeseen/overlooked instruction requests","Court permission"],["Original and one copy","Instruction submission","Different content/numbering fields"],["Close of evidence","Court ruling on requested instructions","Recorded/endorsed method"],["Before trial","Preliminary-instruction conference","If those initial instructions are considered under rule"],["Before jury deliberates","Instruction objection and distinct grounds","Not same event as special-verdict retirement demand"],["Before final arguments","Final instructions read","After rulings/notice to parties"],["Original and minimum two copies","Instructions furnished to deliberating jury","No constructed packet"],["Before jury retires","Demand to submit omitted special-verdict issue","Otherwise statutory waiver/finding relation"],["After trial begins, before verdict","Mistrial window","Fair-trial finding"],["Reasonable causal expenses","Deliberate misconduct causing mistrial","Discretionary; no amount"],["After plaintiff’s evidence","Rule41(b)(2)nonjury motion","Court may wait for all evidence"],["After close of evidence","Oral Rule52findings option","Filed opinion/memorandum alternative"]]},{"headers":["Quantity/relation","Required act and trigger","Qualification"],"index":31,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Quantity/relation","Required act and trigger","Qualification"],["No later than fourteen days after judgment entry","Serve Rule50(b)(1)JNOV motion","Prior directed-verdict motion not required by text"],["No later than fourteen days after jury discharge","Serve JNOV where no verdict returned","Different event"],["No later than fourteen days after judgment entry","Displaced-verdict party serves Rule50(b)(4)(C)new-trial motion","Conditional ruling; waiver provision"],["No later than fourteen days after judgment entry","File Rule52(b)motion","Court may amend/add findings/judgment"],["Within fourteen days after judgment entry","File and serve Rule59(b)new-trial motion","Nonextendable category"],["With new-trial motion","File and serve supporting affidavits","Ground-specific support requirements"],["Fourteen days after service","File and serve opposing affidavits","Service-based event"],["Up to twenty-one additional days","Opposing-affidavit extension","Court order or written stipulation"],["No fixed period in clause","Reply affidavits","Court permission"],["No later than fourteen days after judgment entry","Court gives Rule59(d)(1)notice of intent","Not automatically final-order deadline"],["Before order granting new trial","Notice and opportunity to be heard","Grounds must be specified"],["No later than fourteen days after entry","File and serve Rule59(e)alter/amend motion","Different from Rule52file-only wording"],["Forty-two days from conditional order entry","Accept/reject additur or remittitur","Appeal-deferment clause"],["Fourteen days from issuance of appellate remittitur","Postaffirmance accept/reject branch","Not service or trial-order entry"],["After verdict or filed findings/conclusions","Rule63successor-judge duties","Not unrestricted midtrial substitution"],["No separate numeric period","Rule52(c)appropriate-motion requirement","No borrowed deadline assigned to that clause"]]},{"headers":["Rule","Relation","Limit"],"index":32,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Rule","Relation","Limit"],["Rule2.2(a)","Exclude trigger day, count intermediates, qualified last-day extension","No actual calendar"],["Clerk inaccessible","Filing extended to stated accessible day","Unless court orders otherwise"],["General extension","Good cause; after-expiration excusable-neglect motion","Subject to listed nonextensions"],["Nonextendable list","50(b),52(b),59(b),(d),(e),60(b)","Rule60merits not completed"],["Three additional days","Action due specified time after service by mail","Not added automatically to entry/discharge/remittitur issuance"],["Rule7ordinary papers","Fourteen/seven/two days before hearing, received","Other rule/statute and good-cause exceptions"],["At least one day before hearing","Denial of oral argument","No hearing result"],["Immediately after entry","Clerk notice of order/judgment","Rule2.3exception preserved"],["No recorded mailing and no actual notice","Lack-of-notice exception","No automatic new period supplied"],["Reasonable causal expenses","Rule16sanction branch","Justification/injustice exceptions"],["No fixed bond/security amount established","Rule62(b)stay","No actual stay"],["March1/July1,2016","Civil-rule footer baseline","Original orders unopened"],["March26/July1,2018","Selected evidence-rule footer baseline","Original history held"],["November5,2024","Constitution publication label","Not clause-specific amendment date"],["2025/undated","Statutory reproduction/compilation versions","Not official2026authentication"]]},{"headers":["Branch","Missing predicate","Supported consequence","Adverse inference to avoid","Next generic inquiry"],"index":33,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Branch","Missing predicate","Supported consequence","Adverse inference to avoid","Next generic inquiry"],["B01—ordinary scope","Correct proceeding","Ordinary trial rules may apply","All civil proceedings identical","Governing special law"],["B02—setting","Filed answer/appearance or alternative conditions","Rule16scheduling duty","Mandatory completed order by same day","Exact order/construction, no event assessed"],["B03—continuance","Court approval/good cause or applicable authority","Possible date change","Party stipulation alone binds court","Rules2.5/16interaction"],["B04—jury right","Constitutional/statutory issue classification","Preserved right","“Debt” automatically establishes jury entitlement","Current statutory and judicial construction"],["B05—demand","Correct issue, last pleading, service and filing","Rule38effect","Any jury reference is sufficient","Rule38construction"],["B06—waiver/withdrawal","Specific procedural or consent predicates","Rule38/39branch","Actual waiver from abstract facts","No actual determination"],["B07—composition","Assignment-capable category and lawful agreement","Correct jury-size rule","One universal panel size","Constitution/Rule47construction"],["B08—qualification","Statutory category and competent evidence","Defined decision process","Age/occupation/condition alone decides","Official statutes/restoration/disability law"],["B09—challenges","Proper grounds, timing, allocation","Cause/peremptory procedure","Unlimited cause means no legal constraints","Constitutional challenge law"],["B10—alternates","Lawful added-juror/replacement event","Stated counts and restart","Earlier deliberations automatically remain valid","Rule47application"],["B11—testimony","Open/remote/exclusion predicates","Court-managed evidence presentation","Remote platform or exclusion request suffices","ICAR52 and evidence law"],["B12—record","Applicable reporting branch","Required record/certification","Recording always equals official transcript","ICARincorporations"],["B13—instructions","Applicable subject/request/timing","Rule51ruling framework","Late request always barred or always allowed","Pattern-instruction/current law"],["B14—preservation","Actual ruling, opportunity, distinct objection","Specific preservation relation","Any objection preserves every issue","Rule46/51/IRE103construction"],["B15—special verdict","Omitted factual issue and demand event","Waiver/judicial-finding branch","All omissions automatically require retrial","Rule49construction"],["B16—general plus answers","Exact consistency category","Correct judicial options","Every inconsistency produces same remedy","Rule49classification"],["B17—bench dismissal","Nonjury stage after plaintiff evidence","Rule41(b)(2)route","Federal52(c)automatically applies","Idaho substantive sufficiency standard"],["B18—findings","Factual bench/advisory trial or other explicit duty","Required findings","Every motion requires findings","Rule52exceptions"],["B19—lack versus sufficiency","Nature