{"meta":{"key":"r001--correction-02","task":"R001","title":"Debt terminology research: source-ID reconciliation and dependent-text correction","parent_title":"Debt terminology and definitions","edition":"correction-02","path":"/research/r001--correction-02/","kind":"correction","category":"subject","role":"primary_area","area_numbers":[1],"groups":["foundations"],"date":"2026-10-23","tables":5,"claims":11,"sources":0,"review_status":"revise","review_complete":true,"sha256":"b4754a91d8d8b4e11b8c3b9be26a9c8157d0d95ecf5bcdf51037d57282f3a18a","headings":["Source-ID reconciliation and dependent-text replacements","1. Complete source-alias mapping","2. Controlling-authority reference index","3. Corrected claim-reference rows","4. Exact dependent-text disposition and finished replacement wording","Line 32 — Terminology comparison","Line 129 — Substantive R001-C023 finding","Line 356 — Original source-register row","Line 386 — Original claim/evidence-register row","Line 419 — Coverage table","Line 478 — Numerical-claim self-check","Line 482 — Evidence-sufficiency conclusion","5. Dependency audit summary","6. Residual holds","7. Researcher self-check"],"generation_provenance":{"actual_route":"regular_chat_adaptive_models","actual_model":"GPT-6","actual_mode":"Pro","provenance_limit":"Actual documented capture labels only; missing labels remain unknown. No preferred setting is inferred as actual execution."},"public_id":"R001/correction-02","facets":{"geography":["us"],"debt_type":[],"stage":[],"subject":["definitions-classification","client-money"]},"scope":"","pending_corrections":0},"markdown":"# SettleADebt.com — R001 Correction-02\n\n## Source-ID reconciliation and dependent-text replacements\n\nArea A001 | Baseline: October 22, 2026 | Reconciliation date: October 22, 2026 | Scope: California judgment satisfaction only\n\nDisposition: Accept the coordinator's correction-01-only alias mapping. Preserve the original R001 source IDs and historical claim/source table cells. Replace conflicting references in the correction supplement without renumbering the original report.\n\nThis is an editorial and evidence-reconciliation pass, not a new legal investigation.\n\n### 1. Complete source-alias mapping\n\n| Historical correction-01 ID | Canonical correction-01 ID | Disposition |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| R001-S033 | R001-R1-S033 | Rename correction source only |\n| R001-S034 | R001-R1-S034 | Rename correction source only |\n| R001-S035 | R001-R1-S035 | Rename |\n| R001-S036 | R001-R1-S036 | Rename |\n| R001-S037 | R001-R1-S037 | Rename |\n| R001-S038 | R001-R1-S038 | Rename |\n| R001-S039 | R001-R1-S039 | Rename |\n| R001-S040 | R001-R1-S040 | Rename |\n| R001-S041 | R001-R1-S041 | Rename |\n| R001-S042 | R001-R1-S042 | Rename |\n| R001-S043 | R001-R1-S043 | Rename |\n| R001-S044 | R001-R1-S044 | Rename |\n\nOriginal IDs protected:\n\n- R001-S032: California Courts satisfaction guidance, with corrected attribution and no universal 14-day-after-payment assertion.\n- R001-S033: Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Coughlin, U.S. Supreme Court.\n- R001-S034: 38 CFR Part 36, federal veterans' loan-guaranty regulations.\n\nThe mapping applies to all 12 new correction-01 sources, not merely the two that collided with existing source IDs. The underlying source titles, URLs, pinpoints and access qualifications must be carried forward unchanged from their original correction-01 rows. The complete contents of those 12 rows are not available here, so their individual authorities cannot responsibly be reconstructed from the numeric IDs alone.\n\n### 2. Controlling-authority reference index\n\nThe following four authorities have coordinator-documented official-browser access at 2026-10-22T23:05:23Z (October 22, 2026, 4:05:23 p.m. PDT).\n\n| Authority | Exact pinpoint | Direct literal URL | Evidence status |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| California Courts, Satisfaction of Judgment | Filing after full payment; written-demand guidance | [https://selfhelp.courts.ca.gov/civil-lawsuit/judgment/satisfaction](https://selfhelp.courts.ca.gov/civil-lawsuit/judgment/satisfaction?utm_source=chatgpt.com) | Coordinator opened official page; original R001-S032 |\n| California CCP § 724.030 | Immediate filing; full satisfaction pursuant to writ exception | [https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=724.030.&lawCode=CCP](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=724.030.