{"meta":{"key":"s_id--pass-24","task":"S_ID","title":"SID Idaho ordinary civil discovery, disclosures, depositions, subpoenas, and protective/enforcement boundaries","parent_title":"Idaho debt and debt relief law","edition":"pass-24","path":"/research/s_id--pass-24/","kind":"split_pass","category":"state","role":"state","area_numbers":[66],"groups":["collections"],"date":"2026-10-28","tables":25,"claims":56,"sources":5,"review_status":"scoped_review_complete_with_history_incorporation_construction_application_holds","review_complete":true,"sha256":"695d24ac406a0b0a217731bdb0d25aec6cb1fcb88934b0711d4e4c51fc70a61d","headings":["Evidence disposition","Principal findings","1.1 Ordinary discovery versus other proceedings","1.2 Discovery is not adjudication","2.1 Relevance, burden, and inaccessible ESI","2.2 Initial disclosures and scheduling","2.3 Work product and prior statements","2.4 Expert disclosures and protection","2.5 Privilege assertions, produced material, and protective orders","2.6 Supplementation and signing","3.1 Method comparison","3.2 Interrogatory answers and records option","3.3 Production response and ESI form","3.4 Admissions: different from production or an answer to a complaint","3.5 Nonfiling and retention","4.1 Oral versus written-question depositions","4.2 Early-plaintiff leave condition","4.3 Officer, organization, remote method, and recording","4.4 Objections, termination, review, and retention","4.5 Objection waiver and use boundaries","5.1 Issuance, service, and proof","5.2 Party production versus nonparty production","5.3 Quashing, privilege, and geographic limits","5.4 Fees: payment duty versus later taxable costs","6.1 Motions to compel and protective motions","6.2 Conditional expense rules","6.3 Distinct sanction branches","6.4 ESI loss","6.5 Scheduling sanctions and examination boundary","S_ID-P24-S001 — official Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure","Displayed credits and effectiveness","S_ID-P24-S002 — small-claims discovery exclusion on appeal","S_ID-P24-S003 — official amendment locator","S_ID-P24-S004 — fresh original-order failure","S_ID-P24-S005 — discovery-only source history","10.1 General discovery and written methods","10.2 Depositions and subpoenas","10.3 Costs, protection, sanctions, and counting","Actual work performed","PDF and visual status","Remaining gaps and conclusion"],"generation_provenance":{"actual_route":"regular_chat_adaptive_models","actual_model":"GPT-6","actual_mode":"Pro","provenance_limit":"Actual documented capture labels only; missing labels remain unknown. No preferred setting is inferred as actual execution."},"public_id":"S_ID/pass-24","facets":{"geography":["us","us-id"],"debt_type":[],"stage":["origination","repossession"],"subject":["agreements-disclosures","discovery"]},"scope":"Independent required generic ordinary civil debt-action pretrial disclosure/discovery/methods/protection/enforcement dimension4; smallclaims/initialcourt/proof/fulltrial/postjudgment/federal/localmerits excluded.","pending_corrections":0},"markdown":"# S_ID PASS-24 — Idaho ordinary civil discovery, disclosures, depositions, subpoenas, and protective/enforcement boundaries\n\n**Fresh public-source access date:** **October 28, 2026, America/Los_Angeles.**\n\n**Scope:** Generic pretrial discovery in an ordinary civil debt action. Initial jurisdiction/service/default, small claims, substantive debt validity, evidentiary rulings, full trial practice, appeals, and postjudgment discovery remain separate.\n\n## Evidence disposition\n\nThe **official current-published Idaho civil-rule bodies were recovered and read** to the bounds recorded below. The relevant provisions are not identical to familiar federal formulations. The original March 2016 adoption PDF returned **404**. Displayed adoption and amendment footers are preserved as publication evidence, **not as a completed original-order audit**.\n\nNo actual request, response, record, witness, privilege claim, discovery event, order, or misconduct was supplied or evaluated. Earlier findings, provenance, C033/C035, and other holds remain unchanged. The resolved Rule 40 quantity clarification is not reopened.\n\n## Principal findings\n\n**The read Idaho rules do not state a universal automatic initial-disclosure package or a universal discovery-planning conference prerequisite.** They instead contain request-based discovery, specified expert disclosures, supplementation, court-ordered disclosures, and scheduling-order requirements. That is not a finding that no special statute or valid order can impose additional duties. **[C003–C005.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/26?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n**The ordinary interrogatory limit is forty, including discrete subparts.** Document requests and admissions have different content, signature, objection, effect, and retention rules. The absence of a numerical limit in a particular method is not unlimited discovery permission. **[C019–C026.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/33?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n**A deposition notice, party production request, and nonparty subpoena are not interchangeable.** Idaho’s oral-deposition leave provisions, written-question sequence, simultaneous stenographic-record requirement, county-based attendance limits, and third-party advance-notice rule must be kept separate. **[C027–C040.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/30?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n**Discovery protection does not automatically establish privilege or nonwaiver.** The rules prescribe withholding descriptions and postproduction handling while a claim is resolved. They do not adjudicate an actual privilege or erase a separate confidentiality, privacy, or public-access inquiry. **[C009, C013–C014.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/26?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n**The published ESI-loss provision is Rule 37(e)’s routine, good-faith-system-operation protection, subject to exceptional circumstances.** This report does not replace it with a different federal intent/prejudice framework or infer unrestricted permission to destroy information. **[C048.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/37?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n# 1. Scope and procedural setting\n\nEvidence labels:\n\n- **O — Official body read:** current-published court rule or official locator, within the stated bounds.\n- **H — Held:** a material original-history, incorporation, construction, or application dependency remains unresolved.\n\n## 1.1 Ordinary discovery versus other proceedings\n\n| Context | Newly read rule relationship | Boundary |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Ordinary district-court or magistrate-division civil action | Rule 1(b) applies the civil rules uniformly within its scope. | Assignment, subject-matter jurisdiction, party status, and claim validity are not determined. |\n| Original small claims | Ordinary rules apply only as the small-claims rules provide. | The full ordinary discovery framework is not imported automatically. |\n| Small-claims de novo appeal | Small-claims Rule 15(d)(4) permits discovery **only by written court order**, within court-set limits. | Not a general unrestricted right to ordinary discovery. |\n| Special statutory, family, and identified treatment proceedings | Rule 1(b) preserves the specified alternative regimes. | Their discovery rules were not investigated. |\n| Pre-action or appeal-period perpetuation | Rule 27 has separate petition, order, and scope provisions. | It is not treated as ordinary pending-action discovery or a general pre-suit records demand. |\n| Trial and summary judgment | Discovery access and production are not themselves admissibility or merits rulings. | P23 proof and Rule 56 findings are not reused. |\n| Postjudgment discovery | Separate enforcement authority is required. | No Rule 69 or collection procedure is completed here. |\n| Local procedure | Rule 1(c) requires consistency, Supreme Court approval/publication, and its emergency qualification. | No local rule, scheduling order, or actual assignment was inspected. |\n\n**[C001–C002; S001 Rules 1, 27; S002.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 1.2 Discovery is not adjudication\n\n| Item | Legal function | What does not follow automatically |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Request | Invokes a permitted method within its scope. | Relevance, proportionality, control, or entitlement to every requested item. |\n| Response or production | Supplies information or access subject to governing duties. | Authenticity, truth, admissibility, debt ownership, or liability. |\n| Admission | Can establish the admitted matter for the pending action under Rule 36. | A judgment for all requested relief or use in every other proceeding. |\n| Deposition | Preserved testimony taken under specified conditions. | Admissibility of every answer or automatic proof of the claim. |\n| Subpoena | Court process with defined issuance, service, scope, and protection rules. | Valid service, compliance entitlement, or absence of privilege. |\n| Protective order | Conditional judicial protection. | A universal privilege or permanent public-access seal. |\n| Discovery sanction | A consequence under its own predicates. | Automatic validation of the underlying debt or unlimited relief. |\n\n**[C006, C024–C025, C035–C049.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/36?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n# 2. General discovery scope, disclosures, sequencing, and protection\n\n## 2.1 Relevance, burden, and inaccessible ESI\n\nRule 26(b)(1) permits discovery of nonprivileged matter relevant to a claim or defense. For good cause, the court may permit subject-matter discovery. The published Idaho text retains its stated relationship between discovery and potentially admissible evidence; discovery is not limited to material already admissible at trial.\n\nThe court **must limit** otherwise permitted discovery when the stated cumulative/duplicative, better-source, ample-opportunity, or burden-versus-benefit condition is found. The factors include case needs, amount in controversy, resources, issue importance, and importance of the discovery. **[C006.]**\n\nFor identified ESI sources claimed not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost, the responding party bears the specified showing on a motion. A requesting party’s good-cause showing can still support ordered discovery, with conditions. Inaccessibility is not established by merely using that label. **[C007.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/26?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nRule 26(b)(2) separately permits discovery of a qualifying insurance agreement’s existence and contents. Disclosure does not make it admissible, and the insurance application is excluded from that particular disclosure provision. **[C008.]**\n\n## 2.2 Initial disclosures and scheduling\n\nThe read Rules 16 and 26 do not state a universal automatic initial-disclosure exchange analogous to a different jurisdiction’s rule. They do impose or authorize the following:\n\n| Duty | Trigger and scope |\n| --- | --- |\n| Court scheduling action | Within thirty days after an answer or appearance is filed; alternatively, within ninety days after complaint filing if a defendant has been served but none has appeared. |\n| Scheduling order | Must address discovery completion and expert-disclosure deadlines, along with the other listed management matters. |\n| Scheduling-order modification | Court leave/good cause, or the permitted all-party stipulation **with court approval**, depending on the paragraph. |\n| Expert identification and substance | By interrogatory answer or court order under Rule 26(b)(4). |\n| Trial witness/exhibit lists | Court may order them; later-discovered material receives Rule 16(d)’s supplementation treatment. |\n| Supplementation | Governed by Rule 26(e), not a universal assumption that every complete answer must be continually rewritten. |\n\nThe thirty-/ninety-day provisions require **court action leading to an order as soon as practicable**, not necessarily a fully entered scheduling order by the same deadline. **[C003–C004.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/16?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nDiscovery methods may proceed in any sequence unless ordered otherwise; one party’s discovery does not automatically postpone another’s. Rule 29 permits procedural stipulations unless the court orders otherwise, but court approval is required when a discovery-time extension would interfere with trial or another order requires approval. **[C005.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/29?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 2.3 Work product and prior statements\n\nRule 26(b)(3) distinguishes:\n\n| Material | Rule relationship |\n| --- | --- |\n| Documents/things prepared for litigation or trial by or for a party or representative | Ordinarily protected; the stated substantial-need and undue-hardship showing can permit discovery of otherwise discoverable material. |\n| Mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, legal theories | Court must preserve the specified protection when ordering production. |\n| A person’s own prior statement | The person may request it without the substantial-need showing; signed/adopted written and substantially verbatim contemporaneous-recording categories are defined. |\n| Refusal to provide that statement | Motion and Rule 37(a)(5) expense provisions apply. |\n\n**[C009.]** No actual preparation purpose, statement, representative, waiver, or privilege is found. ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/26?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 2.4 Expert disclosures and protection\n\nThe rule distinguishes retained/specially employed or party-employee experts from nonretained persons whose relevant knowledge was not acquired in trial preparation.\n\nThe retained branch includes opinions and bases, considered information, supporting exhibits, qualifications, publications during the preceding **ten years**, compensation, and testimony history during the preceding **four years**. The nonretained branch uses subject matter and a summary of facts/opinions. No actual expert, publication, prior case, or testimony was searched.\n\nDraft protections and attorney-expert communications have express compensation, supplied-facts/data, and relied-on-assumptions exceptions. Non-testifying consulting experts receive the exceptional-circumstances/Rule 35(b) qualification. Contact with an opposing retained expert requires the specified permission. **[C010–C011.]**\n\nExpert-discovery payment under Rule 26(b)(4)(E) is separate from taxable prevailing-party costs:\n\n- The published provision requires reasonable responding/testifying fees in its specified branches, absent manifest injustice.\n- Consulting-expert discovery carries the stated fair-portion expense requirement.\n- The nonretained branch’s additional expense sharing is discretionary.\n- The paragraph’s express references to **(A)(ii), (A)(i), and (D)** are preserved as printed; they are not silently replaced with federal numbering.\n\n**[C012.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/26?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 2.5 Privilege assertions, produced material, and protective orders\n\n| Event | Required or permitted treatment |\n| --- | --- |\n| Withholding otherwise discoverable information | Expressly claim the privilege/protection and describe the material sufficiently to allow assessment without revealing the protected substance. |\n| Claim asserted after production | Notify recipients of claim and basis; producer must preserve the material pending resolution. |\n| Recipient notified | Prompt return, sequestration, or destruction; no use/disclosure pending resolution; reasonable retrieval steps if previously disclosed; permitted sealed presentation for determination. |\n| Protective-order motion | Party or affected person; appropriate court; certification of good-faith conference or attempt. |\n| Protective relief | Good cause; possible limits on method, subject, people present, time/place, trade-secret/commercial information, or specified sealed handling. |\n| Motion denied wholly or partly | Court may order discovery on just terms; expense rules remain applicable. |\n\n**[C013–C014.]** These handling duties do not themselves decide privilege, waiver, confidentiality, sealing under public-access law, or ownership of information. Filing a protective-order motion is not established as a universal automatic stay. ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/26?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 2.6 Supplementation and signing\n\nRule 26(e) begins with no general duty to add later-acquired information to an answer complete when made, **subject to its express exceptions**: material incorrectness; a formerly true response whose noncorrection would be knowing concealment; identity/location of knowledgeable persons; agreement, timely supplementation requests, or court order; and expert supplementation.\n\nRule 26(f) requires the appropriate attorney or unrepresented-party signature and reasonable-inquiry certification. An unsigned item need not be acted upon until signed and must be struck unless promptly corrected. An unjustified certification violation requires an appropriate sanction; reasonable causal expenses may be included. **[C015–C017.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/26?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n**Rule 11 qualification:** Rule 11(d) excludes discovery papers and motions under Rules 26–37. Yet Rule 30(a)(2)(B)(ii) expressly refers its early-deposition certification to Rule 11 sanctions. Both texts are preserved. Their exact reconciliation is held; a universal Rule 11 safe-harbor period is not imported into discovery sanctions. **[C018.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n# 3. Interrogatories, production, and admissions\n\n## 3.1 Method comparison\n\n| Method | Recipient and permissible subject | Number and response |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **Interrogatories, Rule 33** | Party; Rule 26 matters, including permitted fact/law-to-fact contentions | **Forty including discrete subparts**, unless stipulated or specific additional number ordered for good cause; thirty-day service-based response |\n| **Production/inspection, Rule 34** | Party’s possession, custody, or control; documents, ESI, things, or qualifying property inspection | No numerical count stated in Rule 34; thirty-day written response, subject to Rule 29/order |\n| **Admissions, Rule 36** | Party; pending-action facts, application of law to fact, opinions about either, document genuineness | No numerical count stated in Rule 36; thirty-day answer/objection period, subject to Rule 29/order |\n\nThe general scope, burden, protection, and scheduling limits still apply. Each may be served on the plaintiff after commencement and on another party with or after summons/complaint service. This is not an initial-process service instruction. **[C019, C022, C024.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/33?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 3.2 Interrogatory answers and records option\n\nRule 33 requires separate, full written answers under oath to the extent not objected to. An organizational officer/agent supplies information available to the party, not merely personal recollection. The answerer signs answers; the attorney signs objections, with Rule 26’s unrepresented-party framework also relevant.\n\nObjections must be specific. Untimely unstated grounds are waived unless the court excuses them for good cause.\n\nThe business-record option requires substantially equal burdens of deriving the answer, sufficiently specific identification, and a reasonable examination/copying opportunity. An undifferentiated document production is not declared sufficient. **[C020–C021.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/33?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 3.3 Production response and ESI form\n\nRule 34 requires reasonable particularity and reasonable time, place, and manner. The response must address each item/category, state permission or reasons for objection, identify a partial objection, and permit the unobjectionable remainder.