of asserted error","Different preservation rules","No-findings motion unnecessary for all issues","Rule52construction"],["B20—directed/JNOV","Specific grounds and correct posture","Rule50route","Federal prerequisite imported","Idaho merits standard"],["B21—conditional ruling","JNOVgrant and new-trial request","Mandatory conditional determination","Conditional order changes finality automatically","Rule50/appeal boundary"],["B22—new trial","One complete ground, support and timing","Discretionary relief","Defeat alone proves error/misconduct","Rule59construction"],["B23—juror affidavit","Permitted IRE606subject","Limited possible evidence","Jury-misconduct claim permits all deliberation inquiry","Privilege/constitutional law"],["B24—court initiative","Timely notice and opportunity to be heard","Rule59(d)route","Final order necessarily due within same14days","Exact rule/application"],["B25—additur/remittitur","Conditional new-trial order and appeal posture","Specific acceptance periods","Trial remittitur equals appellate remittitur","Full appellate law later"],["B26—alter/findings","Correct motion and act","File-only versus file-and-serve distinction","All post-trial motions share one act",""],["B27—computation","Correct trigger and service method","Rule2.2application","Mail adds days to entry-based deadline","Applicable computation construction"],["B28—notice/stay","Recorded mailing/actual notice or lawful stay","Limited exception/discretion","Request or lack of notice automatically suspends judgment","Full stay/appeal law"],["B29—history","Original orders and official statute chain","Exact gap can close","Footer or county hosting proves complete history","Ordinary official source recovery"],["B30—actual outcome","Facts, orders, lawful proof and claim law","No outcome supplied","Generic rule is operational permission","Separate authorized application, not performed"]]},{"headers":["Separate subject","Required later generic authority"],"index":34,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Separate subject","Required later generic authority"],["Substantive debt and damages","Contract, assignment, instruments, licensing, sector rules, lawful charges, burden of proof, damages and offsets"],["Jury entitlement construction","Legal/equitable classifications, mixed issues, constitutional history, specific statutory rights and proper composition"],["Juror qualifications","Current official §§2-209/2-212, restoration statutes, constitutional ArticleVI§3, disability/discrimination and applicable federal law"],["Jury selection/privacy","Full statutory selection challenge, protected-class challenge law, questionnaire access, public-record and confidentiality rules"],["Jury instructions","Current IDJI edition and relevant substantive instruction authority; no actual instruction selected"],["Evidence/experts","Full privilege, authentication, hearsay, expert and specific evidentiary questions; no P23rerun"],["Interpreters and accommodations","Complete ICAR52, applicable disability/language law, authority and cost allocation"],["Records and exhibits","ICAR21,37,38,71; §1-2212; transcript-certification forms and current Rule83relationship"],["Declarations","Current official §9-1406, foreign declaration and electronic-record rules"],["Sanctions/contempt","Full Rule37incorporation and constitutional/procedural limits; causal fees and actual misconduct not determined"],["Finality and appellate review","Complete Idaho Appellate Rules, appeal periods, tolling, preservation, standards, remittitur and mandate effects"],["Stay and enforcement","Full Rule62, judgment duration/renewal, liens, execution, exemptions, satisfaction and discharge"],["Rule60","Separate grounds, timing and independent-action interfaces; not a substitute for the present post-trial rules"],["Protected parties/federal","Bankruptcy, SCRA, capacity, representation, disability, federal collection/reporting and other special statutes"],["Local/tribal/interstate","Valid local rules/orders, sovereignty, jurisdiction and conflicts"],["Original history","Original court orders, statutory enactments/amendments/application/savings provisions"]]},{"headers":["Field","Entry"],"index":35,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Field","Entry"],["Governing proceeding",""],["Authority and edition",""],["Official-current-text status",""],["Special-proceeding exclusion",""],["Trial-setting trigger",""],["Scheduling-order requirement",""],["Modification/continuance condition",""],["Jury-right source",""],["Jury-demand issue and trigger",""],["Service/filing distinction",""],["Waiver/withdrawal condition",""],["Composition provision",""],["Advisory/consensual-jury branch",""],["Qualification dependency",""],["Challenge provision",""],["Record requirement",""],["Testimony/interpreter condition",""],["Instruction-request requirement",""],["Instruction-preservation condition",""],["Verdict form/category",""],["Polling/discharge condition",""],["Inconsistency branch",""],["Nonjury midtrial provision",""],["Findings requirement",""],["Findings-amendment provision",""],["Directed-verdict/JNOV provision",""],["Conditional-ruling requirement",""],["New-trial ground",""],["Supporting-material requirement",""],["Alter/amend provision",""],["Additur/remittitur event",""],["Computation/nonextension rule",""],["Notice/stay boundary",""],["Missing primary authority",""],["Review status",""]]},{"headers":["Requested issue","Disposition","Claims/sources","Exact remaining gap"],"index":36,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Requested issue","Disposition","Claims/sources","Exact remaining gap"],["1—ordinary trial scope","Official rules read","C002; S001,S003,S005","Specialized actual application"],["District/magistrate","Relevant distinctions preserved","C002,C011,C020","No assignment investigation"],["Small claims/de novo","Narrow fresh comparison","S005","No small-claims merits rerun"],["Setting/pretrial/modification","Complete material rules","C003–C005","Actual order and good cause absent"],["Consolidation/separation","Complete Rule42","C006","No common-issue/prejudice finding"],["Continuance","Rule2.5andRule16conditions","C005","No universal fixed request period"],["2—jury right","Constitution and Rules38–39read","C007–C010","Specific claim entitlement and history"],["Demand/issues/withdrawal","Complete clauses","C008–C009","No actual pleading/service/consent"],["Advisory/consensual/nonjury","Distinguished","C010","No actual election"],["Composition/majority","Complete material rule/constitutional text","C011","Actual category/rounding not determined"],["3—empanelment","Complete Rule47","C012–C017","Current statutory incorporations"],["Qualification/excusal","Provisional text with limits","S006–S007","Original/current statute chain"],["Judge/jury/witness roles","Narrow evidence rules read","C018–C019","Full evidence/privilege law"],["Record/testimony","Complete necessary rules","C020","Recorder/interpreter/exhibit incorporations"],["Instructions/preservation","Complete Rule51andnecessaryrules","C021–C023","Current IDJI/substantive law"],["4—verdicts/polling","Complete material clauses","C024–C026","No vote/verdict supplied"],["Inconsistencies","Separate branches retained","C026","Judicial reconciliation construction"],["Bench findings","Complete Rule52","C029–C031","No actual factfinding"],["Nonjury partial decision","Actual Rule41(b)(2)identified","C028","No federal52(c)substitution"],["5—Rule50","Complete body read","C032–C036","Merits standard/judicial construction"],["Rule52amendment","Complete body read","C031","No actual motion"],["Rule59grounds/support/timing","Complete body read","C037–C042","No actual proof or ground"],["Conditional rulings","Complete Rule50/59.1branches","C035,C043","Full appeal law held"],["Successor judge","Complete Rule63","C044","No actual inability"],["Rule56/60distinction","Narrow boundaries retained","C002,C047,C054","No rerun or imported standards"],["6—judgment