{"meta":{"key":"d012--validation-05","task":"D012","title":"Medical and care debt: validation sentence and example corrections","parent_title":"Medical dental and long term care debt","edition":"validation-05","path":"/research/d012--validation-05/","kind":"correction","category":"subject","role":"foundation","area_numbers":[16],"groups":["debt-types"],"date":"2026-10-23","tables":4,"claims":1,"sources":2,"review_status":"original_and_remaining_required_medical_work_open","review_complete":true,"sha256":"03437d921967652476c9208258ae0d873e0033129293224ebdf66574369f6124","headings":["1. Exact sentence replacements","Affected example wording","2. Complete corrected claim record","3. Finished consumer replacement paragraph","What happens when you dispute a debt during the validation period?","4. Source and reuse register","5. Coverage and publication holds","6. Researcher self-check"],"generation_provenance":{"actual_route":"regular_chat_adaptive_models","actual_model":"GPT-6","actual_mode":"Pro","provenance_limit":"Actual documented capture labels only; missing labels remain unknown. No preferred setting is inferred as actual execution."},"public_id":"D012/validation-05","facets":{"geography":["us"],"debt_type":["medical","dental"],"stage":["collection"],"subject":["validation-disputes","medical-assistance","employment-care-benefits"]},"scope":"","pending_corrections":0},"markdown":"# SettleADebt.com — D012 VALIDATION-05\n\nArea: A016 — Collections / Debt validation\nTarget: D012-C026\nBaseline: October 22, 2026 (America/Los_Angeles)\nDisposition: Targeted timing correction completed using coordinator-verified primary evidence.\n\nThe correction distinguishes two separate events:\n\n- Submission condition: The consumer submits a qualifying written dispute within the validation period.\n- Collection-pause trigger: The covered debt collector receives that dispute.\n\nThe regulation does not require the collector to receive the written dispute before the validation period expires. The earlier wording incorrectly combined submission timing with receipt timing.\n\n## 1. Exact sentence replacements\n\n| Location | Superseded sentence | Corrected sentence |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| VALIDATION-04, C026 claim | “When an FDCPA-covered debt collector receives a consumer's written dispute within the Regulation F validation period, it must cease collection…” | “When a consumer submits a qualifying written dispute within the Regulation F validation period, an FDCPA-covered debt collector must cease collection of the debt, or disputed portion, upon receiving that dispute, subject to the response requirements and duplicative-dispute alternative in § 1006.38(d)(2).” |\n| VALIDATION-04, consumer paragraph | “Under federal Regulation F, if a covered debt collector receives your written dispute within the validation period, the collector generally must stop collecting the debt…” | “Under federal Regulation F, if you submit a qualifying written dispute within the validation period, the covered debt collector generally must stop collecting the debt, or disputed portion, when it receives your dispute, until it provides the response required by the regulation.” |\n\n### Affected example wording\n\nVALIDATION-04, Example A — replace timing description with:\n\nA consumer submits a written dispute concerning a $2,400 medical debt within the Regulation F validation period. The covered collector receives it after the validation period has ended.\n\nAssuming the dispute was properly submitted in writing and otherwise qualifies, the collector's collection-pause obligation begins upon receipt. The fact that receipt occurred after the validation-period cutoff does not, by itself, defeat the protection.\n\nThis example does not establish a universal mailing rule, delivery presumption, or deadline-extension doctrine.\n\nExamples B and C retain their substantive conclusions, but any reference to the collector receiving a dispute within the validation period must be understood as the consumer submitting it within that period.