\n\nThe response deadline is not automatically an independently stated completion date for every production. Requested timing, agreement, and court orders remain material.\n\nDocuments must be produced in usual business order or organized to the requests. ESI-form objections require the intended form to be stated. Without a specified form, ordinarily maintained or reasonably usable forms apply; duplicate forms generally are not required. The court may allocate reasonable extraordinary retrieval/production expenses to the requesting party. **[C022–C023.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/34?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 3.4 Admissions: different from production or an answer to a complaint\n\nRule 36 requires separately stated matters and the specified document copy/access condition. A response must admit, fairly deny, or detail inability after reasonable inquiry into known or readily obtainable information. Qualified responses must identify admitted and disputed parts. A genuine trial issue alone is not a sufficient objection.\n\nFailure to serve a qualifying signed answer or objection within the applicable period produces the rule’s admission consequence. A sufficiency motion may result in an answer order, an amended answer, or admission. **[C024.]**\n\nAn admission is conclusive only in the pending action unless withdrawal/amendment is allowed under the merits and prejudice conditions. It does not independently award judgment. A pleading attachment is not admitted merely because no verified denial was made. **[C025.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/36?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 3.5 Nonfiling and retention\n\nRules 33, 34, and 36 direct that the requests and responses themselves are not routinely filed. A notice of when and on whom service occurred is filed. The propounding party retains the originals and proof of service for **one year following final disposition and expiration of any appeal period**, or longer if ordered.\n\nUse of selected materials with the court is separately authorized. These provisions do not establish a universal destruction permission notwithstanding another preservation duty or order. **[C026.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/34?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n# 4. Depositions\n\n## 4.1 Oral versus written-question depositions\n\n| Issue | Oral deposition | Written-question deposition |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| General availability | Any person, including a party, subject to leave conditions | Same general availability, with different leave conditions |\n| Prison confinement | Leave required | Leave required |\n| Early plaintiff examination | Rule 30’s initial-service period applies, with stated exceptions | That Rule 30 early-plaintiff condition is not automatically imported |\n| Previously deposed person | No separate repeat-deposition leave condition appears in Rule 30(a)(2) | Without stipulation, leave required; grant is subject to Rule 26(b)(1)(C) |\n| Notice | Reasonable written notice to every other party; time/place and identifying information | Notice plus direct questions, served on every other party; officer identified |\n| Other parties’ questions | Oral participation or the specified sealed-written-question method | Cross, redirect, and recross sequence |\n| Organizational witness | Reasonably particular subjects and designated consenting representative(s) | Rule 30(b)(6) incorporation |\n| Attendance | Subpoena where compulsion is required | Same distinction |\n\n**[C027–C029, C034.]** The published Rules 30 and 31 do not state a general numeric deposition-count ceiling or a default hours-per-deposition limit. Court orders and Rule 26 limits remain; this is not unlimited permission. ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/30?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 4.2 Early-plaintiff leave condition\n\nRule 30(a)(2)(B) uses the wording **“more than thirty days have not passed”** since the specified initial service. The exceptions concern the defendant’s having sought discovery or the supported departure/unavailability certification.\n\nThe latter involves departure from the district to more than **100 miles from the place of trial**, or departure from the United States, before expiration of the period, plus later unavailability. If the other party shows inability despite diligence to obtain counsel for that deposition, the stated use prohibition applies.\n\nThese exceptions do not automatically erase the separate prison-confinement leave requirement. **[C028.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/30?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 4.3 Officer, organization, remote method, and recording\n\nRule 28 requires the appropriate oath-authorized or appointed officer and disqualifies the listed relatives, employees, attorneys, related/employed persons, and financially interested persons. Foreign and military officer branches exist but are not certifications of actual authority.\n\nAn organization must designate one or more permitted persons to testify about information known or reasonably available to it. No requirement that a particular “custodian” or officer always be chosen is inferred.\n\nRemote examination requires stipulation or court order. For the specified rules, the deposition is located where the deponent answers.\n\nAudio/audiovisual recording must also be simultaneously stenographically recorded unless the governing rule/order exception applies. Rule 30.1 regulates opening/closing identification, oath, units, indexing, edits, custody, and costs; an edited copy does not authorize alteration of the original. **[C027, C029–C030.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/30.1?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 4.4 Objections, termination, review, and retention\n\n| Event | Rule consequence |\n| --- | --- |\n| Ordinary objection during examination | Recorded; examination generally proceeds subject to it |\n| Instruction not to answer | Only the specified privilege, court-limitation, or Rule 30(d)(4) motion ground |\n| Impeding/delaying/frustrating examination | Discretionary sanctions under Rule 30(d)(3) |\n| Bad-faith or unreasonably annoying, embarrassing, or oppressive examination | Motion to terminate/limit; on the stated demand, suspension for the time needed to obtain an order |\n| Examination terminated by order | Resumption requires order of the court where the action is pending |\n| Review | Unless waived by deponent and parties, thirty days after officer notification that transcript/recording is available |\n| Changes | Signed statement of form/substance changes and reasons |\n| Unsigned after period | Officer’s signature and reason statement; use remains subject to Rule 32(d)(4) |\n| Transcript custody | Not routinely filed; attorney retention until one year after final disposition, unless longer ordered |\n| Recording/notes | Officer retains the specified notes or recording copy; no universal separate destruction date inferred |\n\n**[C031–C033.]** The deposition transcript retention event is not rewritten to match the written-discovery “final disposition **and appeal-period expiration**” language. ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/30?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nRule 31’s sequence is fourteen days for cross-questions, seven for redirect, and seven for recross, each measured from the specified service. Good cause permits court alteration. Written questions remain a deposition before an officer, not Rule 33 interrogatories. **[C034.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/31?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 4.5 Objection waiver and use boundaries\n\nRule 32 distinguishes prompt written notice objections, officer-qualification objections, curable examination defects, written-question-form objections, and prompt motions concerning completion/return defects.\n\nIts short-notice protection requires **less than fourteen days’ notice**, a prompt protective motion requesting nonoccurrence or another time/place, and the motion still pending when the deposition occurs. It is not a universal fourteen-day minimum deposition notice.\n\nTaking or producing a deposition does not make all testimony admissible. Full trial-use and unavailable-witness branches are not reapplied here. **[C035.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/32?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n# 5. Subpoenas, nonparties, and costs\n\n## 5.1 Issuance, service, and proof\n\nRule 45 distinguishes:\n\n| Matter | Material rule |\n| --- | --- |\n| General issuing court | Court where the action is pending |\n| Issuer | Clerk under the stated signed/sealed procedure, or Idaho-licensed attorney as officer of the court |\n| Required form/content | Substantially Appendix B form; court, action, command, time/place and recording method where applicable |\n| Server | Nonparty at least eighteen |\n| Service | Delivery to the named person |\n| Attendance fees | One day’s attendance and lawful mileage tendered **if requested**, subject to government exceptions |\n| Attorney service for party | The stated Rule 5 branch concerns hearing/trial attendance, not every nonparty or deposition subpoena |\n| Proof | Officer certificate or other server affidavit with required details |\n\n**[C036.]** The standalone Appendix B form was not opened. No subpoena was issued, completed, served, or paid. ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/45?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 5.2 Party production versus nonparty production\n\n| Branch | Conditions |\n| --- | --- |\n| Party deponent required to produce | Rule 34 scope/procedure; at least **thirty days** to comply |\n| Nonparty production/inspection | After all parties have appeared or defaulted, unless otherwise ordered |\n| Advance party notice | Opposing party receives a copy at least **seven days before service on the nonparty**, unless court specifies otherwise |\n| Costs | Issuing party pays reasonable production/copying cost; requested copies to another party carry reasonable-cost conditions |\n| Document-only command | No personal attendance unless separately commanded |\n| Organization/form of production | Usual-course or category organization; ordinarily maintained/reasonably usable ESI; generally one form |\n\n**[C037.]** Rule 45(c)(2)’s heading refers to a “Non Attending Party,” but its operative text says a **person who is not a party**. The operative scope is retained. ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/45?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 5.3 Quashing, privilege, and geographic limits\n\nUpon timely motion, Rule 45(d) says the court **may** quash, modify, or condition compliance under the unreasonable, oppressive, insufficient-time, protected-material, undue-burden, and cost provisions. A universal fourteen-day objection period or automatic compliance stay was not established by this text.\n\nNonparty ESI inaccessibility and privilege claims use the burdens and postproduction handling in Rule 45(e). They do not establish actual waiver or confidentiality.\n\nFor a resident deponent, the attendance limit is the county of residence, employment, or in-person business. A nonresident may be required to attend in a county where served. Hearing/trial subpoenas have their stated statewide branch. **[C038–C039.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/45?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nRule 45(j)’s interstate mechanism is separately identified, not certified as a complete international/tribal procedure. Its published cross-references to 45(e)(2) for service and 45(c) for form need reconciliation before operational reliance.\n\n## 5.4 Fees: payment duty versus later taxable costs\n\n| Source | Limited relationship |\n| --- | --- |\n| Rule 45(b), (h) | Attendance tender and witness-fee incorporation |\n| Rule 54(d)(1)(C)(iii) | $20 per day for a nonparty, nonexpert witness testifying at deposition or trial |\n| Rule 54(d)(1)(C)(iv)–(v) | One-way $0.30 mileage language; the private-transport paragraph expressly refers to trial testimony |\n| Rule 54(d)(1)(C)(ix) | Ordinary taxable expert-cost ceiling of $2,000 per expert for all appearances |\n| Rule 26(b)(4)(E) | Separate reasonable expert-discovery payment duties; not automatically capped by that taxable-cost figure |\n| Rule 54(d)(1)(C)(x)–(xi) | Reporting/transcription and one deposition-copy costs, subject to reasonableness |\n| Rule 54(d)(1)(D) | Additional exceptional/necessary costs require the specified showing and findings |\n| Rules 30.1(g), 34(b)(2)(E)(iv), 45(c)–(d) | Separate discretionary taxation or allocation of recording, extraordinary retrieval, and production costs |\n\n**[C040.]** No universal deposition-travel payment is calculated from the trial-specific mileage language. A permissible cost category is not an actual award; nonuse of a deposition does not by itself make its reasonable preparation cost improper. ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nFailure without adequate excuse to obey a served subpoena may be treated as contempt under Rule 45(i). A disputed command, missed event, or asserted expense does not itself establish that consequence. **[C041.]**\n\n# 6. Discovery disagreements, expenses, and sanctions\n\n## 6.1 Motions to compel and protective motions\n\nRule 37(a) requires notice to parties and affected persons and certification of a good-faith conference or attempt. Motions to a party belong in the pending-action court; the rule separately addresses discovery outside Idaho involving a nonparty.\n\nEvasive or incomplete responses count as failures for subsection (a). A deposition may be completed or adjourned before a motion concerning an unanswered question. Admission sufficiency has its separate Rule 36 motion. **[C042.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/37?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 6.2 Conditional expense rules\n\n| Outcome | Rule 37(a)(5) |\n| --- | --- |\n| Motion granted, or discovery supplied after filing | Expenses required after opportunity to be heard, unless no prior good-faith attempt, substantial justification, or other injustice |\n| Motion denied | Opponent’s expenses required after opportunity to be heard, unless substantial justification or other injustice; protective order may issue |\n| Granted in part/denied in part | Protective relief and apportionment are discretionary after the stated opportunity |\n\n**[C043.]** The rule does not turn every discovery disagreement into a fee award or establish any amount. ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/37?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 6.3 Distinct sanction branches\n\n| Branch | Predicate and consequence | Exception or limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Violation of discovery order, Rule 37(b) | Court may impose just issue/evidence, pleading, stay, dismissal, default, or contempt-related consequences | Prior order is material to this branch; contempt excludes the stated examination order |\n| Failure to produce another person for examination | Specified sanctions may apply | Inability-to-produce showing is expressly preserved |\n| Expenses caused by order violation | Required instead of or in addition to other relief | Substantial justification or unjust circumstances |\n| Failure to supplement or obey court-ordered disclosure, Rule 37(c)(1) | Information/witness use excluded in the specified settings | Substantial justification or harmlessness; additional/alternative sanctions require motion and opportunity to be heard |\n| Failure to admit, Rule 37(c)(2) | After later proof, reasonable proof expenses required on motion | Objectionable request, immaterial matter, reasonable belief of prevailing, or other good reason |\n| Complete failure to attend/answer/respond, Rule 37(d) | Motion-based sanctions for the specified properly noticed/served failures | No universal prior compel order is stated; certification required for specified response failures |\n| Mere objection as excuse | Insufficient under Rule 37(d)(2) unless a protective motion is pending | Pending motion is not declared a universal immunity or automatic stay |\n| General order violation, Rule 37(f) | Additional discretionary sanctions/conditions/fees/costs/expenses | Requires failure to comply with an order under the rules |\n\n**[C044–C047, C049.]** Dismissal/default is an authorized consequence in specified branches, not an automatic result of every missed step. Full constitutional sanction standards and judicial construction remain held. ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/37?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 6.4 ESI loss\n\nRule 37(e) limits sanctions **under these rules**, absent exceptional circumstances, where the loss resulted from routine, good-faith operation of an electronic information system.\n\nIt does not specify a complete standalone preservation-trigger code, every source of sanctions authority, or a universal intent/prejudice test. The rule is not permission to destroy material subject to a valid preservation obligation, order, or pending privilege dispute. **[C048.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/37?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n## 6.5 Scheduling sanctions and examination boundary\n\nRule 16(e) separately addresses order violations, nonappearance, substantial unpreparedness, and lack of good faith. Its just-order discretion and causal-expense requirement have their own substantial-justification/injustice exceptions. **[C050.]**\n\nRule 35 was read only because Rules 26 and 37 incorporate it. Examination requires an in-controversy condition, good cause, notice, and an order specifying scope and conditions. Report-sharing, inability, agreed-examination, and a particular privilege-waiver provision are separate. Examiner qualification includes an unread statutory definition. No medical facts, examination, report, or waiver were evaluated. **[C051.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/35?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n# 7. Timing, service, and motions\n\nRule 5 applies to discovery papers required to be served, subject to specific exceptions. Represented-party service ordinarily goes to counsel. Mail service completes on mailing; electronic service requires the stated written consent and nonreceipt qualification. Actual electronic-filing rules and local practices were not completed.\n\nThe specific nonfiling provisions of Rules 30, 33, 34, and 36 are not displaced by Rule 5’s general filing language. **[C052.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/5?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nRule 2.2 excludes the triggering day, counts intermediate days, and supplies the stated last-day and inaccessibility qualifications. Three days are added when an act is due a specified time **after service by mail**—not automatically after receipt, filing, notification, or every hearing-relative event.\n\nRule 29 and Rule 16’s approval requirements remain applicable even where Rule 2.2 permits a stipulation or extension. No actual deadline is calculated. **[C052.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\nRule 7’s ordinary motion papers must be filed and served **so as to be received** under its fourteen-/seven-/two-day hearing-relative sequence, unless another rule/statute or authorized good-cause alteration applies. This is distinct from mere service completion. Discovery-specific notice and opportunity-to-be-heard requirements remain. **[C053.]** ([Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7?utm_source=chatgpt.com))\n\n# 8. Source and usage register\n\nAll fresh access occurred **October 28, 2026, Pacific time**.\n\n## S_ID-P24-S001 — official Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure\n\n**Issuer/title:** Idaho Supreme Court, *Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure*.\n**Consolidated literal URL:** https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ircp\n\nThe print pages below are uses of the **same official rule collection**, not independent corroboration. Complete bodies were read unless narrower reliance is stated.