{"meta":{"key":"s_id--pass-23","task":"S_ID","title":"SID Idaho contested debt proof, documentary evidence, and summary judgment","parent_title":"Idaho debt and debt relief law","edition":"pass-23","path":"/research/s_id--pass-23/","kind":"split_pass","category":"state","role":"state","area_numbers":[66],"groups":["collections"],"date":"2026-10-28","tables":23,"claims":50,"sources":8,"review_status":"scoped_review_complete_with_source_history_statutory_incorporation_construction_application_holds","review_complete":true,"sha256":"62f6866739a4aa8088cebced1d3e6695d32e66522d624907d8ca7616c55ec53c","headings":["Evidence disposition","Principal findings","1.1 Applicable rule systems","1.2 Allegation, admission, proof, and weight","2.1 Relevance and exclusion","2.2 Personal knowledge, competency, and oath","3.1 Rule 901 foundation","Published-text qualification","3.2 Self-authentication is limited to authenticity","4.1 Statement, purpose, and opposing-party exclusions","4.2 Records of regularly conducted activity","Transferred or predecessor records","4.3 Absence, public records, and layers","4.4 Ancient and residual branches are not shortcuts","5.1 Content proof is not the same as authentication","5.2 Summaries","5.3 Judicial notice and presumptions","5.4 Settlement communications","6.1 Governing test and record support","6.2 Missing evidence, defective support, and partial disposition","6.3 Timing, service, and conversion","6.4 Declarations and verification","6.5 Motion, order, partial fact, and judgment","S001 — fresh failures and original-history limits","S002 — official Idaho Rules of Evidence","Displayed evidence-rule history","S003 — official Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure","Displayed civil-rule history","S004 — small-claims de novo boundary only","S005 — official transcript incorporation","S006 — declaration statute","S007 — official amendment locator","S008 — discovery-only materials","15.1 Actual work performed","15.2 PDF and visual status","15.3 Remaining gaps and conclusion"],"generation_provenance":{"actual_route":"regular_chat_adaptive_models","actual_model":"GPT-6","actual_mode":"Pro","provenance_limit":"Actual documented capture labels only; missing labels remain unknown. No preferred setting is inferred as actual execution."},"public_id":"S_ID/pass-23","facets":{"geography":["us","us-id"],"debt_type":[],"stage":["judgment","repossession"],"subject":["proof-evidence"]},"scope":"Independent required generic ordinary contested debt proof/documentauthentication/hearsay/summaryjudgment dimension4; initialcourt/smallclaims/discovery/fulltrial/sectors/federalmerits excluded.","pending_corrections":0},"markdown":"# S_ID PASS-23 — Idaho contested debt proof, documentary evidence, and summary judgment\n\n**Fresh public-source access date:** **October 28, 2026, America/Los_Angeles.**\n\n**Scope:** Ordinary contested civil debt proof; relevance, knowledge, authentication, hearsay, originals and summaries; and the current Idaho summary-judgment rule. Initial process/default, full discovery, trial practice, arbitration, appeals, enforcement, and substantive debt-sector law remain separate.\n\n## Evidence disposition\n\nThe **official current-published Idaho evidence and civil rules were recovered and read** to the bounds recorded below. The original 2016 civil-rule adoption PDF and 2018 evidence-rule adoption PDF returned 404s. Their displayed rule footers are therefore preserved as publication evidence, **not a reconstructed original-order history**.\n\nThe necessary declaration statute, **Idaho Code § 9-1406**, was recovered only as a **2025 secondary reproduction** after the official route failed. Its current official wording and enactment/application chain remain held.\n\nNo earlier report supplies a substantive premise. Earlier findings, provenance, C033/C035, and all other holds remain unchanged.\n\n## Principal findings\n\n**Filing, authentication, hearsay admissibility, weight, and entitlement to recover are separate questions.** A document attached to a pleading does not become indisputably genuine or true merely because the opposing party did not file a verified denial. **[C004–C006.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/10)\n\n**The records exception has conditions, not a creditor-status shortcut.** The rule requires the specified knowledge, timing, recordkeeping, regular-practice, and witness-or-certification foundation, while preserving the opponent’s trustworthiness challenge. No categorical rule for or against a debt purchaser establishing another entity’s records is determined without judicial construction. **[C019–C021.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/803)\n\n**Idaho Rule 56 must not be silently replaced with its federal counterpart.** The published Idaho text has its own timing, hearing-admissibility wording, affidavit-attachment requirement, and remedial structure. **[C032–C043.]** [isc.idaho.gov](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/56)\n\n**An unsupported response, unavailable evidence, partial adjudication, and bad-faith submission have different consequences.** None independently establishes a valid debt, an admissible record, a damages amount, or discharge. The operative findings are set out in the claim register and timing register below.\n\n# 1. Scope and procedural posture\n\nEvidence labels:\n\n- **O — Official body read:** current-published rule text.\n- **P — Provisional:** dated secondary statutory reproduction.\n- **H — Held:** a material incorporation, historical, construction, or application dependency remains unresolved.\n\n## 1.1 Applicable rule systems\n\n| Context | Newly read authority | Boundary |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Ordinary civil action | IRCP 1(b); IRE 101(b) | General civil/evidence framework, subject to express exceptions. |\n| Original small-claims proceeding | IRCP 1(b); IRE 101(e)(5) | Ordinary civil rules apply only through the special rules; ordinary evidence rules are excluded except privilege. |\n| Small-claims de novo appeal | Small-claims Rule 15(c), (d)(2) | A distinct proceeding; civil rules apply subject to that rule and the court’s stated discretion. The initial small-claims exclusion is not transferred automatically. |\n| Preliminary admissibility question | IRE 104(a), 101(e)(1) | The court is not bound by evidence rules other than privilege when resolving the specified preliminary questions. |\n| Specialized proceedings | IRE 101(d)–(e); IRCP 1(b) | Enumerated criminal, family, juvenile, contempt, medical-treatment, and other qualifications remain separate. |\n| Summary judgment | IRCP 56, with necessary incorporated rules | Not a default hearing or an ordinary trial merely conducted on paper. |\n| Appeal from a final judgment | Separate appellate rules | Full appellate review and preservation consequences are not completed here. |\n\n**[C002–C003.]** The complete scope provisions were read. A proceeding’s label as “summary” does not itself establish an exemption from the evidence rules. [Idaho Supreme Court+2](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1)\n\n## 1.2 Allegation, admission, proof, and weight\n\n| Item | Legal effect actually supported | Limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Pleaded allegation | Rule 8 supplies pleading and admission/denial consequences. | Pleading a fact is not ordinarily evidence proving it. |\n| Failure to deny | Rule 8(b)(6) distinguishes allegations requiring a response, damages allegations, and allegations requiring no response. | The exceptions cannot be omitted. |\n| Instrument attached to pleading | Rule 10(c) makes it part of the pleading. | Not automatic authentication, hearsay clearance, or proof of ownership. |\n| Failure to make a verified denial of an attachment | Rule 36(c) expressly rejects automatic admission of genuineness, accuracy, or truth on that basis. | Does not decide some other admission or stipulation. |\n| Formal Rule 36 admission | Conclusive in the pending action unless withdrawal/amendment is permitted under the stated merits/prejudice conditions. | Not an admission for another proceeding. |\n| Evidence admitted for a limited purpose | Rule 105 requires the stated limitation on timely request. | Admission for one purpose is not unrestricted substantive use. |\n| Preliminary admissibility ruling | Rule 104 allocates qualification, privilege, and admissibility questions to the court. | Weight and credibility remain distinct under subsection (e). |\n\n**[C004–C008.]** Discovery request mechanics were not rerun. Only the effect and use of an admission, and the attachment limitation, are relied on. [Idaho Supreme Court+4](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/8)\n\nRule 11’s signing and reasonable-inquiry certifications likewise do not establish that every factual assertion is true or admissible. A verified pleading based on belief is not automatically equivalent to personal-knowledge summary-judgment evidence. **[C046.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11)\n\n# 2. Relevance, knowledge, and evidentiary purpose\n\n## 2.1 Relevance and exclusion\n\n| Rule | Complete material relation |\n| --- | --- |\n| **401** | Evidence must tend to affect the probability of a fact and that fact must matter to deciding the action. |\n| **402** | Relevant evidence remains subject to other exclusion rules; irrelevant evidence is inadmissible. |\n| **403** | The court may exclude relevant evidence when its probative value is substantially outweighed by the specified prejudice, confusion, delay, waste, or cumulative-evidence dangers. |\n| **104(b)** | Conditional relevance requires sufficient support for the predicate fact; the court may condition admission on later proof. |\n| **105** | Proper party/purpose limits remain material. |\n| **106** | Fairness may require contemporaneous consideration of the remainder or a related writing/recorded statement. |\n\n**[C006–C008.]** Rule 106’s published text is not treated as an automatic override of hearsay, privilege, or every other objection. Its relationship to another exclusion rule remains a construction question where material. [Idaho Supreme Court+4](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/401)\n\n## 2.2 Personal knowledge, competency, and oath\n\nRule 602 requires evidence sufficient to support personal knowledge; the witness’s own testimony can supply that showing. Its express expert-testimony exception refers to Rule 703.\n\nRule 601 separately addresses competency, including court-found incapacity and the specific unwritten-communication/agreement branch involving claims against an estate. Rule 603 requires an oath or affirmation before testimony. **[C009.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+2](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/601)\n\nThese are not interchangeable:\n\n- Personal knowledge of a recordkeeping system is not automatically personal knowledge of every underlying event.\n- A “custodian” title alone is not a judicial qualification finding.\n- Taking an oath does not remove hearsay or establish the truth of the testimony.\n- Expert-basis Rule 703 is not a general business-record substitute. Its reasonable-reliance and jury-disclosure conditions differ; expert qualification and reliability remain a later inquiry. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/703)\n\nNo person, witness, expertise, incapacity, estate, or recordkeeping practice was examined.\n\n# 3. Authentication and self-authentication\n\n## 3.1 Rule 901 foundation\n\nRule 901 requires sufficient evidence for a finding that the item is what the proponent claims. Its listed methods are examples, not an exhaustive checklist.\n\nMaterial examples include knowledgeable testimony, nonlitigation-acquired handwriting familiarity, comparison with an authenticated specimen, distinctive characteristics in context, public-office source, and an accurately functioning process or system. Electronic storage does not eliminate that requirement. **[C010–C012.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/901)\n\n### Published-text qualification\n\nThe official HTML places public-record wording under **Rule 901(b)(6)(B)**, within the telephone-conversation example, and repeats that wording in **(b)(7)(B)**. The original adoption PDF was inaccessible.\n\nThat telephone subbranch is **not corrected by assumption or relied on here**. The independent general standard and other complete examples remain the basis of this report. **[C048.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ire)\n\n## 3.2 Self-authentication is limited to authenticity\n\n| Category | Material condition |\n| --- | --- |\n| Domestic public document | The applicable seal/signature or officer-certification conditions in Rule 902(1)–(2). |\n| Foreign public document | Authorized attestation and final-certification chain; the stated opportunity-to-investigate/good-cause alternatives remain. |\n| Certified public-record copy | Correct-copy certification by the custodian/authorized person or the specified compliant certificate. |\n| Official publication | Must purport to be issued by a public authority. |\n| Acknowledged document | Lawfully executed acknowledgment by an authorized officer. |\n| Commercial paper | Only to the extent allowed by governing commercial law, which is not completed here. |\n| Statutory authenticity presumption | Requires the particular statute or Supreme Court rule. |\n| Domestic business record | Rule 902(11)’s qualified certification plus reasonable written pre-hearing/trial notice and inspection opportunity. |\n| Foreign business record | Rule 902(12)’s country-of-signing criminal-penalty qualification and incorporated notice conditions. |\n\n**[C013–C016.]** These categories do not independently establish hearsay admissibility or the truth, legal effect, or enforceability of the contents. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/902)\n\nThe business-record certification is a legally qualified declaration, not merely a signature, letterhead, or “certified” label. The records exception’s remaining conditions still matter.\n\nRule 903 requires a subscribing witness only when the law governing the writing’s validity requires one. That is not a universal demand for—or universal exemption from—such testimony. **[C014.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/903)\n\n# 4. Hearsay and regularly conducted activity records\n\n## 4.1 Statement, purpose, and opposing-party exclusions\n\nRule 801 defines a statement as an intended human assertion and hearsay by its out-of-court and truth-of-the-assertion conditions. Rule 802 supplies the exclusion rule and its rule-based exceptions.\n\nRule 801(d)(2) requires an opposing-party use and the applicable party, adoption, authority, employment/agency, or conspiracy predicate. A statement alone does not establish the authority, relationship, or conspiracy specified in the final paragraph. Prior witness statements under subsection (d)(1) have different testimony, cross-examination, and statement conditions. **[C017–C018.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/801)\n\nA source-generated number, an automated output, and human-supplied information may present different statement questions. The rule’s definition does not resolve every electronic-data construction issue merely because the material is digital.\n\n## 4.2 Records of regularly conducted activity\n\nRule 803(6) requires:\n\n| Element | Required relationship |\n| --- | --- |\n| Timing/source | Made at or near the relevant time by, or from information transmitted by, someone with knowledge |\n| Activity | Kept in the course of a regularly conducted business, organizational, occupational, or other calling, whether for profit or not |\n| Practice | Making that record was a regular practice |\n| Foundation | Qualified custodian/witness testimony or a compliant Rule 902(11)/(12) certification |\n| Trustworthiness | Opponent does not establish the specified source, method, or preparation circumstances indicating untrustworthiness |\n\nThe declarant’s availability is not a prerequisite to this exception. **[C019–C020.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/803)\n\n### Transferred or predecessor records\n\nThe rule does not expressly declare that a debt purchaser always can—or never can—establish a predecessor’s records. Nor does it state that every foundational witness must have personally participated in every underlying transaction.\n\n**The supported conclusion is narrower:** the complete foundation and any layered-statement problem must be addressed. Acquisition, storage, reliance, integration, authority, and witness qualification cannot be presumed from a purchaser or custodian label. The applicable judicial construction remains held. **[C021.]**\n\n## 4.3 Absence, public records, and layers\n\n| Branch | Source-stated boundary |\n| --- | --- |\n| **803(7), absence of business record** | The kind of matter must ordinarily be recorded, and the trustworthiness qualification remains. |\n| **803(8), public record** | The public-office activity, observation, or legally authorized investigation categories have Idaho-specific exclusions, including the stated office-party and special-investigation material. |\n| **803(10), absence of public record** | Requires a diligent-search showing and the relevant regular-recordkeeping predicate; its criminal notice provision is not a civil deadline. |\n| **805, multiple layers** | Each hearsay part must satisfy the applicable rule. Filing or certifying an outer record does not automatically cure every embedded statement. |\n| **806, declarant credibility** | Admission of the specified hearsay or opposing-party statements does not immunize the declarant’s credibility from the rule’s permitted challenge. |\n\n**[C022–C024.]** A private document filed in a public office does not automatically turn all private assertions into admissible public-office findings. [Idaho Supreme Court+2](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ire)\n\n## 4.4 Ancient and residual branches are not shortcuts\n\nThe published Idaho provisions use **at least thirty years**, not a federal date cutoff, for their identified ancient-document branches. Authentication still has separate condition and location requirements. Rule 803(24)’s residual exception requires its trustworthiness, materiality, comparative-probativeness, interests-of-justice, and reasonable-notice conditions. Neither branch is applied here. **[C025.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/901)\n\nUnavailable-declarant exceptions under Rule 804 and medical-specific Rule 904 were not completed. Their prerequisites cannot be inferred from the absence of a witness or the label of a record.