{"meta":{"key":"c_br--pass-19","task":"C_BR","title":"Ordinary civil revelia and ensuing merits-judgment gateway","parent_title":"Brazil consumer debt and resolution","edition":"pass-19","path":"/research/c_br--pass-19/","kind":"split_pass","category":"international","role":"country","area_numbers":[97,98],"groups":["global"],"date":"2026-10-27","tables":13,"claims":77,"sources":12,"review_status":"delegated_coordinator_scoped_review_no_new_material_error_RQ001_validation_only_UNSENT","review_complete":true,"sha256":"f2a9604d810f1543a3982ae91d537c585f4b91dd755854c148cd4d30e557079a","headings":["Ordinary civil revelia and ensuing merits-judgment gateway","1.1 Current CPC and temporal boundaries","1.2 Preconditions, not a service rerun","2.1 What creates the status","2.2 Failure to answer versus failure to deny a particular fact","2.3 What the presumption covers","2.4 All art. 345 exceptions","Co-defendant qualification","3.1 Publication and representation","3.2 Evidence after default","Not every requested item must be produced","3.3 Later allegations and just cause","3.4 When the factual effect does not apply","4.1 Ordinary burden","4.2 Redistribution is reasoned and prospective enough to permit compliance","4.3 CDC inversion is not automatic from a label or default","4.4 Contradictory process and judicial proof","5.1 Early merits judgment","5.2 Organization of the remaining case","5.3 Partial merits judgment","6.1 Essential judgment structure","6.2 Amount of the monetary obligation","6.3 Liquidation is not a second opportunity to prove the entire claim","6.4 Relief cannot exceed the claim—but the claim has statutory implicit components","6.5 Supervening facts","7.1 Main claim","7.2 Preliminary issues: an express default exception","7.3 What does not independently become final","7.4 Preclusion and reopening","H01 — Unanswered ordinary money claim","H02 — One co-defendant answers","H03 — Non-disposable right","H04 — Legally indispensable instrument missing","H05 — Implausible or contradicted allegations","H06 — Late appearance","H07 — Appearance while evidence can still be produced","H08 — Liability established but amount unresolved","H09 — Claimant’s proof remains weak","H10 — Relief exceeds the claim","H11 — Partial versus final judgment","H12 — Reasons missing","T01 — Ordinary answer period after an unsuccessful hearing","T02 — Five-day adjustment request after saneamento","T03 — Separable partial merits component","Preserved literal record","Narrow PASS-19 dispositions"],"generation_provenance":{"actual_route":"regular_chat_adaptive_models","actual_model":"GPT-6","actual_mode":"Pro","provenance_limit":"Actual documented capture labels only; missing labels remain unknown. No preferred setting is inferred as actual execution."},"public_id":"C_BR/pass-19","facets":{"geography":["international","c_br"],"debt_type":[],"stage":["judgment"],"subject":["proof-evidence"]},"scope":"ReviewedP01D15ordinarycivilrevelia/defaultandjudgmentgatewayONLY;P18serviceunreviewednotpremise.","pending_corrections":0},"markdown":"# SettleADebt C_BR PASS-19 — Brazil\n\n## Ordinary civil *revelia* and ensuing merits-judgment gateway\n\n**Reviewed component:** The *revelia/default and ensuing judgment* portion of P01 D15 only.\n\n**Actual source-access dates:** October 26, 2026, America/Los_Angeles; October 27, 2026, UTC.\n**Exact source-opening clocks:** Unknown. Publication, signature and judgment dates below are not access timestamps.\n\n**Assumed procedural setting:** An ordinary private consumer-money dispute under the CPC’s *procedimento comum*. An execution proceeding, *ação monitória*, small-claims case, insolvency proceeding or public-debt action can have materially different rules and is not treated as interchangeable.\n\nP04, P05, P08, P09, P10, P16 and P18 remain unreviewed for this purpose. None of their findings is adopted. Necessary CPC and limited CDC provisions were read afresh. The supplied P01 review remains a same-coordinator scoped review, not whole-country or all-source certification.\n\n**Central determination:** *Revelia* is a procedural status, not an automatic judgment for the claimant. It can create a rebuttable presumption concerning factual allegations, but statutory exceptions, the existing evidence, the applicable law, the requested relief and the defendant’s remaining procedural opportunities still matter. The court may grant, partly grant or reject the claim. **C_BR-P19-C004, C009–C016, C065.** [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\nNo actual person, creditor, debtor, account, contract, court order, service record, deadline or private proceeding was examined.\n\n# 1. Operative framework and currentness\n\n## 1.1 Current CPC and temporal boundaries\n\nThe primary body is the current compiled **Lei 13.105/2015 — Código de Processo Civil**:\n\nhttps://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm\n\nThe official parallel amended text was also read:\n\nhttps://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105.htm\n\nThe material provisions include arts. 344–349 and the linked provisions on defense, evidence, judgment, reasoning, relief and finality identified below.\n\nArticle 1.045 specifies one year after official publication; the footer identifies DOU publication on March 17, 2015. Article 14 preserves completed procedural acts and established procedural situations; arts. 1.046–1.047 contain transition qualifications. Article 1.054 separately limits the expanded preliminary-issue finality rule in art. 503 §1 to proceedings begun after the CPC’s commencement. No exact original effective-date calculation or full historic-case transition opinion is made. **C001.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\nTwo 2026 instruments displayed by the official CPC compilation were checked narrowly:\n\n| Instrument | Status and relevance at access |\n| --- | --- |\n| **Lei 15.479/2026** | Published July 30, 2026; art. 4 provides one year before commencement. It was **enacted-future**, not applied as operative default law. Its support-enforcement and technical amendments do not supply a current ordinary-default rule here. |\n| **Lei 15.484/2026** | Published in the DOU extra edition of August 4, 2026; art. 7 provides 30 days before commencement. It was operative by this research date, but concerns the special-appeal relevance regime, not a replacement for CPC arts. 344–349. Its full appellate application is deferred. |\n\n**C002, C077.**\nFull URLs:\nhttps://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15479.htm\nhttps://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15484.htm [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15479.htm)\n\nThis is a bounded examination of the displayed current bodies, not certification that every potentially applicable procedural amendment or special statute has been exhausted.\n\n## 1.2 Preconditions, not a service rerun\n\nA default classification first requires a valid procedural opportunity to answer. CPC art. 239 supplies the general citation prerequisite and the voluntary-appearance qualification. Procedural representation and curatorship can matter under arts. 72, 76 and 103.\n\nThose provisions were read only to prevent treating an unserved, improperly represented or statutorily protected defendant as an ordinary unanswered defendant without further inquiry. P18’s service findings are not incorporated, and no CNJ or actual-service analysis is repeated. **C003.**\n\nPrimary URL: CPC compiled body above, arts. 72, 76, 103 and 239. [Planalto+2](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/L13105compilada.htm)\n\n# 2. *Revelia*: status, factual effect and exceptions\n\n## 2.1 What creates the status\n\nUnder art. 344, a defendant who does not contest the action is considered *revel*. The associated factual presumption must then be tested separately.\n\nMissing the conciliation hearing under art. 334 is not the same event as failing to file a *contestação*. Hearing nonattendance has its own requirements and possible consequence; it does not by itself establish that no timely defense was filed. **C004–C005.**\n\nThe ordinary art. 335 defense period is 15 procedural days. Depending on the applicable branch, its trigger is:\n\n- the unsuccessful conciliation/mediation hearing or last session;\n- the qualifying request to cancel that hearing; or\n- the applicable statutory service event.\n\nThe actual route, valid notice, multiple-party rules, procedural privileges and court calendar remain prerequisites. No actual answer deadline is supplied here. **C006, C074.**\n\nPrimary URL:\nhttps://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm, arts. 219, 334–335 and 344. [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105.htm)\n\n## 2.2 Failure to answer versus failure to deny a particular fact\n\nArticle 341 requires a defendant who answers to address factual allegations specifically, subject to exceptions:\n\n- confession is legally inadmissible concerning the fact;\n- an instrument constituting the substance of the act is missing; or\n- the allegation conflicts with the defense considered as a whole.\n\nThe specific-denial burden does not apply to the public defender, court-appointed lawyer or special curator.\n\nThus an inadequate denial and complete failure to contest are related but different procedural questions. A legally permitted general denial by a special curator is not treated as no defense merely because it lacks detailed factual admissions. **C007–C008.**\n\nPrimary URL: CPC compiled body, art. 341 and sole paragraph; art. 72. [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 2.3 What the presumption covers\n\nArticle 344 concerns **allegations of fact**. It does not require the court to accept:\n\n- the claimant’s legal characterization;\n- an unlawful remedy;\n- an unsupported contractual interpretation;\n- a requested rate or penalty merely because it was demanded; or\n- relief outside the claim.\n\nThe STJ’s published September 2026 judgment expressly states that default effects are relative and do not produce automatic success; the allegations must be examined against the evidence. **C009, C016.** [STJ](https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=25%2F09%2F2026&num_registro=202600712462)\n\nThis does not mean every fact must always be independently proved despite a valid presumption. CPC art. 374 recognizes that facts supported by a legal presumption ordinarily do not require separate proof. The court must first determine whether the presumption applies, to what facts, and whether contrary evidence or an exception defeats it. **C028.**\n\nPrimary URL: CPC compiled body, arts. 344–345, 371 and 374. [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 2.4 All art. 345 exceptions\n\n| Provision | Exact exception to the art. 344 factual effect | Required qualification |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **345(I)** | There are multiple defendants and one contests the action. | The defense and evidence can benefit the defaulting defendant concerning common facts. Do not automatically transfer a purely personal defense. |\n| **345(II)** | The litigation concerns *direitos indisponíveis*. | Identify the actual non-disposable right. Neither “consumer dispute” nor “public entity” is, by itself, a complete classification. |\n| **345(III)** | The initial petition lacks an instrument the law considers indispensable to proof of the act. | Identify the law requiring that particular instrument. Not every missing document is automatically this exception. |\n| **345(IV), first branch** | The claimant’s factual allegations are implausible. | The conclusion must be reasoned, not an unexplained credibility preference. |\n| **345(IV), second branch** | The allegations conflict with evidence already in the file. | Evidence can contradict the claimant even when the defendant supplied no timely answer. |\n\n**C010–C015.**\nPrimary URL:\nhttps://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm, art. 345(I)–(IV). [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n### Co-defendant qualification\n\nIn a June 2026 consumer-debt judgment, the STJ stated that even in simple passive joinder, one defendant’s defense and evidence may benefit a defaulting co-defendant where the facts are common and the evidence removes the presumption. That ruling does not make every fact common merely because two defendants appear in the caption. **C011.** [STJ](https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=09%2F06%2F2026&num_registro=202600600158)\n\n# 3. Participation after default and remaining opportunities\n\n## 3.1 Publication and representation\n\nArticle 346 provides that periods against a defaulting defendant **without counsel in the case** run from publication of the decisional act in the official organ.\n\nThis is not an individualized deadline calculation. Publication identification, the relevant act and general counting rules still matter. Once counsel is properly constituted, the applicable counsel-notification rules must be considered; appearance does not automatically restart expired periods. **C017–C019.**\n\nThe same article expressly permits the defaulting defendant to intervene at any stage, receiving the case **in its existing state**. Late participation is therefore allowed, but it is not a right to rewind the whole case. [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\nPrimary URL: CPC compiled body, arts. 272 and 346.\n\n## 3.2 Evidence after default\n\nArticle 349 permits the defaulting defendant to produce evidence contrary to the claimant’s allegations if represented in time to perform the procedural steps necessary for that evidence.\n\nSTF Súmula 231 states the corresponding principle: a defaulting civil defendant may produce evidence if appearing in time. This is an ordinary STF *súmula*, not a *súmula vinculante*. The official entry was read; the historical underlying decisions were not individually rerun. **C020, C022.**\n\nPrimary URLs:\n\n- CPC art. 349: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm\n- STF Súmula 231: https://portal.stf.jus.br/jurisprudencia/sumariosumulas.asp?base=30&sumula=4151 [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n### Not every requested item must be produced\n\nUnder arts. 370–371, the judge determines necessary evidence, rejects useless or merely delaying steps through a reasoned decision, and evaluates the evidence regardless of which party supplied it.\n\nA 2025 STJ judgment upheld, within its particular documentary record and review limits, a reasoned conclusion that further evidence was unnecessary. It does not remove art. 349’s opportunity to request material counter-evidence. **C021, C036.** [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 3.3 Later allegations and just cause\n\nArticle 342 permits new allegations after the answer only within the stated branches:\n\n- supervening law or facts;\n- matters the judge must consider ex officio; or\n- express legal authorization to raise them at any time and level.\n\nThis is not an unlimited license to present an ordinary factual defense whenever convenient. **C023.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\nArticle 223 separately permits a party to prove *justa causa*: an event outside the party’s will that prevented the procedural act. If recognized, the judge permits the act within a period fixed by the court. No ordinary forgetfulness, missed email or private assertion is automatically sufficient, and this gateway does not decide a post-judgment reopening remedy. **C024.**\n\nPrimary URL: CPC compiled body, arts. 223 and 342. [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105.htm)\n\n## 3.4 When the factual effect does not apply\n\nUnder art. 348, where the defendant does not answer but the art. 344 effect does not arise, the judge must order the claimant to specify intended evidence if it has not already been identified.\n\nArticle 348 itself does **not** state a universal 15-day period. The actual order and the applicable general rule in art. 218 must be examined. A deadline from another adjacent article cannot simply be imported. **C025.** [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n# 4. Proof, burden and the consumer qualification\n\n## 4.1 Ordinary burden\n\nCPC art. 373 ordinarily assigns:\n\n- to the claimant, proof of facts constituting the asserted right;\n- to the defendant, proof of impeding, modifying or extinguishing facts.\n\nThe valid operation of art. 344 and art. 374 can relieve separate proof of particular facts; it does not dispense with the legal requirements of the claim or override art. 345. **C026–C028.**\n\nPrimary URL:\nhttps://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm, arts. 373–374. [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 4.2 Redistribution is reasoned and prospective enough to permit compliance\n\nArticle 373 §1 permits a different burden allocation where:\n\n- law provides it;\n- the ordinary burden is impossible or excessively difficult to discharge; or\n- the opposing party has greater ease of producing contrary evidence.\n\nThe court must explain the redistribution and give the affected party an opportunity to discharge the new burden. Section 2 prohibits replacing one difficulty with an impossible or excessively difficult burden on the other party.\n\nA burden-shifting agreement is also limited: it cannot concern a party’s non-disposable right or make exercise of the right excessively difficult. **C029–C030.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 4.3 CDC inversion is not automatic from a label or default\n\nThe fresh CDC read establishes:\n\n- arts. 2–3: consumer/supplier predicates, including the relevant service category;\n- art. 6(VIII): judicial inversion in the consumer’s favor where the statutory plausibility or *hipossuficiência* criterion is satisfied according to ordinary experience;\n- art. 51(VI): invalidity of a contractual burden reversal detrimental to the consumer.\n\nA consumer can be claimant or defendant. A creditor does not acquire the consumer’s evidentiary protection merely by calling its claim a consumer debt. Nor does default automatically establish the CDC inversion predicates. **C031–C032.**\n\nFull primary URL:\nhttps://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8078compilado.htm, arts. 2–3, 6(VIII), 51(VI). [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8078compilado.htm)\n\nNo full contract, fee, abusive-term or collection report is incorporated.\n\n## 4.4 Contradictory process and judicial proof\n\nThe court’s evidence powers do not authorize an unexplained surprise outcome. CPC arts. 9–11 preserve the applicable opportunity to be heard and reason-giving requirements, including art. 10’s rule against deciding on an unaddressed ground, subject to the statutory procedural setting.\n\nThe judge may determine necessary evidence, but the court is not automatically obliged to rescue a claimant that declines a proper evidence opportunity and fails to establish an essential fact. **C021, C025–C033, C068.** [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n# 5. From default to early, partial or evidentiary judgment\n\n## 5.1 Early merits judgment\n\nArticle 355 has two separate routes:\n\n| Route | Predicate | Consequence |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **355(I)** | Further evidence is unnecessary. | The court may reach the merits on the existing record, whether the defendant is defaulting or not. |\n| **355(II)** | Defendant is defaulting; the art. 344 factual effect applies; and no qualifying art. 349 evidence request has been made. | The default-specific early-judgment route is available. It still does not dictate that every claim succeeds. |\n\n**C034–C036.**\nPrimary URL: CPC compiled body, art. 355. [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\nIf a material factual question requires evidence, default alone is not a reason to bypass it. Conversely, a generic evidence request does not necessarily prevent judgment where the judge explains why it is unnecessary.\n\n## 5.2 Organization of the remaining case\n\nIf the case is not ready for disposition, art. 357 requires the judge to organize it by:\n\n- resolving pending procedural questions;\n- identifying factual issues and permitted evidence;\n- allocating the burden of proof;\n- identifying relevant legal issues; and\n- scheduling an evidentiary hearing where necessary.\n\nAfter that decision, the parties have a common five-day period to seek clarification or adjustments. The ensuing procedural stability is not the same as merits *coisa julgada*. **C037–C038.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 5.3 Partial merits judgment\n\nUnder art. 356, the court decides one or more claims—or a part of them—where they are uncontested or otherwise ready for immediate judgment under art. 355.\n\nThe decision may recognize a liquid or unliquidated obligation. The remaining part of the case can continue. Article 356 supplies separate liquidation/enforcement and challenge consequences, but their full procedure is outside this report. In particular, the partial merits decision is not simply interchangeable with the judgment ending the entire cognitive phase. **C039–C042.**\n\nPrimary URL: CPC compiled body, arts. 203, 356 and 487(I). [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\nA default declaration alone does not establish that every requested component is legally uncontested, separable and ready.\n\n# 6. Reasons, amount and limits of relief\n\n## 6.1 Essential judgment structure\n\nArticle 489 requires the judgment’s report, reasons and dispositive conclusion. Under §1, a decision is not adequately reasoned where it:\n\n1. merely cites or paraphrases a rule without explaining its connection to the case;\n2. uses an indeterminate concept without explaining its concrete application;\n3. gives reasons that would fit any case;\n4. fails to address arguments capable, in principle, of defeating the conclusion;\n5. invokes a precedent or *súmula* without its determining rationale and factual fit; or\n6. disregards an invoked precedent, jurisprudence or *súmula* without explaining distinction or overruling.\n\nWhere norms conflict, §2 requires explanation of the balancing and factual premises. Section 3 requires reading the decision as a whole and in good faith.\n\n“Defendant defaulted; therefore everything requested is granted” is not a substitute for these requirements. **C043–C050.**\n\nPrimary URL:\nhttps://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm, art. 489. [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 6.2 Amount of the monetary obligation\n\nArticle 491 ordinarily requires the money judgment to define:\n\n- the extent of the obligation;\n- the correction index;\n- the interest rate;\n- the starting point of correction and interest; and\n- capitalization periodicity, where applicable.\n\nThe exceptions are where the amount cannot be definitively determined or determining it requires evidence recognized in the judgment as excessively costly or time-consuming. Those situations permit later liquidation.\n\nDefault does not itself establish the requested rate, fee, penalty or calculation. The source of each must remain lawful and supported. **C051–C052, C057.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 6.3 Liquidation is not a second opportunity to prove the entire claim\n\nArticle 509 distinguishes:\n\n- liquidation by valuation/arbitration where legally appropriate;\n- common-procedure liquidation where new facts concerning quantification must be alleged and proved; and\n- a purely arithmetic calculation, which does not require a separate liquidation proceeding.\n\nIt expressly forbids reopening the decided dispute or modifying the judgment during liquidation.\n\nAccordingly, **inference from arts. 491 and 509:** an unresolved question whether the defendant owes anything cannot simply be relabeled “amount to be liquidated later.” Entitlement and the permissible scope of later quantification must be decided appropriately. **C052–C054.**\n\nPrimary URL: CPC compiled body, arts. 491 and 509. [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 6.4 Relief cannot exceed the claim—but the claim has statutory implicit components\n\nArticle 492 prohibits a different type of relief, a higher quantity or a different object from what was demanded. The decision must be certain even when resolving a conditional legal relationship.\n\nHowever, art. 322 §1 includes legal interest, monetary correction and litigation-cost consequences within the principal claim, and art. 323 addresses continuing instalments. An award above a headline principal figure is therefore not automatically *ultra petita* merely because it includes a legally implicit component.\n\n**C055–C056.