\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Actual read bounds and use |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1 | Complete (a)–(c); scope and local-rule qualifications |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2 | Complete (a)–(c), including exceptions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/5 | Complete; substantive use limited to discovery service, proof, and specific-rule filing interaction; fax mechanics not applied |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7 | Complete; use limited to motions, receipt-based timing and exceptions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11 | Complete (a)–(d); use confined to discovery exclusion and Rule 30 cross-reference issue |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/16 | Complete (a)–(e); scheduling, disclosure and sanctions used; trial/ADR merits not completed |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/26 | **Complete (a)–(f)** |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/27 | Complete body inspected; substantive use limited to identifying separate perpetuation scope; pre-action/appeal procedure not completed |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/28 | Complete (a)–(d); ordinary officer/disqualification rules used; foreign/military qualifications held |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/29 | Complete stipulation provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/30 | **Complete (a)–(g)** |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/30.1 | Complete (a)–(g) |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/31 | Complete (a)–(d) |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/32 | Complete body inspected; reliance on (a)(1), (a)(5), (b), (d), and Rule 30 signature incorporation; full trial-use/unavailability branches not applied |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/33 | Complete (a)–(e) |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/34 | Complete (a)–(d) |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/35 | Complete (a)–(b); limited incorporated boundary only; § 6-1901 not read |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/36 | Complete (a)–(e) |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/37 | **Complete (a)–(f)** |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/43 | Complete page inspected; reliance only on (b), (d) as examination incorporations; interpreter/trial provisions deferred |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/45 | **Complete operative (a)–(j)**; substantive ordinary findings limited to (a)–(i); (j) read to identify interstate scope, historical application and cross-reference gaps. Illustrative comments not used as scenarios. |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54 | Complete (d)(1) read; reliance on (A)–(D), especially (C)(iii)–(v), (ix)–(xi). Remaining fee/enforcement procedures not developed. |\n\n### Displayed credits and effectiveness\n\n| Rules | Displayed history |\n| --- | --- |\n| All listed civil rules | Adopted **March 1, 2016**, effective **July 1, 2016** |\n| Rule 1 | Amended April 30, 2024/effective same day; September 30, 2024/effective October 1, 2024 |\n| Rules 2.2 and 30 | Amended September 9, 2016/effective same day |\n| Rule 54 | April 27, 2016/July 1, 2016; October 6, 2016/March 1, 2017; April 17, 2017/nunc pro tunc March 1, 2017; December 14, 2017/January 1, 2018; April 28, 2021/July 1, 2021 |\n| Rule 45(j)(8) | Body retains a separate historical pending-action application reference to **July 1, 2009** |\n\n**Status limit:** Official current-published text was read. Footers are not proof that every original order, transition rule, or later unincorporated development was independently audited.\n\n## S_ID-P24-S002 — small-claims discovery exclusion on appeal\n\n**Issuer/title:** Idaho Supreme Court, *Small Claims Rule 15*.\n**Literal URL:** https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irsca/15\n\n**Read:** Complete page; substantive use confined to **(d)(2), (d)(4)**.\n**Footer:** March 1, 2016/July 1, 2016; June 30, 2026/July 1, 2026.\n**Limit:** No small-claims appeal, fee, jury, or merits rerun.\n\n## S_ID-P24-S003 — official amendment locator\n\n**Issuer/title:** Idaho Supreme Court, *Recent Amendments*.\n**Literal URL:** https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments\n\n**Read:** The statement that amendments are incorporated into the rule text on their effective date, and visible locator context.\n\n**Limit:** The ordinary opened response did not deliver a completed historical order list. Search metadata included other rule families and unrelated amendments; none was treated as an amendment to these discovery rules without the operative body.\n\n## S_ID-P24-S004 — fresh original-order failure\n\n**Literal URL:** https://isc.idaho.gov/rules/IRCP/03012016-Adoption-Newly-Formatted.pdf\n\n**Result:** One fresh ordinary attempt returned **404**.\n**Discovery basis:** The exact route appeared in an official search-indexed historical rule link.\n**Limit:** No original-order body or pixels read. No repeated identical retry, guessed variant, API, contact, or bypass.\n\nThe materially different official history route in S003 was read but did not recover the original order.\n\n## S_ID-P24-S005 — discovery-only source history\n\n| Literal URL or material | Actual status |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/1988 | Search-indexed official rule link exposed the exact adoption URL; PDF body not opened |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/2059 | Search result for Rule 26; not treated as a separate authority or read PDF |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/2281 | Rule-index search lead only |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/2120 | Historical rule-index search lead only |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/recent-amendments | Search metadata; current ordinary page separately identified in S003 |\n| API-hosted original orders and Appendix B | Not opened |\n| Unrelated criminal/juvenile/family-rule search results | Not applied |\n\nNo secondary statutory reproduction is used to supply a positive discovery rule in this pass. Unread statutory incorporations remain held.\n\n# 9. Atomic consequential-claim register\n\nAll short IDs below carry the prefix **S_ID-P24-**.\n\n| Claim | Precise proposition | Source/pinpoint | Limit |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **C001** | Ordinary scope includes district and magistrate divisions with express special-proceeding exclusions. | S001 Rule 1(b) | O |\n| **C002** | Local rules and particular orders require their own lawful scope; no actual order was examined. | Rule 1(c); S002 | O/H |\n| **C003** | Read Rules 16/26 do not supply a universal automatic initial-disclosure package or planning-conference prerequisite. | Rules 16, 26 | Bounded textual finding |\n| **C004** | Scheduling action, order contents, modifications, and ordered disclosures have distinct duties. | Rule 16(a)–(d) | O |\n| **C005** | Sequence and stipulation rules preserve court-order and trial-interference limits. | Rules 26(d), 29 | O |\n| **C006** | Nonprivileged relevance and mandatory burden/cumulative limits both govern. | Rule 26(b)(1)(A),(C) | O |\n| **C007** | Inaccessible-ESI claims have responding-party and requesting-party burdens. | Rule 26(b)(1)(B) | O |\n| **C008** | Insurance-agreement discovery is not admissibility and excludes the stated application category. | Rule 26(b)(2) | O |\n| **C009** | Work product, mental impressions, and own prior statements are separate branches. | Rule 26(b)(3) | O/H |\n| **C010** | Expert disclosures differ by expert category and trigger. | Rule 26(b)(4)(A) | O |\n| **C011** | Expert drafts, communications, non-testifying work, and contact have specific protections/exceptions. | Rule 26(b)(4)(A)(v)–(D) | O |\n| **C012** | Expert-discovery payment differs from taxable expert costs. | Rule 26(b)(4)(E); Rule 54(d)(1) | O |\n| **C013** | Privilege assertions and postproduction handling do not decide privilege or waiver. | Rule 26(b)(5) | O/H |\n| **C014** | Protective orders require the specified motion, conference certification, and good cause. | Rule 26(c) | O |\n| **C015** | Supplementation has enumerated conditions, not an unqualified universal duty. | Rule 26(e) | O |\n| **C016** | Discovery signatures certify reasonable inquiry and the stated purposes/proportionality. | Rule 26(f)(1) | O |\n| **C017** | Missing signatures and unjustified certifications have different consequences. | Rule 26(f)(2)–(3) | O |\n| **C018** | Rule 11’s exclusion and Rule 30’s express reference require qualified treatment. | Rules 11(d), 30(a)(2)(B)(ii) | O/H |\n| **C019** | Interrogatories are party-directed, capped at forty including discrete subparts, with defined timing. | Rule 33(a) | O |\n| **C020** | Interrogatory oath, organizational information, signatures, and specific objections are distinct duties. | Rule 33(b) | O |\n| **C021** | Business-record substitution requires substantially equal burden and adequate identification/access. | Rule 33(d) | O |\n| **C022** | Production requires proper scope, control and particularity. | Rule 34(a),(b)(1) | O |\n| **C023** | Production responses, partial objections, ESI form and extraordinary costs have separate rules. | Rule 34(b)(2) | O |\n| **C024** | Admission responses require reasonable inquiry, specific treatment and timely signed service. | Rule 36(a) | O |\n| **C025** | Admissions are action-specific and withdrawal/amendment is conditional, not automatic judgment. | Rule 36(b)–(d) | O |\n| **C026** | Written discovery has nonfiling, notice and retention obligations. | Rules 33(e),34(d),36(e) | O |\n| **C027** | Deposition officer and stipulation requirements do not establish actual authority. | Rules 28–29 | O/H |\n| **C028** | Oral leave rules distinguish prison confinement from early plaintiff examination and its exceptions. | Rule 30(a) | O |\n| **C029** | Oral notice, organizations and remote location have separate predicates. | Rule 30(b)(1),(4)–(6) | O |\n| **C030** | Audio/audiovisual recording retains stenographic and custody requirements. | Rules 30(b)(3),30.1 | O |\n| **C031** | Objections, nonanswer instructions, obstruction sanctions and suspension are distinct. | Rule 30(c)–(d) | O |\n| **C032** | Review, changes and unsigned-deposition treatment use their stated thirty-day event. | Rule 30(e) | O |\n| **C033** | Deposition retention differs from written-discovery retention. | Rule 30(f) | O |\n| **C034** | Written-question depositions have their own leave and fourteen/seven/seven sequence. | Rule 31 | O |\n| **C035** | Short-notice use protection and objection waivers are not universal notice or admissibility rules. | Rule 32(a)(1),(5),(b),(d) | O/H |\n| **C036** | Subpoena issuance, delivery, fees, proof and attorney-service exception are distinct. | Rule 45(a)–(b) | O |\n| **C037** | Party deposition-production and nonparty production have different timing/cost predicates. | Rule 45(c) | O |\n| **C038** | Quashing and nonparty ESI/privilege handling require their specified conditions. | Rule 45(d)–(e) | O |\n| **C039** | Deposition attendance uses the county-based rule; interstate law remains separate. | Rule 45(f)–(j) | O/H |\n| **C040** | Witness payment, expert-discovery fees and taxable costs are not one universal cap. | Rules 45(h),54(d)(1),26(b)(4)(E) | O/H |\n| **C041** | Subpoena contempt requires service and lack of adequate excuse. | Rule 45(i) | O |\n| **C042** | Compel motions require notice, conference certification and the correct forum/predicate. | Rule 37(a)(1)–(4) | O |\n| **C043** | Granted/denied/mixed-motion expenses have different mandatory and discretionary branches. | Rule 37(a)(5) | O |\n| **C044** | Order-violation sanctions preserve justice, inability, examination and expense exceptions. | Rule 37(b) | O |\n| **C045** | Nondisclosure/supplementation exclusion preserves justification/harmlessness and hearing conditions. | Rule 37(c)(1) | O |\n| **C046** | Failure-to-admit expenses require later proof and retain four exceptions. | Rule 37(c)(2) | O |\n| **C047** | Complete discovery failures can invoke sanctions without a universal prior compel order. | Rule 37(d) | O/H |\n| **C048** | ESI-loss protection uses routine good-faith operation and exceptional-circumstance wording. | Rule 37(e) | O/H |\n| **C049** | Catch-all discovery consequences require the stated court-order failure. | Rule 37(f) | O |\n| **C050** | Scheduling sanctions have independent triggers and causal-expense qualifications. | Rule 16(e) | O |\n| **C051** | Rule 35 is a separate, conditional examination/report/waiver branch. | Rule 35; Rules 26/37 incorporations | O/H |\n| **C052** | Service, receipt, filing, retention and additional mail time must remain distinct. | Rules 2.2,5,29 | O/H |\n| **C053** | Ordinary motion timing yields to different governing rules and authorized exceptions. | Rule 7(b) | O |\n| **C054** | Original-history and published cross-reference issues remain explicit. | S001–S005 | Provenance/H |\n| **C055** | Full privilege/privacy, interstate, federal, sector, trial and postjudgment regimes remain open. | Section 12 | H |\n| **C056** | No actual discovery event or outcome was evaluated; all prior holds remain. | Research record | Certain |\n\n# 10. Quantity, event, and exception register\n\nNo actual count, amount, location, date, fee, or calendar result is supplied.\n\n## 10.1 General discovery and written methods\n\n| Quantity/relation | Reference event or base | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Thirty days | Answer or appearance **filed** | Court must take scheduling action; order as soon as practicable |\n| Ninety days | Complaint **filed**, with served defendant but no appearance | Alternative Rule 16 condition |\n| At least thirty days before trial | Final pretrial process | Not a universal automatic disclosure deadline |\n| Seven days | Service of a party’s trial-setting request | Response filed and served under Rule 16(b)(3) |\n| Forty, including all discrete subparts | Interrogatories to any other party | Stipulation or specific additional number for good cause |\n| Thirty days after service | Interrogatory answers/objections | Rule 29 or court may alter |\n| Thirty days after service | Production response | Not automatically completion of every production |\n| Thirty days after service | Admission answer/objection | Untimely absence has the Rule 36 consequence |\n| No numerical count stated | Production requests/admissions in their method rules | Rule 26 and orders still limit |\n| After commencement | Service on plaintiff of Rules 33/34/36 papers | Other party: with or after summons/complaint service |\n| One year after final disposition **and appeal-period expiration** | Written-discovery originals and proof | Longer retention may be ordered |\n| One ordinarily maintained or reasonably usable ESI form | Production absent a valid contrary specification/order | No routine duplicate-form duty |\n| Ten preceding years | Retained-expert publications disclosure | No publication or author researched |\n| Four preceding years | Retained-expert testimony history | No case or witness investigated |\n| Timely supplementation | Rule 26(e) triggers | No fixed universal number of days |\n| Prompt signature correction | Unsigned discovery paper | Otherwise strike/no duty to act |\n| Reasonable inquiry | Signature certification and admission inability response | Different substantive duties |\n| Prompt postproduction handling | Privilege/protection notification | No adjudicated waiver |\n| Reasonable opportunity/time/place | Records-option access and other provisions | No fixed numeric substitution |\n\n## 10.2 Depositions and subpoenas\n\n| Quantity/relation | Reference event/base | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| “More than thirty days have not passed” | Specified initial service in early plaintiff deposition | Literal Rule 30 wording preserved |\n| More than 100 miles / leaving United States | Certified departure before early period expires | Later unavailability and supporting facts required |\n| Reasonable written notice | Oral deposition | Not a universal fourteen-day minimum |\n| No general count/hour ceiling stated | Read Rules 30–31 | Court and Rule 26 limits remain |\n| One or more designees | Organization deposition | Consent/authority and available-information duties |\n| Remote location | Where deponent answers | Specified rule purposes |\n| Simultaneous stenographic record | Audio/audiovisual deposition | Applicable stipulation/order/rule conditions |\n| Thirty days after officer notification | Transcript/recording review | Unless deponent and parties waive |\n| Thirty-day signature period | Witness changes/signature branch | Officer certification and Rule 32 qualification |\n| One year after final disposition | Attorney-held deposition transcript | Different from written-discovery appeal-expiration wording |\n| No fixed retention period stated in that clause | Officer’s notes/recording copy | Other duties/orders remain |\n| Fourteen / seven / seven days | Written cross/redirect/recross questions after specified service | Court may alter for good cause |\n| Seven days after service | Objection to recross written-question form | Other written-question objections within responsive-question period |\n| Less than fourteen days’ notice | Rule 32(a)(5)(A) use limitation | Prompt protective motion still pending is required |\n| Before deposition or promptly after knowledge | Officer-disqualification objection | Diligence qualification |\n| Prompt written objection | Notice irregularity | Waiver if omitted as stated |\n| Timely at examination | Curable oral defects | Not every relevance/competency objection |\n| Prompt suppression motion | Completion/return defects | Knowledge or reasonably discoverable basis |\n| At least eighteen | Nonparty subpoena server | Distinct from initial-process server language |\n| One day’s attendance plus lawful mileage | Attendance tender if requested | Government and party-attorney-service exceptions |\n| At least thirty days | Party deposition production subpoena | Rule 34 applies |\n| All parties appeared or defaulted | Nonparty production timing | Court may order otherwise |\n| At least seven days before third-party service | Copy to opposing party | Court may specify otherwise |\n| Timely motion | Ordinary subpoena quash/modify | No universal fourteen-day objection clock stated |\n| Resident’s qualifying county | Deposition attendance | Residence, employment, or in-person business |\n| County where nonresident served | Nonresident deposition attendance | No actual territory selected |\n| At any time during deposition | Termination/limitation motion | Stated grounds and suspension-demand conditions |\n| Only by pending-action court order | Resumption after ordered termination | Not automatically restarted |\n| July 1, 2009 | Rule 45(j)(8) historical application text | Interstate mechanism not fully completed |\n\n## 10.3 Costs, protection, sanctions, and counting\n\n| Quantity/relation | Legal base | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| $20 per day | Nonparty/nonexpert witness testifies at deposition or trial | Rule 54 category, not every person |\n| $0.30 per mile, one way | Rule 54 travel clauses | Private-transport clause expressly trial-related; no universal deposition mileage calculation |\n| $2,000 per expert, all appearances | Ordinary taxable expert-cost category | Distinct from Rule 26 payment; discretionary-cost provision preserved |\n| One deposition copy | Taxable preparation-copy category | Reasonableness and court assessment |\n| Reasonable expert fee | Rule 26(b)(4)(E) | Manifest-injustice qualification; responding/testifying branches differ |\n| Fair portion of consulting-expert expenses | Rule 26(b)(4)(D),(E) | Required branch versus discretionary nonretained branch |\n| Reasonable production/copying cost | Rule 45(c)(2) | Issuing-party duty; no actual invoice |\n| Reasonable extraordinary retrieval expense | Rule 34(b)(2)(E)(iv) | Court may allocate |\n| Causally incurred reasonable expenses/fees | Rules 16,26,30,37 | Specific predicates/exceptions, not universal award |\n| Opportunity to be heard | Rule 37(a)(5), (c)(1) branches | No fixed number of days stated there |\n| Later proof of truth/genuineness | Failure-to-admit expenses | Four statutory-rule exceptions |\n| Prior discovery order | Rule 37(b) | Not imported as universal prerequisite to Rule 37(d) |\n| Routine good-faith ESI loss; exceptional circumstances | Rule 37(e) | Not complete preservation law |\n| Fourteen / seven / two days before hearing | Rule 7 moving/opposing/reply papers **received** | Other-rule and good-cause exceptions |\n| At least one day before hearing | Court’s denial of requested oral argument | Separate from response timing |\n| Trigger day excluded; intermediate days counted | Rule 2.2 | Qualified last-day extension |\n| First accessible nonweekend/nonholiday day | Clerk inaccessibility | Unless otherwise ordered |\n| Three additional days | Act due after service by mail | Not automatic for receipt, filing, notification, or hearing-relative periods |\n| Before expiry / after expiry | Extension request | Good cause; latter also motion and excusable neglect |\n| Written stipulation and court approval where required | Rules 2.2,16,29 | Trial/order interference cannot be ignored |\n| March 1 / July 1, 2016 | Rule adoption/effectiveness footers | Original order unavailable |\n| September 9, 2016 | Rules 2.2/30 amendment/effectiveness footers | Original amendments unopened |\n| Unknown | Actual request count, service, receipt, control, privilege, loss, expense, expert status, order, violation | None supplied or inferred |\n\nUnrelied-on quantities in Rule 27’s separate perpetuation route, full postjudgment cost practice, physical-examination medical facts, and interstate comments are not adopted as ordinary-discovery findings.