\n\n# 5. Originals, duplicates, summaries, and judicial notice\n\n## 5.1 Content proof is not the same as authentication\n\n| Rule | Material relation |\n| --- | --- |\n| **1001** | A qualifying accurate, readable output of electronically stored information can be an “original”; a duplicate must accurately reproduce the original. |\n| **1002** | Content proof ordinarily requires an original unless a rule or statute provides otherwise. |\n| **1003** | Duplicates are generally treated like originals, subject to a genuine authenticity question or unfairness. |\n| **1004** | Alternative content proof has separate loss/destruction-without-bad-faith, unavailable-process, opponent-control/notice/nonproduction, or noncontrolling-issue branches. |\n| **1005(a)** | Public-record copies require otherwise-admissible material and the specified certification or comparison testimony; reasonable-diligence failure is a separate branch. |\n| **1007** | The opposing party’s testimony, deposition, or written statement may establish content without accounting for the original. |\n| **1008** | Court and jury functions differ for the specified existence, originality, and accurate-content issues. |\n\n**[C026–C030.]** These provisions do not establish physical possession, chain of assignment, signature validity, or a right to enforce an instrument. [Idaho Supreme Court+6](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1001)\n\nThe official-transcript branch in Rule 1005(b) incorporates ICAR 27(d). That definition distinguishes a certified reporter’s transcript from the specified certified transcription of an electronic recording; a raw recording or realtime display is not automatically the official transcript. The incorporated certification-form/current-cross-reference question remains held. **[C028.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/icar/27)\n\n## 5.2 Summaries\n\nRule 1006 permits a summary, chart, or calculation for voluminous material that cannot conveniently be examined in court. It requires the originals or duplicates to be available for examination or copying at a reasonable time and place; court production may also be ordered.\n\nA summary does not itself supply a missing foundation, cure hearsay, prove the inputs, or establish an amount owed. Those conclusions follow only through the applicable rules and substantive law, not the summary label. **[C029.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1006)\n\n## 5.3 Judicial notice and presumptions\n\nRule 201 concerns adjudicative facts not reasonably disputable under its two stated tests. Judicial notice of court-file materials requires identification of the specific items; a timely opportunity to be heard remains. It is not blanket judicial notice that all assertions in a file are true. **[C031.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/201)\n\nRule 301 ordinarily shifts the burden of producing rebuttal evidence, **not the ultimate burden of persuasion**, unless the specified law provides otherwise. Rule 302 directs to federal law when federal law supplies the claim or defense’s rule of decision. No substantive presumption or federal claim is applied. [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/301)\n\n## 5.4 Settlement communications\n\nRule 408 restricts specified compromise material offered to establish a disputed claim’s validity or amount, or for the stated impeachment use. Other permitted purposes and otherwise discoverable evidence remain distinct.\n\nThis is an admissibility rule, not a complete mediation privilege, confidentiality guarantee, or discovery prohibition. **[C047.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/408)\n\n# 6. Ordinary summary judgment\n\n## 6.1 Governing test and record support\n\n| Rule 56 provision | Operative distinction |\n| --- | --- |\n| **(a)** | Grant requires both absence of a genuine material factual dispute and legal entitlement. A claim, defense, or part may be addressed. |\n| **(c)(1)** | Particular record citations or the specified demonstration of evidentiary insufficiency must support factual positions. |\n| **(c)(2)** | Idaho’s objection wording is **“not admissible in evidence at the hearing.”** A federal “capable of later presentation” formulation is not substituted. |\n| **(c)(3)** | The court need consider cited material only, but may examine other record material. |\n| **(c)(4)** | Personal knowledge, admissible facts, competence, and attached/served sworn or certified referenced papers are required; supplementation is discretionary. |\n\n**[C032, C035–C037.]** Substantive burden allocation, inference rules, and any bench-trial qualification require judicial construction not undertaken here. [isc.idaho.gov](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/56)\n\n## 6.2 Missing evidence, defective support, and partial disposition\n\n| Provision | Source-stated consequence |\n| --- | --- |\n| **56(d)** | Specified inability shown by affidavit/declaration permits deferral, denial, additional evidence/discovery time, or another appropriate order. |\n| **56(e)** | The court may permit correction, treat a fact undisputed for the motion, grant only upon demonstrated entitlement, or otherwise order. Nonresponse is not automatic judgment. |\n| **56(f)** | An undisputed material fact or relief item may be established for further proceedings without granting everything requested. |\n| **56(b)(3)** | Good cause permits timing alteration; continuance, costs, fees, and sanctions are discretionary. |\n| **56(g)** | Bad faith or sole-delay submission, after notice and reasonable response time, requires causally incurred reasonable expenses, including fees; contempt or other sanctions remain discretionary. |\n\n**[C039–C043.]** None is debt discharge, an automatic fee amount, or a finding that an actual submission was improper. [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ircp)\n\nThe published Idaho Rule 56(f) is not a separately authenticated authorization for every federal-style sua-sponte summary-judgment procedure. No absence-of-authority conclusion is made; that distinct inquiry remains held.\n\n## 6.3 Timing, service, and conversion\n\nThe complete source-stated timing appears in the quantity register in Section 10. Rule 7(b)(3)(I) prevents its ordinary motion schedule from replacing a different period supplied by Rule 56. Filing, service, receipt, and hearing dates remain different events. **[C033–C034, C044.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7)\n\nRule 5’s later-paper service clauses include mailing completion and qualified written-consent electronic transmission. They do not authenticate initial service, electronic consent, or actual receipt. Rule 2.2’s mail addition applies only to an act due a specified time **after service by mail**, not mechanically to every hearing-relative interval. [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/5)\n\nUnder Rule 12(d), a qualifying motion becomes a Rule 56 motion if outside material is presented and not excluded; all parties must receive a reasonable opportunity to present pertinent material. Full Rule 12 practice was not rerun. **[C045.]** [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/12)\n\n## 6.4 Declarations and verification\n\nRule 2.7 includes a qualifying § 9-1406 declaration within “affidavit.” The reproduced statute requires a subscribed written penalty-of-perjury certification in substantially the statutory form and excludes depositions, office oaths, specified-official oaths, and acknowledgments.\n\nIts current official statutory body remains unverified. No declaration form was constructed. **[C038.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.7)\n\nRule 11.1’s belief-based verification is expressly qualified where personal knowledge is required. Rule 28 was read for its oath-officer and disqualification incorporation, not as a discovery guide. A Rule 902 records certification, a notarized acknowledgment, a verified pleading, and a qualifying affidavit are not automatically the same legal instrument. **[C037–C038, C046.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11.1)\n\nRule 2.8’s foreign-declaration route has its own location, exclusions, medium, and prescribed-form requirements. Its appendix form and federal electronic-signature relationship were not completed; no foreign declaration is approved. [Idaho Supreme Court](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.8)\n\n## 6.5 Motion, order, partial fact, and judgment\n\nA motion requests relief; an order resolving an evidentiary or factual issue is not necessarily a final judgment. Rule 54(a)–(b) governs separate judgment form and partial-final certification. Rule 58 makes entry a distinct event. No appeal, execution, interest, or collection consequence is determined. **[C041.]** [Idaho Supreme Court+1](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54)\n\n# 7. Source and usage register\n\nAll fresh reads occurred **October 28, 2026, Pacific time**. Short IDs carry the prefix **S_ID-P23-**.\n\nThe tables below reuse document identities. Print and consolidated formats of the same rule are **not independent authorities**.\n\n## S001 — fresh failures and original-history limits\n\n| Literal HTTPS URL | Actual observation |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules/Adoption_of_Newly_Formatted_Idaho_Rules_of_Evidence_07.01.18.pdf | Original-adoption route discovered through ordinary search; 404 |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules/IRCP/03012016-Adoption-Newly-Formatted.pdf | Original civil-rule adoption route discovered through visible historical links; 404 |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/1972 | Search-discovered Rule 56 PDF delivery; 404 |\n| https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title9/T9CH14/SECT9-1406/ | Fresh ordinary official section attempt restricted |\n| API-hosted orders/forms | Not opened |\n| Proposed restyled-evidence draft | Search lead only; not adopted text or a correction source |\n\nNo failed source proves absence of a rule, protection, amendment, or remedy. No PDF body was recovered from these failed routes.\n\n## S002 — official Idaho Rules of Evidence\n\n**Issuer/title:** Idaho Supreme Court, *Idaho Rules of Evidence*.\n**Consolidated URL:** https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ire\n\n**Status:** Official current-published HTML. Individual print pages below were read. Unless limited, the complete rule and displayed footer were inspected.\n\n| Literal URL | Actual read bounds and substantive use |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/101 | Complete (a)–(f), including every scope exception; no special-regime merits |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/103 | Complete; narrow evidentiary-ruling boundary only, not a full appellate-preservation report |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/104 | Complete (a)–(e) |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/105 | Complete limiting-purpose rule |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/106 | Complete writing/recorded-statement completeness rule |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/201 | Complete adjudicative-notice rule |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/301 | Complete civil-presumption rule |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/302 | Complete federal-presumption choice rule; no federal presumption applied |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/401 | Complete relevance test |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/402 | Complete admissibility rule |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/403 | Complete exclusion/balancing rule |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/408 | Complete compromise-use restriction and exceptions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/601 | Complete competency exceptions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/602 | Complete personal-knowledge rule and expert exception |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/603 | Complete oath/affirmation rule |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/703 | Complete; only to preserve Rule 602’s expert-basis distinction |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/801 | Complete definitions and (d)(1)–(2) exclusions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/802 | Complete hearsay prohibition |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/803 | Complete published (1)–(24) inspected; substantive use limited to lead-in, (6)–(8), (10), (16), and (24); other branches not applied |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/805 | Complete multiple-hearsay rule |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/806 | Complete declarant-credibility rule |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/901 | Complete (a), (b)(1)–(10); anomalous (b)(6)(B) held |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/902 | Complete (1)–(12), including domestic/foreign certification and notice |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/903 | Complete subscribing-witness rule |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1001 | Complete original/duplicate/ESI definitions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1002 | Complete original requirement |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1003 | Complete duplicate exceptions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1004 | Complete (a)–(d) alternative-content branches |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1005 | Complete (a)–(b); transcript incorporation separately limited |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1006 | Complete summary/access provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1007 | Complete opposing-party content-proof provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1008 | Complete court/jury allocation |\n\n### Displayed evidence-rule history\n\n| Rules | Displayed adoption/amendment/effectiveness |\n| --- | --- |\n| Listed rules other than 101, 201, 805 | Adopted **March 26, 2018**, effective **July 1, 2018** |\n| Rule 201 | Same baseline; amended **January 13, 2021**, effective that day |\n| Rule 805 | Same baseline; amended effective **May 28, 2019** |\n| Rule 101 | Adopted January 8, 1985/effective July 1, 1985; amendments June 7, 1993/July 1, 1993; March 1, 2000/July 1, 2000; December 26, 2002/February 1, 2003; March 21, 2007/July 1, 2007; April 4, 2008/July 1, 2008; February 9, 2012/July 1, 2012; amended/effective May 28, 2019 |\n\nThese are **displayed footers**, not an assertion that the original orders were opened. The 2018 search excerpt and proposed draft were not used to repair the Rule 901 anomaly.\n\n## S003 — official Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure\n\n**Issuer/title:** Idaho Supreme Court, *Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure*.\n**Consolidated URL:** https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ircp\n\n| Literal URL | Actual read bounds |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1 | Complete (a)–(c); scope and local-rule boundary only |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2 | Complete computation, extension, exclusions, mail addition |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.7 | Complete declaration inclusion |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.8 | Complete (a)–(g) and visible comments; no federal electronic-signature outcome; appendix form unopened |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/5 | Complete material service/final-paper filing clauses; fax mechanics inspected but not applied |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7 | Complete; reliance on motion/order distinction, timing exception, argument and good-cause conditions |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7.1 | Complete evidence-on-motion clause |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/8 | Complete (a)–(b), relevant (d)–(e); defenses list not developed into merits |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/10 | Complete; reliance on (c) only |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11 | Complete (a)–(b); sanctions/discovery-exclusion paragraphs visible but not applied |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11.1 | Complete verification provision |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/12 | Complete (c)–(d), with (b)(6) identified; other response/default merits not rerun |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/28 | Complete (a)–(d); used only for verification’s officer/disqualification incorporation |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/36 | Complete (b)–(d); (a) and (e) inspected but discovery timing/retention/sanctions not adopted |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54 | Complete (a)–(b)(1) for judgment/partial-final distinction; fee and full appellate branches excluded |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/56 | **Complete (a)–(g)**, including all timing, evidence, relief and sanction clauses; consolidated text also checked |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/58 | Complete judgment-entry clause |\n\n### Displayed civil-rule history\n\nAll listed rules display adoption **March 1, 2016**, effective **July 1, 2016**. Additional footers read:\n\n| Rule | Additional entries |\n| --- | --- |\n| 1 | April 30, 2024/effective same day; September 30, 2024/effective October 1, 2024 |\n| 2.2 | September 9, 2016/effective same day |\n| 12 | September 9, 2016/effective same day; April 25, 2018/effective July 1, 2018 |\n| 54 | April 27, 2016/July 1, 2016; October 6, 2016/March 1, 2017; April 17, 2017/nunc pro tunc March 1, 2017; December 14, 2017/January 1, 2018; April 28, 2021/July 1, 2021 |\n\nThe Rule 56 page displays no additional amendment entry beyond its baseline. That is not a comprehensive absence-of-amendment certification.\n\n## S004 — small-claims de novo boundary only\n\n**Issuer/title:** Idaho Supreme Court, *Small Claims Rule 15*.\n**URL:** https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irsca/15\n\n**Read:** Complete page inspected; substantive reliance confined to **(c), (d)(2)** and related scope.\n**Footer:** March 1, 2016/July 1, 2016; June 30, 2026/July 1, 2026.\n**Limit:** No small-claims appeal deadline, fee, jury, or merits rerun.\n\n## S005 — official transcript incorporation\n\n**Issuer/title:** Idaho Supreme Court, *Idaho Court Administrative Rule 27*.\n**URL:** https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/icar/27\n\n**Read:** Complete **(d)–(e)**, including realtime/electronic-recording exclusions; adjacent clauses inspected for context.\n**Footer:** March 15, 2004/July 1, 2004; January 3, 2008/March 1, 2008; March 29, 2010/May 1, 2010; September 9, 2016/effective same day.\n**Limit:** The incorporated certification form and current Rule 83(g) relationship were not completed. Reporter fees, transcript procurement, and actual recordings were not investigated.\n\n## S006 — declaration statute\n\n**Publisher/title:** Justia, *2025 Idaho Code § 9-1406*.\n**URL:** https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-9/chapter-14/section-9-1406/\n\n**Read:** Complete **(1)–(2)**, including exceptions, generic statutory form, history and disclaimer.\n**Displayed credit:** Added **2013, chapter 259, § 1, page 636**.\n**Status:** **Secondary 2025 reproduction.** Original act, effective/application clause, and current official body were not recovered. No declaration was populated or drafted.\n\n## S007 — official amendment locator\n\n**Issuer/title:** Idaho Supreme Court, *Recent Amendments*.\n**URL:** https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments\n\n**Read:** Statement that amendments are incorporated into the rule text on their effective date; visible index context.