{"meta":{"key":"c_br--pass-22","task":"C_BR","title":"Ordinary civil agravo de instrumento and interlocutory-review gateway","parent_title":"Brazil consumer debt and resolution","edition":"pass-22","path":"/research/c_br--pass-22/","kind":"split_pass","category":"international","role":"country","area_numbers":[97,98],"groups":["global"],"date":"2026-10-27","tables":15,"claims":80,"sources":17,"review_status":"delegated_coordinator_scoped_review_selected_Tema988_primary_statutory_access_later_judicial_application_holds","review_complete":true,"sha256":"f8a535125629e6fe3926d45b9fffeb61e978c26dd52b3aa9eb20f943995468f5","headings":["Ordinary civil agravo de instrumento and interlocutory-review gateway","1.1 Statute and commencement","1.2 Material amendment/status crosswalk","2.1 Interlocutory decision versus sentence","2.2 Deferred review under art. 1.009 §1","3.1 Sole-paragraph procedural contexts","3.2 Special intervention limits","4.1 Actual full judgment obtained","4.2 The majority’s test","4.3 Application in the representative judgment","4.4 Temporal modulation","4.5 Preclusion: preserve the two different branches","Expressly appealable decisions","Exceptional unlisted decisions","4.6 Separate writings","4.7 Status limitation","5.1 Correcting the case value is not denying legal aid","5.2 Evidence inside a disregard incident is not automatically art. 1.015(IV)","5.3 An evidentiary ruling does not establish urgency by its label","5.4 Later authority is not a new repetitive thesis","6.1 Standing and adverse interest","6.2 Directly to the competent tribunal","6.3 Petition contents","6.4 Required instrument in the non-electronic branch","6.5 Authenticity and preservation","6.6 Electronic origin records","6.7 Filing channels","6.8 Missing pieces and other curable defects","7.1 Paper origin records","7.2 Consequence requires respondent allegation and proof","7.3 Later prejudice and proof qualification","7.4 Retraction and information from the originating judge","8.1 Ordinary appeal period","8.2 Electronic journal sequence","8.3 Calendar, suspension and just cause","8.4 Multiple parties and institutions","8.5 Local-holiday proof","8.6 Electronic filing time and unavailability","9.1 Ordinary preparation","9.2 Distinct correction branches","9.3 Aid requested on appeal versus review of an aid denial","10.1 Relator’s initial actions","10.2 Respondent’s response","10.3 Ministério Público","10.4 One-month scheduling direction","10.5 Submission alone is not suspension","Three different inquiries","10.6 Reasons, participation and evidence","10.7 Agravo interno is a different remedy","T01 — Ordinary fifteen-business-day appeal","T02 — Three-day paper-origin notification","T03 — Five-day documentary correction","Preserved literal record","PASS-22 narrow dispositions","Exact unresolved inputs for an actual application"],"generation_provenance":{"actual_route":"regular_chat_adaptive_models","actual_model":"GPT-6","actual_mode":"Pro","provenance_limit":"Actual documented capture labels only; missing labels remain unknown. No preferred setting is inferred as actual execution."},"public_id":"C_BR/pass-22","facets":{"geography":["international","c_br"],"debt_type":[],"stage":["appeal"],"subject":["appeals"]},"scope":"SettleADebt C_BR PASS-22 — SAME ORIGINAL AUTHORISED REGULAR CHAT. ONLY REVIEWED P01 D15 REMAINING ORDINARY CIVIL AGRAVO DE INSTRUMENTO / INTERLOCUTORY-REVIEW GATEWAY, CPC1015-1020 AND NECESSARY1009(1),1021BOUNDARY. No apelação or embargosdeclaração rerun.","pending_corrections":0},"markdown":"# SettleADebt C_BR PASS-22 — Brazil\n\n## Ordinary civil *agravo de instrumento* and interlocutory-review gateway\n\n**Reviewed component:** The ordinary interlocutory-review portion of P01 D15 only.\n\n**Actual fresh-access date:** **October 27, 2026, in both America/Los_Angeles and UTC.**\n**Exact source-opening clocks:** Unknown. Publication, signature, judgment and review-completion dates are not treated as source-opening timestamps.\n\n**Assumed setting:** A generic private consumer-money dispute proceeding under the ordinary CPC framework. Special-court, collective-consumer, insolvency, execution-specific merits and foreign-procedure questions remain separate.\n\nP18, P19, P20 and P21 are saved but unreviewed and supply no substantive premise. The supplied P01 review record is preserved as a scoped review boundary; this report does not invent a dated provider-permission certification or reopen the provider-perimeter investigation. Necessary procedural standing and representation provisions were read afresh.\n\n**Principal conclusion:** Immediate review ordinarily depends on one of four routes:\n\n1. an express category in CPC art. 1.015;\n2. an interlocutory decision in one of art. 1.015’s sole-paragraph contexts;\n3. another express statutory authorization; or\n4. the exceptional **Tema 988** route, where waiting for review through a later *apelação* would make review useless.\n\nMere inconvenience, increased litigation expense or disagreement with an evidentiary ruling does not automatically establish the fourth route. Availability of the appeal, admissibility of the filing, and entitlement to interim relief are separate questions. **C_BR-P22-C008–C030, C065–C069.** [Planalto+2](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\nNo actual person, entity, creditor, borrower, provider, contract, property, licence, account or private proceeding was investigated.\n\n# 1. Current primary framework\n\n## 1.1 Statute and commencement\n\nThe current compiled CPC was read at:\n\nhttps://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm\n\nThe operative chapter is **arts. 1.015–1.020**. Necessary linked provisions include decision classification, standing, representation, filing periods, preparation, electronic records, correction of defects, provisional appellate relief, deferred review and the *agravo interno* boundary.\n\nArticle 1.045 states that the Code enters into force one year after official publication; the official footer identifies DOU publication on March 17, 2015. Article 14 preserves completed procedural acts and established procedural situations. No exact original effective-date calculation or complete historical-case transition analysis is made. **C001.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 1.2 Material amendment/status crosswalk\n\n| Instrument | Material provision read | Status and limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **Lei 14.939/2024** | Arts. 1–2, amending CPC art. 1.003 §6 | Effective on publication, DOU July 31, 2024. Missing proof of a local holiday can be corrected, or the omission disregarded where the information is already in the electronic record. This does not cure actual lateness by inventing a holiday. |\n| **Lei 15.484/2026** | Relevant amendments to CPC art. 932 and linked qualified-precedent provisions; art. 7 | DOU extra August 4, 2026; 30-day vacatio. Operative by access. Relevant to the relator’s current precedent-based powers, not a replacement for arts. 1.015–1.020. Full special-appeal relevance procedure is deferred. |\n| **Lei 15.479/2026** | Material CPC changes and art. 4 | DOU July 30, 2026; one-year delayed commencement. **Enacted-future at access**, not applied as current interlocutory-review law. |\n| **Lei 11.419/2006** | Electronic filing, publication, digital evidence and system-unavailability provisions | Operative statute. Article 22 provides 90 days after publication; DOU December 20, 2006. Current CNJ channel allocation and each court’s implementation remain unexamined here. |\n\n**C002–C004, C046–C051.**\n\nFull primary URLs:\n\n- https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2024/lei/l14939.htm\n- https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15484.htm\n- https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15479.htm\n- https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2006/lei/l11419.htm\n\nThese reads establish the identified provisions and dates, not an exhaustive absence-of-amendment certificate. [Planalto+3](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2024/lei/l14939.htm)\n\n# 2. Classify the decision before choosing the remedy\n\n## 2.1 Interlocutory decision versus sentence\n\nCPC art. 203 distinguishes:\n\n- a **sentence**, subject to special procedures, that ends the ordinary cognitive phase on an art. 485 or 487 ground, or extinguishes execution;\n- an **interlocutory decision**, meaning another decisional judicial act; and\n- a **despacho**, a non-decisional procedural direction.\n\nA label such as “order,” “partial judgment” or “sentence” is not conclusive. The actual content and procedural effect control the classification. A genuine *despacho* is not appealable under art. 1.001. **C005.**\n\nA partial merits decision under art. 356 is challenged by *agravo de instrumento* under §5, even though it resolves part of the substantive dispute. The partial-termination branch in art. 354’s sole paragraph also uses *agravo*. A decision truly ending the relevant phase is not converted into an interlocutory decision merely because it arose during enforcement. **C006.**\n\nPrimary URL:\nhttps://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm, arts. 203, 354, 356 §5, 1.001 and 1.009. [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 2.2 Deferred review under art. 1.009 §1\n\nIn the ordinary cognitive phase, a question decided interlocutorily that **does not admit immediate agravo** is not lost merely because no unavailable immediate appeal was filed. It must be raised:\n\n- preliminarily in a later *apelação* against the final sentence; or\n- in the relevant *contrarrazões*.\n\nIf raised in *contrarrazões*, art. 1.009 §2 gives the appellant the specified opportunity to respond. A matter listed in art. 1.015 that instead appears as a chapter of the sentence is challenged through *apelação* under art. 1.009 §3.\n\nThis is a route boundary, not a complete appeal report. **C007.**\n\nPrimary URL: CPC compiled body, art. 1.009 §§1–3. [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n# 3. Every art. 1.015 branch\n\nThe following is the actual statutory list, including the vetoed item. The list identifies a route; it does not establish that any actual ruling fits it or that the appeal will succeed.\n\n| Article | Operative category | Exact qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **I** | Provisional relief—*tutelas provisórias* | The ruling must concern provisional relief. Appealability does not itself establish entitlement to a stay or affirmative relief. **C008.** |\n| **II** | Merits of the proceeding | Includes qualifying partial merits decisions; distinguish a sentence ending the phase. **C009.** |\n| **III** | Rejection of an allegation of an arbitration agreement | The text addresses rejection of that allegation. Acceptance that ends the proceeding may produce a different decisional classification. **C010.** |\n| **IV** | Incident of disregard of legal personality—*incidente de desconsideração da personalidade jurídica* | Do not assume every evidentiary direction issued within such an incident is independently covered; the later STJ qualification below matters. **C011.** |\n| **V** | Rejection of legal aid or acceptance of its revocation | This does not automatically include every ruling affecting litigation expense or the case value. **C012.** |\n| **VI** | Exhibition or possession of a document or thing | Actual document/thing-production content must be established. **C013.** |\n| **VII** | Exclusion of a co-party—*litisconsorte* | The wording is exclusion, not an unrestricted category for every joinder ruling. **C014.** |\n| **VIII** | Rejection of a request to limit joinder | Distinct from exclusion under VII. **C015.** |\n| **IX** | Admission or inadmission of third-party intervention | Must be read with special provisions, including the separate *amicus curiae* limitations in art. 138. **C016, C022.** |\n| **X** | Grant, modification or revocation of suspensive effect for *embargos à execução* | These are execution objections, not *embargos de declaração*. Full execution merits remain held. **C017.** |\n| **XI** | Redistribution of the burden of proof under art. 373 §1 | Not every decision about evidence is a burden-redistribution decision. **C018.** |\n| **XII** | **Vetoed** | No operative appeal category can be inferred from this number. **C019.** |\n| **XIII** | Other cases expressly referred to in law | The additional statutory authorization must actually be identified and read. **C020.** |\n\nPrimary URL:\nhttps://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm, art. 1.015(I)–(XIII); linked arts. 138 and 373 §1. [Planalto+2](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 3.1 Sole-paragraph procedural contexts\n\nArticle 1.015’s sole paragraph separately admits *agravo de instrumento* against interlocutory decisions in:\n\n| Context | Gateway consequence | Remaining limitation |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **Liquidation of a sentence** | The broader statutory interlocutory route applies. | Actual liquidation and merits rules remain separate. |\n| **Cumprimento de sentença** | The broader statutory interlocutory route applies. | A truly terminating sentence is not automatically an interlocutory ruling. |\n| **Execution proceedings** | The broader statutory interlocutory route applies. | Title, defenses, attachment and enforcement law are not cleared. |\n| **Inventário** | The broader statutory interlocutory route applies. | Estate, succession and probate merits remain separate. |\n\nAn appeal relying directly on one of these statutory contexts does not need to manufacture Tema 988 urgency merely to establish that statutory route. Ordinary standing, timeliness, preparation and other admissibility conditions still apply. **C021.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 3.2 Special intervention limits\n\nArticle 138 contains its own restrictions on *amicus curiae* participation and appeals. Therefore, art. 1.015(IX) is not a sufficient basis to announce that every admission or exclusion of every possible third-party participant is immediately appealable.\n\nThe full *amicus* and intervention jurisprudence is not completed here. **C022.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n# 4. Tema 988: full judgment, majority, modulation and preclusion\n\n## 4.1 Actual full judgment obtained\n\nThe full official published **REsp 1.704.520-MT**, one of Tema 988’s representative appeals, was obtained:\n\nhttps://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246\n\nIt is a **98-page official judgment document** containing the majority opinion, separate writings and final certificate.\n\n- **Court:** STJ Corte Especial.\n- **Judgment:** December 5, 2018.\n- **Publication:** DJe December 19, 2018.\n- **Majority:** Seven votes with the relator; five dissenting votes, as counted from the final certificate.\n- **Result:** Special appeal granted so the originating tribunal would process the interlocutory appeal concerning judicial competence, subject to the other admissibility requirements.\n- **Original context:** A forum/competence dispute arising from a franchise contract. No consumer-contract merits rule is imported from that context.\n\nThe full text was accessible and the material passages were read. Attempts to render screenshots of selected pages failed; **no pixel-review claim is made for this PDF**. The read bounds and printed/zero-based page references are recorded below. **C023, C027.** [STJ+1](https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246)\n\nThe official Tema registry also identifies the companion **REsp 1.696.396-MT**, the thesis, modulation and recorded finality. The companion’s official published summary was read, but its attempted full-PDF route failed. It is not misclassified as a full-body read.\n\n## 4.2 The majority’s test\n\nTema 988 characterizes the list as **taxatividade mitigada**. An unlisted interlocutory decision can be challenged immediately when urgency results from the **uselessness of reviewing the question only in the later appeal**.\n\nThe test is not simply:\n\n- the ruling is inconvenient;\n- the party will spend more money;\n- the party disagrees with the evidence ruling;\n- reversal later would require additional work; or\n- the litigation will take longer.\n\nThe applicant must identify why later review would fail to provide a useful remedy for the specific question. The tribunal must accept that exceptional predicate; the applicant’s assertion alone does not establish admissibility. **C024.**\n\nFull judgment, printed pp. 43–44 and 51–54; zero-based indices 42–43 and 50–53. [STJ+2](https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246)\n\n## 4.3 Application in the representative judgment\n\nThe majority treated the competence question as requiring prompt review: adjudication before a potentially incompetent court could make later review of that threshold issue ineffective. The result was not a ruling that the applicant necessarily won the competence dispute. It was an order that the tribunal process the interlocutory appeal if the other admission requirements were met.\n\n**C023–C024.** Full judgment, printed pp. 57–58; zero-based indices 56–57. [STJ](https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246)\n\n## 4.4 Temporal modulation\n\nThe majority limited the thesis to interlocutory decisions **issued after publication of the judgment**, December 19, 2018.\n\nThat criterion concerns the date of the challenged interlocutory decision—not simply the date the lawsuit began or the later appeal was filed. Historical cases require the actual decision and publication chronology. **C025.** [STJ+1](https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246)\n\n## 4.5 Preclusion: preserve the two different branches\n\n### Expressly appealable decisions\n\nThe majority explains that decisions with content within art. 1.015’s statutory immediate-review categories can become precluded if not challenged through the proper timely route. Article 1.009 §1 is not a universal rescue for an omitted expressly available appeal.\n\n### Exceptional unlisted decisions\n\nThe majority’s separate explanation for its urgency-based extension is narrower:\n\n- the party may attempt the exceptional immediate appeal;\n- the tribunal must positively admit it on the Tema 988 predicate;\n- once the question is admitted and decided, it is subject to the corresponding preclusion;\n- absent those conditions, the issue remains available for the later art. 1.009 challenge.\n\nThis is the majority’s actual discussion, not a statement that every interlocutory objection can safely be postponed. Nor does it make the practical harm of waiting disappear. **C026.**\n\nFull judgment, printed pp. 51–54; zero-based indices 50–53. [STJ+2](https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246)\n\n## 4.6 Separate writings\n\nThe document contains dissents by Justices Maria Thereza de Assis Moura, João Otávio de Noronha and Og Fernandes, with other listed members joining the dissenting outcome.\n\nThe separate writings objected, in substance, that:\n\n- the legislature deliberately restricted immediate interlocutory appeals;\n- a judicially created urgency exception could reproduce the broad appeal practice the new Code sought to limit;\n- uncertainty about urgency could encourage protective appeals from nearly every ruling; and\n- preclusion could become difficult to predict.\n\nThose objections are **dissents**, not the final rule. They are relevant to understanding why the majority carefully separated the statutory list, exceptional urgency and preclusion. **C027.**\n\nSelected separate-writing passages: printed pp. 68–69, 79–80 and 95–96; zero-based indices 67–68, 78–79 and 94–95. Final certificate: printed p. 98, zero-based index 97. [STJ+3](https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246)\n\n## 4.7 Status limitation\n\nThe official Tema registry records the thesis and finality on February 22, 2019. Its displayed theme update was February 17, 2023. Accessing that registry in 2026 does not turn its update field into proof of an exhaustive 2026 citator review.\n\nThe later judgments below were separately read to test material applications. No blanket “all later cases checked” conclusion is made. **C077.**\n\nOfficial registry:\n\nhttps://processo.stj.jus.br/repetitivos/temas_repetitivos/pesquisa.jsp?novaConsulta=true&num_processo_classe=1696396&sg_classe=REsp&tipo_pesquisa=T [Processo STJ](https://processo.stj.jus.br/repetitivos/temas_repetitivos/pesquisa.jsp?novaConsulta=true&num_processo_classe=1696396&sg_classe=REsp&tipo_pesquisa=T)\n\n# 5. Material later judicial applications\n\n## 5.1 Correcting the case value is not denying legal aid\n\nIn **REsp 2.186.037-AM**, the Third Panel unanimously held that correction of the amount assigned to the case was not automatically covered by art. 1.015(V), which concerns legal aid. The record did not establish Tema 988 urgency; later review remained useful.\n\n- **Judgment:** March 20, 2025.\n- **Document signature:** March 24, 2025.\n- **Publication:** March 26, 2025.\n- **Result:** Special appeal partly known and, to that extent, denied.\n\nThe distinction matters: increased costs alone do not turn a valuation ruling into an aid-denial order. The judgment’s discussion of later remedies is not a promise of an actual refund. **C028.**\n\nhttps://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=26/03/2025&num_registro=202401922245 [STJ+1](https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=26%2F03%2F2025&num_registro=202401922245)\n\n## 5.2 Evidence inside a disregard incident is not automatically art. 1.015(IV)\n\nIn **REsp 2.182.040-SP**, the Third Panel distinguished a ruling permitting expert evidence inside an incident of disregard of legal personality from a ruling deciding the incident itself. The court did not treat every evidentiary direction within the incident as automatically appealable under item IV, and no sufficient Tema 988 urgency was established.\n\n- **Judgment:** June 10, 2025.\n- **Acórdão signature:** June 11, 2025.\n- **Publication:** June 16, 2025.\n- **Result:** Appeal denied.\n\nThe incident’s own cognitive character and the precise challenged act mattered. It would be unsafe to infer that any reference to an execution proceeding in the surrounding litigation automatically removes that classification problem. **C029.**\n\nhttps://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=16/06/2025&num_registro=202404368455 [STJ+1](https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=16%2F06%2F2025&num_registro=202404368455)\n\n## 5.3 An evidentiary ruling does not establish urgency by its label\n\nIn **REsp 2.242.573-RS**, the Fourth Panel examined an accounting-expertise issue in a PASEP dispute. The lower court had deferred the expertise to a later quantification stage if liability were established. The STJ did not find a basis to overturn the conclusion that immediate review was unnecessary; the factual-review restrictions were also material.\n\n- **Session:** March 10–16, 2026.\n- **Acórdão:** March 17, 2026.\n- **Publication:** March 19, 2026.\n- **Result:** Special appeal partly known and denied in the known part; unanimous.\n\nThis does not establish that every evidence refusal is unappealable, or that every party must wait until liquidation. The actual evidentiary ruling, procedural stage and loss of useful review must be demonstrated. **C030.**\n\nhttps://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?num_registro=202504167899 [STJ](https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?num_registro=202504167899)\n\n## 5.4 Later authority is not a new repetitive thesis\n\nThese panel decisions apply the existing framework to particular procedural records. They do not replace Tema 988 with a universal rule that all case-value, evidence or disregard-incident questions are either appealable or unappealable.\n\nNo substantive consumer, PASEP, corporate-liability or debt-merits conclusion is imported.\n\n# 6. Actor, tribunal, petition and record\n\n## 6.1 Standing and adverse interest\n\nCPC art. 996 permits an appeal by:\n\n- the unsuccessful party;\n- a prejudiced third party; or\n- the Ministério Público in the legally relevant role.\n\nA third party must demonstrate the possibility that the decision affects a right the third party claims or is authorized to litigate as substitute. Article 17 separately requires interest and standing. Mere dissatisfaction or business involvement is not enough. **C031.**\n\nProcedural capacity, assistance and representation are governed by arts. 70–76 and 103–105. Article 76 provides a correction mechanism for qualifying representation defects; failure to comply can lead to non-admission of the appellant’s appeal. No actual mandate or professional status is examined. **C032.**\n\nPrimary URL: CPC compiled body, arts. 17, 70–76, 103–105 and 996. [Planalto+3](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 6.2 Directly to the competent tribunal\n\nArticle 1.016 directs the *agravo de instrumento* to the **competent tribunal**. The actual reviewing court and its jurisdiction, distribution, internal chamber and filing system depend on the originating proceeding.\n\nThis differs from an *apelação* lodged at origin. Article 1.017 §2 nevertheless recognizes several lawful filing channels, discussed below. **C033.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 6.3 Petition contents\n\nArticle 1.016 requires:\n\n1. the parties’ names;\n2. the facts and legal basis;\n3. reasons for reforming or invalidating the challenged ruling and the requested result; and\n4. the names and complete addresses of the lawyers appearing in the case.\n\nThe petition must identify the challenged decision and explain both the proper immediate-review route and the alleged error. An urgency narrative that establishes appealability does not, by itself, prove the merits. **C034.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 6.4 Required instrument in the non-electronic branch\n\nArticle 1.017(I) lists copies of:\n\n- the initial petition;\n- the contestation;\n- the motion that generated the challenged ruling;\n- the challenged ruling;\n- its notification certificate or another official document proving timeliness; and\n- powers of attorney given to the appellant’s and respondent’s lawyers.\n\nIf one of those documents does not exist, counsel provides the art. 1.017(II) declaration under personal responsibility. Other useful documents may be added.\n\nA declaration of nonexistence is not a substitute for a document that exists but was inconvenient to obtain. **C035–C036.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 6.5 Authenticity and preservation\n\nCPC art. 425(IV) recognizes copies of judicial-record pieces declared authentic by the lawyer under personal responsibility, if authenticity is not challenged. Article 425(VI) addresses digital reproductions subject to a reasoned allegation of adulteration. The linked preservation rules require retention of originals for the applicable period.\n\nThese provisions do not certify a particular copy, signature or electronic account. **C037.**\n\nPrimary URL: CPC compiled body, art. 425(IV), (VI) and §1. [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 6.6 Electronic origin records\n\nIf the **underlying proceeding’s records are electronic**, art. 1.017 §5 dispenses with the mandatory pieces and nonexistence declarations in items I and II. The appellant may attach documents useful to understanding the dispute.\n\nThe condition is not satisfied merely because the appeal itself is filed electronically. The origin record’s format and accessibility matter. **C038.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 6.7 Filing channels\n\nWithin the appeal period, art. 1.017 §2 recognizes:\n\n- direct filing at the competent tribunal;\n- filing in the originating comarca, judicial section or subsection;\n- registered post with acknowledgment;\n- fax-type transmission under the governing law; and\n- another legally provided method.\n\nFor fax or similar transmission, §4 requires the accompanying pieces when the original petition is filed. These provisions are not a guarantee that a court with mandatory electronic filing will accept every physical channel without its applicable rules. **C039.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 6.8 Missing pieces and other curable defects\n\nArticle 1.017 §3 requires application of art. 932’s sole paragraph when a required copy is missing or another curable defect compromises admissibility. The appellant must receive **five days** to correct the defect or supplement required documentation.\n\nThis does not automatically cure:\n\n- an actually late appeal;\n- absence of a proper appeal route;\n- every substantive failure to challenge the ruling; or\n- the separately regulated failure to perform art. 1.018’s origin-notification act.\n\n**C040.** [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n# 7. Notification to the originating court: art. 1.018\n\n## 7.1 Paper origin records\n\nFor non-electronic origin records, the appellant must, within **three procedural days from filing the agravo**, place in the originating record:\n\n- a copy of the appeal petition;\n- proof that the appeal was filed; and\n- the list of documents forming the instrument.\n\nThis is a separate period from the ordinary appeal deadline. **C041.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 7.2 Consequence requires respondent allegation and proof\n\nArticle 1.018 §3 ties inadmissibility to the respondent **asserting and proving** the failure. It is not phrased as an unrestricted ex officio dismissal ground.\n\nIn **REsp 1.749.958-RS**, the Third Panel applied the paper-origin requirement even though the appeal itself was electronic and rejected importing the art. 1.017 §3 documentary-cure rule to this distinct statutory act.\n\n- Judgment: September 18, 2018.\n- Publication: September 21, 2018.\n- Unanimous; dismissal maintained on the record examined.\n\n**C042.**\n\nhttps://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=21/09/2018&num_registro=201800907539 [STJ](https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=21%2F09%2F2018&num_registro=201800907539)\n\n## 7.3 Later prejudice and proof qualification\n\nIn **REsp 1.758.943-SP**, the Third Panel reversed an inadmissibility result where the respondent’s proof and the demonstrated procedural prejudice did not justify that result in the record before it. The judgment emphasized the purpose of the communication and the respondent’s actual ability to defend.\n\n- Judgment: June 23, 2020.\n- Publication: June 26, 2020.\n- Unanimous.\n\nThis is not permission to ignore the three-day duty. It means the statutory allegation/proof conditions and the actual procedural effect must be examined rather than mechanically treating every accusation of noncompliance as established.\n\n**C043.**\n\nhttps://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=26/06/2020&num_registro=201800452722 [STJ](https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=26%2F06%2F2020&num_registro=201800452722)\n\n## 7.4 Retraction and information from the originating judge\n\nIf the originating judge communicates that the challenged ruling has been **entirely reformed**, art. 1.018 §1 directs the relator to treat the appeal as *prejudicado*—without a remaining object.\n\nPartial reform does not automatically establish complete mootness. The remaining challenged issues must be identified.\n\nThe current arts. 1.018–1.020 do not supply a separate universal “judge must report within X days” rule. Additional information or evidence may be obtained through the relator’s applicable direction and diligence powers; the actual order controls.\n\n**C044, C070–C071.** [Planalto+2](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n# 8. Deadlines and notification boundaries\n\n## 8.1 Ordinary appeal period\n\nThe ordinary filing period is **15 business days**, combining art. 1.003 §5 with art. 219. The trigger is the legally effective intimation of the relevant lawyer, law firm, public advocacy, Defensoria or Ministério Público, subject to the applicable statutory branch.\n\nA judge’s signature date, an informal email or the date a client first hears about the ruling is not automatically the legal trigger. **C045–C046.** [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 8.2 Electronic journal sequence\n\nLei 11.419 art. 4 distinguishes:\n\n1. availability in the electronic journal;\n2. deemed publication on the following business day; and\n3. counting beginning on the next business day after publication.\n\nPersonal portal notifications and current national/local electronic channels may have different rules. Those channel rules are not supplied from unreviewed P18.\n\n**C046.**\n\nhttps://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2006/lei/l11419.htm, art. 4 §§2–4. [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2006/lei/l11419.htm)\n\n## 8.3 Calendar, suspension and just cause\n\nCPC arts. 216 and 219–224 distinguish business days, court holidays, exclusion of the starting day, inclusion of the endpoint, the December 20–January 20 suspension, qualifying obstruction and proved just cause.\n\nA remaining period preserved by suspension is not necessarily a new full period. The specific art. 1.004 death/force-majeure restoration rule must not be generalized to every missed filing. **C047.** [Planalto+3](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 8.4 Multiple parties and institutions\n\nArticle 229 can double periods for qualifying co-parties with different lawyers from different law offices, but:\n\n- its statutory cessation qualification must be considered; and\n- the doubling does **not** apply to electronic proceedings.\n\nThe Ministério Público, listed public-law entities and Defensoria have separate statutory period and personal-notification rules, subject to express special periods. Public ownership of a company or private legal assistance does not automatically establish the relevant status.\n\n**C048–C049.** [Planalto+2](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 8.5 Local-holiday proof\n\nUnder current art. 1.003 §6, the appellant should prove a local holiday at filing. If the document is omitted, the tribunal must order correction, or may disregard the omission if the information is already in the electronic record.\n\nNo holiday was verified in this report. The rule does not create a nonexistent holiday or guarantee that an actually late appeal becomes timely. **C050.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2024/lei/l14939.htm)\n\n## 8.6 Electronic filing time and unavailability\n\nLei 11.419 arts. 3 and 10 recognize transmission through the court’s system and the final-day 24:00 rule. CPC art. 213 requires the legally relevant court timezone. Official judicial-system unavailability has its statutory treatment.\n\nA user’s own device or internet problem is not automatically an official system outage. The actual filing channel, timestamp, court timezone, outage certificate and local implementation remain held. **C051.** [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2006/lei/l11419.htm)\n\n# 9. Preparation, legal aid and cure\n\n## 9.1 Ordinary preparation\n\nArticles 1.017 §1 and 1.007 require proof of the applicable costs and return transport charges when due, according to the tribunal’s published schedule.\n\nNo fee amount or percentage is established here. Electronic records dispense with remittance/return transport charges under art. 1.007 §3, not with every possible court fee. Statutory public-actor and other legal exemptions must be classified precisely. **C052–C053.** [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 9.2 Distinct correction branches\n\n| Defect | Statutory response | Limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **Insufficient preparation paid** | Counsel is intimated to supplement within **five days**. | Article 1.007 §2. |\n| **No proof of preparation at filing** | Counsel is intimated for payment in double. | Section 4 itself does **not** specify a numeric period; inspect the order and applicable general rule. |\n| **Insufficient doubled payment** | Section 5 bars further supplementation of the §4 doubled payment. | No unlimited cure cycle. |\n| **Proved just impediment** | Relator may relieve desertion and allow **five days** for payment. | The impediment and ruling must be established. |\n| **Error completing the payment guide** | Not automatic desertion; where payment is doubtful, correction is allowed within **five days**. | Does not excuse every missing or late payment. |\n\n**C054–C058.**\n\nPrimary URL:\nhttps://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm, art. 1.007 §§2, 4–7. [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 9.3 Aid requested on appeal versus review of an aid denial\n\nUnder art. 99 §7, a party requesting legal aid in the appeal does not initially have to prove preparation. The relator decides the request and, if refusing it, fixes a payment period. That subsection does not itself prescribe a universal five-day period.\n\nUnder art. 101:\n\n- denial of aid or acceptance of revocation is challenged by *agravo de instrumento*, unless the issue is decided in a sentence;\n- while that preliminary issue is unresolved, the appellant is exempt from the costs described there;\n- if the refusal or revocation is confirmed, §2 requires payment within **five days**, subject to its non-admission consequence.\n\nThese are different procedural branches. **C059–C060.** [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\nThe natural-person insufficiency presumption and a legal person’s evidentiary burden are not interchangeable. No actual resources, fee waiver or legal-aid order is assessed.\n\n# 10. Tribunal processing, response and interim relief\n\n## 10.1 Relator’s initial actions\n\nAfter immediate distribution, and unless the preliminary art. 932(III)–(IV) route applies, art. 1.019 provides a **five-day period for the relator** to take the specified initial steps.\n\nThat is an institutional processing direction, not an appellant’s additional filing period or an automatic grant if the court takes longer. **C063.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 10.2 Respondent’s response\n\nUnder art. 1.019(II), the respondent is notified:\n\n- personally by registered letter with acknowledgment if not represented by counsel; or\n- through the official journal or registered letter directed to counsel.\n\nThe respondent has **15 days** to respond and may attach documents considered necessary. This does not authorize the researcher to infer actual receipt or compute a live deadline. **C061.**\n\nThe response is not an adhesive *agravo de instrumento*: art. 997 §2(II) does not list this remedy among the appeals admitting adhesion. An independently adverse ruling requires its own appropriate timely challenge. **C073.** [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 10.3 Ministério Público\n\nWhere intervention is legally required, art. 1.019(III) directs notification, preferably electronically, for a **15-day** manifestation.\n\nThis express period must be read with art. 180 §2, which excludes automatic doubling where the law expressly gives the Ministério Público its own period. Ordinary private money litigation does not automatically require MP intervention. **C062.** [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 10.4 One-month scheduling direction\n\nArticle 1.020 directs the relator to request a hearing date within **one month from the respondent’s notification**.\n\n“One month” is not “30 business days,” and this provision is not a guarantee that the appeal will be finally decided within a month. No actual month-end calculation or court-agenda prediction is made. **C064.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 10.5 Submission alone is not suspension\n\nArticle 995 supplies the general rule that appeals do not prevent the decision from taking effect unless law or a judicial decision provides otherwise.\n\nUnder art. 1.019(I), the relator may:\n\n- suspend the challenged decision; or\n- grant all or part of the affirmative provisional relief sought on appeal,\n\ncommunicating the decision to the originating judge.\n\n**C065, C069.** [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n### Three different inquiries\n\n| Inquiry | Required showing |\n| --- | --- |\n| **Tema 988 appealability of an unlisted issue** | Later review would be useless. |\n| **Suspension under art. 995 sole paragraph** | Probability of success **and** risk of grave harm that is difficult or impossible to repair. |\n| **Affirmative urgency relief under art. 300** | Probability of the right **and** danger of harm or risk to the useful result; applicable security and irreversibility qualifications also matter. |\n\nThe same facts may be relevant to more than one test, but satisfying one is not automatic satisfaction of the others. **C024, C066–C068.** [STJ+2](https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246)\n\nArticle 300 permits appropriate real or personal security where necessary, with the stated economic-insufficiency qualification. Anticipatory relief faces the statutory irreversibility limitation. No deposit, bond or security amount is invented.\n\n## 10.6 Reasons, participation and evidence\n\nThe relator’s admissibility and merits powers are governed by art. 932, including the current qualified-precedent wording. Articles 9–11, 489, 933 and 938 preserve reasons, relevant opportunities to be heard and correction/evidence procedures.\n\nUrgent interim relief may be considered before an opposing response under the applicable statutory exception, but that does not eliminate the later adversarial process.\n\nArticle 937(VIII) expressly provides oral argument for the specified provisional-relief *agravo* category; other oral-argument possibilities depend on law and court rules. It is not a universal oral-argument entitlement for every interlocutory appeal. **C069–C071.** [Planalto+2](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 10.7 *Agravo interno* is a different remedy\n\nArticle 1.021 addresses a relator’s decision within the tribunal, with review by the competent collegiate body and specific attack on the challenged grounds.\n\nThat is different from the art. 1.015 appeal against a qualifying first-instance interlocutory decision. Its complete processing and sanction rules are not rerun here. No internal-appeal sanction is treated as an automatic charge for filing an *agravo de instrumento*. **C072.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n# 11. Sixteen fictional workflows\n\nAll actors, proceedings, amounts and documents below are invented. No actual filing, deadline, liability or appellate result is determined.\n\n| Workflow | Actor, ruling and primary route | Conditional result, adverse branch and exact next question |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **H01 — Provisional relief denied** | A defendant requests urgent relief in an ordinary debt dispute; the judge denies it. **C008, C065–C068.** | Item I supplies an immediate-route candidate. A stay or affirmative appellate order still needs its separate predicates. **Missing:** ruling, evidence and risk. **Next:** What relief was actually requested, and what harm would occur before ordinary adjudication? |\n| **H02 — Partial merits versus ending sentence** | The judge decides one separable merits component while another continues. **C005–C006, C009.** | Article 356 §5 points to *agravo*. If the decision actually ends the relevant phase, the route may be *apelação*. **Missing:** full dispositive text and remaining issues. **Next:** What remains for first-instance decision? |\n| **H03 — Arbitration objection rejected** | A party invokes an arbitration agreement; the judge rejects the objection and keeps the case. **C010.** | Item III applies to the rejection branch. Acceptance ending the case is not assumed to use the same route. **Missing:** agreement, objection and ruling. **Next:** Did the judge reject arbitration or terminate the action because of it? |\n| **H04 — Case value increased** | The judge corrects the case value, increasing fees, but does not refuse legal aid. **C012, C028.** | Item V is not automatically available. Tema 988 requires more than labeling additional expense urgent. **Missing:** valuation ruling, aid request and actual loss of useful later review. **Next:** Why would later correction be useless rather than merely inconvenient? |\n| **H05 — Burden redistributed** | The judge expressly reallocates proof under art. 373 §1. **C018.** | Item XI is a candidate. An ordinary order to produce an existing document may fall under another category or require separate analysis. **Missing:** exact burden ruling and reasons. **Next:** Was the legal burden changed, or only a specific evidentiary act ordered? |\n| **H06 — Expert examination deferred** | Accounting expertise is postponed to a later phase if liability is established. **C024, C030.** | No automatic immediate route from the word “evidence.” Show why later review cannot remedy the issue. **Adverse:** the ruling may prevent essential proof of liability now. **Next:** Which fact must be proved now, and why can the proposed later stage not address it? |\n| **H07 — Unlisted irreversible disclosure** | An interlocutory order would publicly disclose information that, once released, cannot be made secret again. **C024–C026.** | This can illustrate the majority’s useless-later-review concern, but actual confidentiality and disclosure facts are required. **Adverse:** disclosure may be lawful, already public or avoidable by another measure. **Next:** What irreversible informational effect would occur before later appeal? |\n| **H08 — Unlisted scheduling inconvenience** | A party dislikes the order of evidence-taking but identifies no loss of useful later review. **C007, C024–C026.** | Deferred review may remain the route. Mere inconvenience does not establish Tema 988 urgency. **Missing:** concrete prejudice and available later correction. **Next:** What remedy would become impossible if review waited? |\n| **H09 — Evidence within disregard incident** | The judge orders expert evidence inside a disregard-of-personality incident. **C011, C029.** | Item IV does not automatically cover every evidentiary direction. **Adverse:** the ruling may also decide the incident or independently fit another branch. **Next:** Did it determine disregard, or only manage evidence? |\n| **H10 — Missing required copy** | A timely paper-record appeal omits the motion that generated the ruling. **C035, C040.** | A curable missing-piece defect receives the statutory correction opportunity. **Adverse:** the appeal itself may be late or use the wrong route, which a copy does not fix. **Next:** Is the omitted document the only admission defect? |\n| **H11 — Contestation does not yet exist** | The decision occurs before the respondent has filed a contestation. **C036.** | Counsel may declare actual nonexistence under personal responsibility. **Adverse:** a contestation exists but was overlooked. **Next:** Does the originating record confirm that no such document existed when the appeal was filed? |\n| **H12 — Electronic appeal, paper origin** | The appeal is electronic, but the first-instance record is paper. The appellant omits origin notification. **C038, C041–C043.