**\nPrimary URL: CPC compiled body, arts. 322–323 and 492. [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105.htm)\n\n## 6.5 Supervening facts\n\nArticle 493 requires consideration of a later constitutive, modifying or extinguishing fact that affects the merits. If the judge identifies it ex officio, the parties must be heard before decision.\n\nThis is distinct from giving a late defendant an unrestricted opportunity to revive every omitted factual defense. **C058.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n# 7. Finality and challenge boundaries\n\n## 7.1 Main claim\n\nArticle 502 defines material *coisa julgada* by a merits decision no longer subject to appeal. Article 503 gives total or partial merits decisions binding force within the limits of the principal issue expressly decided.\n\nA defaulting defendant is not categorically immune from the finality of the main claim merely because no answer was filed. **C059–C060.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 7.2 Preliminary issues: an express default exception\n\nArticle 503 §1 can extend finality to an expressly and incidentally decided preliminary issue only where:\n\n- the merits depend on it;\n- there was prior and effective adversarial participation;\n- the court had subject-matter and personal competence to decide it as a principal issue; and\n- the §2 restrictions on evidence or depth of cognition do not apply.\n\nThe text expressly says that this extension **does not apply in cases of revelia**. Article 1.054 also preserves a temporal limit for older proceedings. **C061.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 7.3 What does not independently become final\n\nArticle 504 excludes the reasons and the truth of facts used as the judgment’s foundation from independent *coisa julgada*. Article 506 binds the parties without prejudicing third parties.\n\nThese rules do not erase the operative judgment. They define the limits of what is conclusively decided. **C062–C063.** [Planalto](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## 7.4 Preclusion and reopening\n\nArticle 507 restricts relitigation of procedurally precluded questions. After final merits judgment, art. 508 treats allegations and defenses that could have been advanced for or against the claim as raised and rejected.\n\nArticle 494 restricts the original judge’s alteration of a published judgment to material/calculation correction and *embargos de declaração*. The appropriate appeal, nullity challenge, rescission, *querela nullitatis* or enforcement objection depends on facts and procedure not researched here.\n\n**C064–C067.** No automatic right to “start over” or automatic loss of every conceivable remedy is concluded. [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n# 8. Published judicial qualifications\n\n| Authority | Actual proposition used | Court, dates, posture and limitation |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **STF Súmula 231** | A defaulting civil defendant may produce evidence if appearing in time. | Plenary approval December 13, 1963; ordinary *súmula*, not binding-súmula status. Official entry read, not all historical underlying opinions. https://portal.stf.jus.br/jurisprudencia/sumariosumulas.asp?base=30&sumula=4151 |\n| **STJ AgInt no AREsp 3.196.447-SP** | Default creates a relative factual presumption, not automatic success; allegations are assessed against the file. | Fourth Panel, unanimous; virtual session September 15–22, 2026; judgment September 22; DJEN September 25. Consortium-contract setting; factual and contractual reexamination limited by Súmulas 5 and 7. No product-validity rule generalized. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=25/09/2026&num_registro=202600712462 |\n| **STJ AREsp 3.137.657-SP** | A curator’s permitted general denial and co-defendant participation can remove default’s factual effect; weak plaintiff proof can still lead to rejection. | Third Panel, unanimous; session June 16–22, 2026; judgment June 22; DJEN June 29. Traffic-damages case. Dynamic-burden arguments were not reached for lack of prequestioning; no general rejection of dynamic burden inferred. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=29/06/2026&num_registro=202505052322 |\n| **STJ AgInt no AREsp 2.860.050-MS** | Further evidence can be refused where the court gives a supported reason that the documentary record suffices. | Fourth Panel, unanimous; virtual session October 7–13, 2025; judgment term October 13, acórdão dated October 15; DJEN October 17. Commodity-delivery damages context and limits on reexamining evidence. Not a universal bar on a defaulting defendant’s proof. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=17/10/2025&num_registro=202500489671 |\n| **STJ AREsp 3.187.530-SP** | In simple joinder, another defendant’s defense/evidence can benefit the defaulting party where facts are common. | Third Panel, unanimous; session May 26–June 1, 2026; judgment June 1; DJEN June 9. Consumer action disputing a payroll loan. Actual contract/biometric findings were not reweighed; no general authentication or banking-merits conclusion adopted. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=09/06/2026&num_registro=202600600158 |\n\n**C011, C016, C022, C036, C068–C069.** These are published authorities with stated factual and admissibility limits. No repetitive-theme status, universal prospective rule, finality certificate or exhaustive later citator is claimed. No temporal modulation relevant to this narrow proposition was established in the passages read. [Portal STF+4](https://portal.stf.jus.br/jurisprudencia/sumariosumulas.asp?base=30&sumula=4151)\n\nA 2022 STJ editorial overview was also read as guidance. An older full judgment linked from it failed through two official routes; its unopened body is not used as proof.\n\n# 9. Twelve fictional workflows\n\nAll actors, claims, amounts and procedural events are invented. Valid service and the relevant procedural route must be established independently in any real matter.\n\n## H01 — Unanswered ordinary money claim\n\n**Facts:** A private claimant sues for an ordinary consumer-money obligation. The defendant, properly given an opportunity to answer, files no contestation.\n\n**Claims:** C003–C004, C009–C016, C034–C035.\n\n**Conditional result:** The defendant can be *revel*. The judge must separately test art. 345 and the legal sufficiency of the requested remedy. If the factual effect applies and no timely counter-evidence is requested, early judgment may be available.\n\n**Adverse branch:** The claimant’s own ledger contradicts the alleged balance or the claim is legally unsupported.\n\n**Missing proof/next question:** What proves expiration of the correct answer period, and which alleged facts survive every art. 345 exception?\n\n## H02 — One co-defendant answers\n\n**Facts:** A consumer names two defendants. One answers and produces evidence concerning a transaction common to both; the other does not answer.\n\n**Claims:** C010–C011.\n\n**Conditional result:** The common defense and evidence can defeat the factual presumption against the non-answering defendant.\n\n**Adverse branch:** A defense personal to the answering party may not resolve a separate factual allegation against the other.\n\n**Missing proof/next question:** Which pleaded facts are genuinely common, and which concern only the defaulting defendant?\n\n## H03 — Non-disposable right\n\n**Facts:** The court identifies, under a separately established governing rule, that a material part of the litigation concerns a *direito indisponível*.\n\n**Claims:** C012, C025–C028.\n\n**Conditional result:** Article 345(II) excludes the default factual effect for that branch. Necessary evidence remains required.\n\n**Adverse branch:** A party merely labels an ordinary disposable monetary interest “public policy” without establishing the statutory predicate.\n\n**Missing proof/next question:** Which precise rule makes the right non-disposable, and which issue does it affect?\n\n## H04 — Legally indispensable instrument missing\n\n**Facts:** A claimant relies on an act for which the applicable law requires a specified proof instrument, but the petition omits it.\n\n**Claims:** C013, C025–C028.\n\n**Conditional result:** Default does not supply the missing legally indispensable instrument under art. 345(III).\n\n**Adverse branch:** The missing document may merely be useful evidence rather than legally indispensable; another lawful proof method may exist.\n\n**Missing proof/next question:** What statute makes this particular instrument indispensable to proof of this act?\n\n## H05 — Implausible or contradicted allegations\n\n**Facts:** The claimant alleges no payments were made, while its own authenticated statement lists several payments.\n\n**Claims:** C014–C016, C021.\n\n**Conditional result:** The contradiction prevents automatic acceptance of the “no payment” allegation. The judge must examine and explain the evidence.\n\n**Adverse branch:** The entries could concern another account, reversed transactions or an allocation dispute.\n\n**Missing proof/next question:** What do the entries represent, and do they actually concern the pleaded obligation?\n\n## H06 — Late appearance\n\n**Facts:** After the answer period, a lawyer appears for the defendant and asks to restart the whole case.\n\n**Claims:** C017–C024, C064.\n\n**Conditional result:** The defendant may intervene but receives the case as it stands. Appointment of counsel alone does not revive every expired step.\n\n**Adverse branch:** Proven *justa causa*, a supervening fact, an ex officio issue or a service defect may support a different procedural request, requiring separate analysis.\n\n**Missing proof/next question:** Which specific act was missed, why, and what statutory ground permits it now?\n\n## H07 — Appearance while evidence can still be produced\n\n**Facts:** Before the evidentiary steps are completed, the represented defendant identifies a material disputed entry and requests a targeted examination of records.\n\n**Claims:** C020–C022, C034–C037.\n\n**Conditional result:** Article 349 can permit the evidence. The judge must assess necessity rather than reject it merely because the defendant is *revel*.\n\n**Adverse branch:** The request may be late for the necessary procedural acts, irrelevant, repetitive or dilatory.\n\n**Missing proof/next question:** Can the necessary evidence steps still be performed, and what disputed fact would the evidence resolve?\n\n## H08 — Liability established but amount unresolved\n\n**Facts:** The court has a sufficient basis for liability, but a legally permissible part of quantification requires lengthy technical evidence.\n\n**Claims:** C051–C054.\n\n**Conditional result:** A reasoned art. 491 exception can permit an unliquidated judgment followed by the appropriate liquidation.\n\n**Adverse branch:** The missing evidence actually concerns whether any liability exists, not merely its amount.\n\n**Missing proof/next question:** Which issue is already established, and which remaining facts concern only quantification?\n\n## H09 — Claimant’s proof remains weak\n\n**Facts:** The factual presumption does not apply. The claimant is asked to identify evidence, declines further evidence and relies on a unilateral statement that does not establish a constitutive fact.\n\n**Claims:** C025–C029, C065, C068.\n\n**Conditional result:** The claim can be rejected for failure of proof. Default is not a substitute for the missing legal element.\n\n**Adverse branch:** A legal presumption or properly ordered burden redistribution may change who must prove the disputed fact.\n\n**Missing proof/next question:** What burden allocation was actually ordered, and what evidence supports each constitutive element?\n\n## H10 — Relief exceeds the claim\n\n**Facts:** The petition requests a specified principal claim; the judgment adds a different substantive obligation not pleaded, citing only default.\n\n**Claims:** C055–C057.\n\n**Conditional result:** Article 492’s limits remain relevant despite default.\n\n**Adverse branch:** Legal interest, monetary correction, litigation-cost consequences or qualifying continuing instalments may be included by arts. 322–323 and are not automatically excess relief.\n\n**Missing proof/next question:** Is the disputed addition a new substantive claim or a legally implicit component of the requested relief?\n\n## H11 — Partial versus final judgment\n\n**Facts:** One independently separable monetary component is ready for decision; another needs evidence.\n\n**Claims:** C039–C042, C059–C061.\n\n**Conditional result:** Article 356 may permit partial merits adjudication while the rest continues. The partial decision’s challenge and enforcement treatment differ from a judgment ending the entire cognitive phase.\n\n**Adverse branch:** The components may be interdependent, preventing isolated resolution.\n\n**Missing proof/next question:** Can the ready component be decided without prejudging the unresolved component?\n\n## H12 — Reasons missing\n\n**Facts:** The judgment says only, “The defendant defaulted, so the claim is granted,” without explaining exceptions, legal entitlement or the amount.\n\n**Claims:** C043–C050, C066–C067.\n\n**Conditional result:** The art. 489 reasoning requirements are implicated.\n\n**Adverse branch:** The complete decision, read as a whole, may contain reasons elsewhere; brevity is not automatically absence of reasons.\n\n**Missing proof/next question:** Which material issues or potentially outcome-changing arguments did the complete decision fail to address?\n\n**Workflow count: 12.**\n\n# 10. Three conditional calculations\n\nThese are arithmetic demonstrations, not actual deadlines or awards. No local calendar, holiday, system closure or court order was checked.\n\n## T01 — Ordinary answer period after an unsuccessful hearing\n\n**Stipulations:** A valid common-procedure case; one defendant; no special or doubled period; the relevant unsuccessful hearing occurs **Monday, August 3, 2026**; art. 335(I) supplies the trigger; no holiday, closure or suspension.\n\n- Day 0, excluded: August 3.\n- August 4–7: business days 1–4.\n- August 10–14: days 5–9.\n- August 17–21: days 10–14.\n- August 24: day 15.\n\n15 business days after August 3, 2026 = Monday, August 24, 2026\n\nIf **August 11** is instead an applicable court closure, with all other assumptions unchanged:\n\n15th business day = Tuesday, August 25, 2026\n\nThe exact last filing instant, electronic rule and actual hearing trigger remain held. This calculation does not establish default in any case. **C070, C074.**\n\nSource: CPC arts. 219, 224 and 335(I),\nhttps://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm. [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105.htm)\n\n## T02 — Five-day adjustment request after *saneamento*\n\n**Stipulations:** Valid intimation of the art. 357 decision on **Monday, August 3, 2026**; ordinary counting; no holiday or closure.\n\n- Day 0: August 3.\n- August 4: day 1.\n- August 5: day 2.\n- August 6: day 3.\n- August 7: day 4.\n- August 10: day 5.\n\nFive business days = Tuesday August 4 through Monday August 10, 2026, excluding the weekend\n\nIf August 7 is an applicable closure, the fifth business day becomes **Tuesday, August 11**.\n\nThis is the art. 357 §1 clarification/adjustment window, not a general appeal period and not the date of merits *coisa julgada*. **C071, C074.**\n\nSource: CPC arts. 219, 224, 357 §1, same URL. [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n## T03 — Separable partial merits component\n\n**Fictional inputs:**\n\n- Pleaded principal components: R$15,000.00.\n- Component A: R$9,000.00, stipulated to be legally supported, separable and ready under arts. 355–356.\n- Component B: R$6,000.00, requiring further proof.\n- No interest, correction, costs, penalty or later instalment is included.\n\nCalculation:\n\nR$15,000.00 − R$9,000.00 = R$6,000.00 still undecided\n\nReconciliation:\n\nR$9,000.00 decided component + R$6,000.00 undecided component = R$15,000.00 pleaded principal\n\nThe R$6,000 is **not** thereby owed, forgiven or rejected. If A and B cannot be separated, the partial-judgment assumption fails. Values are exact to two decimal places; no rounding is required. **C072.**\n\nSource: CPC arts. 356 and 492, same URL. [Planalto+1](https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm)\n\n# 11. Exact P01 D15 crosswalk\n\n## Preserved literal record\n\n| # | Named deferred family | Gateway reference/status | Exact next research action |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **D15** | **Court/service/default/judgment/appeal beyond capacity** | **C027, C030; Deferred** | **Map CPC, local procedure, notice, default and appeal rules in a separate litigation review.** |\n\nOriginal coordinator status remains explicit_deferred_hold_preserved.\n\n## Narrow PASS-19 dispositions\n\n| D15 component | PASS-19 result | Remaining gate |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Default status | Art. 344 distinguished from hearing nonattendance and defective specific denial. | Actual answer trigger, service and representation. |\n| Factual effect | All art. 345 exceptions and common-fact qualification identified. | Actual allegations, instrument requirement and evidence. |\n| Late participation | Arts. 346, 349 and narrow later-allegation/just-cause boundaries identified. | Actual stage, authority, proof request and missed act. |\n| Proof management | Arts. 348, 370–374 and limited CDC burden rules read. | Actual burden order, evidence and consumer nexus. |\n| Early/partial judgment | Arts. 355–357 pathways identified. | Readiness, separability and remaining evidence. |\n| Reasons and amount | Arts. 489–493 and 509 gateway identified. | Actual judgment, lawful amount components and quantification. |\n| Finality limits | Main-issue finality separated from preliminary issues, reasons and facts. | Actual finality, party scope and procedural history. |\n| Service, reopening, appeals and enforcement | Not completed or imported from P18. | Separate focused passes. |\n\n**Crosswalk count: nine logical items and nine physical data rows—one preserved record plus eight dispositions.**\n\n# 12. Source register\n\n**Access metadata for every row:** October 26, 2026 PDT / October 27, 2026 UTC. Exact opening clocks unknown. All fresh reads are PASS-19 access, not retroactive certifications of earlier reports. Failed routes are separately classified.\n\n| Source ID | Issuer, title and full literal URL | Actual read, status, dates and limits |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **C_BR-P19-S001** | Presidência da República, **CPC, Lei 13.105/2015, current compiled text**. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm — official parallel text also read: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105.htm | **Fresh operative selected body.** Arts. 9–11, 14, 72, 76, 103, 203, 216, 218–224, 239 caput/§1, 272, 320–324, 334–349, 355–357, 369–374, 487(I), 489–494, 502–509, 1045–1047 and 1054; footer. Original art.1045: one year after publication; DOU March17,2015. HTML, printed page/PDF index N/A. No complete service, appeal or enforcement read. |\n| **S002** | Presidência, **CDC, Lei 8.078/1990, compiled**. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8078compilado.htm | **Fresh limited operative crossover.** Arts.2–3,6(VIII),51(VI). Current consumer/burden boundary only. Original commencement not recalculated; no full contract/collection module. HTML; page/index N/A. |\n| **S003** | Presidência, **Lei 15.479/2026**. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15479.htm | **Fresh enacted-future body.** Arts.1–2,4/footer. DOU July30,2026; one-year delayed commencement. Support-enforcement/technical changes not applied as current default law. HTML; page/index N/A. |\n| **S004** | STF, **Súmula 231 — official entry**. https://portal.stf.jus.br/jurisprudencia/sumariosumulas.asp?base=30&sumula=4151 | **Fresh official súmula text.** Timely appearance and evidence proposition; plenary approval December13,1963. Ordinary súmula, not binding-súmula certification. Underlying historical opinions not individually reopened. HTML; page/index N/A. |\n| **S005** | STJ, **“Efeitos da revelia no processo civil: as alegações do autor, o silêncio do réu e a análise do juiz”**. https://www.stj.jus.br/sites/portalp/Paginas/Comunicacao/Noticias/2022/04092022-Efeitos-da-revelia-no-processo-civil-as-alegacoes-do-autor--o-silencio-do-reu-e-a-analise-do-juiz.aspx | **Fresh official explanatory overview**, September4,2022. Selected general-default discussion and source discovery only; not a full judgment or current citator. Its unrelated enforcement examples were not adopted. HTML; page/index N/A. |\n| **S006** | STJ, **AgInt no AREsp 3.196.447-SP**, official full-judgment PDF. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=25/09/2026&num_registro=202600712462 | **Fresh selected full-judgment body.** Fourth Panel unanimous; judgment September22,2026; DJEN September25. Ten PDF pages. Ementa/result zero-index0; reasoning3–4; session certificate8. Relevant screenshots inspected at0 and8. Printed folios not displayed on inspected pages. Relative presumption; contract/fact-reexamination limits preserved. |\n| **S007** | STJ, **AREsp 3.137.657-SP**, official full-judgment PDF. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=29/06/2026&num_registro=202505052322 | **Fresh selected full-judgment body.** Third Panel unanimous; judgment June22,2026; DJEN June29. Ten pages. Ementa/result indices0–1; relevant reasons4–5; screenshots1 and4. Printed folios not displayed. Curator/general denial and weak proof; dynamic-burden argument not reached. |\n| **S008** | STJ, **AgInt no AREsp 2.860.050-MS**, official full-judgment PDF. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=17/10/2025&num_registro=202500489671 | **Fresh selected full-judgment body.** Fourth Panel unanimous; session ended October13,2025; acórdão datedOctober15; DJENOctober17. Six pages. Relevant ementa/reasons indices0 and3, both visually inspected. Printed folios not displayed. Reasoned denial of unnecessary evidence; no universal exclusion of late evidence. |\n| **S009** | STJ, **AREsp 3.187.530-SP**, official full-judgment PDF. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=09/06/2026&num_registro=202600600158 | **Fresh selected full-judgment body.** Third Panel unanimous; judgmentJune1,2026; DJENJune9. Thirteen pages. Ementa/result indices0–1; relevant reasons4–8; screenshots0 and8. Printed folios not displayed. Common-fact co-defendant defense; no general loan-validity or biometric-law conclusion. |\n| **S010** | STJ, **older REsp 1.335.994 judgment route**. https://www.stj.jus.br/websecstj/cgi/revista/REJ.cgi/ITA?CodOrgaoJgdr=&SeqCgrmaSessao=&dt=20140818&formato=HTML&nreg=201201558341&salvar=false&seq=1338290&tipo=0 | **Failed body:403.** No substantive holding adopted from search/index text. Requested publication parameter August18,2014 is not a fresh body verification. Printed page/PDF index unknown. |\n| **S011** | STJ, **official alternate for the same older judgment**. https://processo.stj.jus.br/processo/revista/documento/mediado/?componente=ITA&data=20140818&formato=PDF&num_registro=201201558341&sequencial=1338290 | **Attempted official alternate; substantive body unread.** Returned an HTML wrapper rather than the judgment. No repeated loop, hidden-endpoint substitution or security workaround. Printed page/PDF index unknown. |\n| **S012** | Presidência, **Lei 15.484/2026**. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15484.htm | **Fresh amendment boundary.** Arts.1–4,7/footer read to classify relevance. DOU extraAugust4,2026;30-day vacatio underart.7, operative by access. Concerns special-appeal relevance, not replacement of default arts.344–349. Full appellate implementation deferred. HTML; page/index N/A. |\n\n**Source-register count: 12 rows:** four statutory bodies, one STF súmula entry, one official STJ overview, four published STJ judgment PDFs, and two failed/substantively unread routes. S001 contains two official representations of one statute; row count is not a URL count.\n\n# 13. Atomic claim/evidence register\n\nAll claim IDs below are **C_BR-P19-Cxxx**. S001 pinpoints refer to the full CPC URLs in the source register; S002 to the full CDC URL. These references identify source, actor, predicate and consequence without adopting any private case outcome.