\n**Limit:** The retrieved page did not provide a completed historical order list. No contact, API, or original-order retrieval through an inaccessible route occurred.\n\n## S008 — discovery-only materials\n\n| Literal URL | Status |\n| --- | --- |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/proposals/Proposed_Draft_of_Restyled_Idaho_Rules_of_Evidence.pdf | Proposed-draft search lead only; not opened or used as law |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/1964 | Historical-link discovery only |\n| https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/1976 | Historical-link discovery only |\n| API-hosted 2016 adoption PDF appearing in search | Not opened; search text not treated as an original-order read |\n\nIncidental opinion/case results were not investigated, named in the findings, or relied on.\n\n# 8. Atomic consequential-claim register\n\nShort IDs carry the prefix **S_ID-P23-**.\n\n| Claim | Precise proposition | Source/pinpoint | Status |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **C001** | Official current rule text was read; original-order and declaration-statute history remain incomplete. | S001–S007 | O/P/H |\n| **C002** | Ordinary civil and evidence scope retain their express exclusions. | IRCP 1; IRE 101 | O |\n| **C003** | Original small claims and de novo appeal are not interchangeable proof contexts. | IRE 101(e)(5); S004(c),(d)(2) | O/H |\n| **C004** | Allegation, pleading admission, and damages are distinct. | IRCP 8(b) | O |\n| **C005** | Formal admissions have action-specific effect; an attachment is not admitted merely for lack of verified denial. | IRCP 36(b)–(d), 10(c) | O |\n| **C006** | Admissibility and weight are separately governed. | IRE 104 | O |\n| **C007** | Relevance does not eliminate other exclusions or balancing. | IRE 401–403 | O |\n| **C008** | Conditional relevance, limited purpose, and completeness have separate predicates. | IRE 104(b), 105–106 | O/H |\n| **C009** | Knowledge, competency, oath, and expert-basis rules are distinct. | IRE 601–603, 703 | O/H |\n| **C010** | Authentication requires support that the item is what is claimed. | IRE 901(a) | O |\n| **C011** | Authentication examples are nonexclusive and condition-dependent. | IRE 901(b) | O/H |\n| **C012** | Electronic format alone does not authenticate content. | IRE 101(f), 901(b)(9), 1001 | O |\n| **C013** | Public self-authentication removes only the specified authenticity foundation. | IRE 902(1)–(5) | O |\n| **C014** | Acknowledgment, commercial-paper status, and subscribing-witness requirements depend on their own authority. | IRE 902(8)–(10), 903 | O/H |\n| **C015** | Domestic records certification requires foundation, penal qualification, notice and inspection. | IRE 902(11) | O |\n| **C016** | Foreign records certification has separate country/signature and incorporated notice conditions. | IRE 902(12) | O/H |\n| **C017** | Hearsay depends on statement, declarant and offered purpose. | IRE 801(a)–(c), 802 | O |\n| **C018** | Opposing-party and prior-witness exclusions require their specified predicates. | IRE 801(d) | O |\n| **C019** | Regular-activity records require the complete source/time/practice/foundation relation. | IRE 803(6)(A)–(D) | O |\n| **C020** | The business-record trustworthiness challenge is allocated expressly to the opponent. | IRE 803(6)(E) | O |\n| **C021** | No categorical predecessor-record rule is certified from status alone. | IRE 803(6), 805, 902(11) | H/construction |\n| **C022** | Absence-of-record evidence requires its own regular-recordkeeping and search conditions. | IRE 803(7),(10) | O |\n| **C023** | Idaho public-record exclusions must be retained. | IRE 803(8) | O |\n| **C024** | Layered statements and declarant credibility remain separately governed. | IRE 805–806 | O |\n| **C025** | Ancient/residual branches are conditional, not automatic admission. | IRE 901(b)(8), 803(16),(24) | O |\n| **C026** | Originals, ESI outputs, and duplicates have distinct definitions and exceptions. | IRE 1001–1003 | O |\n| **C027** | Alternative content proof requires a complete Rule 1004 branch. | IRE 1004 | O |\n| **C028** | Public-copy and official-transcript provisions retain certification and incorporation limits. | IRE 1005; ICAR 27(d)–(e) | O/H |\n| **C029** | A summary requires the specified voluminous-material and access predicates. | IRE 1006 | O |\n| **C030** | Party content-proof and court/jury allocation are separate rules. | IRE 1007–1008 | O |\n| **C031** | Judicial notice and presumptions do not universally prove disputed records or shift persuasion. | IRE 201, 301–302 | O/H |\n| **C032** | Summary judgment requires both Rule 56(a) predicates. | IRCP 56(a) | O |\n| **C033** | Filing eligibility and cutoff are distinct. | Rule 56(b)(1) | O |\n| **C034** | Hearing-relative service intervals are distinct. | Rule 56(b)(2) | O |\n| **C035** | Factual positions require rule-compliant support. | Rule 56(c)(1),(3) | O |\n| **C036** | Idaho hearing-admissibility wording is preserved. | Rule 56(c)(2) | O/H |\n| **C037** | Affidavit requirements and supplementation differ. | Rule 56(c)(4) | O |\n| **C038** | Qualifying declarations and belief verification are not identical. | Rules 2.7–2.8, 11.1; § 9-1406 | O/P/H |\n| **C039** | Unavailable-fact relief is discretionary and predicate-dependent. | Rule 56(d) | O |\n| **C040** | Defective support does not automatically decide entitlement. | Rule 56(e) | O |\n| **C041** | Established facts, partial relief, and final judgment differ. | Rule 56(f); Rules 54(a)–(b), 58 | O |\n| **C042** | Bad-faith consequences require finding, notice, response opportunity, and causal expenses. | Rule 56(g) | O |\n| **C043** | Timing modification and its consequences are discretionary. | Rule 56(b)(3) | O |\n| **C044** | Service, filing, receipt, and counting are distinct. | Rules 2.2, 5, 7 | O/H |\n| **C045** | Accepted outside material can trigger conversion with a reasonable opportunity to respond. | Rule 12(d) | O |\n| **C046** | Signature and verification do not themselves prove admissible facts. | Rules 11(a)–(b), 11.1; IRE 602 | O |\n| **C047** | Compromise-use restrictions are not universal confidentiality or exclusion. | IRE 408 | O/H |\n| **C048** | Published Rule 901(b)(6)(B) contains an unresolved textual anomaly. | S002, both formats | Source issue |\n| **C049** | Footers and locator statements do not complete original adoption history. | S001–S008 | Provenance limit |\n| **C050** | No actual evidence or legal outcome was assessed; all previous holds remain. | Research record | Certain |\n\n# 9. Material distinctions and burden register\n\n| Distinction | Required separation | Unresolved application |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Allegation / proof | Procedural statement versus supported evidence | No factual assertion evaluated |\n| Pleading admission / Rule 36 admission / party statement | Different procedural and evidentiary effects | No admission or adoption found |\n| Authentication / hearsay | Identity of item versus truth-use exception | Neither automatically supplies the other |\n| Certification / acknowledgment | Different authority, content, and legal function | No signer or certificate assessed |\n| Knowledge / job title | Foundation rather than label | Qualified-witness construction held |\n| Business record / public record | Different foundations and exclusions | Filing does not transform private assertions |\n| Record / embedded statements | Each truth-use layer requires treatment | No categorical debt-purchaser rule |\n| Original / duplicate / readable ESI output | Separate definitions and exceptions | No actual accuracy or authenticity finding |\n| Summary / underlying material | Access and foundation remain | No sum or input validated |\n| Admissibility / weight | Judicial gatekeeping versus credibility/weight | No comparative evidence assessment |\n| Production / persuasion | Civil-presumption rule ordinarily changes only production | Substantive burden law held |\n| Summary-judgment record / trial proof | Rule 56 has its own text and posture | No imported federal formulation |\n| Nonresponse / judgment | Fact treatment differs from legal entitlement | No automatic result |\n| Defective support / bad faith | Curable insufficiency is not itself misconduct | No accusation or finding |\n| Partial factual order / final judgment | Rules 56, 54 and 58 have different functions | No appeal or enforcement consequence |\n| Signed statement / declaration / affidavit | Formal qualification does not remove knowledge/hearsay requirements | § 9-1406 official currency held |\n\n# 10. Quantities, periods, triggers, and unknown counting issues\n\nNo financial amount, numerical debt example, actual date, or calendar result is supplied.\n\n| Quantity or relation | Reference event/base | Qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **After expiration of 21 days** | Service of process on adverse party or that party’s appearance | Rule 56(b)(1); separate adverse-motion alternative |\n| **After service of adverse party’s summary-judgment motion** | Alternative filing eligibility | Not a merits finding |\n| **At least 90 days before trial or within 7 days of trial-setting order, whichever later** | Filing cutoff | Court may order otherwise |\n| **At least 28 / 14 / 7 days before hearing** | Motion/support/brief; opposition; reply service | Rule 56 schedule, not Rule 7’s ordinary schedule |\n| **Good cause** | Timing alteration | Court discretion; no actual extension |\n| **14 / 7 / 2 days before hearing** | General Rule 7 receipt schedule | Not substituted where Rule 56 supplies different limits |\n| **At least 1 day before hearing** | Rule 7 notice denying requested oral argument | Separate from filing/service periods |\n| **3 added days** | Act due a specified time after service by mail | Not automatically added to a hearing-relative deadline |\n| Exclude trigger day; count intermediate days; qualified last-day extension | Rule 2.2 computation | No actual calendar or local order |\n| First accessible nonweekend/nonholiday day | Clerk-inaccessibility branch | Unless court otherwise orders |\n| Before/after expiration | Extension request | Post-expiration motion additionally requires excusable neglect |\n| Filed written stipulation | Time extension | Must not disturb orderly business or court convenience |\n| Nonextendable specified rules | Rule 2.2(b)(3) | No Rule 56 exclusion appears in that list; no extension granted here |\n| Mailing / transmission / receipt | Rule 5 service methods | Written-consent electronic and known-nonreceipt qualifications |\n| Reasonable time after service | Rule 5 filing relation | No universal fixed period inferred |\n| **At or near the time** | Business-record creation | Source knowledge and practice also required |\n| **Before trial or hearing; reasonable written notice** | Rule 902(11)–(12) | Fair opportunity and inspection; no fixed day count |\n| Reasonable opportunity plus good cause | Foreign-public-document certification alternative | Not automatic waiver |\n| **At least 30 years when offered** | Rule 901 ancient-authentication example | Condition and location predicates |\n| **At least 30 years; authenticity established** | Rule 803 ancient-statement branch | Separate from authentication alone |\n| **14-day / 7-day criminal notice relations** | Rule 803(10)(B) | Read as an exclusion boundary; **not an ordinary civil deadline** |\n| Reasonable pre-hearing/trial notice | Residual hearsay branch | Complete trustworthiness/materiality/probativeness conditions |\n| Reasonable time and place | Summary underlying-material access | Court may require production |\n| Reasonable opportunity | Rule 12 conversion | No fixed period supplied |\n| Specified reasons | Rule 56(d) inability showing | Not unsupported assertion of need |\n| Notice and reasonable response time | Rule 56(g) | No fixed-day sanction interval |\n| Reasonable expenses incurred as a result | Rule 56(g) measure | Causal requirement; no amount or fee calculation |\n| Reasonable diligence | Alternative public-record content proof | Does not establish diligence |\n| Timely request | Limiting instruction and judicial-notice hearing | No universal fixed time |\n| Same action only | Rule 36 admission | Withdrawal/amendment conditions retained |\n| March 1 / July 1, 2016 | Civil-rule adoption/effectiveness footers | Original order unavailable |\n| March 26 / July 1, 2018 | Evidence-rule adoption/effectiveness footers | Original order unavailable |\n| May 28, 2019 | IRE 101/805 displayed amendment effectiveness | Original amendments not recovered |\n| January 13, 2021 | IRE 201 displayed amendment/effectiveness | Not all evidence rules’ date |\n| 2013, ch.259, §1, p.636 | Declaration statute displayed credit | No original effective date authenticated |\n| Unknown | Actual authenticity, source knowledge, trustworthiness, notice, record availability, prejudice, dispute, amount, misconduct | None supplied or inferred |\n\nThe Rule 56 timing relations are drawn from the current official text; no filing or service permission is provided. [Idaho Supreme Court+2](https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/56)\n\nUnrelied-on discovery response periods, transcript-fee quantities, foreign-form fields, and broader sanction procedures are not adopted into this register.\n\n# 11. Conditional branches and precise next inquiries\n\n| Branch | Missing predicate | Supported consequence | Adverse inference to avoid | Exact next generic inquiry |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **B01 — ordinary scope** | Correct proceeding category | Ordinary evidence/civil rules may apply | Every civil-looking proceeding has identical proof rules | Governing special-proceeding text |\n| **B02 — allegation/admission** | Applicable pleading or formal-admission condition | Different legal effect | Every allegation or attachment is established evidence | Relevant procedural construction |\n| **B03 — relevance** | Consequential fact and probative connection | Relevance gate | Relevant means automatically admissible | Other applicable exclusions |\n| **B04 — knowledge** | Sufficient personal-knowledge support | Ordinary witness foundation | Custodian title proves every event | Qualified-witness construction |\n| **B05 — authentication** | Item-identity foundation | Rule 901 threshold | Signature, metadata, or format automatically suffices | Applicable authenticating method |\n| **B06 — self-authentication** | Exact category and certification conditions | Extrinsic authenticity evidence unnecessary to that extent | Contents automatically true | Hearsay, originals, substantive law |\n| **B07 — commercial paper** | Governing commercial-law predicates | Possible Rule 902(9) effect | Every debt document is negotiable commercial paper | Complete instrument law |\n| **B08 — business record** | Complete A–D foundation and trustworthiness treatment | Possible hearsay exception | Every routinely stored file qualifies | Rule 803(6) construction |\n| **B09 — predecessor record** | Knowledge transmission, practices, integration, qualified foundation | No categorical result | Purchaser status always permits or forbids proof | Generic judicial construction; no cases investigated |\n| **B10 — multiple layers** | Each asserted layer’s legal treatment | Rule 805 analysis | Outer certification cures embedded statements | Applicable nonhearsay/exception branch |\n| **B11 — public record** | Office function and no applicable exclusion | Possible public-record exception | Filing private material changes its truth status | Exact Rule 803(8) category |\n| **B12 — absent record** | Regular practice/diligent search | Conditional absence proof | Missing search hit proves nonexistence | Complete source and search predicates |\n| **B13 — electronic material** | Accurate process/output and statement analysis | Potential ordinary-rule treatment | Digital form automatically authentic or hearsay-free | Electronic-transactions and construction law |\n| **B14 — original/duplicate** | Correct definition and no exception concern | Content-proof route | Every copy barred or every copy admissible | Rules 1001–1004 application |\n| **B15 — summary** | Voluminous source and inspection conditions | Rule 1006 route | Summary proves its own inputs | Underlying admissibility and proof |\n| **B16 — judicial notice** | Indisputability and specific identified item | Conditional notice | Entire court file conclusively true | Rule 201 construction |\n| **B17 — summary judgment** | Genuine/material/legal predicates | Possible adjudication | Procedural submission proves entitlement | Substantive law and Rule 56 construction |\n| **B18 — evidentiary form** | Idaho admissibility and foundation | Correct Rule 56 treatment | Federal form-conversion language controls | Idaho construction; no federal import |\n| **B19 — unavailable facts** | Specified affidavit/declaration showing | Discretionary relief | Discovery request guarantees delay | Rule 56(d); discovery separately |\n| **B20 — defective support** | Identified deficiency | Possible correction or other order | Nonresponse equals automatic judgment | Rule 56(e) application |\n| **B21 — bad faith** | Required judicial finding, notice and causal expense | Defined consequence | Mistake or defeat alone is bad faith | Complete sanction due process |\n| **B22 — partial adjudication** | Undisputed issue and appropriate order | Limited established fact | Every partial order is final judgment | Rules 54/58; appeal separately |\n| **B23 — declaration** | Proper subscribed declaration and no exclusion | Rule 2.7/statutory relation | Unsworn text or acknowledgment universally substitutes | Official § 9-1406/current history |\n| **B24 — source anomaly** | Original operative 901 text | No telephone-branch result here | Silently correct publication wording | Readable adopted order |\n| **B25 — special law** | Independent scope | Held dependency | State evidence rules prove federal compliance | Authorities below |\n\n# 12. Exact uncompleted interfaces\n\n| Regime or subject | Required later inquiry |\n| --- | --- |\n| Privileges and confidentiality | Applicable IRE Article V privilege, waiver, confidentiality statutes, protective orders, and public-access rules |\n| Expert proof | Rules 701–705 and applicable qualification/reliability construction; Rule 703 alone is insufficient |\n| Unavailable declarants | Complete Rule 804 and its unavailability, causation, and exception conditions |\n| Medical records | Rule 904, statutory privacy and certification requirements, and medical-sector law |\n| Debt ownership and capacity | Contract, assignment, authority, licensing, real-party, protected-person, and representation law |\n| Instruments and security | UCC negotiability, signatures, enforcement entitlement, title/security, consumer defenses, and relevant sector law |\n| Electronic transactions | UETA, E-SIGN, attribution, consent, retention, and digital-signature rules |\n| Discovery and sanctions | Rules 26–37, subpoena/deposition/production procedures, and separate Rule 11/37 sanctions |\n| Foreign declarations and records | Rule 2.8 appendix form, foreign certification/penalty authority, treaties and applicable foreign law |\n| Official transcripts | ICAR 27(d)’s certification form and current Rule 83(g) cross-reference |\n| Federal collection/reporting | FDCPA/Regulation F, FCRA, relevant definitions, exclusions, duties and remedies |\n| Bankruptcy/military | Applicable stay, discharge, protected-party and service-related law |\n| Local/tribal/interstate | Approved local rules, sovereignty, conflicts and jurisdictional requirements |\n| Judicial construction | Inferences at summary judgment, bench-trial distinctions, predecessor-record foundation, automation, waiver, trustworthiness, and constitutional notice |\n| Original history | Readable original 2016/2018 orders, relevant later amendments, and § 9-1406’s adopted application provisions |\n\nThese are precise dependencies, not findings that the regimes are inapplicable.