&lawCode=CCP&utm_source=chatgpt.com) | Coordinator opened official statute |\n| California CCP § 724.050 | Subsections (a)–(e), especially (c) | [https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=724.050.&lawCode=CCP](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=724.050.&lawCode=CCP&utm_source=chatgpt.com) | Coordinator opened official statute |\n| California CCP § 116.850 | Subsections (a)–(b) | [https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=116.850.&lawCode=CCP](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=116.850.&lawCode=CCP&utm_source=chatgpt.com) | Coordinator opened official statute |\n\nThese are verified-access statements attributed to the coordinator, not claims of independent reopening in this response. The statutes control over conflicting explanatory guidance. The coordinator's access record does not, by itself, establish a separate current-amendment audit.\n\n### 3. Corrected claim-reference rows\n\nThe original claim identifiers remain stable. The following are replacement or reference-reconciliation instructions, not an assertion that the unavailable full correction-01 claim table has been independently inspected.\n\n| Claim ID | Corrected statement or reference disposition | Source references |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| R001-C023 | Satisfaction of a California money judgment requires analysis of the applicable procedure. General civil judgments involve immediate filing under CCP § 724.030, subject to the writ exception. Section 724.050 establishes a separate qualified written-demand procedure, including a 15-day period after actual receipt. Small-claims § 116.850 distinguishes immediate filing following satisfaction from the 14-day written-request condition for specified failure liability. Satisfaction does not automatically prove every lien has been cleared. | R001-S032; CCP §§ 724.030, 724.050, 116.850; corresponding R001-R1 source aliases, subject to source-register matching |\n| R001-C036 | Retain correction-01 claim wording and pinpoints; substitute R001-R1-S033 through R001-R1-S044 wherever its actual references use the former correction IDs. | Alias mapping |\n| R001-C037 | Same reference-only reconciliation. | Alias mapping |\n| R001-C038 | Same reference-only reconciliation. | Alias mapping |\n| R001-C039 | Same reference-only reconciliation. | Alias mapping |\n| R001-C040 | Same reference-only reconciliation. | Alias mapping |\n| R001-C041 | Same reference-only reconciliation. | Alias mapping |\n| R001-C042 | Same reference-only reconciliation. | Alias mapping |\n| R001-C043 | Same reference-only reconciliation. | Alias mapping |\n| R001-C044 | Same reference-only reconciliation. | Alias mapping |\n| R001-C045 | Same reference-only reconciliation. | Alias mapping |\n\nReference-integrity limitation: Without the actual C036–C045 claim rows and S033–S044 correction source rows, assigning individual source aliases to individual claims would risk manufacturing relationships. The mapping above is complete at the identifier level, but row-level cross-references require a mechanical join against the retained correction-01 tables.\n\nNo original source or claim table cell should be overwritten merely to eliminate an ID collision.\n\n## 4. Exact dependent-text disposition and finished replacement wording\n\nThe coordinator has supplied seven original Markdown passages with line locations. All seven are addressed below.\n\n### Line 32 — Terminology comparison\n\nRetain with qualificationWriting| **Satisfaction** | Has the obligation or judgment been fulfilled or accepted as satisfied under the governing law? | Satisfaction alone does not establish that every related lien, enforcement record, collateral interest, or claim against another liable party has been released. Separate documentation or procedures may be necessary. |\n\nThis preserves the useful conceptual distinction without importing California-specific deadlines into the general terminology table.\n\n### Line 129 — Substantive R001-C023 finding\n\nReplaceWriting**Satisfaction — R001-C023.** Satisfaction describes an obligation or judgment that has been fulfilled or accepted as fulfilled under applicable law. A California money judgment illustrates why satisfaction, acknowledgment, and lien clearing must be distinguished.\n\nFor ordinary California civil money judgments, CCP § 724.030 requires the judgment creditor to file an acknowledgment of satisfaction immediately upon satisfaction, except where the judgment was fully satisfied pursuant to a writ of execution. CCP § 724.050 separately establishes written-demand procedures and remedies, including a 15-day period after actual receipt of a qualifying demand under subsection (c). These are different legal triggers.