\n\n| Claim | Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification | Evidence |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **C001** | A098. CPC commencement and transition must be distinguished from publication/access; older proof and preliminary-issue finality rules have express transitions. | S001 arts.14,1045–1047,1054/footer. |\n| **C002** | A098. Lei15.479 is enacted-future at access and supplies no present ordinary-default rule here. | S003 arts.1–2,4. |\n| **C003** | A097. Default requires a proper procedural opportunity; service/representation prerequisites remain fact-dependent. | S001 arts.72,76,103,239. |\n| **C004** | A098. Failure to contest creates art.344 default status, distinct from its factual effect. | S001 art.344. |\n| **C005** | A098. Hearing nonattendance is not identical to failure to file contestation. | S001 arts.334–335,344. |\n| **C006** | A098. Ordinary contestation is15 procedural days with art.335’s alternative triggers. | S001 arts.219,335. |\n| **C007** | A098. Specific denial has art.341’s separate exceptions; it is not identical to complete default. | S001 art.341. |\n| **C008** | A098. Public defender, dativo and special curator are exempt from specific-denial burden; curator appointment has statutory predicates. | S001 arts.72,341 sole paragraph. |\n| **C009** | A098. Default presumption concerns facts, not automatic acceptance of legal conclusions or requested relief. | S001 arts.344–345; S006. |\n| **C010** | A098. One co-defendant’s contestation can prevent the art.344 effect under345(I). | S001 art.345(I). |\n| **C011** | A098. Common facts/evidence can benefit the defaulted co-defendant; purely personal matters need separate analysis. | S009 indices0,4–8. |\n| **C012** | A098. Non-disposable rights exclude the factual effect; their legal classification must be established. | S001 art.345(II). |\n| **C013** | A098. A legally indispensable proof instrument cannot be supplied by default. | S001 art.345(III). |\n| **C014** | A098. Implausible allegations do not receive art.344’s factual effect. | S001 art.345(IV). |\n| **C015** | A098. Allegations contradicted by evidence in the file do not receive that effect. | S001 art.345(IV). |\n| **C016** | A098. The presumption is relative; default does not automatically produce success. | S006 indices0,3–4. |\n| **C017** | A098. Periods against an unrepresented defaulting defendant run from official publication under346. | S001 art.346 caput. |\n| **C018** | A098. Late defendant may intervene at any stage but receives the case as it stands. | S001 art.346 sole paragraph. |\n| **C019** | A097. Constitution of counsel changes representation/notice analysis but does not automatically revive expired steps. | S001 arts.103,272,346. |\n| **C020** | A098. Defaulting defendant may produce counter-evidence if represented in time for necessary procedural acts. | S001 art.349. |\n| **C021** | A098. Judge determines necessary proof and must explain rejection of useless/dilatory steps and evaluation of evidence. | S001 arts.370–371. |\n| **C022** | A098. STF Súmula231 recognizes timely evidence by the defaulting civil defendant. | S004 exact enunciado. |\n| **C023** | A098. Later allegations are confined by supervenience, ex-officio or express-law branches. | S001 art.342. |\n| **C024** | A098. Proven just cause can permit a missed act within a judicially fixed period, not an automatic restart. | S001 art.223. |\n| **C025** | A098. Without the default factual effect, claimant must specify evidence if not already identified;348 supplies no universal15-day period. | S001 arts.218,348. |\n| **C026** | A098. Claimant ordinarily proves constitutive facts. | S001 art.373(I). |\n| **C027** | A098. Defendant ordinarily proves impeding, modifying or extinguishing facts. | S001 art.373(II). |\n| **C028** | A098. Legally presumed facts can dispense with independent proof; this does not erase345 exceptions. | S001 arts.344–345,374. |\n| **C029** | A098. Dynamic burden allocation requires reasons, statutory difficulty/ease predicates, an opportunity to comply and no impossible new burden. | S001 art.373 §§1–2. |\n| **C030** | A098. Burden agreements cannot impair non-disposable rights or make exercise excessively difficult. | S001 art.373 §§3–4. |\n| **C031** | A098. CDC inversion favors a qualifying consumer under judicial plausibility or vulnerability predicates, not automatically from default. | S002 arts.2–3,6(VIII). |\n| **C032** | A098. Contractual burden inversion detrimental to the consumer is invalid under the specified CDC provision. | S002 art.51(VI). |\n| **C033** | A098. Applicable hearing/opportunity and no-surprise/reasoning duties remain. | S001 arts.9–11. |\n| **C034** | A098. Early merits judgment is available where further proof is unnecessary. | S001 art.355(I). |\n| **C035** | A098. The default-specific early route requires status, factual effect and no qualifying349 evidence request. | S001 art.355(II). |\n| **C036** | A098. Necessary evidence differs from an unconditional right to every requested item; reasoned denial can be valid. | S008 indices0,3. |\n| **C037** | A098. Saneamento resolves procedure and organizes facts, evidence, burden and legal issues. | S001 art.357 caput. |\n| **C038** | A098. Parties have a common5-day clarification/adjustment period; resulting stability is not merits res judicata. | S001 art.357 §1. |\n| **C039** | A098. Separable claims/parts can receive partial merits judgment if uncontested or immediately ready. | S001 art.356(I)–(II). |\n| **C040** | A098. Partial merits decision can recognize liquid or unliquidated obligation. | S001 art.356 §1. |\n| **C041** | A098. Partial decisions have distinct liquidation/enforcement and challenge consequences; full procedure held. | S001 art.356 §§2–5. |\n| **C042** | A098. A partial merits decision is not identical to a sentence ending the entire cognitive phase. | S001 arts.203,356,487(I). |\n| **C043** | A098. Sentence requires report, factual/legal reasons and dispositive conclusion. | S001 art.489 caput. |\n| **C044** | A098. Bare citation/paraphrase of a rule without case fit is inadequate. | S001 art.489 §1(I). |\n| **C045** | A098. Indeterminate legal concepts require concrete explanation. | S001 art.489 §1(II). |\n| **C046** | A098. Generic reasons capable of fitting any decision are inadequate. | S001 art.489 §1(III). |\n| **C047** | A098. Reasons must address arguments capable of undermining the outcome. | S001 art.489 §1(IV). |\n| **C048** | A098. Precedent use requires rationale/fit; departure from invoked authority requires distinction or overruling explanation. | S001 art.489 §1(V)–(VI). |\n| **C049** | A098. Balancing conflicting norms requires stated criteria, reasons and factual premises. | S001 art.489 §2. |\n| **C050** | A098. Decision is interpreted as a whole and in good faith. | S001 art.489 §3. |\n| **C051** | A098. Money judgment ordinarily specifies extent, correction, interest, starting points and applicable capitalization. | S001 art.491 caput. |\n| **C052** | A098. Statutory inability/cost/delay exceptions allow later amount liquidation, not postponement of an unproved entitlement. | S001 art.491(I)–(II),§1; last distinction is inference with509. |\n| **C053** | A098. Valuation/common-procedure liquidation differs from pure arithmetic calculation. | S001 art.509(I)–(II),§2. |\n| **C054** | A098. Liquidation cannot reargue the decided dispute or alter the judgment. | S001 art.509 §4. |\n| **C055** | A098. Judgment cannot award different type, higher quantity or different object than demanded; it must be certain. | S001 art.492. |\n| **C056** | A098. Statutorily implicit accessories and qualifying continuing instalments limit simplistic face-amount comparisons. | S001 arts.322 §1,323. |\n| **C057** | A098. Default itself establishes no universal monetary penalty or legal interest rate. | Bounded reading of344–349 and491; underlying law held. |\n| **C058** | A098. Relevant supervening facts must be considered, with hearing if identified ex officio. | S001 art.493. |\n| **C059** | A098. Material res judicata concerns a merits decision no longer appealable. | S001 art.502. |\n| **C060** | A098. Total/partial main issue expressly decided can bind despite default. | S001 art.503 caput. |\n| **C061** | A098. Extended preliminary-issue finality requires effective prior contest and is expressly excluded in default, with other competence/proof/temporal limits. | S001 art.503 §§1–2;1054. |\n| **C062** | A098. Reasons and factual truth as foundations are not independently res judicata. | S001 art.504. |\n| **C063** | A098. Judgment binds the parties without prejudicing third parties. | S001 art.506. |\n| **C064** | A098. Procedural preclusion and final merits preclusion prevent an automatic new start for available omitted defenses. | S001 arts.507–508. |\n| **C065** | A098. Court may accept or reject the claim wholly or partly; default does not dictate outcome. | S001 arts.487(I),490; S006–S007. |\n| **C066** | A098. Post-publication alteration by original judge has494’s limits; appropriate challenge must be separately classified. | S001 art.494. |\n| **C067** | A098. Appeal, reopening, rescission, enforcement and actual challenge outcome remain deferred. | Scope boundary. |\n| **C068** | A098. The2026 curator/proof judgment supports the stated default exception; its dynamic-burden issue was not decided. | S007 indices0–1,4–5. |\n| **C069** | A098. Published authorities retain factual/admissibility limits; no repetitive-status, complete citator or temporal-modulation certification. | S004–S009. |\n| **C070** | A098. T01’s August24/25 endpoints depend on the stipulated hearing trigger, ordinary period and calendar. | S001 arts.219,224,335(I); fictional input. |\n| **C071** | A098. T02’s August10/11 endpoints concern357§1 adjustments, not appeal or merits finality. | S001 arts.219,224,357§1; fictional input. |\n| **C072** | A098. T03’s R$9,000/R$6,000 split assumes a separable ready component, not automatic default entitlement. | S001 arts.356,492; fictional input. |\n| **C073** | A097. Procedural knowledge does not confer legal-practice, collection, financial or provider permission. | Scope boundary; no licensing determination. |\n| **C074** | A098. Procedural day periods use business days and start/end rules with recess/closure qualifications. | S001 arts.216,219–224. |\n| **C075** | A098. No actual local calendar, order, case, contract, party or deadline was examined. | Research boundary. |\n| **C076** | A098. Currentness/private/local/foreign/component/country holds remain; no acceptance follows. | Scope and source limits. |\n| **C077** | A098. Lei15.484 was operative by access but concerns special appeals, not a new344–349 default rule. | S012 arts.1–4,7/footer. |\n\n**Atomic claim count: 77.**\n\n# 14. Granular core coverage\n\n| Row | Required issue | Claim refs | Status; exact remaining fact or next action |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| **P19-G01** | Ordinary common-procedure scope | C003–C006 | Confirm actual action type; special procedures held. |\n| **G02** | Current CPC/transition | C001 | Selected body read; actual case date and later consolidation required. |\n| **G03** | 2026 displayed laws | C002,C077 | Future/support and operative/appellate branches separated. |\n| **G04** | Valid opportunity to answer | C003 | Actual service and trigger unexamined. |\n| **G05** | Capacity/representation | C003,C019 | Actual appointment/mandate unknown. |\n| **G06** | Default status | C004 | Establish absence of timely contestation. |\n| **G07** | Hearing nonattendance | C005 | Do not equate with no answer. |\n| **G08** | Answer trigger | C006 | Identify335 branch and order. |\n| **G09** | Procedural counting | C074 | Actual calendar/privileges required. |\n| **G10** | Specific denial | C007 | Compare defense as a whole and exceptions. |\n| **G11** | Curator/general denial | C008,C068 | Verify lawful appointment and common facts. |\n| **G12** | Facts versus law | C009 | No automatic legal entitlement. |\n| **G13** | Co-defendant answer | C010 | Apply345(I). |\n| **G14** | Common-fact limitation | C011 | Separate common and personal matters. |\n| **G15** | Non-disposable right | C012 | Identify governing substantive rule. |\n| **G16** | Mandatory instrument | C013 | Identify law making it indispensable. |\n| **G17** | Implausibility | C014 | Require reasoned record-based assessment. |\n| **G18** | Contrary evidence | C015 | Examine complete file, not silence alone. |\n| **G19** | Relative presumption | C016 | No automatic whole-claim success. |\n| **G20** | Unrepresented publication | C017 | Obtain official publication and relevant act. |\n| **G21** | Counsel after appearance | C019 | Obtain appointment/notification record. |\n| **G22** | Late intervention | C018 | Existing procedural stage governs. |\n| **G23** | Timely counter-evidence | C020–C022 | Necessary steps and relevance required. |\n| **G24** | Later allegations | C023 | Apply342 predicates, not blanket reopening. |\n| **G25** | Just cause | C024 | Prove external prevention and actual court decision. |\n| **G26** | Claimant specifies evidence | C025 | Apply348 if not already specified. |\n| **G27** | 348 response time | C025 | No imported15days; inspect order/218. |\n| **G28** | Claimant burden | C026 | Identify constitutive facts. |\n| **G29** | Defendant burden | C027 | Identify impeding/modifying/extinguishing facts. |\n| **G30** | Legal presumptions | C028 | Do not require redundant proof of every presumed fact. |\n| **G31** | Dynamic allocation | C029 | Reasons, opportunity and feasibility required. |\n| **G32** | Burden agreement | C030 | Check non-disposable rights/excessive difficulty. |\n| **G33** | Consumer nexus | C031 | Final-recipient/supplier facts unknown. |\n| **G34** | Consumer inversion | C031 | Judicial predicates required. |\n| **G35** | Detrimental contractual inversion | C032 | Actual clause and consumer nexus required. |\n| **G36** | Non-surprise decision | C033 | Actual opportunities and grounds unknown. |\n| **G37** | Early judgment355(I) | C034 | Determine necessity of further evidence. |\n| **G38** | Default route355(II) | C035 | All three predicates required. |\n| **G39** | Denial of evidence | C021,C036 | Must be reasoned and relevance-specific. |\n| **G40** | Saneamento | C037 | Obtain organized issues/burden order. |\n| **G41** | Five-day adjustment | C038 | Valid intimation/calendar required. |\n| **G42** | Partial merits conditions | C039 | Identify ready separable component. |\n| **G43** | Liquid/unliquid partial obligation | C040 | Specify what is decided versus quantified later. |\n| **G44** | Partial decision consequences | C041 | Full challenge/enforcement process held. |\n| **G45** | Partial versus final sentence | C042 | Examine actual dispositive scope. |\n| **G46** | Essential judgment structure | C043 | Read full sentence. |\n| **G47** | Bare statutory citation | C044 | Check concrete application. |\n| **G48** | Abstract concepts | C045 | Require fact-specific explanation. |\n| **G49** | Generic reasons | C046 | Check whether reasoning fits this dispute. |\n| **G50** | Material arguments | C047 | Identify arguments capable of changing outcome. |\n| **G51** | Precedent use/departure | C048 | Identify rationale, fit, distinction or overruling. |\n| **G52** | Norm balancing | C049 | Obtain criteria and factual premises. |\n| **G53** | Holistic interpretation | C050 | Do not isolate one sentence from full reasons. |\n| **G54** | Monetary terms | C051 | Actual legal rate/index/starts unknown. |\n| **G55** | Liquidation exception | C052 | Distinguish missing liability from missing amount. |\n| **G56** | Valuation versus arithmetic | C053 | Classify required quantification. |\n| **G57** | No merits reopening in liquidation | C054 | Preserve judgment’s limits. |\n| **G58** | Requested-relief ceiling/type | C055 | Compare petition and dispositive order. |\n| **G59** | Implicit accessories | C056 | Determine valid statutory components. |\n| **G60** | Continuing instalments | C056 | Apply323 to actual periodic obligation. |\n| **G61** | No automatic default rate/penalty | C057 | Separate legal/contractual basis required. |\n| **G62** | Supervening fact | C058 | Establish relevance and hearing. |\n| **G63** | Main-issue finality | C059–C060 | Actual no-further-appeal status unknown. |\n| **G64** | Preliminary-issue finality | C061 | Revelia exclusion and temporal limits preserved. |\n| **G65** | Reasons/facts outside separate finality | C062 | Distinguish foundation from dispositive issue. |\n| **G66** | Parties/third parties | C063 | Actual subjective scope required. |\n| **G67** | Preclusion | C064 | No automatic repeat litigation. |\n| **G68** | Challenge boundary | C066–C067 | Separate remedy/appeal research required. |\n| **G69** | Court-authority limits | C069 | No exhaustive citator or binding-status expansion. |\n| **G70** | Possible claimant loss | C065,C068 | Apply actual burden and file. |\n| **G71** | H01 unanswered claim | C003–C016 | Conditional workflow complete; private facts absent. |\n| **G72** | H02 co-defendant | C010–C011 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G73** | H03 non-disposable right | C012,C025 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G74** | H04 missing instrument | C013 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G75** | H05 implausibility/contradiction | C014–C016 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G76** | H06 late appearance | C017–C024 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G77** | H07 timely evidence | C020–C022 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G78** | H08 unproven amount | C051–C054 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G79** | H09 weak claimant proof | C025–C029,C068 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G80** | H10 excess relief | C055–C057 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G81** | H11 partial judgment | C039–C042 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G82** | H12 missing reasons | C043–C050 | Conditional workflow complete. |\n| **G83** | T01 answer calculation | C070,C074 | Hypothetical calendar only. |\n| **G84** | T02 saneamento calculation | C071,C074 | Not an appeal calculation. |\n| **G85** | T03 monetary partition | C072 | Not an amount owed or awarded. |\n| **G86** | P01 D15 crosswalk | Preserved record | Only default/judgment gateway augmented. |\n| **G87** | State/DF/local procedure | C075 | All27 branches unexamined. |\n| **G88** | Actual private records | C075 | None obtained or classified. |\n| **G89** | Provider/professional permission | C073 | Separate; no authority conferred. |\n| **G90** | Publication/component/country status | C076 | HOLD; separate review required. |\n\n**Core-coverage count: 90.**\n\n# 15. Separately deferred families\n\n| Row | Deferred family | Exact next action |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **P19-D01** | Commencement, citation and CNJ service | P18 remains unreviewed; independently establish actual service before applying default. |\n| **D02** | Defective-service reopening | Identify procedural posture and proper challenge; no automatic remedy. |\n| **D03** | Rescisória, querela nullitatis and post-finality attacks | Research exact grounds, standing, periods and jurisdiction separately. |\n| **D04** | Appeals and appellate admissibility | Read applicable appeal route, current2026 provisions and actual decision. |\n| **D05** | Cumprimento, execution and collection of judgment | Separate enforcement pass; no attachment or payment command inferred. |\n| **D06** | Full liquidation, expert evidence and associated fees | Determine actual quantitative issue and method. |\n| **D07** | Juizados and small-claims default | Read special-law attendance, representation and judgment rules. |\n| **D08** | Monitória and executive-title proceedings | Classify initiating title and special opposition rules. |\n| **D09** | Public, tax, family and support claims | Apply distinct rights, party and procedural regimes. |\n| **D10** | Superendividamento and creditor nonappearance | Separate statutory consumer-procedure inquiry. |\n| **D11** | Insolvency, recuperação and falência | Identify stay, participation, claim and judgment effects. |\n| **D12** | Consumer contract, fees and cancellation | P04 unreviewed; no merits adoption. |\n| **D13** | Prescription and substantive default | P05 unreviewed; no debt-clock conclusion. |\n| **D14** | Payment, release, assignment and ownership | Obtain actual instruments; no P09 or assignment-premise import. |\n| **D15** | Collection communications | P10 unreviewed; distinguish creditor conduct from court procedure. |\n| **D16** | Privacy, negative/positive reporting and scores | P08 and sector modules remain separate. |\n| **D17** | Surety, solidary liability and substantive joinder | P16 unreviewed; procedural co-defense does not establish substantive liability. |\n| **D18** | Provider, OAB, financial and payment permission | Separate actor/activity authorization. |\n| **D19** | Security, property and homestead | Separate title, guarantee and attachment analysis. |\n| **D20** | Filing fees, legal aid and cost awards | Read competent court schedule and actual order. |\n| **D21** | Local forms, calendars and digital implementation | Read the actual court’s operative instruments. |\n| **D22** | Foreign law, service, recognition and language/accessibility | No foreign procedural premise adopted. |\n| **D23** | Private records and exhaustive judicial citator | No actual case lookup; later authority check required before reliance. |\n| **D24** | Later amendments, publication and country/parent acceptance | Preserve all A066/A097/A098/component/local/country holds. |\n\n**Deferred-family count: 24.**\n\n# 16. All 27 inherited states and Distrito Federal\n\nThe jurisdiction names are inherited from the preserved P01 inventory. No fresh geographical certification or API was used. Federal judgments discussing a state case do not certify that state’s current local rules.\n\n| State/DF | Local read status | Exact remaining question |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **Acre (AC)** | No local operative body read. | TJAC/default practice, evidence orders, forms, fees and calendar. |\n| **Alagoas (AL)** | No local operative body read. | TJAL procedural implementation, publication and holiday rules. |\n| **Amapá (AP)** | No local operative body read. | TJAP evidence scheduling, digital notices and forms. |\n| **Amazonas (AM)** | No local operative body read. | TJAM remote participation, calendar and fee implementation. |\n| **Bahia (BA)** | No local operative body read. | TJBA default/evidence procedure, court closures and forms. |\n| **Ceará (CE)** | No local operative body read. | TJCE saneamento, publication, fees and calendar. |\n| **Distrito Federal (DF)** | No local operative body read. | TJDFT actual orders, forms, local calendar and fee rules. |\n| **Espírito Santo (ES)** | No local operative body read. | TJES publication, evidence management and procedural calendars. |\n| **Goiás (GO)** | No local operative body read. | TJGO digital procedure, default practices and forms. |\n| **Maranhão (MA)** | No local operative body read. | TJMA access, evidence scheduling and court calendar. |\n| **Mato Grosso (MT)** | No local operative body read. | TJMT local deadlines, publication and fees. |\n| **Mato Grosso do Sul (MS)** | No local operative body read. | TJMS rules; the published STJ authority is not a local implementation audit. |\n| **Minas Gerais (MG)** | No local operative body read. | TJMG evidence orders, forms and holiday calendar. |\n| **Pará (PA)** | No local operative body read. | TJPA remote access, evidence and local court calendar. |\n| **Paraíba (PB)** | No local operative body read. | TJPB digital procedure, notices and fee schedule. |\n| **Paraná (PR)** | No local operative body read. | TJPR case-management, publication and closure rules. |\n| **Pernambuco (PE)** | No local operative body read. | TJPE saneamento, forms, fees and holidays. |\n| **Piauí (PI)** | No local operative body read. | TJPI evidence scheduling, accessibility and calendar. |\n| **Rio de Janeiro (RJ)** | No local operative body read. | TJRJ default/evidence implementation and local publications. |\n| **Rio Grande do Norte (RN)** | No local operative body read. | TJRN court orders, forms and calendar. |\n| **Rio Grande do Sul (RS)** | No local operative body read. | TJRS case-management and current local implementation. |\n| **Rondônia (RO)** | No local operative body read. | TJRO remote participation, fee and calendar rules. |\n| **Roraima (RR)** | No local operative body read. | TJRR access, language needs, forms and holidays. |\n| **Santa Catarina (SC)** | No local operative body read. | TJSC evidence, publication and deadline implementation. |\n| **São Paulo (SP)** | No local operative body read. | TJSP rules; STJ discussion of SP cases does not clear local procedure. |\n| **Sergipe (SE)** | No local operative body read. | TJSE forms, costs, evidence and calendar. |\n| **Tocantins (TO)** | No local operative body read. | TJTO digital procedure, access and court closures. |\n\n**Territorial count: 27; no state or DF branch is cleared.