\n\n# 13. Wholly blank conceptual worksheet\n\n| Field | Entry |\n| --- | --- |\n| Governing proceeding |  |\n| Authority and edition |  |\n| Official-current-text status |  |\n| Allegation/admission category |  |\n| Fact of consequence |  |\n| Offered purpose |  |\n| Personal-knowledge basis |  |\n| Competency qualification |  |\n| Authentication method |  |\n| Self-authentication category |  |\n| Certification/notice condition |  |\n| Statement/declarant classification |  |\n| Hearsay layer |  |\n| Applicable exclusion or exception |  |\n| Regular-activity foundation |  |\n| Trustworthiness issue |  |\n| Predecessor-record dependency |  |\n| Original/duplicate category |  |\n| Summary-source/access condition |  |\n| Judicial-notice condition |  |\n| Summary-judgment issue |  |\n| Record-citation requirement |  |\n| Evidentiary-form requirement |  |\n| Affidavit/declaration qualification |  |\n| Timing/reference event |  |\n| Unavailable-fact condition |  |\n| Defective-support provision |  |\n| Partial-adjudication provision |  |\n| Sanction predicate |  |\n| Substantive-law dependency |  |\n| Unread incorporation |  |\n| Missing primary authority |  |\n| Review status |  |\n\nNo field is completed.\n\n# 14. Granular coverage\n\n| Requested question/subquestion | Disposition | Claims/sources | Exact retained gap |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **1 — ordinary rule scope** | Official bodies read | C002–C003; S002–S004 | Specialized proceeding application |\n| Small claims/de novo distinction | Narrow fresh scope reading | C003 | No small-claims merits rerun |\n| Allegations/admissions/proof | Distinguished | C004–C006 | Actual admission or evidence absent |\n| Admissibility/weight/substantive entitlement | Distinguished | C006–C008,C032 | Judicial/substantive construction |\n| **2 — relevance** | Complete material rules | C007–C008 | No fact relevance decided |\n| Personal knowledge/competency | Complete material rules | C009 | Expert/estate/protected-party law |\n| Authentication examples | Read with anomaly preserved | C010–C012,C048 | Original 901(b)(6)(B) text |\n| Self-authentication | Complete Rule 902 | C013–C016 | Officer, commercial-law and foreign-law predicates |\n| Electronic form | Source distinctions read | C012,C026 | Automation/attribution construction |\n| Public/private record | Distinguished | C013,C023,C028 | No actual record classification |\n| **3 — hearsay definition/exclusions** | Complete relevant clauses | C017–C018 | Actual purpose/declarant absent |\n| Business records | Complete (6)(A)–(E) | C019–C020 | No foundation or trustworthiness finding |\n| Predecessor/debt-purchaser records | Explicitly held beyond rule text | C021 | Judicial construction |\n| Multiple layers | Complete Rule 805 | C024 | Each actual layer absent |\n| Absence/public records | Complete relied-on exceptions | C022–C023 | Statutory duty/source facts |\n| Originals/duplicates/summaries | Complete necessary rules | C026–C030 | No content/value proof |\n| Ancient/residual exceptions | Conditions retained | C025 | No application |\n| **4 — complete Rule 56** | Entire (a)–(g) read | C032–C043; S003 | Original-order history |\n| Movant/nonmovant support | Textual duties identified | C032,C035–C037 | Substantive burdens and inference law |\n| Admissibility/form distinction | Idaho wording preserved | C036–C038 | No federal formulation imported |\n| Motion versus order | Distinguished | C041,C045 | Actual finality absent |\n| Failure to respond | Not automatic judgment | C040 | No actual nonresponse |\n| Time/counting/service | Registered | C033–C034,C044 | Local orders and actual events |\n| Verification/declarations | Rule and provisional statute read | C038,C046 | Official statute/foreign appendix |\n| **5 — unavailable facts** | Complete branch | C039 | No affidavit or diligence determination |\n| Defective support | Complete branch | C040 | No entitlement to correction assumed |\n| Partial adjudication | Complete branch and finality interface | C041 | Appeal/enforcement held |\n| Bad-faith consequences | Complete Rule 56(g) | C042 | No misconduct or amount |\n| Broader sanctions/discovery | Deferred | C050 | Rules 11/37 and discovery methods |\n| **6 — privileges/protected persons** | Scope and dependencies identified | C009,C050 | Full regime not completed |\n| Substantive debt/sector law | Deferred | C021,C050 | No debt-ownership or amount finding |\n| Federal/local/tribal/interstate | Exact dependencies | Section 12 | No federal merits conclusion |\n| Judicial construction | Expressly open | Section 12 | No cases investigated |\n| **7 — literal sources/read bounds** | Visible register supplied | Section 7 | Original-order failures preserved |\n| Adoption/effectiveness | Footers accurately separated | C049 | No full original-history authentication |\n| Current/historical/proposed | Distinguished | S001,S007–S008 | Proposal not treated as law |\n| PDF text/pixels | No PDF body recovered | Section 15 | No screenshot/pixel claim |\n| Quantities/branches/worksheet | Supplied | Sections 10–13 | No calendar, values, or populated form |\n| Prior holds/provenance | Unchanged | C050 | No prior acceptance implied |\n| Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent | **Not accepted complete** | Entire report | Exact remaining dependencies |\n\n# 15. Read, search, failure, and researcher self-check\n\n## 15.1 Actual work performed\n\n| Material | Actual use |\n| --- | --- |\n| Official evidence rules | Complete or expressly bounded provisions listed in S002 |\n| Official civil rules | Complete Rule 56 and necessary scope, motion, declaration, admission, service, counting, and partial-finality clauses |\n| Official small-claims rule | De novo scope only |\n| Official transcript rule | Necessary definition and exclusions only |\n| Official statute route | Fresh § 9-1406 attempt failed |\n| Secondary declaration statute | Complete 2025 body, exceptions, history and disclaimer |\n| Original-order searches | Generic adopted-rule searches; ordinary routes failed as recorded |\n| Proposed draft/search excerpts | Discovery only; not law or a correction source |\n| Cases/opinions/dockets | Incidental results not investigated or relied on |\n| Actual records, affidavits, contracts, statements, metadata, signatures, identities | Not requested, opened, constructed, or evaluated |\n| Prior saved reports/local metadata | Supplied scope exclusion only; not legal premises |\n\n## 15.2 PDF and visual status\n\nNo PDF body was successfully recovered or analyzed in this pass. The original-order and Rule 56 PDF routes returned 404s. Accordingly:\n\n- No parsed-PDF reading is represented as a successful original-order read.\n- No PDF screenshot or page-pixel inspection is claimed.\n- Search-engine excerpts from PDFs remain discovery material only.\n- Official HTML print and consolidated versions remain the same underlying rule instruments.\n\n## 15.3 Remaining gaps and conclusion\n\nThe principal unresolved matters are:\n\n1. Original adoption/amendment orders and § 9-1406’s current official statutory chain.\n2. The published Rule 901(b)(6)(B) anomaly.\n3. Predecessor-record integration, qualified-witness foundation, electronic/automated data, and other judicial construction.\n4. Substantive claim elements and burden allocation.\n5. Privilege, expert, foreign-declaration, transcript-certification, protected-party, federal, and special-sector incorporations.\n6. Full discovery, trial, appellate, sanction, and postjudgment procedures.\n\nNo actual or invented person, creditor, debtor, account, contract, assignment, custodian, statement, affidavit, record, amount, transaction, or case was supplied or constructed. No admissibility, evidentiary weight, debt validity, liability, misconduct, judgment, or legal outcome was determined.\n\nThis is a **researcher self-check, not independent review**. The component is supported by newly read official rules but remains **conditional at the exact source-history, statutory, incorporation, and construction gaps identified above**. Earlier findings and holds remain preserved. No Idaho, dimension4, A066, parent, operational, or publication acceptance follows.\n\nEND S_ID PASS-23.\n\n","tables":[{"headers":["Context","Newly read authority","Boundary"],"index":0,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Context","Newly read authority","Boundary"],["Ordinary civil action","IRCP 1(b); IRE 101(b)","General civil/evidence framework, subject to express exceptions."],["Original small-claims proceeding","IRCP 1(b); IRE 101(e)(5)","Ordinary civil rules apply only through the special rules; ordinary evidence rules are excluded except privilege."],["Small-claims de novo appeal","Small-claims Rule 15(c), (d)(2)","A distinct proceeding; civil rules apply subject to that rule and the court’s stated discretion. The initial small-claims exclusion is not transferred automatically."],["Preliminary admissibility question","IRE 104(a), 101(e)(1)","The court is not bound by evidence rules other than privilege when resolving the specified preliminary questions."],["Specialized proceedings","IRE 101(d)–(e); IRCP 1(b)","Enumerated criminal, family, juvenile, contempt, medical-treatment, and other qualifications remain separate."],["Summary judgment","IRCP 56, with necessary incorporated rules","Not a default hearing or an ordinary trial merely conducted on paper."],["Appeal from a final judgment","Separate appellate rules","Full appellate review and preservation consequences are not completed here."]]},{"headers":["Item","Legal effect actually supported","Limit"],"index":1,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Item","Legal effect actually supported","Limit"],["Pleaded allegation","Rule 8 supplies pleading and admission/denial consequences.","Pleading a fact is not ordinarily evidence proving it."],["Failure to deny","Rule 8(b)(6) distinguishes allegations requiring a response, damages allegations, and allegations requiring no response.","The exceptions cannot be omitted."],["Instrument attached to pleading","Rule 10(c) makes it part of the pleading.","Not automatic authentication, hearsay clearance, or proof of ownership."],["Failure to make a verified denial of an attachment","Rule 36(c) expressly rejects automatic admission of genuineness, accuracy, or truth on that basis.","Does not decide some other admission or stipulation."],["Formal Rule 36 admission","Conclusive in the pending action unless withdrawal/amendment is permitted under the stated merits/prejudice conditions.","Not an admission for another proceeding."],["Evidence admitted for a limited purpose","Rule 105 requires the stated limitation on timely request.","Admission for one purpose is not unrestricted substantive use."],["Preliminary admissibility ruling","Rule 104 allocates qualification, privilege, and admissibility questions to the court.","Weight and credibility remain distinct under subsection (e)."]]},{"headers":["Rule","Complete material relation"],"index":2,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Rule","Complete material relation"],["401","Evidence must tend to affect the probability of a fact and that fact must matter to deciding the action."],["402","Relevant evidence remains subject to other exclusion rules; irrelevant evidence is inadmissible."],["403","The court may exclude relevant evidence when its probative value is substantially outweighed by the specified prejudice, confusion, delay, waste, or cumulative-evidence dangers."],["104(b)","Conditional relevance requires sufficient support for the predicate fact; the court may condition admission on later proof."],["105","Proper party/purpose limits remain material."],["106","Fairness may require contemporaneous consideration of the remainder or a related writing/recorded statement."]]},{"headers":["Category","Material condition"],"index":3,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Category","Material condition"],["Domestic public document","The applicable seal/signature or officer-certification conditions in Rule 902(1)–(2)."],["Foreign public document","Authorized attestation and final-certification chain; the stated opportunity-to-investigate/good-cause alternatives remain."],["Certified public-record copy","Correct-copy certification by the custodian/authorized person or the specified compliant certificate."],["Official publication","Must purport to be issued by a public authority."],["Acknowledged document","Lawfully executed acknowledgment by an authorized officer."],["Commercial paper","Only to the extent allowed by governing commercial law, which is not completed here."],["Statutory authenticity presumption","Requires the particular statute or Supreme Court rule."],["Domestic business record","Rule 902(11)’s qualified certification plus reasonable written pre-hearing/trial notice and inspection opportunity."],["Foreign business record","Rule 902(12)’s country-of-signing criminal-penalty qualification and incorporated notice conditions."]]},{"headers":["Element","Required relationship"],"index":4,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Element","Required relationship"],["Timing/source","Made at or near the relevant time by, or from information transmitted by, someone with knowledge"],["Activity","Kept in the course of a regularly conducted business, organizational, occupational, or other calling, whether for profit or not"],["Practice","Making that record was a regular practice"],["Foundation","Qualified custodian/witness testimony or a compliant Rule 902(11)/(12) certification"],["Trustworthiness","Opponent does not establish the specified source, method, or preparation circumstances indicating untrustworthiness"]]},{"headers":["Branch","Source-stated boundary"],"index":5,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Branch","Source-stated boundary"],["803(7), absence of business record","The kind of matter must ordinarily be recorded, and the trustworthiness qualification remains."],["803(8), public record","The public-office activity, observation, or legally authorized investigation categories have Idaho-specific exclusions, including the stated office-party and special-investigation material."],["803(10), absence of public record","Requires a diligent-search showing and the relevant regular-recordkeeping predicate; its criminal notice provision is not a civil deadline."],["805, multiple layers","Each hearsay part must satisfy the applicable rule. Filing or certifying an outer record does not automatically cure every embedded statement."],["806, declarant credibility","Admission of the specified hearsay or opposing-party statements does not immunize the declarant’s credibility from the rule’s permitted challenge."]]},{"headers":["Rule","Material relation"],"index":6,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Rule","Material relation"],["1001","A qualifying accurate, readable output of electronically stored information can be an “original”; a duplicate must accurately reproduce the original."],["1002","Content proof ordinarily requires an original unless a rule or statute provides otherwise."],["1003","Duplicates are generally treated like originals, subject to a genuine authenticity question or unfairness."],["1004","Alternative content proof has separate loss/destruction-without-bad-faith, unavailable-process, opponent-control/notice/nonproduction, or noncontrolling-issue branches."],["1005(a)","Public-record copies require otherwise-admissible material and the specified certification or comparison testimony; reasonable-diligence failure is a separate branch."],["1007","The opposing party’s testimony, deposition, or written statement may establish content without accounting for the original."],["1008","Court and jury functions differ for the specified existence, originality, and accurate-content issues."]]},{"headers":["Rule 56 provision","Operative distinction"],"index":7,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Rule 56 provision","Operative distinction"],["(a)","Grant requires both absence of a genuine material factual dispute and legal entitlement. A claim, defense, or part may be addressed."],["(c)(1)","Particular record citations or the specified demonstration of evidentiary insufficiency must support factual positions."],["(c)(2)","Idaho’s objection wording is “not admissible in evidence at the hearing.” A federal “capable of later presentation” formulation is not substituted."],["(c)(3)","The court need consider cited material only, but may examine other record material."],["(c)(4)","Personal knowledge, admissible facts, competence, and attached/served sworn or certified referenced papers are required; supplementation is discretionary."]]},{"headers":["Provision","Source-stated consequence"],"index":8,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Provision","Source-stated consequence"],["56(d)","Specified inability shown by affidavit/declaration permits deferral, denial, additional evidence/discovery time, or another appropriate order."],["56(e)","The court may permit correction, treat a fact undisputed for the motion, grant only upon demonstrated entitlement, or otherwise order. Nonresponse is not automatic judgment."],["56(f)","An undisputed material fact or relief item may be established for further proceedings without granting everything requested."],["56(b)(3)","Good cause permits timing alteration; continuance, costs, fees, and sanctions are discretionary."],["56(g)","Bad faith or sole-delay submission, after notice and reasonable response time, requires causally incurred reasonable expenses, including fees; contempt or other sanctions remain discretionary."]]