** | Electronic appeal filing alone does not remove the three-day duty. Respondent allegation/proof and the actual procedural effect must be assessed. **Next:** What were the origin record’s format, filing date and proof of communication? |\n| **H13 — Electronic origin** | The first-instance proceeding is genuinely electronic and accessible. **C038–C040.** | Section 5 dispenses with the specified mandatory pieces/declaration; useful documents can still be attached. **Adverse:** the record is hybrid or inaccessible to the reviewing body. **Next:** What does the official system show about the origin record and access? |\n| **H14 — Stay requested** | A party files an admissible appeal and requests suspension of the challenged order. **C065–C069.** | Filing alone does not suspend. The relator assesses the statutory probability/harm predicates. **Adverse:** stopping the order may itself create serious harm or irreversible relief. **Next:** What precisely must be suspended, for how long, and on what evidence? |\n| **H15 — Relator refuses interim relief** | The appellate relator denies a stay. The party proposes another *agravo de instrumento* against that decision. **C072.** | The art. 1.021 internal route is the relevant boundary, not a new first-instance instrument appeal. **Missing:** decision and applicable internal rules. **Next:** Is the challenged act from the first-instance judge or the tribunal’s relator? |\n| **H16 — Enforcement-stage order versus termination** | One ruling manages an ongoing *cumprimento*; another actually extinguishes it. **C005, C021.** | The first can fall under the sole paragraph; the second must be classified as a possible sentence. **Missing:** complete disposition and what remains pending. **Next:** Did the ruling merely resolve an incident or end the execution phase? |\n\n**Workflow count: 16.**\n\n# 12. Three conditional computations\n\nNo actual calendar, fee schedule, court order or electronic certificate was checked.\n\n## T01 — Ordinary fifteen-business-day appeal\n\n**Stipulations:** A valid intimation occurs on **Monday, March 2, 2026**. The ordinary 15-business-day period applies; there is no doubled period, recess, interruption, holiday or closure.\n\n- Day 0, excluded: March 2.\n- March 3–6: days 1–4.\n- March 9–13: days 5–9.\n- March 16–20: days 10–14.\n- March 23: day 15.\n\nConditional endpoint = Monday, March 23, 2026\n\nIf March 6 were an applicable court closure, with every other assumption unchanged:\n\nConditional endpoint = Tuesday, March 24, 2026\n\nThis does not determine the correct notification channel or actual final filing instant. **C074.**\n\nSource: CPC arts. 219, 224 and 1.003 §5, full CPC URL above. [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## T02 — Three-day paper-origin notification\n\n**Stipulations:** The *agravo* is filed on **Friday, March 6, 2026**; the origin record is not electronic; no holiday or closure intervenes.\n\n- Day 0: March 6.\n- Monday, March 9: day 1.\n- Tuesday, March 10: day 2.\n- Wednesday, March 11: day 3.\n\nConditional art. 1.018 §2 endpoint = Wednesday, March 11, 2026\n\nIf March 10 is an applicable closure:\n\nConditional endpoint = Thursday, March 12, 2026\n\nThis period starts from filing the appeal, not from the original decision’s intimation. It is separate from the 15-day appeal period. **C075.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## T03 — Five-day documentary correction\n\n**Stipulations:** A valid relator’s notice under arts. 1.017 §3 and 932 sole paragraph is received on **Monday, March 9, 2026**. It concerns a genuinely curable missing document; no special period or closure applies.\n\n- Day 0: March 9.\n- March 10: day 1.\n- March 11: day 2.\n- March 12: day 3.\n- March 13: day 4.\n- March 16: day 5.\n\nConditional correction endpoint = Monday, March 16, 2026\n\nIf March 13 is an applicable closure:\n\nConditional endpoint = Tuesday, March 17, 2026\n\nThis does not establish that an omitted art. 1.018 act, an actually late appeal or a wrong remedy becomes curable. **C076.** [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\nNo monetary example is forced: actual preparation requires the competent tribunal’s fee schedule, which was not read.\n\n# 13. Exact P01 D15 crosswalk\n\n## Preserved literal record\n\n| # | Named deferred family | Gateway reference/status | Exact next research action |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **D15** | **Court/service/default/judgment/appeal beyond capacity** | **C027, C030; Deferred** | **Map CPC, local procedure, notice, default and appeal rules in a separate litigation review.** |\n\nCoordinator status remains explicit_deferred_hold_preserved.\n\n## PASS-22 narrow dispositions\n\n| D15 component | PASS-22 addition | Remaining gate |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Decision classification | Interlocutory, partial merits, sentence and despacho boundaries identified. | Actual decision and procedural stage. |\n| Immediate appealability | Every art. 1.015 item and sole-paragraph context identified. | Actual statutory fit and special law. |\n| Unlisted questions | Full Tema 988 majority, modulation, preclusion discussion and dissents read. | Concrete useless-later-review urgency and later treatment. |\n| Filing and record | Tribunal, petition, copies, authenticity and electronic-origin rules identified. | Actual mandate, instrument and local system. |\n| Origin communication | Three-day paper-record duty and qualified consequences identified. | Actual filing, respondent proof and procedural prejudice. |\n| Timing, costs and response | Ordinary periods, cure and legal-aid branches identified. | Actual notice, calendar, fee schedule and orders. |\n| Provisional appellate relief | Suspension and affirmative-relief predicates separated from appealability. | Actual evidence and relator’s order. |\n| Other litigation components | Not adopted or completed here. | P18–P21 review, full higher appeals, reopening and enforcement remain separate. |\n\n**Crosswalk count: nine logical items and nine physical data rows—one preserved record plus eight dispositions.**\n\n# 14. Source register\n\n**Access metadata for every row:** October 27, 2026 in Pacific time and UTC. Exact source-opening clocks unknown.\n\n“Full judgment” describes the official document obtained. It does not imply independent review of every quoted authority or every unrelated passage.\n\n| Source ID | Issuer/title and full literal URL | Actual body read, status, publication and limits |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **C_BR-P22-S001** | Presidência, **CPC, Lei 13.105/2015, compiled**. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm | **Fresh operative selected body.** Material arts. 9–11, 14, 17, 70–76, 98–105, 138, 180, 183, 186, 203, 213, 216, 218–224, 229, 272, 298–300, 354, 356 §5, 373 §1, 425, 489 §1, 927, 932–933, 937–938, 994–1009, 1015–1021 and 1045/footer. DOU March 17, 2015; one-year original vacatio. HTML; printed page/PDF index N/A. No full provider, apelação, ED, service, execution or higher-appeal survey. |\n| **S002** | Presidência, **Lei 14.939/2024**. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2024/lei/l14939.htm | **Fresh amendment.** Arts. 1–2/footer; art. 1003 §6. DOU July 31, 2024; effect on publication. HTML; page/index N/A. |\n| **S003** | Presidência, **Lei 15.484/2026**. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15484.htm | **Fresh limited amendment.** Relevant 927/932 changes, arts. 4–7/footer. DOU extra August 4, 2026; 30-day vacatio; operative by access. Full relevance regime not researched. |\n| **S004** | Presidência, **Lei 15.479/2026**. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15479.htm | **Fresh enacted-future boundary.** Material amendment/commencement text, art. 4/footer. DOU July 30, 2026; one-year vacatio. Not applied as current interlocutory-review law. |\n| **S005** | Presidência, **Lei 11.419/2006**. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2006/lei/l11419.htm | **Fresh limited electronic-procedure body.** Arts. 2–5, 8–11, 22/footer, materially filing, publication, digital copies and system unavailability. DOU December 20, 2006; 90-day original vacatio. Current CNJ/local channel implementation held. |\n| **S006** | STJ Corte Especial, **REsp 1.704.520-MT — Tema 988 full judgment**. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246 | **Fresh full official judgment, relevant text read.** 98-page PDF. Judgment December 5, 2018; DJe December 19. Ementa/result pp. 1–3, indices 0–2; selected majority passages pp. 43–44, 51–54, 57–58, indices 42–43, 50–53, 56–57; selected dissents pp. 68–69, 79–80, 95–96, indices 67–68, 78–79, 94–95; final certificate p. 98, index 97. Printed footer’s total-page denominator is malformed (“de 10”); numeric page and PDF index are kept distinct. Screenshot attempts at indices 2, 52 and 97 failed; parsed body was readable. **No pixel review claimed.** |\n| **S007** | STJ, **Tema Repetitivo 988 registry**. https://processo.stj.jus.br/repetitivos/temas_repetitivos/pesquisa.jsp?novaConsulta=true&num_processo_classe=1696396&sg_classe=REsp&tipo_pesquisa=T | **Fresh official thesis/status register.** Thesis, two representative appeals, judgment/publication, modulation and recorded finality February 22, 2019 read. Displayed update February 17, 2023. HTML; page/index N/A. Not an exhaustive 2026 citator. |\n| **S008** | STJ, **REsp 2.242.573-RS**. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?num_registro=202504167899 | **Fresh published full-judgment document, selected passages.** Fourth Panel unanimous; session March 10–16, 2026; acórdão March 17; DJEN March 19. Seven PDF pages. Ementa index 0, reasons 2–4, certificate 5–6; screenshot index 0 inspected. Printed folios not reliably displayed. Accounting-evidence/PASEP context; no substantive account rule adopted. |\n| **S009** | STJ, **REsp 2.186.037-AM**. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=26/03/2025&num_registro=202401922245 | **Fresh published full-judgment document, selected passages.** Third Panel unanimous; actual session March 20, 2025; signature March 24; publication March 26. Eleven pages. Ementa/result 0–1, reasons 6–9, certificate 10; screenshot 1 inspected. Printed folios not reliably displayed. Case value versus legal aid; no actual cost reimbursement promised. |\n| **S010** | STJ, **REsp 2.182.040-SP**. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=16/06/2025&num_registro=202404368455 | **Fresh published full-judgment document, selected passages.** Third Panel unanimous; June 10, 2025; signature June 11; publication June 16. Six pages. Ementa 0, reasons 3–4, certificate 5; screenshot 0 inspected. Evidentiary ruling inside disregard incident; no blanket corporate-liability conclusion. |\n| **S011** | STJ, **REsp 1.749.958-RS**. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=21/09/2018&num_registro=201800907539 | **Fresh published full-judgment document, selected passages.** Third Panel unanimous; September 18, 2018; DJe September 21. Thirteen PDF pages. Ementa/result indices 0–2; relevant reasons 6–10. Screenshot 1 inspected, displaying printed p. 2 with inconsistent total denominator. Origin-paper notification requirement; electronic appeal alone insufficient. |\n| **S012** | STJ, **REsp 1.758.943-SP**. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=26/06/2020&num_registro=201800452722 | **Fresh published full-judgment document, selected passages.** Third Panel unanimous; June 23, 2020; DJe June 26. Ten pages. Ementa index 0; reasons 6–8; result 9. Screenshot 0 inspected, displaying printed p. 1 with inconsistent total denominator. Respondent proof/prejudice and instrumentality; no permission to ignore art. 1018. |\n| **S013** | STJ, **“Novas decisões do STJ sobre o cabimento do agravo de instrumento no regime do CPC/2015”**. https://www.stj.jus.br/sites/portalp/Paginas/Comunicacao/Noticias/2026/22022026-Novas-decisoes-do-STJ-sobre-o-cabimento-do-agravo-de-instrumento-no-regime-do-CPC2015.aspx | **Fresh official overview/discovery**, February 22, 2026. Used to locate later judgments. Their actual bodies, not the overview alone, support the findings. HTML; page/index N/A. |\n| **S014** | STJ, **REsp 1.696.396-MT published ementa/disposition**. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/jurisprudencia/toc.jsp?O=JT&b=ACOR&livre=201702262874.REG.+E+19/12/2018.FONT. | **Fresh official judgment-summary/disposition only.** Companion Tema 988 authority; December 5/19, 2018 judgment/publication. Not represented as the full votes. S006 is the actual full representative judgment read. |\n| **S015** | STJ, **attempted full REsp 1.696.396-MT**. https://ww2.stj.jus.br/websecstj/cgi/revista/REJ.cgi/ITA?CodOrgaoJgdr=&SeqCgrmaSessao=&dt=20181219&formato=PDF&nreg=201702262874&salvar=false&seq=1731780&tipo=0 | **Failed full-body route.** No full-body access claimed. The different representative judgment S006 and official records S007/S014 were obtained. Page/index for this failed route unknown. |\n| **S016** | STJ, **attempted EREsp 1.730.436-SP body**. https://www.stj.jus.br/websecstj/cgi/revista/REJ.cgi/ITA?CodOrgaoJgdr=&SeqCgrmaSessao=&dt=20210903&formato=PDF&nreg=201800568774&salvar=false&seq=2086408&tipo=0 | **Failed body.** Search text not adopted as a holding. One different official alternate, S017, was attempted. |\n| **S017** | STJ, **official alternate for EREsp 1.730.436-SP**. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=03/09/2021&num_registro=201800568774 | **Failed alternate body.** No holding or currentness conclusion adopted from it. No further retry loop or workaround. |\n\n**Source-register count: 17 rows:** five statutory bodies; six published full-judgment documents, including Tema 988; three official registry/overview/summary records; and three failed routes.\n\n# 15. Atomic claim/evidence register\n\nAll IDs below are **C_BR-P22-Cxxx**. Source references identify the complete literal URLs in the register. A097 concerns actors/capacity; A098 concerns procedure, review, timing, effects and limits.\n\n| Claim | Atomic proposition and retained qualification | Evidence |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **C001** | A098. CPC commencement is one year after official publication; temporal application preserves completed acts. | S001 arts. 14, 1045/footer. |\n| **C002** | A098. Lei 14.939 amended holiday-proof correction and took effect on publication. | S002 arts. 1–2. |\n| **C003** | A098. Lei 15.484’s relevant 932/qualified-precedent amendments are operative by access; full higher-appeal regime held. | S003 arts. 3–7. |\n| **C004** | A098. Lei 15.479 remains enacted-future at access. | S004 art. 4. |\n| **C005** | A098. Sentence/interlocutory/despacho classification follows content and procedural function; despacho is not appealable. | S001 arts. 203,1001,1009. |\n| **C006** | A098. Specified partial termination/merits decisions use agravo. | S001 arts.354 sole paragraph,356§5. |\n| **C007** | A098. Non-immediately-appealable cognitive issues have deferred1009 review, with its response/sentence qualifications. | S001 art.1009§§1–3. |\n| **C008** | A098. Provisional-relief interlocutory decisions fall under1015(I). | S001 art.1015(I). |\n| **C009** | A098. Interlocutory merits decisions fall under1015(II). | S001 art.1015(II). |\n| **C010** | A098. Rejection of an arbitration-convention allegation is expressly listed. | S001 art.1015(III). |\n| **C011** | A098. Disregard-of-personality incident decisions require precise classification; not every internal evidence ruling is covered. | S001 art.1015(IV); S010. |\n| **C012** | A098. Aid rejection or accepted revocation is listed, not every increased-cost ruling. | S001 art.1015(V); S009. |\n| **C013** | A098. Exhibition/possession of document or thing is expressly listed. | S001 art.1015(VI). |\n| **C014** | A098. Exclusion of a co-party is expressly listed. | S001 art.1015(VII). |\n| **C015** | A098. Rejection of a request to limit joinder is expressly listed. | S001 art.1015(VIII). |\n| **C016** | A098. Admission/inadmission of third-party intervention is listed, subject to special restrictions. | S001 art.1015(IX). |\n| **C017** | A098. Suspensive-effect rulings concerning execution objections are listed; these are not clarification motions. | S001 art.1015(X). |\n| **C018** | A098. Art.373§1 burden redistribution is listed; ordinary evidence management is not automatically the same. | S001 art.1015(XI),373§1. |\n| **C019** | A098. Item XII is vetoed and supplies no operative category. | S001 art.1015(XII). |\n| **C020** | A098. Additional immediate routes require express statutory authorization. | S001 art.1015(XIII). |\n| **C021** | A098. Sole-paragraph contexts broaden interlocutory appealability, but do not convert a sentence into an interlocutory act. | S001 art.1015 sole paragraph,203. |\n| **C022** | A098. Amicus participation/appeal limitations cannot be erased by a generic third-party label. | S001 art.138. |\n| **C023** | A098. Tema988’s full representative judgment adopted urgency-based mitigated taxativity by majority. | S006 pp.57–58,98; S007. |\n| **C024** | A098. The exceptional predicate is uselessness of delayed appellate review, not mere inconvenience. | S006 pp.43–44,51–54. |\n| **C025** | A098. Tema988 modulation uses interlocutory decisions after December19,2018 publication. | S006 pp.53–54; S007. |\n| **C026** | A098. The majority separates statutory immediate-review preclusion from exceptional unlisted questions admitted and decided under Tema988. | S006 pp.51–54. |\n| **C027** | A098. The dissents argued legislative restriction/security concerns; they are not the final rule. | S006 selected separate writings and p.98 certificate. |\n| **C028** | A098. Case-value correction is not automatically aid denial or Tema988 urgency. | S009. |\n| **C029** | A098. Expert-evidence direction inside a disregard incident was not automatically immediately appealable in the read case. | S010. |\n| **C030** | A098. The2026 deferred-expertise case did not establish useless later review; factual posture limits the ruling. | S008. |\n| **C031** | A097. Appellant needs standing/adverse interest; prejudiced-third-party status requires the statutory rights connection. | S001 arts.17,996. |\n| **C032** | A097. Capacity, counsel and mandate must be established; qualifying representation defects have a correction mechanism. | S001 arts.70–76,103–105. |\n| **C033** | A098. Agravo is directed to the competent tribunal, subject to lawful filing channels. | S001 arts.1016,1017§2. |\n| **C034** | A098. Petition must state parties, facts/law, specific reform/nullity reasons/request and counsel addresses. | S001 art.1016. |\n| **C035** | A098. The non-electronic instrument requires the listed originating pleadings, ruling, official timeliness proof and mandates. | S001 art.1017(I). |\n| **C036** | A098. Actual nonexistence is declared by appellant’s lawyer under personal responsibility. | S001 art.1017(II). |\n| **C037** | A098. Lawyer-attested copies and digital reproductions have statutory authenticity qualifications and preservation duties. | S001 art.425(IV),(VI),§1; S005 art.11. |\n| **C038** | A098. Electronic origin records dispense with1017(I)–(II) pieces; electronic appeal alone is insufficient. | S001 art.1017§5; S011. |\n| **C039** | A098. Statutory filing channels and fax-original requirements remain subject to governing law/local implementation. | S001 art.1017§§2,4. |\n| **C040** | A098. Missing pieces/curable defects require the932 five-day opportunity; not every admission failure is curable. | S001 arts.1017§3,932 sole paragraph. |\n| **C041** | A098. Non-electronic origin records require1018 notification within three procedural days of appeal filing. | S001 art.1018§2. |\n| **C042** | A098. Noncompliance consequence requires respondent allegation/proof; the2018 case rejects automatic importation of documentary cure. | S001 art.1018§3; S011. |\n| **C043** | A098. The2020 case requires attention to proof, purpose and actual prejudice; it does not erase the duty. | S012. |\n| **C044** | A098. Complete reformation communicated by the original judge makes the appeal moot; partial change requires remaining-scope analysis. | S001 art.1018§1. |\n| **C045** | A098. Ordinary appeal period is15 business days from the lawful trigger. | S001 arts.219,1003§5. |\n| **C046** | A098. Notification/publication, not signature or alert alone, controls; journal availability and publication differ. | S001 arts.272,1003; S005 art.4. |\n| **C047** | A098. Business-day counting, recess, suspension and just cause require their exact predicates. | S001 arts.216,219–224,1004. |\n| **C048** | A098. Co-party doubling requires art.229 conditions and does not apply to electronic proceedings. | S001 art.229. |\n| **C049** | A098. Public-law/MP/Defensoria privileges require exact institutional categories and special-period exceptions. | S001 arts.180,183,186. |\n| **C050** | A098. Missing holiday proof receives statutory correction treatment; actual lateness is not cured merely by alleging a holiday. | S001 art.1003§6; S002. |\n| **C051** | A098. Electronic final-hour/timezone/outage treatment requires actual court-system evidence. | S001 art.213; S005 arts.3,10. |\n| **C052** | A098. Required preparation and return expenses follow the published tribunal schedule and filing proof rule. | S001 arts.1007,1017§1. |\n| **C053** | A098. Statutory exemptions and electronic transport-charge dispensation do not establish universal fee waiver. | S001 art.1007§§1,3. |\n| **C054** | A098. Insufficient preparation requires counsel notice and five days to supplement. | S001 art.1007§2. |\n| **C055** | A098. No proof at filing triggers double-payment notice; §4 states no numeric period. | S001 art.1007§4. |\n| **C056** | A098. Insufficient doubled payment does not receive further supplementation under§5. | S001 art.1007§5. |\n| **C057** | A098. Proved just impediment can relieve desertion with five-day payment opportunity. | S001 art.1007§6. |\n| **C058** | A098. Guide-completion error is not automatic desertion; doubtful payment can receive five-day correction. | S001 art.1007§7. |\n| **C059** | A098. Aid requested in the appeal postpones proof pending relator decision; refusal leads to a judicially fixed period. | S001 arts.98–99,99§7. |\n| **C060** | A098. Review of aid denial/revocation has the separate101/1015(V) route and five-day payment rule if confirmed. | S001 art.101§§1–2. |\n| **C061** | A098. Respondent notification follows1019(II), with15days and supporting documents. | S001 art.1019(II). |\n| **C062** | A098. MP intervention is conditional;1019(III)’s express15days is read with180§2. | S001 arts.1019(III),180§2. |\n| **C063** | A098. Relator’s five-day initial-processing direction is not automatic relief or a party filing window. | S001 art.1019 caput. |\n| **C064** | A098. Article1020 requires requesting a hearing date within one month of respondent notice, not final judgment within30days. | S001 art.1020. |\n| **C065** | A098. Filing an agravo does not itself suspend the challenged decision. | S001 art.995 caput. |\n| **C066** | A098. Suspension requires probability of success plus grave difficult/impossible harm under995. | S001 art.995 sole paragraph. |\n| **C067** | A098. Affirmative urgency relief requires the applicable300 probability and danger predicates. | S001 arts.300,1019(I). |\n| **C068** | A098. Security/waiver and anticipatory irreversibility qualifications remain applicable where relevant. | S001 art.300§§1–3. |\n| **C069** | A098. Appellate provisional order is communicated to origin; urgent consideration does not erase later participation. | S001 arts.9–11,1019(I)–(II). |\n| **C070** | A098. Relator’s admissibility/merits powers are statutory and reasoned, not unrestricted. | S001 arts.489,927,932–933; S003. |\n| **C071** | A098. Diligence/correction and oral-argument rights depend on their specific provisions. | S001 arts.937(VIII),938. |\n| **C072** | A098. A relator’s decision is subject to the1021 internal route, not automatically another instrument appeal. | S001 art.1021. |\n| **C073** | A098. Agravo de instrumento is not among the appeals permitting adhesive appeal under997§2(II). | S001 art.997§2(II). |\n| **C074** | A098. T01’s15-day endpoint is conditional on valid notice and the stipulated calendar. | S001 arts.219,224,1003§5; fictional inputs. |\n| **C075** | A098. T02’sthree-day period starts from appeal filing in a non-electronic origin case. | S001 art.1018§2; fictional inputs. |\n| **C076** | A098. T03’sfive-day correction period assumes a valid order and genuinely curable documentary defect. | S001 arts.1017§3,932 sole paragraph; fictional inputs. |\n| **C077** | A098. Full Tema representative judgment and later bodies were read within stated limits; failed sources are not holdings. | S006–S017/source limits. |\n| **C078** | A097. No actual capacity, provider permission, private instrument, locality or case was classified. | Scope boundary. |\n| **C079** | A098. Admission, merits and interim relief are separate; no debt cancellation, stay or discharge is guaranteed. | S001 arts.932,995,1019; scope. |\n| **C080** | A098. Only D15’s interlocutory gateway is augmented; sibling, parent and country acceptance remain held. | Supplied P01 record and scope. |\n\n**Atomic claim count: 80.**\n\n# 16. Granular core coverage\n\n| Row | Required issue | Claim refs | Status and exact remaining action |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **P22-G01** | Ordinary civil scope | C005,C080 | Confirm actual procedure; special regimes held. |\n| **G02** | Current CPC/commencement | C001 | Selected body read; actual historical transition remains. |\n| **G03** | Holiday amendment | C002,C050 | Apply current text to actual holiday proof. |\n| **G04** | 2026 operative amendment | C003 | Linked relator provisions read; higher regime held. |\n| **G05** | Enacted-future law | C004 | Not applied as current gateway. |\n| **G06** | Interlocutory classification | C005 | Read actual content and phase. |\n| **G07** | Sentence/partial merits | C005–C006 | Distinguish terminating and partial decisions. |\n| **G08** | Despacho | C005 | Confirm whether decisional content exists. |\n| **G09** | Deferred1009 review | C007 | Determine immediate-route availability first. |\n| **G10** | Art1015(I) relief | C008 | Identify actual provisional ruling. |\n| **G11** | Art1015(II) merits | C009 | Identify partial merits content. |\n| **G12** | Art1015(III) arbitration | C010 | Rejection versus termination matters. |\n| **G13** | Art1015(IV) disregard | C011,C029 | Separate incident determination from proof management. |\n| **G14** | Art1015(V) aid | C012 | Denial/revocation, not cost label alone. |\n| **G15** | Art1015(VI) document/thing | C013 | Actual exhibition/possession issue required. |\n| **G16** | Art1015(VII) exclusion | C014 | Exact joinder act required. |\n| **G17** | Art1015(VIII) joinder limit | C015 | Rejection of limitation request. |\n| **G18** | Art1015(IX) intervention | C016,C022 | Apply special participant restrictions. |\n| **G19** | Art1015(X) execution objections | C017 | Distinguish from clarification motions. |\n| **G20** | Art1015(XI) burden | C018 | Actual redistribution under373§1 required. |\n| **G21** | Art1015(XII) veto | C019 | No operative branch. |\n| **G22** | Art1015(XIII) other law | C020 | Read actual express authorization. |\n| **G23** | Sole paragraph liquidation | C021 | Confirm actual stage. |\n| **G24** | Sole paragraph cumprimento | C021 | Distinguish interlocutory from ending sentence. |\n| **G25** | Sole paragraph execution | C021 | Merits/eligibility held. |\n| **G26** | Sole paragraph inventário | C021 | Probate merits held. |\n| **G27** | Amicus restriction | C022 | Full special jurisprudence held. |\n| **G28** | Tema988 full body | C023,C077 | Full representative document obtained; pixel limitation disclosed. |\n| **G29** | Majority and result | C023 | Seven–five certificate; competence route only. |\n| **G30** | Urgency predicate | C024 | Prove uselessness of later review. |\n| **G31** | Mere inconvenience | C024,C028–C030 | Not automatically sufficient. |\n| **G32** | Modulation | C025 | Actual interlocutory date required. |\n| **G33** | Listed-issue preclusion | C026 | Proper immediate deadline must be established. |\n| **G34** | Unlisted exceptional preclusion | C026 | Preserve majority’s admission/decision qualification. |\n| **G35** | Separate writings | C027 | Dissent recorded, not treated as holding. |\n| **G36** | Later value-of-case ruling | C028 | No automatic aid analogy. |\n| **G37** | Later incident evidence ruling | C029 | No blanket itemIV route. |\n| **G38** | Later deferred expertise ruling | C030 | Actual stage/necessity/urgency required. |\n| **G39** | Standing and adverse interest | C031 | Identify requested useful change. |\n| **G40** | Third-party standing | C031 | Demonstrate affected right. |\n| **G41** | Capacity/mandate | C032 | Actual representation unexamined. |\n| **G42** | Competent tribunal | C033 | Court organization/local distribution held. |\n| **G43** | Petition contents/reasons | C034 | Compare full ruling and proposed grounds. |\n| **G44** | Required copies | C035 | Actual origin record required. |\n| **G45** | Nonexistent pieces | C036 | Counsel’s truthful declaration required. |\n| **G46** | Optional useful documents | C035–C036 | Add context without inventing records. |\n| **G47** | Authenticity/preservation | C037 | Actual original/copy challenge unknown. |\n| **G48** | Electronic origin exception | C038 | Confirm origin, not appeal-only, status. |\n| **G49** | Filing channels | C039 | Current local mandatory-system rules held. |\n| **G50** | Fax original requirement | C039 | Governing law/order required. |\n| **G51** | Missing-piece cure | C040 | Five-day statutory mechanism. |\n| **G52** | Noncurable substantive defects | C040 | Do not equate every failure with a missing copy. |\n| **G53** | Paper-origin notification | C041 | Three days from filing. |\n| **G54** | Respondent allegation/proof | C042 | Actual proof required. |\n| **G55** | Prejudice/instrumentality qualification | C043 | Actual defense opportunity required. |\n| **G56** | Complete retraction | C044 | Full reform must be communicated. |\n| **G57** | Judicial information | C044,C070–C071 | No invented universal extra reporting period. |\n| **G58** | Fifteen-day appeal | C045 | Actual lawful trigger required. |\n| **G59** | Notice/journal sequence | C046 | Certificate and applicable channel required. |\n| **G60** | Business days/recess | C047 | Actual court calendar required. |\n| **G61** | Co-party doubled period | C048 | Different offices/electronic exception. |\n| **G62** | Institutional privileges | C049 | Exact actor and special period. |\n| **G63** | Holiday proof | C050 | No holiday assumed. |\n| **G64** | Electronic final hour/outage | C051 | Official system evidence required. |\n| **G65** | Preparation schedule | C052 | No amount invented. |\n| **G66** | Exemptions/transport charges | C053 | Statutory category required. |\n| **G67** | Insufficient payment | C054 | Five-day supplement. |\n| **G68** | No proof/doubled payment | C055–C056 | Order controls time; no endless supplementation. |\n| **G69** | Impediment/guide error | C057–C058 | Exact cure predicate required. |\n| **G70** | Aid request/review | C059–C060 | Distinguish99§7 from101. |\n| **G71** | Respondent response | C061 | Proper notice and15-day computation. |\n| **G72** | MP participation | C062 | Required intervention and express period. |\n| **G73** | Relator’s five-day processing | C063 | Not automatic grant. |\n| **G74** | One-month scheduling direction | C064 | Not30days or final-result guarantee. |\n| **G75** | Stay versus affirmative relief | C065–C068 | Separate merits/probability/harm predicates. |\n| **G76** | Reasons, hearing and diligence | C069–C071 | Actual order and evidence required. |\n| **G77** | Internal appeal boundary | C072 | No full1021 report. |\n| **G78** | No adhesive instrument appeal | C073 | Independent timely challenge may be needed. |\n| **G79** | H01 provisional ruling | C008,C065–C068 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G80** | H02 partial merits | C005–C006 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G81** | H03 arbitration | C010 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G82** | H04 case value | C012,C028 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G83** | H05 burden redistribution | C018 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G84** | H06 expert deferral | C024,C030 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G85** | H07 irreversible disclosure | C024–C026 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G86** | H08 inconvenience | C007,C024–C026 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G87** | H09 incident evidence | C011,C029 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G88** | H10 missing copy | C035,C040 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G89** | H11 nonexistence declaration | C036 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G90** | H12 electronic appeal/paper origin | C038,C041–C043 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G91** | H13 electronic origin | C038–C040 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G92** | H14 interim relief | C065–C069 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G93** | H15 relator decision | C072 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G94** | H16 enforcement classification | C005,C021 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G95** | T01 ordinary deadline model | C074 | Hypothetical calendar only. |\n| **G96** | T02 origin-notification model | C075 | Not the appeal period. |\n| **G97** | T03 cure model | C076 | Curable-document assumption only. |\n| **G98** | Sources/citator limits | C077 | No complete current-law certification. |\n| **G99** | Actual facts/provider authority | C078–C079 | None classified or cleared. |\n| **G100** | D15/component/country acceptance | C080 | Narrow addition; all acceptance holds remain. |\n\n**Core-coverage count: 100.**\n\n# 17. Separately deferred families\n\n| Row | Deferred family | Exact next action |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **P22-D01** | First-instance commencement and service | P18 unreviewed; establish actual notice independently. |\n| **D02** | Default and ensuing judgment | P19 unreviewed; no default merits imported. |\n| **D03** | Full apelação | P20 unreviewed; only1009 boundary used freshly. |\n| **D04** | Full embargos de declaração | P21 unreviewed; no interruptive filing assumption adopted. |\n| **D05** | Full agravo interno | Read actual relator decision and internal rules separately. |\n| **D06** | Special/extraordinary appeals and agravo to higher courts | Do not confuse with ordinary1015 instrument appeal. |\n| **D07** | Full2026 relevance regime | Separate current higher-court implementation. |\n| **D08** | Rescisória, reopening and mandado de segurança | Identify actual finality, exceptional remedy and competent court. |\n| **D09** | Execution, cumprimento and attachment merits | Sole-paragraph route is not enforcement clearance. |\n| **D10** | Liquidation merits and expert valuation | Determine actual quantitative issue separately. |\n| **D11** | Inventário and probate | Route boundary only; estate rights and procedure held. |\n| **D12** | Juizados and special courts | No ordinary agravo procedure by analogy. |\n| **D13** | Collective consumer litigation | Identify standing and special procedural statutes. |\n| **D14** | Superendividamento | Separate statutory participation and remedy rules. |\n| **D15** | Insolvency, recuperação and falência | Determine special stage, stay and appeal regime. |\n| **D16** | Public, tax, family and support proceedings | Apply exact special statute and institutional predicates. |\n| **D17** | Consumer contracts, fees and cancellation | P04 unreviewed; no substantive claim validation. |\n| **D18** | Prescription and underlying debt defenses | P05 unreviewed. |\n| **D19** | Payment, release, assignment and creditor authority | Actual instruments required; no sibling adoption. |\n| **D20** | Collection conduct | P10 unreviewed. |\n| **D21** | LGPD and credit reporting | Separate privacy/reporting modules. |\n| **D22** | Surety, solidarity and substantive joinder | P16 unreviewed; procedural route does not establish liability. |\n| **D23** | OAB/provider/financial/payment permission | No operating authority from appeal rules. |\n| **D24** | Full security, property and homestead | No attachment or property-restoration conclusion. |\n| **D25** | Local fees, forms, calendars and e-filing | Obtain actual competent-court instruments. |\n| **D26** | Foreign jurisdiction, service and recognition | No foreign procedure imported. |\n| **D27** | Private records and exhaustive current citator | No private lookup; later primary treatment still required. |\n| **D28** | Country/component/A066/A097/A098/parent acceptance | HOLD pending separate coordinator review and remaining work. |\n\n**Deferred-family count: 28.**\n\n# 18. All 27 inherited states and Distrito Federal\n\nThe names are inherited from the preserved P01 inventory. No geography API or fresh territorial certification was used. Published STJ judgments from state-origin disputes do not establish those states’ current local rules.\n\n| State/DF | Actual local read status | Exact remaining local question |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **Acre (AC)** | No local operative body read. | TJAC competence, filing, fees, calendar and record-transmission rules. |\n| **Alagoas (AL)** | No local operative body read. | TJAL portal, preparation, notice and distribution procedures. |\n| **Amapá (AP)** | No local operative body read. | TJAP electronic-origin status, forms, closures and costs. |\n| **Amazonas (AM)** | No local operative body read. | TJAM actual filing/timezone/fee rules; STJ’s AM case is not local certification. |\n| **Bahia (BA)** | No local operative body read. | TJBA distribution, preparation and notification implementation. |\n| **Ceará (CE)** | No local operative body read. | TJCE record requirements, calendars and internal processing. |\n| **Distrito Federal (DF)** | No local operative body read. | TJDFT actual competent body, forms, fees and filing calendar. |\n| **Espírito Santo (ES)** | No local operative body read. | TJES digital access, preparation and notice rules. |\n| **Goiás (GO)** | No local operative body read. | TJGO origin communication, portal and fee implementation. |\n| **Maranhão (MA)** | No local operative body read. | TJMA accessibility, court closures and record transmission. |\n| **Mato Grosso (MT)** | No local operative body read. | TJMT current rules; Tema988’s originating context is not a local audit. |\n| **Mato Grosso do Sul (MS)** | No local operative body read. | TJMS filing system, preparation and outage certification. |\n| **Minas Gerais (MG)** | No local operative body read. | TJMG competent chamber, costs, forms and calendar. |\n| **Pará (PA)** | No local operative body read. | TJPA remote access, language needs and court-calendar rules. |\n| **Paraíba (PB)** | No local operative body read. | TJPB filing, record access and preparation procedure. |\n| **Paraná (PR)** | No local operative body read. | TJPR origin/appeal system interaction and calendar. |\n| **Pernambuco (PE)** | No local operative body read. | TJPE appeal forms, fee schedule and notification rules. |\n| **Piauí (PI)** | No local operative body read. | TJPI local holidays, electronic access and costs. |\n| **Rio de Janeiro (RJ)** | No local operative body read. | TJRJ filing, distribution, preparation and hearing rules. |\n| **Rio Grande do Norte (RN)** | No local operative body read. | TJRN local procedure, forms and court calendar. |\n| **Rio Grande do Sul (RS)** | No local operative body read. | TJRS current paper/electronic implementation; published cases do not certify it. |\n| **Rondônia (RO)** | No local operative body read. | TJRO timezone, portal, official outages and fees. |\n| **Roraima (RR)** | No local operative body read. | TJRR access, local calendar and filing requirements. |\n| **Santa Catarina (SC)** | No local operative body read. | TJSC instrument filing, record access and preparation rules. |\n| **São Paulo (SP)** | No local operative body read. | TJSP actual records, notification and cost rules; STJ cases are not implementation proof. |\n| **Sergipe (SE)** | No local operative body read. | TJSE forms, preparation, closures and distribution. |\n| **Tocantins (TO)** | No local operative body read. | TJTO electronic procedure, access and court-calendar requirements. |\n\n**Territorial count: 27; no state or DF branch is cleared.**\n\n# 19. Evidence-backed article, checklist and conditional-tool opportunities\n\n| Specification | Supported use | Guardrail |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **Immediate-review classifier** | Separate express item, sole-paragraph context, other statute and Tema988 exception. | No “all interlocutory rulings are appealable” output. |\n| **Urgency explanation worksheet** | Identify what later review could no longer repair. | Mere expense, delay or disagreement is not automatically enough. |\n| **Instrument checklist** | Required copies, true nonexistence, authenticity and electronic-origin exception. | Electronic appeal is not the same as electronic origin. |\n| **Origin-notification tracker** | Separate15-day appeal and3-day paper-record communication. | Actual filing proof, respondent assertion and prejudice still matter. |\n| **Preparation decision tree** | Insufficient payment, no proof, doubled payment, aid and guide error. | No invented fee or universal cure period. |\n| **Interim-relief matrix** | Distinguish Tema988 admissibility, suspensive relief and affirmative relief. | Filing/admission is not a stay or merits victory. |\n\nNo website, court filing, operational tool or publication was created.\n\n# 20. Reconciliation and researcher self-check\n\n| Item | Actual result |\n| --- | --- |\n| Assigned component | P01 D15 ordinary civil interlocutory-review gateway only. |\n| Unreviewed sibling findings used as premises | None. |\n| P01 review-file access | User-supplied metadata preserved; no local review file opened or modified. |\n| Source-register rows | **17**. |\n| Statutory bodies | **5**. |\n| Published full-judgment documents | **6**, including one complete Tema988 representative document. |\n| Other official registry/summary/overview records | **3**. |\n| Failed routes | **3**; no holding adopted from their unread bodies. |\n| Tema988 full-body access | **Yes:** REsp1.704.520-MT,98 pages; relevant majority, separate writings and certificate read. |\n| Tema988 PDF pixel review | **No:** screenshot rendering failed; text read and limitation preserved. |\n| Later/other judgment pixel review | Relevant pages of **5** PDFs inspected. |\n| Atomic claims | **80**. |\n| Core coverage | **100**. |\n| Deferred families | **28**. |\n| Territorial rows | **27**. |\n| Total coverage rows | **155**:100 core +28 deferred +27 territorial. |\n| Fictional workflows | **16**. |\n| Conditional computations | **3**. |\n| P01 crosswalk | **9 logical items and9 physical data rows**. |\n| Actual deadline, fee, debt or appellate result | None determined. |\n| Actual private party/account/licence/docket investigation | None. |\n| Contact, filing, payment or account action | None. |\n| API, hidden endpoint, security workaround, new chat or subagent | None. |\n| Coordinator-file write | None performed or claimed. |\n| Exact source-opening clocks | Unknown. |\n| Independent/all-source/current-law certification | Not claimed. |\n| Provider, locality, component, parent or country acceptance | Not granted; all holds remain. |\n\n## Exact unresolved inputs for an actual application\n\nThe complete challenged decision and procedural stage; the proposed statutory or Tema988 route; the specific loss of useful later review; the party’s interest and mandate; the lawful notification certificate; court calendar and filing rules; origin-record format and access; mandatory pieces or truthful nonexistence declarations; preparation or legal-aid documents; origin-notification proof; respondent objections; any retraction; the requested interim relief and its evidence; and the competent tribunal’s current rules and later controlling treatment.\n\n**Final disposition:** PASS-22 establishes the bounded federal gateway for ordinary *agravo de instrumento*: statutory categories, Tema988’s majority urgency test and limits, filing and record requirements, paper-origin notification, periods, costs, response, relator processing and provisional relief. It does not establish that any actual ruling is immediately appealable, any filing is timely or admissible, any stay should issue, any debt is discharged, or any provider, locality, component or Brazil-wide operating model is accepted.\n\nEND C_BR PASS-22\n\n","tables":[{"headers":["Instrument","Material provision read","Status and limit"],"index":0,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Instrument","Material provision read","Status and limit"],["Lei 14.939/2024","Arts. 1–2, amending CPC art. 1.003 §6","Effective on publication, DOU July 31, 2024. Missing proof of a local holiday can be corrected, or the omission disregarded where the information is already in the electronic record. This does not cure actual lateness by inventing a holiday."],["Lei 15.484/2026","Relevant amendments to CPC art. 932 and linked qualified-precedent provisions; art. 7","DOU extra August 4, 2026; 30-day vacatio. Operative by access. Relevant to the relator’s current precedent-based powers, not a replacement for arts. 1.015–1.020. Full special-appeal relevance procedure is deferred."],["Lei 15.479/2026","Material CPC changes and art. 4","DOU July 30, 2026; one-year delayed commencement. Enacted-future at access, not applied as current interlocutory-review law."],["Lei 11.419/2006","Electronic filing, publication, digital evidence and system-unavailability provisions","Operative statute. Article 22 provides 90 days after publication; DOU December 20, 2006. Current CNJ channel allocation and each court’s implementation remain unexamined here."]]