**\n\n# 17. Evidence-backed opportunities\n\n| Article/checklist/conditional-tool specification | Supported use | Publication guardrail |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **“Default is not an automatic win”** | Separate status, factual effect, legal entitlement and amount. | Do not imply that default has no consequences. |\n| **Art.345 exception checklist** | Co-defendant/common facts, non-disposable rights, indispensable instrument, implausibility and contradiction. | Require the actual law and file; no checkbox outcome. |\n| **Late-participation map** | Existing stage, counsel, timely evidence, supervening facts and just cause. | No promise that an expired defense period restarts. |\n| **Judgment-readiness worksheet** | Separate355(I),355(II),356 and357. | Default alone does not prove readiness of every component. |\n| **Money-judgment audit** | Relief requested, implicit components, legal rate/index, extent and liquidation basis. | No invented penalty, interest rate or actual award. |\n| **Finality-boundary explainer** | Main claim versus preliminary issue, reasons, factual findings and third parties. | No generic reopening or appeal advice. |\n\nNo site, tool, complaint, filing or publication was created.\n\n# 18. Reconciliation and researcher self-check\n\n| Item | Actual result |\n| --- | --- |\n| Assigned component | P01 D15 *revelia/default and ensuing judgment* gateway only. |\n| Prior unreviewed reports used as premises | None. |\n| Source-register rows | **12**. |\n| Successfully read source rows | **10**: four statutes, STF entry, STJ overview, four judgment PDFs. |\n| Failed/substantively unread routes | **2**, concerning one older judgment; no holding adopted from them. |\n| Atomic claims | **77**, C_BR-P19-C001–C077. |\n| Core coverage | **90**, P19-G01–G90. |\n| Deferred families | **24**, P19-D01–D24. |\n| Territorial rows | **27**. |\n| Total coverage rows | **141**: 90 core +24 deferred +27 territorial. |\n| Fictional workflows | **12**. |\n| Conditional calculations | **3**. |\n| P01 crosswalk | **9 logical items and9 physical data rows**. |\n| Judicial qualification comparison | **5 rows**, not counted as coverage or additional sources. |\n| Opportunity table | **6 rows**, not counted as coverage. |\n| Self-check table | **26 rows**, not counted as substantive coverage. |\n| PDF inspection | Relevant pages of all four relied STJ judgment PDFs visually inspected; printed folios not invented. |\n| Currentness | Selected current compilation and displayed2026 amendments checked; no exhaustive all-law certification. |\n| Local calendar, fee, form or actual order | None checked. |\n| Actual deadline, debt, award or finality | None determined. |\n| Named/private party, docket or account lookup | None; only generic officially published authorities were read. |\n| External action or coordinator-file write | None. |\n| API, hidden endpoint, security bypass, new chat or subagent | None. |\n| Source-opening clocks | Unknown; no fabricated session window. |\n| Review/acceptance | No independent-review, all-source, provider, locality, component, parent or country acceptance. |\n\n**Residual priorities:** the actual procedural route and answer trigger; valid service and representation; all filed defenses and evidence; any art.345 exception; the burden-allocation order; timeliness and necessity of proposed counter-evidence; the requested relief and lawful monetary components; the full judgment and its finality; and the competent court’s calendar, forms and current procedural implementation.\n\n**Final disposition:** PASS-19 establishes the narrow federal distinction between default status, conditional factual presumptions, remaining participation and evidence rights, early or partial merits judgment, reasoned adjudication, quantified relief and finality. It does not establish that any actual debt is proved, any defendant is validly in default, any requested amount is owed, any judgment is valid or final, or any reopening, appeal or enforcement remedy is available.\n\nEND C_BR PASS-19\n\n","tables":[{"headers":["Instrument","Status and relevance at access"],"index":0,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[]],"rows":[["Instrument","Status and relevance at access"],["Lei 15.479/2026","Published July 30, 2026; art. 4 provides one year before commencement. It was enacted-future, not applied as operative default law. Its support-enforcement and technical amendments do not supply a current ordinary-default rule here."],["Lei 15.484/2026","Published in the DOU extra edition of August 4, 2026; art. 7 provides 30 days before commencement. It was operative by this research date, but concerns the special-appeal relevance regime, not a replacement for CPC arts. 344–349. Its full appellate application is deferred."]]},{"headers":["Provision","Exact exception to the art. 344 factual effect","Required qualification"],"index":1,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Provision","Exact exception to the art. 344 factual effect","Required qualification"],["345(I)","There are multiple defendants and one contests the action.","The defense and evidence can benefit the defaulting defendant concerning common facts. Do not automatically transfer a purely personal defense."],["345(II)","The litigation concerns direitos indisponíveis.","Identify the actual non-disposable right. Neither “consumer dispute” nor “public entity” is, by itself, a complete classification."],["345(III)","The initial petition lacks an instrument the law considers indispensable to proof of the act.","Identify the law requiring that particular instrument. Not every missing document is automatically this exception."],["345(IV), first branch","The claimant’s factual allegations are implausible.","The conclusion must be reasoned, not an unexplained credibility preference."],["345(IV), second branch","The allegations conflict with evidence already in the file.","Evidence can contradict the claimant even when the defendant supplied no timely answer."]]},{"headers":["Route","Predicate","Consequence"],"index":2,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[]],"rows":[["Route","Predicate","Consequence"],["355(I)","Further evidence is unnecessary.","The court may reach the merits on the existing record, whether the defendant is defaulting or not."],["355(II)","Defendant is defaulting; the art. 344 factual effect applies; and no qualifying art. 349 evidence request has been made.","The default-specific early-judgment route is available. It still does not dictate that every claim succeeds."]]},{"headers":["Authority","Actual proposition used","Court, dates, posture and limitation"],"index":3,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Authority","Actual proposition used","Court, dates, posture and limitation"],["STF Súmula 231","A defaulting civil defendant may produce evidence if appearing in time.","Plenary approval December 13, 1963; ordinary súmula, not binding-súmula status. Official entry read, not all historical underlying opinions. https://portal.stf.jus.br/jurisprudencia/sumariosumulas.asp?base=30&sumula=4151"],["STJ AgInt no AREsp 3.196.447-SP","Default creates a relative factual presumption, not automatic success; allegations are assessed against the file.","Fourth Panel, unanimous; virtual session September 15–22, 2026; judgment September 22; DJEN September 25. Consortium-contract setting; factual and contractual reexamination limited by Súmulas 5 and 7. No product-validity rule generalized. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=25/09/2026&num_registro=202600712462"],["STJ AREsp 3.137.657-SP","A curator’s permitted general denial and co-defendant participation can remove default’s factual effect; weak plaintiff proof can still lead to rejection.","Third Panel, unanimous; session June 16–22, 2026; judgment June 22; DJEN June 29. Traffic-damages case. Dynamic-burden arguments were not reached for lack of prequestioning; no general rejection of dynamic burden inferred. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=29/06/2026&num_registro=202505052322"],["STJ AgInt no AREsp 2.860.050-MS","Further evidence can be refused where the court gives a supported reason that the documentary record suffices.","Fourth Panel, unanimous; virtual session October 7–13, 2025; judgment term October 13, acórdão dated October 15; DJEN October 17. Commodity-delivery damages context and limits on reexamining evidence. Not a universal bar on a defaulting defendant’s proof. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=17/10/2025&num_registro=202500489671"],["STJ AREsp 3.187.530-SP","In simple joinder, another defendant’s defense/evidence can benefit the defaulting party where facts are common.","Third Panel, unanimous; session May 26–June 1, 2026; judgment June 1; DJEN June 9. Consumer action disputing a payroll loan. Actual contract/biometric findings were not reweighed; no general authentication or banking-merits conclusion adopted. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=09/06/2026&num_registro=202600600158"]]},{"headers":["#","Named deferred family","Gateway reference/status","Exact next research action"],"index":4,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[]],"rows":[["#","Named deferred family","Gateway reference/status","Exact next research action"],["D15","Court/service/default/judgment/appeal beyond capacity","C027, C030; Deferred","Map CPC, local procedure, notice, default and appeal rules in a separate litigation review."]]},{"headers":["D15 component","PASS-19 result","Remaining gate"],"index":5,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["D15 component","PASS-19 result","Remaining gate"],["Default status","Art. 344 distinguished from hearing nonattendance and defective specific denial.","Actual answer trigger, service and representation."],["Factual effect","All art. 345 exceptions and common-fact qualification identified.","Actual allegations, instrument requirement and evidence."],["Late participation","Arts. 346, 349 and narrow later-allegation/just-cause boundaries identified.","Actual stage, authority, proof request and missed act."],["Proof management","Arts. 348, 370–374 and limited CDC burden rules read.","Actual burden order, evidence and consumer nexus."],["Early/partial judgment","Arts. 355–357 pathways identified.","Readiness, separability and remaining evidence."],["Reasons and amount","Arts. 489–493 and 509 gateway identified.","Actual judgment, lawful amount components and quantification."],["Finality limits","Main-issue finality separated from preliminary issues, reasons and facts.","Actual finality, party scope and procedural history."],["Service, reopening, appeals and enforcement","Not completed or imported from P18.","Separate focused passes."]]},{"headers":["Source ID","Issuer, title and full literal URL","Actual read, status, dates and limits"],"index":6,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Source ID","Issuer, title and full literal URL","Actual read, status, dates and limits"],["C_BR-P19-S001","Presidência da República, CPC, Lei 13.105/2015, current compiled text. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm — official parallel text also read: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105.htm","Fresh operative selected body. Arts. 9–11, 14, 72, 76, 103, 203, 216, 218–224, 239 caput/§1, 272, 320–324, 334–349, 355–357, 369–374, 487(I), 489–494, 502–509, 1045–1047 and 1054; footer. Original art.1045: one year after publication; DOU March17,2015. HTML, printed page/PDF index N/A. No complete service, appeal or enforcement read."],["S002","Presidência, CDC, Lei 8.078/1990, compiled. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8078compilado.htm","Fresh limited operative crossover. Arts.2–3,6(VIII),51(VI). Current consumer/burden boundary only. Original commencement not recalculated; no full contract/collection module. HTML; page/index N/A."],["S003","Presidência, Lei 15.479/2026. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15479.htm","Fresh enacted-future body. Arts.1–2,4/footer. DOU July30,2026; one-year delayed commencement. Support-enforcement/technical changes not applied as current default law. HTML; page/index N/A."],["S004","STF, Súmula 231 — official entry. https://portal.stf.jus.br/jurisprudencia/sumariosumulas.asp?base=30&sumula=4151","Fresh official súmula text. Timely appearance and evidence proposition; plenary approval December13,1963. Ordinary súmula, not binding-súmula certification. Underlying historical opinions not individually reopened. HTML; page/index N/A."],["S005","STJ, “Efeitos da revelia no processo civil: as alegações do autor, o silêncio do réu e a análise do juiz”. https://www.stj.jus.br/sites/portalp/Paginas/Comunicacao/Noticias/2022/04092022-Efeitos-da-revelia-no-processo-civil-as-alegacoes-do-autor--o-silencio-do-reu-e-a-analise-do-juiz.aspx","Fresh official explanatory overview, September4,2022. Selected general-default discussion and source discovery only; not a full judgment or current citator. Its unrelated enforcement examples were not adopted. HTML; page/index N/A."],["S006","STJ, AgInt no AREsp 3.196.447-SP, official full-judgment PDF. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=25/09/2026&num_registro=202600712462","Fresh selected full-judgment body. Fourth Panel unanimous; judgment September22,2026; DJEN September25. Ten PDF pages. Ementa/result zero-index0; reasoning3–4; session certificate8. Relevant screenshots inspected at0 and8. Printed folios not displayed on inspected pages. Relative presumption; contract/fact-reexamination limits preserved."],["S007","STJ, AREsp 3.137.657-SP, official full-judgment PDF. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=29/06/2026&num_registro=202505052322","Fresh selected full-judgment body. Third Panel unanimous; judgment June22,2026; DJEN June29. Ten pages. Ementa/result indices0–1; relevant reasons4–5; screenshots1 and4. Printed folios not displayed. Curator/general denial and weak proof; dynamic-burden argument not reached."],["S008","STJ, AgInt no AREsp 2.860.050-MS, official full-judgment PDF. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=17/10/2025&num_registro=202500489671","Fresh selected full-judgment body. Fourth Panel unanimous; session ended October13,2025; acórdão datedOctober15; DJENOctober17. Six pages. Relevant ementa/reasons indices0 and3, both visually inspected. Printed folios not displayed. Reasoned denial of unnecessary evidence; no universal exclusion of late evidence."],["S009","STJ, AREsp 3.187.530-SP, official full-judgment PDF. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=09/06/2026&num_registro=202600600158","Fresh selected full-judgment body. Third Panel unanimous; judgmentJune1,2026; DJENJune9. Thirteen pages. Ementa/result indices0–1; relevant reasons4–8; screenshots0 and8. Printed folios not displayed. Common-fact co-defendant defense; no general loan-validity or biometric-law conclusion."],["S010","STJ, older REsp 1.335.994 judgment route. https://www.stj.jus.br/websecstj/cgi/revista/REJ.cgi/ITA?CodOrgaoJgdr=&SeqCgrmaSessao=&dt=20140818&formato=HTML&nreg=201201558341&salvar=false&seq=1338290&tipo=0","Failed body:403. No substantive holding adopted from search/index text. Requested publication parameter August18,2014 is not a fresh body verification. Printed page/PDF index unknown."],["S011","STJ, official alternate for the same older judgment. https://processo.stj.jus.br/processo/revista/documento/mediado/?componente=ITA&data=20140818&formato=PDF&num_registro=201201558341&sequencial=1338290","Attempted official alternate; substantive body unread. Returned an HTML wrapper rather than the judgment. No repeated loop, hidden-endpoint substitution or security workaround. Printed page/PDF index unknown."],["S012","Presidência, Lei 15.484/2026. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15484.htm","Fresh amendment boundary. Arts.1–4,7/footer read to classify relevance. DOU extraAugust4,2026;30-day vacatio underart.7, operative by access. Concerns special-appeal relevance, not replacement of default arts.344–349. Full appellate implementation deferred. HTML; page/index N/A."]]},{"headers":["Claim","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification","Evidence"],"index":7,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Claim","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification","Evidence"],["C001","A098. CPC commencement and transition must be distinguished from publication/access; older proof and preliminary-issue finality rules have express transitions.","S001 arts.14,1045–1047,1054/footer."],["C002","A098. Lei15.479 is enacted-future at access and supplies no present ordinary-default rule here.","S003 arts.1–2,4."],["C003","A097. Default requires a proper procedural opportunity; service/representation prerequisites remain fact-dependent.","S001 arts.72,76,103,239."],["C004","A098. Failure to contest creates art.344 default status, distinct from its factual effect.","S001 art.344."],["C005","A098. Hearing nonattendance is not identical to failure to file contestation.","S001 arts.334–335,344."],["C006","A098. Ordinary contestation is15 procedural days with art.335’s alternative triggers.","S001 arts.219,335."],["C007","A098. Specific denial has art.341’s separate exceptions; it is not identical to complete default.","S001 art.341."],["C008","A098. Public defender, dativo and special curator are exempt from specific-denial burden; curator appointment has statutory predicates.","S001 arts.72,341 sole paragraph."],["C009","A098. Default presumption concerns facts, not automatic acceptance of legal conclusions or requested relief.","S001 arts.344–345; S006."],["C010","A098. One co-defendant’s contestation can prevent the art.344 effect under345(I).","S001 art.345(I)."],["C011","A098. Common facts/evidence can benefit the defaulted co-defendant; purely personal matters need separate analysis.","S009 indices0,4–8."],["C012","A098. Non-disposable rights exclude the factual effect; their legal classification must be established.","S001 art.345(II)."],["C013","A098. A legally indispensable proof instrument cannot be supplied by default.","S001 art.345(III)."],["C014","A098. Implausible allegations do not receive art.344’s factual effect.","S001 art.345(IV)."],["C015","A098. Allegations contradicted by evidence in the file do not receive that effect.","S001 art.345(IV)."],["C016","A098. The presumption is relative; default does not automatically produce success.","S006 indices0,3–4."],["C017","A098. Periods against an unrepresented defaulting defendant run from official publication under346.","S001 art.346 caput."],["C018","A098. Late defendant may intervene at any stage but receives the case as it stands.","S001 art.346 sole paragraph."],["C019","A097. Constitution of counsel changes representation/notice analysis but does not automatically revive expired steps.","S001 arts.103,272,346."],["C020","A098. Defaulting defendant may produce counter-evidence if represented in time for necessary procedural acts.","S001 art.349."],["C021","A098. Judge determines necessary proof and must explain rejection of useless/dilatory steps and evaluation of evidence.","S001 arts.370–371."],["C022","A098. STF Súmula231 recognizes timely evidence by the defaulting civil defendant.","S004 exact enunciado."],["C023","A098. Later allegations are confined by supervenience, ex-officio or express-law branches.","S001 art.342."],["C024","A098. Proven just cause can permit a missed act within a judicially fixed period, not an automatic restart.","S001 art.223."],["C025","A098. Without the default factual effect, claimant must specify evidence if not already identified;348 supplies no universal15-day period.","S001 arts.218,348."],["C026","A098. Claimant ordinarily proves constitutive facts.","S001 art.373(I)."],["C027","A098. Defendant ordinarily proves impeding, modifying or extinguishing facts.","S001 art.373(II)."],["C028","A098. Legally presumed facts can dispense with independent proof; this does not erase345 exceptions.","S001 arts.344–345,374."],["C029","A098. Dynamic burden allocation requires reasons, statutory difficulty/ease predicates, an opportunity to comply and no impossible new burden.","S001 art.373 §§1–2."],["C030","A098. Burden agreements cannot impair non-disposable rights or make exercise excessively difficult.","S001 art.373 §§3–4."],["C031","A098. CDC inversion favors a qualifying consumer under judicial plausibility or vulnerability predicates, not automatically from default.","S002 arts.2–3,6(VIII)."],["C032","A098. Contractual burden inversion detrimental to the consumer is invalid under the specified CDC provision.","S002 art.51(VI)."],["C033","A098. Applicable hearing/opportunity and no-surprise/reasoning duties remain.","S001 arts.9–11."],["C034","A098. Early merits judgment is available where further proof is unnecessary.","S001 art.355(I)."],["C035","A098. The default-specific early route requires status, factual effect and no qualifying349 evidence request.","S001 art.355(II)."],["C036","A098. Necessary evidence differs from an unconditional right to every requested item; reasoned denial can be valid.","S008 indices0,3."],["C037","A098. Saneamento resolves procedure and organizes facts, evidence, burden and legal issues.","S001 art.357 caput."],["C038","A098. Parties have a common5-day clarification/adjustment period; resulting stability is not merits res judicata.","S001 art.357 §1."],["C039","A098. Separable claims/parts can receive partial merits judgment if uncontested or immediately ready.","S001 art.356(I)–(II)."],["C040","A098. Partial merits decision can recognize liquid or unliquidated obligation.","S001 art.356 §1."],["C041","A098. Partial decisions have distinct liquidation/enforcement and challenge consequences; full procedure held.","S001 art.356 §§2–5."],["C042","A098. A partial merits decision is not identical to a sentence ending the entire cognitive phase.","S001 arts.203,356,487(I)."],["C043","A098. Sentence requires report, factual/legal reasons and dispositive conclusion.","S001 art.489 caput."],["C044","A098. Bare citation/paraphrase of a rule without case fit is inadequate.","S001 art.489 §1(I)."],["C045","A098. Indeterminate legal concepts require concrete explanation.","S001 art.489 §1(II)."],["C046","A098. Generic reasons capable of fitting any decision are inadequate.","S001 art.489 §1(III)."],["C047","A098. Reasons must address arguments capable of undermining the outcome.","S001 art.489 §1(IV)."],["C048","A098. Precedent use requires rationale/fit; departure from invoked authority requires distinction or overruling explanation.","S001 art.489 §1(V)–(VI)."],["C049","A098. Balancing conflicting norms requires stated criteria, reasons and factual premises.","S001 art.489 §2."],["C050","A098. Decision is interpreted as a whole and in good faith.","S001 art.489 §3."],["C051","A098. Money judgment ordinarily specifies extent, correction, interest, starting points and applicable capitalization.","S001 art.491 caput."],["C052","A098. Statutory inability/cost/delay exceptions allow later amount liquidation, not postponement of an unproved entitlement.","S001 art.491(I)–(II),§1; last distinction is inference with509."],["C053","A098. Valuation/common-procedure liquidation differs from pure arithmetic calculation.","S001 art.509(I)–(II),§2."],["C054","A098. Liquidation cannot reargue the decided dispute or alter the judgment.","S001 art.509 §4."],["C055","A098. Judgment cannot award different type, higher quantity or different object than demanded; it must be certain.","S001 art.492."],["C056","A098. Statutorily implicit accessories and qualifying continuing instalments limit simplistic face-amount comparisons.","S001 arts.322 §1,323."],["C057","A098. Default itself establishes no universal monetary penalty or legal interest rate.","Bounded reading of344–349 and491; underlying law held."],["C058","A098. Relevant supervening facts must be considered, with hearing if identified ex officio.","S001 art.493."],["C059","A098. Material res judicata concerns a merits decision no longer appealable.","S001 art.502."],["C060","A098. Total/partial main issue expressly decided can bind despite default.","S001 art.503 caput."],["C061","A098. Extended preliminary-issue finality requires effective prior contest and is expressly excluded in default, with other competence/proof/temporal limits.","S001 art.503 §§1–2;1054."],["C062","A098. Reasons and factual truth as foundations are not independently res judicata.","S001 art.504."],["C063","A098. Judgment binds the parties without prejudicing third parties.","S001 art.506."],["C064","A098. Procedural preclusion and final merits preclusion prevent an automatic new start for available omitted defenses.","S001 arts.507–508."],["C065","A098. Court may accept or reject the claim wholly or partly; default does not dictate outcome.","S001 arts.487(I),490; S006–S007."],["C066","A098. Post-publication alteration by original judge has494’s limits; appropriate challenge must be separately classified.","S001 art.494."],["C067","A098. Appeal, reopening, rescission, enforcement and actual challenge outcome remain deferred.","Scope boundary."],["C068","A098. The2026 curator/proof judgment supports the stated default exception; its dynamic-burden issue was not decided.","S007 indices0–1,4–5."],["C069","A098. Published authorities retain factual/admissibility limits; no repetitive-status, complete citator or temporal-modulation certification.","S004–S009."],["C070","A098. T01’s August24/25 endpoints depend on the stipulated hearing trigger, ordinary period and calendar.","S001 arts.219,224,335(I); fictional input."],["C071","A098. T02’s August10/11 endpoints concern357§1 adjustments, not appeal or merits finality.","S001 arts.219,224,357§1; fictional input."],["C072","A098. T03’s R$9,000/R$6,000 split assumes a separable ready component, not automatic default entitlement.","S001 arts.356,492; fictional input."],["C073","A097. Procedural knowledge does not confer legal-practice, collection, financial or provider permission.","Scope boundary; no licensing determination."],["C074","A098. Procedural day periods use business days and start/end rules with recess/closure qualifications.","S001 arts.216,219–224."],["C075","A098. No actual local calendar, order, case, contract, party or deadline was examined.","Research boundary."],["C076","A098. Currentness/private/local/foreign/component/country holds remain; no acceptance follows.","Scope and source limits."],["C077","A098. Lei15.484 was operative by access but concerns special appeals, not a new344–349 default rule.","S012 arts.1–4,7/footer."]]