},{"headers":["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual observation"],"index":9,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal HTTPS URL","Actual observation"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules/Adoption_of_Newly_Formatted_Idaho_Rules_of_Evidence_07.01.18.pdf","Original-adoption route discovered through ordinary search; 404"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules/IRCP/03012016-Adoption-Newly-Formatted.pdf","Original civil-rule adoption route discovered through visible historical links; 404"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/1972","Search-discovered Rule 56 PDF delivery; 404"],["https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title9/T9CH14/SECT9-1406/","Fresh ordinary official section attempt restricted"],["API-hosted orders/forms","Not opened"],["Proposed restyled-evidence draft","Search lead only; not adopted text or a correction source"]]},{"headers":["Literal URL","Actual read bounds and substantive use"],"index":10,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal URL","Actual read bounds and substantive use"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/101","Complete (a)–(f), including every scope exception; no special-regime merits"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/103","Complete; narrow evidentiary-ruling boundary only, not a full appellate-preservation report"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/104","Complete (a)–(e)"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/105","Complete limiting-purpose rule"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/106","Complete writing/recorded-statement completeness rule"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/201","Complete adjudicative-notice rule"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/301","Complete civil-presumption rule"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/302","Complete federal-presumption choice rule; no federal presumption applied"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/401","Complete relevance test"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/402","Complete admissibility rule"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/403","Complete exclusion/balancing rule"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/408","Complete compromise-use restriction and exceptions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/601","Complete competency exceptions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/602","Complete personal-knowledge rule and expert exception"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/603","Complete oath/affirmation rule"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/703","Complete; only to preserve Rule 602’s expert-basis distinction"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/801","Complete definitions and (d)(1)–(2) exclusions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/802","Complete hearsay prohibition"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/803","Complete published (1)–(24) inspected; substantive use limited to lead-in, (6)–(8), (10), (16), and (24); other branches not applied"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/805","Complete multiple-hearsay rule"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/806","Complete declarant-credibility rule"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/901","Complete (a), (b)(1)–(10); anomalous (b)(6)(B) held"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/902","Complete (1)–(12), including domestic/foreign certification and notice"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/903","Complete subscribing-witness rule"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1001","Complete original/duplicate/ESI definitions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1002","Complete original requirement"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1003","Complete duplicate exceptions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1004","Complete (a)–(d) alternative-content branches"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1005","Complete (a)–(b); transcript incorporation separately limited"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1006","Complete summary/access provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1007","Complete opposing-party content-proof provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1008","Complete court/jury allocation"]]},{"headers":["Rules","Displayed adoption/amendment/effectiveness"],"index":11,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Rules","Displayed adoption/amendment/effectiveness"],["Listed rules other than 101, 201, 805","Adopted March 26, 2018, effective July 1, 2018"],["Rule 201","Same baseline; amended January 13, 2021, effective that day"],["Rule 805","Same baseline; amended effective May 28, 2019"],["Rule 101","Adopted January 8, 1985/effective July 1, 1985; amendments June 7, 1993/July 1, 1993; March 1, 2000/July 1, 2000; December 26, 2002/February 1, 2003; March 21, 2007/July 1, 2007; April 4, 2008/July 1, 2008; February 9, 2012/July 1, 2012; amended/effective May 28, 2019"]]},{"headers":["Literal URL","Actual read bounds"],"index":12,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal URL","Actual read bounds"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1","Complete (a)–(c); scope and local-rule boundary only"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2","Complete computation, extension, exclusions, mail addition"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.7","Complete declaration inclusion"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.8","Complete (a)–(g) and visible comments; no federal electronic-signature outcome; appendix form unopened"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/5","Complete material service/final-paper filing clauses; fax mechanics inspected but not applied"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7","Complete; reliance on motion/order distinction, timing exception, argument and good-cause conditions"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7.1","Complete evidence-on-motion clause"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/8","Complete (a)–(b), relevant (d)–(e); defenses list not developed into merits"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/10","Complete; reliance on (c) only"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11","Complete (a)–(b); sanctions/discovery-exclusion paragraphs visible but not applied"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11.1","Complete verification provision"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/12","Complete (c)–(d), with (b)(6) identified; other response/default merits not rerun"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/28","Complete (a)–(d); used only for verification’s officer/disqualification incorporation"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/36","Complete (b)–(d); (a) and (e) inspected but discovery timing/retention/sanctions not adopted"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54","Complete (a)–(b)(1) for judgment/partial-final distinction; fee and full appellate branches excluded"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/56","Complete (a)–(g), including all timing, evidence, relief and sanction clauses; consolidated text also checked"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/58","Complete judgment-entry clause"]]},{"headers":["Rule","Additional entries"],"index":13,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Rule","Additional entries"],["1","April 30, 2024/effective same day; September 30, 2024/effective October 1, 2024"],["2.2","September 9, 2016/effective same day"],["12","September 9, 2016/effective same day; April 25, 2018/effective July 1, 2018"],["54","April 27, 2016/July 1, 2016; October 6, 2016/March 1, 2017; April 17, 2017/nunc pro tunc March 1, 2017; December 14, 2017/January 1, 2018; April 28, 2021/July 1, 2021"]]},{"headers":["Literal URL","Status"],"index":14,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Literal URL","Status"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/proposals/Proposed_Draft_of_Restyled_Idaho_Rules_of_Evidence.pdf","Proposed-draft search lead only; not opened or used as law"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/1964","Historical-link discovery only"],["https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/1976","Historical-link discovery only"],["API-hosted 2016 adoption PDF appearing in search","Not opened; search text not treated as an original-order read"]]},{"headers":["Claim","Precise proposition","Source/pinpoint","Status"],"index":15,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claim","Precise proposition","Source/pinpoint","Status"],["C001","Official current rule text was read; original-order and declaration-statute history remain incomplete.","S001–S007","O/P/H"],["C002","Ordinary civil and evidence scope retain their express exclusions.","IRCP 1; IRE 101","O"],["C003","Original small claims and de novo appeal are not interchangeable proof contexts.","IRE 101(e)(5); S004(c),(d)(2)","O/H"],["C004","Allegation, pleading admission, and damages are distinct.","IRCP 8(b)","O"],["C005","Formal admissions have action-specific effect; an attachment is not admitted merely for lack of verified denial.","IRCP 36(b)–(d), 10(c)","O"],["C006","Admissibility and weight are separately governed.","IRE 104","O"],["C007","Relevance does not eliminate other exclusions or balancing.","IRE 401–403","O"],["C008","Conditional relevance, limited purpose, and completeness have separate predicates.","IRE 104(b), 105–106","O/H"],["C009","Knowledge, competency, oath, and expert-basis rules are distinct.","IRE 601–603, 703","O/H"],["C010","Authentication requires support that the item is what is claimed.","IRE 901(a)","O"],["C011","Authentication examples are nonexclusive and condition-dependent.","IRE 901(b)","O/H"],["C012","Electronic format alone does not authenticate content.","IRE 101(f), 901(b)(9), 1001","O"],["C013","Public self-authentication removes only the specified authenticity foundation.","IRE 902(1)–(5)","O"],["C014","Acknowledgment, commercial-paper status, and subscribing-witness requirements depend on their own authority.","IRE 902(8)–(10), 903","O/H"],["C015","Domestic records certification requires foundation, penal qualification, notice and inspection.","IRE 902(11)","O"],["C016","Foreign records certification has separate country/signature and incorporated notice conditions.","IRE 902(12)","O/H"],["C017","Hearsay depends on statement, declarant and offered purpose.","IRE 801(a)–(c), 802","O"],["C018","Opposing-party and prior-witness exclusions require their specified predicates.","IRE 801(d)","O"],["C019","Regular-activity records require the complete source/time/practice/foundation relation.","IRE 803(6)(A)–(D)","O"],["C020","The business-record trustworthiness challenge is allocated expressly to the opponent.","IRE 803(6)(E)","O"],["C021","No categorical predecessor-record rule is certified from status alone.","IRE 803(6), 805, 902(11)","H/construction"],["C022","Absence-of-record evidence requires its own regular-recordkeeping and search conditions.","IRE 803(7),(10)","O"],["C023","Idaho public-record exclusions must be retained.","IRE 803(8)","O"],["C024","Layered statements and declarant credibility remain separately governed.","IRE 805–806","O"],["C025","Ancient/residual branches are conditional, not automatic admission.","IRE 901(b)(8), 803(16),(24)","O"],["C026","Originals, ESI outputs, and duplicates have distinct definitions and exceptions.","IRE 1001–1003","O"],["C027","Alternative content proof requires a complete Rule 1004 branch.","IRE 1004","O"],["C028","Public-copy and official-transcript provisions retain certification and incorporation limits.","IRE 1005; ICAR 27(d)–(e)","O/H"],["C029","A summary requires the specified voluminous-material and access predicates.","IRE 1006","O"],["C030","Party content-proof and court/jury allocation are separate rules.","IRE 1007–1008","O"],["C031","Judicial notice and presumptions do not universally prove disputed records or shift persuasion.","IRE 201, 301–302","O/H"],["C032","Summary judgment requires both Rule 56(a) predicates.","IRCP 56(a)","O"],["C033","Filing eligibility and cutoff are distinct.","Rule 56(b)(1)","O"],["C034","Hearing-relative service intervals are distinct.","Rule 56(b)(2)","O"],["C035","Factual positions require rule-compliant support.","Rule 56(c)(1),(3)","O"],["C036","Idaho hearing-admissibility wording is preserved.","Rule 56(c)(2)","O/H"],["C037","Affidavit requirements and supplementation differ.","Rule 56(c)(4)","O"],["C038","Qualifying declarations and belief verification are not identical.","Rules 2.7–2.8, 11.1; § 9-1406","O/P/H"],["C039","Unavailable-fact relief is discretionary and predicate-dependent.","Rule 56(d)","O"],["C040","Defective support does not automatically decide entitlement.","Rule 56(e)","O"],["C041","Established facts, partial relief, and final judgment differ.","Rule 56(f); Rules 54(a)–(b), 58","O"],["C042","Bad-faith consequences require finding, notice, response opportunity, and causal expenses.","Rule 56(g)","O"],["C043","Timing modification and its consequences are discretionary.","Rule 56(b)(3)","O"],["C044","Service, filing, receipt, and counting are distinct.","Rules 2.2, 5, 7","O/H"],["C045","Accepted outside material can trigger conversion with a reasonable opportunity to respond.","Rule 12(d)","O"],["C046","Signature and verification do not themselves prove admissible facts.","Rules 11(a)–(b), 11.1; IRE 602","O"],["C047","Compromise-use restrictions are not universal confidentiality or exclusion.","IRE 408","O/H"],["C048","Published Rule 901(b)(6)(B) contains an unresolved textual anomaly.","S002, both formats","Source issue"],["C049","Footers and locator statements do not complete original adoption history.","S001–S008","Provenance limit"],["C050","No actual evidence or legal outcome was assessed; all previous holds remain.","Research record","Certain"]]},{"headers":["Distinction","Required separation","Unresolved application"],"index":16,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Distinction","Required separation","Unresolved application"],["Allegation / proof","Procedural statement versus supported evidence","No factual assertion evaluated"],["Pleading admission / Rule 36 admission / party statement","Different procedural and evidentiary effects","No admission or adoption found"],["Authentication / hearsay","Identity of item versus truth-use exception","Neither automatically supplies the other"],["Certification / acknowledgment","Different authority, content, and legal function","No signer or certificate assessed"],["Knowledge / job title","Foundation rather than label","Qualified-witness construction held"],["Business record / public record","Different foundations and exclusions","Filing does not transform private assertions"],["Record / embedded statements","Each truth-use layer requires treatment","No categorical debt-purchaser rule"],["Original / duplicate / readable ESI output","Separate definitions and exceptions","No actual accuracy or authenticity finding"],["Summary / underlying material","Access and foundation remain","No sum or input validated"],["Admissibility / weight","Judicial gatekeeping versus credibility/weight","No comparative evidence assessment"],["Production / persuasion","Civil-presumption rule ordinarily changes only production","Substantive burden law held"],["Summary-judgment record / trial proof","Rule 56 has its own text and posture","No imported federal formulation"],["Nonresponse / judgment","Fact treatment differs from legal entitlement","No automatic result"],["Defective support / bad faith","Curable insufficiency is not itself misconduct","No accusation or finding"],["Partial factual order / final judgment","Rules 56, 54 and 58 have different functions","No appeal or enforcement consequence"],["Signed statement / declaration / affidavit","Formal qualification does not remove knowledge/hearsay requirements","§ 9-1406 official currency held"]]},{"headers":["Quantity or relation","Reference event/base","Qualification"],"index":17,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Quantity or relation","Reference event/base","Qualification"],["After expiration of 21 days","Service of process on adverse party or that party’s appearance","Rule 56(b)(1); separate adverse-motion alternative"],["After service of adverse party’s summary-judgment motion","Alternative filing eligibility","Not a merits finding"],["At least 90 days before trial or within 7 days of trial-setting order, whichever later","Filing cutoff","Court may order otherwise"],["At least 28 / 14 / 7 days before hearing","Motion/support/brief; opposition; reply service","Rule 56 schedule, not Rule 7’s ordinary schedule"],["Good cause","Timing alteration","Court discretion; no actual extension"],["14 / 7 / 2 days before hearing","General Rule 7 receipt schedule","Not substituted where Rule 56 supplies different limits"],["At least 1 day before hearing","Rule 7 notice denying requested oral argument","Separate from filing/service periods"],["3 added days","Act due a specified time after service by mail","Not automatically added to a hearing-relative deadline"],["Exclude trigger day; count intermediate days; qualified last-day extension","Rule 2.2 computation","No actual calendar or local order"],["First accessible nonweekend/nonholiday day","Clerk-inaccessibility branch","Unless court otherwise orders"],["Before/after expiration","Extension request","Post-expiration motion additionally requires excusable neglect"],["Filed written stipulation","Time extension","Must not disturb orderly business or court convenience"],["Nonextendable specified rules","Rule 2.2(b)(3)","No Rule 56 exclusion appears in that list; no extension granted here"],["Mailing / transmission / receipt","Rule 5 service methods","Written-consent electronic and known-nonreceipt qualifications"],["Reasonable time after service","Rule 5 filing relation","No universal fixed period inferred"],["At or near the time","Business-record creation","Source knowledge and practice also required"],["Before trial or hearing; reasonable written notice","Rule 902(11)–(12)","Fair opportunity and inspection; no fixed day count"],["Reasonable opportunity plus good cause","Foreign-public-document certification alternative","Not automatic waiver"],["At least 30 years when offered","Rule 901 ancient-authentication example","Condition and location predicates"],["At least 30 years; authenticity established","Rule 803 ancient-statement branch","Separate from authentication alone"],["14-day / 7-day criminal notice relations","Rule 803(10)(B)","Read as an exclusion boundary; not an ordinary civil deadline"],["Reasonable pre-hearing/trial notice","Residual hearsay branch","Complete trustworthiness/materiality/probativeness conditions"],["Reasonable time and place","Summary underlying-material access","Court may require production"],["Reasonable opportunity","Rule 12 conversion","No fixed period supplied"],["Specified reasons","Rule 56(d) inability showing","Not unsupported assertion of need"],["Notice and reasonable response time","Rule 56(g)","No fixed-day sanction interval"],["Reasonable expenses incurred as a result","Rule 56(g) measure","Causal requirement; no amount or fee calculation"],["Reasonable diligence","Alternative public-record content proof","Does not establish diligence"],["Timely request","Limiting instruction and judicial-notice hearing","No universal fixed time"],["Same action only","Rule 36 admission","Withdrawal/amendment conditions retained"],["March 1 / July 1, 2016","Civil-rule adoption/effectiveness footers","Original order unavailable"],["March 26 / July 1, 2018","Evidence-rule adoption/effectiveness footers","Original order unavailable"],["May 28, 2019","IRE 101/805 displayed amendment effectiveness","Original amendments not recovered"],["January 13, 2021","IRE 201 displayed amendment/effectiveness","Not all evidence rules’ date"],["2013, ch.259, §1, p.636","Declaration statute displayed credit","No original effective date authenticated"],["Unknown","Actual authenticity, source knowledge, trustworthiness, notice, record availability, prejudice, dispute, amount, misconduct","None supplied or inferred"]]},{"headers":["Branch","Missing