{"meta":{"key":"c_za--pass-20","task":"C_ZA","title":"CZA South Africa","parent_title":"South Africa consumer debt and resolution","edition":"pass-20","path":"/research/c_za--pass-20/","kind":"split_pass","category":"international","role":"country","area_numbers":[97,98],"groups":["global"],"date":"2026-10-27","tables":16,"claims":20,"sources":17,"review_status":"scoped_review_complete_joint_current_primary_and_observer_holds","review_complete":true,"sha256":"41aa939f1b3b5b7d9109250c4b8129ef371ecbb86a515bd745f5ab9d37c3f8ec","headings":["Section 9 qualifying-claim thresholds and monetary continuity","1.1 Single-creditor R100: fresh primary judicial confirmation","1.2 Statutory conversion rule found—not merely historical commentary","Commencement and edition limit","1.3 Joint R200: judicial corroboration, but not the requested controlling application","1.4 Exact §9(1)–(2) structure recovered only from a secondary reproduction","1.5 Result of the currentness inquiry","Replacement for C_ZA-P18-C004","Replacement coverage cells","Model A — single-creditor boundary","Model B — grouped boundary and separate single-creditor possibility","Source-status accounting","Threshold, wording and monetary chain — 18 rows","Fictional postures — 8 rows","Reconciliation and safeguards — 4 rows","Nine provincial/local holds","Evidence-backed next product"],"generation_provenance":{"actual_route":"regular_chat_adaptive_models","actual_model":"GPT-6","actual_mode":"Pro","provenance_limit":"Actual documented capture labels only; missing labels remain unknown. No preferred setting is inferred as actual execution."},"public_id":"C_ZA/pass-20","facets":{"geography":["international","c_za"],"debt_type":[],"stage":[],"subject":[]},"scope":"SettleADebt C_ZA PASS-20 — SAME ORIGINAL AUTHORISED REGULAR CHAT. ONLY REVIEWED P18 REMAINING CURRENT-PRIMARY JOINT R200 / SINGLE R100 QUALIFYING CLAIM THRESHOLD AND MONETARY CONTINUITY QUESTION. No whole sequestration or P19procedure rerun.","pending_corrections":0},"markdown":"# SettleADebt C_ZA PASS-20 — South Africa\n\n## Section 9 qualifying-claim thresholds and monetary continuity\n\n**Disposition: partly resolved.** P20 found a statutory monetary-conversion provision, which materially improves P18’s reliance on a historical central-bank explanation. It also found a final High Court judgment expressly stating both R100 and aggregate R200. However, that judgment applied the single-creditor limb, not a genuinely joint-creditor threshold dispute. A complete current-primary verification of §9(1)–(2) and the joint-threshold amendment chain through October 2026 remains unclosed.\n\n**Fresh access:** 27 October 2026 UTC and America/Los_Angeles. Individual source-opening times were not logged and are unknown.\n\nP18’s raw findings and access history remain preserved. This is not a finding that R200 is wrong. It is a correction to the strength and completeness of its evidential certification. P19 is not adopted as a premise.\n\n# 1. Findings\n\n## 1.1 Single-creditor R100: fresh primary judicial confirmation\n\nThe official SCA judgment in *Osborne v Cockin NO and Others* [2018] ZASCA 58, paragraph 20, expressly identifies a creditor holding a liquidated claim of **not less than R100**. This supports equality at R100, not a requirement to exceed R100. It does not state the joint-creditor amount. **C_ZA-P20-C001–C002.**\n\nDirect primary URL:\n\nhttps://www.supremecourtofappeal.org.za/index.php/component/jdownloads/send/3-judgments-2018/284-osborne-v-cockin-no-others-549-2017-2018-zasca-58-17-may-2018?Itemid=0\n\nPinpoint: paragraph 20, **zero-based PDF P6 / printed page 7**. [Supreme Court of Appeal](https://www.supremecourtofappeal.org.za/index.php/component/jdownloads/send/3-judgments-2018/284-osborne-v-cockin-no-others-549-2017-2018-zasca-58-17-may-2018?Itemid=0)\n\nThe same judgment preserves the distinction between an asserted amount and an established qualifying claim. The majority rejected the claim on the evidence and addressed its unliquidated character; the concurrence agreed with dismissal but disagreed with that particular liquidation analysis. P20 does not convert the concurrence into the majority holding. **C003.** [Supreme Court of Appeal+2](https://www.supremecourtofappeal.org.za/index.php/component/jdownloads/send/3-judgments-2018/284-osborne-v-cockin-no-others-549-2017-2018-zasca-58-17-may-2018?Itemid=0)\n\n## 1.2 Statutory conversion rule found—not merely historical commentary\n\nThe SARB-hosted text of the **South African Reserve Bank Act 90 of 1989** contains:\n\n- **§18:** a construction rule covering monetary references in laws and other instruments, using the equivalents in §15(2);\n- **§15(2):** the pound/sovereign equivalent of **two rand**.\n\nThat is legislative text, not merely an educational statement about decimalisation. **C004–C006.**\n\nFull URL:\n\nhttps://www.resbank.co.za/content/dam/sarb/what-we-do/banknotes-and-coin/SA%20Reserve%20Bank%20Act%2090%20of%201989.pdf\n\nPinpoints: §15(2), **zero P11**; §18, **zero P12**. Printed labels were not established. [South African Reserve Bank](https://www.resbank.co.za/content/dam/sarb/what-we-do/banknotes-and-coin/SA%20Reserve%20Bank%20Act%2090%20of%201989.pdf)\n\nApplied conditionally to the retained historical §9 figures:\n\n£50 × R2 per £1 = R100\n\n£100 × R2 per £1 = R200\n\nThis is a denomination-construction calculation, not current GBP/ZAR conversion, inflation indexation or a new threshold amendment.\n\n### Commencement and edition limit\n\nThe compilation records commencement on **1 August 1989**, but §41 itself requires proclamation. The underlying commencement proclamation was not obtained. Its amendment list ends with Act 12 of 2003, so this PDF is not a certified 2026 consolidation. Sections 40–41 were read; their repeal/savings provisions do not establish that Insolvency Act §9 remained unchanged indefinitely. **C007–C008.** [South African Reserve Bank](https://www.resbank.co.za/content/dam/sarb/what-we-do/banknotes-and-coin/SA%20Reserve%20Bank%20Act%2090%20of%201989.pdf)\n\n## 1.3 Joint R200: judicial corroboration, but not the requested controlling application\n\nA final KwaZulu-Natal High Court judgment, *Kurz NO and Another v van den Berg*, delivered **17 July 2013**, states in paragraph 6(a) that two or more creditors may have aggregate liquidated claims of not less than **R200**. **C013.**\n\nPublished final-judgment PDF:\n\nhttps://semantis.ai/resources/35235.pdf\n\nPinpoint: paragraph 6(a), **zero P1**; printed page label not displayed in the inspected image. [Semantis](https://semantis.ai/resources/35235.pdf)\n\n**Important limit:** Paragraphs 7 and 10 show that the two applicants acted as trustees for **one trust creditor**. The court applied the R100 limb. Two representatives were not two distinct creditors. The R200 passage is therefore a judicial statement of the alternative rule, not a holding that adjudicated the aggregate threshold between separate petitioning creditors. The PDF is on a non-official host; no full later citator was performed. [Semantis+1](https://semantis.ai/resources/35235.pdf)\n\nA 2026 High Court result containing threshold language surfaced in search, but its body returned an access failure. It supplies no fresh merits or currentness finding. **C014.**\n\n## 1.4 Exact §9(1)–(2) structure recovered only from a secondary reproduction\n\nThe freshly opened Acts Online reproduction retains the historical pound amounts and gives this structure:\n\n| Provision | Faithful content of the reproduced text | P20 evidence status |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **§9(1), single creditor** | A creditor, or the creditor’s agent, has a liquidated claim of at least £50 against the debtor. | Single rand amount independently confirmed by *Osborne*. |\n| **§9(1), grouped creditors** | Two or more creditors, or their agent, have liquidated claims aggregating at least £100 against the same debtor. | Reproduced statutory text, statutory conversion support and judicial restatement; complete current-primary chain still held. |\n| **§9(1), remaining conditions** | The debtor has committed an act of insolvency or is insolvent; the creditor may petition. | Preserved P18 conditions, not rerun. |\n| **§9(2)** | A liquidated claim that has accrued but is not yet due **at the hearing date** counts for §9(1). | Fresh secondary text read; fresh current-primary subsection body remains missing. |\n\nURL:\n\nhttps://www.acts.co.za/insolvency-act-1936/9__petition_for_sequestration_of_estate\n\nPinpoints: HTML §9(1)–(2), lines 9–10; no PDF pagination. **C009–C012.** [Acts Online](https://www.acts.co.za/insolvency-act-1936/9__petition_for_sequestration_of_estate.php)\n\nThe hearing-date qualification must not be replaced by “every debt must already be payable when the application is filed.” Equally, an unaccrued contingency or unquantified allegation is not made qualifying merely by calling it a future claim. This remains a conditional application of the text, not an actual claim determination.\n\n## 1.5 Result of the currentness inquiry\n\n| Question | P20 result |\n| --- | --- |\n| Does a primary SCA body confirm single R100? | **Yes.** |\n| Was an enacted monetary-construction rule found? | **Yes, in a dated SARB-hosted legislative compilation.** |\n| Does a final judgment expressly mention joint R200? | **Yes, but not as a dispositive joint-creditor threshold holding.** |\n| Was a current official §9(1)–(2) consolidation successfully opened? | **No.** |\n| Was the complete conversion/commencement and later-amendment chain verified through October 2026? | **No.** |\n| Is there evidence here that R200 was changed? | **No such instrument was established—but that is not proof of absence.** |\n\nThus, P18’s single-threshold baseline is retained; its joint-threshold coverage should be labelled **partial**, with the improved sources and remaining gap stated expressly. **C014, C018.**\n\n# 2. Exact P18 replacements and crosswalk\n\nOnly the following threshold-related cells and qualifications change.\n\n| P18 location | Previous position | P20 replacement/disposition |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **C_ZA-P18-C004** | R100 single/R200 aggregate presented together as an established baseline, supported by §9 reproduction, *Osborne* and historical conversion. | Replace with the full cell below. |\n| **P18 G1-05 — Single threshold** | “Answered as established baseline — C004”; qualifying claim remains. | Retain the baseline, identify *Osborne* as the primary support and preserve currentness/private-claim limits. |\n| **P18 G1-06 — Joint threshold** | “Answered as established baseline — C004”; same debtor and each claim. | Change to **partial current-primary confirmation**. |\n| **P18 threshold narrative** | Both amounts appeared equally verified. | State that their evidence strength differs as explained in §1.5 above. |\n| **P18 Example A** | Aggregate arithmetic was correct but could be read as proving standing. | Retain all amounts; add the conditional and separate-individual-route qualifications below. |\n| **P18 source history** | Historical SARB explanation and §9 read-aid were part of the original evidence. | Preserve those rows unchanged. Add P20 sources; do not describe them as having been read in P18. |\n\n## Replacement for C_ZA-P18-C004\n\n**C_ZA-P18-C004 — revised evidence qualification:** The single-creditor R100 baseline is expressly confirmed by *Osborne* paragraph 20. The joint aggregate R200 proposition is supported by the reproduced §9(1) wording, the statutory conversion provision newly located in P20, and a High Court restatement, but P20 did not establish a complete current-primary amendment chain or a controlling decision actually applying the joint-creditor limb. The grouped route requires qualifying claims against the same debtor; numerical sufficiency alone does not establish standing or entitlement to sequestration.