},{"headers":["Article","Operative category","Exact qualification"],"index":1,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Article","Operative category","Exact qualification"],["I","Provisional relief—tutelas provisórias","The ruling must concern provisional relief. Appealability does not itself establish entitlement to a stay or affirmative relief. C008."],["II","Merits of the proceeding","Includes qualifying partial merits decisions; distinguish a sentence ending the phase. C009."],["III","Rejection of an allegation of an arbitration agreement","The text addresses rejection of that allegation. Acceptance that ends the proceeding may produce a different decisional classification. C010."],["IV","Incident of disregard of legal personality—incidente de desconsideração da personalidade jurídica","Do not assume every evidentiary direction issued within such an incident is independently covered; the later STJ qualification below matters. C011."],["V","Rejection of legal aid or acceptance of its revocation","This does not automatically include every ruling affecting litigation expense or the case value. C012."],["VI","Exhibition or possession of a document or thing","Actual document/thing-production content must be established. C013."],["VII","Exclusion of a co-party—litisconsorte","The wording is exclusion, not an unrestricted category for every joinder ruling. C014."],["VIII","Rejection of a request to limit joinder","Distinct from exclusion under VII. C015."],["IX","Admission or inadmission of third-party intervention","Must be read with special provisions, including the separate amicus curiae limitations in art. 138. C016, C022."],["X","Grant, modification or revocation of suspensive effect for embargos à execução","These are execution objections, not embargos de declaração. Full execution merits remain held. C017."],["XI","Redistribution of the burden of proof under art. 373 §1","Not every decision about evidence is a burden-redistribution decision. C018."],["XII","Vetoed","No operative appeal category can be inferred from this number. C019."],["XIII","Other cases expressly referred to in law","The additional statutory authorization must actually be identified and read. C020."]]},{"headers":["Context","Gateway consequence","Remaining limitation"],"index":2,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Context","Gateway consequence","Remaining limitation"],["Liquidation of a sentence","The broader statutory interlocutory route applies.","Actual liquidation and merits rules remain separate."],["Cumprimento de sentença","The broader statutory interlocutory route applies.","A truly terminating sentence is not automatically an interlocutory ruling."],["Execution proceedings","The broader statutory interlocutory route applies.","Title, defenses, attachment and enforcement law are not cleared."],["Inventário","The broader statutory interlocutory route applies.","Estate, succession and probate merits remain separate."]]},{"headers":["Defect","Statutory response","Limit"],"index":3,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Defect","Statutory response","Limit"],["Insufficient preparation paid","Counsel is intimated to supplement within five days.","Article 1.007 §2."],["No proof of preparation at filing","Counsel is intimated for payment in double.","Section 4 itself does not specify a numeric period; inspect the order and applicable general rule."],["Insufficient doubled payment","Section 5 bars further supplementation of the §4 doubled payment.","No unlimited cure cycle."],["Proved just impediment","Relator may relieve desertion and allow five days for payment.","The impediment and ruling must be established."],["Error completing the payment guide","Not automatic desertion; where payment is doubtful, correction is allowed within five days.","Does not excuse every missing or late payment."]]},{"headers":["Inquiry","Required showing"],"index":4,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Inquiry","Required showing"],["Tema 988 appealability of an unlisted issue","Later review would be useless."],["Suspension under art. 995 sole paragraph","Probability of success and risk of grave harm that is difficult or impossible to repair."],["Affirmative urgency relief under art. 300","Probability of the right and danger of harm or risk to the useful result; applicable security and irreversibility qualifications also matter."]]},{"headers":["Workflow","Actor, ruling and primary route","Conditional result, adverse branch and exact next question"],"index":5,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Workflow","Actor, ruling and primary route","Conditional result, adverse branch and exact next question"],["H01 — Provisional relief denied","A defendant requests urgent relief in an ordinary debt dispute; the judge denies it. C008, C065–C068.","Item I supplies an immediate-route candidate. A stay or affirmative appellate order still needs its separate predicates. Missing: ruling, evidence and risk. Next: What relief was actually requested, and what harm would occur before ordinary adjudication?"],["H02 — Partial merits versus ending sentence","The judge decides one separable merits component while another continues. C005–C006, C009.","Article 356 §5 points to agravo. If the decision actually ends the relevant phase, the route may be apelação. Missing: full dispositive text and remaining issues. Next: What remains for first-instance decision?"],["H03 — Arbitration objection rejected","A party invokes an arbitration agreement; the judge rejects the objection and keeps the case. C010.","Item III applies to the rejection branch. Acceptance ending the case is not assumed to use the same route. Missing: agreement, objection and ruling. Next: Did the judge reject arbitration or terminate the action because of it?"],["H04 — Case value increased","The judge corrects the case value, increasing fees, but does not refuse legal aid. C012, C028.","Item V is not automatically available. Tema 988 requires more than labeling additional expense urgent. Missing: valuation ruling, aid request and actual loss of useful later review. Next: Why would later correction be useless rather than merely inconvenient?"],["H05 — Burden redistributed","The judge expressly reallocates proof under art. 373 §1. C018.","Item XI is a candidate. An ordinary order to produce an existing document may fall under another category or require separate analysis. Missing: exact burden ruling and reasons. Next: Was the legal burden changed, or only a specific evidentiary act ordered?"],["H06 — Expert examination deferred","Accounting expertise is postponed to a later phase if liability is established. C024, C030.","No automatic immediate route from the word “evidence.” Show why later review cannot remedy the issue. Adverse: the ruling may prevent essential proof of liability now. Next: Which fact must be proved now, and why can the proposed later stage not address it?"],["H07 — Unlisted irreversible disclosure","An interlocutory order would publicly disclose information that, once released, cannot be made secret again. C024–C026.","This can illustrate the majority’s useless-later-review concern, but actual confidentiality and disclosure facts are required. Adverse: disclosure may be lawful, already public or avoidable by another measure. Next: What irreversible informational effect would occur before later appeal?"],["H08 — Unlisted scheduling inconvenience","A party dislikes the order of evidence-taking but identifies no loss of useful later review. C007, C024–C026.","Deferred review may remain the route. Mere inconvenience does not establish Tema 988 urgency. Missing: concrete prejudice and available later correction. Next: What remedy would become impossible if review waited?"],["H09 — Evidence within disregard incident","The judge orders expert evidence inside a disregard-of-personality incident. C011, C029.","Item IV does not automatically cover every evidentiary direction. Adverse: the ruling may also decide the incident or independently fit another branch. Next: Did it determine disregard, or only manage evidence?"],["H10 — Missing required copy","A timely paper-record appeal omits the motion that generated the ruling. C035, C040.","A curable missing-piece defect receives the statutory correction opportunity. Adverse: the appeal itself may be late or use the wrong route, which a copy does not fix. Next: Is the omitted document the only admission defect?"],["H11 — Contestation does not yet exist","The decision occurs before the respondent has filed a contestation. C036.","Counsel may declare actual nonexistence under personal responsibility. Adverse: a contestation exists but was overlooked. Next: Does the originating record confirm that no such document existed when the appeal was filed?"],["H12 — Electronic appeal, paper origin","The appeal is electronic, but the first-instance record is paper. The appellant omits origin notification. C038, C041–C043.","Electronic appeal filing alone does not remove the three-day duty. Respondent allegation/proof and the actual procedural effect must be assessed. Next: What were the origin record’s format, filing date and proof of communication?"],["H13 — Electronic origin","The first-instance proceeding is genuinely electronic and accessible. C038–C040.","Section 5 dispenses with the specified mandatory pieces/declaration; useful documents can still be attached. Adverse: the record is hybrid or inaccessible to the reviewing body. Next: What does the official system show about the origin record and access?"],["H14 — Stay requested","A party files an admissible appeal and requests suspension of the challenged order. C065–C069.","Filing alone does not suspend. The relator assesses the statutory probability/harm predicates. Adverse: stopping the order may itself create serious harm or irreversible relief. Next: What precisely must be suspended, for how long, and on what evidence?"],["H15 — Relator refuses interim relief","The appellate relator denies a stay. The party proposes another agravo de instrumento against that decision. C072.","The art. 1.021 internal route is the relevant boundary, not a new first-instance instrument appeal. Missing: decision and applicable internal rules. Next: Is the challenged act from the first-instance judge or the tribunal’s relator?"],["H16 — Enforcement-stage order versus termination","One ruling manages an ongoing cumprimento; another actually extinguishes it. C005, C021.","The first can fall under the sole paragraph; the second must be classified as a possible sentence. Missing: complete disposition and what remains pending. Next: Did the ruling merely resolve an incident or end the execution phase?"]]},{"headers":["#","Named deferred family","Gateway reference/status","Exact next research action"],"index":6,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[]],"rows":[["#","Named deferred family","Gateway reference/status","Exact next research action"],["D15","Court/service/default/judgment/appeal beyond capacity","C027, C030; Deferred","Map CPC, local procedure, notice, default and appeal rules in a separate litigation review."]]},{"headers":["D15 component","PASS-22 addition","Remaining gate"],"index":7,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["D15 component","PASS-22 addition","Remaining gate"],["Decision classification","Interlocutory, partial merits, sentence and despacho boundaries identified.","Actual decision and procedural stage."],["Immediate appealability","Every art. 1.015 item and sole-paragraph context identified.","Actual statutory fit and special law."],["Unlisted questions","Full Tema 988 majority, modulation, preclusion discussion and dissents read.","Concrete useless-later-review urgency and later treatment."],["Filing and record","Tribunal, petition, copies, authenticity and electronic-origin rules identified.","Actual mandate, instrument and local system."],["Origin communication","Three-day paper-record duty and qualified consequences identified.","Actual filing, respondent proof and procedural prejudice."],["Timing, costs and response","Ordinary periods, cure and legal-aid branches identified.","Actual notice, calendar, fee schedule and orders."],["Provisional appellate relief","Suspension and affirmative-relief predicates separated from appealability.","Actual evidence and relator’s order."],["Other litigation components","Not adopted or completed here.","P18–P21 review, full higher appeals, reopening and enforcement remain separate."]]},{"headers":["Source ID","Issuer/title and full literal URL","Actual body read, status, publication and limits"],"index":8,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Source ID","Issuer/title and full literal URL","Actual body read, status, publication and limits"],["C_BR-P22-S001","Presidência, CPC, Lei 13.105/2015, compiled. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm","Fresh operative selected body. Material arts. 9–11, 14, 17, 70–76, 98–105, 138, 180, 183, 186, 203, 213, 216, 218–224, 229, 272, 298–300, 354, 356 §5, 373 §1, 425, 489 §1, 927, 932–933, 937–938, 994–1009, 1015–1021 and 1045/footer. DOU March 17, 2015; one-year original vacatio. HTML; printed page/PDF index N/A. No full provider, apelação, ED, service, execution or higher-appeal survey."],["S002","Presidência, Lei 14.939/2024. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2024/lei/l14939.htm","Fresh amendment. Arts. 1–2/footer; art. 1003 §6. DOU July 31, 2024; effect on publication. HTML; page/index N/A."],["S003","Presidência, Lei 15.484/2026. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15484.htm","Fresh limited amendment. Relevant 927/932 changes, arts. 4–7/footer. DOU extra August 4, 2026; 30-day vacatio; operative by access. Full relevance regime not researched."],["S004","Presidência, Lei 15.479/2026. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15479.htm","Fresh enacted-future boundary. Material amendment/commencement text, art. 4/footer. DOU July 30, 2026; one-year vacatio. Not applied as current interlocutory-review law."],["S005","Presidência, Lei 11.419/2006. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2006/lei/l11419.htm","Fresh limited electronic-procedure body. Arts. 2–5, 8–11, 22/footer, materially filing, publication, digital copies and system unavailability. DOU December 20, 2006; 90-day original vacatio. Current CNJ/local channel implementation held."],["S006","STJ Corte Especial, REsp 1.704.520-MT — Tema 988 full judgment. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","Fresh full official judgment, relevant text read. 98-page PDF. Judgment December 5, 2018; DJe December 19. Ementa/result pp. 1–3, indices 0–2; selected majority passages pp. 43–44, 51–54, 57–58, indices 42–43, 50–53, 56–57; selected dissents pp. 68–69, 79–80, 95–96, indices 67–68, 78–79, 94–95; final certificate p. 98, index 97. Printed footer’s total-page denominator is malformed (“de 10”); numeric page and PDF index are kept distinct. Screenshot attempts at indices 2, 52 and 97 failed; parsed body was readable. No pixel review claimed."],["S007","STJ, Tema Repetitivo 988 registry. https://processo.stj.jus.br/repetitivos/temas_repetitivos/pesquisa.jsp?novaConsulta=true&num_processo_classe=1696396&sg_classe=REsp&tipo_pesquisa=T","Fresh official thesis/status register. Thesis, two representative appeals, judgment/publication, modulation and recorded finality February 22, 2019 read. Displayed update February 17, 2023. HTML; page/index N/A. Not an exhaustive 2026 citator."],["S008","STJ, REsp 2.242.573-RS. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?num_registro=202504167899","Fresh published full-judgment document, selected passages. Fourth Panel unanimous; session March 10–16, 2026; acórdão March 17; DJEN March 19. Seven PDF pages. Ementa index 0, reasons 2–4, certificate 5–6; screenshot index 0 inspected. Printed folios not reliably displayed. Accounting-evidence/PASEP context; no substantive account rule adopted."],["S009","STJ, REsp 2.186.037-AM. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=26/03/2025&num_registro=202401922245","Fresh published full-judgment document, selected passages. Third Panel unanimous; actual session March 20, 2025; signature March 24; publication March 26. Eleven pages. Ementa/result 0–1, reasons 6–9, certificate 10; screenshot 1 inspected. Printed folios not reliably displayed. Case value versus legal aid; no actual cost reimbursement promised."],["S010","STJ, REsp 2.182.040-SP. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=16/06/2025&num_registro=202404368455","Fresh published full-judgment document, selected passages. Third Panel unanimous; June 10, 2025; signature June 11; publication June 16. Six pages. Ementa 0, reasons 3–4, certificate 5; screenshot 0 inspected. Evidentiary ruling inside disregard incident; no blanket corporate-liability conclusion."],["S011","STJ, REsp 1.749.958-RS. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=21/09/2018&num_registro=201800907539","Fresh published full-judgment document, selected passages. Third Panel unanimous; September 18, 2018; DJe September 21. Thirteen PDF pages. Ementa/result indices 0–2; relevant reasons 6–10. Screenshot 1 inspected, displaying printed p. 2 with inconsistent total denominator. Origin-paper notification requirement; electronic appeal alone insufficient."],["S012","STJ, REsp 1.758.943-SP. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=26/06/2020&num_registro=201800452722","Fresh published full-judgment document, selected passages. Third Panel unanimous; June 23, 2020; DJe June 26. Ten pages. Ementa index 0; reasons 6–8; result 9. Screenshot 0 inspected, displaying printed p. 1 with inconsistent total denominator. Respondent proof/prejudice and instrumentality; no permission to ignore art. 1018."],["S013","STJ, “Novas decisões do STJ sobre o cabimento do agravo de instrumento no regime do CPC/2015”. https://www.stj.jus.br/sites/portalp/Paginas/Comunicacao/Noticias/2026/22022026-Novas-decisoes-do-STJ-sobre-o-cabimento-do-agravo-de-instrumento-no-regime-do-CPC2015.aspx","Fresh official overview/discovery, February 22, 2026. Used to locate later judgments. Their actual bodies, not the overview alone, support the findings. HTML; page/index N/A."],["S014","STJ, REsp 1.696.396-MT published ementa/disposition. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/jurisprudencia/toc.jsp?O=JT&b=ACOR&livre=201702262874.REG.+E+19/12/2018.FONT.","Fresh official judgment-summary/disposition only. Companion Tema 988 authority; December 5/19, 2018 judgment/publication. Not represented as the full votes. S006 is the actual full representative judgment read."],["S015","STJ, attempted full REsp 1.696.396-MT. https://ww2.stj.jus.br/websecstj/cgi/revista/REJ.cgi/ITA?CodOrgaoJgdr=&SeqCgrmaSessao=&dt=20181219&formato=PDF&nreg=201702262874&salvar=false&seq=1731780&tipo=0","Failed full-body route. No full-body access claimed. The different representative judgment S006 and official records S007/S014 were obtained. Page/index for this failed route unknown."],["S016","STJ, attempted EREsp 1.730.436-SP body. https://www.stj.jus.br/websecstj/cgi/revista/REJ.cgi/ITA?CodOrgaoJgdr=&SeqCgrmaSessao=&dt=20210903&formato=PDF&nreg=201800568774&salvar=false&seq=2086408&tipo=0","Failed body. Search text not adopted as a holding. One different official alternate, S017, was attempted."],["S017","STJ, official alternate for EREsp 1.730.436-SP. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=03/09/2021&num_registro=201800568774","Failed alternate body. No holding or currentness conclusion adopted from it. No further retry loop or workaround."]]},{"headers":["Claim","Atomic proposition and retained qualification","Evidence"],"index":9,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claim","Atomic proposition and retained qualification","Evidence"],["C001","A098. CPC commencement is one year after official publication; temporal application preserves completed acts.","S001 arts. 14, 1045/footer."],["C002","A098. Lei 14.939 amended holiday-proof correction and took effect on publication.","S002 arts. 1–2."],["C003","A098. Lei 15.484’s relevant 932/qualified-precedent amendments are operative by access; full higher-appeal regime held.","S003 arts. 3–7."],["C004","A098. Lei 15.479 remains enacted-future at access.","S004 art. 4."],["C005","A098. Sentence/interlocutory/despacho classification follows content and procedural function; despacho is not appealable.","S001 arts. 203,1001,1009."],["C006","A098. Specified partial termination/merits decisions use agravo.","S001 arts.354 sole paragraph,356§5."],["C007","A098. Non-immediately-appealable cognitive issues have deferred1009 review, with its response/sentence qualifications.","S001 art.1009§§1–3."],["C008","A098. Provisional-relief interlocutory decisions fall under1015(I).","S001 art.1015(I)."],["C009","A098. Interlocutory merits decisions fall under1015(II).","S001 art.1015(II)."],["C010","A098. Rejection of an arbitration-convention allegation is expressly listed.","S001 art.1015(III)."],["C011","A098. Disregard-of-personality incident decisions require precise classification; not every internal evidence ruling is covered.","S001 art.1015(IV); S010."],["C012","A098. Aid rejection or accepted revocation is listed, not every increased-cost ruling.","S001 art.1015(V); S009."],["C013","A098. Exhibition/possession of document or thing is expressly listed.","S001 art.1015(VI)."],["C014","A098. Exclusion of a co-party is expressly listed.","S001 art.1015(VII)."],["C015","A098. Rejection of a request to limit joinder is expressly listed.","S001 art.1015(VIII)."],["C016","A098. Admission/inadmission of third-party intervention is listed, subject to special restrictions.","S001 art.1015(IX)."],["C017","A098. Suspensive-effect rulings concerning execution objections are listed; these are not clarification motions.","S001 art.1015(X)."],["C018","A098. Art.373§1 burden redistribution is listed; ordinary evidence management is not automatically the same.","S001 art.1015(XI),373§1."],["C019","A098. Item XII is vetoed and supplies no operative category.","S001 art.1015(XII)."],["C020","A098. Additional immediate routes require express statutory authorization.","S001 art.1015(XIII)."],["C021","A098. Sole-paragraph contexts broaden interlocutory appealability, but do not convert a sentence into an interlocutory act.","S001 art.1015 sole paragraph,203."],["C022","A098. Amicus participation/appeal limitations cannot be erased by a generic third-party label.","S001 art.138."],["C023","A098. Tema988’s full representative judgment adopted urgency-based mitigated taxativity by majority.","S006 pp.57–58,98; S007."],["C024","A098. The exceptional predicate is uselessness of delayed appellate review, not mere inconvenience.","S006 pp.43–44,51–54."],["C025","A098. Tema988 modulation uses interlocutory decisions after December19,2018 publication.","S006 pp.53–54; S007."],["C026","A098. The majority separates statutory immediate-review preclusion from exceptional unlisted questions admitted and decided under Tema988.","S006 pp.51–54."],["C027","A098. The dissents argued legislative restriction/security concerns; they are not the final rule.","S006 selected separate writings and p.98 certificate."],["C028","A098. Case-value correction is not automatically aid denial or Tema988 urgency.","S009."],["C029","A098. Expert-evidence direction inside a disregard incident was not automatically immediately appealable in the read case.","S010."],["C030","A098. The2026 deferred-expertise case did not establish useless later review; factual posture limits the ruling.","S008."],["C031","A097. Appellant needs standing/adverse interest; prejudiced-third-party status requires the statutory rights connection.","S001 arts.17,996."],["C032","A097. Capacity, counsel and mandate must be established; qualifying representation defects have a correction mechanism.","S001 arts.70–76,103–105."],["C033","A098. Agravo is directed to the competent tribunal, subject to lawful filing channels.","S001 arts.1016,1017§2."],["C034","A098. Petition must state parties, facts/law, specific reform/nullity reasons/request and counsel addresses.","S001 art.1016."],["C035","A098. The non-electronic instrument requires the listed originating pleadings, ruling, official timeliness proof and mandates.","S001 art.1017(I)."],["C036","A098. Actual nonexistence is declared by appellant’s lawyer under personal responsibility.","S001 art.1017(II)."],["C037","A098. Lawyer-attested copies and digital reproductions have statutory authenticity qualifications and preservation duties.","S001 art.425(IV),(VI),§1; S005 art.11."],["C038","A098. Electronic origin records dispense with1017(I)–(II) pieces; electronic appeal alone is insufficient.","S001 art.1017§5; S011."],["C039","A098. Statutory filing channels and fax-original requirements remain subject to governing law/local implementation.","S001 art.1017§§2,4."],["C040","A098. Missing pieces/curable defects require the932 five-day opportunity; not every admission failure is curable.","S001 arts.1017§3,932 sole paragraph."],["C041","A098. Non-electronic origin records require1018 notification within three procedural days of appeal filing.","S001 art.1018§2."],["C042","A098. Noncompliance consequence requires respondent allegation/proof; the2018 case rejects automatic importation of documentary cure.","S001 art.1018§3; S011."],["C043","A098. The2020 case requires attention to proof, purpose and actual prejudice; it does not erase the duty.","S012."],["C044","A098. Complete reformation communicated by the original judge makes the appeal moot; partial change requires remaining-scope analysis.","S001 art.1018§1."],["C045","A098. Ordinary appeal period is15 business days from the lawful trigger.","S001 arts.219,1003§5."],["C046","A098. Notification/publication, not signature or alert alone, controls; journal availability and publication differ.","S001 arts.272,1003; S005 art.4."],["C047","A098. Business-day counting, recess, suspension and just cause require their exact predicates.","S001 arts.216,219–224,1004."],["C048","A098. Co-party doubling requires art.229 conditions and does not apply to electronic proceedings.","S001 art.229."],["C049","A098. Public-law/MP/Defensoria privileges require exact institutional categories and special-period exceptions.","S001 arts.180,183,186."],["C050","A098. Missing holiday proof receives statutory correction treatment; actual lateness is not cured merely by alleging a holiday.","S001 art.1003§6; S002."],["C051","A098. Electronic final-hour/timezone/outage treatment requires actual court-system evidence.","S001 art.213; S005 arts.3,10."],["C052","A098. Required preparation and return expenses follow the published tribunal schedule and filing proof rule.","S001 arts.1007,1017§1."],["C053","A098. Statutory exemptions and electronic transport-charge dispensation do not establish universal fee waiver.","S001 art.1007§§1,3."],["C054","A098. Insufficient preparation requires counsel notice and five days to supplement.","S001 art.1007§2."],["C055","A098. No proof at filing triggers double-payment notice; §4 states no numeric period.","S001 art.1007§4."],["C056","A098. Insufficient doubled payment does not receive further supplementation under§5.","S001 art.1007§5."],["C057","A098. Proved just impediment can relieve desertion with five-day payment opportunity.","S001 art.1007§6."],["C058","A098. Guide-completion error is not automatic desertion; doubtful payment can receive five-day correction.","S001 art.1007§7."],["C059","A098. Aid requested in the appeal postpones proof pending relator decision; refusal leads to a judicially fixed period.","S001 arts.98–99,99§7."],["C060","A098. Review of aid denial/revocation has the separate101/1015(V) route and five-day payment rule if confirmed.","S001 art.101§§1–2."],["C061","A098. Respondent notification follows1019(II), with15days and supporting documents.","S001 art.1019(II)."],["C062","A098. MP intervention is conditional;1019(III)’s express15days is read with180§2.","S001 arts.1019(III),180§2."],["C063","A098. Relator’s five-day initial-processing direction is not automatic relief or a party filing window.","S001 art.1019 caput."],["C064","A098. Article1020 requires requesting a hearing date within one month of respondent notice, not final judgment within30days.","S001 art.1020."],["C065","A098. Filing an agravo does not itself suspend the challenged decision.","S001 art.995 caput."],["C066","A098. Suspension requires probability of success plus grave difficult/impossible harm under995.","S001 art.995 sole paragraph."],["C067","A098. Affirmative urgency relief requires the applicable300 probability and danger predicates.","S001 arts.300,1019(I)."],["C068","A098. Security/waiver and anticipatory irreversibility qualifications remain applicable where relevant.","S001 art.300§§1–3."],["C069","A098. Appellate provisional order is communicated to origin; urgent consideration does not erase later participation.","S001 arts.9–11,1019(I)–(II)."],["C070","A098. Relator’s admissibility/merits powers are statutory and reasoned, not unrestricted.","S001 arts.489,927,932–933; S003."],["C071","A098. Diligence/correction and oral-argument rights depend on their specific provisions.","S001 arts.937(VIII),938."],["C072","A098. A relator’s decision is subject to the1021 internal route, not automatically another instrument appeal.","S001 art.1021."],["C073","A098. Agravo de instrumento is not among the appeals permitting adhesive appeal under997§2(II).","S001 art.997§2(II)."],["C074","A098. T01’s15-day endpoint is conditional on valid notice and the stipulated calendar.","S001 arts.219,224,1003§5; fictional inputs."],["C075","A098. T02’sthree-day period starts from appeal filing in a non-electronic origin case.","S001 art.1018§2; fictional inputs."],["C076","A098. T03’sfive-day correction period assumes a valid order and genuinely curable documentary defect.","S001 arts.1017§3,932 sole paragraph; fictional inputs."],["C077","A098. Full Tema representative judgment and later bodies were read within stated limits; failed sources are not holdings.","S006–S017/source limits."],["C078","A097. No actual capacity, provider permission, private instrument, locality or case was classified.","Scope boundary."],["C079","A098. Admission, merits and interim relief are separate; no debt cancellation, stay or discharge is guaranteed.","S001 arts.932,995,1019; scope."],["C080","A098. Only D15’s interlocutory gateway is augmented; sibling, parent and country acceptance remain held.","Supplied P01 record and scope."]]},{"headers":["Row","Required issue","Claim refs","Status and exact remaining action"],"index":10,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Row","Required issue","Claim refs","Status and exact remaining action"],["P22-G01","Ordinary civil scope","C005,C080","Confirm actual procedure; special regimes held."],["G02","Current CPC/commencement","C001","Selected body read; actual historical transition remains."],["G03","Holiday amendment","C002,C050","Apply current text to actual holiday proof."],["G04","2026 operative amendment","C003","Linked relator provisions read; higher regime held."],["G05","Enacted-future law","C004","Not applied as current gateway."],["G06","Interlocutory classification","C005","Read actual content and phase."],["G07","Sentence/partial merits","C005–C006","Distinguish terminating and partial decisions."],["G08","Despacho","C005","Confirm whether decisional content exists."],["G09","Deferred1009 review","C007","Determine immediate-route availability first."],["G10","Art1015(I) relief","C008","Identify actual provisional ruling."],["G11","Art1015(II) merits","C009","Identify partial merits content."],["G12","Art1015(III) arbitration","C010","Rejection versus termination matters."],["G13","Art1015(IV) disregard","C011,C029","Separate incident determination from proof management."],["G14","Art1015(V) aid","C012","Denial/revocation, not cost label alone."],["G15","Art1015(VI) document/thing","C013","Actual exhibition/possession issue required."],["G16","Art1015(VII) exclusion","C014","Exact joinder act required."],["G17","Art1015(VIII) joinder limit","C015","Rejection of limitation request."],["G18","Art1015(IX) intervention","C016,C022","Apply special participant restrictions."],["G19","Art1015(X) execution objections","C017","Distinguish from clarification motions."],["G20","Art1015(XI) burden","C018","Actual redistribution under373§1 required."],["G21","Art1015(XII) veto","C019","No operative branch."],["G22","Art1015(XIII) other law","C020","Read actual express authorization."],["G23","Sole paragraph liquidation","C021","Confirm actual stage."],["G24","Sole paragraph cumprimento","C021","Distinguish interlocutory from ending sentence."],["G25","Sole paragraph execution","C021","Merits/eligibility held."],["G26","Sole paragraph inventário","C021","Probate merits held."],["G27","Amicus restriction","C022","Full special jurisprudence held."],["G28","Tema988 full body","C023,C077","Full representative document obtained; pixel limitation disclosed."],["G29","Majority and result","C023","Seven–five certificate; competence route only."],["G30","Urgency predicate","C024","Prove uselessness of later review."],["G31","Mere inconvenience","C024,C028–C030","Not automatically sufficient."],["G32","Modulation","C025","Actual interlocutory date required."],["G33","Listed-issue preclusion","C026","Proper immediate deadline must be established."],["G34","Unlisted exceptional preclusion","C026","Preserve majority’s admission/decision qualification."],["G35","Separate writings","C027","Dissent recorded, not treated as holding."],["G36","Later value-of-case ruling","C028","No automatic aid analogy."],["G37","Later incident evidence ruling","C029","No blanket itemIV route."],["G38","Later deferred expertise ruling","C030","Actual stage/necessity/urgency required."],["G39","Standing and adverse interest","C031","Identify requested useful change."],["G40","Third-party standing","C031","Demonstrate affected right."],["G41","Capacity/mandate","C032","Actual representation unexamined."],["G42","Competent tribunal","C033","Court organization/local distribution held."],["G43","Petition contents/reasons","C034","Compare full ruling and proposed grounds."],["G44","Required copies","C035","Actual origin record required."],["G45","Nonexistent pieces","C036","Counsel’s truthful declaration required."],["G46","Optional useful documents","C035–C036","Add context without inventing records."],["G47","Authenticity/preservation","C037","Actual original/copy challenge unknown."],["G48","Electronic origin exception","C038","Confirm origin, not appeal-only, status."],["G49","Filing channels","C039","Current local mandatory-system rules held."],["G50","Fax original requirement","C039","Governing law/order required."],["G51","Missing-piece cure","C040","Five-day statutory mechanism."],["G52","Noncurable substantive defects","C040","Do not equate every failure with a missing copy."],["G53","Paper-origin notification","C041","Three days from filing."],["G54","Respondent allegation/proof","C042","Actual proof required."],["G55","Prejudice/instrumentality qualification","C043","Actual defense opportunity required."],["G56","Complete retraction","C044","Full reform must be communicated."],["G57","Judicial information","C044,C070–C071","No invented universal extra reporting period."],["G58","Fifteen-day appeal","C045","Actual lawful trigger required."],["G59","Notice/journal sequence","C046","Certificate and applicable channel required."],["G60","Business days/recess","C047","Actual court calendar required."],["G61","Co-party doubled period","C048","Different offices/electronic exception."],["G62","Institutional privileges","C049","Exact actor and special period."],["G63","Holiday proof","C050","No holiday assumed."],["G64","Electronic final hour/outage","C051","Official system evidence required."],["G65","Preparation schedule","C052","No amount invented."],["G66","Exemptions/transport charges","C053","Statutory category required."],["G67","Insufficient payment","C054","Five-day supplement."],["G68","No proof/doubled payment","C055–C056","Order controls time; no endless supplementation."],["G69","Impediment/guide error","C057–C058","Exact cure predicate required."],["G70","Aid request/review","C059–C060","Distinguish99§7 from101."],["G71","Respondent response","C061","Proper notice and15-day computation."],["G72","MP participation","C062","Required intervention and express period."],["G73","Relator’s five-day processing","C063","Not automatic grant."],["G74","One-month scheduling direction","C064","Not30days or final-result guarantee."],["G75","Stay versus affirmative relief","C065–C068","Separate merits/probability/harm predicates."],["G76","Reasons, hearing and diligence","C069–C071","Actual order and evidence required."],["G77","Internal appeal boundary","C072","No full1021 report."],["G78","No adhesive instrument appeal","C073","Independent timely challenge may be needed."],["G79","H01 provisional ruling","C008,C065–C068","Conditional workflow complete."],["G80","H02 partial merits","C005–C006","Conditional workflow complete."],["G81","H03 arbitration","C010","Conditional workflow complete."],["G82","H04 case value","C012,C028","Conditional workflow complete."],["G83","H05 burden redistribution","C018","Conditional workflow complete."],["G84","H06 expert deferral","C024,C030","Conditional workflow complete."],["G85","H07 irreversible disclosure","C024–C026","Conditional workflow complete."],["G86","H08 inconvenience","C007,C024–C026","Conditional workflow complete."],["G87","H09 incident evidence","C011,C029","Conditional workflow complete."],["G88","H10 missing copy","C035,C040","Conditional workflow complete."],["G89","H11 nonexistence declaration","C036","Conditional workflow complete."],["G90","H12 electronic appeal/paper origin","C038,C041–C043","Conditional workflow complete."],["G91","H13 electronic origin","C038–C040","Conditional workflow complete."],["G92","H14 interim relief","C065–C069","Conditional workflow complete."],["G93","H15 relator decision","C072","Conditional workflow complete."],["G94","H16 enforcement classification","C005,C021","Conditional workflow complete."],["G95","T01 ordinary deadline model","C074","Hypothetical calendar only."],["G96","T02 origin-notification model","C075","Not the appeal period."],["G97","T03 cure model","C076","Curable-document assumption only."],["G98","Sources/citator limits","C077","No complete current-law certification."],["G99","Actual facts/provider authority","C078–C079","None classified or cleared."],["G100","D15/component/country acceptance","C080","Narrow addition; all acceptance holds remain."]]},{"headers":["Row","Deferred family","Exact next action"],"index":11,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Row","Deferred family","Exact next action"],["P22-D01","First-instance commencement and service","P18 unreviewed; establish actual notice independently."],["D02","Default and ensuing judgment","P19 unreviewed; no default merits imported."],["D03","Full apelação","P20 unreviewed; only1009 boundary used freshly."],["D04","Full embargos de declaração","P21 unreviewed; no interruptive filing assumption adopted."],["D05","Full agravo interno","Read actual relator decision and internal rules separately."],["D06","Special/extraordinary appeals and agravo to higher courts","Do not confuse with ordinary1015 instrument appeal."],["D07","Full2026 relevance regime","Separate current higher-court implementation."],["D08","Rescisória, reopening and mandado de segurança","Identify actual finality, exceptional remedy and competent court."],["D09","Execution, cumprimento and attachment merits","Sole-paragraph route is not enforcement clearance."],["D10","Liquidation merits and expert valuation","Determine actual quantitative issue separately."],["D11","Inventário and probate","Route boundary only; estate rights and procedure held."],["D12","Juizados and special courts","No ordinary agravo procedure by analogy."],["D13","Collective consumer litigation","Identify standing and special procedural statutes."],["D14","Superendividamento","Separate statutory participation and remedy rules."],["D15","Insolvency, recuperação and falência","Determine special stage, stay and appeal regime."],["D16","Public, tax, family and support proceedings","Apply exact special statute and institutional predicates."],["D17","Consumer contracts, fees and cancellation","P04 unreviewed; no substantive claim validation."],["D18","Prescription and underlying debt defenses","P05 unreviewed."],["D19","Payment, release, assignment and creditor authority","Actual instruments required; no sibling adoption."],["D20","Collection conduct","P10 unreviewed."],["D21","LGPD and credit reporting","Separate privacy/reporting modules."],["D22","Surety, solidarity and substantive joinder","P16 unreviewed; procedural route does not establish liability."],["D23","OAB/provider/financial/payment permission","No operating authority from appeal rules."],["D24","Full security, property and homestead","No attachment or property-restoration conclusion."],["D25","Local fees, forms, calendars and e-filing","Obtain actual competent-court instruments."],["D26","Foreign jurisdiction, service and recognition","No foreign procedure imported."],["D27","Private records and exhaustive current citator","No private lookup; later primary treatment still required."],["D28","Country/component/A066/A097/A098/parent acceptance","HOLD pending separate coordinator review and remaining work."]]},{"headers":["State/DF","Actual local read status","Exact remaining local question"],"index":12,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["State/DF","Actual local read status","Exact remaining local question"],["Acre (AC)","No local operative body read.","TJAC competence, filing, fees, calendar and record-transmission rules."],["Alagoas (AL)","No local operative body read.","TJAL portal, preparation, notice and distribution procedures."],["Amapá (AP)","No local operative body read.","TJAP electronic-origin status, forms, closures and costs."],["Amazonas (AM)","No local operative body read.","TJAM actual filing/timezone/fee rules; STJ’s AM case is not local certification."],["Bahia (BA)","No local operative body read.","TJBA distribution, preparation and notification implementation."],["Ceará (CE)","No local operative body read.","TJCE record requirements, calendars and internal processing."],["Distrito Federal (DF)","No local operative body read.","TJDFT actual competent body, forms, fees and filing calendar."],["Espírito Santo (ES)","No local operative body read.","TJES digital access, preparation and notice rules."],["Goiás (GO)","No local operative body read.","TJGO origin communication, portal and fee implementation."],["Maranhão (MA)","No local operative body read.","TJMA accessibility, court closures and record transmission."],["Mato Grosso (MT)","No local operative body read.","TJMT current rules; Tema988’s originating context is not a local audit."],["Mato Grosso do Sul (MS)","No local operative body read.","TJMS filing system, preparation and outage certification."],["Minas Gerais (MG)","No local operative body read.","TJMG competent chamber, costs, forms and calendar."],["Pará (PA)","No local operative body read.","TJPA remote access, language needs and court-calendar rules."],["Paraíba (PB)","No local operative body read.","TJPB filing, record access and preparation procedure."],["Paraná (PR)","No local operative body read.","TJPR origin/appeal system interaction and calendar."],["Pernambuco (PE)","No local operative body read.","TJPE appeal forms, fee schedule and notification rules."],["Piauí (PI)","No local operative body read.","TJPI local holidays, electronic access and costs."],["Rio de Janeiro (RJ)","No local operative body read.","TJRJ filing, distribution, preparation and hearing rules."],["Rio Grande do Norte (RN)","No local operative body read.","TJRN local procedure, forms and court calendar."],["Rio Grande do Sul (RS)","No local operative body read.","TJRS current paper/electronic implementation; published cases do not certify it."],["Rondônia (RO)","No local operative body read.","TJRO timezone, portal, official outages and fees."],["Roraima (RR)","No local operative body read.","TJRR access, local calendar and filing requirements."],["Santa Catarina (SC)","No local operative body read.","TJSC instrument filing, record access and preparation rules."],["São Paulo (SP)","No local operative body read.","TJSP actual records, notification and cost rules; STJ cases are not implementation proof."],["Sergipe (SE)","No local operative body read.","TJSE forms, preparation, closures and distribution."],["Tocantins (TO)","No local operative body read.","TJTO electronic procedure, access and court-calendar requirements."]]},{"headers":["Specification","Supported use","Guardrail"],"index":13,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Specification","Supported use","Guardrail"],["Immediate-review classifier","Separate express item, sole-paragraph context, other statute and Tema988 exception.","No “all interlocutory rulings are appealable” output."],["Urgency explanation worksheet","Identify what later review could no longer repair.","Mere expense, delay or disagreement is not automatically enough."],["Instrument checklist","Required copies, true nonexistence, authenticity and electronic-origin exception.","Electronic appeal is not the same as electronic origin."],["Origin-notification tracker","Separate15-day appeal and3-day paper-record communication.","Actual filing proof, respondent assertion and prejudice still matter."],["Preparation decision tree","Insufficient payment, no proof, doubled payment, aid and guide error.","No invented fee or universal cure period."],["Interim-relief matrix","Distinguish Tema988 admissibility, suspensive relief and affirmative relief.","Filing/admission is not a stay or merits victory."]]},{"headers":["Item","Actual result"],"index":14,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Item","Actual result"],["Assigned component","P01 D15 ordinary civil interlocutory-review gateway only."],["Unreviewed sibling findings used as premises","None."],["P01 review-file access","User-supplied metadata preserved; no local review file opened or modified."],["Source-register rows","17."],["Statutory bodies","5."],["Published full-judgment documents","6, including one complete Tema988 representative document."],["Other official registry/summary/overview records","3."],["Failed routes","3; no holding adopted from their unread bodies."],["Tema988 full-body access","Yes: REsp1.704.520-MT,98 pages; relevant majority, separate writings and certificate read."],["Tema988 PDF pixel review","No: screenshot rendering failed; text read and limitation preserved."],["Later/other judgment pixel review","Relevant pages of 5 PDFs inspected."],["Atomic claims","80."],["Core coverage","100."],["Deferred families","28."],["Territorial rows","27."],["Total coverage rows","155:100 core +28 deferred +27 territorial."],["Fictional workflows","16."],["Conditional computations","3."],["P01 crosswalk","9 logical items and9 physical data rows."],["Actual deadline, fee, debt or appellate result","None determined."],["Actual private party/account/licence/docket investigation","None."],["Contact, filing, payment or account action","None."],["API, hidden endpoint, security workaround, new chat or subagent","None."],["Coordinator-file write","None performed or claimed."],["Exact source-opening clocks","Unknown."],["Independent/all-source/current-law certification","Not claimed."],["Provider, locality, component, parent or country acceptance","Not granted; all holds remain."]]}],"claims":[{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C001","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C001","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. CPC commencement is one year after official publication; temporal application preserves completed acts.","Evidence":"S001 arts. 14, 1045/footer."