\n\n# 11. Conditional branches and precise next inquiries\n\n| Branch | Missing predicate | Supported consequence | Adverse inference to avoid | Next generic inquiry |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **B01—ordinary scope** | Correct proceeding | Ordinary rules may govern | All civil-looking proceedings share discovery rights | Special-rule/statutory scope |\n| **B02—disclosure** | Specific request, rule, or order | Relevant disclosure duty | No automatic package means no duty | Applicable scheduling/special law |\n| **B03—scope** | Relevance, nonprivilege, burden balance | Permitted/limited discovery | Relevance alone means unlimited access | Rule 26 construction |\n| **B04—ESI access** | Burden/cost and good cause | Conditional discovery/conditions | Storage label proves inaccessibility | Technical and legal construction, no actual system |\n| **B05—work product** | Litigation purpose and need/hardship | Qualified protection | Every business record is work product | Complete privilege/work-product law |\n| **B06—privilege return** | Qualifying claim and notice | Interim handling duties | Notice conclusively proves privilege or nonwaiver | Applicable privilege/waiver law |\n| **B07—expert** | Correct witness category | Required substance/protection/payment | “Expert” title decides category | Qualification and rule construction |\n| **B08—supplement** | Exact Rule 26(e) condition | Timely correction/supplement | Every later fact always or never requires update | Construction/order scope |\n| **B09—signature** | Reasonable inquiry and permitted purpose | Certification consequence | Every incorrect answer automatically sanctionable | Rule 26(f) predicates |\n| **B10—interrogatories** | Count including discrete subparts | Limit or authorized enlargement | All subquestions count identically without construction | Counting construction |\n| **B11—records option** | Substantially equal burden and adequate access | Possible answer by records | Document dump necessarily answers | Rule 33(d) application |\n| **B12—production** | Possession/custody/control and format | Conditional production | Affiliate/cloud access automatically equals control | Generic control/ESI law |\n| **B13—admission** | Proper service, response and scope | Action-specific established matter | Automatic full judgment | Rule 36 and substantive law |\n| **B14—withdrawal** | Merits and prejudice conditions | Discretionary amendment/withdrawal | No consequence or automatic relief | Rule 36(b) construction |\n| **B15—early deposition** | Correct timing/exception/leave | Conditional examination | Departure allegation alone suffices | Rule 30/11 interaction |\n| **B16—organization** | Particular subjects and proper designation | Available-knowledge testimony duty | Every witness must know every fact personally | Organizational preparation construction |\n| **B17—remote record** | Stipulation/order and officer/record compliance | Permitted remote method | Video meeting alone is a deposition | Officer and recording authority |\n| **B18—objection** | Privilege, limitation or motion ground | Narrow nonanswer/suspension route | Any objection halts testimony | Rules 30/32 |\n| **B19—subpoena** | Issuance, service, recipient, geography | Conditional command | Notice alone compels nonparty attendance | Rule 45 and jurisdiction |\n| **B20—nonparty costs** | Proper production and reasonable cost | Rule-based payment/allocation | All requested costs automatically recoverable | Exact cost source |\n| **B21—protective motion** | Conference attempt, good cause | Possible order | Motion always stays compliance | Protective-order construction |\n| **B22—compel** | Failed response and certification | Motion route | Motion establishes discoverability | Rule 37(a) |\n| **B23—expenses** | Outcome, justification, injustice and hearing | Conditional payment | Losing any dispute automatically triggers fees | Rule 37(a)(5) |\n| **B24—order violation** | Valid applicable order and failure | Just sanctions | Any defect automatically defaults merits | Rule 37(b)/constitutional limits |\n| **B25—nondisclosure** | Duty and unjustified/nonharmless failure | Exclusion or alternatives | No materiality/harmlessness inquiry | Rule 37(c) |\n| **B26—ESI loss** | Routine good faith/exceptional circumstances and other law | Rule 37(e) protection or limit | Deletion is always permitted or automatically sanctionable | Preservation/spoliation law |\n| **B27—physical examination** | Controversy, good cause, notice/order and qualification | Separate branch | Debt action automatically permits medical inquiry | Rule 35/statutory/privacy law |\n| **B28—interstate** | Correct foreign-action and territorial framework | Separate mechanism | Idaho subpoena reaches everywhere | Rule 45(j) reconciliation/other jurisdiction |\n| **B29—history** | Original adopted orders and current incorporations | Exact gap may close | Footer proves entire history | Ordinary official original publication |\n| **B30—actual application** | Orders, facts and lawful authority | No result supplied | Generic rule is operational permission | Separate authorized application, not performed |\n\n# 12. Exact remaining dependencies\n\n| Separate subject | Required later generic inquiry |\n| --- | --- |\n| Privilege and waiver | IRE Article V, applicable statutory privileges, exceptions, waiver, common-interest and work-product construction |\n| Privacy/confidentiality/public access | Relevant medical, financial, consumer, employment and other confidentiality law; current court-access/sealing/redaction rules |\n| Preservation/spoliation | Duty triggers, reasonable preservation, inherent authority, constitutional limits, and remedies beyond Rule 37(e) |\n| Electronic declarations and records | Oath authority, § 9-1406, electronic-signature/e-filing requirements and any specific order |\n| Foreign/interstate discovery | Complete Rule 45(j), its published cross-references, other jurisdictions, treaties, foreign countries, sovereignty and tribal law |\n| Physical/mental examinations | § 6-1901 examiner definition, Rule 35 application, privilege and privacy law |\n| Trial testimony and experts | Full IRE qualification, reliability, hearsay, privilege and trial-use law; Rule 32’s complete unavailable-witness operation |\n| Contempt | Full substantive and procedural contempt protections; Rule 37/45 references alone do not complete them |\n| Sanction severity and default | Required judicial findings, proportionality, constitutional process, and review |\n| Costs and fees | Complete applicable statutory witness payments, taxable costs, fee-assessment procedures and necessary findings |\n| Sector protections | Medical, consumer credit, banking, insurance, benefits, secured property, public entities and protected-party regimes |\n| Federal law | Applicable federal discovery/procedure, FDCPA/FCRA, bankruptcy, SCRA, privacy and program law—only upon complete scope reading |\n| Pre-action/postjudgment/appellate | Rule 27, enforcement discovery, appellate/stay and original-order review beyond the narrow boundaries here |\n| Local rules/orders | Valid approved local rules and lawful scheduling/protective orders; none actually inspected |\n\nThe original Rule 28 reference to **Rule 29(a)** is retained although the current Rule 29 page uses unlettered bullets. The Rule 45(j) form/service cross-reference issues and the Rule 30/Rule 11 interaction remain uncorrected by assumption. **[C054–C055.]**\n\n# 13. Wholly blank conceptual worksheet\n\n| Field | Entry |\n| --- | --- |\n| Governing proceeding |  |\n| Authority and version |  |\n| Official-current-text status |  |\n| Applicable special-rule exclusion |  |\n| Scheduling-order dependency |  |\n| Discovery method |  |\n| Party/nonparty category |  |\n| Scope/relevance predicate |  |\n| Burden/proportionality condition |  |\n| Possession/custody/control condition |  |\n| Privilege/work-product assertion |  |\n| ESI accessibility issue |  |\n| Required certification |  |\n| Method-specific count |  |\n| Service trigger |  |\n| Response/objection period |  |\n| Oath/signature requirement |  |\n| Supplementation condition |  |\n| Production format |  |\n| Filing/retention rule |  |\n| Deposition leave predicate |  |\n| Officer/recording requirement |  |\n| Subpoena authority |  |\n| Attendance/territory condition |  |\n| Notice distinction |  |\n| Cost/payment source |  |\n| Conference prerequisite |  |\n| Protective-order condition |  |\n| Compel-motion condition |  |\n| Sanction predicate |  |\n| Expense exception |  |\n| Preservation dependency |  |\n| Unread incorporation |  |\n| Missing primary evidence |  |\n| Review status |  |\n\nNo field is completed.\n\n# 14. Granular coverage\n\n| Requested issue | Disposition | Claims/sources | Exact remaining gap |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **1—ordinary applicability** | Official scope read | C001–C002; S001–S002 | Actual proceeding/local-order scope |\n| District/magistrate distinction | Uniform rule application identified | C001 | Assignment/jurisdiction not rerun |\n| Small claims/de novo | Exact discovery restriction read | S002(d)(4) | No small-claims merits |\n| Pretrial versus proof/trial/postjudgment | Distinguished | C025,C035,C055 | Full separate regimes |\n| **2—general discovery scope** | Complete Rule 26 read | C003–C018 | Judicial construction |\n| Relevance/proportionality | Mandatory limitation conditions read | C006 | No actual burden finding |\n| Initial disclosures/conference | Text-specific finding | C003–C004 | Special statutes/orders |\n| Sequencing/stipulation | Complete provisions | C005 | No agreement/order |\n| Supplementation/signing | Complete provisions | C015–C017 | No actual failure |\n| ESI/accessibility/preservation | Rule text read; full preservation held | C007,C048 | Broader duty and spoliation law |\n| Privilege/work product/inadvertent production | Handling and protection rules read | C009,C013–C014 | Actual privilege/waiver |\n| Expert branches | Complete Rule 26(b)(4) | C010–C012 | Qualification and individual fee facts |\n| **3—interrogatories** | Complete Rule 33 | C019–C021 | Discrete-subpart construction |\n| Production/inspection | Complete Rule 34 | C022–C023 | Actual control and format |\n| Admissions | Complete Rule 36 | C024–C025 | No admission or withdrawal result |\n| Timing/signature/objection | Registered | Sections 3,10 | No calendar |\n| Nonfiling/retention | Complete relevant clauses | C026 | Other preservation law |\n| **4—oral deposition** | Complete Rule 30 | C027–C033 | Actual leave/notice/officer |\n| Written deposition | Complete Rule 31 | C034 | No questions or testimony |\n| Recording/remote/organization | Complete relevant clauses | C029–C030 | Foreign/technical authority |\n| Count/duration | Absence of a general numeric limit carefully bounded | C028,C034 | Court-imposed limits |\n| Subpoena issuance/service | Complete ordinary clauses | C036–C039 | Appendix B and external law |\n| Production-only versus attendance | Distinguished | C037 | No actual command |\n| Costs/territory | Material clauses read | C039–C040 | Exact fee/travel application |\n| Objection/quash/protection | Complete ordinary clauses | C031,C038 | No actual privilege/burden |\n| Interstate mechanisms | Read for boundary; not completed | C054–C055 | Cross-reference/foreign-law issues |\n| **5—conference/compel** | Complete Rule 37(a) | C042–C043 | No actual dispute |\n| Protective relief | Complete Rule 26(c) | C014 | No automatic stay/seal |\n| Order violation | Complete Rule 37(b) | C044 | Full sanction construction |\n| Failure to disclose/admit/attend/respond | Complete relevant branches | C045–C047 | No actual justification/harmlessness |\n| ESI loss | Complete current Rule 37(e) | C048 | No imported federal test |\n| Catch-all/Rule 16 sanctions | Read | C049–C050 | Constitutional and severity limits |\n| Rule 11 distinction | Exact text tension preserved | C018 | Reconciliation held |\n| **6—privilege/privacy/public access** | Exact dependencies registered | C055; Section 12 | Separate authority required |\n| Local/tribal/federal/interstate | Held beyond narrow rule scope | C055 | No universal reach/compliance |\n| Trial/appeal/postjudgment | Excluded | C055 | Later components |\n| Original history/judicial construction | Expressly held | C054 | Original orders unavailable |\n| **7—sources/read bounds** | Complete visible register | Section 8 | No original-order audit |\n| Dates/status distinctions | Footers, history and failed route separated | S001–S005 | No no-change inference |\n| Quantities/branches/worksheet | Supplied | Sections 10–13 | No inputs or actual events |\n| Read/failure/self-check | Supplied | Section 15 | Not independent review |\n| Prior findings/Q001/C033/C035 | Unchanged | C056 | No prior hold closed |\n| Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent | **Not accepted complete** | Entire report | Exact remaining gaps |\n\n# 15. Read, search, failure, and researcher self-check\n\n## Actual work performed\n\n| Material | Actual use |\n| --- | --- |\n| Official current IRCP | Complete or expressly bounded provisions in S001 |\n| Official small-claims rule | Discovery-on-appeal boundary only |\n| Official amendment index | Publication statement and available locator context |\n| Original 2016 adoption route | Fresh attempt; 404 |\n| Generic currentness searches | Relevant discovery-rule and adoption searches; no absence-of-amendment inference |\n| Consolidated/print formats | Cross-checks of the same instrument, not independent corroboration |\n| API-hosted original orders/forms | Not opened |\n| Cases, opinions, dockets, rosters | Not investigated |\n| Actual parties, witnesses, medical information, records, contracts, requests, responses, orders | Not requested, constructed, or evaluated |\n| Prior reports/local metadata | Supplied exclusions only; not fresh legal premises |\n\n## PDF and visual status\n\nNo PDF body was successfully recovered or analyzed in this pass. The original adoption route returned 404. Search-indexed PDF snippets remained discovery leads.\n\nAccordingly, no parsed-PDF body, original-order read, screenshot, or page-pixel inspection is claimed. The operative sources used were official HTML rule bodies.\n\n## Remaining gaps and conclusion\n\nThe principal gaps are:\n\n- Original adoption/amendment orders beyond displayed footers.\n- Rule 30’s Rule 11 reference, Rule 28’s Rule 29(a) reference, and Rule 45(j)’s published cross-references.\n- Complete privilege, waiver, privacy, sealing, preservation, contempt, and sanction-construction law.\n- Statutory examiner, oath, witness-fee, foreign, federal, and special-sector incorporations.\n- Actual scheduling orders, agreements, requests, responses, control, burden, loss, notice, or justification facts.\n\nNo actual or invented person, entity, creditor, debtor, lawyer, witness, employer, custodian, account, transaction, record, request, response, order, discovery event, amount, or date was supplied or constructed. No disclosure, objection, subpoena, motion, payment, sanction, or calendar outcome was determined.\n\nThis is a **researcher self-check, not independent review**. The discovery component is supported by newly read official rules but remains **conditional at the exact original-history, incorporation, construction, and actual-application boundaries identified above**. Earlier findings and holds remain preserved. No Idaho, dimension4, A066, parent, operational, or publication acceptance follows.\n\nEND S_ID PASS-24.\n\n","tables":[{"headers":["Context","Newly read rule relationship","Boundary"],"index":0,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Context","Newly read rule relationship","Boundary"],["Ordinary district-court or magistrate-division civil action","Rule 1(b) applies the civil rules uniformly within its scope.","Assignment, subject-matter jurisdiction, party status, and claim validity are not determined."],["Original small claims","Ordinary rules apply only as the small-claims rules provide.","The full ordinary discovery framework is not imported automatically."],["Small-claims de novo appeal","Small-claims Rule 15(d)(4) permits discovery only by written court order, within court-set limits.","Not a general unrestricted right to ordinary discovery."],["Special statutory, family, and identified treatment proceedings","Rule 1(b) preserves the specified alternative regimes.","Their discovery rules were not investigated."],["Pre-action or appeal-period perpetuation","Rule 27 has separate petition, order, and scope provisions.","It is not treated as ordinary pending-action discovery or a general pre-suit records demand."],["Trial and summary judgment","Discovery access and production are not themselves admissibility or merits rulings.","P23 proof and Rule 56 findings are not reused."],["Postjudgment discovery","Separate enforcement authority is required.","No Rule 69 or collection procedure is completed here."],["Local procedure","Rule 1(c) requires consistency, Supreme Court approval/publication, and its emergency qualification.","No local rule, scheduling order, or actual assignment was inspected."]]},{"headers":["Item","Legal function","What does not follow automatically"],"index":1,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Item","Legal function","What does not follow automatically"],["Request","Invokes a permitted method within its scope.","Relevance, proportionality, control, or entitlement to every requested item."],["Response or production","Supplies information or access subject to governing duties.","Authenticity, truth, admissibility, debt ownership, or liability."],["Admission","Can establish the admitted matter for the pending action under Rule 36.","A judgment for all requested relief or use in every other proceeding."],["Deposition","Preserved testimony taken under specified conditions.","Admissibility of every answer or automatic proof of the claim."],["Subpoena","Court process with defined issuance, service, scope, and protection rules.","Valid service, compliance entitlement, or absence of privilege."],["Protective order","Conditional judicial protection.","A universal privilege or permanent public-access seal."],["Discovery sanction","A consequence under its own predicates.","Automatic validation of the underlying debt or unlimited relief."]]},{"headers":["Duty","Trigger and scope"],"index":2,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Duty","Trigger and scope"],["Court scheduling action","Within thirty days after an answer or appearance is filed; alternatively, within ninety days after complaint filing if a defendant has been served but none has appeared."],["Scheduling order","Must address discovery completion and expert-disclosure deadlines, along with the other listed management matters."],["Scheduling-order modification","Court leave/good cause, or the permitted all-party stipulation with court approval, depending on the paragraph."],["Expert identification and substance","By interrogatory answer or court order under Rule 26(b)(4)."],["Trial witness/exhibit lists","Court may order them; later-discovered material receives Rule 16(d)’s supplementation treatment."],["Supplementation","Governed by Rule 26(e), not a universal assumption that every complete answer must be continually rewritten."]]