\n**Support:** C_ZA-P20-S001–S004; C_ZA-P20-C001–C014.\n**Hold:** Current-primary joint threshold, exact claim facts and full later citator remain open.\n\n## Replacement coverage cells\n\n| Row | Issue | Replacement status/finding | Exact remaining fact or action |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **C_ZA-P18-G1-05** | Single threshold | **Answered as a judicially confirmed baseline, with currentness limits.** *Osborne* para20 confirms at least R100. P20 C001–C003. | Establish the actual qualifying claim and complete any necessary current-law check. |\n| **C_ZA-P18-G1-06** | Joint threshold | **Partial.** R200 has strengthened statutory-conversion and judicial-restatement support, but the requested complete current-primary joint chain remains unclosed. P20 C004–C014. | Obtain current official §9(1)–(2), the material monetary commencement/amendment chain, or a controlling final judgment actually deciding the joint limb. |\n\n**P18 C005 is not rewritten.** Its accrued-but-not-yet-due proposition is preserved, while P20 records that the fresh subsection read was a secondary reproduction, not a new official current consolidation.\n\n# 3. Six-plus fictional qualifying-claim postures\n\nAll cases below are invented. They test only claim grouping and amount—not actual sequestration eligibility.\n\n| No. | Assumed posture | Conditional classification | Adverse branch / missing proof | Claims |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **1** | One creditor holds a fixed, admitted R100 debt. | Equality meets the single-amount baseline. | The claimant must still own the debt; the other sequestration predicates remain separate. | C001,C015 |\n| **2** | One creditor holds R99.99 and appoints two agents. | Two agents do not turn one creditor into two creditors or increase its claim. | Authority and ownership must be proved; no qualifying additional creditor is assumed. | C009–C010,C015 |\n| **3** | Two distinct creditors hold R60 and R140 against the same debtor. | On the retained joint rule, aggregate R200 reaches the amount boundary. | Each claim must qualify. The R140 creditor independently meets the single amount, but that is a distinct posture. | C010,C012,C015–C016 |\n| **4** | Two distinct creditors hold R60 and R139.99 against the same debtor. | Aggregate R199.99 falls below the joint model. | This does not mean neither could ever petition: the R139.99 creditor separately meets the R100 amount baseline. | C012,C015–C016 |\n| **5** | R120 is owed by Debtor A; R100 is owed by Debtor B. | Adding them produces R220 arithmetically, but not qualifying aggregate claims against one debtor. | Separate debtor identity and any joint-liability theory require actual evidence and law. | C009–C010,C015 |\n| **6** | Two trustees represent one trust creditor owed R500. | Representative headcount is not creditor headcount. The assumed claim is assessed as that creditor’s claim. | The nature of the estate/entity and authority are not decided; *Kurz* illustrates why two named applicants can represent one creditor. | C010,C013 |\n| **7** | A fixed R150 claim has accrued, but its contractual payment date is after the petition hearing. | The reproduced §9(2) includes that posture if it is truly accrued and liquidated. | A contingent claim dependent on an unfulfilled condition is not assumed accrued. Fresh current-primary §9(2) verification remains held. | C011,C014 |\n| **8** | An applicant alleges R10,000 damages, or a fixed invoice that the respondent genuinely disputes. | A large number does not establish a liquidated, legally owed claim. | The court must address the claim’s legal/evidential quality; the majority/concurrence distinction in *Osborne* is preserved. | C003,C015 |\n\n# 4. Two conditional threshold models\n\nThe numerical values below are retained from the already-checked P18 arithmetic. No estate-value, dividend or cost model is rerun.\n\n## Model A — single-creditor boundary\n\n**Assumptions:** One actual creditor; claim ownership and liquidation stipulated solely for the model.\n\n| Amount | Comparison | Amount-only result |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| R99.99 | R99.99 < R100 | Below baseline |\n| R100.00 | R100.00 = R100 | Equality reaches baseline |\n\nNo rounding or inflation allowance is added. Passing the amount limb does not prove a valid claim, insolvency, advantage, jurisdiction or procedural compliance. **C001, C015, C017.**\n\n## Model B — grouped boundary and separate single-creditor possibility\n\n**Assumptions:** Two distinct creditors; both claims against the same debtor; both qualifying; R200 rule retained subject to the current-primary hold.\n\n| Claims | Aggregate | Joint amount-only result |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| R60 + R140 | R200 | Reaches conditional joint boundary |\n| R60 + R139.99 | R199.99 | Falls short |\n\nThe second row does **not** erase the possible individual amount posture of the R139.99 creditor. It says only that the stipulated pair fails the conditional R200 aggregate test. **C012, C015–C016.**\n\nThese are not recommendations to file or to restructure ownership of claims.\n\n# 5. Full P20 source register\n\n**All fresh accesses: 27 October 2026 UTC/Pacific. Exact opening clocks unknown.** “P” is zero-based PDF index. Failed sources have no body/page evidence.\n\n| Source ID | Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL | Body/read status and pinpoint | Edition, commencement and limits |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **C_ZA-P20-S001** | SCA, *Osborne v Cockin NO and Others* [2018] ZASCA58, 17 May 2018. https://www.supremecourtofappeal.org.za/index.php/component/jdownloads/send/3-judgments-2018/284-osborne-v-cockin-no-others-549-2017-2018-zasca-58-17-may-2018?Itemid=0 | **Fresh final judgment/body and images.** Para20 P6/printed7; paras22–29 P6–P8/printed7–9. | Confirms R100 only. Majority and concurrence distinguished. No full later citator. |\n| **S002** | SARB-hosted *South African Reserve Bank Act 90 of 1989*, dated compilation. https://www.resbank.co.za/content/dam/sarb/what-we-do/banknotes-and-coin/SA%20Reserve%20Bank%20Act%2090%20of%201989.pdf | **Fresh body:** §§14–18 P10–P12; §§40–41 P20–P21; Schedule3 P24. §18 and §40 images inspected; §15 table screenshot failed, parsed text read. Printed labels unverified. | Header lists amendments through 2003 and commencement 1 Aug1989. §41 requires proclamation; proclamation not obtained. Not a complete 2026 consolidation. |\n| **S003** | KwaZulu-Natal High Court, *Kurz NO and Another v van den Berg*, 17 July 2013, public mirror. https://semantis.ai/resources/35235.pdf | **Fresh final-opinion body/images:** para6(a) P1; paras7–10 P2. Printed labels not displayed. | States both figures but applies R100 to one creditor represented by trustees. Not a joint-limb ratio; non-official hosting. |\n| **S004** | Acts Online, Insolvency Act §9 reproduction. https://www.acts.co.za/insolvency-act-1936/9__petition_for_sequestration_of_estate | **Fresh secondary body:** §9(1)–(2), HTML lines9–10. | Exact grouping/accrual wording recovered, but not current primary certification. P18’s earlier read remains separate. |\n| **S005** | Government Gazette, original SARB Act90/1989 candidate. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201503/act-90-1989.pdf | **Failed body fetch.** | Original enactment pages not read; S002 was the successful different official-hosted route. |\n| **S006** | gov.za, SARB Act90/1989 legislative record. https://www.gov.za/documents/south-african-reserve-bank-act-24-mar-2015-1516 | **Search metadata; direct body timed out.** | No commencement or amendment-body claim derived from the failed page. |\n| **S007** | gov.za, SARB Amendment Act4/2010 record. https://www.gov.za/documents/south-african-reserve-bank-amendment-act-3 | **Discovery metadata; direct body timed out.** | Later amendment candidate, not read operative clauses. |\n| **S008** | gov.za, SARB Amendment Act commencement record. https://www.gov.za/documents/south-african-reserve-bank-amendment-act-commencement | **Discovery metadata; direct body timed out.** | No proclamation content or effective date adopted. |\n| **S009** | SARB, *Core legislation* page. https://www.resbank.co.za/en/home/about-us/SARB-core-legislation | **Fresh HTML index**, lines173–188. Act link140 failed on following it; exact final target was not recovered. | Current listing is not a read current consolidation. |\n| **S010** | Gazette6255/Decimal Coinage Act61/1959 candidate hosted by Legal Assistance Centre. https://www.lac.org.na/laws/GGsa/sagg6255.pdf | **Metadata plus failed PDF fetch.** | Historical South African Gazette candidate, not adopted as Namibian law or as a read conversion/commencement clause. |\n| **S011** | National Archives catalogue entry for Decimal Coinage Act61/1959. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.za/node/7362521 | **Search metadata; direct fetch failed.** | Catalogue identity only; no legislative body. |\n| **S012** | LawOnline, Act61/1959 page. https://lawonline.co.za/act/no-61-of-1959/ | **Failed secondary alternate, HTTP429.** | No text or commencement conclusion. |\n| **S013** | Western Cape Numismatic Society, Gazette library. https://www.wcnumsoc.com/new-library | **Fresh HTML discovery index.** Link to 6July1959 Act61/1959 failed; no scan obtained. | Collector-hosted index, not operative authority. |\n| **S014** | LawLibrary, original Insolvency Act static publication candidate. https://media.lawlibrary.org.za/media/legislation/291667/source_file/3adfa89a7c8d23a7/1936-24.pdf | **New published alternate; HTTP403.** | No fresh original §9 body. Not an unchanged retry of the prior consolidation paths. |\n| **S015** | South African Law Commission, *Report: Review of the Law of Insolvency*, April2000. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/reviewlawinsolvency0.pdf | **Official report candidate; body timed out.** | Even if obtained, a law-reform report would not itself enact a current threshold. |\n| **S016** | High Court final-judgment candidate, [2026] ZAFSHC284, 15May2026. https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAFSHC/2026/284.html | **Threshold wording in search result; direct body HTTP403.** | No merits, posture, joint application or currentness finding adopted. |\n| **S017** | Acts Online, SARB Act amendment inventory. https://www.acts.co.za/south_african_reserve_bank_act_1989_act_no_90_of_1989_ | **Discovery/index result only.** | Flags later amendment families; no final clauses or complete chain read. |\n\n### Source-status accounting\n\nThe successful primary-content reads are **S001–S003**: official SCA judgment, official-hosted statutory compilation and a final judicial opinion on a public mirror. **S004 is secondary text.** S009 and S013 are discovery pages. The other rows preserve failed or unread material candidates. None is promoted into an operative rule through its filename, year or search snippet.\n\n# 6. New atomic claim register\n\nAll claims are bounded South African threshold findings; **A066/A097/A098 remain held**.