form/entry","Narrow complete interface","C045","Full lifecycle excluded"],["Computation/mail/nonextension","Complete Rule2.2","C046–C049","No calendar"],["Reconsideration/harmless error","Exact limited text","C050–C051","No actual preservation/outcome"],["Stay/appeal","Necessary boundary only","C052","Full regime held"],["Other substantive/federal/local law","Exact dependencies","C054; Section13","No broad overview counted"],["7—literal sources/history","Complete visible register","Section9","Original orders/statutes incomplete"],["Current/provisional/history distinction","Preserved","C053","No no-change certification"],["PDF text/pixels","Separately logged below","S002,S006","No unviewed-page claim"],["Quantities/branches/worksheet","Supplied visibly","Sections11–14","No inputs/forms/calendar"],["Prior findings and Rule40Q001","Preserved; not reopened","C055","No earlier hold closed"],["Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent","Not accepted complete","Entire report","Exact remaining boundaries"]]},{"headers":["Material","Actual use"],"index":37,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Material","Actual use"],["Official IRCP bodies","Complete or expressly bounded clauses listed in S001"],["Official constitutional PDF","Complete ArticleI§7, visually inspected"],["Official IRE/ICAR bodies","Necessary trial, record and juror-evidence interfaces"],["Official small-claims rules","Narrow distinction only"],["Official statutory routes","Fresh failures recorded in S008"],["Materially different public source","Undated government-hosted jury-statute compilation"],["Dated secondary statutes","Complete §§2-209and2-212with histories/disclaimers"],["Official amendment index","Current-publication statement; original orders not recovered"],["Historical jury-right leads","Discovery only; no repeal or entitlement conclusion"],["Cases/opinions/dockets","Incidental results not opened or relied on"],["Juror rosters/questionnaires/medical data","Not queried or examined"],["Actual trial orders, evidence, affidavits, motions, verdicts, judgments","Not supplied, constructed, or evaluated"],["Prior saved reports/local metadata","Supplied exclusions only; not substantive authority"]]},{"headers":["PDF","Parsed/read scope","Pixels inspected"],"index":38,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["PDF","Parsed/read scope","Pixels inspected"],["Official Idaho Constitution","ArticleI§7","Printedp.2/PDFindex7"],["County-hosted Title2compilation","Selected complete provisions identified in S006","Printedpp.1,4,5,6/indices0,3,4,5"],["Original court orders","Not opened","None"],["Failed official statutory routes","No operative body","None"]]}],"claims":[{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C001","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C001","Precise proposition":"Official current rule bodies were read; statutory and original-history gaps remain.","Source/pinpoint":"S001–S009","Status/limit":"O/P/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C002","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C002","Precise proposition":"Ordinary, small-claims, de novo, default, summary, bench, and jury postures differ.","Source/pinpoint":"IRCP1; IRE101; Small-Claims11/15; Rule55(a)(3)","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C003","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C003","Precise proposition":"Scheduling action, scheduling order, and party trial-setting request have distinct triggers.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule16(a)–(b)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C004","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C004","Precise proposition":"Pretrial process and date modification require their stated order/good-cause/approval conditions.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule16(a)(3),(c)–(d)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C005","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C005","Precise proposition":"Continuance stipulations and trial amendments are not automatic.","Source/pinpoint":"Rules2.4–2.5,15(b)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C006","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C006","Precise proposition":"Consolidation/separation must retain jury-right protections.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule42","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C007","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C007","Precise proposition":"Jury entitlement derives from the Constitution/statute, not the generic debt label.","Source/pinpoint":"Art.I§7; Rule38(a)","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C008","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C008","Precise proposition":"Jury-demand service, filing, issue designation, and additional-issue timing differ.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule38(b)–(c)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C009","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C009","Precise proposition":"Jury waiver and withdrawal require the stated conditions.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule38(d)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C010","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C010","Precise proposition":"Demanded, discretionary, advisory, and consensual juries are separate branches.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule39","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C011","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C011","Precise proposition":"Jury composition and civil verdict agreement depend on category and consent.","Source/pinpoint":"Art.I§7; Rule47(l)","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C012","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C012","Precise proposition":"Statutory qualification/excusal findings remain provisional and fact-dependent.","Source/pinpoint":"S006–S007","Status/limit":"P/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C013","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C013","Precise proposition":"Confidentiality and supervised selection do not authorize actual roster inquiry here.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule47(a)–(g)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C014","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C014","Precise proposition":"Cause challenges have stated grounds, timing, unlimited count, and record conditions.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule47(h)","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C015","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C015","Precise proposition":"Peremptory allocation and waiver distinguish co-parties and sequential waiver.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule47(i)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C016","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C016","Precise proposition":"Additional-juror counts and deliberation replacement have specific effects.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule47(j)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C017","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C017","Precise proposition":"Juror notes, questions, sequestration and deliberation materials are controlled by separate clauses.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule47(k)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C018","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C018","Precise proposition":"Open/remote testimony and interpreter provisions have express qualifications.","Source/pinpoint":"Rules42.1,43","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C019","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C019","Precise proposition":"Judicial/juror testimony and witness exclusion are not unrestricted.