\n\n## 2. Complete corrected claim record\n\n| Field | D012-C026 — revised |\n| --- | --- |\n| Claim ID | D012-C026 — original ID preserved |\n| Area | A016 / Collections / Validation disputes |\n| Precise claim | Under 12 CFR § 1006.38(d)(2), when a consumer submits a qualifying written dispute within the Regulation F validation period, an FDCPA-covered debt collector must cease collection of the debt, or disputed portion, upon receiving the dispute. The pause continues until the collector sends verification or a copy of a judgment as required by § 1006.42, or satisfies the specified alternative for a reasonably determined duplicative dispute. |\n| Submission condition | Consumer submits the written dispute within the validation period defined by § 1006.34(b)(5). Submission timing and collector receipt are distinct. |\n| Receipt trigger | The covered collector's duty to cease collection arises upon receipt of the qualifying dispute, not automatically upon the consumer's submission. |\n| Ordinary response | Collector sends verification of the debt or a copy of a judgment in compliance with § 1006.38(d)(2)(i) and the applicable § 1006.42 delivery requirements. |\n| Duplicative-dispute classification | Under § 1006.38(a)(1), a later dispute may be reasonably determined duplicative when it is substantially the same as an earlier timely written dispute for which the collector satisfied § 1006.38(d)(2)(i), and contains no new and material supporting information. |\n| Duplicative-dispute alternative | Under § 1006.38(d)(2)(ii), the collector may send the prescribed notice rather than repeat verification. The notice must identify the duplicative determination, briefly state the reasons, and refer the consumer to the earlier response, with applicable delivery requirements satisfied. Alternatively, the collector may send verification or a judgment copy. |\n| New material information | Information not previously provided that is reasonably likely to change the verification prevents classification as duplicative under the stated definition. |\n| Electronic writing | An accepted electronic communication method can satisfy the writing requirement. Not every arbitrary message or channel necessarily qualifies. |\n| Failure to dispute | Under § 1006.38(d)(1), failure to dispute does not constitute a legal admission of liability. Neither a dispute nor a failure to dispute automatically invalidates, releases, or establishes the debt. |\n| Primary support | D012-S021, § 1006.34(b)(5), (c)(3)(i); D012-S048, § 1006.38(a)(1), (d)(1), (d)(2)(i)–(ii), official interpretations 38-1, 38(a)(1)-1–2 and 38(d)(2)(ii)-1. |\n| Jurisdiction/status | U.S. federal Regulation F; operative baseline October 22, 2026. |\n| Evidence limitation | Submission method, actual submission and receipt, collector coverage, verification adequacy, § 1006.42 compliance and state-law requirements remain fact-specific or unreviewed. |\n| Disposition | Corrected — federal timing language supported by coordinator-opened primary evidence; individual applications held. |\n\n## 3. Finished consumer replacement paragraph\n\nWriting### What happens when you dispute a debt during the validation period?\n\nUnder federal Regulation F, if you submit a qualifying written dispute within the validation period, a covered debt collector generally must stop collecting the debt, or disputed portion, **when it receives your dispute**. The collector does not necessarily have to receive the dispute before the validation period ends. Collection remains paused until the collector sends the required verification or judgment copy, or completes the permitted response for a reasonably determined duplicative dispute.\n\nA dispute may qualify as duplicative when the collector already responded to an earlier timely written dispute with verification or a judgment copy, and the later dispute is substantially the same without new and material supporting information. In that situation, the collector may instead send a notice explaining the duplicative determination, briefly stating its reasons and referring to the earlier response, subject to applicable delivery requirements. New and material information cannot simply be ignored.\n\nWritten disputes may be submitted through qualifying physical or accepted electronic methods. An arbitrary electronic message does not necessarily satisfy the writing requirement. Failure to dispute is not a legal admission that you owe the debt, and disputing does not automatically cancel or discharge it.\n\n**Federal sources:** 12 CFR §§ 1006.34(b)(5), 1006.38(a)(1), 1006.38(d)(1)–(2), and applicable official interpretations.\n\n## 4. Source and reuse register\n\n| Source ID | Direct URL and exact pinpoint | Access, status and scope |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| D012-S021 — existing | [https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-12/chapter-X/part-1006/subpart-B/section-1006.34](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-12/chapter-X/part-1006/subpart-B/section-1006.34?utm_source=chatgpt.com) — §§ 1006.34(b)(5), (c)(3)(i). | Coordinator previously opened/read; eCFR Title 12 displayed current through October 21, 2026. Reused, not independently reopened. Federal validation-period definition and notice disclosure. |\n| D012-S048 — existing | [https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1006/38/](https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1006/38/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) — §§ 1006.38(a)(1), (d)(1), (d)(2)(i)–(ii); official interpretations 38-1, 38(a)(1)-1–2, 38(d)(2)(ii)-1. | Coordinator freshly opened/read for VALIDATION-05. Coordinator evidence reused, not independently accessed in this response. CFPB identifies the provision as current federal regulation. |\n| § 1006.42 cross-reference | Referenced by § 1006.38(d)(2)(i)–(ii) for delivery requirements. | Full § 1006.42 compliance audit not performed; remains held. No new source ID assigned. |\n\nNo new primary-source discovery or source IDs are necessary for this amendment.