},{"headers":["Row","Required issue","Claim refs","Status; exact remaining fact or next action"],"index":8,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Row","Required issue","Claim refs","Status; exact remaining fact or next action"],["P19-G01","Ordinary common-procedure scope","C003–C006","Confirm actual action type; special procedures held."],["G02","Current CPC/transition","C001","Selected body read; actual case date and later consolidation required."],["G03","2026 displayed laws","C002,C077","Future/support and operative/appellate branches separated."],["G04","Valid opportunity to answer","C003","Actual service and trigger unexamined."],["G05","Capacity/representation","C003,C019","Actual appointment/mandate unknown."],["G06","Default status","C004","Establish absence of timely contestation."],["G07","Hearing nonattendance","C005","Do not equate with no answer."],["G08","Answer trigger","C006","Identify335 branch and order."],["G09","Procedural counting","C074","Actual calendar/privileges required."],["G10","Specific denial","C007","Compare defense as a whole and exceptions."],["G11","Curator/general denial","C008,C068","Verify lawful appointment and common facts."],["G12","Facts versus law","C009","No automatic legal entitlement."],["G13","Co-defendant answer","C010","Apply345(I)."],["G14","Common-fact limitation","C011","Separate common and personal matters."],["G15","Non-disposable right","C012","Identify governing substantive rule."],["G16","Mandatory instrument","C013","Identify law making it indispensable."],["G17","Implausibility","C014","Require reasoned record-based assessment."],["G18","Contrary evidence","C015","Examine complete file, not silence alone."],["G19","Relative presumption","C016","No automatic whole-claim success."],["G20","Unrepresented publication","C017","Obtain official publication and relevant act."],["G21","Counsel after appearance","C019","Obtain appointment/notification record."],["G22","Late intervention","C018","Existing procedural stage governs."],["G23","Timely counter-evidence","C020–C022","Necessary steps and relevance required."],["G24","Later allegations","C023","Apply342 predicates, not blanket reopening."],["G25","Just cause","C024","Prove external prevention and actual court decision."],["G26","Claimant specifies evidence","C025","Apply348 if not already specified."],["G27","348 response time","C025","No imported15days; inspect order/218."],["G28","Claimant burden","C026","Identify constitutive facts."],["G29","Defendant burden","C027","Identify impeding/modifying/extinguishing facts."],["G30","Legal presumptions","C028","Do not require redundant proof of every presumed fact."],["G31","Dynamic allocation","C029","Reasons, opportunity and feasibility required."],["G32","Burden agreement","C030","Check non-disposable rights/excessive difficulty."],["G33","Consumer nexus","C031","Final-recipient/supplier facts unknown."],["G34","Consumer inversion","C031","Judicial predicates required."],["G35","Detrimental contractual inversion","C032","Actual clause and consumer nexus required."],["G36","Non-surprise decision","C033","Actual opportunities and grounds unknown."],["G37","Early judgment355(I)","C034","Determine necessity of further evidence."],["G38","Default route355(II)","C035","All three predicates required."],["G39","Denial of evidence","C021,C036","Must be reasoned and relevance-specific."],["G40","Saneamento","C037","Obtain organized issues/burden order."],["G41","Five-day adjustment","C038","Valid intimation/calendar required."],["G42","Partial merits conditions","C039","Identify ready separable component."],["G43","Liquid/unliquid partial obligation","C040","Specify what is decided versus quantified later."],["G44","Partial decision consequences","C041","Full challenge/enforcement process held."],["G45","Partial versus final sentence","C042","Examine actual dispositive scope."],["G46","Essential judgment structure","C043","Read full sentence."],["G47","Bare statutory citation","C044","Check concrete application."],["G48","Abstract concepts","C045","Require fact-specific explanation."],["G49","Generic reasons","C046","Check whether reasoning fits this dispute."],["G50","Material arguments","C047","Identify arguments capable of changing outcome."],["G51","Precedent use/departure","C048","Identify rationale, fit, distinction or overruling."],["G52","Norm balancing","C049","Obtain criteria and factual premises."],["G53","Holistic interpretation","C050","Do not isolate one sentence from full reasons."],["G54","Monetary terms","C051","Actual legal rate/index/starts unknown."],["G55","Liquidation exception","C052","Distinguish missing liability from missing amount."],["G56","Valuation versus arithmetic","C053","Classify required quantification."],["G57","No merits reopening in liquidation","C054","Preserve judgment’s limits."],["G58","Requested-relief ceiling/type","C055","Compare petition and dispositive order."],["G59","Implicit accessories","C056","Determine valid statutory components."],["G60","Continuing instalments","C056","Apply323 to actual periodic obligation."],["G61","No automatic default rate/penalty","C057","Separate legal/contractual basis required."],["G62","Supervening fact","C058","Establish relevance and hearing."],["G63","Main-issue finality","C059–C060","Actual no-further-appeal status unknown."],["G64","Preliminary-issue finality","C061","Revelia exclusion and temporal limits preserved."],["G65","Reasons/facts outside separate finality","C062","Distinguish foundation from dispositive issue."],["G66","Parties/third parties","C063","Actual subjective scope required."],["G67","Preclusion","C064","No automatic repeat litigation."],["G68","Challenge boundary","C066–C067","Separate remedy/appeal research required."],["G69","Court-authority limits","C069","No exhaustive citator or binding-status expansion."],["G70","Possible claimant loss","C065,C068","Apply actual burden and file."],["G71","H01 unanswered claim","C003–C016","Conditional workflow complete; private facts absent."],["G72","H02 co-defendant","C010–C011","Conditional workflow complete."],["G73","H03 non-disposable right","C012,C025","Conditional workflow complete."],["G74","H04 missing instrument","C013","Conditional workflow complete."],["G75","H05 implausibility/contradiction","C014–C016","Conditional workflow complete."],["G76","H06 late appearance","C017–C024","Conditional workflow complete."],["G77","H07 timely evidence","C020–C022","Conditional workflow complete."],["G78","H08 unproven amount","C051–C054","Conditional workflow complete."],["G79","H09 weak claimant proof","C025–C029,C068","Conditional workflow complete."],["G80","H10 excess relief","C055–C057","Conditional workflow complete."],["G81","H11 partial judgment","C039–C042","Conditional workflow complete."],["G82","H12 missing reasons","C043–C050","Conditional workflow complete."],["G83","T01 answer calculation","C070,C074","Hypothetical calendar only."],["G84","T02 saneamento calculation","C071,C074","Not an appeal calculation."],["G85","T03 monetary partition","C072","Not an amount owed or awarded."],["G86","P01 D15 crosswalk","Preserved record","Only default/judgment gateway augmented."],["G87","State/DF/local procedure","C075","All27 branches unexamined."],["G88","Actual private records","C075","None obtained or classified."],["G89","Provider/professional permission","C073","Separate; no authority conferred."],["G90","Publication/component/country status","C076","HOLD; separate review required."]]},{"headers":["Row","Deferred family","Exact next action"],"index":9,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Row","Deferred family","Exact next action"],["P19-D01","Commencement, citation and CNJ service","P18 remains unreviewed; independently establish actual service before applying default."],["D02","Defective-service reopening","Identify procedural posture and proper challenge; no automatic remedy."],["D03","Rescisória, querela nullitatis and post-finality attacks","Research exact grounds, standing, periods and jurisdiction separately."],["D04","Appeals and appellate admissibility","Read applicable appeal route, current2026 provisions and actual decision."],["D05","Cumprimento, execution and collection of judgment","Separate enforcement pass; no attachment or payment command inferred."],["D06","Full liquidation, expert evidence and associated fees","Determine actual quantitative issue and method."],["D07","Juizados and small-claims default","Read special-law attendance, representation and judgment rules."],["D08","Monitória and executive-title proceedings","Classify initiating title and special opposition rules."],["D09","Public, tax, family and support claims","Apply distinct rights, party and procedural regimes."],["D10","Superendividamento and creditor nonappearance","Separate statutory consumer-procedure inquiry."],["D11","Insolvency, recuperação and falência","Identify stay, participation, claim and judgment effects."],["D12","Consumer contract, fees and cancellation","P04 unreviewed; no merits adoption."],["D13","Prescription and substantive default","P05 unreviewed; no debt-clock conclusion."],["D14","Payment, release, assignment and ownership","Obtain actual instruments; no P09 or assignment-premise import."],["D15","Collection communications","P10 unreviewed; distinguish creditor conduct from court procedure."],["D16","Privacy, negative/positive reporting and scores","P08 and sector modules remain separate."],["D17","Surety, solidary liability and substantive joinder","P16 unreviewed; procedural co-defense does not establish substantive liability."],["D18","Provider, OAB, financial and payment permission","Separate actor/activity authorization."],["D19","Security, property and homestead","Separate title, guarantee and attachment analysis."],["D20","Filing fees, legal aid and cost awards","Read competent court schedule and actual order."],["D21","Local forms, calendars and digital implementation","Read the actual court’s operative instruments."],["D22","Foreign law, service, recognition and language/accessibility","No foreign procedural premise adopted."],["D23","Private records and exhaustive judicial citator","No actual case lookup; later authority check required before reliance."],["D24","Later amendments, publication and country/parent acceptance","Preserve all A066/A097/A098/component/local/country holds."]]},{"headers":["State/DF","Local read status","Exact remaining question"],"index":10,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["State/DF","Local read status","Exact remaining question"],["Acre (AC)","No local operative body read.","TJAC/default practice, evidence orders, forms, fees and calendar."],["Alagoas (AL)","No local operative body read.","TJAL procedural implementation, publication and holiday rules."],["Amapá (AP)","No local operative body read.","TJAP evidence scheduling, digital notices and forms."],["Amazonas (AM)","No local operative body read.","TJAM remote participation, calendar and fee implementation."],["Bahia (BA)","No local operative body read.","TJBA default/evidence procedure, court closures and forms."],["Ceará (CE)","No local operative body read.","TJCE saneamento, publication, fees and calendar."],["Distrito Federal (DF)","No local operative body read.","TJDFT actual orders, forms, local calendar and fee rules."],["Espírito Santo (ES)","No local operative body read.","TJES publication, evidence management and procedural calendars."],["Goiás (GO)","No local operative body read.","TJGO digital procedure, default practices and forms."],["Maranhão (MA)","No local operative body read.","TJMA access, evidence scheduling and court calendar."],["Mato Grosso (MT)","No local operative body read.","TJMT local deadlines, publication and fees."],["Mato Grosso do Sul (MS)","No local operative body read.","TJMS rules; the published STJ authority is not a local implementation audit."],["Minas Gerais (MG)","No local operative body read.","TJMG evidence orders, forms and holiday calendar."],["Pará (PA)","No local operative body read.","TJPA remote access, evidence and local court calendar."],["Paraíba (PB)","No local operative body read.","TJPB digital procedure, notices and fee schedule."],["Paraná (PR)","No local operative body read.","TJPR case-management, publication and closure rules."],["Pernambuco (PE)","No local operative body read.","TJPE saneamento, forms, fees and holidays."],["Piauí (PI)","No local operative body read.","TJPI evidence scheduling, accessibility and calendar."],["Rio de Janeiro (RJ)","No local operative body read.","TJRJ default/evidence implementation and local publications."],["Rio Grande do Norte (RN)","No local operative body read.","TJRN court orders, forms and calendar."],["Rio Grande do Sul (RS)","No local operative body read.","TJRS case-management and current local implementation."],["Rondônia (RO)","No local operative body read.","TJRO remote participation, fee and calendar rules."],["Roraima (RR)","No local operative body read.","TJRR access, language needs, forms and holidays."],["Santa Catarina (SC)","No local operative body read.","TJSC evidence, publication and deadline implementation."],["São Paulo (SP)","No local operative body read.","TJSP rules; STJ discussion of SP cases does not clear local procedure."],["Sergipe (SE)","No local operative body read.","TJSE forms, costs, evidence and calendar."],["Tocantins (TO)","No local operative body read.","TJTO digital procedure, access and court closures."]]},{"headers":["Article/checklist/conditional-tool specification","Supported use","Publication guardrail"],"index":11,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Article/checklist/conditional-tool specification","Supported use","Publication guardrail"],["“Default is not an automatic win”","Separate status, factual effect, legal entitlement and amount.","Do not imply that default has no consequences."],["Art.345 exception checklist","Co-defendant/common facts, non-disposable rights, indispensable instrument, implausibility and contradiction.","Require the actual law and file; no checkbox outcome."],["Late-participation map","Existing stage, counsel, timely evidence, supervening facts and just cause.","No promise that an expired defense period restarts."],["Judgment-readiness worksheet","Separate355(I),355(II),356 and357.","Default alone does not prove readiness of every component."],["Money-judgment audit","Relief requested, implicit components, legal rate/index, extent and liquidation basis.","No invented penalty, interest rate or actual award."],["Finality-boundary explainer","Main claim versus preliminary issue, reasons, factual findings and third parties.","No generic reopening or appeal advice."]]},{"headers":["Item","Actual result"],"index":12,"links":[],"row_links":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]],"rows":[["Item","Actual result"],["Assigned component","P01 D15 revelia/default and ensuing judgment gateway only."],["Prior unreviewed reports used as premises","None."],["Source-register rows","12."],["Successfully read source rows","10: four statutes, STF entry, STJ overview, four judgment PDFs."],["Failed/substantively unread routes","2, concerning one older judgment; no holding adopted from them."],["Atomic claims","77, C_BR-P19-C001–C077."],["Core coverage","90, P19-G01–G90."],["Deferred families","24, P19-D01–D24."],["Territorial rows","27."],["Total coverage rows","141: 90 core +24 deferred +27 territorial."],["Fictional workflows","12."],["Conditional calculations","3."],["P01 crosswalk","9 logical items and9 physical data rows."],["Judicial qualification comparison","5 rows, not counted as coverage or additional sources."],["Opportunity table","6 rows, not counted as coverage."],["Self-check table","26 rows, not counted as substantive coverage."],["PDF inspection","Relevant pages of all four relied STJ judgment PDFs visually inspected; printed folios not invented."],["Currentness","Selected current compilation and displayed2026 amendments checked; no exhaustive all-law certification."],["Local calendar, fee, form or actual order","None checked."],["Actual deadline, debt, award or finality","None determined."],["Named/private party, docket or account lookup","None; only generic officially published authorities were read."],["External action or coordinator-file write","None."],["API, hidden endpoint, security bypass, new chat or subagent","None."],["Source-opening clocks","Unknown; no fabricated session window."],["Review/acceptance","No independent-review, all-source, provider, locality, component, parent or country acceptance."]]}],"claims":[{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C001","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C001","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. CPC commencement and transition must be distinguished from publication/access; older proof and preliminary-issue finality rules have express transitions.","Evidence":"S001 arts.14,1045–1047,1054/footer."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C001","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C002","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C002","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Lei15.479 is enacted-future at access and supplies no present ordinary-default rule here.","Evidence":"S003 arts.1–2,4."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"validation_only_RQ001_current_amendment_body_blocked","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C002","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"validation_only_RQ001_current_amendment_body_blocked","validation_only_question_ids":["C_BR-P19-RQ001"],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C003","area_numbers":[97],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C003","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A097. Default requires a proper procedural opportunity; service/representation prerequisites remain fact-dependent.","Evidence":"S001 arts.72,76,103,239."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C003","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C004","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C004","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Failure to contest creates art.344 default status, distinct from its factual effect.","Evidence":"S001 art.344."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C004","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C005","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C005","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Hearing nonattendance is not identical to failure to file contestation.","Evidence":"S001 arts.334–335,344."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C005","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C006","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C006","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Ordinary contestation is15 procedural days with art.335’s alternative triggers.","Evidence":"S001 arts.219,335."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C006","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C007","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C007","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Specific denial has art.341’s separate exceptions; it is not identical to complete default.","Evidence":"S001 art.341."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C007","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C008","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C008","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Public defender, dativo and special curator are exempt from specific-denial burden; curator appointment has statutory predicates.","Evidence":"S001 arts.72,341 sole paragraph."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C008","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C009","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C009","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Default presumption concerns facts, not automatic acceptance of legal conclusions or requested relief.","Evidence":"S001 arts.344–345; S006."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C009","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C010","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C010","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. One co-defendant’s contestation can prevent the art.344 effect under345(I).","Evidence":"S001 art.345(I)."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C010","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C011","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C011","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Common facts/evidence can benefit the defaulted co-defendant; purely personal matters need separate analysis.","Evidence":"S009 indices0,4–8."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C011","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C012","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C012","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Non-disposable rights exclude the factual effect; their legal classification must be established.","Evidence":"S001 art.345(II)."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C012","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C013","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C013","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. A legally indispensable proof instrument cannot be supplied by default.","Evidence":"S001 art.345(III)."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C013","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C014","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C014","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Implausible allegations do not receive art.344’s factual effect.","Evidence":"S001 art.345(IV)."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C014","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C015","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C015","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Allegations contradicted by evidence in the file do not receive that effect.","Evidence":"S001 art.345(IV)."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C015","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C016","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C016","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. The presumption is relative; default does not automatically produce success.","Evidence":"S006 indices0,3–4."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C016","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C017","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C017","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Periods against an unrepresented defaulting defendant run from official publication under346.","Evidence":"S001 art.346 caput."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C017","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C018","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C018","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Late defendant may intervene at any stage but receives the case as it stands.","Evidence":"S001 art.346 sole paragraph."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C018","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C019","area_numbers":[97],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C019","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A097. Constitution of counsel changes representation/notice analysis but does not automatically revive expired steps.","Evidence":"S001 arts.103,272,346."