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE605–606,611,614–615","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C020","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C020","Precise proposition":"Required records, recordings, and official transcripts are distinct.","Source/pinpoint":"ICAR25,27","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C021","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C021","Precise proposition":"Instruction timing includes receipt, late-request discretion, and close-of-evidence limits.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule51(a)–(b),(e)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C022","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C022","Precise proposition":"Court-proposed/pattern/preliminary instructions retain their predicates.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule51(c)–(i)","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C023","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C023","Precise proposition":"Instruction and evidentiary preservation rules are issue-specific.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule51(f),(i)(3); Rule46; IRE103","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C024","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C024","Precise proposition":"Verdict signatures, polling, further deliberations, acceptance, and discharge differ.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule47(m)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C025","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C025","Precise proposition":"Special-verdict omitted issues have a pre-retirement demand and judicial-finding branch.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule49(a)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C026","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C026","Precise proposition":"Verdict/answer inconsistencies have different mandatory/discretionary outcomes.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule49(b)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C027","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C027","Precise proposition":"Mistrial and causal-expense consequences require separate findings.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule48","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C028","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C028","Precise proposition":"Rule41(b)(2), not a federal-style52(c), supplies the read nonjury midtrial route.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule41(b)(2)–(3)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C029","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C029","Precise proposition":"Bench/advisory findings and motion/default exceptions are distinct.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule52(a)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C030","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C030","Precise proposition":"Sufficiency challenge and absence-of-findings preservation are different.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule52(a)(1),(6)–(7),(c)","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C031","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C031","Precise proposition":"Amended-findings motion has a filing deadline and discretionary consequence.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule52(b)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C032","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C032","Precise proposition":"Directed-verdict text preserves specified evidence/jury rights and requires specific grounds.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule50(a)","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C033","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C033","Precise proposition":"JNOV has service-based deadlines and no prior-directed-verdict prerequisite in the rule.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule50(b)(1)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C034","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C034","Precise proposition":"Joined/alternative relief is subject to the rule and Rule59(a).","Source/pinpoint":"Rule50(b)(2)","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C035","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C035","Precise proposition":"Conditional new-trial rulings and the displaced-verdict party’s motion have separate duties.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule50(b)(4)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C036","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C036","Precise proposition":"Sufficiency-review preservation does not erase all trial-preservation rules.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule50(b)(3),(5)","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C037","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C037","Precise proposition":"All eight Rule59grounds retain their stated predicates.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule59(a)(1)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C038","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C038","Precise proposition":"New-trial support and affidavit admissibility requirements differ by ground.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule59(a)(2),(c); Rule56(c)(4)","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C039","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C039","Precise proposition":"New-trial motion and affidavit periods use distinct filing/service events.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule59(b)–(c)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C040","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C040","Precise proposition":"Nonjury new-trial relief can include additional testimony and new findings.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule59(a)(3)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C041","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C041","Precise proposition":"Court initiative concerns timely notice of intent plus later hearing/order requirements.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule59(d)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C042","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C042","Precise proposition":"Alter/amend requires both filing and service by the stated entry-based deadline.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule59(e)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C043","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C043","Precise proposition":"Additur/remittitur acceptance and appellate-remittitur issuance are separate events.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule59.1","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C044","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C044","Precise proposition":"Rule63’s substitute-judge authority has postverdict/postfindings predicates.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule63","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C045","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C045","Precise proposition":"Verdict/findings, judgment form, entry, amendment, and finality differ.","Source/pinpoint":"Rules54(a)–(b),58","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C046","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C046","Precise proposition":"Time computation is governed by complete Rule2.2conditions.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule2.2(a)–(b)","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C047","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C047","Precise proposition":"Nonextension and mail-addition provisions must not be collapsed.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule2.2(b)(3),(c); Rule59(c)","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C048","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C048","Precise proposition":"Lack of notice has a conjunctive exception, not a universal new period.