\n\n## 5. Coverage and publication holds\n\n| Coverage item | Status | Claim/source | Remaining limitation |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Submission versus receipt timing | Corrected | C026 / S021, S048 | Proof of submission and receipt in individual cases |\n| Receipt-triggered collection pause | Corrected | C026 / S048 | Covered collector, disputed amount, factual timing |\n| Duplicative-dispute alternative | Retained | C026 / S048 | Prior verification, reasonableness and notice compliance |\n| New and material information | Retained | C026 / S048 | Actual content and materiality |\n| Required response and delivery | Partial | C026 / S048; § 1006.42 | Full delivery-compliance audit outstanding |\n| Accepted electronic writing | Retained | C026 / S048 | Collector's accepted methods and submission evidence |\n| Failure to dispute / non-admission | Retained | C026 / S048 | Debt validity and enforceability separately determined |\n| State-law rules and individual facts | Held | C026 | Jurisdiction-specific law and evidence |\n| Other original D012 claims | Outside scope | Original claim inventory | No acceptance or further review implied |\n\n## 6. Researcher self-check\n\nThis amendment corrects the precise timing defect in VALIDATION-04. It preserves the original C026 and S048 identities, the duplicative-dispute exception, notice requirements, accepted electronic-writing qualifications and non-admission rule.\n\nThe operative timing language is attributed to the coordinator's freshly opened CFPB regulation. I did not independently reopen the page, audit § 1006.42, verify individual dispute facts, or conduct an independent review of the remaining D012 claims.\n\nNo publication, contact, account modification or local file save occurred.\n\nFinal disposition: D012 VALIDATION-05 completed for the submission-versus-receipt wording correction. All identified residual holds remain.\n\nEND D012 VALIDATION-05\n\n","tables":[{"headers":[],"index":0,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[]],"rows":[["Location","Superseded sentence","Corrected sentence"],["VALIDATION-04, C026 claim","“When an FDCPA-covered debt collector receives a consumer's written dispute within the Regulation F validation period, it must cease collection…”","“When a consumer submits a qualifying written dispute within the Regulation F validation period, an FDCPA-covered debt collector must cease collection of the debt, or disputed portion, upon receiving that dispute, subject to the response requirements and duplicative-dispute alternative in § 1006.38(d)(2).”"],["VALIDATION-04, consumer paragraph","“Under federal Regulation F, if a covered debt collector receives your written dispute within the validation period, the collector generally must stop collecting the debt…”","“Under federal Regulation F, if you submit a qualifying written dispute within the validation period, the covered debt collector generally must stop collecting the debt, or disputed portion, when it receives your dispute, until it provides the response required by the regulation.”"]]},{"headers":[],"index":1,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Field","D012-C026 — revised"],["Claim ID","D012-C026 — original ID preserved"],["Area","A016 / Collections / Validation disputes"],["Precise claim","Under 12 CFR § 1006.38(d)(2), when a consumer submits a qualifying written dispute within the Regulation F validation period, an FDCPA-covered debt collector must cease collection of the debt, or disputed portion, upon receiving the dispute. The pause continues until the collector sends verification or a copy of a judgment as required by § 1006.42, or satisfies the specified alternative for a reasonably determined duplicative dispute."],["Submission condition","Consumer submits the written dispute within the validation period defined by § 1006.34(b)(5). Submission timing and collector receipt are distinct."],["Receipt trigger","The covered collector's duty to cease collection arises upon receipt of the qualifying dispute, not automatically upon the consumer's submission."],["Ordinary response","Collector