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C019","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C020","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C020","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Defaulting defendant may produce counter-evidence if represented in time for necessary procedural acts.","Evidence":"S001 art.349."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C020","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C021","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C021","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Judge determines necessary proof and must explain rejection of useless/dilatory steps and evaluation of evidence.","Evidence":"S001 arts.370–371."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C021","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C022","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C022","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. STF Súmula231 recognizes timely evidence by the defaulting civil defendant.","Evidence":"S004 exact enunciado."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C022","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C023","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C023","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Later allegations are confined by supervenience, ex-officio or express-law branches.","Evidence":"S001 art.342."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C023","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C024","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C024","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Proven just cause can permit a missed act within a judicially fixed period, not an automatic restart.","Evidence":"S001 art.223."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C024","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C025","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C025","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Without the default factual effect, claimant must specify evidence if not already identified;348 supplies no universal15-day period.","Evidence":"S001 arts.218,348."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C025","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C026","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C026","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Claimant ordinarily proves constitutive facts.","Evidence":"S001 art.373(I)."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C026","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C027","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C027","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Defendant ordinarily proves impeding, modifying or extinguishing facts.","Evidence":"S001 art.373(II)."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C027","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C028","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C028","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Legally presumed facts can dispense with independent proof; this does not erase345 exceptions.","Evidence":"S001 arts.344–345,374."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C028","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C029","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C029","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Dynamic burden allocation requires reasons, statutory difficulty/ease predicates, an opportunity to comply and no impossible new burden.","Evidence":"S001 art.373 §§1–2."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C029","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C030","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C030","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Burden agreements cannot impair non-disposable rights or make exercise excessively difficult.","Evidence":"S001 art.373 §§3–4."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C030","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C031","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C031","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. CDC inversion favors a qualifying consumer under judicial plausibility or vulnerability predicates, not automatically from default.","Evidence":"S002 arts.2–3,6(VIII)."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C031","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C032","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C032","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Contractual burden inversion detrimental to the consumer is invalid under the specified CDC provision.","Evidence":"S002 art.51(VI)."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C032","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C033","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C033","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Applicable hearing/opportunity and no-surprise/reasoning duties remain.","Evidence":"S001 arts.9–11."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C033","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C034","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C034","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Early merits judgment is available where further proof is unnecessary.","Evidence":"S001 art.355(I)."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C034","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C035","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C035","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. The default-specific early route requires status, factual effect and no qualifying349 evidence request.","Evidence":"S001 art.355(II)."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C035","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C036","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C036","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Necessary evidence differs from an unconditional right to every requested item; reasoned denial can be valid.","Evidence":"S008 indices0,3."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C036","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C037","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C037","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Saneamento resolves procedure and organizes facts, evidence, burden and legal issues.","Evidence":"S001 art.357 caput."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C037","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C038","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C038","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Parties have a common5-day clarification/adjustment period; resulting stability is not merits res judicata.","Evidence":"S001 art.357 §1."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C038","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C039","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C039","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Separable claims/parts can receive partial merits judgment if uncontested or immediately ready.","Evidence":"S001 art.356(I)–(II)."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C039","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C040","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C040","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Partial merits decision can recognize liquid or unliquidated obligation.","Evidence":"S001 art.356 §1."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C040","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C041","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C041","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Partial decisions have distinct liquidation/enforcement and challenge consequences; full procedure held.","Evidence":"S001 art.356 §§2–5."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C041","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C042","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C042","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. A partial merits decision is not identical to a sentence ending the entire cognitive phase.","Evidence":"S001 arts.203,356,487(I)."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C042","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C043","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C043","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Sentence requires report, factual/legal reasons and dispositive conclusion.","Evidence":"S001 art.489 caput."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C043","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C044","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C044","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Bare citation/paraphrase of a rule without case fit is inadequate.","Evidence":"S001 art.489 §1(I)."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C044","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C045","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C045","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Indeterminate legal concepts require concrete explanation.","Evidence":"S001 art.489 §1(II)."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C045","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C046","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C046","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Generic reasons capable of fitting any decision are inadequate.","Evidence":"S001 art.489 §1(III)."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C046","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C047","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C047","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Reasons must address arguments capable of undermining the outcome.","Evidence":"S001 art.489 §1(IV)."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C047","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C048","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C048","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Precedent use requires rationale/fit; departure from invoked authority requires distinction or overruling explanation.","Evidence":"S001 art.489 §1(V)–(VI)."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C048","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C049","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C049","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Balancing conflicting norms requires stated criteria, reasons and factual premises.","Evidence":"S001 art.489 §2."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C049","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C050","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C050","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Decision is interpreted as a whole and in good faith.","Evidence":"S001 art.489 §3."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C050","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C051","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C051","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Money judgment ordinarily specifies extent, correction, interest, starting points and applicable capitalization.","Evidence":"S001 art.491 caput."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C051","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C052","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C052","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Statutory inability/cost/delay exceptions allow later amount liquidation, not postponement of an unproved entitlement.","Evidence":"S001 art.491(I)–(II),§1; last distinction is inference with509."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C052","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C053","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C053","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Valuation/common-procedure liquidation differs from pure arithmetic calculation.","Evidence":"S001 art.509(I)–(II),§2."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C053","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C054","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C054","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Liquidation cannot reargue the decided dispute or alter the judgment.","Evidence":"S001 art.509 §4."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C054","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C055","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C055","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Judgment cannot award different type, higher quantity or different object than demanded; it must be certain.","Evidence":"S001 art.492."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C055","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C056","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C056","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Statutorily implicit accessories and qualifying continuing instalments limit simplistic face-amount comparisons.","Evidence":"S001 arts.322 §1,323."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C056","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C057","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C057","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Default itself establishes no universal monetary penalty or legal interest rate.","Evidence":"Bounded reading of344–349 and491; underlying law held."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C057","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C058","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C058","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Relevant supervening facts must be considered, with hearing if identified ex officio.","Evidence":"S001 art.493."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C058","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C059","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C059","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Material res judicata concerns a merits decision no longer appealable.","Evidence":"S001 art.502."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C059","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C060","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C060","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Total/partial main issue expressly decided can bind despite default.","Evidence":"S001 art.503 caput."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C060","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C061","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C061","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Extended preliminary-issue finality requires effective prior contest and is expressly excluded in default, with other competence/proof/temporal limits.","Evidence":"S001 art.503 §§1–2;1054."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C061","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C062","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C062","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Reasons and factual truth as foundations are not independently res judicata.","Evidence":"S001 art.504."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C062","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C063","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C063","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Judgment binds the parties without prejudicing third parties.","Evidence":"S001 art.506."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C063","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C064","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C064","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Procedural preclusion and final merits preclusion prevent an automatic new start for available omitted defenses.","Evidence":"S001 arts.507–508."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C064","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C065","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C065","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Court may accept or reject the claim wholly or partly; default does not dictate outcome.","Evidence":"S001 arts.487(I),490; S006–S007."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C065","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C066","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C066","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Post-publication alteration by original judge has494’s limits; appropriate challenge must be separately classified.","Evidence":"S001 art.494."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C066","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C067","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C067","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Appeal, reopening, rescission, enforcement and actual challenge outcome remain deferred.","Evidence":"Scope boundary."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"scope_method_hold_reconciled; not legalpermission_or_actualoutcome","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C067","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"scope_method_hold_reconciled; not legalpermission_or_actualoutcome","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C068","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C068","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. The2026 curator/proof judgment supports the stated default exception; its dynamic-burden issue was not decided.","Evidence":"S007 indices0–1,4–5."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C068","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C069","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C069","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Published authorities retain factual/admissibility limits; no repetitive-status, complete citator or temporal-modulation certification.","Evidence":"S004–S009."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C069","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"selected_published_authority_corroboration_only; statutory_currentness_and_private_application_held","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C070","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C070","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. T01’s August24/25 endpoints depend on the stipulated hearing trigger, ordinary period and calendar.","Evidence":"S001 arts.219,224,335(I); fictional input."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"supplied_calendar_or_scalar_checked; legalpremises_and_local_application_held","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C070","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"supplied_calendar_or_scalar_checked; legalpremises_and_local_application_held","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C071","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C071","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. T02’s August10/11 endpoints concern357§1 adjustments, not appeal or merits finality.","Evidence":"S001 arts.219,224,357§1; fictional input."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"supplied_calendar_or_scalar_checked; legalpremises_and_local_application_held","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C071","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"supplied_calendar_or_scalar_checked; legalpremises_and_local_application_held","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C072","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C072","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. T03’s R$9,000/R$6,000 split assumes a separable ready component, not automatic default entitlement.","Evidence":"S001 arts.356,492; fictional input."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"supplied_calendar_or_scalar_checked; legalpremises_and_local_application_held","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C072","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"supplied_calendar_or_scalar_checked; legalpremises_and_local_application_held","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C073","area_numbers":[97],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C073","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A097. Procedural knowledge does not confer legal-practice, collection, financial or provider permission.","Evidence":"Scope boundary; no licensing determination."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"scope_method_hold_reconciled; not legalpermission_or_actualoutcome","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C073","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"scope_method_hold_reconciled; not legalpermission_or_actualoutcome","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C074","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C074","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Procedural day periods use business days and start/end rules with recess/closure qualifications.","Evidence":"S001 arts.216,219–224."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C074","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"read_and_reconciled; current_CPC_or_CDC_primarybody_unavailable; no all-claim_merits_acceptance","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C075","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C075","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. No actual local calendar, order, case, contract, party or deadline was examined.","Evidence":"Research boundary."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"scope_method_hold_reconciled; not legalpermission_or_actualoutcome","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C075","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"scope_method_hold_reconciled; not legalpermission_or_actualoutcome","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C076","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C076","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Currentness/private/local/foreign/component/country holds remain; no acceptance follows.","Evidence":"Scope and source limits."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"scope_method_hold_reconciled; not legalpermission_or_actualoutcome","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C076","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"scope_method_hold_reconciled; not legalpermission_or_actualoutcome","validation_only_question_ids":[],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}},{"claim_id":"C_BR-P19-C077","area_numbers":[98],"area_assignment_method":"literal_atomic_A097_or_A098_label; coordinator mechanical mapping, not acceptance","researcher_record":{"Claim":"C077","Area; atomic proposition and retained qualification":"A098. Lei15.484 was operative by access but concerns special appeals, not a new344–349 default rule.","Evidence":"S012 arts.1–4,7/footer."},"raw_table_index":7,"coordinator_verification_status":"validation_only_RQ001_current_amendment_body_blocked","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-C077","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","disposition":"validation_only_RQ001_current_amendment_body_blocked","validation_only_question_ids":["C_BR-P19-RQ001"],"original_record_unchanged":true,"full_reconciliation":"[internal evidence reference]"}}],"sources":[{"source_id":"C_BR-P19-S001","urls":["https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm","https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105.htm"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"C_BR-P19-S001","Issuer, title and full literal URL":"Presidência da República, CPC, Lei 13.105/2015, current compiled text. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105compilada.htm — official parallel text also read: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105.htm","Actual read, status, dates and limits":"Fresh operative selected body. Arts. 9–11, 14, 72, 76, 103, 203, 216, 218–224, 239 caput/§1, 272, 320–324, 334–349, 355–357, 369–374, 487(I), 489–494, 502–509, 1045–1047 and 1054; footer. Original art.1045: one year after publication; DOU March17,2015. HTML, printed page/PDF index N/A. No complete service, appeal or enforcement read."