\n\nFor California small-claims judgments, CCP § 116.850(a)–(b) distinguishes immediate filing following full satisfaction from a separate 14-day period following receipt of a written request relevant to the specified failure-liability rule.\n\nForm EJ-100 is an acknowledgment form for applicable civil judgment procedures. Court filing alone should not be described as automatically clearing every recorded judgment lien. Applicable recording, lien-clearing and form requirements require separate verification.\n\nThe California Courts satisfaction guidance is explanatory material, not the controlling statute. No universal 14-day-after-payment deadline applies across these procedures.\n\nPinpoints: CCP §§ 724.030, 724.050(a)–(e), 116.850(a)–(b).\n\n### Line 356 — Original source-register row\n\nReplaceWriting| **R001-S032** | California Courts — Satisfaction of Judgment: [https://selfhelp.courts.ca.gov/civil-lawsuit/judgment/satisfaction](https://selfhelp.courts.ca.gov/civil-lawsuit/judgment/satisfaction) ; EJ-100 information: [https://selfhelp.courts.ca.gov/jcc-form/EJ-100](https://selfhelp.courts.ca.gov/jcc-form/EJ-100) | California Judicial Branch | Guidance addresses filing after full payment and a separate 15-day written-demand procedure. It does not establish a universal 14-day-after-payment deadline. | California judgment procedure; explanatory guidance subordinate to controlling statutes | Coordinator-documented official-browser access: 2026-10-22T23:05:23Z for the satisfaction page. Independent current-session reopening not performed. EJ-100 page access and current instructions not independently reconfirmed in this reconciliation. |\n\nPreserve the original historical row in the correction log rather than deleting the evidence of the prior attribution error.\n\n### Line 386 — Original claim/evidence-register row\n\nReplaceWriting| **R001-C023** | A001 | California judgment satisfaction does not have one universal 14-day-after-payment acknowledgment deadline. Ordinary civil judgments are governed by CCP § 724.030's immediate-filing requirement and writ exception; § 724.050 supplies separate qualified written-demand procedures, including a 15-day actual-receipt trigger; small-claims § 116.850 distinguishes immediate filing from a separate 14-day written-request failure-liability condition. Judgment satisfaction and clearing liens remain distinct. | R001-S032; CCP §§ 724.030, 724.050(a)–(e), 116.850(a)–(b); applicable R001-R1 aliases after source-row reconciliation | California only; form, lien-recording, calendar-counting and current-amendment details remain held. |\n\n### Line 419 — Coverage table\n\nQualifyWriting| **Satisfaction** | **Answered for terminology; California mechanics partially verified** | R001-C023; correction-01 claims R001-C036–C045 as applicable | California general civil and small-claims acknowledgment triggers distinguished. Form selection, lien clearing, exact calendar calculations and current-amendment review remain incomplete. Nationwide accord-and-satisfaction and judgment-satisfaction procedures were not surveyed. | Verify outstanding California implementation details in the separate state dossier; address other jurisdictions individually without extrapolating California deadlines. |\n\n### Line 478 — Numerical-claim self-check\n\nReplace affected assertionWriting**Numerical-claim check performed.** The original report identified sources for federal bank supervisory charge-off benchmarks, TSR fee-allocation and dedicated-account provisions, FCRA reporting chronology, federal-benefit garnishment protections, and the Form 1099-C reporting threshold. Those subjects were not independently rechecked in correction-02.\n\nThe original reference to California's universal 14-day judgment-satisfaction guidance was erroneous and has been withdrawn. California's distinct immediate-filing, 15-day qualified written-demand, and small-claims 14-day written-request provisions are addressed in corrected R001-C023. Exact calendar calculations remain unverified.\n\nNo settlement percentage or guaranteed consumer outcome is inferred from these rules.\n\nThis corrects the affected numerical assertion without claiming a new review of the other numerical rules.\n\n### Line 482 — Evidence-sufficiency conclusion\n\nQualifyWriting**Evidence sufficiency conclusion.