sends verification of the debt or a copy of a judgment in compliance with § 1006.38(d)(2)(i) and the applicable § 1006.42 delivery requirements."],["Duplicative-dispute classification","Under § 1006.38(a)(1), a later dispute may be reasonably determined duplicative when it is substantially the same as an earlier timely written dispute for which the collector satisfied § 1006.38(d)(2)(i), and contains no new and material supporting information."],["Duplicative-dispute alternative","Under § 1006.38(d)(2)(ii), the collector may send the prescribed notice rather than repeat verification. The notice must identify the duplicative determination, briefly state the reasons, and refer the consumer to the earlier response, with applicable delivery requirements satisfied. Alternatively, the collector may send verification or a judgment copy."],["New material information","Information not previously provided that is reasonably likely to change the verification prevents classification as duplicative under the stated definition."],["Electronic writing","An accepted electronic communication method can satisfy the writing requirement. Not every arbitrary message or channel necessarily qualifies."],["Failure to dispute","Under § 1006.38(d)(1), failure to dispute does not constitute a legal admission of liability. Neither a dispute nor a failure to dispute automatically invalidates, releases, or establishes the debt."],["Primary support","D012-S021, § 1006.34(b)(5), (c)(3)(i); D012-S048, § 1006.38(a)(1), (d)(1), (d)(2)(i)–(ii), official interpretations 38-1, 38(a)(1)-1–2 and 38(d)(2)(ii)-1."],["Jurisdiction/status","U.S. federal Regulation F; operative baseline October 22, 2026."],["Evidence limitation","Submission method, actual submission and receipt, collector coverage, verification adequacy, § 1006.42 compliance and state-law requirements remain fact-specific or unreviewed."],["Disposition","Corrected — federal timing language supported by coordinator-opened primary evidence; individual applications held."]]},{"headers":[],"index":2,"links":[{"href":"https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-12/chapter-X/part-1006/subpart-B/section-1006.34?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-12/chapter-X/part-1006/subpart-B/section-1006.34"},{"href":"https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1006/38/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1006/38/"}],"row_links":[[],[{"href":"https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-12/chapter-X/part-1006/subpart-B/section-1006.34?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-12/chapter-X/part-1006/subpart-B/section-1006.34"}],[{"href":"https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1006/38/?utm_source=chatgpt.com","text":"https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1006/38/"}],[]],"rows":[["Source ID","Direct URL and exact pinpoint","Access, status and scope"],["D012-S021 — existing","https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-12/chapter-X/part-1006/subpart-B/section-1006.34 — §§ 1006.34(b)(5), (c)(3)(i).","Coordinator previously opened/read; eCFR Title 12 displayed current through October 21, 2026. Reused, not independently reopened. Federal validation-period definition and notice disclosure."],["D012-S048 — existing","https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1006/38/ — §§ 1006.38(a)(1), (d)(1), (d)(2)(i)–(ii); official interpretations 38-1, 38(a)(1)-1–2, 38(d)(2)(ii)-1.","Coordinator freshly opened/read for VALIDATION-05. Coordinator evidence reused, not independently accessed in this response. CFPB identifies the provision as current federal regulation."],["§ 1006.42 cross-reference","Referenced by § 1006.38(d)(2)(i)–(ii) for delivery requirements.","Full § 1006.42 compliance audit not performed; remains held. No new source ID assigned."]]},{"headers":[],"index":3,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Coverage item","Status","Claim/source","Remaining limitation"],["Submission versus receipt timing","Corrected","C026 / S021, S048","Proof of submission and receipt in individual cases"],["Receipt-triggered collection pause","Corrected","C026 / S048","Covered collector, disputed amount, factual timing"],["Duplicative-dispute alternative","Retained","C026 / S048","Prior verification, reasonableness and notice compliance"],["New and material information","Retained","C026 / S048","Actual content and materiality"],["Required response and delivery","Partial","C026 / S048; § 1006.42","Full delivery-compliance audit outstanding"],["Accepted electronic writing","Retained","C026 / S048","Collector's accepted methods and submission evidence"],["Failure to dispute / non-admission","Retained","C026 / S048","Debt validity and enforceability