},"coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_literal_access_block","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-S001","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","note":"CompiledCPCblockedonce; parallelCPCpath notattempted afterblock. No current344-349 or related fullstatutorybody certification; selected judicialquotationsdo not substitute completebody.","all_source_or_currentness_accepted":false,"original_record_unchanged":true}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S002","urls":["https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8078compilado.htm"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S002","Issuer, title and full literal URL":"Presidência, CDC, Lei 8.078/1990, compiled. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8078compilado.htm","Actual read, status, dates and limits":"Fresh limited operative crossover. Arts.2–3,6(VIII),51(VI). Current consumer/burden boundary only. Original commencement not recalculated; no full contract/collection module. HTML; page/index N/A."},"coordinator_verification_status":"inherited_CDC_block_not_retried","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-S002","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","note":"ExactCDCURLblocked inBR4; completeunchangedfailurepacketcopy/readboundpreserved. Original2-3/6VIII/51VIreadsremain researcherattribution.","all_source_or_currentness_accepted":false,"original_record_unchanged":true}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S003","urls":["https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15479.htm"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S003","Issuer, title and full literal URL":"Presidência, Lei 15.479/2026. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15479.htm","Actual read, status, dates and limits":"Fresh enacted-future body. Arts.1–2,4/footer. DOU July30,2026; one-year delayed commencement. Support-enforcement/technical changes not applied as current default law. HTML; page/index N/A."},"coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_literal_access_block","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-S003","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","note":"Lei15479literalURLblockedonce. Future/status/commencementdescription unverified here; RQ001noterrorfinding.","all_source_or_currentness_accepted":false,"original_record_unchanged":true}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S004","urls":["https://portal.stf.jus.br/jurisprudencia/sumariosumulas.asp?base=30&sumula=4151"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S004","Issuer, title and full literal URL":"STF, Súmula 231 — official entry. https://portal.stf.jus.br/jurisprudencia/sumariosumulas.asp?base=30&sumula=4151","Actual read, status, dates and limits":"Fresh official súmula text. Timely appearance and evidence proposition; plenary approval December13,1963. Ordinary súmula, not binding-súmula certification. Underlying historical opinions not individually reopened. HTML; page/index N/A."},"coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_selected_official_sumula","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-S004","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","note":"Officialenunciadoand13December1963approvalread. Timelycivildefaultevidence proposition supported. Ordinarysúmula; excerpted historicaljudgments notfullreopenings.","all_source_or_currentness_accepted":false,"original_record_unchanged":true}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S005","urls":["https://www.stj.jus.br/sites/portalp/Paginas/Comunicacao/Noticias/2022/04092022-Efeitos-da-revelia-no-processo-civil-as-alegacoes-do-autor--o-silencio-do-reu-e-a-analise-do-juiz.aspx"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S005","Issuer, title and full literal URL":"STJ, “Efeitos da revelia no processo civil: as alegações do autor, o silêncio do réu e a análise do juiz”. https://www.stj.jus.br/sites/portalp/Paginas/Comunicacao/Noticias/2022/04092022-Efeitos-da-revelia-no-processo-civil-as-alegacoes-do-autor--o-silencio-do-reu-e-a-analise-do-juiz.aspx","Actual read, status, dates and limits":"Fresh official explanatory overview, September4,2022. Selected general-default discussion and source discovery only; not a full judgment or current citator. Its unrelated enforcement examples were not adopted. HTML; page/index N/A."},"coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_official_explanation_not_full_judgment","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-S005","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","note":"2022STJoverviewread, directsupportforrelativefactualpresumption and lateparticipationdiscussion. Editorial source role preserved, no linkedjudgment/CPCbody upgrade.","all_source_or_currentness_accepted":false,"original_record_unchanged":true}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S006","urls":["https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=25/09/2026&num_registro=202600712462"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S006","Issuer, title and full literal URL":"STJ, AgInt no AREsp 3.196.447-SP, official full-judgment PDF. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=25/09/2026&num_registro=202600712462","Actual read, status, dates and limits":"Fresh selected full-judgment body. Fourth Panel unanimous; judgment September22,2026; DJEN September25. Ten PDF pages. Ementa/result zero-index0; reasoning3–4; session certificate8. Relevant screenshots inspected at0 and8. Printed folios not displayed on inspected pages. Relative presumption; contract/fact-reexamination limits preserved."},"coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_selected_published_judgment_parsed_text","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-S006","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","note":"FourthPanelunanimous,22September2026judgment/25SeptemberDJEN. Relativeeffect/currentfileassessment and5/7reviewlimits corroborated; selected ownreason122-125andquotedcontext. No consortium/privatefactsgeneralization.","all_source_or_currentness_accepted":false,"original_record_unchanged":true}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S007","urls":["https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=29/06/2026&num_registro=202505052322"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S007","Issuer, title and full literal URL":"STJ, AREsp 3.137.657-SP, official full-judgment PDF. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=29/06/2026&num_registro=202505052322","Actual read, status, dates and limits":"Fresh selected full-judgment body. Third Panel unanimous; judgment June22,2026; DJEN June29. Ten pages. Ementa/result indices0–1; relevant reasons4–5; screenshots1 and4. Printed folios not displayed. Curator/general denial and weak proof; dynamic-burden argument not reached."},"coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_selected_published_judgment_parsed_text","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-S007","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","note":"ThirdPanelunanimous22June2026/29JuneDJEN. Curator/generaldenial,commondefenseandweakproofcontext corroborated; dynamicburdennotreached forlackprequestioning. No generalrejection ofburdenshifting.","all_source_or_currentness_accepted":false,"original_record_unchanged":true}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S008","urls":["https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=17/10/2025&num_registro=202500489671"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S008","Issuer, title and full literal URL":"STJ, AgInt no AREsp 2.860.050-MS, official full-judgment PDF. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=17/10/2025&num_registro=202500489671","Actual read, status, dates and limits":"Fresh selected full-judgment body. Fourth Panel unanimous; session ended October13,2025; acórdão datedOctober15; DJENOctober17. Six pages. Relevant ementa/reasons indices0 and3, both visually inspected. Printed folios not displayed. Reasoned denial of unnecessary evidence; no universal exclusion of late evidence."},"coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_selected_published_judgment_parsed_text","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-S008","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","note":"FourthPanelunanimous7-13October2025session; dated15Octoberacórdão/17OctoberDJEN. Reasonednecessity/sufficiency and7reviewlimit corroborated. No blanketbar on timelycounterevidence.","all_source_or_currentness_accepted":false,"original_record_unchanged":true}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S009","urls":["https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=09/06/2026&num_registro=202600600158"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S009","Issuer, title and full literal URL":"STJ, AREsp 3.187.530-SP, official full-judgment PDF. https://scon.stj.jus.br/SCON/GetInteiroTeorDoAcordao?dt_publicacao=09/06/2026&num_registro=202600600158","Actual read, status, dates and limits":"Fresh selected full-judgment body. Third Panel unanimous; judgmentJune1,2026; DJENJune9. Thirteen pages. Ementa/result indices0–1; relevant reasons4–8; screenshots0 and8. Printed folios not displayed. Common-fact co-defendant defense; no general loan-validity or biometric-law conclusion."},"coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_selected_published_judgment_parsed_text","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-S009","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","note":"ThirdPanelunanimous1June2026/9JuneDJEN. Commonfacts/evidence in simplejoinder supported; sourcequotes345I. Merits/biometricsnotreweighed, no authentication/provider inference.","all_source_or_currentness_accepted":false,"original_record_unchanged":true}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S010","urls":["https://www.stj.jus.br/websecstj/cgi/revista/REJ.cgi/ITA?CodOrgaoJgdr=&SeqCgrmaSessao=&dt=20140818&formato=HTML&nreg=201201558341&salvar=false&seq=1338290&tipo=0"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S010","Issuer, title and full literal URL":"STJ, older REsp 1.335.994 judgment route. https://www.stj.jus.br/websecstj/cgi/revista/REJ.cgi/ITA?CodOrgaoJgdr=&SeqCgrmaSessao=&dt=20140818&formato=HTML&nreg=201201558341&salvar=false&seq=1338290&tipo=0","Actual read, status, dates and limits":"Failed body:403. No substantive holding adopted from search/index text. Requested publication parameter August18,2014 is not a fresh body verification. Printed page/PDF index unknown."},"coordinator_verification_status":"prior_failed_judgment_route_not_retried","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-S010","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","note":"Original403olderjudgmentroutepreserved. Not reopened orusedasfreshholding.","all_source_or_currentness_accepted":false,"original_record_unchanged":true}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S011","urls":["https://processo.stj.jus.br/processo/revista/documento/mediado/?componente=ITA&data=20140818&formato=PDF&num_registro=201201558341&sequencial=1338290"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S011","Issuer, title and full literal URL":"STJ, official alternate for the same older judgment. https://processo.stj.jus.br/processo/revista/documento/mediado/?componente=ITA&data=20140818&formato=PDF&num_registro=201201558341&sequencial=1338290","Actual read, status, dates and limits":"Attempted official alternate; substantive body unread. Returned an HTML wrapper rather than the judgment. No repeated loop, hidden-endpoint substitution or security workaround. Printed page/PDF index unknown."},"coordinator_verification_status":"prior_wrapper_without_body_not_retried","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-S011","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","note":"Originalofficialalternatewrapper notsubstantivejudgment; no alternatequery/hostroute attempted.","all_source_or_currentness_accepted":false,"original_record_unchanged":true}},{"source_id":"C_BR-S012","urls":["https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15484.htm"],"researcher_record":{"Source ID":"S012","Issuer, title and full literal URL":"Presidência, Lei 15.484/2026. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15484.htm","Actual read, status, dates and limits":"Fresh amendment boundary. Arts.1–4,7/footer read to classify relevance. DOU extraAugust4,2026;30-day vacatio underart.7, operative by access. Concerns special-appeal relevance, not replacement of default arts.344–349. Full appellate implementation deferred. HTML; page/index N/A."},"coordinator_verification_status":"fresh_literal_access_block","id_normalization":"Unprefixed visible ID qualified by this task; original cell unchanged.","coordinator_contextual_id":"C_BR-P19-S012","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","note":"Lei15484literalURLblockedonce. Operative/specialappeal description is notconfirmed/falsified bydenial; RQ001held.","all_source_or_currentness_accepted":false,"original_record_unchanged":true}}],"coverage":[{"topic":"P19-G01 Ordinary common-procedure scope","researcher_record":{"Row":"P19-G01","Required issue":"Ordinary common-procedure scope","Claim refs":"C003–C006","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Confirm actual action type; special procedures held."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G02 Current CPC/transition","researcher_record":{"Row":"G02","Required issue":"Current CPC/transition","Claim refs":"C001","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Selected body read; actual case date and later consolidation required."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":["C_BR-P19-RQ001"]}},{"topic":"G03 2026 displayed laws","researcher_record":{"Row":"G03","Required issue":"2026 displayed laws","Claim refs":"C002,C077","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Future/support and operative/appellate branches separated."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":["C_BR-P19-RQ001"]}},{"topic":"G04 Valid opportunity to answer","researcher_record":{"Row":"G04","Required issue":"Valid opportunity to answer","Claim refs":"C003","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Actual service and trigger unexamined."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G05 Capacity/representation","researcher_record":{"Row":"G05","Required issue":"Capacity/representation","Claim refs":"C003,C019","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Actual appointment/mandate unknown."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G06 Default status","researcher_record":{"Row":"G06","Required issue":"Default status","Claim refs":"C004","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Establish absence of timely contestation."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G07 Hearing nonattendance","researcher_record":{"Row":"G07","Required issue":"Hearing nonattendance","Claim refs":"C005","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Do not equate with no answer."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G08 Answer trigger","researcher_record":{"Row":"G08","Required issue":"Answer trigger","Claim refs":"C006","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Identify335 branch and order."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G09 Procedural counting","researcher_record":{"Row":"G09","Required issue":"Procedural counting","Claim refs":"C074","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Actual calendar/privileges required."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G10 Specific denial","researcher_record":{"Row":"G10","Required issue":"Specific denial","Claim refs":"C007","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Compare defense as a whole and exceptions."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G11 Curator/general denial","researcher_record":{"Row":"G11","Required issue":"Curator/general denial","Claim refs":"C008,C068","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Verify lawful appointment and common facts."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G12 Facts versus law","researcher_record":{"Row":"G12","Required issue":"Facts versus law","Claim refs":"C009","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"No automatic legal entitlement."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G13 Co-defendant answer","researcher_record":{"Row":"G13","Required issue":"Co-defendant answer","Claim refs":"C010","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Apply345(I)."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G14 Common-fact limitation","researcher_record":{"Row":"G14","Required issue":"Common-fact limitation","Claim refs":"C011","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Separate common and personal matters."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G15 Non-disposable right","researcher_record":{"Row":"G15","Required issue":"Non-disposable right","Claim refs":"C012","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Identify governing substantive rule."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G16 Mandatory instrument","researcher_record":{"Row":"G16","Required issue":"Mandatory instrument","Claim refs":"C013","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Identify law making it indispensable."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G17 Implausibility","researcher_record":{"Row":"G17","Required issue":"Implausibility","Claim refs":"C014","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Require reasoned record-based assessment."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G18 Contrary evidence","researcher_record":{"Row":"G18","Required issue":"Contrary evidence","Claim refs":"C015","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Examine complete file, not silence alone."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G19 Relative presumption","researcher_record":{"Row":"G19","Required issue":"Relative presumption","Claim refs":"C016","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"No automatic whole-claim success."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G20 Unrepresented publication","researcher_record":{"Row":"G20","Required issue":"Unrepresented publication","Claim refs":"C017","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Obtain official publication and relevant act."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G21 Counsel after appearance","researcher_record":{"Row":"G21","Required issue":"Counsel after appearance","Claim refs":"C019","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Obtain appointment/notification record."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G22 Late intervention","researcher_record":{"Row":"G22","Required issue":"Late intervention","Claim refs":"C018","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Existing procedural stage governs."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G23 Timely counter-evidence","researcher_record":{"Row":"G23","Required issue":"Timely counter-evidence","Claim refs":"C020–C022","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Necessary steps and relevance required."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G24 Later allegations","researcher_record":{"Row":"G24","Required issue":"Later allegations","Claim refs":"C023","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Apply342 predicates, not blanket reopening."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G25 Just cause","researcher_record":{"Row":"G25","Required issue":"Just cause","Claim refs":"C024","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Prove external prevention and actual court decision."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G26 Claimant specifies evidence","researcher_record":{"Row":"G26","Required issue":"Claimant specifies evidence","Claim refs":"C025","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Apply348 if not already specified."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G27 348 response time","researcher_record":{"Row":"G27","Required issue":"348 response time","Claim refs":"C025","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"No imported15days; inspect order/218."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G28 Claimant burden","researcher_record":{"Row":"G28","Required issue":"Claimant burden","Claim refs":"C026","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Identify constitutive facts."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G29 Defendant burden","researcher_record":{"Row":"G29","Required issue":"Defendant burden","Claim refs":"C027","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Identify impeding/modifying/extinguishing facts."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G30 Legal presumptions","researcher_record":{"Row":"G30","Required issue":"Legal presumptions","Claim refs":"C028","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Do not require redundant proof of every presumed fact."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G31 Dynamic allocation","researcher_record":{"Row":"G31","Required issue":"Dynamic allocation","Claim refs":"C029","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Reasons, opportunity and feasibility required."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G32 Burden agreement","researcher_record":{"Row":"G32","Required issue":"Burden agreement","Claim refs":"C030","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Check non-disposable rights/excessive difficulty."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G33 Consumer nexus","researcher_record":{"Row":"G33","Required issue":"Consumer nexus","Claim refs":"C031","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Final-recipient/supplier facts unknown."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G34 Consumer inversion","researcher_record":{"Row":"G34","Required issue":"Consumer inversion","Claim refs":"C031","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Judicial predicates required."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G35 Detrimental contractual inversion","researcher_record":{"Row":"G35","Required issue":"Detrimental contractual inversion","Claim refs":"C032","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Actual clause and consumer nexus required."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G36 Non-surprise decision","researcher_record":{"Row":"G36","Required issue":"Non-surprise decision","Claim refs":"C033","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Actual opportunities and grounds unknown."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G37 Early judgment355(I)","researcher_record":{"Row":"G37","Required issue":"Early judgment355(I)","Claim refs":"C034","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Determine necessity of further evidence."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G38 Default route355(II)","researcher_record":{"Row":"G38","Required issue":"Default route355(II)","Claim refs":"C035","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"All three predicates required."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G39 Denial of evidence","researcher_record":{"Row":"G39","Required issue":"Denial of evidence","Claim refs":"C021,C036","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Must be reasoned and relevance-specific."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G40 Saneamento","researcher_record":{"Row":"G40","Required issue":"Saneamento","Claim refs":"C037","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Obtain organized issues/burden order."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G41 Five-day adjustment","researcher_record":{"Row":"G41","Required issue":"Five-day adjustment","Claim refs":"C038","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Valid intimation/calendar required."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G42 Partial merits conditions","researcher_record":{"Row":"G42","Required issue":"Partial merits conditions","Claim refs":"C039","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Identify ready separable component."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G43 Liquid/unliquid partial obligation","researcher_record":{"Row":"G43","Required issue":"Liquid/unliquid partial obligation","Claim refs":"C040","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Specify what is decided versus quantified later."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G44 Partial decision consequences","researcher_record":{"Row":"G44","Required issue":"Partial decision consequences","Claim refs":"C041","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Full challenge/enforcement process held."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G45 Partial versus final sentence","researcher_record":{"Row":"G45","Required issue":"Partial versus final sentence","Claim refs":"C042","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Examine actual dispositive scope."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G46 Essential judgment structure","researcher_record":{"Row":"G46","Required issue":"Essential judgment structure","Claim refs":"C043","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Read full sentence."