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule2.3","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C049","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C049","Precise proposition":"Service completion, receipt, filing and hearing schedules remain distinct.","Source/pinpoint":"Rules5,7","Status/limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C050","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C050","Precise proposition":"Rule11.2’s listed reconsideration exclusions are not rewritten to include or authorize other motions.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule11.2(b)(2)","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C051","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C051","Precise proposition":"Harmless error requires the rule’s substantial-rights/justice analysis.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule61","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C052","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C052","Precise proposition":"A post-trial request does not establish an automatic stay.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule62(a)–(b)","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C053","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C053","Precise proposition":"Displayed footers and government hosting do not complete original/current statutory history.","Source/pinpoint":"S001–S009","Status/limit":"Provenance limit"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C054","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C054","Precise proposition":"Federal, substantive, appellate, and special-regime dependencies remain open.","Source/pinpoint":"Section13","Status/limit":"H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C055","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C055","Precise proposition":"No actual trial event or outcome was evaluated; previous holds remain.","Source/pinpoint":"Research record","Status/limit":"Certain"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P25-C056","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C056","Precise proposition":"Pretrial sanctions retain separate order/participation and expense predicates.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule16(e)","Status/limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":27,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_explicit_prior_current_rule_aspects_only_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false}],"sources":[{"source_id":"S_ID-P25-S001","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ircp","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.3","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.4","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.5","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.7","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/5","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11.2","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/15","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/16","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/38","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/39","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/41","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/42","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/42.1","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/43","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/46","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/47","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/48","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/49","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/50","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/51","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/52","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/55","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/56","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/58","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59.1","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/61","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/62","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/63"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P25-S001","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S001 — official Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure\n\nIssuer/title: Idaho Supreme Court, Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure.\nConsolidated URL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ircp\n\nThe print pages are usages of the same official rule collection, not independent corroborating authorities.\n\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tActual read bounds and use\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1\tComplete (a)–(c) in consolidated text; scope and local-rule qualifications\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2\tComplete computation/extension provisions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.3\tComplete proposed/entered-order notice and lack-of-notice clause\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.4\tComplete in consolidated text; court-initiative setting\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.5\tComplete in consolidated text; stipulated continuance\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.7\tComplete declaration incorporation; § 9-1406 not newly read\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/5\tComplete material later-paper service, filing, and proof clauses; fax mechanics not applied\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7\tComplete; reliance on motion form/timing/exception interface\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11.2\tComplete; substantive use limited to (b)(2), with surrounding limitation preserved\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/15\tComplete body inspected; substantive use limited to (b)(1)–(2)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/16\tComplete (a)–(e); discovery/ADR merits not rerun\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/38\tComplete (a)–(d)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/39\tComplete (a)–(c)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/41\tComplete body inspected; substantive use limited to (b)(2)–(3)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/42\tComplete consolidation/separate-trial provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/42.1\tComplete open-court/location provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/43\tComplete testimony provision; interpreter/other incorporations held as stated\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/46\tComplete objection/exception provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/47\tComplete (a)–(m)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/48\tComplete mistrial provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/49\tComplete (a)–(b), including published numbering\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/50\tComplete (a)–(b)(5)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/51\tComplete (a)–(i)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/52\tComplete (a)–(c)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54\tComplete material (a)–(b)(1), (c); fee/cost schedule not applied\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/55\tSubsection (a)(3) and necessary surrounding context only\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/56\tComplete (a), (c)(4) for posture and Rule 59 affidavit incorporation only\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/58\tComplete entry provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59\tComplete (a)–(e)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/59.1\tComplete (a)–(b)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/61\tComplete harmless-error provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/62\tComplete (a)–(b) for narrow stay boundary; other displayed branches not applied\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/63\tComplete inability-to-proceed provision\nDisplayed rule history\n\nAll listed civil rules display adoption March 1, 2016, effective July 1, 2016. Additional displayed entries material to the source record:\n\nRule\tAdditional footer entries\n1\tApril 30, 2024/effective same day; September 30, 2024/effective October 1, 2024\n2.2 and 11.2\tSeptember 9, 2016/effective same day\n15\tSeptember 9, 2016/effective same day; May 5, 2017/effective July 1, 2017\n41\tMay 5, 2017/effective July 1, 2017\n54\tApril 27, 2016/July 1, 2016; October 6, 2016/March 1, 2017; April 17, 2017/nunc pro tunc March 1, 2017; December 14, 2017/January 1, 2018; April 28, 2021/July 1, 2021\n55\tSeptember 9, 2016/effective same day\n\nThese are displayed source credits. Original API-hosted orders were not opened, and a complete original amendment/application audit is not claimed."