** The original R001 terminology framework distinguishes debt, credit, delinquency, default, charge-off, collection, settlement, restructuring, forgiveness, cancellation, discharge, satisfaction and release. Correction-01 and correction-02 clarify that California judgment satisfaction, acknowledgment filing, demand-based remedies and lien clearing involve separate legal requirements.\n\nThis reconciliation does not independently revalidate the other 34 original claims or authorize publication. The corrected California deadline language and source attribution must be integrated before the affected passages are used. State-specific limitations, accord and satisfaction, lien release, creditor settlement policies, bankruptcy dischargeability, tax outcomes and credit-reporting outcomes remain subject to their existing evidence limitations and publication holds.\n\n### 5. Dependency audit summary\n\n| Original line | Disposition | Outcome |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| 32 | Retain with qualification | Satisfaction/release distinction preserved |\n| 129 | Replace | Three statutory triggers distinguished |\n| 356 | Replace | S032 attribution and access corrected |\n| 386 | Replace | C023 evidence claim corrected |\n| 419 | Qualify | Coverage remains partial |\n| 478 | Replace affected assertion | False numerical rule withdrawn |\n| 482 | Qualify | No implied publication approval |\n\nThe coordinator reports no concrete payment-date-plus-14-day worked example in the complete original saved report. No example is invented or globally rewritten. These seven supplied passages constitute the identified dependency set for this reconciliation; they are not evidence of independent inspection of the entire saved report.\n\n## 6. Residual holds\n\n| Hold | Remaining action | Status |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| R2-H01 — Alias integrity | Join each original correction-01 S033–S044 row to its R001-R1 counterpart; update actual C023/C036–C045 references | Open pending row-level join |\n| R2-H02 — Current law | Verify any relevant amendments and operative dates beyond the coordinator's bounded statutory access | Open |\n| R2-H03 — Forms | Verify current EJ-100, SC-290 and procedural applicability | Open |\n| R2-H04 — Lien clearing | Verify separate recording, release and enforcement-record procedures | Open |\n| R2-H05 — Exact deadlines | Verify receipt, service and time-counting rules before calculating dates | Open |\n| R2-H06 — Guidance conflict | Preserve differing official explanations and resolve them against controlling statutory text | Partially reconciled |\n| R2-H07 — Wider R001 | Independent review of other 34 claims and separate state dossier | Outside scope |\n\n## 7. Researcher self-check\n\nCompleted in this response: All 12 source aliases confirmed, original S032–S034 identities preserved, seven supplied original passages assigned dispositions and finished replacement wording, corrected C023 references provided, and outstanding holds retained.\n\nEvidence provenance: The four official California authorities were accessed by the coordinator on October 22, 2026 at 23:05:23 UTC. No additional web reading was undertaken in this reconciliation. No third-party reproduction, search extraction, or unsuccessful reader request is characterized as a complete official-source reading.\n\nNot independently completed: Reconstruction of unavailable correction-01 source/claim rows, verification of current amendments, form and lien mechanics, exact deadline calculations, review of the other 34 original claims, or review of the separate state dossier.\n\nThis is a bounded reconciliation for coordinator import and review. It is not an independent legal opinion or publication approval. No local-save or publication action is claimed.\n\nEND R001 CORRECTION-02\n\n","tables":[{"headers":[],"index":0,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Historical correction-01 ID","Canonical correction-01 ID","Disposition"],["R001-S033","R001-R1-S033","Rename correction source only"],["R001-S034","R001-R1-S034","Rename correction source only"],["R001-S035","R001-R1-S035","Rename"],["R001-S036","R001-R1-S036","Rename"],["R001-S037","R001-R1-S037","Rename"],["R001-S038","R001-R1-S038","Rename"],["R001-S039","R001-R1-S039","Rename"],["R001-S040","R001-R1-S040","Rename"],["R001-S041","R001-R1-S041","Rename"],["R001-S042","R001-R1-S042","Rename"],["R001-S043","R001-R1-S043","Rename"],["R001-S044","R001-R1-S044","Rename"]]},{"headers":[],"index":1,"links":[{"href":"https://selfhelp.courts.ca.gov/civil-lawsuit/judgment/satisfaction?