predicate","Supported consequence","Adverse inference to avoid","Exact next generic inquiry"],"index":18,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Branch","Missing predicate","Supported consequence","Adverse inference to avoid","Exact next generic inquiry"],["B01 — ordinary scope","Correct proceeding category","Ordinary evidence/civil rules may apply","Every civil-looking proceeding has identical proof rules","Governing special-proceeding text"],["B02 — allegation/admission","Applicable pleading or formal-admission condition","Different legal effect","Every allegation or attachment is established evidence","Relevant procedural construction"],["B03 — relevance","Consequential fact and probative connection","Relevance gate","Relevant means automatically admissible","Other applicable exclusions"],["B04 — knowledge","Sufficient personal-knowledge support","Ordinary witness foundation","Custodian title proves every event","Qualified-witness construction"],["B05 — authentication","Item-identity foundation","Rule 901 threshold","Signature, metadata, or format automatically suffices","Applicable authenticating method"],["B06 — self-authentication","Exact category and certification conditions","Extrinsic authenticity evidence unnecessary to that extent","Contents automatically true","Hearsay, originals, substantive law"],["B07 — commercial paper","Governing commercial-law predicates","Possible Rule 902(9) effect","Every debt document is negotiable commercial paper","Complete instrument law"],["B08 — business record","Complete A–D foundation and trustworthiness treatment","Possible hearsay exception","Every routinely stored file qualifies","Rule 803(6) construction"],["B09 — predecessor record","Knowledge transmission, practices, integration, qualified foundation","No categorical result","Purchaser status always permits or forbids proof","Generic judicial construction; no cases investigated"],["B10 — multiple layers","Each asserted layer’s legal treatment","Rule 805 analysis","Outer certification cures embedded statements","Applicable nonhearsay/exception branch"],["B11 — public record","Office function and no applicable exclusion","Possible public-record exception","Filing private material changes its truth status","Exact Rule 803(8) category"],["B12 — absent record","Regular practice/diligent search","Conditional absence proof","Missing search hit proves nonexistence","Complete source and search predicates"],["B13 — electronic material","Accurate process/output and statement analysis","Potential ordinary-rule treatment","Digital form automatically authentic or hearsay-free","Electronic-transactions and construction law"],["B14 — original/duplicate","Correct definition and no exception concern","Content-proof route","Every copy barred or every copy admissible","Rules 1001–1004 application"],["B15 — summary","Voluminous source and inspection conditions","Rule 1006 route","Summary proves its own inputs","Underlying admissibility and proof"],["B16 — judicial notice","Indisputability and specific identified item","Conditional notice","Entire court file conclusively true","Rule 201 construction"],["B17 — summary judgment","Genuine/material/legal predicates","Possible adjudication","Procedural submission proves entitlement","Substantive law and Rule 56 construction"],["B18 — evidentiary form","Idaho admissibility and foundation","Correct Rule 56 treatment","Federal form-conversion language controls","Idaho construction; no federal import"],["B19 — unavailable facts","Specified affidavit/declaration showing","Discretionary relief","Discovery request guarantees delay","Rule 56(d); discovery separately"],["B20 — defective support","Identified deficiency","Possible correction or other order","Nonresponse equals automatic judgment","Rule 56(e) application"],["B21 — bad faith","Required judicial finding, notice and causal expense","Defined consequence","Mistake or defeat alone is bad faith","Complete sanction due process"],["B22 — partial adjudication","Undisputed issue and appropriate order","Limited established fact","Every partial order is final judgment","Rules 54/58; appeal separately"],["B23 — declaration","Proper subscribed declaration and no exclusion","Rule 2.7/statutory relation","Unsworn text or acknowledgment universally substitutes","Official § 9-1406/current history"],["B24 — source anomaly","Original operative 901 text","No telephone-branch result here","Silently correct publication wording","Readable adopted order"],["B25 — special law","Independent scope","Held dependency","State evidence rules prove federal compliance","Authorities below"]]},{"headers":["Regime or subject","Required later inquiry"],"index":19,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Regime or subject","Required later inquiry"],["Privileges and confidentiality","Applicable IRE Article V privilege, waiver, confidentiality statutes, protective orders, and public-access rules"],["Expert proof","Rules 701–705 and applicable qualification/reliability construction; Rule 703 alone is insufficient"],["Unavailable declarants","Complete Rule 804 and its unavailability, causation, and exception conditions"],["Medical records","Rule 904, statutory privacy and certification requirements, and medical-sector law"],["Debt ownership and capacity","Contract, assignment, authority, licensing, real-party, protected-person, and representation law"],["Instruments and security","UCC negotiability, signatures, enforcement entitlement, title/security, consumer defenses, and relevant sector law"],["Electronic transactions","UETA, E-SIGN, attribution, consent, retention, and digital-signature rules"],["Discovery and sanctions","Rules 26–37, subpoena/deposition/production procedures, and separate Rule 11/37 sanctions"],["Foreign declarations and records","Rule 2.8 appendix form, foreign certification/penalty authority, treaties and applicable foreign law"],["Official transcripts","ICAR 27(d)’s certification form and current Rule 83(g) cross-reference"],["Federal collection/reporting","FDCPA/Regulation F, FCRA, relevant definitions, exclusions, duties and remedies"],["Bankruptcy/military","Applicable stay, discharge, protected-party and service-related law"],["Local/tribal/interstate","Approved local rules, sovereignty, conflicts and jurisdictional requirements"],["Judicial construction","Inferences at summary judgment, bench-trial distinctions, predecessor-record foundation, automation, waiver, trustworthiness, and constitutional notice"],["Original history","Readable original 2016/2018 orders, relevant later amendments, and § 9-1406’s adopted application provisions"]]},{"headers":["Field","Entry"],"index":20,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Field","Entry"],["Governing proceeding",""],["Authority and edition",""],["Official-current-text status",""],["Allegation/admission category",""],["Fact of consequence",""],["Offered purpose",""],["Personal-knowledge basis",""],["Competency qualification",""],["Authentication method",""],["Self-authentication category",""],["Certification/notice condition",""],["Statement/declarant classification",""],["Hearsay layer",""],["Applicable exclusion or exception",""],["Regular-activity foundation",""],["Trustworthiness issue",""],["Predecessor-record dependency",""],["Original/duplicate category",""],["Summary-source/access condition",""],["Judicial-notice condition",""],["Summary-judgment issue",""],["Record-citation requirement",""],["Evidentiary-form requirement",""],["Affidavit/declaration qualification",""],["Timing/reference event",""],["Unavailable-fact condition",""],["Defective-support provision",""],["Partial-adjudication provision",""],["Sanction predicate",""],["Substantive-law dependency",""],["Unread incorporation",""],["Missing primary authority",""],["Review status",""]]},{"headers":["Requested question/subquestion","Disposition","Claims/sources","Exact retained gap"],"index":21,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Requested question/subquestion","Disposition","Claims/sources","Exact retained gap"],["1 — ordinary rule scope","Official bodies read","C002–C003; S002–S004","Specialized proceeding application"],["Small claims/de novo distinction","Narrow fresh scope reading","C003","No small-claims merits rerun"],["Allegations/admissions/proof","Distinguished","C004–C006","Actual admission or evidence absent"],["Admissibility/weight/substantive entitlement","Distinguished","C006–C008,C032","Judicial/substantive construction"],["2 — relevance","Complete material rules","C007–C008","No fact relevance decided"],["Personal knowledge/competency","Complete material rules","C009","Expert/estate/protected-party law"],["Authentication examples","Read with anomaly preserved","C010–C012,C048","Original 901(b)(6)(B) text"],["Self-authentication","Complete Rule 902","C013–C016","Officer, commercial-law and foreign-law predicates"],["Electronic form","Source distinctions read","C012,C026","Automation/attribution construction"],["Public/private record","Distinguished","C013,C023,C028","No actual record classification"],["3 — hearsay definition/exclusions","Complete relevant clauses","C017–C018","Actual purpose/declarant absent"],["Business records","Complete (6)(A)–(E)","C019–C020","No foundation or trustworthiness finding"],["Predecessor/debt-purchaser records","Explicitly held beyond rule text","C021","Judicial construction"],["Multiple layers","Complete Rule 805","C024","Each actual layer absent"],["Absence/public records","Complete relied-on exceptions","C022–C023","Statutory duty/source facts"],["Originals/duplicates/summaries","Complete necessary rules","C026–C030","No content/value proof"],["Ancient/residual exceptions","Conditions retained","C025","No application"],["4 — complete Rule 56","Entire (a)–(g) read","C032–C043; S003","Original-order history"],["Movant/nonmovant support","Textual duties identified","C032,C035–C037","Substantive burdens and inference law"],["Admissibility/form distinction","Idaho wording preserved","C036–C038","No federal formulation imported"],["Motion versus order","Distinguished","C041,C045","Actual finality absent"],["Failure to respond","Not automatic judgment","C040","No actual nonresponse"],["Time/counting/service","Registered","C033–C034,C044","Local orders and actual events"],["Verification/declarations","Rule and provisional statute read","C038,C046","Official statute/foreign appendix"],["5 — unavailable facts","Complete branch","C039","No affidavit or diligence determination"],["Defective support","Complete branch","C040","No entitlement to correction assumed"],["Partial adjudication","Complete branch and finality interface","C041","Appeal/enforcement held"],["Bad-faith consequences","Complete Rule 56(g)","C042","No misconduct or amount"],["Broader sanctions/discovery","Deferred","C050","Rules 11/37 and discovery methods"],["6 — privileges/protected persons","Scope and dependencies identified","C009,C050","Full regime not completed"],["Substantive debt/sector law","Deferred","C021,C050","No debt-ownership or amount finding"],["Federal/local/tribal/interstate","Exact dependencies","Section 12","No federal merits conclusion"],["Judicial construction","Expressly open","Section 12","No cases investigated"],["7 — literal sources/read bounds","Visible register supplied","Section 7","Original-order failures preserved"],["Adoption/effectiveness","Footers accurately separated","C049","No full original-history authentication"],["Current/historical/proposed","Distinguished","S001,S007–S008","Proposal not treated as law"],["PDF text/pixels","No PDF body recovered","Section 15","No screenshot/pixel claim"],["Quantities/branches/worksheet","Supplied","Sections 10–13","No calendar, values, or populated form"],["Prior holds/provenance","Unchanged","C050","No prior acceptance implied"],["Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent","Not accepted complete","Entire report","Exact remaining dependencies"]]},{"headers":["Material","Actual use"],"index":22,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Material","Actual use"],["Official evidence rules","Complete or expressly bounded provisions listed in S002"],["Official civil rules","Complete Rule 56 and necessary scope, motion, declaration, admission, service, counting, and partial-finality clauses"],["Official small-claims rule","De novo scope only"],["Official transcript rule","Necessary definition and exclusions only"],["Official statute route","Fresh § 9-1406 attempt failed"],["Secondary declaration statute","Complete 2025 body, exceptions, history and disclaimer"],["Original-order searches","Generic adopted-rule searches; ordinary routes failed as recorded"],["Proposed draft/search excerpts","Discovery only; not law or a correction source"],["Cases/opinions/dockets","Incidental results not investigated or relied on"],["Actual records, affidavits, contracts, statements, metadata, signatures, identities","Not requested, opened, constructed, or evaluated"],["Prior saved reports/local metadata","Supplied scope exclusion only; not legal premises"]]}],"claims":[{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C001","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C001","Precise proposition":"Official current rule text was read; original-order and declaration-statute history remain incomplete.","Source/pinpoint":"S001–S007","Status":"O/P/H"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C002","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C002","Precise proposition":"Ordinary civil and evidence scope retain their express exclusions.","Source/pinpoint":"IRCP 1; IRE 101","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C003","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C003","Precise proposition":"Original small claims and de novo appeal are not interchangeable proof contexts.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 101(e)(5); S004(c),(d)(2)","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C004","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C004","Precise proposition":"Allegation, pleading admission, and damages are distinct.","Source/pinpoint":"IRCP 8(b)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C005","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C005","Precise proposition":"Formal admissions have action-specific effect; an attachment is not admitted merely for lack of verified denial.","Source/pinpoint":"IRCP 36(b)–(d), 10(c)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C006","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C006","Precise proposition":"Admissibility and weight are separately governed.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 104","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C007","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C007","Precise proposition":"Relevance does not eliminate other exclusions or balancing.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 401–403","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C008","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C008","Precise proposition":"Conditional relevance, limited purpose, and completeness have separate predicates.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 104(b), 105–106","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C009","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C009","Precise proposition":"Knowledge, competency, oath, and expert-basis rules are distinct.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 601–603, 703","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C010","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C010","Precise proposition":"Authentication requires support that the item is what is claimed.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 901(a)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C011","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C011","Precise proposition":"Authentication examples are nonexclusive and condition-dependent.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 901(b)","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C012","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C012","Precise proposition":"Electronic format alone does not authenticate content.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 101(f), 901(b)(9), 1001","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C013","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C013","Precise proposition":"Public self-authentication removes only the specified authenticity foundation.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 902(1)–(5)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C014","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C014","Precise proposition":"Acknowledgment, commercial-paper status, and subscribing-witness requirements depend on their own authority.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 902(8)–(10), 903","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C015","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C015","Precise proposition":"Domestic records certification requires foundation, penal qualification, notice and inspection.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 902(11)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C016","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C016","Precise proposition":"Foreign records certification has separate country/signature and incorporated notice conditions.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 902(12)","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C017","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C017","Precise proposition":"Hearsay depends on statement, declarant and offered purpose.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 801(a)–(c), 802","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C018","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C018","Precise proposition":"Opposing-party and prior-witness exclusions require their specified predicates.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 801(d)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C019","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C019","Precise proposition":"Regular-activity records require the complete source/time/practice/foundation relation.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 803(6)(A)–(D)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C020","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C020","Precise proposition":"The business-record trustworthiness challenge is allocated expressly to the opponent.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 803(6)(E)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C021","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C021","Precise proposition":"No categorical predecessor-record rule is certified from status alone.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 803(6), 805, 902(11)","Status":"H/construction"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C022","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C022","Precise proposition":"Absence-of-record evidence requires its own regular-recordkeeping and search conditions.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 803(7),(10)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C023","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C023","Precise proposition":"Idaho public-record exclusions must be retained.