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"fresh24_current_IRCP_bodies_plus9_actual_prior_current_rule_reads","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"All33reportedIRCPURLsaccounted. Freshcomplete2.3/2.4/2.5/11.2/15/38/39/41/42/42.1/46/47/48/49/50/51/52/55/58/59/59.1/61/62/63andcredits. Actualpriorcomplete1/2.2/2.7/5/7/16/43/54/56mapped. Relianceonlymaterialtrialandboundaryclauses; nooriginalorders/fullappeal-stay-default-merits/AppendixB/actualcase.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P25-S002","urls":["https://sos.idaho.gov/elections/publications/Idaho_Constitution.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P25-S002","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S002 — official Idaho Constitution\n\nIssuer/title: Idaho Secretary of State, Constitution of the State of Idaho.\nURL: https://sos.idaho.gov/elections/publications/Idaho_Constitution.pdf\n\nPublication label: Last amended November 5, 2024.\nRead: Complete Article I, § 7; other visible text not used as an expanded constitutional report.\nPixels: Printed page 2, PDF index 7.\nLimit: Original constitutional adoption/amendment history and debt-claim entitlement construction remain held."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"whole_source_record_read_constitution_not_freshly_reopened","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"ResearcherreportedArtI7complete/PDFpixels retained; no coordinatornewPDF/constitutionaloriginalhistory/substantivejuryentitlementcheck. Rule38/47freshindependentlycomparedwithinactualrulescope.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P25-S003","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ire","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/101","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/103","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/605","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/606","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/611","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/614","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/615"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P25-S003","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S003 — official evidence rules, narrow trial interfaces\n\nIssuer/title: Idaho Supreme Court, Idaho Rules of Evidence.\nConsolidated URL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ire\n\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tActual read bounds\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/101\tComplete (a)–(f); scope exceptions only\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/103\tComplete ruling/offer/preservation provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/605\tComplete judge-as-witness restriction\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/606\tComplete juror testimony and verdict-validity exceptions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/611\tComplete control, cross-examination, and leading-question clauses\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/614\tComplete court-called/examined-witness provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/615\tComplete exclusion rule; criminal/child branches not applied\n\nFooters: Rules 103, 605, 606, 611, 614, and 615 display March 26, 2018 adoption/July 1, 2018 effectiveness. Rule 101 displays its 1985 adoption and listed amendments through May 28, 2019.\n\nLimit: No full P23 authentication/hearsay/originals rerun. Privilege, expert, victim-rights, and original-order history remain held."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"fresh5_current_IRE_bodies_plus2_actual_prior_current_reads","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Freshcomplete605/606/611/614/615andcredits. Actualpriorcomplete101/103mappedandselectedcurrenttextre-readlocallyforP25scope/preservation. Criminal/child/privilege/constitutionalincorporationsnotaccepted.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P25-S004","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/icar/25","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/icar/27"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P25-S004","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S004 — official record/reporting rules\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tActual read bounds\tDisplayed history\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/icar/25\tComplete (a)–(g); substantive use limited to recording, reporter qualification dependency, log/storage/transcription distinction\tAdopted December 27, 1979/effective July 1, 1980; amended January 10, 2001/effective same day; December 2, 2015/effective July 1, 2016\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/icar/27\tComplete body inspected; reliance on (a)–(e), (h); transcript-fee/request/office provisions not applied\tMarch 15, 2004/July 1, 2004; January 3, 2008/March 1, 2008; March 29, 2010/May 1, 2010; September 9, 2016/effective same day\n\nLimits: ICAR 21, 37, 38, 52, 71; § 1-2212; and the Rule 83(g) transcript-certification incorporation were not completed. No log form, transcript, fee estimate, or actual record was requested."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_current_ICAR25_plus_documented_actual_prior_current_ICAR27","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Freshcomplete25a-gandcredits;formnotopened;1-2212notreverified. Actualpriorcomplete27mappedandfullbodyre-readlocally, selectedattendance/record/transcript/emergencybranchesonly; nofee/procurement/retention/certificationformacceptance.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P25-S005","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irsca/11","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irsca/15"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P25-S005","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S005 — special small-claims boundaries\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tRead bounds\tFooter\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irsca/11\tComplete informal-proceeding/record provision\tMarch 1, 2016/July 1, 2016\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irsca/15\tComplete page inspected; substantive use confined to (c), (d)(2), (d)(6)\tMarch 1, 2016/July 1, 2016; June 30, 2026/July 1, 2026\n\nNo small-claims monetary ceiling, fee, service, default, reconsideration, or appeal-merits revalidation is claimed."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_current_smallclaims11_plus_actual_prior_current15","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Freshcomplete11andcredits;actualpriorcomplete15mappedandre-readlocally, selectedc/d2/d6scope/jurydemand-compositiononly. No fullsmallclaimsmeritsorappealrerun.