separately determined"],["State-law rules and individual facts","Held","C026","Jurisdiction-specific law and evidence"],["Other original D012 claims","Outside scope","Original claim inventory","No acceptance or further review implied"]]}],"claims":[{"claim_id":"D012-C026","area_numbers":[16],"area_assignment_method":"visible_A016_field_table","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"D012-C026 — original ID preserved","Area":"A016 / Collections / Validation disputes","Precise claim":"Under 12 CFR § 1006.38(d)(2), when a consumer submits a qualifying written dispute within the Regulation F validation period, an FDCPA-covered debt collector must cease collection of the debt, or disputed portion, upon receiving the dispute. The pause continues until the collector sends verification or a copy of a judgment as required by § 1006.42, or satisfies the specified alternative for a reasonably determined duplicative dispute.","Submission condition":"Consumer submits the written dispute within the validation period defined by § 1006.34(b)(5). Submission timing and collector receipt are distinct.","Receipt trigger":"The covered collector's duty to cease collection arises upon receipt of the qualifying dispute, not automatically upon the consumer's submission.","Ordinary response":"Collector sends verification of the debt or a copy of a judgment in compliance with § 1006.38(d)(2)(i) and the applicable § 1006.42 delivery requirements.","Duplicative-dispute classification":"Under § 1006.38(a)(1), a later dispute may be reasonably determined duplicative when it is substantially the same as an earlier timely written dispute for which the collector satisfied § 1006.38(d)(2)(i), and contains no new and material supporting information.","Duplicative-dispute alternative":"Under § 1006.38(d)(2)(ii), the collector may send the prescribed notice rather than repeat verification. The notice must identify the duplicative determination, briefly state the reasons, and refer the consumer to the earlier response, with applicable delivery requirements satisfied. Alternatively, the collector may send verification or a judgment copy.","New material information":"Information not previously provided that is reasonably likely to change the verification prevents classification as duplicative under the stated definition.","Electronic writing":"An accepted electronic communication method can satisfy the writing requirement. Not every arbitrary message or channel necessarily qualifies.","Failure to dispute":"Under § 1006.38(d)(1), failure to dispute does not constitute a legal admission of liability. Neither a dispute nor a failure to dispute automatically invalidates, releases, or establishes the debt.","Primary support":"D012-S021, § 1006.34(b)(5), (c)(3)(i); D012-S048, § 1006.38(a)(1), (d)(1), (d)(2)(i)–(ii), official interpretations 38-1, 38(a)(1)-1–2 and 38(d)(2)(ii)-1.","Jurisdiction/status":"U.S. federal Regulation F; operative baseline October 22, 2026.","Evidence limitation":"Submission method, actual submission and receipt, collector coverage, verification adequacy, § 1006.42 compliance and state-law requirements remain fact-specific or unreviewed.","Disposition":"Corrected — federal timing language supported by coordinator-opened primary evidence; individual applications held."},"coordinator_verification_status":"scoped_timing_and_repeat_dispute_wording_checked_individual_delivery_and_state_application_held","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-23T03:07:53.918368+00:00","classification_note":"One complete vertical replacement claim mechanically transposed; original cells/raw unchanged."}],"sources":[{"source_id":"D012-S021","urls":["https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-12/chapter-X/part-1006/subpart-B/section-1006.34","https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-12/chapter-X/part-1006/subpart-B/section-1006.34?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"D012-S021 — existing","Direct URL and exact pinpoint":"https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-12/chapter-X/part-1006/subpart-B/section-1006.34 — §§ 1006.34(b)(5), (c)(3)(i).","Access, status and scope":"Coordinator previously opened/read; eCFR Title 12 displayed current through October 21, 2026. Reused, not independently reopened. Federal validation-period definition and notice disclosure."