\n\n| Claim ID | Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect | Source and pinpoint | Remaining hold |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **C_ZA-P20-C001** | Single creditor: at least R100 is expressly stated in *Osborne*. | S001 para20, P6/printed7 | Actual claim and later-law application |\n| **C002** | That paragraph does not confirm the joint amount. | S001 para20 | Joint-primary gap separate |\n| **C003** | Fixed amount, liquidation and genuinely owed liability are distinct; the concurrence does not replace the majority. | S001 paras20–29 | Actual claim evidence |\n| **C004** | A statutory monetary-reference construction provision was found. | S002 §18, P12 | Dated compilation |\n| **C005** | Its referenced table supplies the £1/R2 equivalence. | S002 §15(2), P11 | Table parsed; image unavailable |\n| **C006** | Applied to retained £50/£100 premises, the conversion produces R100/R200. | S002 §§15(2),18; S004 | Conditional on operative underlying text |\n| **C007** | Header commencement is not a freshly read proclamation; compilation stops at listed2003 amendments. | S002 P0, §41 P21 | Commencement/later chain incomplete |\n| **C008** | Conversion does not by itself prove §9’s amounts remained unchanged through2026. | S002–S008 source limits | Current-primary chain held |\n| **C009** | Reproduced §9(1) separates one creditor from two or more and includes agents. | S004 §9(1) | Secondary text only |\n| **C010** | Grouped claims concern the same debtor; representative headcount is not creditor headcount. | S004; S003 paras7,10 | Actual ownership/authority |\n| **C011** | Reproduced §9(2) includes accrued liquidated claims not yet due at hearing. | S004 §9(2) | Fresh primary subsection missing |\n| **C012** | The joint text tests aggregate claims; it does not say each creditor must hold R100. | S004 §9(1) | Conditional currentness status |\n| **C013** | *Kurz* states R200 alternatively but applies the single-creditor limb. | S003 paras6(a),7,10 | Not controlling joint-limb determination |\n| **C014** | No complete current-primary §9(1)–(2) or dispositive joint-threshold authority was obtained. | Search/read audit; S014–S016 | Not proof none exists |\n| **C015** | Amount arithmetic does not establish valid creditor standing or other sequestration predicates. | S001; conditional models | No actual outcome |\n| **C016** | A failed aggregate model can coexist with one member meeting the single amount. | Stipulated model + C001,C012 | Separate proceeding/standing not advised |\n| **C017** | Models use rand amounts without CPI, present GBP exchange or rounding uplift. | Model assumptions; C006 | No new monetary adjustment |\n| **C018** | P18 C004/G1-05/G1-06 receive a source-strength overlay, not a contrary-amount finding. | Replacement cells | Original history preserved |\n| **C019** | No actual party, claim file, account, licence or docket was investigated. | Research-method fact | Public legal material only |\n| **C020** | §149, Rule6, local, private-claim, citator and acceptance holds remain. | Scope | P19 not adopted |\n\n# 7. Granular coverage register\n\n## Threshold, wording and monetary chain — 18 rows\n\n| Row | Subquestion | Status / claims | Missing body or exact next action |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **G1-01** | Single R100 | Answered as primary judicial baseline — C001 | Actual qualifying claim |\n| **G1-02** | Equality at R100 | Answered at baseline — C001 | No “more than” substitution |\n| **G1-03** | Joint R200 | Partial — C006,C013–C014 | Current primary §9 or controlling joint application |\n| **G1-04** | Equality at R200 | Conditional — C012 | Same joint-currentness hold |\n| **G1-05** | Two or more creditors | Secondary wording recovered — C009 | Current primary body |\n| **G1-06** | Same debtor | Conditional textual finding — C010 | Actual debtor identity/liability |\n| **G1-07** | Agent versus creditor | Conditional — C009–C010 | Mandate and claim ownership |\n| **G1-08** | Aggregate versus per-creditor amount | Conditional — C012 | Current primary confirmation |\n| **G1-09** | Liquidated claim | Primary qualification retained — C003 | Agreement/judgment/quantification |\n| **G1-10** | Accrued but not due | Partial-source status — C011 | Official §9(2) or primary quotation |\n| **G1-11** | Hearing-date reference | Secondary wording recovered — C011 | Actual hearing and accrual facts |\n| **G1-12** | Unaccrued contingency | Not automatically included — C011,C015 | Contractual event/legal accrual |\n| **G1-13** | Statutory conversion provision | Body located — C004–C006 | Full currentness chain |\n| **G1-14** | £50/£100 premises | Retained text, not newly original-Gazette certified — C009 | Original/current official §9 |\n| **G1-15** | Commencement proclamation | Unresolved — C007 | Actual proclamation body |\n| **G1-16** | Savings/transitions | Partially read — C007–C008 | Complete 1959/1964/1989 continuity if required |\n| **G1-17** | Later amendments | Unresolved — C008,C014 | Material final bodies and effective clauses |\n| **G1-18** | Judicial hierarchy | Answered as evidence distinction — C002–C003,C013 | Full later citator remains |\n\n## Fictional postures — 8 rows\n\n| Row | Posture | Status / claims | Missing fact |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **G2-01** | One creditor R100 | Conditional amount result — C001,C015 | Valid claim/other gates |\n| **G2-02** | One creditor, two agents | Conditional distinction — C009–C010 | Authority/ownership |\n| **G2-03** | R60 + R140 | Conditional joint model — C012,C016 | Two qualifying claims/same debtor |\n| **G2-04** | R60 + R139.99 | Aggregate fails; individual amount separate — C016 | Actual filing posture |\n| **G2-05** | Different debtors | No aggregate model established — C010 | Joint-liability basis, if alleged |\n| **G2-06** | Two trustees/one creditor | Representative count distinction — C013 | Actual estate/entity role |\n| **G2-07** | Accrued/not yet due | Conditional inclusion — C011 | Accrual and hearing facts |\n| **G2-08** | Disputed/unliquidated | Amount insufficient — C003,C015 | Merits evidence |\n\n## Reconciliation and safeguards — 4 rows\n\n| Row | Matter | Status / claims | Next action |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **G3-01** | P18 C004 | Revised evidence qualification — C018 | Coordinator review of overlay |\n| **G3-02** | P18 G1-05/G1-06 | Single retained; joint partial — C018 | Close exact primary gap |\n| **G3-03** | Existing arithmetic | Preserved with standing caveat — C015–C017 | No financial-model rerun |\n| **G3-04** | P19/private records/acceptance | Not adopted; no actual action — C019–C020 | Holds below |\n\n**Core coverage count: 30 rows.**\n\n# 8. Retained holds\n\n| Row | Held family | P20 disposition |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **H01** | Current official §9(1)–(2) | Exact complete primary chain unresolved |\n| **H02** | Original decimalisation commencement | 1959 Act/proclamation body not obtained |\n| **H03** | Current §§15/18 monetary-law chain | Dated statutory body found; later amendments not exhaustively checked |\n| **H04** | Actual debt ownership, accrual, amount and liquidation | Unknown; no records searched |\n| **H05** | Agency/representation authority | No actual mandate assessed |\n| **H06** | Genuine dispute and private contractual defences | Case-specific; not adjudicated |\n| **H07** | §149 jurisdiction | Existing hold preserved |\n| **H08** | Rule6, Master and service procedure | Existing hold preserved; P19 not adopted |\n| **H09** | Insolvency, advantage, valuation and security | P18 scope retained; not rerun |\n| **H10** | Full current judicial citator | Not performed |\n| **H11** | Foreign law/currency/jurisdiction | No foreign law adopted; no live FX conversion |\n| **H12** | Parent/country/A066/A097/A098 acceptance | Held |\n\n## Nine provincial/local holds\n\n| Province | Status | Next local question |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **Eastern Cape** | Unexamined locally | Applicable division, current practice direction and filing/service requirements |\n| **Free State** | Unexamined locally | Same; a failed 2026 opinion fetch does not establish local procedure |\n| **Gauteng** | Unexamined locally | Applicable seat, current electronic filing and procedural directions |\n| **KwaZulu-Natal** | Not generally examined | *Kurz* is narrow published authority, not certification of all current local practice |\n| **Limpopo** | Unexamined locally | Division/seat and current procedural requirements |\n| **Mpumalanga** | Unexamined locally | Division/seat and current procedural requirements |\n| **Northern Cape** | Unexamined locally | Division/seat and current procedural requirements |\n| **North West** | Unexamined locally | Division/seat and current procedural requirements |\n| **Western Cape** | Unexamined locally | Division/seat and current procedural requirements |\n\n# 9. Search/read audit\n\nThe new research stayed with the threshold, statutory currency bridge, accrual wording and necessary claim qualification.\n\n| Search family | Representative actual queries/routes | Result |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Primary §9 wording | \"Insolvency Act\" \"liquidated claim which has accrued\"; \"Insolvency Act\" \"one hundred pounds\" | Fresh secondary §9 text; no successful current official whole body |\n| Joint judicial amount | \"R200\" \"section 9(1)\" site:supremecourtofappeal.org.za; \"R200\" \"sequestration\" site:judiciary.org.za | *Kurz* alternative statement; no controlling joint-limb application established |\n| Accrued/not-yet-due | \"Insolvency Act\" \"not yet due\" in official court domains | No fresh final primary authority closing §9(2) gap |\n| Decimalisation | Decimal Coinage Act61/1959 and Gazette6255 routes | Catalogue/index discovery; bodies failed |\n| Statutory monetary construction | SARB Act90/1989 §§15,18,40–41 | Successful official-hosted legislative text |\n| Later monetary amendments | gov.za SARB Act and Act4/2010/commencement routes | Metadata surfaced; body fetches failed |\n| New original-law alternate | LawLibrary static publication PDF | Failed; not an unchanged retry of previously failed consolidations |\n| Recent judgment candidate | [2026] ZAFSHC284 | Snippet only; body failed; no legal finding adopted |\n\nForeign-jurisdiction statutes, study notes, practice blogs and private submissions that surfaced were not used to supply South African law. No historical pound value was inflated or translated using a current exchange rate.\n\n## Evidence-backed next product\n\nA narrow **claim-threshold verification card** could display separate fields for creditor count, legal creditor versus representative, same debtor, claim ownership, liquidation, accrual, hearing-date maturity and the source/version supporting the amount. Its joint-threshold field must remain marked “current-primary chain incomplete” until the missing source is obtained. No tool was built or published.