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://selfhelp.courts.ca.gov/civil-lawsuit/judgment/satisfaction"},{"href":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=724.030.&lawCode=CCP&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=724.030.&lawCode=CCP"},{"href":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=724.050.&lawCode=CCP&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=724.050.&lawCode=CCP"},{"href":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=116.850.&lawCode=CCP&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=116.850.&lawCode=CCP"}],"row_links":[[],[{"href":"https://selfhelp.courts.ca.gov/civil-lawsuit/judgment/satisfaction?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://selfhelp.courts.ca.gov/civil-lawsuit/judgment/satisfaction"}],[{"href":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=724.030.&lawCode=CCP&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=724.030.&lawCode=CCP"}],[{"href":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=724.050.&lawCode=CCP&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=724.050.&lawCode=CCP"}],[{"href":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=116.850.&lawCode=CCP&utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=116.850.&lawCode=CCP"}]],"rows":[["Authority","Exact pinpoint","Direct literal URL","Evidence status"],["California Courts, Satisfaction of Judgment","Filing after full payment; written-demand guidance","https://selfhelp.courts.ca.gov/civil-lawsuit/judgment/satisfaction","Coordinator opened official page; original R001-S032"],["California CCP § 724.030","Immediate filing; full satisfaction pursuant to writ exception","https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=724.030.&lawCode=CCP","Coordinator opened official statute"],["California CCP § 724.050","Subsections (a)–(e), especially (c)","https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=724.050.&lawCode=CCP","Coordinator opened official statute"],["California CCP § 116.850","Subsections (a)–(b)","https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=116.850.&lawCode=CCP","Coordinator opened official statute"]]},{"headers":[],"index":2,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claim ID","Corrected statement or reference disposition","Source references"],["R001-C023","Satisfaction of a California money judgment requires analysis of the applicable procedure. General civil judgments involve immediate filing under CCP § 724.030, subject to the writ exception. Section 724.050 establishes a separate qualified written-demand procedure, including a 15-day period after actual receipt. Small-claims § 116.850 distinguishes immediate filing following satisfaction from the 14-day written-request condition for specified failure liability. Satisfaction does not automatically prove every lien has been cleared.","R001-S032; CCP §§ 724.030, 724.050, 116.850; corresponding R001-R1 source aliases, subject to source-register matching"],["R001-C036","Retain correction-01 claim wording and pinpoints; substitute R001-R1-S033 through R001-R1-S044 wherever its actual references use the former correction IDs.","Alias mapping"],["R001-C037","Same reference-only reconciliation.","Alias mapping"],["R001-C038","Same reference-only reconciliation.","Alias mapping"],["R001-C039","Same reference-only reconciliation.","Alias mapping"],["R001-C040","Same reference-only reconciliation.","Alias mapping"],["R001-C041","Same reference-only reconciliation.","Alias mapping"],["R001-C042","Same reference-only reconciliation.","Alias mapping"],["R001-C043","Same reference-only reconciliation.","Alias mapping"],["R001-C044","Same reference-only reconciliation.","Alias mapping"],["R001-C045","Same reference-only reconciliation.","Alias mapping"]]},{"headers":[],"index":3,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Original line","Disposition","Outcome"],["32","Retain with qualification","Satisfaction/release distinction preserved"],["129","Replace","Three statutory triggers distinguished"],["356","Replace","S032 attribution and access corrected"],["386","Replace","C023 evidence claim corrected"],["419","Qualify","Coverage remains partial"],["478","Replace affected assertion","False numerical rule withdrawn"],["482","Qualify","No implied publication approval"]]},{"headers":[],"index":4,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Hold","Remaining