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"dated_CPC1045partial_support_other_rule_and_currentness_held","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C001","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C001","coordinator_status":"dated_CPC1045partial_support_other_rule_and_currentness_held","selected_evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm","actual_evidence_URL":"https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105.htm","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":5,"actual_numbered_lines":[[7291,7293]],"packet_character_bounds":[14106,25198],"access":"dated_statutory_family_capture_reuse_not_current_body"}],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C002","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C002","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Lei 14.939 amended holiday-proof correction and took effect on publication.","Evidence":"S002 arts. 1–2."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C002","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C002","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C003","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C003","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Lei 15.484’s relevant 932/qualified-precedent amendments are operative by access; full higher-appeal regime held.","Evidence":"S003 arts. 3–7."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C003","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C003","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C004","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C004","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Lei 15.479 remains enacted-future at access.","Evidence":"S004 art. 4."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C004","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C004","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C005","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C005","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Sentence/interlocutory/despacho classification follows content and procedural function; despacho is not appealable.","Evidence":"S001 arts. 203,1001,1009."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C005","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C005","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C006","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C006","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Specified partial termination/merits decisions use agravo.","Evidence":"S001 arts.354 sole paragraph,356§5."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C006","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C006","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C007","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C007","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Non-immediately-appealable cognitive issues have deferred1009 review, with its response/sentence qualifications.","Evidence":"S001 art.1009§§1–3."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_majority_registry_rule_comparison_with_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C007","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C007","coordinator_status":"selected_primary_majority_registry_rule_comparison_with_holds","selected_evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":1,"actual_numbered_lines":[[1449,1456]],"packet_character_bounds":[4990,9886],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C008","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C008","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Provisional-relief interlocutory decisions fall under1015(I).","Evidence":"S001 art.1015(I)."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C008","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C008","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C009","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C009","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Interlocutory merits decisions fall under1015(II).","Evidence":"S001 art.1015(II)."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C009","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C009","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C010","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C010","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Rejection of an arbitration-convention allegation is expressly listed.","Evidence":"S001 art.1015(III)."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C010","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C010","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C011","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C011","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Disregard-of-personality incident decisions require precise classification; not every internal evidence ruling is covered.","Evidence":"S001 art.1015(IV); S010."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C011","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C011","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C012","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C012","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Aid rejection or accepted revocation is listed, not every increased-cost ruling.","Evidence":"S001 art.1015(V); S009."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C012","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C012","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C013","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C013","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Exhibition/possession of document or thing is expressly listed.","Evidence":"S001 art.1015(VI)."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C013","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C013","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C014","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C014","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Exclusion of a co-party is expressly listed.","Evidence":"S001 art.1015(VII)."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C014","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C014","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C015","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C015","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Rejection of a request to limit joinder is expressly listed.","Evidence":"S001 art.1015(VIII)."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C015","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C015","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C016","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C016","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Admission/inadmission of third-party intervention is listed, subject to special restrictions.","Evidence":"S001 art.1015(IX)."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C016","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C016","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C017","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C017","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Suspensive-effect rulings concerning execution objections are listed; these are not clarification motions.","Evidence":"S001 art.1015(X)."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C017","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C017","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C018","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C018","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Art.373§1 burden redistribution is listed; ordinary evidence management is not automatically the same.","Evidence":"S001 art.1015(XI),373§1."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C018","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C018","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C019","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C019","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Item XII is vetoed and supplies no operative category.","Evidence":"S001 art.1015(XII)."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C019","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C019","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C020","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C020","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Additional immediate routes require express statutory authorization.","Evidence":"S001 art.1015(XIII)."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C020","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C020","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C021","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C021","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Sole-paragraph contexts broaden interlocutory appealability, but do not convert a sentence into an interlocutory act.","Evidence":"S001 art.1015 sole paragraph,203."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C021","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C021","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C022","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C022","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Amicus participation/appeal limitations cannot be erased by a generic third-party label.","Evidence":"S001 art.138."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C022","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C022","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C023","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C023","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Tema988’s full representative judgment adopted urgency-based mitigated taxativity by majority.","Evidence":"S006 pp.57–58,98; S007."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_majority_registry_rule_comparison_with_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C023","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C023","coordinator_status":"selected_primary_majority_registry_rule_comparison_with_holds","selected_evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":3,"actual_numbered_lines":[[1605,1635]],"packet_character_bounds":[14636,19650],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"},{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":4,"actual_numbered_lines":[[2910,2925]],"packet_character_bounds":[19730,24592],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"},{"registered_URL":"https://processo.stj.jus.br/repetitivos/temas_repetitivos/pesquisa.jsp?novaConsulta=true&num_processo_classe=1696396&sg_classe=REsp&tipo_pesquisa=T","actual_evidence_URL":"https://processo.stj.jus.br/repetitivos/temas_repetitivos/pesquisa.jsp?novaConsulta=true&num_processo_classe=1696396&sg_classe=REsp&tipo_pesquisa=T","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":0,"actual_numbered_lines":[[160,188]],"packet_character_bounds":[0,9034],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C024","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C024","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. The exceptional predicate is uselessness of delayed appellate review, not mere inconvenience.","Evidence":"S006 pp.43–44,51–54."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_majority_registry_rule_comparison_with_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C024","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C024","coordinator_status":"selected_primary_majority_registry_rule_comparison_with_holds","selected_evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":0,"actual_numbered_lines":[[1214,1264]],"packet_character_bounds":[0,4910],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"},{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":1,"actual_numbered_lines":[[1467,1490]],"packet_character_bounds":[4990,9886],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"},{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":2,"actual_numbered_lines":[[1491,1502]],"packet_character_bounds":[9966,14556],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"},{"registered_URL":"https://processo.stj.jus.br/repetitivos/temas_repetitivos/pesquisa.jsp?novaConsulta=true&num_processo_classe=1696396&sg_classe=REsp&tipo_pesquisa=T","actual_evidence_URL":"https://processo.stj.jus.br/repetitivos/temas_repetitivos/pesquisa.jsp?novaConsulta=true&num_processo_classe=1696396&sg_classe=REsp&tipo_pesquisa=T","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":0,"actual_numbered_lines":[[174,183]],"packet_character_bounds":[0,9034],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C025","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C025","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Tema988 modulation uses interlocutory decisions after December19,2018 publication.","Evidence":"S006 pp.53–54; S007."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_majority_registry_rule_comparison_with_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C025","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C025","coordinator_status":"selected_primary_majority_registry_rule_comparison_with_holds","selected_evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":2,"actual_numbered_lines":[[1509,1522]],"packet_character_bounds":[9966,14556],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"},{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":3,"actual_numbered_lines":[[1629,1631]],"packet_character_bounds":[14636,19650],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"},{"registered_URL":"https://processo.stj.jus.br/repetitivos/temas_repetitivos/pesquisa.jsp?novaConsulta=true&num_processo_classe=1696396&sg_classe=REsp&tipo_pesquisa=T","actual_evidence_URL":"https://processo.stj.jus.br/repetitivos/temas_repetitivos/pesquisa.jsp?novaConsulta=true&num_processo_classe=1696396&sg_classe=REsp&tipo_pesquisa=T","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":0,"actual_numbered_lines":[[182,184]],"packet_character_bounds":[0,9034],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C026","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C026","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. The majority separates statutory immediate-review preclusion from exceptional unlisted questions admitted and decided under Tema988.","Evidence":"S006 pp.51–54."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_majority_registry_rule_comparison_with_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C026","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C026","coordinator_status":"selected_primary_majority_registry_rule_comparison_with_holds","selected_evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":1,"actual_numbered_lines":[[1449,1490]],"packet_character_bounds":[4990,9886],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"},{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":2,"actual_numbered_lines":[[1491,1502]],"packet_character_bounds":[9966,14556],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"},{"registered_URL":"https://processo.stj.jus.br/repetitivos/temas_repetitivos/pesquisa.jsp?novaConsulta=true&num_processo_classe=1696396&sg_classe=REsp&tipo_pesquisa=T","actual_evidence_URL":"https://processo.stj.jus.br/repetitivos/temas_repetitivos/pesquisa.jsp?novaConsulta=true&num_processo_classe=1696396&sg_classe=REsp&tipo_pesquisa=T","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":0,"actual_numbered_lines":[[182,183]],"packet_character_bounds":[0,9034],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C027","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C027","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. The dissents argued legislative restriction/security concerns; they are not the final rule.","Evidence":"S006 selected separate writings and p.98 certificate."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_majority_registry_rule_comparison_with_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C027","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C027","coordinator_status":"selected_primary_majority_registry_rule_comparison_with_holds","selected_evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":0,"actual_numbered_lines":[[1939,1988]],"packet_character_bounds":[0,9136],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"},{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":1,"actual_numbered_lines":[[2293,2338]],"packet_character_bounds":[9216,18004],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"},{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":1,"actual_numbered_lines":[[2347,2355]],"packet_character_bounds":[9216,18004],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"},{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":4,"actual_numbered_lines":[[2863,2868]],"packet_character_bounds":[19730,24592],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"},{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":2,"actual_numbered_lines":[[2830,2868]],"packet_character_bounds":[18084,26776],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"},{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":4,"actual_numbered_lines":[[2910,2925]],"packet_character_bounds":[19730,24592],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C028","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C028","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Case-value correction is not automatically aid denial or Tema988 urgency.","Evidence":"S009."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"official_overview_corrob_or_discovery_only_full_later_opinion_unreopened","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C028","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C028","coordinator_status":"official_overview_corrob_or_discovery_only_full_later_opinion_unreopened","selected_evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://www.stj.jus.br/sites/portalp/Paginas/Comunicacao/Noticias/2026/22022026-Novas-decisoes-do-STJ-sobre-o-cabimento-do-agravo-de-instrumento-no-regime-do-CPC2015.aspx","actual_evidence_URL":"https://www.stj.jus.br/sites/portalp/Paginas/Comunicacao/Noticias/2026/22022026-Novas-decisoes-do-STJ-sobre-o-cabimento-do-agravo-de-instrumento-no-regime-do-CPC2015.aspx","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":1,"actual_numbered_lines":[[24,29]],"packet_character_bounds":[9114,27202],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C029","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C029","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Expert-evidence direction inside a disregard incident was not automatically immediately appealable in the read case.","Evidence":"S010."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"official_overview_corrob_or_discovery_only_full_later_opinion_unreopened","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C029","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C029","coordinator_status":"official_overview_corrob_or_discovery_only_full_later_opinion_unreopened","selected_evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://www.stj.jus.br/sites/portalp/Paginas/Comunicacao/Noticias/2026/22022026-Novas-decisoes-do-STJ-sobre-o-cabimento-do-agravo-de-instrumento-no-regime-do-CPC2015.aspx","actual_evidence_URL":"https://www.stj.jus.br/sites/portalp/Paginas/Comunicacao/Noticias/2026/22022026-Novas-decisoes-do-STJ-sobre-o-cabimento-do-agravo-de-instrumento-no-regime-do-CPC2015.aspx","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":1,"actual_numbered_lines":[[30,32]],"packet_character_bounds":[9114,27202],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C030","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C030","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. The2026 deferred-expertise case did not establish useless later review; factual posture limits the ruling.","Evidence":"S008."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C030","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C030","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C031","area_numbers":[97],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C031","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A097. Appellant needs standing/adverse interest; prejudiced-third-party status requires the statutory rights connection.","Evidence":"S001 arts.17,996."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C031","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C031","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[97],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C032","area_numbers":[97],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C032","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A097. Capacity, counsel and mandate must be established; qualifying representation defects have a correction mechanism.","Evidence":"S001 arts.70–76,103–105."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C032","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C032","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[97],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C033","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C033","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Agravo is directed to the competent tribunal, subject to lawful filing channels.","Evidence":"S001 arts.1016,1017§2."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C033","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C033","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C034","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C034","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Petition must state parties, facts/law, specific reform/nullity reasons/request and counsel addresses.","Evidence":"S001 art.1016."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C034","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C034","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C035","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C035","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. The non-electronic instrument requires the listed originating pleadings, ruling, official timeliness proof and mandates.","Evidence":"S001 art.1017(I)."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C035","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C035","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C036","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C036","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Actual nonexistence is declared by appellant’s lawyer under personal responsibility.","Evidence":"S001 art.1017(II)."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C036","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C036","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C037","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C037","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Lawyer-attested copies and digital reproductions have statutory authenticity qualifications and preservation duties.","Evidence":"S001 art.425(IV),(VI),§1; S005 art.11."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C037","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C037","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C038","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C038","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Electronic origin records dispense with1017(I)–(II) pieces; electronic appeal alone is insufficient.","Evidence":"S001 art.1017§5; S011."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C038","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C038","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C039","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C039","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Statutory filing channels and fax-original requirements remain subject to governing law/local implementation.","Evidence":"S001 art.1017§§2,4."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C039","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C039","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C040","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C040","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Missing pieces/curable defects require the932 five-day opportunity; not every admission failure is curable.","Evidence":"S001 arts.1017§3,932 sole paragraph."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C040","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C040","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C041","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C041","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Non-electronic origin records require1018 notification within three procedural days of appeal filing.","Evidence":"S001 art.1018§2."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C041","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C041","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C042","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C042","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Noncompliance consequence requires respondent allegation/proof; the2018 case rejects automatic importation of documentary cure.","Evidence":"S001 art.1018§3; S011."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C042","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C042","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C043","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C043","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. The2020 case requires attention to proof, purpose and actual prejudice; it does not erase the duty.","Evidence":"S012."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C043","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C043","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C044","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C044","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Complete reformation communicated by the original judge makes the appeal moot; partial change requires remaining-scope analysis.","Evidence":"S001 art.1018§1."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C044","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C044","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C045","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C045","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Ordinary appeal period is15 business days from the lawful trigger.","Evidence":"S001 arts.219,1003§5."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C045","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C045","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C046","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C046","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Notification/publication, not signature or alert alone, controls; journal availability and publication differ.","Evidence":"S001 arts.272,1003; S005 art.4."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C046","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C046","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C047","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C047","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Business-day counting, recess, suspension and just cause require their exact predicates.","Evidence":"S001 arts.216,219–224,1004."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C047","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C047","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C048","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C048","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Co-party doubling requires art.229 conditions and does not apply to electronic proceedings.","Evidence":"S001 art.229."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C048","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C048","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C049","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C049","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Public-law/MP/Defensoria privileges require exact institutional categories and special-period exceptions.","Evidence":"S001 arts.180,183,186."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C049","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C049","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C050","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C050","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Missing holiday proof receives statutory correction treatment; actual lateness is not cured merely by alleging a holiday.","Evidence":"S001 art.1003§6; S002."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C050","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C050","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C051","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C051","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Electronic final-hour/timezone/outage treatment requires actual court-system evidence.","Evidence":"S001 art.213; S005 arts.3,10."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C051","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C051","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C052","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C052","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Required preparation and return expenses follow the published tribunal schedule and filing proof rule.","Evidence":"S001 arts.1007,1017§1."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C052","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C052","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C053","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C053","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Statutory exemptions and electronic transport-charge dispensation do not establish universal fee waiver.","Evidence":"S001 art.1007§§1,3."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C053","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C053","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C054","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C054","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Insufficient preparation requires counsel notice and five days to supplement.","Evidence":"S001 art.1007§2."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C054","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C054","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C055","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C055","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. No proof at filing triggers double-payment notice; §4 states no numeric period.","Evidence":"S001 art.1007§4."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C055","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C055","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C056","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C056","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Insufficient doubled payment does not receive further supplementation under§5.","Evidence":"S001 art.1007§5."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C056","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C056","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C057","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C057","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Proved just impediment can relieve desertion with five-day payment opportunity.","Evidence":"S001 art.1007§6."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C057","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C057","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C058","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C058","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Guide-completion error is not automatic desertion; doubtful payment can receive five-day correction.","Evidence":"S001 art.1007§7."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C058","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C058","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C059","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C059","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Aid requested in the appeal postpones proof pending relator decision; refusal leads to a judicially fixed period.","Evidence":"S001 arts.98–99,99§7."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C059","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C059","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C060","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C060","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Review of aid denial/revocation has the separate101/1015(V) route and five-day payment rule if confirmed.","Evidence":"S001 art.101§§1–2."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C060","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C060","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C061","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C061","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Respondent notification follows1019(II), with15days and supporting documents.","Evidence":"S001 art.1019(II)."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C061","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C061","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C062","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C062","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. MP intervention is conditional;1019(III)’s express15days is read with180§2.","Evidence":"S001 arts.1019(III),180§2."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C062","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C062","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C063","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C063","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Relator’s five-day initial-processing direction is not automatic relief or a party filing window.","Evidence":"S001 art.1019 caput."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C063","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C063","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C064","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C064","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Article1020 requires requesting a hearing date within one month of respondent notice, not final judgment within30days.","Evidence":"S001 art.1020."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C064","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C064","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C065","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C065","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Filing an agravo does not itself suspend the challenged decision.","Evidence":"S001 art.995 caput."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C065","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C065","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C066","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C066","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Suspension requires probability of success plus grave difficult/impossible harm under995.","Evidence":"S001 art.995 sole paragraph."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C066","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C066","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C067","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C067","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Affirmative urgency relief requires the applicable300 probability and danger predicates.","Evidence":"S001 arts.300,1019(I)."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C067","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C067","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C068","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C068","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Security/waiver and anticipatory irreversibility qualifications remain applicable where relevant.","Evidence":"S001 art.300§§1–3."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C068","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C068","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C069","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C069","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Appellate provisional order is communicated to origin; urgent consideration does not erase later participation.","Evidence":"S001 arts.9–11,1019(I)–(II)."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C069","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C069","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C070","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C070","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Relator’s admissibility/merits powers are statutory and reasoned, not unrestricted.","Evidence":"S001 arts.489,927,932–933; S003."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C070","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C070","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C071","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C071","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Diligence/correction and oral-argument rights depend on their specific provisions.","Evidence":"S001 arts.937(VIII),938."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C071","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C071","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C072","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C072","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. A relator’s decision is subject to the1021 internal route, not automatically another instrument appeal.","Evidence":"S001 art.1021."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C072","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C072","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C073","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C073","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Agravo de instrumento is not among the appeals permitting adhesive appeal under997§2(II).","Evidence":"S001 art.997§2(II)."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C073","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C073","coordinator_status":"coordinator_unreopened_statutory_or_original_later_judicial_proposition_holds","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C074","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C074","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. T01’s15-day endpoint is conditional on valid notice and the stipulated calendar.","Evidence":"S001 arts.219,224,1003§5; fictional inputs."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"conditional_arithmetic_or_private_scope_hold_notactualapplication","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C074","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C074","coordinator_status":"conditional_arithmetic_or_private_scope_hold_notactualapplication","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C075","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C075","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. T02’sthree-day period starts from appeal filing in a non-electronic origin case.","Evidence":"S001 art.1018§2; fictional inputs."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"conditional_arithmetic_or_private_scope_hold_notactualapplication","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C075","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C075","coordinator_status":"conditional_arithmetic_or_private_scope_hold_notactualapplication","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C076","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C076","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. T03’sfive-day correction period assumes a valid order and genuinely curable documentary defect.","Evidence":"S001 arts.1017§3,932 sole paragraph; fictional inputs."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"conditional_arithmetic_or_private_scope_hold_notactualapplication","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C076","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C076","coordinator_status":"conditional_arithmetic_or_private_scope_hold_notactualapplication","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C077","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C077","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Full Tema representative judgment and later bodies were read within stated limits; failed sources are not holdings.","Evidence":"S006–S017/source limits."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_primary_majority_registry_rule_comparison_with_holds","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C077","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C077","coordinator_status":"selected_primary_majority_registry_rule_comparison_with_holds","selected_evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://processo.stj.jus.br/repetitivos/temas_repetitivos/pesquisa.jsp?novaConsulta=true&num_processo_classe=1696396&sg_classe=REsp&tipo_pesquisa=T","actual_evidence_URL":"https://processo.stj.jus.br/repetitivos/temas_repetitivos/pesquisa.jsp?novaConsulta=true&num_processo_classe=1696396&sg_classe=REsp&tipo_pesquisa=T","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":0,"actual_numbered_lines":[[160,259]],"packet_character_bounds":[0,9034],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C078","area_numbers":[97],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C078","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A097. No actual capacity, provider permission, private instrument, locality or case was classified.","Evidence":"Scope boundary."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"conditional_arithmetic_or_private_scope_hold_notactualapplication","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C078","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C078","coordinator_status":"conditional_arithmetic_or_private_scope_hold_notactualapplication","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[97],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C079","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C079","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Admission, merits and interim relief are separate; no debt cancellation, stay or discharge is guaranteed.","Evidence":"S001 arts.932,995,1019; scope."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"conditional_arithmetic_or_private_scope_hold_notactualapplication","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C079","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C079","coordinator_status":"conditional_arithmetic_or_private_scope_hold_notactualapplication","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C080","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"explicit_atomic_researcher_claim_area_label","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C080","Atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Only D15’s interlocutory gateway is augmented; sibling, parent and country acceptance remain held.","Evidence":"Supplied P01 record and scope."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_verification_status":"conditional_arithmetic_or_private_scope_hold_notactualapplication","coordinator_prior_area_assignment":{"area_numbers":[97,98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_pass_scope"},"coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_claim_id":"C_BR-P22-C080","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-C080","coordinator_status":"conditional_arithmetic_or_private_scope_hold_notactualapplication","selected_evidence":[],"actual_area_assignment":[98],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_current_primary_or_actual_appellate_result_accepted":false}}],"sources":[{"source_id":"C_BR-P22-S001","urls":["https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"C_BR-P22-S001","Issuer/title and full literal URL":"Presidência, CPC, Lei 13.105/2015, compiled. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm","Actual body read, status, publication and limits":"Fresh operative selected body. Material arts. 9–11, 14, 17, 70–76, 98–105, 138, 180, 183, 186, 203, 213, 216, 218–224, 229, 272, 298–300, 354, 356 §5, 373 §1, 425, 489 §1, 927, 932–933, 937–938, 994–1009, 1015–1021 and 1045/footer. DOU March 17, 2015; one-year original vacatio. HTML; printed page/PDF index N/A. No full provider, apelação, ED, service, execution or higher-appeal survey."