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 803(8)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C024","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C024","Precise proposition":"Layered statements and declarant credibility remain separately governed.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 805–806","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C025","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C025","Precise proposition":"Ancient/residual branches are conditional, not automatic admission.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 901(b)(8), 803(16),(24)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C026","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C026","Precise proposition":"Originals, ESI outputs, and duplicates have distinct definitions and exceptions.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 1001–1003","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C027","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C027","Precise proposition":"Alternative content proof requires a complete Rule 1004 branch.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 1004","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C028","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C028","Precise proposition":"Public-copy and official-transcript provisions retain certification and incorporation limits.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 1005; ICAR 27(d)–(e)","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C029","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C029","Precise proposition":"A summary requires the specified voluminous-material and access predicates.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 1006","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C030","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C030","Precise proposition":"Party content-proof and court/jury allocation are separate rules.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 1007–1008","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C031","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C031","Precise proposition":"Judicial notice and presumptions do not universally prove disputed records or shift persuasion.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 201, 301–302","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C032","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C032","Precise proposition":"Summary judgment requires both Rule 56(a) predicates.","Source/pinpoint":"IRCP 56(a)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C033","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C033","Precise proposition":"Filing eligibility and cutoff are distinct.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 56(b)(1)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C034","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C034","Precise proposition":"Hearing-relative service intervals are distinct.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 56(b)(2)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C035","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C035","Precise proposition":"Factual positions require rule-compliant support.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 56(c)(1),(3)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C036","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C036","Precise proposition":"Idaho hearing-admissibility wording is preserved.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 56(c)(2)","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C037","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C037","Precise proposition":"Affidavit requirements and supplementation differ.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 56(c)(4)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C038","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C038","Precise proposition":"Qualifying declarations and belief verification are not identical.","Source/pinpoint":"Rules 2.7–2.8, 11.1; § 9-1406","Status":"O/P/H"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C039","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C039","Precise proposition":"Unavailable-fact relief is discretionary and predicate-dependent.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 56(d)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C040","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C040","Precise proposition":"Defective support does not automatically decide entitlement.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 56(e)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C041","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C041","Precise proposition":"Established facts, partial relief, and final judgment differ.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 56(f); Rules 54(a)–(b), 58","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C042","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C042","Precise proposition":"Bad-faith consequences require finding, notice, response opportunity, and causal expenses.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 56(g)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C043","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C043","Precise proposition":"Timing modification and its consequences are discretionary.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 56(b)(3)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C044","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C044","Precise proposition":"Service, filing, receipt, and counting are distinct.","Source/pinpoint":"Rules 2.2, 5, 7","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C045","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C045","Precise proposition":"Accepted outside material can trigger conversion with a reasonable opportunity to respond.","Source/pinpoint":"Rule 12(d)","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C046","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C046","Precise proposition":"Signature and verification do not themselves prove admissible facts.","Source/pinpoint":"Rules 11(a)–(b), 11.1; IRE 602","Status":"O"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C047","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C047","Precise proposition":"Compromise-use restrictions are not universal confidentiality or exclusion.","Source/pinpoint":"IRE 408","Status":"O/H"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C048","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C048","Precise proposition":"Published Rule 901(b)(6)(B) contains an unresolved textual anomaly.","Source/pinpoint":"S002, both formats","Status":"Source issue"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C049","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C049","Precise proposition":"Footers and locator statements do not complete original adoption history.","Source/pinpoint":"S001–S008","Status":"Provenance limit"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"claim_id":"S_ID-P23-C050","area_numbers":[66],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C050","Precise proposition":"No actual evidence or legal outcome was assessed; all previous holds remain.","Source/pinpoint":"Research record","Status":"Certain"},"raw_table_index":15,"coordinator_verification_status":"whole_report_read_selected_current_official_rule_aspects_compared_all_history_construction_application_holds_preserved","id_normalization":"Visible bare claim ID qualified by actual task AND pass; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false}],"sources":[{"source_id":"S_ID-P23-S001","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules/Adoption_of_Newly_Formatted_Idaho_Rules_of_Evidence_07.01.18.pdf","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules/IRCP/03012016-Adoption-Newly-Formatted.pdf","https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/1972","https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title9/T9CH14/SECT9-1406/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P23-S001","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S001 — fresh failures and original-history limits\nLiteral HTTPS URL\tActual observation\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules/Adoption_of_Newly_Formatted_Idaho_Rules_of_Evidence_07.01.18.pdf\tOriginal-adoption route discovered through ordinary search; 404\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules/IRCP/03012016-Adoption-Newly-Formatted.pdf\tOriginal civil-rule adoption route discovered through visible historical links; 404\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/1972\tSearch-discovered Rule 56 PDF delivery; 404\nhttps://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title9/T9CH14/SECT9-1406/\tFresh ordinary official section attempt restricted\nAPI-hosted orders/forms\tNot opened\nProposed restyled-evidence draft\tSearch lead only; not adopted text or a correction source\n\nNo failed source proves absence of a rule, protection, amendment, or remedy. No PDF body was recovered from these failed routes."},"source_access_status":"failed_routes_record_only","coordinator_verification_status":"not_reopened_historical_failure_secondary_or_discovery_only_preserved","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Whole report source/readlogtextreviewed; no freshattempt/retry of original2016/2018orders/Rule56PDF/official9-1406, no freshsecondary9-1406orproposeddraft/API. Failedsourceandprovisional2025historyretainreportedlimits.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P23-S002","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ire","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/101","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/103","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/104","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/105","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/106","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/201","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/301","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/302","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/401","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/402","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/403","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/408","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/601","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/602","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/603","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/703","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/801","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/802","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/803","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/805","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/806","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/901","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/902","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/903","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1001","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1002","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1003","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1004","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1005","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1006","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1007","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1008"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P23-S002","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S002 — official Idaho Rules of Evidence\n\nIssuer/title: Idaho Supreme Court, Idaho Rules of Evidence.\nConsolidated URL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ire\n\nStatus: Official current-published HTML. Individual print pages below were read. Unless limited, the complete rule and displayed footer were inspected.\n\nLiteral URL\tActual read bounds and substantive use\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/101\tComplete (a)–(f), including every scope exception; no special-regime merits\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/103\tComplete; narrow evidentiary-ruling boundary only, not a full appellate-preservation report\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/104\tComplete (a)–(e)\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/105\tComplete limiting-purpose rule\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/106\tComplete writing/recorded-statement completeness rule\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/201\tComplete adjudicative-notice rule\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/301\tComplete civil-presumption rule\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/302\tComplete federal-presumption choice rule; no federal presumption applied\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/401\tComplete relevance test\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/402\tComplete admissibility rule\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/403\tComplete exclusion/balancing rule\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/408\tComplete compromise-use restriction and exceptions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/601\tComplete competency exceptions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/602\tComplete personal-knowledge rule and expert exception\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/603\tComplete oath/affirmation rule\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/703\tComplete; only to preserve Rule 602’s expert-basis distinction\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/801\tComplete definitions and (d)(1)–(2) exclusions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/802\tComplete hearsay prohibition\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/803\tComplete published (1)–(24) inspected; substantive use limited to lead-in, (6)–(8), (10), (16), and (24); other branches not applied\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/805\tComplete multiple-hearsay rule\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/806\tComplete declarant-credibility rule\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/901\tComplete (a), (b)(1)–(10); anomalous (b)(6)(B) held\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/902\tComplete (1)–(12), including domestic/foreign certification and notice\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/903\tComplete subscribing-witness rule\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1001\tComplete original/duplicate/ESI definitions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1002\tComplete original requirement\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1003\tComplete duplicate exceptions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1004\tComplete (a)–(d) alternative-content branches\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1005\tComplete (a)–(b); transcript incorporation separately limited\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1006\tComplete summary/access provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1007\tComplete opposing-party content-proof provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ire/1008\tComplete court/jury allocation\nDisplayed evidence-rule history\nRules\tDisplayed adoption/amendment/effectiveness\nListed rules other than 101, 201, 805\tAdopted March 26, 2018, effective July 1, 2018\nRule 201\tSame baseline; amended January 13, 2021, effective that day\nRule 805\tSame baseline; amended effective May 28, 2019\nRule 101\tAdopted January 8, 1985/effective July 1, 1985; amendments June 7, 1993/July 1, 1993; March 1, 2000/July 1, 2000; December 26, 2002/February 1, 2003; March 21, 2007/July 1, 2007; April 4, 2008/July 1, 2008; February 9, 2012/July 1, 2012; amended/effective May 28, 2019\n\nThese are displayed footers, not an assertion that the original orders were opened. The 2018 search excerpt and proposed draft were not used to repair the Rule 901 anomaly."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_current_published_all32listed_evidence_rule_bodies_and_footers_read","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"All32literalindividualURLs in rawtable10; completepublishedbodiesincluding803(1)-(24),901(a)/(b)(1)-(10),902(1)-(12),1001-1008. Reliance confined to reportselectedclauses; published901b6Banomaly preserved. Not originalorders/judicialconstruction/individualprivilegeorforeignlaw.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P23-S003","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ircp","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.7","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.8","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/5","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7.1","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/8","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/10","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11.1","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/12","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/28","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/36","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/56","https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/58"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P23-S003","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S003 — official Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure\n\nIssuer/title: Idaho Supreme Court, Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure.\nConsolidated URL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/ircp\n\nLiteral URL\tActual read bounds\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/1\tComplete (a)–(c); scope and local-rule boundary only\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.2\tComplete computation, extension, exclusions, mail addition\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.7\tComplete declaration inclusion\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/2.8\tComplete (a)–(g) and visible comments; no federal electronic-signature outcome; appendix form unopened\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/5\tComplete material service/final-paper filing clauses; fax mechanics inspected but not applied\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7\tComplete; reliance on motion/order distinction, timing exception, argument and good-cause conditions\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/7.1\tComplete evidence-on-motion clause\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/8\tComplete (a)–(b), relevant (d)–(e); defenses list not developed into merits\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/10\tComplete; reliance on (c) only\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11\tComplete (a)–(b); sanctions/discovery-exclusion paragraphs visible but not applied\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/11.1\tComplete verification provision\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/12\tComplete (c)–(d), with (b)(6) identified; other response/default merits not rerun\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/28\tComplete (a)–(d); used only for verification’s officer/disqualification incorporation\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/36\tComplete (b)–(d); (a) and (e) inspected but discovery timing/retention/sanctions not adopted\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/54\tComplete (a)–(b)(1) for judgment/partial-final distinction; fee and full appellate branches excluded\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/56\tComplete (a)–(g), including all timing, evidence, relief and sanction clauses; consolidated text also checked\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/ircp/58\tComplete judgment-entry clause\nDisplayed civil-rule history\n\nAll listed rules display adoption March 1, 2016, effective July 1, 2016. Additional footers read:\n\nRule\tAdditional entries\n1\tApril 30, 2024/effective same day; September 30, 2024/effective October 1, 2024\n2.2\tSeptember 9, 2016/effective same day\n12\tSeptember 9, 2016/effective same day; April 25, 2018/effective July 1, 2018\n54\tApril 27, 2016/July 1, 2016; October 6, 2016/March 1, 2017; April 17, 2017/nunc pro tunc March 1, 2017; December 14, 2017/January 1, 2018; April 28, 2021/July 1, 2021\n\nThe Rule 56 page displays no additional amendment entry beyond its baseline. That is not a comprehensive absence-of-amendment certification."