\n\n# 10. Counts and final disposition\n\n| Deliverable | Actual displayed count |\n| --- | --- |\n| P20 source-register rows | **17** |\n| New atomic claims | **20** |\n| Core coverage rows | **30** |\n| Separate general holds | **12** |\n| Provincial/local rows | **9** |\n| **Total coverage/hold rows** | **51** |\n| Fictional qualifying-claim postures | **8** |\n| Conditional threshold models | **2** |\n| Statutory-conversion illustration | **1**, containing two equations |\n| P18 replacement/crosswalk rows | **6** |\n| New actual claim, filing or sequestration outcomes | **0** |\n\n**Self-check:** Single R100 is not used to prove joint R200. A statutory conversion provision is now identified, but its dated compilation is not called a complete 2026 chain. The High Court R200 statement is not misdescribed as a joint-creditor ratio. Two representatives are not automatically two creditors. An accrued claim is not equated with an unaccrued contingency. The hearing-date qualification is retained. Threshold arithmetic is not standing, and a failed aggregate model does not necessarily eliminate a distinct single-creditor posture. No current tariff, dividend, deadline or legal permission is added.\n\n**What was found and what remains insufficient:** The legal currency-conversion basis is substantially stronger than P18’s historical educational support. The specific remaining insufficiency is fresh, complete current-primary confirmation of the **joint §9(1) limb and §9(2)**, together with the material monetary commencement/later-amendment chain—or a controlling final decision actually applying the joint threshold. The failed sources and bounded searches do not establish that such authority does not exist.\n\n**Final P20 disposition:** **Single R100 retained as a primary judicial baseline; monetary-conversion support augmented; joint R200 strengthened but still partially unresolved under the requested current-primary standard.** All unaffected P18 findings, raw provenance, procedural, private, local, foreign and acceptance holds remain unchanged.\n\nEND C_ZA PASS-20\n\n","tables":[{"headers":["Provision","Faithful content of the reproduced text","P20 evidence status"],"index":0,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Provision","Faithful content of the reproduced text","P20 evidence status"],["§9(1), single creditor","A creditor, or the creditor’s agent, has a liquidated claim of at least £50 against the debtor.","Single rand amount independently confirmed by Osborne."],["§9(1), grouped creditors","Two or more creditors, or their agent, have liquidated claims aggregating at least £100 against the same debtor.","Reproduced statutory text, statutory conversion support and judicial restatement; complete current-primary chain still held."],["§9(1), remaining conditions","The debtor has committed an act of insolvency or is insolvent; the creditor may petition.","Preserved P18 conditions, not rerun."],["§9(2)","A liquidated claim that has accrued but is not yet due at the hearing date counts for §9(1).","Fresh secondary text read; fresh current-primary subsection body remains missing."]]},{"headers":["Question","P20 result"],"index":1,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Question","P20 result"],["Does a primary SCA body confirm single R100?","Yes."],["Was an enacted monetary-construction rule found?","Yes, in a dated SARB-hosted legislative compilation."],["Does a final judgment expressly mention joint R200?","Yes, but not as a dispositive joint-creditor threshold holding."],["Was a current official §9(1)–(2) consolidation successfully opened?","No."],["Was the complete conversion/commencement and later-amendment chain verified through October 2026?","No."],["Is there evidence here that R200 was changed?","No such instrument was established—but that is not proof of absence."]]},{"headers":["P18 location","Previous position","P20 replacement/disposition"],"index":2,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["P18 location","Previous position","P20 replacement/disposition"],["C_ZA-P18-C004","R100 single/R200 aggregate presented together as an established baseline, supported by §9 reproduction, Osborne and historical conversion.","Replace with the full cell below."],["P18 G1-05 — Single threshold","“Answered as established baseline — C004”; qualifying claim remains.","Retain the baseline, identify Osborne as the primary support and preserve currentness/private-claim limits."],["P18 G1-06 — Joint threshold","“Answered as established baseline — C004”; same debtor and each claim.","Change to partial current-primary confirmation."],["P18 threshold narrative","Both amounts appeared equally verified.","State that their evidence strength differs as explained in §1.5 above."],["P18 Example A","Aggregate arithmetic was correct but could be read as proving standing.","Retain all amounts; add the conditional and separate-individual-route qualifications below."],["P18 source history","Historical SARB explanation and §9 read-aid were part of the original evidence.","Preserve those rows unchanged. Add P20 sources; do not describe them as having been read in P18."]]},{"headers":["Row","Issue","Replacement status/finding","Exact remaining fact or action"],"index":3,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[]],"rows":[["Row","Issue","Replacement status/finding","Exact remaining fact or action"],["C_ZA-P18-G1-05","Single threshold","Answered as a judicially confirmed baseline, with currentness limits. Osborne para20 confirms at least R100. P20 C001–C003.","Establish the actual qualifying claim and complete any necessary current-law check."],["C_ZA-P18-G1-06","Joint threshold","Partial. R200 has strengthened statutory-conversion and judicial-restatement support, but the requested complete current-primary joint chain remains unclosed. P20 C004–C014.","Obtain current official §9(1)–(2), the material monetary commencement/amendment chain, or a controlling final judgment actually deciding the joint limb."]]},{"headers":["No.","Assumed posture","Conditional classification","Adverse branch / missing proof","Claims"],"index":4,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["No.","Assumed posture","Conditional classification","Adverse branch / missing proof","Claims"],["1","One creditor holds a fixed, admitted R100 debt.","Equality meets the single-amount baseline.","The claimant must still own the debt; the other sequestration predicates remain separate.","C001,C015"],["2","One creditor holds R99.99 and appoints two agents.","Two agents do not turn one creditor into two creditors or increase its claim.","Authority and ownership must be proved; no qualifying additional creditor is assumed.","C009–C010,C015"],["3","Two distinct creditors hold R60 and R140 against the same debtor.","On the retained joint rule, aggregate R200 reaches the amount boundary.","Each claim must qualify. The R140 creditor independently meets the single amount, but that is a distinct posture.","C010,C012,C015–C016"],["4","Two distinct creditors hold R60 and R139.99 against the same debtor.","Aggregate R199.99 falls below the joint model.","This does not mean neither could ever petition: the R139.99 creditor separately meets the R100 amount baseline.","C012,C015–C016"],["5","R120 is owed by Debtor A; R100 is owed by Debtor B.","Adding them produces R220 arithmetically, but not qualifying aggregate claims against one debtor.","Separate debtor identity and any joint-liability theory require actual evidence and law.","C009–C010,C015"],["6","Two trustees represent one trust creditor owed R500.","Representative headcount is not creditor headcount. The assumed claim is assessed as that creditor’s claim.","The nature of the estate/entity and authority are not decided; Kurz illustrates why two named applicants can represent one creditor.","C010,C013"],["7","A fixed R150 claim has accrued, but its contractual payment date is after the petition hearing.","The reproduced §9(2) includes that posture if it is truly accrued and liquidated.","A contingent claim dependent on an unfulfilled condition is not assumed accrued. Fresh current-primary §9(2) verification remains held.","C011,C014"],["8","An applicant alleges R10,000 damages, or a fixed invoice that the respondent genuinely disputes.","A large number does not establish a liquidated, legally owed claim.","The court must address the claim’s legal/evidential quality; the majority/concurrence distinction in Osborne is preserved.","C003,C015"]]},{"headers":["Amount","Comparison","Amount-only result"],"index":5,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[]],"rows":[["Amount","Comparison","Amount-only result"],["R99.99","R99.99 < R100","Below baseline"],["R100.00","R100.00 = R100","Equality reaches baseline"]]},{"headers":["Claims","Aggregate","Joint amount-only result"],"index":6,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claims","Aggregate","Joint amount-only result"],["R60 + R140","R200","Reaches conditional joint boundary"],["R60 + R139.99","R199.99","Falls short"]]},{"headers":["Source ID","Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL","Body/read status and pinpoint","Edition, commencement and limits"],"index":7,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Source ID","Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL","Body/read status and pinpoint","Edition, commencement and limits"],["C_ZA-P20-S001","SCA, Osborne v Cockin NO and Others [2018] ZASCA58, 17 May 2018. https://www.supremecourtofappeal.org.za/index.php/component/jdownloads/send/3-judgments-2018/284-osborne-v-cockin-no-others-549-2017-2018-zasca-58-17-may-2018?Itemid=0","Fresh final judgment/body and images. Para20 P6/printed7; paras22–29 P6–P8/printed7–9.","Confirms R100 only. Majority and concurrence distinguished. No full later citator."],["S002","SARB-hosted South African Reserve Bank Act 90 of 1989, dated compilation. https://www.resbank.co.za/content/dam/sarb/what-we-do/banknotes-and-coin/SA%20Reserve%20Bank%20Act%2090%20of%201989.pdf","Fresh body: §§14–18 P10–P12; §§40–41 P20–P21; Schedule3 P24. §18 and §40 images inspected; §15 table screenshot failed, parsed text read. Printed labels unverified.","Header lists amendments through 2003 and commencement 1 Aug1989. §41 requires proclamation; proclamation not obtained. Not a complete 2026 consolidation."],["S003","KwaZulu-Natal High Court, Kurz NO and Another v van den Berg, 17 July 2013, public mirror. https://semantis.ai/resources/35235.pdf","Fresh final-opinion body/images: para6(a) P1; paras7–10 P2. Printed labels not displayed.","States both figures but applies R100 to one creditor represented by trustees. Not a joint-limb ratio; non-official hosting."],["S004","Acts Online, Insolvency Act §9 reproduction. https://www.acts.co.za/insolvency-act-1936/9__petition_for_sequestration_of_estate","Fresh secondary body: §9(1)–(2), HTML lines9–10.","Exact grouping/accrual wording recovered, but not current primary certification. P18’s earlier read remains separate."],["S005","Government Gazette, original SARB Act90/1989 candidate. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201503/act-90-1989.pdf","Failed body fetch.","Original enactment pages not read; S002 was the successful different official-hosted route."],["S006","gov.za, SARB Act90/1989 legislative record. https://www.gov.za/documents/south-african-reserve-bank-act-24-mar-2015-1516","Search metadata; direct body timed out.","No commencement or amendment-body claim derived from the failed page."],["S007","gov.za, SARB Amendment Act4/2010 record. https://www.gov.za/documents/south-african-reserve-bank-amendment-act-3","Discovery metadata; direct body timed out.","Later amendment candidate, not read operative clauses."],["S008","gov.za, SARB Amendment Act commencement record. https://www.gov.za/documents/south-african-reserve-bank-amendment-act-commencement","Discovery metadata; direct body timed out.","No proclamation content or effective date adopted."],["S009","SARB, Core legislation page. https://www.resbank.co.za/en/home/about-us/SARB-core-legislation","Fresh HTML index, lines173–188. Act link140 failed on following it; exact final target was not recovered.","Current listing is not a read current consolidation."],["S010","Gazette6255/Decimal Coinage Act61/1959 candidate hosted by Legal Assistance Centre. https://www.lac.org.na/laws/GGsa/sagg6255.pdf","Metadata plus failed PDF fetch.","Historical South African Gazette candidate, not adopted as Namibian law or as a read conversion/commencement clause."],["S011","National Archives catalogue entry for Decimal Coinage Act61/1959. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.za/node/7362521","Search metadata; direct fetch failed.","Catalogue identity only; no legislative body."],["S012","LawOnline, Act61/1959 page. https://lawonline.co.za/act/no-61-of-1959/","Failed secondary alternate, HTTP429.","No text or commencement conclusion."],["S013","Western Cape Numismatic Society, Gazette library. https://www.wcnumsoc.com/new-library","Fresh HTML discovery index. Link to 6July1959 Act61/1959 failed; no scan obtained.","Collector-hosted index, not operative authority."],["S014","LawLibrary, original Insolvency Act static publication candidate. https://media.lawlibrary.org.za/media/legislation/291667/source_file/3adfa89a7c8d23a7/1936-24.pdf","New published alternate; HTTP403.","No fresh original §9 body. Not an unchanged retry of the prior consolidation paths."],["S015","South African Law Commission, Report: Review of the Law of Insolvency, April2000. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/reviewlawinsolvency0.pdf","Official report candidate; body timed out.","Even if obtained, a law-reform report would not itself enact a current threshold."],["S016","High Court final-judgment candidate, [2026] ZAFSHC284, 15May2026. https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAFSHC/2026/284.html","Threshold wording in search result; direct body HTTP403.","No merits, posture, joint application or currentness finding adopted."],["S017","Acts Online, SARB Act amendment inventory. https://www.acts.co.za/south_african_reserve_bank_act_1989_act_no_90_of_1989_","Discovery/index result only.","Flags later amendment families; no final clauses or complete chain read."]]},{"headers":["Claim ID","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect","Source and pinpoint","Remaining hold"],"index":8,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claim ID","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect","Source and pinpoint","Remaining hold"],["C_ZA-P20-C001","Single creditor: at least R100 is expressly stated in Osborne.","S001 para20, P6/printed7","Actual claim and later-law application"],["C002","That paragraph does not confirm the joint amount.","S001 para20","Joint-primary gap separate"],["C003","Fixed amount, liquidation and genuinely owed liability are distinct; the concurrence does not replace the majority.","S001 paras20–29","Actual claim evidence"],["C004","A statutory monetary-reference construction provision was found.","S002 §18, P12","Dated compilation"],["C005","Its referenced table supplies the £1/R2 equivalence.","S002 §15(2), P11","Table parsed; image unavailable"],["C006","Applied to retained £50/£100 premises, the conversion produces R100/R200.","S002 §§15(2),18; S004","Conditional on operative underlying text"],["C007","Header commencement is not a freshly read proclamation; compilation stops at listed2003 amendments.","S002 P0, §41 P21","Commencement/later chain incomplete"],["C008","Conversion does not by itself prove §9’s amounts remained unchanged through2026.","S002–S008 source limits","Current-primary chain held"],["C009","Reproduced §9(1) separates one creditor from two or more and includes agents.","S004 §9(1)","Secondary text only"],["C010","Grouped claims concern the same debtor; representative headcount is not creditor headcount.","S004; S003 paras7,10","Actual ownership/authority"],["C011","Reproduced §9(2) includes accrued liquidated claims not yet due at hearing.","S004 §9(2)","Fresh primary subsection missing"],["C012","The joint text tests aggregate claims; it does not say each creditor must hold R100.","S004 §9(1)","Conditional currentness status"],["C013","Kurz states R200 alternatively but applies the single-creditor limb.","S003 paras6(a),7,10","Not controlling joint-limb determination"],["C014","No complete current-primary §9(1)–(2) or dispositive joint-threshold authority was obtained.","Search/read audit; S014–S016","Not proof none exists"],["C015","Amount arithmetic does not establish valid creditor standing or other sequestration predicates.","S001; conditional models","No actual outcome"],["C016","A failed aggregate model can coexist with one member meeting the single amount.","Stipulated model + C001,C012","Separate proceeding/standing not advised"],["C017","Models use rand amounts without CPI, present GBP exchange or rounding uplift.","Model assumptions; C006","No new monetary adjustment"],["C018","P18 C004/G1-05/G1-06 receive a source-strength overlay, not a contrary-amount finding.","Replacement cells","Original history preserved"],["C019","No actual party, claim file, account, licence or docket was investigated.","Research-method fact","Public legal material only"],["C020","§149, Rule6, local, private-claim, citator and acceptance holds remain.","Scope","P19 not adopted"]]},{"headers":["Row","Subquestion","Status / claims","Missing body or exact next action"],"index":9,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Row","Subquestion","Status / claims","Missing body or exact next action"],["G1-01","Single R100","Answered as primary judicial baseline — C001","Actual qualifying claim"],["G1-02","Equality at R100","Answered at baseline — C001","No “more than” substitution"],["G1-03","Joint R200","Partial — C006,C013–C014","Current primary §9 or controlling joint application"],["G1-04","Equality at R200","Conditional — C012","Same joint-currentness hold"],["G1-05","Two or more creditors","Secondary wording recovered — C009","Current primary body"],["G1-06","Same debtor","Conditional textual finding — C010","Actual debtor identity/liability"],["G1-07","Agent versus creditor","Conditional — C009–C010","Mandate and claim ownership"],["G1-08","Aggregate versus per-creditor amount","Conditional — C012","Current primary confirmation"],["G1-09","Liquidated claim","Primary qualification retained — C003","Agreement/judgment/quantification"],["G1-10","Accrued but not due","Partial-source status — C011","Official §9(2) or primary quotation"],["G1-11","Hearing-date reference","Secondary wording recovered — C011","Actual hearing and accrual facts"],["G1-12","Unaccrued contingency","Not automatically included — C011,C015","Contractual event/legal accrual"],["G1-13","Statutory conversion provision","Body located — C004–C006","Full currentness chain"],["G1-14","£50/£100 premises","Retained text, not newly original-Gazette certified — C009","Original/current official §9"],["G1-15","Commencement proclamation","Unresolved — C007","Actual proclamation body"],["G1-16","Savings/transitions","Partially read — C007–C008","Complete 1959/1964/1989 continuity if required"],["G1-17","Later amendments","Unresolved — C008,C014","Material final bodies and effective clauses"],["G1-18","Judicial hierarchy","Answered as evidence distinction — C002–C003,C013","Full later citator remains"]]},{"headers":["Row","Posture","Status / claims","Missing fact"],"index":10,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Row","Posture","Status / claims","Missing fact"],["G2-01","One creditor R100","Conditional amount result — C001,C015","Valid claim/other gates"],["G2-02","One creditor, two agents","Conditional distinction — C009–C010","Authority/ownership"],["G2-03","R60 + R140","Conditional joint model — C012,C016","Two qualifying claims/same debtor"],["G2-04","R60 + R139.99","Aggregate fails; individual amount separate — C016","Actual filing posture"],["G2-05","Different debtors","No aggregate model established — C010","Joint-liability basis, if alleged"],["G2-06","Two trustees/one creditor","Representative count distinction — C013","Actual estate/entity role"],["G2-07","Accrued/not yet due","Conditional inclusion — C011","Accrual and hearing facts"],["G2-08","Disputed/unliquidated","Amount insufficient — C003,C015","Merits evidence"]]},{"headers":["Row","Matter","Status / claims","Next action"],"index":11,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Row","Matter","Status / claims","Next action"],["G3-01","P18 C004","Revised evidence qualification — C018","Coordinator review of overlay"],["G3-02","P18 G1-05/G1-06","Single retained; joint partial — C018","Close exact primary gap"],["G3-03","Existing arithmetic","Preserved with standing caveat — C015–C017","No financial-model rerun"],["G3-04","P19/private records/acceptance","Not adopted; no actual action — C019–C020","Holds below"]]},{"headers":["Row","Held family","P20 disposition"],"index":12,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Row","Held family","P20 disposition"],["H01","Current official §9(1)–(2)","Exact complete primary chain unresolved"],["H02","Original decimalisation commencement","1959 Act/proclamation body not obtained"],["H03","Current §§15/18 monetary-law chain","Dated statutory body found; later amendments not exhaustively checked"],["H04","Actual debt ownership, accrual, amount and liquidation","Unknown; no records searched"],["H05","Agency/representation authority","No actual mandate assessed"],["H06","Genuine dispute and private contractual defences","Case-specific; not adjudicated"],["H07","§149 jurisdiction","Existing hold preserved"],["H08","Rule6, Master and service procedure","Existing hold preserved; P19 not adopted"],["H09","Insolvency, advantage, valuation and security","P18 scope retained; not rerun"],["H10","Full current judicial citator","Not performed"],["H11","Foreign law/currency/jurisdiction","No foreign law adopted; no live FX conversion"],["H12","Parent/country/A066/A097/A098 acceptance","Held"]]},{"headers":["Province","Status","Next local question"],"index":13,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Province","Status","Next local question"],["Eastern Cape","Unexamined locally","Applicable division, current practice direction and filing/service requirements"],["Free State","Unexamined locally","Same; a failed 2026 opinion fetch does not establish local procedure"],["Gauteng","Unexamined locally","Applicable seat, current electronic filing and procedural directions"],["KwaZulu-Natal","Not generally examined","Kurz is narrow published authority, not certification of all current local practice"],["Limpopo","Unexamined locally","Division/seat and current procedural requirements"],["Mpumalanga","Unexamined locally","Division/seat and current procedural requirements"],["Northern Cape","Unexamined locally","Division/seat and current procedural requirements"],["North West","Unexamined locally","Division/seat and current procedural requirements"],["Western Cape","Unexamined locally","Division/seat and current procedural requirements"]]},{"headers":["Search family","Representative actual queries/routes","Result"],"index":14,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Search family","Representative actual queries/routes","Result"],["Primary §9 wording","\"Insolvency Act\" \"liquidated claim which has accrued\"; \"Insolvency Act\" \"one hundred pounds\"","Fresh