},"coordinator_verification_status":"inherited_exact_statutory_block_unretried_current_body_unread","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_source_id":"C_BR-P22-S001","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-S001","registered_literal_URL":"https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm","coordinator_status":"inherited_exact_statutory_block_unretried_current_body_unread","selected_scopes":[{"source_id":"C_BR-P22-S001","line_range":[7291,7293],"scope":"DatedstatutoryfamilyCPC1045one-yearwording only; art14/currentversion/footernotverified and literalURLdiffersregisteredcompiledpath","evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm","actual_evidence_URL":"https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105.htm","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":5,"actual_numbered_lines":[[7291,7293]],"packet_character_bounds":[14106,25198],"access":"dated_statutory_family_capture_reuse_not_current_body"}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false}],"inherited_block":[{"source_id":"C_BR-P22-S001","literal_URL":"https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm","exact_message":"Esta requisição foi bloqueada.","original_packet":"[internal evidence reference]","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":0,"whole_block_character_bounds":[0,722],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[0,5]],"new_attempt_this_review":false,"no_parallel_url_variant_alternatehost_or_workaround":true,"does_not_reclassify_original_generation_access":true}],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_currentness_or_application_accepted":false,"limits":["Delegated same-coordinator saved ordinarycivil interlocutorygateway review only, never independent/exhaustive/allsource/currentalllaw/allclaim/actualadmissibility/actualstay/local/country/A066/A097/A098/parent/publicationacceptance. Noactualparty/provider/person/account/property/entity/contract/licence/privatecase/docket/record investigated and no newscenario constructed.","Allfive statutoryliteralURLs have attributablepriorblocks, preservedincompleteimmutablepacket copies fromBR18/19/rootBR20. None retried, parallelCPCURLfetched, alternatehosted or bypassed. Zero newfailedURLevents, not freshrecovery or disproof ofresearchergenerationaccess. Roottextwrapperextra newline versus canonicalJSONtoolstringpreservedandseparatelyhashed.","ThreepreselectedgenericpublicauthorityURLs readable in fivecompleteunmodifiedtoolpackets:publishedTema988representativeopinion, officialgenericTema registry andofficial2026overview. Publishedlaw/precedent readbyprovidedliteralpublicationURLs only, nonewcase/personsearchorprivate/docketrecord inquiry; no linkedcase/partyrecordsopened. Location-onlyfinds have empty substantivebounds; no-matchpattern isnot legalabsence.","Published98pageopiniondocument available, but onlyselected majority/modulation/context/dissent/certificate passages consumed, notentire98pages or everyquotedauthority. Parsedtextonly, zero freshPDFpixels; originalreportedfailedscreenshotsindices2/52/97not retried, rawpixelclaimselsewherepreservedasattribution. Malformed printedtotal denominator preserved; printedpageandzeroPDFindexdistinguished. Missingreturnedlines1210-1213not reconstructed.","Actualselected majority1449-1502 distinguishes statutorylistedpreclusion from exceptionalunlisted positiveadmission/decision.1520-1522and1624-1634modulate by interlocutorydecisionissuedafterpublication; registryquotes19December2018publication. Certificatecounts6joiners+relator7versus5dissents; membersabsentinfinalsessionnotmiscountedasnevervoting. Noactualparty’spreclusion/urgency/competence/meritsdetermined.","Genericregistry supports thesis/modulation/status andrecordsfinality22February2019; update17February2023not a2026citatorcertificate.2026overview isofficialguidance/summary, not fulljudgment or evidenceofeveryquotedholding. Otherfivepublishedjudgments S008-S012andcompanionS014summaryremainunreopened researcherattribution, withactualposture/date/result/pixel/currentlater-treatmentlimits. No broadnewcasevalue/evidence/origin-notice ruleacceptedfromoverviewalone.","OriginalS015fullcompanion andS016/S017otherprecedentfailedroutesnotretried; originalnativeerrorsnotrecovered, noholdingfromunreadbodyorsearchsnippet. SelectedS006successfuldistinctrepresentativepublicationdoesnotrecoverthosefailedsources. CompletecurrentSTJ/STFcitator,latermodulation/qualifiedprecedent/treatmentandactualapplicationheld.","CPCcompiladabody/current1015-1020/1009/1021/1007/representation/cure/preparo/relator/relief/periodstatutesremaincoordinatorunreopened underexactpriorblock. OneoriginaldatedCPC1045capture reusedonlyasstatutoryfamilysupport; itsactualnoncompiladaliteralURLexplicitlydiffersfromregisteredS001andwasnotnewlyfetched. Art14/DOUfooter/currentlawnotverifiedthere.","2024holidayproofamendment,2026operativequalifiedprecedentlaw,2026enacted-futurelaw and2006electroniclawremainoriginalresearcherpropositionssubjecttoaccess/currentness/effectivechainholds. No newoperative2026law orabsenceofotheramendmentclaimed. Noallimmediateappealability, universalcurability, paper-origin notificationexcuse, automaticstay/relief/debtcancellation/dischargeorprofession/licenceauthority established.","Sixteenexistingworkflowsandthreeexistingdatemodelsread; sixendpoints/46businessdaypositions/26originalstatedpositions-or-alternativeendpoints/10distinctweekdaylabels checked understipulations. Existingthreeclosurealternativesonly,no newdates, profiles, fees, amountorfinancialscenario. Zero monetaryoperations. Twojudicialvotecountcomparisons arepublishedcertificatecounts, not newfinancialexamples. Currentstatutorytrigger/holiday/courtcalendar/receipt/order/timezone/outage/lastinstant notcertified.","Eightyderivedclaimareaassignmentsreconciledfrom97/98passfallbacktotheactualatomiclabels:3A097,77A098. Alloriginalresearchercells/sourceclaimIDsunchanged, oldfallbackpreservedinbeforecopies. Sourceandclaimreconciliationisnotprimaryacceptance. All155coverage rowsretainstatus/questions:100core28deferred27stateDF; all27localbranchesunexamined.","ExactP01D15originalremainingrowandvisiblecrosswalkmatch; interlocutorycomponentonly. CurrentP18-P21statusesobservedseparately,historicthenunreviewedlabelsnotrewrittenandnosiblingfindingadopted. P01same-coordinatorscope/professional/funds/contract/territorial/parentholdsretained. Fullapelação/ED/internalhigherappeals/service/default/reopening/judgment/execution/collective/Juizados/tax/family/insolvency/property/security/foreign/local/provider/countryremainheld.","Onlyassignedpass22/reviewartifactswritten; no sharedparent/history/index/register/tasks/routing/model/automationmutation. Parenthistoryproposalonlyincompletion. NewChatGPTprompts/correctionSends/modelprobes/browser/CUA/tabs/HUMANaccess/researchAPIs/accounts/purchases/contact/filing/site/publication/privateinquiry/researchgeneration/furtheragentsremainpaused/notperformed.","Exactsourceopeningclocksunknown; originalpublication/signature/finality/update/capture/reviewtimesnotopeningclocks. Actualservercompletionclockunknown. ActualP22GPT6Prohistoricalpreflight/renderedresponseprovenancepreserved; no newUIverification or reclassification ofoldSol/otherreports."]}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S002","urls":["https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2024/lei/l14939.htm"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S002","Issuer/title and full literal URL":"Presidência, Lei 14.939/2024. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2024/lei/l14939.htm","Actual body read, status, publication and limits":"Fresh amendment. Arts. 1–2/footer; art. 1003 §6. DOU July 31, 2024; effect on publication. HTML; page/index N/A."},"coordinator_verification_status":"inherited_exact_statutory_block_unretried_current_body_unread","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_source_id":"C_BR-S002","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-S002","registered_literal_URL":"https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2024/lei/l14939.htm","coordinator_status":"inherited_exact_statutory_block_unretried_current_body_unread","selected_scopes":[],"inherited_block":[{"source_id":"C_BR-P22-S002","literal_URL":"https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2024/lei/l14939.htm","exact_message":"Esta requisição foi bloqueada.","original_packet":"[internal evidence reference]","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":0,"whole_block_character_bounds":[0,704],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[0,5]],"new_attempt_this_review":false,"no_parallel_url_variant_alternatehost_or_workaround":true,"does_not_reclassify_original_generation_access":true}],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_currentness_or_application_accepted":false,"limits":["Delegated same-coordinator saved ordinarycivil interlocutorygateway review only, never independent/exhaustive/allsource/currentalllaw/allclaim/actualadmissibility/actualstay/local/country/A066/A097/A098/parent/publicationacceptance. Noactualparty/provider/person/account/property/entity/contract/licence/privatecase/docket/record investigated and no newscenario constructed.","Allfive statutoryliteralURLs have attributablepriorblocks, preservedincompleteimmutablepacket copies fromBR18/19/rootBR20. None retried, parallelCPCURLfetched, alternatehosted or bypassed. Zero newfailedURLevents, not freshrecovery or disproof ofresearchergenerationaccess. Roottextwrapperextra newline versus canonicalJSONtoolstringpreservedandseparatelyhashed.","ThreepreselectedgenericpublicauthorityURLs readable in fivecompleteunmodifiedtoolpackets:publishedTema988representativeopinion, officialgenericTema registry andofficial2026overview. Publishedlaw/precedent readbyprovidedliteralpublicationURLs only, nonewcase/personsearchorprivate/docketrecord inquiry; no linkedcase/partyrecordsopened. Location-onlyfinds have empty substantivebounds; no-matchpattern isnot legalabsence.","Published98pageopiniondocument available, but onlyselected majority/modulation/context/dissent/certificate passages consumed, notentire98pages or everyquotedauthority. Parsedtextonly, zero freshPDFpixels; originalreportedfailedscreenshotsindices2/52/97not retried, rawpixelclaimselsewherepreservedasattribution. Malformed printedtotal denominator preserved; printedpageandzeroPDFindexdistinguished. Missingreturnedlines1210-1213not reconstructed.","Actualselected majority1449-1502 distinguishes statutorylistedpreclusion from exceptionalunlisted positiveadmission/decision.1520-1522and1624-1634modulate by interlocutorydecisionissuedafterpublication; registryquotes19December2018publication. Certificatecounts6joiners+relator7versus5dissents; membersabsentinfinalsessionnotmiscountedasnevervoting. Noactualparty’spreclusion/urgency/competence/meritsdetermined.","Genericregistry supports thesis/modulation/status andrecordsfinality22February2019; update17February2023not a2026citatorcertificate.2026overview isofficialguidance/summary, not fulljudgment or evidenceofeveryquotedholding. Otherfivepublishedjudgments S008-S012andcompanionS014summaryremainunreopened researcherattribution, withactualposture/date/result/pixel/currentlater-treatmentlimits. No broadnewcasevalue/evidence/origin-notice ruleacceptedfromoverviewalone.","OriginalS015fullcompanion andS016/S017otherprecedentfailedroutesnotretried; originalnativeerrorsnotrecovered, noholdingfromunreadbodyorsearchsnippet. SelectedS006successfuldistinctrepresentativepublicationdoesnotrecoverthosefailedsources. CompletecurrentSTJ/STFcitator,latermodulation/qualifiedprecedent/treatmentandactualapplicationheld.","CPCcompiladabody/current1015-1020/1009/1021/1007/representation/cure/preparo/relator/relief/periodstatutesremaincoordinatorunreopened underexactpriorblock. OneoriginaldatedCPC1045capture reusedonlyasstatutoryfamilysupport; itsactualnoncompiladaliteralURLexplicitlydiffersfromregisteredS001andwasnotnewlyfetched. Art14/DOUfooter/currentlawnotverifiedthere.","2024holidayproofamendment,2026operativequalifiedprecedentlaw,2026enacted-futurelaw and2006electroniclawremainoriginalresearcherpropositionssubjecttoaccess/currentness/effectivechainholds. No newoperative2026law orabsenceofotheramendmentclaimed. Noallimmediateappealability, universalcurability, paper-origin notificationexcuse, automaticstay/relief/debtcancellation/dischargeorprofession/licenceauthority established.","Sixteenexistingworkflowsandthreeexistingdatemodelsread; sixendpoints/46businessdaypositions/26originalstatedpositions-or-alternativeendpoints/10distinctweekdaylabels checked understipulations. Existingthreeclosurealternativesonly,no newdates, profiles, fees, amountorfinancialscenario. Zero monetaryoperations. Twojudicialvotecountcomparisons arepublishedcertificatecounts, not newfinancialexamples. Currentstatutorytrigger/holiday/courtcalendar/receipt/order/timezone/outage/lastinstant notcertified.","Eightyderivedclaimareaassignmentsreconciledfrom97/98passfallbacktotheactualatomiclabels:3A097,77A098. Alloriginalresearchercells/sourceclaimIDsunchanged, oldfallbackpreservedinbeforecopies. Sourceandclaimreconciliationisnotprimaryacceptance. All155coverage rowsretainstatus/questions:100core28deferred27stateDF; all27localbranchesunexamined.","ExactP01D15originalremainingrowandvisiblecrosswalkmatch; interlocutorycomponentonly. CurrentP18-P21statusesobservedseparately,historicthenunreviewedlabelsnotrewrittenandnosiblingfindingadopted. P01same-coordinatorscope/professional/funds/contract/territorial/parentholdsretained. Fullapelação/ED/internalhigherappeals/service/default/reopening/judgment/execution/collective/Juizados/tax/family/insolvency/property/security/foreign/local/provider/countryremainheld.","Onlyassignedpass22/reviewartifactswritten; no sharedparent/history/index/register/tasks/routing/model/automationmutation. Parenthistoryproposalonlyincompletion. NewChatGPTprompts/correctionSends/modelprobes/browser/CUA/tabs/HUMANaccess/researchAPIs/accounts/purchases/contact/filing/site/publication/privateinquiry/researchgeneration/furtheragentsremainpaused/notperformed.","Exactsourceopeningclocksunknown; originalpublication/signature/finality/update/capture/reviewtimesnotopeningclocks. Actualservercompletionclockunknown. ActualP22GPT6Prohistoricalpreflight/renderedresponseprovenancepreserved; no newUIverification or reclassification ofoldSol/otherreports."]}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S003","urls":["https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15484.htm"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S003","Issuer/title and full literal URL":"Presidência, Lei 15.484/2026. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15484.htm","Actual body read, status, publication and limits":"Fresh limited amendment. Relevant 927/932 changes, arts. 4–7/footer. DOU extra August 4, 2026; 30-day vacatio; operative by access. Full relevance regime not researched."},"coordinator_verification_status":"inherited_exact_statutory_block_unretried_current_body_unread","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_source_id":"C_BR-S003","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-S003","registered_literal_URL":"https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15484.htm","coordinator_status":"inherited_exact_statutory_block_unretried_current_body_unread","selected_scopes":[],"inherited_block":[{"source_id":"C_BR-P22-S003","literal_URL":"https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15484.htm","exact_message":"Esta requisição foi bloqueada.","original_packet":"[internal evidence reference]","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":1,"whole_block_character_bounds":[784,1489],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[0,5]],"new_attempt_this_review":false,"no_parallel_url_variant_alternatehost_or_workaround":true,"does_not_reclassify_original_generation_access":true}],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_currentness_or_application_accepted":false,"limits":["Delegated same-coordinator saved ordinarycivil interlocutorygateway review only, never independent/exhaustive/allsource/currentalllaw/allclaim/actualadmissibility/actualstay/local/country/A066/A097/A098/parent/publicationacceptance. Noactualparty/provider/person/account/property/entity/contract/licence/privatecase/docket/record investigated and no newscenario constructed.","Allfive statutoryliteralURLs have attributablepriorblocks, preservedincompleteimmutablepacket copies fromBR18/19/rootBR20. None retried, parallelCPCURLfetched, alternatehosted or bypassed. Zero newfailedURLevents, not freshrecovery or disproof ofresearchergenerationaccess. Roottextwrapperextra newline versus canonicalJSONtoolstringpreservedandseparatelyhashed.","ThreepreselectedgenericpublicauthorityURLs readable in fivecompleteunmodifiedtoolpackets:publishedTema988representativeopinion, officialgenericTema registry andofficial2026overview. Publishedlaw/precedent readbyprovidedliteralpublicationURLs only, nonewcase/personsearchorprivate/docketrecord inquiry; no linkedcase/partyrecordsopened. Location-onlyfinds have empty substantivebounds; no-matchpattern isnot legalabsence.","Published98pageopiniondocument available, but onlyselected majority/modulation/context/dissent/certificate passages consumed, notentire98pages or everyquotedauthority. Parsedtextonly, zero freshPDFpixels; originalreportedfailedscreenshotsindices2/52/97not retried, rawpixelclaimselsewherepreservedasattribution. Malformed printedtotal denominator preserved; printedpageandzeroPDFindexdistinguished. Missingreturnedlines1210-1213not reconstructed.","Actualselected majority1449-1502 distinguishes statutorylistedpreclusion from exceptionalunlisted positiveadmission/decision.1520-1522and1624-1634modulate by interlocutorydecisionissuedafterpublication; registryquotes19December2018publication. Certificatecounts6joiners+relator7versus5dissents; membersabsentinfinalsessionnotmiscountedasnevervoting. Noactualparty’spreclusion/urgency/competence/meritsdetermined.","Genericregistry supports thesis/modulation/status andrecordsfinality22February2019; update17February2023not a2026citatorcertificate.2026overview isofficialguidance/summary, not fulljudgment or evidenceofeveryquotedholding. Otherfivepublishedjudgments S008-S012andcompanionS014summaryremainunreopened researcherattribution, withactualposture/date/result/pixel/currentlater-treatmentlimits. No broadnewcasevalue/evidence/origin-notice ruleacceptedfromoverviewalone.","OriginalS015fullcompanion andS016/S017otherprecedentfailedroutesnotretried; originalnativeerrorsnotrecovered, noholdingfromunreadbodyorsearchsnippet. SelectedS006successfuldistinctrepresentativepublicationdoesnotrecoverthosefailedsources. CompletecurrentSTJ/STFcitator,latermodulation/qualifiedprecedent/treatmentandactualapplicationheld.","CPCcompiladabody/current1015-1020/1009/1021/1007/representation/cure/preparo/relator/relief/periodstatutesremaincoordinatorunreopened underexactpriorblock. OneoriginaldatedCPC1045capture reusedonlyasstatutoryfamilysupport; itsactualnoncompiladaliteralURLexplicitlydiffersfromregisteredS001andwasnotnewlyfetched. Art14/DOUfooter/currentlawnotverifiedthere.","2024holidayproofamendment,2026operativequalifiedprecedentlaw,2026enacted-futurelaw and2006electroniclawremainoriginalresearcherpropositionssubjecttoaccess/currentness/effectivechainholds. No newoperative2026law orabsenceofotheramendmentclaimed. Noallimmediateappealability, universalcurability, paper-origin notificationexcuse, automaticstay/relief/debtcancellation/dischargeorprofession/licenceauthority established.","Sixteenexistingworkflowsandthreeexistingdatemodelsread; sixendpoints/46businessdaypositions/26originalstatedpositions-or-alternativeendpoints/10distinctweekdaylabels checked understipulations. Existingthreeclosurealternativesonly,no newdates, profiles, fees, amountorfinancialscenario. Zero monetaryoperations. Twojudicialvotecountcomparisons arepublishedcertificatecounts, not newfinancialexamples. Currentstatutorytrigger/holiday/courtcalendar/receipt/order/timezone/outage/lastinstant notcertified.","Eightyderivedclaimareaassignmentsreconciledfrom97/98passfallbacktotheactualatomiclabels:3A097,77A098. Alloriginalresearchercells/sourceclaimIDsunchanged, oldfallbackpreservedinbeforecopies. Sourceandclaimreconciliationisnotprimaryacceptance. All155coverage rowsretainstatus/questions:100core28deferred27stateDF; all27localbranchesunexamined.","ExactP01D15originalremainingrowandvisiblecrosswalkmatch; interlocutorycomponentonly. CurrentP18-P21statusesobservedseparately,historicthenunreviewedlabelsnotrewrittenandnosiblingfindingadopted. P01same-coordinatorscope/professional/funds/contract/territorial/parentholdsretained. Fullapelação/ED/internalhigherappeals/service/default/reopening/judgment/execution/collective/Juizados/tax/family/insolvency/property/security/foreign/local/provider/countryremainheld.","Onlyassignedpass22/reviewartifactswritten; no sharedparent/history/index/register/tasks/routing/model/automationmutation. Parenthistoryproposalonlyincompletion. NewChatGPTprompts/correctionSends/modelprobes/browser/CUA/tabs/HUMANaccess/researchAPIs/accounts/purchases/contact/filing/site/publication/privateinquiry/researchgeneration/furtheragentsremainpaused/notperformed.","Exactsourceopeningclocksunknown; originalpublication/signature/finality/update/capture/reviewtimesnotopeningclocks. Actualservercompletionclockunknown. ActualP22GPT6Prohistoricalpreflight/renderedresponseprovenancepreserved; no newUIverification or reclassification ofoldSol/otherreports."]}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S004","urls":["https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15479.htm"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S004","Issuer/title and full literal URL":"Presidência, Lei 15.479/2026. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15479.htm","Actual body read, status, publication and limits":"Fresh enacted-future boundary. Material amendment/commencement text, art. 4/footer. DOU July 30, 2026; one-year vacatio. Not applied as current interlocutory-review law."},"coordinator_verification_status":"inherited_exact_statutory_block_unretried_current_body_unread","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_source_id":"C_BR-S004","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-S004","registered_literal_URL":"https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15479.htm","coordinator_status":"inherited_exact_statutory_block_unretried_current_body_unread","selected_scopes":[],"inherited_block":[{"source_id":"C_BR-P22-S004","literal_URL":"https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15479.htm","exact_message":"Esta requisição foi bloqueada.","original_packet":"[internal evidence reference]","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":0,"whole_block_character_bounds":[0,704],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[0,5]],"new_attempt_this_review":false,"no_parallel_url_variant_alternatehost_or_workaround":true,"does_not_reclassify_original_generation_access":true}],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_currentness_or_application_accepted":false,"limits":["Delegated same-coordinator saved ordinarycivil interlocutorygateway review only, never independent/exhaustive/allsource/currentalllaw/allclaim/actualadmissibility/actualstay/local/country/A066/A097/A098/parent/publicationacceptance. Noactualparty/provider/person/account/property/entity/contract/licence/privatecase/docket/record investigated and no newscenario constructed.","Allfive statutoryliteralURLs have attributablepriorblocks, preservedincompleteimmutablepacket copies fromBR18/19/rootBR20. None retried, parallelCPCURLfetched, alternatehosted or bypassed. Zero newfailedURLevents, not freshrecovery or disproof ofresearchergenerationaccess. Roottextwrapperextra newline versus canonicalJSONtoolstringpreservedandseparatelyhashed.","ThreepreselectedgenericpublicauthorityURLs readable in fivecompleteunmodifiedtoolpackets:publishedTema988representativeopinion, officialgenericTema registry andofficial2026overview. Publishedlaw/precedent readbyprovidedliteralpublicationURLs only, nonewcase/personsearchorprivate/docketrecord inquiry; no linkedcase/partyrecordsopened. Location-onlyfinds have empty substantivebounds; no-matchpattern isnot legalabsence.","Published98pageopiniondocument available, but onlyselected majority/modulation/context/dissent/certificate passages consumed, notentire98pages or everyquotedauthority. Parsedtextonly, zero freshPDFpixels; originalreportedfailedscreenshotsindices2/52/97not retried, rawpixelclaimselsewherepreservedasattribution. Malformed printedtotal denominator preserved; printedpageandzeroPDFindexdistinguished. Missingreturnedlines1210-1213not reconstructed.","Actualselected majority1449-1502 distinguishes statutorylistedpreclusion from exceptionalunlisted positiveadmission/decision.1520-1522and1624-1634modulate by interlocutorydecisionissuedafterpublication; registryquotes19December2018publication. Certificatecounts6joiners+relator7versus5dissents; membersabsentinfinalsessionnotmiscountedasnevervoting. Noactualparty’spreclusion/urgency/competence/meritsdetermined.","Genericregistry supports thesis/modulation/status andrecordsfinality22February2019; update17February2023not a2026citatorcertificate.2026overview isofficialguidance/summary, not fulljudgment or evidenceofeveryquotedholding. Otherfivepublishedjudgments S008-S012andcompanionS014summaryremainunreopened researcherattribution, withactualposture/date/result/pixel/currentlater-treatmentlimits. No broadnewcasevalue/evidence/origin-notice ruleacceptedfromoverviewalone.","OriginalS015fullcompanion andS016/S017otherprecedentfailedroutesnotretried; originalnativeerrorsnotrecovered, noholdingfromunreadbodyorsearchsnippet. SelectedS006successfuldistinctrepresentativepublicationdoesnotrecoverthosefailedsources. CompletecurrentSTJ/STFcitator,latermodulation/qualifiedprecedent/treatmentandactualapplicationheld.","CPCcompiladabody/current1015-1020/1009/1021/1007/representation/cure/preparo/relator/relief/periodstatutesremaincoordinatorunreopened underexactpriorblock. OneoriginaldatedCPC1045capture reusedonlyasstatutoryfamilysupport; itsactualnoncompiladaliteralURLexplicitlydiffersfromregisteredS001andwasnotnewlyfetched. Art14/DOUfooter/currentlawnotverifiedthere.","2024holidayproofamendment,2026operativequalifiedprecedentlaw,2026enacted-futurelaw and2006electroniclawremainoriginalresearcherpropositionssubjecttoaccess/currentness/effectivechainholds. No newoperative2026law orabsenceofotheramendmentclaimed. Noallimmediateappealability, universalcurability, paper-origin notificationexcuse, automaticstay/relief/debtcancellation/dischargeorprofession/licenceauthority established.","Sixteenexistingworkflowsandthreeexistingdatemodelsread; sixendpoints/46businessdaypositions/26originalstatedpositions-or-alternativeendpoints/10distinctweekdaylabels checked understipulations. Existingthreeclosurealternativesonly,no newdates, profiles, fees, amountorfinancialscenario. Zero monetaryoperations. Twojudicialvotecountcomparisons arepublishedcertificatecounts, not newfinancialexamples. Currentstatutorytrigger/holiday/courtcalendar/receipt/order/timezone/outage/lastinstant notcertified.","Eightyderivedclaimareaassignmentsreconciledfrom97/98passfallbacktotheactualatomiclabels:3A097,77A098. Alloriginalresearchercells/sourceclaimIDsunchanged, oldfallbackpreservedinbeforecopies. Sourceandclaimreconciliationisnotprimaryacceptance. All155coverage rowsretainstatus/questions:100core28deferred27stateDF; all27localbranchesunexamined.","ExactP01D15originalremainingrowandvisiblecrosswalkmatch; interlocutorycomponentonly. CurrentP18-P21statusesobservedseparately,historicthenunreviewedlabelsnotrewrittenandnosiblingfindingadopted. P01same-coordinatorscope/professional/funds/contract/territorial/parentholdsretained. Fullapelação/ED/internalhigherappeals/service/default/reopening/judgment/execution/collective/Juizados/tax/family/insolvency/property/security/foreign/local/provider/countryremainheld.","Onlyassignedpass22/reviewartifactswritten; no sharedparent/history/index/register/tasks/routing/model/automationmutation. Parenthistoryproposalonlyincompletion. NewChatGPTprompts/correctionSends/modelprobes/browser/CUA/tabs/HUMANaccess/researchAPIs/accounts/purchases/contact/filing/site/publication/privateinquiry/researchgeneration/furtheragentsremainpaused/notperformed.","Exactsourceopeningclocksunknown; originalpublication/signature/finality/update/capture/reviewtimesnotopeningclocks. Actualservercompletionclockunknown. ActualP22GPT6Prohistoricalpreflight/renderedresponseprovenancepreserved; no newUIverification or reclassification ofoldSol/otherreports."]}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S005","urls":["https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2006/lei/l11419.htm"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S005","Issuer/title and full literal URL":"Presidência, Lei 11.419/2006. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2006/lei/l11419.htm","Actual body read, status, publication and limits":"Fresh limited electronic-procedure body. Arts. 2–5, 8–11, 22/footer, materially filing, publication, digital copies and system unavailability. DOU December 20, 2006; 90-day original vacatio. Current CNJ/local channel implementation held."},"coordinator_verification_status":"inherited_exact_statutory_block_unretried_current_body_unread","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_source_id":"C_BR-S005","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-S005","registered_literal_URL":"https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2006/lei/l11419.htm","coordinator_status":"inherited_exact_statutory_block_unretried_current_body_unread","selected_scopes":[],"inherited_block":[{"source_id":"C_BR-P22-S005","literal_URL":"https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2006/lei/l11419.htm","exact_message":"Esta requisição foi bloqueada.","original_packet":"[internal evidence reference]","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":2,"whole_block_character_bounds":[1569,2274],"actual_numbered_lines_read":[[0,5]],"new_attempt_this_review":false,"no_parallel_url_variant_alternatehost_or_workaround":true,"does_not_reclassify_original_generation_access":true}],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_currentness_or_application_accepted":false,"limits":["Delegated same-coordinator saved ordinarycivil interlocutorygateway review only, never independent/exhaustive/allsource/currentalllaw/allclaim/actualadmissibility/actualstay/local/country/A066/A097/A098/parent/publicationacceptance. Noactualparty/provider/person/account/property/entity/contract/licence/privatecase/docket/record investigated and no newscenario constructed.","Allfive statutoryliteralURLs have attributablepriorblocks, preservedincompleteimmutablepacket copies fromBR18/19/rootBR20. None retried, parallelCPCURLfetched, alternatehosted or bypassed. Zero newfailedURLevents, not freshrecovery or disproof ofresearchergenerationaccess. Roottextwrapperextra newline versus canonicalJSONtoolstringpreservedandseparatelyhashed.","ThreepreselectedgenericpublicauthorityURLs readable in fivecompleteunmodifiedtoolpackets:publishedTema988representativeopinion, officialgenericTema registry andofficial2026overview. Publishedlaw/precedent readbyprovidedliteralpublicationURLs only, nonewcase/personsearchorprivate/docketrecord inquiry; no linkedcase/partyrecordsopened. Location-onlyfinds have empty substantivebounds; no-matchpattern isnot legalabsence.","Published98pageopiniondocument available, but onlyselected majority/modulation/context/dissent/certificate passages consumed, notentire98pages or everyquotedauthority. Parsedtextonly, zero freshPDFpixels; originalreportedfailedscreenshotsindices2/52/97not retried, rawpixelclaimselsewherepreservedasattribution. Malformed printedtotal denominator preserved; printedpageandzeroPDFindexdistinguished. Missingreturnedlines1210-1213not reconstructed.","Actualselected majority1449-1502 distinguishes statutorylistedpreclusion from exceptionalunlisted positiveadmission/decision.1520-1522and1624-1634modulate by interlocutorydecisionissuedafterpublication; registryquotes19December2018publication. Certificatecounts6joiners+relator7versus5dissents; membersabsentinfinalsessionnotmiscountedasnevervoting. Noactualparty’spreclusion/urgency/competence/meritsdetermined.","Genericregistry supports thesis/modulation/status andrecordsfinality22February2019; update17February2023not a2026citatorcertificate.2026overview isofficialguidance/summary, not fulljudgment or evidenceofeveryquotedholding. Otherfivepublishedjudgments S008-S012andcompanionS014summaryremainunreopened researcherattribution, withactualposture/date/result/pixel/currentlater-treatmentlimits. No broadnewcasevalue/evidence/origin-notice ruleacceptedfromoverviewalone.","OriginalS015fullcompanion andS016/S017otherprecedentfailedroutesnotretried; originalnativeerrorsnotrecovered, noholdingfromunreadbodyorsearchsnippet. SelectedS006successfuldistinctrepresentativepublicationdoesnotrecoverthosefailedsources. CompletecurrentSTJ/STFcitator,latermodulation/qualifiedprecedent/treatmentandactualapplicationheld.","CPCcompiladabody/current1015-1020/1009/1021/1007/representation/cure/preparo/relator/relief/periodstatutesremaincoordinatorunreopened underexactpriorblock. OneoriginaldatedCPC1045capture reusedonlyasstatutoryfamilysupport; itsactualnoncompiladaliteralURLexplicitlydiffersfromregisteredS001andwasnotnewlyfetched. Art14/DOUfooter/currentlawnotverifiedthere.","2024holidayproofamendment,2026operativequalifiedprecedentlaw,2026enacted-futurelaw and2006electroniclawremainoriginalresearcherpropositionssubjecttoaccess/currentness/effectivechainholds. No newoperative2026law orabsenceofotheramendmentclaimed. Noallimmediateappealability, universalcurability, paper-origin notificationexcuse, automaticstay/relief/debtcancellation/dischargeorprofession/licenceauthority established.","Sixteenexistingworkflowsandthreeexistingdatemodelsread; sixendpoints/46businessdaypositions/26originalstatedpositions-or-alternativeendpoints/10distinctweekdaylabels checked understipulations. Existingthreeclosurealternativesonly,no newdates, profiles, fees, amountorfinancialscenario. Zero monetaryoperations. Twojudicialvotecountcomparisons arepublishedcertificatecounts, not newfinancialexamples. Currentstatutorytrigger/holiday/courtcalendar/receipt/order/timezone/outage/lastinstant notcertified.","Eightyderivedclaimareaassignmentsreconciledfrom97/98passfallbacktotheactualatomiclabels:3A097,77A098. Alloriginalresearchercells/sourceclaimIDsunchanged, oldfallbackpreservedinbeforecopies. Sourceandclaimreconciliationisnotprimaryacceptance. All155coverage rowsretainstatus/questions:100core28deferred27stateDF; all27localbranchesunexamined.","ExactP01D15originalremainingrowandvisiblecrosswalkmatch; interlocutorycomponentonly. CurrentP18-P21statusesobservedseparately,historicthenunreviewedlabelsnotrewrittenandnosiblingfindingadopted. P01same-coordinatorscope/professional/funds/contract/territorial/parentholdsretained. Fullapelação/ED/internalhigherappeals/service/default/reopening/judgment/execution/collective/Juizados/tax/family/insolvency/property/security/foreign/local/provider/countryremainheld.","Onlyassignedpass22/reviewartifactswritten; no sharedparent/history/index/register/tasks/routing/model/automationmutation. Parenthistoryproposalonlyincompletion. NewChatGPTprompts/correctionSends/modelprobes/browser/CUA/tabs/HUMANaccess/researchAPIs/accounts/purchases/contact/filing/site/publication/privateinquiry/researchgeneration/furtheragentsremainpaused/notperformed.","Exactsourceopeningclocksunknown; originalpublication/signature/finality/update/capture/reviewtimesnotopeningclocks. Actualservercompletionclockunknown. ActualP22GPT6Prohistoricalpreflight/renderedresponseprovenancepreserved; no newUIverification or reclassification ofoldSol/otherreports."]}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S006","urls":["https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S006","Issuer/title and full literal URL":"STJ Corte Especial, REsp 1.704.520-MT — Tema 988 full judgment. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","Actual body read, status, publication and limits":"Fresh full official judgment, relevant text read. 98-page PDF. Judgment December 5, 2018; DJe December 19. Ementa/result pp. 1–3, indices 0–2; selected majority passages pp. 43–44, 51–54, 57–58, indices 42–43, 50–53, 56–57; selected dissents pp. 68–69, 79–80, 95–96, indices 67–68, 78–79, 94–95; final certificate p. 98, index 97. Printed footer’s total-page denominator is malformed (“de 10”); numeric page and PDF index are kept distinct. Screenshot attempts at indices 2, 52 and 97 failed; parsed body was readable. No pixel review claimed."},"coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_selected_majority_dissent_certificate_public_precedent_parsed_only","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_source_id":"C_BR-S006","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-S006","registered_literal_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","coordinator_status":"fresh_selected_majority_dissent_certificate_public_precedent_parsed_only","selected_scopes":[{"source_id":"C_BR-P22-S006","line_range":[1214,1264],"scope":"Selected majority delayed-review utility discussion, printed43-44/zeroPDF42-43; earlier1210-1213not returned and not reconstructed","evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":0,"actual_numbered_lines":[[1214,1264]],"packet_character_bounds":[0,4910],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"C_BR-P22-S006","line_range":[1449,1502],"scope":"Selected actualmajority:listed immediate-route preclusion versus exceptional unlisted issue/positiveadmission/decision and laterdeferredreview; printed51-53/zeroPDF50-52","evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":1,"actual_numbered_lines":[[1449,1490]],"packet_character_bounds":[4990,9886],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"},{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":2,"actual_numbered_lines":[[1491,1502]],"packet_character_bounds":[9966,14556],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"C_BR-P22-S006","line_range":[1509,1522],"scope":"Majoritymodulation:only interlocutorydecisions issued afterpublication; printed53-54/zeroPDF52-53","evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":2,"actual_numbered_lines":[[1509,1522]],"packet_character_bounds":[9966,14556],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"C_BR-P22-S006","line_range":[1605,1635],"scope":"Majoritycompetencecontext/resultsubjecttootheradmissibility plus thesis/modulation/conclusion; printed57-58/zeroPDF56-57, noactualunderlying meritsopinion","evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":3,"actual_numbered_lines":[[1605,1635]],"packet_character_bounds":[14636,19650],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"C_BR-P22-S006","line_range":[2910,2925],"scope":"Finalcertificate:majoritygranted; sixnamedjoiners plusrelator=seven,fivenameddissents; nonparticipants/absentfinalsession distinct, printed98/zeroPDF97","evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":4,"actual_numbered_lines":[[2910,2925]],"packet_character_bounds":[19730,24592],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"C_BR-P22-S006","line_range":[1939,1988],"scope":"Selectedseparatewritingquotation/security-stabilitycontext, printed67/zeroPDF66; not entire dissent","evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":0,"actual_numbered_lines":[[1939,1988]],"packet_character_bounds":[0,9136],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"C_BR-P22-S006","line_range":[2293,2338],"scope":"Selectedseparatewriting legislative-list/restricted-immediate-appeal argument; printed77-78/zeroPDF76-77","evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":1,"actual_numbered_lines":[[2293,2338]],"packet_character_bounds":[9216,18004],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"C_BR-P22-S006","line_range":[2347,2355],"scope":"Selectedseparatewriting legislativeabstractutility/list argument; printed79/zeroPDF78; otherrowsnotcreditedasread","evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":1,"actual_numbered_lines":[[2347,2355]],"packet_character_bounds":[9216,18004],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"C_BR-P22-S006","line_range":[2830,2868],"scope":"Selected dissentmodulation/conclusion, printed95-96/zeroPDF94-95; dissentnot majorityholding","evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":4,"actual_numbered_lines":[[2863,2868]],"packet_character_bounds":[19730,24592],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"},{"registered_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19/12/2018&num_registro=201702719246","actual_evidence_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=19%2F12%2F2018&num_registro=201702719246","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":2,"actual_numbered_lines":[[2830,2868]],"packet_character_bounds":[18084,26776],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false}],"inherited_block":[],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_currentness_or_application_accepted":false,"limits":["Delegated same-coordinator saved ordinarycivil interlocutorygateway review only, never independent/exhaustive/allsource/currentalllaw/allclaim/actualadmissibility/actualstay/local/country/A066/A097/A098/parent/publicationacceptance. Noactualparty/provider/person/account/property/entity/contract/licence/privatecase/docket/record investigated and no newscenario constructed.","Allfive statutoryliteralURLs have attributablepriorblocks, preservedincompleteimmutablepacket copies fromBR18/19/rootBR20. None retried, parallelCPCURLfetched, alternatehosted or bypassed. Zero newfailedURLevents, not freshrecovery or disproof ofresearchergenerationaccess. Roottextwrapperextra newline versus canonicalJSONtoolstringpreservedandseparatelyhashed.","ThreepreselectedgenericpublicauthorityURLs readable in fivecompleteunmodifiedtoolpackets:publishedTema988representativeopinion, officialgenericTema registry andofficial2026overview. Publishedlaw/precedent readbyprovidedliteralpublicationURLs only, nonewcase/personsearchorprivate/docketrecord inquiry; no linkedcase/partyrecordsopened. Location-onlyfinds have empty substantivebounds; no-matchpattern isnot legalabsence.","Published98pageopiniondocument available, but onlyselected majority/modulation/context/dissent/certificate passages consumed, notentire98pages or everyquotedauthority. Parsedtextonly, zero freshPDFpixels; originalreportedfailedscreenshotsindices2/52/97not retried, rawpixelclaimselsewherepreservedasattribution. Malformed printedtotal denominator preserved; printedpageandzeroPDFindexdistinguished. Missingreturnedlines1210-1213not reconstructed.","Actualselected majority1449-1502 distinguishes statutorylistedpreclusion from exceptionalunlisted positiveadmission/decision.1520-1522and1624-1634modulate by interlocutorydecisionissuedafterpublication; registryquotes19December2018publication. Certificatecounts6joiners+relator7versus5dissents; membersabsentinfinalsessionnotmiscountedasnevervoting. Noactualparty’spreclusion/urgency/competence/meritsdetermined.","Genericregistry supports thesis/modulation/status andrecordsfinality22February2019; update17February2023not a2026citatorcertificate.2026overview isofficialguidance/summary, not fulljudgment or evidenceofeveryquotedholding. Otherfivepublishedjudgments S008-S012andcompanionS014summaryremainunreopened researcherattribution, withactualposture/date/result/pixel/currentlater-treatmentlimits. No broadnewcasevalue/evidence/origin-notice ruleacceptedfromoverviewalone.","OriginalS015fullcompanion andS016/S017otherprecedentfailedroutesnotretried; originalnativeerrorsnotrecovered, noholdingfromunreadbodyorsearchsnippet. SelectedS006successfuldistinctrepresentativepublicationdoesnotrecoverthosefailedsources. CompletecurrentSTJ/STFcitator,latermodulation/qualifiedprecedent/treatmentandactualapplicationheld.","CPCcompiladabody/current1015-1020/1009/1021/1007/representation/cure/preparo/relator/relief/periodstatutesremaincoordinatorunreopened underexactpriorblock. OneoriginaldatedCPC1045capture reusedonlyasstatutoryfamilysupport; itsactualnoncompiladaliteralURLexplicitlydiffersfromregisteredS001andwasnotnewlyfetched. Art14/DOUfooter/currentlawnotverifiedthere.","2024holidayproofamendment,2026operativequalifiedprecedentlaw,2026enacted-futurelaw and2006electroniclawremainoriginalresearcherpropositionssubjecttoaccess/currentness/effectivechainholds. No newoperative2026law orabsenceofotheramendmentclaimed. Noallimmediateappealability, universalcurability, paper-origin notificationexcuse, automaticstay/relief/debtcancellation/dischargeorprofession/licenceauthority established.","Sixteenexistingworkflowsandthreeexistingdatemodelsread; sixendpoints/46businessdaypositions/26originalstatedpositions-or-alternativeendpoints/10distinctweekdaylabels checked understipulations. Existingthreeclosurealternativesonly,no newdates, profiles, fees, amountorfinancialscenario. Zero monetaryoperations. Twojudicialvotecountcomparisons arepublishedcertificatecounts, not newfinancialexamples. Currentstatutorytrigger/holiday/courtcalendar/receipt/order/timezone/outage/lastinstant notcertified.","Eightyderivedclaimareaassignmentsreconciledfrom97/98passfallbacktotheactualatomiclabels:3A097,77A098. Alloriginalresearchercells/sourceclaimIDsunchanged, oldfallbackpreservedinbeforecopies. Sourceandclaimreconciliationisnotprimaryacceptance. All155coverage rowsretainstatus/questions:100core28deferred27stateDF; all27localbranchesunexamined.","ExactP01D15originalremainingrowandvisiblecrosswalkmatch; interlocutorycomponentonly. CurrentP18-P21statusesobservedseparately,historicthenunreviewedlabelsnotrewrittenandnosiblingfindingadopted. P01same-coordinatorscope/professional/funds/contract/territorial/parentholdsretained. Fullapelação/ED/internalhigherappeals/service/default/reopening/judgment/execution/collective/Juizados/tax/family/insolvency/property/security/foreign/local/provider/countryremainheld.","Onlyassignedpass22/reviewartifactswritten; no sharedparent/history/index/register/tasks/routing/model/automationmutation. Parenthistoryproposalonlyincompletion. NewChatGPTprompts/correctionSends/modelprobes/browser/CUA/tabs/HUMANaccess/researchAPIs/accounts/purchases/contact/filing/site/publication/privateinquiry/researchgeneration/furtheragentsremainpaused/notperformed.","Exactsourceopeningclocksunknown; originalpublication/signature/finality/update/capture/reviewtimesnotopeningclocks. Actualservercompletionclockunknown. ActualP22GPT6Prohistoricalpreflight/renderedresponseprovenancepreserved; no newUIverification or reclassification ofoldSol/otherreports."]}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S007","urls":["https://processo.stj.jus.br/repetitivos/temas_repetitivos/pesquisa.jsp?novaConsulta=true&num_processo_classe=1696396&sg_classe=REsp&tipo_pesquisa=T"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S007","Issuer/title and full literal URL":"STJ, Tema Repetitivo 988 registry. https://processo.stj.jus.br/repetitivos/temas_repetitivos/pesquisa.jsp?novaConsulta=true&num_processo_classe=1696396&sg_classe=REsp&tipo_pesquisa=T","Actual body read, status, publication and limits":"Fresh official thesis/status register. Thesis, two representative appeals, judgment/publication, modulation and recorded finality February 22, 2019 read. Displayed update February 17, 2023. HTML; page/index N/A. Not an exhaustive 2026 citator."