action","Status"],["R2-H01 — Alias integrity","Join each original correction-01 S033–S044 row to its R001-R1 counterpart; update actual C023/C036–C045 references","Open pending row-level join"],["R2-H02 — Current law","Verify any relevant amendments and operative dates beyond the coordinator's bounded statutory access","Open"],["R2-H03 — Forms","Verify current EJ-100, SC-290 and procedural applicability","Open"],["R2-H04 — Lien clearing","Verify separate recording, release and enforcement-record procedures","Open"],["R2-H05 — Exact deadlines","Verify receipt, service and time-counting rules before calculating dates","Open"],["R2-H06 — Guidance conflict","Preserve differing official explanations and resolve them against controlling statutory text","Partially reconciled"],["R2-H07 — Wider R001","Independent review of other 34 claims and separate state dossier","Outside scope"]]}],"claims":[{"claim_id":"R001-C023","area_numbers":[1],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"R001-C023","Corrected statement or reference disposition":"Satisfaction of a California money judgment requires analysis of the applicable procedure. General civil judgments involve immediate filing under CCP § 724.030, subject to the writ exception. Section 724.050 establishes a separate qualified written-demand procedure, including a 15-day period after actual receipt. Small-claims § 116.850 distinguishes immediate filing following satisfaction from the 14-day written-request condition for specified failure liability. Satisfaction does not automatically prove every lien has been cleared.","Source references":"R001-S032; CCP §§ 724.030, 724.050, 116.850; corresponding R001-R1 source aliases, subject to source-register matching"},"coordinator_verification_status":"editorial_reference_reconciliation_checked_source_coverage_holds_remain","coordinator_check_evidence":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"R001-C036","area_numbers":[1],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"R001-C036","Corrected statement or reference disposition":"Retain correction-01 claim wording and pinpoints; substitute R001-R1-S033 through R001-R1-S044 wherever its actual references use the former correction IDs.","Source references":"Alias mapping"},"coordinator_verification_status":"editorial_reference_reconciliation_checked_source_coverage_holds_remain","coordinator_check_evidence":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"R001-C037","area_numbers":[1],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"R001-C037","Corrected statement or reference disposition":"Same reference-only reconciliation.","Source references":"Alias mapping"},"coordinator_verification_status":"editorial_reference_reconciliation_checked_source_coverage_holds_remain","coordinator_check_evidence":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"R001-C038","area_numbers":[1],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"R001-C038","Corrected statement or reference disposition":"Same reference-only reconciliation.","Source references":"Alias mapping"},"coordinator_verification_status":"editorial_reference_reconciliation_checked_source_coverage_holds_remain","coordinator_check_evidence":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"R001-C039","area_numbers":[1],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"R001-C039","Corrected statement or reference disposition":"Same reference-only reconciliation.","Source references":"Alias mapping"},"coordinator_verification_status":"editorial_reference_reconciliation_checked_source_coverage_holds_remain","coordinator_check_evidence":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"R001-C040","area_numbers":[1],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"R001-C040","Corrected statement or reference disposition":"Same reference-only reconciliation.","Source references":"Alias mapping"},"coordinator_verification_status":"editorial_reference_reconciliation_checked_source_coverage_holds_remain","coordinator_check_evidence":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"R001-C041","area_numbers":[1],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"R001-C041","Corrected statement or reference disposition":"Same reference-only reconciliation.","Source references":"Alias mapping"},"coordinator_verification_status":"editorial_reference_reconciliation_checked_source_coverage_holds_remain","coordinator_check_evidence":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"R001-C042","area_numbers":[1],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"R001-C042","Corrected