secondary §9 text; no successful current official whole body"],["Joint judicial amount","\"R200\" \"section 9(1)\" site:supremecourtofappeal.org.za; \"R200\" \"sequestration\" site:judiciary.org.za","Kurz alternative statement; no controlling joint-limb application established"],["Accrued/not-yet-due","\"Insolvency Act\" \"not yet due\" in official court domains","No fresh final primary authority closing §9(2) gap"],["Decimalisation","Decimal Coinage Act61/1959 and Gazette6255 routes","Catalogue/index discovery; bodies failed"],["Statutory monetary construction","SARB Act90/1989 §§15,18,40–41","Successful official-hosted legislative text"],["Later monetary amendments","gov.za SARB Act and Act4/2010/commencement routes","Metadata surfaced; body fetches failed"],["New original-law alternate","LawLibrary static publication PDF","Failed; not an unchanged retry of previously failed consolidations"],["Recent judgment candidate","[2026] ZAFSHC284","Snippet only; body failed; no legal finding adopted"]]},{"headers":["Deliverable","Actual displayed count"],"index":15,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Deliverable","Actual displayed count"],["P20 source-register rows","17"],["New atomic claims","20"],["Core coverage rows","30"],["Separate general holds","12"],["Provincial/local rows","9"],["Total coverage/hold rows","51"],["Fictional qualifying-claim postures","8"],["Conditional threshold models","2"],["Statutory-conversion illustration","1, containing two equations"],["P18 replacement/crosswalk rows","6"],["New actual claim, filing or sequestration outcomes","0"]]}],"claims":[{"claim_id":"C_ZA-P20-C001","area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C_ZA-P20-C001","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect":"Single creditor: at least R100 is expressly stated in Osborne.","Source and pinpoint":"S001 para20, P6/printed7","Remaining hold":"Actual claim and later-law application"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Full unique pass qualification only; literal researcher cell and raw originals unchanged."},{"claim_id":"C_ZA-P20-C002","area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C002","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect":"That paragraph does not confirm the joint amount.","Source and pinpoint":"S001 para20","Remaining hold":"Joint-primary gap separate"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Full unique pass qualification only; literal researcher cell and raw originals unchanged."},{"claim_id":"C_ZA-P20-C003","area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C003","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect":"Fixed amount, liquidation and genuinely owed liability are distinct; the concurrence does not replace the majority.","Source and pinpoint":"S001 paras20–29","Remaining hold":"Actual claim evidence"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Full unique pass qualification only; literal researcher cell and raw originals unchanged."},{"claim_id":"C_ZA-P20-C004","area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C004","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect":"A statutory monetary-reference construction provision was found.","Source and pinpoint":"S002 §18, P12","Remaining hold":"Dated compilation"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Full unique pass qualification only; literal researcher cell and raw originals unchanged."},{"claim_id":"C_ZA-P20-C005","area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C005","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect":"Its referenced table supplies the £1/R2 equivalence.","Source and pinpoint":"S002 §15(2), P11","Remaining hold":"Table parsed; image unavailable"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Full unique pass qualification only; literal researcher cell and raw originals unchanged."},{"claim_id":"C_ZA-P20-C006","area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C006","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect":"Applied to retained £50/£100 premises, the conversion produces R100/R200.","Source and pinpoint":"S002 §§15(2),18; S004","Remaining hold":"Conditional on operative underlying text"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Full unique pass qualification only; literal researcher cell and raw originals unchanged."},{"claim_id":"C_ZA-P20-C007","area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C007","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect":"Header commencement is not a freshly read proclamation; compilation stops at listed2003 amendments.","Source and pinpoint":"S002 P0, §41 P21","Remaining hold":"Commencement/later chain incomplete"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Full unique pass qualification only; literal researcher cell and raw originals unchanged."},{"claim_id":"C_ZA-P20-C008","area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C008","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect":"Conversion does not by itself prove §9’s amounts remained unchanged through2026.","Source and pinpoint":"S002–S008 source limits","Remaining hold":"Current-primary chain held"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Full unique pass qualification only; literal researcher cell and raw originals unchanged."},{"claim_id":"C_ZA-P20-C009","area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C009","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect":"Reproduced §9(1) separates one creditor from two or more and includes agents.","Source and pinpoint":"S004 §9(1)","Remaining hold":"Secondary text only"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Full unique pass qualification only; literal researcher cell and raw originals unchanged."},{"claim_id":"C_ZA-P20-C010","area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C010","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect":"Grouped claims concern the same debtor; representative headcount is not creditor headcount.","Source and pinpoint":"S004; S003 paras7,10","Remaining hold":"Actual ownership/authority"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Full unique pass qualification only; literal researcher cell and raw originals unchanged."},{"claim_id":"C_ZA-P20-C011","area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C011","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect":"Reproduced §9(2) includes accrued liquidated claims not yet due at hearing.","Source and pinpoint":"S004 §9(2)","Remaining hold":"Fresh primary subsection missing"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Full unique pass qualification only; literal researcher cell and raw originals unchanged."},{"claim_id":"C_ZA-P20-C012","area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C012","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect":"The joint text tests aggregate claims; it does not say each creditor must hold R100.","Source and pinpoint":"S004 §9(1)","Remaining hold":"Conditional currentness status"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Full unique pass qualification only; literal researcher cell and raw originals unchanged."},{"claim_id":"C_ZA-P20-C013","area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C013","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect":"Kurz states R200 alternatively but applies the single-creditor limb.","Source and pinpoint":"S003 paras6(a),7,10","Remaining hold":"Not controlling joint-limb determination"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Full unique pass qualification only; literal researcher cell and raw originals unchanged."},{"claim_id":"C_ZA-P20-C014","area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C014","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect":"No complete current-primary §9(1)–(2) or dispositive joint-threshold authority was obtained.","Source and pinpoint":"Search/read audit; S014–S016","Remaining hold":"Not proof none exists"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Full unique pass qualification only; literal researcher cell and raw originals unchanged."},{"claim_id":"C_ZA-P20-C015","area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C015","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect":"Amount arithmetic does not establish valid creditor standing or other sequestration predicates.","Source and pinpoint":"S001; conditional models","Remaining hold":"No actual outcome"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Full unique pass qualification only; literal researcher cell and raw originals unchanged."},{"claim_id":"C_ZA-P20-C016","area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C016","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect":"A failed aggregate model can coexist with one member meeting the single amount.","Source and pinpoint":"Stipulated model + C001,C012","Remaining hold":"Separate proceeding/standing not advised"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Full unique pass qualification only; literal researcher cell and raw originals unchanged."},{"claim_id":"C_ZA-P20-C017","area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C017","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect":"Models use rand amounts without CPI, present GBP exchange or rounding uplift.","Source and pinpoint":"Model assumptions; C006","Remaining hold":"No new monetary adjustment"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Full unique pass qualification only; literal researcher cell and raw originals unchanged."},{"claim_id":"C_ZA-P20-C018","area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C018","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect":"P18 C004/G1-05/G1-06 receive a source-strength overlay, not a contrary-amount finding.","Source and pinpoint":"Replacement cells","Remaining hold":"Original history preserved"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Full unique pass qualification only; literal researcher cell and raw originals unchanged."},{"claim_id":"C_ZA-P20-C019","area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C019","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect":"No actual party, claim file, account, licence or docket was investigated.","Source and pinpoint":"Research-method fact","Remaining hold":"Public legal material only"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Full unique pass qualification only; literal researcher cell and raw originals unchanged."},{"claim_id":"C_ZA-P20-C020","area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"task_scope_fallback","researcher_record":{"Claim ID":"C020","Exact proposition / actor / predicate / effect":"§149, Rule6, local, private-claim, citator and acceptance holds remain.","Source and pinpoint":"Scope","Remaining hold":"P19 not adopted"},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Full unique pass qualification only; literal researcher cell and raw originals unchanged."}],"sources":[{"source_id":"C_ZA-P20-S001","urls":["https://www.supremecourtofappeal.org.za/index.php/component/jdownloads/send/3-judgments-2018/284-osborne-v-cockin-no-others-549-2017-2018-zasca-58-17-may-2018?Itemid=0"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"C_ZA-P20-S001","Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL":"SCA, Osborne v Cockin NO and Others [2018] ZASCA58, 17 May 2018. https://www.supremecourtofappeal.org.za/index.php/component/jdownloads/send/3-judgments-2018/284-osborne-v-cockin-no-others-549-2017-2018-zasca-58-17-may-2018?Itemid=0","Body/read status and pinpoint":"Fresh final judgment/body and images. Para20 P6/printed7; paras22–29 P6–P8/printed7–9.","Edition, commencement and limits":"Confirms R100 only. Majority and concurrence distinguished. No full later citator."