},"coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_generic_official_thesis_status_registry_checked_notfulljudgment","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_source_id":"C_BR-S007","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-S007","registered_literal_URL":"https://processo.stj.jus.br/repetitivos/temas_repetitivos/pesquisa.jsp?novaConsulta=true&num_processo_classe=1696396&sg_classe=REsp&tipo_pesquisa=T","coordinator_status":"fresh_generic_official_thesis_status_registry_checked_notfulljudgment","selected_scopes":[{"source_id":"C_BR-P22-S007","line_range":[160,188],"scope":"Tema988genericofficialregistry:thesis/court/status/modulationquotednote/no nationalsuspension statement; not fullvotes","evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://processo.stj.jus.br/repetitivos/temas_repetitivos/pesquisa.jsp?novaConsulta=true&num_processo_classe=1696396&sg_classe=REsp&tipo_pesquisa=T","actual_evidence_URL":"https://processo.stj.jus.br/repetitivos/temas_repetitivos/pesquisa.jsp?novaConsulta=true&num_processo_classe=1696396&sg_classe=REsp&tipo_pesquisa=T","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":0,"actual_numbered_lines":[[160,188]],"packet_character_bounds":[0,9034],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"C_BR-P22-S007","line_range":[192,259],"scope":"Genericregistryrepresentativejudgment/publication/finalitymetadata, update17February2023; no sourceclockor2026citator","evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://processo.stj.jus.br/repetitivos/temas_repetitivos/pesquisa.jsp?novaConsulta=true&num_processo_classe=1696396&sg_classe=REsp&tipo_pesquisa=T","actual_evidence_URL":"https://processo.stj.jus.br/repetitivos/temas_repetitivos/pesquisa.jsp?novaConsulta=true&num_processo_classe=1696396&sg_classe=REsp&tipo_pesquisa=T","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":0,"actual_numbered_lines":[[192,259]],"packet_character_bounds":[0,9034],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false}],"inherited_block":[],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_currentness_or_application_accepted":false,"limits":["Delegated same-coordinator saved ordinarycivil interlocutorygateway review only, never independent/exhaustive/allsource/currentalllaw/allclaim/actualadmissibility/actualstay/local/country/A066/A097/A098/parent/publicationacceptance. Noactualparty/provider/person/account/property/entity/contract/licence/privatecase/docket/record investigated and no newscenario constructed.","Allfive statutoryliteralURLs have attributablepriorblocks, preservedincompleteimmutablepacket copies fromBR18/19/rootBR20. None retried, parallelCPCURLfetched, alternatehosted or bypassed. Zero newfailedURLevents, not freshrecovery or disproof ofresearchergenerationaccess. Roottextwrapperextra newline versus canonicalJSONtoolstringpreservedandseparatelyhashed.","ThreepreselectedgenericpublicauthorityURLs readable in fivecompleteunmodifiedtoolpackets:publishedTema988representativeopinion, officialgenericTema registry andofficial2026overview. Publishedlaw/precedent readbyprovidedliteralpublicationURLs only, nonewcase/personsearchorprivate/docketrecord inquiry; no linkedcase/partyrecordsopened. Location-onlyfinds have empty substantivebounds; no-matchpattern isnot legalabsence.","Published98pageopiniondocument available, but onlyselected majority/modulation/context/dissent/certificate passages consumed, notentire98pages or everyquotedauthority. Parsedtextonly, zero freshPDFpixels; originalreportedfailedscreenshotsindices2/52/97not retried, rawpixelclaimselsewherepreservedasattribution. Malformed printedtotal denominator preserved; printedpageandzeroPDFindexdistinguished. Missingreturnedlines1210-1213not reconstructed.","Actualselected majority1449-1502 distinguishes statutorylistedpreclusion from exceptionalunlisted positiveadmission/decision.1520-1522and1624-1634modulate by interlocutorydecisionissuedafterpublication; registryquotes19December2018publication. Certificatecounts6joiners+relator7versus5dissents; membersabsentinfinalsessionnotmiscountedasnevervoting. Noactualparty’spreclusion/urgency/competence/meritsdetermined.","Genericregistry supports thesis/modulation/status andrecordsfinality22February2019; update17February2023not a2026citatorcertificate.2026overview isofficialguidance/summary, not fulljudgment or evidenceofeveryquotedholding. Otherfivepublishedjudgments S008-S012andcompanionS014summaryremainunreopened researcherattribution, withactualposture/date/result/pixel/currentlater-treatmentlimits. No broadnewcasevalue/evidence/origin-notice ruleacceptedfromoverviewalone.","OriginalS015fullcompanion andS016/S017otherprecedentfailedroutesnotretried; originalnativeerrorsnotrecovered, noholdingfromunreadbodyorsearchsnippet. SelectedS006successfuldistinctrepresentativepublicationdoesnotrecoverthosefailedsources. CompletecurrentSTJ/STFcitator,latermodulation/qualifiedprecedent/treatmentandactualapplicationheld.","CPCcompiladabody/current1015-1020/1009/1021/1007/representation/cure/preparo/relator/relief/periodstatutesremaincoordinatorunreopened underexactpriorblock. OneoriginaldatedCPC1045capture reusedonlyasstatutoryfamilysupport; itsactualnoncompiladaliteralURLexplicitlydiffersfromregisteredS001andwasnotnewlyfetched. Art14/DOUfooter/currentlawnotverifiedthere.","2024holidayproofamendment,2026operativequalifiedprecedentlaw,2026enacted-futurelaw and2006electroniclawremainoriginalresearcherpropositionssubjecttoaccess/currentness/effectivechainholds. No newoperative2026law orabsenceofotheramendmentclaimed. Noallimmediateappealability, universalcurability, paper-origin notificationexcuse, automaticstay/relief/debtcancellation/dischargeorprofession/licenceauthority established.","Sixteenexistingworkflowsandthreeexistingdatemodelsread; sixendpoints/46businessdaypositions/26originalstatedpositions-or-alternativeendpoints/10distinctweekdaylabels checked understipulations. Existingthreeclosurealternativesonly,no newdates, profiles, fees, amountorfinancialscenario. Zero monetaryoperations. Twojudicialvotecountcomparisons arepublishedcertificatecounts, not newfinancialexamples. Currentstatutorytrigger/holiday/courtcalendar/receipt/order/timezone/outage/lastinstant notcertified.","Eightyderivedclaimareaassignmentsreconciledfrom97/98passfallbacktotheactualatomiclabels:3A097,77A098. Alloriginalresearchercells/sourceclaimIDsunchanged, oldfallbackpreservedinbeforecopies. Sourceandclaimreconciliationisnotprimaryacceptance. All155coverage rowsretainstatus/questions:100core28deferred27stateDF; all27localbranchesunexamined.","ExactP01D15originalremainingrowandvisiblecrosswalkmatch; interlocutorycomponentonly. CurrentP18-P21statusesobservedseparately,historicthenunreviewedlabelsnotrewrittenandnosiblingfindingadopted. P01same-coordinatorscope/professional/funds/contract/territorial/parentholdsretained. Fullapelação/ED/internalhigherappeals/service/default/reopening/judgment/execution/collective/Juizados/tax/family/insolvency/property/security/foreign/local/provider/countryremainheld.","Onlyassignedpass22/reviewartifactswritten; no sharedparent/history/index/register/tasks/routing/model/automationmutation. Parenthistoryproposalonlyincompletion. NewChatGPTprompts/correctionSends/modelprobes/browser/CUA/tabs/HUMANaccess/researchAPIs/accounts/purchases/contact/filing/site/publication/privateinquiry/researchgeneration/furtheragentsremainpaused/notperformed.","Exactsourceopeningclocksunknown; originalpublication/signature/finality/update/capture/reviewtimesnotopeningclocks. Actualservercompletionclockunknown. ActualP22GPT6Prohistoricalpreflight/renderedresponseprovenancepreserved; no newUIverification or reclassification ofoldSol/otherreports."]}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S008","urls":["https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?num_registro=202504167899"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S008","Issuer/title and full literal URL":"STJ, REsp 2.242.573-RS. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?num_registro=202504167899","Actual body read, status, publication and limits":"Fresh published full-judgment document, selected passages. Fourth Panel unanimous; session March 10–16, 2026; acórdão March 17; DJEN March 19. Seven PDF pages. Ementa index 0, reasons 2–4, certificate 5–6; screenshot index 0 inspected. Printed folios not reliably displayed. Accounting-evidence/PASEP context; no substantive account rule adopted."},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_published_judgment_or_summary_attribution_unreopened","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_source_id":"C_BR-S008","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-S008","registered_literal_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?num_registro=202504167899","coordinator_status":"original_published_judgment_or_summary_attribution_unreopened","selected_scopes":[],"inherited_block":[],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_currentness_or_application_accepted":false,"limits":["Delegated same-coordinator saved ordinarycivil interlocutorygateway review only, never independent/exhaustive/allsource/currentalllaw/allclaim/actualadmissibility/actualstay/local/country/A066/A097/A098/parent/publicationacceptance. Noactualparty/provider/person/account/property/entity/contract/licence/privatecase/docket/record investigated and no newscenario constructed.","Allfive statutoryliteralURLs have attributablepriorblocks, preservedincompleteimmutablepacket copies fromBR18/19/rootBR20. None retried, parallelCPCURLfetched, alternatehosted or bypassed. Zero newfailedURLevents, not freshrecovery or disproof ofresearchergenerationaccess. Roottextwrapperextra newline versus canonicalJSONtoolstringpreservedandseparatelyhashed.","ThreepreselectedgenericpublicauthorityURLs readable in fivecompleteunmodifiedtoolpackets:publishedTema988representativeopinion, officialgenericTema registry andofficial2026overview. Publishedlaw/precedent readbyprovidedliteralpublicationURLs only, nonewcase/personsearchorprivate/docketrecord inquiry; no linkedcase/partyrecordsopened. Location-onlyfinds have empty substantivebounds; no-matchpattern isnot legalabsence.","Published98pageopiniondocument available, but onlyselected majority/modulation/context/dissent/certificate passages consumed, notentire98pages or everyquotedauthority. Parsedtextonly, zero freshPDFpixels; originalreportedfailedscreenshotsindices2/52/97not retried, rawpixelclaimselsewherepreservedasattribution. Malformed printedtotal denominator preserved; printedpageandzeroPDFindexdistinguished. Missingreturnedlines1210-1213not reconstructed.","Actualselected majority1449-1502 distinguishes statutorylistedpreclusion from exceptionalunlisted positiveadmission/decision.1520-1522and1624-1634modulate by interlocutorydecisionissuedafterpublication; registryquotes19December2018publication. Certificatecounts6joiners+relator7versus5dissents; membersabsentinfinalsessionnotmiscountedasnevervoting. Noactualparty’spreclusion/urgency/competence/meritsdetermined.","Genericregistry supports thesis/modulation/status andrecordsfinality22February2019; update17February2023not a2026citatorcertificate.2026overview isofficialguidance/summary, not fulljudgment or evidenceofeveryquotedholding. Otherfivepublishedjudgments S008-S012andcompanionS014summaryremainunreopened researcherattribution, withactualposture/date/result/pixel/currentlater-treatmentlimits. No broadnewcasevalue/evidence/origin-notice ruleacceptedfromoverviewalone.","OriginalS015fullcompanion andS016/S017otherprecedentfailedroutesnotretried; originalnativeerrorsnotrecovered, noholdingfromunreadbodyorsearchsnippet. SelectedS006successfuldistinctrepresentativepublicationdoesnotrecoverthosefailedsources. CompletecurrentSTJ/STFcitator,latermodulation/qualifiedprecedent/treatmentandactualapplicationheld.","CPCcompiladabody/current1015-1020/1009/1021/1007/representation/cure/preparo/relator/relief/periodstatutesremaincoordinatorunreopened underexactpriorblock. OneoriginaldatedCPC1045capture reusedonlyasstatutoryfamilysupport; itsactualnoncompiladaliteralURLexplicitlydiffersfromregisteredS001andwasnotnewlyfetched. Art14/DOUfooter/currentlawnotverifiedthere.","2024holidayproofamendment,2026operativequalifiedprecedentlaw,2026enacted-futurelaw and2006electroniclawremainoriginalresearcherpropositionssubjecttoaccess/currentness/effectivechainholds. No newoperative2026law orabsenceofotheramendmentclaimed. Noallimmediateappealability, universalcurability, paper-origin notificationexcuse, automaticstay/relief/debtcancellation/dischargeorprofession/licenceauthority established.","Sixteenexistingworkflowsandthreeexistingdatemodelsread; sixendpoints/46businessdaypositions/26originalstatedpositions-or-alternativeendpoints/10distinctweekdaylabels checked understipulations. Existingthreeclosurealternativesonly,no newdates, profiles, fees, amountorfinancialscenario. Zero monetaryoperations. Twojudicialvotecountcomparisons arepublishedcertificatecounts, not newfinancialexamples. Currentstatutorytrigger/holiday/courtcalendar/receipt/order/timezone/outage/lastinstant notcertified.","Eightyderivedclaimareaassignmentsreconciledfrom97/98passfallbacktotheactualatomiclabels:3A097,77A098. Alloriginalresearchercells/sourceclaimIDsunchanged, oldfallbackpreservedinbeforecopies. Sourceandclaimreconciliationisnotprimaryacceptance. All155coverage rowsretainstatus/questions:100core28deferred27stateDF; all27localbranchesunexamined.","ExactP01D15originalremainingrowandvisiblecrosswalkmatch; interlocutorycomponentonly. CurrentP18-P21statusesobservedseparately,historicthenunreviewedlabelsnotrewrittenandnosiblingfindingadopted. P01same-coordinatorscope/professional/funds/contract/territorial/parentholdsretained. Fullapelação/ED/internalhigherappeals/service/default/reopening/judgment/execution/collective/Juizados/tax/family/insolvency/property/security/foreign/local/provider/countryremainheld.","Onlyassignedpass22/reviewartifactswritten; no sharedparent/history/index/register/tasks/routing/model/automationmutation. Parenthistoryproposalonlyincompletion. NewChatGPTprompts/correctionSends/modelprobes/browser/CUA/tabs/HUMANaccess/researchAPIs/accounts/purchases/contact/filing/site/publication/privateinquiry/researchgeneration/furtheragentsremainpaused/notperformed.","Exactsourceopeningclocksunknown; originalpublication/signature/finality/update/capture/reviewtimesnotopeningclocks. Actualservercompletionclockunknown. ActualP22GPT6Prohistoricalpreflight/renderedresponseprovenancepreserved; no newUIverification or reclassification ofoldSol/otherreports."]}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S009","urls":["https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=26/03/2025&num_registro=202401922245"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S009","Issuer/title and full literal URL":"STJ, REsp 2.186.037-AM. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=26/03/2025&num_registro=202401922245","Actual body read, status, publication and limits":"Fresh published full-judgment document, selected passages. Third Panel unanimous; actual session March 20, 2025; signature March 24; publication March 26. Eleven pages. Ementa/result 0–1, reasons 6–9, certificate 10; screenshot 1 inspected. Printed folios not reliably displayed. Case value versus legal aid; no actual cost reimbursement promised."},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_published_judgment_or_summary_attribution_unreopened","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_source_id":"C_BR-S009","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-S009","registered_literal_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=26/03/2025&num_registro=202401922245","coordinator_status":"original_published_judgment_or_summary_attribution_unreopened","selected_scopes":[],"inherited_block":[],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_currentness_or_application_accepted":false,"limits":["Delegated same-coordinator saved ordinarycivil interlocutorygateway review only, never independent/exhaustive/allsource/currentalllaw/allclaim/actualadmissibility/actualstay/local/country/A066/A097/A098/parent/publicationacceptance. Noactualparty/provider/person/account/property/entity/contract/licence/privatecase/docket/record investigated and no newscenario constructed.","Allfive statutoryliteralURLs have attributablepriorblocks, preservedincompleteimmutablepacket copies fromBR18/19/rootBR20. None retried, parallelCPCURLfetched, alternatehosted or bypassed. Zero newfailedURLevents, not freshrecovery or disproof ofresearchergenerationaccess. Roottextwrapperextra newline versus canonicalJSONtoolstringpreservedandseparatelyhashed.","ThreepreselectedgenericpublicauthorityURLs readable in fivecompleteunmodifiedtoolpackets:publishedTema988representativeopinion, officialgenericTema registry andofficial2026overview. Publishedlaw/precedent readbyprovidedliteralpublicationURLs only, nonewcase/personsearchorprivate/docketrecord inquiry; no linkedcase/partyrecordsopened. Location-onlyfinds have empty substantivebounds; no-matchpattern isnot legalabsence.","Published98pageopiniondocument available, but onlyselected majority/modulation/context/dissent/certificate passages consumed, notentire98pages or everyquotedauthority. Parsedtextonly, zero freshPDFpixels; originalreportedfailedscreenshotsindices2/52/97not retried, rawpixelclaimselsewherepreservedasattribution. Malformed printedtotal denominator preserved; printedpageandzeroPDFindexdistinguished. Missingreturnedlines1210-1213not reconstructed.","Actualselected majority1449-1502 distinguishes statutorylistedpreclusion from exceptionalunlisted positiveadmission/decision.1520-1522and1624-1634modulate by interlocutorydecisionissuedafterpublication; registryquotes19December2018publication. Certificatecounts6joiners+relator7versus5dissents; membersabsentinfinalsessionnotmiscountedasnevervoting. Noactualparty’spreclusion/urgency/competence/meritsdetermined.","Genericregistry supports thesis/modulation/status andrecordsfinality22February2019; update17February2023not a2026citatorcertificate.2026overview isofficialguidance/summary, not fulljudgment or evidenceofeveryquotedholding. Otherfivepublishedjudgments S008-S012andcompanionS014summaryremainunreopened researcherattribution, withactualposture/date/result/pixel/currentlater-treatmentlimits. No broadnewcasevalue/evidence/origin-notice ruleacceptedfromoverviewalone.","OriginalS015fullcompanion andS016/S017otherprecedentfailedroutesnotretried; originalnativeerrorsnotrecovered, noholdingfromunreadbodyorsearchsnippet. SelectedS006successfuldistinctrepresentativepublicationdoesnotrecoverthosefailedsources. CompletecurrentSTJ/STFcitator,latermodulation/qualifiedprecedent/treatmentandactualapplicationheld.","CPCcompiladabody/current1015-1020/1009/1021/1007/representation/cure/preparo/relator/relief/periodstatutesremaincoordinatorunreopened underexactpriorblock. OneoriginaldatedCPC1045capture reusedonlyasstatutoryfamilysupport; itsactualnoncompiladaliteralURLexplicitlydiffersfromregisteredS001andwasnotnewlyfetched. Art14/DOUfooter/currentlawnotverifiedthere.","2024holidayproofamendment,2026operativequalifiedprecedentlaw,2026enacted-futurelaw and2006electroniclawremainoriginalresearcherpropositionssubjecttoaccess/currentness/effectivechainholds. No newoperative2026law orabsenceofotheramendmentclaimed. Noallimmediateappealability, universalcurability, paper-origin notificationexcuse, automaticstay/relief/debtcancellation/dischargeorprofession/licenceauthority established.","Sixteenexistingworkflowsandthreeexistingdatemodelsread; sixendpoints/46businessdaypositions/26originalstatedpositions-or-alternativeendpoints/10distinctweekdaylabels checked understipulations. Existingthreeclosurealternativesonly,no newdates, profiles, fees, amountorfinancialscenario. Zero monetaryoperations. Twojudicialvotecountcomparisons arepublishedcertificatecounts, not newfinancialexamples. Currentstatutorytrigger/holiday/courtcalendar/receipt/order/timezone/outage/lastinstant notcertified.","Eightyderivedclaimareaassignmentsreconciledfrom97/98passfallbacktotheactualatomiclabels:3A097,77A098. Alloriginalresearchercells/sourceclaimIDsunchanged, oldfallbackpreservedinbeforecopies. Sourceandclaimreconciliationisnotprimaryacceptance. All155coverage rowsretainstatus/questions:100core28deferred27stateDF; all27localbranchesunexamined.","ExactP01D15originalremainingrowandvisiblecrosswalkmatch; interlocutorycomponentonly. CurrentP18-P21statusesobservedseparately,historicthenunreviewedlabelsnotrewrittenandnosiblingfindingadopted. P01same-coordinatorscope/professional/funds/contract/territorial/parentholdsretained. Fullapelação/ED/internalhigherappeals/service/default/reopening/judgment/execution/collective/Juizados/tax/family/insolvency/property/security/foreign/local/provider/countryremainheld.","Onlyassignedpass22/reviewartifactswritten; no sharedparent/history/index/register/tasks/routing/model/automationmutation. Parenthistoryproposalonlyincompletion. NewChatGPTprompts/correctionSends/modelprobes/browser/CUA/tabs/HUMANaccess/researchAPIs/accounts/purchases/contact/filing/site/publication/privateinquiry/researchgeneration/furtheragentsremainpaused/notperformed.","Exactsourceopeningclocksunknown; originalpublication/signature/finality/update/capture/reviewtimesnotopeningclocks. Actualservercompletionclockunknown. ActualP22GPT6Prohistoricalpreflight/renderedresponseprovenancepreserved; no newUIverification or reclassification ofoldSol/otherreports."]}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S010","urls":["https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=16/06/2025&num_registro=202404368455"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S010","Issuer/title and full literal URL":"STJ, REsp 2.182.040-SP. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=16/06/2025&num_registro=202404368455","Actual body read, status, publication and limits":"Fresh published full-judgment document, selected passages. Third Panel unanimous; June 10, 2025; signature June 11; publication June 16. Six pages. Ementa 0, reasons 3–4, certificate 5; screenshot 0 inspected. Evidentiary ruling inside disregard incident; no blanket corporate-liability conclusion."},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_published_judgment_or_summary_attribution_unreopened","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_source_id":"C_BR-S010","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-S010","registered_literal_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=16/06/2025&num_registro=202404368455","coordinator_status":"original_published_judgment_or_summary_attribution_unreopened","selected_scopes":[],"inherited_block":[],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_currentness_or_application_accepted":false,"limits":["Delegated same-coordinator saved ordinarycivil interlocutorygateway review only, never independent/exhaustive/allsource/currentalllaw/allclaim/actualadmissibility/actualstay/local/country/A066/A097/A098/parent/publicationacceptance. Noactualparty/provider/person/account/property/entity/contract/licence/privatecase/docket/record investigated and no newscenario constructed.","Allfive statutoryliteralURLs have attributablepriorblocks, preservedincompleteimmutablepacket copies fromBR18/19/rootBR20. None retried, parallelCPCURLfetched, alternatehosted or bypassed. Zero newfailedURLevents, not freshrecovery or disproof ofresearchergenerationaccess. Roottextwrapperextra newline versus canonicalJSONtoolstringpreservedandseparatelyhashed.","ThreepreselectedgenericpublicauthorityURLs readable in fivecompleteunmodifiedtoolpackets:publishedTema988representativeopinion, officialgenericTema registry andofficial2026overview. Publishedlaw/precedent readbyprovidedliteralpublicationURLs only, nonewcase/personsearchorprivate/docketrecord inquiry; no linkedcase/partyrecordsopened. Location-onlyfinds have empty substantivebounds; no-matchpattern isnot legalabsence.","Published98pageopiniondocument available, but onlyselected majority/modulation/context/dissent/certificate passages consumed, notentire98pages or everyquotedauthority. Parsedtextonly, zero freshPDFpixels; originalreportedfailedscreenshotsindices2/52/97not retried, rawpixelclaimselsewherepreservedasattribution. Malformed printedtotal denominator preserved; printedpageandzeroPDFindexdistinguished. Missingreturnedlines1210-1213not reconstructed.","Actualselected majority1449-1502 distinguishes statutorylistedpreclusion from exceptionalunlisted positiveadmission/decision.1520-1522and1624-1634modulate by interlocutorydecisionissuedafterpublication; registryquotes19December2018publication. Certificatecounts6joiners+relator7versus5dissents; membersabsentinfinalsessionnotmiscountedasnevervoting. Noactualparty’spreclusion/urgency/competence/meritsdetermined.","Genericregistry supports thesis/modulation/status andrecordsfinality22February2019; update17February2023not a2026citatorcertificate.2026overview isofficialguidance/summary, not fulljudgment or evidenceofeveryquotedholding. Otherfivepublishedjudgments S008-S012andcompanionS014summaryremainunreopened researcherattribution, withactualposture/date/result/pixel/currentlater-treatmentlimits. No broadnewcasevalue/evidence/origin-notice ruleacceptedfromoverviewalone.","OriginalS015fullcompanion andS016/S017otherprecedentfailedroutesnotretried; originalnativeerrorsnotrecovered, noholdingfromunreadbodyorsearchsnippet. SelectedS006successfuldistinctrepresentativepublicationdoesnotrecoverthosefailedsources. CompletecurrentSTJ/STFcitator,latermodulation/qualifiedprecedent/treatmentandactualapplicationheld.","CPCcompiladabody/current1015-1020/1009/1021/1007/representation/cure/preparo/relator/relief/periodstatutesremaincoordinatorunreopened underexactpriorblock. OneoriginaldatedCPC1045capture reusedonlyasstatutoryfamilysupport; itsactualnoncompiladaliteralURLexplicitlydiffersfromregisteredS001andwasnotnewlyfetched. Art14/DOUfooter/currentlawnotverifiedthere.","2024holidayproofamendment,2026operativequalifiedprecedentlaw,2026enacted-futurelaw and2006electroniclawremainoriginalresearcherpropositionssubjecttoaccess/currentness/effectivechainholds. No newoperative2026law orabsenceofotheramendmentclaimed. Noallimmediateappealability, universalcurability, paper-origin notificationexcuse, automaticstay/relief/debtcancellation/dischargeorprofession/licenceauthority established.","Sixteenexistingworkflowsandthreeexistingdatemodelsread; sixendpoints/46businessdaypositions/26originalstatedpositions-or-alternativeendpoints/10distinctweekdaylabels checked understipulations. Existingthreeclosurealternativesonly,no newdates, profiles, fees, amountorfinancialscenario. Zero monetaryoperations. Twojudicialvotecountcomparisons arepublishedcertificatecounts, not newfinancialexamples. Currentstatutorytrigger/holiday/courtcalendar/receipt/order/timezone/outage/lastinstant notcertified.","Eightyderivedclaimareaassignmentsreconciledfrom97/98passfallbacktotheactualatomiclabels:3A097,77A098. Alloriginalresearchercells/sourceclaimIDsunchanged, oldfallbackpreservedinbeforecopies. Sourceandclaimreconciliationisnotprimaryacceptance. All155coverage rowsretainstatus/questions:100core28deferred27stateDF; all27localbranchesunexamined.","ExactP01D15originalremainingrowandvisiblecrosswalkmatch; interlocutorycomponentonly. CurrentP18-P21statusesobservedseparately,historicthenunreviewedlabelsnotrewrittenandnosiblingfindingadopted. P01same-coordinatorscope/professional/funds/contract/territorial/parentholdsretained. Fullapelação/ED/internalhigherappeals/service/default/reopening/judgment/execution/collective/Juizados/tax/family/insolvency/property/security/foreign/local/provider/countryremainheld.","Onlyassignedpass22/reviewartifactswritten; no sharedparent/history/index/register/tasks/routing/model/automationmutation. Parenthistoryproposalonlyincompletion. NewChatGPTprompts/correctionSends/modelprobes/browser/CUA/tabs/HUMANaccess/researchAPIs/accounts/purchases/contact/filing/site/publication/privateinquiry/researchgeneration/furtheragentsremainpaused/notperformed.","Exactsourceopeningclocksunknown; originalpublication/signature/finality/update/capture/reviewtimesnotopeningclocks. Actualservercompletionclockunknown. ActualP22GPT6Prohistoricalpreflight/renderedresponseprovenancepreserved; no newUIverification or reclassification ofoldSol/otherreports."]}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S011","urls":["https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=21/09/2018&num_registro=201800907539"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S011","Issuer/title and full literal URL":"STJ, REsp 1.749.958-RS. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=21/09/2018&num_registro=201800907539","Actual body read, status, publication and limits":"Fresh published full-judgment document, selected passages. Third Panel unanimous; September 18, 2018; DJe September 21. Thirteen PDF pages. Ementa/result indices 0–2; relevant reasons 6–10. Screenshot 1 inspected, displaying printed p. 2 with inconsistent total denominator. Origin-paper notification requirement; electronic appeal alone insufficient."},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_published_judgment_or_summary_attribution_unreopened","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_source_id":"C_BR-S011","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-S011","registered_literal_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=21/09/2018&num_registro=201800907539","coordinator_status":"original_published_judgment_or_summary_attribution_unreopened","selected_scopes":[],"inherited_block":[],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_currentness_or_application_accepted":false,"limits":["Delegated same-coordinator saved ordinarycivil interlocutorygateway review only, never independent/exhaustive/allsource/currentalllaw/allclaim/actualadmissibility/actualstay/local/country/A066/A097/A098/parent/publicationacceptance. Noactualparty/provider/person/account/property/entity/contract/licence/privatecase/docket/record investigated and no newscenario constructed.","Allfive statutoryliteralURLs have attributablepriorblocks, preservedincompleteimmutablepacket copies fromBR18/19/rootBR20. None retried, parallelCPCURLfetched, alternatehosted or bypassed. Zero newfailedURLevents, not freshrecovery or disproof ofresearchergenerationaccess. Roottextwrapperextra newline versus canonicalJSONtoolstringpreservedandseparatelyhashed.","ThreepreselectedgenericpublicauthorityURLs readable in fivecompleteunmodifiedtoolpackets:publishedTema988representativeopinion, officialgenericTema registry andofficial2026overview. Publishedlaw/precedent readbyprovidedliteralpublicationURLs only, nonewcase/personsearchorprivate/docketrecord inquiry; no linkedcase/partyrecordsopened. Location-onlyfinds have empty substantivebounds; no-matchpattern isnot legalabsence.","Published98pageopiniondocument available, but onlyselected majority/modulation/context/dissent/certificate passages consumed, notentire98pages or everyquotedauthority. Parsedtextonly, zero freshPDFpixels; originalreportedfailedscreenshotsindices2/52/97not retried, rawpixelclaimselsewherepreservedasattribution. Malformed printedtotal denominator preserved; printedpageandzeroPDFindexdistinguished. Missingreturnedlines1210-1213not reconstructed.","Actualselected majority1449-1502 distinguishes statutorylistedpreclusion from exceptionalunlisted positiveadmission/decision.1520-1522and1624-1634modulate by interlocutorydecisionissuedafterpublication; registryquotes19December2018publication. Certificatecounts6joiners+relator7versus5dissents; membersabsentinfinalsessionnotmiscountedasnevervoting. Noactualparty’spreclusion/urgency/competence/meritsdetermined.","Genericregistry supports thesis/modulation/status andrecordsfinality22February2019; update17February2023not a2026citatorcertificate.2026overview isofficialguidance/summary, not fulljudgment or evidenceofeveryquotedholding. Otherfivepublishedjudgments S008-S012andcompanionS014summaryremainunreopened researcherattribution, withactualposture/date/result/pixel/currentlater-treatmentlimits. No broadnewcasevalue/evidence/origin-notice ruleacceptedfromoverviewalone.","OriginalS015fullcompanion andS016/S017otherprecedentfailedroutesnotretried; originalnativeerrorsnotrecovered, noholdingfromunreadbodyorsearchsnippet. SelectedS006successfuldistinctrepresentativepublicationdoesnotrecoverthosefailedsources. CompletecurrentSTJ/STFcitator,latermodulation/qualifiedprecedent/treatmentandactualapplicationheld.","CPCcompiladabody/current1015-1020/1009/1021/1007/representation/cure/preparo/relator/relief/periodstatutesremaincoordinatorunreopened underexactpriorblock. OneoriginaldatedCPC1045capture reusedonlyasstatutoryfamilysupport; itsactualnoncompiladaliteralURLexplicitlydiffersfromregisteredS001andwasnotnewlyfetched. Art14/DOUfooter/currentlawnotverifiedthere.","2024holidayproofamendment,2026operativequalifiedprecedentlaw,2026enacted-futurelaw and2006electroniclawremainoriginalresearcherpropositionssubjecttoaccess/currentness/effectivechainholds. No newoperative2026law orabsenceofotheramendmentclaimed. Noallimmediateappealability, universalcurability, paper-origin notificationexcuse, automaticstay/relief/debtcancellation/dischargeorprofession/licenceauthority established.","Sixteenexistingworkflowsandthreeexistingdatemodelsread; sixendpoints/46businessdaypositions/26originalstatedpositions-or-alternativeendpoints/10distinctweekdaylabels checked understipulations. Existingthreeclosurealternativesonly,no newdates, profiles, fees, amountorfinancialscenario. Zero monetaryoperations. Twojudicialvotecountcomparisons arepublishedcertificatecounts, not newfinancialexamples. Currentstatutorytrigger/holiday/courtcalendar/receipt/order/timezone/outage/lastinstant notcertified.","Eightyderivedclaimareaassignmentsreconciledfrom97/98passfallbacktotheactualatomiclabels:3A097,77A098. Alloriginalresearchercells/sourceclaimIDsunchanged, oldfallbackpreservedinbeforecopies. Sourceandclaimreconciliationisnotprimaryacceptance. All155coverage rowsretainstatus/questions:100core28deferred27stateDF; all27localbranchesunexamined.","ExactP01D15originalremainingrowandvisiblecrosswalkmatch; interlocutorycomponentonly. CurrentP18-P21statusesobservedseparately,historicthenunreviewedlabelsnotrewrittenandnosiblingfindingadopted. P01same-coordinatorscope/professional/funds/contract/territorial/parentholdsretained. Fullapelação/ED/internalhigherappeals/service/default/reopening/judgment/execution/collective/Juizados/tax/family/insolvency/property/security/foreign/local/provider/countryremainheld.","Onlyassignedpass22/reviewartifactswritten; no sharedparent/history/index/register/tasks/routing/model/automationmutation. Parenthistoryproposalonlyincompletion. NewChatGPTprompts/correctionSends/modelprobes/browser/CUA/tabs/HUMANaccess/researchAPIs/accounts/purchases/contact/filing/site/publication/privateinquiry/researchgeneration/furtheragentsremainpaused/notperformed.","Exactsourceopeningclocksunknown; originalpublication/signature/finality/update/capture/reviewtimesnotopeningclocks. Actualservercompletionclockunknown. ActualP22GPT6Prohistoricalpreflight/renderedresponseprovenancepreserved; no newUIverification or reclassification ofoldSol/otherreports."]}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S012","urls":["https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=26/06/2020&num_registro=201800452722"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S012","Issuer/title and full literal URL":"STJ, REsp 1.758.943-SP. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=26/06/2020&num_registro=201800452722","Actual body read, status, publication and limits":"Fresh published full-judgment document, selected passages. Third Panel unanimous; June 23, 2020; DJe June 26. Ten pages. Ementa index 0; reasons 6–8; result 9. Screenshot 0 inspected, displaying printed p. 1 with inconsistent total denominator. Respondent proof/prejudice and instrumentality; no permission to ignore art. 1018."},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_published_judgment_or_summary_attribution_unreopened","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_source_id":"C_BR-S012","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-S012","registered_literal_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=26/06/2020&num_registro=201800452722","coordinator_status":"original_published_judgment_or_summary_attribution_unreopened","selected_scopes":[],"inherited_block":[],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_currentness_or_application_accepted":false,"limits":["Delegated same-coordinator saved ordinarycivil interlocutorygateway review only, never independent/exhaustive/allsource/currentalllaw/allclaim/actualadmissibility/actualstay/local/country/A066/A097/A098/parent/publicationacceptance. Noactualparty/provider/person/account/property/entity/contract/licence/privatecase/docket/record investigated and no newscenario constructed.","Allfive statutoryliteralURLs have attributablepriorblocks, preservedincompleteimmutablepacket copies fromBR18/19/rootBR20. None retried, parallelCPCURLfetched, alternatehosted or bypassed. Zero newfailedURLevents, not freshrecovery or disproof ofresearchergenerationaccess. Roottextwrapperextra newline versus canonicalJSONtoolstringpreservedandseparatelyhashed.","ThreepreselectedgenericpublicauthorityURLs readable in fivecompleteunmodifiedtoolpackets:publishedTema988representativeopinion, officialgenericTema registry andofficial2026overview. Publishedlaw/precedent readbyprovidedliteralpublicationURLs only, nonewcase/personsearchorprivate/docketrecord inquiry; no linkedcase/partyrecordsopened. Location-onlyfinds have empty substantivebounds; no-matchpattern isnot legalabsence.","Published98pageopiniondocument available, but onlyselected majority/modulation/context/dissent/certificate passages consumed, notentire98pages or everyquotedauthority. Parsedtextonly, zero freshPDFpixels; originalreportedfailedscreenshotsindices2/52/97not retried, rawpixelclaimselsewherepreservedasattribution. Malformed printedtotal denominator preserved; printedpageandzeroPDFindexdistinguished. Missingreturnedlines1210-1213not reconstructed.","Actualselected majority1449-1502 distinguishes statutorylistedpreclusion from exceptionalunlisted positiveadmission/decision.1520-1522and1624-1634modulate by interlocutorydecisionissuedafterpublication; registryquotes19December2018publication. Certificatecounts6joiners+relator7versus5dissents; membersabsentinfinalsessionnotmiscountedasnevervoting. Noactualparty’spreclusion/urgency/competence/meritsdetermined.","Genericregistry supports thesis/modulation/status andrecordsfinality22February2019; update17February2023not a2026citatorcertificate.2026overview isofficialguidance/summary, not fulljudgment or evidenceofeveryquotedholding. Otherfivepublishedjudgments S008-S012andcompanionS014summaryremainunreopened researcherattribution, withactualposture/date/result/pixel/currentlater-treatmentlimits. No broadnewcasevalue/evidence/origin-notice ruleacceptedfromoverviewalone.","OriginalS015fullcompanion andS016/S017otherprecedentfailedroutesnotretried; originalnativeerrorsnotrecovered, noholdingfromunreadbodyorsearchsnippet. SelectedS006successfuldistinctrepresentativepublicationdoesnotrecoverthosefailedsources. CompletecurrentSTJ/STFcitator,latermodulation/qualifiedprecedent/treatmentandactualapplicationheld.","CPCcompiladabody/current1015-1020/1009/1021/1007/representation/cure/preparo/relator/relief/periodstatutesremaincoordinatorunreopened underexactpriorblock. OneoriginaldatedCPC1045capture reusedonlyasstatutoryfamilysupport; itsactualnoncompiladaliteralURLexplicitlydiffersfromregisteredS001andwasnotnewlyfetched. Art14/DOUfooter/currentlawnotverifiedthere.","2024holidayproofamendment,2026operativequalifiedprecedentlaw,2026enacted-futurelaw and2006electroniclawremainoriginalresearcherpropositionssubjecttoaccess/currentness/effectivechainholds. No newoperative2026law orabsenceofotheramendmentclaimed. Noallimmediateappealability, universalcurability, paper-origin notificationexcuse, automaticstay/relief/debtcancellation/dischargeorprofession/licenceauthority established.","Sixteenexistingworkflowsandthreeexistingdatemodelsread; sixendpoints/46businessdaypositions/26originalstatedpositions-or-alternativeendpoints/10distinctweekdaylabels checked understipulations. Existingthreeclosurealternativesonly,no newdates, profiles, fees, amountorfinancialscenario. Zero monetaryoperations. Twojudicialvotecountcomparisons arepublishedcertificatecounts, not newfinancialexamples. Currentstatutorytrigger/holiday/courtcalendar/receipt/order/timezone/outage/lastinstant notcertified.","Eightyderivedclaimareaassignmentsreconciledfrom97/98passfallbacktotheactualatomiclabels:3A097,77A098. Alloriginalresearchercells/sourceclaimIDsunchanged, oldfallbackpreservedinbeforecopies. Sourceandclaimreconciliationisnotprimaryacceptance. All155coverage rowsretainstatus/questions:100core28deferred27stateDF; all27localbranchesunexamined.","ExactP01D15originalremainingrowandvisiblecrosswalkmatch; interlocutorycomponentonly. CurrentP18-P21statusesobservedseparately,historicthenunreviewedlabelsnotrewrittenandnosiblingfindingadopted. P01same-coordinatorscope/professional/funds/contract/territorial/parentholdsretained. Fullapelação/ED/internalhigherappeals/service/default/reopening/judgment/execution/collective/Juizados/tax/family/insolvency/property/security/foreign/local/provider/countryremainheld.","Onlyassignedpass22/reviewartifactswritten; no sharedparent/history/index/register/tasks/routing/model/automationmutation. Parenthistoryproposalonlyincompletion. NewChatGPTprompts/correctionSends/modelprobes/browser/CUA/tabs/HUMANaccess/researchAPIs/accounts/purchases/contact/filing/site/publication/privateinquiry/researchgeneration/furtheragentsremainpaused/notperformed.","Exactsourceopeningclocksunknown; originalpublication/signature/finality/update/capture/reviewtimesnotopeningclocks. Actualservercompletionclockunknown. ActualP22GPT6Prohistoricalpreflight/renderedresponseprovenancepreserved; no newUIverification or reclassification ofoldSol/otherreports."]}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S013","urls":["https://www.stj.jus.br/sites/portalp/Paginas/Comunicacao/Noticias/2026/22022026-Novas-decisoes-do-STJ-sobre-o-cabimento-do-agravo-de-instrumento-no-regime-do-CPC2015.aspx"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S013","Issuer/title and full literal URL":"STJ, “Novas decisões do STJ sobre o cabimento do agravo de instrumento no regime do CPC/2015”. https://www.stj.jus.br/sites/portalp/Paginas/Comunicacao/Noticias/2026/22022026-Novas-decisoes-do-STJ-sobre-o-cabimento-do-agravo-de-instrumento-no-regime-do-CPC2015.aspx","Actual body read, status, publication and limits":"Fresh official overview/discovery, February 22, 2026. Used to locate later judgments. Their actual bodies, not the overview alone, support the findings. HTML; page/index N/A."},"coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_official_generic_overview_guidance_only_notjudgment","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_source_id":"C_BR-S013","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-S013","registered_literal_URL":"https://www.stj.jus.br/sites/portalp/Paginas/Comunicacao/Noticias/2026/22022026-Novas-decisoes-do-STJ-sobre-o-cabimento-do-agravo-de-instrumento-no-regime-do-CPC2015.aspx","coordinator_status":"fresh_official_generic_overview_guidance_only_notjudgment","selected_scopes":[{"source_id":"C_BR-P22-S013","line_range":[14,35],"scope":"Official2026overview generalTema988andvalue/evidence summaries only; not substitutedforindividualjudgments","evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://www.stj.jus.br/sites/portalp/Paginas/Comunicacao/Noticias/2026/22022026-Novas-decisoes-do-STJ-sobre-o-cabimento-do-agravo-de-instrumento-no-regime-do-CPC2015.aspx","actual_evidence_URL":"https://www.stj.jus.br/sites/portalp/Paginas/Comunicacao/Noticias/2026/22022026-Novas-decisoes-do-STJ-sobre-o-cabimento-do-agravo-de-instrumento-no-regime-do-CPC2015.aspx","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":1,"actual_numbered_lines":[[14,35]],"packet_character_bounds":[9114,27202],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false},{"source_id":"C_BR-P22-S013","line_range":[53,61],"scope":"Officialoverview route/phase distinction aroundappealdenial andTema1267reported only; fullunderlyingbody/parentapelaçãomodule notcompleted","evidence":[{"registered_URL":"https://www.stj.jus.br/sites/portalp/Paginas/Comunicacao/Noticias/2026/22022026-Novas-decisoes-do-STJ-sobre-o-cabimento-do-agravo-de-instrumento-no-regime-do-CPC2015.aspx","actual_evidence_URL":"https://www.stj.jus.br/sites/portalp/Paginas/Comunicacao/Noticias/2026/22022026-Novas-decisoes-do-STJ-sobre-o-cabimento-do-agravo-de-instrumento-no-regime-do-CPC2015.aspx","packet":"[internal evidence reference]","chunk":1,"actual_numbered_lines":[[53,61]],"packet_character_bounds":[9114,27202],"access":"fresh_preselected_generic_public_authority_parsed_text"}],"fresh_PDFpixels":false}],"inherited_block":[],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_currentness_or_application_accepted":false,"limits":["Delegated same-coordinator saved ordinarycivil interlocutorygateway review only, never independent/exhaustive/allsource/currentalllaw/allclaim/actualadmissibility/actualstay/local/country/A066/A097/A098/parent/publicationacceptance. Noactualparty/provider/person/account/property/entity/contract/licence/privatecase/docket/record investigated and no newscenario constructed.","Allfive statutoryliteralURLs have attributablepriorblocks, preservedincompleteimmutablepacket copies fromBR18/19/rootBR20. None retried, parallelCPCURLfetched, alternatehosted or bypassed. Zero newfailedURLevents, not freshrecovery or disproof ofresearchergenerationaccess. Roottextwrapperextra newline versus canonicalJSONtoolstringpreservedandseparatelyhashed.","ThreepreselectedgenericpublicauthorityURLs readable in fivecompleteunmodifiedtoolpackets:publishedTema988representativeopinion, officialgenericTema registry andofficial2026overview. Publishedlaw/precedent readbyprovidedliteralpublicationURLs only, nonewcase/personsearchorprivate/docketrecord inquiry; no linkedcase/partyrecordsopened. Location-onlyfinds have empty substantivebounds; no-matchpattern isnot legalabsence.","Published98pageopiniondocument available, but onlyselected majority/modulation/context/dissent/certificate passages consumed, notentire98pages or everyquotedauthority. Parsedtextonly, zero freshPDFpixels; originalreportedfailedscreenshotsindices2/52/97not retried, rawpixelclaimselsewherepreservedasattribution. Malformed printedtotal denominator preserved; printedpageandzeroPDFindexdistinguished. Missingreturnedlines1210-1213not reconstructed.","Actualselected majority1449-1502 distinguishes statutorylistedpreclusion from exceptionalunlisted positiveadmission/decision.1520-1522and1624-1634modulate by interlocutorydecisionissuedafterpublication; registryquotes19December2018publication. Certificatecounts6joiners+relator7versus5dissents; membersabsentinfinalsessionnotmiscountedasnevervoting. Noactualparty’spreclusion/urgency/competence/meritsdetermined.","Genericregistry supports thesis/modulation/status andrecordsfinality22February2019; update17February2023not a2026citatorcertificate.2026overview isofficialguidance/summary, not fulljudgment or evidenceofeveryquotedholding. Otherfivepublishedjudgments S008-S012andcompanionS014summaryremainunreopened researcherattribution, withactualposture/date/result/pixel/currentlater-treatmentlimits. No broadnewcasevalue/evidence/origin-notice ruleacceptedfromoverviewalone.","OriginalS015fullcompanion andS016/S017otherprecedentfailedroutesnotretried; originalnativeerrorsnotrecovered, noholdingfromunreadbodyorsearchsnippet. SelectedS006successfuldistinctrepresentativepublicationdoesnotrecoverthosefailedsources. CompletecurrentSTJ/STFcitator,latermodulation/qualifiedprecedent/treatmentandactualapplicationheld.","CPCcompiladabody/current1015-1020/1009/1021/1007/representation/cure/preparo/relator/relief/periodstatutesremaincoordinatorunreopened underexactpriorblock. OneoriginaldatedCPC1045capture reusedonlyasstatutoryfamilysupport; itsactualnoncompiladaliteralURLexplicitlydiffersfromregisteredS001andwasnotnewlyfetched. Art14/DOUfooter/currentlawnotverifiedthere.","2024holidayproofamendment,2026operativequalifiedprecedentlaw,2026enacted-futurelaw and2006electroniclawremainoriginalresearcherpropositionssubjecttoaccess/currentness/effectivechainholds. No newoperative2026law orabsenceofotheramendmentclaimed. Noallimmediateappealability, universalcurability, paper-origin notificationexcuse, automaticstay/relief/debtcancellation/dischargeorprofession/licenceauthority established.","Sixteenexistingworkflowsandthreeexistingdatemodelsread; sixendpoints/46businessdaypositions/26originalstatedpositions-or-alternativeendpoints/10distinctweekdaylabels checked understipulations. Existingthreeclosurealternativesonly,no newdates, profiles, fees, amountorfinancialscenario. Zero monetaryoperations. Twojudicialvotecountcomparisons arepublishedcertificatecounts, not newfinancialexamples. Currentstatutorytrigger/holiday/courtcalendar/receipt/order/timezone/outage/lastinstant notcertified.","Eightyderivedclaimareaassignmentsreconciledfrom97/98passfallbacktotheactualatomiclabels:3A097,77A098. Alloriginalresearchercells/sourceclaimIDsunchanged, oldfallbackpreservedinbeforecopies. Sourceandclaimreconciliationisnotprimaryacceptance. All155coverage rowsretainstatus/questions:100core28deferred27stateDF; all27localbranchesunexamined.","ExactP01D15originalremainingrowandvisiblecrosswalkmatch; interlocutorycomponentonly. CurrentP18-P21statusesobservedseparately,historicthenunreviewedlabelsnotrewrittenandnosiblingfindingadopted. P01same-coordinatorscope/professional/funds/contract/territorial/parentholdsretained. Fullapelação/ED/internalhigherappeals/service/default/reopening/judgment/execution/collective/Juizados/tax/family/insolvency/property/security/foreign/local/provider/countryremainheld.","Onlyassignedpass22/reviewartifactswritten; no sharedparent/history/index/register/tasks/routing/model/automationmutation. Parenthistoryproposalonlyincompletion. NewChatGPTprompts/correctionSends/modelprobes/browser/CUA/tabs/HUMANaccess/researchAPIs/accounts/purchases/contact/filing/site/publication/privateinquiry/researchgeneration/furtheragentsremainpaused/notperformed.","Exactsourceopeningclocksunknown; originalpublication/signature/finality/update/capture/reviewtimesnotopeningclocks. Actualservercompletionclockunknown. ActualP22GPT6Prohistoricalpreflight/renderedresponseprovenancepreserved; no newUIverification or reclassification ofoldSol/otherreports."]