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_prior_coordinator_evidence_reused_no_new_researcher_opening_application_held","coordinator_check_evidence":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-23T03:07:53.918368+00:00","id_normalization":"Display label removed only from derived ID; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"D012-S048","urls":["https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1006/38/","https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1006/38/?utm_source=chatgpt.com"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"D012-S048 — existing","Direct URL and exact pinpoint":"https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1006/38/ — §§ 1006.38(a)(1), (d)(1), (d)(2)(i)–(ii); official interpretations 38-1, 38(a)(1)-1–2, 38(d)(2)(ii)-1.","Access, status and scope":"Coordinator freshly opened/read for VALIDATION-05. Coordinator evidence reused, not independently accessed in this response. CFPB identifies the provision as current federal regulation."},"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_prior_coordinator_evidence_reused_no_new_researcher_opening_application_held","coordinator_check_evidence":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_checked_at":"2026-10-23T03:07:53.918368+00:00","id_normalization":"Display label removed only from derived ID; original cell unchanged."}],"coverage":[{"topic":"Submission versus receipt timing","researcher_record":{"Coverage item":"Submission versus receipt timing","Status":"Corrected","Claim/source":"C026 / S021, S048","Remaining limitation":"Proof of submission and receipt in individual cases"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_wording_repair_checked_remaining_delivery_factual_state_or_other_claim_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Receipt-triggered collection pause","researcher_record":{"Coverage item":"Receipt-triggered collection pause","Status":"Corrected","Claim/source":"C026 / S048","Remaining limitation":"Covered collector, disputed amount, factual timing"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_wording_repair_checked_remaining_delivery_factual_state_or_other_claim_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Duplicative-dispute alternative","researcher_record":{"Coverage item":"Duplicative-dispute alternative","Status":"Retained","Claim/source":"C026 / S048","Remaining limitation":"Prior verification, reasonableness and notice compliance"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_wording_repair_checked_remaining_delivery_factual_state_or_other_claim_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"New and material information","researcher_record":{"Coverage item":"New and material information","Status":"Retained","Claim/source":"C026 / S048","Remaining limitation":"Actual content and materiality"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_wording_repair_checked_remaining_delivery_factual_state_or_other_claim_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Required response and delivery","researcher_record":{"Coverage item":"Required response and delivery","Status":"Partial","Claim/source":"C026 / S048; § 1006.42","Remaining limitation":"Full delivery-compliance audit outstanding"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_wording_repair_checked_remaining_delivery_factual_state_or_other_claim_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Accepted electronic writing","researcher_record":{"Coverage item":"Accepted electronic writing","Status":"Retained","Claim/source":"C026 / S048","Remaining limitation":"Collector's accepted methods and submission evidence"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_wording_repair_checked_remaining_delivery_factual_state_or_other_claim_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Failure to dispute / non-admission","researcher_record":{"Coverage item":"Failure to dispute / non-admission","Status":"Retained","Claim/source":"C026 / S048","Remaining limitation":"Debt validity and enforceability separately determined"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_wording_repair_checked_remaining_delivery_factual_state_or_other_claim_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"State-law rules and individual facts","researcher_record":{"Coverage item":"State-law rules and individual facts","Status":"Held","Claim/source":"C026","Remaining limitation":"Jurisdiction-specific law and evidence"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_wording_repair_checked_remaining_delivery_factual_state_or_other_claim_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"},{"topic":"Other original D012 claims","researcher_record":{"Coverage item":"Other original D012 claims","Status":"Outside scope","Claim/source":"Original claim inventory","Remaining limitation":"No acceptance or further review implied"},"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_wording_repair_checked_remaining_delivery_factual_state_or_other_claim_holds","coordinator_review":"[internal evidence reference]"}],"annotations":{},"corrections":[],"resolved_corrections":[],"review_history":[]}