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked"},{"source_id":"C_ZA-S002","urls":["https://www.resbank.co.za/content/dam/sarb/what-we-do/banknotes-and-coin/SA%20Reserve%20Bank%20Act%2090%20of%201989.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S002","Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL":"SARB-hosted South African Reserve Bank Act 90 of 1989, dated compilation. https://www.resbank.co.za/content/dam/sarb/what-we-do/banknotes-and-coin/SA%20Reserve%20Bank%20Act%2090%20of%201989.pdf","Body/read status and pinpoint":"Fresh body: §§14–18 P10–P12; §§40–41 P20–P21; Schedule3 P24. §18 and §40 images inspected; §15 table screenshot failed, parsed text read. Printed labels unverified.","Edition, commencement and limits":"Header lists amendments through 2003 and commencement 1 Aug1989. §41 requires proclamation; proclamation not obtained. Not a complete 2026 consolidation."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"C_ZA-S003","urls":["https://semantis.ai/resources/35235.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S003","Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL":"KwaZulu-Natal High Court, Kurz NO and Another v van den Berg, 17 July 2013, public mirror. https://semantis.ai/resources/35235.pdf","Body/read status and pinpoint":"Fresh final-opinion body/images: para6(a) P1; paras7–10 P2. Printed labels not displayed.","Edition, commencement and limits":"States both figures but applies R100 to one creditor represented by trustees. Not a joint-limb ratio; non-official hosting."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"C_ZA-S004","urls":["https://www.acts.co.za/insolvency-act-1936/9__petition_for_sequestration_of_estate"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S004","Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL":"Acts Online, Insolvency Act §9 reproduction. https://www.acts.co.za/insolvency-act-1936/9__petition_for_sequestration_of_estate","Body/read status and pinpoint":"Fresh secondary body: §9(1)–(2), HTML lines9–10.","Edition, commencement and limits":"Exact grouping/accrual wording recovered, but not current primary certification. P18’s earlier read remains separate."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"C_ZA-S005","urls":["https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201503/act-90-1989.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S005","Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL":"Government Gazette, original SARB Act90/1989 candidate. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201503/act-90-1989.pdf","Body/read status and pinpoint":"Failed body fetch.","Edition, commencement and limits":"Original enactment pages not read; S002 was the successful different official-hosted route."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"C_ZA-S006","urls":["https://www.gov.za/documents/south-african-reserve-bank-act-24-mar-2015-1516"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S006","Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL":"gov.za, SARB Act90/1989 legislative record. https://www.gov.za/documents/south-african-reserve-bank-act-24-mar-2015-1516","Body/read status and pinpoint":"Search metadata; direct body timed out.","Edition, commencement and limits":"No commencement or amendment-body claim derived from the failed page."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"C_ZA-S007","urls":["https://www.gov.za/documents/south-african-reserve-bank-amendment-act-3"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S007","Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL":"gov.za, SARB Amendment Act4/2010 record. https://www.gov.za/documents/south-african-reserve-bank-amendment-act-3","Body/read status and pinpoint":"Discovery metadata; direct body timed out.","Edition, commencement and limits":"Later amendment candidate, not read operative clauses."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"C_ZA-S008","urls":["https://www.gov.za/documents/south-african-reserve-bank-amendment-act-commencement"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S008","Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL":"gov.za, SARB Amendment Act commencement record. https://www.gov.za/documents/south-african-reserve-bank-amendment-act-commencement","Body/read status and pinpoint":"Discovery metadata; direct body timed out.","Edition, commencement and limits":"No proclamation content or effective date adopted."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"C_ZA-S009","urls":["https://www.resbank.co.za/en/home/about-us/SARB-core-legislation"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S009","Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL":"SARB, Core legislation page. https://www.resbank.co.za/en/home/about-us/SARB-core-legislation","Body/read status and pinpoint":"Fresh HTML index, lines173–188. Act link140 failed on following it; exact final target was not recovered.","Edition, commencement and limits":"Current listing is not a read current consolidation."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"C_ZA-S010","urls":["https://www.lac.org.na/laws/GGsa/sagg6255.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S010","Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL":"Gazette6255/Decimal Coinage Act61/1959 candidate hosted by Legal Assistance Centre. https://www.lac.org.na/laws/GGsa/sagg6255.pdf","Body/read status and pinpoint":"Metadata plus failed PDF fetch.","Edition, commencement and limits":"Historical South African Gazette candidate, not adopted as Namibian law or as a read conversion/commencement clause."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"C_ZA-S011","urls":["https://www.nationalarchives.gov.za/node/7362521"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S011","Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL":"National Archives catalogue entry for Decimal Coinage Act61/1959. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.za/node/7362521","Body/read status and pinpoint":"Search metadata; direct fetch failed.","Edition, commencement and limits":"Catalogue identity only; no legislative body."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"C_ZA-S012","urls":["https://lawonline.co.za/act/no-61-of-1959/"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S012","Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL":"LawOnline, Act61/1959 page. https://lawonline.co.za/act/no-61-of-1959/","Body/read status and pinpoint":"Failed secondary alternate, HTTP429.","Edition, commencement and limits":"No text or commencement conclusion."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"C_ZA-S013","urls":["https://www.wcnumsoc.com/new-library"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S013","Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL":"Western Cape Numismatic Society, Gazette library. https://www.wcnumsoc.com/new-library","Body/read status and pinpoint":"Fresh HTML discovery index. Link to 6July1959 Act61/1959 failed; no scan obtained.","Edition, commencement and limits":"Collector-hosted index, not operative authority."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"C_ZA-S014","urls":["https://media.lawlibrary.org.za/media/legislation/291667/source_file/3adfa89a7c8d23a7/1936-24.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S014","Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL":"LawLibrary, original Insolvency Act static publication candidate. https://media.lawlibrary.org.za/media/legislation/291667/source_file/3adfa89a7c8d23a7/1936-24.pdf","Body/read status and pinpoint":"New published alternate; HTTP403.","Edition, commencement and limits":"No fresh original §9 body. Not an unchanged retry of the prior consolidation paths."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"C_ZA-S015","urls":["https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/reviewlawinsolvency0.pdf"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S015","Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL":"South African Law Commission, Report: Review of the Law of Insolvency, April2000. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/reviewlawinsolvency0.pdf","Body/read status and pinpoint":"Official report candidate; body timed out.","Edition, commencement and limits":"Even if obtained, a law-reform report would not itself enact a current threshold."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"C_ZA-S016","urls":["https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAFSHC/2026/284.html"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S016","Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL":"High Court final-judgment candidate, [2026] ZAFSHC284, 15May2026. https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAFSHC/2026/284.html","Body/read status and pinpoint":"Threshold wording in search result; direct body HTTP403.","Edition, commencement and limits":"No merits, posture, joint application or currentness finding adopted."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."},{"source_id":"C_ZA-S017","urls":["https://www.acts.co.za/south_african_reserve_bank_act_1989_act_no_90_of_1989_"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S017","Issuer/title and complete literal HTTPS URL":"Acts Online, SARB Act amendment inventory. https://www.acts.co.za/south_african_reserve_bank_act_1989_act_no_90_of_1989_","Body/read status and pinpoint":"Discovery/index result only.","Edition, commencement and limits":"Flags later amendment families; no final clauses or complete chain read."},"coordinator_verification_status":"not_yet_checked","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged."}],"coverage":[{"topic":"G1-01 Single R100","researcher_record":{"Row":"G1-01","Subquestion":"Single R100","Status / claims":"Answered as primary judicial baseline — C001","Missing body or exact next action":"Actual qualifying claim"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G1-02 Equality at R100","researcher_record":{"Row":"G1-02","Subquestion":"Equality at R100","Status / claims":"Answered at baseline — C001","Missing body or exact next action":"No “more than” substitution"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G1-03 Joint R200","researcher_record":{"Row":"G1-03","Subquestion":"Joint R200","Status / claims":"Partial — C006,C013–C014","Missing body or exact next action":"Current primary §9 or controlling joint application"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G1-04 Equality at R200","researcher_record":{"Row":"G1-04","Subquestion":"Equality at R200","Status / claims":"Conditional — C012","Missing body or exact next action":"Same joint-currentness hold"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G1-05 Two or more creditors","researcher_record":{"Row":"G1-05","Subquestion":"Two or more creditors","Status / claims":"Secondary wording recovered — C009","Missing body or exact next action":"Current primary body"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G1-06 Same debtor","researcher_record":{"Row":"G1-06","Subquestion":"Same debtor","Status / claims":"Conditional textual finding — C010","Missing body or exact next action":"Actual debtor identity/liability"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G1-07 Agent versus creditor","researcher_record":{"Row":"G1-07","Subquestion":"Agent versus creditor","Status / claims":"Conditional — C009–C010","Missing body or exact next action":"Mandate and claim ownership"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G1-08 Aggregate versus per-creditor amount","researcher_record":{"Row":"G1-08","Subquestion":"Aggregate versus per-creditor amount","Status / claims":"Conditional — C012","Missing body or exact next action":"Current primary confirmation"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G1-09 Liquidated claim","researcher_record":{"Row":"G1-09","Subquestion":"Liquidated claim","Status / claims":"Primary qualification retained — C003","Missing body or exact next action":"Agreement/judgment/quantification"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G1-10 Accrued but not due","researcher_record":{"Row":"G1-10","Subquestion":"Accrued but not due","Status / claims":"Partial-source status — C011","Missing body or exact next action":"Official §9(2) or primary quotation"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G1-11 Hearing-date reference","researcher_record":{"Row":"G1-11","Subquestion":"Hearing-date reference","Status / claims":"Secondary wording recovered — C011","Missing body or exact next action":"Actual hearing and accrual facts"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G1-12 Unaccrued contingency","researcher_record":{"Row":"G1-12","Subquestion":"Unaccrued contingency","Status / claims":"Not automatically included — C011,C015","Missing body or exact next action":"Contractual event/legal accrual"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G1-13 Statutory conversion provision","researcher_record":{"Row":"G1-13","Subquestion":"Statutory conversion provision","Status / claims":"Body located — C004–C006","Missing body or exact next action":"Full currentness chain"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G1-14 £50/£100 premises","researcher_record":{"Row":"G1-14","Subquestion":"£50/£100 premises","Status / claims":"Retained text, not newly original-Gazette certified — C009","Missing body or exact next action":"Original/current official §9"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G1-15 Commencement proclamation","researcher_record":{"Row":"G1-15","Subquestion":"Commencement proclamation","Status / claims":"Unresolved — C007","Missing body or exact next action":"Actual proclamation body"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G1-16 Savings/transitions","researcher_record":{"Row":"G1-16","Subquestion":"Savings/transitions","Status / claims":"Partially read — C007–C008","Missing body or exact next action":"Complete 1959/1964/1989 continuity if required"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G1-17 Later amendments","researcher_record":{"Row":"G1-17","Subquestion":"Later amendments","Status / claims":"Unresolved — C008,C014","Missing body or exact next action":"Material final bodies and effective clauses"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G1-18 Judicial hierarchy","researcher_record":{"Row":"G1-18","Subquestion":"Judicial hierarchy","Status / claims":"Answered as evidence distinction — C002–C003,C013","Missing body or exact next action":"Full later citator remains"},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G2-01 One creditor R100","researcher_record":{"Row":"G2-01","Posture":"One creditor R100","Status / claims":"Conditional amount result — C001,C015","Missing fact":"Valid claim/other gates"},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G2-02 One creditor, two agents","researcher_record":{"Row":"G2-02","Posture":"One creditor, two agents","Status / claims":"Conditional distinction — C009–C010","Missing fact":"Authority/ownership"},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G2-03 R60 + R140","researcher_record":{"Row":"G2-03","Posture":"R60 + R140","Status / claims":"Conditional joint model — C012,C016","Missing fact":"Two qualifying claims/same debtor"},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G2-04 R60 + R139.99","researcher_record":{"Row":"G2-04","Posture":"R60 + R139.99","Status / claims":"Aggregate fails; individual amount separate — C016","Missing fact":"Actual filing posture"},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G2-05 Different debtors","researcher_record":{"Row":"G2-05","Posture":"Different debtors","Status / claims":"No aggregate model established — C010","Missing fact":"Joint-liability basis, if alleged"},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G2-06 Two trustees/one creditor","researcher_record":{"Row":"G2-06","Posture":"Two trustees/one creditor","Status / claims":"Representative count distinction — C013","Missing fact":"Actual estate/entity role"},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G2-07 Accrued/not yet due","researcher_record":{"Row":"G2-07","Posture":"Accrued/not yet due","Status / claims":"Conditional inclusion — C011","Missing fact":"Accrual and hearing facts"},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G2-08 Disputed/unliquidated","researcher_record":{"Row":"G2-08","Posture":"Disputed/unliquidated","Status / claims":"Amount insufficient — C003,C015","Missing fact":"Merits evidence"},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G3-01 P18 C004","researcher_record":{"Row":"G3-01","Matter":"P18 C004","Status / claims":"Revised evidence qualification — C018","Next action":"Coordinator review of overlay"},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G3-02 P18 G1-05/G1-06","researcher_record":{"Row":"G3-02","Matter":"P18 G1-05/G1-06","Status / claims":"Single retained; joint partial — C018","Next action":"Close exact primary gap"},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G3-03 Existing arithmetic","researcher_record":{"Row":"G3-03","Matter":"Existing arithmetic","Status / claims":"Preserved with standing caveat — C015–C017","Next action":"No financial-model rerun"},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"G3-04 P19/private records/acceptance","researcher_record":{"Row":"G3-04","Matter":"P19/private records/acceptance","Status / claims":"Not adopted; no actual action — C019–C020","Next action":"Holds below"},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"H01 Current official §9(1)–(2)","researcher_record":{"Row":"H01","Held family":"Current official §9(1)–(2)","P20 disposition":"Exact complete primary chain unresolved"},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"H02 Original decimalisation commencement","researcher_record":{"Row":"H02","Held family":"Original decimalisation commencement","P20 disposition":"1959 Act/proclamation body not obtained"},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"H03 Current §§15/18 monetary-law chain","researcher_record":{"Row":"H03","Held family":"Current §§15/18 monetary-law chain","P20 disposition":"Dated statutory body found; later amendments not exhaustively checked"},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"H04 Actual debt ownership, accrual, amount and liquidation","researcher_record":{"Row":"H04","Held family":"Actual debt ownership, accrual, amount and liquidation","P20 disposition":"Unknown; no records searched"},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"H05 Agency/representation authority","researcher_record":{"Row":"H05","Held family":"Agency/representation authority","P20 disposition":"No actual mandate assessed"},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"H06 Genuine dispute and private contractual defences","researcher_record":{"Row":"H06","Held family":"Genuine dispute and private contractual defences","P20 disposition":"Case-specific; not adjudicated"},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"H07 §149 jurisdiction","researcher_record":{"Row":"H07","Held family":"§149 jurisdiction","P20 disposition":"Existing hold preserved"},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"H08 Rule6, Master and service procedure","researcher_record":{"Row":"H08","Held family":"Rule6, Master and service procedure","P20 disposition":"Existing hold preserved; P19 not adopted"},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"H09 Insolvency, advantage, valuation and security","researcher_record":{"Row":"H09","Held family":"Insolvency, advantage, valuation and security","P20 disposition":"P18 scope retained; not rerun"},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"H10 Full current judicial citator","researcher_record":{"Row":"H10","Held family":"Full current judicial citator","P20 disposition":"Not performed"},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"H11 Foreign law/currency/jurisdiction","researcher_record":{"Row":"H11","Held family":"Foreign law/currency/jurisdiction","P20 disposition":"No foreign law adopted; no live FX conversion"},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"H12 Parent/country/A066/A097/A098 acceptance","researcher_record":{"Row":"H12","Held family":"Parent/country/A066/A097/A098 acceptance","P20 disposition":"Held"},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"Eastern Cape Unexamined locally","researcher_record":{"Province":"Eastern Cape","Status":"Unexamined locally","Next local question":"Applicable division, current practice direction and filing/service requirements"},"raw_table_index":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"Free State Unexamined locally","researcher_record":{"Province":"Free State","Status":"Unexamined locally","Next local question":"Same; a failed 2026 opinion fetch does not establish local procedure"},"raw_table_index":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"Gauteng Unexamined locally","researcher_record":{"Province":"Gauteng","Status":"Unexamined locally","Next local question":"Applicable seat, current electronic filing and procedural directions"},"raw_table_index":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"KwaZulu-Natal Not generally examined","researcher_record":{"Province":"KwaZulu-Natal","Status":"Not generally examined","Next local question":"Kurz is narrow published authority, not certification of all current local practice"},"raw_table_index":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"Limpopo Unexamined locally","researcher_record":{"Province":"Limpopo","Status":"Unexamined locally","Next local question":"Division/seat and current procedural requirements"},"raw_table_index":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"Mpumalanga Unexamined locally","researcher_record":{"Province":"Mpumalanga","Status":"Unexamined locally","Next local question":"Division/seat and current procedural requirements"},"raw_table_index":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"Northern Cape Unexamined locally","researcher_record":{"Province":"Northern Cape","Status":"Unexamined locally","Next local question":"Division/seat and current procedural requirements"},"raw_table_index":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"North West Unexamined locally","researcher_record":{"Province":"North West","Status":"Unexamined locally","Next local question":"Division/seat and current procedural requirements"},"raw_table_index":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"},{"topic":"Western Cape Unexamined locally","researcher_record":{"Province":"Western Cape","Status":"Unexamined locally","Next local question":"Division/seat and current procedural requirements"},"raw_table_index":13,"coordinator_acceptance":"not_accepted;first_review_queued"}],"annotations":{},"corrections":[],"resolved_corrections":[],"review_history":[]}