}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S014","urls":["https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/jurisprudencia/toc.jsp?O=JT&b=ACOR&livre=201702262874.REG.+E+19/12/2018.FONT"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S014","Issuer/title and full literal URL":"STJ, REsp 1.696.396-MT published ementa/disposition. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/jurisprudencia/toc.jsp?O=JT&b=ACOR&livre=201702262874.REG.+E+19/12/2018.FONT.","Actual body read, status, publication and limits":"Fresh official judgment-summary/disposition only. Companion Tema 988 authority; December 5/19, 2018 judgment/publication. Not represented as the full votes. S006 is the actual full representative judgment read."},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_published_judgment_or_summary_attribution_unreopened","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_source_id":"C_BR-S014","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-S014","registered_literal_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/jurisprudencia/toc.jsp?O=JT&b=ACOR&livre=201702262874.REG.+E+19/12/2018.FONT","coordinator_status":"original_published_judgment_or_summary_attribution_unreopened","selected_scopes":[],"inherited_block":[],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_currentness_or_application_accepted":false,"limits":["Delegated same-coordinator saved ordinarycivil interlocutorygateway review only, never independent/exhaustive/allsource/currentalllaw/allclaim/actualadmissibility/actualstay/local/country/A066/A097/A098/parent/publicationacceptance. Noactualparty/provider/person/account/property/entity/contract/licence/privatecase/docket/record investigated and no newscenario constructed.","Allfive statutoryliteralURLs have attributablepriorblocks, preservedincompleteimmutablepacket copies fromBR18/19/rootBR20. None retried, parallelCPCURLfetched, alternatehosted or bypassed. Zero newfailedURLevents, not freshrecovery or disproof ofresearchergenerationaccess. Roottextwrapperextra newline versus canonicalJSONtoolstringpreservedandseparatelyhashed.","ThreepreselectedgenericpublicauthorityURLs readable in fivecompleteunmodifiedtoolpackets:publishedTema988representativeopinion, officialgenericTema registry andofficial2026overview. Publishedlaw/precedent readbyprovidedliteralpublicationURLs only, nonewcase/personsearchorprivate/docketrecord inquiry; no linkedcase/partyrecordsopened. Location-onlyfinds have empty substantivebounds; no-matchpattern isnot legalabsence.","Published98pageopiniondocument available, but onlyselected majority/modulation/context/dissent/certificate passages consumed, notentire98pages or everyquotedauthority. Parsedtextonly, zero freshPDFpixels; originalreportedfailedscreenshotsindices2/52/97not retried, rawpixelclaimselsewherepreservedasattribution. Malformed printedtotal denominator preserved; printedpageandzeroPDFindexdistinguished. Missingreturnedlines1210-1213not reconstructed.","Actualselected majority1449-1502 distinguishes statutorylistedpreclusion from exceptionalunlisted positiveadmission/decision.1520-1522and1624-1634modulate by interlocutorydecisionissuedafterpublication; registryquotes19December2018publication. Certificatecounts6joiners+relator7versus5dissents; membersabsentinfinalsessionnotmiscountedasnevervoting. Noactualparty’spreclusion/urgency/competence/meritsdetermined.","Genericregistry supports thesis/modulation/status andrecordsfinality22February2019; update17February2023not a2026citatorcertificate.2026overview isofficialguidance/summary, not fulljudgment or evidenceofeveryquotedholding. Otherfivepublishedjudgments S008-S012andcompanionS014summaryremainunreopened researcherattribution, withactualposture/date/result/pixel/currentlater-treatmentlimits. No broadnewcasevalue/evidence/origin-notice ruleacceptedfromoverviewalone.","OriginalS015fullcompanion andS016/S017otherprecedentfailedroutesnotretried; originalnativeerrorsnotrecovered, noholdingfromunreadbodyorsearchsnippet. SelectedS006successfuldistinctrepresentativepublicationdoesnotrecoverthosefailedsources. CompletecurrentSTJ/STFcitator,latermodulation/qualifiedprecedent/treatmentandactualapplicationheld.","CPCcompiladabody/current1015-1020/1009/1021/1007/representation/cure/preparo/relator/relief/periodstatutesremaincoordinatorunreopened underexactpriorblock. OneoriginaldatedCPC1045capture reusedonlyasstatutoryfamilysupport; itsactualnoncompiladaliteralURLexplicitlydiffersfromregisteredS001andwasnotnewlyfetched. Art14/DOUfooter/currentlawnotverifiedthere.","2024holidayproofamendment,2026operativequalifiedprecedentlaw,2026enacted-futurelaw and2006electroniclawremainoriginalresearcherpropositionssubjecttoaccess/currentness/effectivechainholds. No newoperative2026law orabsenceofotheramendmentclaimed. Noallimmediateappealability, universalcurability, paper-origin notificationexcuse, automaticstay/relief/debtcancellation/dischargeorprofession/licenceauthority established.","Sixteenexistingworkflowsandthreeexistingdatemodelsread; sixendpoints/46businessdaypositions/26originalstatedpositions-or-alternativeendpoints/10distinctweekdaylabels checked understipulations. Existingthreeclosurealternativesonly,no newdates, profiles, fees, amountorfinancialscenario. Zero monetaryoperations. Twojudicialvotecountcomparisons arepublishedcertificatecounts, not newfinancialexamples. Currentstatutorytrigger/holiday/courtcalendar/receipt/order/timezone/outage/lastinstant notcertified.","Eightyderivedclaimareaassignmentsreconciledfrom97/98passfallbacktotheactualatomiclabels:3A097,77A098. Alloriginalresearchercells/sourceclaimIDsunchanged, oldfallbackpreservedinbeforecopies. Sourceandclaimreconciliationisnotprimaryacceptance. All155coverage rowsretainstatus/questions:100core28deferred27stateDF; all27localbranchesunexamined.","ExactP01D15originalremainingrowandvisiblecrosswalkmatch; interlocutorycomponentonly. CurrentP18-P21statusesobservedseparately,historicthenunreviewedlabelsnotrewrittenandnosiblingfindingadopted. P01same-coordinatorscope/professional/funds/contract/territorial/parentholdsretained. Fullapelação/ED/internalhigherappeals/service/default/reopening/judgment/execution/collective/Juizados/tax/family/insolvency/property/security/foreign/local/provider/countryremainheld.","Onlyassignedpass22/reviewartifactswritten; no sharedparent/history/index/register/tasks/routing/model/automationmutation. Parenthistoryproposalonlyincompletion. NewChatGPTprompts/correctionSends/modelprobes/browser/CUA/tabs/HUMANaccess/researchAPIs/accounts/purchases/contact/filing/site/publication/privateinquiry/researchgeneration/furtheragentsremainpaused/notperformed.","Exactsourceopeningclocksunknown; originalpublication/signature/finality/update/capture/reviewtimesnotopeningclocks. Actualservercompletionclockunknown. ActualP22GPT6Prohistoricalpreflight/renderedresponseprovenancepreserved; no newUIverification or reclassification ofoldSol/otherreports."]}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S015","urls":["https://ww2.stj.jus.br/websecstj/cgi/revista/REJ.cgi/ITA?CodOrgaoJgdr=&SeqCgrmaSessao=&dt=20181219&formato=PDF&nreg=201702262874&salvar=false&seq=1731780&tipo=0"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S015","Issuer/title and full literal URL":"STJ, attempted full REsp 1.696.396-MT. https://ww2.stj.jus.br/websecstj/cgi/revista/REJ.cgi/ITA?CodOrgaoJgdr=&SeqCgrmaSessao=&dt=20181219&formato=PDF&nreg=201702262874&salvar=false&seq=1731780&tipo=0","Actual body read, status, publication and limits":"Failed full-body route. No full-body access claimed. The different representative judgment S006 and official records S007/S014 were obtained. Page/index for this failed route unknown."},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_failed_judicial_route_preserved_unretried","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_source_id":"C_BR-S015","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-S015","registered_literal_URL":"https://ww2.stj.jus.br/websecstj/cgi/revista/REJ.cgi/ITA?CodOrgaoJgdr=&SeqCgrmaSessao=&dt=20181219&formato=PDF&nreg=201702262874&salvar=false&seq=1731780&tipo=0","coordinator_status":"original_failed_judicial_route_preserved_unretried","selected_scopes":[],"inherited_block":[],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_currentness_or_application_accepted":false,"limits":["Delegated same-coordinator saved ordinarycivil interlocutorygateway review only, never independent/exhaustive/allsource/currentalllaw/allclaim/actualadmissibility/actualstay/local/country/A066/A097/A098/parent/publicationacceptance. Noactualparty/provider/person/account/property/entity/contract/licence/privatecase/docket/record investigated and no newscenario constructed.","Allfive statutoryliteralURLs have attributablepriorblocks, preservedincompleteimmutablepacket copies fromBR18/19/rootBR20. None retried, parallelCPCURLfetched, alternatehosted or bypassed. Zero newfailedURLevents, not freshrecovery or disproof ofresearchergenerationaccess. Roottextwrapperextra newline versus canonicalJSONtoolstringpreservedandseparatelyhashed.","ThreepreselectedgenericpublicauthorityURLs readable in fivecompleteunmodifiedtoolpackets:publishedTema988representativeopinion, officialgenericTema registry andofficial2026overview. Publishedlaw/precedent readbyprovidedliteralpublicationURLs only, nonewcase/personsearchorprivate/docketrecord inquiry; no linkedcase/partyrecordsopened. Location-onlyfinds have empty substantivebounds; no-matchpattern isnot legalabsence.","Published98pageopiniondocument available, but onlyselected majority/modulation/context/dissent/certificate passages consumed, notentire98pages or everyquotedauthority. Parsedtextonly, zero freshPDFpixels; originalreportedfailedscreenshotsindices2/52/97not retried, rawpixelclaimselsewherepreservedasattribution. Malformed printedtotal denominator preserved; printedpageandzeroPDFindexdistinguished. Missingreturnedlines1210-1213not reconstructed.","Actualselected majority1449-1502 distinguishes statutorylistedpreclusion from exceptionalunlisted positiveadmission/decision.1520-1522and1624-1634modulate by interlocutorydecisionissuedafterpublication; registryquotes19December2018publication. Certificatecounts6joiners+relator7versus5dissents; membersabsentinfinalsessionnotmiscountedasnevervoting. Noactualparty’spreclusion/urgency/competence/meritsdetermined.","Genericregistry supports thesis/modulation/status andrecordsfinality22February2019; update17February2023not a2026citatorcertificate.2026overview isofficialguidance/summary, not fulljudgment or evidenceofeveryquotedholding. Otherfivepublishedjudgments S008-S012andcompanionS014summaryremainunreopened researcherattribution, withactualposture/date/result/pixel/currentlater-treatmentlimits. No broadnewcasevalue/evidence/origin-notice ruleacceptedfromoverviewalone.","OriginalS015fullcompanion andS016/S017otherprecedentfailedroutesnotretried; originalnativeerrorsnotrecovered, noholdingfromunreadbodyorsearchsnippet. SelectedS006successfuldistinctrepresentativepublicationdoesnotrecoverthosefailedsources. CompletecurrentSTJ/STFcitator,latermodulation/qualifiedprecedent/treatmentandactualapplicationheld.","CPCcompiladabody/current1015-1020/1009/1021/1007/representation/cure/preparo/relator/relief/periodstatutesremaincoordinatorunreopened underexactpriorblock. OneoriginaldatedCPC1045capture reusedonlyasstatutoryfamilysupport; itsactualnoncompiladaliteralURLexplicitlydiffersfromregisteredS001andwasnotnewlyfetched. Art14/DOUfooter/currentlawnotverifiedthere.","2024holidayproofamendment,2026operativequalifiedprecedentlaw,2026enacted-futurelaw and2006electroniclawremainoriginalresearcherpropositionssubjecttoaccess/currentness/effectivechainholds. No newoperative2026law orabsenceofotheramendmentclaimed. Noallimmediateappealability, universalcurability, paper-origin notificationexcuse, automaticstay/relief/debtcancellation/dischargeorprofession/licenceauthority established.","Sixteenexistingworkflowsandthreeexistingdatemodelsread; sixendpoints/46businessdaypositions/26originalstatedpositions-or-alternativeendpoints/10distinctweekdaylabels checked understipulations. Existingthreeclosurealternativesonly,no newdates, profiles, fees, amountorfinancialscenario. Zero monetaryoperations. Twojudicialvotecountcomparisons arepublishedcertificatecounts, not newfinancialexamples. Currentstatutorytrigger/holiday/courtcalendar/receipt/order/timezone/outage/lastinstant notcertified.","Eightyderivedclaimareaassignmentsreconciledfrom97/98passfallbacktotheactualatomiclabels:3A097,77A098. Alloriginalresearchercells/sourceclaimIDsunchanged, oldfallbackpreservedinbeforecopies. Sourceandclaimreconciliationisnotprimaryacceptance. All155coverage rowsretainstatus/questions:100core28deferred27stateDF; all27localbranchesunexamined.","ExactP01D15originalremainingrowandvisiblecrosswalkmatch; interlocutorycomponentonly. CurrentP18-P21statusesobservedseparately,historicthenunreviewedlabelsnotrewrittenandnosiblingfindingadopted. P01same-coordinatorscope/professional/funds/contract/territorial/parentholdsretained. Fullapelação/ED/internalhigherappeals/service/default/reopening/judgment/execution/collective/Juizados/tax/family/insolvency/property/security/foreign/local/provider/countryremainheld.","Onlyassignedpass22/reviewartifactswritten; no sharedparent/history/index/register/tasks/routing/model/automationmutation. Parenthistoryproposalonlyincompletion. NewChatGPTprompts/correctionSends/modelprobes/browser/CUA/tabs/HUMANaccess/researchAPIs/accounts/purchases/contact/filing/site/publication/privateinquiry/researchgeneration/furtheragentsremainpaused/notperformed.","Exactsourceopeningclocksunknown; originalpublication/signature/finality/update/capture/reviewtimesnotopeningclocks. Actualservercompletionclockunknown. ActualP22GPT6Prohistoricalpreflight/renderedresponseprovenancepreserved; no newUIverification or reclassification ofoldSol/otherreports."]}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S016","urls":["https://www.stj.jus.br/websecstj/cgi/revista/REJ.cgi/ITA?CodOrgaoJgdr=&SeqCgrmaSessao=&dt=20210903&formato=PDF&nreg=201800568774&salvar=false&seq=2086408&tipo=0"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S016","Issuer/title and full literal URL":"STJ, attempted EREsp 1.730.436-SP body. https://www.stj.jus.br/websecstj/cgi/revista/REJ.cgi/ITA?CodOrgaoJgdr=&SeqCgrmaSessao=&dt=20210903&formato=PDF&nreg=201800568774&salvar=false&seq=2086408&tipo=0","Actual body read, status, publication and limits":"Failed body. Search text not adopted as a holding. One different official alternate, S017, was attempted."},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_failed_judicial_route_preserved_unretried","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_source_id":"C_BR-S016","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-S016","registered_literal_URL":"https://www.stj.jus.br/websecstj/cgi/revista/REJ.cgi/ITA?CodOrgaoJgdr=&SeqCgrmaSessao=&dt=20210903&formato=PDF&nreg=201800568774&salvar=false&seq=2086408&tipo=0","coordinator_status":"original_failed_judicial_route_preserved_unretried","selected_scopes":[],"inherited_block":[],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_currentness_or_application_accepted":false,"limits":["Delegated same-coordinator saved ordinarycivil interlocutorygateway review only, never independent/exhaustive/allsource/currentalllaw/allclaim/actualadmissibility/actualstay/local/country/A066/A097/A098/parent/publicationacceptance. Noactualparty/provider/person/account/property/entity/contract/licence/privatecase/docket/record investigated and no newscenario constructed.","Allfive statutoryliteralURLs have attributablepriorblocks, preservedincompleteimmutablepacket copies fromBR18/19/rootBR20. None retried, parallelCPCURLfetched, alternatehosted or bypassed. Zero newfailedURLevents, not freshrecovery or disproof ofresearchergenerationaccess. Roottextwrapperextra newline versus canonicalJSONtoolstringpreservedandseparatelyhashed.","ThreepreselectedgenericpublicauthorityURLs readable in fivecompleteunmodifiedtoolpackets:publishedTema988representativeopinion, officialgenericTema registry andofficial2026overview. Publishedlaw/precedent readbyprovidedliteralpublicationURLs only, nonewcase/personsearchorprivate/docketrecord inquiry; no linkedcase/partyrecordsopened. Location-onlyfinds have empty substantivebounds; no-matchpattern isnot legalabsence.","Published98pageopiniondocument available, but onlyselected majority/modulation/context/dissent/certificate passages consumed, notentire98pages or everyquotedauthority. Parsedtextonly, zero freshPDFpixels; originalreportedfailedscreenshotsindices2/52/97not retried, rawpixelclaimselsewherepreservedasattribution. Malformed printedtotal denominator preserved; printedpageandzeroPDFindexdistinguished. Missingreturnedlines1210-1213not reconstructed.","Actualselected majority1449-1502 distinguishes statutorylistedpreclusion from exceptionalunlisted positiveadmission/decision.1520-1522and1624-1634modulate by interlocutorydecisionissuedafterpublication; registryquotes19December2018publication. Certificatecounts6joiners+relator7versus5dissents; membersabsentinfinalsessionnotmiscountedasnevervoting. Noactualparty’spreclusion/urgency/competence/meritsdetermined.","Genericregistry supports thesis/modulation/status andrecordsfinality22February2019; update17February2023not a2026citatorcertificate.2026overview isofficialguidance/summary, not fulljudgment or evidenceofeveryquotedholding. Otherfivepublishedjudgments S008-S012andcompanionS014summaryremainunreopened researcherattribution, withactualposture/date/result/pixel/currentlater-treatmentlimits. No broadnewcasevalue/evidence/origin-notice ruleacceptedfromoverviewalone.","OriginalS015fullcompanion andS016/S017otherprecedentfailedroutesnotretried; originalnativeerrorsnotrecovered, noholdingfromunreadbodyorsearchsnippet. SelectedS006successfuldistinctrepresentativepublicationdoesnotrecoverthosefailedsources. CompletecurrentSTJ/STFcitator,latermodulation/qualifiedprecedent/treatmentandactualapplicationheld.","CPCcompiladabody/current1015-1020/1009/1021/1007/representation/cure/preparo/relator/relief/periodstatutesremaincoordinatorunreopened underexactpriorblock. OneoriginaldatedCPC1045capture reusedonlyasstatutoryfamilysupport; itsactualnoncompiladaliteralURLexplicitlydiffersfromregisteredS001andwasnotnewlyfetched. Art14/DOUfooter/currentlawnotverifiedthere.","2024holidayproofamendment,2026operativequalifiedprecedentlaw,2026enacted-futurelaw and2006electroniclawremainoriginalresearcherpropositionssubjecttoaccess/currentness/effectivechainholds. No newoperative2026law orabsenceofotheramendmentclaimed. Noallimmediateappealability, universalcurability, paper-origin notificationexcuse, automaticstay/relief/debtcancellation/dischargeorprofession/licenceauthority established.","Sixteenexistingworkflowsandthreeexistingdatemodelsread; sixendpoints/46businessdaypositions/26originalstatedpositions-or-alternativeendpoints/10distinctweekdaylabels checked understipulations. Existingthreeclosurealternativesonly,no newdates, profiles, fees, amountorfinancialscenario. Zero monetaryoperations. Twojudicialvotecountcomparisons arepublishedcertificatecounts, not newfinancialexamples. Currentstatutorytrigger/holiday/courtcalendar/receipt/order/timezone/outage/lastinstant notcertified.","Eightyderivedclaimareaassignmentsreconciledfrom97/98passfallbacktotheactualatomiclabels:3A097,77A098. Alloriginalresearchercells/sourceclaimIDsunchanged, oldfallbackpreservedinbeforecopies. Sourceandclaimreconciliationisnotprimaryacceptance. All155coverage rowsretainstatus/questions:100core28deferred27stateDF; all27localbranchesunexamined.","ExactP01D15originalremainingrowandvisiblecrosswalkmatch; interlocutorycomponentonly. CurrentP18-P21statusesobservedseparately,historicthenunreviewedlabelsnotrewrittenandnosiblingfindingadopted. P01same-coordinatorscope/professional/funds/contract/territorial/parentholdsretained. Fullapelação/ED/internalhigherappeals/service/default/reopening/judgment/execution/collective/Juizados/tax/family/insolvency/property/security/foreign/local/provider/countryremainheld.","Onlyassignedpass22/reviewartifactswritten; no sharedparent/history/index/register/tasks/routing/model/automationmutation. Parenthistoryproposalonlyincompletion. NewChatGPTprompts/correctionSends/modelprobes/browser/CUA/tabs/HUMANaccess/researchAPIs/accounts/purchases/contact/filing/site/publication/privateinquiry/researchgeneration/furtheragentsremainpaused/notperformed.","Exactsourceopeningclocksunknown; originalpublication/signature/finality/update/capture/reviewtimesnotopeningclocks. Actualservercompletionclockunknown. ActualP22GPT6Prohistoricalpreflight/renderedresponseprovenancepreserved; no newUIverification or reclassification ofoldSol/otherreports."]}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S017","urls":["https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=03/09/2021&num_registro=201800568774"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S017","Issuer/title and full literal URL":"STJ, official alternate for EREsp 1.730.436-SP. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=03/09/2021&num_registro=201800568774","Actual body read, status, publication and limits":"Failed alternate body. No holding or currentness conclusion adopted from it. No further retry loop or workaround."},"coordinator_verification_status":"original_failed_judicial_route_preserved_unretried","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"stored_source_id":"C_BR-S017","contextual_alias":"C_BR-P22-S017","registered_literal_URL":"https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=03/09/2021&num_registro=201800568774","coordinator_status":"original_failed_judicial_route_preserved_unretried","selected_scopes":[],"inherited_block":[],"original_researcher_record_unchanged":true,"all_currentness_or_application_accepted":false,"limits":["Delegated same-coordinator saved ordinarycivil interlocutorygateway review only, never independent/exhaustive/allsource/currentalllaw/allclaim/actualadmissibility/actualstay/local/country/A066/A097/A098/parent/publicationacceptance. Noactualparty/provider/person/account/property/entity/contract/licence/privatecase/docket/record investigated and no newscenario constructed.","Allfive statutoryliteralURLs have attributablepriorblocks, preservedincompleteimmutablepacket copies fromBR18/19/rootBR20. None retried, parallelCPCURLfetched, alternatehosted or bypassed. Zero newfailedURLevents, not freshrecovery or disproof ofresearchergenerationaccess. Roottextwrapperextra newline versus canonicalJSONtoolstringpreservedandseparatelyhashed.","ThreepreselectedgenericpublicauthorityURLs readable in fivecompleteunmodifiedtoolpackets:publishedTema988representativeopinion, officialgenericTema registry andofficial2026overview. Publishedlaw/precedent readbyprovidedliteralpublicationURLs only, nonewcase/personsearchorprivate/docketrecord inquiry; no linkedcase/partyrecordsopened. Location-onlyfinds have empty substantivebounds; no-matchpattern isnot legalabsence.","Published98pageopiniondocument available, but onlyselected majority/modulation/context/dissent/certificate passages consumed, notentire98pages or everyquotedauthority. Parsedtextonly, zero freshPDFpixels; originalreportedfailedscreenshotsindices2/52/97not retried, rawpixelclaimselsewherepreservedasattribution. Malformed printedtotal denominator preserved; printedpageandzeroPDFindexdistinguished. Missingreturnedlines1210-1213not reconstructed.","Actualselected majority1449-1502 distinguishes statutorylistedpreclusion from exceptionalunlisted positiveadmission/decision.1520-1522and1624-1634modulate by interlocutorydecisionissuedafterpublication; registryquotes19December2018publication. Certificatecounts6joiners+relator7versus5dissents; membersabsentinfinalsessionnotmiscountedasnevervoting. Noactualparty’spreclusion/urgency/competence/meritsdetermined.","Genericregistry supports thesis/modulation/status andrecordsfinality22February2019; update17February2023not a2026citatorcertificate.2026overview isofficialguidance/summary, not fulljudgment or evidenceofeveryquotedholding. Otherfivepublishedjudgments S008-S012andcompanionS014summaryremainunreopened researcherattribution, withactualposture/date/result/pixel/currentlater-treatmentlimits. No broadnewcasevalue/evidence/origin-notice ruleacceptedfromoverviewalone.","OriginalS015fullcompanion andS016/S017otherprecedentfailedroutesnotretried; originalnativeerrorsnotrecovered, noholdingfromunreadbodyorsearchsnippet. SelectedS006successfuldistinctrepresentativepublicationdoesnotrecoverthosefailedsources. CompletecurrentSTJ/STFcitator,latermodulation/qualifiedprecedent/treatmentandactualapplicationheld.","CPCcompiladabody/current1015-1020/1009/1021/1007/representation/cure/preparo/relator/relief/periodstatutesremaincoordinatorunreopened underexactpriorblock. OneoriginaldatedCPC1045capture reusedonlyasstatutoryfamilysupport; itsactualnoncompiladaliteralURLexplicitlydiffersfromregisteredS001andwasnotnewlyfetched. Art14/DOUfooter/currentlawnotverifiedthere.","2024holidayproofamendment,2026operativequalifiedprecedentlaw,2026enacted-futurelaw and2006electroniclawremainoriginalresearcherpropositionssubjecttoaccess/currentness/effectivechainholds. No newoperative2026law orabsenceofotheramendmentclaimed. Noallimmediateappealability, universalcurability, paper-origin notificationexcuse, automaticstay/relief/debtcancellation/dischargeorprofession/licenceauthority established.","Sixteenexistingworkflowsandthreeexistingdatemodelsread; sixendpoints/46businessdaypositions/26originalstatedpositions-or-alternativeendpoints/10distinctweekdaylabels checked understipulations. Existingthreeclosurealternativesonly,no newdates, profiles, fees, amountorfinancialscenario. Zero monetaryoperations. Twojudicialvotecountcomparisons arepublishedcertificatecounts, not newfinancialexamples. Currentstatutorytrigger/holiday/courtcalendar/receipt/order/timezone/outage/lastinstant notcertified.","Eightyderivedclaimareaassignmentsreconciledfrom97/98passfallbacktotheactualatomiclabels:3A097,77A098. Alloriginalresearchercells/sourceclaimIDsunchanged, oldfallbackpreservedinbeforecopies. Sourceandclaimreconciliationisnotprimaryacceptance. All155coverage rowsretainstatus/questions:100core28deferred27stateDF; all27localbranchesunexamined.","ExactP01D15originalremainingrowandvisiblecrosswalkmatch; interlocutorycomponentonly. CurrentP18-P21statusesobservedseparately,historicthenunreviewedlabelsnotrewrittenandnosiblingfindingadopted. P01same-coordinatorscope/professional/funds/contract/territorial/parentholdsretained. Fullapelação/ED/internalhigherappeals/service/default/reopening/judgment/execution/collective/Juizados/tax/family/insolvency/property/security/foreign/local/provider/countryremainheld.","Onlyassignedpass22/reviewartifactswritten; no sharedparent/history/index/register/tasks/routing/model/automationmutation. Parenthistoryproposalonlyincompletion. NewChatGPTprompts/correctionSends/modelprobes/browser/CUA/tabs/HUMANaccess/researchAPIs/accounts/purchases/contact/filing/site/publication/privateinquiry/researchgeneration/furtheragentsremainpaused/notperformed.","Exactsourceopeningclocksunknown; originalpublication/signature/finality/update/capture/reviewtimesnotopeningclocks. Actualservercompletionclockunknown. ActualP22GPT6Prohistoricalpreflight/renderedresponseprovenancepreserved; no newUIverification or reclassification ofoldSol/otherreports."]}}],"coverage":[{"topic":"P22-G01 Ordinary civil scope","researcher_record":{"Row":"P22-G01","Required issue":"Ordinary civil scope","Claim refs":"C005,C080","Status and exact remaining action":"Confirm actual procedure; special regimes held."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"P22-G01","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Confirm actual procedure; special regimes held.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C005","C_BR-P22-C080"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G02 Current CPC/commencement","researcher_record":{"Row":"G02","Required issue":"Current CPC/commencement","Claim refs":"C001","Status and exact remaining action":"Selected body read; actual historical transition remains."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G02","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Selected body read; actual historical transition remains.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C001"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G03 Holiday amendment","researcher_record":{"Row":"G03","Required issue":"Holiday amendment","Claim refs":"C002,C050","Status and exact remaining action":"Apply current text to actual holiday proof."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G03","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Apply current text to actual holiday proof.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C002","C_BR-P22-C050"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G04 2026 operative amendment","researcher_record":{"Row":"G04","Required issue":"2026 operative amendment","Claim refs":"C003","Status and exact remaining action":"Linked relator provisions read; higher regime held."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G04","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Linked relator provisions read; higher regime held.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C003"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G05 Enacted-future law","researcher_record":{"Row":"G05","Required issue":"Enacted-future law","Claim refs":"C004","Status and exact remaining action":"Not applied as current gateway."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G05","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Not applied as current gateway.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C004"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G06 Interlocutory classification","researcher_record":{"Row":"G06","Required issue":"Interlocutory classification","Claim refs":"C005","Status and exact remaining action":"Read actual content and phase."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G06","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Read actual content and phase.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C005"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G07 Sentence/partial merits","researcher_record":{"Row":"G07","Required issue":"Sentence/partial merits","Claim refs":"C005–C006","Status and exact remaining action":"Distinguish terminating and partial decisions."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G07","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Distinguish terminating and partial decisions.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C005","C_BR-P22-C006"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G08 Despacho","researcher_record":{"Row":"G08","Required issue":"Despacho","Claim refs":"C005","Status and exact remaining action":"Confirm whether decisional content exists."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G08","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Confirm whether decisional content exists.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C005"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G09 Deferred1009 review","researcher_record":{"Row":"G09","Required issue":"Deferred1009 review","Claim refs":"C007","Status and exact remaining action":"Determine immediate-route availability first."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G09","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Determine immediate-route availability first.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C007"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G10 Art1015(I) relief","researcher_record":{"Row":"G10","Required issue":"Art1015(I) relief","Claim refs":"C008","Status and exact remaining action":"Identify actual provisional ruling."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G10","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Identify actual provisional ruling.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C008"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G11 Art1015(II) merits","researcher_record":{"Row":"G11","Required issue":"Art1015(II) merits","Claim refs":"C009","Status and exact remaining action":"Identify partial merits content."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G11","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Identify partial merits content.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C009"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G12 Art1015(III) arbitration","researcher_record":{"Row":"G12","Required issue":"Art1015(III) arbitration","Claim refs":"C010","Status and exact remaining action":"Rejection versus termination matters."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G12","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Rejection versus termination matters.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C010"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G13 Art1015(IV) disregard","researcher_record":{"Row":"G13","Required issue":"Art1015(IV) disregard","Claim refs":"C011,C029","Status and exact remaining action":"Separate incident determination from proof management."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G13","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Separate incident determination from proof management.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C011","C_BR-P22-C029"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G14 Art1015(V) aid","researcher_record":{"Row":"G14","Required issue":"Art1015(V) aid","Claim refs":"C012","Status and exact remaining action":"Denial/revocation, not cost label alone."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G14","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Denial/revocation, not cost label alone.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C012"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G15 Art1015(VI) document/thing","researcher_record":{"Row":"G15","Required issue":"Art1015(VI) document/thing","Claim refs":"C013","Status and exact remaining action":"Actual exhibition/possession issue required."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G15","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Actual exhibition/possession issue required.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C013"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G16 Art1015(VII) exclusion","researcher_record":{"Row":"G16","Required issue":"Art1015(VII) exclusion","Claim refs":"C014","Status and exact remaining action":"Exact joinder act required."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G16","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Exact joinder act required.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C014"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G17 Art1015(VIII) joinder limit","researcher_record":{"Row":"G17","Required issue":"Art1015(VIII) joinder limit","Claim refs":"C015","Status and exact remaining action":"Rejection of limitation request."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G17","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Rejection of limitation request.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C015"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G18 Art1015(IX) intervention","researcher_record":{"Row":"G18","Required issue":"Art1015(IX) intervention","Claim refs":"C016,C022","Status and exact remaining action":"Apply special participant restrictions."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G18","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Apply special participant restrictions.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C016","C_BR-P22-C022"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G19 Art1015(X) execution objections","researcher_record":{"Row":"G19","Required issue":"Art1015(X) execution objections","Claim refs":"C017","Status and exact remaining action":"Distinguish from clarification motions."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G19","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Distinguish from clarification motions.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C017"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G20 Art1015(XI) burden","researcher_record":{"Row":"G20","Required issue":"Art1015(XI) burden","Claim refs":"C018","Status and exact remaining action":"Actual redistribution under373§1 required."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G20","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Actual redistribution under373§1 required.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C018"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G21 Art1015(XII) veto","researcher_record":{"Row":"G21","Required issue":"Art1015(XII) veto","Claim refs":"C019","Status and exact remaining action":"No operative branch."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G21","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"No operative branch.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C019"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G22 Art1015(XIII) other law","researcher_record":{"Row":"G22","Required issue":"Art1015(XIII) other law","Claim refs":"C020","Status and exact remaining action":"Read actual express authorization."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G22","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Read actual express authorization.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C020"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G23 Sole paragraph liquidation","researcher_record":{"Row":"G23","Required issue":"Sole paragraph liquidation","Claim refs":"C021","Status and exact remaining action":"Confirm actual stage."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G23","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Confirm actual stage.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C021"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G24 Sole paragraph cumprimento","researcher_record":{"Row":"G24","Required issue":"Sole paragraph cumprimento","Claim refs":"C021","Status and exact remaining action":"Distinguish interlocutory from ending sentence."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G24","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Distinguish interlocutory from ending sentence.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C021"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G25 Sole paragraph execution","researcher_record":{"Row":"G25","Required issue":"Sole paragraph execution","Claim refs":"C021","Status and exact remaining action":"Merits/eligibility held."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G25","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Merits/eligibility held.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C021"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G26 Sole paragraph inventário","researcher_record":{"Row":"G26","Required issue":"Sole paragraph inventário","Claim refs":"C021","Status and exact remaining action":"Probate merits held."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G26","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Probate merits held.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C021"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G27 Amicus restriction","researcher_record":{"Row":"G27","Required issue":"Amicus restriction","Claim refs":"C022","Status and exact remaining action":"Full special jurisprudence held."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G27","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Full special jurisprudence held.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C022"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G28 Tema988 full body","researcher_record":{"Row":"G28","Required issue":"Tema988 full body","Claim refs":"C023,C077","Status and exact remaining action":"Full representative document obtained; pixel limitation disclosed."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G28","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Full representative document obtained; pixel limitation disclosed.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C023","C_BR-P22-C077"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G29 Majority and result","researcher_record":{"Row":"G29","Required issue":"Majority and result","Claim refs":"C023","Status and exact remaining action":"Seven–five certificate; competence route only."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G29","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Seven–five certificate; competence route only.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C023"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G30 Urgency predicate","researcher_record":{"Row":"G30","Required issue":"Urgency predicate","Claim refs":"C024","Status and exact remaining action":"Prove uselessness of later review."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G30","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Prove uselessness of later review.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C024"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G31 Mere inconvenience","researcher_record":{"Row":"G31","Required issue":"Mere inconvenience","Claim refs":"C024,C028–C030","Status and exact remaining action":"Not automatically sufficient."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G31","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Not automatically sufficient.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C024","C_BR-P22-C028","C_BR-P22-C029","C_BR-P22-C030"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G32 Modulation","researcher_record":{"Row":"G32","Required issue":"Modulation","Claim refs":"C025","Status and exact remaining action":"Actual interlocutory date required."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G32","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Actual interlocutory date required.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C025"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G33 Listed-issue preclusion","researcher_record":{"Row":"G33","Required issue":"Listed-issue preclusion","Claim refs":"C026","Status and exact remaining action":"Proper immediate deadline must be established."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G33","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Proper immediate deadline must be established.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C026"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G34 Unlisted exceptional preclusion","researcher_record":{"Row":"G34","Required issue":"Unlisted exceptional preclusion","Claim refs":"C026","Status and exact remaining action":"Preserve majority’s admission/decision qualification."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G34","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Preserve majority’s admission/decision qualification.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C026"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G35 Separate writings","researcher_record":{"Row":"G35","Required issue":"Separate writings","Claim refs":"C027","Status and exact remaining action":"Dissent recorded, not treated as holding."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G35","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Dissent recorded, not treated as holding.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C027"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G36 Later value-of-case ruling","researcher_record":{"Row":"G36","Required issue":"Later value-of-case ruling","Claim refs":"C028","Status and exact remaining action":"No automatic aid analogy."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G36","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"No automatic aid analogy.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C028"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G37 Later incident evidence ruling","researcher_record":{"Row":"G37","Required issue":"Later incident evidence ruling","Claim refs":"C029","Status and exact remaining action":"No blanket itemIV route."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G37","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"No blanket itemIV route.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C029"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G38 Later deferred expertise ruling","researcher_record":{"Row":"G38","Required issue":"Later deferred expertise ruling","Claim refs":"C030","Status and exact remaining action":"Actual stage/necessity/urgency required."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G38","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Actual stage/necessity/urgency required.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C030"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G39 Standing and adverse interest","researcher_record":{"Row":"G39","Required issue":"Standing and adverse interest","Claim refs":"C031","Status and exact remaining action":"Identify requested useful change."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G39","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Identify requested useful change.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C031"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G40 Third-party standing","researcher_record":{"Row":"G40","Required issue":"Third-party standing","Claim refs":"C031","Status and exact remaining action":"Demonstrate affected right."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G40","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Demonstrate affected right.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C031"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G41 Capacity/mandate","researcher_record":{"Row":"G41","Required issue":"Capacity/mandate","Claim refs":"C032","Status and exact remaining action":"Actual representation unexamined."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G41","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Actual representation unexamined.