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P25-S006","urls":["https://www.cassia.gov/media/Jury/IC%20Title%202%20Chapter%202.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P25-S006","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S006 — government-hosted statutory compilation\n\nHost/title: Cassia County public website, Title 2—Juries and Jurors, Chapter 2—Jury Selection and Service.\nURL: https://www.cassia.gov/media/Jury/IC%20Title%202%20Chapter%202.pdf\n\nEdition: Undated compilation. It is not authenticated as the current Legislature’s official 2026 code.\n\nRead:\n\nComplete §§ 2-202 and 2-203.\nNecessary complete § 2-204(1)–(2).\nComplete §§ 2-209, 2-211, and 2-212.\nAdjacent provisions visible on pages were not used as a full jury-administration or jury-selection-challenge report.\n\nPixels: Printed page 1/PDF index 0; printed pages 4–6/indices 3–5.\n\nDisplayed credits: Section 2-202—1971 ch.169 §1 p.799; §2-203—1971 ch.169 §2 p.799; §2-204 amendments through 2005 ch.190 §1 p.583; §2-209 amendments through 2005 ch.190 §6 p.587. The compilation’s §2-212 credit ends in 2005, while the 2025 reproduction includes a 2019 amendment.\n\nLimit: Government hosting does not close edition, currentness, or original-enactment gaps. The differing history credits are retained."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported_undated_government_compilation","coordinator_verification_status":"whole_source_record_read_undated_county_statutes_not_reopened","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Undatedgovernmentcompilation/sourcehistorydifferences/parsedvspixelsrecordsretained; noofficial2026authenticationoractualqualification.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P25-S007","urls":["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-2/chapter-2/section-2-209/","https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-2/chapter-2/section-2-212/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P25-S007","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S007 — dated jury-qualification reproductions\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tActual read\tDisplayed credits\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-2/chapter-2/section-2-209/\tComplete 2025 body (1)–(3), history, disclaimer\tAdded 1971 ch.169 §8 p.799; amendments 1972 ch.8 §1 p.12; 1981 ch.266 §1 p.565; 1996 ch.189 §1 p.598; 2002 ch.94 §4 p.259; 2005 ch.190 §6 p.587\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-2/chapter-2/section-2-212/\tComplete 2025 body (1)–(3), history, disclaimer\tAdded 1971 ch.169 §11 p.799; amendments 1986 ch.295 §1 p.742; 2002 ch.94 §6 p.261; 2005 ch.190 §9 p.588; 2019 ch.222 §5 p.685\n\nStatus: Secondary 2025 reproductions. No actual qualification, medical condition, criminal status, restoration of rights, or excusal was investigated."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported_provisional_secondary","coordinator_verification_status":"whole_source_record_read_secondary2025_statutes_not_reopened","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Provisional2-209/2-212history/disclaimerboundsretained; no currentofficialstatutory/constitutional-restoration-disabilityorindividualeligibilityacceptance.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P25-S008","urls":["https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title2/T2CH2/SECT2-209/","https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title10/T10CH1/SECT10-105/","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P25-S008","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S008 — access failures and official history locator\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tActual observation\nhttps://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title2/T2CH2/SECT2-209/\tFresh official statutory attempt inaccessible\nhttps://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title10/T10CH1/SECT10-105/\tHistorical jury-right locator attempt inaccessible; no operative entitlement derived\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments\tOfficial page states incorporation of amendments on effective dates; retrieved response did not supply a completed original-order history\nAPI-hosted orders and forms\tNot opened\n\nThe county-hosted compilation was a materially different ordinary public route for generic jury statutes. No failed route was retried through guessed variants or access workarounds."},"source_access_status":"failed_routes_and_locator_record_only","coordinator_verification_status":"actual_prior_current_amendment_locator_reused_statutory_failures_not_reopened","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Mappedactualpriorcompletecurrentrecent-amendmentspublishingstatementonly; notoriginalhistoryrecovery. Researcherfailedofficialstatutoryroutesretainedwithoutfreshattempt/retry/absenceinference.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P25-S009","urls":["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-10/chapter-1/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P25-S009","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S009 — discovery-only version leads\n\nhttps://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-10/chapter-1/\n\nThis chapter index was inspected only as a locator after the historical §10-105 lead. It was not used to prove repeal, absence of a jury right, or current statutory entitlement. Historical search results and incidental case/opinion results were not investigated or relied on."},"source_access_status":"discovery_only","coordinator_verification_status":"discovery_only_record_not_reopened_or_used_as_law","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Wholelocatorrecordread;no repeal/entitlementabsence/proposedmaterial/case-opinion/docketinference.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false}],"coverage":[{"topic":"1—ordinary trial scope","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"1—ordinary trial scope","Disposition":"Official rules read","Claims/sources":"C002; S001,S003,S005","Exact remaining gap":"Specialized actual application"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"District/magistrate","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"District/magistrate","Disposition":"Relevant distinctions preserved","Claims/sources":"C002,C011,C020","Exact remaining gap":"No assignment investigation"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Small claims/de novo","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Small claims/de novo","Disposition":"Narrow fresh comparison","Claims/sources":"S005","Exact remaining gap":"No small-claims merits rerun"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Setting/pretrial/modification","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Setting/pretrial/modification","Disposition":"Complete material rules","Claims/sources":"C003–C005","Exact remaining gap":"Actual order and good cause absent"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Consolidation/separation","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Consolidation/separation","Disposition":"Complete Rule42","Claims/sources":"C006","Exact remaining gap":"No common-issue/prejudice finding"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Continuance","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Continuance","Disposition":"Rule2.5andRule16conditions","Claims/sources":"C005","Exact remaining gap":"No universal fixed request period"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"2—jury right","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"2—jury right","Disposition":"Constitution and Rules38–39read","Claims/sources":"C007–C010","Exact remaining gap":"Specific claim entitlement and history"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Demand/issues/withdrawal","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Demand/issues/withdrawal","Disposition":"Complete