},{"headers":["Material","Rule relationship"],"index":3,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Material","Rule relationship"],["Documents/things prepared for litigation or trial by or for a party or representative","Ordinarily protected; the stated substantial-need and undue-hardship showing can permit discovery of otherwise discoverable material."],["Mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, legal theories","Court must preserve the specified protection when ordering production."],["A person’s own prior statement","The person may request it without the substantial-need showing; signed/adopted written and substantially verbatim contemporaneous-recording categories are defined."],["Refusal to provide that statement","Motion and Rule 37(a)(5) expense provisions apply."]]},{"headers":["Event","Required or permitted treatment"],"index":4,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Event","Required or permitted treatment"],["Withholding otherwise discoverable information","Expressly claim the privilege/protection and describe the material sufficiently to allow assessment without revealing the protected substance."],["Claim asserted after production","Notify recipients of claim and basis; producer must preserve the material pending resolution."],["Recipient notified","Prompt return, sequestration, or destruction; no use/disclosure pending resolution; reasonable retrieval steps if previously disclosed; permitted sealed presentation for determination."],["Protective-order motion","Party or affected person; appropriate court; certification of good-faith conference or attempt."],["Protective relief","Good cause; possible limits on method, subject, people present, time/place, trade-secret/commercial information, or specified sealed handling."],["Motion denied wholly or partly","Court may order discovery on just terms; expense rules remain applicable."]]},{"headers":["Method","Recipient and permissible subject","Number and response"],"index":5,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Method","Recipient and permissible subject","Number and response"],["Interrogatories, Rule 33","Party; Rule 26 matters, including permitted fact/law-to-fact contentions","Forty including discrete subparts, unless stipulated or specific additional number ordered for good cause; thirty-day service-based response"],["Production/inspection, Rule 34","Party’s possession, custody, or control; documents, ESI, things, or qualifying property inspection","No numerical count stated in Rule 34; thirty-day written response, subject to Rule 29/order"],["Admissions, Rule 36","Party; pending-action facts, application of law to fact, opinions about either, document genuineness","No numerical count stated in Rule 36; thirty-day answer/objection period, subject to Rule 29/order"]]},{"headers":["Issue","Oral deposition","Written-question deposition"],"index":6,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Issue","Oral deposition","Written-question deposition"],["General availability","Any person, including a party, subject to leave conditions","Same general availability, with different leave conditions"],["Prison confinement","Leave required","Leave required"],["Early plaintiff examination","Rule 30’s initial-service period applies, with stated exceptions","That Rule 30 early-plaintiff condition is not automatically imported"],["Previously deposed person","No separate repeat-deposition leave condition appears in Rule 30(a)(2)","Without stipulation, leave required; grant is subject to Rule 26(b)(1)(C)"],["Notice","Reasonable written notice to every other party; time/place and identifying information","Notice plus direct questions, served on every other party; officer identified"],["Other parties’ questions","Oral participation or the specified sealed-written-question method","Cross, redirect, and recross sequence"],["Organizational witness","Reasonably particular subjects and designated consenting representative(s)","Rule 30(b)(6) incorporation"],["Attendance","Subpoena where compulsion is required","Same distinction"]]},{"headers":["Event","Rule consequence"],"index":7,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Event","Rule consequence"],["Ordinary objection during examination","Recorded; examination generally proceeds subject to it"],["Instruction not to answer","Only the specified privilege, court-limitation, or Rule 30(d)(4) motion ground"],["Impeding/delaying/frustrating examination","Discretionary sanctions under Rule 30(d)(3)"],["Bad-faith or unreasonably annoying, embarrassing, or oppressive examination","Motion to terminate/limit; on the stated demand, suspension for the time needed to obtain an order"],["Examination terminated by order","Resumption requires order of the court where the action is pending"],["Review","Unless waived by deponent and parties, thirty days after officer notification that transcript/recording is available"],["Changes","Signed statement of form/substance changes and reasons"],["Unsigned after period","Officer’s signature and reason statement; use remains subject to Rule 32(d)(4)"],["Transcript custody","Not routinely filed; attorney retention until one year after final disposition, unless longer ordered"],["Recording/notes","Officer retains the specified notes or recording copy; no universal separate destruction date inferred"]]},{"headers":["Matter","Material rule"],"index":8,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Matter","Material rule"],["General issuing court","Court where the action is pending"],["Issuer","Clerk under the stated signed/sealed procedure, or Idaho-licensed attorney as officer of the court"],["Required form/content","Substantially Appendix B form; court, action, command, time/place and recording method where applicable"],["Server","Nonparty at least eighteen"],["Service","Delivery to the named person"],["Attendance fees","One day’s attendance and lawful mileage tendered if requested, subject to government exceptions"],["Attorney service for party","The stated Rule 5 branch concerns hearing/trial attendance, not every nonparty or deposition subpoena"],["Proof","Officer certificate or other server affidavit with required details"]]},{"headers":["Branch","Conditions"],"index":9,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Branch","Conditions"],["Party deponent required to produce","Rule 34 scope/procedure; at least thirty days to comply"],["Nonparty production/inspection","After all parties have appeared or defaulted, unless otherwise ordered"],["Advance party notice","Opposing party receives a copy at least seven days before service on the nonparty, unless court specifies otherwise"],["Costs","Issuing party pays reasonable production/copying cost; requested copies to another party carry reasonable-cost conditions"],["Document-only command","No personal attendance unless separately commanded"],["Organization/form of production","Usual-course or category organization; ordinarily maintained/reasonably usable ESI; generally one form"]]},{"headers":["Source","Limited relationship"],"index":10,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Source","Limited relationship"],["Rule 45(b), (h)","Attendance tender and witness-fee incorporation"],["Rule 54(d)(1)(C)(iii)","$20 per day for a nonparty, nonexpert witness testifying at deposition or trial"],["Rule 54(d)(1)(C)(iv)–(v)","One-way $0.30 mileage language; the private-transport paragraph expressly refers to trial testimony"],["Rule 54(d)(1)(C)(ix)","Ordinary taxable expert-cost ceiling of $2,000 per expert for all appearances"],["Rule 26(b)(4)(E)","Separate reasonable expert-discovery payment duties; not automatically capped by that taxable-cost figure"],["Rule 54(d)(1)(C)(x)–(xi)","Reporting/transcription and one deposition-copy costs, subject to reasonableness"],["Rule 54(d)(1)(D)","Additional exceptional/necessary costs require the specified showing and findings"],["Rules 30.1(g), 34(b)(2)(E)(iv), 45(c)–(d)","Separate discretionary taxation or allocation of recording, extraordinary retrieval, and production costs"]]},{"headers":["Outcome","Rule 37(a)(5)"],"index":11,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Outcome","Rule 37(a)(5)"],["Motion granted, or discovery supplied after filing","Expenses required after opportunity to be heard, unless no prior good-faith attempt, substantial justification, or other injustice"],["Motion denied","Opponent’s expenses required after opportunity to be heard, unless substantial justification or other injustice; protective order may issue"],["Granted in part/denied in part","Protective relief and apportionment are discretionary after the stated opportunity"]]},{"headers":["Branch","Predicate and consequence","Exception or limit"],"index":12,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Branch","Predicate and consequence","Exception or limit"],["Violation of discovery order, Rule 37(b)","Court may impose just issue/evidence, pleading, stay, dismissal, default, or contempt-related consequences","Prior order is material to this branch; contempt excludes the stated examination order"],["Failure to produce another person for examination","Specified sanctions may apply","Inability-to-produce showing is expressly preserved"],["Expenses caused by order violation","Required instead of or in addition to other relief","Substantial justification or unjust circumstances"],["Failure to supplement or obey court-ordered disclosure, Rule 37(c)(1)","Information/witness use excluded in the specified settings","Substantial justification or harmlessness; additional/alternative sanctions require motion and opportunity to be heard"],["Failure to admit, Rule 37(c)(2)","After later proof, reasonable proof expenses required on motion","Objectionable request, immaterial matter, reasonable belief of prevailing, or other good reason"],["Complete failure to attend/answer/respond, Rule 37(d)","Motion-based sanctions for the specified properly noticed/served failures","No universal prior compel order is stated; certification required for specified response failures"],["Mere objection as excuse","Insufficient under Rule 37(d)(2) unless a protective motion is pending","Pending motion is not declared a universal immunity or automatic stay"],["General order violation, Rule 37(f)","Additional discretionary sanctions/conditions/fees/costs/expenses","Requires failure to comply with an order under the rules"]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds and use"],"index":13,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual read bounds and use"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1","Complete (a)–(c); scope and local-rule qualifications"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2","Complete (a)–(c), including exceptions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/5","Complete; substantive use limited to discovery service, proof, and specific-rule filing interaction; fax mechanics not applied"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7","Complete; use limited to motions, receipt-based timing and exceptions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11","Complete (a)–(d); use confined to discovery exclusion and Rule 30 cross-reference issue"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/16","Complete (a)–(e); scheduling, disclosure and sanctions used; trial/ADR merits not completed"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/26","Complete (a)–(f)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/27","Complete body inspected; substantive use limited to identifying separate perpetuation scope; pre-action/appeal procedure not completed"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/28","Complete (a)–(d); ordinary officer/disqualification rules used; foreign/military qualifications held"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/29","Complete stipulation provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/30","Complete (a)–(g)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/30.1","Complete (a)–(g)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/31","Complete (a)–(d)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/32","Complete body inspected; reliance on (a)(1), (a)(5), (b), (d), and Rule 30 signature incorporation; full trial-use/unavailability branches not applied"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/33","Complete (a)–(e)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/34","Complete (a)–(d)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/35","Complete (a)–(b); limited incorporated boundary only; § 6-1901 not read"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/36","Complete (a)–(e)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/37","Complete (a)–(f)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/43","Complete page inspected; reliance only on (b), (d) as examination incorporations; interpreter/trial provisions deferred"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/45","Complete operative (a)–(j); substantive ordinary findings limited to (a)–(i); (j) read to identify interstate scope, historical application and cross-reference gaps. Illustrative comments not used as scenarios."],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54","Complete (d)(1) read; reliance on (A)–(D), especially (C)(iii)–(v), (ix)–(xi). Remaining fee/enforcement procedures not developed."]]},{"headers":["Rules","Displayed history"],"index":14,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Rules","Displayed history"],["All listed civil rules","Adopted March 1, 2016, effective July 1, 2016"],["Rule 1","Amended April 30, 2024/effective same day; September 30, 2024/effective October 1, 2024"],["Rules 2.2 and 30","Amended September 9, 2016/effective same day"],["Rule 54","April 27, 2016/July 1, 2016; October 6, 2016/March 1, 2017; April 17, 2017/nunc pro tunc March 1, 2017; December 14, 2017/January 1, 2018; April 28, 2021/July 1, 2021"],["Rule 45(j)(8)","Body retains a separate historical pending-action application reference to July 1, 2009"]]},{"headers":["Literal URL or material","Actual status"],"index":15,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal URL or material","Actual status"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/1988","Search-indexed official rule link exposed the exact adoption URL; PDF body not opened"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/2059","Search result for Rule 26; not treated as a separate authority or read PDF"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/2281","Rule-index search lead only"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/2120","Historical rule-index search lead only"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/recent-amendments","Search metadata; current ordinary page separately identified in S003"],["API-hosted original orders and Appendix B","Not opened"],["Unrelated criminal/juvenile/family-rule search results","Not applied"]]},{"headers":["Claim","Precise proposition","Source/pinpoint","Limit"],"index":16,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claim","Precise proposition","Source/pinpoint","Limit"],["C001","Ordinary scope includes district and magistrate divisions with express special-proceeding exclusions.","S001 Rule 1(b)","O"],["C002","Local rules and particular orders require their own lawful scope; no actual order was examined.","Rule 1(c); S002","O/H"],["C003","Read Rules 16/26 do not supply a universal automatic initial-disclosure package or planning-conference prerequisite.","Rules 16, 26","Bounded textual finding"],["C004","Scheduling action, order contents, modifications, and ordered disclosures have distinct duties.","Rule 16(a)–(d)","O"],["C005","Sequence and stipulation rules preserve court-order and trial-interference limits.","Rules 26(d), 29","O"],["C006","Nonprivileged relevance and mandatory burden/cumulative limits both govern.","Rule 26(b)(1)(A),(C)","O"],["C007","Inaccessible-ESI claims have responding-party and requesting-party burdens.","Rule 26(b)(1)(B)","O"],["C008","Insurance-agreement discovery is not admissibility and excludes the stated application category.","Rule 26(b)(2)","O"],["C009","Work product, mental impressions, and own prior statements are separate branches.","Rule 26(b)(3)","O/H"],["C010","Expert disclosures differ by expert category and trigger.","Rule 26(b)(4)(A)","O"],["C011","Expert drafts, communications, non-testifying work, and contact have specific protections/exceptions.","Rule 26(b)(4)(A)(v)–(D)","O"],["C012","Expert-discovery payment differs from taxable expert costs.","Rule 26(b)(4)(E); Rule 54(d)(1)","O"],["C013","Privilege assertions and postproduction handling do not decide privilege or waiver.","Rule 26(b)(5)","O/H"],["C014","Protective orders require the specified motion, conference certification, and good cause.","Rule 26(c)","O"],["C015","Supplementation has enumerated conditions, not an unqualified universal duty.","Rule 26(e)","O"],["C016","Discovery signatures certify reasonable inquiry and the stated purposes/proportionality.","Rule 26(f)(1)","O"],["C017","Missing signatures and unjustified certifications have different consequences.","Rule 26(f)(2)–(3)","O"],["C018","Rule 11’s exclusion and Rule 30’s express reference require qualified treatment.","Rules 11(d), 30(a)(2)(B)(ii)","O/H"],["C019","Interrogatories are party-directed, capped at forty including discrete subparts, with defined timing.","Rule 33(a)","O"],["C020","Interrogatory oath, organizational information, signatures, and specific objections are distinct duties.","Rule 33(b)","O"],["C021","Business-record substitution requires substantially equal burden and adequate identification/access.","Rule 33(d)","O"],["C022","Production requires proper scope, control and particularity.","Rule 34(a),(b)(1)","O"],["C023","Production responses, partial objections, ESI form and extraordinary costs have separate rules.","Rule 34(b)(2)","O"],["C024","Admission responses require reasonable inquiry, specific treatment and timely signed service.","Rule 36(a)","O"],["C025","Admissions are action-specific and withdrawal/amendment is conditional, not automatic judgment.","Rule 36(b)–(d)","O"],["C026","Written discovery has nonfiling, notice and retention obligations.","Rules 33(e),34(d),36(e)","O"],["C027","Deposition officer and stipulation requirements do not establish actual authority.","Rules 28–29","O/H"],["C028","Oral leave rules distinguish prison confinement from early plaintiff examination and its exceptions.","Rule 30(a)","O"],["C029","Oral notice, organizations and remote location have separate predicates.","Rule 30(b)(1),(4)–(6)","O"],["C030","Audio/audiovisual recording retains stenographic and custody requirements.","Rules 30(b)(3),30.1","O"],["C031","Objections, nonanswer instructions, obstruction sanctions and suspension are distinct.","Rule 30(c)–(d)","O"],["C032","Review, changes and unsigned-deposition treatment use their stated thirty-day event.","Rule 30(e)","O"],["C033","Deposition retention differs from written-discovery retention.","Rule 30(f)","O"],["C034","Written-question depositions have their own leave and fourteen/seven/seven sequence.","Rule 31","O"],["C035","Short-notice use protection and objection waivers are not universal notice or admissibility rules.","Rule 32(a)(1),(5),(b),(d)","O/H"],["C036","Subpoena issuance, delivery, fees, proof and attorney-service exception are distinct.","Rule 45(a)–(b)","O"],["C037","Party deposition-production and nonparty production have different timing/cost predicates.","Rule 45(c)","O"],["C038","Quashing and nonparty ESI/privilege handling require their specified conditions.","Rule 45(d)–(e)","O"],["C039","Deposition attendance uses the county-based rule; interstate law remains separate.","Rule 45(f)–(j)","O/H"],["C040","Witness payment, expert-discovery fees and taxable costs are not one universal cap.","Rules 45(h),54(d)(1),26(b)(4)(E)","O/H"],["C041","Subpoena contempt requires service and lack of adequate excuse.","Rule 45(i)","O"],["C042","Compel motions require notice, conference certification and the correct forum/predicate.","Rule 37(a)(1)–(4)","O"],["C043","Granted/denied/mixed-motion expenses have different mandatory and discretionary branches.","Rule 37(a)(5)","O"],["C044","Order-violation sanctions preserve justice, inability, examination and expense exceptions.","Rule 37(b)","O"],["C045","Nondisclosure/supplementation exclusion preserves justification/harmlessness and hearing conditions.","Rule 37(c)(1)","O"],["C046","Failure-to-admit expenses require later proof and retain four exceptions.","Rule 37(c)(2)","O"],["C047","Complete discovery failures can invoke sanctions without a universal prior compel order.","Rule 37(d)","O/H"],["C048","ESI-loss protection uses routine good-faith operation and exceptional-circumstance wording.","Rule 