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G47 Bare statutory citation","researcher_record":{"Row":"G47","Required issue":"Bare statutory citation","Claim refs":"C044","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Check concrete application."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G48 Abstract concepts","researcher_record":{"Row":"G48","Required issue":"Abstract concepts","Claim refs":"C045","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Require fact-specific explanation."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G49 Generic reasons","researcher_record":{"Row":"G49","Required issue":"Generic reasons","Claim refs":"C046","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Check whether reasoning fits this dispute."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G50 Material arguments","researcher_record":{"Row":"G50","Required issue":"Material arguments","Claim refs":"C047","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Identify arguments capable of changing outcome."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G51 Precedent use/departure","researcher_record":{"Row":"G51","Required issue":"Precedent use/departure","Claim refs":"C048","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Identify rationale, fit, distinction or overruling."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G52 Norm balancing","researcher_record":{"Row":"G52","Required issue":"Norm balancing","Claim refs":"C049","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Obtain criteria and factual premises."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G53 Holistic interpretation","researcher_record":{"Row":"G53","Required issue":"Holistic interpretation","Claim refs":"C050","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Do not isolate one sentence from full reasons."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G54 Monetary terms","researcher_record":{"Row":"G54","Required issue":"Monetary terms","Claim refs":"C051","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Actual legal rate/index/starts unknown."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G55 Liquidation exception","researcher_record":{"Row":"G55","Required issue":"Liquidation exception","Claim refs":"C052","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Distinguish missing liability from missing amount."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G56 Valuation versus arithmetic","researcher_record":{"Row":"G56","Required issue":"Valuation versus arithmetic","Claim refs":"C053","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Classify required quantification."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G57 No merits reopening in liquidation","researcher_record":{"Row":"G57","Required issue":"No merits reopening in liquidation","Claim refs":"C054","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Preserve judgment’s limits."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G58 Requested-relief ceiling/type","researcher_record":{"Row":"G58","Required issue":"Requested-relief ceiling/type","Claim refs":"C055","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Compare petition and dispositive order."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G59 Implicit accessories","researcher_record":{"Row":"G59","Required issue":"Implicit accessories","Claim refs":"C056","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Determine valid statutory components."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G60 Continuing instalments","researcher_record":{"Row":"G60","Required issue":"Continuing instalments","Claim refs":"C056","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Apply323 to actual periodic obligation."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G61 No automatic default rate/penalty","researcher_record":{"Row":"G61","Required issue":"No automatic default rate/penalty","Claim refs":"C057","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Separate legal/contractual basis required."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G62 Supervening fact","researcher_record":{"Row":"G62","Required issue":"Supervening fact","Claim refs":"C058","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Establish relevance and hearing."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G63 Main-issue finality","researcher_record":{"Row":"G63","Required issue":"Main-issue finality","Claim refs":"C059–C060","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Actual no-further-appeal status unknown."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G64 Preliminary-issue finality","researcher_record":{"Row":"G64","Required issue":"Preliminary-issue finality","Claim refs":"C061","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Revelia exclusion and temporal limits preserved."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G65 Reasons/facts outside separate finality","researcher_record":{"Row":"G65","Required issue":"Reasons/facts outside separate finality","Claim refs":"C062","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Distinguish foundation from dispositive issue."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G66 Parties/third parties","researcher_record":{"Row":"G66","Required issue":"Parties/third parties","Claim refs":"C063","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Actual subjective scope required."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G67 Preclusion","researcher_record":{"Row":"G67","Required issue":"Preclusion","Claim refs":"C064","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"No automatic repeat litigation."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G68 Challenge boundary","researcher_record":{"Row":"G68","Required issue":"Challenge boundary","Claim refs":"C066–C067","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Separate remedy/appeal research required."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G69 Court-authority limits","researcher_record":{"Row":"G69","Required issue":"Court-authority limits","Claim refs":"C069","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"No exhaustive citator or binding-status expansion."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G70 Possible claimant loss","researcher_record":{"Row":"G70","Required issue":"Possible claimant loss","Claim refs":"C065,C068","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Apply actual burden and file."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G71 H01 unanswered claim","researcher_record":{"Row":"G71","Required issue":"H01 unanswered claim","Claim refs":"C003–C016","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Conditional workflow complete; private facts absent."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G72 H02 co-defendant","researcher_record":{"Row":"G72","Required issue":"H02 co-defendant","Claim refs":"C010–C011","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G73 H03 non-disposable right","researcher_record":{"Row":"G73","Required issue":"H03 non-disposable right","Claim refs":"C012,C025","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G74 H04 missing instrument","researcher_record":{"Row":"G74","Required issue":"H04 missing instrument","Claim refs":"C013","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G75 H05 implausibility/contradiction","researcher_record":{"Row":"G75","Required issue":"H05 implausibility/contradiction","Claim refs":"C014–C016","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G76 H06 late appearance","researcher_record":{"Row":"G76","Required issue":"H06 late appearance","Claim refs":"C017–C024","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G77 H07 timely evidence","researcher_record":{"Row":"G77","Required issue":"H07 timely evidence","Claim refs":"C020–C022","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G78 H08 unproven amount","researcher_record":{"Row":"G78","Required issue":"H08 unproven amount","Claim refs":"C051–C054","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G79 H09 weak claimant proof","researcher_record":{"Row":"G79","Required issue":"H09 weak claimant proof","Claim refs":"C025–C029,C068","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G80 H10 excess relief","researcher_record":{"Row":"G80","Required issue":"H10 excess relief","Claim refs":"C055–C057","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G81 H11 partial judgment","researcher_record":{"Row":"G81","Required issue":"H11 partial judgment","Claim refs":"C039–C042","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G82 H12 missing reasons","researcher_record":{"Row":"G82","Required issue":"H12 missing reasons","Claim refs":"C043–C050","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Conditional workflow complete."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G83 T01 answer calculation","researcher_record":{"Row":"G83","Required issue":"T01 answer calculation","Claim refs":"C070,C074","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Hypothetical calendar only."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G84 T02 saneamento calculation","researcher_record":{"Row":"G84","Required issue":"T02 saneamento calculation","Claim refs":"C071,C074","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Not an appeal calculation."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G85 T03 monetary partition","researcher_record":{"Row":"G85","Required issue":"T03 monetary partition","Claim refs":"C072","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Not an amount owed or awarded."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G86 P01 D15 crosswalk","researcher_record":{"Row":"G86","Required issue":"P01 D15 crosswalk","Claim refs":"Preserved record","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Only default/judgment gateway augmented."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G87 State/DF/local procedure","researcher_record":{"Row":"G87","Required issue":"State/DF/local procedure","Claim refs":"C075","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"All27 branches unexamined."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G88 Actual private records","researcher_record":{"Row":"G88","Required issue":"Actual private records","Claim refs":"C075","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"None obtained or classified."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G89 Provider/professional permission","researcher_record":{"Row":"G89","Required issue":"Provider/professional permission","Claim refs":"C073","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"Separate; no authority conferred."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"G90 Publication/component/country status","researcher_record":{"Row":"G90","Required issue":"Publication/component/country status","Claim refs":"C076","Status; exact remaining fact or next action":"HOLD; separate review required."},"raw_table_index":8,"coordinator_acceptance":"scoped_reconciled_with_primary_currentness_application_holds","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"P19-D01 Commencement, citation and CNJ service","researcher_record":{"Row":"P19-D01","Deferred family":"Commencement, citation and CNJ service","Exact next action":"P18 remains unreviewed; independently establish actual service before applying default."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D02 Defective-service reopening","researcher_record":{"Row":"D02","Deferred family":"Defective-service reopening","Exact next action":"Identify procedural posture and proper challenge; no automatic remedy."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D03 Rescisória, querela nullitatis and post-finality attacks","researcher_record":{"Row":"D03","Deferred family":"Rescisória, querela nullitatis and post-finality attacks","Exact next action":"Research exact grounds, standing, periods and jurisdiction separately."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D04 Appeals and appellate admissibility","researcher_record":{"Row":"D04","Deferred family":"Appeals and appellate admissibility","Exact next action":"Read applicable appeal route, current2026 provisions and actual decision."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D05 Cumprimento, execution and collection of judgment","researcher_record":{"Row":"D05","Deferred family":"Cumprimento, execution and collection of judgment","Exact next action":"Separate enforcement pass; no attachment or payment command inferred."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D06 Full liquidation, expert evidence and associated fees","researcher_record":{"Row":"D06","Deferred family":"Full liquidation, expert evidence and associated fees","Exact next action":"Determine actual quantitative issue and method."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D07 Juizados and small-claims default","researcher_record":{"Row":"D07","Deferred family":"Juizados and small-claims default","Exact next action":"Read special-law attendance, representation and judgment rules."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D08 Monitória and executive-title proceedings","researcher_record":{"Row":"D08","Deferred family":"Monitória and executive-title proceedings","Exact next action":"Classify initiating title and special opposition rules."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D09 Public, tax, family and support claims","researcher_record":{"Row":"D09","Deferred family":"Public, tax, family and support claims","Exact next action":"Apply distinct rights, party and procedural regimes."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D10 Superendividamento and creditor nonappearance","researcher_record":{"Row":"D10","Deferred family":"Superendividamento and creditor nonappearance","Exact next action":"Separate statutory consumer-procedure inquiry."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D11 Insolvency, recuperação and falência","researcher_record":{"Row":"D11","Deferred family":"Insolvency, recuperação and falência","Exact next action":"Identify stay, participation, claim and judgment effects."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D12 Consumer contract, fees and cancellation","researcher_record":{"Row":"D12","Deferred family":"Consumer contract, fees and cancellation","Exact next action":"P04 unreviewed; no merits adoption."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D13 Prescription and substantive default","researcher_record":{"Row":"D13","Deferred family":"Prescription and substantive default","Exact next action":"P05 unreviewed; no debt-clock conclusion."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D14 Payment, release, assignment and ownership","researcher_record":{"Row":"D14","Deferred family":"Payment, release, assignment and ownership","Exact next action":"Obtain actual instruments; no P09 or assignment-premise import."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D15 Collection communications","researcher_record":{"Row":"D15","Deferred family":"Collection communications","Exact next action":"P10 unreviewed; distinguish creditor conduct from court procedure."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D16 Privacy, negative/positive reporting and scores","researcher_record":{"Row":"D16","Deferred family":"Privacy, negative/positive reporting and scores","Exact next action":"P08 and sector modules remain separate."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D17 Surety, solidary liability and substantive joinder","researcher_record":{"Row":"D17","Deferred family":"Surety, solidary liability and substantive joinder","Exact next action":"P16 unreviewed; procedural co-defense does not establish substantive liability."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D18 Provider, OAB, financial and payment permission","researcher_record":{"Row":"D18","Deferred family":"Provider, OAB, financial and payment permission","Exact next action":"Separate actor/activity authorization."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D19 Security, property and homestead","researcher_record":{"Row":"D19","Deferred family":"Security, property and homestead","Exact next action":"Separate title, guarantee and attachment analysis."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D20 Filing fees, legal aid and cost awards","researcher_record":{"Row":"D20","Deferred family":"Filing fees, legal aid and cost awards","Exact next action":"Read competent court schedule and actual order."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D21 Local forms, calendars and digital implementation","researcher_record":{"Row":"D21","Deferred family":"Local forms, calendars and digital implementation","Exact next action":"Read the actual court’s operative instruments."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D22 Foreign law, service, recognition and language/accessibility","researcher_record":{"Row":"D22","Deferred family":"Foreign law, service, recognition and language/accessibility","Exact next action":"No foreign procedural premise adopted."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D23 Private records and exhaustive judicial citator","researcher_record":{"Row":"D23","Deferred family":"Private records and exhaustive judicial citator","Exact next action":"No actual case lookup; later authority check required before reliance."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"D24 Later amendments, publication and country/parent acceptance","researcher_record":{"Row":"D24","Deferred family":"Later amendments, publication and country/parent acceptance","Exact next action":"Preserve all A066/A097/A098/component/local/country holds."},"raw_table_index":9,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Acre (AC) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Acre (AC)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJAC/default practice, evidence orders, forms, fees and calendar."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Alagoas (AL) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Alagoas (AL)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJAL procedural implementation, publication and holiday rules."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Amapá (AP) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Amapá (AP)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJAP evidence scheduling, digital notices and forms."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Amazonas (AM) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Amazonas (AM)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJAM remote participation, calendar and fee implementation."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Bahia (BA) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Bahia (BA)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJBA default/evidence procedure, court closures and forms."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Ceará (CE) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Ceará (CE)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJCE saneamento, publication, fees and calendar."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Distrito Federal (DF) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Distrito Federal (DF)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJDFT actual orders, forms, local calendar and fee rules."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Espírito Santo (ES) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Espírito Santo (ES)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJES publication, evidence management and procedural calendars."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Goiás (GO) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Goiás (GO)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJGO digital procedure, default practices and forms."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Maranhão (MA) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Maranhão (MA)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJMA access, evidence scheduling and court calendar."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Mato Grosso (MT) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Mato Grosso (MT)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJMT local deadlines, publication and fees."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Mato Grosso do Sul (MS) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Mato Grosso do Sul (MS)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJMS rules; the published STJ authority is not a local implementation audit."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Minas Gerais (MG) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Minas Gerais (MG)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJMG evidence orders, forms and holiday calendar."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Pará (PA) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Pará (PA)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJPA remote access, evidence and local court calendar."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Paraíba (PB) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Paraíba (PB)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJPB digital procedure, notices and fee schedule."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Paraná (PR) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Paraná (PR)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJPR case-management, publication and closure rules."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Pernambuco (PE) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Pernambuco (PE)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJPE saneamento, forms, fees and holidays."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Piauí (PI) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Piauí (PI)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJPI evidence scheduling, accessibility and calendar."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Rio de Janeiro (RJ) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Rio de Janeiro (RJ)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJRJ default/evidence implementation and local publications."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Rio Grande do Norte (RN) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Rio Grande do Norte (RN)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJRN court orders, forms and calendar."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Rio Grande do Sul (RS) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Rio Grande do Sul (RS)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJRS case-management and current local implementation."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Rondônia (RO) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Rondônia (RO)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJRO remote participation, fee and calendar rules."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Roraima (RR) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Roraima (RR)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJRR access, language needs, forms and holidays."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Santa Catarina (SC) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Santa Catarina (SC)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJSC evidence, publication and deadline implementation."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"São Paulo (SP) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"São Paulo (SP)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJSP rules; STJ discussion of SP cases does not clear local procedure."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Sergipe (SE) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Sergipe (SE)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJSE forms, costs, evidence and calendar."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}},{"topic":"Tocantins (TO) No local operative body read.","researcher_record":{"State/DF":"Tocantins (TO)","Local read status":"No local operative body read.","Exact remaining question":"TJTO digital procedure, access and court closures."},"raw_table_index":10,"coordinator_acceptance":"deferred_or_territorial_hold_preserved_no_acceptance","coordinator_review":{"at":"2026-10-29T05:38:06.440795+00:00","review":"[internal evidence reference]","original_record_unchanged":true,"no_country_parent_locality_or_actual_application_acceptance":true,"validation_question_ids":[]}}],"annotations":{},"corrections":[],"resolved_corrections":[],"review_history":[{"id":"C_BR-P19-SCOPED-REVIEW","status":"scoped_coordinator_review_complete_with_statutory_access_currentness_application_holds","at":null},{"id":"C_BR-P19-RQ001","status":"validation_only_UNSENT_not_established_error","at":null}]}