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_current_published_all17listed_civil_rule_bodies_read_selected_merits_checked","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"All17literalURLs rawtable12. CompleteRule56(a)-(g),2.2,5,7,1,2.7,2.8,7.1,8,10,11,11.1,12,28,36,54,58returned/read. Substantivereliance on requestedlimitedscope/notice/computation/declaration/motion/admission/judgmentclauses; Rule54(a)-(b)(1)only for finality; noalltrial/discovery/cost/fee/appellateacceptance. AppendixB/form/E-SIGN/incorporatedstatutes unread.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P23-S004","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irsca/15"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P23-S004","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S004 — small-claims de novo boundary only\n\nIssuer/title: Idaho Supreme Court, Small Claims Rule 15.\nURL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/irsca/15\n\nRead: Complete page inspected; substantive reliance confined to (c), (d)(2) and related scope.\nFooter: March 1, 2016/July 1, 2016; June 30, 2026/July 1, 2026.\nLimit: No small-claims appeal deadline, fee, jury, or merits rerun."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_current_smallclaims_de_novo_scope_checked","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"CompleteofficialRule15(a)-(f)/footerread; substantivecomparisononly(c)/(d)(2)scope; nootherappealmeritsrerun.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P23-S005","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/icar/27"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P23-S005","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S005 — official transcript incorporation\n\nIssuer/title: Idaho Supreme Court, Idaho Court Administrative Rule 27.\nURL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/print/icar/27\n\nRead: Complete (d)–(e), including realtime/electronic-recording exclusions; adjacent clauses inspected for context.\nFooter: March 15, 2004/July 1, 2004; January 3, 2008/March 1, 2008; March 29, 2010/May 1, 2010; September 9, 2016/effective same day.\nLimit: The incorporated certification form and current Rule 83(g) relationship were not completed. Reporter fees, transcript procurement, and actual recordings were not investigated."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_current_official_transcript_definition_and_exclusions_checked","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"CompletecurrentICAR27returned/read; reliance(d)-(e), realtime/electronic-recording exclusions andfooter only; Rule83g/form/actualtranscripts/procurement/fees notinvestigated.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P23-S006","urls":["https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-9/chapter-14/section-9-1406/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P23-S006","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S006 — declaration statute\n\nPublisher/title: Justia, 2025 Idaho Code § 9-1406.\nURL: https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-9/chapter-14/section-9-1406/\n\nRead: Complete (1)–(2), including exceptions, generic statutory form, history and disclaimer.\nDisplayed credit: Added 2013, chapter 259, § 1, page 636.\nStatus: Secondary 2025 reproduction. Original act, effective/application clause, and current official body were not recovered. No declaration was populated or drafted."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"not_reopened_historical_failure_secondary_or_discovery_only_preserved","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Whole report source/readlogtextreviewed; no freshattempt/retry of original2016/2018orders/Rule56PDF/official9-1406, no freshsecondary9-1406orproposeddraft/API. Failedsourceandprovisional2025historyretainreportedlimits.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P23-S007","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P23-S007","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S007 — official amendment locator\n\nIssuer/title: Idaho Supreme Court, Recent Amendments.\nURL: https://isc.idaho.gov/rules-procedure/recent-amendments\n\nRead: Statement that amendments are incorporated into the rule text on their effective date; visible index context.\nLimit: The retrieved page did not provide a completed historical order list. No contact, API, or original-order retrieval through an inaccessible route occurred."},"source_access_status":"researcher_reported","coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_amendment_locator_statement_only_checked","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Complete77linerenderread; effective-date incorporation statement/indexcontextchecked; no completedoriginalorderlist/contact/API/sourcehistoryrecovery.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false},{"source_id":"S_ID-P23-S008","urls":["https://isc.idaho.gov/proposals/Proposed_Draft_of_Restyled_Idaho_Rules_of_Evidence.pdf","https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/1964","https://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/1976"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S_ID-P23-S008","Verbatim complete visible source and usage section":"S008 — discovery-only materials\nLiteral URL\tStatus\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/proposals/Proposed_Draft_of_Restyled_Idaho_Rules_of_Evidence.pdf\tProposed-draft search lead only; not opened or used as law\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/1964\tHistorical-link discovery only\nhttps://isc.idaho.gov/printpdf/1976\tHistorical-link discovery only\nAPI-hosted 2016 adoption PDF appearing in search\tNot opened; search text not treated as an original-order read\n\nIncidental opinion/case results were not investigated, named in the findings, or relied on."},"source_access_status":"discovery_only_not_opened_or_used_as_law","coordinator_verification_status":"not_reopened_historical_failure_secondary_or_discovery_only_preserved","classification_reconciliation":"Complete visible heading source group; not new source verification.","coordinator_read_bounds":"Whole report source/readlogtextreviewed; no freshattempt/retry of original2016/2018orders/Rule56PDF/official9-1406, no freshsecondary9-1406orproposeddraft/API. Failedsourceandprovisional2025historyretainreportedlimits.","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_full_primary_acceptance":false}],"coverage":[{"topic":"1 — ordinary rule scope","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"1 — ordinary rule scope","Disposition":"Official bodies read","Claims/sources":"C002–C003; S002–S004","Exact retained gap":"Specialized proceeding application"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Small claims/de novo distinction","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Small claims/de novo distinction","Disposition":"Narrow fresh scope reading","Claims/sources":"C003","Exact retained gap":"No small-claims merits rerun"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Allegations/admissions/proof","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Allegations/admissions/proof","Disposition":"Distinguished","Claims/sources":"C004–C006","Exact retained gap":"Actual admission or evidence absent"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Admissibility/weight/substantive entitlement","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Admissibility/weight/substantive entitlement","Disposition":"Distinguished","Claims/sources":"C006–C008,C032","Exact retained gap":"Judicial/substantive construction"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"2 — relevance","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"2 — relevance","Disposition":"Complete material rules","Claims/sources":"C007–C008","Exact retained gap":"No fact relevance decided"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Personal knowledge/competency","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Personal knowledge/competency","Disposition":"Complete material rules","Claims/sources":"C009","Exact retained gap":"Expert/estate/protected-party law"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Authentication examples","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Authentication examples","Disposition":"Read with anomaly preserved","Claims/sources":"C010–C012,C048","Exact retained gap":"Original 901(b)(6)(B) text"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Self-authentication","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Self-authentication","Disposition":"Complete Rule 902","Claims/sources":"C013–C016","Exact retained gap":"Officer, commercial-law and foreign-law predicates"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Electronic form","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Electronic form","Disposition":"Source distinctions read","Claims/sources":"C012,C026","Exact retained gap":"Automation/attribution construction"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Public/private record","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Public/private record","Disposition":"Distinguished","Claims/sources":"C013,C023,C028","Exact retained gap":"No actual record classification"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"3 — hearsay definition/exclusions","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"3 — hearsay definition/exclusions","Disposition":"Complete relevant clauses","Claims/sources":"C017–C018","Exact retained gap":"Actual purpose/declarant absent"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Business records","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Business records","Disposition":"Complete (6)(A)–(E)","Claims/sources":"C019–C020","Exact retained gap":"No foundation or trustworthiness finding"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Predecessor/debt-purchaser records","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Predecessor/debt-purchaser records","Disposition":"Explicitly held beyond rule text","Claims/sources":"C021","Exact retained gap":"Judicial construction"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Multiple layers","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Multiple layers","Disposition":"Complete Rule 805","Claims/sources":"C024","Exact retained gap":"Each actual layer absent"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Absence/public records","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Absence/public records","Disposition":"Complete relied-on exceptions","Claims/sources":"C022–C023","Exact retained gap":"Statutory duty/source facts"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Originals/duplicates/summaries","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Originals/duplicates/summaries","Disposition":"Complete necessary rules","Claims/sources":"C026–C030","Exact retained gap":"No content/value proof"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Ancient/residual exceptions","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Ancient/residual exceptions","Disposition":"Conditions retained","Claims/sources":"C025","Exact retained gap":"No application"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"4 — complete Rule 56","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"4 — complete Rule 56","Disposition":"Entire (a)–(g) read","Claims/sources":"C032–C043; S003","Exact retained gap":"Original-order history"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Movant/nonmovant support","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Movant/nonmovant support","Disposition":"Textual duties identified","Claims/sources":"C032,C035–C037","Exact retained gap":"Substantive burdens and inference law"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Admissibility/form distinction","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Admissibility/form distinction","Disposition":"Idaho wording preserved","Claims/sources":"C036–C038","Exact retained gap":"No federal formulation imported"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Motion versus order","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Motion versus order","Disposition":"Distinguished","Claims/sources":"C041,C045","Exact retained gap":"Actual finality absent"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Failure to respond","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Failure to respond","Disposition":"Not automatic judgment","Claims/sources":"C040","Exact retained gap":"No actual nonresponse"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Time/counting/service","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Time/counting/service","Disposition":"Registered","Claims/sources":"C033–C034,C044","Exact retained gap":"Local orders and actual events"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Verification/declarations","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Verification/declarations","Disposition":"Rule and provisional statute read","Claims/sources":"C038,C046","Exact retained gap":"Official statute/foreign appendix"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"5 — unavailable facts","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"5 — unavailable facts","Disposition":"Complete branch","Claims/sources":"C039","Exact retained gap":"No affidavit or diligence determination"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Defective support","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Defective support","Disposition":"Complete branch","Claims/sources":"C040","Exact retained gap":"No entitlement to correction assumed"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Partial adjudication","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Partial adjudication","Disposition":"Complete branch and finality interface","Claims/sources":"C041","Exact retained gap":"Appeal/enforcement held"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Bad-faith consequences","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Bad-faith consequences","Disposition":"Complete Rule 56(g)","Claims/sources":"C042","Exact retained gap":"No misconduct or amount"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Broader sanctions/discovery","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Broader sanctions/discovery","Disposition":"Deferred","Claims/sources":"C050","Exact retained gap":"Rules 11/37 and discovery methods"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"6 — privileges/protected persons","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"6 — privileges/protected persons","Disposition":"Scope and dependencies identified","Claims/sources":"C009,C050","Exact retained gap":"Full regime not completed"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Substantive debt/sector law","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Substantive debt/sector law","Disposition":"Deferred","Claims/sources":"C021,C050","Exact retained gap":"No debt-ownership or amount finding"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Federal/local/tribal/interstate","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Federal/local/tribal/interstate","Disposition":"Exact dependencies","Claims/sources":"Section 12","Exact retained gap":"No federal merits conclusion"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Judicial construction","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Judicial construction","Disposition":"Expressly open","Claims/sources":"Section 12","Exact retained gap":"No cases investigated"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"7 — literal sources/read bounds","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"7 — literal sources/read bounds","Disposition":"Visible register supplied","Claims/sources":"Section 7","Exact retained gap":"Original-order failures preserved"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Adoption/effectiveness","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Adoption/effectiveness","Disposition":"Footers accurately separated","Claims/sources":"C049","Exact retained gap":"No full original-history authentication"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Current/historical/proposed","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Current/historical/proposed","Disposition":"Distinguished","Claims/sources":"S001,S007–S008","Exact retained gap":"Proposal not treated as law"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"PDF text/pixels","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"PDF text/pixels","Disposition":"No PDF body recovered","Claims/sources":"Section 15","Exact retained gap":"No screenshot/pixel claim"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Quantities/branches/worksheet","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Quantities/branches/worksheet","Disposition":"Supplied","Claims/sources":"Sections 10–13","Exact retained gap":"No calendar, values, or populated form"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Prior holds/provenance","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Prior holds/provenance","Disposition":"Unchanged","Claims/sources":"C050","Exact retained gap":"No prior acceptance implied"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true},{"topic":"Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent","researcher_record":{"Requested question/subquestion":"Idaho/dimension4/A066/parent","Disposition":"Not accepted complete","Claims/sources":"Entire report","Exact retained gap":"Exact remaining dependencies"},"raw_table_index":21,"coordinator_acceptance":"whole_report_scoped_review_selected_current_official_rules_only_all_explicit_gaps_preserved","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","no_state_dimension_or_parent_acceptance":true}],"annotations":{},"corrections":[],"resolved_corrections":[],"review_history":[{"id":"S_ID-P23-proof-summaryjudgment-scoped-review-20261028","status":"reviewed_with_source_history_statutory_construction_application_holds","at":"2026-10-28T21:24:01.794897+00:00"}]}