clauses","Claims/sources":"C008–C009","Exact remaining gap":"No actual pleading/service/consent"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Advisory/consensual/nonjury","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Advisory/consensual/nonjury","Disposition":"Distinguished","Claims/sources":"C010","Exact remaining gap":"No actual election"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Composition/majority","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Composition/majority","Disposition":"Complete material rule/constitutional text","Claims/sources":"C011","Exact remaining gap":"Actual category/rounding not determined"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"3—empanelment","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"3—empanelment","Disposition":"Complete Rule47","Claims/sources":"C012–C017","Exact remaining gap":"Current statutory incorporations"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Qualification/excusal","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Qualification/excusal","Disposition":"Provisional text with limits","Claims/sources":"S006–S007","Exact remaining gap":"Original/current statute chain"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Judge/jury/witness roles","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Judge/jury/witness roles","Disposition":"Narrow evidence rules read","Claims/sources":"C018–C019","Exact remaining gap":"Full evidence/privilege law"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Record/testimony","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Record/testimony","Disposition":"Complete necessary rules","Claims/sources":"C020","Exact remaining gap":"Recorder/interpreter/exhibit incorporations"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Instructions/preservation","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Instructions/preservation","Disposition":"Complete Rule51andnecessaryrules","Claims/sources":"C021–C023","Exact remaining gap":"Current IDJI/substantive law"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"4—verdicts/polling","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"4—verdicts/polling","Disposition":"Complete material clauses","Claims/sources":"C024–C026","Exact remaining gap":"No vote/verdict supplied"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Inconsistencies","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Inconsistencies","Disposition":"Separate branches retained","Claims/sources":"C026","Exact remaining gap":"Judicial reconciliation construction"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Bench findings","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Bench findings","Disposition":"Complete Rule52","Claims/sources":"C029–C031","Exact remaining gap":"No actual factfinding"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Nonjury partial decision","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Nonjury partial decision","Disposition":"Actual Rule41(b)(2)identified","Claims/sources":"C028","Exact remaining gap":"No federal52(c)substitution"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"5—Rule50","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"5—Rule50","Disposition":"Complete body read","Claims/sources":"C032–C036","Exact remaining gap":"Merits standard/judicial construction"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Rule52amendment","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Rule52amendment","Disposition":"Complete body read","Claims/sources":"C031","Exact remaining gap":"No actual motion"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Rule59grounds/support/timing","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Rule59grounds/support/timing","Disposition":"Complete body read","Claims/sources":"C037–C042","Exact remaining gap":"No actual proof or ground"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Conditional rulings","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Conditional rulings","Disposition":"Complete Rule50/59.1branches","Claims/sources":"C035,C043","Exact remaining gap":"Full appeal law held"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Successor judge","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Successor judge","Disposition":"Complete Rule63","Claims/sources":"C044","Exact remaining gap":"No actual inability"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Rule56/60distinction","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Rule56/60distinction","Disposition":"Narrow boundaries retained","Claims/sources":"C002,C047,C054","Exact remaining gap":"No rerun or imported standards"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"6—judgment form/entry","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"6—judgment form/entry","Disposition":"Narrow complete interface","Claims/sources":"C045","Exact remaining gap":"Full lifecycle excluded"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Computation/mail/nonextension","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Computation/mail/nonextension","Disposition":"Complete Rule2.2","Claims/sources":"C046–C049","Exact remaining gap":"No calendar"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Reconsideration/harmless error","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Reconsideration/harmless error","Disposition":"Exact limited text","Claims/sources":"C050–C051","Exact remaining gap":"No actual preservation/outcome"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Stay/appeal","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Stay/appeal","Disposition":"Necessary boundary only","Claims/sources":"C052","Exact remaining gap":"Full regime held"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Other substantive/federal/local law","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Other substantive/federal/local law","Disposition":"Exact dependencies","Claims/sources":"C054; Section13","Exact remaining gap":"No broad overview counted"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"7—literal sources/history","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"7—literal sources/history","Disposition":"Complete visible register","Claims/sources":"Section9","Exact remaining gap":"Original orders/statutes incomplete"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Current/provisional/history distinction","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Current/provisional/history distinction","Disposition":"Preserved","Claims/sources":"C053","Exact remaining gap":"No no-change certification"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"PDF text/pixels","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"PDF text/pixels","Disposition":"Separately logged below","Claims/sources":"S002,S006","Exact remaining gap":"No unviewed-page claim"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Quantities/branches/worksheet","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Quantities/branches/worksheet","Disposition":"Supplied visibly","Claims/sources":"Sections11–14","Exact remaining gap":"No inputs/forms/calendar"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Prior findings and Rule40Q001","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Prior findings and Rule40Q001","Disposition":"Preserved; not reopened","Claims/sources":"C055","Exact remaining gap":"No earlier hold closed"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent","Disposition":"Not accepted complete","Claims/sources":"Entire report","Exact remaining gap":"Exact remaining boundaries"},"raw_table_index":36,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_fresh_and_actual_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true}],"annotations":{},"corrections":[],"resolved_corrections":[],"review_history":[{"id":"S_ID-P25-trial-scoped-review-20261028","status":"reviewed_with_originalhistory_statutory_incorporation_construction_application_holds","at":"2026-10-28T22:16:15.850777+00:00"}]}