37(e)","O/H"],["C049","Catch-all discovery consequences require the stated court-order failure.","Rule 37(f)","O"],["C050","Scheduling sanctions have independent triggers and causal-expense qualifications.","Rule 16(e)","O"],["C051","Rule 35 is a separate, conditional examination/report/waiver branch.","Rule 35; Rules 26/37 incorporations","O/H"],["C052","Service, receipt, filing, retention and additional mail time must remain distinct.","Rules 2.2,5,29","O/H"],["C053","Ordinary motion timing yields to different governing rules and authorized exceptions.","Rule 7(b)","O"],["C054","Original-history and published cross-reference issues remain explicit.","S001–S005","Provenance/H"],["C055","Full privilege/privacy, interstate, federal, sector, trial and postjudgment regimes remain open.","Section 12","H"],["C056","No actual discovery event or outcome was evaluated; all prior holds remain.","Research record","Certain"]]},{"headers":["Quantity/relation","Reference event or base","Qualification"],"index":17,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Quantity/relation","Reference event or base","Qualification"],["Thirty days","Answer or appearance filed","Court must take scheduling action; order as soon as practicable"],["Ninety days","Complaint filed, with served defendant but no appearance","Alternative Rule 16 condition"],["At least thirty days before trial","Final pretrial process","Not a universal automatic disclosure deadline"],["Seven days","Service of a party’s trial-setting request","Response filed and served under Rule 16(b)(3)"],["Forty, including all discrete subparts","Interrogatories to any other party","Stipulation or specific additional number for good cause"],["Thirty days after service","Interrogatory answers/objections","Rule 29 or court may alter"],["Thirty days after service","Production response","Not automatically completion of every production"],["Thirty days after service","Admission answer/objection","Untimely absence has the Rule 36 consequence"],["No numerical count stated","Production requests/admissions in their method rules","Rule 26 and orders still limit"],["After commencement","Service on plaintiff of Rules 33/34/36 papers","Other party: with or after summons/complaint service"],["One year after final disposition and appeal-period expiration","Written-discovery originals and proof","Longer retention may be ordered"],["One ordinarily maintained or reasonably usable ESI form","Production absent a valid contrary specification/order","No routine duplicate-form duty"],["Ten preceding years","Retained-expert publications disclosure","No publication or author researched"],["Four preceding years","Retained-expert testimony history","No case or witness investigated"],["Timely supplementation","Rule 26(e) triggers","No fixed universal number of days"],["Prompt signature correction","Unsigned discovery paper","Otherwise strike/no duty to act"],["Reasonable inquiry","Signature certification and admission inability response","Different substantive duties"],["Prompt postproduction handling","Privilege/protection notification","No adjudicated waiver"],["Reasonable opportunity/time/place","Records-option access and other provisions","No fixed numeric substitution"]]},{"headers":["Quantity/relation","Reference event/base","Qualification"],"index":18,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Quantity/relation","Reference event/base","Qualification"],["“More than thirty days have not passed”","Specified initial service in early plaintiff deposition","Literal Rule 30 wording preserved"],["More than 100 miles / leaving United States","Certified departure before early period expires","Later unavailability and supporting facts required"],["Reasonable written notice","Oral deposition","Not a universal fourteen-day minimum"],["No general count/hour ceiling stated","Read Rules 30–31","Court and Rule 26 limits remain"],["One or more designees","Organization deposition","Consent/authority and available-information duties"],["Remote location","Where deponent answers","Specified rule purposes"],["Simultaneous stenographic record","Audio/audiovisual deposition","Applicable stipulation/order/rule conditions"],["Thirty days after officer notification","Transcript/recording review","Unless deponent and parties waive"],["Thirty-day signature period","Witness changes/signature branch","Officer certification and Rule 32 qualification"],["One year after final disposition","Attorney-held deposition transcript","Different from written-discovery appeal-expiration wording"],["No fixed retention period stated in that clause","Officer’s notes/recording copy","Other duties/orders remain"],["Fourteen / seven / seven days","Written cross/redirect/recross questions after specified service","Court may alter for good cause"],["Seven days after service","Objection to recross written-question form","Other written-question objections within responsive-question period"],["Less than fourteen days’ notice","Rule 32(a)(5)(A) use limitation","Prompt protective motion still pending is required"],["Before deposition or promptly after knowledge","Officer-disqualification objection","Diligence qualification"],["Prompt written objection","Notice irregularity","Waiver if omitted as stated"],["Timely at examination","Curable oral defects","Not every relevance/competency objection"],["Prompt suppression motion","Completion/return defects","Knowledge or reasonably discoverable basis"],["At least eighteen","Nonparty subpoena server","Distinct from initial-process server language"],["One day’s attendance plus lawful mileage","Attendance tender if requested","Government and party-attorney-service exceptions"],["At least thirty days","Party deposition production subpoena","Rule 34 applies"],["All parties appeared or defaulted","Nonparty production timing","Court may order otherwise"],["At least seven days before third-party service","Copy to opposing party","Court may specify otherwise"],["Timely motion","Ordinary subpoena quash/modify","No universal fourteen-day objection clock stated"],["Resident’s qualifying county","Deposition attendance","Residence, employment, or in-person business"],["County where nonresident served","Nonresident deposition attendance","No actual territory selected"],["At any time during deposition","Termination/limitation motion","Stated grounds and suspension-demand conditions"],["Only by pending-action court order","Resumption after ordered termination","Not automatically restarted"],["July 1, 2009","Rule 45(j)(8) historical application text","Interstate mechanism not fully completed"]]},{"headers":["Quantity/relation","Legal base","Qualification"],"index":19,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Quantity/relation","Legal base","Qualification"],["$20 per day","Nonparty/nonexpert witness testifies at deposition or trial","Rule 54 category, not every person"],["$0.30 per mile, one way","Rule 54 travel clauses","Private-transport clause expressly trial-related; no universal deposition mileage calculation"],["$2,000 per expert, all appearances","Ordinary taxable expert-cost category","Distinct from Rule 26 payment; discretionary-cost provision preserved"],["One deposition copy","Taxable preparation-copy category","Reasonableness and court assessment"],["Reasonable expert fee","Rule 26(b)(4)(E)","Manifest-injustice qualification; responding/testifying branches differ"],["Fair portion of consulting-expert expenses","Rule 26(b)(4)(D),(E)","Required branch versus discretionary nonretained branch"],["Reasonable production/copying cost","Rule 45(c)(2)","Issuing-party duty; no actual invoice"],["Reasonable extraordinary retrieval expense","Rule 34(b)(2)(E)(iv)","Court may allocate"],["Causally incurred reasonable expenses/fees","Rules 16,26,30,37","Specific predicates/exceptions, not universal award"],["Opportunity to be heard","Rule 37(a)(5), (c)(1) branches","No fixed number of days stated there"],["Later proof of truth/genuineness","Failure-to-admit expenses","Four statutory-rule exceptions"],["Prior discovery order","Rule 37(b)","Not imported as universal prerequisite to Rule 37(d)"],["Routine good-faith ESI loss; exceptional circumstances","Rule 37(e)","Not complete preservation law"],["Fourteen / seven / two days before hearing","Rule 7 moving/opposing/reply papers received","Other-rule and good-cause exceptions"],["At least one day before hearing","Court’s denial of requested oral argument","Separate from response timing"],["Trigger day excluded; intermediate days counted","Rule 2.2","Qualified last-day extension"],["First accessible nonweekend/nonholiday day","Clerk inaccessibility","Unless otherwise ordered"],["Three additional days","Act due after service by mail","Not automatic for receipt, filing, notification, or hearing-relative periods"],["Before expiry / after expiry","Extension request","Good cause; latter also motion and excusable neglect"],["Written stipulation and court approval where required","Rules 2.2,16,29","Trial/order interference cannot be ignored"],["March 1 / July 1, 2016","Rule adoption/effectiveness footers","Original order unavailable"],["September 9, 2016","Rules 2.2/30 amendment/effectiveness footers","Original amendments unopened"],["Unknown","Actual request count, service, receipt, control, privilege, loss, expense, expert status, order, violation","None supplied or inferred"]]},{"headers":["Branch","Missing predicate","Supported consequence","Adverse inference to avoid","Next generic inquiry"],"index":20,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Branch","Missing predicate","Supported consequence","Adverse inference to avoid","Next generic inquiry"],["B01—ordinary scope","Correct proceeding","Ordinary rules may govern","All civil-looking proceedings share discovery rights","Special-rule/statutory scope"],["B02—disclosure","Specific request, rule, or order","Relevant disclosure duty","No automatic package means no duty","Applicable scheduling/special law"],["B03—scope","Relevance, nonprivilege, burden balance","Permitted/limited discovery","Relevance alone means unlimited access","Rule 26 construction"],["B04—ESI access","Burden/cost and good cause","Conditional discovery/conditions","Storage label proves inaccessibility","Technical and legal construction, no actual system"],["B05—work product","Litigation purpose and need/hardship","Qualified protection","Every business record is work product","Complete privilege/work-product law"],["B06—privilege return","Qualifying claim and notice","Interim handling duties","Notice conclusively proves privilege or nonwaiver","Applicable privilege/waiver law"],["B07—expert","Correct witness category","Required substance/protection/payment","“Expert” title decides category","Qualification and rule construction"],["B08—supplement","Exact Rule 26(e) condition","Timely correction/supplement","Every later fact always or never requires update","Construction/order scope"],["B09—signature","Reasonable inquiry and permitted purpose","Certification consequence","Every incorrect answer automatically sanctionable","Rule 26(f) predicates"],["B10—interrogatories","Count including discrete subparts","Limit or authorized enlargement","All subquestions count identically without construction","Counting construction"],["B11—records option","Substantially equal burden and adequate access","Possible answer by records","Document dump necessarily answers","Rule 33(d) application"],["B12—production","Possession/custody/control and format","Conditional production","Affiliate/cloud access automatically equals control","Generic control/ESI law"],["B13—admission","Proper service, response and scope","Action-specific established matter","Automatic full judgment","Rule 36 and substantive law"],["B14—withdrawal","Merits and prejudice conditions","Discretionary amendment/withdrawal","No consequence or automatic relief","Rule 36(b) construction"],["B15—early deposition","Correct timing/exception/leave","Conditional examination","Departure allegation alone suffices","Rule 30/11 interaction"],["B16—organization","Particular subjects and proper designation","Available-knowledge testimony duty","Every witness must know every fact personally","Organizational preparation construction"],["B17—remote record","Stipulation/order and officer/record compliance","Permitted remote method","Video meeting alone is a deposition","Officer and recording authority"],["B18—objection","Privilege, limitation or motion ground","Narrow nonanswer/suspension route","Any objection halts testimony","Rules 30/32"],["B19—subpoena","Issuance, service, recipient, geography","Conditional command","Notice alone compels nonparty attendance","Rule 45 and jurisdiction"],["B20—nonparty costs","Proper production and reasonable cost","Rule-based payment/allocation","All requested costs automatically recoverable","Exact cost source"],["B21—protective motion","Conference attempt, good cause","Possible order","Motion always stays compliance","Protective-order construction"],["B22—compel","Failed response and certification","Motion route","Motion establishes discoverability","Rule 37(a)"],["B23—expenses","Outcome, justification, injustice and hearing","Conditional payment","Losing any dispute automatically triggers fees","Rule 37(a)(5)"],["B24—order violation","Valid applicable order and failure","Just sanctions","Any defect automatically defaults merits","Rule 37(b)/constitutional limits"],["B25—nondisclosure","Duty and unjustified/nonharmless failure","Exclusion or alternatives","No materiality/harmlessness inquiry","Rule 37(c)"],["B26—ESI loss","Routine good faith/exceptional circumstances and other law","Rule 37(e) protection or limit","Deletion is always permitted or automatically sanctionable","Preservation/spoliation law"],["B27—physical examination","Controversy, good cause, notice/order and qualification","Separate branch","Debt action automatically permits medical inquiry","Rule 35/statutory/privacy law"],["B28—interstate","Correct foreign-action and territorial framework","Separate mechanism","Idaho subpoena reaches everywhere","Rule 45(j) reconciliation/other jurisdiction"],["B29—history","Original adopted orders and current incorporations","Exact gap may close","Footer proves entire history","Ordinary official original publication"],["B30—actual application","Orders, facts and lawful authority","No result supplied","Generic rule is operational permission","Separate authorized application, not performed"]]},{"headers":["Separate subject","Required later generic inquiry"],"index":21,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Separate subject","Required later generic inquiry"],["Privilege and waiver","IRE Article V, applicable statutory privileges, exceptions, waiver, common-interest and work-product construction"],["Privacy/confidentiality/public access","Relevant medical, financial, consumer, employment and other confidentiality law; current court-access/sealing/redaction rules"],["Preservation/spoliation","Duty triggers, reasonable preservation, inherent authority, constitutional limits, and remedies beyond Rule 37(e)"],["Electronic declarations and records","Oath authority, § 9-1406, electronic-signature/e-filing requirements and any specific order"],["Foreign/interstate discovery","Complete Rule 45(j), its published cross-references, other jurisdictions, treaties, foreign countries, sovereignty and tribal law"],["Physical/mental examinations","§ 6-1901 examiner definition, Rule 35 application, privilege and privacy law"],["Trial testimony and experts","Full IRE qualification, reliability, hearsay, privilege and trial-use law; Rule 32’s complete unavailable-witness operation"],["Contempt","Full substantive and procedural contempt protections; Rule 37/45 references alone do not complete them"],["Sanction severity and default","Required judicial findings, proportionality, constitutional process, and review"],["Costs and fees","Complete applicable statutory witness payments, taxable costs, fee-assessment procedures and necessary findings"],["Sector protections","Medical, consumer credit, banking, insurance, benefits, secured property, public entities and protected-party regimes"],["Federal law","Applicable federal discovery/procedure, FDCPA/FCRA, bankruptcy, SCRA, privacy and program law—only upon complete scope reading"],["Pre-action/postjudgment/appellate","Rule 27, enforcement discovery, appellate/stay and original-order review beyond the narrow boundaries here"],["Local rules/orders","Valid approved local rules and lawful scheduling/protective orders; none actually inspected"]]},{"headers":["Field","Entry"],"index":22,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Field","Entry"],["Governing proceeding",""],["Authority and version",""],["Official-current-text status",""],["Applicable special-rule exclusion",""],["Scheduling-order dependency",""],["Discovery method",""],["Party/nonparty category",""],["Scope/relevance predicate",""],["Burden/proportionality condition",""],["Possession/custody/control condition",""],["Privilege/work-product assertion",""],["ESI accessibility issue",""],["Required certification",""],["Method-specific count",""],["Service trigger",""],["Response/objection period",""],["Oath/signature requirement",""],["Supplementation condition",""],["Production format",""],["Filing/retention rule",""],["Deposition leave predicate",""],["Officer/recording requirement",""],["Subpoena authority",""],["Attendance/territory condition",""],["Notice distinction",""],["Cost/payment source",""],["Conference prerequisite",""],["Protective-order condition",""],["Compel-motion condition",""],["Sanction predicate",""],["Expense exception",""],["Preservation dependency",""],["Unread incorporation",""],["Missing primary evidence",""],["Review status",""]]},{"headers":["Requested issue","Disposition","Claims/sources","Exact remaining gap"],"index":23,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Requested issue","Disposition","Claims/sources","Exact remaining gap"],["1—ordinary applicability","Official scope read","C001–C002; S001–S002","Actual proceeding/local-order scope"],["District/magistrate distinction","Uniform rule application identified","C001","Assignment/jurisdiction not rerun"],["Small claims/de novo","Exact discovery restriction read","S002(d)(4)","No small-claims merits"],["Pretrial versus proof/trial/postjudgment","Distinguished","C025,C035,C055","Full separate regimes"],["2—general discovery scope","Complete Rule 26 read","C003–C018","Judicial construction"],["Relevance/proportionality","Mandatory limitation conditions read","C006","No actual burden finding"],["Initial disclosures/conference","Text-specific finding","C003–C004","Special statutes/orders"],["Sequencing/stipulation","Complete provisions","C005","No agreement/order"],["Supplementation/signing","Complete provisions","C015–C017","No actual failure"],["ESI/accessibility/preservation","Rule text read; full preservation held","C007,C048","Broader duty and spoliation law"],["Privilege/work product/inadvertent production","Handling and protection rules read","C009,C013–C014","Actual privilege/waiver"],["Expert branches","Complete Rule 26(b)(4)","C010–C012","Qualification and individual fee facts"],["3—interrogatories","Complete Rule 33","C019–C021","Discrete-subpart construction"],["Production/inspection","Complete Rule 34","C022–C023","Actual control and format"],["Admissions","Complete Rule 36","C024–C025","No admission or withdrawal result"],["Timing/signature/objection","Registered","Sections 3,10","No calendar"],["Nonfiling/retention","Complete relevant clauses","C026","Other preservation law"],["4—oral deposition","Complete Rule 30","C027–C033","Actual leave/notice/officer"],["Written deposition","Complete Rule 31","C034","No questions or testimony"],["Recording/remote/organization","Complete relevant clauses","C029–C030","Foreign/technical authority"],["Count/duration","Absence of a general numeric limit carefully bounded","C028,C034","Court-imposed limits"],["Subpoena issuance/service","Complete ordinary clauses","C036–C039","Appendix B and external law"],["Production-only versus attendance","Distinguished","C037","No actual command"],["Costs/territory","Material clauses read","C039–C040","Exact fee/travel application"],["Objection/quash/protection","Complete ordinary clauses","C031,C038","No actual privilege/burden"],["Interstate mechanisms","Read for boundary; not completed","C054–C055","Cross-reference/foreign-law issues"],["5—conference/compel","Complete Rule 37(a)","C042–C043","No actual dispute"],["Protective relief","Complete Rule 26(c)","C014","No automatic stay/seal"],["Order violation","Complete Rule 37(b)","C044","Full sanction construction"],["Failure to disclose/admit/attend/respond","Complete relevant branches","C045–C047","No actual justification/harmlessness"],["ESI loss","Complete current Rule 37(e)","C048","No imported federal test"],["Catch-all/Rule 16 sanctions","Read","C049–C050","Constitutional and severity limits"],["Rule 11 distinction","Exact text tension preserved","C018","Reconciliation held"],["6—privilege/privacy/public access","Exact dependencies registered","C055; Section 12","Separate authority required"],["Local/tribal/federal/interstate","Held beyond narrow rule scope","C055","No universal reach/compliance"],["Trial/appeal/postjudgment","Excluded","C055","Later components"],["Original history/judicial construction","Expressly held","C054","Original orders unavailable"],["7—sources/read bounds","Complete visible register","Section 8","No original-order audit"],["Dates/status distinctions","Footers, history and failed route separated","S001–S005","No no-change inference"],["Quantities/branches/worksheet","Supplied","Sections 10–13","No inputs or actual events"],["Read/failure/self-check","Supplied","Section 15","Not independent review"],["Prior findings/Q001/C033/C035","Unchanged","C056","No prior hold closed"],["Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent","Not accepted complete","Entire report","Exact remaining gaps"]]},{"headers":["Material","Actual use"],"index":24,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Material","Actual use"],["Official current IRCP","Complete or expressly bounded provisions in S001"],["Official small-claims rule","Discovery-on-appeal boundary only"],["Official amendment index","Publication statement and available locator context"],["Original 2016 adoption route","Fresh attempt; 404"],["Generic currentness searches","Relevant discovery-rule and adoption searches; no absence-of-amendment inference"],["Consolidated/print formats","Cross-checks of the same instrument, not independent corroboration"],["API-hosted original orders/forms","Not opened"],["Cases, opinions, dockets, rosters","Not investigated"],["Actual parties, witnesses, medical information, records, contracts, requests, responses, orders","Not requested, constructed, or evaluated"],["Prior reports/local metadata","Supplied exclusions only; not fresh legal premises"]]}],"claims":[{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C001","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C001","Precise proposition":"Ordinary scope includes district and magistrate divisions with express special-proceeding exclusions.","Source/pinpoint":"S001 Rule 1(b)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C002","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C002","Precise proposition":"Local rules and particular orders require their own lawful scope; no actual order was examined.