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C032"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G42 Competent tribunal","researcher_record":{"Row":"G42","Required issue":"Competent tribunal","Claim refs":"C033","Status and exact remaining action":"Court organization/local distribution held."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G42","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Court organization/local distribution held.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C033"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G43 Petition contents/reasons","researcher_record":{"Row":"G43","Required issue":"Petition contents/reasons","Claim refs":"C034","Status and exact remaining action":"Compare full ruling and proposed grounds."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G43","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Compare full ruling and proposed grounds.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C034"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G44 Required copies","researcher_record":{"Row":"G44","Required issue":"Required copies","Claim refs":"C035","Status and exact remaining action":"Actual origin record required."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G44","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Actual origin record required.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C035"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G45 Nonexistent pieces","researcher_record":{"Row":"G45","Required issue":"Nonexistent pieces","Claim refs":"C036","Status and exact remaining action":"Counsel’s truthful declaration required."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G45","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Counsel’s truthful declaration required.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C036"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G46 Optional useful documents","researcher_record":{"Row":"G46","Required issue":"Optional useful documents","Claim refs":"C035–C036","Status and exact remaining action":"Add context without inventing records."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G46","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Add context without inventing records.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C035","C_BR-P22-C036"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G47 Authenticity/preservation","researcher_record":{"Row":"G47","Required issue":"Authenticity/preservation","Claim refs":"C037","Status and exact remaining action":"Actual original/copy challenge unknown."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G47","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Actual original/copy challenge unknown.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C037"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G48 Electronic origin exception","researcher_record":{"Row":"G48","Required issue":"Electronic origin exception","Claim refs":"C038","Status and exact remaining action":"Confirm origin, not appeal-only, status."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G48","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Confirm origin, not appeal-only, status.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C038"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G49 Filing channels","researcher_record":{"Row":"G49","Required issue":"Filing channels","Claim refs":"C039","Status and exact remaining action":"Current local mandatory-system rules held."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G49","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Current local mandatory-system rules held.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C039"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G50 Fax original requirement","researcher_record":{"Row":"G50","Required issue":"Fax original requirement","Claim refs":"C039","Status and exact remaining action":"Governing law/order required."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G50","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Governing law/order required.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C039"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G51 Missing-piece cure","researcher_record":{"Row":"G51","Required issue":"Missing-piece cure","Claim refs":"C040","Status and exact remaining action":"Five-day statutory mechanism."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G51","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Five-day statutory mechanism.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C040"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G52 Noncurable substantive defects","researcher_record":{"Row":"G52","Required issue":"Noncurable substantive defects","Claim refs":"C040","Status and exact remaining action":"Do not equate every failure with a missing copy."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G52","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Do not equate every failure with a missing copy.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C040"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G53 Paper-origin notification","researcher_record":{"Row":"G53","Required issue":"Paper-origin notification","Claim refs":"C041","Status and exact remaining action":"Three days from filing."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G53","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Three days from filing.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C041"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G54 Respondent allegation/proof","researcher_record":{"Row":"G54","Required issue":"Respondent allegation/proof","Claim refs":"C042","Status and exact remaining action":"Actual proof required."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G54","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Actual proof required.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C042"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G55 Prejudice/instrumentality qualification","researcher_record":{"Row":"G55","Required issue":"Prejudice/instrumentality qualification","Claim refs":"C043","Status and exact remaining action":"Actual defense opportunity required."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G55","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Actual defense opportunity required.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C043"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G56 Complete retraction","researcher_record":{"Row":"G56","Required issue":"Complete retraction","Claim refs":"C044","Status and exact remaining action":"Full reform must be communicated."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G56","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Full reform must be communicated.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C044"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G57 Judicial information","researcher_record":{"Row":"G57","Required issue":"Judicial information","Claim refs":"C044,C070–C071","Status and exact remaining action":"No invented universal extra reporting period."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G57","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"No invented universal extra reporting period.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C044","C_BR-P22-C070","C_BR-P22-C071"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G58 Fifteen-day appeal","researcher_record":{"Row":"G58","Required issue":"Fifteen-day appeal","Claim refs":"C045","Status and exact remaining action":"Actual lawful trigger required."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G58","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Actual lawful trigger required.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C045"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G59 Notice/journal sequence","researcher_record":{"Row":"G59","Required issue":"Notice/journal sequence","Claim refs":"C046","Status and exact remaining action":"Certificate and applicable channel required."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G59","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Certificate and applicable channel required.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C046"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G60 Business days/recess","researcher_record":{"Row":"G60","Required issue":"Business days/recess","Claim refs":"C047","Status and exact remaining action":"Actual court calendar required."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G60","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Actual court calendar required.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C047"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G61 Co-party doubled period","researcher_record":{"Row":"G61","Required issue":"Co-party doubled period","Claim refs":"C048","Status and exact remaining action":"Different offices/electronic exception."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G61","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Different offices/electronic exception.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C048"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G62 Institutional privileges","researcher_record":{"Row":"G62","Required issue":"Institutional privileges","Claim refs":"C049","Status and exact remaining action":"Exact actor and special period."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G62","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Exact actor and special period.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C049"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G63 Holiday proof","researcher_record":{"Row":"G63","Required issue":"Holiday proof","Claim refs":"C050","Status and exact remaining action":"No holiday assumed."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G63","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"No holiday assumed.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C050"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G64 Electronic final hour/outage","researcher_record":{"Row":"G64","Required issue":"Electronic final hour/outage","Claim refs":"C051","Status and exact remaining action":"Official system evidence required."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G64","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Official system evidence required.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C051"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G65 Preparation schedule","researcher_record":{"Row":"G65","Required issue":"Preparation schedule","Claim refs":"C052","Status and exact remaining action":"No amount invented."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G65","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"No amount invented.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C052"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G66 Exemptions/transport charges","researcher_record":{"Row":"G66","Required issue":"Exemptions/transport charges","Claim refs":"C053","Status and exact remaining action":"Statutory category required."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G66","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Statutory category required.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C053"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G67 Insufficient payment","researcher_record":{"Row":"G67","Required issue":"Insufficient payment","Claim refs":"C054","Status and exact remaining action":"Five-day supplement."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G67","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Five-day supplement.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C054"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G68 No proof/doubled payment","researcher_record":{"Row":"G68","Required issue":"No proof/doubled payment","Claim refs":"C055–C056","Status and exact remaining action":"Order controls time; no endless supplementation."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G68","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Order controls time; no endless supplementation.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C055","C_BR-P22-C056"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G69 Impediment/guide error","researcher_record":{"Row":"G69","Required issue":"Impediment/guide error","Claim refs":"C057–C058","Status and exact remaining action":"Exact cure predicate required."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G69","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Exact cure predicate required.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C057","C_BR-P22-C058"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G70 Aid request/review","researcher_record":{"Row":"G70","Required issue":"Aid request/review","Claim refs":"C059–C060","Status and exact remaining action":"Distinguish99§7 from101."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G70","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Distinguish99§7 from101.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C059","C_BR-P22-C060"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G71 Respondent response","researcher_record":{"Row":"G71","Required issue":"Respondent response","Claim refs":"C061","Status and exact remaining action":"Proper notice and15-day computation."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G71","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Proper notice and15-day computation.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C061"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G72 MP participation","researcher_record":{"Row":"G72","Required issue":"MP participation","Claim refs":"C062","Status and exact remaining action":"Required intervention and express period."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G72","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Required intervention and express period.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C062"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G73 Relator’s five-day processing","researcher_record":{"Row":"G73","Required issue":"Relator’s five-day processing","Claim refs":"C063","Status and exact remaining action":"Not automatic grant."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G73","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Not automatic grant.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C063"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G74 One-month scheduling direction","researcher_record":{"Row":"G74","Required issue":"One-month scheduling direction","Claim refs":"C064","Status and exact remaining action":"Not30days or final-result guarantee."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G74","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Not30days or final-result guarantee.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C064"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G75 Stay versus affirmative relief","researcher_record":{"Row":"G75","Required issue":"Stay versus affirmative relief","Claim refs":"C065–C068","Status and exact remaining action":"Separate merits/probability/harm predicates."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G75","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Separate merits/probability/harm predicates.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C065","C_BR-P22-C066","C_BR-P22-C067","C_BR-P22-C068"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G76 Reasons, hearing and diligence","researcher_record":{"Row":"G76","Required issue":"Reasons, hearing and diligence","Claim refs":"C069–C071","Status and exact remaining action":"Actual order and evidence required."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G76","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Actual order and evidence required.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C069","C_BR-P22-C070","C_BR-P22-C071"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G77 Internal appeal boundary","researcher_record":{"Row":"G77","Required issue":"Internal appeal boundary","Claim refs":"C072","Status and exact remaining action":"No full1021 report."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G77","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"No full1021 report.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C072"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G78 No adhesive instrument appeal","researcher_record":{"Row":"G78","Required issue":"No adhesive instrument appeal","Claim refs":"C073","Status and exact remaining action":"Independent timely challenge may be needed."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G78","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Independent timely challenge may be needed.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C073"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G79 H01 provisional ruling","researcher_record":{"Row":"G79","Required issue":"H01 provisional ruling","Claim refs":"C008,C065–C068","Status and exact remaining action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G79","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Conditional workflow complete.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C008","C_BR-P22-C065","C_BR-P22-C066","C_BR-P22-C067","C_BR-P22-C068"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G80 H02 partial merits","researcher_record":{"Row":"G80","Required issue":"H02 partial merits","Claim refs":"C005–C006","Status and exact remaining action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G80","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Conditional workflow complete.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C005","C_BR-P22-C006"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G81 H03 arbitration","researcher_record":{"Row":"G81","Required issue":"H03 arbitration","Claim refs":"C010","Status and exact remaining action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G81","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Conditional workflow complete.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C010"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G82 H04 case value","researcher_record":{"Row":"G82","Required issue":"H04 case value","Claim refs":"C012,C028","Status and exact remaining action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G82","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Conditional workflow complete.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C012","C_BR-P22-C028"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G83 H05 burden redistribution","researcher_record":{"Row":"G83","Required issue":"H05 burden redistribution","Claim refs":"C018","Status and exact remaining action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G83","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Conditional workflow complete.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C018"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G84 H06 expert deferral","researcher_record":{"Row":"G84","Required issue":"H06 expert deferral","Claim refs":"C024,C030","Status and exact remaining action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G84","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Conditional workflow complete.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C024","C_BR-P22-C030"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G85 H07 irreversible disclosure","researcher_record":{"Row":"G85","Required issue":"H07 irreversible disclosure","Claim refs":"C024–C026","Status and exact remaining action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G85","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Conditional workflow complete.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C024","C_BR-P22-C025","C_BR-P22-C026"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G86 H08 inconvenience","researcher_record":{"Row":"G86","Required issue":"H08 inconvenience","Claim refs":"C007,C024–C026","Status and exact remaining action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G86","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Conditional workflow complete.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C007","C_BR-P22-C024","C_BR-P22-C025","C_BR-P22-C026"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G87 H09 incident evidence","researcher_record":{"Row":"G87","Required issue":"H09 incident evidence","Claim refs":"C011,C029","Status and exact remaining action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G87","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Conditional workflow complete.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C011","C_BR-P22-C029"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G88 H10 missing copy","researcher_record":{"Row":"G88","Required issue":"H10 missing copy","Claim refs":"C035,C040","Status and exact remaining action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G88","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Conditional workflow complete.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C035","C_BR-P22-C040"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G89 H11 nonexistence declaration","researcher_record":{"Row":"G89","Required issue":"H11 nonexistence declaration","Claim refs":"C036","Status and exact remaining action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G89","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Conditional workflow complete.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C036"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G90 H12 electronic appeal/paper origin","researcher_record":{"Row":"G90","Required issue":"H12 electronic appeal/paper origin","Claim refs":"C038,C041–C043","Status and exact remaining action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G90","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Conditional workflow complete.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C038","C_BR-P22-C041","C_BR-P22-C042","C_BR-P22-C043"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G91 H13 electronic origin","researcher_record":{"Row":"G91","Required issue":"H13 electronic origin","Claim refs":"C038–C040","Status and exact remaining action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G91","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Conditional workflow complete.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C038","C_BR-P22-C039","C_BR-P22-C040"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G92 H14 interim relief","researcher_record":{"Row":"G92","Required issue":"H14 interim relief","Claim refs":"C065–C069","Status and exact remaining action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G92","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Conditional workflow complete.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C065","C_BR-P22-C066","C_BR-P22-C067","C_BR-P22-C068","C_BR-P22-C069"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G93 H15 relator decision","researcher_record":{"Row":"G93","Required issue":"H15 relator decision","Claim refs":"C072","Status and exact remaining action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G93","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Conditional workflow complete.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C072"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G94 H16 enforcement classification","researcher_record":{"Row":"G94","Required issue":"H16 enforcement classification","Claim refs":"C005,C021","Status and exact remaining action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G94","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Conditional workflow complete.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C005","C_BR-P22-C021"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G95 T01 ordinary deadline model","researcher_record":{"Row":"G95","Required issue":"T01 ordinary deadline model","Claim refs":"C074","Status and exact remaining action":"Hypothetical calendar only."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G95","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Hypothetical calendar only.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C074"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G96 T02 origin-notification model","researcher_record":{"Row":"G96","Required issue":"T02 origin-notification model","Claim refs":"C075","Status and exact remaining action":"Not the appeal period."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G96","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Not the appeal period.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C075"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G97 T03 cure model","researcher_record":{"Row":"G97","Required issue":"T03 cure model","Claim refs":"C076","Status and exact remaining action":"Curable-document assumption only."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G97","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Curable-document assumption only.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C076"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G98 Sources/citator limits","researcher_record":{"Row":"G98","Required issue":"Sources/citator limits","Claim refs":"C077","Status and exact remaining action":"No complete current-law certification."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G98","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"No complete current-law certification.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C077"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G99 Actual facts/provider authority","researcher_record":{"Row":"G99","Required issue":"Actual facts/provider authority","Claim refs":"C078–C079","Status and exact remaining action":"None classified or cleared."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G99","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"None classified or cleared.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C078","C_BR-P22-C079"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"G100 D15/component/country acceptance","researcher_record":{"Row":"G100","Required issue":"D15/component/country acceptance","Claim refs":"C080","Status and exact remaining action":"Narrow addition; all acceptance holds remain."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"G100","raw_table_index":10,"original_status_or_question":"Narrow addition; all acceptance holds remain.","coordinator_status":"scoped_saved_rule_workflow_reconciled_statutory_judicial_application_holds","contextual_claim_refs":["C_BR-P22-C080"],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"P22-D01 First-instance commencement and service","researcher_record":{"Row":"P22-D01","Deferred family":"First-instance commencement and service","Exact next action":"P18 unreviewed; establish actual notice independently."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"P22-D01","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"P18 unreviewed; establish actual notice independently.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D02 Default and ensuing judgment","researcher_record":{"Row":"D02","Deferred family":"Default and ensuing judgment","Exact next action":"P19 unreviewed; no default merits imported."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D02","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"P19 unreviewed; no default merits imported.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D03 Full apelação","researcher_record":{"Row":"D03","Deferred family":"Full apelação","Exact next action":"P20 unreviewed; only1009 boundary used freshly."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D03","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"P20 unreviewed; only1009 boundary used freshly.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D04 Full embargos de declaração","researcher_record":{"Row":"D04","Deferred family":"Full embargos de declaração","Exact next action":"P21 unreviewed; no interruptive filing assumption adopted."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D04","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"P21 unreviewed; no interruptive filing assumption adopted.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D05 Full agravo interno","researcher_record":{"Row":"D05","Deferred family":"Full agravo interno","Exact next action":"Read actual relator decision and internal rules separately."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D05","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"Read actual relator decision and internal rules separately.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D06 Special/extraordinary appeals and agravo to higher courts","researcher_record":{"Row":"D06","Deferred family":"Special/extraordinary appeals and agravo to higher courts","Exact next action":"Do not confuse with ordinary1015 instrument appeal."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D06","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"Do not confuse with ordinary1015 instrument appeal.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D07 Full2026 relevance regime","researcher_record":{"Row":"D07","Deferred family":"Full2026 relevance regime","Exact next action":"Separate current higher-court implementation."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D07","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"Separate current higher-court implementation.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D08 Rescisória, reopening and mandado de segurança","researcher_record":{"Row":"D08","Deferred family":"Rescisória, reopening and mandado de segurança","Exact next action":"Identify actual finality, exceptional remedy and competent court."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D08","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"Identify actual finality, exceptional remedy and competent court.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D09 Execution, cumprimento and attachment merits","researcher_record":{"Row":"D09","Deferred family":"Execution, cumprimento and attachment merits","Exact next action":"Sole-paragraph route is not enforcement clearance."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D09","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"Sole-paragraph route is not enforcement clearance.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D10 Liquidation merits and expert valuation","researcher_record":{"Row":"D10","Deferred family":"Liquidation merits and expert valuation","Exact next action":"Determine actual quantitative issue separately."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D10","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"Determine actual quantitative issue separately.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D11 Inventário and probate","researcher_record":{"Row":"D11","Deferred family":"Inventário and probate","Exact next action":"Route boundary only; estate rights and procedure held."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D11","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"Route boundary only; estate rights and procedure held.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D12 Juizados and special courts","researcher_record":{"Row":"D12","Deferred family":"Juizados and special courts","Exact next action":"No ordinary agravo procedure by analogy."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D12","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"No ordinary agravo procedure by analogy.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D13 Collective consumer litigation","researcher_record":{"Row":"D13","Deferred family":"Collective consumer litigation","Exact next action":"Identify standing and special procedural statutes."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D13","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"Identify standing and special procedural statutes.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D14 Superendividamento","researcher_record":{"Row":"D14","Deferred family":"Superendividamento","Exact next action":"Separate statutory participation and remedy rules."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D14","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"Separate statutory participation and remedy rules.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D15 Insolvency, recuperação and falência","researcher_record":{"Row":"D15","Deferred family":"Insolvency, recuperação and falência","Exact next action":"Determine special stage, stay and appeal regime."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D15","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"Determine special stage, stay and appeal regime.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D16 Public, tax, family and support proceedings","researcher_record":{"Row":"D16","Deferred family":"Public, tax, family and support proceedings","Exact next action":"Apply exact special statute and institutional predicates."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D16","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"Apply exact special statute and institutional predicates.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D17 Consumer contracts, fees and cancellation","researcher_record":{"Row":"D17","Deferred family":"Consumer contracts, fees and cancellation","Exact next action":"P04 unreviewed; no substantive claim validation."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D17","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"P04 unreviewed; no substantive claim validation.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D18 Prescription and underlying debt defenses","researcher_record":{"Row":"D18","Deferred family":"Prescription and underlying debt defenses","Exact next action":"P05 unreviewed."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D18","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"P05 unreviewed.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D19 Payment, release, assignment and creditor authority","researcher_record":{"Row":"D19","Deferred family":"Payment, release, assignment and creditor authority","Exact next action":"Actual instruments required; no sibling adoption."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D19","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"Actual instruments required; no sibling adoption.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D20 Collection conduct","researcher_record":{"Row":"D20","Deferred family":"Collection conduct","Exact next action":"P10 unreviewed."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D20","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"P10 unreviewed.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D21 LGPD and credit reporting","researcher_record":{"Row":"D21","Deferred family":"LGPD and credit reporting","Exact next action":"Separate privacy/reporting modules."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D21","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"Separate privacy/reporting modules.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D22 Surety, solidarity and substantive joinder","researcher_record":{"Row":"D22","Deferred family":"Surety, solidarity and substantive joinder","Exact next action":"P16 unreviewed; procedural route does not establish liability."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D22","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"P16 unreviewed; procedural route does not establish liability.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D23 OAB/provider/financial/payment permission","researcher_record":{"Row":"D23","Deferred family":"OAB/provider/financial/payment permission","Exact next action":"No operating authority from appeal rules."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D23","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"No operating authority from appeal rules.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D24 Full security, property and homestead","researcher_record":{"Row":"D24","Deferred family":"Full security, property and homestead","Exact next action":"No attachment or property-restoration conclusion."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D24","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"No attachment or property-restoration conclusion.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D25 Local fees, forms, calendars and e-filing","researcher_record":{"Row":"D25","Deferred family":"Local fees, forms, calendars and e-filing","Exact next action":"Obtain actual competent-court instruments."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D25","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"Obtain actual competent-court instruments.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D26 Foreign jurisdiction, service and recognition","researcher_record":{"Row":"D26","Deferred family":"Foreign jurisdiction, service and recognition","Exact next action":"No foreign procedure imported."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D26","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"No foreign procedure imported.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D27 Private records and exhaustive current citator","researcher_record":{"Row":"D27","Deferred family":"Private records and exhaustive current citator","Exact next action":"No private lookup; later primary treatment still required."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D27","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"No private lookup; later primary treatment still required.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"D28 Country/component/A066/A097/A098/parent acceptance","researcher_record":{"Row":"D28","Deferred family":"Country/component/A066/A097/A098/parent acceptance","Exact next action":"HOLD pending separate coordinator review and remaining work."},"raw_table_index":11,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"D28","raw_table_index":11,"original_status_or_question":"HOLD pending separate coordinator review and remaining work.","coordinator_status":"deferred_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Acre (AC) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Acre (AC)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJAC competence, filing, fees, calendar and record-transmission rules."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Acre (AC)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Alagoas (AL) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Alagoas (AL)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJAL portal, preparation, notice and distribution procedures."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Alagoas (AL)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Amapá (AP) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Amapá (AP)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJAP electronic-origin status, forms, closures and costs."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Amapá (AP)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Amazonas (AM) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Amazonas (AM)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJAM actual filing/timezone/fee rules; STJ’s AM case is not local certification."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Amazonas (AM)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Bahia (BA) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Bahia (BA)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJBA distribution, preparation and notification implementation."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Bahia (BA)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Ceará (CE) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Ceará (CE)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJCE record requirements, calendars and internal processing."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Ceará (CE)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Distrito Federal (DF) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Distrito Federal (DF)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJDFT actual competent body, forms, fees and filing calendar."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Distrito Federal (DF)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Espírito Santo (ES) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Espírito Santo (ES)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJES digital access, preparation and notice rules."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Espírito Santo (ES)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Goiás (GO) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Goiás (GO)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJGO origin communication, portal and fee implementation."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Goiás (GO)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Maranhão (MA) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Maranhão (MA)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJMA accessibility, court closures and record transmission."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Maranhão (MA)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Mato Grosso (MT) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Mato Grosso (MT)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJMT current rules; Tema988’s originating context is not a local audit."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Mato Grosso (MT)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Mato Grosso do Sul (MS) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Mato Grosso do Sul (MS)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJMS filing system, preparation and outage certification."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Mato Grosso do Sul (MS)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Minas Gerais (MG) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Minas Gerais (MG)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJMG competent chamber, costs, forms and calendar."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Minas Gerais (MG)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Pará (PA) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Pará (PA)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJPA remote access, language needs and court-calendar rules."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Pará (PA)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Paraíba (PB) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Paraíba (PB)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJPB filing, record access and preparation procedure."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Paraíba (PB)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Paraná (PR) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Paraná (PR)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJPR origin/appeal system interaction and calendar."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Paraná (PR)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Pernambuco (PE) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Pernambuco (PE)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJPE appeal forms, fee schedule and notification rules."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Pernambuco (PE)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Piauí (PI) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Piauí (PI)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJPI local holidays, electronic access and costs."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Piauí (PI)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Rio de Janeiro (RJ) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Rio de Janeiro (RJ)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJRJ filing, distribution, preparation and hearing rules."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Rio de Janeiro (RJ)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Rio Grande do Norte (RN) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Rio Grande do Norte (RN)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJRN local procedure, forms and court calendar."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Rio Grande do Norte (RN)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Rio Grande do Sul (RS) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Rio Grande do Sul (RS)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJRS current paper/electronic implementation; published cases do not certify it."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Rio Grande do Sul (RS)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Rondônia (RO) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Rondônia (RO)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJRO timezone, portal, official outages and fees."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Rondônia (RO)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Roraima (RR) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Roraima (RR)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJRR access, local calendar and filing requirements."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Roraima (RR)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Santa Catarina (SC) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Santa Catarina (SC)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJSC instrument filing, record access and preparation rules."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Santa Catarina (SC)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"São Paulo (SP) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"São Paulo (SP)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJSP actual records, notification and cost rules; STJ cases are not implementation proof."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"São Paulo (SP)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Sergipe (SE) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Sergipe (SE)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJSE forms, preparation, closures and distribution."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Sergipe (SE)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}},{"topic":"Tocantins (TO) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Tocantins (TO)","Actual local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining local question":"TJTO electronic procedure, access and court-calendar requirements."},"raw_table_index":12,"coordinator_acceptance":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","coordinator_review_file":"[internal evidence reference]","coordinator_annotation":{"row":"Tocantins (TO)","raw_table_index":12,"original_status_or_question":"No local operative body read.","coordinator_status":"territorial_unexamined_no_substantive_completion","contextual_claim_refs":[],"original_missing_questions_preserved":true,"actual_case_local_parent_country_accepted":false}}],"annotations":{},"corrections":[],"resolved_corrections":[],"review_history":[{"id":"C_BR-P22-REVIEW-SCOPE","status":"scoped_coordinator_review_selected_Tema988_statutory_access_later_treatment_actual_local_application_holds","at":null}]}