statement or reference disposition":"Same reference-only reconciliation.","Source references":"Alias mapping"},"coordinator_verification_status":"editorial_reference_reconciliation_checked_source_coverage_holds_remain","coordinator_check_evidence":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"R001-C043","area_numbers":[1],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"R001-C043","Corrected statement or reference disposition":"Same reference-only reconciliation.","Source references":"Alias mapping"},"coordinator_verification_status":"editorial_reference_reconciliation_checked_source_coverage_holds_remain","coordinator_check_evidence":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"R001-C044","area_numbers":[1],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"R001-C044","Corrected statement or reference disposition":"Same reference-only reconciliation.","Source references":"Alias mapping"},"coordinator_verification_status":"editorial_reference_reconciliation_checked_source_coverage_holds_remain","coordinator_check_evidence":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"claim_id":"R001-C045","area_numbers":[1],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"R001-C045","Corrected statement or reference disposition":"Same reference-only reconciliation.","Source references":"Alias mapping"},"coordinator_verification_status":"editorial_reference_reconciliation_checked_source_coverage_holds_remain","coordinator_check_evidence":"[internal evidence reference]"}],"sources":[],"coverage":[{"topic":"R2-H01 — Alias integrity","researcher_record":{"Hold":"R2-H01 — Alias integrity","Remaining action":"Join each original correction-01 S033–S044 row to its R001-R1 counterpart; update actual C023/C036–C045 references","Status":"Open pending row-level join"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_except_mechanical_alias_join_resolved","extraction_provenance":"Explicitly reconciled residual-hold table from complete visible response"},{"topic":"R2-H02 — Current law","researcher_record":{"Hold":"R2-H02 — Current law","Remaining action":"Verify any relevant amendments and operative dates beyond the coordinator's bounded statutory access","Status":"Open"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_except_mechanical_alias_join_resolved","extraction_provenance":"Explicitly reconciled residual-hold table from complete visible response"},{"topic":"R2-H03 — Forms","researcher_record":{"Hold":"R2-H03 — Forms","Remaining action":"Verify current EJ-100, SC-290 and procedural applicability","Status":"Open"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_except_mechanical_alias_join_resolved","extraction_provenance":"Explicitly reconciled residual-hold table from complete visible response"},{"topic":"R2-H04 — Lien clearing","researcher_record":{"Hold":"R2-H04 — Lien clearing","Remaining action":"Verify separate recording, release and enforcement-record procedures","Status":"Open"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_except_mechanical_alias_join_resolved","extraction_provenance":"Explicitly reconciled residual-hold table from complete visible response"},{"topic":"R2-H05 — Exact deadlines","researcher_record":{"Hold":"R2-H05 — Exact deadlines","Remaining action":"Verify receipt, service and time-counting rules before calculating dates","Status":"Open"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_except_mechanical_alias_join_resolved","extraction_provenance":"Explicitly reconciled residual-hold table from complete visible response"},{"topic":"R2-H06 — Guidance conflict","researcher_record":{"Hold":"R2-H06 — Guidance conflict","Remaining action":"Preserve differing official explanations and resolve them against controlling statutory text","Status":"Partially reconciled"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_except_mechanical_alias_join_resolved","extraction_provenance":"Explicitly reconciled residual-hold table from complete visible response"},{"topic":"R2-H07 — Wider R001","researcher_record":{"Hold":"R2-H07 — Wider R001","Remaining action":"Independent review of other 34 claims and separate state dossier","Status":"Outside scope"},"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted_except_mechanical_alias_join_resolved","extraction_provenance":"Explicitly reconciled residual-hold table from complete visible response"}],"annotations":{},"corrections":[],"resolved_corrections":[],"review_history":[]}