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 1(c); S002","Limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C003","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C003","Precise proposition":"Read Rules 16/26 do not supply a universal automatic initial-disclosure package or planning-conference prerequisite.","Source/pinpoint":"Rules 16, 26","Limit":"Bounded textual finding"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C004","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C004","Precise proposition":"Scheduling action, order contents, modifications, and ordered disclosures have distinct duties.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 16(a)–(d)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C005","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C005","Precise proposition":"Sequence and stipulation rules preserve court-order and trial-interference limits.","Source/pinpoint":"Rules 26(d), 29","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C006","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C006","Precise proposition":"Nonprivileged relevance and mandatory burden/cumulative limits both govern.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 26(b)(1)(A),(C)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C007","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C007","Precise proposition":"Inaccessible-ESI claims have responding-party and requesting-party burdens.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 26(b)(1)(B)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C008","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C008","Precise proposition":"Insurance-agreement discovery is not admissibility and excludes the stated application category.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 26(b)(2)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C009","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C009","Precise proposition":"Work product, mental impressions, and own prior statements are separate branches.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 26(b)(3)","Limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C010","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C010","Precise proposition":"Expert disclosures differ by expert category and trigger.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 26(b)(4)(A)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C011","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C011","Precise proposition":"Expert drafts, communications, non-testifying work, and contact have specific protections/exceptions.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 26(b)(4)(A)(v)–(D)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C012","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C012","Precise proposition":"Expert-discovery payment differs from taxable expert costs.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 26(b)(4)(E); Rule 54(d)(1)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C013","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C013","Precise proposition":"Privilege assertions and postproduction handling do not decide privilege or waiver.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 26(b)(5)","Limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C014","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C014","Precise proposition":"Protective orders require the specified motion, conference certification, and good cause.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 26(c)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C015","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C015","Precise proposition":"Supplementation has enumerated conditions, not an unqualified universal duty.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 26(e)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C016","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C016","Precise proposition":"Discovery signatures certify reasonable inquiry and the stated purposes/proportionality.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 26(f)(1)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C017","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C017","Precise proposition":"Missing signatures and unjustified certifications have different consequences.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 26(f)(2)–(3)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C018","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C018","Precise proposition":"Rule 11’s exclusion and Rule 30’s express reference require qualified treatment.","Source/pinpoint":"Rules 11(d), 30(a)(2)(B)(ii)","Limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C019","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C019","Precise proposition":"Interrogatories are party-directed, capped at forty including discrete subparts, with defined timing.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 33(a)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C020","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C020","Precise proposition":"Interrogatory oath, organizational information, signatures, and specific objections are distinct duties.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 33(b)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C021","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C021","Precise proposition":"Business-record substitution requires substantially equal burden and adequate identification/access.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 33(d)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C022","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C022","Precise proposition":"Production requires proper scope, control and particularity.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 34(a),(b)(1)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C023","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C023","Precise proposition":"Production responses, partial objections, ESI form and extraordinary costs have separate rules.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 34(b)(2)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C024","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C024","Precise proposition":"Admission responses require reasonable inquiry, specific treatment and timely signed service.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 36(a)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C025","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C025","Precise proposition":"Admissions are action-specific and withdrawal/amendment is conditional, not automatic judgment.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 36(b)–(d)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C026","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C026","Precise proposition":"Written discovery has nonfiling, notice and retention obligations.","Source/pinpoint":"Rules 33(e),34(d),36(e)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C027","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C027","Precise proposition":"Deposition officer and stipulation requirements do not establish actual authority.","Source/pinpoint":"Rules 28–29","Limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C028","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C028","Precise proposition":"Oral leave rules distinguish prison confinement from early plaintiff examination and its exceptions.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 30(a)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C029","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C029","Precise proposition":"Oral notice, organizations and remote location have separate predicates.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 30(b)(1),(4)–(6)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C030","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C030","Precise proposition":"Audio/audiovisual recording retains stenographic and custody requirements.","Source/pinpoint":"Rules 30(b)(3),30.1","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C031","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C031","Precise proposition":"Objections, nonanswer instructions, obstruction sanctions and suspension are distinct.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 30(c)–(d)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C032","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C032","Precise proposition":"Review, changes and unsigned-deposition treatment use their stated thirty-day event.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 30(e)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C033","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C033","Precise proposition":"Deposition retention differs from written-discovery retention.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 30(f)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C034","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C034","Precise proposition":"Written-question depositions have their own leave and fourteen/seven/seven sequence.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 31","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C035","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C035","Precise proposition":"Short-notice use protection and objection waivers are not universal notice or admissibility rules.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 32(a)(1),(5),(b),(d)","Limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C036","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C036","Precise proposition":"Subpoena issuance, delivery, fees, proof and attorney-service exception are distinct.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 45(a)–(b)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C037","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C037","Precise proposition":"Party deposition-production and nonparty production have different timing/cost predicates.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 45(c)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C038","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C038","Precise proposition":"Quashing and nonparty ESI/privilege handling require their specified conditions.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 45(d)–(e)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C039","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C039","Precise proposition":"Deposition attendance uses the county-based rule; interstate law remains separate.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 45(f)–(j)","Limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C040","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C040","Precise proposition":"Witness payment, expert-discovery fees and taxable costs are not one universal cap.","Source/pinpoint":"Rules 45(h),54(d)(1),26(b)(4)(E)","Limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C041","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C041","Precise proposition":"Subpoena contempt requires service and lack of adequate excuse.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 45(i)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C042","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C042","Precise proposition":"Compel motions require notice, conference certification and the correct forum/predicate.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 37(a)(1)–(4)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C043","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C043","Precise proposition":"Granted/denied/mixed-motion expenses have different mandatory and discretionary branches.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 37(a)(5)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C044","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C044","Precise proposition":"Order-violation sanctions preserve justice, inability, examination and expense exceptions.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 37(b)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C045","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C045","Precise proposition":"Nondisclosure/supplementation exclusion preserves justification/harmlessness and hearing conditions.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 37(c)(1)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C046","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C046","Precise proposition":"Failure-to-admit expenses require later proof and retain four exceptions.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 37(c)(2)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C047","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C047","Precise proposition":"Complete discovery failures can invoke sanctions without a universal prior compel order.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 37(d)","Limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C048","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C048","Precise proposition":"ESI-loss protection uses routine good-faith operation and exceptional-circumstance wording.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 37(e)","Limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C049","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C049","Precise proposition":"Catch-all discovery consequences require the stated court-order failure.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 37(f)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C050","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C050","Precise proposition":"Scheduling sanctions have independent triggers and causal-expense qualifications.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 16(e)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C051","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C051","Precise proposition":"Rule 35 is a separate, conditional examination/report/waiver branch.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 35; Rules 26/37 incorporations","Limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C052","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C052","Precise proposition":"Service, receipt, filing, retention and additional mail time must remain distinct.","Source/pinpoint":"Rules 2.2,5,29","Limit":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C053","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C053","Precise proposition":"Ordinary motion timing yields to different governing rules and authorized exceptions.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 7(b)","Limit":"O"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C054","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C054","Precise proposition":"Original-history and published cross-reference issues remain explicit.","Source/pinpoint":"S001–S005","Limit":"Provenance/H"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C055","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C055","Precise proposition":"Full privilege/privacy, interstate, federal, sector, trial and postjudgment regimes remain open.","Source/pinpoint":"Section 12","Limit":"H"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P24-C056","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C056","Precise proposition":"No actual discovery event or outcome was evaluated; all prior holds remain.","Source/pinpoint":"Research record","Limit":"Certain"},"raw_table_index":16,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_other_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false}],"sources":[{"source_id":"S_ID-P24-S001","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ircp","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/5","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/16","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/26","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/27","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/28","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/29","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/30","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/30.1","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/31","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/32","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/33","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/34","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/35","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/36","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/37","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/43","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/45","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P24-S001","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S_ID-P24-S001 — official Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure\n\nIssuer/title: Idaho Supreme Court, Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure.\nConsolidated literal URL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ircp\n\nThe print pages below are uses of the same official rule collection, not independent corroboration. Complete bodies were read unless narrower reliance is stated.\n\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tActual read bounds and use\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1\tComplete (a)–(c); scope and local-rule qualifications\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2\tComplete (a)–(c), including exceptions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/5\tComplete; substantive use limited to discovery service, proof, and specific-rule filing interaction; fax mechanics not applied\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7\tComplete; use limited to motions, receipt-based timing and exceptions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11\tComplete (a)–(d); use confined to discovery exclusion and Rule 30 cross-reference issue\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/16\tComplete (a)–(e); scheduling, disclosure and sanctions used; trial/ADR merits not completed\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/26\tComplete (a)–(f)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/27\tComplete body inspected; substantive use limited to identifying separate perpetuation scope; pre-action/appeal procedure not completed\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/28\tComplete (a)–(d); ordinary officer/disqualification rules used; foreign/military qualifications held\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/29\tComplete stipulation provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/30\tComplete (a)–(g)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/30.1\tComplete (a)–(g)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/31\tComplete (a)–(d)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/32\tComplete body inspected; reliance on (a)(1), (a)(5), (b), (d), and Rule 30 signature incorporation; full trial-use/unavailability branches not applied\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/33\tComplete (a)–(e)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/34\tComplete (a)–(d)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/35\tComplete (a)–(b); limited incorporated boundary only; § 6-1901 not read\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/36\tComplete (a)–(e)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/37\tComplete (a)–(f)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/43\tComplete page inspected; reliance only on (b), (d) as examination incorporations; interpreter/trial provisions deferred\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/45\tComplete operative (a)–(j); substantive ordinary findings limited to (a)–(i); (j) read to identify interstate scope, historical application and cross-reference gaps. Illustrative comments not used as scenarios.\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54\tComplete (d)(1) read; reliance on (A)–(D), especially (C)(iii)–(v), (ix)–(xi). Remaining fee/enforcement procedures not developed.\nDisplayed credits and effectiveness\nRules\tDisplayed history\nAll listed civil rules\tAdopted March 1, 2016, effective July 1, 2016\nRule 1\tAmended April 30, 2024/effective same day; September 30, 2024/effective October 1, 2024\nRules 2.2 and 30\tAmended September 9, 2016/effective same day\nRule 54\tApril 27, 2016/July 1, 2016; October 6, 2016/March 1, 2017; April 17, 2017/nunc pro tunc March 1, 2017; December 14, 2017/January 1, 2018; April 28, 2021/July 1, 2021\nRule 45(j)(8)\tBody retains a separate historical pending-action application reference to July 1, 2009\n\nStatus limit: Official current-published text was read. Footers are not proof that every original order, transition rule, or later unincorporated development was independently audited."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"fresh15_current_IRCP_bodies_plus7_documented_actual_prior_coordinator_rule_reads","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"All22literalruleURLs accounted. Freshcomplete16,26,27,29,30,30.1,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,43,45andfootersread. Reuseactualpriorcomplete1,2.2,5,7,11,28,54. Selectedrelianceonly:27scope;32(a1,a5,b,d)/signature;35conditionalboundarywithunread6-1901;43b,d;45a-iandjreferences/historynotfullinterstate;54d1costcategories. No originalorders/AppendixB/actualrecord/privilege/judicialconstruction.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P24-S002","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irsca/15"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P24-S002","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S_ID-P24-S002 — small-claims discovery exclusion on appeal\n\nIssuer/title: Idaho Supreme Court, Small Claims Rule 15.\nLiteral URL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irsca/15\n\nRead: Complete page; substantive use confined to (d)(2), (d)(4).\nFooter: March 1, 2016/July 1, 2016; June 30, 2026/July 1, 2026.\nLimit: No small-claims appeal, fee, jury, or merits rerun."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"documented_prior_coordinator_complete_current_Rule15_read_reused","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"PriorreviewID23packet2205completecurrentbody/credits, selected(d)(2)/(d)(4)discovery-on-appeal restriction; notfreshfetch/fullappeal.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P24-S003","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P24-S003","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S_ID-P24-S003 — official amendment locator\n\nIssuer/title: Idaho Supreme Court, Recent Amendments.\nLiteral URL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments\n\nRead: The statement that amendments are incorporated into the rule text on their effective date, and visible locator context.\n\nLimit: The ordinary opened response did not deliver a completed historical order list. Search metadata included other rule families and unrelated amendments; none was treated as an amendment to these discovery rules without the operative body."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"documented_prior_coordinator_current_locator_statement_reused","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"PriorID23packet2211currentpublishingstatement/indexcontext; no completedoriginalorderlist/contact/API.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P24-S004","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules/IRCP/03012016-Adoption-Newly-Formatted.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P24-S004","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S_ID-P24-S004 — fresh original-order failure\n\nLiteral URL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules/IRCP/03012016-Adoption-Newly-Formatted.pdf\n\nResult: One fresh ordinary attempt returned 404.\nDiscovery basis: The exact route appeared in an official search-indexed historical rule link.\nLimit: No original-order body or pixels read. No repeated identical retry, guessed variant, API, contact, or bypass.\n\nThe materially different official history route in S003 was read but did not recover the original order."},"source_access_status":"failed_routes_record_only","coordinator_verification_status":"researcher_reported_original_order_failure_not_reopened","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Wholefailurerecordreviewed;original2016PDF404retainedhistorical, no newattempt/retry/recovery/pixelclaim.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P24-S005","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/1988","https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/2059","https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/2281","https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/2120","https://isc.idaho.gov/recent-amendments"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P24-S005","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S_ID-P24-S005 — discovery-only source history\nLiteral URL or material\tActual status\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/1988\tSearch-indexed official rule link exposed the exact adoption URL; PDF body not opened\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/2059\tSearch result for Rule 26; not treated as a separate authority or read PDF\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/2281\tRule-index search lead only\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/2120\tHistorical rule-index search lead only\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/recent-amendments\tSearch metadata; current ordinary page separately identified in S003\nAPI-hosted original orders and Appendix B\tNot opened\nUnrelated criminal/juvenile/family-rule search results\tNot applied\n\nNo secondary statutory reproduction is used to supply a positive discovery rule in this pass. Unread statutory incorporations remain held."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"discovery_only_sources_not_opened_or_used_as_law","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Wholevisiblehistory/sourceleadregisterread;noPDFsnippet/API/proposed/other-rule-familymeritsadopted.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false}],"coverage":[{"topic":"1—ordinary applicability","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"1—ordinary applicability","Disposition":"Official scope read","Claims/sources":"C001–C002; S001–S002","Exact remaining gap":"Actual proceeding/local-order scope"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"District/magistrate distinction","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"District/magistrate distinction","Disposition":"Uniform rule application identified","Claims/sources":"C001","Exact remaining gap":"Assignment/jurisdiction not rerun"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Small claims/de novo","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Small claims/de novo","Disposition":"Exact discovery restriction read","Claims/sources":"S002(d)(4)","Exact remaining gap":"No small-claims merits"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Pretrial versus proof/trial/postjudgment","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Pretrial versus proof/trial/postjudgment","Disposition":"Distinguished","Claims/sources":"C025,C035,C055","Exact remaining gap":"Full separate regimes"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"2—general discovery scope","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"2—general discovery scope","Disposition":"Complete Rule 26 read","Claims/sources":"C003–C018","Exact remaining gap":"Judicial construction"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Relevance/proportionality","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Relevance/proportionality","Disposition":"Mandatory limitation conditions read","Claims/sources":"C006","Exact remaining gap":"No actual burden finding"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Initial disclosures/conference","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Initial disclosures/conference","Disposition":"Text-specific finding","Claims/sources":"C003–C004","Exact remaining gap":"Special statutes/orders"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Sequencing/stipulation","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Sequencing/stipulation","Disposition":"Complete provisions","Claims/sources":"C005","Exact remaining gap":"No agreement/order"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Supplementation/signing","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Supplementation/signing","Disposition":"Complete provisions","Claims/sources":"C015–C017","Exact remaining gap":"No actual failure"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"ESI/accessibility/preservation","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"ESI/accessibility/preservation","Disposition":"Rule text read; full preservation held","Claims/sources":"C007,C048","Exact remaining gap":"Broader duty and spoliation law"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Privilege/work product/inadvertent production","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Privilege/work product/inadvertent production","Disposition":"Handling and protection rules read","Claims/sources":"C009,C013–C014","Exact remaining gap":"Actual privilege/waiver"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Expert branches","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Expert branches","Disposition":"Complete Rule 26(b)(4)","Claims/sources":"C010–C012","Exact remaining gap":"Qualification and individual fee facts"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"3—interrogatories","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"3—interrogatories","Disposition":"Complete Rule 33","Claims/sources":"C019–C021","Exact remaining gap":"Discrete-subpart construction"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Production/inspection","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Production/inspection","Disposition":"Complete Rule 34","Claims/sources":"C022–C023","Exact remaining gap":"Actual control and format"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Admissions","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Admissions","Disposition":"Complete Rule 36","Claims/sources":"C024–C025","Exact remaining gap":"No admission or withdrawal result"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Timing/signature/objection","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Timing/signature/objection","Disposition":"Registered","Claims/sources":"Sections 3,10","Exact remaining gap":"No calendar"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Nonfiling/retention","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Nonfiling/retention","Disposition":"Complete relevant clauses","Claims/sources":"C026","Exact remaining gap":"Other preservation law"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"4—oral deposition","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"4—oral deposition","Disposition":"Complete Rule 30","Claims/sources":"C027–C033","Exact remaining gap":"Actual leave/notice/officer"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Written deposition","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Written deposition","Disposition":"Complete Rule 31","Claims/sources":"C034","Exact remaining gap":"No questions or testimony"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Recording/remote/organization","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Recording/remote/organization","Disposition":"Complete relevant clauses","Claims/sources":"C029–C030","Exact remaining gap":"Foreign/technical authority"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Count/duration","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Count/duration","Disposition":"Absence of a general numeric limit carefully bounded","Claims/sources":"C028,C034","Exact remaining gap":"Court-imposed limits"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Subpoena issuance/service","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Subpoena issuance/service","Disposition":"Complete ordinary clauses","Claims/sources":"C036–C039","Exact remaining gap":"Appendix B and external law"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Production-only versus attendance","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Production-only versus attendance","Disposition":"Distinguished","Claims/sources":"C037","Exact remaining gap":"No actual command"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Costs/territory","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Costs/territory","Disposition":"Material clauses read","Claims/sources":"C039–C040","Exact remaining gap":"Exact fee/travel application"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Objection/quash/protection","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Objection/quash/protection","Disposition":"Complete ordinary clauses","Claims/sources":"C031,C038","Exact remaining gap":"No actual privilege/burden"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Interstate mechanisms","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Interstate mechanisms","Disposition":"Read for boundary; not completed","Claims/sources":"C054–C055","Exact remaining gap":"Cross-reference/foreign-law issues"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"5—conference/compel","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"5—conference/compel","Disposition":"Complete Rule 37(a)","Claims/sources":"C042–C043","Exact remaining gap":"No actual dispute"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Protective relief","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Protective relief","Disposition":"Complete Rule 26(c)","Claims/sources":"C014","Exact remaining gap":"No automatic stay/seal"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Order violation","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Order violation","Disposition":"Complete Rule 37(b)","Claims/sources":"C044","Exact remaining gap":"Full sanction construction"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Failure to disclose/admit/attend/respond","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Failure to disclose/admit/attend/respond","Disposition":"Complete relevant branches","Claims/sources":"C045–C047","Exact remaining gap":"No actual justification/harmlessness"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"ESI loss","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"ESI loss","Disposition":"Complete current Rule 37(e)","Claims/sources":"C048","Exact remaining gap":"No imported federal test"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Catch-all/Rule 16 sanctions","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Catch-all/Rule 16 sanctions","Disposition":"Read","Claims/sources":"C049–C050","Exact remaining gap":"Constitutional and severity limits"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Rule 11 distinction","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Rule 11 distinction","Disposition":"Exact text tension preserved","Claims/sources":"C018","Exact remaining gap":"Reconciliation held"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"6—privilege/privacy/public access","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"6—privilege/privacy/public access","Disposition":"Exact dependencies registered","Claims/sources":"C055; Section 12","Exact remaining gap":"Separate authority required"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Local/tribal/federal/interstate","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Local/tribal/federal/interstate","Disposition":"Held beyond narrow rule scope","Claims/sources":"C055","Exact remaining gap":"No universal reach/compliance"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Trial/appeal/postjudgment","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Trial/appeal/postjudgment","Disposition":"Excluded","Claims/sources":"C055","Exact remaining gap":"Later components"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Original history/judicial construction","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Original history/judicial construction","Disposition":"Expressly held","Claims/sources":"C054","Exact remaining gap":"Original orders unavailable"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"7—sources/read bounds","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"7—sources/read bounds","Disposition":"Complete visible register","Claims/sources":"Section 8","Exact remaining gap":"No original-order audit"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Dates/status distinctions","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Dates/status distinctions","Disposition":"Footers, history and failed route separated","Claims/sources":"S001–S005","Exact remaining gap":"No no-change inference"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Quantities/branches/worksheet","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Quantities/branches/worksheet","Disposition":"Supplied","Claims/sources":"Sections 10–13","Exact remaining gap":"No inputs or actual events"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Read/failure/self-check","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Read/failure/self-check","Disposition":"Supplied","Claims/sources":"Section 15","Exact remaining gap":"Not independent review"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Prior findings/Q001/C033/C035","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Prior findings/Q001/C033/C035","Disposition":"Unchanged","Claims/sources":"C056","Exact remaining gap":"No prior hold closed"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent","researcher_record":{"Requested issue":"Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent","Disposition":"Not accepted complete","Claims/sources":"Entire report","Exact remaining gap":"Exact remaining gaps"},"raw_table_index":23,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_fresh_and_documented_prior_current_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true}],"annotations":{},"corrections":[],"resolved_corrections":[],"review_history":[{"id":"S_ID-P24-discovery-scoped-review-20261028","status":"reviewed_with_history_incorporation_construction_application_holds","at":"2026-10-28T21:39:26.991421+00:00"}]}